Consultation Report

Quietway 5: The Avenue / Nightingale Walk

Response to consultation September 2016

Contents

Executive Summary ...... 2 1 Introduction ...... 3 2 The consultation ...... 6 3 Overview of consultation responses ...... 7 4. Conclusion ...... 16 Appendix A – Response to issues commonly raised ...... 17 Appendix B – Copy of the consultation letter ...... 23 Appendix C – Leaflet distribution area...... 24 Appendix D – Copy of stakeholder email ...... 26 Appendix E – List of stakeholders consulted ...... 27

Executive Summary

Between 10 December 2015 and 3 February 2016, we consulted on proposals for a road improvement scheme at the junction of A205 The Avenue and Nightingale Walk as part of the Quietway 5 cycle route between Waterloo and Croydon.

We received 60 responses to consultation. Of the 50 respondents who answered the corresponding closed question, 26 said they supported or partially supported our proposals for the junction and 24 said they did not.

The main issues that respondents raised in response to consultation were:

 Impact of banned turns proposed at Nightingale Walk caused concerns about increased traffic congestion, safety and local access  Support or opposition to the scheme in general  Cycling facilities including suggestions for alternative routes and opposition to shared use space for cyclists and pedestrians  Traffic impacts including effects on motorists and journey times

Next steps

After considering all responses, we intend to proceed with the scheme as set out in the consultation documents, subject to the formal Traffic Order process and approval from the London Borough of Wandsworth for changes to local roads in the scheme area.

Construction

We plan to carry out the construction work later in 2016. We will keep visitors and road users informed of our plans and progress, including writing to local residents, businesses and other stakeholders before undertaking work in their area. We also provide road traffic information to help people better plan their journeys and make informed choices about how, where and when they travel.

1 Introduction

1.1 About Quietways

Quietways are a network of high quality, well signed cycle routes throughout London, mostly using the backstreets. The routes link key destinations and are designed to appeal to new and existing people that cycle who want to use quieter, low traffic routes. Quietways complement other cycling initiatives in London, such as the Cycle Superhighways.

Quietways are more than just cycle routes. They also provide the opportunity to make streets and neighbourhoods safer and more pleasant for everyone by reducing the speed and dominance of motor traffic, improving air quality and investing in the urban realm.

For more information about Quietways, please visit tfl.gov.uk/quietways.

1.2 This scheme

As part of Quietway 5, a route is planned connecting Waterloo and Croydon, which crosses the Transport for London Road Network at the junction of A205 The Avenue and Nightingale Walk.

We developed proposals to provide a safer and more attractive cycle connection across A205 The Avenue and Nightingale Walk. These proposals aim to improve safety for cyclists and accommodate the predicted increase of cyclists along this route. The design would provide a more direct route for cyclists.

1.3 Purpose of the Scheme The scheme is designed to:

 Provide a well-signed route linking Waterloo and Croydon  Improve safety for cycling by providing more dedicated space for cycling and dedicated cycle features at the junction  Accommodate the predicted increase in cycling  Encourage less confident cyclists or those who do not currently cycle but would like to do so

1.4 Descriptions of the proposals

The changes include:

New shared Toucan crossing for pedestrians and cyclists

1. New 4-metre-wide Toucan crossing with shared-use space on adjacent footway for pedestrians and cyclists would allow them to safely cross The Avenue and cyclists to access the Quietway on Clapham Common. Measures such as signage and tactile paving would be used to indicate the shared use area. A pedestrian countdown facility would indicate remaining crossing time. 2. New 6-metre-long dropped kerb for cyclists to access Toucan crossing via shared-use space from The Avenue 3. Existing Pelican crossing removed as pedestrians would be able to use the proposed Toucan crossing 4. New footway build-out to align with new Toucan crossing and allow cyclists to easily and safely access the crossing from Nightingale Walk

