Assessment Authority-Tamil Nadu

MINUTES

44ft MEETING

STATE LEVEL ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY-TAMIL NADU

Date: 22.04.2021 .tHE MINUTTS OF THE 44I,t MEETING OF STATE LEVEL ENvIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY HELD ON 22.04.2021.

Agenda Description File Minutes No No.

Confirmation of the minutes of the The minutes of the 440th meeting of the a) 440th meeting of the Authority held Authority held on 20.04.2021was confirmed. on20.04.2021

The Action taken on the decisions of The Member Secretary tabled the action taken

b) the 440th meeting of the Authority report on the decisions of the 440th meeting and held on 20.04.2021. discussed the details.

I To consider the proposal for the grant 8294 After detailed discussions, the Authority noted of Terms of Reference with Public as follows. Hearing Proposed Rough Stone & l. The project proponent Tvl.Sai Hridham Gravel quarry lease over an extent of Infraa (P) Ltd has submitted the proposal for 1.68.0 Ha at S.F.Nos. the grant of Terms of Reference with Public 80/3,90/4,90/5,90/6,90 117 & g0/19 at Hearing Proposed Rough Stone & Gravel Melur Village, Kulathur Taluk, quaruy lease over an extent of 1.68.0 Ha at pudukkottai District. Tamil Nadu by S.F.Nos. 80/3,80/4,80/5,80/6,80117 & 80/19 Tvl.Sai Hridham Infraa (P) lrd at Melur Village, Kulathur Taluk, pudukkottai District.

2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC held on 24.03.2021, the SEAC has recommended the proposal for the issue of the following Terms of Reference along with public hearing for the proposed project among others:

a. Restricting the maximum depth of mining up to 41m (35mofRoughSone,

2 m of weatlrered rock & 4 m of Crrav{ considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and follo*iy

7'n --, \^ MEMBER.leGro*" MEMBEfr- CHAI SEIAA.TN Page2 of37 the principle of the sustairlable mining and the same was accePted by the proponent. Consequently the maximum minable quantities of 117040 Cu.m of rough stone, 15680 Cu.m of weathered rock & 41292 Cum of gravel are permitted for mining over five years and the EIA may be prepared considering the

ultimate depth as 41 m.

b. The TOR is issued onlY for the rectangular section excluding remaining area on the eastem side bearing SF. No.80/17. Hence, the project proponent shall revise mining plan, only for the rectangular section excluding remaining area on the

eastern side bearing SF. No.80/17.

c. The project proponent shall furnish revised proposal for green belt area including said area on the eastem

side bearing SF. No.80/17.

In view of the above, the Authority unanimously accepts the recommendation of SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing under cluster for undertaking the combined Environment Impact Assessment Study and preparation of separate Environment Management Plan subject to the

conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal condition in addition to the following condition.

1. As per the recommendation of SEAC and as

MEMBBR ,ro@ '"'[6OON SE,IAA-TN Page 3 of37 accepted by the proponent, the ultimate depth of mining is restricted to 41m (35m of RoWh stone,2 m of weatlrercd rock & 4 m of Gmvel) considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the

principle of the sustainable mining and the same was accepted by the proponent. Consequently the maximum minable

quantities of 117040 Cu.m of rough stone, 15680 Cu.m of weathered rock & 41292 Cum of gravel are permitted for mining over five years and the EIA may be prepared

considering the ultimate depth as 4l m

2. As per the recommendation of SEAC, the

I TOR is issued only for the rectangular I section excluding remaining area on ,n. I

I eastern side bearing SF. No.80/17. Hence,

I the project proponent shall revise mining I plan, only for the rectangular section I

I excluding remaining area on the eastern side I bearing SF. No.80/17. I

a I As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum I F.No.22-65 12017-IA.Iil dated: 30.09.20201 and, 20.10.2020 the proponent shall fu-ish

I the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER I

activities as committed and the .or".*. I raised during public hearing meeting & the I action plan to mitigate the concerns. I

2. To consider the proposal for the grant 8322 After detailed discussions, the Authority of Terms of Reference with Public unanimously accepts the recommendation of Hearing Proposed Rough Stone & SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference a'Yt , MEMBER sBcf#anv METUBE{ CHAI SEIAA.TN Page 4 of37 quarry lease over an extent of (ToR) with Public Hearing under cluster for Gravel I

at undertaking the combined Environment Impact 0.85.0 ha at S.F.Nos. 52 I Ekkatatampalayam Village, Assessment Study and preparation of ,.nurut. I Perundurai Taluk, Erode District, Environment Management Plan subject to the I conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal Tamil Nadu by Tmt.G.BanugoPal I

condition in addition to the following condition. I

I per the recommendation of SEAC 1. As I

I and as accepted by the ProPonent, the

] ultimate depth of mining is restricted to

37 m (Rough stone mining firom tlre exising pitof 22m) considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequently the maximum minable quantities of 49320 cu.m of Rougfr sone

are permitted for mining over five years. I Z. As per the MoEF& CC office

I I memorandum F.No.22-6512017-IA.Ill

I I dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the

I I proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP

I | .teffi' mentioning all the CER I I activities as committed and the concerns

I I raised during public hearing meeting & I I the action plan to mitigate the concerns

J. To consider the proposal for the grant 8297 After detailed discussions, the Authority noted of Terms of Reference with Public as follows.

