Phyllis Auty Simon Fraser University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phyllis Auty Simon Fraser University Although cast by myth in a heroic role which he came to believe in himself, he had none of the qualities for successful military or political leadership. Milazzo's final conclusion is that even if Mihailovic had been able to exploit the Chetnik's initial advantages, and with Allied support restore a Serbian-dominated Yugoslavia, "the restoration of the monarchy would surely have been ac- companied by violent political purges and a reign of Serb vengeance." This, of course, is historical speculation, but it is based on what is in general an unbiased examination of facts. There are a number of errors that should be corrected, e.g., the first British officer to Mihailovic was Captain D. T. Hudson (described throughout as W. Hudson) and the British Ambas- sador to the Yugoslav emigre government was Sir George Rendall (not Randall). Unfortunately, the index is so etiolated as to be of limited use. This does not detract from the fact that this is a valuable book of unpolemical history. It has a good bibliography and will be most useful to general readers and students. It will no doubt provide some new starting points for doctoral theses on a subject which never fails to intrigue historians in a number of varied fields. Phyllis Auty Simon Fraser University Jozo Tomasevich, War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941-1945; The Chetniks. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1975. vii, 508 pp. $20.00. The first of three projected volumes dealing with war and revolution in Yugoslavia 1941-45, Professor Tomasevich's volume on the Chetniks is a massive and impressive work of scholarship which will remain the definitive authority on the subject for some considerable time. It embodies the fruits of research begun in 1963, when the author was contemplating a single volume covering all aspects of the Yugoslav wartime experience. However, Professor Tomasevich has chosen instead to write three separate studies, one each on the main wartime internal forces. The subsequent two volumes will be on the Croatian Ustashi and the Partisans, and if they are of the standard of this volume, then together they will represent a major and indispensable source to historians both of the Balkans and of World War II. In addition to his impressive mastery of published sources, Professor Tomasevich has used the captured German and Italian archives, has had access to Yugoslav documentary collections in Belgrade, has interviewed extensively, and has used declassified OSS and Foreign Office papers. Even where he has not worked himself on certain sources, such as seems the case with the British Foreign Office papers, he has kept in close touch with scholars who have, and has used their findings with skill. He knows what questions to ask, and, above all, has rigorously organized his work so that rarely does the massive amount of information threaten to overwhelm the reader. The footnotes themselves are mines of information, and the reader must thank the publishers for placing them at the foot of each page, a necessity which is unfortunately rapidly becoming a luxury. The book is a sustained and massive rebuttal of the myth of Mihailovic and the Chetniks, a myth created during the war, heightened by Mihailovic's execution at the hands of the Communists on 17 July 1946, and subsequently fostered by former Chetniks in exile and their friends. The myth represents the Chetniks as the first and only "genuine" resistance force in Yugoslavia, denies the widespread claims that they collaborated with the Italians and Germans (or, alternatively, explains instances of collaboration as being no more than local and temporary expedients which in sum did not amount to a policy, no more than did occasional Partisan contacts with the Germans), and argues that the Allies, the British in particular, betray- ed Mihailovic by transferring their support in 1943 to Tito and the Partisans, thus delivering Yugoslavia into the hands of the Communists. The myth had already become somewhat tar- nished, but Professor Tomasevich must surely lay it to rest once and for all. He makes it clear that from the very beginning the objectives of the Chetniks were threefold; (a) to rebuild Yugoslavia around a Great Serbia and to re-establish the Serbian Karadjordjevic dynasty; (b) to avoid fighting the Axis forces as much as possible until an Allied landing was effected in the Balkans, or until the eve of Allied liberation; (c) to defeat the Partisans who were defined as the main short and long term threat. From the beginning, therefore, the Chetniks were fighting a civil war against the Partisans, and if it suited their purposes they were quite prepared to collaborate with the Italian and German occupying forces. For their failure to achieve these objectives Professor Tomasevich suggests eight main causes: (i) the leadership consisted of pro- fessional army officers who proved incapable of adjusting to the strategic, tactical, political, and