Globalization and International Labor Solidarity—Intro- Duction to a Theme

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Globalization and International Labor Solidarity—Intro- Duction to a Theme Nordic journal of working life studies Volume 4 ❚ Number 1 ❚ February 2014 Globalization and International Labor Solidarity—Intro- duction to a Theme ❚❚ Christer Thörnqvist Associate Professor, University of Skövde, Sweden The never ending story of international labor solidarity—and the lack of it Is cross-national trade union cooperation and labor solidarity a forgotten item on Nor- dic working life researchers’ agenda? And if so, why? Is not the matter more crucial today than ever, considering the challenges from globalization? True, there have not been too many studies in the field by Nordic scholars, and also true, the field is in great need of research considering the great labor market changes both nationally and glob- ally over the last few decades. In order to find a remedy for this lack, a special workshop was dedicated to the subject at the Nordic Working Life Conference in Elsinore, April 2012. The response among the Nordic academics was not exactly overwhelming, but there were several highly interesting papers, bringing up new aspects or shedding new light on old ones. Some of the papers are now compiled in this special issue of Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies. All of them are individual texts and can be read sepa- rately. This introduction is just an attempt to put the articles into their common context, that is, to outline the framework within which they belong by highlighting some items they share. The long-term perspective The point of departure is deeply historical; after all, the urge for cross-national labor solidarity is 150 years old. Exactly 150 years old this year, if we view the founding of the International Workingmen’s Association, later also known as the First International, in 1864 as the start. The major direct incentive for cross-national collaboration between trade unions and workers’ parties was the importation of strikebreakers from continental Europe to the UK in the early 1860s (Lorwin 1929). Yet there is no straight line from the International Workingmen’s Association onward. The frictions between Marx and Bakunin and their followers is well known, but when it comes to trade unions and in- ternationalism, the ideological and strategic differences between Marx and Ferdinand Lassalle was more crucial. The strongest national labor movement at the time for the First International was the German one, and as one of the founders of what would come to be the German Social Democratic Party, Lassalle made a great impact, also after his untimely death in the notorious duel in 1864. In practice his influence was stronger than Marx’s in Germany. Consequently, Lassalle’s theories about das eherne Lohngesetz, in English the “Iron Law of Wages,” strongly impacted on the labor movement both in Germany and in other continental European countries. Trade union struggle within the capitalist system, Lassalle argued, was more or less futile, since capitalists could always outplay workers 1 2 Globalization and International Labor Solidarity Christer Thörnqvist against each other to take any job for minimum remuneration just to stay alive. There- fore, the only way for real improvement was to fight for all-encompassing suffrage and win power over the national political system. In other words, already from the start, the international labor movement was divided between Marxist internationalists, stressing cross-national trade unionism, and Lassallean “nationalists” emphasizing the political parties’ national role (Moses 1982).1 The outbreak of the First World War in 1914 was a decisive blow against what was left of European labor internationalism. Despite the promises made to the Second International, labor parties and trade unions dropped their internationalist ideals that no working men should fight each other and rallied around their national governments (Abendroth 1966, chapter 4). International trade unionism no doubt both recovered and stayed healthy, and survived challenges from the communist split following the Russian revolution and the frictions during the Cold War, when especially American trade unions threatened the ideological content of the movement. Still the frictions between national and international, as well as between political approaches and trade unionist activities, have remained. In addition, there have been crucial discrepancies due to religion and language within single countries and, in the aftermath of the decolonization, between the North and the South. Especially the latter has increased. According to the theme of the Elsinore workshop as well as of this special issue, the question is if the tradition- al concept of international labor solidarity needs to be redefined due to globalization, changes in employment, and state–capital relations. Are present day solidarity questions transferred from union collectives to public welfare-state and legislation issues, nation- ally implementing ILO conventions or EU regulation on human rights and equal labor standards—or