PDF: Terry Atkinson Talk (On the Occasion of JCHP)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PDF: Terry Atkinson Talk (On the Occasion of JCHP) LANCHESTER GALLERY PROJECTS 1 TERRY ATKINSON for the occasion of JCHP 28 February 2014 RESOURCE DOCUMENT Terry Atkinson presented his commissioned paper EXHIBITIONISM, for the occasion of Jeffrey Charles Henry Peacock’s exhibition CRITICAL DÉCOR: WHAT WORKS! CRITICAL DÉCOR was a determined bid to reformulate the conventions of the exhibition apparatus and disengage the relations of production with the relations of distribution, which are immobilised in their bind to one another in the art system. SK: Thanks all for coming and this afternoon’s talk is the final event for the occasion of Jeffrey Charles Henry Peacock’s exhibition CRITICAL DÉCOR WHAT WORKS! Previous to this, we’ve had three critical bouts led by Michael Hampton, Alex Bowen and Lynda Morris who finished them off last night. I do think the framing of these critical bouts really… not really, but slightly which is good enough, set them apart from the usual polite complicity that exists between actors in the artworld. A big thing to come from these sessions was the reliance that the art system has on the hermetic compliance of the maintenance of the status quo. This afternoon I can drop this stupid artificial fighting language because it’s a straightforward talk given by Terry Atkinson, who from the early 60s has sustained a very formidable critique against the prevailing ideologies of the art system, and in particular the distortion that the market has had on the whole apparatus, including, importantly, art education. Terry has had a long ongoing exchange with JCHP and the latest output of this is his essay Exhibition and Exposition which breaks down his response into the chapters Exhibitionism, Stockholm Syndrome, Shift-work and Referencing, Excuse and Exhibiting. Terry will elaborate on this essay, the exhibition, on JCHP’s practice and CRITICAL DÉCOR: WHAT WORKS! and it really just leaves me to say first of all thank you very much to Terry for doing this and I feel very privileged that Terry’s here in the closing week of LGP. And of course thanks to JCHP for ending LGP because it brings every cynicism I’ve had with what I’ve been doing with the programme, right into my office and gallery space so it’s been an entirely welcome end. TA: Just an opening shot, last time I did anything public here, a couple of years ago when I did a joint exchange with Owen Hatherley and the guy I shared the exchange with was Dave Bainbridge who died last June. It was a big loss to me, I had known him since 1958, probably my oldest friend and was one of the founders of Art & Language. He was a very loyal friend so this is a dedication to Dave and it’s hopefully put out in the spirit of an ongoing enquiry which he always promoted and modeled. Note. The main body of this text was delivered as a talk at the exhibition Critical Décor: What Works by Jeffrey Charles Henry Peacock (JCHP) at Lanchester Gallery Projects, Coventry on 28th February, 2014. Apart from some condensed references, the notes referring to the text were not included in the talk. 1 LANCHESTER GALLERY PROJECTS 2 TERRY ATKINSON for the occasion of JCHP 28 February 2014 RESOURCE DOCUMENT EXHIBITIONISM I begin with an attempt to set the specific issue of concern of this talk in a broad sociopolitical frame by setting out two brief scenarios, one widely political, the other one more personal. Let us call this issue, for now anyway, whether an exhibition can be used as a critique of exhibiting without the task itself appearing to be illogical. First, on the wider level: I take the main characteristic of the system we live in Western democracies to be that of capitalist accumulation, and that this system in now driven relentlessly by a grouping of what I call the Corporate Tyranny (the term is not an original one of mine, I copy it from Noam Chomsky). And although the precursor formations of today’s Corporate Tyranny were formed and activated immediately after WW2,for my purposes here it is worth noting that since especially the 1970s the Corporate Tyranny has been much more concerned with the advancement of finance capital rather than industrial capital. It has subordinated the requirements of industrial capital to those of finance capital. And it is also worth remembering that one of the main mechanisms through which finance capital has gained its hegemonic position in Western democracies is that of accumulation through dispossession and on a global scale. Thus in this pattern of development the Corporate Tyranny is not only a financial elite, just as significantly it has come to dominate the legislative elites – in our own case here, the elected governments of in the transatlantic world, the Western countries. We can roughly characterize