Akobo County Profile - Flooding Response Jonglei State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk Very High Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: 5,000 - 25,000 Recommendation Close Monitoring Nutrition 4

The numbers are indicative and have not been verified. Source: OCHA Overview Floods Matrix NAWG: Needs Analysis Working Group Source:IPC - Integrated Food Security Phase Classification

Flooded Locations! Introduction ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping

! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping Ulang ! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! ! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! ! ! ! !! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! ! ! ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! 2 ! Average County Rainfall

! ! !!! !!

! ! !!!Wechboth Garkong !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Akobo! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! !! ! Akobo ! ! Dima! ! ! ! !! ! ! Reported Affected settlements ! ! !! Ulali Uror ! ! ! Reported flooded area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Other existing settlements ! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) ! ! Existing waterways/rivers ! ! • Abnormally high flooding in October may have damaged sorghum crops prior to harvesting, as well as access ! Wet lands ! Data sources: to supplementary wild foods that are a critical coping strategy for populations going into the lean season REACH participatory mapping by field officer Primary roads on the ground; ! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; • Deteriorated livelihoods can also be expected in an agro-pastoralist area reliant on cultivation ! Secondary roads ! ! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; Tertiary roads Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; • Flooding in Akobo town has also constrained access to the market, thereby impacting short-term food Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger availability Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Moderate • Distress migration to Gambella (Ethiopia) or to cattle camps is reportedly increasingly likely due to the negative impact of flooding on access to services and harvesting of crops Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Very High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Very High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health Very High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Duk County Profile - Flooding Response Jonglei State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk High Food Security & Livelihoods 4 Individuals affected: 25,001 - 50,000 Recommendation No Action Nutrition 4

! Mareang ! !! Duk ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ager !!Payuel! ! !!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! Reported Affected settlements ! ! ! Reported flooded! area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (as reported by KIs) !!!! Other existing settlements ! Impact of Flooding ! !! ! Existing waterways/rivers ! • Increased insecurity in the form of cattle raiding and intercommunal violence across the county has contributed ! ! ! Wet lands !! Data sources: to reduced access to livelihoods and basic services, and eroded household resilience through repeated !! REACH participatory mapping by field officer !! PanyijiarPrimary! roads Twic East!!! on the ground; exposure to shocks Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; Secondary! roads ! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; ! ! ! • Having already seen an increase in the number of IDPs living in temporary shelters before the flooding, the ! ! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; ! Tertiary roads ! ! ! ! !!! county is likely to see higher vulnerability to shelter damage due to flooding Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • The already significant IDP population may also contribute to large numbers of unregistered populations Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Moderate that may not be accounted for in flooding planning Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Very High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Nyirol County Profile - Flooding Response Jonglei State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk Confirmed Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: 25,001 - 50,000 Recommendation Close Monitoring Nutrition 4

The numbers are indicative and have not been verified. Source: OCHA Overview Floods Matrix NAWG: Needs Analysis Working Group Source:IPC - Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Flooded Locations Introduction ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! ! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, ! ! ! ! ! ! Baliet ! ! ! ! ! ! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping ! ! ! ! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ulang! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Nyirol! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Average County Rainfall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Thol! !!! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! Tut! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Majok! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Fakuach ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Chuil ! ! ! Reported Affected settlements! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! Reported flooded area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Other existing settlements!! ! ! ! Waat Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! Akobo ! ! !! ! Existing waterways/rivers!! ! ! ! ! ! ! • Large returnee and IDP populations are present in the area, so the flooding will likely exacerbate the needs of a Uror ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wet lands ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Data sources: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! population with pre-existing vulnerabilities ! ! ! ! ! REACH participatory mapping by field officer ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! on the ground; Primary! roads ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; • The county was predicted to move from IPC Phase 4 (Emergency) to Phase 3 (Crisis) in September-December ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Secondary roads! ! ! ! ! ! ! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; ! !!! 2019, but damage to crops and wild foods will likely increase food shortages in the short and long-term ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Roads: UNMAS,! OCHA,! HDX; Tertiary roads ! ! ! ! Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • Acute malnutrition (Phase 4: Critical) may be exacerbated due to increased food insecurity, reduced access to health/nutrition services, and unhygienic environment, with flooding possibly contaminating water sources. Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Moderate Displacement > 5000 Yes Nutrition Very High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% Yes prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Twic East County Profile - Flooding Response Jonglei State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk Very High Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: 25,001 - 50,000 Recommendation No Action Nutrition 4

! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Panyagordit (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! Gadiang ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! 2 Pakuor!! Kongor!! ! !! Average County Rainfall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!!! ! ! Baping! !!! ! ! ! Lualajokbil!!! ! ! ! !! Twic East ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Fakoi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!!! !Paliau!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Nomlaaw! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jorwach Maar ! ! ! ! Bor Reported! Affected! settlements ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Reported flooded area ! ! ! Yirol East ! ! ! ! ! ! South !Other existing settlements ! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Existing waterways/rivers ! • Flooding may exacerbate the already widespread food insecurity (IPC Phase 3: Crisis) in Twic East, especially ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Data sources: ! ! Wet lands ! as crops have been submerged and likely damaged prior to harvest ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! REACH participatory mapping by field officer ! ! ! ! Primary roads! ! on the ground; !! ! !! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; • In an area reliant on cattle-keeping, flooding has likely negatively impacted livelihoods as grazing grounds have ! ! ! ! Secondary roads !! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; ! been destroyed, migration paths washed away, and livestock diseases spread more easily ! !! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; ! ! ! Tertiary roads ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • WASH needs have been historically high along the Nile in Jonglei, making the area vulnerable to waterborne diseases such as cholera and typhoid, which when coupled with poor access to healthcare may lead to disease Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Moderate outbreak, and long-term increases in malnutrition in the area Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Very High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Very High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health Very High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Uror County Profile - Flooding Response Jonglei State, South Sudan - October 2019

! Existing waterways/rivers ! • The county was predicted to move from IPC Phase 4 (Emergency) to Phase 3 (Crisis) between September- ! ! ! Wet lands Data sources: December 2019, but damage to crops and wild foods will likely further increase food shortages in the short and ! ! REACH participatory mapping by field officer Primary roads! on the ground; long-term ! ! !!! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; ! Secondary! roads Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; • Although the damage to crop yields has not yet been ascertained, pre-harvest flooding has likely led to reduced ! Tertiary roads Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; food stocks that will be depleted earlier into the lean season, forcing populations to employ negative coping Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger strategies even earlier than normal Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Moderate • Possibility of increased distress migration to Gambella (Ethiopia) or to cattle camps due to the negative impact Displacement > 5000 Yes Nutrition Very High of flooding on access to services and future harvesting of crops IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Moderate 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% Yes prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Luakpiny/Nasir County Profile - Flooding Response Upper Nile State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk High Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: 25,001 - 50,000 Recommendation Close Monitoring Nutrition 4

Reported flooded area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) Other existing settlements! ! ! ! ! ! Existing waterways/rivers !!! ! ! • With livelihoods largely reliant on livestock rearing and to a lesser extent fishing, flooding has reportedly ! ! Wet lands ! ! Akobo ! ! ! ! destroyed critical livelihood assets such as livestock, which are dying or falling ill, as well as fishing equipment ! !! ! !! ! ! ! Primary roads ! ! !! ! Data sources:REACH Participary mapping ! ! ! !! ! !! ! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; • Continuously rising water levels have reportedly destroyed shelters, displaced people to higher grounds, ! !Secondary!!! ! roads ! ! ! ! ! ! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; ! ! ! and led to a loss of NFIs Tertiary roads! ! ! !!! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • Coping strategies such as relocating to towns with functional markets to sell existing livestock are reportedly Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods High becoming more common in the immediate aftermath of the floods. Sale of livestock is notably the most important source of cash in the region and as such is likely to have long-term negative repercussions on the livelihoods of Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Very High the area IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Maban County Profile - Flooding Response Upper Nile State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk High Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: 100,000+ Recommendation No Update Nutrition 3

The numbers are indicative and have not been verified. Source: REACH FGD NAWG: Needs Analysis Working Group Source:IPC - Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Flooded Locations Introduction In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. Offra ! ÔKaya In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, ! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping Tuyo Quffah mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping Feyqa ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, Kanje and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group Yelqu (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! Feika 2 ! Average County Rainfall Tagga ÔYusuf Batil Maban !