Hearing for the Proposed Rough 1. The Project Proponent, Thiru.M.Ramasamy Stone & Gravel Quarry lease over an has submitted the proposal for the grant of extent of 1.37.0Ha in Terms of Reference for the Proposed S.F.Nos.80/1E1, 80/182, 80llE4 of Rough Stone & Gravel Quany lease over Pachapalayam Village, sulur Taluk, 7'" --- MEMBER SECIMTARY nne nr6n c 19 SEIAA.T N Page 5 of37 Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu extent of 1.37.0Ha in S.F.Nos.80/1E1, | - by Thiru.M.Ramasamy I 80/1E2. 80llE4 of Pachapalayam Village, I sulur Taluk. Coimbatore District. lZ. In the 208'h meeting of SEAC held on

I 24.03.2021, the SEAC | has recommend the for the issue of the following I RroRosal Terms of Reference along with public I I hearing among others:

I , Restricting the maximum | depth of *ining up to 33m (30m of Rough | rtone & 3m of Gravel) considering I ,he environmental | impacts due to the .ining, safety of the working I and following I nersonnel the principle I of the sustainable mining and the I rame was accepted by the proponent

I .onsequently, the maximum minable I quantities of 20,955cu.m of Rough

stone & 2850cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years.

3. On verifying the form-1 & approved mining plan the maximum minable quantities for

] the restricted ultimate depth of 33m is

I 20,955cu.m of Rough stone & 6477 cu.m of I Gravel whereas in the SEAC minutes the I gravel quantity is typed inadvertentfy u. 2850cu.m. I I

In view of the above, the Authority unanimourf,

I accepts the recommendation of SEAC ana I decided to grant Terms of Reference (ToR) | with Pubtic Hearing under cluster for I undertaking the combined Environment ImRact

I 7?-- MEMBER sBckanv ME[6ER ,rorM1 SEIAA-TN Page 6 of37 Assessment Study and preparation of separate Environment Management Plan subject to the

conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal condition in addition to the following condition.

l. As per the recommendation of SEAC and as accepted by the proponent. the ultimate depth of mining is restricted to 33m (30m of Rough stone & 3m of Gravel) considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and the same was accepted by the proponent consequently, the maximum minable quantities of 20,955cu.m of Rough stone & 6477 cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years.

2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-65 12017-IA.Ill dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER activities as committed and the concerns raised during public hearing meeting & the action plan to mitigate the concerns.

4. To consider the proposal for the grant 8313 After detailed discussions, the Authority of Terms of Reference with public unanimously accepts the recommendation of hearing for the Proposed Rough SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference Stone Quany lease over an extent of (ToR) with Public Hearing under cluster for 1.05.0Ha in S.F.Nos.50/2 of undertaking the combined Environment Impact Ekkattampalayam Village, Assessment Study and preparation of separate Perundurai Taluk, Erode District, Environment Management Plan subject to the Tamil Nadu -bv conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal t'.2..5 ,/ MEMBER'J6'O*' MEMBER ,rm SEIAA-TN Page 7 of37 Thiru.P.Venkatachalam condition in addition to the following condition. I

I I t. As per the recommendation of SEAC I und as accepted by the proponent, the I I ultimate depth of mining is restricted to I l, m (Rough srcne mining fiom ttre CIdsting I I pit of l0 m) considering the environmental I I i*pacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the

principle of the sustainable mining and consequently the maximum minable

quantities of 7\,7l6cu.m of Rough stone are permitted for mining over five years.

2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-6512017-IA.III

dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER activities

as committed and the concems raised during public hearing meeting & the action plan to mitigate the concerns.

5. To consider the proposal for the grant 832t After detailed discussions, the Authority of Terms of Reference with public unanimously accepts the recommendation of hearing for the Proposed Rough SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference Stone & Gravel Quany lease over an (ToR) with Pubtic Hearing under cluster for extent of 2.99.5Ha in S.F.Nos.86/3 of undertaking the combined Environment Impact Ponnamangalam Village, Assessment Study and preparation of separate Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai Environment Management plan subject to the District, Tamil Nadu by conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal Thiru. S.Vishnuvarthan condition in addition to the following condition.

l. As per the recommendation of SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the ultimate - MEMBER s"cMon" MEIVf66^h .,*MV SEIAA.TN Page 8 of37 depth of mining is restricted to 32 m (30rn of

RoWh stcne &2 m of Gravel) considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequently the maximum minable quantities of 4, 92,4721w.m of Rough stone &49,680cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years.

As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-65 12017-IA.Ill dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER activities as committed and the concerns raised during public hearing meeting & the action plan to mitigate the concerns.

After detailed discussions, the Authority noted To consider the proposal for the grant 8329 as follows. of Terms of Reference with Public Project ProPonent, hearing for the ProPosed Multi 'fhiru.M.Sengottuvel has submitted the Coloured Granite Quarry lease over proposal for the grant of Terms of an extent of 2.28.5Ha in Reference with public hearing for the S.F.Nos.503/1 of SithamPoondi Proposed Multi Coloured Granite Quarry Village, Paramathivelur Taluk, lease over an extent of 2.285Ha in Namakkal District, Tamil Nadu -bY S.F.Nos.503/1 of Sithampoondi Village, Thiru.M.Sengottuvel Paramathivelur Taluk, Namakkal District,' 2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC held on 24.03.2021. the SEAC has recommend the proposal fbr the issue of the following Terms of Reference along with public hearing among others: a. Restricting the maximum depth of

MEMBER SE TARY M .ro'O#sn SEIAA.TN

Page 9 of37 mining up to 33m (30m multicoloured Granite, 2m weathered I rock & lm gravel) considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle

of the sustainable mining as well as considering level of ground water table and consequently the maximum minable quantities of 16,986cu.m of Multi - Coloud Granite, 4422cu.m of Weathercd Rock & 2628cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years.

