The Exclusion of Erich Fromm from the IPA Paul Roazen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Exclusion of Erich Fromm from the IPA Paul Roazen Publikation der Internationalen Erich-Fromm-Gesellschaft e.V. Publication of the International Erich Fromm Society Copyright © beim Autor / by the author The Exclusion of Erich Fromm from the IPA Paul Roazen “The Exclusion of Erich Fromm from the IPA,“ in: Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (Wil- liam Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 37 (2001), pp. 5-42. Copyright © 2001 by Professor Dr. Paul Roazen, 2009 by the Estate of Paul Roazen. The subject of psychoanalytic lineage has re- England published under the title The Fear of cently acquired a new respectability among his- Freedom) became for years a central text in the torians in the field; although privately analysts education of social scientists. Works of Fromm’s have known and acknowledged how critical it is like Man For Himself, Psychoanalysis and Relig- who has gone where and to whom for training, ion, The Forgotten Language, and also The Sane it is only relatively rarely that public attention Society5 formed an essential part of my genera- has been focused on the unusually powerful im- tion’s general education. (Fromm’s most horta- pact which such training analyses can have. The tory last writings, and his specifically political special suggestive role of analytic training ex- ones, fall I think into a different category as far periences was long ago pointed out in the as the general influence that he had; still, the course of controversial in-fighting by such differ- book Fromm co-authored with Michael Mac- ently oriented pioneers as Edward Glover1 and coby, Social Character in a Mexican Village, de- Jacques Lacan, but it has been unusual to find serves more attention.6 Fromm’s The Art of Lov- the institution of training analysis itself publicly ing has meanwhile sold millions of copies, and challenged. It remains too little known that his- To Have Or To Be? succeeded in selling a mil- torically the requirement that all analysts be lion copies in Germany alone; The Anatomy of themselves analyzed for purposes of training Human Destructiveness was also a notable only officially got going under the auspices of achievement.7) the International Psychoanalytic Association Ernest Jones’s biography of Freud was also (IPA) in 1925, after Freud was ill with cancer formative of the psychoanalytic education of my and had implicitly to concede his inability per- time, as was Fromm’s short and relatively ne- sonally to control the future of his movement.2 glected retort to Jones: Sigmund Freud’s Mis- At the same time, however, that analytic sion: An Analysis of His Personality and Influ- lineage (family tree matters3) deserve to get full ence8. The fact that such distinguished literary attention, it can be too easy to forget the role critics as Lionel Trilling and Steven Marcus faith- that books themselves play, especially for intel- fully edited Jones’s biography into a one- lectuals, in spreading ideas One might think it a volume edition is only the tip of the iceberg of truism that people not only go for treatment but the specific means by which orthodox psycho- respond powerfully to what they come across in analytic thinking worked its way into being print. Many of us were first attracted to psycho- credulously accepted within the culture at large. analysis by reading the writings of Erich Fromm Jones’s multiple distortions are so built into his (1900-80), and this includes even such stalwart heavily documented narrative that they con- defenders of recent orthodoxy as the historian tinue to slide by even many of the most consci- Peter Gay. Erich Fromm’s powerful papers from entious researchers. the early 1930s were once relatively unknown, Let me give just one example from Sigmund but a book of his like Escape From Freedom4 (in Freud’s Mission of the persuasivenss of Fromm’s page 1 of 22 Roazen, P., 2001 The Exclusion of Erich Fromm from the IPA Publikation der Internationalen Erich-Fromm-Gesellschaft e.V. Publication of the International Erich Fromm Society Copyright © beim Autor / by the author reasoning. In the following passage Fromm was thought once known as „neo-Freudianism“ writing about the „secret“ Committee, made up (Fromm did not like having the term applied to of Karl Abraham, Jones, Otto Rank, Sandor Fer- himself) has been considered as a „failure“ enczi, Hanns Sachs, and Max Eitingon, which within intellectual history11. Even while he was was designed before World War I to safeguard alive Fromm saw how peculiar and wayward a the psychoanalytic „cause“ after the so-called direction the history of ideas seemed to be mov- defection of Carl G. Jung: ing in, as his rightful standing seemed to sink Who were these first most loyal disciples, ever since the late 1960s. When the term „psy- the wearers of the six rings? They were urban in- cho-history,“ thanks largely to the initiative of tellectuals, with a deep yearning to be commit- the work of Erik H. Erikson, had first started to ted to an ideal, to a leader, to a movement, and take hold in the late 1950s and early 1960s, yet without having any religious or political or Fromm justifiably felt somehow left out of the philosophical ideal or convictions; there was whole story. (Freud’s own most speculative neither a socialist, Zionist, Catholic nor Ortho- works might appeal to political philosophers, dox Jew among them. (Eitingon may have had but not to most practicing social scientists.) mild Zionist sympathies.) Their religion was the Fromm could not understand how Erikson could Movement. The growing circle of analysts came proceed in ignoring Fromm’s own pioneering from the same background; the vast majority work in this area – after all Fromm’s The Dogma were and are middle-class intellectuals, with no of Christ12 (a text among those the Nazis religious, political or philosophical interests or banned) had originally come out as long ago as commitments. The great popularity of psycho- in 1930. analysis in the West, and particularly in the We now know that Erikson had explicitly United States, since the beginning of the thirties discussed Fromm’s Escape From Freedom at a has undoubtedly the same social basis. Here is a meeting of the San Francisco Psychoanalytic So- middle class for whom life has lost meaning. ciety in March 1943, well before Erikson’s own They have no political or religious ideals, yet Childhood and Society saw the light of day in they are in search of a meaning, of an idea to 195013. Erikson always proceeded more than devote themselves to, of an explanation of life warily about ever even citing Fromm – Erikson’s which does not require faith or sacrifices, and own enduring concerns about his biological le- which satisfies this need to feel part of a move- gitimacy helped feed his insecurities as a psycho- ment. All these needs were fulfilled by the analyst. And so Erikson could be fearful of risk- Movement.9 ing the fate of Fromm’s having been excluded as a psychoanalyst, even more than the conse- These words seem to me still strikingly valid. En- quences of Erikson’s favorably mentioning -- in tirely aside from any of Fromm’s other clinical his last works -- the otherwise dread name of and theoretical contributions, one essay of his Jung; Erikson publicly idealized Freud at the (which originally appeared in the old Saturday same time Erikson was moving away from or- Review of Literature) played a notable role, de- thodox thinking in an original direction.14 spite an effort to rebut it by an orthodox ana- (Fromm would remain intransigently unforgiv- lyst, in helping to start the „rehabilitation“ of ing about Jung’s work, and in good part this the historical reputations of both Ferenczi and was related to Jung’s politics in the 1930s that Rank.10 In fact I think that the recent renaissance we will be touching on.) in Ferenczi’s clinical reputation is the one great Yet Erikson had himself played a subtle part success story in the psychoanalytic historiogra- in assisting in the process of Fromm’s being phy with which I have been associated over the stigmatized as a professional alien; Fromm last forty years. seems to have been virtually alone in pointing Yet bureaucratic struggles, as we shall see, out, in reading Erikson’s Young Man Luther, the were to limit Fromm’s own historical place. By significance of the passage where Erikson refers now he can be accurately described as a „forgot- to „sociological treatises of our time by authors ten intellectual,“ and the whole school of from Weber to Fromm“15. The word „sociologi- page 2 of 22 Roazen, P., 2001 The Exclusion of Erich Fromm from the IPA Publikation der Internationalen Erich-Fromm-Gesellschaft e.V. Publication of the International Erich Fromm Society Copyright © beim Autor / by the author cal“ was clearly meant to distance Erikson from the criticisms of his former allies at the Frankfurt Fromm, and the very designation of being a so- Institute for Social Research; Herbert Marcuse’s ciologist (rather than an analyst) Erikson had ill-founded charges against Fromm and other feared being used about himself by his own ana- „revisionists“ like Horney and Harry Stack Sulli- lyst, Anna Freud. (This was part of a tradition in van were to gain notoriety starting in the mid- which on Dec. 19, 1934, Jones had written to 1950s.) Anna Freud: „Like [Franz] Alexander and many others she [Karen Horney] seems to be replacing Fromm’s organizational problems within psy- Psychoanalysis by a pseudo-sociology.“) Karl choanalysis, which wound up in him being fi- Menninger’s harsh 1942 critique of Fromm’s Es- nally excluded from the IPA in the early 1950s, cape From Freedom helped establish the party really got their start with the coming to power line which Erikson was dutifully following; for of the Nazis in Germany in early 1933.