Ô Reported affected refugee camps ÔGendrassa ! Reported affected settlements ! Other existing Doro/MabanÔ settlements Bunj/Maban ! Primary roads !! Ballah Boing Secondary roads R.Yabus Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) Tertiary roads • According to UNHCR, around 150,000 refugees and over 70,000 members of the host community were ! Existing Liti affected by the recent flooding, which has been unprecedented this season waterways/rivers ! • The only road connecting Bunj and Melut town was submerged contributing to scarcity of goods in the market Wet lands 1:185,000 Dangaji km and a subsequent significant increase of prices of food and goods ! 0 2 4 Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • According to an assessment completed by DRC and UNHCR in Doro Camp in Maban, 80% of shelters have been damaged and there has been a 70% increase in food prices in the markets. Coping mechanisms include Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods High eating fewer meals a day and eating more wild foods than usual Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Moderate 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Rumbek North County Profile - Flooding Response Lakes State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk Moderate Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: 25,001 - 50,000 Recommendation No Action Nutrition 3

The numbers are indicative and have not been verified. Source: OCHA Overview Floods NAWG: Needs Analysis Working Group Source:IPC - Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Matrix Flooded Locations Introduction ! ! ! ! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! ! ! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, ! ! ! Mayendit however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! !! !! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Tonj East ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mantio ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected Maper ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! 2 ! !! ! ! Average County Rainfall !! ! ! ! ! ! Burut ! ! !! !! ! ! Panyijiar ! !! ! !!! Paging ! !! !Atit! !! !

! ! Rumbek North ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Akocdong! !! !! ! Thol ! ! ! ! Wundhiot! Reported Affected settlements! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Reported flooded area! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Other existing! settlements! ! ! ! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) ! ! ! Cueibet ! ! ! Existing waterways/rivers! !! ! ! • Flooding occurred from July through September in low-lying and river-adjacent areas of Meen, Maper, Madol, ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! !! ! Wet lands ! ! ! Data sources: and Wunrieng Payams, resulting in displacement towards Rumbek Centre and unaffected areas in the east of ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! !! REACH participatory mapping by field officer ! !! ! ! ! !!! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Primary! roads ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! on the ground; the county ! !! ! ! ! Rumbek Centre ! ! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; ! ! ! ! ! ! Secondary! !! roads ! ! ! ! !! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX;! ! ! ! ! ! • Excess ground water has resulted in damage to staple cereals such as sorghum, and disrupted other important ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; ! Tertiary! roads ! ! ! ! ! livelihood sources such as livestock and cattle rearing Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • Due to increased illnesses like malaria and waterborne diseases, outputs of normally productive family Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Low members may be reduced, resulting in a greater burden of daily activities to fall upon more vulnerable Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition High household members, and a parallel reduction in livelihoods IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Moderate 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Yirol East County Profile - Flooding Response Lakes State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk Confirmed Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: No Info Recommendation Close Monitoring Nutrition 2

! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! ! ! ! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! Panyijiar ! ! ! ! ! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, ! ! ! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! ! Twic East ! ! ! ! ! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping ! ! ! Rumbek! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! ! ! ! ! !! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group East ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! 2 ! Yirol East ! ! ! Average County Rainfall ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nhiar Amou ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Pagarau!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!Tinagou !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Manhiany! !! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Lieny !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! !Lekakedu! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Yali!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Reported Affected! settlements ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Reported! flooded area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Other! existing! settlements! ! ! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yirol West! ! !! ! ! Existing! waterways/rivers ! !! ! ! • Exposure to multiple shocks over the course of several years has eroded community resilience in Yirol East, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Wet lands ! ! ! ! ! notably the only county reported to have populations in IPC Phase 5 (Catastrophe) in August 2019 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Primary!!! roads ! ! ! ! ! ! Data sources:REACH Participary mapping • In the short and mid-term, access and availability of food will be reduced as crops are destroyed and access ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Secondary roads ! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD,! HDX; ! ! ! ! to markets are cut off which will likely aggravate hunger and acute malnutrition cases already present ! ! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX;! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Tertiary! roads !! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; ! ! ! ! throughout the community Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • Reduced access to health and nutrition services during the flooding period, and possible contamination of Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Moderate water sources will likely increase cases or malaria and other waterborne diseases Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Moderate IPC Population in Phase 5 Yes Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Very High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health Very High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Aweil Centre County Profile - Flooding Response Northern Bahr el Ghazal State, South Sudan - October 2019