ideological demands of modern guerrilla warfare; (ii) the failure, at least before January, 1944, when it was too late, to create any political organization which would embrace the civilian population (it is clear that even as late as the�fall of 1944 they enjoyed possibly as much as 90 percent support of the Serbian population); (iii) the traditionalist, conservative, and anti- intellectual nature of the movement and, one might add, its exclusively male ethos and orienta- tion; (iv) the overestimation of their abilities to conduct successfully a highly complex and often duplicitous policy towards the occupying forces; (v) their inability to realize the strength of the Partisans from 1942 onwards; (vi) strategic and tactical incompetence; (vii) their failure to appeal to non-Serb groups, and, finally; (viii) the illusion that they were indispensable to the West, which would never allow the Communists to take power. All these failings, indeed, were embodied in the personality of Mihailovic himself, a man who for all his courage was circum- scribed by a Great Serb view of Yugoslavia, limited in his vision and organizational capacities, old-fashioned in his military approach, provincial-minded, incapable of growth to meet the challenges set by his own complex strategies, and distrustful of politicians and of political matters. Professor Tomasevich provides extensive and conclusive documentation of Chetnik collab- oration with the Italians, Ustashi, and Germans, and shows clearly that this was a conscious and deliberate strategy seen by the Chetniks as the means to a greater end-the destruction of the Partisans; it did not preclude them fighting the Germans from time to time, and they were certainly going to fight them when the Allies landed, but neither were they going to let pass opportunities to finish off their rivals in the struggle for post-war power. This is clear from such documents as the armistice with the Germans signed by Colonel Simi6, the Inspector of all Chetnik forces, on 17 January 1944 (pp. 326-327), from which it is also clear that while Mihailovich was not directly involved, he knew and approved of such arrangements. The height of Chetnik-German collaboration against the Partisans came during the battle of the Neretva River, early in 1943. Perhaps appropriately, however, it was also the beginning of the end for Mihailovic. Not only was the battle lost, but shortly thereafter British policy began to shift, the Partisans strengthened their hold throughout the country, and the composition of the Royal Yugoslav Government in exile changed to Mihailovic's disadvantage. From the beginning of 1944 it was downhill for the Chetniks, with Mihailovic pathetically clinging to the end to the illusion that the British would land and help him, and unrepentantly holding to his practice of collabora- tion with the German occupying forces. All this is clearly described and analyzed, down to the last days when the Communists tricked Mihailovic into capture on 12 March 1946. Professor Tomasevich is equally effective, if briefer, in analyzing British relations with the Chetniks. While he stresses the immense importance of the BBC for in the first instance creating the Mihailovic myth, and is critical of British policy in 1941, he examines the evidence carefully, and rejects some of the criticisms of British policy made by Deakin in The Embattled Mountain. Contrary to Deakin's claim, the British were fully aware of the dangers of supplying the Chetniks with materiel in the situation of incipient civil war in November, 1941 (p. 284), and, more important, had sources of information about affairs in Yugoslavia throughout 1942 which belies Deakin's claim that because SOE missions were failures there was no information about what was happening to the two main resistance forces. On the contrary, SIS appears to have dropped in several missions, while intercepts must surely have provided considerable infor- mation about Mihailovic's dealings with the Axis (p. 287). Tomasevich does not refer to intercepts directly but on the evidence of Major Boughey's denunciation of Chetnik collabora- tion to Major Zivan Knezevic on 29 December 1942, only four days after Colonel Bailey had been dropped (and presumably therefore before he could have reported via Cairo), and of the later negative reaction of the War Office to Bailey's suggestion for a territorial separation of Partisans and Chetniks (p. 295), it is clear that the British had quite accurate non-SOE sources of information. Similarly, the request to Mihailovic to attack two bridges on the Salonica railway, made on 8 December 1943, was made in the certain knowledge that he would fail to do so and thus make public what the British knew from secret sources-presumably intercepts. The vital factor in British policy which Professor Tomasevich rightly emphasizes, was that "As long as the Mediterranean theater of war was not an area of major Allied operations, what went on in Yugoslavia did not matter much, and the Chetniks' collaboration with the Axis was allowed to pass" (p.