Banned turns

5. No entry into Nightingale Walk. The location of the new Toucan crossing, which would allow pedestrians and cyclists to safely cross The Avenue, requires Nightingale Walk to be closed to southbound vehicles. Its new position and the footway build out would mean that vehicles would no longer have space to turn. Our latest traffic counts show that up to 96 motorised vehicles per hour turn into Nightingale Walk from The Avenue. TfL’s traffic modelling indicates that these vehicles could be accommodated within the existing network without causing significant delay. A number of alternative routes are available nearby for motorists. Access to Nightingale Walk from the south would remain unchanged. 6. No right turn out of Nightingale Walk. There would no longer be space for vehicles turning right out of Nightingale Walk to safely stop and wait on The Avenue while pedestrians and cyclists are using the new Toucan crossing. Our latest traffic counts show that up to 65 motorised vehicles per hour currently turn right out of Nightingale Walk. TfL’s traffic modelling indicates that these vehicles could be accommodated within the existing network without causing significant delay. A number of alternative routes are available nearby for motorists

At construction stage, the junction would also be resurfaced.

1.5 Drawing of the proposals

2 The consultation

2.1 About the consultation

The consultation ran from 10 December 2015 to 3 February 2016.

Information on the consultation, including details of the proposals consulted on, was available online at consultations.tfl.gov.uk/cycling/nightingale-walk from 10 December 2015.

Respondents were asked about whether they supported the proposals (‘yes’, ‘partially’, ‘no’, ‘not sure’, ‘no opinion’). Respondents were also given an opportunity to comment on the proposals. Respondents were also asked to submit their name, email address and postcode, whether they were responding on behalf of an organisation, and how they heard about the consultation. All questions were optional.

The objectives of the consultation were:

 To give stakeholders and the public easily-understandable information about the proposals and allow them to respond  To understand the level of support or opposition for the proposals  To understand any issues that might affect the proposal of which we were not previously aware  To understand concerns and objections  To allow respondents to make suggestions

2.2 Consultation material, distribution and publicity

Consultation website The consultation web page at consultations.tfl.gov.uk/cycling/nightingale-walk provided explanatory text and a detailed design drawing of the proposals.

Non-web formats A consultation letter and drawing explaining our proposals were sent to 5,051 addresses near the scheme area. Printed plans, accompanying descriptions and response forms were available on request by telephone, email or writing to FREEPOST TFL CONSULTATIONS.

A copy of the letter is shown in Appendix B and a map of the distribution area can be found in Appendix C.

Stakeholder email We emailed around 350 different stakeholder organisations to let them know about the consultation. The email contained a brief summary of the proposals and a link to

6 the consultation website. Please see Appendix D for the email and Appendix E for the list of recipients. 3 Overview of consultation responses

There were 60 responses to the consultation which answered one or more question.

3.1 Stakeholder and public responses There were 58 responses from members of the public and two from stakeholders.

Fig.1 Consultation responses by respondent type

3.2 Support for the proposed changes at The Avenue / Nightingale Walk

We asked two questions about the proposals at The Avenue / Nightingale Walk. Respondents were asked whether they supported the proposals ‘Yes’, ‘Partially’, ‘No’, ‘Not sure’, ‘No opinion’). Respondents were also given the opportunity to comment on these proposals.

Fig.2 Support for proposed changes at The Avenue / Nightingale Walk

3.3 Analysis of consultation responses

47 respondents gave comments on the proposed changes at The Avenue / Nightingale Walk. The issues raised are summarised into key themes below, with stakeholder responses also given separately in Section 3.7.

Banned turns

32 respondents made a comment about the banned movements for motor vehicles proposed. Comments included:

Opposition

 28 respondents opposed the proposed banned turns  27 said the banned turns would increase congestion on local roads  2 respondents suggested that the scheme would restrict local access

Support

 4 supported the banned turns

Suggestions

 1 respondent suggested banning a different turn

Support and opposition

18 respondents made a comment supporting or opposing the scheme generally. These included:

 16 comments opposing the scheme  2 comments supporting the scheme

Traffic

15 respondents made a comment about traffic. Comments included:

 7 respondents said the scheme would have a negative impact on motorists, including 4 who highlighted inconvenience  6 respondents were concerned that the scheme would increase journey times  1 respondents raised a concern about rat running by motorists  1 respondent said the scheme would decrease congestion on Nightingale Walk

Suggestions

 3 respondents suggested additional motor traffic control measures on Nightingale Walk, including 2 who suggested closing it to through motor traffic and 1 who suggested speed bumps and no parking for motor vehicles

Safety

15 respondents made a comment about safety. Comments included:

