TOWN OF GRAFTON GRAFTON MEMORIAL MUNICIPAL CENTER 30 PROVIDENCE ROAD GRAFTON, MA 01519
Community Preservation Committee MEETING NOTICE/AGENDA REGULAR MEETING Thursday, March 25, 2021 7:00 p.m. Zoom Conference Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88252002399?pwd=Qzd4TFYvQzJpVHBTV3BJL2I1RjZzUT09 Passcode: 334927 Phone: 301-715-8592 Webinar ID: 882 5200 2399 Passcode: 334927 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kcBClScN5F
A copy of the Grafton PUBLIC MEETING REMOTE PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES is attached to this agenda for reference. Please review the guidelines prior to joining the remote public meeting.
1. Call to Order
2. Town Administrator Introduction
3. Treasurer’s Report
4. Clerk’s Report
5. Correspondence
6. Field Investigation/documentation of Invasive Aquatic Weed Infestation Project Proposal
7. Lions Club Dauphinais Park Rehabilitation Project Proposal
8. New England Village Park at Whitney Park Project Proposal
9. Sunset Provision Wording Decision
10. 2021 Spring Town Meeting Warrant Articles
11. Project Updates • Open Space and Recreation Plan • Institute Woods Trail Feasibility Study • Town Records Archival Project • Historic Gravestones • Grafton Common Restoration • Weights and Measures • Historical Resources Inventory • Lions Club Property Engineering Work • Lions Club Property Recreational Improvements • Cisco Homestead • Emergency Rental Assistance • Recreation ADA Projects
12. Adjournment
TOWN OF GRAFTON GRAFTON MEMORIAL MUNICIPAL CENTER 30 PROVIDENCE ROAD GRAFTON, MASSACHUSETTS 01519 (508) 839-5335 ext. 1120 FAX (508) 839-4602 [email protected] PLANNING www.grafton-ma.gov DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M TO: Board of Selectmen; Finance Committee; Community Preservation Committee FROM: Christopher McGoldrick, Town Planner CC: Evan Brassard, Town Administrator; Leah Cameron, Conservation Agent; Paul Cournoyer, DPW Director DATE: March 2, 2021 SUBJECT: Request to Reconsider – 46 Adams Road (Item #16 – Capital Plan) ______
This memo has been prepared in response to review of the proposed FY ’22 Capital Outlay, submitted to the Finance Committee for review on March 11, 2021. Specifically, this memo outlines a request to reconsider Item #16 – Repurposing of 46 Adams Road:
BACKGROUND On November 2, 2020, the Conservation Department submitted a Capital Improvement Program request for the repurposing of Town owned land located at 46 Adams Road. This request was prioritized as “Urgent” on the provided form. The request was for $55,500 related to the demolition of the existing barn structure with minor trailhead improvements, with $500 being provided through CPA funding.
On February 8, 2021, the Office of the Town Administrator issued its FY ’22 Capital Program Recommendation. Upon review by Conservation staff, it was noted that the 46 Adams Road request (Item #16) was not recommended for funding.
STAFF ANALYSIS & RECCOMENDATION The impetus for requesting the proposed Capital project stems from concerns regarding the safety and structural stability of the existing on-site structure as indicated by the Department of Public Works. Preliminary review by Planning & Conservation staff has led to our full support of DPW’s recommendation that the existing structure be demolished in order to remove the attractive nuisance of the existing structure and reduce the potential for Town liability in regards to the existing structure’s safety, security and potential unauthorized use of the facility. Minimal additional work to the property would then be required to improve existing site features to enhance access to nearby trails, converting the nuisance into a significant municipal amenity.
In consultation with the Interim Town Administrator, Carter Terenzini, potential budgetary adjustments included increasing total free cash dollars by $25k and reducing the contingency by $20k+/-. We defer to the Town Administrator, Select Board and Finance Committee if an appropriate funding solution may be achieved, and respectfully request reconsideration of this proposed project in the FY ’22 Capital Plan Outlay.
Request to Reconsider – 46 Adams Road (Item #16 – Capital Plan) March 2, 2021 Page 2 of 2 ______
We trust this memo clarifies the Planning Department’s request for reconsideration of Item #16 in the FY’22 Capital Plan Outlay. We are happy to address any portion of this memo which is unclear. Staff is available to attend meetings upon request.
Thank you. TOWN OF GRAFTON GRAFTON MEMORIAL MUNICIPAL CENTER 30 PROVIDENCE ROAD GRAFTON, MASSACHUSETTS 01519
COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
This packet contains all of the information an applicant needs to apply for Grafton’s Community Preservation Act (CPA) funding, including:
1. An explanation of the annual timeline for the Community Preservation Committee
2. Scoring Criteria
3. Instructions for submitting a full application Timeline
The Community Preservation Committee (CPC) will make recommendations for funding both at Annual Town Meeting which occurs in May, as well as Semi-Annual Town Meeting, which typically occurs in October. While applications are accepted throughout the year, the following timeline provides deadlines by which applications must be received and presented to the CPC in order to be included in each Town Meeting.
Timeline Step Approximate Timeline/Deadline Optional Grant writing Workshop Annually on First Thursday of November Applications must be received for Spring Town On or by February 1 Meeting Applications presented to CPC Annually on Fourth Thursday of March Optional Grant writing Workshop Annually on Fourth Thursday of April Annual Town Meeting Annually on Second Monday in May CPC Annual Hearing on Community Needs and Annually on Fourth Thursday of June Priorities Applications must be received for Semi-Annual TM On or by July 1 Applications presented to CPC Annually on Fourth Thursday of August Semi-Annual Town Meeting Annually on Third Monday in October
Applicants are encouraged, but not required to attend a Grantwriting Workshop in the fall or spring to assist in preparing applications for the following Town Meeting. Applicants may also request a meeting with the CPC at any time to ask questions or obtain input on projects for which they would like to seek funding.
Depending on the complexity of the project and the point in the annual timeline, the CPC may conduct a preliminary review of each application that is received, upon which additional information may be requested of applicants if needed. (Applicants are encouraged to provide more time for planning an review of more complex projects.) The CPC may conduct a preliminary review of each application that is received, upon which additional information may be requested of applicants if needed. Applications will be posted on the CPC’s website, and applicants will be invited to present their projects at a CPC meeting. At the Presentation the CPC will accept public comment, and will then deliberate and vote on recommending funding for each project after the application is presented.
Each year the CPC holds a public hearing in June (after the Annual Town Meeting) to gather input on the needs and priorities of the community with respect to the CPA program areas.
If project funding is successfully approved at Town Meeting, grant recipients will subsequently enter a Grant Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding with the CPC, and will be required to submit regular project reports and photographs to the designated CPC representative.
Guidelines for Project Submission
1. Project requests must be submitted via the online form which can be found on the Community Preservation Committee’s web page at [address here].
2. Requests must be documented with appropriate supporting information. The use of photos, maps, visual aids and other supplemental information is encouraged.
3. Obtain quotes for project costs whenever possible. If not available, estimates may be used provided the basis of the estimate is fully explained.
4. Requests must be received at least three months prior to the spring or fall semi- annual Town Meeting. More advance time is recommended for complex projects. See the Timeline for submission dates.
5. For applicants that have multiple project requests, please prioritize projects.
6. Applicants must be present at a CPC meeting to answer questions. The CPC meets the fourth Thursday of each month.
Please note that there are legal limitations on the use of CPA funds. Additional information on the CPA and the Community Preservation Committee can be found at www.communitypreservation.org. If you are in doubt about your project’s eligibility you are encouraged to submit an application so that the Committee can determine eligibility.
Please use the online application form to submit a proposal. Accompanying documentation may be submitted via the form, electronically via email to [coordinator’s address], or by hard copy (original and 9 copies) to:
Community Preservation Committee Grafton Municipal Center 30 Providence Road Grafton, MA 01519 Project Requirements & Evaluation Criteria
All proposed projects must be eligible for CPA funding according to the requirements set forth in the law before further consideration can be given.
Requirements for all projects:
1. Projects must fit the description of eligible assets and activities, as shown on Chart 1.
2. For projects on Town-owned property, an appropriate Town department, board, or committee must be the applicant or co-applicant.
3. For projects that entail privately-owned assets, public access (as appropriate) and/or public benefit must be ensured.
4. Permanent or commensurate protection of assets for their intended use (affordable housing, conservation, or historic preservation) must be provided for as required under Chapter 44B and the Anti-Aid Amendment to the Massachusetts Constitution.
5. For projects related to housing development or rehabilitation, CPA funds can only be used to support the creation of units that are affordable to income-eligible households.
6. CPA funds cannot replace funding previously committed from the Town budget or other sources.
Comparative Evaluation Criteria
Applications that present a thorough description of the project with as many details as possible, have significant support from other Town Boards/Committees, have gathered public input and endorsements, and present a comprehensive, well described and reasonable budget will have the greatest likelihood of success. Budget requests must be thorough because there will not be an opportunity to change the budget amount after the CPC makes its funding recommendation. For applications that take place on Town property, consultation with the Development Team and coordination with other Town staff who may be involved in the implementation of the project will help to ensure a complete application.
All recommendations and award amounts are subject to the availability of CPA funds and approval by Town Meeting. Projects must meet all the legal criteria of the Community Preservation Act. However, meeting all of the criteria does not guarantee CPC support. The Grafton Community Preservation Committee will give preference to proposals which address as many of the following general criteria as possible:
Consistency with Grafton’s Community Preservation Plan Goals and Priorities, Open Space and Recreation Plan, Housing Production Plan, and other local and regional planning documents related to community preservation that have undergone a public planning process;
Projects should be highly visible and accessible, generating broad benefits to the community.
Priority is given to projects that are part of a coordinated, connecting vision for area improvements.
Priority is given to projects that preserve resources that would otherwise be threatened and/or serve a currently under served population.
Priority is given to projects that leverage funding from other sources and/or fill a gap where other sources are not available.
Projects should demonstrate cost-sensitivity both in the short-term use of CPA funds, and the long-term maintenance or lifespan of the resource for which the funds are used.
Category Specific Criteria
Proposals which address as many of the following criteria as possible within the appropriate program area category(s) will receive preference:
Open Space and Recreation
Meets one or more of the following goals (Score 1-5 for each goal):
Promote the preservation of open spaces and natural resources including wildlife habitat, water quality and watershed protection, working farms and forests.
Expand and improve recreation facilities to serve Grafton residents of all ages and abilities.
Create connected systems of trails for walking and biking, as well as green ways to protect habitats and natural resources. (Not every facility serves the needs of every resident. CPA funds should support a range of offerings so that residents have access to a variety of passive- and active recreational offerings.)
Fits under the following priorities (Select one priority level, score 1-3 for Second Priority or 4-5 for First Priority):
First Priority: Protect water resources, critical habitats, and historic open space features.
Second Priority: Preserve heritage landscapes and expand opportunities for active and passive recreation. Historical
Meets one or more of the following goals (Score 1-5 for each goal):
Preserve assets that are significant to Grafton’s history and contribute to the town’s unique sense of place.
Improve public access to historic assets and increase awareness of the Town’s history.
Fits under the following priorities (Select one priority level, score 1 for Third Priority, 2-3 for Second Priority, or 4-5 for First Priority):
First Priority: Prevent the loss of historic buildings or other threatened assets Second Priority: Create or expand community engagement with Grafton History
Third Priority: Preserve or enhance curb appeal of Grafton villages and neighborhoods Affordable Housing
Meets one or more of the following goals (Score 1-5 for each goal):
Meet Grafton’s needs for appropriate housing options affordable to low and moderate income residents, including workforce housing.
Promote the creation and preservation of affordable housing through the adaptation of existing buildings and redevelopment sites.
Support low and moderate income households in accessing housing that they can afford.
Fits under the following priorities (Select one priority level, score 1 for Third Priority, 2-3 for Second Priority, or 4-5 for First Priority):
First Priority: Create or preserve SHI-eligible affordable housing units (up to 80% AMI)
Second Priority: Provide support for households to access affordable housing or prevent displacement
Third Priority: Create or preserve units affordable to moderate income households (80-100% AMI) CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
Part 1: COVER PAGE
DATE: January 6. 2021 APPLICANT NAME: William H. Nelson
Co-APPLICANT NAME (if applicable): Lake Quinsigamond Commission
PHONE: 508-839-6849 EMAIL: [email protected]
Mailing Address: 88 George Hill Road, Grafton, MA, 01519
SITE INFORMATION
PROJECT NAME:
Field Investigation/documentation of Invasive Aquatic Weed Infestation.
Project Location:
Flint & Hovey Ponds & the part of Quinsigamond River connecting them.
ASSESSOR’S MAP 10 & 26 LOT#
PROPERTY OWNER’S NAME: Town of Grafton MA
Deed recorded in the Worcester District Registry of Deeds in Book: _____ Page: ______
Brief Project Summary (a detailed description will be required with your supporting information)
A factual one-time scientific field investigation by trained aquatic ecologists, botanists, and other specialists of the aquatic alien invasive weed infestation and contaminants of Flint & Hovey Ponds & the Quinsigamond River connecting them.
Estimated Start Date:
Early summer 2021 (determined by the invasive weeds growing season).
Estimated Completion Date:
Field-investigation takes less than a week, report issued within months after.
CPA CATEGORY (check most appropriate)
Open Space __X__ Historic Preservation _____ Recreation _____ Community Housing ______
Total Project Cost ___$17,000.____ CPA Funding Request _____$17,000.______CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
Part 2: Project Narrative. Please provide narrative responses to all relevant questions. Answers are required for questions marked with*.
* Describe the project, including location and the property involved:
A factual one-time scientific investigation, documentation, and updating of the aquatic alien invasive weed infestation in parts of the Flint Pond, Hovey Pond, and the section of the Quinsigamond River connecting them (all Grafton town properties), employing appropriately trained aquatic botanists, aquatic ecologists, and other specialists, formed into an environmental team for collecting field data on the extent of the infestation, the species requiring removal, those native endangered species requiring protection, and nutrient and contaminant levels; and determining the optimal scientifically approved corrective actions. This investigation, done by and reviewed by scientific experts, is required both practically, and is state mandated legally, before any yearly aquatic invasive weed control maintenance by the Lake Quinsigamond Commission and it's partners can be be started, and continued in the following years, to control this vegetative invasion. The information in this study/report will be public and shared with all interested parties.
The 3 actions needing to be done in order of priority are: (1) document the sediments, and it's contaminants, in Flint Pond, particularly near the Wymen-Gorden plant; (2) document how the changes in stream in-flow and out-flow from Flint Pond, made during World War II for Wyman- Gordan's wartime plant, created the stagnant non-flowing water conditions leading to today's excessive weed infestations and containment levels in Flint Pond, and investigate how those flows could be returned back to approximately their original state, to help restore the pond to it's previous open surface-water condition without requiring costly yearly weed treatment maintenance; (3) document and update the alien weed infestation and the threatened endangered species in Flint and Hovey Ponds, all located in Grafton;
Please note that the aquatic weed infestations and water-quality issues in Hovey Pond are not given priority as part of this proposal, as that part of that effort was done in Fall 2019, so it does not need to be repeated. Although Hovey Pond is located in Grafton, that work was funded in full by the Lake Quinsigamond Commission. A copy of that investigative report is attached to this proposal as a typical example of such a study, to illustrate the costs, and to inform you of the current situation in a part of this watershed. In addition, the weed infestations in Flint Pond are not given priority as the part of it in Shrewsbury has previously been investigated in the past, also under LQC funding.
* Consistency with CPA Objectives: How does the project meet the general evaluation criteria and the priorities identified for the applicable program area? How does the project meet the specific criteria in the Community Preservation Act Funding Allowable Uses Table?
The applicable program area is: Open Space and Recreation
Promote the preservation of open spaces and natural resources including wildlife habitat, water quality and watershed protection, working farms and forests.
score = 5
Expand and improve recreation facilities to serve Grafton residents of all ages and abilities. score = 4
Create connected systems of trails for walking and biking, as well as green ways to protect habitats and natural resources. (Not every facility serves the needs of every resident. CPA funds should support a range of offerings so that residents have access to a variety of passive- and active recreational offerings.)
Added note: If this includes open-surface water-ways for use by canoe, kayak, motor boat, sail boat, row boat, rowing scull or eight, swimming, fishing, hunting, and the many other water activities requiring local open surface water, and if "green ways to protect habitats and natural resources" include rivers and pond watersheds for use by both humans and other native species, then the score is.
score = 3
The priory scores are:
First Priority: Protect water resources, critical habitats, and historic open space features.
score = 5
Second Priority: Preserve heritage landscapes and expand opportunities for active and passive recreation.
score = 3
How the Project meets criteria in CPA Funding Allowable Uses Table:
This project meets all requirements, as specified in this application form, and that are required by law. As this application form is missing the "Allowable Use Table," and the town staff can not provide us with a copy of it, as they out-of-work sick with COVID-19, the answers of how this project meets the requirements that are actually listed in this application form, and other legal criteria, is described in detail in each of the relevant sections of this attachment.
* Need met by the Project: How does the project benefit the public? Does the project preserve a threatened resource? What populations will it serve? Has there been a public process, plan, or site evaluation to document the goals for this project? Is there demonstrated community support for the project?
The deterioration of these pond's water quality will soon reduce their value to Grafton residents, both as a recreational resource, and as a factor in determining real estate values in Grafton. This is a serious issue, because once an alien invasive plant has invaded a habitat, it changes the conditions of that environment, representing a major threat to ecosystem health and our native plant biodiversity. Floating masses of these aquatic plants further effect Grafton, as they flow out these pond's outlets into the Quinsigamond River, down to Lake Ripple, and into Fisherville Pond. You can observe this aquatic plant invasion along many sections of the Quinsigamond River in Grafton. Preventing these threatened water resources from becoming inaccessible weed-choked swamps, and preserving their traditional open surface water uses will greatly benefit Grafton residents. Particularly those who canoe, kayak, motor boat, sail, row, swim, fish, hunt, and enjoy the many other water activities requiring open surface water, as well as those Grafton residents who just enjoy the quiet flowing beauty of Grafton's still open flowing waterways in their town.
Correcting alien weed infestation is consistent with the. (1) primary goal of addressing the quality of Grafton's water resources in the 2020 Grafton Open Space & Recreation plan (GOS&R);" and (2) is consistent with a secondary goal of the plan, of jointly working with other organizations such as the Lake Quinsigamond Commission (LQC), in addressing and solving these problems. Both of those goals were thoroughly addressed during the year-long public process of updating Grafton's 2020 GOS&R plan. Particularly, Grafton's 2020 plan states: the number one goal is preserving and maintaining the quality of Grafton's water resources (references found on: on page 41 - noxious weeds in Flint Pond; on page 42 - noxious weeds in Lake Ripple; on page 43 - measuring phosphorus in Flint Pond; on pages 73 &74 – Grafton's #1 goal (out of 6) is preserving and maintaining Grafton water resources; on pages 83 & 84 - supporting regional efforts to improve and maintain Grafton's water resources). Additional public input has come from the many year's that the LQC has been addressing the invasive weed control problem in those parts of Lake Quinsigamond located in the town of Shrewsbury and the city of Worcester. All past and present aspects of invasive weed treatment by the LQC have been and are presently covered in open advertised public monthly meetings, that are publicly broadcast, and all decisions publicly voted on in these open meetings by Grafton's, Shrewsbury's, and Worcester's appointed LQC commissioners and CONCOM representatives, and attended by and publicly spoken at by Grafton residents. The past history of invasive weed treatment in those locations has been publicly posted, been covered by local media, and been praised and appreciated by users of this watershed.