Recommended publications
  • Farming As a Way of Life: Yugoslav Peasant Attitudes
    JOEL M. HALPERN Farming as a Way of Life: Yugoslav Peasant A t titudes The village and the city, the farm and the factory, the developers and the developed-these are the too frequently evoked dualities used to de- scribe some of the complex processes of change being acted out in our time.' In those countries which have experienced the major portion of their industrialization since World War 11, we cannot easily draw any firm lines separating villager from urbanite because they are both chang- ing, although not always at the same rate or in identical ways. The pre-industrial city which served as an administrative market and religious center, or a combination of these, has undergone enormous changes, but the continuity with the past has usually been more clearly This essay draws on two of my articles published earlier: "Yugoslav Peasant Society in Transition-Stability in Change," Anthropological Quarterly, XXXVI (July, 1963) and "Peasant Culture and Urbanization in Yugoslavia," Human Organization, XMV:2 (Summer, 1965). It is based on research carried out in Yugoslavia during 1961-1962 and in the summer of 1964, supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and counterpart funds from the Depart- ment of State. The present discussion includes a preliminary survey of some of the field data, a more complete analysis of which will be published later. Part of the field data was gathered by Yugoslav students, with organizational support from university authorities in Belgrade, Zagreb, Ljubljana, and Sarajevo. Vida and Theodore Tarnovsky assisted in the United States, and helpful comments on a preliminary version of the essay were received from Dimitri Shimkin and Jozo Tomasevich.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural History of US Involvement in Axis-Occupied Yugoslavia
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 2018 The Power of Narratives: A Cultural History of US Involvement in Axis-Occupied Yugoslavia William P. Fouse University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Fouse, William P., "The Power of Narratives: A Cultural History of US Involvement in Axis-Occupied Yugoslavia" (2018). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 1195. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/1195 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POWER OF NARRATIVES: A CULTURAL HISTORY OF US INVOLVEMENT IN AXIS-OCCUPIED YUGOSLAVIA BY WILLIAM P. FOUSE A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2018 MASTER OF ARTS THESIS OF WILLIAM P. FOUSE APPROVED: Thesis Committee: Major Professor Robert W. Widell, Jr. James Mace Ward Valerie Karno Nasser H. Zawia DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2018 ABSTRACT My thesis examines the ways in which narratives about Axis-occupied Yugoslavia developed within the United States over the course of World War II and identifies how these narratives influenced the development of American foreign policy. Methodologically, I utilize the literary theories of Northrop Frye and Hayden White as a means of narrative analysis. Frye categorizes narratives as romance, comedy, tragedy, or satire.
    [Show full text]
  • Partisans and Chetniks in Occupied Yugoslavia by Heather Williams – a Commentary by Gaj Trifković
    Gaj Trifković: Zašto je pogrešno javni institut za povijest nazvati imenom Franje Tuđmana GAJ TRIFKOVIĆ Sarajevo Partisans and Chetniks in occupied Yugoslavia by Heather Williams – A Commentary by Gaj Trifković Being a historian of the region, I naturally welcomed the publishing of The Routled- ge Handbook of Balkan and Southeast European History in October 2020 (for more information on this edited volume see https://www.routledge.com/The-Routled- ge-Handbook-of-Balkan-and-Southeast-European-History/Lampe-Brunnbauer/p/ book/9781138613089). Whereas the vast majority of the contributions contained in the volume fall outside my area of expertise, I feel there are a number of points in He- ather Williams’ piece „Partisans And Chetniks in occupied Yugoslavia“ that need to be addressed in some detail. Let’s start: • p. 392: „The Independent State of Croatia (the NDH) had already adhered to the Tripartite Pact on April 10 and withdrawn from hostilities.“ The NDH was proclaimed on 10 April 1941; it would officially join the -Tri partite Pact only on 15 June 1941. (Bogdan Krizman, „Pavelić između Hitlera i Musolinija“, Zagreb, Globus, 1980, p. 76). • p. 393: „In Serbia, the German invasion of the USSR on June 11, combined with feelings of outrage at the suffering of fellow Orthodox Christians arriving as refugees from the NDH, produced a spontaneous rising, encouraged by the withdrawal of many German frontline divisions to the east.“ The invasion of the USSR began on 22 June 1941. Unlike the sudden, violent, and largely spontaneous uprisings in Montenegro and the NDH, the uprising in Serbia was a much more gradual, snowball- effect affair, set in motion by the Communists.
