DOCSLIB.ORG

A Short Review of Requirements Gathering in Agile Software

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Short Review of Requirements Gathering in Agile Software JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS ISSN 2518-8739 31st December 2017, Volume 2, Issue 3, JSEIS, CAOMEI Copyright © 2016-2017 www.jseis.org A short review of requirements gathering in agile software development 1 Israr Ghani, 2 Muhammad Irfan Khan, 3 Adila Firdaus Arbain 1,2University of Arid Agriculture Rawalpindi, Pakistan 3Limkokwing University of Creative Technology, Cyberjaya, Malaysia Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Collecting, understanding, and managing requirements is a critical aspect in all the development methods. This is true for agile methods as well. In particular, several agile practices deal with requirements in order to implement them correctly and satisfy the needs of the client. These practices focus on a continuous interaction with the client, customer and end user to address the requirements evolution over time, estimate and prioritize them, and deliver the most valuable functionalities first. Understanding and satisfying every individual client necessities have been perceived as a squeezing challenge for programming enterprises. In order to produce high quality software products and meeting stakeholder’s requirement is a major challenge in software requirement. Poor pre-requisites and changes to necessities are one of the causes for project overrun and quality issues in the delivered software. The research shares some of the existing studies that deal with this question “How different existing agile methodologies manage requirements and how collaboration issue affects these steps in a project?” Keywords: requirements engineering; team collaboration; communication; agile software development; software quality; requirement management; 1. INTRODUCTION Agile development methodology is an approach used in software development which has become more popular during the last few years due to the introduction of agile manifesto [1]. As compared with traditional software development life cycle (SDLC), effective collaboration and requirements gathering with team collaboration is a fundamental component for agile based development [2-6]. Agile software development is iterative and incremental development where you do development in small iterations. It attempts to provide many opportunities to assess the different stages of a project throughout the software development life cycle. There are a number of methods used by agile teams such as Scrum, eXtreme Programming (XP), Feature Driven Development (FDD), Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM), Kanban, Lean and Crystal. These methods aim to deliver software faster and ensure that the software meets customer’s changing needs and expectations. Agile methodologies focus on skills, communication and community clarifying the roles of customers, managers and developers for a more satisfying and productive relationship. Requirements gathering & communication is accepted as one of the most crucial stages in software engineering as it addresses the critical problem of designing the right software for the stakeholder. Agile development works in a different manner than tradition methods [2, 7]. Instead of specifying everything before you start developing, one need to take a small portion of the most important features and only specify and implement those. Requirement gathering is different for different methods [8, 9], but user story method is the most popular one used by many agile teams as shown in the Figure 1 below [10]. Figure. 1 User story in agile development [10] 231 JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS ISSN 2518-8739 31st December 2017, Volume 2, Issue 3, JSEIS, CAOMEI Copyright © 2016-2017 www.jseis.org Requirement specification is an iterative process that continues until the customer is satisfied with the product. By using this method, it is easier to react to changes and can have a better estimate and better control on the development leading towards a quality product and customer satisfaction. There are a number of agile methods that offer the ways to collect and analyse requirements. Some of these are discussed in the following section. 2. REQUIREMENTS GATHERING IN AGILE METHODS This section discussed four most popular agile methods that offer requirements gathering. 2.1 Scrum and requirements gathering Scrum is an agile approach to software development. It has been found out that Scrum is very beneficial when applied to small and medium projects. Rather than a full process or methodology, it is a framework which instead of providing complete, detailed descriptions of how everything is to be done on the project, much is left up to the team, because the team will know best how to solve its problem. For example, in a sprint planning meeting the discussion about requirements is in terms of the desired outcome (a commitment to set of features to be developed in the next sprint). Scrum relies on a self-organizing, cross-functional team. There is no team leader in a scrum team who decides which person will do what. The development begins with the discussion about requirements and user stories by the product owner. Based on this the developers try to have a clear idea of what to develop. It means product owner gathers the requirements and analysis is performed with the team during the project inception, sprint planning and review meetings. Still there are such issues? 