DOCSLIB.ORG

Our Voices. Our Impact

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Pfizer PAC Our Voices. Our Impact. Pfizer PAC and Corporate Political Contributions Report January 2015 – December 2016 Pfizer PAC – Our Voices. Our Impact. A Message from Sally Susman, Chair, Pfizer PAC I am pleased to share our 2016 election cycle political contributions report, which includes a list of candidates and political committees supported either by Pfizer or the Pfizer PAC from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2016. The Pfizer PAC is bipartisan; we contribute to candidates of both political parties and we do not contribute to Presidential candidates. Pfizer PAC and Pfizer Inc supported 2,420 candidates and multiple political committees at all levels of the government. 56% of the funds went to Republicans and 44% went to Democrats. I hope you will take time to review the report to see which candidates the PAC supported in your state and community. Patients continue to face significant legislative and regulatory challenges, and each election cycle is a new opportunity for lawmakers to either help or hinder patient access to innovative medicines. We are focused on making sure it’s the former. Our elected representatives are making difficult choices, including focusing on cost reductions that could fundamentally alter our ability to discover and develop new cures and therapies for those who are counting on us to help make their lives better. Our priority is to help build a constructive discourse in the political and regulatory environment to support our business priorities. Those priorities include the protection of intellectual property, supporting a patient centric healthcare system that enables access and encourages innovation, protecting patients from dangerous counterfeit medicines, protecting Medicare Part D, a program with 90% satisfaction among beneficiaries, and enacting a contemporary tax code that rewards innovation. At the state level, we are working to reform insurer barriers that delay and deny care, reduce out- of-pocket costs for patients, eliminate regulatory and legislative barriers to accessing biosimilars, innovative vaccines and consumer products, and pass civil justice reform legislation. As Pfizer’s PAC Chair, and through my interactions with elected officials, I see first-hand how decisions are made that impact our ability to discover and bring to market innovative medicines and vaccines as well as off-patent medicines that patients and physicians rely on every day. Thank you for your support, Sally Susman Chair, Pfizer PAC 2 PFIZER PAC Our Voices. Our Impact. What is a PAC? Who Receives Pfizer PAC Contributions? PAC stands for Political Action Committee. A political action Pfizer PAC is nonpartisan. committee is a It supports Democrats and government-regulated Republicans alike. From January organization that anyone can 2015 through Decmeber 2016, form to raise money for Pfizer PAC supported 2,420 political campaign donations. candidates. True to its nonpartisan PACs are formed by values, Pfizer PAC is committed individuals, non-profits, and to support candidates from both even many major corporations. political parties who share Pfizer’s vision and values for healthcare. How Does Pfizer PAC Work? When choosing to make a contribution to a candidate, the The Pfizer political action Pfizer PAC considers candidates’ committee, Pfizer PAC, is a views on issues that impact Pfizer nonpartisan organization that and its employees as well as the provides opportunities for presence of Pfizer facilities or employees to participate in the employees in the candidate’s American political process. The district or state. A complete list Pfizer PAC is an employee-run of Pfizer PAC and state corporate organization with a Steering political contributions for January Committee made up of Pfizer 2015 - December 2016 is included employees from different in this report. divisions of the company. All corporate PACs are funded by voluntary employee contributions. Pfizer PAC is no different; it relies on the participation of Pfizer colleagues. 3 PFIZER PAC & POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS GOVERNANCE POLICY Pfizer complies fully with all federal, state, and local laws and reporting requirements governing PAC and corporate political contributions. Pfizer has a Corporate Policy Procedure (#802a) that requires all PAC and corporate political contributions to be compiled and published semiannually in a report that is made available to employees, shareholders, and the public, and posted on the Company’s website at www.pfizer.com in “Lobbying and Political Contributions” under the “About Pfizer” tab within the “Corporate Governance” section. At the end of each Federal cycle (every two years), the Pfizer PAC is audited by Bond Beebe, a certified public accounting and advisory firm. Pfizer also requests that trade associations receiving total payments of $100,000 or more from Pfizer in a given year report the portion of Pfizer dues or payments used for expenditures or contributions that, if made directly by Pfizer, would