DOCSLIB.ORG

Modifications to Federally Permitted Seafood Dealer Reporting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modifications to Federally Permitted Seafood Dealer Reporting 9/25/13 Modifications to Federally Permitted Seafood Dealer Reporting Requirements Final Generic Amendment to the Fishery Management Plans in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Regions Including Environmental Assessment, Fishery Impact Statement, Regulatory Impact Review, and Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis August 2013 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA10NMF4410011. This page intentionally blank ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET Name of Action Generic Amendment to the fishery management plans for the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Regions for Modifications to Federally Permitted Seafood Dealer Reporting Requirements, Including Environmental Assessment, Social Impact Statement/Fishery Impact Statement, Regulatory Impact Review, and Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis Responsible Agencies and Contact Persons Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council 813-348-1630 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100 813-348-1711 (fax) Tampa, Florida 33607 [email protected] John Froeschke ([email protected]) http://www.gulfcouncil.org South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 843-571-4366 4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201 843-769-4520 (fax) North Charleston, South Carolina 29405 www.safmc.net Gregg Waugh ([email protected]) National Marine Fisheries Service (Lead Agency) 727-824-5305 Southeast Regional Office 727-824-5308 (fax) 263 13th Avenue South http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Rich Malinowski ([email protected]) Rick DeVictor ([email protected]) Type of Action ( ) Administrative ( ) Legislative ( ) Draft (X) Final Generic Amendment i Dealer Reporting Requirements ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ACCSP Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program ACL annual catch limits ALS Accumulated Landing System AM accountability measures ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission CMP Coastal Migratory Pelagic EA environmental assessment EEZ exclusive economic zone EFH essential fish habitat EIS Environmental Impact Statement EJ Environmental justice FLS Fisheries Logbook System FMP fishery management plan FTE full time equivalent GSMFC Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission HAPC habitat areas of particular concern HMS Highly Migratory Species IRFAA Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act Magnuson-Stevens Act Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act MSY maximum sustainable yield NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration OY optimum yield RA Regional Administrator RIR regulatory impact review SAFE Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report SAFIS Standard Atlantic Fisheries Information System SAFMC South Atlantic Fishery Management Council SEDAR Southeast Data Assessment and Review SEFSC Southeast Fisheries Science Center SERO Southeast Regional Office SRD Science and Research Director USCG U.S. Coast Guard YPR yield-per-recruit Generic Amendment ii Dealer Reporting Requirements TABLE OF CONTENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET ................................................................ i ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ...................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... viii FISHERY IMPACT STATEMENT .............................................................................................. ix Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Proposed Actions ................................................................................................................. 4 1.3.1 Gulf of Mexico Council’s History of Management for Fishery Management Plans (FMP) Affected by this Amendment .................................................................................... 15 1.3.2 South Atlantic Council’s History of Management for Fishery Management Plans (FMP) Affected by this Amendment .................................................................................... 16 1.3.3 Joint Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Council’s History of Management for Fishery Management Plans ( FMP) Affected by this Amendment ....................................... 18 Chapter 2. Management Alternatives .......................................................................................... 21 2.1 Action 1 – Dealer Permits Required .................................................................................. 21 2.2 Action 2 – Frequency and Method of Reporting ............................................................... 26 2.3 Action 3 – Requirements to Maintain a Dealer Permit ...................................................... 30 Chapter 3. Affected Environment ................................................................................................ 33 3.1 Description of the Physical Environment .......................................................................... 33 3.1.1 Gulf of Mexico Region ............................................................................................... 33 3.1.2 South Atlantic Region ................................................................................................. 