West Muswellbrook Project Gateway Application Supporting Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

West Muswellbrook Project Gateway Application Supporting Document West Muswellbrook Project Gateway Application Supporting Document Pursuant to Part 4AA of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries) 2007 WEST MUSWELLBROOK PROJECT GATEWAY APPLICATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT DOCUMENT CONTROL Report for client Muswellbrook Coal Company Limited Attention of Mr Paul Martinkus Date 10 December 2014 Document number IDEM0523.1 Version D Authored by Mr Terry Short Peer review by Dr Jan Green (Idemitsu Australia Resources) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS REPORT IS COPYRIGHT The author wishes to thank the landholders who © La Tierra Pty Limited and Muswellbrook Coal engaged with him in preparing this report. The Company Limited, 2014. contributions of Ms Tiffany Thomson and Ms Bronwen This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted Morrison of La Tierra, AGE and SLR consultants, and under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be also Ms Ronda Comber, are gratefully acknowledged. reproduced by any process without prior written SUGGESTED CITATION permission from La Tierra Pty Limited and This report should be cited as follows. Muswellbrook Coal Company Limited. Short, T. (2014) West Muswellbrook Project, Gateway ABOUT LA TIERRA Application, Supporting Document. A report prepared for La Tierra Pty Limited is an independent team of Muswellbrook Coal Company Limited by La Tierra Pty professional consultants who provide expert objective Limited, Brisbane, 10 December 2014. scientific and engineering advice about management of DISCLAIMER the Earth's natural resources. This report has been prepared in accordance with the brief provided by the Client and has relied upon the We focus our consulting expertise on key areas of information collected at or under the times and corporate strategic and operational risk in natural conditions specified herein. All findings, conclusions or resource management. We execute our services in due recommendations contained within the report are based diligence programmes, impact assessments, audits and only on the aforementioned circumstances. The report reviews, technical consulting and scientific report is for the use of the Client only and La Tierra Pty Limited writing. will take no responsibility for its use by other parties. We work for resource and agricultural companies, INFORMATION SOURCES AND REFERENCING governments, investment institutions, industry This report was derived from an extensive range of associations and other organisations throughout the information sources including interviews and literature Asia Pacific region and beyond. review. Much of the cited literature is available via the CONTACT LA TIERRA Internet. The authors have sought to ensure that La Tierra Pty Limited sources for their use of text, figures, diagrams and Ground Floor, Wickham House images are provided in text, footnotes or references. If 155-157 Wickham Terrace inadvertently the authors have failed to adequately Brisbane Queensland 4000 Australia acknowledge a source of material used they would e [email protected] | w latierra.com.au appreciate prompt notification so the matter can be OUR SUSTAINABILITY corrected in the electronic copy of the document and a If supplied in hardcopy by La Tierra Pty Limited, full acknowledgement provided. this report has been printed on certified carbon neutral and 100% recycled paper using only vegetable based inks. la tierra the earth PAGE 2 of 106 WEST MUSWELLBROOK PROJECT GATEWAY APPLICATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 3! LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................. 6! LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ 7! LIST OF PLATES .................................................................................................................................................. 8! ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 8! EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 10! 1! INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 15! 1.1! Purpose of this report .......................................................................................................................... 15! 1.1.1! Report structure ................................................................................................................................ 16! 1.1.2! Addressing the relevant criteria ....................................................................................................... 18! 1.1.3! Complying with the Guideline for Gateway Applicants ..................................................................... 18! 1.2! Project description ............................................................................................................................... 21! 1.2.1! General arrangement ........................................................................................................................ 23! 1.2.2! Open cut pit layout ............................................................................................................................. 25! 1.2.3! Mining infrastructure area layout ..................................................................................................... 25! 1.2.4! CHPP .................................................................................................................................................. 25! 1.2.5! Mine waste ......................................................................................................................................... 30! 1.2.6! Personnel requirements ................................................................................................................... 30! 1.2.7! Water management ........................................................................................................................... 30! 1.2.8! Power supply ..................................................................................................................................... 