PERTH AND COUNCIL 3 17/387 22 November 2017

PROPOSED LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2

Report by Depute Chief Executive (Chief Operating Officer)

PURPOSE OF REPORT This report seeks approval of the Proposed Perth & Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) and its supporting documents. It also seeks agreement to its publication for representations from 1 December 2017 to 2 February 2018.

1. BACKGROUND

1.1 The Perth & Kinross Local Development Plan (LDP) is the spatial representation of various Council plans and strategies. The Plan sets out policies and proposals to support and encourage positive change in Perth & Kinross. It details where new development should and should not take place. It sets out the preferred locations for new homes and businesses to help foster growth; describes how any new or improved facilities, such as schools and green infrastructure will be provided; supports the City of Perth and the outlying town centres; and protects places of value to people and wildlife.

1.2 There is a statutory requirement to revise and update the Plan every five years. Work has been ongoing since the adoption of the Plan in 2014 to monitor the longer term outcomes of that Plan and to prepare the next Plan i.e. LDP2. The timetable for this process is set out in the Council’s Development Plan Scheme updated annually by the Environment Enterprise & Infrastructure Committee (EEI) with the most recent update being 9 November 2016 (Article 16/495). The most significant stage to date was the publication of the Main Issues Report (MIR) approved for consultation by the Council on 16 December 2015 (Article 15/576). The next stage and the subject of this report, is the approval and publication of the Proposed Plan for a period of representations.

1.3 A Proposed Plan is an expression of the Council’s settled view in relation to the appropriate use of land within the Council area . In preparing the Proposed Plan, the Council should have regard to the MIR and the comments submitted in response to that report. Members’ views had already been sought prior to the publication of the MIR in July 2015. Elected Members have again had an opportunity, during October 2017, to discuss with officers the content of the emerging Proposed Plan. Main Issues Report Consultation

1.4 The MIR is the most important consultative stage in the plan-making process when everyone can become effectively involved in shaping the final content of the LDP. The MIR was published on 23 December 2015 and focused on the key issues and changes from the adopted LDP. The consultation on the MIR started on 23 December 2015 and closed on 16 March 2016. It provided an opportunity for key agencies, developers, landowners, members of the public and other interested parties to make representations on the key issues presented in the MIR.

1.5 This consultation was advertised through a release in the local press, community newsletters and information made available on social media. 862 letters and 1773 emails were issued to stakeholders, key agencies and contacts on our consultation database. Information regarding the consultation was available online, including interactive representation forms. In addition, ten drop in sessions were held during the consultation period throughout , attended by more than 450 people. A total of 3070 website hits were received during the period of consultation. This was a successful consultation process with more than 350 representations made in response to the MIR. The representations received have been analysed and the information used to contribute towards the content of the Proposed Plan. The next stage of the Development Plan Scheme is the preparation of the Proposed Plan.

Proposed Perth & Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) and Supporting Documents

1.6 This section of the report discusses the main supporting documents and gives a brief summary of the format of LDP2 and the key changes from the Adopted Plan.

Development Plan Scheme

1.7 The Development Plan Scheme (DPS) sets out the programme for preparing and reviewing the LDP and requires to be updated annually.

1.8 It is proposed to publish a revised version in December 2017 along with the Proposed Plan. The DPS will be updated with regard to: information regarding what stage we are at in the process and what happens next; preparation and publication of the Action Programme, the preparation and publication of Supplementary Guidance; and the detail of the consultation undertaken in relation to the MIR. Copies of the DPS are available in the Members Lounge and online by using the following link http://www.pkc.gov.uk/ldp2 . Draft Action Programme

1.9 As part of the LDP process, Section 21 of the Planning etc. (Scotland) Act 2006 requires Perth and Kinross Council to prepare an Action Programme to accompany LDP2. The Action Programme for LDP1 was approved by the Enterprise & Infrastructure Committee on 2 April 2014 (Article 14/224). The Committee also remitted to the Executive Director (Environment) to regularly update this document. The Draft Action Programme is an update of this document carrying forward action from the current Adopted Plan together with the new actions arising out of the Proposed Plan. It includes: a list of actions required to deliver each of the plans, policies and proposals; the names of who will carry out the actions required; and an indicative timescale for each action. The Draft Action Programme will be published for comment alongside the Proposed Plan. Copies of the Draft Action Programme are available in the Members Lounge and online by using the following link http://www.pkc.gov.uk/ldp2 .

Environmental Report Addendum

1.10 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is a requirement under the Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act 2005. The purpose of an Environmental Report is to identify, describe and evaluate the likely significant effects on the environment of implementing LDP2 and, if necessary, identify ways to mitigate those effects. The Environmental Report is prepared in parallel to the key stages of the LDP. A Draft Environmental Report was prepared to accompany the MIR and was consulted upon late 2015 to early 2016. An Addendum to this report has since been prepared to take account of responses to that consultation and in doing so it has informed and directed the preparation of the Proposed LDP2.

1.11 The Addendum to the Environmental Report, along with a Non-Technical Summary, will be published alongside the Proposed Plan and made available for consultation for the same 9 week period. Copies of the Addendum to the Environmental Report are available in the Members Lounge and online by using the following link http://www.pkc.gov.uk/ldp2 .

Habitats Regulations Appraisal

1.12 Article 6(3) of the EC Habitats Directive requires that any plan (or project), which is not directly connected with, or necessary to, the management of a European site (Special Conservation Areas and Special Protection Areas), but would be likely to have a significant effect on one of these sites, must be subject to an ‘appropriate assessment’. This procedure is applied in Scotland through The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994, as amended, and is known as the ‘Habitats Regulations Appraisal’ of plans. The purpose of the Habitat Regulations Appraisal (HRA) for an LDP is to screen which policies or proposals may have an impact on the conservation objectives and qualifying features of any Special Conservation Area or Special Protection Area. For those where there may be an adverse effect, it is necessary to undertake an ‘appropriate assessment’ which identifies any mitigation required. If the policy or proposal cannot be mitigated then it should be removed from the Proposed Plan.