just considered a voluntary ethical choice for individual consumers and companies? A long period of deregulation, offshoring, outsourcing, increased inequality, unem- ployment, and lost union battles have changed conditions for labor. The current crisis causes unemployment globally and governments cut in social welfare with austerity pro- grams. How is working life and unions affected in the North and the South, in different regions and countries to this increase in insecurity, and decrease in union influence on collective agreement, labor contracts, and labor market regulation? Will eventually a re- vitalization of labor struggle and international solidarity come as a result of neoliberal economic policies or is labor losing ground? There have been a strong social movement labor agenda in Latin America and currently against EU austerity policies in Southern Europe. Multinational companies (MNCs) have put corporate social responsibility (CSR) on their agenda. How are labor, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and unions reacting and cooperating in the age of global labor market flexibility and insecurity? Trade union decline Trade union density has, with a few exceptions, declined worldwide since the heydays in the first three or four decades after the Second World War (Frege 2006). In the words of Craig Phelan: “It is a bitter irony that trade union decline is occurring precisely when the labour movement is needed most” (Phelan 2006, p. 24). To some extent the drop in membership is not surprising, considering the transformation of working life in general. There have been profound changes in the sectoral and occupational structure of the Nordic journal of working life studies Volume 4 ❚ Number 1 ❚ February 2014 3 economy that have worsened the conditions for labor organization. Traditional sectors such as manufacturing have declined, at least in the already industrialized countries, in relation to private-sector services and the emergence of the information technology sec- tor. For the trade unions this means that their membership base has been changing since their traditional stronghold of membership linked to manufacturing is shrinking in such a way that they are forced to look for compensation in new sectors, sectors based more on small workplaces with few employees. Because of the transformation, there is also a decline in full-time jobs in vertically integrated firms based on conventional, open-ended labor contracts (Traxler 2007). But there are also features that cannot be explained solely by indispensable struc- tural changes. Outside the OECD area, the number of employees in manufacturing is still high, in many countries even increasing both in absolute and relative figures, so the transformation of the Western economies cannot be the whole answer to the global union decline. It should further be noted that even though the political repression of labor in the non-OECD countries has many times been exceptionally hard, it barely became even harder in the 1980s and 1990s, when the trade union density dropped the most in Asia, Latin America, and Africa (Fredge 2006, pp. 228–232). Globalization Besides being debated by the trade unions themselves, both nationally and internation- ally, the decline in membership has attracted much attention by academic scholars. This special issue is no exception. Yet, the main focus is—as the title of the issue hints—not on national unions; one feature that has been increasingly highlighted at pace with the globalization debate from the mid-1990s onward is how the preconditions for interna- tional trade union work have changed. “Globalization,” almost no matter the definition, is today stressed as the most crucial parameter to understand diminishing labor power at national as well as cross-national levels, as we will see in the contributions. The logic is very clear-cut; any economic internationalization threatens to devaluate the benefits of associations that still operate in the areas of the nation (Traxler 2007, p. 156). More- over, we do not need to either accept any of the many definitions of “globalization” or to elaborate a new one in order to see why trade unions and labor solidarity face problems that were not present in the heydays of postwar economics; there are some undeniable empirical facts and trends that rather much speak for themselves.2 The most obvious such trend is the growth of MNCs. At the turn of the Millen- nium there were for the first time more MNCs than nations at the Top 100 list of the world’s largest economies: 51 corporations vs. 49 countries, based on the comparison of corporate sales and country GDPs. Of course no MNC could compete with the largest national economies. Yet, to put it in perspective, the biggest corporation, General Mo- tors, came in as number 23, just before this journal’s editorial home country, Denmark. The 1999 sales of each of the top five corporations (General Motors, Wal-Mart, Exxon Mobil, Ford Motor, and DaimlerChrysler) were bigger than the GDP’s of 182 countries, and the Top 200 corporations’ combined sales were bigger than the combined economies of all countries minus the biggest ten (Anderson and Cavanagh 2000, p.
