APPENDICES TO THE MASTER PLAN Town of Otis,
Massachusetts A: MAPS
B: KEY ISSUES
C: EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY
D: MGL 41: MASTER PLANNING LAW
E: PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS
Prepared by: The Otis Master Plan Steering Committee & The Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
APPENDIX A: MAPS
LIST OF MAPS: Map 1—Regional Context Map 2—Environmental Jus ce Map 3—Zoning Map 4—Soils and Geologic Features Map 5—Unique Features Map 6—Water Resources Map 7—Inventory of Lands of Conserva on and Recrea on Interest Map 8—Historic Resources Map 9—Current Land Use Map 10—Development Trend Map 11—Buildable Land Map 12—Infrastructure Map 13—Vegeta on and Fisheries and Wildlife Map 14—Road Maintenance
LENOX WASHINGTON MIDDLEFIELD Town of Otis
¤£20 Master Plan 183)" ¤£7 )"8
102)" LEE Map 1: Regional Context ¨¦§ STOCKBRIDGE 90 CHESTER 102)" BECKET HUNTINGTON
¤£20 ¤£7
TYRINGHAM WESTFIELD
GREAT BARRINGTON MONTGOMERY Towns Interstate HOUSATONIC Major Road OTIS Minor Road Major Watersheds Protected Land MONTEREY 23)" 57)" BLANDFORD 23)"
)"8
RUSSELL
FARMINGTON SHEFFIELD
57)" WESTFIELD SANDISFIELD NEW MARLBOROUGH 012 Miles 57)" TOLLAND
183)" ³ GRANVILLE
¤£7 This map was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission and is intended for Berkshire general planning purposes only. 7A)" )"8 Regional This map shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or Planning regulatory purposes. MassGIS, Commission BRPC or the municipality may have supplied portions of this data. Miles Master Plan Master This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commissionand is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes. MassGIS, BRPC the or municipalitymay have supplied portions of this data. Towns Interstate Road Major Road Minor Local Road Stream Wetland Open Water Environmental Justice Town of Otis 00.51 Justice Populations ³
Map 2: Environmental Map 2:
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A
E R Pond
Pond
Upper Lower G Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp D L R IL H Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) Swamp 23 TOWN Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey
AM H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
S
E
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain
O H R T AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield Miles Master Plan Master This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commissionand is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes. MassGIS, BRPC the or municipalitymay have supplied portions of this data. Map 3: ZoningMap 3: Town of Otis 00.51 R-40 V-1 Floodplain OverlayDistrict Towns Interstate Road Major Road Minor Local Road Stream Wetland Open Water Zoning ³
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A
E R Pond
Pond
Upper Lower G Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp D L R IL H Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) Swamp 23 TOWN Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey
AM H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
S
E
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain
O H R T AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield Miles Master Plan Master This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commissionand is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes. MassGIS, BRPC the or municipalitymay have supplied portions of this data. Town of Otis 00.51 Map 4: Soils and Prime Agricultural Soils Agricultural Prime Excessively Drained Soils Soils Drained Poorly Towns Interstate Road Major Road Minor Local Road Stream Wetland Open Water ³ Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
Geologic Features Map Features Geologic
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A
E R Pond
Pond
Upper Lower G Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp D L R IL H Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) Swamp 23 TOWN Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey
AM H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
S
E
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain
O H R T AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield
Miles Master Plan Master This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commissionand is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes. MassGIS, BRPC the or municipalitymay have supplied portions of this data. Town of Otis 00.51 PWS Interim WellheadProtection Area Protection Zone WaterSurface Outstanding ResourceWaters FEMA 100yr Floodplain Watersheds Subwatersheds Towns Interstate Road Major Road Minor Local Road Stream Wetland Open Water ³ Berkshire Regional Planning Commission !
Map 6: Water Resources
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A
E R Pond
Pond
Upper Lower G Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp D L R IL H Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) Swamp 23 TOWN Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey
AM H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
S
E
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain
O H R T AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield Miles Master Plan Master This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commissionand is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes. MassGIS, BRPC the or municipalitymay have supplied portions of this data. Town of Otis 00.51 Federal State Municipality Conservation Organization Land Trust Private 61, 61A, Chapter 61B Towns Interstate Road Major Road Minor Local Road Stream Wetland Open Water Recreation Interest of Conservation and ³ Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
Map 7: Inventory of Land of Inventory 7: Map
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A
E R Pond
Pond
Upper Lower G Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp D L R IL H Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) Swamp 23 TOWN Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey
AM H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
S
E
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain
O H R T AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield
Miles Master Pla n This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commissionand is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes. MassGIS, BRPC the or municipalitymay have supplied portions of this data. Town of Otis 00.51 Historic Properties (MACRIS) Towns Interstate Road Major Road Minor Local Road Stream Wetland Open Water ! ³ Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
: Historic Resources Map 8 : Historic
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A
E R Pond
Pond
Upper Lower G Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp D L R IL H Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) 23 Swamp TOWN Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey
AM H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
S
E
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain
O H R T AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield Use (2005) Miles Master Pla n This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commissionand is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes. MassGIS, BRPC the or municipalitymay have supplied portions of this data. Town of Otis 00.51 Agriculture Forest Commercial Industrial Mining Multi-Family Residential High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Very Recreation LandOpen Urban Public/Institutional UtilitiesTransportation / Water Towns Interstate Major Road Minor Road Local Road Stream Wetland Water Open Map 9: Current Land ³
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A
E R Pond
Pond
Upper Lower G Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp D L R IL H Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) 23 Swamp TOWN Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey
AM H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
S
E
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain
O H R T AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield Miles Master Plan Master This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission and is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for or legal, survey, engineering, regulatory purposes. MassGIS, may municipality the or BRPC have supplied portions of this data. Town of Otis 00.51 Pre 1900 19011950 - 19511975 - 1976Post Towns Interstate Road Major Road Minor Local Road Stream Wetland Open Water 0DS Development Trend Year Building Year Built ³
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A E Pond
Pond
Upper Lower GR Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) 23 Swamp TOWN HILL RD Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey M A H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
ES
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain O R TH AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield
Map 11: Miles Master Plan This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commissionand is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes. MassGIS, BRPC the or municipalitymay have supplied portions of this data. Buildable L and Town of Otis 00.51 Partially Constrained Land Buildable Land Towns Interstate Road Major Road Minor Local Road Stream Wetland Open Water ³
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A E Pond
Pond
Upper Lower GR Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp D L R IL
H Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) 23 Swamp TOWN Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey
AM H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
ES
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain O R TH AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield B Golden Fawn Lake O N Shaw ¤£20 N Baldy Longbow IE Pond RI Mountain Lake G Town of Otis G H I LL R Thomas Robin Indian D Master Plan Pond Hood Lake Lake Dorman Mountain Angerman Horseshoe ¨¦§90 Swamp Pond Map :
Whiting Infrastructure Pond
Hayden Quarry Long Pond Swamp Hayden Mountain Pond ! Wastewater Treatment Plant N Creek O Pond Round R ! Fire Department T Mountain H Church M Hill Pond White ! Police Department A Lily IN R Pond D 4 School Mud Pond ! Town Office Kingsbury Church Hill LE ! Town Garage Mountain E W ES RD Sodem TF IELD Pond Wastewater M A IN Towns
R D Interstate
4 Major Road
D Minor Road R Haley ! E I ! R Pond Geisler E Local Road G Swamp L N A Stream GTO RD IN Dimmock RR T A )"8 Wetland Y B Brook R Phelps I T N A Pond G Swamp E Open Water H AM GR ! ! )" R The S 23 D O E Big Pond Pinnacle A U S T T )" H O 23 M T IS A R IN D Filley R D Mountain Camp Upper Sequena Benton Royal Spectale Pond Pond Pond Pond Latimer 23 Lake TE Hill OU Garfield R
Chestnut Hill ! S
O
Morley Lower U T Hill Spectacle H Larkum Pond M
A Pond Larkum I N Hill S T 00.51
Belden Miles EA Hill S TH Otis Reservoir ³ U B TOWN HILL RD BAR D RD
T This map was created by the S Allen Morley T Berkshire Regional Planning Mountain Swamp ES Berkshire Commission and is intended for W general planning purposes only. R Town This map shall not be used for E Regional
W Hill engineering, survey, legal, or O Planning regulatory purposes. MassGIS, L BRPC or the municipality may Abbey Abbey Commission have supplied portions of this Hill Lake data. Wildlife Miles Master Pla n This mapThis was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commissionand is intended for general planning purposesonly. mapThis shall not be used for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes. MassGIS, BRPC the or municipalitymay have supplied portions of this data. Fisheries and Town of Otis 00.51 Certified Vernal Pool Vernal Certified Pool Vernal Potential Priority Habitats NHESP of Rare Species BioMap2 Core Habitat Communities Natural Agriculture Forest Towns Interstate Road Major Road Minor Local Road Stream Wetland Open Water and ! ! Map 13 : Vegetation ³
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
D
R
D
L
E I
F T S E Pond Haley W Pond
Quarry E
E
L
D R
E
I
R
E
G L A
D R LL HI
G Lily Pond
G White RI IE N
N Lake Otis Indian Hill
O Big Pond B Latimer Reservoir Pond Benton Pond Creek
D R TIS O ST
EA Pond Larkum Hill Church Robin Hood Lake " ) 23 Hill Larkum 90 § ¨ ¦ Church IN ST Hill Pond A
Pond M
Brook H SOUT Dimmock
D R N A I
Lake M OUTH Longbow S 8 " ) Hill Belden Pond Camp Sequena The Pinnacle Golden Fawn Lake RD Pond IN
Whiting A
Pond M ORTH
Horseshoe N Pond
Thomas D
R
N 20 £ ¤
Pond O T
Hayden
G
N
I
Filley R
R
Mountain
A B
T
A
E R Pond
Pond
Upper Lower G Spectale Spectacle Pond Allen Shaw Mountain Geisler Swamp D L R IL H Hill Town Phelps Swamp " ) 23 Swamp TOWN Hayden Mountain Kingsbury Long Mud Pond Mud Swamp Mountain Angerman D Lake
R Abbey
AM H G N RI TY Hill Abbey Dorman Mountain Pond Royal Hill
Pond
Sodem Morley
T
S
T
S
E
D W R E
R W O RD L
D N 3 Hill I R
A 2
Chestnut A
M E B T Round
U UB
Mountain
O H R T AS E Baldy Mountain Morley Swamp Lake Garfield Golden Fawn Lake ¤£20 Baldy Shaw Longbow Mountain Pond Lake Town of Otis
Robin DIMMOCK Master Plan RD Thomas Hood Indian Pond Lake Lake Dorman Mountain Angerman Map 14: Road D Horseshoe Swamp R
N Pond ¨¦§90
E
D R
E Maintenance and
W Whiting Pond USETTS TURNPIKE Hayden MASSACH KE Culvert Locations Hayden Pond ETTS TURNPI ACHUS Quarry Long Swamp MASS ED JO Pond Mountain NES R D LE E W EST FIEL Creek D R Round MERRITT RD D Pond Mountain Church White GILES RD Hill Pond R Lily O U Pond T E 8
Mud Pond S T E
B
B
I Church Kingsbury N M
S
A Hill Mountain R " Culverts
R D
C
Sodem Y BECKET
Pond R MassDOT Maintained D
RD S RD Town Maintained
IBB
G
D Other Roads
R E ENTER RD I WEST C R E Towns
G
L G
A I B Stream B Haley D
S R
R L Pond
D L Geisler I Wetland H
Swamp C R
U Open Water PEARL RD H
C J )"8 U Dimmock D Big Pond Phelps D Brook Pond Swamp R HILL RD T GTON RD D BL N Y ARRIN AN IO R AT B DFO L IN GRE RD G D RD
H R A M )" D PEASE 23 N CL R RD D UBH
PO OU D LE R S 23)" E ISUR E DR S A Filley E E Camp P CO LN ER SPEC LD P Mountain Sequena SP RING R UP Upper Pond Benton Royal D Spectale Pond RD Pond Pond L HIL Lake ER N RD TIM Garfield TO RD R E LA NO R
Chestnut WEST SHO RESERVOIR RD Hill RD IR RD IKE B RVO P L RESE A N P LN I ELM D N F E O R R Morley R D D O R Hill U D Lower T D E R
8 Spectacle Larkum D N Pond Hill A L L O T 00.51
KI WEST MINE B E BE RLY AV Belden R R E D Miles R I Hill RD D G Otis E A
V ³ Reservoir R E RD D R CI SPRING LD O C D This map was created by the Morley Allen R N Berkshire Regional Planning Mountain I Swamp A Commission and is intended for M Berkshire general planning purposes only. Town Regional This map shall not be used for Hill engineering, survey, legal, or Planning regulatory purposes. MassGIS, Abbey Commission BRPC or the municipality may Abbey have supplied portions of this Hill Lake data. O s Master Plan Appendix APPENDIX B: KEY ISSUES
INTRODUCTION younger employees, children, or other business owners in town willing or able to take over the This appendix summarizes the key issues iden fied in opera on of exis ng businesses once these owners the planning process that formed the basis for the re re. The town will explore efforts to help aging goals, policies, and priori es established in the plan. business owners with succession planning and other These issues were iden fied through an inventory of services to ensure that exis ng local business remains exis ng condi ons, feedback from Town Master Plan open in town. Steering Commi ee members, input from public forums / informa onal mee ngs, the public survey, and stakeholder interviews. Broadband Internet Development O s has been pursuing the development of high speed broadband internet for some me, and voted to fund POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS such efforts in the Fall of 2015. The O s MPSC feels An Older Populace that broadband internet service in town will allow for The increased number of older residents may affect the expansion of home‐based and other local business, and provide incen ve for others business to move to the range of services the town wishes to provide as the area. For more informa on on broadband internet well as the range of housing op ons available. in O s, see Chapter 4: Infrastructure. Addi onally, it makes the need for accessibility to town buildings or ameni es more important due to poten al mobility impairment issues. INFRASTRUCTURE Infrastructure as Economic Development Seasonal Residents Wastewater treatment expansion and broadband Seasonal residents have a poten ally large impact on internet could allow for increased economic town popula on, as well as town services and local development in O s. Wastewater treatment housing. expansion could a ract business to its village center as well as help O s to retain exis ng business like the Planning for Increased Diversity O s Ridge ski area. Broadband internet development The town may wish to consider poten al language and could a ract workers and businesses to the area based cultural barriers that may be encountered in a on the ability to work remotely. poten ally increasingly diverse town and county.
ECONOMY Economics of Energy Efficiency and Self‐ Business Growth and Economic Sufficiency Major town ini a ves have focused on reducing Development current energy use and improving the efficiency of O s has a business environment comprised of small exis ng buildings. Savings created by efficiency locally based businesses. In the past, there was an projects can be allocated for other purposes. In ac ve business associa on in town. The Town of O s addi on, the O s Wind Energy Project is an cipated to will pursue economic development efforts only with produce enough energy to “zero out” municipal the coopera on, partnership and input of the O s energy costs, and through sale of energy credits, business community to ensure the success of any create a revenue source for the town. The town will poten al projects. con nue these ongoing projects and encourage residents to par cipate in energy efficiency and small Aging / Changing Demographics scale energy produc on programs, such as Mass Saves The O s MPSC iden fied that many business owners and Solarize Mass. The town will emphasize the in the town are becoming older, and there may not be
poten al cost savings associated with these efforts, as Only services for elderly or disabled adults provide well as the environmental benefits of such work. public transporta on within the town of O s.
SERVICES LAND USE Budget Related Village Centers The town has a limited budget with which to provide O s’ village centers are important economic and services, which makes efficiency all the more popula on centers, as well as gateways into the important. community. The town will examine op ons to expand parking in both its village centers as well as examine Public Par cipa on and Civic Engagement design guidelines for O s Center Village. The first Master Plan public forum iden fied a need to increase public par cipa on and civic engagement. Members of the O s MPSC also iden fied East O s as Addi onally, the town’s strong spirit of volunteerism an area to be explored for future redevelopment. East and independence was discussed. The town will O s is the smaller of O s’ two village centers. pursue several strategies to increase public Addi onally, the areas around Big Pond and O s par cipa on and work to embrace the independent Reservoir contain some of the town’s largest spirit of town residents to encourage ini a ves from neighborhoods. The commi ee iden fied several the “ground up”, rather than from the “top down”. possible topics to examine in East O s including the need for wastewater treatment to protect natural resources, addi onal infrastructure, and underu lized HOUSING proper es. Aging Popula on / Changing Demographics NATURAL AND CULTURAL The Town of O s has an increasingly older popula on. Recent survey data from BRPC indicates that most RESOURCES older Berkshire residents want to remain in their own Water Quality homes as they age, rather than transi oning to other As men oned in previous chapters, water quality is an housing or into assisted living facili es. The town will important issue in O s. Water quality impacts human work with exis ng business to examine poten al health, and O s’ water resources are major draws to services to support the housing needs of this the town that impact the local economy. The town popula on. Moreover, the town will par cipate in will address water quality through ongoing tes ng and programs to address the housing needs of all its by working to both expand wastewater treatment at residents, and work to connect these residents to its exis ng WWTP near O s Center Village and by exis ng tools that support affordable home ownership working to develop a poten al new wastewater and enable older residents to live within their treatment system in East O s Village. residences as long as they choose.
Inventory, Documenta on and Planning of TRANSPORTATION Town Historic Resources Road Maintenance The town’s Historic Commission has taken the lead on Road maintenance needs are a major town expense. promo ng the town’s historic resources, including significant work to make the Knox Trail a four‐season Lack of Public Transporta on mul ‐use trail. The town will con nue its ongoing The town of O s is not served by regional public work to develop and promote this trail, as well as transporta on services available to the general public. update the inventory of the town’s historic buildings
O s Master Plan Appendix
and other resources. These historic resources create a poten al draw for economically important tourists and other visitors.
OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION Water Quality Water quality is an issue that impacts the health of O s’ residents and visitors. Moreover, O s’ high water quality and water recrea on opportuni es are an important draw for seasonal residents, which is crucial to the local economy. The town will pursue future expansion of sewer in O s Center Village at its exis ng WWTP. Addi onally, the town will pursue development of a second wastewater treatment system in East O s, where the town’s major water bodies are located, with an emphasis on possible alterna ve or ecological wastewater treatment systems for this area.