Feasibility: Identify any assessments or approvals that have been received or will be required for this project (i.e., Zoning, Conservation, Historical Commission, Historic District Commission, etc.), and any known barriers or potential impediments to project completion. Does the project meet ADA requirements, if applicable?
This project has the support of the Grafton CONCOM, is within their recent 5-year permit for maintenance of invasive aquatic weeds by the LQC, and will be done in consultation with and the support of the LQC, Grafton CONCOM, Worcester CONCOM, Shrewsbury CONCOM, the Lake Quinsigamond Watershed Association, and the Endangered and Natural Heritage Program at Massachusetts Wildlife. As this project is a study for understanding necessary and permitted future actions, it will not run into any of the barriers that construction, destruction, or other alterations to the environment encounter. Actually, it is the opposite, as it helps to inform those governmental organizations, such as the Endangered and Natural Heritage Program at Massachusetts Wildlife, of the health and extent of those endangered species that require additional protection. The project will take place on town owned waterways in the town of Grafton.
Coordination: Identify partner organizations or entities that will be involved in the implementation of this project. Has the proponent consulted with the Development Team, relevant boards and committees, community partners, and immediate abutters? Have there been meetings or other initiatives to gather public input and support for this project? If the project is for open space or historic preservation acquisition, a Conservation Restriction (CR) or Preservation Restriction (PR) is required. A third party holder of the CR or PR must be identified.
The partner organizations of the the Lake Quinsigamond Commission, are the Grafton Conservation Commission, Worcester Conservation Commission, Shrewsbury Conservation Commission, the Lake Quinsigamond Watershed Association, and the Endangered and Natural Heritage Program at Massachusetts Wildlife. In particular, representatives of the LQC have recently met with the Grafton Conservation Commission and the Grafton Selectmen to discuss this aquatic alien weed infestation problem and it's need for treatment, and are asking the Grafton Conservation Commission for a formal vote of support.
Project Timing: Is the timing of this project essential to preserve a threatened resource or to leverage an opportunity to create an asset?
Yes, this aquatic alien invasive weed infestation grows worse every year, and it's control grows more expensive the longer it is allowed to continue exponentially expanding. In addition, as aquatic invasive weed corrective treatments must be done during the weeds summer growing season, all of the treatment-preceding field investigations, studies, and documentation of the actual aquatic species, and the extent of the invasive weed infestation, must also be done during their summer growing season to be as accurate as is possible.
* Timeline: Explain the steps of the project and the anticipated timeline for completion:
A factual one-time scientific investigation and documentation of the aquatic alien invasive weed infestation will employ appropriately trained aquatic botanists, aquatic ecologists, and other specialists on aquatic plants, as well as experts on nutrient and contaminant levels, formed into an environmental team for collecting field data on the extent of the infestation, the species requiring removal, those native endangered spices requiring protection; and determining the optimal scientifically approved corrective actions. The investigation, will take place on the water over a few days, involving boats for transportation and sampling, and will be reviewed by scientific experts. This field investigation of the aquatic weed infestation, documentation of the actual aquatic species, and the extent of the infestation, must be done in the summer during the weeds peak growing season, which will determine the actual dates. All final reports of the findings and recommendations should then be available a few months later.
Open Space
Natural Resource Value: Describe how the project will protect natural resources such as water quality, wildlife habitat, drinking water resources, wetlands, vernal pools, or agricultural land. Indicate whether the project is located within or near an identified natural resource area such as a Wellhead Protection Area, Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC), Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP)/BioMap2, or Scenic Landscape Inventory.
This project is expressively designed to support this goal, to obtain critical information that is required to protect the natural resources listed in this question, such as water quality, wildlife habitat, drinking water resources, wetlands, open-surface water, and endangered species, both plant and animal. The location of this project is on the NHESP's BioMap, and we have worked extensively with NHESP at MassWildlife to map the endangered species Vasey's Pondweed (Potamogeton vaseyi) in the Shrewsbury and Worcester part of the lake Quinsigamond water-shed, but must expand this mapping for that species, as well as others, in the un-investigated parts of that water-shed that are located in Flint Pond and Hovey Pond in Grafton. This project is essential, and extremely timely, to prevent any possible loss of as yet un-discovered endangered species in up- coming construction projects, such as the large up-coming one planned for the old Edgemere Drive-in on the shores of Flint Pond.
Historic Open Space Resources: Will the project protect open space with historic significance or that contains archaeological resources, memorials, stone walls, old roads, or scenic vistas, or that is adjacent to a scenic road? Please explain:
Yes. The Quinsigamond watershed in the past was mostly all open surface-water, and was used extensively by our local Indian tribes well-before Europeans settlers arrived on our shores. And following that arrival, has a well documented 200 year history of use for recreation and industry, both on it's shores and on the water. If not maintained, this open-water resource will disappear under an ever-encroaching invasion of aquatic invasive alien weeds, that will in the very long-run turn it into a swamp, and eventually a meadow. The lake contains significant archaeological artifacts, according to experts in that field, such as Indian arrowheads and sunken Indian log canoes. Those canoes have been left undisturbed until funding and scientific techniques are available to preserve them, as they soon disintegrate once removed from the water and dry out. These artifacts will be lost forever under the sediments and yearly load of organic matter produced by invasive weed growth as these open surface-water ponds turn into an impenetrable swamp, if these watershed are left un-protected.
Connectivity: Does this project expand the connection of open space parcels to protect natural resources, create a green-way, or enable development of a trail network? Does this project improve public access to natural or historic resources, or expand opportunities for recreation or educational programming? Please explain:
Yes on both counts. It protects natural resources by maintaining a continuous open water-way for aquatic, avian, and land species between Narragansett Bay in Rhode island all the way up to the cold-water brooks in Boylston MA containing native brook trout. Interrupting this long existing water-way corridor to the Atlantic ocean, in it's middle section in Grafton, will greatly disrupt many Massachusetts native species travel for survival and reproduction. On the second count, losing such a beautiful open water resource will also greatly diminish the opportunities for open- water recreation, such as our residents who canoe, kayak, motor boat, sail, row, swim, fish, hunt, and enjoy the many other water activities requiring local open surface water, but can't afford the time and expense of traveling far away to find similar conditions in less populated US states or Canada. Recreation
Amenities: Describe the amenities to be created or improved through this project, the types of programming that may be enabled, and the population that will be served.
Access: Does this project expand opportunities for outdoor recreation or improve access to recreation facilities for all or a segment of Grafton’s population? Does the project incorporate connectivity to surrounding neighborhoods and resources? Historic Preservation
Historical Significance: Describe the significance of the historic asset that this project will protect or preserve. Indicate whether the asset has been identified in a local survey of historic properties, is located within a Local Historic District, or ifit is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or State Historic Register.
* Eligibility: To be eligible under the category of Historic Preservation, projects must entail physical assets which are either listed on the National Register of Historic Places or State Historic Register, or have been determined by the Grafton Historical Commission to be of historical significance. Please attach documentation that the asset has received historic designation.
Historic Preservation: Describe how the project will prevent the loss or destruction of the historic asset. If applicable, how will the project comply with the U.S. Department of Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation? Will the project require approval from the Grafton Historic District Commission or from the holder of a Preservation Restriction?
Public Benefit: Describe how the project will ensure public access and/or enhance awareness of Grafton’s history. Is th asset public or privately owned? How is the site or asset currently used, and will the project result in a change of use or accessibility? Affordable Housing
Project Description: Provide a project description or summary of action plan detailing how the requested funds will be used to create, preserve, or support affordable housing. List any involved public, private, or nonprofit partners.
Housing Needs: How does the project meet housing needs and preferences described in Grafton’s Housing Production Plan? What population or income level will be assisted? (Note: CPA funds can assist households earning up to 100% of Area Median Income. In the case of mixed-income development, CPA funds can only be used for the affordable portion of a project.)
Land Use Preferences: Describe how the project aligns with goals articulated in Grafton’s Master Plan or area strategic plans. Does the project entail historic preservation, adaptive reuse, or conversion of an existing building to affordable housing? Is a specific site located in an area served by water/sewer infrastructure, and/or convenient to public transit, retail, or other amenities?
CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM) Part 3: Project Budget
Budget Summary Total Project Cost CPA Funds Requested Other Funds Total Other Funds: % of Total $17,000.00 $17,000.00 0.00%
Equipment is generally defined as an item with a useful life expectancy of more than one year. Supplies are defined as an item with a useful life of less than one year. Construction means all types of work done on a particular property or building including erecting, altering or remodeling.
Budget Categories (Leave any category blank if not applicable to your project) CPA FUNDS OTHER FUNDS TOTAL Personnel Equipment Supplies Contractual $17,000.00 $17,000.00 Construction Other TOTAL
Please attach quotes, estimates, or other supporting documents. Quotes attached.
Budget Other Funds Identify the amount of other (non-CPA) funds or resources to be contributed for this project. Sources include private, federal, state or local government, or any other sources. Organization Item Amount Type (cash, in-kind, etc.)
Is there an opportunity for other matching funding contingent upon the approval of CPA funds? If so, please explain.
Will the project require funding over multiple years? If so, please provide anticipated future funding requirements. The CPC cannot commit funding for future years. Requests for funding must be applied for each funding round.
Lifetime Cost: Is the project going to result in a requirement for ongoing maintenance? If yes, please explain how this will be managed. Yes, this will continue to be done by the Lake Quinsigamond Commission, as it has been done in the past. 2/18/2021 Town of Grafton Mail - Grafton CPA application, by Lake Quinsigamond Commission.
Joann Duncan
Grafton CPA application, by Lake Quinsigamond Commission.
Leah Cameron
Hi Bill,
At their meeting last night, the Commission voted unanimously to endorse the Lake Quinsigamond Commission's application for CPA funds for the study of invasive weeds in Flint Pond, Hovey Pond, and a portion of the Quinsigamond River, as reflected in the attachments you have provided. Additionally, they voted unanimously to designate Jonathan Nickerson as the Commission's co-sponsor of the application.
If you need anything further from me, please let me know.
Leah Cameron Conservation Agent 30 Providence Road Grafton, MA 01519 508-839-5335 x1138
[Quoted text hidden]
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=c664a31432&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1690707613662445136&simpl=msg-f%3A16907076136… 1/1
December 13, 2019
Peter Collins Chairman Lake Quinsigamond Commission 106 Maple Street Shrewsbury, Massachusetts 01545
Re: Hovey Pond Assessment Grafton, Massachusetts ESS Project No. L200-000
Dear Mr. Collins,
ESS Group, Inc. (ESS) is pleased to present this report on the 2019 assessment of Hovey Pond. This report provides a summary of our findings with regard to aquatic macrophyte and water quality conditions in the pond, as well as an initial assessment of management options for 2020 and beyond. SETTING Hovey Pond is an approximately 23-acre impoundment of the Quinsigamond River, located in the town of Grafton, Massachusetts. The pond consists of a single, elongated basin, running roughly north to south, with Quinsigamond River flow entering from the northwest and exiting toward the east at the dam. In addition to the Quinsigamond River, one unnamed tributary also enters Hovey Pond and its northwestern end. The full history of the pond’s creation and evolution over time is beyond the scope of this assessment. However, historical topographic maps and Massachusetts Historical Commission correspondence regarding the recent repairs at Hovey Pond dam suggest that the dam dates back to at least the nineteenth century. The recent Hovey Pond dam repairs included installation of an emergency spillway and low level
Hovey Pond on US Geological Survey topographic maps from 1944 (left) and 1953 (right). Hovey Pond is labeled as Flint Pond in the 1944 version.
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
outlet. Historical US Geological Survey topographic maps indicate the normal pool elevation of the pond was approximately 354 feet at one point but may have been lowered to 351 feet. It is unclear whether this was a real change or simply a correction of a mapping error. However, if such a reduction in pond elevation occurred, it would have significantly reduced the footprint of the pond. Hovey Pond is located within an approximately 16,300-acre watershed, which includes the Lake Quinsigamond/Flint Pond complex, as well as numerous smaller ponds, many of which are regulated by a dam. The watershed is fairly urbanized, with more than 60 percent of the area classified as developed. Forest land only comprises approximately 25 percent of the watershed. The shoreline of Hovey Pond is developed along its southwestern and southeastern shorelines, including single-family residences and condominiums, as well as limited commercial development. Although at least one publicly owned parcel abuts the pond, improved public access for boating is not currently available. APPROACH ESS completed a field visit to Hovey Pond on October 14, 2019. During this visit, ESS conducted a field assessment of existing conditions in the pond, including bathymetry, water quality, and biology, with a focus on aquatic plants. Details of the approach for each component are provided in the following sections. Bathymetry ESS collected depth soundings throughout Hovey Pond, using an echosounder or sounding line, depending on the density of plant growth and total water depth in each location. These soundings were used to develop a contoured bathymetric (water depth) map of the pond at normal pool elevation. Water Quality ESS assessed water quality in at the deep hole of Hovey Pond. The water quality assessment included a vertical profile of field parameters measured at half-meter (1.6-foot) intervals, as well as collection of surface and bottom water quality samples. The following parameters were measured in the field:
o Temperature o Dissolved oxygen o Transparency (Secchi disk) o Specific conductance o pH o Turbidity The following parameters were analyzed in each sample by Phoenix Environmental Laboratories of Manchester, Connecticut:
o Total nitrogen (including nitrate, nitrite, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen) o Total phosphorus
2
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
Aquatic Vegetation ESS used plant rakes, and direct observation to map the aquatic vegetative community composition, as well as cover and biovolume at 61 locations in Hovey Pond. All vascular aquatic plants were identified to genus or species level in the field by qualified staff. Percent cover and biovolume were visually ranked using the following scale; 0% (no cover), 1-24%, 25-49%, 50-74%, and greater than 75%. All observed species, percent cover, and biovolume were recorded at each point and positions were collected with a sub-meter accurate Trimble Geo7X GPS receiver. RESULTS Bathymetry Hovey Pond is relatively shallow with a maximum water depth of approximately 14 feet near the dam (Figure 1). Most of the upper part of the pond is very shallow, typically less than 3 feet deep, except in isolated locations. Deeper water is largely confined to the lower quarter of the pond, near the dam. Water Quality Water quality results for Hovey Pond are discussed by parameter in the following sections. However, it should be noted that the water quality results presented in this report represent a single snapshot of water quality in the pond and a select group of parameters. Each of these parameters should be expected to vary on a daily, seasonal, and interannual basis. Temperature The temperature profile for Hovey Pond demonstrates minor differences from the surface to the bottom of the pond, with some slightly cooler water remaining at near the bottom (Figure 2). This suggests that the pond was mostly mixed during the October sampling event (Figure 2). Given the shallow depth of Hovey Pond and the high flushing rate, it is unlikely to experience strong thermal stratification (layering) even during warm summer conditions. Dissolved Oxygen As in terrestrial ecosystems, oxygen is required to support respiration in most life associated with aquatic ecosystems, including plants, algae, fish, invertebrates, and many other life forms. Oxygen dissolves in water at a rate related to temperature, with cold water able to “hold” more dissolved oxygen than warm water. In Massachusetts, the state dissolved oxygen standard for support of aquatic organisms is 6.0 mg/L for systems classified as coldwater fish resources and 5.0 mg/L for those classified as warmwater fish resources. Hovey Pond is an impoundment of a warmwater stream (Quinsigamond River) and is not known to host a year-round coldwater fish community (e.g., trout).
3 Path: J:\L200-000 Lake Quinsigamond Commission- Hovey and Newton Ponds\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\L200_HoveyPond_Bathy01.mxd Drawing Date: 12/6/2019 Author: mmahoney © 2019 ESS Group, Inc. °!
2
5 4
1
5
4
3
2
3
E V RI D OD
O 1 W Y 2 LL 3 HO
S
E
C
O SHORE DRIVE
N
5 D
S
6 T
R
E
E LAKE VIEW DRIVE
T
7
3
4
BEVERLEY ROAD
1 ANDERSON LANE
2
3
4 SUNSET LANE 10 11
5 6 5 8 9 10
7 11 8 9 12 13
14
6
4
BEVERLEY ROAD
WORCESTER S TREET
Lake Quinsigamond Commission Hovey Pond Bathymetry Grafton, MA
Bathymetry Depth Contour (2-Ft Interval)
Figure 1 Source: 1) ESRI, World Imagery, 2018 0 100 200 2) ESS, GPS Locations, 10/14/2019 Feet
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
At Hovey Pond, observed dissolved oxygen concentrations met the warmwater standard during the October sampling event, indicating conditions suitable to support aquatic life (Figure 2). The vertical profile in dissolved oxygen demonstrated some variability from the surface to the bottom of the pond with less well- oxygenated water toward the bottom.
Figure 2. Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Profiles at Hovey Pond on October 14, 2019
Specific Conductance Specific conductance is a measure of dissolved ions (salts) in the water. Although there are no state numerical standards for specific conductance, measurements above 100 µS/cm appear to be rare in central and eastern Massachusetts, except near limestone outcrops and marine waters (both natural sources) or where humans have had a significant impact. Pavement deicing is one of the most obvious sources of human-derived specific conductance, although landscape practices (such as liming and fertilization), septic systems, and treated wastewater discharges, among other contributions may also serve as sources. Measurements of specific conductance from Hovey Pond were 514 µS/cm (Table A) and suggest a substantial human-derived contribution of dissolved salts to the pond. pH The pH of water indicates whether it is acidic (< 7 SU), circumneutral (~7 SU), or basic (> 7 SU). As with dissolved oxygen, pH may vary substantially over distances and over time (even a single day). Therefore, a single snapshot of pH (as collected in this study) should be interpreted with caution. Hovey Pond was acidic at the time of measurement with a pH of 6.3 SU (Table A).
5
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
Turbidity Turbidity is a measure of light scattering by matter in the water column. Some waterbodies are naturally turbid. Turbidity in Hovey Pond was 1.65 NTU on the day of measurement (Table A), which is typically not considered to be indicative of excessive turbidity levels. Although from a different year, this value is very similar to what was observed in the Lake Quinsigamond/Flint Pond complex just upstream as part of the 2018 permit compliance monitoring program for that water body (ESS 2018). Therefore, it appears to be consistent with what would be anticipated. Transparency Water transparency is often expressed as the depth at which a Secchi disk just becomes visible. Low transparency measurements indicate poor transmission of light through the water column, although this may be due to a variety of causes including, but not limited to, natural staining, suspended sediments, algal growth, and manmade pollutants. Some waterbodies are naturally less transparent than others and low transparency does not necessarily indicate poor water quality. Higher transparencies are generally considered to be more aesthetically pleasing but also allow aquatic plants to grow at greater depths. Transparency at Hovey Pond was 2.5 meters (8.2 feet), which is somewhat obscured but not abnormally low (Table A). Natural water staining and aquatic plant growth may reduce transparency at Hovey Pond. Table A. Water Quality Parameters at Hovey Pond Temperature Dissolved Specific pH Turbidity Secchi Disk Total Total (°C) Oxygen Conductance (SU) (NTU) Transparency Phosphorus Nitrogen (mg/L) (µS/cm) (m) (mg/L) (mg/L) 13.8 8.4 514 6.3 1.65 2.5 0.027 0.59
Nutrients Phosphorus and nitrogen are essential nutrients for the growth of plants and algae. Although these nutrients are naturally present, human activity directly increases the amounts of these nutrients and may greatly accelerate their mobilization from the watershed into lakes and ponds. This increase in nutrients may likewise lead to accelerating plant and algal production and eventual shallowing of the pond by the accumulation of organic matter (cultural eutrophication). Cultural eutrophication and the accompanying high levels of nutrients in the water column can lead to undesirable biological consequences. For example, high levels of these nutrients may trigger excessive algal growth, leading to bloom conditions and, under certain conditions, dominance by harmful species of blue-green algae (cyanobacteria). Additionally, deposition of nutrient-rich sediments in shallow water may encourage the excessive growth of rooted aquatic plants. Total phosphorus levels at and above 0.020 mg/L are typically associated with declining water quality, including an increase in algae blooms and decreased water transparency. At concentrations of 0.050 mg/L and above, severe and recurring algae blooms are likely each season. In Hovey Pond, total phosphorus concentrations were somewhat elevated at 0.027 mg/L (Table A). Although elevated nitrogen concentrations are not as frequently linked to declines in sensible water quality in most fresh waters, levels in excess of 1.0 mg/L are rare except where human sources, such as septic inputs, are abundant.