the main players of the Corporate Tyranny as some such as the Party of Wall Street, the Caucus of the City of London and the European Bourses such as Frankfurt, Paris and Zurich, and the Lobbyists of the Global Mega-corporations. All are necessarily linked through the common drive to attain and maintain the 3% compound interest. [1] In gaining this dominant position of control and influence in Western societies, the Corporate Tyranny has also become, through its increasing financial hold on them, a dominant player in presiding over and regulating cultural institutions. The institution I am going to try and say more about in the context of remarking on this exhibition, Cultural Décor, is the institution of the avant-garde – more particularly the Corporate Tyranny’s control of what I call the avant-garde model of the artistic subject (which I abbreviate to the acronym AGMOAS). [2] Second, on a less broad and more personal level: My entire formal education programme through which I passed during the period 1945-64 was a manifestation of the arrangements of what is called the Bretton Woods Accord. In my case this was what then was called primary and junior school (1945-50), grammar school (1950-58),art school (1958-64). I have not the time here to detail out a thorough exposition of the history of the Bretton Woods Accord except to state that this was an international agreement set up in 1944 which was concerned with the kind of public policy it was thought, that capitalism should develop post WW2. Two of the main architects of the agreement were Harry Dexter White for the United States and John Maynard Keynes for the United Kingdom. [3] The Bretton Woods Accord was the predominant financial arrangement of British public policy, including education, during the period I attended the above mentioned type of schools. All my education was free, in my case courtesy of grants from what was then called the West Riding Education Authority. I note the latter point to mark a contrast between my financial passage through art school and that of many, perhaps most, art students today. The Bretton Woods Accord remained more or less intact until Richard Nixon in 1971 initiated the major break in it when what is now called the Nixon Shock was enacted. What this enactment comprised was that Nixon unilaterally cancelled the direct convertibility of the US dollar into gold. This enactment was a considerable achievement of the Corporate Tyranny lobby against the Bretton Woods Accord which had insistently been conducted during the prior twenty-five years since the end of WW2. [4] One of the primary aims of the Corporate Tyranny lobby was to subject all public services to increasing privatization, not least education. And the increasing privatization of education is one of the important instruments through which the Corporate Tyranny controls and regulates cultural institutions, not least art school education. And through this regulation of art school education the Corporate Tyranny increasingly directs and influences the character of the AGMOAS. [5] So to focus for a few minutes on the exhibition, I am going to endeavor to construct a brief analysis of two sets of relations. These relations I take to constitute both the act of art practice and the exposure and distribution of the products of that practice. These are the sets of relations (1) The relation between exhibitionism and avant-gardism (2) The relation between practice and career. 2 LANCHESTER GALLERY PROJECTS 3 TERRY ATKINSON for the occasion of JCHP 28 February 2014 RESOURCE DOCUMENT It is no (1), the relation between exhibitionism and avant-gardism that I shall mostly attempt to expand upon in these remarks To explain more what I mean by ‘exhibitionism’ and ‘avant-gardism’ the following. I attempted to state what I mean by the term exhibitionism in a short section from an essay titled Exhibition and Exposition that I wrote for the publication Critical Decor which is part of this exhibition. I quote the relevant passage thus. “The main target [OF THE EXHIBITION] is itself the event of exhibiting. What might be called some such as exhibitionism? The whole organum seems to rest on the question ‘Why exhibit?’ Since the event of the exhibition is the standard procedure for artists to expose their work and is therefore a critical part of the relations of distribution (hereafter ROD) it seems to be a dominant force on many, probably most, artist’s relations of production (hereafter ROP). Thus, a second question, how significant an influence is exhibitionism upon the ROP? It is perhaps worth pointing out that in a list of the stream of twentieth century art isms (say Cubism, Constructivism, Conceptualism) then just formulating that exhibitionism is a problem seems to indicate that this particular ism is not of quite the same character as Cubism etc.