Recommended publications
  • CRITICAL THEORY and AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism
    CDSMS EDITED BY JEREMIAH MORELOCK CRITICAL THEORY AND AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism edited by Jeremiah Morelock Critical, Digital and Social Media Studies Series Editor: Christian Fuchs The peer-reviewed book series edited by Christian Fuchs publishes books that critically study the role of the internet and digital and social media in society. Titles analyse how power structures, digital capitalism, ideology and social struggles shape and are shaped by digital and social media. They use and develop critical theory discussing the political relevance and implications of studied topics. The series is a theoretical forum for in- ternet and social media research for books using methods and theories that challenge digital positivism; it also seeks to explore digital media ethics grounded in critical social theories and philosophy. Editorial Board Thomas Allmer, Mark Andrejevic, Miriyam Aouragh, Charles Brown, Eran Fisher, Peter Goodwin, Jonathan Hardy, Kylie Jarrett, Anastasia Kavada, Maria Michalis, Stefania Milan, Vincent Mosco, Jack Qiu, Jernej Amon Prodnik, Marisol Sandoval, Se- bastian Sevignani, Pieter Verdegem Published Critical Theory of Communication: New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet Christian Fuchs https://doi.org/10.16997/book1 Knowledge in the Age of Digital Capitalism: An Introduction to Cognitive Materialism Mariano Zukerfeld https://doi.org/10.16997/book3 Politicizing Digital Space: Theory, the Internet, and Renewing Democracy Trevor Garrison Smith https://doi.org/10.16997/book5 Capital, State, Empire: The New American Way of Digital Warfare Scott Timcke https://doi.org/10.16997/book6 The Spectacle 2.0: Reading Debord in the Context of Digital Capitalism Edited by Marco Briziarelli and Emiliana Armano https://doi.org/10.16997/book11 The Big Data Agenda: Data Ethics and Critical Data Studies Annika Richterich https://doi.org/10.16997/book14 Social Capital Online: Alienation and Accumulation Kane X.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism in the Works of Erich Fromm and the Crisis of Socialism Enzo
    Propriety of the Erich Fromm Document Center. For personal use only. Citation or publication of mate- rial prohibited without express written permission of the copyright holder. Eigentum des Erich Fromm Dokumentationszentrums. Nutzung nur für persönliche Zwecke. Veröffentli- chungen – auch von Teilen – bedürfen der schriftlichen Erlaubnis des Rechteinhabers. Marxism in the Works of Erich Fromm and the Crisis of Socialism Enzo Lio Paper presented as a first draft on the seminar of the International Erich Fromm Society on Charac- ter Structure and Society, Janus Pannonius University, Pécs/Hungary, August 24-26, 1990. - First published in the Yearbook of the International Erich Fromm Society, Vol. 2: Erich Fromm und die Kritische Theorie, Münster: LIT-Verlag, 1991, pp. 250-264. Copyright © 1991 and 2011 by Dr. Enzo Lio, Vicolo Quartirolo 5, I-40121 Bologna, Italy; E-Mail: en- zo.lio[at-symbol]@tele2.it. - Translation from Italian by Susan Garton, Bologna. 1. Introduction che is the product of the collective life history of humankind. This constitutes a scientifically valid The crisis of socialism, in the light of the histori- approach within the tradition of humanistic cal events that have provoked its downfall in thought insofar as, by using modern and effi- Eastern Europe, had already been discussed in cient scientific tools (psychoanalysis and the so- our Fromm Institute in Bologna, at the end of cial sciences) a closer and deeper investigation of 1989. Romano Biancoli maintained that Fromm the needs and motivations of human beings is had been proved right in his vision of Marxism possible. and of real socialism. I realized that, if Fromm The starting point for Fromm’s research is were still alive he would not be surprised by this precisely this, the search for the real and deep turn of events, which he hopes for in all his motives behind human action.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Erich Fromm's Social-Psychological
