Owl: an Exploratory Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Owl: an Exploratory Study j. Raptor Res. 28(3):154-157 ¸ 1994 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. NEST-BOX VERSUS NATURAL-CAVITY NESTS OF THE EASTERN SCREECH-OWL: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY FREDERICK R. GEHLBACH Departmentof Biology,Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798 U.S.A. ABSTI•½T.--The use of nest boxesversus natural tree cavitiesby easternscreech-owls (Otus asio) in centralTexas was exploredfor 9 yr. Box sitesresembled natural-cavity sites vegetatively and physically exceptthat the boxeswere positionedsomewhat lower. The three box sizesprovided spanned the size rangeof natural cavitiesused by screech-owls.Box sizemade no differencein nestsite selection,clutch size, or nestingsuccess. Three kinds of wood usedin box constructionmade no differenceeither. The largestboxes were usedmore often for replacementnests, and the smallestones tended to crowdbroods, contributingslightly to mortality and early fledging.Overall, nestboxes produced data on frequencyof use, clutch size, and fledgling productivity that were equivalent to data from natural cavities. KEY WORDS: breedingsuccess; eastern screech-owl; nest boxes; nest-site use; Otus asio;tree-cavity nests. Nidos en cajasanideras versus cavidades naturales de Otusasio: un estudioexploratorio RESUMEN.--Seexplor6 por nueveaftos el uso de cajasanideras versus cavidades naturales ubicadas en firbolespor parte de Otusasio en el centro de Texas. Las cajasanideras se asemejaronalas cavidades naturalestanto vegetativacomo fisicamente, excepto que las cajasfueron ubicadasalgo mils abajo.E1 tamafiode las cajasutilizadas correspondla al espectrode tamafiosde las cavidadesnaturales usadas por O. asio;no se registrarondiferencias en la selecci6nde sitio de nidificaci6n,tamafio de la nidada o •xito de lospolluelos. Tres tiposde maderasse utilizaron en la construcci6nde las cajasy tampocose registraron diferencias.Las cajasmls grandesfueron utilizadasa menudopara reemplazode nidosyen las mils pequefiasse tendla a agrupar las crlas, aumentandoligeramente la mortalidad y un desarrolloprecoz. En general,las cajasanideras producen datos sobre la frecuenciade uso,tamafio de nidaday productividad de volantonesque fueron equivalentesa los obtenidosdesde cavidades naturales. [Traducci6n de Ivan Lazo] Many raptor researchersemploying artificial owls, only the boreal or Tengmalm'sowl (Aegolius structures like nest boxes or nesting platforms do funereus) has been studied in a somewhat similar not utilize or report simultaneouscomparisons with manner; clutchsize and number of fledglingsof that natural structuresor distinguishsite suitability or specieswere determinedin both nestboxes and nat- availability in studying habitat selection.Moller ural cavities but not in controlled fashion (Korpi- (1989, 1992) and Clobert and Lebreton (1991) note mSki 1984). possibledeficiencies in suchstudies using nest boxes, METHODS includingthe potentialfor greaternesting success in The study was conductedin 135 ha of Woodway, a boxes than natural cavities. Here, I focus on the suburb of Waco, TX, U.S.A., during 1967-75. This area simultaneous comparison of eastern screech-owls had 508 human residents/km2 and 25.9% green space (Otusasio) nesting in boxesand natural tree cavities averaging 327-1504 trees/ha in lawns and wooded ra- to discover if there was a difference in the use of and vines,respectively. Eastern screech-owls and the natural tree cavitiesthey usedwere locatedby mappingcavity- breedingsuccess in the two site types. advertisementsongs and making cavity inspectionsin Field studiesof birds may need to be conducted Decemberthrough early March before nestingbegan. I over severalyears during which investigativebiases continuedto searchfor used and unusedbut apparently canmultiply errors.Consequently, I testedfor biases suitable cavities (as large or larger than used cavities; McCallum and Gehlbach [1988]) until the cumulative that might result from using nest boxes prior to number found versus cumulative search effort indicated conductinga 16-yr populationstudy of the eastern that essentiallyall were known. screech-owl(Gehlbach 1994). Amongcavity-nesting Nine nest