DOCSLIB.ORG

Building the Homes We Need a Programme for the 2015 Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building the Homes We Need a Programme for the 2015 Government Building the homes we need A PROGRAMME FOR THE 2015 GOVERNMENT kpmg.co.uk ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is the result of a year-long joint project by KPMG in the UK and Shelter to contribute to the crucial national debate on the housing shortage. In October 2013 we published an interim report which summarised our findings from a series of roundtables in the West Midlands, and several other subsequent roundtable discussions. We have now supplemented our findings from the West Midlands with expert input from the UK and abroad, and with a series of commissioned technical research reports led by Capital Economics, Europe Economics and IPPR, to develop a comprehensive package of solutions to the housing shortage. Report authors: Pete Jefferys, Toby Lloyd, Andy Argyle, Joe Sarling, Jan Crosby, John Bibby. KPMG and Shelter project teams: Steve Akehurst, Thomas McCarthy, Sorrelle Cooper, Marianne Fallon, Roger Harding, Liz Hickson, Arthur Hook, Ian Joynson, Markus Korner, Andrew Nolan, Campbell Robb, Lizzie Russell, Zoe Sheppard, Isabel Thompson and Clare Woodham. We would also like to thank everybody who organised and participated in open and candid discussions at roundtables and other meetings, and all those who commented on draft versions of the report. © 2014 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Contents Foreword: An open letter to the Party Leaders 2 Executive summary 5 Part I: The housing shortage and its impacts 18 - Current impacts of the housing shortage 22 - What will happen if we take no further action? 28 Part II: England’s broken supply system 32 -The land supply system 32 -The house building sector 42 - Public investment 45 - Building local consensus 48 Part III: The solutions 50 - Land market reform 51 - A more diverse and resilient developer market 64 - Investment in affordable homes 72 - Strategic local leadership 82 Part IV: A programme for government 90 -The new housing principles our country needs 92 -The programme to kick start a long-term change 94 Conclusion 102 Appendix 1: Summary of evidence 104 Appendix 2: Assumptions for KPMG/Shelter housing programme illustrations 106 Building the homes we need | A programme for the 2015 government | 1 © 2014 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Foreword Executive summary Part I: The housing shortage and its impacts Part II: England’s broken supply system Part III: The solutions Part IV: A programme for government Conclusion Appendices Recommendations in this report Area for reform Policy recommendations Vision Land Market 1. Introduce “new homes Zones” Our vision is for a land supply system that 2. Incentivise the use of stalled sites is transparent, efficient and stable and 3. Build new Garden Cities most importantly provides much more land at lower prices 4. Open up the land market with far more data House 5. help local builders access finance Our vision is for a house building sector building 6. Prioritise stable house prices to help with many more local builders and more market SME builders innovative models of development such 7. Provide land for custom build as custom build. We need the big players running at full throttle, but alone they won’t 8. Level the playing field for builders with be able to solve the housing shortage. We national space standards need to help local builders thrive once more and new builders join the market. Affordable 9. Boost public and private investment in Our vision is for an affordable housing housing affordable homes sector that’s well funded, has a variety investment 10. Set up a National Housing Investment of developers and produces high quality Bank and use public land in joint homes for a wide range of income groups, ventures including social rented homes for those on low incomes and shared ownership 11. Raise borrowing caps on local authority homes for middle earners. building Strategic local 12. Put housing at the heart of new City Our vision is for cities and towns which leadership Deals plan strategically: linking jobs, services, 13. A ssess housing needs across local transport and homes. Local leadership will authority boundaries be vital to get us building the new places 14. Integrate major new infrastructure with we need. new homes 15. Increase flexibility to make green belt swaps 2 | Building the homes we need | A programme for the 2015 government © 2014 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Foreword Executive summary Part I: The housing shortage and its impacts Part II: England’s broken supply system Part III: The solutions Part IV: A programme for government Conclusion Appendices Dear David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband, Everyone now accepts that we have a desperate housing shortage in England. Each year we build 100,000 fewer homes than we need, adding to a shortage that has been growing for decades.What’s