2.2 XP and requirements gathering One objective for the agile methods is to lower the cost of changing requirements. Requirement gathering in XP addresses this issue by simplifying management tasks and documentation while the traditional software engineering places more emphasis on strict control and extensive documentation. In order to achieve simplicity, XP uses an iterative and incremental software process and very short development cycles. Here are XP practices namely: • planning game • small releases • metaphor • pair programming • refactoring • collective code ownership • on site customer • continuous testing • simple design • continuous integration • and coding standard [11, 12]. 2.3 FDD and requirements gathering Discovering list of features is a critical process. The quality of this step largely defines how precise the project will be tracked, how maintainable and extensible the code will be. This process requires full-time participation of customers. FDD includes: • the principle of least privilege • the principle of failing securely • the principle of securing the weakest link • the principle of defence in depth • the principle of separation of privilege • the principle of economy of mechanism • the principle of least common mechanism • and the principle of complete mediation [13, 14]. 232 JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS ISSN 2518-8739 31st December 2017, Volume 2, Issue 3, JSEIS, CAOMEI Copyright © 2016-2017 www.jseis.org 2.4 DSDM and requirements gathering Agile methods can be beneficial when combined with distributed development. This helped in reducing the cost involved and access to skilled resources. The main objective is to develop high quality products at lower cost than co- located developments by optimizing the resources sometimes, [15-17] the search for competitive advantage forces organizations to search for external solutions. Project and process management issues as high organizational complexity, scheduling, task assignment, and cost estimation becomes more problematic in distribute environments as a result of volatile requirements, changing specifications, cultural diversity, and lack of informal communication. Managers must control the overall development process, improving it during the enactment and minimizing any factors that may decrease productivity. 3. COMPARISON OF APPROACHES This section summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of existing agile approaches in relation to requirements gathering. Table 1 highlights the comparison of different approaches in the domain of agile software development. Table. 1 Comparison of approaches Approach Strengths Limitations [11] Online serious games in distributed 1. Enhances individuals’ creativity, and 1. Still need excessive involvement requirements gathering. therefore customers are able to provide of different customers until an more innovative ideas about the software agreement is achieved. to be developed. 2. Rich ICT mediated tool facilitates collaboration and off-site communication between software stakeholders, which might lead to effective requirements communication in distributed projects [13] Hybrid user-requirements and Using prototypes and User interfaces to 1. Users must be familiar with the interface evaluation. navigate the client in using the desired prototypes navigation and that will system and the gather the real take some effort and time. requirements that the clients really need. 2. Different navigation results from different types of users. Do not solve the issues of distributed stakeholders. [15] Groom and prioritises. 1. Product backlog continuously evolving. 1. Rely on human skills and experience especially the role of 2. Priorities based on set of experiences product owner, not much on the set- that product owners have. up approaches. [12] Method for Elicitation, 1. Helps to prioritize the gathered 1. Excessive formal documentation Documentation and Validation of requirements. that needed in order to gather the software user requirements (MEDoV) requirements. 2. Requirements gathering is based on the business objectives. 2. Wasted efforts in understanding the whole individual Key 3. No
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A System Model for Managing Requirement Traceability Matrices Via Statistical Artifact Change Analysis Benjamin J
    A System Model for Managing Requirement Traceability Matrices via Statistical Artifact Change Analysis Benjamin J. Deaver and LiGuo Huang, Southern Methodist University, Dallas Introduction and Motivation Requirement Traceability Matrix – Gantt Open Source Software Project The Value of the Requirements Traceability Matrix The system Requirement Traceability Matrix (RTM) is primarily used for ensuring Our initial dataset for evaluation is taken from the Gantt Open Source PROCEDURE Kannenberg et al identify the underlying necessity of the Requirements Traceability Matrix and the underlying effect on that all requirements are fulfilled by the system artifact deliverables and the Software Project (http://www.ganttproject.biz). The initial trace data 1. Identify the taxonomy of change for a given domain (Systems Engineering, project management, process visibility, verification and