1.13 The HRA has to be submitted to Scottish Ministers. Whilst it is not necessary to prepare the HRA until the Proposed Plan has to be submitted to Scottish Ministers, it is necessary to formally consult and get agreement from Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) prior to this. A draft of the HRA is therefore being progressed.

Background Information

1.14 In an attempt to keep the Plan as succinct as possible, much of the technical information has been extracted from the plan, and is presented in a series of background papers. Published in tandem with the Plan will be the following background technical papers:

• Housing Background Paper – provides detailed information on the housing land requirement calculations for each Housing Market Area. • Infrastructure Studies- provides information on the infrastructure capacity within settlements and its adequacy to support the level of growth envisaged within the LDP.

1.15 Copies of the background technical papers are available in the Members Lounge and online by using the following link http://www.pkc.gov.uk/ldp2 .

1.16 In addition to the above, a Schedule of Responses to the MIR, together with the Council’s response to the comments received, will be available prior to commencement of the consultation period. This document is prepared following the Council’s consideration of the Proposed Plan.

2. Proposed Perth & Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2)

2.1 The Proposed Plan must be consistent with the Strategic Development Plan (TAYplan) and take account of a range of documents produced by the Scottish Government and others. Whilst the range of documents which have influenced the Plan is extensive, the following have had a key role in shaping the Plan:-

• National Planning Framework 3 • Scottish Planning Policy • Strategic Transport Projects Review • Strategic Development Plan (TAYplan) • TACTRAN Regional Transport Strategy

2.2 A copy of the Proposed Plan is set out at Appendix 1 and is also available online at http://www.pkc.gov.uk/ldp2 along with the Development Plan Scheme, Environmental Report Addendum, Draft Action Programme and all other supporting documents.

2.3 The format of LDP2 has been changed from the Adopted Plan and consists of 4 chapters:

1. Introduction 2. Vision 3. Policies 4. Settlement Statements

Chapters 1 and 2

2.4 Chapter 1 provides background information, and Chapter 2 contains the LDP2 Vision statement which has not changed from the Adopted Plan. Neither of these chapters are discussed further in the report.

Chapter 3

2.5 The policy chapter of the Plan has been restructured into 4 sections to reflect the 4 policy themes set out in Scottish Planning Policy. Each policy section contains a Vision, Key Objectives and Spatial Strategy as it relates to that policy theme. The policies themselves, however, remain relatively unchanged from the Adopted Plan. There have been a few new policies added to address emerging issues including policies relating to:

• Delivery of Housing sites – In line with the recommendation of the Planning Act review, this policy focuses on delivery of the Plan, and seeks to highlight what or who is holding up delivery of development sites • Maintaining an Effective Housing Land Supply – In response to a new Scottish Government requirement for plans to contain a policy allowing sites, not identified in the Plan, to come forward if there is a lack of effective supply • Spatial Framework for Wind - SPP requires the preparation of a spatial framework to identify those areas where wind farms are likely to be acceptable, subject to detailed site consideration • Renewable Heat / Heat Networks - The deployment of energy efficient heat networks will help to reduce carbon emissions, improve fuel security, address issues of fuel poverty, provide more affordable forms of heating, and offer local economic opportunities. Reducing heat demand of new development through improving energy efficiency and decarbonising heat provision will also help to mitigate the effects of climate change • Housing Mix Policy – Directed at larger sites with the aim of providing housing suitable for all, including elderly and those with disabilities • Perth city – Policy provided to improve linkages with the Perth City Plan • Perth City Transport and Active Travel – Provide improved key transport routes and corridors and support multi-modal transport choices with greater priority being given to public transport, walking and cycling on key routes linking with key destinations

2.6 In addition to the new policies mentioned above, three other policy issues require noting.

Standards of Design

2.7 Since the publication of LDP1, there have been increased calls, from a variety of sources, for improved design standards in new development. This issue was considered in the review of policies and whilst some minor strengthening of the policies was incorporated, it is suggested that the policy framework is robust. This is further supported by the Placemaking Supplementary Guidance which was consulted upon earlier this year. Both the policy framework and guidance gives a firm basis for the Council to require that all new development incorporates good design. Achieving this shift will require considerable work, including further training for planners and elected members. The Council will also have to work with developers to clearly articulate the desired design standards, through training events and enhanced pre-application consultations. There may also be merit in considering the re- introduction of local design awards to promote good design. Much of this is beyond the scope of the LDP. It is proposed to bring forward a paper on this subject early in 2017 to the EEI Committee.

Housing Site Capacities

2.8 When planning applications come forward for allocated sites, the actual number of houses is seldom exactly that identified in the Plan. This is because at the plan preparation stage, the detailed site analysis and design work is not complete. In addition, market trends change. Although the Adopted Plan indicates the site capacities are indicative, the variation at planning application stage clearly confuses the local communities.

2.9 A new approach is being taken to the identification of the number of housing units for sites allocated in the Proposed Plan. Instead of a single figure, it is proposed that each site allocated for housing in LDP2 will have a ‘capacity range’ identified. This will set the minimum and maximum number of houses which will be permitted to be built on each site. Any variation to this (up or down) will be exceptional and will need to be justified under LDP2 Policy 1: Placemaking. Application of the Placemaking Policy will ensure that the number of units is determined by achieving an appropriate design and layout for the site, in line with the Council’s commitment to improving the standard of design across the Council area.