APPENDIX C: EXISTING CONDITIONS POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS Historic and Projected Growth Rates This trend also reveals itself in enrollment data from The year‐round 2010 popula on of O s was es mated O s’s Farmington River School district. O s is part of at 1,612, up 18% from 2000 (1,365) and 58% from the combined Farmington River School District, which 1990 (1,018). Growth in the town beyond 1990 also receives students from Sandisfield as well as exceeded the previous town popula on peak reached school choice students. This elementary school in 1850 (1,224). From this peak, popula on in O s contains pre‐school through 6th grade classes. Beyond decreased to a 1950 low of 359 residents. Popula on 6th grade, students can a end regional middle and has been steadily increasing since that me to its high schools in Great Barrington or Lee. Since 2003, current levels. Growth in O s was greatest during the enrollment at the school has declined by about 25%. 1960‐1970 decade in which popula on in the town Available data indicates that the number of school nearly doubled. choice students and those from Sandisfield decreased the most. The number of school choice students Addi onally, O s is one of only a handful of Berkshire enrolled at Farmington River has decreased from 35 to county towns projected to grow in the future. The 24 students since 2007. Students a ending from Donahue Ins tute at UMass Amherst projects that O s Sandisfield decreased from 43 to 26. However, the will grow by roughly 300 addi onal residents over the number of students from O s increased slightly – by 7 next two decades, reaching 1,980 year‐round students – since 2007. residents by 2030 (See Table C1 ‐ this appendix). Seasonal Residents/Second Homeowners Popula on Composi on Seasonal residents and second homeowners are a The popula on of O s is predominantly white tremendous por on of the O s popula on that (97.58%), with a median age of 48 years (2010). are barely captured by census and other data. Between 2000 and 2010, the popula on of residents According to the 2010 census, 55% of all housing older than 44 increased, while those younger than 44 units in O s are listed as seasonal. However, town decreased. Those in the 45‐65 age bracket increased assessor records place the percentage even higher, at the most at 7.95% (See Table 2.1 in Chapter 2 68% (O s Town Assessor Records, 2015). demographic changes between 2010 and Figure C2 for a current popula on breakdown by age). Some of the Along with the towns of Becket, Stockbridge and increase and loss may be a ributable to the aging of Lenox, O s has one of the highest numbers of exis ng town residents as well as young people who seasonal homes in the Berkshires. This seasonal move away to pursue jobs or educa onal popula on affects town services, infrastructure opportuni es. However, some is likely due to new and housing. Addi onally, they are likely a large residents moving to the area or seasonal residents contributor of new year‐round residents to O s. who decide to make O s their year‐round residence. A demographics ques on related to seasonal residents The decreasing number of younger residents and and second homeowners was included on the public increasing number of older residents is a trend that survey that was developed as part of the Master Plan has been iden fied in regional county wide planning. process. According to the survey results, 17 out of 79
Table C1 ‐ Projected Popula on Growth in O s from 2010 to 2030 Source: Donahue Ins tute, University of Massachuse s ‐ Amherst U.S. Census Projec on Projec on Projec on Projec on Year Projected 2010‐2030 Change 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Popula on 1612 1726 1829 1914 1980 368
O s Master Plan Appendix
year round residents (21%), indicated that they had at this popula on in Becket is based on income, meaning one me been seasonal residents or second that 25% or more of households within one area of the homeowners. Addi onally, 9 out of 50 seasonal community earn 65% or less than the Massachuse s residents or second homeowners (18%) reported that median household income. they were planning on becoming year round residents of O s. For the complete results of the public survey, refer to appendix E.
Race, Ethnicity and Diversity The popula on of several ethnic groups including African Americans and Asians fell between 2000 and 2010. The number of African Americans in O s decreased from 8 persons to 2. The number of Asian Americans decreased from 12 to 9. However, the popula on of Hispanic and La no residents in O s increased from 4 to 18 between 2000 and 2010. (See Figure C1 for a breakdown of O s residents by race and ethnicity as of the 2010 census).
Context and Demographics of Environmental Justice Populations Environmental jus ce is “based on the principle that all people have a right to be protected from environmental pollu on, and to live in and enjoy a clean and healthful environment “ (Mass. Execu ve Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, 2015). Conceptually, environmental jus ce recognizes that some of the most highly polluted and undesirable areas to live have tended to contain popula ons of low‐income, minority, foreign‐born, and non‐English speaking residents. Addi onally, these popula ons have tended to have reduced or limited access to open space. In Massachuse s, these popula ons have been mapped in each municipality based on census informa on. Because these popula ons have historically been underserved in terms of open space and recrea on access and opportuni es, they should be a crucial factor in future decision‐making regarding these issues.
Currently there are no environmental jus ce popula ons within the town of O s (see Map 2— Environmental Jus ce Popula ons). However, there is an environmental jus ce popula on within the town of Becket, immediately to the north. The designa on of
O s Master Plan Appendix
ECONOMY
Composi on and Employment Table C3 ‐ O s Occupa on by Industry 2000‐2013 As of the 2009‐2013 American Community Survey, the Source: 2000 Census and 2009‐2013 American Commu‐ civilian labor force of O s was 737 persons, repre‐ nity Survey sen ng approximately 59.4% of the popula on over the age of 16 or 51.8% of the total popula on (737 out 2000 2013 Percent of an es mated 1,421 residents). This percentage of Employed Employed change individuals considered “in the labor force” has de‐ Agriculture, forest‐ creased since 2000 levels (67.9%), and might indicate ry, fishing and
an increase in older or re red residents who are not hun ng, and min‐ 14 (2%) 9 (1.4%) ‐0.6% ac vely employed or seeking work. Unfortunately, a ing Construc on detailed breakdown of labor force status by age is not 111 (15.8%) 94 (14.2%) ‐1.6% available from the 2000 Census for comparison. Manufacturing 95 (13.5%) 27 (4.1%) ‐9.4% The unemployment rate has increased since 2000 Wholesale trade 20 (2.8%) 14 (2.1%) ‐0.7% (3.3%), with approximately 6.1% of the popula on 16 Retail trade and older listed as unemployed as of 2013 (See Chap‐ 64 (9.1%) 120 (18.1%) 9.0% ter 3—Table 3.1) . This value is lower than the value Transporta on and for the county (7.1% according to the Bureau of Labor warehousing, and Sta s cs). O s’ unemployment rate is higher than u li es 25 (3.6%) 29 (4.4%) 0.8% that of surrounding Tyringham (2.5%) and Monterey Informa on (3.9%), but lower than that of Becket (7.2%). 17 (2.4%) 0 (0.0%) ‐2.4% Finance and insur‐ It is important to note how employment figures are ance, and real es‐ calculated. Only persons over the age of 16 who are tate and rental and not members of the military, or ins tu onalized (such leasing 49 (7%) 19 (2.9%) ‐4.1% as in in prison, in a nursing home or mental health fa‐ Professional, scien‐ cility) are used to calculate employment figures. This fic, and manage‐ popula on of individuals over the age of 16 is consid‐ ment, and adminis‐ ered the popula on that is eligible to work. Em‐ tra ve and waste management ser‐ ployed and unemployed individuals are combined to vices 48 (6.8%) 67 (10.1%) 3.3% es mate what is considered the “civilian labor force”. Educa onal ser‐ Individuals who have received any payment for work vices, and health are considered employed. Individuals who are laid off care and social from work or are ac vely seeking employment are assistance 147 (20.9%) 137 (20.7%) ‐0.2% considered unemployed. Individuals who are not em‐ Arts, entertain‐ ployed, laid off, or ac vely seeking employment are ment, and recrea‐ on, and accom‐ moda on and food 59 (8.4%) 76 (11.5%) 3.1% Table C2 ‐ O s “Doing Business As” Records 2011‐ services 2014 Other services, except public ad‐ Source: O s Town Clerk, 2015 ministra on 29(4.1%) 56 (8.5%) 4.4% 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Public administra‐ New 8 5 10 8 31 on Renewal 8 7 14 6 35 24 (3.4%) 14 (2.1%) ‐1.3%
Table C4 ‐ Employment Des na ons of O s Residents within the town of O s (see Table C5, this appendix). Source: U.S. Census ACS 2006‐2010 Journey to Work Only an es mated 10 individuals (17.5%) of the 16‐19 year old age group are considered employed, with 47 Es mated Number of Employment Des na on Employees Percent individuals, or 82.5% ,of this age group considered not in the labor force. This high percentage of individuals O s, MA 236 40% not in the labor force might represent high school or Lee, MA 68 12% college students who are a ending school and do not Great Barrington, MA 52 9% have a job or recent graduates that have not yet begun Pi sfield, MA 34 6% to look for work. The percentage of employed individ‐ Becket, MA 23 4% uals is highest in the 25‐44 age group with 93.9% of Wes ield, MA 23 4% 201 people employed. Unemployment is greatest in Tolland, MA 22 4% the 55‐64 year age group with an es mated 47, or 17.3% , of individuals in this age group either laid off Lenox, MA 15 3% from work or ac vely seeking employment. Sheffield, MA 15 3%
Winchester, CT 12 2% Beyond the age of 65, the number and percentage of New Canaan, CT 10 2% individuals not in the labor force increases to over 80% Windsor, CT 10 2% for these age groups. This likely includes re red indi‐ North Adams, MA 9 2% viduals who are no longer working or seeking work. Sandisfield, MA 8 1% The es mated number of individuals aged 65 or older Cheshire, MA 6 1% who are not in the labor force is 286. When compared New York County, NY 6 1% to the en re es mated popula on of O s, MA from the 2009‐2013 American Community Survey (an es ‐ Torrington, CT 5 1% mated 1,421 residents), this amounts to 20.1% of the Har ord, CT 4 1% popula on. While this percentage includes individuals Holyoke, MA 4 1% who are no longer in the labor force, it also might in‐ Ludlow, MA 4 1% clude individuals who have never worked, such as an West Springfield, MA 4 1% individual who has been financially independent their Essex County, NY 4 1% en re life, or homemakers who never received pay for Suffolk County, NY 4 1% work.. Addi onally, this number would not include Montgomery County, PA 4 1% individuals who are re red but are younger than the Philadelphia County. PA 4 1% age of 65.
Tyringham, MA 3 1% “Journey to work” commu ng data available from the Total 589 100% 2006‐2010 American Community Survey indicates that as many as 236, or 40% of, employed O s residents work within the town. This figure includes workers considered not in the labor force. Individuals in this who commute within the town as well as those who category might include re rees, homemakers, stu‐ are self‐employed or work from home. Another 222, dents, the independently wealthy, or a person without or 37%, travel to the towns of Lee, Great Barrington, a job who has stopped looking for work (perhaps tem‐ Becket and Tolland, as well as the ci es of Pi sfield porarily). A person in this last category is some mes and Wes ield for employment. The remaining 131 referred to as a “discouraged worker”. workers, or 22%, travel to a variety of des na ons in Massachuse s, Connec cut and metropolitan areas The 2009‐2013 American Community Survey is able to such as New York City, NY and Philadelphia, PA (See provide a breakdown of employment status by age Table C4—Employment Des na ons of O s Resi‐
O s Master Plan Appendix
Table C5 ‐ Town of O s Employment Data by Age Source: 2009‐2013 Census American Community Survey In Civilian Labor Force (employed and unemployed individuals) (59.4% of popula on over the age of 16) Individuals Not in Labor Force Number of Unemployed (laid off or looking (not employed, laid off or looking Age individuals Employed for work) for work) 16 to 19 years 57 10 (17.5%) 0 47 (82.5%) 20 to 24 years 45 26 (57.8%) 5 (11.1%) 14 (31.1%) 25 to 44 years 214 201 (93.9%) 6 (2.8%) 7 (3.3%) 45 to 54 years 322 227 (70.5%) 17 (5.2%) 78 (24.2%) 55 to 64 years 271 154 (56.8%) 47 (17.3%) 70 (25.8%) 65 to 74 years 193 24 (12.4%) 0 169 (87.6%) 75 years and over 137 20 (14.6%) 0 117 (85.4%) Total 1239 662 (53.4%) 75 (6.1%) 502 (40.5%)
dents). Addi onal data on commu ng is available economy ‐ seasonal and summer camps. These include from the 2009‐2013 U.S. Census American Community Camp Bonnie Brae, Camp Overflow, Mountain‐view, Survey, which shows that the mean travel me to Camp Lenox and Berkshire Soccer Academy to name a work for O s residents is over half an hour (See Table few. Moreover, the town’s public and private 3.1 ‐ O s Employment Sta s cs in Chapter 3). campgrounds as well as the ski area contribute the town’s well‐known status as an outdoor recrea on Between 2000 and 2013, the percentage of workers in des na on. O s who worked in manufacturing declined by 9.4%. The number of workers in retail increased by 9%. Sim‐ Public Survey Results ilarly, the number of workers in the “arts, entertain‐ Based on the results of the public survey, O s resi‐ ment, accommoda on and food service” sector in‐ dents generally supported the encouragement of busi‐ creased by 3.1%. This trend has been iden fied at the ness development within the town. Farming was the county level as well. With the shi away from manu‐ top business type that residents wished to encourage facturing, the economy has fewer living wage jobs or (76%), followed by professional services such as archi‐ those that provide benefits such as insurance and re‐ tects, engineers and accountants (74%) and personal rement savings (See Table C3 in Appendix C for a services like hairdressers and personal trainers (69%). breakdown of employment changes by sector be‐ tween 2000 and 2013). Local Business Resources Local Business There are two very ac ve economic resource and busi‐ Small local businesses dominate the business ac vity ness marke ng groups in southern Berkshire County: in O s. Town Clerk records show that sixty‐six busi‐ the Southern Berkshire Chamber of Commerce and nesses registered or renewed their “Doing Business Berkshire Grown. As” (DBA) in O s between 2011 and 2014 (O s Town Clerk Records, 2015) (see Table C2). DBA records must Southern Berkshire Chamber of Commerce be renewed every four years. These business fall into Southern Berkshire Chamber of Commerce is an ac ve broad categories of construc on and excava on, real‐ network of businesses in the southern Berkshire re‐ ty, childcare, restaurants, and a few farms. Business gion, which consists of the towns of Alford, Egremont, license data highlights another notable segment of the Great Barrington, Monterey, Mount Washington, New
Marlborugh, O s, Sandisfield and Sheffield.
Berkshire Grown Berkshire Grown is a not‐for‐profit organiza on work‐ ing to promote local farms and the local businesses that support them.
Member Organiza ons Located in O s: O s Farmer’s Market
O s Master Plan Appendix
INFRASTRUCTURE town. Municipal light plants are regulated under Mass. General Law 164 and can be established for the pur‐ pose of electric and telecommunica ons for a town. Originally, the project would have fed power back into Exis ng Town Infrastructure the regional grid allowing for resident’s power bills to O s currently owns 14 major buildings, including town be reduced. However, recent state policy changes hall, the Recrea on Center at Harmony Hall and the have created a credit system in which O s can only sell town transfer sta on and highway department garage its power to other municipali es or to educa on ins ‐ to name a few. The town also owns the Erbe building, tu ons (Larry Gould Personal Communica on, 2015). a rental property immediately north of town hall (See O s has recently made plans to sell excess power pro‐ Table C6, this appendix for a list of town owned build‐ duced by the turbine project to the Lower Pioneer Val‐ ings). These buildings provide the infrastructure that ley Educa onal Collabora ve, a group of seven school the town uses to provide services to residents such as districts who pool resources and students from their fire and police protec on, governance and road member areas. maintenance. The O s Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and its sewer system serves much of O s The O s Wind Energy Project has now entered the de‐ Center Village. The treatment plant and the sewer sign and construc on phase. The town recently final‐ form the basis for the town’s wastewater infrastruc‐ ized an interconnec on study that will allow for the ture. In recent years, the town has engaged in build‐ wind project to e into transmission lines and the re‐ ing upgrades and improvements, aimed at reducing gional power grid a er a lengthy process with the re‐ energy costs as well as inves ng and developing mu‐ gional u lity Eversource (formerly Western Massachu‐ nicipal energy and communica ons infrastructure in se s Electric Company or WMECO). The project has the form of a wind energy project and development of seen much support in the town as shown by the con‐ high speed internet network in town . sistency in funding approvals. Addi onally, the pro‐ posed project has a limited view shed which has O s Wind Energy Project helped it to limit controversy. The turbine itself would O s has been moving forward with plans to complete only be visible from a small area in town. a wind energy project at a site near Interstate 90 on Algerie Road. An exis ng wind turbine on the nearby In town mee ngs held in August and September of William’s Stone quarry property has been providing 2015, O s voters authorized a $6.4 million 20 year electrical power to manufacturing facili es there since bond to pay for the purchase, design, construc on and 2009. The town’s wind energy project was conceived installa on of the wind turbine. Once constructed, as a way to make the town more energy independent the turbine is expected to produce around 6.2 million and pass energy savings on to town residents. Work kilowa hours. The turbine will be much larger than has been spearheaded by the town’s Energy Com‐ the exis ng one at the Williams Stone quarry, and mi ee. In 2011, approval for a wind power feasibility once constructed will stand roughly 400’ in height. study was secured at a special town mee ng. The The town will use around 5% of the energy produced study was supported by a grant from the Massachu‐ by the turbine, with the remainder of the energy to be se ’s Commonwealth Energy Center (CEC) which cov‐ purchased by the Lower Pioneer Valley Educa onal ered nearly the en re cost of the study. Collabora ve. The turbine is predicted to save the town up to $100,000 a year in energy costs and pay for In 2012, Sustainable Energy Developments Inc. final‐ itself with the revenue generated from the energy ized the feasibility study for the wind energy project. sales. Addi onally, a federal Cer fied Renewable En‐ The study results showed that a wind energy project ergy Bond will cover 70% of the interest reducing the was both technically and financially viable (Sustainable total interest from 4.7% to 1.4%. In November of Energy Developments, 2012). Based on its recommen‐ 2015, the town voted to exclude funding for the pro‐ da ons, the town formed its own energy coopera ve ject from proposi on 2 1/2, which will allow the town (municipal light plant) that would allow it to extend to increase its tax levy to fund the turbine project over benefits produced by the turbine project back to the the dura on of the bond. The town hopes to have the
Figure C3—Harmony Hall is located at 70 North Main Road. Harmony Hall is the town’s original town hall building and currently houses the town’s recrea on center.
turbine up and running by the summer or fall of 2016. ministrator, building inspector, Police department and council on aging. The building also contains mee ng Town Building and Energy Upgrades / space for town boards and commi ees and a gymna‐ Improvements sium which is used for town mee ng as well as for some recrea on center ac vi es. O s currently owns 14 major buildings (See Table C6—
this appendix). The following sec on describes some The town began implemen ng some of the recom‐ of the major buildings and facili es and recent work menda ons of the energy audit almost immediately by and planning that has been done to improve them. replacing light ballast and changing light scheduling in
town hall. This brought immediate energy savings of In partnership with the state Department of Energy 15%. The town then embarked on addi onal energy Resources (DOER), an energy audit of six municipal saving measures for town hall iden fied in the energy buildings was performed in 2008. Buildings studied audit. included the town hall, two fire sta ons, the wastewa‐
ter treatment plan, community center (Harmony Hall) In 2010, the work helped to “wrap” the town hall with and highway garage. The study concluded that the addi onal insula on in the form of structural insulated town hall and highway garage were most in need of panels (SIP). These panels included five and half inches energy conserva on measures. of extruded polystyrene insula on and add an addi‐ Town Hall onal R‐value of 27.5 to the exterior walls of town hall. The panels have significantly improved the insula ng O s Town Hall is located at 1 North Main Road, at the quali es of the exis ng cinder block structure. Further intersec on of Route 23 and Route 8. Town hall cur‐ improvements to town hall replaced exterior doors rently houses the town assessor, town clerk, town ad‐ and windows to improve energy savings. Addi onally,
O s Master Plan Appendix the town installed a new gas boiler, ven la on (HVAC) Table C6 ‐ Town‐Owned Buildings in O s system, thermostats and a tankless instant water heat‐ Source: James Crandall, Personal Communica on, er. As part of this work, the underground fuel oil stor‐ 2015 age tank was removed by the town. The town has seen significant energy savings as a result of this work. Name Address Overall electricity use is down 60% from its 2008 lev‐ Town Hall 1 North Main Road els.