30! 1.2.9! Sewage treatment ............................................................................................................................. 30! 1.2.10! Transport and logistics ...................................................................................................................... 31! 1.2.11! Rehabilitation ..................................................................................................................................... 31! 1.3! Project alternatives .............................................................................................................................. 31! 1.3.1! Mining method ................................................................................................................................... 31! 1.3.2! Out of pit waste rock disposal ........................................................................................................... 32! 1.3.3! Coal handling and processing ........................................................................................................... 32! 1.4! Project assessment area (PAA) ........................................................................................................... 32! 2! REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................... 33! 2.1! Upper Hunter region ............................................................................................................................ 33! 2.2! History of agricultural development .................................................................................................... 33! 2.2.1! Beef, grain and dairy ......................................................................................................................... 35! 2.2.2! Equine ................................................................................................................................................ 36! 2.2.3! Viticulture .......................................................................................................................................... 38! 2.3! Key agricultural infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 38! 2.3.1! Transport Routes ............................................................................................................................... 39! la tierra the earth PAGE 3 of 106 WEST MUSWELLBROOK PROJECT GATEWAY APPLICATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENT 2.4! Natural resources ................................................................................................................................ 40! 2.4.1! Geology and geomorphology ............................................................................................................. 40! 2.4.2! Topography .......................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Scone Airport Master Plan Final Report
    SCONE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN FINAL REPORT Prepared for Upper Hunter Shire Council June 2016 Scone Airport Master Plan Report Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 2 2 Airport Background and Regional Context ............................................................................ 4 2.1 Airport Business Model ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Regional Context ................................................................................................................... 6 3 Existing Airport Facilities ....................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Runway 11/29 & Runway Strip - Physical Features ............................................................... 8 3.2 Taxiways .............................................................................................................................. 10 3.3 Apron and Aircraft Parking Areas ........................................................................................ 12 3.4 Terminal Building ................................................................................................................ 12 3.5 Privately Owned Facilities ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL NCIG SEE Report April 2020
    Coal Export Terminal Optimisation Statement of Environmental Effects Project Approval (06_0009) Modification Report APRIL 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 5 Engagement 22 1.1 Background 1 5.1 Consultation 22 1.1.1 NCIG Development History 1 5.1.1 Department Of Planning, Industry and Environment 22 1.1.2 Description of Approved Operations 4 5.1.2 Regulatory Agencies and Local Council 22 1.1.3 Optimisation Initiatives Implemented at the NCIG CET 6 5.1.3 Other Key Stakeholders 22 1.2 Modification Overview 8 5.1.4 Public Consultation 23 1.3 Interactions with other Projects 9 5.2 Key Comments and Concerns 23 1.4 Structure of this Modification Report 9 6 Assessment Of Impacts 25 6.1 Noise 25 2 Description Of The Modification 10 6.1.1 Methodology 25 2.1 Train Movements 10 6.1.2 Background 25 2.2 Ships 10 6.1.3 Applicable Criteria 27 2.3 Water Management 10 6.1.4 Impact Assessment Review 29 6.2 Air Quality 32 3 Strategic Context 12 6.2.1 Methodology 32 3.1 Optimisation Of Existing Infrastructure 12 6.2.2 Background 32 3.2 Benefits For NCIG’s Customers 12 6.2.3 Impact Assessment Review 35 3.3 Importance to Port of Newcastle 13 6.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 36 3.4 Hunter Valley Coal Chain Efficiency 14 6.3.1 Assessment of Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions 36 4 Statutory Context 15 6.3.2 International, National and State Policies and Programs Regarding Greenhouse 4.1 Environmental Planning and Gas Emissions 37 Assessment Act, 1979 15 6.3.3 NCIG Greenhouse Gas Mitigation 4.1.1 EP&A Act Objects 16 Measures 38 4.2 Environmental Planning Instruments 17 4.2.1 State Environmental Planning Policy 7 Evaluation Of Merits 39 (Three Ports) 2013 17 7.1 Stakeholder Engagement Overview 39 4.2.2 State Environmental Planning Policy 7.2 Consolidated Summary of Assessment (Coastal Management) 2018 19 of Impacts 39 4.2.3 State Environmental Planning Policy No.