The numbers are indicative and have not been verified. Source: OCHA Overview Floods Matrix NAWG: Needs Analysis Working Group Source:IPC - Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Flooded Locations Introduction ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! ! !! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Aweil West ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! Aweil East!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, !! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! Apada !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! !! !!!!! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Makuach-Akon! !!! ! !!!!!! ! ! ! Aweil!!!! !! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group !! !Malou ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. !!!! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !South! ! ! !! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Kuom ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! 2 ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Average County Rainfall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Panameth ! ! ! ! ! ! Maluil-Akot! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! Aweil Centre ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Reported Affected settlements ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! Reported flooded area ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! (as reported by KIs) Other existing settlements ! !! ! !!! ! Impact of Flooding ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! Existing waterways/rivers Jur River! ! • Roads have deteriorated and become impassable due to flooding, which is also severely impacting people’s ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! access to water in this county as most households have reported clean water sources are more than 30 Wet lands ! ! Raja !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Wau ! ! Primary roads ! ! ! ! minutes walking distance from their homes (REACH AOK) ! ! ! DataData sources:REACH sources:REACH Participary Participary! mapping mapping ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! AdministrativeAdministrative! boundaries: boundaries: OCHA OCHA !COD, COD,! HDX; HDX; Secondary roads ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Settlements:Settlements:! !! OCHA OCHA COD,REACH, COD,REACH,! HDX; HDX; • Members of the affected population have reportedly started to engage in coping strategies, such as collecting !! ! ! ! ! ! Tertiary roads Roads:Roads: UNMAS, UNMAS, OCHA, OCHA, HDX; HDX;! ! more wild foods to sustain their households after crop and livestock destruction Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • Areas in and around Aweil Town have been hardest hit and high rates of displacement are seen across the Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Very High county, with likely knock-on negative effects on areas receiving an influx of IDPs Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Aweil East County Profile - Flooding Response Northern Bahr el Ghazal State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk Very High Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: No Info Recommendation No Action Nutrition 3

! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! ! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, !

! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Malual! ! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. Aweil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! Average County Rainfall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! North ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Aweil East ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Mabior!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! !!! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Warawar! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!!!! !!!! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! !!! !! ! ! Twic! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! !!! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Yargot ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! !Malualkon! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Reported Affected! ! settlements ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Reported flooded! area ! ! !!!! ! ! Akuem ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! Other existing settlements ! !! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) ! ! ! !! !!! ! !!!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! Gogrial! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Existing waterways/rivers ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! • Flooding has impacted road accessibility across the county, which may impact trade routes with Sudan ! Aweil West ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! AweilWet lands ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! • County was predicted to move from IPC Phase 4 (Emergency) to Phase 3 (Crisis) between September- ! ! ! ! West! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! Primary roads! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!!! !Data! sources:REACH! ! ! Participary mapping! ! ! !!!! !! ! !! !!! !! ! ! ! ! December 2019, but crop and wild food destruction due to flooding will likely increase food shortages in the short ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Administrative! boundaries: OCHA! COD, HDX;! CentreSecondary! roads ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! !Settlements:! OCHA COD,REACH,! ! HDX; and long-term ! ! ! ! ! !!Aweil! ! !! ! ! South! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !!!!!!!!! Tertiary roads! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • Increased cases of malaria and waterborne diseases are already being reported as the primary health concerns, which will likely increase with continued rains Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods High Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Very High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health Very High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Aweil North County Profile - Flooding Response Northern Bahr el Ghazal State, South Sudan - October 2019

! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group

Gok Mishar ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! Average County Rainfall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Raja ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Aweil North ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !! !!!! !! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! Gok Machar! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! !! Aweil! !! ! ! !!! ! ! Majok-Tiit ! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!!!!! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Gor-Ayen!!! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Reported Affected settlements ! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! Ariath!! Centre! !! ! !! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! !!!! ! !!! !! ! ! Mayom Angok! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !East !!! Reported flooded area !! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) Other existing settlements ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! • Roads have deteriorated and become impassable due to flooding, which is also severely impacting people’s Existing waterways/rivers ! ! ! ! ! !!!!Maker! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wet lands ! ! !! Ajiith ! access to water in this county as most households have reported clean water sources are more than 30 ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Primary roads! Aweil West! !! ! ! ! minutes walking distance from their homes (REACH AOK) ! !! !!! !! ! ! ! Data! !sources:REACH! ! Participary mapping ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Administrative! ! boundaries:!! OCHA COD,! HDX; Secondary roads ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! Settlements:! ! !OCHA COD,REACH,! !!HDX;!!! ! • Sustained flooding has resulted in little to no harvest, as well as deaths of livestock, which is the main food and ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! !! ! Tertiary! roads! Roads: UNMAS,! OCHA,! HDX;! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!! income source in this county; flooding is therefore expected to reduce food availability and income sources in the Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger coming months Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods High • Impact on livelihoods will likely encourage an increase in migration to Sudan in search of casual labour Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition High opportunities IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Very High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health Very High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Gogrial West County Profile - Flooding Response Warrap State, South Sudan - October 2019

