An Intrusion Using Malware and DDNS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IP Addressing: DNS Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS Release 12.4
IP Addressing: DNS Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS Release 12.4 Americas Headquarters Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134-1706 USA http://www.cisco.com Tel: 408 526-4000 800 553-NETS (6387) Fax: 408 527-0883 THE SPECIFICATIONS AND INFORMATION REGARDING THE PRODUCTS IN THIS MANUAL ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. ALL STATEMENTS, INFORMATION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS MANUAL ARE BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE BUT ARE PRESENTED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. USERS MUST TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR APPLICATION OF ANY PRODUCTS. THE SOFTWARE LICENSE AND LIMITED WARRANTY FOR THE ACCOMPANYING PRODUCT ARE SET FORTH IN THE INFORMATION PACKET THAT SHIPPED WITH THE PRODUCT AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SOFTWARE LICENSE OR LIMITED WARRANTY, CONTACT YOUR CISCO REPRESENTATIVE FOR A COPY. The Cisco implementation of TCP header compression is an adaptation of a program developed by the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) as part of UCB’s public domain version of the UNIX operating system. All rights reserved. Copyright © 1981, Regents of the University of California. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER WARRANTY HEREIN, ALL DOCUMENT FILES AND SOFTWARE OF THESE SUPPLIERS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” WITH ALL FAULTS. CISCO AND THE ABOVE-NAMED SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THOSE OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OR ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE, OR TRADE PRACTICE. IN NO EVENT SHALL CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS OR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO DATA ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THIS MANUAL, EVEN IF CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. -
Microsoft DNS
1 a. Domain Name Service (DNS) encompassing Microsoft DNS From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Microsoft DNS is the name given to the implementation of domain name system services provided in Microsoft Windows operating systems. Contents [hide] 1 Overview 2 DNS lookup client o 2.1 The effects of running the DNS Client service o 2.2 Differences from other systems 3 Dynamic DNS Update client 4 DNS server o 4.1 Common issues 5 See also 6 References 7 External links [edit] Overview The Domain Name System support in Microsoft Windows NT, and thus its derivatives Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003, comprises two clients and a server. Every Microsoft Windows machine has a DNS lookup client, to perform ordinary DNS lookups. Some machines have a Dynamic DNS client, to perform Dynamic DNS Update transactions, registering the machines' names and IP addresses. Some machines run a DNS server, to publish DNS data, to service DNS lookup requests from DNS lookup clients, and to service DNS update requests from DNS update clients. The server software is only supplied with the server versions of Windows. [edit] DNS lookup client Applications perform DNS lookups with the aid of a DLL. They call library functions in the DLL, which in turn handle all communications with DNS servers (over UDP or TCP) and return the final results of the lookup back to the applications. 2 Microsoft's DNS client also has optional support for local caching, in the form of a DNS Client service (also known as DNSCACHE). Before they attempt to directly communicate with DNS servers, the library routines first attempt to make a local IPC connection to the DNS Client service on the machine. -
Stateless DNS
Technical Report KN{2014{DiSy{004 Distributed System Laboratory Stateless DNS Daniel Kaiser, Matthias Fratz, Marcel Waldvogel, Valentin Dietrich, Holger Strittmatter Distributed Systems Laboratory Department of Computer and Information Science University of Konstanz { Germany Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-267760 Abstract. Several network applications, like service discovery, file dis- covery in P2P networks, distributed hash tables, and distributed caches, use or would benefit from distributed key value stores. The Domain Name System (DNS) is a key value store which has a huge infrastructure and is accessible from almost everywhere. Nevertheless storing information in this database makes it necessary to be authoritative for a domain or to be \registered" with a domain, e.g. via DynDNS, to be allowed to store and update resource records using nsupdate . Applications like the ones listed above would greatly benefit from a configurationless approach, giving users a much more convenient experience. In this report we describe a technique we call Stateless DNS, which allows to store data in the cache of the local DNS server. It works without any infrastructure updates; it just needs our very simple, configurationless echo DNS server that can parse special queries containing information desired to be stored, process this information, and generate DNS answers in a way that the DNS cache that was asked the special query will store the desired information. Because all this happens in the authority zone of our echo DNS server, we do not cause cache poisoning. Our tests show that Stateless DNS works with a huge number of public DNS servers. -