6
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
Concentrations of total nitrogen were below this level (0.59 mg/L) in Hovey Pond (Table A). Aquatic Vegetation Total aquatic plant cover (i.e., the bottom area occupied by aquatic plants) was moderate to dense over much of the pond, although substantial areas of open water or low plant cover also occur within the pond (Figure 3). The densest aquatic plant growth was observed in shallow waters. Of note, a substantial area of emergent plants – dominated by swamp loosestrife (Decadon verticillata) – occupies the shallowest portions of the northern end of the pond. Plant biovolume (i.e., the volume of the water column occupied by plants) was high (i.e., >50% biovolume) in a few areas, primarily along the west-central shoreline and in shallowest areas of the north-central portion of the pond (Figure 4). High biovolume was confined to 1.7 acres of the pond, with moderate biovolume observed over an additional 7.2 acres. Overall, 10 species of aqutic plants were observed in Hovey Pond (Table B). Of these, one was an exotic species (variable-leaf milfoil [Myriophyllum heterophyllum]). This species is known to have invasive tendencies, rapidly expanding into available habitats, and crowding out native aquatic plants with very dense growth. At Hovey Pond, variable-leaf milfoil was observed to cover approximately 18 acres, with the densest beds occurring in north-central portions of the pond (Figure 5). However, this species was widely distributed and smaller or less dense beds were observed in many other areas.
Table B. List of Aquatic Plants Observed at Hovey Pond
Scientific Name Common Growth Form Status Name Submerged/ Eleocharis sp. Spikerush Native Emergent Swamp Native Decadon verticillata Emergent loosestrife (sometimes grows at nuisance levels)
Lemna minor Duckweed Floating Native (sometimes grows at nuisance levels) Variable-leaf Myriophyllum Submerged Exotic heterophyllum milfoil Nuphar lutea variegata Yellow waterlily Floating-leaved Native (sometimes grows at nuisance levels) Native Nymphaea odorata White waterlily Floating-leaved (sometimes grows at nuisance levels) Polyganum sp. Water Emergent Native smartweed (sometimes grows at nuisance levels) Submerged/ Pontederia cordata Pickerelweed Native Emergent
Potamogeton amplifolius Bigleaf Submerged Native pondweed Potamogeton robbinsii Robbins’ Submerged Native pondweed Exotic species appear in bold
7 Path: J:\L200-000 Lake Quinsigamond Commission- Hovey and Newton Ponds\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\L200_HoveyPond_PlantCover.mxd Drawing Date: 11/14/2019 Author: mmahoney © 2019 ESS Group, Inc. °!
E IV R D D O O YW LL HO
S
H
O
R
E
D
R
I V
L E A
K
E
V
I E
W
D
R
I V
E
SECOND STREET ANDERSON LANE
E LAN SET SUN
Hovey Pond (24.6 acres)
EmergAeDnt Vegetation (1.8 acres) RO Y LE Plant ECRover EV B 0% (3.0 acres)
1% to 25% (6.1 acres)
26% to 50% (10.3 acres)
51% to 75% (3.4 acres)
76% to 100% (0.0 acres) WORCESTER STREET
Lake Quinsigamond Commission Hovey Pond Grafton, Massachusetts Plant Cover
Figure 2 Source: 1) ESRI, World Imagery, 2018 0 100 200 2) ESS, GPS Locations, 10/14/2019 Feet Path: J:\L200-000 Lake Quinsigamond Commission- Hovey and Newton Ponds\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\L200_HoveyPond_PlantBiovolume.mxd Drawing Date: 11/14/2019 Author: mmahoney © 2019 ESS Group, Inc. °!
E IV R D D O O YW LL HO
S
H
O
R
E
D
R
I V
L E A
K
E
V
I E
W
D
R
I V
E
SECOND STREET ANDERSON LANE
E LAN SET SUN
Hovey Pond (24.6 acres)
D EmergeOnAt Vegetation (1.8 acres) R EY RL PlanVtE Biovolume BE 0% (3.0 acres) 1% to 25% (10.8 acres) 26% to 50% (7.2 acres) 51% to 75% (1.7 acres) 76% to 100% (0.0 acres) WORCESTER STREET
Lake Quinsigamond Commission Hovey Pond Grafton, Massachusetts Plant Biovolume
Figure 3 Source: 1) ESRI, World Imagery, 2018 0 100 200 2) ESS, GPS Locations, 10/14/2019 Feet Path: J:\L200-000 Lake Quinsigamond Commission- Hovey and Newton Ponds\04 GRAPHICS\GIS\MXD\L200_HoveyPond_VariableLeafMilfoil.mxd Drawing Date: 12/5/2019 Author: mmahoney © 2019 ESS Group, Inc. °!
E IV R D D O O YW LL HO
S
H
O
R
E
D
R
I V
L E A
K
E
V
I E
W
D
R
I V
E
SECOND STREET ANDERSON LANE
E LAN SET SUN
Hovey Pond (24.6 acres) D OA Emer gRent Vegetation (1.8 acres) EY RL VE VariBaEble-Leaf Milfoil Cover 0% (4.6 acres)
1% to 25% (14.5 acres)
26% to 50% (2.7 acres)
51% to 75% (1.0 acres) ESTER STR 76% to 100% (0.0 acres) WORC EET
Lake Quinsigamond Commission Hovey Pond Grafton, Massachusetts Variable-Leaf Milfoil Cover
Figure 4 Source: 1) ESRI, World Imagery, 2018 0 100 200 2) ESS, GPS Locations, 10/14/2019 Feet
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
MANAGEMENT GOALS AND OPTIONS Management Goals The management of nuisance plant growth in Hovey Pond is intended to address the following goals: • Restore aquatic habitat and ecological function of the pond • Improve water quality • Improve recreational opportunities and aesthetics • Prevent the establishment of new invasive plants in the pond Management Options A large number of management options could potentially be considered for implementation at Hovey Pond, given the conditions ESS observed during our field assessment, as well as what is known about upstream water bodies. However, ESS has selected the in-pond options that most closely address the management goals above. Each of the potential management options described in this section would require some level of permitting to implement. In general, a Notice of Intent would need to be filed with the Conservation Commission in Grafton in order to obtain an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act and its implementing regulations. The cost to file and obtain permits to implement a vegetation management program would likely be on the order of $7,000 to $8,000. Any additional studies or filings, as described under each management option, may require additional costs. Chemical Controls (Algaecides and Herbicides) In the short-term, herbicide treatment is usually the most cost-effective means by which to rapidly achieve the goal of reducing aquatic weed biomass over a large area. Herbicides may also be used over the long- term as part of a comprehensive management plan to treat areas of recurring infestations that are not readily controllable through other means. Although no herbicide is completely without risk, a premise of pesticide regulation is that the potential benefits derived from use outweigh the risks when registered herbicides are applied according to label recommendations and restrictions. Additionally, current herbicide registration procedures are far more rigorous than in the past, particularly in Massachusetts, and the ability of applicators to target applications of herbicides with improved precision further improves the relative safety of using these chemicals for nuisance aquatic plant control. Many of the newer aquatic herbicides have favorable toxicological profiles and some are considered to be practically non-toxic to non-target species, including mammals and birds. Label restrictions are typically limited to irrigation with few or no restrictions on use for primary recreation, boating, fishing, or drinking. Therefore, direct impacts to non-target species are usually minimal. Rather, indirect impacts (e.g., rapid loss of aquatic vegetative cover or sags in dissolved oxygen as plant dieback occurs) are often the primary concern. However, these impacts can be managed through appropriate selection and application of herbicides.
12
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
Herbicides can be classified by many different means. However, one of the most useful classifications for lake management purposes is systemic versus contact herbicides. Systemic herbicides generally require longer contact times but, once they are taken up, are effective in killing all parts of the plant. This typically results in effective control for two or more years following treatment. Additionally, a benefit of the longer contact time required is that plant dieback tends to occur more gradually within treated areas, resulting in less opportunity dissolved oxygen sags that could impact non-target species. Contact herbicides generally require minimal contact time to be effective. However, they are only effective on the parts of the plant that actually come into contact with the herbicide. This means that contact herbicides tend to achieve only single-season control of perennial plant species. Additionally, due to the rapid dieback induced by contact herbicides, they generally should not be used for pond-wide control of aquatic plant growth all at once, especially in ponds where dissolved oxygen levels are marginal during the growing season. Any aquatic herbicide treatment program will require an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act. Additionally, each year’s herbicide application program will require a License to Apply Chemicals from the MassDEP Bureau of Resource Protection – Watershed Management. Only applicators certified to apply herbicides in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts may apply aquatic herbicides to Hovey Pond. The four herbicide options with potential to be useful for aquatic plant control in Hovey Pond are fluridone, florpyrauxifen-benzyl, flumioxazin, and diquat dibromide. These options are discussed in more detail below. Fluridone – Systemic Herbicide: Fluridone (trade name Sonar) is a systemic herbicide that reduces photosynthesis in affected plants, leading to the eventual starvation of the entire plant. Fluridone provides some control of variable-leaf milfoil, although it is more effective on other species that are currently found in Lake Quinsigamond. However, fluridone concentrations must be maintained at treatment levels for as long as 90 days to achieve effective treatment. This may present a challenge at Hovey Pond, where substantial flushing from the Quinsigamond River may make it difficult to maintain the required concentrations. Additionally, early application of fluridone (spring) is often essential to successful control. Due to the slow action of this herbicide, plant dieback is gradual and dissolved oxygen sags are rarely problematic. In Hovey Pond, fluridone is unlikely to be needed in the short-term, as two of the plants that respond most favorably to it (fanwort and Eurasian milfoil) were not encountered during the pond assessment. However, both species are found upstream in Lake Quinsigamond. Therefore, Hovey Pond should be considered to be at relatively high risk for establishment of these species. Should fanwort or Eurasian milfoil form beds in Hovey Pond, fluridone could possibly be used and would likely be applied as a full-lake treatment starting in April or May with “booster” treatments through June or July. Fluridone is one of the more expensive herbicides on the market and treatments are typically on the order of $800 to more than $1,000/acre, depending on the formulation used and the need for booster treatments to maintain the concentration of the herbicide at an effective level over the treatment period. Fluridone can be applied in controlled-release granular formulations to maximize effectiveness in ponds with high flushing rates, such as Hovey Pond.
13
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
Florpyrauxifen-benzyl – Systemic Herbicide: Florpyrauxifen-benzyl (trade name ProcellaCOR) is a systemic herbicide that is selective for control of exotic milfoils without impacting most native aquatic plant species. As a systemic herbicide, ProcellaCOR kills the entire plant, thereby providing control over multiple seasons. ProcellaCOR received full approval for aquatic use in Massachusetts in 2019 and therefore does not yet have a well-established track record in the Commonwealth. However, where it has been used in other states, it is known to be effective on exotic milfoils at low concentrations and typically requires less contact time than fluridone or other systemic herbicides. This means that ProcellaCOR can be applied at very low doses and is unlikely to require costly booster treatments. Both of these factors suggest that ProcellaCOR is likely to be both cost-effective on exotic milfoils and protective of non-target resources. It is possible that ProcellaCOR could provide a useful control on excessive aquatic plant growth at Hovey Pond in the future. The effectiveness of this herbicide on target species in Massachusetts will likely become better established soon, once results of treatments completed in 2019 and subsequent seasons can be fully evaluated. The costs for ProcellaCOR treatments in Massachusetts are not well-established yet. However, this herbicide is likely to range between $500 and $1,000/acre to apply. Diquat dibromide – Contact Herbicide: Diquat dibromide, also known as diquat, has a long track record of successful use in Massachusetts for the control of exotic milfoils. As a contact herbicide, it works quickly by interrupting the photosynthetic process, resulting in the dieback of leaf and stem cells. Another advantage of diquat is that it is not subject to the same restrictions for use as some other herbicides, such as flumioxazin. The primary drawback of diquat is that, as a contact herbicide, it only kills the exposed parts of the target plant (i.e., leaves and stems) and allows the growth to eventually resume from the roots. Control of perennial weeds, such as variable-leaf milfoil, which can re-grow from the roots, is typically limited to one season. However, if applied over multiple years in succession, repeated treatment may eventually weaken the target plants enough to kill them. Diquat is likely to be the most cost-effective control of variable-leaf milfoil at Hovey Pond over the short-term. Diquat is one of the least expensive herbicides on the market and treatments typically cost between $275 and $350/acre. Flumioxazin – Contact Herbicide: Flumioxazin (trade name Clipper) is a fast-acting contact herbicide and works by inhibiting protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO), an enzyme necessary for photosynthesis. Inhibition of PPO causes destruction of plant cell plasma membranes in the presence of sunlight, resulting in rapid dieback of plant tissues. Flumioxazin is most effective when applied to young, actively growing weeds in water with a pH of less than 8.5. Flumioxazin breaks down rapidly and loses herbicidal effectiveness in high pH water (pH greater than 8.5). Plant cells not directly exposed to the agent or sunlight (e.g., roots) are not readily killed by flumioxazin. Therefore, shaded plants or those with sufficient energy reserves may re-grow during the same growing season if application is not carefully undertaken. The primary advantage of using flumioxazin over other contact herbicides is that flumioxazin is effective on a wide spectrum of invasive species, including fanwort. Although fanwort was not observed during the pond assessment, it is known to be present in Lake Quinsigamond upstream and may eventually spread to Hovey Pond. Should this occur, flumioxazin could provide a tool for rapid control of fanwort beds. One drawback of flumioxazin is that it cannot be used in more than 25% of a waterbody in any given year per state herbicide restrictions. Additionally, as a contact herbicide, flumioxazin is likely to only kill
14
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
topgrowth. Although this may weaken the target plants, it is likely that at least some will return from the roots during the subsequent growing season. The cost of flumioxazin is significantly higher than most other contact herbicides, ranging up to $1,000/acre for treatment. However, treatment costs can sometimes be reduced if flumioxazin is used in combination with diquat, which would be useful for areas of mixed exotic milfoil and fanwort beds. Copper-based Algaecides: Given the relatively nutrient-rich water observed at Hovey Pond during the October 14, 2019 visit, the risk for development of nuisance algae blooms may be slightly elevated, especially if a large-scale aquatic plant control program is implemented. Hovey Pond is likely to be a well- flushed system, as suggested by the large area of the watershed relative to the pond (more than 700:1). Although not a certainty, the removal of aquatic plants from the system may permit algal growth to increase to nuisance levels. Therefore, algaecides (primarily copper-based formulations) should be considered for use on an as-needed basis. Algaecides, if needed, would be applied in a similar way to contact herbicides with similar potential for impacts to non-target organisms. Physical Controls Harvesting Macrophyte harvesting covers a wide range of techniques, including mechanical harvesting, hand harvesting (often conducted by divers), and diver assisted suction harvesting (DASH). Hand harvesting is the only technique that is likely to be useful for control of nuisance species at this time, given the lack of unimproved pond access or substantial parcels of publicly owned land adjacent to the pond for staging or dewatering. Harvesting of any kind typically requires an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act. Hand harvesting generally produces few negative direct impacts on aquatic life, although some incidental bycatch is unavoidable. Indirect impacts, such as generation of turbidity, may also occur but are typically negligible. Hand harvesting is the simplest form of harvesting and involves manual pulling of individual plants. Depending on the depth of the water at the targeted site, hand harvesting may involve wading, snorkeling, or SCUBA diving. Pulled plants and fragments are placed in a mesh bag or container that allows for transport and disposal of the vegetation. Hand harvesting of submerged vegetation aims to remove entire plants, including the roots, thereby preventing re-growth in subsequent seasons. In practice, it is difficult to achieve 100 percent removal, except where beds are isolated or represent pioneer infestations. Additionally, successful hand harvesting of small or pioneer infestations requires extreme care to avoid releasing plant fragments that could encourage an expansion of the infestation to other parts of the pond or downstream waters. Where hand harvesting is used to control established weed beds, some re-growth should be expected in subsequent seasons. However, with diligence, control may be achieved after a few consecutive seasons of hand harvesting. At Hovey Pond, hand harvesting could be used to provide precision control of target species around dock and shallow shorelines, or to control pioneer infestations of new invasive species. Hand harvesting of submerged aquatic plants can be conducted on smaller scales (up to a few hundred square feet) by trained volunteers. However, larger scale work is a major undertaking that may span weeks or months each year and is usually conducted by professionals.