not be deductible under section 162(e)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. We are disclosing such information received from our trade associations in this report. Pfizer has a PAC Steering Committee comprised of eight colleagues who review and approve all PAC and corporate political contributions on a monthly basis. To ensure adequate representation, Steering Committee members represent different divisions within the Pfizer organization. The PAC Steering Committee evaluates candidates on a basis of their views on issues that impact Pfizer and its colleagues. It also takes note of whether Pfizer facilities or colleagues reside in a candidate’s district or state. In addition, all PAC and corporate contribution requests are shared with the Pfizer Political Contributions Policy Committee for review. The Political Contributions Policy Committee is responsible for governing the Pfizer PAC. Pfizer does not traditionally make contributions to 527 Issue Organizations. If we were asked to make such a contribution, it would have to be reviewed and approved by the Political Contributions Policy Committee and subsequently disclosed in our semi-annual report. Finally, in light of the Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United case, Pfizer will not make any direct independent expenditures, a decision which has been discussed at the executive level as well as with the Corporate Governance Committee of our Board. 4 Political Contributions Policy Committee CHAIR Ken Cole Tony Maddaluna Sally Susman Senior Vice President, Executive Vice President & Executive Vice President, US Government Relations President, Corporate Affairs Pfizer Global Supply TREASURER Robert Jones Marc Scarduffa Joseph Gruber Vice President, Vice President, Senior Vice President, National Government Relations US Government Relations & Global Tax US Public Affairs SECRETARY Jeff Keisling Andrew Schmeltz Barbara Bonfiglio Senior Vice President, Senior Vice President, Assistant General Counsel, Chief Information Officer, Patient & Health Impact, Corporate Governance Business Technology Pfizer Innovative Health Doug Lankler Julie Schiffman Executive Vice President Vice President, Chief General Counsel Portfolio & Decision Analysis Margaret Madden Susan Silbermann Senior Vice President & President & General Manager, Corporate Secretary, Global Vaccines Chief Governance Counsel Rod MacKenzie John Young Executive Vice President, Group President, Chief Development Officer, Pfizer Essential Health Global Product Development Group Pfizer PAC Steering Committee David Blackwell Richard Dudek John F. Kelly Senior Director, Vice President Vice President, Research & Development Specialty Access Solutions Strategy & Transitioning Sites Groton, CT Itasca, IL New York, NY Sheryl Colyer Michael Flesher Dennis Ryan Vice President, Director, Key Account Manager, Human Resources Pfizer Medical Pfizer Essential Health New York, NY Chicago, IL La Jolla, CA Patrick Doyle Mike Hoffman Group Lead, Vice President, Pfizer Essential Health Global Procurement New York, NY Peapack, NJ 5 Pfizer PAC Our Voices. Our Impact. Political Contributions Recipients January 2015 – December 2016 Pfizer Political Contributions RecipientsJanuary 2015 - December 2016 Debt State/Office Win Full Name Facility Future Party District Corp PAC Retirement Election ALABAMA US HOUSE W Rep. Robert Brown Aderholt R 004 $5,000.00 W Rep. Bradley Roberts Byrne R 001 $2,000.00 W Rep. Martha Roby R 002 $2,000.00 W Rep. Terri Andrea Sewell D 007 $3,500.00 STATE SENATE Sen. Del Marsh R 012 $1,000.00 STATE HOUSE Rep. Jack Williams R 047 $1,000.00 ALASKA US SENATE W Sen. Lisa Ann Murkowski R $5,000.00 ARIZONA US SENATE Sen. Jeffrey Lane Flake (Up in ‘18) R $1,000.00 US HOUSE W Rep. Andrew S. Biggs R 005 $5,000.00 W Rep. Ruben M. Gallego D 007 $2,000.00 Matthew James Salmon R $2,500.00 W Rep. Kyrsten Sinema D 009 $3,000.00 GOVERNOR Gov. Doug Ducey (Up in ‘18) R $3,000.00 STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AG Mark Brnovich (Up in ‘18) R $1,500.00 STATE SENATE W Sen. Nancy K. Barto R 015 $1,000.00 Sen. Nancy K. Barto (Up in ‘18) R 015 $400.00 Carlyle W. Begay R 007 $300.00 Rep. Andrew S. Biggs R 012 $400.00 W Sen. Sonny Borrelli R 005 $600.00 Sen. Sean Bowie (Up in ‘18) D 018 $400.00 W NP Winner Non-Partisan Debt-Retirement Facility 7 Pfizer Political Contributions RecipientsJanuary 2015 - December 2016 Debt State/Office Win Full Name Facility Future Party District Corp PAC Retirement Election W Sen. David T. Bradley D 010 $500.00 W Sen. Kate Brophy McGee R 028 $1,250.00 Sen. Kate Brophy McGee (Up in ‘18) R 028 $400.00 W Sen. Judy M. Burges R 022 $400.00 W Sen. Lupe Chavira Contreras D 019 $400.00 Jeff Dial R 018 $800.00 Adam Driggs R 028 $400.00 W Sen. Karen Elizabeth Fann R 001 $600.00 W Sen. Steve Farley D 009 $500.00 Sen. Steve Farley (Up in ‘18) D 009 $400.00 W Sen. Gail Griffin R 014 $600.00 W Sen. Katie Hobbs D 024 $800.00 Sen. Katie Hobbs (Up in ‘18) D 024 $400.00 W Sen. John Kavanagh R 023 $300.00 W Sen. Debbie Lesko R 021 $700.00 Eric Meyer D 028 $900.00 W Sen.
Recommended publications
  • Legal Notice #4