38 3.1.3 Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Regions ............................................................... 43 3.2 Description of the Biological/Ecological Environment ..................................................... 45 3.2.1 Gulf of Mexico Region ............................................................................................... 46 3.2.2 South Atlantic Region ................................................................................................. 47 3.2.3 Mid-Atlantic Region ................................................................................................... 48 3.2.4 Northeast Region ........................................................................................................ 49 3.2.5 Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Regions ............................................................... 51 3.3 Description of the Economic Environment......................................................................... 51 3.4 Description of the Social Environment .............................................................................. 57 3.4.1 Federal Dealer Permits ................................................................................................ 57 Generic Amendment iii Dealer Reporting Requirements 3.4.2 Dealers that Receive Federally-Managed Species ...................................................... 61 3.4.3 Fishermen and Fishing Permits ................................................................................... 67 3.4.4 Descriptions of Affected Communities ...................................................................... 68 3.4.5 Environmental Justice Considerations ........................................................................ 68 3.5 Description of the Administrative Environment ................................................................ 73 3.5.1 The Fishery Management Process and Applicable Laws ........................................... 73 3.5.2 Enforcement ................................................................................................................ 75 3.5.3 Data Collection ........................................................................................................... 76 Chapter 4. Environmental Consequences .................................................................................... 78 4.1 Action 1: Dealer Permits Required ................................................................................... 78 4.1.1 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Biological/Ecological Environment ..................... 78 4.1.2 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Economic Environment ........................................ 79 4.1.3 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Social Environment .............................................. 90 4.1.4 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Administrative Environment ................................ 91 4.2 Action 2: Frequency and Method of Reporting ................................................................ 93 4.2.1 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Biological/Ecological Environment ..................... 93 4.2.2 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Economic Environment ........................................ 94 4.2.3 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Social Environment .............................................. 99 4.2.4 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Administrative Environment .............................. 100 4.3 Action 3: Requirements to Maintain a Dealer Permit ..................................................... 102 4.3.1 Direct and Indirect Effects on the Biological/Ecological Environment ................... 102 4.3.2 Direct and Indirect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles of the Mediterranean and Black Seas
    Marine mammals and sea turtles of the Mediterranean and Black Seas MEDITERRANEAN AND BLACK SEA BASINS Main seas, straits and gulfs in the Mediterranean and Black Sea basins, together with locations mentioned in the text for the distribution of marine mammals and sea turtles Ukraine Russia SEA OF AZOV Kerch Strait Crimea Romania Georgia Slovenia France Croatia BLACK SEA Bosnia & Herzegovina Bulgaria Monaco Bosphorus LIGURIAN SEA Montenegro Strait Pelagos Sanctuary Gulf of Italy Lion ADRIATIC SEA Albania Corsica Drini Bay Spain Dardanelles Strait Greece BALEARIC SEA Turkey Sardinia Algerian- TYRRHENIAN SEA AEGEAN SEA Balearic Islands Provençal IONIAN SEA Syria Basin Strait of Sicily Cyprus Strait of Sicily Gibraltar ALBORAN SEA Hellenic Trench Lebanon Tunisia Malta LEVANTINE SEA Israel Algeria West Morocco Bank Tunisian Plateau/Gulf of SirteMEDITERRANEAN SEA Gaza Strip Jordan Suez Canal Egypt Gulf of Sirte Libya RED SEA Marine mammals and sea turtles of the Mediterranean and Black Seas Compiled by María del Mar Otero and Michela Conigliaro The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by Compiled by María del Mar Otero IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Spain © IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Malaga, Spain Michela Conigliaro IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Spain Copyright © 2012 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources With the support of Catherine Numa IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Spain Annabelle Cuttelod IUCN Species Programme, United Kingdom Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the sources are fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Assessment