The numbers are indicative and have not been verified. Source: REACH FGD NAWG: Needs Analysis Working Group Source:IPC - Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Flooded Locations Introduction ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !!! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Twic ! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, !!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Aweil! ! ! East! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Aweil! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! West! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! Malek Ngok ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! 2 !!! !!! !!! !! !! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! Average County Rainfall ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Atukuel ! Ranypriny ! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Aweil! !! !South!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tonj ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Aweil !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! North ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Centre!! !! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !Gogrial !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! Reported Affected settlements! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Gogrial! Reported flooded! area ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! West !! ! Other existing settlements ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! Existing waterways/rivers !! ! ! ! ! ! ! East ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! • Heavy rainfall contributed to atypical flooding in the southern, western, and northern areas of the county ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wet lands ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Jur ! River! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! • Flooding has reportedly restricted road access to some of the more remote areas of Gogrial West, limiting ! ! ! ! ! !! Primary roads ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Data sources:REACH! Participary! mapping !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! access to markets and humanitarian services for already vulnerable populations ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Secondary roads! ! ! ! Administrative! boundaries:! OCHA COD, HDX; ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH,! HDX; ! ! ! ! ! Tertiary roads ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!!!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Roads:! UNMAS, !OCHA, HDX; • Given the high dependence on cultivation, the reduced yield will likely result in an early-onset lean season, Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger further exacerbating food insecurity Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Very High • Flooding has also reportedly damaged key grazing land around cattle camps for livestock, which will likely have longer-term implications on livestock health and livelihoods Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Very High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Very High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Tonj North County Profile - Flooding Response Warrap State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk Moderate Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: 5,000 - 25,000 Recommendation No Action Nutrition 2

The numbers are indicative and have not been verified. Source: OCHA Overview Floods Matrix NAWG: Needs Analysis Working Group Source:IPC - Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Flooded Locations Introduction ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! Mayom water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Achier-Chok ! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Koch mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Alabek!! ! ! ! ! ! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Tonj! ! North ! ! ! ! ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Akop ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Aliek ! !! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Average County Rainfall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Gogrial!! East! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! Warrap ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Ayai ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Agok ! ! Gogrial! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Rualbet ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! West! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Marial-Lou! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Reported affected! settlements!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Reported!! !!!! Flooded! ! ! !! area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Tonj! East ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) ! !!! Other! existing! settlements! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !!!Existing! ! waterways/rivers! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! • Reported destruction of crops due to flooding and displacement will likely impede access to food and basic ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Wetlands! ! ! ! ! ! ! Data sources: !!!!! ! !! ! ! ! Jur ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! ! services in Tonj North, which is a largely rural area that already faces seasonal access constraints !!!!! !!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! REACH participatory! mapping by field officer !!!! !! ! !!!!! !!Primary! roads! ! ! ! !!!!!!! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! ! on the ground;! ! ! !!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! • Poor harvest resulting from the destruction of crops during flooding may have short, medium and long-term ! ! ! ! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; Secondary roads! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! River! ! ! ! ! ! ! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; ! !!! ! !! Tertiary roads ! food security implications given high reliance on agriculture across the county !! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; ! !! ! ! ! ! • Increased cases of malaria and waterborne diseases, alongside decreased access to health services, may Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger exacerbate existing health needs Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Low Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Moderate IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Twic County Profile - Flooding Response Warrap State, South Sudan - October 2019