Policy 50 New Development and Flooding

2.10 It is proposed that we resist SEPA’s sought commitment to not allow development on undeveloped land protected by appropriate flood protection schemes. SEPA are concerned because flood protection schemes can fail. However, it is considered that undeveloped land on the natural flood plain behind appropriate flood protection schemes may be suitable for development. On these sites, appropriate mitigation could be made rather than removing the site. SEPA’s position is different to Scottish Planning Policy which refers to land within the built up area behind appropriate flood defences rather than being concerned about whether land has been previously developed or not. The LDP needs to provide sufficient certainty to developers, and SEPA’s approach would undermine the certainty provided in the Adopted Plan. SEPA now seek removal of E3 (Arran Road), E1 (the Triangle) of the current LDP, and suggest a new commitment to no development on undeveloped land within E38 (Ruthvenfield Road) and H73 (Almond Valley). There is no Scottish Government policy change that supports or prompts this SEPA change in position from the Adopted Plan and it should be resisted. If considering our proposed position in terms of Scottish Planning Policy, this position should only be a potential issue for the northern part of E3 Food and Drink Park which might be considered to be beyond the built up area. All the other allocations are considered to lie within the built up area.

2.11 E3 (Food and Drink Park) is an important part of the settlement strategy, and all of this allocation should be retained. Local Authorities have a legal responsibility for maintaining their flood protection schemes. Local Authorities can also seek minimum floor heights to mitigate the likelihood of significant impacts. A level of autonomy is required, and where the Local Authorities are willing to commit to maintaining schemes and protecting existing/future premises, then this should be a decision available to us. If a site lies on the periphery of the settlement then there should be scope to consider and weigh up all planning considerations before deciding whether it is the best location overall. It would sometimes be more sustainable to develop adjacent to key settlements (such as Perth and E3) rather than to push development outwith (if flood risk issues can be suitably mitigated). Flood risk is a very important consideration, but it is not the only one. Where flood risk is suitably addressed by a flood protection scheme and mitigation, then Local Authorities need to have the scope to consider development within these areas if the alternatives are much less desirable overall.

2.12 The view taken in the Proposed Plan, is that the general approach to development behind flood protection schemes, should be in line with the Flood Risk Management Plan Annex 3 Approach to Land Use Planning in the Tay Local Plan District (see extract below).

“The Scottish Planning Policy sets out a flood risk framework to guide development. Areas of medium to high risk – where the annual probability of coastal or watercourse flooding is greater than 0.5% (1:200 years) – may be suitable for development provided flood protection measures to the appropriate standard (1:200 years) already exist and are maintained, are under construction, or are a planned measure in a current flood risk management plan. This is a matter for careful consideration through review of the Development Plan and its Strategic Environmental Assessment. However, if the site is an important component of the settlement strategy and no other equally suitable site is available, then development (apart from civic infrastructure and the most vulnerable uses) may be suitable. Any development in such areas would also be subject to appropriate mitigation measures: including water resistance, and water resilience measures and evacuation procedures.”

2.13 This approach conflicts with SEPA’s requirements and it is likely that they will object to the Proposed Plan on this basis. Any objection would be dealt with through the LDP Examination process.

Supplementary Guidance

2.14 A number of the policies refer to Supplementary Guidance either being available, or to be prepared. Legislation requires that all Supplementary Guidance which the Council wishes to become statutory is referred to in the Plan, formally consulted upon and submitted to Scottish Ministers. This includes all existing Supplementary Guidance, as Supplementary Guidance adopted in connection with a previous plan falls when that plan is replaced.

2.15 A full list of the existing Supplementary Guidance which is to be re-consulted on is detailed below. Consultation on these documents will be undertaken during 2018 and they would then be adopted alongside the LDP in 2019.

• Airfield Safeguarding • Delivering Zero Waste in Perth & Kinross • Landscape • Perth and Kinross Forest and Woodland Strategy • Green Infrastructure • Flood Risk and Flood Risk Assessment • Housing in the Countryside • Developer Contributions and Affordable Housing

2.16 A list of the Supplementary Guidance being prepared for the first time is listed below:

• Renewable and Low-Carbon Energy – Draft consulted on June - August 2017 • Placemaking – Draft consulted on June - August 2017 • Sustainable Heating and Cooling • Open Space & Developer Contributions • Air Quality Management • West/North West Perth Strategic Development Framework

Chapter 4

2.17 The settlement statements are presented in alphabetical order to make it easier for the user to find the settlement they are interested in. This is a change from the Adopted Plan which presented them by housing market area, and has been introduced as a result of user feedback. Much of the detailed information regarding the spatial strategy for the housing market areas is now either contained in the introduction to the policy themes or has been moved to the supporting documents i.e. the Housing Background Paper and the Infrastructure Studies, making the document more reader friendly and usable to the lay person. Each settlement statement provides information where appropriate regarding: the function of the settlement; what’s been happening; expected changes and proposals with detailed developer requirements.

2.18 The spatial strategy of the Proposed Plan remains unchanged. This is consistent with the spatial strategy of the recently approved TAYplan 2016-36. The TAYplan strategy focuses on locating the majority of new development within Principal Settlements and adopts a 3 tier hierarchical approach as set out in Diagram 1.

Diagram 1

Tier 1: Perth Core Area – will accommodate the majority of new development.

Tier 2: Existing Regional Service Centres – will accommodate a small share of new development.

Tier 3: Existing Local Service Centres – will accommodate a small share of new development which is more about sustaining these.

2.19 Below the tiered settlements, the LDP strategy seeks to allocate limited growth to those settlements with a range of facilities capable of serving local needs. The strategy also restricts growth within the smallest and least accessible settlements with little or no local facilities.