Recommended publications
  • Revolutionary Syndicalist Opposition to the First World War: A
    Re-evaluating syndicalist opposition to the First World War Darlington, RR http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2012.731834 Title Re-evaluating syndicalist opposition to the First World War Authors Darlington, RR Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/19226/ Published Date 2012 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Re-evaluating Syndicalist Opposition to the First World War Abstract It has been argued that support for the First World War by the important French syndicalist organisation, the Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT) has tended to obscure the fact that other national syndicalist organisations remained faithful to their professed workers’ internationalism: on this basis syndicalists beyond France, more than any other ideological persuasion within the organised trade union movement in immediate pre-war and wartime Europe, can be seen to have constituted an authentic movement of opposition to the war in their refusal to subordinate class interests to those of the state, to endorse policies of ‘defencism’ of the ‘national interest’ and to abandon the rhetoric of class conflict. This article, which attempts to contribute to a much neglected comparative historiography of the international syndicalist movement, re-evaluates the syndicalist response across a broad geographical field of canvas (embracing France, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Britain and America) to reveal a rather more nuanced, ambiguous and uneven picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Right to Freedom of Association in the Workplace: Australia's Compliance with International Human Rights Law
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title The Right to Freedom of Association in the Workplace: Australia's Compliance with International Human Rights Law Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/98v0c0jj Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 27(2) Author Hutchinson, Zoé Publication Date 2010 DOI 10.5070/P8272022218 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ARTICLES THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: AUSTRALIA'S COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW Zoe Hutchinson BA LLB (Hons, 1st Class)* ABSTRACT The right to freedom of association in the workplace is a well- established norm of internationalhuman rights law. However, it has traditionally received insubstantial attention within human rights scholarship. This article situates the right to freedom of as- sociation at work within human rights discourses. It looks at the status, scope and importance of the right as it has evolved in inter- nationalhuman rights law. In so doing, a case is put that there are strong reasons for states to comply with the right to freedom of association not only in terms of internationalhuman rights obliga- tions but also from the perspective of human dignity in the context of an interconnected world. A detailed case study is offered that examines the right to free- dom of association in the Australian context. There has been a series of significant changes to Australian labor law in recent years. The Rudd-Gillard Labor government claimed that recent changes were to bring Australia into greater compliance with its obligations under internationallaw. This policy was presented to electors as in sharp contrast to the Work Choices legislation of the Howard Liberal-Nationalparty coalitiongovernment.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Commission of Inquiry Appointed to Inquire And
    REPORT OF THE COMMISSION OF INQUIRY APPOINTED TO ENQUIRE AND REPORT ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE DEATH IN AN EXPLOSION OF THE LATE DR. WALTER RODNEY ON THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY AT GEORETOWN VOLUME 1: REPORT AND APPENDICES FEBRUARY 2016 Transmittal Letter Chapter 6 Contents Chapter 7 Table of Contents Chapter 8 Chapter 1 Chapter 9 Chapter 2 Tendered Exhibits Chapter 3 Procedural Rules Chapter 4 Correspondence Chapter 5 Editorial Note 1 2 Transmittal of Report of the Commission of Inquiry to enquire into and report on the circumstances surrounding the death in an explosion of the late Dr. Walter Rodney on the thirteenth day of June one thousand nine hundred and eighty at Georgetown To His Excellency David A. Granger President of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana Your Excellency, In my capacity as Chairman of the Walter Rodney Commission of Inquiry, I have the honour to submit the Report of the Inquiry to which the President appointed us by Instrument dated 8th February, 2014. The Commissioners were, in the Instrument of Appointment, expected to submit their Report within ten (10) weeks from the start of the Commission. The Commission started its work on 28th April, 2014. As we understand it, the premise informing the early submission date was that the Commission coming thirty-four (34) years after the death of Dr. Walter Rodney and the events surrounding that event, would, in all probability, be supported by only a few persons volunteering to give evidence and/or having an interest in this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • 2CO 06 Organising 03-10
    2CO/E/6.6 (final) INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION nd 2 WORLD CONGRESS Vancouver, 21 - 25 June 2010 RESOLUTION ON ORGANISING 1. Congress affirms that the purpose of trade unions is to defend and advance the interests of workers, that this cannot be realised without the organisation of workers and that only through their own organisation can workers change the world of work, create a more just society, and fully realise decent work. By organising workers, trade unions enable them to be defended and represented and to have their views expressed in public affairs and collective bargaining. Equally, the ability of trade unions to serve their purpose depends on the strength, ability to mobilise and legitimacy that comes only from their membership. 2. Congress declares that there can be no substitute for genuine trade unions which are formed as freely chosen associations of workers through democratic participation. They cannot be replaced by advocacy groups, by employer or government dominated labour organisations, or by management driven Corporate Social Responsibility programmes. 3. Workers seeking to form or join unions face daunting challenges and obstacles. Union organising is opposed through dismissals, harassment, intimidation, threats, surveillance, anti-union campaigns and even through physical violence. In many countries governments fail to protect the rights of workers seeking to unionise through inadequate legal protections, insufficient and delayed enforcement, biased judicial proceedings or weak, meaningless legal remedies. Some governments actively suppress trade unions through various means including encouragement of precarious employment relationships. 4. The falling level of trade union density in many countries is directly linked to the structural changes that have taken place in the global economy in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hobo Anomalous: Class, Minorities and Political Invention in the Industrial Workers of the World
    Social Movement Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2003 The Hobo Anomalous: class, minorities and political invention in the Industrial Workers of the World Nicholas Thoburn Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK This article is an analysis of minority political invention in the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). Against the tendency in recent social and cultural theory to dichotomize class and difference, it argues that it was in and through the IWW’s formulation of class that minority political and cultural invention occurred. Using the framework of Deleuze and Guattari’s minor politics, the article shows how the IWW’s composition in the simultaneously diffuse and cramped plane of work operated against the major political identities and subjects of worker, immigrant, American, citizen and ‘people’, and towards the creation of minority political knowledges, tactics and cultural styles premised on the condition that ‘the people are missing’. Seeking to understand the IWW’s modes and techniques of invention, the article explores the general plane of IWW composition, its particular political and cultural expressions (in songs, manifestos, cartoons and tactics), and its minor mode of authorship. The article focuses in particular on two aspects of IWW minority composition, the itinerant worker, or hobo, and the politics of sabotage. Keywords: Class, hobo, Industrial Workers of the World, minor politics, sabotage. Shall we still be slaves and work for wages? It is outrageous—has been for ages. (‘Workingmen, Unite!’, IWW 1989: 64) The wobbly movement has never been more than a radical fungus on the labor movement.