    [Show full text]
  • Tito's Yugoslavia
    The Search for a Communist Legitimacy: Tito's Yugoslavia Author: Robert Edward Niebuhr Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1953 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2008 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of History THE SEARCH FOR A COMMUNIST LEGITIMACY: TITO’S YUGOSLAVIA a dissertation by ROBERT EDWARD NIEBUHR submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE ABSTRACT . iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . v NOTE ON TRANSLATIONS AND TERMS . vi INTRODUCTION . 1 1 A STRUGGLE FOR THE HEARTS AND MINDS: IDEOLOGY AND YUGOSLAVIA’S THIRD WAY TO PARADISE . 26 2 NONALIGNMENT: YUGOSLAVIA’S ANSWER TO BLOC POLITICS . 74 3 POLITICS OF FEAR AND TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE . 133 4 TITO’S TWILIGHT AND THE FEAR OF UNRAVELING . 180 5 CONCLUSION: YUGOSLAVIA AND THE LEGACY OF THE COLD WAR . 245 EPILOGUE: THE TRIUMPH OF FEAR. 254 APPENDIX A: LIST OF KEY LCY OFFICIALS, 1958 . 272 APPENDIX B: ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF JNA, 1963 . 274 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 275 INDEX . 289 © copyright by ROBERT EDWARD NIEBUHR 2008 iii ABSTRACT THE SEARCH FOR A COMMUNIST LEGITIMACY: TITO’S YUGOSLAVIA ROBERT EDWARD NIEBUHR Supervised by Larry Wolff Titoist Yugoslavia—the multiethnic state rising out of the chaos of World War II—is a particularly interesting setting to examine the integrity of the modern nation-state and, more specifically, the viability of a distinctly multi-ethnic nation-building project.
    [Show full text]
  • War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941-1945
    © 2008 AGI-Information Management Consultants May be used for personal purporses only or by libraries associated to dandelon.com network. War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941-1945 OCCUPATION COLLABORATION JOZO TOMASEVICH STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS STANFORD,.CALIFORNIA ZOOI Contents Preface ix Abbreviations of Frequently Cited Materials - xv Yugoslavia Between the Wars i Historical Background, i The Unification Act of December i, 1918, and the Constitution of June 28, 1921, 9 Early Political Emigration, 17 Political Developments from 192.3 to 1934, 21 The Early Stages of the Ustasha Movement, 30 Political Developments in the Late 1930's, 39 The Partition of Yugoslavia 47 The Establishment of the Independent State of Croatia', 47 The Partition of the Country, 61 The German System of Occupation in Serbia, 64 Germany and Italy Divide Slovenia 83 German Occupation of Northern Slovenia, 83 Italian Annexation of the Ljubljana Province, 94 German Occupation of the Ljubljana Province, 121 Collaboration Leads the Anti-Partisan Forces to Defeat, iz6 Foreign Annexation of Yugoslavia 130 Italian Rule in the Annexed Part of Dalmatia, 130 Italian and German Occupation of Montenegro, 138 Italian-Albanian Rule in Kosovo and Western Macedonia, 148 Bulgarian Rule in Parts of Macedonia and Serbia, 156 Hungarian Rule in Parts of Yugoslav Territory, 168 The Puppet Government of Serbia 175 The Establishment and Reorganization of the Puppet Government, 177 German Auxiliary Forces in Serbia, 186 The Bulgarian Army in Serbia, 195 The Special Occupation Regime
    [Show full text]
  • Kent1258151570.Pdf (651.73
    When Two Worlds Collide: The Allied Downgrading Of General Dragoljub “Draža” Mihailović and Their Subsequent Full Support for Josip Broz “Tito” A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Jason Alan Shambach Csehi December, 2009 Thesis written by Jason Alan Shambach Csehi B.A., Kent State University, 2005 M.A., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by Solon Victor Papacosma , Advisor Ken Bindas , Chair, Department of History John R. D. Stalvey , Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….iv Prelude…………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1…………….………………………………………………………………....11 A Brief Overview of the Existing Literature and an Explanation of Balkan Aspirations Chapter 2.........................................................................................................................32 Churchill’s Yugoslav Policy and British Military Involvement Chapter 3….……………………………………………………………………………70 Roosevelt’s Knowledge and American Military Involvement Chapter 4………………….………………………………………………...………...101 Fallout from the War Postlude….……………………………………………………………….…...…….…131 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………….….142 iii Acknowledgements The completion of this thesis could not have been attained without the help of several key individuals. In particular, my knowledgeable thesis advisor, S. Victor Papacosma, was kind enough to take on this task while looking to be on vacation on a beach somewhere in Greece. Gratitude is also due to my other committee members, Mary Ann Heiss, whose invaluable feedback during a research seminar laid an important cornerstone of this thesis, and Kevin Adams for his participation and valuable input. A rather minor thank you must be rendered to Miss Tanja Petrović, for had I not at one time been well-acquainted with her, the questions of what had happened in the former Yugoslavia during World War II as topics for research seminars would not have arisen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of Mihailović's Chetnik Movement: from Royalist Yugoslav Forces to Serb Nationalist Guerrillas