    RUDOLF SIEBERT 8. ERICH FROMM’S SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY OF RELIGION Toward the X-Experience and the City of Being INTRODUCTION1 This essay explores Erich Fromm’s social-psychological theory of religion, as X- experience and longing for the City of Being, as being informed by the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament, Meister Eckhart as well as Georg W.F Hegel, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud. Its religious attitude constituted the very dynamic of Fromm’s writings, as well as of those of the other critical theorists of society, e.g. Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Leo Loewenthal, Herbert Marcuse, etc., It united them. It could only be expressed in poetical symbols: the X-experience; or the longing for the imageless, nameless, notionless utterly Other than the horror and terror of nature and history; or the yearning for perfect justice and unconditional love: that the murderer may not triumph over the innocent victim, at least not ultimately. Man begins to become man only with the awakening of this longing for the entirely Other, or the X-experience. This religious attitude aims as idology at the destruction of all idolatry. In the Near East –––––––––––––– 1 Editors’ note-The author’s use of Fromm’s concept of “x-experience” comes from this passage in his work: What we call the religious attitude is an x that is expressible only in poetic and visual symbols. This x experience has been articulated in various concepts which have varied in accordance with the social organization of a particular cultural period. In the Near East, x was expressed in the concept of a supreme tribal chief, or king, and thus „God” became the supreme concept of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, which were rooted in the social structures of that area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Paper to Be Presented at the 6Th European CHEIRON Meeting in Brighton^England, 2-6 September 1987. Research Was Funded
    Propriety of the Erich Fromm Document Center. For personal use only. Citation or publication of material prohibited without express written permission of the copyright holder. Eigentum des Erich Fromm Dokumentationszentrums. Nutzung nur für persönliche Zwecke. Veröffentlichungen – auch von Teilen – bedürfen der schriftlichen Erlaubnis des Rechteinhabers. "INSTINCTS" AND THE "FORCES OF PRODUCTION": The Freud-Marx Debates in Eastern and Central Europe* Dr. Ferenc Eros Institute of Psychology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest In his essay "Psychology and Art Today", the British-American poet Wystan Hugh Auden writes: Both Freud and Marx start from the failures of civiliza tion, one from the poof, one from the ill. Both see human behavior determined, not consciously, but by instinctive needs, hunger and love. Both desire a world where rational choice and self-determination are possible. The difference between them is the inev itable difference between the man who studies crowds in the street, and the man who sees the patient... in the consulting room- Marx sees the direction of the relations between the outer and inner world from without inwards. Freud vice-versa.... The socialist accuses the psychologist of caving in to the status quo, trying to adapt the neurotic to the system, thus depriving him of a potential revolutionary; the psychologist retorts that the socialist is trying to lift himself by his own boot tags, that he fails to understand himself or the fact that lust for money is only one form of the lust for power; and so that after he has won his power by revolution he will recreate the same conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Roots of Gestalt Therapy Theory
    The Historical Roots of Gestalt Therapy Theory Rosemarie Wulf The theory of Gestalt therapy is itself a new Gestalt, though it does not contain many new thoughts. What its founders, Fritz and Laura Perls and Paul Goodman, did was to weave a new synthesis out of existing concepts. The background of this new Gestalt is composed of concepts and elements from different bodies of knowledge and disciplines. I would like to give you an idea of the cultural and historical situation that is the Zeitgeist (the spirit of the time) that prevailed during the lifetimes of the founders of Gestalt therapy. What kind of theories and traditions did Fritz and Laura come into contact with? Where did they find ideas that were in line with their own, what other ideas did they reject in