Harmony Hall (Rec. Center) 70 North Main Road Transfer Station The town transfer sta on is located on North Main Library and Museum 48 North Main Road Road and provides an area for O s residents to drop off trash and recycling materials. The sta on also con‐ 536 West Center tains the town maintenance garage. In 2010, the town Transfer Sta on Road constructed a weather ght shell around the transfer 537 West Center sta on building to reduce energy costs. Maintenance Garage Road Police Garage 1 North Main Road Main Road Firehouse The Main Road Firehouse is located at 15 South Main Cemetery Garage 41 Monterey Road Road, near the intersec on of Routes 8 and 23. The main road firehouse houses the town fire department O s Fire Sta on #1 15 South Main Road and Rescue Squad. East O s Fire Sta on #2 10 Pine Road
Energy upgrades were made to the Main Road Fire‐ 320 North Main house in 2013. The fire sta on roof was removed and Wastewater Treatment Plant Road replaced. As with town hall, structural insulated panels 417 North Main were added to exterior walls as well as the fire sta on Highway Dept. Garage Road roof. Doors were also replaced. As part of this work, the town extended the exterior wall of the building to East O s Schoolhouse Old Blandford Road accommodate a standard sized fire engine. This al‐ lowed the town to purchase a fire engine that was not a custom size at a significant cost savings. Town East O s Mee nghouse Old Blandford Road maintenance and highway staff performed much of Erbe Building ‐ Town Owned Rent‐ the fire sta on work which allowed for a 30% cost sav‐ al Property 7 North Main Road ings. In addi on to the cost savings in labor, building Note: List includes major buildings only. Does not in‐ energy consump on has decreased. The fire sta on clude storage sheds or other outbuildings. now uses only 15% of the propane that it consumed in previous years. Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and Recreation Center (Harmony Hall) Sewer System Harmony Hall is the former town hall constructed in In 1998, the town constructed a waste water treat‐ the 1800’s and is located at 70 North Main Road (See ment plant and sewer system. The facility u lizes Bio‐ Figure C3). Currently the building houses the O s Rec‐ clere trickling filter units to provide wastewater treat‐ rea on Center. The center is a well used public asset ment (WWTP). Treated wastewater is allowed to per‐ and includes a gym with weight li ing equipment, a colate into the ground, much like a conven onal sep c cardio room (including treadmills) and a large second system. The WWTP and sewer system currently serves floor which contains pool tables and computers for about 70 residences, 8‐10 commercial users, as well as use by O s residents. the Farmington River School building, town hall, fire department and post office. The plant has a maximum
Table C7 ‐ Public Drinking Water Wells in O s, MA Table C7 ‐ Public Drinking Water Wells in O s, MA— Source: Mass GIS Public Water Supplies 2014 Con nued SOURCE_ID SITE_NAME TYPE 1225013‐01G OTIS RIDGE SKI AREA TNC 1225006‐01G KNOX TRAIL INN LLC TNC 1225034‐02G OTIS POULTRY FARM INC. TNC 1225011‐01G OLDE OTIS INN TNC 1225012‐03G BERKSHIRE SPORTS ACADEMY TNC 1225045‐01G OTIS WOODLANDS CLUB, INC. TNC 1225028‐01G OTIS MUNICIPAL BUILDING TNC 1225042‐01G WESTFIELD CAMPING CLUB TNC 1225017‐05G KLONDIKE CAMPGROUND TNC 1225017‐03G KLONDIKE CAMPGROUND TNC 1225022‐01G DCR TOLLAND STATE FOREST TNC 1225033‐01G HALLS STORE TNC MOUNTAIN VIEW 1225019‐01G OTIS RIDGE SKI CAMP TNC 1225014‐02G CAMPGROUND INC. TNC 1225017‐07G KLONDIKE CAMPGROUND TNC 1225036‐01G FARMINGTON RIVER DINER TNC 1225043‐01G LION HILL ROAD ASSOCIATION TNC PAPAS HEALTHY FOOD AND 1225022‐05G DCR TOLLAND STATE FOREST TNC 1225044‐01G FUEL TNC 1225017‐01G KLONDIKE CAMPGROUND TNC 1225017‐04G KLONDIKE CAMPGROUND TNC 1225009‐02G CAMP OVERFLOW TNC 1225009‐04G CAMP OVERFLOW TNC 1225016‐01G CAMP BONNIE BRAE TNC 1225031‐01G GATE ISLAND WATER SUPPLY TNC 1225017‐06G KLONDIKE CAMPGROUND TNC TNC = Transient Non‐Community Well, serve fewer than 25 people daily, such as at a camp or restaurant 1225009‐05G CAMP OVERFLOW TNC NTNC = Non‐Transient Non‐community Well, regularly MOUNTAIN VIEW serves more than 25 people daily for more than 6 1225014‐01G CAMPGROUND INC. TNC months of the year MOUNTAIN VIEW Note: Public well data is from 2014. Business names 1225014‐03G CAMPGROUND INC. TNC and well ownership may have changed.
1225029‐01G J & D MARINA & CAMPGROUND TNC 1225039‐01G BERKSHIRE HILLBILLIES TNC capacity of 30,000 gallons per day (GPD). Average dai‐ ly flows in 2014 were approximately 7,800 gallons per 1225003‐01G LAUREL RIDGE CAMPING AREA TNC day (GPD) (Keith O’Neill, Personal Communica on, 2015). For a map of the exis ng sewer system, please 1225022‐02G DCR TOLLAND STATE FOREST TNC refer to Map 12—Infrastructure. 1225046‐01G MAPLEWOOD 1850 HOUSE TNC 1225009‐03G CAMP OVERFLOW TNC As part of energy upgrades, some of the Bioclere filtra‐ 1225007‐01G COZY SPRUCE RESTAURANT TNC on units were wrapped with insula on. The wastewater must be heated to provide for efficient 1225034‐01G OTIS POULTRY FARM INC. TNC treatment, and this is a significant energy cost, par cu‐ larly in winter months. Addi onally, new wiring and 1225029‐02G J & D MARINA & CAMPGROUND TNC automa on systems were added to the treatment 1225041‐01G KATIES COUNTRY STORE TNC plant during 2013‐2014. An alarm system was also 1225017‐02G KLONDIKE CAMPGROUND TNC installed to no fy operators of equipment and hard‐ FARMINGTON RIVER REG. ELEM. ware issues, which means that the facility does not 1225040‐01G SCHOOL NTNC require full me staffing.
1225022‐03G DCR TOLLAND STATE FOREST TNC The town has hired a full me WWTP operator and 1225013‐01G OTIS RIDGE SKI AREA TNC maintenance staff members are working on obtaining
O s Master Plan Appendix
the necessary cer fica ons so that they can fill in as water systems are either Transient Non‐Community operators. This has helped to reduce the operating Systems (TNC), or Non Transient Non‐Community Sys‐ costs of the WWTP by elimina ng the need for outside tems (NTNC). TNC Systems typically serve at least 25 contractors. different people, for at least 60 days a year, such as at a restaurant or campground. On the other hand, NTNC Potential Sewer Expansion Systems serve at least 25 of the same people each day, In recent years, the town has seen the WWTP as a ve‐ at least 6 months a year, such as a workplace that pro‐ hicle for economic development. A 2014 grant, pre‐ vides water to its employees . All of the public water pared in coopera on with Berkshire Regional Planning systems in O s are of the TNC or NTNC type. Commission sought funds from the MassWorks infra‐ structure Program for a sewer line extension that According to Mass. GIS, there are 43 public water sup‐ would have connected the O s Ridge Ski Area and two ply wells in O s (see Table C7). These wells serve town residences to the WWTP. The ski area was selected as and public buildings, restaurants, and places of busi‐ part of a 2013 direct local technical assistance (DLTA) ness. Addi onally, they include shared well systems project that iden fied suitable priority areas for sewer around Big Pond and O s Reservoir (see Map 6 –Water expansion. In addi on to the ski area, its associated Resources). These public drinking water wells are all restaurant, the Grouse House, would have been con‐ surrounded by interim well‐head protec on areas nected to sewer as well. (IWPA), which provide a 500’ buffer around the well‐ head for TNC systems and a 750’ buffer around NTNC The benefits of sewer expansion iden fied by the systems. grant proposal included a rac ng development in‐ vestment, the crea on and reten on of jobs, as well In the past, the town has experienced well contamina‐ as environmental and public health protec ons. Cur‐ on, primarily due to road salt used along Route 8. rently, the sewer system only serves users along Route For more informa on, please refer to the transporta‐ 8 in O s. The proposed project would have extended on por on of this appendix or Chapter 7— the line along the Route 23 right of way. Addi onally, Transporta on. it would have allowed the ski area to consider higher density housing around the resource in the future. A Broadband Internet Development le er of support from the WWTP’s chief operator not‐ One of the programs of the American Investment and ed that the sewer extension would have benefited the Recovery act of 2009 included significant federal fund‐ treatment plant by filling needed capacity. The ad‐ ing for broadband internet expansion. In Mas‐ di onal effluent would have helped to support a more sachuse s, state legisla on created the Massachuse s stable and effec ve treatment process. Unfortunate‐ Broadband Ins tute (MBI). This organiza on was ly, the grant was not chosen for funding. Currently, tasked with installa on of the “middle mile” which the wastewater treatment plant s ll has excess capaci‐ connects the internet network’s core to local distribu‐ ty. However, due to the high costs associated with on hubs. In February 2014, MBI announced that it sewer construc on, expansion would not be possible had completed work on the middle mile installa on. without outside funding. However, significant work and funding is required be‐ fore many individual users will see high speed internet. Public Drinking Water Wells As defined by the Massachuse s Department of Envi‐ In 2011, a group of towns formed a coopera ve called ronmental Protec on, public water systems are de‐ WiredWest to help advance installa on of the “last fined as those supplies having 15 or more connec ons, mile”, in which broadband internet connec ons are or regularly serving an average of at least 25 people established for individual homes and users. O s was daily, at least 60 days a year. Public water systems can one of the original member towns that signed the or‐ be either Community Water Systems (CWS) or Non‐ ganiza on’s charter. As with O s’s wind energy pro‐ Community Water systems (NCWS). Non‐community ject, the forma on of a municipal light plant (essen ally crea ng a public u lity) was key to Wired‐
West’s plans for broadband expansion. WiredWest nue to repay the Town of O s for the debt it takes on func ons as a coopera ve of individual municipal light to establish its broadband network. plants or individual public u li es. The town created the municipal light plant during a unanimous vote in A special town mee ng was held on October 6th 2015, December, 2010 (O s Annual Report, 2010). A second in which the town voted to appropriate funds for the town vote suppor ng WiredWest passed by a wide crea on of its broadband network. The warrant ar cle margin in 2011. However, WiredWest is not the only authorizing funding passed by a vote of 132 to 16. A en ty working to connect communi es to broadband subsequent town mee ng will vote on whether to ex‐ internet. Communi es such as Alford and Levere empt these costs from Proposi on 2 1/2. have chosen to pursue broadband development di‐ rectly through MBI, rather than relying on the cooper‐ a ve formed through WiredWest as a “middle man”.
The cost of broad‐band installa on in each of the 32 WiredWest member towns is es mated to be as much as $120 million Currently, state funding will cover 40% of these costs, leaving the towns with around $79 mil‐ lion in final costs (WiredWest, 2015). For the Town of O s, the total cost of installing a broadband internet network is es mated at $5.5 million dollars, with the state contribu ng $1.8 million. This leaves a net cost of $3.7 million to the Town of O s.
During its mee ng on August 11th, the O s Board of Selectmen voted to withdraw from the WiredWest coopera ve, ci ng concurring opinions with the town’s Technology Commi ee and Finance Board to pursue development of its broadband network with MBI instead. Among the reasons cited by the town for the withdrawal from WiredWest were a desire for the town to own and control its broadband network. Ad‐ di onally, leaving the coopera ve would allow the town to choose its own network opera ves and inter‐ net service providers on a short term compe ve ba‐ sis.
Moreover, the Select Board cited economy of scale benefits in design and construc on that would be real‐ ized through a partnership with MBI that would not be possible with WiredWest. Furthermore, the Board cited several financial issues with WiredWest including high staffing costs and expected repayment of debt services incurred by the town. The Select Board cited high costs associated with WiredWest’s business plan, par cularly sales and marke ng staff and other offic‐ ers amoun ng to a payroll in excess of $1.5 million per year. Addi onally, it stated that it does not an cipate that WiredWest will be able to generate enough reve‐
O s Master Plan Appendix
SERVICES
Police squad responded to 171 rescue calls, which was a The O s Police Department is a seven member force slight decrease from 2012 (190 calls). In 2011, the that currently operates from town hall. Staff includes squad purchased a new ambulance through dona ons six officers and a police Chief. and previous funds that were set up for the large ex‐ pense. Addi onally, it purchased a power stretcher The department has seen an increase in calls over the with dona ons. In 2013, the squad transi oned to past few years with a 400% increase (to 626) in the electronic run repor ng to meet state requirements. number of calls seen between 2009 and 2010. Be‐ The rescue squad has cer fied CPR instructors and has tween 2010 and 2011, calls increased another 50% (to teamed up with the O s Recrea on Center to teach 942). According to annual town reports, the depart‐ CPR classes. The squad will also take blood pressures ment saw an increase in arrests and criminal com‐ for those who stop by the firehouse. plaint applica ons during 2010‐2011, as well as calls for burglar alarms, medical calls, mutual aid, and fire‐ Fire Department arms complaints. However, during that same me, the The O s Fire Department is staffed primarily by volun‐ number of domes c disturbance and motor vehicle teers and operates from two firehouses in O s Center accidents decreased (O s Annual report, 2011). Since and East O s. The department currently has 26 mem‐ 2011, calls have decreased slightly. bers.
The Police Department has been ac vely engaged The O s fire department responded to 88 calls in 2013 in training including coursework in defensive tac cs, which was a slight decrease from the 93 calls it re‐ domes c violence, underage drinking preven on, and sponded to in 2012. The department ac vely trains firearms training. Moreover, the department has par‐ with surrounding towns and at the Massachuse s Fire cipated in specialized training with FEMA and the Academy. Department of Homeland Security involving hazardous materials, suicide preven on, and cyber crime. Addi‐ In 2011, the fire department helped with the response onally, the town has received grants in recent years to Hurricane Irene as well as a tornado that damaged to upgrade its facili es, including the construc on of por ons of Springfield, Ma. The state disaster team an interview and booking room in the police garage. requested support from O s and the department sent In 2012, the O s Police received a grant from the Mas‐ 5 members and a truck to help with search and rescue sachuse s Emergency Management Agency opera ons both in Springfield and Brimfield. for digital tablets and cameras. (O s Annual report, 2012). Library The O s Library connects residents to a collec on of The department has conducted a significant amount of over 10,000 books, audiobooks, DVD’s and other me‐ outreach including the development of a camp pro‐ dia. The library contains five computers for public use gram during April school vaca on to help children de‐ and has subscrip ons to online services allowing users velop a rapport with officers. The department also to explore their genealogy. Moreover, the library holds similar events during August and for Halloween. works to obtain passes to events, museums, and other The department has received grant funding as well as area a rac ons. many private dona ons to develop these programs. In 2010, the O s Library joined the Central and West‐ Rescue Squad ern Automated Resource and Sharing system (C/ The O s Rescue Squad provides rescue, ambulance an WMARS). This allows the library catalog, as well as the emergency medical service to the town. The squad catalog of over 100 other Massachuse s libraries to be currently has 13 members. With the excep on of two available through an inter‐library loan system (O s full me EMT’s, the staff are volunteers. In 2013, the Annual Report, 2010). Patrons can select books and
other resources from any one of the member libraries and have it delivered to their local library. In 2012, the library es mated that circula on increased 35%.
The library has also added many audiobooks and DVDs in recent years. Addi onally, it has five computers for public use as well as digital E‐Readers (O s Annual Re‐ port, 2012). The library is ac ve in seeking out local authors to present their work and hosts events throughout the year. Also, it has partnered with the Recrea on Center to hold classes in genealogy and kni ng.
Recrea on Center (Harmony Hall) The O s Recrea on Center provides weight li ing, car‐ dio‐aerobic and other exercise equipment for use by town residents.
The Rec. Center also has several computers for public use as well as pool tables. The center offers numerous exercise and cra classes and offers space for groups such as the local quil ng club. For more informa on about the O s Rec. Center see Appendix C—Exis ng Condi ons sec on on open space and recrea on, as well as Chapter 10: Open Space and Recrea on.
Town Website The town operates a website (h p:// www.townofo sma.com) that serves as a central loca‐ on for town data. The website allows for access to board and commi ee mee ng mes, agendas, and minutes. An online mapping service allows users to access parcel data for the en re town as well as view wetlands, FEMA flood areas, and roads. Addi onally, the website contains a calendar of local events and displays links to area businesses.
Public Survey Results The results of the public survey showed that most sur‐ vey respondents wished to keep exis ng town services the same. For the complete results of the public sur‐ vey, see Appendix E.
O s Master Plan Appendix
HOUSING
Housing Supply According to the 2009‐2013 American Community Sur‐ vey, the vast majority (1,564 units or 93.9%) of hous‐ ing stock was of the 1‐unit detached (single family) type. This figure is from an es mated total of 1,666 housing units. There is li le mul ‐family housing in the town. Only 3.1%, or 53 units, are in structures containing 2 or more units of housing. Addi onally, there were no building permits issued for mul ‐unit housing between 2000 and 2013. An es mated 2.7%, or 45 units, of housing are mobile homes. Finally, 4 units, or .2% of all housing, is of the 1‐unit a ached type. These housing units consist of structures with one or more shared wall such as in a townhouse or row house.
None of the town’s housing units are listed by the De‐ partment of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) as Chapter 40B qualifying units (DHCD, 2014). “Chapter 40B Units” are units considered affordable by low‐ and moderate‐income households with long‐ term restric ons that ensure that it will con nue to be affordable. Low income is defined as income equal to or less than 80% of the median income for the area. 40B authorizes a housing agency or developer to ob‐ Moderate income is defined as income between 80 tain a single comprehensive permit for the construc‐ and 95% of the median income for the area. Chapter on of subsidized low‐ or moderate‐income housing. If a community, in which less than 10% of its total year‐ round housing stock is subsidized low‐ or moderate‐ income housing, denies a comprehensive permit, or imposes condi ons that make the project economical‐ ly unviable, the developer may appeal to the state Housing Appeals Commi ee for review of the local ac on.