    [Show full text]
  • IMG/Pdf/Const-ENG-W.Pdf> Accessed 18 August 2016
    DOI: 10.14324/111.2052-1871.082 THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO STRIKE UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Charalampos Stylogiannis* Abstract: The right to strike has been largely acknowledged as an indispensable element of collective bargaining, and as one of the most essential means by which workers can preserve their socio-economic rights. It is safeguarded by international and European human rights instruments, and is enshrined in a number of states’ constitutions, including several parties to the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’). Within the legal framework of the ECHR, in the seminal cases of Demir and Baykara v Turkey and Enerji v Turkey the European Court of Human Rights (‘ECtHR’ or 'the Court') acknowledged the significance of both the right to collective bargaining and to strike as vital features of the freedom of trade unions association, covered by article 11 ECHR. Nevertheless, in RMT v UK, the ECtHR mitigated the cause for enthusiasm produced by its previous decisions. This article assesses the extent to which the right to strike is protected in the ECHR by referring to the recent judicial developments within the context of the Convention. A. INTRODUCTION ‘The only thing workers have to bargain with is their skill or their labour. Denied the right to withhold it as a last resort, they become powerless. The strike is therefore not a breakdown of collective bargaining; it is the indispensable cornerstone of that process.’ (Paul Clark, U.S. Labour Historian, 1989) Let us imagine a legal universe of labour relations where the right to strike would not constitute a legitimate means by which workers can secure fair remuneration and working conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Still Unjaded: Jim Atleson’S Twenty-First Century Turn to International Labor Law
    Still Unjaded: Jim Atleson’s Twenty-first Century Turn to International Labor Law LANCE COMPA† I. VALUES AND ASSUMPTIONS AND THE THINKING UNION ORGANIZER I came late to the academy and am still more of a trade unionist than a scholar, so I am going to start my remarks from this perspective. When Jim wrote Values and Assump- tions I was in my earlier life as a union staffer with the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE), a great, democratic, independent left-wing union. Like everyone else on the union staff, I was a generalist and an itinerant. I received organizing and bargaining assignments in New England, the Carolinas, and Baltimore, corporate campaign assignments in South Dakota, Pennsylvania, and California, political and legislative assignments in Wash- ington, and a dozen other projects. It was nonstop action from the time I started working for the UE after finishing law school in 1973. I had taken labor law with Clyde Summers when he was still at Yale, but I didn’t have any experience against which to measure what I studied. The cases said what they said, but I had no context for really understanding them. I remember reading a smorgasbord of labor-related litera- ture—Stanley Aronowitz, Harry Braverman, Baran and Sweezy; Labor’s Untold Story, manifestos from the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement, and more,1 but they were † Senior Lecturer, Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations. 1. See STANLEY ARONOWITZ, FALSE PROMISES: THE SHAPING OF AMERICAN WORKING CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS (1973); PAUL A. BARAN & PAUL M.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarcho-Syndicalism in the 21St Century Debate Within the Solidarity
    SF SOLIDARITY FEDERATION DEBATE WITHIN THE SOLIDARITY FEDERATION ANARCHO-SYNDICALISM IN THE 21ST CENTURY Strategy & Struggle - Debate Within the Solidarity Federation CONTENTS Page 3 .... About Page 4 .... Strategy & Struggle By Brighton Solidarity Federation Page 22 .. Comments on Strategy & Struggle From Tony (Manchester Solidarity Federation) From Tom (Brighton Solidarity Federation) From Neil (North London Solidarity Federation) From Tom (Brighton Solidarity Federation Page 40 .. Anarcho-Syndicalism By Tony (Manchester Solidarity Federation) SF Strategy & Struggle - Debate Within the Solidarity Federation ABOUT In January 2009 Brighton Solidarity Federation produced the pamphlet “Strategy & Struggle” to seek a “clarification of the meaning of anarcho-syndicalism in the 21st century, and as a contribution to the debate over strategy and organisation.” It provoked both discussion within the Solidarity Federation - where the pamphlet represented a minority viewpoint - and in the wider libertarian class struggle milieu, with reports of discussions from the Netherlands to Eastern Europe to the United States. This document comprises of the original pamphlet followed by the discussion between individuals from Manchester, North London & Brighton Solidarity Federation’s. The document ends with a piece written by Tony from Manchester Solidarity Federation on the role of the anarcho-syndicalist union. 3 SF Strategy & Struggle - Debate Within the Solidarity Federation STRATEGY & STRUGGLE Brighton Solidarity Federation This aim will be pursued by way of introducing the Introduction current industrial strategy of the Solidarity Federation (SF), with some historical context as well as theoretical The spirit of anarcho-syndicalism (...) is clarification of the meaning of a ‘revolutionary union’, “ characterised by independence of action around different organisational roles and the relationship a basic set of core principles; centred on freedom between the form and content of class struggle.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Rank and File Movements