Employment Land Strategy

2.20 Maintaining and improving Perth and Kinross’ economic development land provision is a key driver to achieving sustainable economic growth and is a main component of the Plan. Whilst the Plan strategy carries forward the approach of the Adopted LDP, it is recognised that in a changing economic and technological climate, there is a need for a comprehensive review of the suitability of our employment land supply. The approach set out below remains sound and, in the majority of the Council area, identifies sufficient employment land to meet needs beyond the Plan period. The challenge is to ensure that sufficient serviced land is immediately available, as this is a key criteria for many prospective developers. There is, however, a need for further work to identify the needs and demands of employers in future years. This will allow further analysis of the land supply identified in the Plan, enabling a more targeted approach to individual sites. Identifying areas and sectors of market failure where Council intervention may be required will also be critical.

2.21 To ensure that there is readily available economic development land supply, the Proposed Plan;

• adopts a hierarchical approach with larger employment land allocations in the larger settlements and in particular within the Perth Core Area • promotes sites that allow existing businesses to expand and for new ones to establish • creates a positive and flexible framework by allocating a wide range of sites that promote a variety of employment opportunities within the area. • ensures sustainability is promoted with new employment allocations situated in areas well linked to existing residential areas and the public transport network • promotes rural economic development within the Proposed Plan with sites allocated within, or on the edge of, existing settlements

Housing Land Strategy

2.22 TAYplan has identified anticipated annual build rates and these will be required to accommodate the projected population increases should they materialise. These estimated build rates have been used to inform the housing land requirement to 2028.

2.23 Table 1 below sets out the housing land requirement to 2028 for each housing market area. Further details are contained within the Housing Background Paper. Table 1

Unadjusted TAYplan 2016-28 Requirement & Shortfall Effective supply Housing Housing requirement at March 2016 Additional market area 2016-2028 Audit houses required Highland 1,020 762 258 Kinross 1,008 802 206 Perth 6,480 7,320 1 0 Strathearn 1,704 1,309 395 Strathmore & the Glens 1,716 1,205 511 Greater Dundee 72 33 39 Total PKC 12,000 11,431 1409

1 Note:Oversupply in one housing market area cannot count towards an undersupply in another area.

Perth Area - Key Changes from the Adopted Plan

Housing Numbers

2.24 TAYplan has identified that in order to meet projected population increases, approximately 540 houses will be required per year. If this build rate is to be achieved, it will require LDP2 to identify an effective housing land supply capable of delivering 6480 houses. In addition to this, the Plan reallocates 10% of the Kinross Housing Market Area (HMA) requirement to the Perth Area to reflect the environmental constraints in Kinross–shire. This can easily be accommodated within the surplus in the Perth Housing Market Area. Whilst there are sufficient numbers in the Perth Housing Market Area, the Proposed Plan brings forward a range of sites which will offer further flexibility and choice.

2.25 A further 6 houses per year will be required in the Perth part of the Greater Dundee Housing Market Area. This is proposed to be met through increasing numbers on the existing site H24 Moncur Road, . See paragraph 2.39 for more information.

Adjusted Perth Area Housing Land requirement to 2028 Housing Housing land Effective Reallocation Windfall Additional market requirement supply from sites Allocations area 2016-28 2016 Kinross required HMA Perth 6,480 7,320 +101 648 0

Adjusted Perth part of the Greater Dundee Housing Land Requirement to 2028 Housing Housing Effective Windfall Additional Allocations Market Land Supply Sites Required Area Requirement 2016 2016-28 Greater 72 33 0 39 Dundee

Green Belt

2.26 Three changes were proposed to the Green Belt boundary in the Main Issues Report at Perth West, Scone North and in relation to the line of the Cross Tay Link Road (CTLR). As a result of comments received, it is now proposed to amend these boundary changes, and make an additional change as follows:

• Perth West – An additional area to the south of the A9 to be removed from the Green Belt as it will be required to achieve access into the Perth West site. (See Map 1) • Scone North – Small area to the west of the H29 housing allocation not being removed from the Green Belt (See Map 2) • CTLR – The line of the CTLR had been proposed in the MIR as providing a defensible boundary for the Green Belt rather than the somewhat arbitrary boundary currently defined in the Adopted Plan. Consultation responses were against the removal of such a large area from the Green Belt and it is now proposed to take the boundary along a track through the woods to the north of Scone linking with the line of the CTLR. (See Map 2) • Bertha Park – In addition to the changes promoted through the MIR, an area to the north of Bertha Park has been removed from the Green Belt to accommodate a Park and Ride facility (See Map 8)

Map 1

Map 2

Perth Quarry

2.27 The MIR proposed widening the acceptable uses at Perth Quarry to include recreation and housing in response to a representation from Lafarge Tarmac who operate the quarry. Whilst Perth Quarry could be kept as an employment allocation, it would be preferable to ensure the most effective future reuse with the provision of some recreational facilities here. It is, therefore, proposed to include the site as a mixed use proposal within the Proposed Plan (see Map 3). This is with the provision that a Masterplan setting out the phasing and comprehensive development of the whole site, including a feasibility study and business case for any leisure proposal/s (to clarify their viability and employment levels), is submitted at the time of any planning application.

Map 3

Charrettes for and Methven

2.28 Recognising the existing facilities and that there is opportunity for supporting and growing these settlements, it is proposed to make a commitment in LDP2 to holding design based workshops to inform LDP3. This offers a good way to get all key stakeholders together to explore and clarify the future opportunities and issues for the whole community. The workshops, feedback and testing of emerging proposals should help examine and clarify the opportunities, and get broad consensus and ownership of the possible solutions during preparation of LDP3 . Cemetery Provision

2.29 There is currently an identified need for a new cemetery within the Perth area as Wellshill Cemetery will reach capacity in the next 20 years. A site of circa 8 hectares is likely to be required to serve the Perth area. 2 potential areas of search were identified in the MIR, one at Isla Road (Map 4) and the other at Perth West (Map 5). Whilst Isla Road was the preferred option in the MIR, investigations are not well enough advanced on the assessment of ground conditions to determine if the land is suitable for cemetery use. As a result, it is proposed to identify both locations within the Proposed Plan as areas of search for cemetery provision.