Negative comments about safety

 7 respondents believed the scheme would have a negative impact on safety  4 respondents were concerned about pedestrian safety  3 respondents were concerned about pedestrian / cyclist conflict  2 respondents said there would be no improvement in cyclist safety  2 respondents were concerned about school children’s safety  1 respondent was concerned about current safety

Positive comments about safety

 2 respondents made a comment that the scheme would improve general safety  2 respondents said the scheme would improve safety for cyclists 

Cycling facilities

14 respondents made a comment about the cycling facilities in the scheme. Comments included:

Alternative route suggestions

 4 respondents suggested an alternative route for the Quietway at this location  1 respondent supported the current route

Shared use space

 4 respondents opposed shared use space for pedestrians and cyclists

Other comments

 1 respondent questioned if any changes would be made to Alderbrook Road as part of the scheme  1 respondent said that current paths on Clapham Common were not suitable for cycling  1 respondent said the design should adhere to the London Cycling Design Standards

Demand and justification

12 respondents made a comment about the demand and justification for the scheme, and who it would benefit

 6 respondents said that the scheme was unnecessary  5 respondents said the scheme was unjustified on the grounds of cost, including 2 who said the money should be spent elsewhere  4 respondents said the scheme had no benefit for cycling  2 respondents said the scheme had no benefit for road users other than cyclists  1 respondent questioned the demand for the scheme

Cyclist behaviour

10 respondents made a comment about cyclist behaviour. Comments included:

 4 respondents raised concern about cyclists’ behaviour  4 respondents were concerned about cyclists’ speed  2 respondents made a comment about the increased numbers of cyclists resulting from the scheme

 1 respondent claimed that cyclists did not pay road tax

Numbers of cyclists

 2 respondents were concerned about numbers of cyclists currently or that they thought would be encouraged by the scheme

Local impacts

8 respondents made a comment about the impact on residents, road users and other people using the area. Comments included:

 5 respondents said the scheme would have a negative impact on pedestrians, including 1 who raised a concern about the impact on school children  3 respondents were concerned that the scheme would have a negative impact on residents  3 respondents were concerned about increased air pollution  2 respondents were concerned about the environmental impact on Clapham Common

Traffic data

5 respondents made a comment about the modelling and other data provided by TfL. Comments included:

 3 requests for further clarification or for more data  2 respondents said that the data was inaccurate

Pedestrian / cycle crossing

4 respondents made a comment about the pedestrian / cycle crossing. Comments included:

 3 respondents suggested changes to the pedestrian / cycle crossing, including a new position, extending the footway on the other side of the road and a Tiger crossing (a parallel pedestrian / cycle priority crossing)  2 respondents made a comment about traffic signal phasing or control  1 respondent opposed the pedestrian countdown  1 respondent asked for the crossing at Cavendish Road to be upgraded

Consultation

2 respondents made a comment about the consultation. Comments included:

 1 respondent said the consultation contained no information about alternative routes  1 respondent asked who was responsible for decision making about the scheme

3.2 Support for Quietway 5

We asked two questions about the overall proposals for Quietway 5. Respondents were asked about whether they supported the proposals (‘Yes’, ‘Partially’, ‘No’, ‘Not sure’, ‘No opinion’). Respondents were also given an opportunity to comment on the proposals.

Fig.3 Support for the overall proposals for Quietway 5

3.3 Comments on the overall proposals for Quietway 5

19 respondents provided comments. This summary includes comments from two stakeholder organisations. These responses are also summarised separately in Section 3.4.

Cycling provision

7 respondents made a comment about the cycling provision in the scheme. Comments included:

 4 respondents thought that the scheme offered too much provision for cycling  4 respondents made a comment opposing shared use space  3 respondents raised concern about cyclists’ behaviour  2 respondents were concerned about the number of cyclists  2 respondents commented about the route of Quietway 5  1 respondent said there was not enough road space for Quietway 5  1 respondent said there was limited demand for the scheme and resulting benefit

Support for the scheme

6 respondents made a comment supporting Quietway 5. Comments included:

 5 comments offering general support for the scheme  1 comment saying that Quietway 5 benefits pedestrians and cyclists

Local impacts

5 respondents made a comment about the impact on local residents and road users. Comments included:

 2 respondents were concerned about negative impacts on road users  1 respondent were concerned about negative impacts on residents  1 respondent were concerned about negative impacts on motorists  1 respondent were concerned about negative impacts on pedestrians

Safety

7 respondents made a comment about safety. Comments included:

Negative comments about safety

 2 respondents raised concerns about cyclist safety  2 respondents were concerned about pedestrian safety  1 respondent said that excess signage had a negative impact on safety

Positive comments about safety

 1 respondents said the scheme would improve safety for cyclists  1 respondent said that safety for pedestrians and cyclists was important

Suggestions

 2 respondents suggested speed reduction measures to improve safety

Banned turns

2 respondents opposed banned turns:

 1 respondent opposed the proposed banned turn  1 respondent oppose the banned turn on Malwood Road (outside this scheme)

3.7 Summary of stakeholder responses

Stakeholder group Summary of response

Jane Ellison – MP for Raised concerns about the potential impact to traffic that Battersea, Balham the scheme could cause. Suggested that making and Wandsworth Nightingale Walk one-way would likely increase congestion and force motorists down residential streets and that the crossing be moved elsewhere to prevent such impacts.

London Cycling The stakeholder did not answer the closed question in Campaign terms of support for the scheme. However, concern was raised that the scheme would have an adverse impact on traffic within Clapham Common and Balham. However, it welcomed the creation of a no entry point at the northern end of Nightingale Walk. It was suggested however that the Campaign would prefer if Nightingale Walk was closed completely with a modal filter and a tiger crossing used on The Avenue over a toucan crossing. It was suggested if a modal filter was not feasible, more measures need to be implemented to slow vehicles on Nightingale Walk. Lastly, it suggested that all schemes should be given a Cycling Level of Service rating. The stakeholder did not answer the closed question in terms of support for the overall Quietways scheme.

4. Conclusion

Next steps

Construction

Appendix A – Response to issues commonly raised

Banned turns

There were 32 respondents who made a comment about the proposed banned movements for motor vehicles. Careful consideration is given to potential traffic impact whilst developing proposals Generally, new restrictions are proposed to either address a safety issue or physical constraint, or to help the road network operate more efficiently.

Nightingale Walk will continue to operate as a two-way road for all vehicles. However some movements into and from The Avenue will be restricted.

Impact on local roads

We acknowledge that the banned turns may result in some vehicles using other local roads to complete their journey and/or having longer journeys. The impact of this redistributed traffic has been considered against the significant benefits that will be gained for cyclists and pedestrians by banning movements at the junction of The Avenue and Nightingale Walk, and therefore enabling the installation of a new toucan crossing and extension of the footway.

Traffic counts at this junction indicate that a small proportion of motorists would be impacted, with the most recent counts showing that up to 96 motor vehicles per hour turn into Nightingale Walk from The Avenue and up to 65 motor vehicles per hour currently turn right out of Nightingale Walk.

The Quietway will deliver real benefits in terms of reduced congestion and reduced emissions through encouraging a mode shift from car travel to cycling. A large number of journeys within the local area currently made by car can also be made by bike. By providing a safe, direct and convenient cycle route through Clapham Common, we are providing local residents and businesses the opportunity to undertake journeys by bike that would otherwise have been difficult or unsafe due to the current road network.

Traffic

There were 15 respondents who made a comment about traffic, including that the scheme would increase journey times and inconvenience for motorists and the suggestion to close Nightingale Walk to motor traffic.

Increased journey times / inconvenience

We acknowledge that restrictions will inconvenience some motorists. However, we need to balance this inconvenience against the wider benefits that schemes such as the Quietways can deliver, both in this location and along the route as a whole.

Our proposal (including the realigned crossing and the banned turns) has been assessed using our strategic traffic modelling software, along with other Quietway proposals in the Clapham Common area. Overall, the modelling indicates that during the morning and evening peak traffic periods, our proposal will have a minimal impact on traffic flow and the change in journey times within the local area is unlikely be noticeable.

Closing Nightingale Walk to motor traffic

Some respondents suggested closing Nightingale walk to through motor traffic or to all motor traffic.