15
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
Costs for professional hand harvesting vary with bed density and expertise of the staff conducting the operation but typically range from $4,000/acre for lighter infestations to more than $10,000/acre for very dense beds. Water Level Control (Drawdown) Drawdown involves lowering the water level of a pond to expose shallow bottom sediments and associated plants to drying and/or freezing. Although drawdown can be conducted at any time, the interaction of drying and freezing that occurs with winter drawdown is usually most effective. Winter drawdown achieves the best results during cold, dry winters and where sediments dewater quickly. However, given the difficulty in predicting the exact duration of these conditions during a particular winter, most drawdown programs involve a periodic or as-needed winter drawdown. Winter drawdown is most effective against species that reproduce mainly by vegetative means, including fanwort and exotic milfoils. In theory, drawdown has the potential to impact non-target aquatic species in many ways, although some impacts may be positive. For example, drawdown may benefit species that reproduce by seed or turions, including many native plants. New peer-reviewed research is emerging to better document and quantify these impacts. However, it is likely that permit conditions for new drawdown programs will come with more extensive monitoring requirements than most other control approaches. Winter drawdown would require an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act, which would be subject to comment by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Hovey Pond is not on the Great Pond list and, therefore, is not anticipated to require Chapter 91 (Waterways) authorization to alter water levels. In general, winter drawdown programs in Massachusetts are encouraged not to exceed a total drawdown of more than three feet, although exceptions have been allowed for deeper drawdowns, where justified. At Hovey Pond, a drawdown of three feet would result in approximately 15 acres of exposed sediments, which is well over half the pond area. One of the most attractive advantages of winter drawdown is the minimal operational cost, once the program has been permitted. Although drawdown is simple in concept, it must be carefully planned and conducted, both for safety of those downstream and to minimize negative impacts to sensitive aquatic organisms, including overwintering amphibians, fish, and freshwater mussels. An additional consideration in implementation of winter drawdown at Hovey Pond would be accounting for drawdowns at Lake Quinsigamond just upstream. This could result in greater inflows to Hovey Pond during the target active drawdown period in autumn and reduced inflows during the active refill period in spring. Given these issues, a drawdown feasibility study should first be completed before permitting a drawdown program at Hovey Pond. The cost to complete such a study is anticipated to be on the order of $6,000 to $8,000. If drawdown is determined to be feasible, a drawdown operations and monitoring plan will be necessary to provide guidance for implementation. The cost to develop this plan is anticipated to be $4,000 to $6,000. Finally, costs for environmental monitoring, potentially including surveys of sensitive aquatic life (e.g., freshwater
16
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
mussels) to help document and mitigate impacts, should be expected. These costs may run several thousand dollars per year, depending on permit conditions. Biological Controls Biological controls include the use of a wide variety of organisms to manage an undesirable condition in a waterbody, in this case excessive plant growth. The biological control options include microbiological agents, aquatic herbivores (fish and insects), and hybrid approaches. However, none of the available biological control methods are anticipated to be appropriate for management of the exotic plant growth at Hovey Pond. Some, such as introduction of grass carp, are not only unlikely to be successful but are also banned in Massachusetts. Therefore, these controls are not described in further detail in this report. Monitoring Although not explicitly a management action, pond monitoring is important, both for understanding and tracking pond trends, as well as preventing or containing new issues. Curtailing the spread of aquatic invasive species is critical to preventing the emergence of new management issues at Hovey Pond. Furthermore, most pioneer infestations can be successfully eradicated for minimal cost, as long as they are quickly identified and contained. Additionally, water quality can respond quickly to new or accelerated sources of nutrient and sediment pollution. Changes in water quality can lead to algae blooms or other management issues. The current study helps to update the baseline condition in the pond but water quality information will be much more useful if it is collected on a more frequent basis and at more locations (such as each of the incoming tributaries). Monitoring programs may be implemented by volunteers but are more valuable if conducted under a state or federally accepted Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) to ensure that the data will be usable for informing management decisions. Costs for implementation of a professional monitoring program, including an annual interpretation of results and recommendations for any adjustments to the current monitoring or management program, are likely to be on the order of $5,000 to $7,000 per year, depending on the extent and frequency of monitoring. Some cost savings is possible if data are primarily collected by trained volunteers with professional services limited to data analysis and recommendations. SUMMARY OF MANAGEMENT OPTIONS AND NEXT STEPS Based on the data gathered under the field assessment as well as the management goals and options presented in this report, ESS’s initial recommendations consist of the following key elements: Vegetation Management Options • Chemical Controls
o If aquatic plants are to be managed in any substantial amount at Hovey Pond, the potential need for algaecides should be considered. Hovey Pond appears to be somewhat nutrient- rich and disturbance to the pond resulting from aquatic plant control may permit algal growth to increase.
17
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
o Given the extent and established state of the variable-leaf milfoil infestation at Hovey Pond, herbicides are one of the only options that can achieve relatively rapid and large-scale initial control of the target species. Costs vary by herbicide and extent of treatment required.
o Additional chemical controls may be needed in the future, should other invasive species known from the Lake Quinsigamond/Flint Pond complex spread downstream into Hovey Pond. Including these chemical controls in the management plan for Hovey Pond would be wise, given the likelihood of this scenario. These controls should be targeted to address species that spread quickly by fragmentation (e.g. fanwort and Eurasian milfoil). • Physical Controls
o Hand harvesting may be a useful management tool for precision control of target plant growth over small areas, especially pioneer infestations that have not yet become established in the pond. Although this method can be effective over the long term, it is unlikely to yield lasting results for major infestations unless the extent of target species beds are first reduced by other larger-scale control methods.
o Water level control (winter drawdown) is a potentially cost-effective approach for control of variable-leaf milfoil at Hovey Pond. However, additional study would be necessary to determine the feasibility of such an approach. • Biological Controls
o No appropriate biological controls were identified for the control of excessive plant growth at Hovey Pond • Monitoring
o In addition to tracking trends in the condition of the pond, monitoring provides a critical tool for evaluating the success of any management efforts undertaken. Additionally, regular monitoring is the best way to ensure that any future infestations of aquatic invasive species are detected and managed before they have a chance to establish. This is particularly important at Hovey Pond, which is downstream from known sources of other exotic aquatic plants (i.e., Lake Quinsigamond/Flint Pond complex). This will help to minimize future management costs. Next Steps • Prioritize goals, objectives, and management actions for Hovey Pond using the information presented in this report • If of interest, compete a drawdown feasibility study for Hovey Pond. This can be completed at any time and does not need to be done prior to permitting other management actions at the pond. • Permit the desired management program for Hovey Pond
o Almost any in-pond management action is likely to require a permit. o The permitting cost will be dependent on the management actions selected but a cost of $8,000 should be anticipated to file for an Order of Conditions from the Grafton Conservation Commission.
18
Peter Collins December 13, 2019
o Some actions can be permitted without significant additional study or cost while others may require engineering design and/or additional environmental testing (e.g., drawdown). Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 401.330.1204 with questions.
Sincerely,
ESS GROUP, INC.
Matt Ladewig, CLM Senior Water Resources Scientist
19 From: Matt Ladewig
Hi Peter – Here are the initial thoughts to get the ball rolling. Essentially, this would be a small desktop study to gather, review, and assess the environmental information that may be available for the area. This would help you establish some basic facts about the environmental history of the area and potential implications for future improvement projects that you might be interested in pursuing (e.g., culverts, dredging, etc.). Prepare for and attend kick-off meeting to discuss project goals, approach, and expectations. Assumes two ESS senior staff would attend virtually. Review of readily available sources on federal- and state-listed waste disposal and management sites in close proximity to Flint Pond. Sources are likely to include the following: Environmental database search to obtain report listings and locations of nearby state- and federally listed waste disposal and management sites. MassDEP Searchable Sites Database search to obtain more specific information (i.e., MCP reports) on state-listed waste disposal sites located close to the pond. Review of available historic and current aerial photography as well as USGS topographic maps to determine the proximity of sites to Flint Pond and help to assess the viability of impacts from sites to the pond. Interview with EPA RCRA Project Manager or other EPA representative familiar with site conditions, status of remedial actions, and potential for off-property impacts from nearby RCRA-listed facilities, if any. Brief review of readily available and relevant portions of filings made regarding the withdrawn Access Northeast pipeline project, if any. Technical memorandum/letter report outlining the results of the review including tabulated summaries and figures to present waste disposal site locations, approximate extent of contamination (for relevant sites and if readily available), the type of contamination and their potential to have impacted soil, sediment and/or surface water conditions within either Flint Pond or on Sargents Island. Next steps would also be presented. All in, this is about a $9K effort. Let me know what you think. Matt Matt Ladewig, CLM | ESS Group, Inc. p 401.330.1204 | [email protected] Botanical Survey of Lake Quinsigamond & Flint Pond Shrewsbury/Worcester, Massachusetts
By
Donald J. Padgett, Ph.D.
Padgett Environmental Services 40 Chadderton Way Middleboro, MA 02346
For
Lake Quinsigamond Commission P.O. Box 4476 T.S. Shrewsbury, MA 01545
with
Aquatic Control Technology, LLC 11 John Road Sutton, MA 01590
August 2015
Described herein is a report of botanical surveys for the rare Vasey’s Pondweed (Potamogeton vaseyi ) within a southern portion of Lake Quinsigamond and northern portion of Flint Pond, Worcester County, Massachusetts. This species is imperiled in Massachusetts and currently listed as “endangered”. This survey was mandated by MA Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (Tracking No. 06-20539) to help minimize any rare species impacts during proposed lake management activities.
Methods
In compliance with MA Natural Heritage survey protocol, all suitable habitats (i.e., shallow open pond waters) of the target species were assessed during the current growing season, over an appropriate period for diagnostic material. An effort was made to inventory all the vascular plants encountered in the lake and to describe the plant communities.
The actual survey area was predetermined in consultation with MA NHESP (Fig 1). This area (“survey area” hereafter) was surveyed by canoe or kayak on four occasions: 14 & 18 Jul 2015 (Lake Quinsigamond), and 10 & 21 Jul (Flint Pond). If the target plant was found to be more abundant than a few scattered individuals, a 1×1 m 2 quadrat was employed to better quantify abundance levels (see Fig 8). A total of 32 quadrats were sampled. Discerning and counting individual plants of submerged vegetation, like P. vaseyi , is inherently problematic. So, as a conservative estimate, close sets of floating leaves and/or emerged inflorescences were scored as one individual.
When species were difficult to diagnose in the field, fragments were collected and later identified or confirmed. All determinations were made using Crow & Hellquist ( Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Northeastern North America ), Gleason & Cronquist ( Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada ), and/or Haines (Flora Novae- Angliae ) as references. All nomenclature is that adopted by Dow Cullina et al. (The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist ). For Potamogeton specimens, Haynes and Hellquist ( Flora of North America ) and Hellquist and Crow ( Aquatic Vascular Plants of New England , Part 1) were also consulted.
Findings
Lake Quinsigamond is a large (772 acres) freshwater lake with three distinct regions; a northern basin, southern basin, and adjacent Flint Pond. The surveys were conducted in the shallower southern basin (south of Rte 9) which is connected to Flint Pond to the southeast (Fig. 1). This portion of the lake is heavily developed with large homes, summer camps, and cottages crowding its shores, and open waters heavily used for recreational purposes. Most of the water body in the survey area is open with an occasional dense floating-leaf community, and a fairly extensive submersed community exists along most of the shoreline. Plants were essentially absent where shorelines were rocky or gravelly, but none of these areas were notably large. Floating-leaved species identified in the survey area include, Nymphaea odorata , Nuphar variegata , Brasenia schreberi, Potamogeton amplifolius, Lemna cf. minor , Spirodela polyrhiza , and Wolffia brasiliensis . Populations of Nuphar and Nymphaea were dense where found, which was sporadically and within coves of the survey area (Figs 2-3) or otherwise relatively uncommon. More coverage of floating-leaved vegetation was noted in Flint Pond than Lake Quinsigamond.
A submersed plant community was present more or less throughout the survey areas. Submersed species include Cabomba caroliniana , Ceratophyllum demersum , Elodea canadensis, Myriophyllum spicatum , M. humile , M. heterophyllum , Najas flexilis, N. minor , Potamogeton amplifolius, P. bicupulatus, P. crispus, P. pusillus, P. robbinsii , Utricularia macrorhiza, and Valisneria americana . The most common species in the survey area, and most abundant, were Valisneria americana and Najas minor . While occasionally present in the survey area, neither the invasive Cabomba caroliniana , P. crispus nor Myriophyllum spicatum , or M. heterophyllum were ever locally abundant.
The upland edge around most of the survey area is steep or developed, with a little to no littoral zone. A few emergent species were observed and include Pontederia cordata , Peltandra virginiana , and Sparganium americanum . Target species: Consistent with earlier records, Potamogeton vaseyi was observed in Lake Quinsigamond. It was also observed in Flint Pond. In Lake Quinsigamond, this species was confirmed essentially at three locations: one in the eastern cove north of Flint Pond, one in Half Moon Bay, and one along the southeastern shore of the survey area (Fig. 4). All of these occurrences had plants with floating leaves and flowers, and abundant winterbuds (Fig. 6). All populations appeared to be healthy. Abundance ranged from 2-14 plants per m 2 with 5.1-9.3 plants per m 2 on average (Table 1). Plants were too few to meaningfully estimate density in Half Moon Bay. Plants were most dense at Occurrence #1 (Fig. 4). The distribution of P. vaseyi at the in one western sub-population (Fig 4, Occurrence #3) was particularly broad. The observation of this population and the one in Half Moon Bay are consistent with my 2007 survey results. In Flint Pond, the species was confirmed essentially at four localities (Fig 5). All of these occurrences had plants with floating leaves and flowers, and abundant winterbuds (Fig. 7). At the southern two occurrences, fruits were also observed. All populations in Flint Pond appeared to be healthy. Abundance of Potamogeton vaseyi was notably higher in Flint Pond in comparison to Lake Quinsigamond (Table 1), particularly at the two most southern occurrences there (i.e., Occurrences 2 & 3 of Fig. 5). In Flint Pond, mean P. vaseyi density ranged from 22.83 to 56.33 plants per m 2 with 87 plants/m 2 counted in one sampling (Fig 8). Since the survey areas contained other pusilloid species of Potamogeton (i.e., P. pusillus and P. bicupulatus ), both of which are very similar to P. vaseyi , fragments of any suspect P. vaseyi were routinely collected and inspected under magnification. All confirmed occurrences of P. vaseyi were diagnosed by their narrow submerged leaves, free stipules, lack of nodal glands, floating blades, and axillary winter buds (Figs 6-7). Undoubtedly, P. vaseyi exists in other locations within the Lake where not surveyed and perhaps elsewhere within the survey area— probably intermixed with other pusilloid pondweeds. The entire survey area (Fig. 1), minus the rocky segments, appears to be suitable habitat for this species, as it is for its congeners.
Conservation recommendations: Potential threats to Potamogeton vaseyi in southern Lake Quinsigamond or northern Flint Pond include presumed intense competition from invasive species and perhaps even a water quality issue. While the invasive species ( Potamogeton crispus , Cabomba , Myriophyllum spicatum ) identified during these survey dates were not plentiful anywhere—presumably kept in check with prior management—in the survey area, Najas minor was very abundant (see Fig 8). This is problematic as it was often observed densely-intermixed among plants of P. vaseyi . In eastern areas and coves of Flint Pond, extensive dense, dark, floating colonies of some type of algae were observed which could potentially be a problem too. Perhaps this is indicative of a nutrient input issue with this side of the pond. Other threats are not obvious other than inadvertent damage by boat propellers or recreational activities as all occurrences were close to boat docks/boating areas. I recommend careful spot application of herbicide to control the submersed invasives ( Cabomba, Myriophyllum, Najas ) whereby known occurrences of Potamogeton vaseyi can be avoided.
Conclusions
Individuals of Vasey’s Pondweed ( Potamogeton vaseyi ) were observed at three localities during comprehensive surveys of southern Lake Quinsigamond and four localities in Flint Pond in July 2015. These populations appeared to be healthy and reproductive. An effort should be made to protect these populations of an otherwise rare species, and assume others exist in this body of water.
Figure 1. Prescribed Survey Areas for Potamogeton vaseyi in southern Lake Quinsigamond (hashed yellow area) and northern Flint Pond (solid yellow area).
Figure 2. Open water of Lake Quinsigamond (14 Jul 2015) showing floating-leaved community. Top: western shore, north of Sunset Beach. Bottom: Half-moon Bay
Figure 3. Open water of Flint Pond (10 Jul 2015) showing floating-leaved community. Top photo facing east.
Figure 4. Occurrences of Potamogeton vaseyi in Lake Quinsigamond observed in July 2015. Numbered circles represent occurrences where abundance was measured (See Table 1).
111
42 15’24 N, 071 44’28 W
42 15’23 N, 071 44’29 W
Lake Quinsigamond
Flint Pond
Half Moon Bay
42 14’43 N, 071 44’53 W 42 14’42 N, 071 44’24 W
42 14’49 N, 071 44’58 W 42 14’46 N, 071 44’36 W 42 14’40 N, 071 44’52 W 42 14’43 N, 071 44’38 W 333 222 42 14’39 N, 071 44’36 W
Figure 5. Occurrences of Potamogeton vaseyi observed in Flint Pond (north of Rte 20) July 2015. Numbered circles represent occurrences where abundance was measured (See Table 1).
42 15’05N, 071 44’21W 111 42 15’05N, 071 44’18W
42 15’01N, 071 44’06W
Flint Pond
42 14’49N, 071 44’13W 42 14’51N, 071 43’59W 42 14’51N, 071 44’09W 42 14’50N, 071 44’00W
222 42 14’48N, 071 44’02W
333
Figure 6. Documentation of Potamogeton vaseyi in Lake Quinsigamond (17 Jul 2015). Arrows indicate floating leaves or axillary winterbuds.
Figure 7. Documentation of Potamogeton vaseyi in Flint Pond (10 Jul 2015). Arrows indicate floating leaves or axillary winterbuds.
Figure 8. Abundance of Potamogeton vaseyi in Flint Pond. Top: At south end of survey area (Occurrence #3 of Figure 5) on 10 Jul 2015. Bottom: Sampling quadrat with abundant Najas minor .
Floating leaves of P. vaseyi Table 1. Measure of abundance of Potamogeton vaseyi (July 2015). Refer to Figures 4-5 for location of occurrences, respectively. n = number of quadrats sampled. Means and ranges are number of individuals per m 2.
______Lake Quinsigamond
Occurrence # n Mean Range ______
1 6 9.33 6-14
2 3 5.33 4-8
3 6 5.16 2-11
Flint Pond
Occurrence # n Mean Range ______
1 6 22.83 6-47
2 5 44.80 38-59
3 6 56.33 27-87
______
TOWN OF GRAFTON GRAFTON MEMORIAL MUNICIPAL CENTER 30 PROVIDENCE ROAD GRAFTON, MASSACHUSETTS 01519
COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
This packet contains all of the information an applicant needs to apply for Grafton’s Community Preservation Act (CPA) funding, including:
1. An explanation of the annual timeline for the Community Preservation Committee 2. Scoring Criteria 3. Instructions for submitting a full application
Timeline The Community Preservation Committee (CPC) will make recommendations for funding both at Annual Town Meeting which occurs in May, as well as Semi-Annual Town Meeting, which typically occurs in October. While applications are accepted throughout the year, the following timeline provides deadlines by which applications must be received and presented to the CPC in order to be included in each Town Meeting.
Timeline Step Approx. Timeline/Deadline Optional Grantwriting Workshop Annually on First Thursday of November Applications must be received for Spring Town Meeting On or by February 1 Applications presented to CPC Annually on Fourth Thursday of March Optional Grantwriting Workshop Annually on Fourth Thursday of April Annual Town Meeting Annually on Second Monday in May CPC Annual Hearing on Community Needs and Priorities Annually on Fourth Thursday of June Applications must be received for Semi-Annual TM On or by July 1 Applications presented to CPC Annually on Fourth Thursday of August Semi-Annual Town Meeting Annually on Third Monday in October
Applicants are encouraged, but not required to attend a Grantwriting Workshop in the fall or spring to assist in preparing applications for the following Town Meeting. Applicants may also request a meeting with the CPC at any time to ask questions or obtain input on projects for which they would like to seek funding.
Depending on the complexity of the project and the point in the annual timeline, the CPC may conduct a preliminary review of each application that is received, upon which additional information may be requested of applicants if needed. (Applicants are encouraged to provide more time for planning and review of more complex projects.) The CPC may conduct a preliminary review of each application that is received, upon which additional information may be requested of applicants if needed. Applications will be posted on the CPC’s website, and applicants will be invited to present their projects at a CPC
TOWN OF GRAFTON COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
meeting. At the Presentation the CPC will accept public comment, and will then deliberate and vote on recommending funding for each project after the application is presented.
Each year the CPC holds a public hearing in June (after the Annual Town Meeting) to gather input on the needs and priorities of the community with respect to the CPA program areas.