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk McIlroy, John (2016) A brief history of rank and file movements. Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 44 (1-2) . pp. 31-65. ISSN 0301-7605 [Article] (doi:10.1080/03017605.2016.1173823) Final accepted version (with author’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/20157/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations in Collective Action in the Labor Movement: Organizing Workers Beyond the NLRA and the Business Union
    WORKING PAPER SERIES Innovations in Collective Action in the Labor Movement: Organizing Workers Beyond the NLRA and the Business Union Gabriel Nahmias PhD Candidate, MIT Department of Political Science [email protected] MIT Work of the Future Working Paper 13-2021 February 27, 2021 400 Main Street, E19-733, Cambridge, MA 02139 Innovations in Collective Action in the Labor Movement Organizing Workers Beyond the NLRA and the Business Union Gabriel Nahmias MIT Work of the Future Initiative February 27, 2021 American trade unionism is slowly being limited in influence by changes which destroy the basis on which it is erected. It is probable that changes in the law have adversely affected unionism. [but] over and above these influences, the relative decline in the power of Ameri- can trade unionism is due to occupational changes and to technological revolutions. George E Barnett, American Economic Association President, 1932 I. There and Back Again In 1932, American Economic Association President George Barnett had every reason to believe that structural forces were suffocating the labor movement. Labor was in retreat (Barnett 1933). The American Federation of Labor had seen its membership drop from 5 million in 1919 to just 3 million in 1933 (Zieger, Minchin, and Gall 1986). Radical unions, like the International Workers of the World, had been successfully repressed during the first Red Scare (Dubofsky 2000). The Knights of Labor, who once represented 1 in 5 American workers, were a long distant memory (Zieger, Minchin, and Gall 1986). Indeed, by 1933, only 6.9% of workers were in a union (Mayer 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Disruption European Guide to Strikes and Other Industrial Action Avoiding Disruption European Guide to Strikes and Other Industrial Action
    Avoiding disruption European guide to strikes and other industrial action Avoiding disruption European guide to strikes and other industrial action This European guide to strikes and other industrial action has been created to provide you with a quick and easy reference when responding to threats of industrial action in 15 European countries. 2 Avoiding disruption European guide to strikes and other industrial action Introduction Industrial action taken by workers against pan-European labour law responsibilities employers has always had the potential and aims to provide a quick and easy for severe disruption. However, employers reference when responding to threats of IA need to be aware of new and emerging in 15 European countries. trends in industrial action (“IA”) which have already taken some employers by The guide: surprise, including: – summarises recent national and – disputes involving international, not just international developments in IA law national, issues – provides a comparative overview, – trade unions and workers collaborating by country, of how IA is regulated in across borders, including cross-border different European countries. secondary (solidarity) action – summarises their key similarities and – unwelcome, and sometimes unexpected, differences shifts in the law regulating IA – reflecting the creeping influence of regional – considers how employers can respond, and international treaty obligations on including legal interventions and the right national laws (see “recent developments” to reduce the pay of those involved
    [Show full text]
  • The Voyage of the Neptune Jade: the Perils and Promises of Transnational Labor Solidarity
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 1-1-2004 The Voyage of the Neptune Jade: The Perils and Promises of Transnational Labor Solidarity James B. Atleson University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation James B. Atleson, The Voyage of the Neptune Jade: The Perils and Promises of Transnational Labor Solidarity, 52 Buff. L. Rev. 85 (2004). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/807 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Voyage of the Neptune Jade: The Perils and Promises of Transnational Labor Solidarity JAMES ATLESONt An injury to one is an injury to all.' If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Sympathy strikes.., are becoming increasingly frequent because of the move towards the concentration of enterprises, the globalization of the economy and the delocalization of work centers. While pointing out that a number of distinctions need to be drawn here,. .. the [ILO Freedom of Association] Committee considers that a general prohibition on sympathy strikes could that workers should be able to take such action,2 lead to abuse and is itself lawful.
    [Show full text]