their search for answers to the fundamental questions that are either implicitly or explicitly contained in every theory of psychotherapy? What is a human being? How does he or she function? Why do we exist? Is there a reason to exist? How should we behave toward each other? How does psychological illness develop? Firstly the background: the wider field, an overview of the Zeitgeist. In the second part, I will present the various contacts Fritz and Laura Perls had with specific persons and their ideas or theoretical models. The beginning of the 20th century was characterized by an explosive development of science and technology. The era of automation and cybernetics had begun. The rise of nuclear and quantum physics led to radical revolutionary change. Biology, chemistry and medicine also began to make rapid progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilhelm Reich's Character Analysis in Its Historical Context
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1985 Wilhelm Reich's Character analysis in its historical context R. Daniel McCauley Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Intellectual History Commons, and the Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McCauley, R. Daniel, "Wilhelm Reich's Character analysis in its historical context" (1985). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3593. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5477 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. I AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF R. Daniel McCauley for the Master of Arts in History presented December 4, 1985. Title: Wilhelm Reich's Character Analysis in its Historical Context. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Go(°.j~ Dodds The thesis is an attempt to reconcile contradictions and devise historical meaning from a problematic text. The book is Wilhelm Reich's Character Analysis, first published in 1933. This influential psychoanalytic work embodies both a radical social theory and disturbing authoritarian attitudes. The thesis uses a variety of methodologies, in particular Roland Barthes' techniques for ascribing 2 historical meaning to certain formal qualities of writing. The thesis proceeds from a summary of methodological studies in intellectual history and criticism, including those of I. A. Richards, R. G. Collingwood, and Dominick LaCapra, as well as Barthes, to a description of Character Analysis and its various historical contexts - biographical, social, and intellectual.
    [Show full text]
  • (REICHIAN) THERAPY by Neil Schierholz Psyd
    TOWARD A PATIENT-CENTERED UNDERSTANDING OF ORGONOMIC (REICHIAN) THERAPY by Neil Schierholz PsyD San Francisco, California Copyright © 2011 by Neil Schierholz PsyD Los Angeles (310) 866-0440 San Francisco (415) 821-2345 [email protected] Abstract THIS STUDY EXPLORES the experience of patients who have been treated with orgonomic (Reichian) therapy. The purpose of this study is to shed light on the experience of undergoing this therapy from the perspective of patients who benefited from it. A brief history of Reich and his theory and practice of orgonomic therapy is chronicled along with clinical and autobiographical accounts of treatment cases. Seven current or former patients who have been treated with and benefited from orgonomic therapy were interviewed using a qualitative, heuristic method yielding rich experience-near descriptions of the subjective experience, conscious and unconscious meanings, and functions/experience of orgonomic therapy. Interview data were inductively coded producing individual depictions for each research participant, a composite depiction, and six core themes of the experience: (a) entry into orgonomic therapy, (b) orgonomic therapist attributes, (c) orgonomic biopsychotherapy, (d) experience of the therapeutic process, (e) therapeutic results, (f) thoughts and feelings about orgonomic therapy. The results are consistent with Reich’s theory and practice of orgonomic therapy and provide a broader, deeper, and richer understanding of the patient experience directly from the aggregate voices of those who have experienced and benefited from it first-hand. The results also indicate that patients who are treated with and benefit from orgonomic therapy feel innately and intuitively drawn to it. Clinical implications are offered along with recommendations for future study.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertas Schulze-Boysen Und Die Rote Kapelle Libertas Schulze-Boysen Und Die Rote Kapelle