If project funding is successfully approved at Town Meeting, grant recipients will subsequently enter a Grant Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding with the CPC, and will be required to submit regular project reports and photographs to the designated CPC representative.
Guidelines for Project Submission 1. Project requests must be submitted via the online form which can be found on the Community Preservation Committee’s web page at [addresshere]. 2. Requests must be documented with appropriate supporting information. The use of photos, maps, visual aids and other supplemental information is encouraged. 3. Obtain quotes for project costs whenever possible. If not available, estimates may be used provided the basis of the estimate is fully explained. 4. Requests must be received at least three months prior to the spring or fall semi-annual Town Meeting. More advance time is recommended for complex projects. See the Timeline for submission dates. 5. For applicants that have multiple project requests, please prioritize projects. 6. Applicants must be present at a CPC meeting to answer questions. The CPC meets the fourth Thursday of each month. Please note that there are legal limitations on the use of CPA funds. Additional information on the CPA and the Community Preservation Committee can be found at www.communitypreservation.org. If you are in doubt about your project’s eligibility you are encouraged to submit an application so that the Committee can determine eligibility.
Please use the online application form to submit a proposal. Accompanying documentation may be submitted via the form, electronically via email to [coordinator’s address], or by hard copy (original and 9 copies) to:
Community Preservation Committee Grafton Municipal Center 30 Providence Road Grafton, MA 01519
______Revised: 8-28-2020 TOWN OF GRAFTON COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
Project Requirements & Evaluation Criteria
All proposed projects must be eligible for CPA funding according to the requirements set forth in the law before further consideration can be given.
Requirements for all projects: 1. Projects must fit the description of eligible assets and activities, as shown on Chart 1. 2. For projects on Town-owned property, an appropriate Town department, board, or committee must be the applicant or co-applicant. 3. For projects that entail privately-owned assets, public access (as appropriate) and/or public benefit must be ensured. 4. Permanent or commensurate protection of assets for their intended use (affordable housing, conservation, or historic preservation) must be provided for as required under Chapter 44B and the Anti-Aid Amendment to the Massachusetts Constitution. 5. For projects related to housing development or rehabilitation, CPA funds can only be used to support the creation of units that are affordable to income-eligible households. 6. CPA funds cannot replace funding previously committed from the Town budget or other sources.
Comparative Evaluation Criteria
Applications that present a thorough description of the project with as many details as possible, have significant support from other Town Boards/Committees, have gathered public input and endorsements, and present a comprehensive, well described and reasonable budget will have the greatest likelihood of success. Budget requests must be thorough because there will not be an opportunity to change the budget amount after the CPC makes its funding recommendation. For applications that take place on Town property, consultation with the Development Team and coordination with other Town staff who may be involved in the implementation of the project will help to ensure a complete application.
All recommendations and award amounts are subject to the availability of CPA funds and approval by Town Meeting. Projects must meet all the legal criteria of the Community Preservation Act. However, meeting all of the criteria does not guarantee CPC support. The Grafton Community Preservation Committee will give preference to proposals which address as many of the following general criteria as possible:
Consistency with Grafton’s Community Preservation Plan Goals and Priorities, Open Space and Recreation Plan, Housing Production Plan, and other local and regional planning documents related to community preservation that have undergone a public planning process; Projects should be highly visible and accessible, generating broad benefits to the community. Priority is given to projects that are part of a coordinated, connecting vision for area improvements.
______Revised: 8-28-2020 TOWN OF GRAFTON COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
Priority is given to projects that preserve resources that would otherwise be threatened and/or serve a currently underserved population. Priority is given to projects that leverage funding from other sources and/or fill a gap where other sources are not available. Projects should demonstrate cost-sensitivity both in the short-term use of CPA funds, and the long-term maintenance or lifespan of the resource for which the funds are used.
Category Specific Criteria Proposals which address as many of the following criteria as possible within the appropriate program area category(s) will receive preference:
Open Space and Recreation Meets one or more of the following goals (Score 1-5 for each goal): Promote the preservation of open spaces and natural resources including wildlife habitat, water quality and watershed protection, working farms and forests. Expand and improve recreation facilities to serve Grafton residents of all ages and abilities. Create connected systems of trails for walking and biking, as well as greenways to protect habitats and natural resources. (Not every facility serves the needs of every resident. CPA funds should support a range of offerings so that residents have access to a variety of passive- and active recreational offerings.)
Fits under the following priorities (Select one priority level, score 1-3 for Second Priority or 4-5 for First Priority): First Priority: Protect water resources, critical habitats, and historic open space features. Second Priority: Preserve heritage landscapes and expand opportunities for active and passive recreation.
Historical Meets one or more of the following goals (Score 1-5 for each goal): Preserve assets that are significant to Grafton’s history and contribute to the town’s unique sense of place. Improve public access to historic assets and increase awareness of the Town’s history. Fits under the following priorities (Select one priority level, score 1 for Third Priority, 2-3 for Second Priority, or 4-5 for First Priority): First Priority: Prevent the loss of historic buildings or other threatened assets Second Priority: Create or expand community engagement with Grafton History Third Priority: Preserve or enhance curb appeal of Grafton villages and neighborhoods
______Revised: 8-28-2020 TOWN OF GRAFTON COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
Affordable Housing Meets one or more of the following goals (Score 1-5 for each goal): Meet Grafton’s needs for appropriate housing options affordable to low and moderate income residents, including workforce housing.
Promote the creation and preservation of affordable housing through the adaptation of existing buildings and redevelopment sites.
Support low and moderate income households in accessing housing that they can afford.
Fits under the following priorities (Select one priority level, score 1 for Third Priority, 2-3 for Second Priority, or 4-5 for First Priority): First Priority: Create or preserve SHI-eligible affordable housing units (up to 80% AMI) Second Priority: Provide support for households to access affordable housing or prevent displacement Third Priority: Create or preserve units affordable to moderate income households (80-100% AMI)
______Revised: 8-28-2020 CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
Part 1: COVER PAGE
DATE: February 10, 2021 APPLICANT NAME: Grafton Lions Charities on behalf of Dauphinais Memorial Park
CoAPPLICANT NAME (if applicable): ______
PHONE: 508-395-1125 EMAIL: [email protected] Mailing Address: PO Box 111 - 68 Brigham Hill Road Grafton, MA 01519 SITE INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: Dauphinais Park Rehabilitation c/o Grafton Lions Charities Project Location: PO Box 111 - 68 Brigham Hill Road Grafton, MA 01519
ASSESSOR’S MAP 64 LOT# 1
PROPERTY OWNER’S NAME: Grafton Lions Charities, Inc.
Deed recorded in the Worcester District Registry of Deeds in Book: 51791 Page: ______201
Brief Project Summary (a detailed description will be required with your supporting information) Add outdoor bathrooms for public use which will include a septic system
Estimated Start Date: November 1 2021 Estimated Completion Date: June 1 2022
CPA CATEGORY (check most appropriate)
Open Space _____ Historic Preservation _____ Recreation _____X Community Housing ______
Total Project Cost CPA Funding Request $175,835 $175,835
______Revised: 8-28-2020 CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
Part 2: Project Narrative Please provide narrative responses to all relevant questions. Answers are required for questions marked with *.
* Describe the project, including location and the property involved: *Construction of outdoor public bathroom facilities to be located on the east side of the current Lions building.Construction of a septic system to service the outdoor public bathroom to be located on the south side of the current Lions building.
* Consistency with CPA Objectives: How does the project meet the general evaluation criteria and the priorities identified for the applicable program area? How does the project meet the specific criteria in the Community Preservation Act Funding Allowable Uses Table? *As you are aware the Grafton Lions, as deeded caretakers of the park, maintain the property for public use. We estimate that more than 5000 Grafton citizens make use of our walking trails, soccer field and open space yearly. The Property is offered free of charge for non-profit organizations and a nominal $50 fee for any for profit organizations such has FC Stars and Best Soccer clinics. * Need met by the Project: How does the project benefit the public? Does the project preserve a threatened resource? What populations will it serve? Has there been a public process, plan, or site evaluation to document the goals for this project? Is there demonstrated community support for the project? *These public bathroom facilities are necessary to serve the more 5000 people who use the park throughout the year Currently porta potties are provided for use and paid for by the Grafton Lions.
Feasibility: Identify any assessments or approvals that have been received or will be required for this project (i.e., Zoning, Conservation, Historical Commission, Historic District Commission, etc.), and any known barriers or potential impediments to project completion. Does the project meet ADA requirements, if applicable? *The bathrooms will meet all ADA requirements. All necessary permits will be obtained before construction. The sptic system has been perked and has met the Board of Health requirements
Coordination: Identify partner organizations or entities that will be involved in the implementation of this project. Has the proponent consulted with the Development Team, relevant boards and committees, community partners, and immediate abutters? Have there been meetings or other initiatives to gather public input and support for this project? If the project is for open space or historic preservation acquisition, a Conservation Restriction (CR) or Preservation Restriction (PR) is required. A third party holder of the CR or PR must be identified.
Project Timing: Is the timing of this project essential to preserve a threatened resource or to leverage an opportunity to create an asset?
* Timeline: Explain the steps of the project and the anticipated timeline for completion: * We would anticipate starting on the project immediately upon approval of and availability of funds.
______Revised: 8-28-2020 CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
The following narrative questions are to be completed only for the applicable program area: Open Space Natural Resource Value: Describe how the project will protect natural resources such as water quality, wildlife habitat, drinking water resources, wetlands, vernal pools, or agricultural land. Indicate whether the project is located within or near an identified natural resource area such as a Wellhead Protection Area, Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC), Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP)/BioMap2, or Scenic Landscape Inventory.
Historic Open Space Resources: Will the project protect open space with historic significance or that contains archeological resources, memorials, stone walls, old roads, or scenic vistas, or that is adjacent to a scenic road? Please explain:
Connectivity: Does this project expand the connection of open space parcels to protect natural resources, create a greenway, or enable development of a trail network? Does this project improve public access to natural or historic resources, or expand opportunities for recreation or educational programming? Please explain:
Recreation Amenities: Describe the amenities to be created or improved through this project, the types of programming that may be enabled, and the population that will be served. * We would be improving the bathroom facitities which are currently porta potties
Access: Does this project expand opportunities for outdoor recreation or improve access to recreation facilities for all or a segment of Grafton’s population? Does the project incorporate connectivity to surrounding neighborhoods and resources?
Historic Preservation Historical Significance: Describe the significance of the historic asset that this project will protect or preserve. Indicate whether the asset has been identified in a local survey of historic properties, is located within a Local Historic District, or if it is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or State Historic Register.
______Revised: 8-28-2020 CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
* Eligibility: To be eligible under the category of Historic Preservation, projects must entail physical assets which are either listed on the National Register of Historic Places or State Historic Register, or have been determined by the Grafton Historical Commission to be of historical significance. Please attach documentation that the asset has received historic designation.
Historic Preservation: Describe how the project will prevent the loss or destruction of the historic asset. If applicable, how will the project comply with the U.S. Department of Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation? Will the project require approval from the Grafton Historic District Commission or from the holder of a Preservation Restriction?
Public Benefit: Describe how the project will ensure public access and/or enhance awareness of Grafton’s history. Is the asset public or privately owned? How is the site or asset currently used, and will the project result in a change of use or accessibility?
Affordable Housing Project Description: Provide a project description or summary of action plan detailing how the requested funds will be used to create, preserve, or support affordable housing. List any involved public, private, or nonprofit partners.
Housing Needs: How does the project meet housing needs and preferences described in Grafton’s Housing Production Plan? What population or income level will be assisted? (Note: CPA funds can assist households earning up to 100% of Area Median Income. In the case of mixed-income development, CPA funds can only be used for the affordable portion of a project.)
Land Use Preferences: Describe how the project aligns with goals articulated in Grafton’s Master Plan or area strategic plans. Does the project entail historic preservation, adaptive reuse, or conversion of an existing building to affordable housing? Is a specific site located in an area served by water/sewer infrastructure, and/or convenient to public transit, retail, or other amenities?
______Revised: 8-28-2020 CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
Part 3: Project Budget
Budget Summary Total Project Cost CPA Other Funds Total Other Funds: % of Total Funds Requested $ $ $ % $175,1358 $175,835 0
Equipment is generally defined as an item with a useful life expectancy of more than one year. Supplies are defined as an item with a useful life of less than one year. Construction means all types of work done on a particular property or building including erecting, altering or remodeling.
Budget Categories (Leave any category blank if not applicable to your project) CPA OTHER TOTAL FUNDS FUNDS Personnel Equipment Supplies Contractual Construction $175, 835 $175,835 Other TOTAL D Please attach quotes, estimates, or other supporting documents.
Budget Other Funds Identify the amount of other (non-CPA) funds or resources to be contributed for this project. Sources include private, federal, state or local government, or any other sources. Organization Item Amount Type (cash, in-kind, etc.)
Is there an opportunity for other matching funding contingent upon the approval of CPA funds? If so, please explain.
Will the project require funding over multiple years? If so, please provide anticipated future funding requirements. The CPC cannot commit funding for future years. Requests for funding must be applied for each funding round.
Lifetime Cost: Is the project going to result in a requirement for ongoing maintenance? If yes, please explain how this will be managed. * the facilities will be maintained by members of the Grafton Lions Club ______Revised: 8-28-2020 GRAFTON LIONS CLUB
HANDICAP TOILET - UTILITY -STORAGE ROOM ADDITION
68 BRIGHAM HILL ROAD GRAFTON, MASSACHUSETTS
4
A. FRONT APPROACHES - SWINGING DOORS
RAISED
WOMENS RESTROOMS
B. HINGE SIDE APPROACHES - SWINGING DOORS
MENS
C. LATCH SIDE APPROACHES - SWINGING DOORS
REACH REQUIREMENT DOOR CLEAR SPACE SIGNS / PICTOGRAMS MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS
ACCESSIBLE TABLE SEATING
STAIRS AND HANDRAILS DETAILS RESTROOM ACCESSORIES
SERVICE COUNTER CLEARANCES
WALKING PARALLEL TO A WALL
CONTROLS, SWITCHES AND OUTLETS THRESHOLDS HANDRAILS DOOR NOTES TOILET AND LAVATORIES CONTROLS & OPERATING MECHANISMS GRAB BARS HAZARDS & PROTRUDING OBJECTS SPACE ALLOWANCE & REACH RANGES ENTRANCES AND EXITS
SANITARY FACILITIES (GENERAL)
FIXED OR BUILT-IN SEATING, TABLES & COUNTERS
ELECTRICAL SWITCHES & ELECTRICAL OUTLETS
SANITARY FACILITY FIXTURES & ACCESSORIES
SIGNS & IDENTIFICATION
FLOORS & LEVELS
STORAGE FACILITIES & AREAS
CORRIDORS & AISLES
· · ·
·
·
·
(3) #4 CONTINUE LAP 6" MIN. 1'-0" 3"
6" 1'-6" 6" JOINT REINFORCEMENT SINGLE JOINT REINFORCEMENT TYP. THICKENED SLAB FOOTING BOND BEAM INTERSECTION BOND BEAM CORNER XX WYTHE WALL SINGLE WYTHE CORNER SCALE: N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S.
TOWN OF GRAFTON GRAFTON MEMORIAL MUNICIPAL CENTER 30 PROVIDENCE ROAD GRAFTON, MASSACHUSETTS 01519
COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
This packet contains all of the information an applicant needs to apply for Grafton’s Community Preservation Act (CPA) funding, including:
1. An explanation of the annual timeline for the Community Preservation Committee 2. Scoring Criteria 3. Instructions for submitting a full application
Timeline The Community Preservation Committee (CPC) will make recommendations for funding both at Annual Town Meeting which occurs in May, as well as Semi-Annual Town Meeting, which typically occurs in October. While applications are accepted throughout the year, the following timeline provides deadlines by which applications must be received and presented to the CPC in order to be included in each Town Meeting.
Timeline Step Approx. Timeline/Deadline Optional Grantwriting Workshop Annually on First Thursday of November Applications must be received for Spring Town Meeting On or by February 1 Applications presented to CPC Annually on Fourth Thursday of March Optional Grantwriting Workshop Annually on Fourth Thursday of April Annual Town Meeting Annually on Second Monday in May CPC Annual Hearing on Community Needs and Priorities Annually on Fourth Thursday of June Applications must be received for Semi-Annual TM On or by July 1 Applications presented to CPC Annually on Fourth Thursday of August Semi-Annual Town Meeting Annually on Third Monday in October
Applicants are encouraged, but not required to attend a Grantwriting Workshop in the fall or spring to assist in preparing applications for the following Town Meeting. Applicants may also request a meeting with the CPC at any time to ask questions or obtain input on projects for which they would like to seek funding.
Depending on the complexity of the project and the point in the annual timeline, the CPC may conduct a preliminary review of each application that is received, upon which additional information may be requested of applicants if needed. (Applicants are encouraged to provide more time for planning and review of more complex projects.) The CPC may conduct a preliminary review of each application that is received, upon which additional information may be requested of applicants if needed. Applications will be posted on the CPC’s website, and applicants will be invited to present their projects at a CPC
TOWN OF GRAFTON COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
meeting. At the Presentation the CPC will accept public comment, and will then deliberate and vote on recommending funding for each project after the application is presented.
Each year the CPC holds a public hearing in June (after the Annual Town Meeting) to gather input on the needs and priorities of the community with respect to the CPA program areas.
If project funding is successfully approved at Town Meeting, grant recipients will subsequently enter a Grant Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding with the CPC, and will be required to submit regular project reports and photographs to the designated CPC representative.
Guidelines for Project Submission 1. Project requests must be submitted via the online form which can be found on the Community Preservation Committee’s web page at [addresshere]. 2. Requests must be documented with appropriate supporting information. The use of photos, maps, visual aids and other supplemental information is encouraged. 3. Obtain quotes for project costs whenever possible. If not available, estimates may be used provided the basis of the estimate is fully explained. 4. Requests must be received at least three months prior to the spring or fall semi-annual Town Meeting. More advance time is recommended for complex projects. See the Timeline for submission dates. 5. For applicants that have multiple project requests, please prioritize projects. 6. Applicants must be present at a CPC meeting to answer questions. The CPC meets the fourth Thursday of each month. Please note that there are legal limitations on the use of CPA funds. Additional information on the CPA and the Community Preservation Committee can be found at www.communitypreservation.org. If you are in doubt about your project’s eligibility you are encouraged to submit an application so that the Committee can determine eligibility.
Please use the online application form to submit a proposal. Accompanying documentation may be submitted via the form, electronically via email to [coordinator’s address], or by hard copy (original and 9 copies) to:
Community Preservation Committee Grafton Municipal Center 30 Providence Road Grafton, MA 01519
______Revised: 8-28-2020 TOWN OF GRAFTON COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
Project Requirements & Evaluation Criteria
All proposed projects must be eligible for CPA funding according to the requirements set forth in the law before further consideration can be given.
Requirements for all projects: 1. Projects must fit the description of eligible assets and activities, as shown on Chart 1. 2. For projects on Town-owned property, an appropriate Town department, board, or committee must be the applicant or co-applicant. 3. For projects that entail privately-owned assets, public access (as appropriate) and/or public benefit must be ensured. 4. Permanent or commensurate protection of assets for their intended use (affordable housing, conservation, or historic preservation) must be provided for as required under Chapter 44B and the Anti-Aid Amendment to the Massachusetts Constitution. 5. For projects related to housing development or rehabilitation, CPA funds can only be used to support the creation of units that are affordable to income-eligible households. 6. CPA funds cannot replace funding previously committed from the Town budget or other sources.