Recommended publications
  • Catalogue 8 – ( June 2017 )
    Catalogue 8 – ( June 2017 ) 1. Carl ANDRE. Carl Andre. Works in Belgium. Ghent. Imschoot, Uitgevers. 1993. (22 x 15.5 cm). pp. 56. With 26 black-and-white illustrations. Publisher’s cloth, with dust-jacket. Carl Andre's introduction reads: "This book contains an excellent sampling of my work in Belgium. It is by no means a complete list of works created or exhibited by me in Belgium or presently in Belgian collections. I have said that the New York art audience is the worst in the world. The Flemish art audience is one of the very best!”. One of the 65 deluxe hardback copies, (this one of 25 examples numbered with Roman numerals), signed by Carl Andre in pencil under his printed introduction. $ 750 2. Giovanni ANSELMO. Lire. Ghent. Imschoot, Uitgevers. 1990. (22 x 15.5 cm). pp. (80). Publisher’s cloth, with dust-jacket. Artist’s book, printed along the same lines as Anselmo’s legendary 1972 book Leggere. The single word ‘Lire’ gradually reduces in size, page after page, until it is almost unreadable. Then it comes back gradually, until the word fills the complete field of vision of the book, the pages go completely black, and the word becomes invisible. Published at the occasion of the exhibition-series "Affinités Sélectives" at the Paleis voor Schone Kunsten, Brussels, Belgium, organized by Bernard Marcadé. This is one of 25 deluxe hardback copies, numbered and signed in pencil by Anselmo. $ 1200 3. Hans ARP & Sophie TAEUBER-ARP. Hans Arp. Sophie Taeuber-Arp. Hannover. Kestner-Gesellschaft. 1955. (21 x 15 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979
    Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979 Dennis, M. Submitted version deposited in Coventry University’s Institutional Repository Original citation: Dennis, M. () Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979. Unpublished MSC by Research Thesis. Coventry: Coventry University Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Some materials have been removed from this thesis due to Third Party Copyright. Pages where material has been removed are clearly marked in the electronic version. The unabridged version of the thesis can be viewed at the Lanchester Library, Coventry University. Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ the Art School 1969-1979 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Mark Dennis ​ ​ A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the University’s ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy/Master of ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Research September 2016 ​ ​ Library Declaration and Deposit Agreement Title: Forename: Family Name: Mark Dennis Student ID: Faculty: Award: 4744519 Arts & Humanities PhD Thesis Title: Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979 Freedom of Information: Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) ensures access to any information held by Coventry University, including theses, unless an exception or exceptional circumstances apply. In the interest of scholarship, theses of the University are normally made freely available online in the Institutions Repository, immediately on deposit.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Art in Britain 1964–1979 Art & Language Large Print Guide
    Conceptual Art in Britain 1964–1979 12 April – 29 August 2016 Art & Language Large Print Guide Please return to exhibition entrance Art & Language 1 To focus on reading rather than looking marked a huge shift for art. Language was to be used as art to question art. It would provide a scientific and critical device to address what was wrong with modernist abstract painting, and this approach became the basis for the activity of the Art & Language group, active from about 1967. They investigated how and under what conditions the naming of art takes place, and suggested that meaning in art might lie not with the material object itself, but with the theoretical argument underpinning it. By 1969 the group that constituted Art & Language started to grow. They published a magazine Art-Language and their practice became increasingly rooted in group discussions like those that took place on their art theory course at Coventry College of Art. Theorising here was not subsidiary to art or an art object but the primary activity for these artists. 2 Wall labels Clockwise from right of wall text Art & Language (Mel Ramsden born 1944) Secret Painting 1967–8 Two parts, acrylic paint on canvas and framed Photostat text Mel Ramsden first made contact with Art & Language in 1969. He and Ian Burn were then published in the second and third issues of Art-Language. The practice he had evolved, primarily with Ian Burn, in London and then after 1967 in New York was similar to the critical position regarding modernism that Terry Atkinson and Michael Baldwin were exploring.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Art: a Critical Anthology
    Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology Alexander Alberro Blake Stimson, Editors The MIT Press conceptual art conceptual art: a critical anthology edited by alexander alberro and blake stimson the MIT press • cambridge, massachusetts • london, england ᭧1999 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval)without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Adobe Garamond and Trade Gothic by Graphic Composition, Inc. and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Conceptual art : a critical anthology / edited by Alexander Alberro and Blake Stimson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-01173-5 (hc : alk. paper) 1. Conceptual art. I. Alberro, Alexander. II. Stimson, Blake. N6494.C63C597 1999 700—dc21 98-52388 CIP contents ILLUSTRATIONS xii PREFACE xiv Alexander Alberro, Reconsidering Conceptual Art, 1966–1977 xvi Blake Stimson, The Promise of Conceptual Art xxxviii I 1966–1967 Eduardo Costa, Rau´ l Escari, Roberto Jacoby, A Media Art (Manifesto) 2 Christine Kozlov, Compositions for Audio Structures 6 He´lio Oiticica, Position and Program 8 Sol LeWitt, Paragraphs on Conceptual Art 12 Sigmund Bode, Excerpt from Placement as Language (1928) 18 Mel Bochner, The Serial Attitude 22 Daniel Buren, Olivier Mosset, Michel Parmentier, Niele Toroni, Statement 28 Michel Claura, Buren, Mosset, Toroni or Anybody 30 Michael Baldwin, Remarks on Air-Conditioning: An Extravaganza of Blandness 32 Adrian Piper, A Defense of the “Conceptual” Process in Art 36 He´lio Oiticica, General Scheme of the New Objectivity 40 II 1968 Lucy R.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Peter Goulds, 2008 Mar.24-July 28
    Oral history interview with Peter Goulds, 2008 Mar.24-July 28 Funding for this interview was provided by the Art Dealers Association of America. Funding for the digital preservation of this interview was provided by a grant from the Save America's Treasures Program of the National Park Service. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a recorded interview with Peter Goulds on 2008 March 24 and July 28. The interview took place in Venice CA at the L.A. Louver Gallery, and was conducted by Susan Ford Morgan for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Peter Goulds has reviewed the transcript. His corrections and emendations appear below in brackets with initials. This transcript has been lightly edited for readability by the Archives of American Art. The reader should bear in mind that they are reading a transcript of spoken, rather than written, prose. Interview SUSAN FORD MORGAN: So, this is for the Archives of American Art— PETER GOULDS: Okay. SUSAN FORD MORGAN: —for their oral history project, and so, I have to open up my identifying statement, which is: This is Susan Morgan interviewing Peter Goulds at the L.A. Louver Gallery in Venice, California, on, I believe, the— PETER GOULDS: It is Monday, March the 24th— SUSAN FORD MORGAN: —March the 24th— PETER GOULDS: —2008. SUSAN FORD MORGAN: —2008, and this is disk one. And because this is an oral history project we start at the very beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Art in Britain 1964–1979 Timeline Large Print Guide
    Conceptual Art in Britain 1964–1979 12 April – 29 August 2016 Timeline Large Print Guide Please return to exhibition entrance Contents 1964 Page 1 1965 Page 3 1966 Page 6 1967 Page 9 1968 Page 12 1969 Page 16 1970 Page 23 1971 Page 30 1972 Page 36 1973 Page 41 1974 Page 46 1975 Page 50 1976 Page 54 1977 Page 57 1978 Page 60 1979 Page 63 1964 1 AUG The Centre for Advanced Creative Study publishes Signals Newsbulletin, a forum for the discussion of experimental art exhibitions and events. It also includes poetry and essays on science and technology. The group becomes known as Signals London when it moves to premises in Wigmore Street in central London. The gallery closes in 1966. OCT The Labour party wins the general election under the leadership of Harold Wilson. Wilson speaks about the need ‘to think and speak in the language of our scientific age’. 2 1965 3 FEB Arts minister Jennie Lee publishes the first (and only) white paper on the arts – A Policy for the Arts. She argues that the arts must occupy a central place in British life and be part of everyday life for children and adults. She announces a 30% increase to the Arts Council grant. JUL Comprehensive education system replaces grammar and secondary modern schools, aiming to serve all pupils on an equal basis. Between Poetry and Painting Institute of Contemporary Arts, London 22 October – 27 November Curated by Jasia Reichardt Includes: Barry Flanagan, John Latham 4 NOV Indica gallery and bookshop opens at Mason’s Yard, London.