boxes were constructed,three each of exterior 154 SEPTEMBER 1994 SCREECH-OWL BOX AND CAVITY NESTS 155 plywood,solid pine, and solidcedar (1.9-cm-thick wood), RESULTS and were painted dark brown on the outside.Cavity size has beenshown to influenceclutch size in owls (Korpim5ki Nest Cavities and Habitat. Of the 23 suitable 1985), and to test its affect on screech-owlsI built one box of each wood type with 225, 400, and 625 cm2 bottoms. natural cavities that I found, eastern screech-owls All boxes had a 6.8 cm entrance hole 25 cm above the box nestedin 15 that were deeper(>25 cm) with larger bottom.The bottomareas of theseboxes spanned those of floors(> 10 cm minimum dimension)and had small- natural cavities.Depth of the boxeswas the averageof er entrances (<15 cm maximum dimension) than 12-58-cm-deep natural cavities,and the entrancediameter was the mean minimum dimension of the natural entranc- the others(MANOVA F = 2.9, P = 0.04). The used es. siteswere 3.7 m (SD = 1.6) above ground in nat- Box locationsdepended on landowner permissionand urally rotted, hollow limbs or tree trunks. At least wereplaced 70-300 m fromnatural cavities used by screech- 10 of thesecavities had beenenlarged by fox squir- owls and other boxeson straight tree trunks. Trunk di- rels. The red-bellied woodpecker(Melanerpes car- ameters at these positionswere equal to or larger than box width. Boxes faced nine different directions and were olinus),the largestlocal woodpecker species, did not 3-4 m above ground. Five boxeswere paired with the excavatecavities large enoughfor screech-owls. closestpreviously used natural cavitiesmost like them in Paired box- and natural-cavitysites were 72-280 orientation, height, and volume. The other four could not m apart and similar in their vegetationaland phys- be paired becauseit requiredseveral years to discoverall natural sitesused by screech-owls.I evaluated only first- ical features (MANOVA F = 1.1, NS). However, nest data, sincereplacement nests are so different (Gehl- the boxes tended to be lower (• -- 3.1 vs. 3.7 m, bach 1994). ANOVA F = 3.5, P = 0.06) and in smaller diameter A 75-m, 5-point,20-quarter transect, randomly aligned trees (• = 26.7 vs. 32.2 cm, F = 2.4, P = 0.09). througheach box and cavitytree, was employedto assess While all nine nestboxes were placedlower in small- vegetationalfeatures according to Gehlbach(1988, 1994). These and physicalmeasurements were made before the er trees than the 15 used natural cavities (ANOVA boxeswere positioned,so that box sites would resemble F = 3.2, P < 0.05), both site-typeswere equally natural cavity sites. Measurementsand synthesescon- distributedamong the sevenmost commontrees of cernedtree and shrubdensity, height, and diversity,the the canopy(X 2 = 1.7, NS). Cedar elm (Ulmus cras- evergreenfraction, canopy coverage, tree speciesrelative sifolia) was the dominant tree and had the most nat- importance, nest tree diameter, nest height and bottom area, and distanceto the nearesthouse, permanent water, ural cavities(48%) and boxes (44%). and suitable/availablecavity or box. The frequencieswith which screech-owlsused Severalhandfuls of dried leaveswere placedin the bot- paired boxesand natural cavitiesfor nestingwere tom of each box to simulate an old fox squirrel (Sciurus quite similar, and similar to all nine boxesand nine niger) nest becauseall but one of the usednatural cavities had them. Thereafter, box and cavity contentswere un- cavitieswith at least 5-yr records(Table 1). Type disturbedexcept in a minor way during nestinspections. of wood and box size made no difference in nest box Fox squirrelsand other cavity usersand nest predators selection;useage relative to availability rangedfrom were not disturbedduring the weeklysurveys of nestcon- 60% in pine and 67% in small boxesto 70% in cedar tentswhich extendedthrough June, and nest debriswas not removed between years. and 73% in large boxes(X 2 = 1.7, NS). Multifactor box versus natural-cavity environments, Preferred nesting habitat was distinguishedas high- versuslow-use boxes,and used versusunused nat- having more evergreensin the canopy, lower tree ural cavitieswere evaluatedwith multivariateanalyses density, closer alternate nest site, and lower shrub employingtransformed data. Individual