Home Value Trends In 2000, the median sale price of a home in O s was $155,000, while by 2014 it had increased 67.7% to $260,000 (Banker and Tradesman Online, 2015). Com‐ pared with neighboring towns, O s is more affordable than Monterey or Tyringham. However, home prices are more expensive in O s than in Becket (See Figure 6.1—Chapter 6). As of 2014, home sale prices are com‐ parable to Sandisfield. Home prices are s ll less afford‐ able than the overall county (median of $184,500 in 2014). In 2000, the majority of homes were in the $50,000 to $149,999 price range. However, by 2013,
Table C8 ‐ Housing Occupancy in O s 1990‐2010 Source: Community Development Plan 2004, 2010 U.S. Census Number in % of Total, Number in % of total, % Change Number in % of Total, % Change 1990 1990 2000 2000 1990‐2000 2010 2010 2000‐2010
Seasonal 961 68% 972 62% ‐6% 938 55% ‐7% Year Round 315 22% 476 30% + 8% 611 36% + 6% Rental 85 6% 91 6% 0% 97 6% 0 Vacant Units 63 4% 33 2% ‐2% 55 3% + 1% Vacant Units _ _ _ For Rent 7 0.45% 7 0.41% ‐<1% Vacant Units for Sale _ _ _ 10 0.64% 11 0.65% <1% Total Housing 1,424 1,572 + 10.4% 1,701 + 8.2% Stock:
most homes in O s were valued at $200,000 to the impact that seasonal housing has on the town. $499,999, with an es mated 37 homes valued at O s’s loca on in the southern Berkshires makes it $1,000,000 or more. strongly impacted by the seasonal rental and second home markets from major ci es such as New York City Home Sales Vs. New Construc on and Boston. Sales of single family homes in O s fell from a 2002 high to a 2010 low. Sales have increased since 2010, As of the 2010 Census, seasonal housing is es mated but seen fluctua ons. Addi onally, the number of to comprise 55% of all housing units within the town. building permits for construc on of new single family Es mates by the town assessor are even higher. Ques‐ homes began to fall in 2006, with no building permits onnaires sent by the assessor to households ask if for new single family residences issued in 2009. Since they are second homeowners or not. Data based on 2009, the yearly issuance of building permits for new these ques onnaires indicates that the percentage of homes have remained in the single digits. Town offi‐ second homes in town is 68% . Seasonal residents cials have indicated that there has been a shi in re‐ have a huge poten al impact on town businesses, cent years away from construc on of new homes to‐ roads and infrastructure, as well as the overall popula‐ wards more renova ons and addi ons to exis ng on. homes (Larry Gould, Personal Communica on, 2015). Housing Affordability Housing Ownership and Occupancy Data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban The town has a predominantly single‐family housing Development (HUD) indicates that based on income stock with most being owner occupied. Since 1990, levels determined from the 2007‐2011 American Com‐ the percentage of seasonal housing units has been munity Survey, approximately 100, or 18% of house‐ declining. Between 2000 and 2010, the number of sea‐ holds in O s earn between 50 and 80% of the HUD sonal housing units declined by 7%. However, the Area Median Family Income (HAMFI). HAMFI for O s number of year‐round residences increased by 6% in 2011 was $71,500. This value is derived from the over the same me period. This increase could be due Census American Community Survey median income to second homeowners transi oning into their sum‐ value for the town and is adjusted for infla on and the mer homes into their year‐round residences. Consumer Price Index (CPI). In the town of O s, an es mated 224 households, or 40% of households earn However, this downward trend should not discount less than 80% of the HAMFI, meaning income for these
O s Master Plan Appendix
Table C9 ‐ Housing Issues in O s, MA Source: HUD, 2015 based on the 2007‐2011 Census American Survey Income Distribu on Owner Renter Total Household Income <= 30% HAMFI** 70 10 80 (14%) Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI 40 4 44 (8%) Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI 100 0 100 (18%) Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI 40 4 44 (8%) Household Income >100% HAMFI 275 20 295 (52%) Total 530 40 570 (100%)
Housing Problems Owner Renter Total Household has 1 of 4 Housing Problems* 115 20 135 (24%) Household has none of 4 Housing Problems 395 20 415 (73%) Cost Burden not available 20 0 20 (3%) Total 530 40 570 (100%)
Housing Cost Burden*** Owner Renter Total Cost Burden <=30% 399 24 423 (74%) Cost Burden >30% to <=50% 23 4 27 (5%) Cost Burden >50% 89 14 103 (18%) Cost Burden not available 20 0 20 (3%) Total 530 40 570 (100%) **HAMFI stands for “HUD Area Median Family Income”. For the year 2011, HAMFI in the town of O s was equal to $71,500. HUD calculates its own income values differently from those reported in Census informa on. Census data for income is adjusted based on the consumer price index (CPI) and infla on trends. Finally the value is rounded to the nearest $100. *The four housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facili es, incomplete plumbing facili es, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 30%. ***Cost burden is the ra o of housing costs to household income. For renters, housing cost is gross rent (contract rent plus u li es). For owners, housing cost is "select monthly owner costs", which includes mortgage payment, u li es, as‐ socia on fees, insurance, and real estate taxes. Note: All data is by household. HUD household totals have been rounded to the nearest 10.
households is less than $57,200 per year. HUD defines these households as having low income. considered “housing burdened”. Within the Town of O s, an es mated 130, or 23% of households are con‐ Addi onally, HUD data indicates that as many as 135 sidered housing burdened, with the majority of these households, or 24% of households, have 1 of 4 possi‐ housing burdened households having a cost burden ble housing problems. These can include incomplete above 50% (see Table C9) kitchen facili es, incomplete plumbing facili es, more than 1 person per room, or cost burden greater than 30%. Cost burden is defined as the ra o of housing costs to household income. When housing costs are equal to or greater than 30% of income, a household is
TRANSPORTATION
Regional Roadways of town maintained roads). Private contractors Two major roadways serve O s: Route 8 and Route 23. maintain the remainder of O s’s roadways. These Route 8 runs north from the border with Clarksburg, roads total 42.5 miles or 38.47% of all roads in town. VT south to Sandisfield and the Connec cut state line. Route 23 runs east to west. It begins in Egremont, MA Rail and terminates in Russell. Route 23 is known as the Passenger rail service is available from sta ons located “Knox Trail” as it follows the approximate route of in the Ci es of Pi sfield or Springfield, Ma. Pi sfield is General Knox as he brought cannons from Fort approximately 40 minutes from O s Center Village by Ticonderoga to Boston. The 2013 Road Condi on car. Springfield is slightly farther, approximately a 1‐ Report prepared by BRPC notes that in comparison to hour drive from the Town of O s. other Berkshire towns, O s benefits from the fact that its major arterial roadways (Routes 8 and 23) are Airports maintained by the state. Other communi es that Major airports for commercial travel include Bradley must maintain por ons of their arterials face Interna onal in Har ord, CT and Albany Interna onal significant annual costs because these roads carry the Airport in Albany, NY. Both airports are approximately most traffic and can deteriorate the fastest. a 1‐hour drive from O s Center village.
A por on of Interstate 90 (I‐90) runs through the Bus Transit northeast corner of O s. The nearest I‐90 exits are Within Berkshire County, bus transit service is located to the west, at exit #2 in the Town of Lee or to provided throughout the county by Berkshire Regional the east at exit #3 in the City of Wes ield. The Town Transit Authority (BRTA). No bus line currently serves of Lee interstate access is roughly a 20 minute drive the town. The closest BRTA stop is in Great Barrington, from O s Center village. The City of Wes ield I‐90 about a half hour drive from the Town of O s. access is slightly farther, roughly a 30 minute drive
from O s Center. Maintenance of I‐90, as well as Routes 8 and 23, is the responsibility of the Elderly and Disabled Transporta on Massachuse s Department of Transporta on Southern Berkshire Elderly Transporta on Corpora on (MassDOT). A MassDOT maintenance garage is (SBETC) and Berkshire Regional Transporta on Agency located just north of O s Center on Route 8. State (BRTA) Paratransit provide transporta on services for maintained roadways comprise 23.52 miles of elderly and disabled residents in O s. roadway in O s, or 21.39% of all roads (See Table 7.1 in Chapter 7—Transporta on). SBETC is based out of Great Barrington and serves the towns of Great Barrington, Egremont, Alford, Sheffield, Local Roadways Sandisfield, O s, Monterey and New Marlborough. Service from SBETC is on‐demand and picks passengers O s is a rural community, and as such, the predomi‐ up at their homes for a small fee. Passengers must nant form of transporta on is by automobiles or place a reserva on in advance of travel, reques ng a trucks. The town has many private roads, some of pick up and lis ng the local des na on they wish to which serve O s’s private communi es (See Table 7.1 travel. for a list of road maintenance demand by en ty)
Private roads rely on private contractors for BRTA paratransit is a county wide on‐demand ride maintenance and snow plowing needs. The O s service. A small fee for rides is charged, and a Highway Department maintains 43.91 miles or 39.94% reserva on must be made in advance. Unlike SBETC, of roads within town. These roadways include BRTA paratransit passengers must fill out an Tyringham Road, Becket Road, Lee Wes ield Road, applica on before being approved to use the service. Reservoir Road, Tolland Road, and West Center Road,
to name a few (See Table C10 in this appendix for a list
O s Master Plan Appendix
Pedestrian Transporta on $10,000 of addi onal funds on other materials to Sidewalks extend roughly a half mile through most of repair and patch roads, signs and culverts (BRPC, O s Center, along Route 8. Sidewalk begins north of 2012). The town’s highway department includes a Town Hall near the O s cemetery and extending south supervisor and three laborers. The town makes to just beyond Wi er Rd. repairs to roadways throughout the year, plans for larger projects requiring chapter 90 funding and works The Farmington River Walk, a recrea onal trail, is also on snow removal and winter maintenance needs. located in O s center, with its only access point located behind the parking lot of St. Mary of the Lakes Road Jurisdic on Issues Church. For more informa on on walking and hiking During its dra ing of the Master Plan, in prepara on trails within O s, please see Chapter 10—Open Space of the 2005 Town of O s Status of Roads and Official and Recrea on of the full text of the O s Open Space Map Report, and in the 2013 Road Condi on Report, and Recrea on Plan. BRPC discovered some discrepancies in road jurisdic on and maintenance data available for the Transporta on and Roadway Funding town of O s. Federal Funding Firstly, BRPC discovered that several roads (Great In Massachuse s, towns may nominate poten al road Woods Road, a por on of Old Quarry Road, Chandler repairs and improvements to their Regional Planning Road, Kibbe Point Road, Laurel Drive and Lincoln Road) Agencies as part of the regional Transporta on are maintained by the town and are not included in Improvement Program (TIP). This program helps to the town’s list of Chapter 90 funded roadways. The designate federal funding towards eligible road 2013 Road Condi on Report notes that nearly three projects. O s may nominate projects to the TIP miles of roads maintained by the town are not program administered through the Berkshire Regional accounted for in the Commonwealth’s Road Inventory Planning Commission. Only roadways designated as File (RIF) which is used as the basis for the Chapter 90 “arterial” or “collector” are eligible for funding funding formula. Thus, poten al state funding for through the TIP. Addi onally, the town has a these roadways is lost and the town’s overall Chapter representa ve that serves on the regional 90 funding (which could be used for other roadways) is Transporta on Advisory Commi ee (TAC). The TAC reduced. helps to priori ze projects nominated by the TIP program. Secondly, data available from the MassDOT Road
Inventory File (RIF) shows roads owned and State Funding maintained by state agencies (MassDOT and DCR) and The Commonwealth of Massachuse s provides the town. However, all other roads in the town are addi onal roadway funding through its Chapter 90 labeled as “unknown”. While these “unknown” roads reimbursement program. This program provides are most likely comprised of privately owned and funding for other roadway projects not eligible for the maintained roads, some roads owned and/or TIP program and is allocated based on popula on, maintained by the town are likely included. BRPC had employment level, and miles of roadway within town. also conducted extensive research for the Town of O s However, as a reimbursement program, the town in 2005 to develop an official map (which was never must fully fund any roadway project before it can be adopted). As part of the research for the crea on of compensated by state funding. Yearly Chapter 90 the official map, BRPC developed a Status of Roads funding for O s is around $180,000. and Official Map Report which documented all roads within the town and listed both the right of way owner Town Funding and the maintenance/legal responsibility. The report Yearly town highway funding is around $100,000 made recommenda ons for poten al future ac ons by (Chris Morris, Personal Communica on 2015). The the town, such as vo ng to discon nue roads, to 2013 Road Condi on Report noted that O s spends discon nue maintenance or to designate roads as around $50,000 per year on gravel and chipseal and
Table C10 ‐ Roads Maintained by the Town of O s, MA Source: BRPC Town of O s Road Condi on Report
Segment Type Name Segment Type Old Barrington Road To Becket Algerie Road Town Line Collector Marcy Road Merri Road to Dead End Local Algerie Road Ex‐ Old Barrington Road To Algerie tension Road Local Merri Road Route 8 to Becket Road Local Becket Town Line To Blandford Miller Swamp Blandford Road to Blandford Becket Road Road Collector Road Town Line Local North Blandford Road Local Miner Road Route 8 ‐ Dead End Local Old Blandford New Hollywood Road Local Boulevard Blandford Road to Dead End Local Reservoir Road to Blandford Chandler Road Lee Wes ield Road To Dead End Local Norton Road Road Local Churchill Road Becket Road To Dead End Local Old Quarry Road Local Great Barrington Road To Sandis‐ field Town Line And Route 8 To Route 8 to Sandisfield Town Cold Spring Road Sandisfield Town Line Local Beech Plain Road Line Local Great Barrington Road to Dimmock Road Route 8 To Becket Town Line Local Pearl Road West Center Road Local
Ed Jones Road Route 8 ‐ Stebbins Road Local Pine Road Reservoir Road to Kibbe Road Local Gibbs Road Blandford Road To Becket Road Local Reservoir Road Route 8 to Blandford Road Local Gibbs Road Exten‐ Westerly A Venue to Dead sion Gibbs Road ‐ Dead End Local Ridge Avenue End Local West Center Road to Dim‐ mock Road (not maintained beyond gravel por on of Giles Road Stebbins Road ‐ Dead End Local Stebbins Road road) Local Great Woods Road Local Tannery Road Route 8 to Dead End Local Tolland Town Line to Reser‐ Jones Road Route 8 to Becket Town Line Local Tolland Road voir Road Local Great Barrington Road to Dead Great Barrington Road to Judd Road End Local Town Hill Road Sandisfield Town Line Local Great Barrington Road to Kibbe Road Tolland Road ‐ Dead End Local Tyringham Road Tyringham Town Line Local West Center Great Barrington Road to Kibbe Point Road Local Road Tyringham Road Local Great Barrington Road to Laurel Drive Local West Shore Road Tyringham Road Local Lee Wes ield Blandford Town Line to Becket Blandford Town Line to Dead Road Road Collector Westerly Road End Local
O s Master Plan Appendix
statutory public ways. These ac ons would allow the zoning by‐laws and subdivision regula ons, new town to end legal liability and maintenance development can only occur along land abu ng a responsibility, as in the case of roads that are owned discon nued road via the full subdivision approval by, but not ac vely maintained by the town. process, which gives the Town much greater control over the proposed development. Discon nuance is The status of roads has important ramifica ons for thus an important tool in controlling 1) legal development, as Approval Not Required (ANR) responsibility and liability and 2) growth management. subdivision is generally not allowed on private roads or Statutory Private Ways. Subdivision on these types Discontinuance of Maintenance of roadways must follow the full subdivision review Discon nuance of maintenance is authorized under process. M.G.L. Chap. 82, Sec. 32A and results in the cessa on of the Town’s responsibility for maintenance and The adop on of an Official Map by the town would liability for use of the road (so long as the road is create a legal document that would resolve any issues adequately posted as not maintained), but the road of road maintenance or responsibility. However, the remains a public way with a public right of passage, town would then become responsible for con nuous and with the poten al for strip and ANR development. monitoring of road status changes, which entails Discon nuance of maintenance in Sec on 32A is a corresponding updates to the Official Map and Select Board ac on intended for roads that have repor ng of the updates to the Registry of Deeds, become “abandoned and unused for ordinary travel MassDOT and the Massachuse s Department of and that the common convenience and necessity no Housing and Community Development (DHCD). longer requires said town way…to be maintained in a condi on reasonably safe and convenient for travel….” Options for Altering Legal Road Statuses In order to resolve the road status inconsistencies or Statutory Private Ways ques ons that have been iden fied in the 2005 status Statutory Private Ways are unique to Massachuse s. of roads and official map report, BRPC generally They are actually public roads, with public right of recommends that towns pursue one of three possible passage, but no responsibility by the Town for ac ons including road discon nuance, discon nuance maintenance. Maintenance is provided by the of maintenance, and designa on of roads as statutory abu ers. This is a good op on for the Select Board if it private ways. Many of these ac ons must be taken up is unclear that the road in ques on meets the “unused by the Select Board and some may need to be for ordinary travel” requirements of M.G.L. Chap. 82, approved by Town Mee ng vote. Typically the ac ons Sec. 32A but the Town wants to end maintenance and requiring approval at Town Mee ng can be laid out in legal liability obliga ons for the road. In prac ce, the a series of ar cles in the Town Warrant. Select Board can recommend discon nuing the road in ques on by Town Mee ng vote, and then lay it out as Discontinuance a Statutory Private Way and recommend the Town Discon nuance of a road must be approved by Town vote to accept it as such at the same Town Mee ng. Mee ng vote under M.G.L. Chap. 82, Sec. 21 According to a Massachuse s Supreme Judicial Court completely ends the public right of passage along a ruling (Casagrande v. Town of Harvard, 1979), road or way: the Town ends all legal responsibility for Statutory Private Ways are not considered sufficient the road’s maintenance and its liability for use. In for public access under the Subdivision Control Act, most cases, the discon nued road can no longer serve and therefore cannot be used as frontage for ANR lots as frontage or access for development of land abu ng or strip development. It is up to local interpreta on of the discon nued road, including strip or frontage Town zoning and subdivision regula ons to determine development and Approval Not Required (ANR) whether Statutory Private Ways meet the public development under the Subdivision Control Law access requirements for the full subdivision approval (Chap. 41, Sec 81K‐ 81GG). Depending on the Town’s process. In some cases, Statutory Private Ways may
have to be laid out again and accepted at Town Cold Spring Road West Mee ng as full‐fledged Town roads, with public right North Blandford Road of passage and maintenance. Statutory Private Ways differ from private roads in that public access is Bridges in Need of Repair: allowed on a Statutory Private Way, where it can be Gibbs Road Bridge restricted on a private road. Tannery Road Bridge Cold Spring South Road Bridge Road Maintenance and Recent and Upcoming Roadway Work Complete Streets In 2013, BRPC completed a road condi on report for “Complete Streets” is a transporta on concept that the Town of O s. This report evaluated all roads examines the design of roadways to enable safe access maintained by the town using the Pavement Surface for all users, regardless of age, ability, or mode of Evalua on and Ra ng (PASER) scale to determine transporta on (automobile, bicycle, or on foot). which roads were most in need of repair and help to Complete Streets is not a “one size fits all” solu on, priori ze future roadway projects. Tyringham Road, in but rather a kit of parts and possible solu ons that can the southwest corner of the town, was rated the most be applied to any street or roadway. Complete streets deficient asphalt road. Addi onally, the report also connects with issues of public health, by iden fied Algerie Road and Reservoir Road (recently improving safety for all roadway users and repaired) as projects that would require significant encouraging exercise through walking and cycling. Chapter 90 funds, but were in need of rehabilita on. Within O s, small changes to the roadway, such as Priority unpaved road projects include Becket Road, increased marking and signage, as well as restriping Merri Road and Lee Wes ield Road. and recoloring crosswalks, could do much to enhance safety and increase travel by pedestrian and cyclists. Recently completed roadway work includes the These measures could also help to calm or slow traffic repaving of 1.8 miles of Reservoir Road with hot mix in the village center. asphalt (HMA), and the repaving of Kibbe Road. Addi onally, 3,840 feet of Tolland Road was recently Outside of village centers, measures such as shoulder repaved. The town is also in the process of replacing widening or roadside pathways (in addi on to several culverts. increased signage) could improve safety for walkers and cyclists. These changes to the roadway could be Roadway Needs as simple as narrowing lanes for vehicle traffic during The following summarizes priority roadway needs for rou ne restriping work to increase the shoulder width the town and was provided by Derek Poirier, available for pedestrians and cyclists. superintendent of the O s highway department. Walking Loops Priority Asphalt Roads to be Repaired: Several Berkshire towns have iden fied “walking Pine Road loops” in town centers and on quiet rural roads. These Tyringham Road walking loops help to encourage pedestrian use and West Center Road (1 mile por on from Monterey exercise, especially for elderly residents. Walking Road intersec on) loops should be well marked and located on rela vely Pearl Road flat terrain to enable use by residents of any age. Town Hill Road A walking loop could be easily established on exis ng Recent TIP Requests (for full depth road sidewalks in O s center. Signage could mark a 1/2 and 1‐mile walking loop and could also direct residents to reclamation): the Recrea on Center in Harmony Hall and Farmington Old Blandford Road River Walk Trail. The walking loop could also extend Cold Spring Road South
O s Master Plan Appendix
through the paved roadway of the O s Cemetery. Highway Department (MHD) decided to conduct an in depth inves ga on. However, the inves ga on was Transporta on and the Environment limited to wells that belonged to residents with a Road Salt and Well Contamination documented sodium restricted diet, or wells that had contamina on levels in excess of 250mg/L. Most of Road Salt (Sodium Chloride or NaCl) can be a major the wells were never replaced by MHD due to the contaminant of groundwater due its use as a de‐icer presence of bacterial contamina on, and poten al for roadways. Drinking water contaminated by contamina on from the municipal salt storage area. In Sodium Chloride can exacerbate high blood pressure the end, only two of the seven wells tested were (hypertension) and damage organs. Addi onally, high replaced by MHD in 1994, which included MHD’s own levels can harm fish, amphibians, and other aqua c well at their maintenance facility and the well of a species. However, road salt is not the only poten al resident on a sodium restricted diet. Another well was contributor of Sodium Chloride to drinking water. replaced by a resident without funding or Sep c systems, as well as water so ening systems can reimbursement by MHD. Addi onal tes ng of wells both lead to elevated Sodium Chloride concentra ons along Route 8 was most recently completed in 2001 in drinking water. (Ma os, 2002). For the most part, tes ng in 2001
revealed that Sodium levels had declined significantly Prior to 1993, Sodium Chloride was a regulated since the first round of tes ng in the early 1990’s. contaminant with a maximum level of 20 milligrams/
Liter (mg/L) established by the U.S. Environmental Salt contamina on remains an ongoing issue for the Protec on Agency (EPA). A er 1993, the EPA stopped town. The drinking water well that currently serves regula ng Sodium Chloride as a contaminant. Today the town Recrea on Center, Library, and the O s the EPA lists Sodium Chloride on its “contaminant Congrega onal Church, is planned to be replaced due candidate list”, which includes chemicals that are not to salt contamina on. As of the me of this wri ng, subject to any current drinking water regula ons. The the town is coordina ng with state agencies to EPA issues non‐enforceable guidance levels for the nego ate the new well’s loca on. level of Sodium Chloride in water at the level of 20mg/
L, which was developed based on individuals with MassDOT has had policies in place for some me to restricted sodium intake. Addi onally it recommends address poten al well contamina on. MassDOT will that levels not exceed 30‐60mg/L. Around this conduct an inves ga on of a private water supply if: concentra on level, water becomes no ceably salty in taste. A resident is on a documented sodium restricted
diet of less than 1,000 mg/d and the sodium Beginning in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, some concentra on in the water supply exceeds 20 mg/ O s residents began to no ce problems with elevated l, or; sodium concentra ons in public and private wells A resident is on a documented sodium restricted along Route 8. Tes ng was conducted on diet of less than 2,000 mg/d and the sodium approximately 20 wells at the request of the town’s concentra on in the water supply exceeds 40 mg/ Planning Board. Many of the wells were found to have l, or; sodium chloride concentra ons in excess of 20 mg/l. The chloride concentra on in a domes c supply In 1991, the town began working with the well exceeds 250 mg/l. Massachuse s Highway Department (Now MassDOT) and the Massachuse s Department of Environmental Possible ac ons based on the inves ga on include: Protec on (DEP) to address issues of poten al well contamina on. Construc on of a replacement well
Connec on to a public water supply Based on informa on provided by the town, the Mass.