    [Show full text]
  • Derailment and Collision Between Coal Trains Ravenan (25Km from Muswellbrook), New South Wales, on 26 September 2018
    Derailment and collision between coal trains Ravenan (25km from Muswellbrook), New South Wales, on 26 September 2018 ATSB Transport Safety Report Rail Occurrence Investigation (Defined) RO-2018-017 Final – 18 December 2020 Cover photo: Source ARTC This investigation was conducted under the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 (Commonwealth) by the Office of Transport Safety Investigations (NSW) on behalf of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau in accordance with the Collaboration Agreement Released in accordance with section 26 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 Publishing information Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office: 62 Northbourne Avenue Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 2463 Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Email: [email protected] Website: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence With the exception of the Coat of Arms, ATSB logo, and photos and graphics in which a third party holds copyright, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. The ATSB’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Copyright in material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW 11 Ravensworth Rail Unloader Expansion 1
    MACQUARIE GENERATION 2001 REVIEW 11 Ravensworth rail unloader expansion 1 10 Technology upgrade for Liddell 16 Sawmill waste for renewable energy 19 Aussie Climb 2000—an epic fundraiser 20 Gas-fuelled power plant proposed REVIEW 2001 CONTENTS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE* 4 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS 5 CHAIRMAN’S REVIEW 6 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT 7 FOUNDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE—LIDDELL UPGRADE, RAIL UNLOADER EXPANSION, INDUSTRY ZONE, TOMAGO GAS TURBINE 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE 14 RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO—BIOMASS CO-FIRING, HYDROELECTRIC PLANT, WIND POWER STUDIES 16 IN THE COMMUNITY—AUSSIE CLIMB 2000 19 FORESTRY TRIALS, SAFETY WINNERS 20 * Macquarie Generation’s 2001 Financial Statements presented to the New South Wales Parliament are available from the Corporation’s web site or by contacting our Newcastle office. Contact details appear on the back cover of Review 2001. Cover: Water vapour rises from Bayswater Power Station’s cooling towers. 11 Ravensworth rail unloader expansion 1 10 Technology upgrade for Liddell 16 Sawmill waste for renewable energy 19 Aussie Climb 2000—an epic fundraiser 20 Gas-fuelled power plant proposed REVIEW 2001 CONTENTS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE* 4 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS 5 CHAIRMAN’S REVIEW 6 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT 7 FOUNDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE—LIDDELL UPGRADE, RAIL UNLOADER EXPANSION, INDUSTRY ZONE, TOMAGO GAS TURBINE 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE 14 RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO—BIOMASS CO-FIRING, HYDROELECTRIC PLANT, WIND POWER STUDIES 16 IN THE COMMUNITY—AUSSIE CLIMB 2000 19 FORESTRY TRIALS, SAFETY WINNERS 20 * Macquarie Generation’s 2001 Financial Statements presented to the New South Wales Parliament are available from the Corporation’s web site or by contacting our Newcastle office. Contact details appear on the back cover of Review 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Investment Prospectus 2016 the Hunter Region, Nsw Invest in Australia’S Largest Regional Economy
    HUNTER INVESTMENT PROSPECTUS 2016 THE HUNTER REGION, NSW INVEST IN AUSTRALIA’S LARGEST REGIONAL ECONOMY Australia’s largest Regional economy - $38.5 billion Connected internationally - airport, seaport, national motorways,rail Skilled and flexible workforce Enviable lifestyle Contact: RDA Hunter Suite 3, 24 Beaumont Street, Hamilton NSW 2303 Phone: +61 2 4940 8355 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rdahunter.org.au AN INITIATIVE OF FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT WELCOMES CONTENTS Federal and State Government Welcomes 4 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Australia’s future depends on the