more our current house building system seems incapable of delivering growth on the scale required. Growing demand means that without a step change in supply we will be locked into a spiral of increasing house prices and rents – making the current housing crisis worse. Despite modest efforts to improve supply over many years, there has been no comprehensive plan to get us rapidly building the homes the country needs. If the next government shies away from showing the strong leadership needed, having a home of your own to rent or buy affordably will become a distant dream for an increasing number of people in this country. Rents will rise and homelessness will increase. The economic recovery will be held back by high housing costs, an immobile workforce and unstable housing markets. In short, the country needs a serious plan to transform housing supply. One that faces up to tough choices, but also sets a new tone for political generations to come – and all parties need to sign up to it. Solving this problem will take leadership and vision from across the political spectrum at local and national level. All Parties share responsibility for the housing shortage, and all must commit to ending it. KPMG and Shelter have put together a comprehensive, visionary programme for the next government to get the country building the homes it needs. Taking steps to lower the cost of land for development will reduce the profits made by some land owners, but allow better homes to be built and stimulate a new wave of SME builders who have been squeezed out of the market. Increasing investment to build genuinely affordable homes will mean tough fiscal choices, but reducing the cost of housing will also cut the welfare bill. Introducing new taxes on unused housing land and empty homes will be unpopular with some, but it will get development moving on stalled sites. There are no easy solutions or silver bullets. Coherent and co-ordinated action is needed at each stage of the development process, to deliver a new vision in the way that housing is provided in England. This report has been written through close collaboration between housing policy, financial and housing market experts in KPMG and Shelter. It draws on a wide range of expertise and new research to address the problems and propose solutions. We are confident that our programme will create the new generation of homes which are so desperately needed. We look for ward to working with you to deliver it. Marianne Fallon Campbell Robb – Uk head of corporate Affairs, – ceo, KPMG in the UK Shelter Building the homes we need | A programme for the 2015 government | 3 © 2014 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Foreword Executive summary Part I: The housing shortage and its impacts Part II: England’s broken supply system Part III: The solutions Part IV: A programme for government Conclusion Appendices Executive Summary The housing shortage and its implications We need to build more homes in England.1 With rents and house prices rising, a great many are struggling and many more are worrying where their children and grandchildren will be able to live. Across England, a quarter of adults under the age of 35 are living in their childhood bedroom.2 If we do not take firm action to build more homes there will be very worrying consequences for our economy and society. The impacts will be felt in rising homelessness, stalled social mobility, declining pension saving and an ever rising benefit bill. High house prices and often unaffordable private rented housing is already impacting the country’s competitiveness, particularly given that migration to the job market in London and the South East is increasing, but it is this market that has the highest housing costs.3 Changing demographics mean we need to build a minimum of 250,000 new homes per year in England to meet rising demand. Last year, we built just 110,000. But the housing shortage is not a new phenomenon: successive governments have failed to get us building at the rate we once did, and no party has yet presented a credible plan to fill that gap.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Guide to Construction Arbitration
    Global Arbitration Review The Guide to Construction Arbitration General Editors Stavros Brekoulakis and David Brynmor Thomas QC Third Edition © Law Business Research The Guide to Construction Arbitration Third Edition Editors Stavros Brekoulakis and David Brynmor Thomas QC Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd This article was first published in October 2019 For further information please contact [email protected] arg © Law Business Research Publisher David Samuels Account Manager Bevan Woodhouse Editorial Coordinator Hannah Higgins Head of Production Adam Myers Deputy Head of Production Simon Busby Copy-editor Claire Ancell Proofreader Rakesh Rajani Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, Meridian House, 34-35 Farringdon Street, London EC4A 4HL, UK © 2019 Law Business Research Ltd www.globalarbitrationreview.com No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided is accurate as of September 2019, be advised that this is a developing area. Enquiries concerning reproduction should be sent to Law Business Research, at the address above. Enquiries concerning editorial content should be directed