In view of the above, the Authority unanimously

accepts the recommendation of SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing under cluster for undertaking the combined Environment Impact

Assessment Study and preparation of separate Environment Management Plan subject to the conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal condition in addition to the following condition. ] As per the l. recommendation of SEAC urrO u, I

I accepted by the proponent, the ultimate I

I depth of mining is restricted to 33 m (30m I multicoloured Granite, 2m weathered rock & I

I lm gravel) considering the environmental I

I impacts due to the mining, safety the ,Iof I working personnel and following the I

I principle of the sustainable mining as well as I considering level of ground water table and I consequently the maximum recovery of I n'; MEMBER spcJ4nv M EDffiffi SEIAA-TN Page l0 of37 16,986 cu.m of Multi - Colotnred Granite is (ROM-I8310 Cu.m & Granite waste 11324 Cu.m) permitted for mining over five years.

2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-65 12017-IA.II dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER activities as committed and the concerns raised during public hearing meeting & the

action plan to mitigate the concerns.

7. Note to Consider for the proposal After detailed discussion, the Authority I 18195 lor unanimously accepts the recommendation of seeking environmental clearance I I

I proposed SEAC and decided to grant Environmental Construction of I Construction of High Raise Clearance subject to the conditions * | SEAC & normal condition in Residential Building by M/S. recommended by I Baashyaam Constructions Pvt Ltd at addition to the following condition. I

I Old No. 277(part) New T.S.No.l4l7, 1. The proponent shall ensure that the treated

I Block No.7l of Kodambakkam sewage should not be disposed directlV or I Village, Mambalam Taluk, Chennai indirectly to the nearby water bodies under I Baashyaam District by M/S. any circumstances I

Constructions Pvt Ltd - Sl. No 8(a) of I 2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum the Schedule - Building and I F.No.22-65l2oll-lA.III dated: 30.09.2020 Construction Projects- as per EIA I and 20. 1O.2O2O the proponent shall fumish Notification 2006 As Amended. I

the detailed EMP t@, mentioning I CER activities for Rs. 167 lakhs as committed and the CER activities shall be I .urri.a out before obtaining CTo from

I I TNPCB.

I I I The proponent has to submit the details of I ar* Activities to be carried out with action

I while submitting application for CTE I ntun .vl

MEMBER.,}6,o*" MEMBERt/ .ro'Q6Y SEIAA-TN Page Ll of37 from TNPCB

8. To consider the proposal for the grant 83 12 After detailed discussions, the Authority of Terms of Reference with Public unanimously accepts the recommendation of Hearing Proposed Rough Stone & SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference Gravel quarry lease over an extent of (ToR) with Public Hearing under cluster for 2.02.3 Ha at S.F.Nos. 176/tA, undertaking the combined Environment Impact

17615A, 176/6A of Marapparai Assessment Study and preparation of separate

I Village and S.F.No. 316128.2 of Environment Management Plan subject to the Paruthipalli Village-, Tiruchengode conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal Taluk, Namakkal District, Tamil condition in addition to the following condition. Nadu by Thiru. S.Rangasamy 1. As per the recommendation of SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the ultimate depth of mining is restricted to 37m (35 m of Rough stone &2 m of Gravel) considering the environmental impacts due to the mining,

safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and the same was accepted by the proponent. Consequently, the maximum minable quantities of 70750 Cu.m of Rough stone & 8050 cu.m of Gravel ure pe.-itted I

I for mining over five years.

I 2. As per the MoEF& CC office *"rnorundr. I F.No.22-65 12017-IA.III dated: 3O.Og.2l2ol and,20.10.2020 the proponent shall furni.h I the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER I

I activities as committed and the conce*s

I raised during public hearing meeting & the I action plan to mitigate the concern, r*ib e.I I

v-; s MEMBBR sBcL(nv ME6 "^offihSEIAA-TN Page 12 of 37 To consider the proposal for the grant 8335 After detailed discussions, the Authority noted of Terms of Reference with Public as follows.

Hearing Proposed Rough Stone 1. The Project Proponent. 4.00.0 quarry lease over an extent of Thiru.P.Adhimoolam has applied for Terms at Ha at S.F.Nos. 135 Part - 7 of Reference for the proposed Rough Stone

Iyukunam Village, Kilpennathur qualry lease over an extent of 4.00.0 Ha at Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District, S.F.Nos. 135 Part -7 at Iyukunam Village, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. P.Adhimoolam Kilpennathur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. 2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC held on 24.03.2021, the SEAC has recommend the proposal for the issue of the following Terms of Reference along with public hearing among others:

a. The complaint letter indicating some allegations may be discussed in the Public-hearing meeting

b. Restricting the maximum depth of mining up to 35 m (AGL) of rough

stone considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safetY of I the working Personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequently the maximum minable quantities of 5,29,180 cu.m of rough stone are Permitted for mining over five years.

c. The project proponent shall furnish revised mining Plan maximum depth of mining uP to 35 m (AGL) 't{7 MEMBER SECRETARY MEMBER "roffi9SEIAA-TN Page 13 of37 ofrough stone over five years.

