DOCSLIB.ORG

Mathematical Modeling for a New Portfolio Selection Problem in Bubble Condition, Using a New Risk Measure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mathematical Modeling for a New Portfolio Selection Problem in Bubble Condition, Using a New Risk Measure Mathematical modeling for a new portfolio selection problem in bubble condition, using a new risk measure Alireza Ghahtarani a, Majid Sheikhmohammady a,*, Amir Abbas Najafi b a) Faculty of Industrial and systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran b) Faculty of Industrial Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran Abstract A portfolio selection model is developed in this study, using a new risk measure. The proposed risk measure is based on the fundamental value of stocks. For this purpose, a mathematical model is developed and transformed into an integer linear programming. In order to analyze the model's efficiency, the actual data of the Tehran Stock Exchange market are used in 12 scenarios to solve the proposed model. In order to evaluate the scenarios, data mining approaches are employed. Data mining methods which are used in this paper include ANFIS, decision tree, random forest, FDA, and GEP. The best method for scenario evaluation is GEP based on numerical results. Hence, the market values are evaluated by this algorithm. Software packages like MATLAB, GEP xpero tools, and LINGO are used to solve the model. Different trends of market value and fundamental value volatility in the optimum stock portfolio are determined. It is possible to examine the optimum portfolio profitability in different scenarios. By using real- world data, trends are extracted and analyzed. Results show that the developed model can be effectively applied in bubble situations. Keywords: Decision Tree, Financial Bubble, Fundamental Value, Gene Expression Programming, Portfolio Selection Problem, Risk Measure * Correspondence Author TEL: (+98) 21 82884394 Email Addresses: [email protected] (Majid Sheikhmohammady), [email protected] (Alireza Ghahtarani), [email protected] (Amir Abbas Najafi) 1 1. Introduction Portfolio selection problem is one of the most important issues in finance in which investors try to maximize return and minimize risk. Markowitz was the first researcher, who developed a mathematical definition for risk measures[1]. However, his risk measure was not linear and it had some calculation issues. After developing that risk measure, many researchers have tried to develop new risk measures. Konno and Yamazaki [2] presented mean absolute deviation (MAD) as a risk measure. Their risk measure was based on the stocks’ rate of return. It was linear but MAD considered both positive and negative deviation from mean as a risk which was not practically acceptable. Next huge step toward a proper risk measure was taken by Rockafellar and Uryasev [3] who developed conditional value at risk (CVaR). This new risk measure is convex, and it has a linear programming model. CVaR is a downside risk measure. However, it uses historical data based on the assumption that historical trends will happen in the future. Moreover, this risk measure uses the rate of return for its calculation. They also developed conditional drawdown at risk (CDaR) which uses the maximum price of a stock in the investment period as a threshold. However, this risk measure is too conservative. Bernardi et al [4] presented multiple risk measures for multivariate dynamic heavy-tailed models. They studied the evolution of risk interdependence and proposed a new risk measure to capture tail co- movements. This risk measure uses the stock rate of return. Kuzubas et al [5] proposed network centrality measures and systemic risk. They used data from Turkish Interbank market in the financial crisis. They did not consider fundamental values in their analysis. Fu et al [6] developed a convex risk measure based on the generalized lower deviation. This risk measure shows the risk aversion of investors in non-linear equations. They used rate of return of stocks in their risk measure. Yan [6] illustrated deviations and asymptotic behavior of convex and coherent entropic risk measures. Gong and Zhuang [7] presented measuring financial risk and portfolio reversion with time changed. They used stochastic volatility by tempered stable Lévy processes to construct time changed tempered stable Lévy processes. Sorwar and Dowd [8] estimated financial risk measures for options. They used simulation-lattice procedure estimation. However, they did not consider the fundamental factors in their analysis. Many researchers have worked on developing financial risk measures [9-15] But, these researches have gap in considering fundamental factors and bubble condition. Many of these risk measures are based on the difference between expected rate of return at the beginning and that in in the last period of investment. One of the most important criticisms toward these risk measures is regarding the nature of the stock market value that is used for the calculation of risk measures. In fact, the assumption is based on the fact that the stock market value illustrates all events and phenomenon around