    Legal Notice #4

    ELECTION NOTICE - SAMPLE BALLOT OFFICIAL BALLOT Carly Fiorina OFFICIAL BALLOT Candidates of the Democratic Committed and Uncommitted STATE OF TENNESSEE STATE OF TENNESSEE Stephen Siao Party for President of the Delegates Jim Gilmore Committed to Ted Cruz MONTGOMERY COUNTY MONTGOMERY COUNTY United States 7th Congressional District Sharon P. Strange MARCH 1, 2016 Lindsey 0. Graham MARCH 1, 2016 Vote For One (1) Delegate Candidates are listed Committed to Ted Cruz PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE 0 selected, incomplete in alphabetical order by Julie West PRIMARY Mike Huckabee PRIMARY Presidential candidate. “I declare my preference Committed to Ted Cruz REPUBLICAN BALLOT DEMOCRATIC BALLOT Vote For Three (3) John R. Kasich for candidate for the office Joe Baugh 0 selected, incomplete of President of the United Committed to Carly Fiorina Precinct Name Precinct Name George Pataki States to be:” Patrick Baggett Brenda H. Davis REPUBLICAN DEMOCRATIC Committed to Jeb Bush Committed to Carly Fiorina Rand Paul Hillary Clinton Mary Kate Brown Doug Edwards Candidates of the Republican Committed to Jeb Bush Committed to Mike Huckabee Marco Rubio Martin J. O’Malley Party for President of the Katherine Carrigan Dale Moore United States Rick Santorum Bernie Sanders Committed to Jeb Bush Committed to Mike Huckabee Vote For One (1) Philip Graham Jerry D. Woods 0 selected, incomplete Donald J. Trump Uncommitted Committed to Jeb Bush Committed to Mike Huckabee "I declare my preference for Ray White Meg Crisp Uncommitted Write-In candidate for the office of President Committed to Jeb Bush Committed to John R. Kasich of the United States to be:" Write-In Mary Ellen Redford Devin Floyd Committed to Ben Carson Committed to John R.
  • President's Message

    President's Message

    Vol. 27 • No. 4 December 2014, January, February 2015 The Official Publication of The Wyoming Nurses Association Index Quarterly circulation approximately 6,000 to all RNs, LPNs, and Student Nurses in Wyoming. WNA Nurses Day at the President’s Message Legislature Making a Difference Anne Raga, RN, MS, CNML regional representatives and work with district leaders to create this new structure. We know there are many I want to begin by saying questions and challenges to work through, but using our I am so honored to have the joint intelligence and creativity we will accomplish it--we opportunity to serve as WNA are nurses, after all! President for the next two years. We are a strong organization, Membership made so by our members and past leaders, and I am grateful for each One goal is to develop better communication with our of you. I offer my thanks to our members, and improve our marketing pieces, especially Pages 4-5 immediate Past President, Lisa using online resources. You recently received an online Horton, for involving me over the newsletter which will now come to you each month. This last two years to better prepare me will provide updates from both the state and national to serve. perspective, and will also be a way for members to share Each month I have the opportunity to meet with the news and upcoming educational events, etc. nurses who are new to our organization. We share our We have created a Convention Planning Committee stories about why we became nurses, and there is always with members from all regions.
  • Voting Record on Voting Record Small Business Issues 2016 Edition