    Seafood Assessment Northern Shrimp Pandalus borealis (fromWikipedia) Atlantic Canada September 2006 Bettina Saier1 and Susanna D. Fuller2 1Independent Consultant and 2 Dalhousie University Shrimp – Atlantic Canada August 2006 About SeaChoice ® and Seafood Assessments The SeaChoice® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the Canadian marketplace. SeaChoice® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. SeaChoice® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of a pocket guide, Canada’s Seafood Guide, that can be downloaded from the Internet (www.seachoice.org) or obtained from the SeaChoice® program directly by emailing a request to us. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower Canadian seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on Canada’s Seafood Guide is supported by a Seafood Assessment by SeaChoice or a Seafood Report by Monterey Bay Aquarium; both groups use the same assessment criteria. Each assessment synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic/sustainability criteria to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices”, “Concerns” or “Some Concern”. The detailed evaluation methodology is available on our website at www.seachoice.org. In producing Seafood Assessments, SeaChoice® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and scientific reviews of ecological sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • A Partial Rostrum of the Porbeagle Shark
    GEOLOGICA BELGICA (2010) 13/1-2: 61-76 A PARTIAL ROSTRUM OF THE PORBEAGLE SHARK LAMNA NASUS (LAMNIFORMES, LAMNIDAE) FROM THE MIOCENE OF THE NORTH SEA BASIN AND THE TAXONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF ROSTRAL MORPHOLOGY IN EXTINCT SHARKS Frederik H. MOLLEN (4 figures, 3 plates) Elasmobranch Research, Meistraat 16, B-2590 Berlaar, Belgium; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A fragmentary rostrum of a lamnid shark is recorded from the upper Miocene Breda Formation at Liessel (Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands); it constitutes the first elasmobranch rostral process to be described from Neogene strata in the North Sea Basin. Based on key features of extant lamniform rostra and CT scans of chondrocrania of modern Lamnidae, the Liessel specimen is assigned to the porbeagle shark, Lamna nasus (Bonnaterre, 1788). In addition, the taxonomic significance of rostral morphology in extinct sharks is discussed and a preliminary list of elasmobranch taxa from Liessel is presented. KEYWORDS. Lamniformes, Lamnidae, Lamna, rostrum, shark, rostral node, rostral cartilages, CT scans. 1. Introduction Pliocene) of North Carolina (USA), detailed descriptions and discussions were not presented, unfortunately. Only In general, chondrichthyan fish fossilise only under recently has Jerve (2006) reported on an ongoing study of exceptional conditions and (partial) skeletons of especially two Miocene otic capsules from the Calvert Formation large species are extremely rare (Cappetta, 1987). (lower-middle Miocene) of Maryland (USA); this will Therefore, the fossil record of Lamniformes primarily yield additional data to the often ambiguous dental studies. comprises only teeth (see e.g. Agassiz, 1833-1844; These well-preserved cranial structures were stated to be Leriche, 1902, 1905, 1910, 1926), which occasionally are homologous to those seen in extant lamnids and thus available as artificial, associated or natural tooth sets useful for future phylogenetic studies of this group.
    [Show full text]
  • Billfish Challenge Bone Structure–Function Paradigms
    Remodeling in bone without osteocytes: Billfish challenge bone structure–function paradigms Ayelet Atkinsa,1, Mason N. Deanb,1, Maria Laura Habeggerc, Phillip J. Mottac, Lior Ofera, Felix Reppb, Anna Shipova, Steve Weinerd, John D. Curreye, and Ron Shahara,2 aKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel; bDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, 14476 Potsdam, Germany; cDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33613; dDepartment of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; and eDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom Edited by David B. Burr, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, and accepted by the Editorial Board September 19, 2014 (received for review July 3, 2014) A remarkable property of tetrapod bone is its ability to detect and borders, heavily remodeled tissue, which forms particularly in remodel areas where damage has accumulated through prolonged situations of large load magnitudes and/or cyclic loading, bears use. This process, believed vital to the long-term health of bone, is a characteristic morphology of overlapping osteons (Fig. 1 C and D), considered to be initiated and orchestrated by osteocytes, cells a structural record of vigorous remodeling (ref. 2; SI Text). within the bone matrix. It is therefore surprising that most extant Considering the pivotal role of osteocytes in remodeling and fishes (neoteleosts) lack osteocytes, suggesting their bones are not that remodeling is believed to be essential for the proper long- constantly repaired, although many species exhibit long lives and term function of bone, it is surprising that the bones of almost all high activity levels, factors that should induce considerable fatigue members of the huge group of extant neoteleost fish—close to damage with time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Key for the Identification of Large Fish Rostra 145-160 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München/Verlag Friedrich Pfeil; Download