In view of the above, the Authority unanimously

accepts the recommendation of SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing under cluster for undertaking the combined Environment Impact

Assessment Study and preparation of separate Environment Management Plan subject to the conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal condition in addition to the following condition.

1. As recommended by SEAC, the complaint

letter indicating some allegations may be discussed in the Public-hearing meeting

2. As per the recommendation of SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the ultimate depth of mining is restricted to 35m AGL (From top) considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the

principle of the sustainable mining and the same was accepted by the proponent. Consequently, the maximum minable

quantities of 529180 Cu.m of Rough stone is permiued for mining over five years.

3. As recommended by SEAC, the project proponent shall fumish revised mining plan for ultimate depth of mining of 35 m (AGL) ofrough stone over five years.

4. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-65 12017-IA.IIL dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER

MEMBER SECL{RY aro, SEIAA.TN Page 14 of 37 activities as committed and the concerns raised during public hearing meeting & the action plan to mitigate the concerns

noted To consider the proposal for the grant 8340 After detailed discussions, the Authority of Terms of Reference with Public as follows. Hearing Proposed Rough Stone l. The Project Proponent, Thiru.K.Govardhan qualry lease over an extent of 2.00.0 Chowdari has aPPlied for Terms of Ha at S.F.Nos. 303(Part-l) Reference for the proposed Rough Stone Athimugam Village, Shoolagiri quarry lease over an extent of 2.00'0 Ha at Taluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil S.F.Nos. 303 (Part-1) Athimugam Village, Nadu by Thiru.K.Govardhan Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, Chowdari Tamil Nadu. 2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC held on I z+.01.2021, the sEAc has recommend the proposal for the issue of the following Terms of Reference along with public hearing among others: a. Restricting the maximum depth of mining uP to 40 m [l8m (AGL) + 21m (BGL) of Rough stone & 1 m of toPsoill considering the environmental imPacts due to the mining, safetY of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequentlY the maximum minable quantities of 4, 51,126 cu.m of Rough stone &16,100 cu'm

of Gravel are Permitted for mining

over five Years. 3. On verifying the approved mining plan, Form-l and other documents fumished by

MEMBER TARY aror*ffi' SEIAA.TN

Page 15 of37 the proponent, it was noticed that the

maximum minable quantity of rough stone for the restricted depth of 40m is 454076 Cu.m of rough stone & 16,100 cu.m of Top soil which is typed inadvertently as 451126 cu.m of Rough stone &16,100 cu.m of Gravel I and also the survey number is typed

inadvertently as S.F.No. 303 (Part) instead of S.F.No. 303 (Part-l) in the minutes of I 208th meeting of SEAC held on 24.03.2021

In view of the above, the Authority unanimously

accepts the recommendation of SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing under cluster for undertaking the combined Environment Impact

Assessment Study and preparation of separate Environment Management Plan subject to the conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal condition in addition to the following condition.

1. As per the recommendation of SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the ultimate depth of mining is restricted to 40 m [lgm (AGL) + 2lm (BGL) of Rough stone & I m of topsoil] considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the

working personnel and following the

principle of the sustainable mining and the same was accepted by the proponent. Consequently, the maximum minable quantity of 454076 Cu.m of rough stone is permitted for mining over five years. h,r MEMBER srcjPdanv MEIyfBET* .rffih SEIAA-TN Page 16 of37 2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorafldum

F.No.22-65 12017 -lAjll dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER activities as committed and the concerns raised during public hearing meeting & the action plan to mitigate the concems. ll To consider the proposal for the grant After detailed discussions, the Authority noted 18412 of Terms of Reference with Public as follows.

I Rough Stone & Hearing Proposed l. The Project Proponent, Thiru. K. Rajkumar | quarry lease an extent of Gravel over has applied for Terms of Reference for the I 4.27.4 Ha at SF. No.469llB tol proposed Rough Stone & Gravel quarry 46916B,476ll to 47614, O, lease over an extent of 4.27.4 Ha at SF. I Village. Alangulam Taluk. Nadanoor No.469l lB to 46916B.,47611 to 47614, A.P I K. Tenkasi District by Thiru. I Nadanoor Village, Alangulam Taluk,

Rajkumar I Tenkasi District. 2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC held on 24.03.2021, the SEAC has recommend the proposal for the issue of the following Terms of Reference along with public hearing among others: a. Restricting the maximum depth of mining up to 37m (35 m of Rough I stone &2 m of Gravel) considering

I I the environmental imPacts due to I I the mining, safety of the working I I personnel and following the I I principle of the sustainable mining

I I und the same was accepted bY the I ConsequentlY, the I nroponent. I maximum minable quantities of 677435 cu.m of Rough stone &

MEMBERT[ro*" MEMBER%7 .ro1*ffi\4 SBIAA-TN PagelT of37 70302 cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years.

3. On verifying the approved mining plan, the

maximum minable quantity of rough stone for the restricted depth of 37m is 677425

Cu.m which is typed inadvertently as 677435 cu.m of Rough stone in the minutes of 208th meeting of SEAC held on 24.03.2021

In view of the above, the Authority unanimously

accepts the recommendation of SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing under cluster for undertaking the combined Environment Impact

Assessment Study and preparation of separate

Environment Management Plan subject to the conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal condition in addition to the following condition.