GW1000 User Manual
GW1000 User Manual Issue: 1.7 Date: 09 September 2016 Table of Contents _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Document scope ....................................................................................... 8 1.2 Using this documentation ........................................................................... 8 2 GW1000 Series hardware ........................................................................... 11 2.1 Hardware model varients ......................................................................... 11 2.2 GW1000 Series hardware features ............................................................ 12 2.3 GSM technology ...................................................................................... 12 2.4 WiFi technology ...................................................................................... 12 2.5 Power supply .......................................................................................... 13 2.6 GW1000 Series router dimensions............................................................. 13 2.7 GW1000M Series router dimensions .......................................................... 13 2.8 Compliance ............................................................................................ 13 2.9 Operating temperature range ................................................................... 14 2.10 -
SMB/CIFS Configuration Power Guide
SMB/CIFS Configuration Power Guide ONTAP® 9 Fifth edition © Copyright Lenovo 2018, 2021. LIMITED AND RESTRICTED RIGHTS NOTICE: If data or software is delivered pursuant to a General Services Administration (GSA) contract, use, reproduction, or disclosure is subject to restrictions set forth in Contract No. GS-35F-05925 Contents Chapter 1. Deciding whether to use Creating an SMB server in a workgroup . 23 the SMB/CIFS Configuration Power Creating local user accounts . 24 Guide . 1 Creating local groups . 25 Managing local group membership . 26 Chapter 2. SMB/CIFS configuration Verifying enabled SMB versions . 27 workflow . 3 Mapping the SMB server on the DNS server. 28 Assessing physical storage requirements . 4 Assessing networking requirements . 5 Chapter 4. Configuring SMB client Deciding where to provision new SMB/CIFS access to shared storage . 29 storage capacity . 6 Creating a volume or qtree storage container . 29 Worksheet for gathering SMB/CIFS configuration Creating a volume . 29 information . 6 Creating a qtree . 30 Chapter 3. Configuring SMB/CIFS Requirements and considerations for creating an access to an SVM . 13 SMB share. 31 Creating an SMB share . 32 Creating an SVM . 13 Verifying SMB client access . 32 Verifying that the SMB protocol is enabled on the SVM . 14 Creating SMB share access control lists . 33 Opening the export policy of the SVM root Configuring NTFS file permissions in a share . 34 volume . 14 Verifying user access. 36 Creating a LIF . 15 Enabling DNS for host-name resolution . 18 Chapter 5. Where to find additional Setting up an SMB server in an Active Directory information. 37 domain . -
Securing the Last Mile of DNS with CGA-TSIG
Master System & Network Engineering Securing the last mile of DNS with CGA-TSIG Research Project 2 Student: Supervisors: Marc Buijsman Matthijs Mekking [email protected] (NLnet Labs) [email protected] Jeroen van der Ham (UvA) [email protected] 7 January 2014 Abstract This document describes the research performed during the course of Research Project 2 of the Master's in System and Network Engineering at the University of Amsterdam, under the supervision of NLnet Labs. Research has been done on the use of a proposed protocol called CGA-TSIG as a potential solution to the last mile problem of the Domain Name System (DNS). A proof of concept has been implemented, which resulted in the identification of several problems with the proposed protocol. Nevertheless, it was found that CGA-TSIG can work as believed to be intended, even though the protocol only works on IPv6. An automated method for authenticating the IP addresses of recursive name servers is additionally needed for CGA-TSIG to be a useful and fully secure solution to the last mile problem, but research to such methods was out of the scope of this project and would require future research. CONTENTS Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research question.........................................2 1.2 Approach.............................................2 2 Background 4 2.1 Transaction Signature (TSIG)..................................4 2.1.1 Signature creation....................................4 2.1.2 Signature verification..................................5 2.1.3 Security..........................................6 2.1.4 Drawbacks........................................6 2.2 Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA)........................7 2.2.1 CGA generation.....................................7 2.2.2 CGA verification.....................................8 2.2.3 CGA signatures..................................... -