    The Transformation of Mihailović’s Chetnik Movement: From Royalist Yugoslav Forces to Serb Nationalist Guerrillas by Aleksandar Petrovic M.A. (History), Simon Fraser University, 2003 B.A. (History), University of British Columbia, 2000 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of History Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Aleksandar Petrovic 2011 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2011 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Aleksandar Petrovic Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: The Transformation of Mihailović’s Chetnik Movement: from Royalist Yugoslav Forces to Serb Nationalist Guerrillas Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Hilmar Pabel Professor Dr. Andre Gerolymatos Senior Supervisor Professor Dr. Ilya Vinkovetsky Supervisor Associate Professor Dr. Dimitri Krallis Internal Examiner Assistant Professor, Department of History Dr. John Fine External Examiner Professor, Department of History University of Michigan Date Defended/Approved: September 30, 2011 ii Partial Copyright Licence Abstract General Dragoljub Mihailović’s Chetnik movement has been the subject of historical studies for more than half a century. Most have focused on the Chetnik- Partisan war and the issues of Chetnik resistance to and collaboration with the Axis powers. This study expands on the existing body of knowledge by considering the effects of ethno-religious conflict on the Chetnik wartime strategy and ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • Tito, Yugoslavia, and Communism: Historical Revisionism of the Second World War and Its Competing Memories
    Tito, Yugoslavia, and Communism: Historical Revisionism of the Second World War and its Competing Memories A thesis submitted by Damir Vucicevic In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History TUFTS UNIVERSITY May 2017 Advisor: Peter Winn i ABSTRACT The Second World War had a traumatizing effect on Yugoslavia and its people. In addition to being partitioned by Italy, Germany, and other foreign powers, Yugoslavia also experienced a bloody, fratricidal war. In the aftermath of the Second World War, the communist Partisans of Yugoslavia, who were victorious against the Nazi occupying powers, attempted to heal the country’s wounds by preaching brotherhood and unity amongst the different nationalities. However, for some, the period after WWII and before the break up of the country in 1990s, was nothing but an illusive compromise. By the 1990s, competing claims of victimhood resurfaced, fostered by anti-communist, neo-fascist political elites who advocated for Yugoslavia’s disintegration. Since then, history books have been revised, socialist-era narratives have been challenged, and sites of memory relating to Tito and Yugoslavia have been destroyed, all which has resulted in dissonant collective memories. This thesis assesses how memories of WWII contributed to the violence of the 1990s and discusses the role of new ruling elites in creating myths of victimhood in order to justify their own power, as well as armed conflict, ethnic cleansing, and political polarization. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to the people who have supported me in my writing journey. First, I would like to thank Professor Peter Winn, who inspired me to write this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Micropolitics of Transition in Yugoslavia
    MICROPOLITICS OF TRANSITION IN YUGOSLAVIA: A LOCAL AND A GLOBAL DEMISE by Martin Y. Marinos A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida December 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to give thanks to the School of Communication and Multimedia Studies at Florida Atlantic University and especially to its Director, Dr. Susan Reilly. I would like to thank Dr. Eric Freedman and Dr. Fred Fejes for their valuable input in preparing my thesis. Words cannot convey my gratitude to my thesis advisor, Dr. Noemi Marin. Without her support, guidance and help I would not have been able to complete my degree. iii ABSTRACT Author: Martin Marinos Title: Micropolitics of Transition in Yugoslavia: A Local and Global Demise Institution: Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. Noemi Marin Degree: Master of Arts Year: 2008 The thesis provides a cultural analysis on the micropolitics of Yugoslavia wars in 1992-1995, examining local and global media coverage along with grassroots and historical dimensions. The study offers an extensive overview of scholarly literature on the Balkans, arguing that often omitted local, cultural and historical narratives of the war events reveal complex perspectives on the rationales provided on civil war. Investigating the nationalist social movements in Yugoslavia (1992-1995), the thesis articulates the need to revisit Deleuze and Guattari’s framework of micropolitics to understand the cultural and historical dimensions operational in such movements. The study presents local media coverage in Nasa Borba, Borba, and Hrvatsko Slovo, focusing mainly on two major atrocities committed during the Balkan conflict, in order to shed light on the complex role of discourse emerging in war environments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politicization of Religion and the Sacralized Balkan Nations Regarding Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 40 Issue 7 Article 8 9-2020 The Politicization of Religion