Installa on of a water treatment system Denial of the salt complaint Sediment can cause water quality issues for both Highway drainage modifica ons or improvements humans and wildlife. Sediment can affect the Designa on of a reduced salt zone (typically aesthe c quality of recrea on areas, as well as reserved for Municipal Water Supplies) accumulate in drainage structures, causing them to fail. Moreover, sediment pollu on and the related Possible reasons for denial of the complaint include: process of erosion can destroy cri cal infrastructure The water is not potable due to non‐highway such as roads and culverts. Addi onally, related contamina on, sedimenta on can cause dams and reservoirs to fill in It is determined that poor well construc on allows at an accelerated rate. In aqua c habitats, sediment surface contamina on to readily enter the well, can cause harm to fish gills and cause spawning areas MassDOT is not the primary source of salt to fill in. Small organisms that live in stream and lake contamina on to the water supply, or beds may be suffocated as sediment accumulates over The well is located too close to a sep c system, as them. This can lead to a breakdown in the aqua c outlined in the state’s Title V code. food chain (BRPC 2004).
For addi onal informa on on well contamina on in Proper maintenance of unpaved roads can help to O s, please refer to the Farmington River Watershed address issues of NPS pollu on by sediment. Many of Road Salt Review, prepared by Michael Ma os for the the possible maintenance ac ons include Massachuse s Execu ve Office of Environmental those that are already performed by the town as part Affairs. of rou ne road maintenance to prevent road failure or to address issues such as dust. In general, For addi onal informa on on poten al contaminated communi es wishing to address sediment pollu on well replacement, please refer to the MassDOT Salt should work to fix exis ng drainage and erosion Remedia on program, available at h ps:// problems on their unpaved roads, such as managing www.massdot.state.ma.us/highway/Departments/ ditches to ensure they have adequate gravel or EnvironmentalServices/SaltRemedia onProgram/ vegeta ve cover or installing check dams to reduce PrivateWells.aspx. water velocity. Road grading and shaping, which are usually performed yearly by towns, can also help to Unpaved Roads and Non‐Point Source maintain the road crown which can reduce erosion Pollution and therefore sediment pollu on. While these Unpaved or dirt roads are a major source of non‐point rou ne maintenance ac vi es can help to address sediment pollu on, implementa on of BMP’s specific source pollu on such as sediment, or soil par cles to sediment reduc on can provide extra water quality that are suspended in water. Sediment from unpaved protec ons par cularly in ecologically sensi ve areas roads is one of the main contributors to water quality or where sediment issues could degrade recrea onal problems in the Farmington River Watershed in Massachuse s. (BRPC 1997). Non‐point source water resources.
pollu on is dis nguished from point source pollu on, BRPC has been involved with several studies of the which refers to pollu on that has a par cular entry Farmington River Watershed, including the site such as a factory's smokestack or pipe. With the development of a watershed wide ac on plan in 1997 decline of point source pollu on problems due to the Clean Water Act of 1972, nonpoint source pollu on to address issues of non‐point source pollu on, the crea on of a system of Best Management Prac ces has become a growing concern. Nonpoint source (BMPs) for unpaved roads in 2001, and community (NPS) pollu on, unlike pollu on from sewage level assessments of possible improvements to treatment plants and industrial discharge pipes, comes from many diffuse sources. address sediment pollu on from unpaved roads in
O s Master Plan Appendix
2004. This last report included a 5‐year ac on plan for the Town of O s with recommenda ons for yearly ditch inspec on and preventa ve maintenance, dust control, and poten al road rehabilita on.
Climate Change Adaptation In Massachuse s and New England, climate change is expected to increase storms and precipita on. Since 1970, annual temperatures have increased by 2° Fahrenheit (F) and winter temperatures have increased 4°F. Regionally, most winter precipita on now falls as rain, not snow (U.S. EPA, 2015). Exis ng roadway infrastructure, such as culverts and bridges, may be undersized and unable to accommodate the greater amount of water an cipated with climate change, leading to a higher likelihood of damage to the roadway requiring costly replacement. Simple climate adapta on measures could take the form of increasing the size of culverts and bridges during replacement. Addi onally, the amount of gravel or stone armoring around these pieces of infrastructure could be increased to help reduce scour and erosion caused by larger and more frequent storms.
Public Survey Results The Master Plan public survey included a sec on with ques ons related to transporta on. O s residents were asked about road maintenance and elderly and disabled transporta on services, as well as support for possible public transporta on op ons. Roads iden fied as most in need of improvement were West Center Road with 11 out of 67 or 16% of responses, Route 23, Kibbe Road and Pine Road. East O s was also men oned in 4 of 65 responses with no specific roads men oned. Overall, 64% of survey respondents said they would support or highly support a public transporta on route. The top three reasons for poten al use included shopping or errands, access other regional transporta on, or a end cultural events. In regards to poten al expansion of elderly or disabled transporta on services, 44% of respondents said to expand services, 39% said they did not know, and 15% said to keep the same
LAND USE
Loca on and Context (5.91% of all land), See Table C11 for O s land use The Town of O s is an area of 38 square miles 1971‐1999. Ins tu onal uses, which includes town (approximately 24,000 acres), located in the southern owned proper es and buildings, as well as schools and por on of Berkshire County in Western Massachu‐ cemeteries increased from 17.31 to 34.06 acres (an se s. O s is bordered by the towns of Becket to the increase of 96.74%). Industrial uses increased from North, Monterey and Tyringham to the West, Sandis‐ 2.67 acres to 8.33 acres, a minimal acreage increase field and Tolland to South and Blandford to the East. but amoun ng to a change of 211.59%. Agricultural (See Map 1‐Regional Context). acreage decreased the most over the 28 year period from 1971‐1999, changing from 333.19 to 267.65 Land Use acres, or a decrease of 19.67%.
State Aerial Photography Analysis Land Use 2005 The state, via the University of Massachuse s ‐ Am‐ While available land use data from 2005 should not be herst’s Resource Mapping ‐ Land Informa on Systems compared with earlier data to determine trends, it Lab in the Department of Natural Resources Con‐ does provide the most recent “snapshot” of land use serva on, conducted an aerial photography analysis of within O s. The 2005 data does not paint a substan‐ land use in 1971, 1985, and 1999. While 1999 data is ally different portrait of the town that earlier data fairly dated at this point, this analysis s ll presents the provides. Forest cover remains the prevalent land use, best picture of the development footprint of O s and extending across 18,533.84 acres or 76.14% of the how it has changed over that 28 year period. town. The 1,493.78 acres (6.14%) of water and
2,773.14 acres (11.39%) of wetland that cover the Addi onally, it is important to note that a similar land town speaks to the extent of O s’s amazing water and use inventory was conducted by the state in 2005. natural resources. Residen al land use remains the However, a change in methodology makes comparison primary “man‐made” use within the town at 824.76 of the 2005 data with the 1971‐1999 data sta s cally acres or 3.39% of all land (See Table 8.1—Chapter 8 impossible. Prior to 2005, land use data was derived Land Use for 2005 Land Use and Map 9—Current Land manually, from analysis of aerial photography. A er Use). Commercial uses cover 49.46 acres, or .2%, of all 2005, these processes became automated. Addi on‐ land within the town. These areas include town busi‐ ally, the state began to integrate exis ng data sets into nesses. Addi onally, BRPC cross checked this land use its analysis. Land use from 1971‐1999 as well as the with aerial photography. The town highway garage, as 2005 analysis have been included in this report. How‐ well as the MassDOT maintenance garage have been ever, these data sets should not be compared in such classified under the commercial category, likely a re‐ a way to determine land use trends between 1999‐ sult of the automated land use classifica on process. 2005. For example, 1999 land use data indicates 1078 Finally, industrial land use is the smallest of any “man‐ acres of wetland, while 2005 data indicates 2773 acres made” category. Industrial land use covers just 6.26 of wetland. In reality, those addi onal wetland acres acres, or .03%, of all land within the town. BRPC always existed within O s, but were previously classi‐ checked these use areas against aerial photography. fied as forest. In 2005, wetland extents determined The majority of these areas appear to be sand pits or from on the ground field work were integrated into contractor staging and equipment storage areas. land use data. Previously, wetland extents were These are cleared areas with heavy equipment clearly mapped from aerial photography, which made the visible. Addi onally, an area that now appears to be a determina on of forested wetland areas difficult. small trailer park along Route 23 was classified as in‐
dustrial. In 2005 aerial photography, this area was Land Use Change 1971‐1999 cleared and heavy equipment was visible. Between 1971 and 1999, residen al acreage increased more than any other land use category, growing from 890.44 acres (3.65% of all land) to 1,439.01 acres
O s Master Plan Appendix
Table C11 ‐ O s Land Use 1971‐1999 Source: Mass. GIS Land Use 1951‐1999, 2015 % of Total % of Total % of Total % Change in acres Category 1971 (Acres) Acres 1985 (Acres) Acres 1999 (Acres) Acres (1971‐1999) Agriculture 333.19 1.37% 329.71 1.35% 267.65 1.10% ‐19.67% Commercial 40.62 0.17% 48.74 0.20% 50.12 0.21% 23.39% Forest 20078.26 82.40% 19692.52 80.81% 19433.45 79.75% ‐3.21% Industrial 2.67 0.01% 5.923 0.02% 8.33 0.03% 211.59% Ins tu onal 17.31 0.07% 35.854 0.15% 34.06 0.14% 96.74% Mining / Waste Disposal 37.19 0.15% 37.84 0.16% 49.15 0.20% 32.14% Recrea on 185.22 0.76% 202.32 0.83% 206.21 0.85% 11.33% Residen al 890.44 3.65% 1224.26 5.02% 1439.01 5.91% 61.61% Transporta on* 82.85 0.34% 84.217 0.35% 84.22 0.35% 1.64% Vacant** 199.31 0.82% 205.70 0.84% 278.56 1.14% 39.77% Water 1439.11 5.91% 1439.11 5.91% 1438.80 5.90% ‐0.02% Wetland 1061.63 4.36% 1061.62 4.36% 1078.24 4.42% 1.57% Total 24367.83 100.00% 24367.83 100.00% 24367.84 100.00% *Transporta on category includes large divided highways or areas like airports and docks. Smaller roadways have not been calculated. **Vacant land category includes abandoned agriculture, areas like power lines, or areas of no vegeta on, as well as brushland and successional environments not dense enough to be classified as forest.
Development Trends and Future Develop‐ Development Trends ment Capacity Available state data showing the construc on date of The density of development around the town’s water buildings within the Town of O s allows for a picture resources (Big Pond, O s Reservoir, etc.) has histori‐ of development trends to emerge. These data show cally been the highest. Addi onally, housing develop‐ the last available construc on date for a given build‐ ment in O s’ two village centers has historically been ing, so do not capture earlier structures that may have rela vely dense. However, new development in the exis ng on a given parcel and been replaced. These village centers has been minimal. In recent years, de‐ data are based on assessor’s informa on current as of velopment has been almost exclusively focused on 2011. residen al parcels with rela vely large lot sizes that are located away from O s’ ponds, shoreline areas, The earliest structures in the town of O s, built prior and village centers. to the year 1900, were located primarily in O s Center Village, with addi onal pockets of development Since 2009, the number of building permits for new around West O s and a few structures around O s residen al structures has slowed (See Figure C5 in this Reservoir and Big Pond. appendix). Anecdotally, there has been a shi away from new construc on, with increased focus on reno‐ From 1901‐1950, new building or reconstruc on takes va ons, addi ons, and other altera ons to exis ng place at the edges and extends the size of O s Center structures (Larry Gould, Personal Communica on, Village. At this me, extensive construc on around 2015). the shorelines of O s Reservoir, Big Pond, and Benton Pond begins.
From 1950‐1975 new building or reconstruc on of Side and Rear: 25 Feet exis ng buildings con nues around O s Reservoir, Big Pond and Benton Pond. Addi onally, pockets of con‐ Allowed Uses: struc on can be seen around Creek Pond, along the By right: northwest shoreline of Big Pond and Great Woods One or two family dwelling Road and sca ered along Routes 8 and 23. Conversion of a one family dwelling into a two family dwelling From 1976 and on, new building or reconstruc on is Bed and breakfast establishment or homestay s ll visible around O s Reservoir, Big Pond and Benton Childcare facility Pond. However, there is addi onal development dur‐ Family day care, small ing this period around White Lily Pond and Hayes Agriculture Pond. Moreover, a shi toward greater development Facili es for sale of wine and dairy products away from the town’s water resource areas can be Educa onal use seen in extensive development along areas such as Land and structures for religious purposes Dimmock Road, Stebbins Road, West Center Road, Municipal or governmental use Judd Road, Harrington Road and the O s Woodlands (See Map 10—Development Trend). By Special Permit: Many uses require a special permit from either the Remaining Buildable Land planning board, zoning board of appeals (ZBA) or the An analysis of remaining buildable land within the Select Board. Refer to the O s zoning bylaws for a town of O s can be created by subtrac ng areas that complete lis ng. have already been developed, permanently protected state and other conserva on lands, wetlands (100 foot Village (V‐1) District buffer around all wetland areas), river protec on are‐ Minimum Lot Size: 20,000 Square Feet (can be mini‐ as (200 foot buffer around rivers), and slopes greater mum of 10,000 Square Feet if the lot is serviced by the than 25%. What remains are areas that could be used O s sewer district). for new construc on. Based on this analysis, 7,150.8 Minimum Road Frontage: 100 feet for residen al use, acres (29.34%) of buildable land remain within the 60 feet for non residen al town. Another 2,297 acres (9.42%) remain on land Front Setback: 35 Feet that is par ally constrained for development, and in‐ Side and Rear: 25 Feet clude areas located in floodplain or on slopes between 15 and 25%. This analysis only es mates remaining Allowed Uses: buildable acreage. It does not examine remaining By Right: buildable road frontage which would be needed to One or two family dwelling access these areas or account for new road construc‐ Conversion of a one family dwelling into a two family on and extensive subdivision that would be needed dwelling for development within these areas. Agriculture Facili es for sale of wine and dairy products Zoning Educa onal Use O s currently has three zoning districts. The allowed Land and structures for religious purposes uses and densi es for each district are summarized Municipal or governmental use below. For a map of current zoning, please refer to Child care facility Map 3—Zoning. Land and structures for hor culture or floriculture Business or Professional Office, Bank Residential (R‐40) District Personal Service Establishment General Service Establishment Minimum Lot Size: 1 Acre Motor vehicle service sta on or repair shop Minimum Road Frontage: 150 Feet Specialized retail Front Setback: 35 Feet
O s Master Plan Appendix
Bed or Breakfast Establishment or Homestay mum lot size or setbacks. The town recognized that Family day care, small this condi on had been created and took measures to help address it (Larry Gould Personal Communica on, By Special Permit: 2015). The town amended its bylaws to create smaller Many uses require a special permit from either the setback requirements for construc on on exis ng non‐ Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) or the conforming structures. In the new language, front set‐ Select Board. Refer to the O s Zoning Bylaws for a backs were reduced from 35 to 25 feet and side and complete lis ng. rear setbacks were changed from 25 to 15 feet. Addi‐ onally, reconstruc on, replacement and renova on Floodplain Overlay District (FPOD) of exis ng non‐conforming structures within the same This overlay district is based on the O s flood hazard building footprint and height are allowed. boundary map issued by the Federal Emergency Man‐ agement Agency (FEMA) for the 100 year regulatory Townhouse Development floodplain. This district helps to limit development O s’ Townhouse Development provision allows for within the floodplain, however, buildings exis ng with‐ any parcel larger than 20 acres to pursue townhouse in the floodplain prior to the adop on of the FPOD are development through a special permit by the planning “grandfathered” in. board. The provision allows for a maximum number of bedrooms on the parcel that is equal to two and a half The Berkshire County Hazard Mi ga on Plan, pre‐ mes the number of lots which would reasonably be pared for the Town of O s and other Berkshire County expected to be developed upon that parcel under a towns in 2012 notes that there are a total of 2,395.9 conven onal plan. Addi onally, at least 30% of the acres of 100‐ year floodplain within the town. This parcel must reserved as con guous open space. As of amounts to 9.8% of the total town. Based on addi on‐ 2015, this form of development has not been imple‐ al analysis, 56.7 acres (2.3%) of the floodplain are de‐ mented within the town. veloped. This leaves 2,339.2 acres that are poten ally developable under current zoning. Currently, there Survey Results are 8 commercial buildings (22.2%) and 167 residen al The Master Plan public survey included several ques‐ buildings (11.1 %) within the floodplain. ons about land use, asking survey respondents their opinion about the rate of housing development, and Permi ed Uses: where future housing and development should be lo‐ Agriculture cated rela ve to O s’ village centers, residen al areas, Forestry and Nursery water resource areas and recrea on areas (i.e. near Outdoor Recrea on the ski area). Conserva on of water, wildlife, and plants Wildlife management areas, pathways Village Centers Temporary non‐residen al structures Respondents wanted to encourage small business, Buildings lawfully exis ng prior to the floodplain dis‐ senior housing, sidewalks, single‐family housing, and trict crea on land conserva on. Respondents wanted to discourage
commercial or industrial uses, and mul ‐family hous‐ Other Zoning Provisions ing . Nonconforming Single and Two Family Resi‐ dential Structures Residential Areas Many parcels, par cularly those located around O s’ Respondents wanted to encourage single family hous‐ ponds and water bodies, were created prior to the ing, land conserva on, senior housing and second adop on of zoning regula ons. They are usually of a homes. Respondents wanted to discourage small busi‐ small size and do not meet the requirements for mini‐ ness, mul ‐family housing and commercial and indus‐
trial uses
Water Resource Areas Respondents wanted to encourage land conserva on. Respondents wanted to discourage mul ‐family hous‐ ing, low income housing, and commercial and industri‐ al uses.