Comparative Evaluation Criteria
Applications that present a thorough description of the project with as many details as possible, have significant support from other Town Boards/Committees, have gathered public input and endorsements, and present a comprehensive, well described and reasonable budget will have the greatest likelihood of success. Budget requests must be thorough because there will not be an opportunity to change the budget amount after the CPC makes its funding recommendation. For applications that take place on Town property, consultation with the Development Team and coordination with other Town staff who may be involved in the implementation of the project will help to ensure a complete application.
All recommendations and award amounts are subject to the availability of CPA funds and approval by Town Meeting. Projects must meet all the legal criteria of the Community Preservation Act. However, meeting all of the criteria does not guarantee CPC support. The Grafton Community Preservation Committee will give preference to proposals which address as many of the following general criteria as possible:
Consistency with Grafton’s Community Preservation Plan Goals and Priorities, Open Space and Recreation Plan, Housing Production Plan, and other local and regional planning documents related to community preservation that have undergone a public planning process; Projects should be highly visible and accessible, generating broad benefits to the community. Priority is given to projects that are part of a coordinated, connecting vision for area improvements.
______Revised: 8-28-2020 TOWN OF GRAFTON COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
Priority is given to projects that preserve resources that would otherwise be threatened and/or serve a currently underserved population. Priority is given to projects that leverage funding from other sources and/or fill a gap where other sources are not available. Projects should demonstrate cost-sensitivity both in the short-term use of CPA funds, and the long-term maintenance or lifespan of the resource for which the funds are used.
Category Specific Criteria Proposals which address as many of the following criteria as possible within the appropriate program area category(s) will receive preference:
Open Space and Recreation Meets one or more of the following goals (Score 1-5 for each goal): Promote the preservation of open spaces and natural resources including wildlife habitat, water quality and watershed protection, working farms and forests. Expand and improve recreation facilities to serve Grafton residents of all ages and abilities. Create connected systems of trails for walking and biking, as well as greenways to protect habitats and natural resources. (Not every facility serves the needs of every resident. CPA funds should support a range of offerings so that residents have access to a variety of passive- and active recreational offerings.)
Fits under the following priorities (Select one priority level, score 1-3 for Second Priority or 4-5 for First Priority): First Priority: Protect water resources, critical habitats, and historic open space features. Second Priority: Preserve heritage landscapes and expand opportunities for active and passive recreation.
Historical Meets one or more of the following goals (Score 1-5 for each goal): Preserve assets that are significant to Grafton’s history and contribute to the town’s unique sense of place. Improve public access to historic assets and increase awareness of the Town’s history. Fits under the following priorities (Select one priority level, score 1 for Third Priority, 2-3 for Second Priority, or 4-5 for First Priority): First Priority: Prevent the loss of historic buildings or other threatened assets Second Priority: Create or expand community engagement with Grafton History Third Priority: Preserve or enhance curb appeal of Grafton villages and neighborhoods
______Revised: 8-28-2020 TOWN OF GRAFTON COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Application Instructions for Community Preservation Funding
Affordable Housing Meets one or more of the following goals (Score 1-5 for each goal): Meet Grafton’s needs for appropriate housing options affordable to low and moderate income residents, including workforce housing.
Promote the creation and preservation of affordable housing through the adaptation of existing buildings and redevelopment sites.
Support low and moderate income households in accessing housing that they can afford.
Fits under the following priorities (Select one priority level, score 1 for Third Priority, 2-3 for Second Priority, or 4-5 for First Priority): First Priority: Create or preserve SHI-eligible affordable housing units (up to 80% AMI) Second Priority: Provide support for households to access affordable housing or prevent displacement Third Priority: Create or preserve units affordable to moderate income households (80-100% AMI)
______Revised: 8-28-2020
CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
Part 2: Project Narrative Please provide narrative responses to all relevant questions. Answers are required for questions marked with *.
* Describe the project, including location and the property involved:
Creation of a community park at Whitney park on Mill st
* Consistency with CPA Objectives: How does the project meet the general evaluation criteria and the priorities identified for the applicable program area? How does the project meet the specific criteria in the Community Preservation Act Funding Allowable Uses Table?
The project falls under Recreation
* Need met by the Project: How does the project benefit the public? Does the project preserve a threatened resource? What populations will it serve? Has there been a public process, plan, or site evaluation to document the goals for this project? Is there demonstrated community support for the project?
Currently Whitney Park is an unused area of grass with no amenities. Once completed the park will serve all ages
Feasibility: Identify any assessments or approvals that have been received or will be required for this project (i.e., Zoning, Conservation, Historical Commission, Historic District Commission, etc.), and any known barriers or potential impediments to project completion. Does the project meet ADA requirements, if applicable?
Zoning, Conservation Commission. The project will meet all ADA requirements
Coordination: Identify partner organizations or entities that will be involved in the implementation of this project. Has the proponent consulted with the Development Team, relevant boards and committees, community partners, and immediate abutters? Have there been meetings or other initiatives to gather public input and support for this project? If the project is for open space or historic preservation acquisition, a Conservation Restriction (CR) or Preservation Restriction (PR) is required. A third party holder of the CR or PR must be identified.
Engine Company Two Association, Recreation Commission, Select Board
Project Timing: Is the timing of this project essential to preserve a threatened resource or to leverage an opportunity to create an asset? No
* Timeline: Explain the steps of the project and the anticipated timeline for completion:
Design: June 2021 - September 2021 Construction: November 2021 - July 2022
______Revised: 8-28-2020 CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
The following narrative questions are to be completed only for the applicable program area:
Open Space
Natural Resource Value: Describe how the project will protect natural resources such as water quality, wildlife habitat, drinking water resources, wetlands, vernal pools, or agricultural land. Indicate whether the project is located within or near an identified natural resource area such as a Wellhead Protection Area, Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC), Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP)/BioMap2, or Scenic Landscape Inventory.
NA
Historic Open Space Resources: Will the project protect open space with historic significance or that contains archeological resources, memorials, stone walls, old roads, or scenic vistas, or that is adjacent to a scenic road? Please explain:
NA
Connectivity: Does this project expand the connection of open space parcels to protect natural resources, create a greenway, or enable development of a trail network? Does this project improve public access to natural or historic resources, or expand opportunities for recreation or educational programming? Please explain:
NA
Recreation
Amenities: Describe the amenities to be created or improved through this project, the types of programming that may be enabled, and the population that will be served.
Walking/exercise path, playground equipment, small water park/splash pad, gathering space, sitting areas, maintenance building
Access: Does this project expand opportunities for outdoor recreation or improve access to recreation facilities for all or a segment of Grafton’s population? Does the project incorporate connectivity to surrounding neighborhoods and resources?
Yes
Historic Preservation
Historical Significance: Describe the significance of the historic asset that this project will protect or preserve. Indicate whether the asset has been identified in a local survey of historic properties, is located within a Local Historic District, or if it is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or State Historic Register.
NA
______Revised: 8-28-2020 CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
* Eligibility: To be eligible under the category of Historic Preservation, projects must entail physical assets which are either listed on the National Register of Historic Places or State Historic Register, or have been determined by the Grafton Historical Commission to be of historical significance. Please attach documentation that the asset has received historic designation.
NA
Historic Preservation: Describe how the project will prevent the loss or destruction of the historic asset. If applicable, how will the project comply with the U.S. Department of Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation? Will the project require approval from the Grafton Historic District Commission or from the holder of a Preservation Restriction?
NA
Public Benefit: Describe how the project will ensure public access and/or enhance awareness of Grafton’s history. Is the asset public or privately owned? How is the site or asset currently used, and will the project result in a change of use or accessibility?
NA
Affordable Housing
Project Description: Provide a project description or summary of action plan detailing how the requested funds will be used to create, preserve, or support affordable housing. List any involved public, private, or nonprofit partners.
NA
Housing Needs: How does the project meet housing needs and preferences described in Grafton’s Housing Production Plan? What population or income level will be assisted? (Note: CPA funds can assist households earning up to 100% of Area Median Income. In the case of mixed-income development, CPA funds can only be used for the affordable portion of a project.)
NA
Land Use Preferences: Describe how the project aligns with goals articulated in Grafton’s Master Plan or area strategic plans. Does the project entail historic preservation, adaptive reuse, or conversion of an existing building to affordable housing? Is a specific site located in an area served by water/sewer infrastructure, and/or convenient to public transit, retail, or other amenities?
NA
______Revised: 8-28-2020 CPA APPLICATION (USE ONLINE FORM)
Part 3: Project Budget
Budget Summary Total Project Cost CPA Other Funds Total Other Funds: % of Total Funds Requested $ $104,600 $ $83,000 $ $21,600 % 21
Equipment is generally defined as an item with a useful life expectancy of more than one year. Supplies are defined as an item with a useful life of less than one year. Construction means all types of work done on a particular property or building including erecting, altering or remodeling.
Budget Categories (Leave any category blank if not applicable to your project) CPA OTHER TOTAL FUNDS FUNDS Personnel Equipment Supplies Contractual $83,000 $21600 $104600 Construction Other TOTAL D Please attach quotes, estimates, or other supporting documents.
Budget Other Funds Identify the amount of other (non-CPA) funds or resources to be contributed for this project. Sources include private, federal, state or local government, or any other sources. Organization Item Amount Type (cash, in-kind, etc.) Affordable housing Civil site survey $1,600
Engine Co 2 Assoc Labor $20,000 in-kind
Is there an opportunity for other matching funding contingent upon the approval of CPA funds? If so, please explain. Additional funding will be available for construction and maintenance
Will the project require funding over multiple years? If so, please provide anticipated future funding requirements. The CPC cannot commit funding for future years. Requests for funding must be applied for each funding round. No
Lifetime Cost: Is the project going to result in a requirement for ongoing maintenance? If yes, please explain how this will be managed. Engine Co. Two will sign an agreement to maintain the park for ten years ______Revised: 8-28-2020 from the date of completion 2/24/2021 Town of Grafton Mail - CPC application Whitney Park
Joann Duncan
CPC application Whitney Park
[email protected]
Joann,
I have enclosed the application for CPC funding for the engineering work at Whitney Park. One issue is that under CPC Category the Total Project Cost is shown as $100,000. The actual number is $104,600. For some reason I cannot change it. Also, the CPA funding request is $83,000 not $80,000. The program will not allow me to change both of these numbers. If you have an y questions please contact me. Thanks
Ray
Ray Mead
Construction Management Services
217 Brigham Hill Road
Grafton, MA 01536
774-535-3758
“Leaders who don’t listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have nothing to say”
cpa_application_2020 (1) (1).pdf 1044K
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=c664a31432&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1692591600598748125&simpl=msg-f%3A16925916005… 1/1 Stantec Planning and Landscape Architecture P.C. 226 Causeway Street Boston MA 02114 Tel: (617) 523-8103
February 1, 2021
Town of Grafton Planning Department 30 Providence Road Grafton, MA 01519
Reference: Proposal, Whitney Park, N. Grafton, MA
Dear Ray,
Stantec Planning and Landscape Architecture is pleased to present you with the following proposal for Design Consulting Services to renovate Whitney Park in North Grafton, MA. The preliminary program for the park project generally consists of the following:
• Create parallel parking around the outside of the park area for additional parking. Incorporate existing poles into the design. • Walking path (pavers) around the entire park with exercise stations. • A water feature for adults and children, including filter systems and electronic control. • Areas where people can sit out of the sun utilizing shade curtains or structures. • All surfaces will be artificial turf and/or poured rubberized play surfaces. • Install play equipment for children. • Lighting and security cameras. • A building for controls and filtering systems for the water features and electrical service • Utility services. • Stormwater management.
SCOPE OF SERVICES:
Stantec will provide Site Design Services as required for the development of the project. Stantec shall coordinate work with the Client and other design consultants. Services will include:
Landscape Architecture
• Overall Project Management • Coordination with internal team consultants • Detailed Design and Layout of all site elements, including curbs, walls, seating, paving and fountain design/water feature. • Detailed Grading Design
STANTEC
February 1, 2021 Page 2 of 9
Reference: Proposal, Whitney Park, N. Grafton, MA
• Planting Design • ADA Design and Compliance Review • Cost Estimating • Lead project meetings and public presentations • Graphic Representations
Civil Engineering
• Parking and roadway layout and grading • Utility Services • Stormwater Management/ Stormwater Report (required for Planning Board)
Architectural/ Structural Design
• Design of equipment building. • Code Review
MEP
• Design of Fountain and other mechanical equipment • Electrical Service and Metering • Site Electrical Plan • Site Lighting Plan
SCOPE OF WORK
Based on our initial conversations, we recommend the following steps and have provided the following scope of work for your review.
Task 1 Kick-off Meeting/ Project Start-Up
At a kick-off meeting, Stantec will review the following:
1. Stantec will perform a site walk and review the scope of the project. 2. Stantec will review a schedule for the design and construction. 3. Topographic Survey – Stantec will retain a subconsultant to perform a comprehensive survey of the project areas.
Task 1 Deliverables:
Meeting notes and schedule Topographic Survey
STANTEC
February 1, 2021 Page 3 of 9
Reference: Proposal, Whitney Park, N. Grafton, MA
Task 2 Schematic Plan and Estimate of Probable Project Cost
Based upon direction provided under Task 1, Stantec will prepare schematic drawings & key details for renovation of the park. Options will be considered for various programmatic elements. Schematic designs will be presented in plan, renderings, perspective views and precedent images. Stantec will meet with the Client and other stakeholders as required to present the schematic design options. Feedback will be incorporated into a final schematic design plan. Once a final schematic design plan is approved, Stantec will prepare and provide a detailed Opinion of Probable Project Costs. These itemized costs are anticipated to include:
• Materials and Installation Costs Demolition and Site Removals Drainage Renovations and Improvements Park Improvements, including a building for mechanical equipment
• Contractor Costs General Construction Conditions Contractor’s Overhead and Profit Construction and Materials Testing Costs
• Contingencies Construction Contingencies
Task 2 Deliverables:
• Schematic Design Drawing Options Package • Schematic Plan Rendering (hard copy and electronic format) • Final Schematic Plan • Schematic Opinion of Probable Project Costs
• Attendance at up to two (2) meetings with the Client
Task 3 Design Development / Permitting Drawings
Based upon the approval of the schematic design drawings, Stantec will prepare Design Development documents which will be sufficient to submit to the Grafton Planning Board for Site Plan approval.
Design Development Drawings will include the following at a minimum:
• Site Preparation/ Demo Plan • Site Layout plans
STANTEC
February 1, 2021 Page 4 of 9
Reference: Proposal, Whitney Park, N. Grafton, MA
• Site Materials plans • Site Grading Plans • Site Planting Plans • Site Planting Details • Site Enlargement Plans • Site Details • Utility Plans • Site Lighting and Electrical Plans • Fountain/ Water Feature Design Drawings o Fountain Design Plans o Fountain Equipment Drawings • Green Infrastructure (stormwater management) in coordination with the civil Engineer • Equipment Building o Plans and Elevations. o Equipment Layout • Site Plan and Perspective Rendering Updates
Outline Specifications
Planning Board (Site Plan Review)
We understand that due to the revisions to the parking and surrounding roadways. Site Plan Review from the Grafton Planning Board is required. Stantec will lead the preparation of required submission materials and will attend one pre-submission meeting with the Planning Department and up to 2 Planning Board Hearings.
Project Meetings with Client
Phase 3 Deliverables:
• 100% Design Development Drawing and Specification Set
• Attendance at up to two (2) Planning Board Hearings
• Attendance at up to two (2) meetings with the Client
Task 4 Construction Documents
Based upon the Planning Board approval, Stantec will prepare construction documents for bid, setting forth in detail the requirements for construction of the park. Stantec will prepare drawings that fix and describe the project in layout and materials, identify infrastructure, site access, rehabilitation of grade differentials and other issues as identified during the schematic design process and the review process during construction. Drawing Development will be reviewed
STANTEC
February 1, 2021 Page 5 of 9
Reference: Proposal, Whitney Park, N. Grafton, MA
biweekly and the Construction Drawings will be prepared in AutoCAD format and are anticipated to include: . Site Preparation/ Demo Plan . Site Layout plans . Site Materials plans . Site Grading Plans . Site Planting Plans . Site Planting Details . Site Enlargement Plans . Site Details . Utility Plans . Site Lighting and Electrical Plans . Fountain/ Water Feature Design Drawings • Fountain Design Plans • Fountain Equipment Drawings . Green Infrastructure (stormwater management) in coordination with the civil Engineer . Equipment Building • Plans and Elevations • Equipment Layout
Stantec will also prepare Technical Specifications and compile the Project Manual for bidding by selected field contractors as reviewed and approved by the Client. It is assumed that Front End Matter, Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and General Conditions will be provided by Stantec with the assistance of the Client.
Drawings and Specifications will be submitted to the Client at the 90% and 100% review stages. Stantec will attend three (3) review and coordination meetings with the Client. It is suggested that Stantec distribute the drawings and specifications to the bidders electronically via a project FTP site (provided by Stantec as part of the project), hard copies to be provided to the Client. Task 4 Deliverables:
• 90% Construction Documents including Technical Specifications
• An Updated Opinion of Probable Project Costs at 90% CD phase
• 100% Construction Documents and Technical Specifications
• Hard Copies Required by the Client and Electron Distribution for Bidding
• Attendance at up to three (3) meetings with the Client
Task 5 Bidding Phase Services:
STANTEC
February 1, 2021 Page 6 of 9
Reference: Proposal, Whitney Park, N. Grafton, MA
Stantec will assist the Client in identifying contractors that should be considered for bidding this project. Stantec will also respond to questions in writing as they arise. Stantec will prepare addenda information as required and assist the Client in the evaluation of bids and sub-contractor qualifications. Stantec will review the bids and attend a de-scoping meeting with the Client to evaluate and discuss the bids. Task 5 Deliverables:
• Preparation of a Bid Evaluation Memo and Vendor Recommendation
• Attendance at one (1) meeting with the Client
• Attendance at one (1) Bid Review/De-scoping Meeting with the Client
Task 6 Services During Construction
Task 6.1: Construction Meetings and Site Visits:
Stantec will provide services during construction of the project in support of the Client. We anticipate these services will include:
• Attendance at the (1) Pre-Construction Conference. It is assumed that meeting notes will be prepared and distributed by the selected general contractor.
• Attendance at biweekly (or appropriately timed) project meetings. For the purposes of this proposal we have assumed attendance at up to sixteen (16) project meetings by one (1) senior Stantec project team member, in addition to the Pre-Construction Conference. It is assumed that meeting notes will be prepared and distributed by the selected construction manager/general contractor. It is assumed that these meetings will be held at the site and site visits will be held in conjunction with the project meetings depending on the progress and schedule.
• Up to three (3) other site visits will be held at appropriate milestones during construction.
• Site visit notes and photographic documentation will be prepared for each site visit. It is assumed that two (2) senior Stantec project team members will attend the milestone visits.
Task 6.2: Office/Construction Administration:
Stantec will provide assistance to the Client in the administration of the construction contract including review of contractor submittals, shop drawings, requests for information, schedule of values and applications for payment, and the preparation of sketches and field reports as required.