corporate including good or bad news about the corporate. However, some part of stock value volatility is the result of investor emotion about events. These volatilities are mostly short term. In fact, after a while, stock price back to the former price channel. Nevertheless, traditional risk measures have no procedure to confront these volatilities. The stock market crash in financial and economic crisis has shown that traditional risk measure cannot evaluate risk properly, especially in emotional and crisis situations. This circumstance leads to a bubble condition. Some stocks’ market prices are greater than the fundamental values, which cause bubble phenomena. In recent years, some researchers focused on bubble analysis in the financial market. Domeij and Ellingsen [16] proposed a quantitative analysis of rational bubbles and public debt policy. They used bubble analysis in securities in public sectors. Barberis et al [17] proposed an 2 article entitled “Extrapolation and bubbles”. They developed a model for extrapolative of bubbles. Lee et al [18] proposed an asset pricing with financial bubble risk. They provided an empirical investigation of risk factors on bubble pricing. Bosi et al [19] proposed an article entitled “financial bubbles and capital accumulation in altruistic economies”. They studied the global dynamics of capital stocks and assets’ values. Maynard and Ren [20] assessed the power of long-horizon predictive tests in a model that contains financial asset bubbles. Michaelides et al [21] developed a non-linearities in financial bubbles. They used theory and Bayesian evidence from S&P500. The authors attempted to find and date non-linear bubble episodes, which are captured by using a neural network. Miao and Wang [22] surveyed banking bubbles and financial crises. Wigniolle [23] considered optimism, and pessimism in financial bubbles. They showed that it is possible to extend the scope of the existence of rational bubbles when uncertainty is introduced associated with rank-dependent expected utility. Harvey et al [24] developed tests for explosive financial bubbles in the presence of non-stationary volatility. Kunieda and Shibata [25] presented a tractable model in which asset bubbles can exist in spite of infinitely lived agents. Their results show that a policy of purchasing the asset avoids financial crises. Many researchers have focused on bubble analysis [26-30]. The above-mentioned researches are among the newest of researches in this context. However, there are still some important gaps in the literature. Researchers who developed risk measure have not considered a fundamental factor and bubble analysis in their models. On the other hand, Researchers who worked on bubble analysis have not developed risk measures. Consequently, there is a gap in this research area. Developing a new risk measure which takes into account bubble conditions can fill this gap. To remove the weakness of traditional risk measures we need the development of a new paradigm in risk measures. Many people in financial market invest in financial assets based on the fundamental value of stocks. The attitude of these investors is that if the market value of a stock is less than the fundamental value then the probability of increasing market value to fundamental value is high. In this situation, investors try to buy stocks. On the other hand, if the market value of a stock is higher than the fundamental value then the probability of decreasing market value to fundamental value is high. In this situation, investors often sell stocks. Accordingly, investors in this strategy have profit and loss zones witch is illustrated in figure 1: Please Insert Figure 1 The aim of this paper is to present a formulation for portfolio selection problem based on a new definition of risk measure. Risk is measured, in this paper, based on the difference between fundamental value and the market value of stocks. The structure of this study is as follows; in the second part, the innovation and research method is presented. The third part, problem modeling and the method of calculating the stock fundamental value are presented. The forth market value prediction based on different scenarios is presented. The fifth part contains the numerical results. Finally, the conclusion of the study is presented in the last part. 2. Innovation and Research Method The most important innovation in this research is the conceptual and mathematical development of the portfolio selection model. In fact, in this research, a new concept is introduced as a risk, and then this new concept is transformed into a mathematical model using mathematical foundations. The concept which is developed in this research is generally different from financial 3 risk measures in the literature of the financial field. On the other hand, the proposed risk measure is more consistent with the existing strategies of investment in the stock markets. To develop a risk measure and thus to develop a new portfolio selection model, this paper uses the concept of market value and fundamental value of stocks. In the real world, many investors use the strategy of estimating the fundamental value and comparing it with the actual stock value to choose their optimum portfolio.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversification
    WORKING PAPER NO. 212 Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversification Luigi Guiso and Tullio Jappelli January 2009 University of Naples Federico II University of Salerno Bocconi University, Milan CSEF - Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS – UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES 80126 NAPLES - ITALY Tel. and fax +39 081 675372 – e-mail: [email protected] WORKING PAPER NO. 212 Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversification Luigi Guiso and Tullio Jappelli Abstract In this paper we focus on poor financial literacy as one potential factor explaining lack of portfolio diversification. We use the 2007 Unicredit Customers’ Survey, which has indicators of portfolio choice, financial literacy and many demographic characteristics of investors. We first propose test-based indicators of financial literacy and document the extent of portfolio under-diversification. We find that measures of financial literacy are strongly correlated with the degree of portfolio diversification. We also compare the test-based degree of financial literacy with investors’ self-assessment of their financial knowledge, and find only a weak relation between the two measures, an issue that has gained importance after the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID) has required financial institutions to rate investors’ financial sophistication through questionnaires. JEL classification: E2, D8, G1 Keywords: Financial literacy, Portfolio diversification. Acknowledgements: We are grateful to the Unicredit Group, and particularly to Daniele Fano and Laura Marzorati, for letting us contribute to the design and use of the UCS survey. European University Institute and CEPR. Università di Napoli Federico II, CSEF and CEPR. Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. The portfolio diversification puzzle 3. The data 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Risk Management in Diversified Financial Companies
    Christine M. Cumming and Beverly J. Hirtle The Challenges of Risk Management in Diversified Financial Companies • Although the benefits of a consolidated, or n recent years, financial institutions and their supervisors firmwide, system of risk management are Ihave placed increased emphasis on the importance of widely recognized, financial firms have consolidated risk management. Consolidated risk traditionally taken a more segmented management—sometimes also called integrated or approach to risk measurement and control. enterprisewide risk management—can have many specific meanings, but in general it refers to a coordinated process for • The cost of integrating information across measuring and managing risk on a firmwide basis. Interest in business lines and the existence of regulatory consolidated risk management has arisen for a variety of barriers to moving capital and liquidity within reasons. Advances in information technology and financial a financial organization appear to have engineering have made it possible to quantify risks more discouraged firms from adopting consolidated precisely. The wave of mergers—both in the United States and risk management. overseas—has resulted in significant consolidation in the financial services industry as well as in larger, more complex financial institutions. The recently enacted Gramm-Leach- • In addition, there are substantial conceptual Bliley Act seems likely to heighten interest in consolidated risk and technical challenges to be overcome in management, as the legislation opens the door to combinations developing risk management systems that of financial activities that had previously been prohibited. can assess and quantify different types of risk This article examines the economic rationale for managing across a wide range of business activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Risk Management Insights CGI & Aalto University Collaboration
    Financial Risk Management Insights CGI & Aalto University Collaboration Financial Risk Management Insights - CGI & Aalto University Collaboration ABSTRACT As worldwide economy is facing far-reaching impacts aggravated by the global COVID-19 pandemic, the financial industry faces challenges that exceeds anything we have seen before. Record unemployment and the likelihood of increasing loan defaults have put significant pressure on financial institutions to rethink their lending programs and practices. The good news is that financial sector has always adapted to new ways of working. Amidst the pandemic crisis, CGI decided to collaborate with Aalto University in looking for ways to challenge conventional ideas and coming up with new, innovative approaches and solutions. During the summer of 2020, Digital Business Master Class (DBMC) students at Aalto University researched the applicability and benefits of new technologies to develop financial institutions’ risk management. The graduate-level students with mix of nationalities and areas of expertise examined the challenge from multiple perspectives and through business design methods in cooperation with CGI. The goal was to present concept level ideas and preliminary models on how to predict and manage financial risks more effectively and real-time. As a result, two DBMC student teams delivered reports outlining the opportunities of emerging technologies for financial institutions’ risk assessments beyond traditional financial risk management. 2 CONTENTS Introduction 4 Background 5 Concept