    Voting Record on Voting Record Small Business Issues 2016 Edition

    2016 | Wyoming YOUR LEGISLATORS’ VOTING RECORD ON VOTING RECORD SMALL BUSINESS ISSUES 2016 EDITION 2015–16 SESSION: Floor votes by your state legislators on key small business issues are listed inside. The Voting Record does not reflect all elements considered by a lawmaker when voting, nor does it represent a complete profile of a legislator, but it can be a guide in evaluat- ing a legislator’s attitude toward small business. Many issues affecting small business are decided in committees and never make it to the floor of the House or Senate. Unfortunately, there were not enough contrasting Senate floor votes to develop a voting record that provided any insight into a legislator’s level of support for small business issues. Please thank those legislators who supported small business and continue to work with those who have fallen short. 2015 4. SF0046, Seizure and forfeiture of assets involved in controlled substance violations. 1. HJR 0004, Balanced Budget Resolution, would This bill reforms guidelines in the seizure of assets if have requested Congress to call a convention to propose the assets are involved in a controlled substance vio- amendments to the United States Constitution to require lation. The bill requires notices of hearings and clear a balanced Federal budget. A YES vote was requested and convincing evidence that the property is subject by NFIB. Passed the House 44–16. Failed in Senate. to forfeiture. The passage provides protections to third parties with an interest in seized property, such 2. SF0080, Trespassing to Collect Data. This bill as a business who sold the property on credit.
  • <Billno> <Sponsor> SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 517 by Gilmore A

    <Billno> <Sponsor> SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 517 by Gilmore A

    <BillNo> <Sponsor> SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 517 By Gilmore A RESOLUTION to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the passage of Public Chapter 95 of 1921. WHEREAS, on April 5, 1921, Governor Alfred A. Taylor signed into law Senate Bill 737, which became Public Chapter 95 of 1921, a law that gave the women of Tennessee the right to hold public office; and WHEREAS, less than thirty years earlier, on April 29, 1893, the Tennessee Supreme Court had declared in State ex rel. v. Davidson, 92 Tenn 531; 22 S.W. 203, that "By the English or common law, no woman, under the dignity of a queen, could take part in the government of the State, and they could hold no office except parish office…"; and WHEREAS, the Tennessee Supreme Court further stated that "Although a woman may be a citizen, she is not entitled, by virtue of her citizenship, to take any part in the government, either as a voter or as an officer, independent of legislation conferring such rights upon her…. It follows that unless there is some constitutional or legislative provision enabling her to hold office, she is not eligible to the same"; and WHEREAS, in short, such ruling declared that although a woman was a citizen of the State, she had no right to vote or hold any elected office; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1919, Governor A. H. Roberts signed into law Public Chapter 139 of 1919, "AN ACT granting women the right to vote for electors of President and Vice President of the United States, and for municipal officers"; under this law, women in Tennessee could now vote in most elections, but the bar to holding public office remained; and WHEREAS, in August 1920, Tennessee became the thirty-sixth and final state necessary to ratify the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution; women throughout the SJR0517 006838 - 1 - United States were then able to vote in the November 1920 presidential election, but women in Tennessee still had no legal right to hold public office; and WHEREAS, in a special election held in January 1921 to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Senator J.
  • 2019 U.S. Political Contribution and Expenditure Policy and Statement