parameterswere densityin first-to-lastorder of importance(F-- 4.0, then testedwith univariate analysisof variance.Use and reproductivedata for the box/cavitypairs were assessed P < 0.07). This combination of features describesa with Wilcoxon signed-rankstests, while unpaired data shady,park-like landscapewith large, cavity-prone were subjectedto Mann-Whitney U-tests.Spearman rank trees at low densities. These habitat characteristics correlationswere used to test relationshipsbetween box were identifiedby subjecting12 high- and 12 low- sizeand nestcontents. Chi-square analyses were madeof nests in boxes versus cavities, use of and results from the use nest sites(employing the 60% median use rate different box sizesand woodtypes, and box versuscavity of all nine boxesplus 15 cavities)to stepwisedis- dispersionsamong dominant trees. criminant analysis. Means,standard deviations, sample sizes (if notobvious Reproduction.Clutch size and numberof fledg- from the designs),and exactprobabilities are givenexcept lings/clutchin the nestboxes were statisticallylike for those>0.10, which I considernon-significant (NS) in two-tailedtests. Probabilities of <0.10 havepotential bi- those
Recommended publications
  • Selection and Use of Nest Sites by Barn Owls in Norfolk, England
    j Raptor Res. 28(3):149-153 ¸ 1994 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. SELECTION AND USE OF NEST SITES BY BARN OWLS IN NORFOLK, ENGLAND PAUL N. JOHNSON The Durrell Instituteof Conservationand Ecology,The University,Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NX United Kingdom AI•STR•CT.--Between1989 and 1993 reproductionwas monitoredat 96 barn owl (Tyro alba) breeding sitesin England. Nestswere locatedin tree cavities,buildings, and nest boxesin farm buildingsand maturetrees. Many of the sitesother than nestboxes used by owls were of human origin, but the number of thosedeclined during the courseof the study due to deteriorationof human-madestructures and competitionfrom otherspecies. Nest boxesincreased the populationdensity from 15 breedingpairs/100 km2 to 27 pairs.Over the studyperiod, pairs usingnest boxes produced significantly larger clutchesthan at other sites,but the numberof fledglingswas not significantlydifferent amongtypes of nest sites. KEY WORDS: barn owl; breedingecology; England; human-altered habitats; nest boxes; Tyro alba. Selecci6ny usode sitiosde nidificaci6npor Tyroalba en Norfolk, Inglaterra RESUMEN.--Entre1989 y 1993 semonitore6 la reproducci6nen 96 sitiosreproductivos de Tyroalba. Los nidosse localizaron en cavidadesde firboles,edificios, cajas anideras en construccionesagricolas y firboles madufos.Mucho de estossitios, aparte de las cajasanideras, usados por T. alba fueron de origen humano, peroel nfimerode ellosdeclin6 durante el cursodel estudiodebido al deteriorode las estructurasartificiales y a la competenciacon otras especies.Las cajasanideras incrementaron la densidadpoblacional de 15 parejasreproductivas/100 km 2 a 27 parejas.En el periodode estudio,las parejasque usaronlas cajas aniderasprodujeron nidadas significativamentemils grandesqueen otros sitios, pero el nfimero de volantonesno fue significativamentediferente entre los distintostipos de sitios. [Traducci6n de Ivan Lazo] The barn owl (Tyro alba) is currentlyclassified box studieshas been criticized by Moller (1989, as vulnerable in northwest Norfolk, England by 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Duck Nest Box Design & Assembly Directions
    Wood Duck Nest Box Design & Assembly Directions Instructions, Illustrations & Photos Courtesy of MWDI and Scott Jasion, Harford County Chapter, Ducks Unlimited Side door opening design for easy mounting & monitoring access light-weight, field-proven effectiveness Design can be easily converted to a top lid opening by keeping the door panel in one piece and permanently attachin to sides; add hinge to roof instead of attaching. Design can also be converted to an “east-west” side door by cutting the door panel into “thirds”, by attaching the upper and lower portions and then by adding a hinged piece in the middle as desired height. Materials Needed for One Box 10-foot, 10” wide board (ideally cypress or cedar for longevity) High quality wood, #2 grade, rough cut one side One – 12-14” x 