    [Show full text]
  • British Art Studies July 2016 British Sculpture Abroad, 1945 – 2000
    British Art Studies July 2016 British Sculpture Abroad, 1945 – 2000 Edited by Penelope Curtis and Martina Droth British Art Studies Issue 3, published 4 July 2016 British Sculpture Abroad, 1945 – 2000 Edited by Penelope Curtis and Martina Droth Cover image: Installation View, Simon Starling, Project for a Masquerade (Hiroshima), 2010–11, 16 mm film transferred to digital (25 minutes, 45 seconds), wooden masks, cast bronze masks, bowler hat, metals stands, suspended mirror, suspended screen, HD projector, media player, and speakers. Dimensions variable. Digital image courtesy of the artist PDF generated on 21 July 2021 Note: British Art Studies is a digital publication and intended to be experienced online and referenced digitally. PDFs are provided for ease of reading offline. Please do not reference the PDF in academic citations: we recommend the use of DOIs (digital object identifiers) provided within the online article. Theseunique alphanumeric strings identify content and provide a persistent link to a location on the internet. A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it to link permanently to electronic documents with confidence. Published by: Paul Mellon Centre 16 Bedford Square London, WC1B 3JA https://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk In partnership with: Yale Center for British Art 1080 Chapel Street New Haven, Connecticut https://britishart.yale.edu ISSN: 2058-5462 DOI: 10.17658/issn.2058-5462 URL: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk Editorial team: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/editorial-team Advisory board:
    [Show full text]
  • Tim Byers Art Books 50 Books
    Tim Byers Art Books 50 Books Catalogue 19 – (February 2020) 1. Helena ALMEIDA. Helena Almeida. Lisbon. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. 1982. (23.8 x 16.9 cm). pp. (130). Monochrome illustrations throughout, text in Portuguese with English translation. Original printed wrappers. Covers slightly foxed and minor creasing to spine. The daughter of the sculptor Leopoldo de Almeida (1898-1975), Helena Almeida graduated in painting from the Escola Superior de Belas-Artes de Lisbon in 1955. In 1961 she participated in the II Exposição de Artes Plásticas da Fundacção Calouste Gulbenkian, and in 1964 she obtained a scholarship, continuing her studies in Paris. Returning to Portugal, she exhibits individually for the first time in 1967 (Galeria Buchholz, Lisbon), and from the end of the 1960s onwards, Almeida began to focus on self-representation and on the tensions between the body, space and the work: her own body is often seen as the object of the work, which since 1975, has been developed through the manipulation of means such as painting, drawing, engraving, installation, photography and video. Dressed in black since the early 1970’s, sometimes with objects or furniture found in her studio, she assumes positions that she has painstakingly choreographed in order to create complex visual compositions that are as much about space and line as the relationship between the artist and the image. This publication, sponsored by the Gulbenkian Foundation, was published on the occasion of Almeida representing Portugal at the Venice Biennale of 1982. £ 120 2. (John BEARDSLEY). Probing the Earth. Contemporary Land Projects. Washington DC. Smithsonian Institution Press.
    [Show full text]
  • A&L PR English
    ART & LANGUAGE ‘HOMELESS STUFF’ 7 JUNE – 15 JULY 2017 Rob Tufnell presents a retrospective of posters, prints, postcards, journals, jigsaws, records, video and ephemera produced by Art & Language between 1969 and 2017. In 1968 ‘Art & Language’ was adopted as the nom de guerre a group of artists teaching at Coventry College of Art. The initial group of Terry Atkinson, David Bainbridge, Michael Baldwin and Harold Hurrell had a shared interest in producing what is now understood as Conceptual Art (a movement Mel Ramsden has since characterised as ‘Modernism’s nervous breakdown’). Their practice, was informed by broad interests including philosophies of science, mathematics and linguistics. They embraced Paul Feyerabend’s notion of “epistemological anarchy” to find new ways of producing, presenting and understanding art. They sought to replace Modernism’s ambitions of certainty and refinement with confusion and contradiction or a state of ‘Pandemonium’ (from John Milton’s ‘Paradise Lost’ (1667)). In 1969 they published the first of 22 issues of the journal ‘Art-Language’ with texts by Terry Atkinson, David Bainbridge and Michael Baldwin and others alongside contributions from Dan Graham, Sol Le Witt and Lawrence Weiner. After they were joined in 1970 by Ian Burn and Mel Ramsden the group quickly expanded forming around two nuclei in the small town of Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire, England and in New York. In the following years they were joined by Charles and Sandra Harrison, Graham Howard, Lynn Lemaster, Philip Pilkington, David Rushton and Paul Wood (in England) and Kathryn Bigelow, Michael Corris, Preston Heller, Christine Kozlov and Andrew Menard (in New York).