    2019 U.S. Political Contribution and Expenditure Policy and Statement

    2019 U.S. Political Contribution and Expenditure Policy and Statement The Company’s policy is to participate in public policymaking by informing government officials about our positions on issues significant to the Company and our customers. These issues are discussed in the context of existing and proposed laws, legislation, regulations, and policy initiatives, and include, for example, commerce, intellectual property, trade, data privacy, transportation, and web services. Relatedly, the Company constructively and responsibly participates in the U.S. political process. The goal of the Company’s political contributions and expenditures is to promote the interests of the Company and our customers, and the Company makes such decisions in accordance with the processes described in this political contribution and expenditure policy and statement, without regard to the personal political preferences of the Company’s directors, officers, or employees. Click here for archives of previous statements. Approval Process The Company’s Vice President of Public Policy reviews and approves each political contribution and expenditure made with Company funds or resources to, or in support of, any political candidate, political campaign, political party, political committee, or public official in any country, or to any other organization for use in making political expenditures, to ensure that it is lawful and consistent with the Company’s business objectives and public policy priorities. The Company’s Senior Vice President for Global Corporate Affairs and the Senior Vice President and General Counsel review all political expenditures. In addition, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors annually reviews this political contribution and expenditure policy and statement and a report on all of the Company’s political contributions and expenditures, including any contributions made to trade associations or 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations.
  • 2013 House Government and Veterans Affairs Hb 1309

    2013 House Government and Veterans Affairs Hb 1309

    2013 HOUSE GOVERNMENT AND VETERANS AFFAIRS HB 1309 2013 HOUSE STANDING COMMITTEE MINUTES House Government and Veterans Affairs Committee Fort Union Room, State Capitol HB 1309 January 24, 201 3 17670 D Conference Committee Committee Clerk Signature Explanation or reason for introduction of bill/resolution: Relating to state agency reporting requirements for employee service awards, employer­ paid tuition, and employer-paid dues and memberships Minutes: You may make reference to "attached te Chairman Jim Kasper opened the hearing on HB 1309. Rep. Guggisberg testified as a sponsor of this bill. I was on the interim committee for employee benefits and we received a summary report of what the bill proposes to take out. We heard testimony that it is a 500-page report and there are departments that are spending 400 hours on it. It appears the 61 st legislative assembly found some improper use of these funds in a certain department and decided to have them report. It has caused a lot of work for departments that were outside of that agency. To get these funds first of all, they have to create a rule that has to go through the rules committee. These funds are tracked during our audits, both fiscal and performance audits. It seems like it is doing the same work twice. Rep. Ben Koppelman If your bill was passed, would these things still show up as a line item in other year end reports? Rep. Guggisberg The budgets I have seen so far in appropriations, these are not line items, but when the department is audited, it is something that they look at in the audit.
  • Voters' Pamphlet Has a Shaded Side Bar and Has City of Wilsonville, Councilor

    Voters' Pamphlet Has a Shaded Side Bar and Has City of Wilsonville, Councilor

    VOTERS’ PAMPHLET NOVEMBER 6, 2018 GENERAL ELECTION Important Information Clackamas County Elections Division ● The deadline to register to vote is 1710 Red Soils Court Suite 100 October 16, 2018 to be eligible for a ballot for this election. Oregon City, OR 97045 www.clackamas.us/elections ● All official drop sites in Clackamas 503.655.8510 County are available to the public 24 hours a day from October 17, 2018 until 8 pm on Election Day. (p. C-84) Sherry Hall ● Ballots may be received by 8:00 pm County Clerk on Election Day, November 6, 2018 CLACKAMAS COUNTY Office of the County Clerk SHERRY HALL CLERK 1710 RED SOILS CT, SUITE 100 OREGON CITY, OR 97045 503.655.8510 FAX 503.650.5687 Dear Clackamas County Voter: This Voters’ Pamphlet contains information designed to assist you in voting: candidates’ statements, ballot titles, explanatory statements, and arguments pertaining to local measures that appear on the November 6, 2018 General Election ballot in Clackamas County. You will not vote on everything that appears in this pamphlet, only those candidate races and measures that appear on the Official Ballot in your Vote-By-Mail packet. In order to vote on a certain measure or race, you must be an active registered voter of the jurisdiction placing the measure on the ballot. Your voted ballot must be received at the Elections Office, 1710 Red Soils Court, Suite 100, in Oregon City or an official ballot drop site by 8:00 p.m. on election night in order to be counted. Remember, the postmark on a mailed ballot does NOT count.
  • Ameren Il 2020 Mid-Year Corporate Political