1. As per the recommendation of SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the ultimate depth of mining is restricted to 37m (35 m of Rough stone &2 m of Gravel) considering the environmental impacts due to the mining,

safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and the same was accepted by the proponent. Consequently, the maximum minable quantities of 677425 Cu.m of Rough stone & 70302cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years..

2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-65 12017-IA.Iil dated: 30.09.2020 7"; MEMBER src{zlnv MEMdR-- SEIAA.TN Page 18 of37 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER activities as committed and the concerns raised during public hearing meeting & the

action plan to mitigate the concerns.

12. To consider the proposal for the grant 833 I Afier detailed discussions, the Authority of Terms of Reference with Public unanimously accepts the recommendation of Hearing Proposed Rough Stone SEAC and decided to grant Terms of Reference quarry lease over an extent of 1.16.0 (ToR) with Public Hearing under cluster for Ha at S.F.Nos. 313A2,31382,313C2, undertaking the combined Environment Impact 313E2 & 3l3G at Palaiyur Village, Assessment Study and preparation of separate Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District, Environment Management Plan subject to the Tamil Nadu by Thiru. conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal A.Thirumalaisamy condition in addition to the following condition.

1. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum Ir.No.22-65 12017-lA.lll dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER activities as committed and the concerns raised during public hearing meeting & the action plan to mitigate the concerns.

13. Note to Consider for the issue of 7650 After detailed discussions, the Authority Environmental Clearance for the unanimously accepts the recommendation of Proposed Construction of SEAC and decided to grant Environmental Warehouse/Lo gistics/Storage Clearance subject to the conditions as Building Project M/s. SHIRINA recommended by SEAC & normal condition in Industrial & Logistics Park Pvt. Ltd., addition to the following condition. Logistics Park Pvt. Ltd., SECURA 1. The proponent shall ensure that the industrial ERPL Industrial & Logistics Park park shall be utilized only for P\4. Ltd.,in Survey No: 98/2, 100, Warehouse/Logistics /Industrial Storage 101, l02ll, t02/2, 10213, 103/14., /Light & Heavy engineering & assembling of t\'n-. MF],MBF],R S ARY rvrrrtrBn CH^MN SEIAA-TN Page 19 of37 103/18, 10312, 106, 10713, 10714, Components - IT Hardware, Packaging 10715, t0gl2, l17llA, lt7llBl, Material, e-corlmerce FMCG Retail tt7lIB2, 155/lA, 15512, t5513, Products, Pharmaceutical Products, Fabric,

15611, 160ll, t6012, 16111, 16U2, Apparel's, Fiber Glass; Ready to assemble t6ll3A, 161/38, 162, r63ltA, furniture, fixtures, Appliances, Engineering 163llB, 164ll, 16412, 165ll, 165/2, Products, Automobiles Accessories, 16611, 16612, 16613, 167, 769, 169, Electronic Goods, Non Agricultural Raw 170, 171 of Vishnuvakkam Village produce storage; Storage of only non- &. 27711. 277/2, 27gllc, 27912, flammable Chemicals within threshold limits g/ g g 27 8l I A, 27 lB, 27 I l, 279 12, 27 13, as per Schedule II & m of Manufacture, 280, 2gl, 292, 29413, 2g5l1A, storage and import of hazardous chemical 285/tB, 2g5llc, 2g5ltD, 295/lE, rules, 1989 as amended. 285ltF, 29512, 29513, 2g6llA, 2. The proponent shall ensure that there shall 286ltB, 29612, 28613A, 2g613P., not be any Storage of non-flammable 28614A, 286/48 of Karikalavakkam Chemicals more than the threshold limits as Village, Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur committed within the said Industrial park as District-For Environmental per Schedule II & III of Manufacture, Clearance - Category 82 - 8(a) of storage and import of hazardous chemical the Schedule - Building and rules, 1989 as amended. Construction Projects As per The As recommended EIA Notification 2006 As Amended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the project proponent shall

provide green belt of 20yo excluding OSR area all along the periphery of the proposed industrial and logistic park.

4. As recommended by SEAC and as acceRted

] by the proponent, the percentage of *.u I allotment to the individual

sector/commodities shall be as follows

a. FMCG/Consumer Durables/

Apparel's :40o/o

b. Electronic and IT hardware

a, )1'h MEMBERTTk^.t M uffi. "r^rM\SEIAA.TN Page 20 of37 Assembling :20o/o

c. Auto ancillary assembling and Allied

storage : l5%o

d. Light and Heavy Engineering l5%o

Logistics Services (3PL/4PL) :10oh

{. As recommended by S and as accepted by the proponent the project shall consume fresh w of 180 KLD and it must be sourced the Bore well located at project si with prior approval from the t Authority.

6. by the proponent, the proponent shall provide the Grey water treatment plant of capacity of 100 KLD to treat grey water generation of 97 KLD and shall be operated & maintained effectively and continuously'

7. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the proponent shall provide the Sewage treatment plant of capacity 70 KLD to treat the Black water generation of 56 KLD and shall be operated & maintained effectively and continuously'

8. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the proponent shall operate and maintain the Sewage Treatment Plant & Grey Water Treatment Plant efficiently and continuously to bring the quality of treated sewage to satisfy the discharge standards prescribed by the CPCB at all times.

g. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted %'\ MEMBER RETARY c'a66Y SBIAA-TN Page2l of37 by the proponent, the proponent shall recycle and reuse the Treated Sewage of 147 KLD for toilet flushing (43.5 KLD) and for Green belt development (103.5 KLD) on land within the premises.