STANTEC
February 1, 2021 Page 7 of 9
Reference: Proposal, Whitney Park, N. Grafton, MA
Task 6.3: Project Closeout:
Stantec will prepare a preliminary Punch List and monetized Final Punch List for the scope of work outlined in this proposal. In addition Stantec will review the contractor/vendor’s as-built field layout drawings and warranty information prior to delivery to the Client. Phase 6 Deliverables:
• Construction Administration, Submittals, Shop Drawings, RFIs, Sketches, etc.
• Meeting Attendance
• Pre-Construction Conference (1st Weekly Meeting)
• Up to sixteen (16) Regular biweekly Construction Meetings
• Site Visit Notes for up to eight (8) site visits (includes 3 critical site visits if they need to occur other than the weekly meeting)
• Punch List/Site Visit Meeting
• Project Closeout, project manual and as built review etc.
STANTEC
February 1, 2021 Page 8 of 9
Reference: Proposal, Whitney Park, N. Grafton, MA
COMPENSATION
Compensation for services shall be on a fixed fee basis per task. A budget for each task of the above scope Is indicated below:
Task 1. Kick-off Meeting/ Project Start-up/ Survey $9,000 Task 2. Schematic Plan and Estimate of Probable Project Cost $16,000 Task 3. Design Development / Permitting Drawings $60,500 Task 4. Construction Documents $137,000 Task 5. Bidding Phase Services $4,000 Task 6. Services During Construction $65,500
Total Labor $292,000
Expenses $3,500
Total Fee $296,500
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic Services and include actual expenditures such as, but not limited to mileage at the current IRS rate, reprographic and plotting services, postage and travel. Where not stated as being included in the fees, project specific subconsultant, contractor, lab and other similar third party charges will be charged as invoiced to Stantec. Reimbursable expenses will be invoiced with a fifteen percent (15%) markup.
ASSUMPTIONS
The scope of work and budget described above is based on a final design with an approximate construction cost of $2,500,000.00. If the estimate of probable construction costs exceeds this amount, Stantec reserves the right to request Additional Services.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
If the Client authorizes services which exceed those listed under Scope of Services and are not customarily furnished in accordance with accepted practice, they shall be compensated as an additional service. Such additional expenses shall include, but not be limited to major revisions in drawings due to causes beyond the control of the Stantec, including significant changes to the Design and drawings resulting from meetings with Town departments, or revisions requested by the
STANTEC
February 1, 2021 Page 9 of 9
Reference: Proposal, Whitney Park, N. Grafton, MA
Client after approval of the Stantec’s plans by the Client, and submission to the municipality, except as included in the scope above.
SERVICES NOT INCLUDED:
• Application / Filing Fees • Geotechnical borings • Traffic Analysis • Off-site Improvements • Structural Engineering not associated with the mechanical building (design of walls, etc.) • Site Electrical Engineering not associated with the splash pad and lighting • Irrigation Design • Historical Review • Design of off-site improvements required for mitigation of project impacts • Permits of any kind other that listed in this proposal • Drawing submittals other than listed in this proposal • Environmental Engineering, soil classification or LSP services
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Please let us know if you have any questions.
Regards,
STANTEC PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE P.C.
Kevin Beuttell RLA LEED AP Bob Corning RLA Senior Associate Senior Principal Ph: 617.654.6005 Ph: 617.654.6018 kevin.beuttell @stantec.com robert.corning @stantec.com>
STANTEC
February 19, 2021 Raymond Mead Construction Management Services 217 Brigham Hill Road Grafton MA 01536 and Town of Grafton 30 Providence Road Grafton MA 01519
Via email to [email protected]
Re: Proposal for Professional Services In Response to the Request for Proposals for Whitney Park, Grafton, Massachusetts
Dear Mr. Mead:
Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc. and Carolyn Cooney & Associates are pleased to offer the following proposal for the Design, Engineering, and Planning Services in response to your RFP for the Whitney Park Project. The scope of work described herein will facilitate the provision of professional services for the following: Mapping the existing conditions of Whitney Park and the surrounding ways; Preliminary Design Plans for a Whitney Park community park improvement project; Permitting through local boards and commissions, Final Construction Documents for the Whitney Park improvements; Preliminary and Final Cost Estimates for the Whitney Park improvements Construction period services to review and assure the specified products and materials are used, to answer questions to interpret the construction documents, to view the construction work as it progresses, and to verify that the Construction Documents are followed.
Background: Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc. is an established firm with an outstanding reputation for quality services. The qualifications and diverse training of our staff, their areas of expertise, and the tools and technology we employ allow us to provide an exceptional level of service to our clients. We have a qualified in-house staff ready to perform surveying, engineering, and environmental services. Occasionally a project requires the services in an area outside our scope of expertise. In these cases, our relationships with allied professionals allow us to provide services in a coordinated, multidisciplinary team to suit the needs of individual projects. We will partner with Carolyn Cooney & Associates to provide Landscape Architectural services. We will recommend the services of Goddard Consulting LLC to provide wetland resource area delineation services, particularly to delineate the resources from which the Riverfront Area and Local Wetland buffer zones will be drawn, to determine the jurisdiction of the Conservation Commission. If any additional services are required Proposal for Professional Services Whitney Park, Grafton, Massachusetts February 19, 2021 Page 2
beyond our areas of expertise, we maintain professional relationships with experts in such diverse fields as rare species habitats, herpetology, botany, biology, hydrogeology, geotechnical and structural engineering.
Introduction of Team: We have called upon our professional network and we are proposing the following team of professionals to conduct the Whitney Park Project. Key personnel would manage the tasks and support staff for any given task would be selected from our staff based upon the area of specialty required to complete the task.
Project Manager/ Civil Engineer: Patrick Healy, P.E. Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc.
Land Surveyor: Robert Nunnemacher, PLS Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc.
Landscape Architect/Designer: Carolyn Cooney, LA Carolyn Cooney & Associates
Wetland Scientist: Scott Goddard, PWS Goddard Consulting LLC
If our proposal is successful, they will be available for any and all meetings that may be required. Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc.’s office in Boylston is only 8 miles from the project site, and this will be the hub of the project team.
Qualifications & Experience: Our team has experience on all phases of activity identified in this effort, surveying, engineering, planning, zoning, community interface, open space and park design, and the execution of construction documents. We have the resources and commitment to partner with you and the Town of Grafton to ensure the Community will have a successful project.
Patrick Healy is a licensed civil engineer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with over thirty years of experience, with expertise in site planning and design, permitting, and stormwater compliance. He has been a project manager at Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc. for over 25 years. He frequently assembles and participates on teams of allied professional on projects ranging from small to very large. His experience in designing and permitting such a variety of projects through local, state, and federal agencies allows him to consider the various regulatory requirements when designing a project. This comprehensive approach to the design of projects leads to smooth coordinated permitting reviews.
Mr. Healy is currently working on the new Table Talk manufacturing facility in downtown Worcester, several retail sites, a puppy nursery for a national not for profit, an multiple residential sites. As an experienced professional and a former small town official, Patrick is adept at public speaking and presentations. Mr. Healy and Ms. Ellsworth have worked together on numerous housing, manufacturing, and commercial sites. Healy will be the project manager, coordinating the efforts and scheduling the various project tasks. He will also be responsible for the engineering details, calculations, and regulatory compliance Proposal for Professional Services Whitney Park, Grafton, Massachusetts February 19, 2021 Page 3
issues, including the preparation of the Notice of Intent to be filed with the Grafton Conservation Commission. Patrick will direct and coordinate the preparation of the construction documents once the preliminary design has been accepted.
Carolyn Cooney is a registered landscape architect in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with over 35 years of experience in all aspects of the profession. She is the Principal of Carolyn Cooney & Associates (CCA), Milford, MA, a small design firm which has specialized in open space/recreational projects and other public facilities since its establishment in 2001. Ms. Cooney will lead the community visioning and preliminary design portion of the project, and will be responsible for the design, details, and specifications of the pedestrian and recreational amenities, landscape, and new surfacing. She will be assisted by Darrell Bird, MA registered landscape architect. Mr. Bird is equally experienced in the profession of landscape architecture, and has special expertise in the technical aspects of spray decks and water features, design documentation and construction administration.
Scope of Work: The tasks below describe out understanding of the scope of work required to produce the plans, procure approvals, and produce construction documents that will be needed for the construction of improvements to Whitney Park. Tasks A&B would be completed prior to requesting funding of the overall project from Town Meeting so you will have plans and images to use in your pitch to Town Meeting. Based upon our team’s experience with community park projects, and given the land area of the site and the elements described in your request for proposals, we anticipate that the project budget for the Whitney Park project will be in the range of $800,000 to $1,000,000. The design fees, construction documents, and especially the construction period services are related to the scope of work that will be included in the project. If your anticipated budget is significantly different, we would like the opportunity to review the scope of work and fees that are described below. Please let us know of any discrepancies that you see or can offer any other guidance.
TASK A - Existing Conditions Survey TLA will conduct research in the records of the Town of Grafton and Worcester Registry of Deeds, field reconnaissance and instrument surveys to determine the property boundaries, easements, rights of way, topographic conditions, and utilities that are present on the site. We will locate the wetland resource area boundaries in proximity to the site in order to draw the riverfront area defined by the wetland protection regulation and the wetland buffer zones defined by the Grafton Wetland Protection Bylaw. We will create a CAD plan to be used for the design plans in the following tasks.
Wetland Resource Area Delineation and Report Goddard Consulting LLC (GC) will conduct the delineation of wetland resource areas before TLA conducts the survey. Goddard will prepare a report suitable for inclusion with the Notice of Intent to be filed with the Grafton Conservation Commission.
TASK B - Conceptual Design Working with the client and TLA, CCA will prepare a conceptual plan of the Community Park and features that will be enhanced and constructed. We will meet with the stakeholders to refine the conceptual design to agree upon the scope of the project, and to produce an exhibit that will be used to gain community support and approval and to seek funding for the construction of the project. Proposal for Professional Services Whitney Park, Grafton, Massachusetts February 19, 2021 Page 4
TASK C - Design and Permitting TLA and CCA will complete the site design plans showing the plan view, grading, utilities, and site amenities, including drawing sections and details of the proposed improvements, and prepare stormwater calculations and designs as may be necessary to comply with the Grafton Stormwater Bylaw. We will prepare an erosion and sedimentation control plan. Using the plans prepared by TLA and CCA, we will assist you with preparing applications, advertisements, and notices to parties in interest for approvals from the Town of Grafton. We will represent you at public hearings with the officials and agencies list, and we will make presentations at the public hearings.
Subject to confirmation from the Inspector of Buildings and Town Planner, we believe you will need approvals as follows:
Permit Board/Committee Public Hearing Required Scenic Roads Bylaw Planning Board/Tree Warden Yes Wetlands Protection Bylaw Conservation Commission Yes Stormwater Bylaw Conservation Commission Yes Site Plan Review Planning Board Yes
TASK D - Construction Documents TLA and CCA will prepare construction drawings and bid specifications for the improvements that will create the basis for bidding and contracting for the work. We will take the design plans, and add more notes and details specific to construction, and write specifications for the various design elements, civil work, and landscaping. We will assist you in soliciting bids and evaluating bids in order to select a qualified contractor. We presume that the contract itself will be provided by the Client or its attorney.
TASK E - Construction Period Services We will work with you and the contractor to hold a preconstruction meeting, to review conditions and approvals, and set up a process for reviewing submittals. We will visit the site periodically to review the status and progress of work and to answer any questions that may come up. We will review submittals, and upon completion review the work for conformity with the contract documents, create a punch list of items that need to be addressed prior to the final closeout.
Availability: We understand that the project is contingent upon funding by the Annual Town Meeting and the process with the Town of Grafton may commence as early as April 1, and we stand ready to begin the surveying and mapping services as soon as the weather conditions allow.
Professional Fees: Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc. and our allied professionals are pleased to offer the following fee proposal for the Design, Engineering, and Planning Services in response to your RFP for the Whitney Park Project. Fees described herein correspond to our written proposal. Proposal for Professional Services Whitney Park, Grafton, Massachusetts February 19, 2021 Page 5
We estimate the fees for each Task and professional to be as follows:
Estimated Fees Task TLA CCA GC A $ 5,500 $ 1,000 B $ 3,000 $ 8,000 C $ 15,000 $ 1,000 D $ 10,000 $ 12,000 E $ 5,500 $ 5,000 Total Fees $ 39,000 $ 26,000 $ 1,000 Expense Allowance*$ 2,000
Total Fees and Expenses $ 68,000
*Does not include filing fees, advertising costs, certified list of abutters, or postage for abutter notifications, which will be paid directly by the client.
The fees described herein for each sub task are estimated. Actual amounts billed for each sub task may vary based upon the number of hours worked by the professional team members and the Hourly Fees shown on Exhibit A included herewith.
Presumptions, Limitations, and Exclusions The estimates are based upon the following assumptions, presumptions, limitations, and exclusions: 1. That this proposal is subject to the attached Exhibits A & B containing our Standard Conditions and Hourly Fee Schedule. 2. That acceptance of this proposal constitutes permission by the land owner or owners authorizing us, in conjunction with the Client, to undertake surveys and testing, to prepare plans and to make applications on their behalf with the Town of Shrewsbury and such other agencies as may be required. Written permission shall be provided to TLA. 3. That since March of 2020 the State of Massachusetts and individual Town Governments have had varying levels of regulations placed on its citizens and businesses do to the COVID 19 Pandemic and related issues. We work very hard to maintain work and filing schedules and but that delays caused by unforeseen delays as a result of government schedules, or mandated work stoppages due to regional or worksite outbreaks and employee quarantine are beyond our control. We require all Clients/client entities with whom we have personal contact to alert us if a positive test for COVID or a related illness occur. 4. That we will not perform work related to traffic assessments, evaluations, improvements, or inspections, and that you will contract separately for those services. 5. That we will not perform any studies or applications related to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), and that we will provide a separate proposal for those services, if they become necessary. Unless another State permit is required, MEPA approval should not be required. We do not anticipate that this project will trigger a review under the MEPA Regulations at 301CMR11.03. Proposal for Professional Services Whitney Park, Grafton, Massachusetts February 19, 2021 Page 6
6. That we will not perform any wildlife studies or other botanical or biological work and that you will contract separately for those services should they become necessary. 7. That no as-built survey work is included in this proposal. Work that may be required for preparation of an as-built plan will be described in a subsequent proposal should these services become necessary. 8. That no mortgage surveys or Land Court Plans are required or included in the proposal fee. 9. That we will not prepare any financing-related statements or certifications. 10. That we will not prepare any cost estimates, percentage of completion calculations, schedules, forms, certifications, or review of payment requisitions. 11. That construction layout, field engineering, inspection reports, and the like are not included in this proposal. If you require surveying construction period services such as those listed above, or others, we would be pleased to prepare a proposal for those services. 12. That we will not prepare any certifications, statements, affidavits, or other plans or documents related to construction or as-built conditions. 13. That we will not attend or represent the Client at any local, state, or federal agency meetings except as described herein. 14. That meeting time with the Client, Attorney, or other agencies in addition to the 12 man- hours which is included herein will be billed according to our hourly fee schedule. 15. That filing fees, application fees, advertising fees, and certified mail postage will be paid directly by the Client. 16. That direct expenses will be invoiced separately. We suggest an allowance of $2,000 to cover such items as mileage, plan copies, and survey supplies. 17. That Soil Testing will be required for the design of stormwater systems. Excavation services for the soil testing will be provided by the Client. 18. That the services of a Wetland Scientist and Landscape Architect, will be required and that said services will be contracted and paid separately by the Client. 19. That retaining walls, if required, will be designed by others after permits have been granted and that structural or geotechnical engineering is not included in the scope of work or fee. 20. That studies of historical or archaeological resources is not required and that the scope of work does not include any work relative thereto. 21. That projections of air pollution are not required and that the scope of work does not include any work relative thereto. 22. That water pressure and availability of supply are unknown at this time. If this information is needed, we can assist you with obtaining record test information from the Water District near the point of connection to the system only, and will not design any supplemental storage capacity, off-site improvements, or booster systems.
23. That any tasks not described herein are not included in the scope of work or proposal fee described herein. Additional Fees will apply for work requested outside the
Proposal for Professional Services Whitney Park, Grafton, Massachusetts February 19, 2021 Page 8
EXHIBIT A STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. The Client is responsible for providing access to the Land for TLA, its employees, agents, and consultants to enter upon the Land for the purposes of carrying out, from time to time, the services described in this Agreement. 2. The Client agrees that the completion of certain phases of the services described in this Agreement may alter the terrain or vegetation in the area of the Land. The Client shall indemnify and hold harmless TLA for such reasonable damage as may ensue from the work. 3. The Client agrees that TLA is not obligated or required to prepare for or appear in any litigation or arbitration proceeding nor any preliminary to such proceedings on behalf of the Client except in consideration of additional compensation as may be mutually agreed upon. 4. The Client agrees to limit TLA's liability to the Client and to all Contractors on the project, such that the total aggregate liability of TLA due to TLA's professional negligent acts, errors, design defects, or omissions for services rendered under this Agreement shall not exceed the limit of this Agreement or $250,000, whichever is less. The Client also agrees to notify any Contractor who may perform work in connection with any of the services described in this Agreement of the limitation of TLA's professional liability and to require that said Contractor agree, as a condition of the Client/Contractor agreement or contract, to limit TLA's professional liability as described in this paragraph. 5. The Client understands and agrees that, in connection with the performance of the services as described in this Agreement, any persons or entities engaged by TLA to perform any portion of the services described in this Agreement shall be independent contractors of TLA. Any such persons or entities shall be solely responsible for the methods and means used in performing their services and they shall not be considered or deemed to be employees or agents of TLA. 6. The Client agrees that TLA shall not be responsible for observations, reports or compliance with respect to OSHA regulations as they may affect or relate to designs, recommendations, or conclusions rendered during the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 7. Since TLA does not have any control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, the Client agrees that any estimates of the expected cost of construction prepared by TLA shall be considered to be preliminary and agrees that TLA shall not be held liable for differences between estimates and construction costs. 8. All documents, including original drawings, reports, estimates, specifications, and field notes and data are and remain the sole and exclusive property of TLA as instruments of service. Excepted from this statement of ownership of documents is a mylar or original plan that will be released for recording at an appropriate Registry of Deeds. The Client may, at its expense and after payment of all outstanding invoices, obtain record prints of drawings, in consideration of which the Client will use them solely in connection with the above described project and not for the purpose of making subsequent extensions or enlargements thereto. Proposal for Professional Services Whitney Park, Grafton, Massachusetts February 19, 2021 Page 9
9. This agreement may be terminated by either party by written notice if the other party has breached a material term of this Agreement and such breach has persisted without cure for twenty (20) days. TLA shall then be paid for services completed up to the time of the termination. TLA's payment shall be based upon the fee schedule and the numbers of hours worked. 10. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 11. Invoices will be rendered at the completion of phases or tasks or on a monthly basis and are due upon presentation. Invoices will be mailed to the Client at the Client's address. A finance charge of 1 1/2% per month (18% per year) on all sums under $500.00 and of 1% per month (12% per year) on all sums over $500.00 will be added to the unpaid balance after 30 days from the date of the invoice that remains unpaid. It is further understood that if there is a failure of the Client to pay any invoice due to TLA within 30 days after the date thereof, TLA may, without waiving any other claim or right against the Client, and without liability whatsoever to the Client, terminate its performance hereunder. In the event that TLA places any unpaid invoice in the hands of an agency or attorney for collection, the Client agrees to pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Out-of-pocket expenses will be billed on an as received basis and will be due on receipt of invoice. 12. In the event that TLA is obstructed or delayed in the completion of these services by any act of the Client or the Client's agents or by any act beyond the control of TLA, including but not limited to snow cover, inclement weather, illness, strikes, failure of equipment, unanticipated degree of difficulty in completing the services, or delay created by approving agencies, the period of completion shall be extended for a period of time equal to the time lost by reason of any or all of the aforementioned causes. 13. This agreement may be amended by mutual agreement in the form of a confirmation of additional services signed by both parties. 14. The Proposal and the Professional Services Agreement to which these Standard Conditions are attached are valid and in force for thirty days after the issuance of the appropriate Proposal or Professional Services Agreement after which time they may be withdrawn. 15. TLA will not be responsible for damage incurred to unmarked underground components of irrigation (sprinkler) systems or underground animal control wires (a.k.a. "invisible fences"). 16. TLA will not be held responsible for costs incurred due to installers or contractor errors. 17. TLA estimates of fees for professional services are understood to be for initial submissions to City/Town boards only. Any revisions required by Client, Municipal Entity, or Governmental Agent will be billed at the hourly rate according to the Fee Schedule shown in Exhibit B. 18. We accept Cash and/or check for payment of retainer and invoice 19. All unpaid invoices shall be paid prior to any and all plan submissions and filings.