Recreation Areas: Respondents wanted to encourage land conserva on, small business, and second homes. Respondents wanted to discourage mul ‐family housing, low in‐ come housing, and commercial and industrial uses.
O s Master Plan Appendix
NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
History of the Community za on, the Farmington River Water Power Company, O s was incorporated as a town in June 13, 1810. The to manage this land as well as the dam. The dam town was named a er Harrison Gray O s, who was a raised the water level 26 feet above the original eleva‐ speaker of the House of Representa ves and known as on of the ponds and allowed for greater control of the “Urban Federalist” (Town of O s OSRP 1991). In the amount of water flowing into the West Branch of 1838, common and previously unincorporated land, the Farmington River. When more water was needed known as the “East Eleven Thousand Acres”, was add‐ by the Collins Company’s opera ons in Connec cut, ed to the original territory that comprised the town. they would send a telegraph to the dam operator who The original se lement was mainly influenced by the would use a horse to raise gates to release more water “Great Road”, the Boston‐ Albany turnpike, also into the Fall River. Control of the dam was maintained known as Knox Trail, or Indian Trail. by the Farmington River Water Power Company un l 1966. Farming and lumbering, especially pine and hemlock, had been the town’s major industry before shi ing to Beyond the crea on of the O s Reservoir, many of the a seasonal and tourism‐based economy. The West town’s buildings, par cularly around the town’s village Branch of the Farmington River had provided an im‐ centers, provided O s with the small town New Eng‐ portant source of waterpower to run the wheels of land atmosphere, s ll visible and enjoyed by residents early mills, and later, for a couple of factories. The and visitors alike today. Berkshire Regional Planning number of mills in O s grew from four in 1829 to 22 in Commission completed an inventory in 1983 that iden‐ 1885 (Town of O s OSRP 1991). fied local structures of historic value. Structures in‐ ventoried include the Congrega onal Church, the St. The crea on of O s’s mills and industry shaped not Paul’s Episcopal Church, Harmony Hall (currently the only the town’s economy, but the landscape we see town’s Recrea on Center), O s Library, the Knox Trail today. In par cular, the crea on of O s Reservoir Inn, a number of old cemeteries, and a variety of land‐ (which is almost a history unto itself) remade large marks along the Knox Trail, among other significant por ons of the town to suit industrial needs. Samuel buildings (BRPC 1979). Watkins Collins and the Collins Company were based in what is now Canton, Connec cut. The Collins Com‐ The O s Congrega onal Church is located on Route 23 pany was a major producer of high quality metal & Route 8. This building is presently owned by the goods during the American Civil War. During the Civil Town of O s Church Society. Da ng back to 1813— War, the company was hindered by difficul es in find‐ 1814, it conserves the original design of a federal ing workers as well as low water flows from the Farm‐ mee nghouse. The construc on of this building ac‐ ington River that impacted the company’s metal forg‐ companied the unifica on of the towns of Loudon and ing opera ons. A er the war ended, the company Bethlehem, into what was later named O s. On June decided to examine the crea on of a dam and reser‐ 5, 1810, members of the church from both towns met, voir that would help to ensure year‐round water flows and voted to consider all members of each as mem‐ needed for its industrial opera ons. bers of a United Church (BRPC 1979).
A er extensive surveying and study, it was determined The St Paul’s Episcopal Church is located on Route 23 that the area around three exis ng ponds; Rand Pond, & Route 8. Owned by the Protestant Episcopal Society Messenger Pond, and Li le Pond had the appropriate of O s, it dates back to 1828‐ 1829. According to his‐ topography for construc on of a dam. Water from toric records, this building was one of the earliest these ponds flowed into the Fall River, as it does from churches of the Anglican Faith in the County. It is O s Reservoir today. unique, as it is the earliest surviving gothic revival building in the Berkshires. It is rendered in wood with The Collins Company purchased land around what is Gothic arched windows, designed to have the look of now the O s Reservoir and created a separate organi‐ leaded glass (BRPC 1979).
Similarly, the Original O s Town Hall, or Harmony Hall, dates back to 1849. This is a two and a half story Greek Revival style public building that fulfilled the need for a new school and a community mee ng place in one building. At that me, the Center School District had decided to buy land and build a new school house. In the mean me, a group of ci zens submi ed a pro‐ posal to combine the two projects. Finally, in Novem‐ ber 3rd, 1849, the School District voted to approve this last idea, and later gave birth to this building, originally named “Harmony Hall” (BRPC 1979).
Among other historic buildings, the Knox Trail Inn, sup‐ plements the structures men oned above. Originally Figure C6—The East O s Schoolhouse. This structure is named the East O s Hotel, this structure dates back to a one and half story greek revival style building that 1820. Located on Route 23 in East O s, this is a one was the one room schoolhouse for the East O s area. and a half story Federal House, with a symmetrical This building is located adjacent to the East O s nine window front. Examples of similar historic value Mee nghouse. are illustrated by the Ida Hall House and Store, Squire Seymour’s Store, and S. H. Norton’s Store, among oth‐ development during the 20th century as loca ons for er buildings (BCRPC 1979). homes, camps, and cabins. Development has histori‐
cally been greatest around Big Pond, O s Reservoir, Beyond these architectural structures, the Knox Trail and Benton Pond. However, there are many other stands as one of the most important historic land‐ bodies of water in the town (see Table C13). In total, marks in town. A marker was built in June 30th, 1928, there are eight state listed “Great Ponds” within the on the East side of Route 23. As town, more than any other town in Berkshire County. inscribed on the monument, General Henry Knox Addi onally, O s Reservoir is the county's largest rec‐ passed through this place in the winter of 1775‐ 1776 rea onal body of water. to deliver the train of ar llery from Fort Ticonderoga
to General George Washington in Cambridge (BRPC O s’ ponds and the O s Reservoir, combined with the 1979). According to historic records, travel was diffi‐ supply of state‐owned recrea on land, including 2 cult through this territory. The first highway was state parks (and a small por on of a third) and 3 wild‐ opened by General Amherst’s army when it marched life management areas, have helped to earn O s the from Boston to Albany in 1759 (Humason 1974.) Nev‐ reputa on of being the “outdoor playground of the ertheless, the main road between Boston and Albany Berkshires” (O s Conserva on Commission, 2015). began as a foot path used by the early explorers in the
late 1600’s. This was the earliest roadway laid to travel between the two states, and has been also referred to Historic and Cultural Resources as the “Barrington Road” (Town of O s OSRP 1991). Otis Historic Commission The Town of O s has an ac ve historic commission Among other sites of historic value, it is important to that has worked hard to develop and promote O s’ consider the Civilian Conserva on Camps (CCC) locat‐ historic and cultural resources. The commission has ed in West O s. This facility hosted over 100 men dur‐ helped to iden fy historic mile markers along the ing the Depression Era (Wingate 2004). route of the Knox Trail or Great Road and worked to restore monuments in town, such as the Wolco O s’s spectacular water resources a racted significant Grant marker near Becket Road.
O s Master Plan Appendix
Recently, the Historic Commission has iden fied a Knox Trail or Great Road mile marker along the Knox Trail that reads “65 mile The Town of O s developed along the historic route to Albany (See Figure 9.1 in Chapter 9). Due to the known as the Knox Trail, or Great Road, that connect‐ marker’s proximity to Algerie Road, the Commission ed Boston and Albany. The town’s loca on along this has been working to make the area around the mark‐ route was cri cal to accessing trade and for the flow er a trailhead and historic site. The town Highway of goods and services into and out of the town. The Department recently installed gravel to create a small route is most famous for its use by General Henry parking area near the mile marker and the town Se‐ Knox as he worked during the winter of 1775‐1776 to lect Board voted in 2009 to designate the area as “65 move cannons from Fort Ticonderoga on Lake Cham‐ Mile to Albany” Milestone Way as a Scenic Road for plain to Boston, Massachuse s. These cannons were the use of foot traffic only. Work con nues on the used to support General George Washington during area around the mile marker, with granite posts erect‐ the siege of Boston by the Bri sh army. The reloca on ed near the mile stone to protect it from poten al of the cannons from Ticonderoga was cri cal to Ameri‐ damage. can victory. Once deployed on the Dorchester heights, with a commanding view of Boston harbor, the can‐ The Historic Commission has also been working with nons prompted the Bri sh fleet to relocate from Bos‐ local landowners to help secure year round access to ton to Halifax, Nova Sco a. The abandonment of Bos‐ por ons of the trail with the end goal of developing ton harbor by the Bri sh fleet was a turning point in the trail as a mul ‐use path that can be used in both the American Revolu onary War. summer and winter. Addi onally, the Historic Com‐ mission has been working towards having the Knox In the late 1920’s, monuments were commissioned for Trail designated as Na onal Historic Landmark. every town in Massachuse s that General Knox passed through to provide a permanent marker to the Massachusetts Cultural Resource events that helped shape the crea on of the United Information System (MACRIS) Database States. The Knox Trail monument for the town of O s The Massachuse s Cultural Informa on Resource Sys‐ is located near Benton Pond. Addi onally, a statue of tem (MACRIS) is a database maintained by the Massa‐ General Knox is located on the Town Hall driveway. chuse s Historical Commission (MHC) that lists histor‐ ic structures, areas, objects and burial grounds recog‐ The route of the Knox Trail crosses into O s near Alge‐ nized at the local, state, and na onal level. Within rie Road in East O s. It then moves west across the O s, the MACRIS database lists 88 records comprising town passing just north of O s Reservoir. Beyond this mostly historic buildings. However, the records also point, the Knox Trail passes through por ons of O s include the town green in front of the Congrega onal State Forest where it then moves into Sandisfield. Church, O s Center Village, O s Reservoir, and O s A er moving just south of Upper Spectacle Pond, the Reservoir Dam just to name a few places. Trail then crosses back into O s near Cold Spring Road. It is important to note that the MACRIS records iden ‐ fied in this plan are likely incomplete, as lis ngs availa‐ Much of the trail is currently used during the winter by ble online are part of ongoing digi za on efforts by Snowmobilers and the local snowmobile club, the the state. Moreover, most of the MACRIS records for Knox Trail Sno‐riders. Members of the O s Historic the Town of O s were collected from an inventory of Commission have been ac ve in iden fying landmarks, historic proper es completed by Berkshire Regional markers, tavern sites, and other historic resources Planning Commission in 1983. MACRIS records availa‐ along the trail. The Historic Commission has also se‐ ble online for the town of O s list no state or na onal‐ cured permission to develop the trail through por ons ly listed historic proper es. A cross reference of of state owned land like O s State Forest. online databases available through Na onal Park Ser‐ vice’s Na onal Register of Historic Places and Na onal
Register of Historic Landmarks returned no results for renovated, both the Schoolhouse and Mee nghouse O s ( See Map 8—Historic Resources for mapped could be repurposed for use by the town. Some sug‐ buildings and areas from the MACRIS database). gested uses for the structures include housing the town’s museum (currently located in the Library), rec‐ East Otis Schoolhouse and Meeting House ords storage, a town hall annex, addi onal mee ng The East O s Schoolhouse and Mee ng House are two space, or an informa on center (Harold Kobrin Person‐ town‐owned buildings located on a single lot in East al Communica on 2015). O s at the corner of Pike Road and Old Blandford Road near the Papa’s Healthy Food and Fuel gas sta on. Current plans for the two structures are as follows. The East O s Schoolhouse is a small one and half story The Selectboard has decided to invest in the School‐ structure that served as the “one room schoolhouse” house building over me, through gradual and incre‐ for the area. The MACRIS database lists the building as mental repairs (Larry Gould Personal Communica on the “East O s Center School” and places the date of 2015). The building would remain and be u lized by construc on in 1850 (See Table C14, this appendix). the town, perhaps as a restored historic building. Due The East O s Mee nghouse, also known as the East to the deteriora ng nature of the East O s Mee ng‐ O s Church or East O s Bap st Church, has func oned house, the Selectboard has determined that the struc‐ as both a public mee nghouse and church in the past ture should be removed and the lot be repurposed by and has been abandoned since the 1980’s. Both struc‐ the town. tures are in disrepair, with damage to the Mee ng‐ house considerably greater than that of the School‐ Additional Historic Sites house. Plans for the Mee nghouse (including possible Informa on provided by Thomas Ragusa, chair of the demoli on or reuse) have generated significant debate O s Historical Commission indicates that there are within town. addi onal historic sites and monuments that should be iden fied as locally significant historic sites and The town’s Selectboard considers the Mee ng House added to the MACRIS database. These include (among to be public safety hazard and poten al liability and others): has advocated for the building’s demoli on (Town Of O s Select Board, 2013). The Selectboard has also dis‐ West Otis Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) cussed the possibility of repurposing the lot as a play‐ Camps ground and picnic area. In this scheme, the East O s The Civilian Conserva on Corps (CCC) was a na onal Schoolhouse would remain and be repurposed for use public work relief program created as part of President by the town. Roosevelt’s “New Deal” during the Great Depression.
The program helped to provide jobs for unemployed The O s Planning Board and Historical Commission men and was focused around ac vi es such as road have advocated for the renova on or replica on of building, erosion control and recrea on improve‐ the buildings and the designa on of the parcel around ments. Within O s, the CCC helped to construct much them as a one lot historic district. A study commi ee of O s State Forest. was formed by the town to examine the crea on of a
poten al historic district. The crea on of this historic Wolcott Grant Marker district around the School House and Mee ng House would allow the town to poten ally access funds from This marker commemorates the Wolco land grants, the MHC for renova on or replica on of the buildings which helped to resolve a series of land disputes be‐ and would require a match from the town. The oppor‐ tween Massachuse s and Connec cut that began in tunity for this funding would dissolve if the structures the 1700’s. The marker base was replaced in 2012 and were demolished (Harold Kobrin, Personal Communi‐ reset at its original loca on on Becket Road. ca on 2015). Renova ons to the church have been es mated to cost up to $300,000 (Sakata 2012). Once
O s Master Plan Appendix
Natural Resources sive system of both educa onal and recrea onal ac v‐ O s has a wealth of natural resources including sur‐ i es. Please refer to Map 5 ‐ Unique Features and to face water, wetlands, and wildlife habitat. Natural Table 4.5‐ Unique features located in the O s Open resources are summarized here. For more informa on Space and Recrea on Plan. on natural resources in the town of O s, see the full text of the O s Open Space and Recrea on Plan. Water Resources For a map of water resources including ponds, rivers Soils and Geology and watersheds, please see Map 6—Water Resources. General soil associa ons determine a unique natural landscape, having a dis nct pa ern of soils, relief, and Watersheds drainage. Typically, an associa on consists of one or O s lies within three watersheds, the Farmington Riv‐ more major soils and some minor soils (Soil Conserva‐ er Watershed (FRW), the Housatonic River Watershed on Service 1988). According to the Soil Survey com‐ (HRW) and the Wes ield River Watershed (WRW). pleted for Berkshire County in 1988 by the Soil Conser‐ The majority of the town lies within the FRW. The va on Service, Turnbridge‐ Lyman‐ Peru is the pre‐ northeast corner of the town is located within the dominant major associa on soil type in O s; this is WRW and the western por on of town is located with‐ true also for 51% of the total area of the county. This in the HRW. O s’s posi on at the headwaters of the associa on is defined by the survey as being Farmington River is regionally important. The Farm‐ “moderately deep, shallow and very deep, well ington River is the primary water supply for Har ord, drained, gently sloping to very steep, loamy soils Connec cut and other towns within the Farmington formed in glacial ll derived from schist, gneiss, and River Valley. The Farmington River Watershed Associ‐ granite (Soil Conserva on Service 1988). For a map of a on (FRWA), the non‐profit group that helps to ad‐ general soil condi ons, see Map 4—Soils and Geology. dress issues of water quality within the watershed, es mates that the river supplies drinking water to Other Unique Features 600,000 people (FRWA 2003). The Town of O s hosts an important system of natural resources and recrea onal opportuni es. Topographic Surface Waters features like the sequence of high hills that develop The town has spectacular water resources including throughout the town, the Farmington River Valley, and eight “Great Ponds” (see Table C13). Great Ponds are a great variety of streams and ponds. Natural water‐ a state water body designa on related to Massachu‐ falls provide a dynamic sequence of scenic quality. The se s General Law Chapter 91 “The Massachuse s Pub‐ different ecosystems that develop throughout these lic Waterfront Act”. A Great Pond is defined as “any lands host an important amount of core habitat and pond or lake that contained more than 10 acres in its suppor ng natural landscape for a great variety of natural state” (Mass DEP, 2015). Ponds which at one plant and animal communi es. point in me were larger than 10 acres, but are now smaller are s ll considered to be great ponds. These natural resources are combined with an im‐ portant list of historic sites. Structures like the Congre‐ In addi on to being natural resources, O s’s ponds ga onal Church, St Paul’s Episcopal Church, the previ‐ have a racted development and help to create the ous Town Hall (currently the recrea on center), the town’s recrea onal and seasonally focused economy. McManus Store, the O s Library, or the East O s Development has historically been greatest around Big School, represent unique landmarks of important com‐ Pond, Benton Pond, and O s Reservoir. munity value (BCRPC 1979). Other historic sites, like the por on of the Knox Trail that passes through O s, Big Pond CCC camps, rail road founda ons along the Farming‐ Big Pond is the second largest body of water in O s at ton River, the trolley line, and several old cemeteries, 331 acres. The shoreline of Big Pond is some of the cons tute a unique opportunity to develop an exten‐ most densely se led in O s. Large wetland areas ex‐
tend around the northern edge of the pond and are Table C12 ‐ Wetlands in O s, Ma listed as core habitat by the BioMap2 project. Big Source: Source: Mass. GIS Wetlands 2009 Pond is also home to the O s Town Beach, which is located at the end of Great Woods Road. As of 2012, Big Pond is listed on the EPA’s 303(d) list of impaired Wetland Type Acres % of all wetlands waters due to the presence of Mercury (Hg) in fish Bog 122.87 4.44% ssue and low dissolved oxygen levels. The publicly Deep Marsh 231.89 8.37% accessible boat launch on Big Pond is located at the Shallow Marsh end of La mer Hill Road in O s. A local group known Meadow of Fen 483.11 17.44% as the Big Pond Associa on acts as an advocate for the pond and the residents around it. Shrub Swamp 489.77 17.68% Wooded Swamp As with many lakes and ponds in Massachuse s, water Coniferous 875.98 31.63% levels are controlled via a dam which was constructed Wooded Swamp by the Commonwealth in 1974. Boards located within Deciduous 292.49 10.56% the dam are removable and allow the water level in Wooded Swamp the pond to be lowered or raised by up to 18”. A year‐ Mixed Trees 273.76 9.88% ly drawdown of the pond occurs in October and is ap‐ proved via an order of condi ons from the Town of Total 2769.87 100.00% O s.