3-4” exit ladder Nominal 10” width and 1” thickness Hardware cloth (rat wire), small mesh, curved in 12” boards can easily be used, adhere to the same length center to form slight hump, easier ladder use by dimensions. ducklings. Other lumber is also feasible but other hardwoods will Trim or fold edges to prevent injury to ducklings add significant weight. from sharp wire points. Softwoods require treatment and will not last as long. Plastic gutter guard will also works well. Cut with scissors. Premium wood glue. Apply liberally to all seams, splits and knot areas. Will 1 ½” stainless steel or galvanized staples, insure boxes hold up much longer than those without ¼” narrow crown, 18 gauge glue. for use in compressed air staple gun. 1 ½” stainless steel, ribbed, cedar shake nails may also Tools Needed be used with hammer or 1 ½" screws.
    [Show full text]
  • Tc & Forward & Owls-I-IX
    USDA Forest Service 1997 General Technical Report NC-190 Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere Second International Symposium February 5-9, 1997 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Editors: James R. Duncan, Zoologist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3J 3W3 <[email protected]> David H. Johnson, Wildlife Ecologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA, USA 98501-1091 <[email protected]> Thomas H. Nicholls, retired formerly Project Leader and Research Plant Pathologist and Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station 1992 Folwell Avenue St. Paul, MN, USA 55108-6148 <[email protected]> I 2nd Owl Symposium SPONSORS: (Listing of all symposium and publication sponsors, e.g., those donating $$) 1987 International Owl Symposium Fund; Jack Israel Schrieber Memorial Trust c/o Zoological Society of Manitoba; Lady Grayl Fund; Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Natural Resources; Manitoba Naturalists Society; Manitoba Critical Wildlife Habitat Program; Metro Propane Ltd.; Pine Falls Paper Company; Raptor Research Foundation; Raptor Education Group, Inc.; Raptor Research Center of Boise State University, Boise, Idaho; Repap Manitoba; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada; USDI Bureau of Land Management; USDI Fish and Wildlife Service; USDA Forest Service, including the North Central Forest Experiment Station; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Wildlife Society - Washington Chapter; Wildlife Habitat Canada; Robert Bateman; Lawrence Blus; Nancy Claflin; Richard Clark; James Duncan; Bob Gehlert; Marge Gibson; Mary Houston; Stuart Houston; Edgar Jones; Katherine McKeever; Robert Nero; Glenn Proudfoot; Catherine Rich; Spencer Sealy; Mark Sobchuk; Tom Sproat; Peter Stacey; and Catherine Thexton.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Southern Flying Squirrel (SFS) Nest Box: a Few Steps but Lots of Details by Don Althoff 2020
    Making a Southern Flying Squirrel (SFS) Nest Box: A Few Steps But Lots of Details By Don Althoff 2020 Knock…and you may find someone home! Plug and check behind the door A “cut” hickory…the SFS is the only species in our region to have this distinctive entry into Flying squirrel box half full a hickory nut. Larger tree of ‘cut’ hickory nuts…a sure squirrels are able to crush sign of SFS in your woods these hard shelled nuts Basics 2 You need one (1) board per box: 1” x 8” x 8-ft white board (aka pine/spruce/fir) Screws or nails. 2” 2 carriage bolts/nuts/washers ¼” diameter, 2 ½” long You need 1-pair of hinges. 1 ½” will do. You need ¼” x ¼” hardware cloth/screen mesh (get 24” wide roll. A 5 ft. long roll will yield 10 screens) 2 carriage bolts +nuts +washers ¼” diameter, 2 ½” long Hook & eyelet 1 ½” is suffcient Electrical outlet plate 1 ½” opening to keep larger species of squirrels (i.e., red, gray, and fox) out of the box 3 Cutting & Assembly Tips 4 Pay attention to grain. Look at the end of your boards. Face outside Always have the curve facing to the inside Face inside Suggest you use 1 ½” paddle bit to make side hole. Drill about ¾ way through on one side, then flip over board and drill from other side to complete hole. This reduces tear- out/splintering on one side For left side (box door side facing you), use strip from piece you just cut to create the inner strip piece.