strength of our regions and their ability to Introducing the Hunter progress as centres of productivity and innovation, and as vibrant places to live. 7 History and strengths The Hunter Region has great natural endowments, and a community that has shown great skill and adaptability in overcoming challenges, and in reinventing and Economic Strength and Diversification diversifying its economy. RDA Hunter has made a great contribution to these efforts, and 12 the 2016 Hunter Investment Prospectus continues this fine work. The workforce, major industries and services The prospectus sets out a clear blueprint of the Hunter’s future direction as a place to invest, do business, and to live. Infrastructure and Development 42 Major projects, transport, port, airports, utilities, industrial areas and commercial develpoment I commend RDA Hunter for a further excellent contribution to the progress of its region. Education & Training 70 The Hon Warren Truss MP Covering the extensive services available in the Hunter Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development Innovation and Creativity 74 How the Hunter is growing it’s reputation as a centre of innovation and creativity Living in the Hunter 79 STATE GOVERNMENT Community and lifestyle in the Hunter The Hunter is the biggest contributor to the NSW economy outside of Sydney and a jewel in NSW’s rich Business Organisations regional crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Hunter Economic Diversification Project
    Upper Hunter Economic Diversification Project Report 3 of 3: Strategy Report Buchan Consulting June 2011 This project is supported by: Trade & Investment Office of Environment & Heritage Department of Premier & Cabinet Final Report Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 A. Regional Economy........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 B. Major Issues.................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 C. A Diversification Strategy.............................................................................................................................................................. 8 D. Opportunities .............................................................................................................................................................................. 10 E. Implementation ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Freight and Ports Plan 2018-2023
    NSW Freight and Ports Plan 2018-2023 September 2018 Contents Message from the Ministers 4 Executive Summary – A Plan For Action 2018-2023 6 What the Plan will achieve over the next five years 6 Objective 1: Economic growth 7 Objective 2: Efficiency, connectivity and access 8 Objective 3: Capacity 9 Objective 4: Safety 10 Objective 5: Sustainability 11 Part 1 – Introduction 13 About this Plan 13 Part 2 – Context: The State Of Freight 17 About this chapter 17 The NSW freight and ports sector at glance 17 Greater Sydney production and freight movements 26 The Greater Sydney freight network 28 Regional NSW production and freight movements 36 The regional freight network 39 Part 3 – How We Will Respond To Challenges And Opportunities 45 About this chapter 45 The five objectives 45 Objective 1: Economic growth 47 Objective 2: Efficiency, connectivity and access 51 Objective 3: Capacity 62 Objective 4: Safety 70 Objective 5: Sustainability 73 Part 4 - Implementation Plan 77 Appendix 78 Message from the Ministers The freight industry is the lifeblood of the • Deliver more than $5 billion in committed NSW economy – worth $66 billion to our key infrastructure projects for freight in State economy. From big businesses to NSW. These include $543 million towards farmers, retailers to consumers, we all rely Fixing Country Roads, $400 million on our goods getting to us in a safe and towards Fixing Country Rail, $15 million efficient manner. towards the Fixing Country Rail pilot, $21.5 million towards the Main West rail line, The NSW Freight and Ports Strategy $500 million towards the Sydney Airport released in 2013 was the first long-term Road upgrade, $400 million towards Port freight vision to be produced for NSW, Botany Rail Line duplication, $1171 million which drove targeted investment in both towards the Coffs Harbour Bypass and metropolitan and regional transport $2.2-$2.6 billion towards Sydney Gateway.