Map 4

Map 5

Murray Royal

2.30 Whilst not identified as a site within the MIR, it is proposed to include the Murray Royal site in the Proposed Plan as an allocation for residential/community uses (see Map 6). At the time of the MIR, it was believed that the then landowner was not interested in pursuing the development of the site. The site is now under new ownership and a planning application is considered to be imminent. It is, therefore, considered appropriate to identify parameters and requirements for its development. There is no estimate given on the numbers that will be appropriate, as this will be a complicated proposal involving: conversion of listed buildings; retention of large areas of parkland setting; and which has potential for flatted development. There will be a requirement for a Masterplan setting out the phasing, delivery strategy and the comprehensive development of the whole site to be submitted at the time of any planning application, and this will determine suitable numbers. A key issue will be the traffic and associated air quality impact. There may be a requirement to phase parts of this development after the completion of the Cross Tay Link Road. This issue will be appraised through a Transport Assesement.

Map 6

Burghmuir Road

2.31 The MIR discussed the potential of an existing area of open space to the north of Burghmuir Reservoir (see Map 7) for residential development. This was not identified as a preferred option due to uncertainty around achieving suitable access arrangements and the provision of a layout that could deliver good residential amenity. It was, instead, proposed to remove it from the open space allocation and to leave it as white land, which would allow a proposal to come forward if it could address these concerns. Suitable information has since been provided which suggests that an acceptable layout and access solution can be achieved on the site. In addition, identifying the site as a housing allocation allows the Council to clearly set out its requirements.

Map 7

Bertha Park Extension

2.32 A proposal was submitted for an extension to Bertha Park allocation to extend this to the north of the current LDP boundary (into land within the Greenbelt) to create further opportunities for commercial/employment land in parallel with a new Park and Ride facility. The Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) stage 2 assessment for the CTLR has investigated the potential operational impact of a Park and Ride in the vicinity of the proposed CTLR/A9 grade separated junction. This considered different potential locations from an operational impact, access and visibility perspective, and the preferred option was closest to the junction. This option requires an extension to the Bertha Park boundary to accommodate the Park and Ride facility (see Map 8). We agree with Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) that there should be a requirement for new native woodland planting towards the open rural landscape to the north, east and west, and in views from the A9 and CTLR to minimise the landscape and visual impact of the development. Map 8

Perth West

2.33 The current LDP Perth West allocation would not create a sustainable community by virtue of its size. Including a larger Perth West would mean a very generous housing land supply for Perth. This provides additional resilience particularly as the strategy is dependent on the delivery of large strategic sites. Any delay on one or more of the major allocations would likely result in a deficit in the effective housing land supply. This flexibility in housing land supply would also create additional choice and healthy competition.

2.34 The Perth West allocation also makes provision for 25ha of employment land in prime locations adjacent to the A9. These prime sites provide a significant long term economic development land supply at a key location.

2.35 A wider Perth West proposal was first tested through a charrette in Spring 2015. Part funded by developers, the Council and Scottish Government, it brought all stakeholders together – community, key agencies, landowners, and the Council. Through workshops and site visits, we worked towards an agreed way forward. On the back of that collaborative charrette process, the wider Perth West was identified in the MIR as a preferred option, although further developer information was sought and obtained through provision of a developer delivery statement and access strategy.

2.36 The extension to Perth West would give greater certainty to, and also greater control of, how development comes forward in an area mostly currently identified as white land within the settlement boundary of the LDP (see Map 9). This proposal also includes an extension further west and a change to the Greenbelt to make a potentially more rigorous long term boundary associated to the West Lamberkine woodland block. Currently, the Greenbelt follows a thin field boundary tree belt. In addition, the A9 access would involve a major junction within the proposed Perth West extension (due to DMRB Design guidance on junction spacing from Broxden roundabout). It would, therefore, seem logical for the West Lamberkine woodland to be the western boundary of the site and for the Greenbelt to be moved. It is proposed that the Council support this wider Perth West proposal, but that this allocation has a pause and review monitoring stage to reflect a precautionary traffic modelling threshold.

Map 9

Errol Airfield

2.37 The adopted Plan includes a site which was granted, in principle, consent for 240 houses in 2010, contrary to recommendation and extended again in 2014. It also has approval for matters specified in conditions, with the 240 houses proposed on a third of the original site, with an indication that future applications will be submitted for the remainder of the site. The TAYplan spatial strategy specifically precludes significant development in the Carse. Any increase in numbers would be contrary to this and the spatial strategy of the Proposed Plan. As a result, it is proposed that the settlement boundary at Errol Airfield be drawn to exclude this entire area (see Map 10). In the event of no progress with the development of the site and a further application to extend the life of the application, the exclusion of the site from the settlement boundary would allow the Council the option not to renew the consent.

Map 10

Inchture

2.38 There is a site identified for housing to the north east of the village which is currently identified for 16 units (see Map 11). The site capacity was set at this level as it was understood to be the landowners desire to develop large prestige plots. The capacity of this site is however significantly greater. It is proposed that this allocation is significantly increased in terms of units to reflect the settlement’s density patterns. This will make better use of greenfield land and meet the housing requirements for this area. The MIR suggested meeting the housing requirement through the allocation of an additional site in . However, it is considered that increasing the numbers on this already consented site to a more appropriate level is preferable to allocating further greenfield land for development.