    [Show full text]
  • American Kestrel Nest Box Monitoring Guidelines
    American Kestrel Nest Box Monitoring Guidelines Phase 1: Pre-season check Shortly before the kestrels are due to return (early March), you should do a pre-season check to get the box ready and ensure that it is in good order. 1. Open – If the box was closed for the winter to prevent squirrels, sparrows, and starlings from using it, open it now. 2. Lining – Line the bottom of the box with a few inches of pine shavings or wood chips. Do not use sawdust, as it will not insulate the eggs properly, and do not use cedar shavings, as these are toxic to young birds. 3. Inspection – Inspect the box and its mounting pole. Do any parts appear cracked or broken? This is the time when a replacement box can be erected – once the season starts, it will be much harder. Phase 2: Early breeding season During the early breeding season (from late March onward), all that needs be done is to assess whether the box has been selected by kestrels. One hour-long visit every two weeks should be sufficient. If the box is likely to be taken over by House Sparrows or starlings, weekly visits should be made to check for these invasives. If kestrels are seen going in and out of the box, you may well have nesting kestrels. If squirrels, starlings, or House Sparrows are seen, the box may have been invaded. Observe for a time, and if you determine that another animal is using the box, wait for the adult animals to leave. Once the adults are outside, simply close the box.
    [Show full text]
  • Build a Duck Nest Box Wood Ducks, Barrow’S Goldeneyes, Common Goldeneyes, Hooded Mergansers, Common Mergansers and Buffleheads Are All Cavity Nesting Ducks
    Build a duck nest box Wood ducks, Barrow’s goldeneyes, common goldeneyes, hooded mergansers, common mergansers and buffleheads are all cavity nesting ducks. They build nests in abandoned woodpecker holes or natural tree cavities caused by disease, fire or lightning. These ducks will also use a constructed nesting box. Here are plans for a nest box that you can build, install and maintain. The design, which is used by the Ducks Unlimited Greenwing program, may even attract other cavity nesting birds such as kestrels, tree swallows, great crested flycatchers or screech owls. Cedar is ideal* Cedar lumber is recommended because it is naturally resistant to weather and insects. You can also use any materials you have available such as pine or plywood. The box pictured uses 10.5 linear feet of 1" X 10" (3/4" thick by 9 1/4" wide) lumber that is rough on one side (for the inside of the box). *Ducks Unlimited staff in the interior of British Columbia indicate that plywood boxes better withstand the region’s temperature extremes. Finishing touches Ducks Unlimited does not recommend applying a finish to cedar boxes. A finish might help to extend the life of a plywood box. If you decide to apply a finish to your nest box, use a nontoxic wood preserver or a light shade of an earth tone paint. The ducks will find your box by seeing the contrast in color caused by the entry hole. Do not apply finish inside the box. Cavity nesting ducks do not carry nesting materials. It’s important to help them out by placing four to six inches of wood shavings in the bottom of the box.You can find wood shavings at your local pet or farm supply store.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Screech-Owl (Otus Asio)
    Wild Things in Your Woodlands Eastern Screech-Owl (Otus asio) The Eastern Screech-Owl is a small, nocturnal, predatory bird, about 8.5 inches in size. The robin-sized owl has short, rounded wings, bright yellow eyes, and a rounded head with visible “ear tufts.” The ear tufts, which the bird raises when alarmed, are otherwise inconspicuous. The facial disc is lightly mottled and has a prominent dark rim along the sides. The tail and the flight feathers of the wings are barred. The eastern screech-owl occurs in two color morphs, red and gray. The red color morph is more common near the coast, and the grey color morph is more common in the interior of the state. Male and female screech owls look alike. In the fall, light and temperature conditions mimic those of spring, and birds and amphibians sometimes begin calling again, a behavior called autumnal recrudescence. At this time, the screech owl’s tremulous call can be heard in a variety of habitats including open woodlands, deciduous forests, parks, farms, riparian areas, swamps, old orchards, small woodlots, and suburban areas. This small owl is an often common, nocturnal bird in much of New York State, though it is uncommon in heavily forested regions, at high elevations, and on Long Island. The screech owl is a year-round resident, spending both the breeding and non-breeding seasons in the same area. The screech owl nests in natural hollows or cavities in trees, old woodpecker holes, nesting boxes, and occasionally crevices in the sides of buildings. Screech owl pairs may roost together in the same tree cavity during the day throughout the breeding season.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestbox Recommendations