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Spixiana, Zeitschrift für Zoologie Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 038 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lange Tabea, Brehm Julian, Moritz Timo Artikel/Article: A practical key for the identification of large fish rostra 145-160 ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München/Verlag Friedrich Pfeil; download www.pfeil-verlag.de SPIXIANA 38 1 145-160 München, August 2015 ISSN 0341-8391 A practical key for the identification of large fish rostra (Pisces) Tabea Lange, Julian Brehm & Timo Moritz Lange, T., Brehm, J. & Moritz, T. 2015. A practical key for the identification of large fish rostra (Pisces). Spixiana 38 (1): 145-160. Large fish rostra without data of origin or determination are present in many museum collections or may appear in customs inspections. In recent years the inclu- sion of fish species on national and international lists for the protection of wildlife resulted in increased trading regulations. Therefore, useful identification tools are of growing importance. Here, we present a practical key for large fish rostra for the families Pristidae, Pristiophoridae, Xiphiidae and Istiophoridae. This key allows determination on species level for three of four families. Descriptions of the rostrum characteristics of the respective taxa are given. Tabea Lange, Lindenallee 38, 18437 Stralsund Julian Brehm, Königsallee 5, 95448 Bayreuth Timo Moritz, Deutsches Meeresmuseum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction Polyodon spathula is equipped with a spoon-like rostrum which is used as an electrosensory organ Rostra are found in many fish species and can for locating plankton in water columns (Wilkens & be used for hunting (Wueringer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sale of Sawfish Rostra on Ebay
    TheThe SaleSale ofof SawfishSawfish RostraRostra onon eBayeBay PreliminaryPreliminary ResultsResults Sawfish Recovery Team Meeting August 3 – 5, 2004 Matthew T. McDavitt 3371 Turnberry Cir. Charlottesville, VA 22911 434-973-0922 [email protected] TopicsTopics Purpose & design of study Methodology for distinguishing rostra to species Historical data on trade in sawfish saws? Results Implications BackgroundBackground Since 1999, I have observed sawfish rostra for sale on eBay I noticed that there were normally several rostra for sale on any day There is very little data available concerning trade in sawfish snouts PurposePurpose To quantify the scope of one regular source of trade in sawfish rostra To characterize the rostra being sold: Frequency of sale Avg prices Avg rostral lengths Species involved Source of rostra Characterize the buyers & sellers StudyStudy DetailsDetails Study Period: Feb 1, 2004 - July 31, 2004 182 days 6 mos Ongoing – will be 1 year MethodsMethods On bi-weekly basis, examined eBay listings for sawfish rostra internationally Using only publicly available information When auctions completed, listing information and photograph were saved Sale details were then recorded to a spreadsheet Examined listing photograph to determine species, where possible If species unclear and the photograph was taken straight-on, rostrum was measured using Adobe Photoshop to verify length / width proportions WhatWhatWhat isisis eBay?eBay?eBay? eBay is the world’s largest online auction house Registered users can
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Whale Words
    Glossary of Whale Words Baleen: Fibrous plates constructed of keratin, material much like human fingernails, grows from the roof of the mouth of some species of whales. It is used to filter small food organisms from the water. Barnacle: A marine crustacean that attaches itself to rocks, ship bottoms and certain whales. Beak: The snout or forward projecting jaws of a cetacean. Found on all dolphins and porpoises. Benthic: Pertaining to the sea bottom or to organisms that live in or on the sea bottom. Blow: The visible breath of a whale, consisting of water vapor and droplets. Blowholes: The nostrils of a cetacean, usually located on the top of the head. Two blowholes are found in Mysticeti whales, one in Odontoceti. Bowriding: The behavior in dolphins and porpoises involving swimming in the bowwave created by moving boats or large whales. Breaching: The behavior in cetaceans that involves thrusting most or all of the body out of the water and landing with a large splash. Humpbacks are known for breaching. Bull: An adult male whale. By-catch: Animals that are caught accidentally or unintentionally by fishermen. Calf: A baby whale. Callosity: Rough, lumpy protrusions on the top and front of the head of right whales. It is make of keratin. Capelin: bait for whales Caudal: Of or near the tail or posterior part of the body Cetacean: A marine mammal of the order of Cetacea, which includes whales, dolphins and porpoises. Chevron: A pigmentation pattern shaped like the letter V on the back of a finback whale. Cow: An adult female whale.