    Libertas Schulze-Boysen und die Rote Kapelle Libertas Schulze-Boysen und die Rote Kapelle Der Großvater, Fürst Philipp Eulenburg zu Hertefeld, Familie genießt als Jugendfreund des Kaisers lange Zeit des- sen Vertrauen und gilt am Hofe als sehr einflussreich. und Nach öffentlichen Anwürfen wegen angeblicher Kindheit homosexueller Neigungen lebt der Fürst seit 1908 zurückgezogen in Liebenberg. Aus der Ehe mit der schwedischen Gräfin Auguste von Sandeln gehen sechs Kinder hervor. 1909 heiratet die jüngste Tochter Victoria den Modegestalter Otto Haas-Heye, einen Mann mit großer Ausstrahlung. Die Familie Haas- Heye lebt zunächst in Garmisch, dann in London und seit 1911 in Paris. Nach Ottora und Johannes kommt Libertas am 20. November 1913 in Paris zur Welt. Ihr Vorname ist dem „Märchen von der Freiheit“ entnom- men, das Philipp Eulenburg zu Hertefeld geschrieben hat. Die Mutter wohnt in den Kriegsjahren mit den Kindern in Liebenberg. 1921 stirbt der Großvater, und die Eltern lassen sich scheiden. Nach Privatunterricht in Liebenberg besucht Libertas seit 1922 eine Schule in Berlin. Ihr Vater leitet die Modeabteilung des Staatlichen Kunstgewerbemu- seums in der Prinz-Albrecht-Straße 8. Auf den weiten Fluren spielen die Kinder. 1933 wird dieses Gebäude Sitz der Gestapozentrale. Die Zeichenlehrerin Valerie Wolffenstein, eine Mitarbeiterin des Vaters, nimmt sich der Kinder an und verbringt mit ihnen den Sommer 1924 in der Schweiz. 4 Geburtstagsgedicht Es ist der Vorabend zum Geburtstag des Fürsten. Libertas erscheint in meinem Zimmer. Sie will ihr Kästchen für den Opapa fertig kleben[...] „Libertas, wie würde sich der Opapa freuen, wenn Du ein Gedicht in das Kästchen legen würdest!“ Sie jubelt, ergreift den Federhalter, nimmt das Ende zwischen die Lippen und läutet mit den Beinen.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Models Interventions and Catchwords Theodor W. Adorno
    EuRoPEAN PERSPECTIVES A Series in Social Thought and Cultural Criticism Lawrence D. Kritzman, Editor Critical Models Interventions and Catchwords European Perspectives presents English translations of books by leading European thinkers. With both classic and outstanding contemporary works, the series aims to shape the major intellectual controversies of our day and to facilitate the tasks of his­ torical understanding. Julia Kristeva Strangers to Ourselves Theodor W. Adorno Notes to Literature, vols.1 and 2 Richard Wolin, editor The Heidegger Controversy Antonio Gramsci Prison Notebooks, vols. 1 and 2 Jacques LeGoff History and Memory Alain Finkielkraut Remembering in Vain: The Klaus Barbie Trial and Crimes Against Humanity Julia Krist eva Nations Without Nationalism Pierre Bourdieu The Field of Cultural Production Theodor W. Adorno Pierre Vidal-Naquet Assassins of Memory: Essays on the Denial of the Holocaust Translated and with a Preface Hugo Ball Critique of the German Intelligentsia by Henry W Pickford Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari What Is Philosophy? Karl Heinz Bohrer Suddenness: On the Moment of Aesthetic Appearance Alain Finkielkraut The Defeat of the Mind Julia Krist eva New Maladies of the Soul Elisabeth Badinter XY: On Masculine Identity Karl Lowith Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism Gilles Deleuze Negotiations, 1972-1990 Pierre Vidal-Naquet The jews: History, Memory, and the Present Norbert Elias The Germans Louis Althusser Writings on Psychoanalysis: Freud and Lacan Elisabeth Roudinesco jacques Lacan: His Life and Work Ross Guberman julia Kristeva Interviews Kelly Oliver The Portable Kristeva Pierra Nora Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, vol. 1: Conflicts and Divisions, vol. 2: Traditions, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Widerstandsgruppe Schulze-Boysen/Harnack