    Ameren Il 2020 Mid-Year Corporate Political

    AMEREN IL 2020 MID-YEAR CORPORATE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION SUMMARY CommitteeID CommitteeName ContributedBy RcvdDate Amount Address1 City State Zip D2Part 25530 Friends of Mark Batinick Ameren 06/30/2020 $ 1,000.00 PO Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 17385 Friends of Mattie Hunter Ameren 06/30/2020 $ 2,500.00 P.O. Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 19155 Citizens for Tom Morrison Ameren 06/30/2020 $ 1,000.00 PO Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 31972 Citizens for Colonel Craig Wilcox Ameren 06/10/2020 $ 3,000.00 PO Box 66892 St Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 35553 Brad Stephens for State RepresentativeAmeren 06/04/2020 $ 1,000.00 P.O. BOX 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 34053 Committee to Elect Dan Caulkins Ameren 05/29/2020 $ 1,000.00 200 W Washington Springfield IL 62701 Individual Contribution 31821 Fowler for Senate Ameren 05/09/2020 $ 1,000.00 P.O. Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 35553 Brad Stephens for State RepresentativeAmeren 04/27/2020 $ 1,000.00 P.O. BOX 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Individual Contribution 4261 Friends of Mary E Flowers Ameren 04/22/2020 $ 2,000.00 607 E. Adams Street Springfield IL 62739 Individual Contribution 34053 Committee to Elect Dan Caulkins Ameren 03/17/2020 $ 1,000.00 200 W Washington Springfield IL 62701 Individual Contribution 22882 Friends of Rita Mayfield Ameren 03/17/2020 $ 1,000.00 P.O. Box 66892 St. Louis MO 63166 Transfer In 25530 Friends of Mark Batinick Ameren 03/11/2020 $ 1,000.00 PO Box 66892 St.
  • Debt Transparency Initiative (Passed House 70-40-0; Passed Senate 37-16-0) House Bill 3649 (Rep

    Debt Transparency Initiative (Passed House 70-40-0; Passed Senate 37-16-0) House Bill 3649 (Rep

    Debt Transparency Initiative (Passed House 70-40-0; Passed Senate 37-16-0) House Bill 3649 (Rep. Fred Crespo - Stephanie A. Kifowit - Marcus C. Evans, Jr. - Brandon W. Phelps, Silvana Tabares, Martin J. Moylan, Robert Martwick, Arthur Turner, Kelly M. Cassidy, Natalie A. Manley, Kathleen Willis, Jehan Gordon-Booth, LaToya Greenwood, Gregory Harris, Frances Ann Hurley, Theresa Mah, Emily McAsey, Christian L. Mitchell, Anna Moeller, Carol Sente, Lawrence Walsh, Jr., Emanuel Chris Welch, William Davis, Justin Slaughter, Michelle Mussman, Carol Ammons, Jerry Costello, II, Katie Stuart, Michael Halpin, Sue Scherer, Litesa E. Wallace and Elizabeth Hernandez) Senate Bill 1652 (Sen. Andy Manar - Pat McGuire - Iris Y. Martinez - Melinda Bush - Don Harmon, Laura M. Murphy, Omar Aquino, Jennifer Bertino-Tarrant, Linda Holmes and Steve Stadelman) Purpose The state’s unprecedented fiscal challenges require a full weighing of outstanding vouchers and the ramifications of the $12 billion-plus unpaid bill backlog. House Bill 3649/Senate Bill 1652 seeks to provide a more accurate accounting of bills being held by each state agency and the late interest penalties the state is accruing. Background: After appropriations are made and services are provided, each state agency sends bills to the Comptroller for payment. However, if vouchers for payment are held at the agency level due to a lack of appropriation or processing delays, these liabilities remain largely hidden from the Comptroller. The state’s Prompt Payment Act, which assigns a 1% per month penalty to bills that are 90 days past due, applies to a currently unknown number of the bills being held by the agencies.
  • 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support