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape with St George Delivered at Night’ Michael Baldwin, Mel Ramsden, Philippe Méaille and Carles Guerra 05 06
    29‘Aura and Temporality: The Insistence of the Archive’ Wolfgang Ernst 03 04 Quaderns portàtils MACBA 31‘Landscape with St George Delivered at Night’ Michael Baldwin, Mel Ramsden, Philippe Méaille and Carles Guerra 05 06 Landscape with St George Delivered at Night MB: Making claims about this conversational character is not to abnegate or to deny that one has a certain responsibility for a kind of production. But rather that the emphasis, if you are engaged in this kind of ‘performance’ (you could call it), is that it is always A Conversation between Michael Baldwin, Mel Ramsden, Philippe Méaille prominent in the nature of any conversational enquiry. The question is not just what and Carles Guerra. do you do but also ‘what does what you do, do to you?’ As we were saying the other evening, it would be traceable to Plato’s Parmenides. It is at that point that the work Carles Guerra: Bearing in mind that any collection is in many ways a random and the question of the work becomes a moral and political one (and here I would even collection of objects or items, the first question I want to address is how representative invoke Schopenhauer and Wittgenstein). If created in this conversational, discursive can a collection, such as this one, be? How representative is it in terms of the history of circumstance, what you do will also do something to you. You then have to have whatever Art & Language? reason or basis to continue to make some contribution to the continuation and to the social ‘worthwhileness’ of that conversation or that practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Guide for the Stanley & Audrey
    The Stanley & Audrey Burton Gallery Seventy Years of Fine Art at Leeds 1949 — 2019 Lessons in the Studio Studio in the Seminar Studio in the Seminar Seventy Years of Fine Art at Leeds 1949 — 2019 ISBN 978-1-900687-31-7 This exhibition – jointly presented in the Stanley & Audrey 14 Burton Gallery and the Project Space in the Fine Art Building – reviews the past 70 years of Fine Art at this University. Through 15 10-12 artworks, artefacts and multimedia, it explores a long conver- sation between making art and studying the history of art and 13 culture, in the context of the radical social and cultural changes 7 6 5 4 since 1949. 16 Fine Art at Leeds was proposed by the trio of influential British 9 8 war poet and modernist art historian Herbert Read, Bonamy Dobrée (then Professor of English at the University), and painter Valentine Dobrée. The fledgling Department of Fine Art was first 1-3 (in collection) led by painter, art historian and pioneering theorist of modern 17 art education, Maurice de Sausmarez — assisted by the The Library 23 distinguished refugee art historians Arnold Hauser and Arnold Noach. Quentin Bell, Lawrence Gowing, T. J. Clark, Adrian Rifkin, 18 Vanalyne Green and Roger Palmer followed him as Chairs of Fine Art. 19 20, 21 22 Read and the Dobrées believed that having Fine Art at the Studio in the Seminar University of Leeds could challenge what they feared was the unfair privileging of science and technology over the arts and humanities. In 2019, again, the arts and humanities are under threat at universities and art, drama and music are disappearing from our schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Art & Language
    List of Plates vii Foreword by Thomas Crow xii Preface and Acknowledgments xv Preface to the MIT Press Edition xix 1 A Kind of Context 1 Modernism in two voices 2 A culture of art 6 Critical resources 13 Epilogue: Modernism and the Postmodern 21 A corrective note 27 2 Conceptual Art and the Suppression of the Beholder 29 Abstraction and Abstractionism 31 Minimalism and the post-Minimal 37 Conceptual Art and Art & Language 47 Postscript 61 3 Indexes and Other Figures 63 The index as art-work 63 A logical implosion 75 4 The Conditions of Problems 82 Background 82 Conditions of work 82 The position of the work 88 The artist as author 91 Some methodological upshots 94 Foreground 95 Proceedings: local history 95 Place of work as possible world 104 Worlds apart 114 Means of survival 126 vi Contents 5 On 'A Portrait of V. I. Lenin in the Style of Jackson Pollock' 129 Readings and readers 129 A monstrous detente 134 Black propaganda 136 An essay, a conjecture and an exhibition 139 The orders of discourse 145 6 'Seeing' and 'Describing': the Artists' Studio 150 The studio genre 150 Painting and expression 156 Some functions of allegory 166 The transformation of the index 168 7 On the Surface of Painting 175 Surface 176 Contingency 182 Change 190 Erasure 200 8 Reading the Museum 206 'Incidents in a Museum' 206 Index: Incident in a Museum VIII 209 Index: Incident in a Museum X VI 215 Index: Incident in a Museum XXV 218 9 Unit Cure, Unit Ground 223 10 On Pictures and Paintings 225 A work in process 225 The moment of criticism 232 Potential and loss 238 11 'Hostages' 1: Painting as Cure 244 12 'Hostages' 2: Some Other Sense 251 Notes 257 Index 297 Page 1 Jackson Pollock, One (Number 31, 1950) (1950) 3 2 Jackson Pollock, No.
    [Show full text]