validation, as well as project maintainability. Over time, the management of change to deliverables with respect to impact on other systems. In has been provided to us by Dr. Alexander Egyed at the Institute for SoS Engineering, Software Engineering). the systems engineering and system of systems (SoS) engineering landscapes, the Systems Engineering and Automation at Johannes Kepler University. Requirements Traceability Matrix provides significant insight in to the internal workings of the relationships between RTM is a tool that is useful at time of creation, but requires constant maintenance in Additional traces of requirements to code for subsequent Gantt versions 2. Identify and classify changes between static versions of the product. requirements and deliverable artifacts. a frequently changing landscape to maintain the original level of validity. The are being created using similar methods to the original collections 3. Generate Requirements Trace Matrixes for each static version of the product dynamic nature of systems and SoS engineering landscapes requires that a RTM be performed by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements Traceability Practices Guide
    CDC UNIFIED PROCESS PRACTICE GUIDE REQUIREMENTS TRACEABILITY Document Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide guidance on the project management practice of Requirements Traceability and to describe the practice overview, requirements, best practices, activities, and key terms related to these requirements. In addition, templates relevant to this practice are provided at the end of this guide. Practice Overview Requirements traceability is an activity that is one part of an overarching requirements management practice and extends from requirements definition through to implementation. Requirements tracing is used to ensure that each step of the product’s development process is correct, conforms to the needs of prior and next steps, and conforms to the defined requirements. Requirements tracing is a technique that helps to ensure that the project delivers what stakeholders expect. If applied correctly requirements tracing is a practice that can greatly increase the quality and reliability of a project’s final product while minimizing costly rework resulting from requirements errors. Requirements tracing defines the ability to describe and follow the life of a requirement, in both a forward and backward direction, ideally through each step of the entire product’s life cycle. This is done by documenting and tracking traceability relationships between requirements. A traceability relationship is a dependency relationship between project and/or product elements. Similar to the way a dynamic project schedule may react to a change in one task, a change to a requirement element may also have a rippling effect on other elements. A well documented traceability relationship clearly defines requirement dependencies and allows for analysis of how changes in requirements affect other requirements and the project as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Functional Requirements
    ® IBM Software Group Non-Functional Requirements Peter Eeles [email protected] IBM Software Group | Rational software Agenda Definitions Types of requirement Classifying requirements Capturing NFRs Summary IBM Software Group | Rational software Definitions Functional Requirement Functional requirements describe the behaviors (functions or services) of the system that support user goals, tasks or activities. [Malan] Non-Functional Requirement Non-functional requirements include constraints and qualities. [Malan] [System] qualities are properties or characteristics of the system that its stakeholders care about and hence will affect their degree of satisfaction with the system. [Malan] A constraint is a restriction on the degree of freedom we have in providing a solution. [Leffingwell] [Leffingwell] Managing Software Requirements – a Unified Approach, Dean Leffingwell and Don Widrig. [Malan] Defining Non-Functional Requirements, Ruth Malan and Dana Bredemeyer. IBM Software Group | Rational software Agenda Definitions Types of requirement Classifying requirements Capturing NFRs Summary IBM Software Group | Rational software Types of Requirement Use Cases Defines the behavior of the system from an external perspective System-Wide Requirements Legal and regulatory requirements, application standards, qualities that the system exhibits (such as usability, reliability, scalability, performance), operating system and environment requirements, compatibility requirements, and other design and implementation constraints Change
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements Traceability Matrix Template