    2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support

    16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support 1 16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support Lilly employees are dedicated to innovation and the discovery of medicines to help people live longer, healthier and more active lives, and more importantly, doing their work with integrity. LillyPAC was established to work to ensure that this vision is also shared by lawmakers, who make policy decisions that impact our company and the patients we serve. In a new political environment where policies can change with a “tweet,” we must be even more vigilant about supporting those who believe in our story, and our PAC is an effective way to support those who share our views. We also want to ensure that you know the story of LillyPAC. Transparency is an important element of our integrity promise, and so we are pleased to share this 2016 LillyPAC annual report with you. LillyPAC raised $949,267 through the generous, voluntary contributions of 3,682 Lilly employees in 2016. Those contributions allowed LillyPAC to invest in 187 federal candidates and more than 500 state candidates who understand the importance of what we do. You will find a full financial accounting in the following pages, as well as complete lists of candidates and political committees that received LillyPAC support and the permissible corporate contributions made by the company. In addition, this report is a helpful guide to understanding how our PAC operates and makes its contribution decisions. On behalf of the LillyPAC Governing Board, I want to thank everyone who has made the decision to support this vital program.
  • Pension Fund Leaders Term Corporate Board Diversification ‘Unacceptably Slow,’ Call for Increased Attention from Investors, Corporate Boards

    Pension Fund Leaders Term Corporate Board Diversification ‘Unacceptably Slow,’ Call for Increased Attention from Investors, Corporate Boards

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PR16:21 Contact: Marc Lifsher June 1, 2016 [email protected] 916-653-2995 Pension Fund Leaders Term Corporate Board Diversification ‘Unacceptably Slow,’ Call for Increased Attention From Investors, Corporate Boards California State Treasurer John Chiang joins group of fiduciaries from funds with more than $1 trillion under management SACRAMENTO – California State Treasurer John Chiang today joined a group of state and local officials who contend that corporate boards have been too slow to diversify their ranks and that institutional investors should increase their focus on board diversity as a corporate governance priority. The joint statement emphasizes that racial and LGBT diversity as well as gender diversity are critical dimensions of effective board composition and performance. “There is broad agreement that a diverse corporate board is good for business,” Treasurer Chiang said. “Boards with directors, who possess a wide range of skills and experiences, are better positioned to oversee company strategy, risk mitigation and management performance.” Statistics show that board diversification has been slow—or has even regressed. White directors hold 85 percent of the board seats at the largest 200 S&P 500 companies, and the percentage of those boards with exclusively white directors has increased over the last decade. Men occupy 80 percent of all S&P 500 board seats. It is also estimated that there are fewer than 10 openly lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender directors among Fortune 500 companies. The 14 co-signers, many of them longtime leaders on the issue of board diversity, are fiduciaries for pension funds responsible for the retirement security of six million participants and with more than $1 trillion in assets under management.
  • Federalism and State Legislative Opposition to the Affordable Care Act: the Political Value of Legal Strategy

    Federalism and State Legislative Opposition to the Affordable Care Act: the Political Value of Legal Strategy

    Federalism and State Legislative Opposition to the Affordable Care Act: The Political Value of Legal Strategy ILARIA DI GIOIA A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Birmingham City University February 2018 Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences ii Acknowledgments This dissertation is the result of four years of intense research and study. I have, throughout these years, taken significant time away from family and friends to be able to concentrate and arrive to the end of this journey. I could not have succeeded without their support and understanding. I am especially grateful to my other half, Aqeel, who always finds the way to cheer me up and to my parents, Aldo and Milena, who believed in me and provided the financial means to begin this extraordinary journey. This dissertation would never have been completed without the generous support of Birmingham City University that awarded a three years Graduate Teaching Assistant bursary and funding to attend at least five conferences abroad. I would also like to thank the American Politics Group of the Political Science Association and Prof. Philip Davies who believed in my project and funded a very productive research trip to the headquarters of the National Conference of State Legislature (NCSL) in Denver, CO. My data collection would have been much more difficult without access to the StateNet database kindly accorded to me by Richard Cauchi, Health Program Director at NCSL. A special debt of gratitude must be expressed to my supervisor Dr. Anne Richardson Oakes, always present and ready to offer invaluable insights and suggestions.