The carriageway on Nightingale Walk is not wide enough to allow a northbound vehicle to easily turn around if the access to the Avenue was closed entirely and a turning area would need to be provided. This would require removing the existing footways on Nightingale Walk or taking green space from the Common. Allowing vehicles to turn left out of Nightingale Walk onto The Avenue ensures that the amount of pedestrian and green space is not reduced.

Safety

There were 15 respondents who made a comment about safety. Safety is the primary barrier to people taking up cycling, or increasing the amount of cycling they already do. A signalised toucan crossing is the safest option to allow cyclists and pedestrians to cross The Avenue and connects the shared paths through Clapham Common with the on-road section of Quietway 5.

The current signalised pedestrian crossing is not located along the key desire line for pedestrians and cyclists travelling to and from Nightingale Walk and Clapham Common. Retaining the crossing in the existing location would require cyclists to travel along the existing narrow footways on either side of The Avenue. This would create more conflicts with pedestrian walking along The Avenue and entering / exiting the Common. Realigning the crossing directly opposite the entrance to Clapham Common reduces the number of movements that cyclists and pedestrians have to make to cross the Avenue and provides more waiting space on either side of the crossing.

The banned movements will also make Nightingale Walk quieter and more attractive for cyclists riding within the carriageway. The London Borough of Wandsworth is

18 proposing wayfinding symbols on Nightingale Walk rather than segregation or formal cycling facilities. Due to the reduction in traffic volumes on Nightingale Walk, cycling on the carriageway will be a safe and attractive option for all types of cyclists using the Quietway.

Cycling and pedestrian facilities

There were 14 respondents who made a comment about the cycling facilities in the scheme, including the pedestrian / cycle crossing and shared use space.

Alternative crossing facilities and options

The Avenue is part of the South Circular Road and is a major arterial route across South London. A signalised crossing is not only the safest crossing option for cyclists and pedestrians but also enables TfL to monitor, adjust, and maintain traffic flow along the South Circular as part of our Urban Traffic Control (UTC) system. The waiting period can be monitored and adjusted to ensure that all users (including motorists, pedestrians and cyclists) are not unnecessarily delayed. An unsignalised crossing point in this location would not offer the same safety benefits and may result in increased delays to traffic on The Avenue.

Alternative segregated crossing options (such as a Tiger crossing) are not appropriate in this instance as there are shared use facilities on both sides of The Avenue. A segregated crossing is likely to cause more conflict as cyclists and pedestrians would be required to re-join the shared use path within a relatively small section of footway.

Pedestrian / cycle crossing: location

The current signalised pedestrian crossing is not located along the key desire line for pedestrians and cyclists travelling to and from Nightingale Walk and Clapham Common. As a pedestrian crossing, cyclists are not currently legally allowed to use the crossing to cross The Avenue. As a result, the crossing needs to be upgraded to accommodate cyclists.

Pedestrian / cycle crossing: kerb extension

A shared pedestrian and cyclist (Toucan) crossing is required to be a minimum of 4 metres wide to provide adequate space for pedestrians and cyclist to safely and quickly use the crossing. The existing kerb on Nightingale Walk needs to be extended to accommodate the 4m wide crossing. Since this reduces the width of entry to Nightingale Walk, vehicles cannot safely turn into the road, and the left and right-turn movements from The Avenue are required to be banned.

As explained under ‘Safety’, retaining the crossing in the existing location would mean cyclists having to use the existing narrow footways either side of the Avenue.

The relocation of the crossing also means that vehicles turning right out of Nightingale Walk would not have adequate turning space or time to safely stop and wait at the signalised crossing without blocking the westbound lane of The Avenue. As a result, this movement is also required to be banned.

Shared use space

Some respondents raised a concern about providing shared use space as part of the scheme.

The paths through Clapham Common on either side of the toucan crossing will be shared paths with pedestrians and cyclists using the same space. Given the limited area available for pedestrians and cyclists at the crossing, we consider shared use space to be an appropriate measure here, allowing the predicted number of pedestrians and cyclists to use the crossing safely.

Our design includes shared use symbols on the footway and signage on poles and bollards to indicate to pedestrians and cyclists the extent of the shared use space on The Avenue. These measures will ensure that the shared use space is clearly indicated to all users and will be consistent with other toucan crossings on the TLRN (Transport for London Road Network).