The numbers are indicative and have not been verified. Source: OCHA Overview Floods Matrix NAWG: Needs Analysis Working Group Source:IPC - Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Flooded Locations Introduction ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! Abiemnhom ! Aweil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! Majak-Kol ! East ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ajak-Kwach ! Nyin Den ! ! ! ! ! ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mathiang!! ! ! Anyiel ! ! ! Ayuel ! ! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Aheer/Lien ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yiikou ! Mayen Abun ! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! Akoc! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mayom ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Turalei! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Pan Nyok ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Average County Rainfall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! Aweng ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bar ! ! ! Akak ! ! ! ! ! Machot ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Panyok! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! Twic ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wunrok ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Gogrial! ! West Wun Liyu ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Gogrial East ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Affecetd settlements ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Reported Flooded! area ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) Other existing settlements ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! • According to REACH Area of Knowledge data, the proportion of assessed settlements reporting flooding as the ! ! Existing waterways/rivers ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wetlands ! Tonj North main cause of displacement increased from 5% to 80% between August and September in Twic County ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Primary roads ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Data sources:REACH! Participary mapping ! ! ! ! ! ! ! • Reduced crop yields will likely negatively impact access to food in the long term, as food stocks will be depleted ! ! ! ! Secondary roads !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Administrative !boundaries:! OCHA COD, HDX; ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; earlier into the lean season ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tertiary !roads ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; ! ! ! ! ! ! Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • The likely increase in cases of malaria and waterborne diseases, alongside decreased access to health services due to damaged roads, will exacerbate existing humanitarian needs Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Moderate • Already vulnerable populations displaced by intercommunal violence have been displaced a second time due Displacement > 5000 Yes Nutrition Very High to flooding IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% Yes prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Ayod County Profile - Flooding Response Jonglei State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk High Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: 5,000 - 25,000 Recommendation Assessment Nutrition 4

! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! ! ! ! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding,

! ! ! ! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response,

! ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping ! ! ! Nyirol ! ! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, !! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! !

! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response.

! Average County Rainfall2

! ! ! ! Mogok Ayod !! !! ! ! ! Jiech ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Reported affected settlements ! ! ! ! !! ! Reported flooded area !! ! ! ! Gorway ! ! !! Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) Other existing settlements !! ! ! ! ! Existing waterways/rivers ! • Flooding may have had a severe impact on cattle-keeping as grazing grounds are destroyed, migration paths ! ! ! ! ! ! Wet lands ! are washed away and livestock diseases spread more easily ! ! ! Primary roads ! ! Data sources:REACH Participary mapping ! ! • Flooding may restrict trade routes and cut off access to markets ! ! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; ! Secondary roads ! ! ! ! ! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH,! HDX; !! • WASH needs have been historically high along the Nile in Jonglei, making the area vulnerable to waterborne ! ! Uror Tertiary roads ! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger diseases such as cholera and typhoid as water sources may have been contaminated by flood water Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Low Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Very High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Very High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health Low of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Pibor County Profile - Flooding Response Jonglei State, South Sudan - October 2019

Affected Populations NAWG Trigger1 (29th October 2019) IPC Phase (August 2019) Overall Risk High Food Security & Livelihoods 3 Individuals affected: 100,000+ Recommendation Assessment Nutrition 4

! ! ! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! ! ! ! ! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! ! ! ! ! ! Pochalla ! ! Likuangole! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! Average County Rainfall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! Pibor!! Town ! ! ! ! ! ! Pibor ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! Gumuruk !! Verthert ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Reported affected settlements! ! ! ! Reported flooded area ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Other! existing settlements Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) Existing! waterways/rivers • Access is reportedly extremely limited due to flooding, but the community has reported an increased need of ! Wet lands NFIs and food assistance Primary roads ! Data sources:REACH Participary mapping • High displacement out of Pibor due to the flooding, but women and children are going to different locations from Secondary roads Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; the men and livestock which may imply protection risks among the community Tertiary roads Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; • According to REACH Joint Market Monitoring Initiative, the market in Pibor town was completely inaccessible Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger due to the flooding Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods High Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Very High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes Moderate 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health Very High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Mayom County Profile - Flooding Response Unity State, South Sudan - October 2019