Big Pond and the homeowners and residents that sur‐ and Eurasian Milfoil (Myriophyllum Spicatum). How‐ round it are represented by the Big Pond Associa on ever, some invasive species such as Purple Loosestrife whose mission is to “preserve, protect, monitor, main‐ (Lythrum salicaria) have been noted around the tain and enhance the environmental, aesthe c, recre‐ shoreline of the pond. The Big Pond Associa on or‐ a onal and economic values of Big Pond and its water‐ ganizes regular volunteer events to remove this spe‐ shed and to provide educa on with respect thereto.” cies and others from the shoreline. the Big Pond Associa on par cipates in a variety of management ac vi es including funding yearly tes ng Otis Reservoir for water quality, and management and monitoring of The Reservoir is located within the boundaries of the invasive species. Towns of O s, Tolland and small por on of Blandford. O s Reservoir is the Commonwealth’s largest recrea‐ The Big Pond Associa on conducts yearly water quali‐ onal body of water at over 1,000 acres in size. The ty tes ng, and in 2004 received a $50,000 grant from Reservoir was created in the 1800’s by the construc‐ the Massachuse s Department of Conserva on and on of a dam on the Fall River to provide addi onal Recrea on to conduct a diagnos c and feasibility flow during low river volumes. This helped to support study that comprehensively examined water quality mills and industry along the nearby Farmington River within the lake. The Big Pond Associa on has part‐ (see Sec on 3B: History of the Community). Begin‐ nered with DCR on its “Weed Watcher” program. ning in the early 20th century, the Reservoir became a Weed Watcher works to educate volunteers to moni‐ des na on for seasonal and summer residents who tor water bodies for invasive species. Addi onally the built co ages along the shore. Today, the neighbor‐ Big Pond Associa on has a ac ve and dedicated group hoods around O s Reservoir are the densest in town, of volunteers who monitor the public boat launch and especially along the western shore. O s Reservoir is work with recrea onal boaters to ensure that invasive currently listed on the EPA’s 303(d) list of impaired species don’t make their way into the pond. Luckily, water ways due to high levels of Mercury (Hg) in fish Big Pond has thus far avoided coloniza on by invasive ssue. species such as Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha)
O s Master Plan Appendix
Water levels are controlled in the Reservoir by the O s Reservoir. Addi onally, the project successfully dam that leads to Fall River. An annual draw down of implemented improvements to the public boat launch the Reservoir occurs during October. Water levels in at Big Pond through the installa on of pre‐cast con‐ the reservoir are lowered by approximately 10 feet. crete planks to replace the exis ng gravel launch. Ad‐ This drawdown is though to help control invasive spe‐ di onally, BRPC established two vegeta ve buffers cies in the lake, par cularly aqua c plants such as Eur‐ comprised of na ve plan ngs at private residences on asian Milfoil (Myriophyllum Spicatum), which is ex‐ O s Reservoir. Vegeta ve buffers are plan ngs of posed to freezing temperatures during the drawdown. shrubs, trees and perennials that intercept stormwater runoff and help to reduce soil erosion. Vegeta ve Addi onally, the drawdown has some recrea on ben‐ buffers are recommended as a Best Management efits, as it means that many dock owners do not need Prac ce (BMP) to minimize the impacts of develop‐ to remove their docks from the Reservoir during win‐ ment near water bodies and replace exis ng lawns. ter for fear of ice damage. The conserva on commis‐ Addi onally, they provide more poten al wildlife habi‐ sions of the towns of O s, Tolland and Blandford re‐ tat than mowed grass or lawn. view and approve the order of condi ons for the year‐ ly drawdown of the reservoir, which is performed by Aquifer Recharge Areas DCR. O s’ groundwater resources are located in the gneiss‐ ic bedrock beneath the town along exis ng fault lines. O s Reservoir and the property owners that surround The Town’s 1986 Land Use Plan (prepared by BRPC) it are represented by the O s Reservoir Property Own‐ explains how most wells will yield only enough for do‐ ers Associa on (ORPOA). ORPOA conducts regular mes c supplies, while they could yield from 50 to 100 water quality tes ng in O s Reservoir, funded through gallons per minute near these fault lines (BRPC 1986). dues it collects from members. Addi onally, ORPOA In a geological survey of the Eastern Berkshires com‐ conducts management ac vi es, such as the removal pleted by Emerson in 1968, two major faults were of invasive species. iden fied in O s. One of them runs along Tyringham
Road in West O s down to the Clam River in Sandis‐ Much of O s Reservoir is contained within Tolland field, and another one is located near the center of State Forest. This area contains the public boat launch town. Forma ons of water soluble limestone offer for O s Reservoir. Boat launching is also available another poten al source of large drinking water yields. through Camp Overflow, a private campground on the Caverns located near O s Center and Shaw Pond are western shore of the reservoir. However, the launch is an indicator of poten al groundwater from recharge only available to campground guests. As much of the areas of this type. land surrounding O s Reservoir is owned by DCR, this organiza on conducts ac ve management around the The other primary ground water resource is beneath reservoir. In the Fall of 2015, DCR will begin imple‐ the Farmington River Valley. These are shallow depos‐ men ng a treatment plan to control Phragmites aus‐ its, approximately 60 feet, which are probably con‐ tralis (also known as Common Reed) on approximately nected to both the river and the water in the underly‐ 40 sites (2.39 acres in total) around the reservoir. ing bedrock. As stated before, these deposits might be
vulnerable to pollu on associated with road salt or In the mid‐2000’s BRPC was also involved with several other contaminants such as from buried gas tanks projects on O s Reservoir as part of the O s Reservoir (BRPC 1986). Lake and Watershed Protec on Ini a ve. This project was a collabora on between BRPC, the Town of O s, As stated in the 1986 Land Use Plan, predic ng re‐ ORPOA, the Farmington River Watershed Associa on charge areas is very difficult without a detailed hydro‐ (FRWA) and the Big Pond Associa on. The project ex‐ logical study. In the case of O s, recharge might be amined the feasibility of installa on of a boat washing happening from water infiltra on in the upland areas sta on and subsurface screen (to prevent fish loss) at of its three watersheds. In unconfined aquifers, re‐
Table C13 ‐ Water Resources in O s, MA Table C13 ‐ Water Resources in O s, MA—Con nued Source: Mass GIS MassDEP List of Integrated Waters, Source: Mass GIS MassDEP List of Integrated Waters, 2012 2012 Impair‐ Approxi‐ ment Impair‐ mate Status Cause of Impair‐ Approximate ment Sta‐ Cause of Name Acreage (Y/N) ment Stream Name Length (Miles) tus (Y/N) Impairment Eurasian Water 1. Cone Brook 1.75 N Milfoil, Lack of a Myriophyllum 2. West Branch Coldwater 1. Benton Pond* 63.00 Y Spicatum Farmington River 10.15 Y Assemblage Dissolved Oxygen 3. Benton Brook 4.00 N Mercury in Fish 2. Big Pond* 331.00 Y Tissue 4. Stream on Cur‐ n Pond 1.66 N 3 Church Hill Pond 20.00 N 4. Watson Pond* (Also Not As‐ known as Creek Pond) 49.00 sessed 5. Stream from Hayes Pond 1.83 N 5. Cur n Pond 4.00 N 6. Spectacle Pond 6. Dimmock Brook Not As‐ Brook 1.54 N Pond 62.00 sessed 7. West Haley Pond* Not As‐ (Also known as Tucker‐ 7. Dimmock Brook 6.18 sessed Haley Pond or Haley 8. Wheeler Brook 1.40 N Pond) 17.00 N 9. Fall River .88 N
Not As‐ 8. Hayden Pond 36.00 sessed charge occurs through water entering the unconsoli‐ Not As‐ dated deposits, via the streams and wetlands near 9. Hayes Pond* 49.00 sessed them (BRPC 1986). 10. Horseshoe Pond 13.00 N Flood Hazard Areas 11. Larkum Pond* 19.00 N Flooding occurs when the volume of water within a 12. Mud Pond 1 (near Long Mountain WMA) 5.00 N given stream or river exceeds the channel’s capacity. 13. Mud Pond 2 (South The flood plain is considered the land area adjacent to of I‐90) 5.00 N a waterbody that is subject to recurring inunda on. Mercury in Fish Flooding o en occurs in the spring, due to snow melt 14. O s Reservoir* 1065.00 Y Tissue and during large storm events. Floods o en occur at predictable intervals. The frequency with which a 15. Quarry Pond 6.00 N flood of a given size occurs is called the “recurrence 16. Royal Pond 8.00 N interval”. For example, the “100‐year flood” is the Dissolved Oxygen flood event that has a 1% chance of happening within Eurasian Water a given year. The 10‐year flood is the flooding event 16. Shaw Pond 23.00 Y Milfoil that has a 10% chance of recurrence in a given year. 17. Upper Spectacle Pond 72.00 Y Dissolved Oxygen O s has extensive areas of 100‐year floodplain, which Not As‐ are labeled as “Zone A” on Federal Emergency Man‐ 18. White Lily Pond* 27.00 sessed agement Agency (FEMA) flood insurance rate maps. Beginning in the west of town, areas of the 100‐year 19. Whi ng Pond 5.00 N floodplain extend around Spectacle Pond Brook and *Denotes state designated “Great Pond”. It is not known the por on of Upper Spectacle Pond located within why other ponds in O s larger than 10 acres in size are not listed as Great Ponds.
O s Master Plan Appendix
the town. The area of the 100‐year floodplain begins lands and other natural environments are some mes just south of Route 23 or Great Barrington Road. An‐ referred to as “ecosystem services”. Valuable ecosys‐ other area of 100‐year flood plain encompasses the tem services provided by wetlands include water puri‐ length of Benton Brook, beginning near Giles Road and fica on, flood storage and control, and shoreline stabi‐ extending south to the town boundary with Sandis‐ liza on. Water speed and flow is greatly reduced in a field. wetland compared to the open water of a stream or river. This causes suspended sediments to fall out of The 100‐year flood plain extends along the en re the water column, thus enhancing downstream water length of the West Branch of the Farmington River in quality. Wetlands also help to remove harmful pollu‐ O s, from Shaw Pond in the north, through O s Cen‐ tants as well as nutrient pollu on from water re‐ ter and south to Sandisfield. sources. During flooding, wetlands act as a “sponge” that helps to absorb excess water. Wetlands also help Further east, a small por on of 100‐year flood plain to reduce erosion by ac ng as a buffer that helps to extends around Dimmock Brook, from just near the protect the shorelines of rivers, lakes and other bodies intersec on of Becket and Gibbs Road south to near of water. the intersec on of Gibbs Road and Blandford Road / Route 23. Seven types of wetland exist in O s. Data include in Table C12 in this appendix is derived from the inter‐ Finally, in the eastern por on of town, the 100‐year preta on of aerial photography which is then field floodplain extends around wetland areas north of Big checked by the Massachuse s Department of Environ‐ Pond near Lee‐Wes ield Road and moves south mental Protec on (DEP). These data come from the around the en rety of Big Pond and its outlet. The most recent wetlands update which was performed in floodplain ends near an area just north of Old Bland‐ 2009. ford Road / Route 23 and Reservoir Road. Immediate‐ ly south of this intersec on, the floodplain begins Wooded coniferous swamps extend across 875 acres again and encircles the area around O s Reservoir and comprise 31.63% of wetland areas within the south to the town’s boundary with Tolland (See Map town. Coniferous swamps in O s are most likely the 6—Water Resources). Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) or Red Spruce (Picea ru‐ bens) type. Bog areas in O s have the least acreage It is important to note that O s has a Floodplain Over‐ (122 acres) and comprise 4.44% of all wetlands in the lay District as a component of its zoning. The O s’ town. Bogs are a type of wetland characterized by FPOD helps to regulate development within the 100‐ acidic waters, peat deposits and sphagnum moss. Due year floodplain. Allowed uses include forestry, agricul‐ to the extreme acidic nature of bog environments, ture, and outdoor recrea on. Buildings exis ng prior bogs are o en home to many unique plant and animal to the adop on of the FPOD are also allowed. species such as pitcher plants (Sarracenia purpurea). The majority of O s’ wetland areas are located imme‐ Wetlands diately north of Big Pond. Other large wetland areas O s has extensive wetland areas totaling over 2,700 include the area immediately south of Church Hill acres (See Table C12—this appendix). Wetlands per‐ Pond, around Dimmock Brook Pond, and south of Hay‐ form important func ons for both humans and wild‐ den Pond. For a map of O s’ wetland areas, please life. Wetlands are the most produc ve ecosystems on refer to Map 13—Vegeta on, Fisheries, and Wildlife. the planet, measured by the amount of biomass or living biological ssue they help to produce. Wetlands Wildlife Habitat serve as habitat for a wide variety of plant and animal The Commonwealth’s BioMap2 study provides the species and o en func on as cri cal nursery and best assessment of wildlife habitat within the Town of breeding areas. Wetlands also provide func ons for O s. humans. The benefits to humans provided by wet‐
BioMap2 combines 30 years of rare species and natu‐ dominated by shrubs and are highly acidic environ‐ ral community data from the NHESP with wildlife spe‐ ments. Some small stunted coniferous trees, such as cies and habitat assessments that were conducted as tamarack (Larix laricina) and black spruce (Picea maria‐ part of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s 2005 na) may occur throughout them. Level bogs usually State Wildlife Ac on Plan (SWAP). Addi onally, Bio‐ receive li le or no streamflow. Carnivorous plant spe‐ Map2 data integrates the Nature Conservancy’s as‐ cies such as Pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) and sessment of large, connected and intact ecosystems Sundews (Drosera rotundifolia and D. intermedia) are across the state. (NHESP, 2012). o en found in these environments. Addi onally, these bog communi es may be home to rare insect BioMap 2 has two primary components, Core Habitat and animal species such as the Jefferson Salamander and Cri cal Natural Landscape. Core Habitat includes (Ambystoma jeffersonianum) and the Ebony “areas that are cri cal for the long term persistence of Boghaunter dragonfly (Williamsonia fletcheri) (NHESP, rare species and other species of conserva on con‐ 1999 Level Bog Fact Sheet). cern” (NHESP, 2012).
Cri cal Natural Landscape iden fies large con guous Acidic Shrub Fen landscape blocks that have been minimally impacted Acidic shrub fen natural communi es are acidic, shrub by development. The BioMap2 report for the Town of dominated peatlands. They are generally less acidic O s notes that “if protected, these areas will provide and therefore less nutrient deprived than shrub fens. habitat for wide‐ranging na ve species, support intact They are typically found along the margins of ponds. ecological processes, maintain connec vity among In O s, this natural community is found along the edge habitats, and enhance ecological resilience to natural of Horseshoe Pond, and is the second largest example and anthropogenic disturbances in a rapidly changing of this natural community in the state. Some rare spe‐ world” (NHESP, 2012). Cri cal natural landscape com‐ cies associated with Acidic shrub fens include Spo ed prises 15,535 acres or 63% of all land within the town. Turtle (Clemmys gu ata) and several rare insect spe‐ cies (NHESP, 1999 Acid shrub fen Fact Sheet). Large areas of core habitat have been iden fied around Long and Kingsbury Mountain on the western High Energy Riverbank side of town. A por on of this area of core habitat is These natural communi es are located near fast mov‐ permanently protected as part of the Long Mountain ing water, where the land is constantly disturbed by Wildlife Management Area. Addi onal core habitat erosion and sedimenta on. They are usually sandy or follows the length of the Farmington River corridor as rocky and have sparse vegeta on that can include it flows through town. Smaller areas extend around prairie grasses, low shrubs or small perennials. These Whi ng pond and in low lying areas near Church Hill environments may provide habitat for migra ng Pond south to Dimmock Brook Pond. Addi onally a shorebirds such as Spo ed Sandpiper (Ac s maculari‐ large area of core habitat coincides with the extensive us) or Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus), and also provide wetland areas north of Big Pond. Core habitat areas breeding habitat for some rare insect species (NHESP, with O s comprise 5,115 acres, or 21% of all land 2006). within the town. Core habitat areas are not mutually exclusive from areas of cri cal natural landscape. In Vernal Pools general, core habitats are located within areas of cri ‐ Vernal pools are a unique type of wetland and wildlife cal natural landscape. habitat, and are some mes known as autumnal or ephemeral pool or temporary woodland ponds. Ver‐ Priority Natural Communities nal pools are shallow depressions that are seasonally Level Bog flooded with water. They can vary greatly in size. Dur‐ Level bog natural communi es are found in Mud Pond ing summer months, vernal pools are usually dry. (just south of I‐90) in O s. Level bogs are primarily However, spring snow melt and rain transform these
O s Master Plan Appendix
areas into rich wildlife habitat. Vernal pools are pro‐ tected by the Wetlands Protec on Act. However, they must be cer fied prior to gaining protected status. Not every depression that fills with water can be con‐ sidered a vernal pool.
Vernal pools are cer fied by the state Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP). Cer fica‐ on involves the documenta on of the poten al ver‐ nal pool’s physical characteris cs, including the lack of a permanently flowing outlet for water and evidence that the pool dries out during the year. Addi onally, cer fica on involves the documenta on of wildlife species that commonly use vernal pools. While the NHESP uses aerial photography to help iden fy vernal pools, they also rely extensively on repor ng of poten‐ al vernal pools from ci zens and landowners.
Due to the fact that vernal pools dry par ally or com‐ pletely during the summer months, fish are prevented from permanently establishing themselves. This makes vernal pools important breeding habitat for amphibian and invertebrate species that would other‐ wise face extensive preda on from fish species. Spe‐ cies that rely on vernal pools for breeding habitat in‐ clude frogs, salamanders, toads, as well as some insect species, such as dragonflies or small fairy shrimp (NHESP, 2015)
Within O s, there are 10 cer fied vernal pools, and another 36 areas that have been iden fied as poten‐ al vernal pools, but have not been cer fied as such (See Map 13, Vegeta on, Fisheries and Wildlife).