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF (2.8
    Rebalancing A Roadmap for Economic Recovery EDITORS Hamid Faruqee and Krishna Srinivasan INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution © 2013 International Monetary Fund Cataloging-in-Publication Joint Bank-Fund Library Global rebalancing : a roadmap for economic recovery/ editors, Hamid Faruqee and Krishna Srinivasan. — Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2013. ix, 159 p. : ill. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Economic policy. 2. Economic development. 3. Financial crises — Prevention. 4. Equilibrium (Economics). 5. Balance of trade. 6. Debts, External. I. Faruqee, Hamid. II. Srinivasan, Krishna, 1965– . III. International Monetary Fund. HD87.G56 2013 ISBN: 978-1-47557-366-4 (paper) 978-1-47557-827-0 (ePub) 978-1-47559-164-4 (Mobipocket) 978-1-47554-877-8 (PDF) Disclaimer: The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and should not be reported as or attributed to the International Monetary Fund, its Executive Board, or the governments of any of its members. Please send orders to: International Monetary Fund, Publication Services P.O. Box 92780, Washington, D.C. 20090, U.S.A. Tel.: (202) 623-7430 Fax: (202) 623-7201 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.elibrary.imf.org www.imfbookstore.org ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution Contents Foreword v Acknowledgments vii PART I A FRAMEWORK FOR REBALANCING AND RECOVERY ..................1 1 The Global Crisis and Imbalances .............................................................................3 Hamid Faruqee and Krishna Srinivasan 2 (Why) Should Current Account Balances Be Reduced? ....................................9 Olivier Blanchard and Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti PART II IMBALANCES IN MAJOR DEFICIT ECONOMIES ...........................19 3 The United States: Resolving “Twin” Deficits ......................................................21 Vladimir Klyuev 4 The United Kingdom: Imbalances and the Financial Sector ........................39 Shaun K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eurozone: Piecemeal Approach to an Optimum Currency Area
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Handler, Heinz Working Paper The Eurozone: Piecemeal Approach to an Optimum Currency Area WIFO Working Papers, No. 446 Provided in Cooperation with: Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Vienna Suggested Citation: Handler, Heinz (2013) : The Eurozone: Piecemeal Approach to an Optimum Currency Area, WIFO Working Papers, No. 446, Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Vienna This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/128970 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ÖSTERREICHISCHES INSTITUT FÜR WIRTSCHAFTSFORSCHUNG WORKING PAPERS The Eurozone: Piecemeal Approach to an Optimum Currency Area Heinz Handler 446/2013 The Eurozone: Piecemeal Approach to an Optimum Currency Area Heinz Handler WIFO Working Papers, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Employers and Other Organisations Involved in Trailblazers
    Employers and other Organisations Involved in Trailblazers Accountancy – Led by organisations including Baker Tilly, BDO, Costain, Dains, Deloitte, Government Finance Profession, , Ernst & Young, Flemmings, Grant Thornton, Hall and Woodhouse, Harvey & Son, Hazlewoods LLP, Health Education East of England, Kingston Smith, KPMG, Lentells Chartered Accountants, London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, NHS Employers, PwC, Solid State Solutions and Warrington and Halton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust with the Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT), Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). This has developed standards for Professional Accounting Technician and Professional Accountant. Accountancy (Phase 4) – Led by organisations including Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Selby Jones Ltd; Shapcotts; Skills for Health Academy (North West); Bibby Ship Management; Jackson Stephen LLP; HFMA; Civil Service; Spofforths LLP; Norse Commercial Services Ltd; Norbert Dentressangle; Charles Wells Limited; TaxAssist Accountants; Mazars; Armstrong Watson; MHA Bloomer Heaven developing standards for Assistant Accountant. Actuarial –Led by organisations including Aon Hewitt, Barnett Waddingham, Grant Thornton, KPMG, Mercer, Munich Re, PwC and RSA with the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. This has developed a standard for Actuarial Technician. Adult Care – Led by organisations including Barchester Healthcare, Caretech Community Services, Creative Support, Hand in Hands, Hendra Health Care (Ludlow), Hertfordshire County Council, Housing and Care 21, Oxfordshire County Council, Progressive Care, Surrey County Council, West England Centre for Inclusive Living, Woodford Homecare. This will develop the standards for Lead Practitioner in Adult Care, and Leader/Manager in Adult Care.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Certification Authority for Reinforcing Steels