Existing waterways/rivers ! ! • Excess rains have caused displacement to surrounding highlands and roadside areas and IDPs are reportedly ! Wet lands Gogrial East Data sources: relying on relatives or social networks for shelter and resources REACH participatory mapping by field officer! ! Primary roads on the ground, IOM-DTM; ! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; • Reported destruction of crops by flooding will likely impede access to food in the short and medium-term, with Secondary roads Settlements:! OCHA! COD,REACH, HDX;! ! reports of increased sales of livestock in the market as a coping mechanism Tertiary roads Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • Flooding has destroyed waterpoints and local community members are reportedly relying on open-water sources, such as rivers and swamps, which is a severe health risk given reports of widespread open defecation Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods Low practices near rivers. This risk is further exacerbated by the reportedly flooded health and nutrition facilities in the Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition High area IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid Ulang County Profile - Flooding Response Upper Nile State, South Sudan - October 2019

The numbers are indicative and have not been verified. Source: OCHA Overview Floods Matrix NAWG: Needs Analysis Working Group Source:IPC - Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Flooded Locations Introduction ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! In 2019, unprecedented flooding has reportedly washed away crops, destroyed homes, and contaminated ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! water sources, as well as cut off or constrained access to critical basic services in some parts of the country. ! ! ! In many parts of South Sudan, strong coping mechanisms are already in place to deal with annual flooding, Baliet ! ! ! ! ! ! !! however, it is important to recognise that many households have limited capacity to adopt traditional coping ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! mechanisms due to the cumulative impact of multiple years of shocks. To inform the emergency response, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! REACH conducted Key Informant interviews with local partners and authorities and Participatory Mapping ! ! ! ! ! Longochuk ! ! ! ! between October 21 - November 5 to provide a better understanding of where atypical flooding has occurred, ! ! ! Luakpiny/Nasir! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! and its impact on the local population. The factsheet below compiles information about the flood-affected ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Koat ! population in each county along with existing vulnerabilities identified by the Needs Analysis Working Group ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! (NAWG) and Area of Knowledge (AoK) data to identify areas of particular concern for the humanitarian response. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Average County Rainfall ! ! Dinkar !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nyirol !! ! ! ! ! Maiwut! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ulang! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Makeir ! ! ! ! ! Jikmir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! Reported! affected! settlements ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Reported flooded area ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! Other existing settlements Impact of Flooding (as reported by KIs) ! ! ! ! !! Existing waterways/rivers ! ! ! ! • Flooding may have had a severe impact on cattle-keeping as grazing grounds are destroyed, migration paths ! ! ! Wet! lands !! ! ! ! are washed away and livestock disease spreads more easily ! !! ! ! ! Akobo ! ! ! ! ! ! Primary! roads ! ! ! ! !! ! Data sources:REACH Participary mapping ! ! ! • Local populations were reportedly displaced, with women and children heading to Mandeng settlement, and ! !! ! ! !Secondary! ! ! roads ! Administrative boundaries: OCHA COD, HDX; ! ! ! Settlements: OCHA COD,REACH, HDX; ! ! ! ! ! !! ! men are going to to Dualdong Tertiary roads ! Roads: UNMAS, OCHA, HDX; Present NAWG Trigger Risk of leading to a NAWG trigger • Key informants reported an urgent need for plastic sheets due to destroyed shelters Disease Outbreak No Food Security & Livelihoods High Displacement > 5000 No Nutrition Very High IPC Population in Phase 5 No Water Sanitation and hygiene Endnotes High 1. The Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) conducts country-wide analysis of critical humanitarian needs to support the Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) with emergency prioritisation. The NAWG identifies counties with any of the following 5 triggers present: Disease outbreak, Displacement >5,000 individuals, IPC Population in Phase 5, GAM > 15%, or Increased Mortality. To support GAM >15% No prioritisation, the INT also estimates the risk that worsening humanitarian needs within sectors (FSL, Nutrition, WASH and Health) may lead to one or more NAWG triggers occurring. The level of risk Health High of NAWG triggers occurring is identified along a 4-point scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High) for each sector in each county. Based on the risk levels observed across sectors, the INT provides an overall risk classification of counties along the same scale (Low, Moderate, High, Very High). Counties with at least one NAWG trigger identified are classified as "Confirmed" in the INT system and Increased Mortality No According to Integrating Needs Tracking (INT) system, available here. flagged for discussion. Following discussion, the NAWG decides among 4 possible actions: no action, assessment, close monitoring or response scale-up. 2. Early Warning Signs: https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/ewx/index.html?region=af as of October 2019

For more information on this factsheet please contact:

Funded by REACH European Union Civil Protec�on and [email protected] Humanitarian Aid