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Moral Hazard Beneath the Financial Crisis
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 5-1-2014 Systemic Moral Hazard Beneath The inF ancial Crisis Xiaoming Duan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Recommended Citation Duan, Xiaoming, "Systemic Moral Hazard Beneath The inF ancial Crisis" (2014). Law School Student Scholarship. 460. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/460 The financial crisis in 2008 is the greatest economic recession since the "Great Depression of the 1930s." The federal government has pumped $700 billion dollars into the financial market to save the biggest banks from collapsing. 1 Five years after the event, stock markets are hitting new highs and well-healed.2 Investors are cheering for the recovery of the United States economy.3 It is important to investigate the root causes of this failure of the capital markets. Many have observed that the sudden collapse of the United States housing market and the increasing number of unqualified subprime mortgages are the main cause of this economic failure. 4 Regulatory responses and reforms were requested right after the crisis occurred, as in previous market upheavals where we asked ourselves how better regulation could have stopped the market catastrophe and prevented the next one. 5 I argue that there is an inherent and systematic moral hazard in our financial systems, where excessive risk-taking has been consistently allowed and even to some extent incentivized. Until these moral hazards are eradicated or cured, our financial system will always face the risk of another financial crisis. 6 In this essay, I will discuss two systematic moral hazards, namely the incentive to take excessive risk and the incentive to underestimate risk.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Managing Cash Flow During a Period of Crisis
    COVID-19: Managing cash flow during a period of crisis COVID-19 Managing cash flow during a period of crisis i COVID-19: Managing cash flow during a period of crisis ii COVID-19: Managing cash flow during a period of crisis As a typical “black swan” event, COVID-19 took the world by complete surprise. This newly identified coronavirus was first seen in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province in central China, on December 31, 2019. As we enter March 2020, the virus has infected over 90,000 people, and led to more than 3,000 deaths. More importantly, more than 75 countries are now reporting positive cases of COVID-19 as the virus spreads globally, impacting communities, ecosystems, and supply chains far beyond China. The focus of most businesses is now on protecting employees, understanding the risks to their business, and managing the supply chain disruptions caused by the efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19. The full impact of this epidemic on businesses and supply chains is still unknown, with the most optimistic forecasts predicting that normalcy in China may return by April,1 with a full global recovery lagging depending on how other geographies are ultimately affected by the virus. However, one thing is certain: this event will have global economic and financial ramifications that will be felt throughout global supply chains, from raw materials to finished products. Our recent report, COVID-19: Managing supply chain risk and disruption, provided 25 recommendations for companies that have business relationships and supply chain flows to and/or from China and other impacted geographies.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Managing Third-Party Risk
    GUIDANCE FOR MANAGING THIRD-PARTY RISK Introduction An institution’s board of directors and senior management are ultimately responsible for managing activities conducted through third-party relationships, and identifying and controlling the risks arising from such relationships, to the same extent as if the activity were handled within the institution. This guidance includes a description of potential risks arising from third-party relationships, and provides information on identifying and managing risks associated with financial institutions’ business relationships with third parties.1 This guidance applies to any of an institution’s third-party arrangements, and is intended to be used as a resource for implementing a third-party risk management program. This guidance provides a general framework that boards of directors and senior management may use to provide appropriate oversight and risk management of significant third-party relationships. A third-party relationship should be considered significant if the institution’s relationship with the third party is a new relationship or involves implementing new bank activities; the relationship has a material effect on the institution’s revenues or expenses; the third party performs critical functions; the third party stores, accesses, transmits, or performs transactions on sensitive customer information; the third party markets bank products or services; the third party provides a product or performs a service involving subprime lending or card payment transactions; or the third party poses risks that could significantly affect earnings or capital. The FDIC reviews a financial institution’s risk management program and the overall effect of its third-party relationships as a component of its normal examination process.