Cyber Espionage
From January 2019 to April 2020 Cyber espionage ENISA Threat Landscape Overview Cyber espionage is considered both a threat and a motive in the cybersecurity playbook. It is defined as ‘the use of computer networks to gain illicit access to confidential information, typically that held by a government or other organisation’.1 In 2019, many reports revealed that global organisations consider cyber espionage (or nation-state-sponsored espionage) a growing threat affecting industrial sectors, as well as critical and strategic infrastructures across the world, including government ministries, railways, telecommunication providers, energy companies, hospitals and banks. Cyber espionage focuses on driving geopolitics, and on stealing state and trade secrets, intellectual property rights and proprietary information in strategic fields. It also mobilises actors from the economy, industry and foreign intelligence services, as well as actors who work on their behalf. In a recent report, threat intelligence analysts were not surprised to learn that 71% of organisations are treating cyber espionage and other threats as a ‘black box’ and are still learning about them. In 2019, the number of nation-state-sponsored cyberattacks targeting the economy increased and it is likely to continue this way. In detail, nation-state-sponsored and other adversary-driven attacks on the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) are increasing in the utilities, oil and natural gas (ONG), and manufacturing sectors. Furthermore, cyberattacks conducted by advanced persistent threat (APT) groups indicate that financial attacks are often motivated by espionage. Using tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) akin to those of their espionage counterparts, groups such as the Cobalt Group, Carbanak and FIN7 have allegedly been targeting large financial institutions and restaurant chains successfully. -
Major Malware Threat Intelligence Report for Bangladesh Context
Major Malware Threat Intelligence Report For Bangladesh Context Report Period: Jan - Sep, 2020 Published: October, 2020 Table of Contents About this Report .............................................................................................................................. 1 General Definition ............................................................................................................................. 2 Malware: AZORult ............................................................................................................................. 6 Malware: KPOT Stealer .................................................................................................................... 26 Malware: Oski Stealer...................................................................................................................... 31 Malware: FormBookFormgrabber.................................................................................................... 34 Malware: Loki PWS .......................................................................................................................... 38 Malware:Nexus Stealer.................................................................................................................... 44 Malware: TrickBot ........................................................................................................................... 46 Malware: Kinsing ............................................................................................................................ -
Download Indictment.Pdf
1 2 3 12/8/2020 4 JB 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 January 2020 Grand Jury 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CR 2:20-cr-00614-DMG 12 Plaintiff, I N D I C T M E N T 13 v. [18 U.S.C. § 371: Conspiracy; 18 U.S.C. § 1349: Conspiracy to 14 JON CHANG HYOK, Commit Wire Fraud and Bank Fraud; aka “Quan Jiang,” 18 U.S.C. §§ 982, 1030: Criminal 15 aka “Alex Jiang,” Forfeiture] KIM IL, 16 aka “Julien Kim,” aka “Tony Walker,” and 17 PARK JIN HYOK, aka “Jin Hyok Park,” 18 aka “Pak Jin Hek,” aka “Pak Kwang Jin,” 19 Defendants. 20 21 The Grand Jury charges: 22 INTRODUCTORY ALLEGATIONS AND DEFINITIONS 23 At times relevant to this Indictment: 24 A. The Conspiracy and Defendants 25 1. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (“DPRK”), also 26 known as (“aka”) North Korea, operated a military intelligence agency 27 called the Reconnaissance General Bureau (“RGB”). The RGB was 28 headquartered in Pyongyang, DPRK, and comprised multiple units. 1 2. Defendants JON CHANG HYOK (ࢷॷୂ), aka “Quan Jiang,” aka 2 “Alex Jiang”; KIM IL (̡ࢊ), aka “Julien Kim,” aka “Tony Walker”; and ऑୂ), aka “Jin Hyok Park,” aka “Pak Jin Hek,” aka) PARK JIN HYOK 3 4 “Pak Kwang Jin” (collectively, the “defendants”), whose photographs 5 are attached as Exhibit A through Exhibit C, respectively, were 6 members of units of the RGB who knowingly and intentionally conspired 7 with each other, and with persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury 8 (collectively, with the defendants, referred to as the “conspirators” 9 and the “hackers”), to conduct criminal cyber intrusions. -