    Connecticut Department of Social Services Enterprise Program Management Office Requirements Traceability Matrix Purpose of the Requirements Traceability Matrix The Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) is a document that links requirements throughout the validation process. The purpose of the Requirements Traceability Matrix is to ensure that all requirements defined for a system are tested in the test protocols. The traceability matrix is a tool both for the validation team to ensure that requirements are not lost during the validation project and for auditors to review the validation documentation. Information to Include The requirements traceability matrix is usually developed in concurrence with the initial list of requirements (either the User Requirements Specification or Functional Requirements Specification). As the Design Specifications and Test Protocols are developed, the traceability matrix is updated to include the updated documents. Ideally, requirements should be traced to the specific test step in the testing protocol in which they are tested. How the RTM is used A requirements traceability matrix is used to check if the current project requirements are being met or to help in the creation of a request for proposal, software requirements specification, various deliverable documents, and project plan tasks. Change Impact Analysis – if a requirement is changing, trace links inform about related and dependent artifacts. These artifacts can easily be verified and if required, be adjusted. The probability to overlook related artifacts is reduced. Coverage Analysis – Traceability ensures that no requirements are overlooked. Especially when certifying safety-critical products it is necessary to demonstrate that all requirements are realized. Project Status Analysis – Tracking of the project status is possible: analyzing the traceability data allows the project manager to see the completion status of the requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements Engineering and Agile Methodology
    Requirements – Architecture - Agility R. Kuehl/J. Scott Hawker p. 1 R I T Software Engineering Requirements Engineering and Agile Processes (You may be thinking) Requirements engineering model as presented is not very agile Writing a SRS, etc. sounds like a classic heavy weight process It is! But, two points to consider as good software engineers: 1. Fit the software methodology and process to the problem 2. Agile processes do equivalent requirement engineering activities – still need requirements validated by stakeholders for success R. Kuehl/J. Scott Hawker p. 2 R I T Software Engineering Requirements and Agile Traditional approach – the requirements document Agile argument against tradition Communication gaps between authors and readers Change cycle is too long Challenging to capture the complete problem and system context Brain’s capacity to retain information Agile answer: Continuous collaboration with stakeholders . Workshops, conversation Stories (index cards) record conversations Are they the requirements? R. Kuehl/J. Scott Hawker p. 3 R I T Software Engineering Requirements Engineering in Agile Processes Where is the Knowledge? Requirements Eng. Agile Methodology 1. Elicitation 1. Stories 2. Iteration design, 2. Analysis customer collaboration 3. Specification 3. Stories, code, acceptance tests, unit 4. Validation tests 5. Management 4. Customer collaboration, acceptance tests 5. Planning cycle, frequent iterations R. Kuehl/J. Scott Hawker p. 4 R I T Software Engineering A Picture Worth a 1000 Words Requirements Waterfall Incremental Evolutionary “Classic” or agile style Design Always maps Construction (coding & testing) Deployment The Requirements Engineering Model The General Software Engineering Framework R. Kuehl/J. Scott Hawker p. 5 R I T Software Engineering R.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Requirement?
    What is a requirement? • May range from – a high-level abstract statement of a service or – a statement of a system constraint to a Software Requirements detailed mathematical functional specification • Requirements may be used for – a bid for a contract Descriptions and specifications • must be open to interpretation of a system – the basis for the contract itself • must be defined in detail • Both the above statements may be called requirements Example Example …… 4.A.5 The database shall support the generation and control of configuration objects; that is, objects which are themselves groupings of other objects in the database. The configuration control facilities shall allow access to the objects in a version group by the use of an incomplete name. …… 1 Types of requirements User requirements readers • Written for customers • Client managers – User requirements • Statements in natural language plus diagrams of the • System end-users services the system provides and its operational constraints. • Client engineers • Written as a contract between client and • Contractor managers contractor – System requirements • System architects • A structured document setting out detailed descriptions of the system services. • Written for developers – Software specification • A detailed software description which can serve as a basis for a design or implementation. System requirements readers Software specification readers • System end-users • Client engineers (maybe) • Client engineers • System architects • System architects • Software developers • Software developers 2 Functional requirements • Statements of services the system should provide, how the system We will come back to user should react to particular inputs and system requirements and how the system should behave in particular situations. Examples of functional Functional requirements requirements • Describe functionality or system services 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tutorial for Requirements Analysis