Map 11

Highland Area – Key Changes from the Adopted Plan

Housing Numbers

2.39 TAYplan has identified that, in order to meet projected population increases, approximately 85 houses will be required per year. If this build rate is to be achieved, it will require LDP2 to identify an effective land supply capable of delivering 1020 houses. The Highland Area has a unique set of constraints which makes it difficult to identify further sites which will provide additional effective housing land supply. The shortfall, however, is insignificant and it should be noted that small windfall sites traditionally make up a significant proportion of the total houses delivered. Accordingly, as a conservative estimate, it is assumed that 15% of the required housing land supply within the Highland area will come from small sites. The remaining shortfall here is insignificant and does not require to be addressed.

Adjusted Highland Housing Land Requirement to 2028 Housing Housing Effective Windfall Small Additional Market Land Supply Sites Sites Allocations Area Requirement 2016 Required 2016-28 Highland 1,020 762 102 153 3

Amulree Road - Aberfeldy

2.40 The MIR considered the potential to identify a site in Aberfeldy at Road in the event that site H37 South of Kenmore Road did not progress. This is no longer an issue, as evidence is available which confirms that H37 is an effective site.

Kinross-shire Area – Key Changes from the Adopted Plan

Housing Numbers

2.41 TAYplan has identified that, in order to meet projected population increases, approximately 84 houses will be required per year. However, it is proposed to reduce this by 10% because of the potential significant adverse environmental impact on Loch Leven. If this build rate is to be achieved, it will require LDP2 to identify an effective land supply capable of delivering 1008 houses. The remaining shortfall here is insignificant and does not require to be addressed.

Adjusted Kinross-shire Housing Land Requirement to 2028 Housing Housing Effective Reallocation Windfall Additional Market Land Supply to Perth Sites Allocations Area Requirement 2016 HMA Required 2016-28 Kinross 1,008 802 -101 101 4

M90 Junction 7

2.42 Concern has been raised over the inadequacy of junction 7 on the M90 to cope with the level of development proposed in and Kinross. To date, there has not been any detailed feasibility work nor a business case developed for this project. In addition, it should be noted that the M90 is under the control of Transport Scotland who currently have no proposals to upgrade this junction. In order to ensure the potential for this junction upgrade is not compromised, the Proposed Plan seeks to protect the line of the potential upgrade to provide southbound slips.

Cemetery Provision

2.43 Further to the publication of the MIR, it has come to light that there is a need to identify a new cemetery within the Kinross area. The Proposed Plan, therefore, identifies an area of search to the east of Milnathort (see Map 12). Site investigations will be undertaken to assess whether ground conditions are suitable for cemetery use.

Map 12

Charrettes for Crook of Devon and

2.44 Recognising the existing facilities and that there is opportunity for supporting and growing these settlements, it is proposed to make a commitment in LDP2 to holding design based workshops to inform LDP3. This offers a good way to get all key stakeholders together to explore and clarify the future opportunities and issues for the whole community. The workshops, feedback and testing of emerging proposals should help examine, and clarify, the opportunities as well as get broad consensus and ownership of the possible solutions during preparation of LDP3 .

Blairingone

2.45 In response to a significant desire from the community of to see development in the village, it has been identified as being able to accommodate some limited future growth in order to help support local services (see Map 13). In order to encourage developer interest and create a flexible framework, the total area for development has been increased from the Adopted Plan. There is unlikely to be housing demand in this area for such a large site during the life of the Plan, nor would it be desirable to see significant large scale development over a short span of time. Accordingly, the plan provides for incremental growth of the village over a longer timescale, expecting no more than 30 homes to be constructed by 2028.

Map 13

Strathearn Area – Key Changes from the Adopted Plan

2.46 TAYplan has identified that, in order to meet projected population increases, approximately 142 houses will be required per year. If this build rate is to be achieved, it will require LDP2 to identify an effective land supply capable of delivering 1704 houses.

Housing Numbers

Adjusted Strathearn Housing Land Requirement to 2028 Housing Housing land Effective Windfall Additional market requirement supply sites allocations area 2016-28 2016 required Strathearn 1,704 1,309 170 225

Increased density at MU7 and Auchterader Expansion Sites

2.47 The MIR used the 2015 Housing Land Audit figures for calculating the effective housing land supply. The Proposed Plan is based on the 2016 figures and this has resulted in a need to find increased numbers in the Strathearn Housing Market Area. The MIR identified that, if increased numbers were required as a result of a need for increased flexibility, this could be accommodated by increasing the densities at MU7 in Crieff and the expansion sites. When calculating the capacity ranges for these sites, it is evident that the increased numbers above can be met by these sites. This is supplemented by the reallocation of the Auchterarder Masterplan employment land for housing. This has been possible as an alternative, larger and better located employment land site has been identified.

Crieff Retail Sites

2.48 In terms of retailing within Crieff, the position has changed since the Main Issues Report. There are now 2 sites at Broich Road with retail consent, for a total of 6205m2 across 4 retail units. Whilst both sites have planning consents at this point in time, it is more than likely, considering anticipated retail capacity, that only 1 proposal will come forward during the life of the Plan. It is, therefore, necessary to consider how to treat the remaining site. Whilst it may be preferable to identify it for employment use, this runs the risk of sitting vacant as employment land does not carry the same value as retail. Potentially, this could lead to a derelict site remaining undeveloped for an extended period. The existence of a potentially derelict site next to key flagship uses, including the new retail units, the Community Campus and the major town expansion area, will detract from recent and proposed investment in the town. It is, therefore, considered beneficial to identify the two retail sites, as a mixed use area (see Map 14), indicating that following the development of one of the retail proposals, should the consent for the other site not be progressed, the preferred use for the second site would be for residential use.