10. The proponent shall ensure that there shall not be any trade effluent generation within

the premises of said Industrial park as committed.

11. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-65 12017-IAJil dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP to TNPCB, mentioning all the CER activities as committed below with the action plan to mitigate the concerns while applying for CTE from TNpCB. The CER activities shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

S. CER Cost of Description Name of Selected Village NO Activity CER (Within 5 Km from project in site) Lakhs 1 Infrastructure 10 The amount will be divided I Vishnuvakkam creation for and spent One time for 2 Karikalavakkam drinking these villages based on the J Vilapakkam water supply requirement. Building of Overhead tanks, Pipeline supply & Hand pumps etc., will be carried out. 2. Health camps 5 Health camps will be l. Vishnuvakkam along with conducted once a year for 2. Karikalavakkam free medicine screening of diseases and 3. Vilapakkam distribution providing medicines free of 4. Veeraragavapuram cost. 5. Kilanur J. Electrification 10 The areas requiring I Vishnuvakkam including electrification such as 2 Veeraragavapuram solar power public road, Schools and J Kilanur Common areas will be h^; MEMBER sncfu(nv MEA,4BE'R-- crl^k:fu SEIAA.TN Page22 of37 selected. Solar powered lamps will be installed. 4. Tree 6 Trees will be planted along l. Vishnuvakkam Plantation in roads for providing shade 2. Karikalavakkam villages over a period of 7 years. 3. Vilapakkam Public area such as schools, Hospitals, temples will also be selected for tree planting. Total 31 Lakhs

14. Note to Consider for the issue of After detailed discussions, the AuthoritV 17592 I Environmental Clearance for tne unanimously accepts the recommendation of

I I grant Environmental proposed construction of M/s. Vels SEAC and decided to I

I Medical College and Hospital Clearance subject to the conditions ^ | " I S.F.Nos. l17lLD, 11712. l1713,l recommended by SEAC & normal condition in I l17B.l addition to the following condition. ttll4A, tt7l4B, llTllc. I

I 1 l8/lA, 1 18/18, l18l2.l l8/3. I l8/4. I l. As recommended by SEAC and ut I 18/5A, I l8/5B,1 18/6.1 18/7. I l8/8. I I accepted by the proponent, the proposed I Ponneri 118/9 At Natham Village, I project constructed only fo. shall be ,I I 13, Taluk, S.No l2l1, 2,3,4,5 & 6, Phase -1 of total Built up area of 54,360 I 14, 17, l42llB, 14212, 143, l44llA2,l | Sq.m in l8 blocks; the proposed Rroject

I t44ltB3B, t4412,14413, l44l4,l shall have a plot coverage of 21.80 % of

14415, 144/6A, l5l/1A, l5l/lBl,l total plot area of 1,55,050 Sq.m. 15UlB2, 15112P.,151/3, 152, 153/1. I 2. As recommended by SEAC & as Per the

15312, l54ll, 15412, 158/2B, I planning permission obtained from 158/3A2over an extent of f S.S0S ha I deputy Director, DTCP vide Uthukottai Let Uaniakaranai Village. I Na.Ka.No. 55012020lTiruvallur-2 dated Itduk, S.No 327nA. 327tB.l tl 21.09.2020, the total built-up area is At Bandikavnur Villaee, 1327128, I restricted 54360.68 sq.m with Ground District. Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur I I I floor & First floor in a plot area of ramil Nadu by Vels Institute of I I I I rs5o5o Sq.m. I I Science, Technology & Advanced I I (VISTAS) Category 82 - 3. As recommended by SEAC and as | ,,r0,., - I I I u.cepted by the proponent, the parking lrtul o, the Schedule - Buildirg *a I I o Projects As e.. rn. I of 11.7 , Roads coverage of 16.03 %o, I lconstruction I creen belt of 33o/o, OSR of l0o/o and I EIA Notification 2006 As Amended I I vacant area o{' 7.44 o of the total plot o/\'r ,.' / ,tl MEMBERE,R SMRETARY MEMtrfR CHAI SEIAA-TN Page23 of37 area shall be maintained for the Phase -l construction activity.

4. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the project proponent shall ensure that the 33Yo of green belt developed shall be maintained

properly and within the premises and at

the periphery of the site and the land area statement shall be as follows

S.No Description Area Percentage (Sq.m) (%) Building I 33846.17 21.80 coverage

2. Parking r8130.00 11.70

J. Roads 24861.00 16.03 4. Green Belt 5l 166.50 33.00

5. OSR 15s05.00 10.00 6. Vacant area I1541.33 7.44

Totalp ot Area 1s5050.00 r 00.00

5. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the total

water required for Phase - I activity shall be 358 KLD out of which 20KLD is for Stream-A (Lab, Animal House, OT, Gynae ward) & 338 KLD is for Steam-B

(P/OP/Visitors/Hostels, Students, Quarters, Staff & Laundry).

As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the

freshwater drawl of 243 KLD shall be

taken from external sources and treated water of I I5KLD shall be recycled for flushing purpose.

7. As recommended by SEAC and as

>1'b- MEMBER.Tk o*" ME}4BE[-- cmtffi SEIAA-TN Page 24 of 37 accepted by the proponent, trade Effluent of ISKLD generated from Stream-A shall be treated in the Effluent treatment

plant of capacity 50KLD as proposed.

8. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent,, sewage of 112 KLD & grey water of 193 KLD generated from Stream-B shall be treated in Sewage Treatment Plant of capacity 300 KLD & Grey Water Treatment Plant of capacity 400 KLD respectively as proposed

9, As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent,, the proponent shall operate and maintain the Sewage Treatment Plant, GreY water Treatment Plant & Effluent Treatment Plant efficiently and continuously to bring the quality of treated sewage/treated trade effluent to satisfu the discharge standards prescribed by the CPCB at all times.

10. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent,, the proponent shall ensure that the treated water of I 15 KLD shall be recYcled within the system for flushing purpose, treated water of 179.2 KLD shall be utilized for Green belt development and treated water of ll.8 KLD shall be used for firefighting /road washing as per requirement basis.

MEMBER aror#q SEIAA-TN Page 25 of37 I l. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the proponent shall ensure that the total treated water of 306 KLD from ETP, GWTP & STp shall be recycled, reused within the premises and will not be discharged anywhere outside the campus.

12. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the project proponent shall ensure that the Solid

waste generated in the hospital and college shall be collected in colour- coded bins as per Bio Medical Waste

Management Rule 2016 norms and taken

to BM waste storage area. Solid waste

generated in hostel, quarters shall be segregated as biodegradable/non- biodegradable waste generation calculated as per CPHEEO Manual on

l MSW Management, 2000 Chapter 7. I

I 13. As recommended by SEAC and as I accepted by the proponent, the project proponent shall ensure that the biomedical waste of quantity approximately 154 Kglday shall be disposed to authorized CBWTF.

14. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the project

proponent shall ensure that the Biodegradable food waste; garden waste of approximately 537 Kg/day & STp sludge of 100Kg/day shall be processed in Biomethanization plant and the >1'r1 MEMBER EN4BTR cHA/ffii\'^ SEIAA-TN Page26 of37 compost shall be used as manure for the green belt development. Non-

Biodegradable paper, Plastics, containers, cartons etc., approximately of 797 Kglday shall be disPosed to authorized recycler.

15. As recommended by SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the project proponent shall ensure that the ETP

sludge of 2 Kglday shall be disposed to authorized TSDF. The Hazardous waste generation of 0.5 Tlyear used/spent oil from the DG shall be collected stored

and disposed to authorized recycler.

16. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-6512017-IAJII dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020, the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP as proposed for Rs.400 Lakh, which includes CER activities of Rs.50 Lakhs to TNPCB, mentioning all the CER activities as committed below with the action plan to mitigate the concerns while applying for CTE from TNPCB. The CER activities shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

S.No CER Activity Cost Description Name of the [Rs.Lakhs Identified Villases i Solid waste 5 Installation of Dustbins for waste Manjankaranai Management segregation. Providing Gloves, Bandikavanor facility Mask and other safety measure, Natham transport of solid waste. Kannigaipair Thatchoor

MEMBER.r"Mto*t #k .ror*Q6"r SEIAA-TN Page27 of37 Vettipalayam Janappanchatram Panchety 2. Infrastructure l5 Roads will be laid in interior of Manjankaranai development villages for easy traffic. Bus Bandikavanor laying roads shelters will be built near school Natham and bus and hospital bus stops as priority. Kannigaipair shelters. 3. Infrastructure l0 To recharge ground aquifers, Manjankaranai development - Rainwater ponds will be Bandikavanor RWH developed in area adjoining the Natham structures hospital campus. In villages Janappanchatram (ponds, drains desilting of ponds will be carried Panchety etc.) out. 4. skill 5 Training recharge ground Manjankaranai Development aquifers, Rain water ponds will Bandikavanor & Training for be developed in area adjoining Natham women the hospital campus. In villages Kannigaipair desilting of ponds will be carried Thatchoor out. Vettipalayam Janappanchatram Panchety 5. Tree Plantation l0 Shade providing trees such as Manjankaranai Neem, Poovarasu, Mango trees Bandikavanor will be planted along roadside, in Natham public places over a period of 7 Kannigaipair years. Thatchoor Panchety 6. Health camps 5 Health camps and eye check up Manjankaranai along with free camps will be conducted once in Bandikavanor medicine a year in mobile vans by hospital Natham distribution staff . Medicines will be provided Thatchoor free of cost. Vettipalayam Janaooanchatram Total Cost (Rs.) 50 Lakhs

15. To consider the proposal for the grant 7253 After detailed discussions, the Authority noted of Environmental Clearance for the as follows.

Proposed Sand quarry lease over an l. The Project Proponent, M/s. The Executive extent of 12.00.0 Ha at Engineer Public Works Department has S.F.Nos.495ll (Part), Agaraelathur applied seeking Environmental Clearance for Village, Sirkazhi Taluk, the Proposed Sand quany lease over an Nagapattinam District, Tamil Nadu extent of 12.00.0 Ha at S.F.Nos. 49511 by M/s.The Executive Engineer (Part), Agaraelathur Village, Sirkazhi Taluk, Public Works Department Myladuthurai District.

MEMBER TffiTo*n k ."o##-u"\' SEIAA-TN Page 28 of37 2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC hetd on 24.03.2021, the SEAC has recommended the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance subject to the following conditions

among others:

a. Permitted ultimate depth of mining is restricted to theoretical bed level. Hence the quantity that shall be

mined up to theoretical bed level as per the approved mining plan is 1,98,175m3.