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Hidden in Plain Sight SOURCE IMAGE MOST of US THINK COUNTERPARTY RISK BEGINS and ENDS with BANKS
    Financial risk management Identify and assess risks Risk hidden in plain sight SOURCE IMAGE MOST OF US THINK COUNTERPARTY RISK BEGINS AND ENDS WITH BANKS. BUT THIS VIEW OVERLOOKS THE RISK TO CORPORATES’ CASH POSITION FROM CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS, ARGUES MICHAEL STEFANSKY Counterparty risk occurs fluctuations. But what about could be not to sell anything Bank guarantees where one party in a the customers that owe us to a particular customer or A guarantee or letter of contract is not able to money or the down payments to make it a policy not to credit (LC) is a promise fulfil its obligation to the we extend to suppliers? make advance payments by the bank to assume other. This is a large topic in Do we always think to to suppliers. However, this responsibility for the debt the corporate and banking include these parties in approach could lead to obligation of the customer worlds, but when we talk our discussions on risk a default of the client or or supplier in the event of about counterparty risk management? And how supplier, which, in turn, a default. This arrangement management, the parties should we tackle this area? could harm our company. is tied to certain criteria and that tend to come to mind There are several options There are several other to bilateral agreements first are banks, where we as that can protect a company possibilities in the market between the customer treasurers hold cash and face from the default of a customer – the most appropriate ones or supplier and the bank.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carbon Bubble: the Financial Risk of Fossil Fuels and Need for Divestment
    EUROPEANGREENPARTY THE CARBON BUBBLE: The financial risk of fossil fuels and need for divestment 2 The 2° target: a minimum consensus which The Carbon Bubble represents economic dynamite 3 The world is agreed: the temperature of the atmosphere must not rise by more than 2°C. However, this means that most oil, gas and coal reserves are valueless. for divestment fossil fuels and need The financial risk of The international community has have on a number of occasions stressed committed itself to an unequivocal target: the urgency of consistent measures if we the Earth’s atmosphere must not warm are to keep the Earth on track towards by more than 2°C by the end of the cen- the 2°C target. tury. At the 2010 UN Climate Conference in Cancún, Mexico, representatives of The 2°C target will not be easy to achieve 194 states committed themselves to this and will only be feasible by determined target. Even the USA and China, who action from the global community. At the never signed the Kyoto Protocol, sup- same time however, climate researchers ported the decision, as do all other major say that 2°C constitutes the borderline greenhouse gas emitters. not between ‘tolerable’ and ‘dangerous’ climate change, but rather between The 2°C target refers to the rise in tem- ‘dangerous’ and ‘very dangerous’ cli- perature relative to pre-industrial levels. mate change. Even with an increase However, as the mean temperature has of ‘only’ 2°C, Arctic ice sheets will melt, already risen by 0.8°C since the 19th and habitats and cultural regions will be Century, the climate must not warm by destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Hazard and the Financial Crisis
    Centre for Risk & Insurance Studies enhancing the understanding of risk and insurance Moral Hazard and the Financial Crisis Kevin Dowd CRIS Discussion Paper Series – 2008.VI MORAL HAZARD AND THE FINANCIAL CRISIS Kevin Dowd* “It’s like not being invited to a party and then being given the bill.” (Comment by a Wall Street passer-by on the bank bailout.) There is no denying that the current financial crisis – possibly the worst the world has ever seen and not over yet – has delivered a major seismic shock to the policy landscape. In country after country, we see governments panicked into knee-jerk responses and throwing their policy manuals overboard: bailouts and nationalizations on an unprecedented scale, fiscal prudence thrown to the winds and the return of no-holds-barred Keynesianism. Lurid stories of the excesses of ‘free’ competition – of greedy bankers walking away with hundreds of millions whilst taxpayers bail their institutions out, of competitive pressure to pay stratospheric bonuses and the like – are grist to the mill of those who tell us that ‘free markets have failed’ and that what we need now is bigger government. To quote just one writer out of many others saying much the same, “the pendulum will swing – and should swing – towards an enhanced role for government in saving the market system from its excesses and inadequacies” (Summers, 2008). Free markets have been tried and failed, so the argument goes,1 now we need more regulation and more active macroeconomic management. Associated with such arguments is the claim that the problem of moral hazard is overrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Market Bubbles and Crashes