    Pembroke House, 21 Pembroke Road UK Certification Sevenoaks, Kent, TN13 1XR Tel: 00 44 1732 450000 Authority for Fax: 00 44 1732 455917 Reinforcing Steels Email : [email protected] Website: www.ukcares.com Tel: 01732 450000 Ref.: CC7619LB 31 October 2013 TO ALL SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONALS CARES Sustainability Scheme enables sustainable procurement and construction The rapidly increasing demand for greener buildings and infrastructure provides both challenges and opportunities in relation to the structural materials used, especially reinforcing steel. Accurate, accessible and timely information on the environmental and social impact of using different materials is increasingly important for designers, contractors and procurers to satisfy green building rating systems. These systems award credits based on the environmental impact of materials and for materials responsibly sourced, aiming to encourage the use of materials with lower environmental impacts over their lifecycle, and to recognize and encourage the specification of responsibly sourced structural materials. The CARES Sustainability Scheme provides a means by which approved firms in the reinforcing steel supply chain are able to declare product and organisational level sustainability performance, and achieve credits in the green building rating systems such as BREEAM and LEED. BREEAM is the UK’s most prominent green building rating system. The CARES Sustainability Scheme has been assessed, by BRE Global, against the requirements for responsible sourcing credits within BREEAM New Construction 2011 and has achieved entry into Tier 4 of Table 10- 2 in the Mat 03 issue [Responsible sourcing of materials]. The key features and benefits of the CARES Sustainability Scheme are summarised as follows, with further details and endorsements of the Scheme available on the CARES website, www.ukcares.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfson Economics Prize 2014
    WOLFSON ECONOMICS PRIZE 2014 Charthills Green – a Garden City in the Garden of England. Chris Blundell Final submission, August 2014 0 © Charthills Green Ltd Photograph taken by author in area adjoining proposed development of SE Maidstone Garden City: Wolfson Economics Prize MMXIV Secondary Submission: Chris Blundell Contents Tables ............................................................................................................................ iii Figures ............................................................................................................................ iv Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. vi 1. Non-Technical Summary .............................................................................................. 2 2. Introduction. ................................................................................................................ 10 3. Preparing for the garden city of the future. .............................................................. 14 3.1. The need for new solutions. .............................................................................. 14 3.2. Garden City principles revisited......................................................................... 14 3.3. Selecting the right location for a new garden city. ............................................. 15 3.4. Understanding the drivers and the markets ...................................................... 16 3.5. Creating places
    [Show full text]
  • Led by Organisations Including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, WM Perry
    Abattoir, Red Meat Slaughter And Primary Processing – Led by organisations including ABP, Dunbia, Tulip, Dawn Meats, W M Perry Ltd, C H Rowley Ltd, Peter Coates (Alrewas) Ltd, JA Jewett (Meat) Ltd, BW & JD Glaves & Sons Ltd, Euro Quality Lambs Ltd, A Wright & Son, Fowler Bros Ltd, C Brumpton Ltd Accountancy – Led by organisations including Baker Tilly, BDO, Costain, Dains, Deloitte, Government Finance Profession , Ernst & Young, Flemmings, Grant Thornton, Hall and Woodhouse, Harvey & Son, Hazlewoods LLP, Health Education East of England, Kingston Smith, KPMG, Lentells Chartered Accountants, London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, NHS Employers, PwC, Solid State Solutions and Warrington and Halton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust with the Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT), Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). Accountancy (Phase 4) – Led by organisations including Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Selby Jones Ltd, Shapcotts, Skills for Health Academy (North West), Bibby Ship Management, Jackson Stephen LLP, HFMA, Civil Service, Spofforths LLP, Norse Commercial Services Ltd, Norbert Dentressangle, Charles Wells Limited, TaxAssist Accountants, Mazars, Armstrong Watson, MHA Bloomer Heaven. Actuarial – Led by organisations including Aon Hewitt, Barnett Waddingham, Grant Thornton, KPMG, Mercer, Munich Re, PwC and RSA with the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. Adult Care – Led by organisations including Barchester Healthcare, Caretech Community Services, Creative Support, Hand in Hands, Hendra Health Care (Ludlow), Hertfordshire County Council, Housing and Care 21, Oxfordshire County Council, Progressive Care, Surrey County Council, West England Centre for Inclusive Living, Woodford Homecare.