We recognise that some cyclists break the law to avoid the dangers of motor traffic. However, we anticipate that providing safe space for cyclists will discourage people from riding on pavements. Providing safe space for cyclists can also help other road users by letting them know where to expect high volumes of cyclists.

Demand and justification

There were 12 respondents who made a comment about the demand and justification for the scheme, and who it would benefit, including comments that the scheme was unnecessary. The Quietways aim to overcome barriers to cycling. This proposal also provides significant benefits for pedestrians. The relocated crossing will improve connectivity for cyclists and pedestrians travelling to / from Clapham Common. The changes improve the safety of cyclists and pedestrians by reducing the temptation to cross away from marked crossings. We will install pedestrian countdown technology at the new crossing to advise pedestrians how long they have to cross.

The number of people cycling in London has increased dramatically over the last ten years. According to the 2011 Census, Wandsworth has the fifth-highest cycling mode share in London for journeys to work – 7.9%, an increase from 4.2% in the

2001 census. This mode share is higher than the average of 7.2% for all inner London boroughs. Overall, cycling makes up 4% of all journeys within Wandsworth – a comparable proportion to other inner London boroughs. We want to continue to support this growth by providing more cycle routes and removing barriers to cycling across London. Whilst the schemes on Quietways are focused on improving provision for cycling, all road users (including pedestrian, motorists and buses) are considered. This scheme balances the needs of all users, while ensuring that the most vulnerable road users (pedestrians and cyclists) are provided with safe facilities.

Cyclist behaviour

There were 10 respondents who expressed concerns about cyclists’ behaviour and speed and the potential for conflicts between pedestrians and cyclists.

Cyclist behaviour and speed

We acknowledge concerns raised about cyclist behaviour although our research shows that most cyclists ride responsibly, and that cyclists are no more likely to disobey road rules than other road users.

We promote adherence to the Highway Code by all road users and encourage responsible cycling and mutual respect between cyclists and other road users. We work to eliminate offences such as jumping red lights, cycling on the pavement and cycling at night without lights. We do this using police enforcement and education programmes, as well as thorough marketing and engagement campaigns.

Local impacts

Eight respondents made a comment about the impact on residents, road users and other people using the area or raised concern about potential impacts on Clapham Common or air pollution.

Impact of proposals on Clapham Common

The proposed crossing on The Avenue is part of the Quietway 5 route through Clapham Common. The London Boroughs of Lambeth and Wandsworth are supporting TfL in the design, consultation and implementation of Quietway 5.

Our proposal has been designed so that it provides for the new Quietway route, while retaining the existing access to the Common for all users and minimising any impact on the Common. The relocated crossing will provide more direct access to the Common for both pedestrians and cyclists by aligning the crossing with the

21 existing footpath. This avoids the need to realign the footpath to match the existing crossing point, which would reduce the amount of green space, and disturb the sensitive ecological environment of the Common.

Air pollution

Some respondents raised a concern about air pollution. Our data on the current volumes of traffic suggests that there would not be a noticeable increase in congestion and consequent air pollution. Additionally, Quietways also provide the opportunity to make streets and neighbourhoods safer and more pleasant for everyone by reducing the dominance of motor traffic, improving air quality and investing in the urban realm.

Appendix B – Copy of the consultation letter

Appendix C – Leaflet distribution area

Appendix D – Copy of stakeholder email Dear Stakeholder,

As part of Quietway 5, a route is planned connecting Waterloo and Croydon. We have today launched two consultations on proposed changes where Quietway 5 would cross the Transport for London Road Network.

A24 Balham Hill / Malwood Road / Cathles Road Key changes proposed include:  A new signalised junction with pedestrian crossings on all arms at Balham Hill  Removing the existing signalised junction  Left turn only for motor vehicles exiting Malwood Road and Cathles Road

Other proposals include changes to parking bay provision and the relocation of bus stop Cathles Road – Stop SR, 55 metres south to a new position south of Hillgate Place. To find out more and have your say on the proposals please visit https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/cycling/balham-hill

A205 The Avenue and Nightingale Walk Key changes proposed include:  A new shared Toucan crossing facility for pedestrians and cyclists  Existing Pelican crossing removed  No entry into or right turn out of Nightingale Walk

To find out more and have your say on the proposals please visit https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/cycling/nightingale-walk

Subject to the outcome of consultation, we plan to start construction in summer 2016.