    Project Scope Management Prof. Dr. Daning Hu Department of Informatics University of Zurich Some of the contents are adapted from “System Analysis and Design” by Dennis, Wixom, &Tegarden. Course Review: What do Project Managers Manage? The Triple Constraint of Project Management •Scope &Quality •Time •Cost 2 Course Review: Project Objectives Scope & Quality (fitness for purpose) Budget (to complete it within the budget) Time (to complete it within the given time) It is clear that these objectives are not in harmony! 3 3 Course Review: Requirements Analysis and System Specification Why is it one of first activities in (software) project life cycle? Need to understand what customer wants first! Goal is to understand the customer’s problem. Though customer may not fully understand it! Requirements analysis says: “Make a list of the guidelines we will use to know when the job is done and the customer is satisfied.” Also called requirements gathering or requirements engineering System specification says: “Here’s a description of what the program/system will do (not how) to satisfy the requirements.” Distinguish requirements gathering & system analysis? A top-level exploration into the problem and discovery of whether it can be done and how long it will take. 4 Learning Objectives: Project Scope Management Explain what scope management is and the related processes Discuss methods for collecting and documenting requirements Explain the scope definition process and describe the contents of a Project Scope Statement Discuss the process of constructing a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) using various approaches Explain the importance of scope verification and control and how to avoid scope problems 5 What is Project Scope Management? Scope refers to all the work involved in creating the products of the project and the processes used to create them.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements Traceability and the Effect on the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC)
    Requirements Traceability and the Effect on the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) by Glenn A. Stout (STOUT) DISS 725: Systems Development Process Spring Cluster, 2001 Research Paper 2 Glenn A. Stout (STOUT) Table of Contents Overview........................................................................................................................................3 Purpose..........................................................................................................................................3 Traceability....................................................................................................................................3 Traceability and Traceability Item Defined...............................................................................4 Traceability Links..................................................................................................................4 Traditional Requirements Gathering.............................................................................................5 In General..................................................................................................................................5 Engaging in the Practice of Tracing Requirements.......................................................................6 Software Requirements Specification (SRS).............................................................................6 Use Case Methodology..............................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Deriving DO-178C Requirements Within the Appropriate Level of Hierarchy
    ICSEA 2012 : The Seventh International Conference on Software Engineering Advances Deriving DO-178C Requirements Within the Appropriate Level of Hierarchy Jamie P. White Hassan Reza Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science University of North Dakota University of North Dakota Grand Forks, USA Grand Forks, USA [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— In this paper, a set of criterion is proposed that assists an engineer in placing a derived requirement as defined by DO-178C in the proper document within the requirement document hierarchy. The proper documentation of derived requirements has historically posed some issues when it comes to requirements-based testing. For one thing, if the derived requirements are inappropriately documented, then it will be very difficult to establish traceability between individual requirements to the elements of design, implementation, and verification. Consequently, the lack of correlation between elements of requirements, design, code, and verification can jeopardize the safety of systems because it will be impossible to establish forward and backward traceability. To this end, the proposed criteria discussed in this work attempts to improve the visibility of derived requirements to prevent the unwanted consequences of masking required information from developers. Keywords-requirement traceability; requirements analysis; Figure 1. Example of a system requirement document hierarchy safety critical systems; RTCA/DO-178C; software testing; software design High-level requirements do not always contain sufficient details to describe the underlying requirement documents. As such it is necessary to create derived requirements (DR). A DR as defined by DO-178C [10] is a requirement that is not I. INTRODUCTION directly traceable to a higher-level source; it is inferred or An aircraft system is a complex system that is composed deduced from a specific source/user.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirement Analysis Fundamentals Requirements Analysis