    [Show full text]
  • Cetaceans of the Red Sea - CMS Technical Series Publication No
    UNEP / CMS Secretariat UN Campus Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1 D-53113 Bonn Germany Tel: (+49) 228 815 24 01 / 02 Fax: (+49) 228 815 24 49 E-mail: [email protected] www.cms.int CETACEANS OF THE RED SEA Cetaceans of the Red Sea - CMS Technical Series Publication No. 33 No. Publication Series Technical Sea - CMS Cetaceans of the Red CMS Technical Series Publication No. 33 UNEP promotes N environmentally sound practices globally and in its own activities. This publication is printed on FSC paper, that is W produced using environmentally friendly practices and is FSC certified. Our distribution policy aims to reduce UNEP‘s carbon footprint. E | Cetaceans of the Red Sea - CMS Technical Series No. 33 MF Cetaceans of the Red Sea - CMS Technical Series No. 33 | 1 Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Recommended citation: Notarbartolo di Sciara G., Kerem D., Smeenk C., Rudolph P., Cesario A., Costa M., Elasar M., Feingold D., Fumagalli M., Goffman O., Hadar N., Mebrathu Y.T., Scheinin A. 2017. Cetaceans of the Red Sea. CMS Technical Series 33, 86 p. Prepared by: UNEP/CMS Secretariat Editors: Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara*, Dan Kerem, Peter Rudolph & Chris Smeenk Authors: Amina Cesario1, Marina Costa1, Mia Elasar2, Daphna Feingold2, Maddalena Fumagalli1, 3 Oz Goffman2, 4, Nir Hadar2, Dan Kerem2, 4, Yohannes T. Mebrahtu5, Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara1, Peter Rudolph6, Aviad Scheinin2, 7, Chris Smeenk8 1 Tethys Research Institute, Viale G.B. Gadio 2, 20121 Milano, Italy 2 Israel Marine Mammal Research and Assistance Center (IMMRAC), Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Natant Decapod Crustacea (Shrimps and Prawns) of New Zealand
    lis < A Guide to the Natant Decapod Crustacea (Shrimps and Prawns) of New Zealand L. R. RICHARDSON and J. C. YALDWYN Department of Zoology, Victoria University of Wellington CARDED CARDED 8 -1963 Reprinted from TUATARA September 1958 Volume 7 Number 1 Pages 17-41 I i A Guide to the Natant Decapod Crustacea (Shrimps and Prawns) of New Zealand* L. R. RICHARDSON and J. C. YALDWYN, Department of Zoology, Victoria University of Wellington EXCEPTING FOR ONE SPECIES common in our lowland running fresh waters, our shrimps and prawns are marine, ranging from sea-shore pools into deeper waters. These animals are crayfish-like, having a body divided into an anterior region of fused head and thorax, equipped with walking legs, and an abdomen which is segmented, terminating in a tail, and bearing a pair of limbs on all segments. The crayfish and its allies swim only backwards, doing this by violent flexion of the abdomen ; but shrimps and prawns also swim forwards using their well-developed abdominal appendages (pleopods) for this purpose. 4 Shrimp ' and ' prawn ' are names of unknown origin and of no strict zoological reference. In common usage, 4 shrimp' are small, some three inches or less in length, taken for food by netting, usually from shallow water. ' Prawn' are larger, up to twelve inches long, taken by trapping and trawling. The species recognised in most countries as prawns, in general have a more or less compressed (i.e. deeper than wide) body, and a long armed rostrum, features shown in many small species which from their size alone are known in common usage as 4 shrimp'; however, the rostrum is short in the principal commercial shrimp of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Evolution and Population Genomics of Loliginid Squids Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0zw3h4ps Author Cheng, Samantha Hue Tone Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Evolution and Population Genomics of Loliginid Squids A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology by Samantha Hue Tone Cheng 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Evolution and Population Genomics of Loliginid Squids by Samantha Hue Tone Cheng Doctor of Philosophy in Biology University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Paul Henry Barber, Chair Globally, rampant harvesting practices have left vital marine resources in sharp decline precipitating a dramatic loss of the biodiversity and threatening the health and viability of natural populations. To protect these