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Newsletter
    Construction update Newsletter Issue 2 2015 Welcome to issue 2 of the 2015 QBE Construction Newsletter With summer here and temperatures Solar radiation set to rise in certain areas of the Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the UK with just under 116,000 cases diagnosed annually. Construction workers are country employers need to be aware the most-at-risk group for this type of cancer. The construction of the effects of solar radiation, industry accounts for 55% of all skin cancer registrations and 58% particularly on a workforce that is of all skin cancer related deaths. Where outdoor tasks cannot be eliminated, it is important to exposed throughout the working minimise the risk to the worker. day. We take a look at some of the What employers can do: measures you can implement to • Educate workers on the dangers of the sun protect your workforce. • In situations where it is not possible to avoid people working in direct sunlight and shade cannot be provided, consider rotating There is good news for the UK construction sector with research workers to minimise potential exposure to direct sunlight forecasting that output will rise by 15% over the next nine months, Ensure workers on site are not working topless. Clothing although capacity is already stretched in London and we are • designed for work outdoors in sunny, hot weather should be seeing an increase in local labour costs as a result. worn. The clothing should be quick drying, high wicking and Apprenticeships are to be given the same legal status as university have a UV protection rating of 30+ degrees in a move by the government which they hope will drive • Hats and neck covers should always be worn.
    [Show full text]
  • Currency Wars, Recession Policies and the Overvalued Euro Are to Be Blamed for the Modern Greek Tragedy
    International Journal in Economics and Business Administration Volume IV, Issue 1, 2016 pp. 3 - 19 Currency Wars, Recession Policies and the Overvalued Euro are to be Blamed for the Modern Greek Tragedy Theodore Katsanevas* Abstract: In this paper we argue that, Modern Greek Tragedy is mainly due to the overvalued euro in combination with the strict austerity policies imposed by Berlin. Greece also pays the price of the currency war between the dollar and the euro. The latter puts a heavy burden upon the country’s economic competitiveness as a costume that does not fit the Greek economy, which is mainly based on tourism that requires a labour-intensive production process. The deadlocks of strict monetary and income’s policies, accelerates the upcoming economic thunderstorm, the spiral of recession, the increase in unemployment, the brutal reduction of wages and pensions, the further fall of GDP and the increase of the debt. The always renewed fatal economic forecasts, simply postpone the explosion of the deadlock. Basic economics in theory and in practice are being depreciated. One wonders if there are economists, neoliberals, not to mention, Keynesians and/or radicals that, may support the possibility of an economic recovery under deep recession policies and the existence of a hard currency such as the euro. Trapped under the Berlin’s political prison and the euro zone fetish, Greece continues to follow its tragic road on the grounds that there is no alternative. Yet, in democracies there are no dead ends. If an economic policy is proven to be wrong and catastrophic, the best alternative is to change it.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital-Economics-Border-Adjustment