    [Show full text]
  • Project SHEET Newcastle, Australia NCIG Berths 8 and 9 Dredging Project
    PROJECT SHEET NEWCASTLE, AUSTRALIA NCIG BErths 8 AND 9 DREDGING PROJECT INTRODUCTION FEaturES For 200 years the Port of Newcastle has been Client Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group, Australia’s premier coal export harbour. Of the 95 with Aurecon Hatch as EPCM Contractor Mtpa of various commodities such as steel, aluminum, minerals and so forth exported from Location Newcastle, Australia Newcastle in 2008-2009, 90.5 Mtpa were Period November 2007 - May 2010 attributable to coal. Average annual growth rate of coal exports from 1990 to 2006 was 6.1%. Contractor Boskalis Dredeco Joint Venture This constant increase has caused a spike in ships queuing to enter the harbour to be loaded. To increase capacity and avoid these traffic jams, a decision was made to develop a new coal stockpile area and construct a third coal terminal. In April 2007 the Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group (NCIG) received approval from the New South Wales Government to proceed. NCIG has a 35-year lease on the 136-hectare site on Kooragang Island and construction on Stage One of the facilities with capacity to load 30Mtpa is almost completed. The shiploading facilities have been built to the west of the existing Kooragang A shiploaders, with the new stockyards and rail facilities to the south-west of the Kooragang Coal A Location map Terminal. The port is located at the mouth of the B The cabins of the backhoes are equipped with Hunter River which, as part of the project, was state-of-the-art technology C deepened to allow ships to reach the new berths.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Hunter Country Destinations Management Plan - October 2013
    Destination Management Plan October 2013 Upper Hunter Country Destinations Management Plan - October 2013 Cover photograph: Hay on the Golden Highway This page - top: James Estate lookout; bottom: Kangaroo at Two Rivers Wines 2 Contents Executive Summary . .2 Destination Analysis . .3 Key Products and Experiences . .3 Key Markets . .3 Destination Direction . .4 Destination Requirements . .4 1. Destination Analysis . .4 1.1. Key Destination Footprint . .5 1.2. Key Stakeholders . .5 1.3. Key Data and Documents . .5 1.4. Key Products and Experiences . .7 Nature Tourism and Outdoor Recreation . .7 Horse Country . .8 Festivals and Events . .9 Wine and Food . .10 Drives, Walks, and Trails . .11 Arts, Culture and Heritage . .12 Inland Adventure Trail . .13 1.5. Key Markets . .13 1.5.1. Visitors . .14 1.5.2. Accommodation Market . .14 1.5.3. Market Growth Potential . .15 1.6. Visitor Strengths . .16 Location . .16 Environment . .16 Rural Experience . .16 Equine Industry . .17 Energy Industry . .17 1.7. Key Infrastructure . .18 1.8. Key Imagery . .19 1.9. Key Communications . .19 1.9.1. Communication Potential . .21 2. Destination Direction . .22 2.1. Focus . .22 2.2. Vision . .22 2.3. Mission . .22 2.4. Goals . .22 2.5. Action Plan . .24 3. Destination Requirements . .28 3.1. Ten Points of Collaboration . .28 1 Upper Hunter Country Destinations Management Plan - October 2013 Executive Summary The Upper Hunter is a sub-region of the Hunter Develop a sustainable and diverse Visitor region of NSW and is located half way between Economy with investment and employment Newcastle and Tamworth. opportunities specifi c to the area’s Visitor Economy Strengths.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Variability and Water Security for Power Generation
    Hydro-climatology: Variability and change (Proceedings of symposium JH02 held during 233 IUGG2011 in Melbourne, Australia, July 2011) (IAHS Publ. 344, 2011). Climate variability and water security for power generation ADAM M. WYATT & STEWART W. FRANKS University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia [email protected] Abstract A reliable supply of fresh water is a critical component of coal fired power generation. During periods when water supplies are reduced, power generation may be limited, with obvious impacts on power consumers. Using the reconstructed historical streamflow series contained in the IQQM water allocation model, and simple water balance modelling, the water supply security of the Bayswater Power Station in the Hunter Valley, Australia, is assessed. The study revealed that the supply of water to the Bayswater Power Station is sensitive to extended dry periods, with some historical periods experiencing water shortfalls so severe that the station would be shut