    Widerstandsgruppe Schulze-Boysen/Harnack Bearbeitet von Klaus Lehmann Herausgegeben von der zentralen Forschungsstelle der Vereinigung der Verfolgten des Naziregimes VVN Berliner Verlag GmbH, Berlin 1948, 88 Seiten Faksimileausgabe der Seiten 3 bis 27 und 86 bis 88 Die Schulze-Boysen/Harnack-Gruppe wurde 1942 von der Gestapo un- ter dem Begriff Rote Kapelle entdeckt und ausgeschaltet. Diese erste ausführliche Veröffentlichung erschien in der damaligen Sowjetischen Besatzungszone und wurde von der VVN, einer von der Sozialistischen Einheitspartei Deutschlands (SED) gelenkten Organisation, herausge- geben. Während die Widerstandsarbeit der Schulze-Boysen/Harnack-Gruppe mit Flugblättern, Zeitschriften, Klebeaktionen, Hilfe für politisch verfolg- te bis hin zur Beschaffung von Waffen beschrieben wird, wird ihre Spi- onagetätigkeit für die Sowjetunion bewusst verschwiegen. Die Spionagesender, die vom sowjetischen Nachrichtendienst zur Ver- fügung gestellt worden waren, werden hier stattdessen in Geräte um- gedeutet, die "mit ihren Sendungen das deutsche Volk" aufklären soll- ten (S.15). Dies zeigt, dass man sich zur Spionage für Stalin nicht be- kennen wollte, weil diese mit den damals gängigen moralischen Maß- stäben nicht in Einklang zu bringen war. Dies wandelte sich erst Ende der 1960-er Jahre, als die Sowjetunion einigen Mitgliedern der Roten Kapelle postum Militärorden verlieh und die DDR sie fortan als "Kundschafter" und Paradebeispiel für kommu- nistischen geführten Widerstand feierte. Auf den Seiten 28 bis 85 werden 55 Mitglieder
    [Show full text]
  • Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism”, Chapter 3 from the Book Creating Literary Analysis (Index.Html) (V
    This is “Writing about Character and Motivation: Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism”, chapter 3 from the book Creating Literary Analysis (index.html) (v. 1.0). This book is licensed under a Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/ 3.0/) license. See the license for more details, but that basically means you can share this book as long as you credit the author (but see below), don't make money from it, and do make it available to everyone else under the same terms. This content was accessible as of December 29, 2012, and it was downloaded then by Andy Schmitz (http://lardbucket.org) in an effort to preserve the availability of this book. Normally, the author and publisher would be credited here. However, the publisher has asked for the customary Creative Commons attribution to the original publisher, authors, title, and book URI to be removed. Additionally, per the publisher's request, their name has been removed in some passages. More information is available on this project's attribution page (http://2012books.lardbucket.org/attribution.html?utm_source=header). For more information on the source of this book, or why it is available for free, please see the project's home page (http://2012books.lardbucket.org/). You can browse or download additional books there. i Chapter 3 Writing about Character and Motivation: Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. Understand the varieties of psychoanalytic literary theories. 2. Apply a psychoanalytic theory to a literary work. 3. Engage in the writing process of a peer writer, including peer review.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Lacanian Psychoanalysis in Law Richard E
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 54 | Issue 3 Article 9 Summer 6-1-1997 Does Law Need an Analyst? Prospects for Lacanian Psychoanalysis in Law Richard E. Redding Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, and the Law and Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Richard E. Redding, Does Law Need an Analyst? Prospects for Lacanian Psychoanalysis in Law, 54 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1119 (1997), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol54/iss3/9 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Does Law Need an Analyst? Prospects for Lacanian Psychoanalysis in Law LACAN AND THE SUBJECT OF LAW: TOWARD A PSYCHOANALYTIC CRITI- CAL LEGAL THEORY. By David S. Caudill. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1997. 206 pp. $15.95 paper, $49.95 cloth. Reviewed by Richard E. Redding The debate continues over the merits of French psychoanalytic theorist Jacques Lacan - was he a "charlatan"' or an "intellectual hero?"2 Enter David Caudill's book, Lacan and the Subject oftaw: Toward a Psychoana- lytic CriticalLegal Theory.3 In providing practical applications of Lacan to the law, the book will no doubt be seen as an important contribution in resolving the debate. Caudill, a law professor with a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]