    Capital Economics is a leading independent international macro-economic research consultancy, providing research on Europe, the Middle East, United States, Canada, Africa, Asia and Australasia, Latin America and the United Kingdom, as well as analysis of financial markets, commodities and the consumer and property sectors. Founded in 1999 by reputed City of London economist Roger Bootle, we have gained an enviable reputation for original and insightful research and have built up a wide and distinguished client base. We undertake bespoke research projects commissioned by companies, government agencies and trade associations. We have helped our clients to produce substantial and detailed research, present to investors and shareholders and lobby government bodies. Our independent reports are used to plan for the future, influence internal business decisions and shape public opinion. In addition, we produce publications for world-wide distribution and offer support to clients in their respective time-zones through our offices in London, New York, Toronto, Singapore and Sydney. Over 1,500 institutions across the globe, ranging from some of the world’s largest banks to boutique property investors, subscribe to our publication packages, or are clients of our consultancy service. They include government bodies, trade associations, political parties, multinational mining and extractive industry companies, global banks, hedge funds, stockbrokers, retailers, property developers, construction companies, building societies and specialist lenders. We are our clients’ outsourced economic advisers. In addition to regular media accolades for economic forecasting, in 2012 a team from Capital Economics, led by Roger Bootle, won the £250,000 Wolfson Economics Prize. Acknowledgements: We wish to acknowledge and thank those individuals and their associated companies, organisations and academic institutions that gave their time to help provide information used in this report and without which it would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurozone Groupthink and Denial on a Grand Scale
    World Economic Review Eurozone Groupthink and Denial on a Grand Scale William Mitchell1 University of Newcastle, Australia 1. Introduction Thrall … slavery, bondage … a state of servitude or submission (Merriam Webster online dictionary). Groupthink … a pattern of thought characterized by self deception, forced manufacture of consent, and conformity to group values and ethic (Merriam Webster online dictionary). This paper is drawn from Mitchell (2015), which traced the origins of the Eurozone back to the desire in the immediate post-World War II period to end the destructive Franco-German rivalry that had caused several major military conflicts, which culminated in German aggression in 1939. Against this background, Mitchell (2015) also examines the way in which the discussions of European economic integration, which had initially begun with the general context of a Keynesian approach to economic policymaking, were transformed by the emergence of Monetarism in the 1970s. The flawed design of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) that was finally agreed on and formulated in the Maastricht Treaty in 1991 reflected both these elements. The dysfunctional response to the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) is a direct result of the mistakes made in the lead up to Maastricht and reflect the dominance of what we might call neo-liberal Groupthink over sound macroeconomic management. The paper is laid out as follows: section 2 considers the path that the European Member States took on the way to establishing the EMU. It also documents examines the impact of the GFC and the policy response taken by the key institutions (European Commission (EC), the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which are collectively known as the ‘Troika’, given their role in the disastrous Greek bailout.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of the UK Housing Market
    An Analysis of Economic Factors Affecting First-Time Buyers; A case of the UK housing market. Jordan de Silva BA (Hons) Business and Management Studies with Finance Cardiff Metropolitan University May 2017 I Declaration ‘’I, Jordan de Silva declare that this Dissertation has not already been accepted in substance for any degree and is not currently submitted in candidature for any degree. It is the result of my own independent research except where otherwise stated’’ All sources have been acknowledged within the text, and a full reference list is appended. Signed: Jordan de Silva Date: 02 May 2017 II Abstract This dissertation presents a critical analysis of the key economic factors within the UK housing market, and how these affect first time buyer’s and their decision to invest. It looked at key macro-economic variables such as house prices, wages, inflation, interest, and mortgage availability to determine how these have changed over time and their subsequent effect on first time buyers. The main purpose of this dissertation was to determine the macro-economic factors that influence first time buyers the most, and how these have changed over time. The issue of the UK housing market, and how accessibility and affordability have all become much more difficult for first time buyers in recent years, is one that is regularly discussed in the media. This study looked to understand why and how accessibility has changed for first time buyers, and the key economic forces behind this. A whole generation of millennials have been aptly dubbed ‘generation rent’. This is due to a lack of house building, soaring private rents, and the increasingly stringent criteria set by mortgage lenders.
    [Show full text]