crucial resources and ecosystems, a comprehensive assessment of biodiversity, as well as a rigorous understanding of the mechanisms underlying it, is urgently needed. As global finfish fisheries decline, harvest of cephalopod fisheries, squid, in particular, has exponentially increased. However, while much is known about the evolution and population dynamics of teleost fishes, much less is understood about squids. This dissertation provides a robust, in-depth examination of these mechanisms in commercially important squids using a novel approach combining genetics and genomics methods. In the first chapter, a suite of genetic markers is used to thoroughly examine the distribution and evolution of a species complex of bigfin reef squid (Sepioteuthis cf. lessoniana) throughout the global center of marine biodiversity, the Coral Triangle, and adjacent areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Rostral Tooth Microwear and Ultrastructure of the Barbels and Rostrum Tip in the Common Sawshark Pristiophorus Cirratus and Their Proposed Behavioural Implications
    Rostral tooth microwear and ultrastructure of the barbels and rostrum tip in the Common Sawshark Pristiophorus cirratus and their proposed behavioural implications Pristiophorus cirratus (© Ryan Nevatte) Ryan Nevatte Marine Ecology Group Department of Biological Sciences Macquarie University Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Research on 10th October 2014 Word Count: 15,229 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Summary 5 Declaration 7 Acknowledgements 9 Chapter 1: General Introduction 11 1.1 Rationale of Study 11 1.2 Biology of Sawsharks 14 1.3 Function of Barbels in Teleosts and Elasmobranchs 15 1.4 Function of Elongated Rostra in Teleosts and Elasmobranchs 18 1.5 Thesis Objectives and Chapter Outline 20 Chapter 2: Ultrastructure of Pristiophorus cirratus barbels 22 2.1 Abstract 22 2.2 Introduction 22 2.3 Methods 24 2.4 Results 28 2.5 Discussion 41 Chapter 3: Comparison of rostral tooth microwear to assess rostrum function in sawsharks 47 3.1 Abstract 47 3.2 Introduction 47 3.3 Methods 50 3.4 Results 53 3.5 Discussion 71 Chapter 4: General Discussion 75 References 77 Electronic References 85 3 4 Summary Although sawsharks are frequent by-catch in commercial deep-water fisheries, our understanding of their behaviour is limited; in particular with regards to how they use their barbels and rostrum. This project employed a variety of techniques to infer how sawsharks use their barbels and rostrum. Evidence from histology and preliminary fluorescent microscopy work suggests that the barbels serve a tactile function, since they lack sensory structures such as taste buds, free neuromasts and ampullae, and contain neurons in the epidermis that may be connected to tactile receptors or free nerve endings.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Morphology and Feeding Mechanics of Billfishes María Laura Habegger University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 11-10-2014 Functional Morphology and Feeding Mechanics of Billfishes María Laura Habegger University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Integrative Biology Commons, and the Physiology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Habegger, María Laura, "Functional Morphology and Feeding Mechanics of Billfishes" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5617 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Functional Morphology and Feeding Mechanics of Billfishes by María Laura Habegger A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Integrative Biology with a concentration in Physiology and Morphology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major-Professor: Philip J. Motta, Ph.D. Stephen Deban, Ph.D. Henry R. Mushinsky, Ph.D. Daniel Huber, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 10, 2014 Keywords: biomechanics, rostrum, anatomy, performance. Copyright © 2014, María Laura Habegger DEDICATION To my family for their endless support, for teaching me to do my best and never give up. To Martin for his patience, his support and his fuelling love. To Phil and Diane for making us feel we were not alone, for giving us a family away from home. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like first and foremost to thank my advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]