down without alternative water supplies. Key words climate variability; water supply security; water balance modelling; IQQM; Hunter Valley, Australia INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to determine the impact that climate processes such as the El Nino – Southern Oscillation have on the reliability of the water supply within the Hunter Valley, Australia. Specifically this study focuses on the water supply security necessary for power generation by Macquarie Generation at the Bayswater and Lake Liddell power stations. The generation of electricity using coal fired power stations such as Bayswater and Lake Liddell is dependent on a reliable supply of fresh water to replenish losses due to the operations of the power stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Bush Fire Risk Management Plan 2006
    Page 2 of 41 Amendment List Amendment Entered Number Date Signature Date Page 4 of 41 Table of Contents Glossary 7 1.1 Background 9 1.2 Aim and Objectives 9 1.3 Description of the Muswellbrook BFMC area 10 1.3.1 Location and land tenure 10 1.3.2 Climate and bush fire season 10 1.3.3 Population and demographic information 11 1.3.4 History of bush fire frequency and ignition cause 11 Chapter 2. Identifying and assessing the bush fire risk 13 2.1 Process 13 2.2 Communication and consultation 13 2.3 Identifying the bush fire risk 14 2.3.1 Assets 14 2.3.2 Assessing the bush fire risk - consequence 15 2.3.3 Assessing the bush fire risk - likelihood 17 2.3.4 Identifying the level of risk 17 2.3.5 Evaluating the bush fire risk 17 2.3.6 Prioritising treatments 17 2.3.7 Risk acceptability 17 Chapter 3. Treating the risk 18 3.1 Bush Fire Management Zones 18 3.2 BFMC wide treatments 20 3.3 Asset specific treatments 22 3.4 Fire thresholds 23 3.5 Annual works programs 24 3.6 Implementation 24 Chapter 4. Performance monitoring and reviewing 25 4.1 Review 25 4.2 Monitoring 25 4.3 Reporting 25 4.4 Performance Measurements 25 Appendix 1: Community Participation Strategy 26 Appendix 2: Asset Register 32 Appendix 3: Treatment Register 36 Appendix 4: Maps 41 Page 5 of 41 List of Tables Table 1.1 Land tenure 10 Table 3.1 Bush Fire Management Zones: Purpose, objectives and characteristics 19 Table 3.2 Asset specific treatments used in the Muswellbrook BFMC area 22 Table 3.3 Fire Thresholds for Vegetation Categories 23 List of Figures Figure 2.1 Overview of the risk assessment process ..............................................................................13 Page 6 of 41 Glossary Assets: anything valued by the community which includes houses, crops, livestock, heritage buildings and places, infrastructure, the environment, businesses, and forests, that may be at risk from bush fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping Data Generation for the Hunter Valley Coal Chain∗
    Shipping Data Generation for the Hunter Valley Coal Chain∗ Natashia Boland, Martin Savelsbergh, and Hamish Waterer School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia Abstract Strategic capacity planning is a core activity for the Hunter Valley Coal Chain Coordinator as demand for coal is expected to double in the next decade. Optimization and simulation models are used to suggest and evaluate infrastructure expansions and operating policy changes. These models require input data in the form of shipping stems, which are arrival streams of ships at the port, together with their cargo types and composition. Creating shipping stems that accurately represent future demand scenarios has been a time-consuming and daunting challenge. We describe a multi-phase optimization-based framework that facilitates and enhances this process, and which has become an integral part of the work flow. The framework embeds sampling to allow for the generation of multiple shipping stems for a single demand scenario, employs targets, and desirable and permissable ranges to specify and control the characteristics of the shipping stems, and uses integer programming in a hierarchical fashion to generate a shipping stem that best meets the set goals. 1 Introduction The Hunter Valley Coal Chain (HVCC) refers to the inland portion of the coal export supply chain in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia. The HVCC essentially follows the path of the Hunter River traveling south-east from the mining areas in the Hunter Valley to Newcastle. The Port of Newcastle is the world's largest coal export port. In 2008 port throughput was around 92 million tonnes, or more than 10 percent of the world's total trade in coal.
    [Show full text]