    NABS Factsheet Nestbox Recommendations The North American Bluebird Society (NABS) no longer approves specific nestbox designs. We recommend the specifications given in this document for nestboxes erected for small, native cavity nesters like bluebirds. Probably no nestbox is “perfect” but if you buy or build one that follows the guidelines given in this document, you will increase the odds that the birds coming to your nestbox will remain safe through the nesting cycle and that their offspring will fledge successfully. A word of caution: We have found that some nestboxes may be sold with a “NABS approved” logo do not conform to these recommendations. Please tell us if you find such a nestbox. NESTBOX STYLE/DESIGN to attract and ensure safety of and Features recommend on bluebird nestboxes suitability for native birds • A wide variety of good nestbox plans are available online including: the NABS website: www.nabluebirdsociety.org/ nestbox-plans/ and also NestBox Builder: http://nestboxbuilder. com/nestbox-plans-for-bluebirds.html • Because of regional variation in bird species, predators, climate, and other factors, nestbox styles or nestbox features that work well in one area may not work as well in others. Many bluebird landlords have favorite styles. Contact experienced bluebirders in your area to learn what works best where you are. The NABS website at lists Affiliate organizations that can also help you with region-specific information: http://www. nabluebirdsociety.org/affiliates/ CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL to help the box last, maintain safe temperatures, and keep it safe from predators The following materials work best for constructing bluebird nestboxes: Bernie Daniel credit: Photo • Solid wood: ¾ to 1 inch thick, of softwoods (such as pine, Shown above are some of the ideal features for a bluebird which should be sealed with a water-based paint or stain) or nestbox.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing, Erecting and Monitoring Pine Marten Den Boxes
    Constructing, erecting and monitoring Pine Marten Den Boxes Background Den boxes are used to provide artificial breeding sites for pine martens, in areas where there is an absence of natural tree cavities. They have proved to be a very successful conservation tool in Scotland, with many boxes occupied year after year. Martens use den boxes to: Raise young in spring/summer Shelter from bad weather Rest in during the day Stay safe from predation (foxes) above ground level. We use them as: Temporary substitute for natural den/rest sites Monitoring tool for pine marten populations. The key features of the VWT den box design are: Den chamber size is similar to natural den sites. Good thermal insulation from the use of thick timber and boarding. Reduced convection heat losses by having entrances at bottom and having a snug fitting lid. Double “chimney” entrances give den chamber no external corners and so no rain penetration, increases insulation for the central chamber and gives animals a choice of entrance (mimicking many natural tree cavities). Den boxes can be purchased from The Nest Box Company (http://www.nestbox.co.uk/) or constructed using the following specification. Materials The plywood used for the front, back and lid is 18mm exterior WBP (water and boil proof) grade. The glues used in its construction are weatherproof, but the timber still needs to be painted and exposed edges need particular attention. Marine grade plywood would be better but is extremely expensive. The sides (both inner and outer) are cut from what is sold as 200mm x 25mm rough sawn timber, although the actual thickness of the timber may vary slightly and allowance for this should be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Raptor Mews: Meet Our Birds