    Financial Market Bubbles and Crashes One would think that economists would by now have already developed a solid grip on how financial bubbles form and how to measure and compare them. This is not the case. Despite the thousands of articles in the professional literature and the millions of times that the word “bubble” has been used in the business press, there still does not appear to be a cohesive theory or persuasive empirical approach with which to study bubble and crash conditions. This book presents what is meant to be a plausible and accessible descriptive theory and empirical approach to the analysis of such financial market conditions. It advances this framework through application of standard econometric methods to its central idea, which is that financial bubbles reflect urgent short side – rationed demand. From this basic idea, an elasticity of variance concept is developed. The notion that easy credit provides fuel for bubbles is supported. It is further shown that a behavioral risk premium can probably be measured and related to the standard equity risk–premium models in a way that is consistent with conventional theory. Harold L. Vogel was ranked as top entertainment industry analyst for ten years by Institutional Investor magazine and was the senior entertainment industry analyst at Merrill Lynch for seventeen years. He is a chartered financial analyst (C.F.A.) and served on the New York State Governor’s Motion Picture and Television Advisory Board and as an adjunct professor at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Business. He also taught at the University of Southern California’s MFA (Peter Stark) film program and at the Cass Business School in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivery Versus Payment in Securities Settlement Systems
    BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT IN SECURITIES SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS Report prepared by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems of the central banks of the Group of Ten countries Basle September 1992 © Bank for International Settlements 1992. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISBN 92-9131-114-6 Published also in French, German and Italian. Contents Section Page Forword Members of the delivery versus payment study group 1. Introduction and summary ................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 2 Additional issues relating to cross-border securities transactions ..................................... 8 2. Analytical framework: Credit and liquidity risks in securities clearance and settlement .... 10 Key steps in clearance and settlement ............................................................................... 10 Types and sources of risk .................................................................................................. 12 The delivery versus payment principle .............................................................................. 15 3. Alternative structural approaches to delivery versus payment ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Financial Risk Management
    ELEMENTS OF FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS OF FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT Peter F. Christoffersen Amsterdam Boston Heidelberg London New York Oxford Paris San Diego San Francisco Singapore Sydney Tokyo This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, e-mail: [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier Science homepage (http://elsevier.com), by selecting “Customer Support” and then “Obtaining Permissions.” Academic Press An imprint of Elsevier Science 525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101-4495, USA http://www.academicpress.com Academic Press 84 Theobald’s Road, London WC1X 8RR, UK http://www.academicpress.com Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2003107899 International Standard Book Number: 0-12-174232-6 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 0304050607 7654321 To Susan CONTENTS PREFACE XI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XIII 1 Risk Management and Financial Returns 1.1. Chapter Outline 1 1.2. Learning Objectives 1 1.3. Risk Management and the Firm 2 1.4. A Brief Taxonomy of Risks 4 1.5. Stylized Facts of Asset Returns 6 1.6. Overview of the Book 9 1.7. Further Resources 9 1.8. Empirical Exercises on CD-ROM 10 References 18 vii viii CONTENTS 2 Volatility Modeling 2.1.
    [Show full text]