    Requirements Analysis The process of Discovering, Refinement, Modeling and Requirement Analysis Specification in a software project. Involve both the Customer and System Engineer Fundamentals Allowing system engineer to achieve a set of objectives: Specify software function and performance Peter Lo Indicate software interface with other system elements Establish design constraints that the software must meet Provides the software designer with a representation of Information and Function that can be translated to Data, Architectural and Procedural Design. CS213 © Peter Lo 2005 1 CS213 © Peter Lo 2005 2 Requirements Analysis Software Requirement Analysis Preparation of the Software Specification: Divided into 5 main areas: It is a formal document that specifies in precise Problem Recognition terms the functional and performance requirements of the software. Evaluation and Synthesis Modeling Specification document in turn will allow the developer and customer to assess quality once Specification the software itself has been built. Review The software developer performing Requirement analysis would often be known as the Analyst CS213 © Peter Lo 2005 3 CS213 © Peter Lo 2005 4 Problem Recognition Evaluation and Synthesis Recognize the basic problem elements perceived Evaluate the flow and content of information by user and customer Define and elaborate all software functions Understand software behavior in the context of events that Understand software in the system context affect the system Define software scope Establish
    [Show full text]
  • DAU Requirements Analysis
    Requirements Analysis Page 1 of 64 Requirements Analysis This topic covers the Requirements Analysis Technical Process, its key inputs and outputs, and illustrates how it can be applied. Get the printer friendly version of the topic here. Requirements Analysis Page 2 of 64 Contents of Topic Approximate Length: 2 hours Topic Description: Requirements Analysis is a Systems Engineering Technical Process that is a key bridge between the Stakeholder Requirements Definition and Architecture Design Processes. The Requirements Analysis Process obtains sets of logical solutions (functional architectures) so as to improve understanding of the system Technical Requirements and the relationships among them. Performance parameters and constraints are allocated to these logical solutions, candidate functional architectures are developed, and Derived Technical Requirements that later become the basis for the system design are defined. This topic discusses the Requirements Analysis Process, illustrates some of the ways it can be performed and how it can be used. Select NEXT to continue. D D-Link Text: Long Description: The animation begins with a puzzle, which includes a piece labeled 'Requirements Analysis.' This ends with a display of the DAU logo. Close window to continue. Popup Text: Stakeholder Requirements Definition One of the Systems Engineering Technical Processes, Stakeholder Requirements Definition is used to determine Stakeholder Requirements (customer and other interested party requirements) and use them as the basis to develop well written Technical Requirements for a given system model. Architecture Design One of the Systems Engineering Technical Processes, Architecture Design is used to transform the outputs of the Requirements Analysis Process into a set of design solutions and a physical architecture representing a feasible system solution that is described by specifications and other design configuration descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • DO-178C/ED-12C Versus DO-178B/ED-12B Changes and Improvements
    Frédéric Pothon ACG Solutions DO-178C/ED-12C versus DO-178B/ED-12B Changes and Improvements (c) Frédéric Pothon, 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Sept 2012 Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Contributions and Reviews Laurent Pomies Cyrille Comar DOSoft-Consulting AdaCore Hervé Delseny Ben Brosgol Airbus AdaCore Content 1. Purpose of this document ________________________________________ 4 2. DO-178C/ED-12C: Statement of work _______________________________ 5 3. DO-178C/ED-12C Products _______________________________________ 8 4. Description of the changes ______________________________________ 10 4.1 Errors and Inconsistencies ______________________________________ 10 4.2 Inconsistent Terminology _______________________________________ 14 4.2.1 “Guidance” and “Guidelines” _____________________________________ 14 4.2.2 Objectives and activities ________________________________________ 15 4.3 Unclear descriptions ___________________________________________ 19 4.3.1 Coordinated System/Software Aspects _____________________ 19 4.3.2 Derived requirements and traceability _____________________ 22 4.3.3 User modifiable software ______________________________ 23 4.3.4 Deactivated code ____________________________________ 24 4.3.5 WCET and Stack analysis ______________________________ 26 4.3.6 Note 6.4.2.1.d on test cases _____________________________ 26 4.3.7 Robustness ________________________________________ 27 4.3.8 Figure 6.1 on tests and reverification ______________________ 28 4.3.9 Additional
    [Show full text]