The deadline for comments is Wednesday 3 February 2016.

Yours faithfully,

Matthew Moore Consultation Team Transport for London

Appendix E – List of stakeholders consulted

London Omnibus Traction Society 3663 First for Foodservice AA British Cycling AA Motoring Trust British Land Abellio British Medical Association Action for Blind People British Motorcycle Federation Action on Hearing Loss (RNID) British Retail Association Age Concern London British School of Cycling Age UK BT Bucks Cycle Training Alive in Space Landscape and Urban Design StudioThe Expeditional All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group Buzzlines, Anderson Travel Ltd, CABE - Design Council APC-Overnight Camden Council Arriva Camden Town Unlimited Asian Peoples Disabilities Alliance Campaign for Better Transport Association of British Drivers Campbell's Association of Car Fleet Operators Canal & River Trust London Capital City School Sport Partnership Association of Town Centre Management Carousel Buses Ltd Superdrug CBI Abbey Travel Centaur Overland Travel Ltd, Baker Street Quarter Central London Cab Trade Section Bankside Residents' Forum Central London Forward Barking and Dagenham Central London Freight Quality Partnership Battersea Society Central London NHS Trust Bayswater BID Centre for Accessible Environments Best Bike Training //Cycletastic Chalkwell Garage & Coach Hire Ltd, Better Bankside Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport Better Transport City Bikes (Vauxhall Walk) Bexley Accessible Transport Scheme, City link Bexley Council Clapham Society Bexleyheath BID Clapham Transport Users' Group bhs bikeability Cobra Corporate Servics Ltd, bidvest logistics Community Transport Association bikeworks Confederation of Passenger Transport bikeXcite Covent Garden Market Authority Blue Triangle Buses Ltd, Cross River Partnership Borough Cycling Officers Group Coaches Excetera Breakspears Road Project Hackney Community Transport Brentwood Community Transport, CTC Brewery Logistics Group Cycle Confidence Cycle Experience

Cycle Newham Guide Dogs for the Blind Association Cycle Systems Hainault Business Park Cycle Training UK (CTUK) HammersmithLondon Cyclelyn Health Poverty Action Cycle-wise Thames Valley Heart of London Business Alliance Cycling Embassy of Great Britain Hermes Europe Cycling Tuition Herne Hill Forum cycling4all Hillingdon Council Cyclists in the City House of Commons Department for Transport Quality Line Design for London IBM DHL Ilford Town BID Disability Alliance Inclusion London Disabled Persons Transport Advisory CommitteeIndependent Disability Advisory Group Clarkes of London Independent Shoreditch Ealing Broadway BID Inmidtown Ealing Council Institute for Sustainability East and South East London Thames GatewayInstitute Transport of Advanced Partnership Motorists Polestar Travel Institution of Civil Engineers ECESurface TEAM inStreatham EDF Energy Snowdrop Coaches Edgware Road Partnership Bikeability Enfield Council The Little Bus Company, English Heritage Joint Committee on Mobility of Blind and Partially Sighted People (JCMBPS) Ensign Bus Company Ltd, Joint Mobility Unit Eurostar Group Keltbray ltd (construction) Evolution Cycle Training Kimpton Industrial Park (Sutton) Express Network Forum Representatitive fromKing's (Robin College Parr-Davis Hospital will coNHS-ordinate Foundation Trust response) Kingston First Federation of Small Businesses laing o'rourke First Beeline Buses Ltd, Lambeth Cyclists Fitzrovia Partnership Lambeth Safer Transport Team Freight Transport Association Lambeth Traffic and Transport Working Group Friends of the Earth London Cycling Campaign Future Inclusion Leonard Cheshire Disability Garratt Business Park (Earlsfield) Lewisham Council Gatwick Flyer Ltd, Licenced Taxi Drivers Association GLA Strategy Access Panel members Licensed Private Hire Car Association (LPHCA) Go-Coach Hire Ltd Line Line Coaches (TGM) Golden Tours (Transport) Ltd, Living Streets Greater London Authority Local Government Ombudsman Greater London Forum for Older People London ambulance Service London Bike Hub Greater London Forum for the Elderly London borough of Lambeth Green Flag Group London Borough of Wandsworth Green Urban Transport Ltd, London Cab Drivers' Club Ltd