and the Sacralized Balkan Nations Regarding Bosnia and Herzegovina Faruk Hadžić Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hadžić, Faruk (2020) "The Politicization of Religion and the Sacralized Balkan Nations Regarding Bosnia and Herzegovina," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40 : Iss. 7 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol40/iss7/8 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POLITICIZATION OF RELIGION AND THE SACRALIZED BALKAN NATIONS REGARDING BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA By Faruk Hadžić Faruk Hadžić is an independent researcher from Zenica, Bosnia, and Herzegovina. He is currently working as a project volunteer in NGO, Lotos - Protection de Sante Mental. He received a BSc in Psychology and Economics, Diploma (MBTA) in Mindfulness-Based Transactional Analysis and MSc in Security Studies, Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement from the University of Modern Sciences, B&H. His research is multidisciplinary in social and political psychology, economics, critical security studies, criminal justice, and political science. Abstract Ethnic, national, and confessional affiliation in ex-Yugoslavia add to political radicalization. As a form of political power, politicized religions are, psychologically speaking, unconscious non-faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Defying Evil How the Italian Army Saved Croatian Jews During the Holocaust
    DEFYING EVIL HOW THE ITALIAN ARMY SAVED CROATIAN JEWS DURING THE HOLOCAUST By Benjamin Wood History Publishing Company Palisades, New York Copyright ©2012 by Benjamin Wood All rights reserved. No part of the publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or trans- mitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without prior written consent from the History Publishing Company. Published in the United States by History Publishing company LLC Palisades, New York www.historypublishingco.com ISBN-10: 1-933909-27-7 ISBN-13: 9781933909-27-1 LCCN: 2012933032 SAN: 850-5942 Wood, Benjamin, 1964- Defying evil : how the Italian Army saved Croatian Jews during the Holocaust / by Benjamin Wood. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. LCCN 2012933032 ISBN 9781933909271 (pbk.) ISBN 9781933909288 (e-book) 1. Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)--Croatia. 2. Italy. Army--Officers. I. Title. D804.3.W66 2012 940.53'18 QBI12-600031 Printed in the United States on acid free paper 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition For my father and step-father, both of whom loved history. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.....................................................................9 1. • • • WAR COMES TO CROATIA................................................... 13 2. • • • REFUGE IN THE ITALIAN ZONE OF OCCUPATION...............43 3. • • • MUSSOLINI’S TREATMENT OF JEWS AT HOME AND ABROAD........................................................................95 4. • • • THE ITALIAN WITHDRAWAL..............................................153 5. • • • FIGHTING WITH THE PARTISANS......................................185 CONCLUSION.....................................................................209 INTRODUCTION THE STORY OF ITALY’S RESCUE AND DEFENSE OF CROATIAN JEWS IS unique in the history of World War II and the Holocaust. Officials at the highest level of Fascist Italy defied their ally Nazi Germany to protect Jews who were not even citizens of their own country.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Apart from the Third Reich Itself, No Other Axis State Has Been
    INTRODUCTION Apart from the Third Reich itself, no other Axis state has been con- demned to villainy in such unequivocal terms by posterity as the Ustasha1 Independent State of Croatia (Nezavisna Država Hrvatska, NDH), which existed as a formal political entity within Axis Europe between 1941 and 1945 under the dictatorial rule of the Poglavnik (Leader) Ante Pavelić (1889–1959). The moral reprobation that accompanies the NDH in histo- riographical (and related political) discourses, in and outside of the pres- ent day Republic of Croatia,2 is certainly not in proportion to the small political and military significance that the Ustasha state actually pos- sessed during the Second World War. The NDH could not claim the mili- tary or political position of Axis countries such as Italy or even Romania and Hungary. The NDH was, however, the German Reich’s closest ally in terms of its political-military structures, racial ideology and policies toward ethnic and racial minorities (albeit with considerable differences), and therein lies the historical significance of the Ustasha state. The NDH was in fact the last standing ally of National Socialist Germany in early May 1945. The NDH was closely attached to Germany through the racial policies of the Ustasha regime. According to the general historiographical view of the NDH, the Ustasha government was ‘the most brutal and most sangui- nary satellite regime in the Axis sphere of influence.’3 Yet, while the ethnic and racial policies of the Ustasha state toward Serbs, Jews and Gypsies in wartime Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina have received a great deal of attention in both Croatian and non-Croatian historiography,4 historians 1 Ustasha (Ustaša) is the singular form, while Ustashe (Ustaše) is plural.
    [Show full text]