Deliverable D3.2
Ref. Ares(2016)3479770 - 15/07/2016 Converged Heterogeneous Advanced 5G Cloud-RAN Architecture for Intelligent and Secure Media Access Project no. 671704 Research and Innovation Action Co-funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union Call identifier: H2020-ICT-2014-1 Topic: ICT-14-2014 - Advanced 5G Network Infrastructure for the Future Internet Start date of project: July 1st, 2015 Deliverable D3.2 Initial 5G multi-provider v-security realization: Orchestration and Management Due date: 30/06/2016 Submission date: 15/07/2016 Deliverable leader: I2CAT Editor: Shuaib Siddiqui (i2CAT) Reviewers: Konstantinos Filis (COSMOTE), Oriol Riba (APFUT), and Michael Parker (UESSEX) Dissemination Level PU: Public PP: Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE: Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO: Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) CHARISMA – D3.2 – v1.0 Page 1 of 145 List of Contributors Participant Short Name Contributor Fundació i2CAT I2CAT Shuaib Siddiqui, Amaia Legarrea, Eduard Escalona Demokritos NCSRD NCSRD Eleni Trouva, Yanos Angelopoulos APFutura APFUT Oriol Riba Innoroute INNO Andreas Foglar, Marian Ulbricht JCP-Connect JCP-C Yaning Liu University of Essex UESSEX Mike Parker, Geza Koczian, Stuart Walker Intracom ICOM Spiros Spirou, Konstantinos Katsaros, Konstantinos Chartsias, Dimitrios Kritharidis Ethernity ETH Eugene Zetserov Ericsson Ericsson Carolina Canales Altice Labs Altice Victor Marques Fraunhofer HHI HHI Kai Habel CHARISMA – D3.2 – v1.0 Page 2 of 145 Table of Contents List of Contributors ................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. 5G network challenges: Security and Multi-tenancy ......................................................................... 7 1.2. -
Zone Poisoning: the How and Where of Non-Secure DNS Dynamic Updates
Zone Poisoning: The How and Where of Non-Secure DNS Dynamic Updates Maciej Korczynski´ Michał Król Michel van Eeten Delft University of Université de Technologie Delft University of Technology de Compiègne Technology The Netherlands France The Netherlands [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT In this study, we explore an attack against the au- This paper illuminates the problem of non-secure DNS thoritative end of the path: the zone file of the authori- dynamic updates, which allow a miscreant to manipu- tative name server itself. We detail how the vulnerable- late DNS entries in the zone files of authoritative name by-design, non-secure DNS dynamic update protocol servers. We refer to this type of attack as to zone extension potentially allows anyone who can reach an poisoning. This paper presents the first measurement authoritative name server to update the content of its study of the vulnerability. We analyze a random sam- zone file. The attacker only needs to know the name of ple of 2.9 million domains and the Alexa top 1 mil- the zone and the name server for that zone. The vul- lion domains and find that at least 1,877 (0.065%) and nerability was indicated already in 1997 by Vixie et al. 587 (0.062%) of domains are vulnerable, respectively. in RFC 2136 [38], but its relevance in the current DNS Among the vulnerable domains are governments, health landscape has not been recognized nor studied. care providers and banks, demonstrating that the threat We refer to this type of attack as to zone poisoning. -
Windows 2000 Domain Naming System (DNS) Sida 1 Av 46
Windows 2000 Domain Naming System (DNS) Sida 1 av 46 TechNet Home > Products & Technologies > Server Operating Systems > Windows 2000 Server > Plan Windows 2000 DNS Operating System Abstract This paper describes the Microsoft® Windows® 2000 operating system Domain Naming System (DNS), including design, implementation, and migration issues. It discusses new features of the Windows 2000 implementation of DNS, provides examples of DNS implementations, and describes the architectural criteria that network architects and administrators should consider when designing a DNS namespace for the Active Directory™ service to provide reliable network naming services. On This Page Introduction DNS Fundamentals New Features of the Windows 2000 DNS Designing a DNS Namespace for the Active Directory Summary Glossary Introduction The designers of the Microsoft ® Windows® 2000 operating system chose the Domain Name System (DNS) as the name service for the operating system. Windows 2000 Server includes an IETF standard-based Domain Name System Server. Because it is RFC compliant it is fully compatible with any other RFC compliant DNS servers. Use of the Windows 2000 Domain Name System server is not mandatory. Any DNS Server implementation supporting Service Location Resource Records (SRV RRs, as described in an Internet Draft "A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)") and Dynamic Update (RFC2136) is sufficient to provide the name service for Windows 2000–based computers1. However, because this implementation of DNS is designed to fully take advantage of the Windows 2000 Active Directory™ service, it is the recommended DNS server for any networked organization with a significant investment in Windows or extranet partners with Windows-based systems.