Table C14 - Massachusetts Cultural Resource Information System (MACRIS) Records for the Town of Otis
Source: MACRIS Database, 2015 Property Name Street Year Otis Center Tolland State Forest - Peninsula Area Old Boston and Albany Road Mile Stone Marker Algerie Rd 1764 Phelps, Starling and Issaic House 1325 Algerie Rd c 1790 Jackson, J. C. House 701 Becket Rd r 1765 Knox, Gen. Henry Trail Marker Blandford Rd 1927 East Cemetery, New Blandford Rd Free Meeting House Burial Ground Cold Spring Rd 1807 Davison, John Farm 40 Davison Rd c 1789 Broga House 9 Dimmock Rd r 1836 Helena Hall 11 East Otis Rd 1868 Hunt, Lucy - Jackson, John C. House 29 East Otis Rd c 1858 Benton, A. S. Farm 1234 East Otis Rd c 1835 East Otis Hotel 1898 East Otis Rd 1820 Hunt - Clark - Brown House 1923 East Otis Rd c 1825 Jones, Adonejah House 470 Ed Jones Rd 1770 Dimmock, T. D. House 215 Gibbs Rd 1817 Hugins, Salome House 195 Lee-Westfield Rd r 1833 Kibbee, Alanson House 837-855 Lee-Westfield Rd r 1829 Huckleberry Trolley Line Massachusetts Tpk c 1911 Merritt, John Farm 197 Merritt Rd 1786 Haskell, George House 200 Merritt Rd 1840 Pearsley, Calvin House 284 Monterey Rd r 1825 Smith, Rev. I. W. House 692 Monterey Rd r 1859 Cornwell, Chester R. House 853 Monterey Rd c 1830 Oles, H. V. House 1488 Monterey Rd 1815 Saint Paul's Episcopal Church North Main Rd 1829 Otis Town Green North Main Rd 1820 Cornwell, Chester R. House 14 North Main Rd 1830 Day, Moses - Crittendon, A. William H. House 22 North Main Rd 1790 Seymour, Squire Store 27 North Main Rd 1790 Otis Congregational Church 46 North Main Rd 1814 Otis Library and Museum 48 North Main Rd 1949 Filley, Lester House 69 North Main Rd r 1815 Osborne - Beach House 69 North Main Rd r 1828 Harmony Hall 70 North Main Rd 1849 Fireman's Hall 72 North Main Rd 1927 137 North Main Rd c 1904 Waters - Clark House 144 North Main Rd r 1843 Millard - Thomas Farm 225 North Main Rd r 1836 Jones - Stowe - Barton House 266 North Main Rd c 1858 Bates - Waters - Hayden House 1525 North Main Rd 1840 Bushnell - Jones House 1892 North Main Rd 1780 Baird - Broga - Bristol House 2015 North Main Rd r 1785 Baird - Dorman - Westover House 2034 North Main Rd r 1816 Tillotson, Samuel House 2051 North Main Rd 1790
O s Master Plan Appendix
Table C14 - Massachusetts Cultural Resource Information System (MACRIS) Records for the Town of Otis - Continued Norton Road Cemetery Norton Rd 1785 Old Albany Road - Knox Trail Old Albany Rd 1764 East Otis Center School 2 Old Blandford Rd 1850 Humason, Arthur House 18 Old Blandford Rd 1840 Gibbs - Pelton, Samuel - Pelton, Ephrain House 75 Old Quarry Rd r 1782 Pearl, Richard - Lee, Rev. Jonathan House 23 Pearl Rd r 1795 Strickland, Hiram House 26 Reservoir Rd c 1840 Larkom, Paul House 390 Reservoir Rd 1760 Hunter, Robert House Route 8 r 1830 Harrington, Thomas House Route 8 North 1820 Flint, Loren House Route 8 South 1828 Palmer, Enoch House 10 Ryan Ln 1800 Waters, Joseph Grocery Store and Post Office South Main Rd 1840 Porter - Carter - Crittendon Cabinet Shop South Main Rd r 1838 Day's Hotel 8 South Main Rd 1815 Pickett and Sears Store 14 South Main Rd r 1821 Jackson, John House 20 South Main Rd r 1843 Marshell House Blacksmith Shop 27 South Main Rd 1830 Congregational Parsonage 32 South Main Rd 1910 Jackson Wagon Shop 33 South Main Rd 1833 Spear, John House 46 South Main Rd r 1805 Calvin - Barker House 60 South Main Rd 1826 Strickland, L. J. House 70 South Main Rd 1829 Porter, H. W. House 73 South Main Rd 1834 Carter, C. J. House 78 South Main Rd 1837 Crittendon, Alanson House 87 South Main Rd 1838 Spelman - Fenn House 92 South Main Rd r 1856 Kenyon, N. J. House 102 South Main Rd r 1863 Norton, George J. House 120 South Main Rd 1841 Strickland, Daniel House 998 South Main Rd r 1807 Gulf Bridge Cemetery State Forest Rd 1840 West Center Cemetery Stebbins Rd 1790 Breakenridge, James House 802 Stebbins Rd 1782 Otis Reservoir Tolland Rd 1867 Otis Reservoir Dam Tolland Rd 1866 Otis Reservoir Gatekeeper's House 410 Tolland Rd c 1850 Tolland State Forest - Upper Peninsula Bath House Tolland State Forest c 1933 West Otis School House 12 Tyringham Rd r 1839 Jones, Arthur House 13 Werden Rd r 1784 Alford, Case House West Center Rd 1820 Alford, Capt. Roman House 1340 West Center Rd r 1805 Otis Center Cemetery West Otis Rd 1777 c=circa construction date estimate r=range construction date estimate. For more detailed construction date information refer to individual MACRIS inventory records for each property available at http://mhc-macris.net/index.htm
OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
Informa on contained in this por on of Appendix C permanent protec on due to conserva on restric ons and in Chapter 10—Open Space and Recrea on, has held by local land trusts. been adapted from the O s Open Space and Recrea‐ on Plan. Please see the full text of the Open Space Areas under limited protec on include other town‐ and Recrea on Plan for addi onal informa on. owned parcels such as town owned lands between Route 8 and West Center Road that have been consid‐ Open Space ered as site for the crea on of the town’s “100‐Acre Open space is defined as land that has not been devel‐ Park”. Addi onally, the town owns a number of unde‐ oped for residen al, commercial or industrial uses and veloped parcels off Great Woods Road. These parcels includes publicly and privately owned land. Open were acquired by tax lien and were originally part of a space o en has par cular interest to conserva on or proposed housing subdivision that never came to frui‐ recrea on and includes: on.
1. Land which contributes to the public water supply Areas under Chapter 61 (A, or B) tax reduc on pro‐ 2. Forests, fields, and agricultural lands grams are considered to have temporary protec ons, 3. Wetlands as they are privately owned. 4. Rivers, streams, and lakes 5. Parks and other recrea on lands All privately owned lands without conserva on re‐ 6. Wildlife corridors or animal habitats stric ons or not enrolled in Chapter 61 are considered 7. Land which preserves scenic views or town charac‐ to be unprotected. For a map of open space parcels ter and Chapter 61 lands in O s, please refer to Map 7 inventory of lands of conserva on and recrea on in‐ As described in previous chapters, O s has an abun‐ terest. dance of natural resources including forest, as well as wetlands, water resources and wildlife habitat (See Privately Owned Parcels Chapter 9‐Natural and Cultural Resources, as well as Privately owned conserva on lands in O s with per‐ the O s Open Space and Recrea on Plan). Moreover manent levels of protec on comprise 211.88 acres or the town has a wealth of recrea on opportuni es that 0.87% of all land within the town. These include three are created by its abundant natural resources, which privately owned parcels with conserva on restric ons has led the town to be called the “outdoor playground held by the Berkshire Natural Resource Council. It of the Berkshires” by some. should be noted, that unless otherwise stated, private parcels should be considered off limits to public ac‐ In total, protected lands in the town of O s extend cess. across 8,114.16 acres, or 33.3% of all land within the town (see Table C15—Protected Land in O s, MA). Chapter 61, 61A, and 61B Lands
Chapter 61 is a state program that allows private land‐ Land in O s is protected in a variety of ways and with owners to manage their proper es for forestry varying degrees of protec on. Conserva on and rec‐ (Chapter 61), agricultural (Chapter 61A), or recrea on‐ rea on lands in the Town of O s are protected by four al purposes (Chapter 61B) in exchange for reduced en es, the town, the commonwealth of Massachu‐ taxes. Parcels in the program for the purposes of for‐ se s, local land trusts and private landowners. estry must be at least 10 acres in size and must have an approved 10‐year management plan in place. Once Land is considered under permanent protec on if it is enrolled in chapter 61, the town where the property is owned by the state or a local land trust. It may also be located acquires a right of first refusal should the land permanently protected if the land is subject to a con‐ be put up for sale. This right of first refusal can also be serva on restric on. Within the Town of O s, many assigned by the town to a land trust or state agency. privately owned proper es are considered to be under Chapter 61 lands are not considered permanently pro‐
O s Master Plan Appendix
Table C15 ‐ Protected Land in O s, MA por on of a third (Beartown State Forest). However, Source: MASS GIS, 2015 there is no access to Beartown State Forest from O s. % of Total The nearest access is in Monterey. Addi onally, O s is % of Pro‐ Land home to three state owned Wildlife Management Are‐ Protected Land Cat‐ tected (24367.91 as (WMA). These areas are managed by the Depart‐ egory Acres Land Acres) ment of Fish and Game primarily as wildlife habitat Conserva on and public access is allowed. Organiza on 93.29 1.15% 0.38% Otis State Forest Municipal Recrea on opportuni es at O s State Forest include Town of O s 266.65 3.29% 1.09% mul use trails, hun ng, and fishing along streams and City of Springfield 245.00 3.02% 1.01% at Upper Spectacle Pond. O s State Forest is com‐ Land Trust 148.31 1.83% 0.61% prised of several large blocks sca ered through out Private 211.88 2.61% 0.87% town. Access to the large tract near Upper Spectacle Pond is available from Route 23. The large block in the State 5788.24 71.34% 23.75% eastern side of town can be accessed from Church Hill Subtotal 6753.37 83.23% 27.71% Road. O s State forest land houses the public boat launch for Upper Spectacle Pond (although it is located Chapter 61 lands 1360.79 16.77% 5.58% within the town of Sandisfield). Addi onally, a small por on of O s State Forest included the public boat Total 8114.16 100.00% 33.30% launch for Big Pond, located near La mer Hill Road in O s.
Tolland State Forest tected, as landowners can remove their property from Tolland State Forest is one of the major public access the program at any me. However, the owner must points for O s Reservoir. Recrea on opportuni es pay a penalty tax if the property is withdrawn from include several mul ‐use trails, a beach area and pub‐ Chapter 61. Chapter 61 proper es are privately lic boat launch, day‐use area, campground, hun ng, owned and should be considered off limits to public and fishing. Off‐highway motorcycle use is also al‐ access without the landowner’s permission. Chapter lowed in Tolland State Forest. 61 proper es in O s total 1360.79 acres, or 5.58% of
all land in O s (See Table C15). While these proper‐ Long Mountain WMA es certainly contribute to the town’s rural character and scenic beauty, they currently offer no public ac‐ This WMA is located between Dimmock and West Cen‐ cess or recrea on opportuni es. ter Road and West of Stebbins Road. This is one of the Commonwealth’s most recently created WMAs and Public and Non‐Profit Parcels was purchased by the state from the Lyme Northern Timber Fund in 2013. Much of this WMA is located Public and non‐profit lands contribute significantly to within land iden fied in the BIoMap2 project as “core the open space and recrea on opportuni es within habitat” and is considered valuable wildlife habitat for town. In total, these areas cover 6,541 acres, or 26.8% both rare species and other species of special concern. of all land within the town.
Otis and Farmington River WMAs State Owned Parcels O s and Farmington River WMAs are used primarily State owned parcels comprise 5,788 acres of land for hun ng, fishing and other passive ac vi es such as within O s, or 23.75% of all land within the town. birdwatching, walking and hiking. Por ons of the These parcels are composed of two major state for‐ Farmington River WMA cover both banks of the Farm‐ ests, (O s State Forest and Tolland State Forest) and a
Figure C9—The O s Skate Park is located immediately behind Town Hall at 1 North Main Road. The Skate Park is paved and offers several ramps, rails and quarter pipes. The Police Garage and Erbe building are visible in the background.
ington River just south of Hayden Pond near Route 8, and science of fishing or “angling”. The property abuts providing pris ne condi ons for fishing. Informal the eastern bank of the Farmington River. The proper‐ walking and hiking trails are located throughout both ty also contains a small baseball diamond. During the WMA areas. Access is available from pull‐off areas on summer, concerts and other town events are held at Route 8, as well as Ed Jones, Merri , and Johnson Izaak Walton Field. Roads. Municipally Owned Parcels Conservation Organization Owned Parcels Municipally owned parcels of conserva on or recrea‐ Izaak Walton Field on interest total 511.65 acres in O s, or 2.1% of all Izaak Walton field is permanently protected 93.29 land within the town. This includes 245 acres of land acre parcel located north of O s Center Village along owned by the City of Springfield in the northeast cor‐ Route 8. Access is from Tannery Road. The property is ner of town which is held to protect the public drinking owned by the Izaak Walton League of America, a con‐ water supply to Cobble Mountain Reservoir located in serva on organiza on with a focus on water quality the towns of Russel and Blandford (Slate, 2008). There and access for fishing. Izaak Walton was an English is no public access to these drinking water protec on writer best known for his book “The Compleat Angler”, lands. considered to the be one of the first guides on the art
O s Master Plan Appendix
Town of Otis Owned Parcels Big Pond Town Beach The remaining 266.65 acres of municipally owned The O s Town Beach is located at the end of Great land are controlled by the Town of O s. These include Woods Road along the northwest shore of Big Pond. 139.39 acres in 3 parcels between Route 23 and West Crea on of the town beach was one of the major ob‐ Center Road near O s Center Village. In the past, the jec ves of the town’s 2005 Open Space and Recrea on town has had plans to develop these parcels as “100‐ Plan. The beach is open to O s Residents and their Acre Park”. Recent planning the O s Parks and Recre‐ guests only. Town transfer sta on permits func on as a on Commission has centered on the development town beach parking permits. Canoes and kayaks may of trails throughout the parcels and the possible inte‐ be launched from the town beach; however, launching gra on of benches, accessible pathways and other of power boats is not allowed. Conversa ons with the features to make the park (or a por on of it) focused O s Parks and Recrea on Commission indicated that on the needs of O s’ older residents (Robert Rosen, while the town beach is well used, many residents Personal Communica on 2015). simply aren’t aware of it. The Parks and Recrea on Commission indicated a need to promote the town The adop on of the Community Preserva on Act beach more thoroughly and possibly install direc onal (CPA) by the town was intended as the funding mech‐ signage to guide people to it from Route 23 (Robert anism by which the town would begin to create 100‐ Rosen Personal Communica on, 2015). For more in‐ Acre Park. The CPA is an op onal surcharge on prop‐ forma on on the town beach and beach regula ons, erty taxes of 1‐3% that can be used by towns to fund please visit: h p://www.townofo sma.com/Pages/ projects in the areas of affordable housing, historic O sMA_Rec/townbeach preserva on, or open space and recrea on. However, the adop on of the CPA failed to pass at the 2014 O s Other Recreation Areas and Facilities town mee ng. Town Hall Park
Town Hall Park is located immediately behind Town Addi onally, the town owns 111.79 acres in 71 parcels Hall at 1 North Main Road in O s. This area contains a north of Great Woods Road. These parcels were ac‐ gazebo, shade structure, playground equipment, and quired by tax lien and were originally part of a pro‐ the town’s skate park. The O s Skate Park is paved posed housing subdivision. Some parcels in this area and contains several ramps, rails and quarter pipes have already been auc oned off by the town. There that can be used by skateboarders, inline skaters, or has been some talk of possibly using this area as a BMX bikes. Safety equipment, including helmets and town park, due to the proximity of these parcels to the pads, is required of all Skate Park users. For more in‐ town beach; however, there has been no formal plan‐ forma on on the O s Skate Park, please visit: h p:// ning (Chris Morris, Personal Communica on, 2015). www.townofo sma.com/Pages/O sMA_Rec/
PLAYGROUNDS/skatepark Town Cemeteries The Town of O s owns and manages 8 cemeteries Firehouse Park sca ered through out town that total 9.8 acres. Six of This small park area is located adjacent to the Main these cemeteries are listed in the MHC’s MACRIS data‐ Road Fire Sta on and was constructed during improve‐ base (See Table C14 in this appendix for a full list of ments to O s Center Village that included the installa‐ buildings and areas with historical significance to the on of sidewalks. The park contains benches, path‐ town). The largest cemetery is the O s Center Ceme‐ ways, and tree and shrub plan ngs. tery located near the intersec on of Routes 23 and 8 in O s Center. While the terrain of this cemetery is Farmington River Walk steep, it contains paved roadways, and could be used to extend a possible walking loop through the village Access to this short walking path is located behind the center. Saint Mary of the Lakes Church (72 North Main Road in O s) immediately north of the O s Recrea on Center
in Harmony Hall. This path is approximately 1/4 of a mile long and is comprised of a loop that begins at the church parking lot, runs along the bank of the Farm‐ ington River and connects back to the parking lot (See Figure C11, this page).
Otis Recreation Center (Harmony Hall) The O s Recrea on Center is located in Harmony Hall. The center is a well used public asset and includes a gym with weight li ing equipment, a cardio room (including treadmills) and a large second floor which contains pool tables and computers for use by O s residents. The center holds many classes and pro‐ grams for O s residents. Non‐residents can use the Recrea on Center facili es and a end classes for a small fee.
Current Recrea on Center Ac vi es and Programs: Bingo Chair Yoga CPR Training Golf Clinic Health Screening Swing Dance Le erboxing Movie night Pilates Qi Gong Tai Chi Volleyball Yoga Figure C11—The Farmington River Walk is a short Passes to area a rac ons walking path that can be accessed from the parking lot behind the Saint Mary of the Lakes Church at 72 Otis Ridge Ski Area North Main Road in O s. The O s Ridge Ski Area is a private 9‐run ski area locat‐ ed northwest of O s Center Village along Route 23. O s Ridge has been opera ng since 1946. O s Ridge is home to the Grouse House, a restaurant, and in the Mountain View Campground warmer months sells flowers. Mountain View Campground is a privately owned campground located south of O s Center Village along Camp Over low Route 8. The campground contains camping areas for Camp Overflow is a privately owned campground lo‐ RV’s and tents and has a swimming pool for guests. cated on the western shore of O s Reservoir. Camp Overflow also contains walking trail, horseshoe pits, a Survey Results volleyball court, a basketball court, and two play‐ Survey respondents were generally in favor of pre‐ ground areas. A boat launch is available to serving various types of open space, with forests be‐ campground guests. ing the type of open space that respondents said was
O s Master Plan Appendix
most important to protect. Overall, respondents were sa sfied with exis ng recrea on areas in town. The top recrea on ac vi es of O s survey respondents, based on a response of “frequently” or “very frequent‐ ly” were walking (73%), swimming (56%), gardening (55%), boa ng (52%), canoeing / kayaking (39%).
REFERENCES
2015.Bureau of Labor Sta s cs. Local Area Unemploy‐ Banker and Tradesman Online. Massachuse s Real ment Sta s cs. Available from h p://data.bls.gov/ Estate Records. 2015. Available from h p:// pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=la. Accessed April 7, 2015. www.bankerandtradesman.com/records/
real_estate_records.html. Accessed on February 26, Clough Harbor and Associates LLP. 1998. Town of O s 2015. Economic Ac on Strategy.
Berkshire County Regional Planning Commission. Crandall, James. Personal Communica on. March 9, 1979. Local historic Preserva on Ac vi es: A Status 2015. report. Pi sfield‐ MA.
D’Orazio, Lisa. Personal Communica on. March 9, Berkshire County Regional Planning Commission. 2015. 2004. Community Development Plan: Town of O s.
Pi sfield, MA. Farmington River Watershed Associa on. 2003. State
of the Farmington River Watershed Report. Simsbury, Berkshire County Regional Planning Commission. Ct. 2014. Sustainable Berkshires: Community Strategies
for a Sustainable Future. Pi sfield, MA. Farmington River Watershed Associa on. Available
from h p://frwa.org/. Accessed March 18, 2015. Berkshire Regional Planning Commission. 1997. Farm‐
ington River Watershed Ac on Plan – A Comprehen‐ Federal Emergency Management Agency. Na onal sive Management Plan to Address Nonpoint Source Flood Insurance Program. 1983, December 15. Flood Pollu on. Prepared for the Massachuse s Depart‐ Insurance Rate Map. Town of O s Massachuse s, ment of Environmental Protec on. Pi sfield, MA. Berkshire County. Community Panel No. 250035
0020B. Berkshire Regional Planning Commission. 2001. Un‐
paved Roads BMP Manual. Prepared for the Massa‐ Geane, Geoffrey. Personal Communica on. June 2, chuse s Department of Environmental Protec on. 2015. Pi sfield, MA.
Gould, Larry. Personal Communica on. March 9, 2015. Berkshire Regional Planning Commission. 2004. Town
of O s Unpaved Roads Assessment. Prepared for the Humason Wood, Lynn. 1974. A Gi From the Past.‐ Massachuse s Department of Environmental Protec‐ Nellie E. Haskell’s History of O s, Massachuse s. El‐ on. Pi sfield, MA. lington, CT.
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission. 2004. Un‐ Kobrin, Harold. Personal Communica on. April 15, paved Roads Assessment in the Farmington River Wa‐ 2015. tershed. Prepared for the Massachuse s Department
of Environmental Protec on. Pi sfield, MA. Land Use Inc. 1995. Economic Development Plan for
O s, Massachuse s. Berkshire Regional Planning Commission. 2013. Road
Condi on Report – O s, Massachuse s. Pi sfield, Ma. Massachuse s Department of Elementary and Second‐ Berkshire Regional Planning Commission. 2005. Town ary Educa on. Enrollment Data. Available from of O s Status of Roads & Official Map Report. Pi s‐ h p://www.doe.mass.edu/infoservices/reports/. Ac‐ field, Ma. cessed March 25, 2015.
Big Pond Associa on. Available from h p:// Massachuse s Department of Environmental Protec‐ www.bigpondassocia on.com/. Accessed March 18,
O s Master Plan Appendix