Proposal for Professional Services Whitney Park, Grafton, Massachusetts February 19, 2021 Page 10
EXHIBIT B FEE SCHEDULE
Per Hour
Principal $150.00
Professional Staff $140.00
Public Meeting Representation Time $210.00
Technical Staff $130.00
Support $ 90.00
Field Crew - 2 Person $140.00
GPS Crew $150.00
Field Crew - 3 Person $200.00
Soil Testing - (4-hour minimum) $150.00
Court Time (Waiting, Testifying, Being Deposed) Double Rate
Time after 8 hours per day and Saturday time is invoiced at 1.5 times the regular hourly rate. Charge time begins when personnel leave our office and ends upon return to our office.
Direct Expenses are billed at cost plus an accounting service fee of 10%. Direct Expenses will include such items as field supplies, printing and copying, plotting, shipping, mailing, mileage, expendable supplies, telephone, fax, plans and deeds, and other materials necessary to complete the project.
BACKGROUND LAND SURVEYING STAFF Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc. is a Our Licensed Professionals and privately held corporation, with Andrew Property Line Surveys & Plans technical staff have a wide range of B. Liston serving as president of the Land Court Surveys & Plans experience in preparing many types of corporation, his wife, Stephanie B. Liston Title Insurance Surveys & Plans plans, tests, calculations, profiles, and is treasurer. The firm is dedicated to Topographic Surveys & Plans reports, both by manual and computerized methods. All work is supervised by our providing outstanding service to its Subdivision Design & Plans clients. Licensed Professionals. Condominium Site and Unit Plans William I. Thompson, CE, founded the Boundary Line Disputes Education firm in 1893, when he began surveying Construction Layout Members of the Staff are educated in and making blueprints. His son, Francis areas such as architecture, art, business, B, Thompson, CE, took the reigns in civil engineering, design, landscape, 1941, and expanded the business into CIVIL ENGINEERING mathematics, and surveying. This areas of civil engineering. Thompson- combination of education and experience Development Feasibility Studies Liston Associates, Inc. was incorporated contributes to the firm’s overall expertise, in 1963 as their successor. Site Planning & Design professional manner, and effective Roadway & Driveway Design presentations in the areas of surveying, Andrew B. Liston represents the fourth Septic System & Sewer Design design, planning, engineering, and generation of the family to be involved hydrology. Continuing education is with the firm. He is registered in Pump Station Design Drainage and Flood Studies encouraged to gain knowledge of design Massachusetts as a Professional Civil and construction trends and regulations. Hydraulic and Hydrologic Studies Engineer (P.E.) and a Professional Land Surveyor (P.L.S.). Mr. Liston served as an Stormwater Management Plans Licensed Professionals appointed member of the Massachusetts Construction Phasing Plans Andrew B. Liston, P.E., P.L.S. – Board of Registration of Professional Grading Designs & Plans Engineers and Professional Land President of the firm, managing all areas Surveyors, and served as President of the Watershed Protection Filings of work, Wetlands Protection Filings National Council of Examiners for Robert Nunnemacher, P.L.S. – Engineering and Surveying. Environmental Filings Project Surveyor, Property Line and Comprehensive Permit Plans SERVICES Title Insurance Surveys, Land Court Project Permitting – Local, State, Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc. was Surveys, Subdivisions, formed to provide land surveying, civil Federal engineering, and planning services for the Patrick J. Healy, P.E. – varied needs of clients in the areas of land Senior Project Manager, Feasibility SITE PLANNING ownership, use, and development. Studies, Site Planning and Permitting, Wetland Restoration Plans Grading, Utilities, Hydrology, Erosion We continue to offer civil engineering, Playgrounds Control Plans, Stormwater Pollution land surveying, planning, landscape Athletic Facilities Prevention Plans, Construction Period architecture, stormwater and erosion Lighting Plans Support, Inspections, and Reports, control services to public and private sector, residential, educational, municipal, Support Staff institutional, commercial, and industrial Seth Liston, Office Manager – clients in the Central Massachusetts and EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL Metro-West areas. Business Development, Client Erosion Control Plans Support, Project Support, Drafting, TECHNOLOGY Sedimentation Controls Field Crew Management, Scheduling. In the preparation of survey and design Stormwater Pollution Prevention plans, staff uses the latest industry Plans for EPA Compliance standard Autodesk, Carlson Survey, and Stormwater Management Plans compatible software. Hydrology and stormwater management designs are prepared using HydroCAD software.
ANDREW B. LISTON, P.E., P.L.S. Professional Engineer Professional Land Surveyor President
Education Worcester and Holden, Massachusetts public schools University of Vermont - B.S. Mathematics, 1970 Worcester Polytechnic Institute - B.S. Civil Engineering, 1971
Employment Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc., Boylston, Massachusetts 1971 to present - President of the firm
Professional Qualifications Registered Professional Engineer - Massachusetts #30401 Registered Professional Engineer - Connecticut #PEN0029225 Registered Professional Land Surveyor - Massachusetts #28976 Maine #1212 (Not renewed) New Hampshire #621(Retired)
Professional Positions Commonwealth of Massachusetts Board of Registration of Professional Engineers and Professional Land Surveyors –Past Chairman United States Council for International Engineering Practice (USCIEP) [RE: Cross Border practice under NAFTA and APEC] Board of Operations – Past President Board of Directors - Past Member National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) Past-President 1999-2000 President 1998-1999 President-Elect 1997-1998 Northeast Zone Vice President 1995-1997 TAC of ABET - Alternate Representative - 1992-1996
Professional Memberships American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) - Member Massachusetts Association of Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers (MALSCE) Past President Central Massachusetts Chapter of MALSCE - Past President MALSCE Surveying Examinations Committee - Past Chairman MALSCE Proprietor's Council - Past Chairman National Institute for Engineering Ethics (NIEE) – Past Member of Board of Directors & Past Member-at-Large National and Massachusetts Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE/MSPE) - Member National Society of Professional Surveyors (NSPS) - Past Area 1 Director
Awards MALSCE Surveyor of the Year - 1987 MALSCE Presidential Citations for Surveying Examinations Committee work - 1987, 1992 NCEES Distinguished Service Award - 2002 2018/02/06
ROBERT NUNNEMACHER, P.L.S. Professional Land Surveyor Project Surveyor CADD Manager
Education Sutton, Massachusetts public schools Worcester State College B. S. Education (Physics/Math), 1972
Employment United States Army 1962 - 1965 Personnel Sergeant
Kenneth M. Shaw Engineering, Inc., Sutton, Massachusetts 1965 - 1977 Surveyor
Lavallee Brothers, Inc., Sutton, Massachusetts 1977 - 1985 Project Surveyor
Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc., Boylston, Massachusetts 1985 - Present Project Surveyor
Professional Qualifications Registered Professional Land Surveyor - Massachusetts #28977 - 1978
PATRICK J. HEALY, P.E. Professional Civil Engineer Project Manager
Education Boylston, Massachusetts public schools Boys State Delegate Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts A.S. Architectural Engineering Technology, 1985 B.S. Civil Engineering Technology, 1987 University of Massachusetts, Business Management courses
Professional Employment F. W. Madigan Company, Inc., Worcester, Massachusetts 1986 - 1987 Field Engineer
Thompson-Liston Associates, Inc., Boylston, Massachusetts 1987 to Present Project Manager
Professional Qualifications Registered Professional Engineer # 39804 –Massachusetts Certified Professional Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Specialist (CPESC) #2101 - expired
Professional Memberships American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE/BSCES) – Member Massachusetts Association of Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers, Inc. (MALSCE) - Central Massachusetts Chapter – Past President, Past Vice President, Past Treasurer
Civic Activities Town of Boylston - Selectman, 1993 - 2002, Chairman 3 years Town of Boylston – Grant Administrator 2011 - 2013 Knights of Columbus, Council 12701, Boylston, Various Offices YMCA of Central Massachusetts - Properties Committee, Corporator, Various Building Committees Hillside Restoration Project, Inc. – Board of Directors, Past Treasurer, Owner’s representative for restoration of a National Landmark building
Awards Outstanding Young Men of America, 1989 Wentworth Alumni Association, Young Alumni Award, 1997 Carolyn Cooney and Associates
Introduction to CCA
Carolyn Cooney and Associates (CCA) is a landscape architectural firm established in 2001 specializing in public work. As CCA we have completed a range of landscape architectural projects that have included highway corridor planting, urban streetscape design, design within historic sites, park and recreational design, and open space and recreational planning. We have successfully collaborated with many state and local agencies and municipalities to find solutions to complex challenges such as those generated by diverse user groups, finite construction budgets, restricted maintenance facilities, and the requirement for long term sustainability. Our repeat public clients include the Massachusetts Division of Conservation and Recreation, the cities of Waltham, Holyoke and Chicopee, and town of Sandwich. rd. We have also successfully worked on projects with the towns of Falmouth, Barnstable, Plymouth, Concord, Sharon and the city of Boston.
CCA is experienced in handling projects from program development, site analysis and conceptual design through final design, construction documentation and construction administration. The majority of our projects have included public presentations and a community participation process. CCA's flexible, responsive, service oriented design approach emphasizes meeting the varying needs and desires of our clients and the end users.
Our modest size allows key personnel the opportunity to engage directly and continuously in all phases on all projects. CCA has strong professional relationships with a number of sub-consultants with whom we have worked when survey, engineering, ecological evaluations or other specialized expertise was needed.
Ms. Carolyn Cooney is a registered Landscape Architect with over 35 years of experience in that capacity. At CCA, she has served as principal-in-charge, project manager and project designer. A significant number of these projects have involved renovation and reuse of existing sites and facilities. Ms. Cooney has current certification by the National Recreation and Park Association as a Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI).
Mr. Darrell Bird is a registered Landscape Architect with over 35 years of experience in Landscape Architecture within the public sector, with particular emphasis on design implementation, construction documentation, and construction administration.
CCA is insured with professional liability, automobile and general liability insurance in the amounts typically required by public agencies.
CAROLYN COONEY and ASSOCIATES
Ms. Cooney is a registered Landscape Architect in the State of Massachusetts. Throughout her career, she has specialized in public work and served as designer and project manager on a wide range of public projects. As Principal of CCA she has led the community design process for each of the park and playground projects. At CCA and previous firms, she has had significant experience in ADA/MAAB code compliance. She has special Carolyn Cooney, L.A. expertise in native planting.
Selected Project Experience at CCA Professional Experience Carolyn Cooney & Associates 2001 to Present Vietnam Memorial Masterplan and Phase I, Paul C.K. Lu & Associates, Belmont MA 1988-2001 Sandwich, MA Brown & Rowe, Boston MA 1985-1986 Rivers Park Improvements, Weir Associates, Boston MA 1983-1984 Chicopee, MA William Pressley Associates, Newton MA 1981-82 Bobby Connors Playground, Roy Rydell Associates, Santa Cruz, CA 1979-81 Waltham, MA Schnadelbach Braun Partnership, Philadelphia PA 1973-1977 Elsie Turner & Graverson Playgrounds, Waltham, MA Gilmore Playground, Education Waltham, MA University of Pennsylvania, Master of Landscape Architecture Cedarwood Playground, 1977 Waltham, MA Cornell University, Bachelor of Arts, 1967 Drake Playground, Waltham, MA Registration Pond End Tot Lot, Registered Landscape Architect, MA License No. 729 Waltham, MA Oak Ridge Adventure Playground, Community Involvement Sandwich, MA Chemistry Station Park, Milford Conservation Commission 1992-1997 Waltham, MA Milford Conservation Commission Open Space Subcommittee, Improvements to Logan Park, Chairperson, 1995 Waltham, MA Improvements to McKenna Playground, Waltham, MA Feldman Spray Park, Holyoke, MA Springdale Park Spray Area Expansion Holyoke, MA Thompson Playground Improvements, Waltham, MA Town of Milford Open Space & Recreation Plan,2002-2007, Milford, MA Fort Sewall Interpretive Signage Marblehead, MA Renovations to Newton District Court, Newton, MA Rte 3 North Transportation Improvements, Corridor Planting Restoration, Burlington to Tyngsborough
CAROLYN COONEY and ASSOCIATES
Mr. Bird has been a registered Landscape Architect practicing in the State of Massachusetts since 1984. He has served as project manager on numerous landscape architectural design projects in the public realm. His project work at CCA has ranged from large scale projects such as municipal swimming pools to neighborhood parks, spray parks, playgrounds and sports facilities. He has particular strengths in site design, construction documentation, cost estimating and construction Darrell R. Bird, L.A. administration.
Selected Project Experience at CCA Professional Experience Latta Brothers Memorial Pool Spray Deck Carolyn Cooney & Associates 2002 to present Somerville, MA Sasaki Associates, Inc., Watertown MA 1986 -2002 Eugene Casey Memorial Pool Modernization Brown & Rowe, Boston MA 1985-1986 Milford, MA William Pressley Associates, Cambridge MA 1980-1985 Higgins Pool and Spray Deck Modernization Lawrence, MA Education Weihn Memorial Poo l & Wading Pool State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Modernization, Clinton, MA Forestry Bradley Palmer State Park Wading Pool and Spray Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, 1980 Deck, Hamilton, MA State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Johnson Pool and Spray Deck Modernization Forestry Fitchburg, MA Bachelor of Environmental Studies, 1979 Thomas Memorial Pool and Spray Deck Modernization Project, Springfield MA Improvements to Ryan Wading Pool and Spray Registration Deck, Boston, MA Registered Landscape Architect, Modifications to Veterans Memorial Pool & Spray Massachusetts License No. 779 Deck, Fall River, MA Ray Ash Pool, Spray Deck and ADA Bathhouse Improvements, Chicopee, MA Selected Project Experience at Sasaki Associates Rivers Pool and ADA Bathhouse Access Brandeis University, Athletic Facilities Master Plan for Track and Field, Improvements, Chicopee MA Waltham, MA Capt. Gerald F. DeConto Veterans Memorial Cleveland Gateway Sports and Entertainment Complex Stadium, East Sandwich, MA Jacobs Field, Gund Arena, Cleveland, OH Fitch Water Spray Park Project Arlington Memorial Park Waltham MA Arlington, MA Feldman Water Spray Park Binghamton OGS Government Plaza Holyoke, MA Binghamton, NY Springdale Park Spray Area Expansion Buffalo Fountain Plaza & Skating Rink Holyoke, MA Buffalo, New York Elsie Turner Playground Improvements Wheeling Heritage Port, Waltham, MA Wheeling, West VA Graverson Playground and Splash Pad U. S. Capitol Visitor Center, Waltham, MA Washington, DC Peter Gilmore Playground Improvements Waltham, MA Drake Playground Improvements Waltham, MA Cedarwood Playground Improvements Waltham, MA Pond End Tot Lot Playground Improvements, Waltham, MA Oak Ridge Adventure Playground Improvements Sandwich, MA Kennedy Middle School Athletic Field Restoration, Waltham, MA New Boston Pilot Middle School Athletic Field Reconstruction, Boston, MA
CCA Selected Project List Previous 5 Years
Parks & Recreation
• Mokema Woods Conservation Land Reclamation Project Client: City of Waltham Scope: Design, documentation and permitting for removal of urban fill and wetland restoration. In construction
• Rivers Park Improvements Client: City of Chicopee Scope: Addition of walkways and various improvements to existing park. In construction
• EN White School Playground Client: City of Holyoke Recreation Department Scope: Renovation of existing city park adjacent to elementary school. Completed: 2020
• Bobby Connors Playground Client: City of Waltham Scope: Reconstruction of existing park including new playground, exercise equipment & spray deck. Completed: 2020
• Elsie Turner Field Improvements Client: City of Waltham Scope: Reconstruction of existing park including softball field, lighting, bleachers, playground, parking lot. Completed: 2020
• Graverson Playground Improvements Client: City of Waltham Scope: Redesign of existing park to include playground, spray deck, walkways and drainage improvements. Completed: 2019
• Gilmore Playground Improvements, Waltham, MA Client: City of Waltham Scope: Redesign of a neighborhood park to include fountain, playground, courts, walkways Completed: 2018
• Drake Playground Improvements, Waltham, MA Client: City of Waltham Scope: Improvements to existing school and municipal playground within a 100 year floodplain Completed: 2016.
• Cedarwood Playground Improvements, Waltham, MA Client: City of Waltham Scope: Redesign of existing park with new playground, shade shelters, walkways and exercise equipment. Completed: 2015
Memorial Design
• Sandwich Vietnam Memorial Client: Town of Sandwich Scope: Design and documentation for siting new memorial and masterplan for future phase. Completed: 2018.
Spray Decks, Wading & Swimming Pools
• Pina Park Improvements, Holyoke MA Client: City of Holyoke Recreation Department Scope: Redesign of existing spray deck and design of new park amenities. Completion: Bid Phase
• Lincoln Grove Spray Deck Client: City of Chicopee Office of Community Development Scope: Design & implementation of new spray deck in existing park. Completed: 2020
• Pouliot Pool, Holyoke, MA Client: AECOM, Inc. Owner: City of Holyoke Recreation Department Scope: CCA responsible for pool, pool deck, site amenities, design, documentation, and construction oversight Completed: 2020
• Nelson Park Spray Deck Renovation, Plymouth, MA Client: Town of Plymouth Scope: Design and documentation for replacement of failed spray deck surfacing. Completed: 2019
• City of Chicopee Improvements to 4 Pools Client: AECOM, Inc. Owner: City of Chicopee Recreation Department Scope: CCA responsible for pool shell design and detailing, site improvements Completed:
• Improvements to DCR Swimming Pools, Various Locations Client: AECOM, Inc. Owner: MA Department of Conservation & Recreation Scope: CCA responsible for pool modifications, spray elements, site improvements Completed pool facilities: Fall River, Springfield, Chicopee, Lawrence, Lowell, Clinton, Artesani Wading pool Brighton, Casey Pool Milford. In design: Magazine Beach Pool Cambridge, Latta Pool Somerville 2012 to present.