    Raptor Mews: Meet our Birds Birds of Prey or “Raptors” are birds with hooked beaks and sharp talons that are strict carnivores: they only eat other animals in order to survive. Hashawha houses several raptor species at the Raptor Mews. These have been evaluated and deemed non-releasable by veterinarians and rehabbers. They are part of our educational programs at Bear Branch Nature Center and Outdoor School. Eastern Screech Owl Otus asio Eastern Screech Owls are the smallest species of owl found in Carroll County. Their color pattern can vary from bright red to gray. The strong patterns on the belly and back, as well as the ear tufts, allow them to blend in with their environment, making it easier to hunt for prey and hide from predators. Though they are predators, they frequently fall prey to larger owl species themselves. Barred Owl Strix varia Also known as ‘Swamp Owls’, Barred Owls can be found mainly in hardwood marsh areas. They are mostly nocturnal, and usually like to hunt at night. However, it is not uncommon to see one in the late afternoon, getting a jump on the day’s hunting. They will eat a variety of prey, including mice, frogs, and even crayfish! Barred Owls have a very distinct call. If you listen closely, it sounds like they are asking a question: “Who cooks for you, who cooks for you all?” Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus These ‘tigers of the night’ are amazing creatures. Great Horned Owls are the top predator in the woods at night. They are extremely powerful and able to carry much larger prey in relation to their body size then other birds of prey.
    [Show full text]
  • David Leach Ecology Ltd. Environmental Consultants Land At
    David Leach Ecology Ltd. Environmental Consultants Land at Long Landsley Salisbury Road Shaftesbury Dorset Ecological Survey Date: November 2018 - updated April 2019 Report compiled by M. Haines Report checked and authorised by D. V. Leach. M.C.I.E.E.M Phone: 01258 840773 Mobile: 07756 855212 E-mail: [email protected] Copyright David Leach Ecology Ltd Registered Office: Arrowsmith Court, Station Approach, Broadstone, Dorset, BH18 8AT Company Reg. No. 8846666 Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................. 2 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Aims of the Survey ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Site Description ........................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Desk Study .................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Site Survey .................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 Results ..........................................................................................................................77
    [Show full text]
  • Nest Box Guide for Waterfowl Nest Box Guide for Waterfowl Copyright © 2008 Ducks Unlimited Canada ISBN 978-0-9692943-8-2
    Nest Box Guide for Waterfowl Nest Box Guide For Waterfowl Copyright © 2008 Ducks Unlimited Canada ISBN 978-0-9692943-8-2 Any reproduction of this present document in any form is illegal without the written authorization of Ducks Unlimited Canada. For additional copies please contact the Edmonton DUC office at (780)489-2002. Published by: Ducks Unlimited Canada www.ducks.ca Acknowledgements Photography provided by : Ducks Unlimited Canada (DUC), Jim Potter (Alberta Conservation Association (ACA)), Darwin Chambers (DUC), Jonathan Thompson (DUC), Lesley Peterson (DUC contractor), Sherry Feser (ACA), Gordon Court ( p 16 photo of Pygmy Owl), Myrna Pearman ,(Ellis Bird Farm), Bryan Shantz and Glen Rowan. Portions of this booklet are based on a Nest Box Factsheet prepared by Jim Potter (ACA) and Lesley Peterson (DUC contractor). Myrna Pearman provided editorial comment. Table of Contents Table of Contents Why Nest Boxes? ......................................................................................................1 Natural Cavities ......................................................................................................................................2 Identifying Wildlife Species That Use Your Nest Boxes .....................................3 Waterfowl ..................................................................................................................4 Common Goldeneye .........................................................................................................................5 Barrow’s Goldeneye
    [Show full text]