London Central Cab Section Northbank Guild London Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI)Ocean Youth Connexions London City Airport Olympian Coaches, London Climate Change Partnership On Your Bike Cycle Training London Councils Organisation of Blind Afro Caribbeans (OBAC) London Duck Tours Ltd Orpington 1st Oxford Tube (Thames Transit), London European Partnership for Transport Parcel Force London fire and Emergency Authority Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS) London Fire Brigade Passenger Focus London First philip kemp cycle training London General Planning Design London Mencap Meridian Duck Tours London Older People's Strategy Group Port of London Authority London Private Hire Board London Riverside (Rainham) Premium Coaches Ltd, London Strategic Health Authority Private Hire Board London Suburban Taxi Drivers' Coalition Purple Parking Ltd, London Taxi Drivers' Club Putney Society London Tourist Coach Operators Association (LTCOA)Putney Town Centre Manager London TravelWatch Putney Traffic Transport and Parking Working Group London Underground Puzzle Focus Ltd London United Busways Ltd, Queen Mary University of London London Visual Impairment Forum Hearn's Coaches, LoveWimbledon BID RAC Marshalls Coaches, RAC Foundation for Motoring Merton Council Raynes Park & West Barnes Residents' Association Metrobus Ltd Red Rose Travel Metroline Ltd Redbridge Cycling Centre Metropolitan Police Service Redwing Coaches (Pullmanor Ltd), MIND Reliance Travel, Mobile Cycle Training Service Reynolds Diplomat Coaches Mode Transport Richmond Council Motorcycle Action Group RNIB Motorcycle Action Group (MAG) RNID (Royal National Institute for Deaf People) Motorcycle Industry Association Road Danger Reduction Forum Mullany's Coaches, Road Haulage Association National Autistic Society Roadpeace National Children's Bureau Royal Institute of British Architects National Express Ltd Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors National Grid Royal London Society for Blind People National Motorcycle Council Royal Mail New Addington BID Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) New West End Company (NWEC) Sainsbury's Supermarkets NHS Care Commissioning Group Red Eagle NHS London SCOPE

Sense The Road Haulage Assoc. Ltd. Sixty Plus The Royal Parks South Bucks CycleTraining The Southwark Cyclists South East London PCT Thomas's London Day Schools (Transport) Ltd South Herts Plus Cycle Training South London Business Forum Time for Twickenham South London Partnership TNT Southbank Employers Group Tower Transit Operations Ltd, Southdown PSV Ltd, Trade Team Southgate & Finchley Coaches Ltd Trailblazers, Muscular Dystrophy UK Southwark Cyclists Transport for All Space syntax Tyssen Community School Cycle Training Spokes Cycling Instruction UK Power Networks STA Bikes Ltd. University College London Stratford Renaissance Partnership University of Westminster Streatham Vale Property Occupiers Associationuno, Stroke Association UPS Successful Sutton Urban Movement Sullivan Bus and Coach Ltd Vandome Cycles Sunwin Service Group Vauxhall Gardens Estate Tenants & Residents Association Sustrans Vauxhall One BID Sutton Centre for the Voluntary Sector Victoria BID Taxi Rank & Interchange Manager Virtual Norwood Forum Team London Bridge Vision Impairment Forum Technicolour Tyre Company Walk London Wandsworth - London Cycling Campaign Terravision Transport Ltd / Stansted Transport Ltd, Wandsworth Access Association TGM Group Ltd Wandsworth Cycling Thames Water Wandsworth mobility forum Thamesmead Business Services Wandsworth Safer Transport Team The Automobile Association Waterloo Quarter The Big Bus Company Ltd, Westminster Council The British Dyslexia Association Westminster Cyclists The British Motorcyclists' Federation Wheels for Wellbeing The City of Oxford Motor Services Ltd, Whizz-Kidz The Ghost Bus Tours Ltd Willow Lane Trading Estate (Merton) The Kings Ferry Ltd, Wilsons Cycles The Licensed Taxi Drivers' Association Wincanton Yodel The Original London Sightseeing Tour /London Pride Sightseeing Ltd, Young Lewisham and Greenwich Cyclists