Map 14

Aberuthven

2.49 There is an existing employment site north and south of the main road where uptake of sites has been healthy. However, there has been limited interest in the additional employment land allocation, and this may in part be as a result of the availability of employment land within Auchterarder. In addition, Transport Scotland is also reviewing options for provision of a new junction at as part of a wider review of all the trunk road junctions between Dunblane and Perth. As a result of the low demand and the alternatives in Auchterarder, the Proposed Plan identifies a smaller employment land allocation in Aberuthven (see Map 15). Should the Abruthven junction be improved this may give the opportunity for a future Plan to identify further employment land opportunities in this vicinity.

Map 15

Strathmore Area – Key Changes from the Adopted Plan

Housing Numbers

2.50 TAYplan has identified that in order to meet projected population increases approximately 143 houses will be required per year. If this build rate is to be achieved, it will require LDP2 to identify an effective land supply capable of delivering 1716 houses.

Adjusted Strathmore Housing Land Requirement to 2028 Housing Housing Land Effective Windfall Additional Market Area Requirement Supply Sites Allocations 2016-28 2016 Required Strathmore 1,716 1,205 172 339 & the Glens

Blairgowrie East

2.51 The MIR used the 2015 Housing Land Audit figures for calculating the effective housing land supply. The Proposed Plan is based on the 2016 figures and this has resulted in a need to find increased numbers in the Strathmore Housing Market Area. The preferred option in the MIR was the allocation of 4 new sites including the identification of a long term expansion area on the eastern side of Blairgowrie (see Map 16). The sites provides a flexible housing supply for potentially 800 additional houses, creating a range of long term development opportunities, and can meet the increased numbers required to be allocated in the Proposed Plan.

Cemetery Provision

2.52 There is less than 20 years capacity in Blairgowrie cemetery with no room for an extension at the existing cemetery. The MIR identified three possible sites for a new cemetery within Blairgowrie. Following the MIR consultation, the preferred option for a new cemetery site is within the Eastern Expansion area (see Map 17) and the Council will work in collaboration with the landowner/developer to assess in detail the suitability for a cemetery site.

Map 16

3. NEXT STEPS AND CONSULTATION

3.1 Following approval of the Proposed Plan, and prior to its publication for consultation, any necessary tidying up in relation to the format, appearance and technical details of the Proposed Plan and associated documents will be undertaken. This will include hyperlinks throughout the online version of the document to improve navigation.

3.2 The Planning etc. (Scotland) Act 2006 prescribes a minimum period of 6 weeks for representations to be submitted on the Proposed Plan. Subject to approval of the Proposed Plan, it is proposed that a period of 9 weeks from 1 December 2017 to 2 February 2018 be allowed to take account of the Christmas and New Year holiday period.

3.3 All persons who made representation on the MIR will be notified that the Proposed Plan has been published, where it can be inspected and how long they have to make a representation. This will be done either by letter or e- mail.

3.4 A copy of the Proposed Plan will be sent to each of the Key Agencies and Community Councils at the beginning of the period for representation. Community Councils will also receive a USB drive containing electronic copies of the Proposed Plan, SEA and other associated documents.

3.5 The Act also requires Neighbour Notification for significant proposals within the Plan. In this instance, it is proposed that Neighbour Notification will be carried out for all proposals to ensure that as many people as possible are made aware of proposals that may affect them or the area they live in.

3.6 It is proposed to make similar consultation arrangements to those followed successfully for the MIR. These are:

• A series of 10 public events/exhibitions will be held throughout the Council area starting in early December, avoiding the Christmas holidays and ending in late January 2018. Community Councillors are encouraged to attend these events and are also welcome to use the event to promote Community Council activities and to help the public review the displays. • A briefing session will be held for Community Councils covering the status of the Proposed Plan within the Development Plan process, what the representation process entails, and an overview of the Proposed Plan and relevant documents. • Use StoryMap (combines authoritative web maps with narrative text, images and multimedia content) and QuestionWhere (a location-based consultation/survey tool). The interatine StoryMap will present the LDP in an engaging way, that is easy to access and simple to digest for all users. • Formal advertisement in the local press and on the Internet • Distribution of posters across the Council area to advertise events • Letters or emails to interested parties including those on the consultation database • Copies of the Proposed Plan will be available to view in public libraries and area offices.

3.7 Following the close of the period for representations on 2 February 2018, the Council must consider all the representations received and decide if it wishes to amend the Plan in response. If, as a result, changes are proposed to the Plan, a Modification will require to be published (March 2018) for a minimum consultation period of 6 weeks prior to submission to the Scottish Ministers. However, if significant modifications are proposed which change the underlying aims or strategy of the Proposed Plan, this will require preparation and publication of a new Proposed Plan adding approximately 12 months to the Plan timescales. Although legislation makes provision for modifications, the clear guidance from the Scottish Ministers is that this should only be considered in exceptional circumstances. If no modifications are made, a summary of unresolved issues must be prepared and submitted to Scottish Ministers along with the Proposed Plan. They will then determine whether to appoint an independent Reporter(s) to undertake an Examination in public.

3.8 The Reporter will decide what form the Examination will take. Most issues are expected to be handled without the need for further information, but where additional evidence is requested, this will normally be in written form. Where a face-to-face meeting is required, this will normally take the form of a discussion with questions led by the Reporter (called a hearing). Only in exceptional circumstances will a formal inquiry be necessary to test information through cross–examination.

3.9 After completing the Examination, the Reporter will present his or her conclusions and recommendations to the Council and to Scottish Ministers. The Council must take on board the conclusions and recommendations before proceeding to adopt the Plan. Only in very exceptional circumstances can the Council choose not to do this.

4. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 Production of the Proposed Plan represents a major stage in the Development Plan process setting out the Council’s view on the content of the final adopted LDP2. It supports the Council’s vision for the future development of Perth and Kinross. The Plan also seeks to promote sustainable economic growth, by setting out a landuse framework which builds upon the special qualities of the area which make it an attractive place to live and do business, whilst at the same time recognising the importance of ‘place-making’ and protecting our most valuable assets.

4.2 The Council is asked to:

i) Note the contents of the Environmental Report Addendum.

ii) Approve the amendments proposed to the Development Plan Scheme as outlined in this report.

iii) Approve the Proposed Plan and agree to its publication on 1 December 2017, allowing a 9 week period for representations.

iv) Authorise the Depute Chief Executive (Chief Operating Officer) to make changes to the format, appearance and technical details of the Proposed Plan and associated documents prior to its publication.

v) Agree the preparation and publication of a schedule of responses in line with the Council decision on the Proposed Plan.

vi) Instruct the Depute Chief Executive (Chief Operating Officer) to report the representations received on the Proposed Plan back to the Council.

vii) Approve the Draft Action Programme for consultation with stakeholders.

viii) Instruct the Director (Environment) to submit to the Environment, Enterprise & Infrastructure Committee a report on the necessary steps to promote higher design standards in developments.

ix) Instruct the Director (Environment) to submit to the Environment, Enterprise & Infrastructure Committee a report on a strategy for the delivery of employment land to meet emerging needs in Perth & Kinross.

Author(s) Name Designation Contact Details Peter Marshall Strategic & Policy 01738 475384 Manager [email protected]

Brenda Murray Development Plans Team 01738 475343 Leader [email protected]

Approved Name Designation Date Jim Valentine Depute Chief Executive 14 November 2017 (Chief Operating Officer)

ANNEX

1. IMPLICATIONS, ASSESSMENTS, CONSULTATION AND COMMUNICATION

Strategic Implications Yes / None Community Plan / Single Outcome Agreement Yes Corporate Plan Yes Resource Implications Financial Yes Workforce No Asset Management (land, property, IST) Yes Assessments Equality Impact Assessment Yes Strategic Environmental Assessment Yes Sustainability (community, economic, environmental) Yes Legal and Governance No Risk No Consultation Internal Yes External Yes Communication Communications Plan Yes

1. Strategic Implications

Community Plan / Single Outcome Agreement

1.1 The Perth & Kinross LDP is the spatial representation of various Council plans and strategies. The Plan sets out policies and proposals to support and encourage positive change in Perth & Kinross. It details where new development should and should not take place. This represents the spatial land use planning framework to enable the delivery of the Perth and Kinross Community Plan / Single Outcome Agreement in terms of the following priorities:

(i) Giving every child the best start in life (ii) Developing educated, responsible and informed citizens (iii) Promoting a prosperous, inclusive and sustainable economy (iv) Supporting people to lead independent, healthy and active lives (v) Creating a safe and sustainable place for future generations

Corporate Plan

1.2 As for 1.1 above.

2. Resource Implications

Financial

2.1 All costs associated with the printing, publishing and the public events/exhibitions can be contained within the Environment Service revenue budget allocation for Development Planning.

Workforce

2.2 Not applicable.

Asset Management (land, property, IT)

2.3 The Proposed Plan contains proposals to develop a number of Council Assets. Appendix 1, The Schedule of Land Ownership, as required by legislation, identifies ant site in which the Council has an interest. The Director (Environment) has been consulted, and has indicated agreement with the proposals.

3. Assessments

Equality Impact Assessment

3.1 Following an assessment using the Integrated Appraisal Toolkit, it has been determined that the Plan is likely to have a positive impact, in particular for Travelling People, of EqIA.

Strategic Environmental Assessment

3.2 The Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act 2005 places a duty on the Council to identify and assess the environmental consequences of its proposals.

3.3 The determination was made that there were likely to be significant environmental effects and as a consequence an environmental assessment was necessary. The environmental report has been completed. It will be submitted to the Consultation Authorities together with the draft PPS for their consideration. The key findings of the Environmental Report have been incorporated into the Proposed Plan

Sustainability

3.4 Following an assessment using the Integrated Appraisal Toolkit, it has been determined that the report is likely to have positive future implications regarding the Council’s corporate sustainable development principles. The report is also likely to have positive future implications in relation to the Council’s duty under the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009, including:

• Development of CTLR and policies to ensure reduced carbon footprint of new development; • Positive framework to support transition to low carbon economy; and • Flood protection policies.

Legal and Governance

3.5 Not applicable.

Risk

3.6 Not applicable.

4. Consultation

Internal

4.1 The preparation of the Proposed Plan is a multi stage process. All Council Services have been consulted at various stages in the plan process as appropriate to their function. Members have been consulted through the process and in particular through briefing sessions during September and October 2017.

External

4.2 The Local Development Plan is subject to a statutory consultation process involving all Key Stakeholders including statutory agencies, the development industry, Community Councils and the public .

5. Communication

5.1 The communications and consultation plan is set out in draft within the report and is contained in the statutory Development Plans Scheme.

2. BACKGROUND PAPERS

1. Planning etc. (Scotland) Act 2006 2. TAYplan 2016-36 3. Scottish Planning Policy 4. Development Plan Scheme November 2016 5. Main Issues Report December 2015 6. Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report December 2015 7. Strategic Environmental Assessment, Environmental Report Addendum 8. EC Habitats Directive

3. APPENDICES

• Local Development Plan 2: Proposed Plan 2017 • Development Plan Scheme November 2017 • Draft Action Programme November 2017