In view of the above, the Authority unanimously accepts the recommendation of SEAC and decided to grant Environmental Clearance subject to the conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal condition in addition to the following condition.

l. As per the recommendation of SEAC, the Permitted ultimate depth of mining is restricted to theoretical bed level. Hence the quantity of sand that shall be mined up to theoretical bed level as per the approved

mining plan is l. 98,1 75m3.

2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-65 12017-IA.Ill dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP to TNPCB, mentioning all the CER activities as committed with action plan while applying for CTE from TNPCB. The CER activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB

. V MEMBER SECRETARY AK .,,MV SEIAA-TN Page29 of37 Tb consider the proposal for the grant 16. 7254 After detailed discussions, the Authority noted of Environmental Clearance for the as follows. Proposed Sand Quarry over an extent 1. The Project Proponent, M/s.The Executive of 20.00 Ha in Coleroon River at I I Eneineer Public Works Department S.F.No: 32lll (Part) of Vadarangam I has applied seeking Environmental Clearance for Village, Sirkazhi Taluk, I I the Proposed Sand quarry lease over an Mayladuthurai District, Tamil Nadu I I extent of 20.00.0 Ha at S.F.Nos. 32t/t

I (Part), Vadarangam Village, | Sirkazhi Taluk, I Myladuthurai Disrrict. 2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC held on

24.03.2021, the SEAC has recommended the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance subject to the following conditions among others:

a. Permitted ultimate depth of mining is

restricted to theoretical bed level. Hence the quantity that shall be mined up to theoretical bed level as per the approved mining plan is 2,79,364m3.

In view of the above, the Authority unanimously

accepts the recommendation of SEAC and decided to grant Environmental Clearance subject to the conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal condition in addition to the following condition. ]

l 1. As per the recommendation of SEAC, the

I Permitted ultimate depth of mining ir l restricted to theoretical bed level. Hence the I

I quantity of sand that shall be mined up to I theoretical bed level as per the approved I mining plan is 2,79,364m3. I

I 2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum

I h. r,' MEMBER ARY ME*{BtrR ,,^MV\\^ SEIAA.TN Page 30 of37 F.No.22-65 12017 -l{.Iil dated: 30.09:2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall fumish

the detailed EMP to TNPCB, mentioning all the CER activities as committed with action plan while applying for CTE from TNPCB. The CER activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

17. To consider the proposal for the grant 7066 After detailed discussions, the Authority noted

of Environmental Clearance for the as follows. I

I Proposed Sand quarry lease over an 1. The Project Proponent, M/s. The Executive

I extent of 20.00.0 Ha at Engineer Public Works Department has (Part), Methirivellur I S.F.Nos.78211 applied seeking Environmental Clearance for ] Taluk, Village, Sirkazhi the Proposed Sand quarry lease over an District, Tamil Nadu Mayladuthurai extent of 20.00.0 Ha at S.F.Nos. 78211 by M/s.The Executive Engineer (Part), Methirivelur Village, Sirkazhi Taluk, Public Works Department Myladuthurai District. 2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC held on 24.03.2021, the SEAC has recommended the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance subject to the following conditions

among others: a. Permitted ultimate depth of mining is restricted to theoretical bed level. Hence the quantity that shall be mined up to theoretical

bed level as per the approved mining plan is 2,53,991m3.

I I ln view of the above, the Authority unanimously

I I accepts the recommendation of SEAC and

I I decided to grant Environmental Clearance

I I subject to the conditions as recommended by

I ISEaC & normal condition in addition to the t T> MEMBER srccKanv MEMBER cH^'#ffi\dP SEIAA-TN Page 31 of37 following condition.

2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum F.No.22-65 12017-IA.III dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP to TNPCB, mentioning all the CER activities as committed with action plan while applying for CTE from TNPCB. The CER activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

18. To consider the proposal for the grant 8239 After detailed discussions, the Authority of Environmental Clearance (EC) unanimously accepts the recommendation of Proposed Rough stone quarry lease SEAC and decided to grant Environmental

over an extent of 1.05.0ha at S.F.Nos. Clearance subject to the conditions as l92ll & 19212 of Sathiyamangalam recommended by SEAC & normal condition in Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukottai addition to the following condition. District, Tamil Nadu by M/s. Veeram 1. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum Stone P\4 Ltd F.No.22-6512017-IA.lil dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP to TNPCB, mentioning all the CER activities as committed with action plan while applying for CTE from TNPCB. The CER activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

19. To consider the proposal for the grant 8136 After detailed discussions, the Authority noted of Environmental Clearance (EC)

MEMBER ARY arorffilh), SEIAA.TN Page 32 of37 Proposed Sand qualry in Palar as follows. riverbed over an extent of 4.90.0 ha l. The Proponent, Executive Engineer, at S.F.No. 242(P) in ArumParuthi PWD/WRD, has applied for Environmental Village, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore Clearance for the proposed Sand quarry over District, Tamil Nadu bY the an extent of 4.90Ha in Palar river bed in Executive Engineer, PWD/WRD S.F.No. 242(P) in Arumparuthi Village, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore District. 2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC held on 24.03.2021, the SEAC has recommended the proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance subject to the following conditions among others: a. Permitted ultimate depth of mining is restricted to theoretical bed level. Hence the quantitY that shall be mined up to theoretical bed level as per the approved mining Plan is 51297m3. b. Manual Mining shall be carried out using Bullock carts only restricting

up to 198 Nos. of bullock carts Per

day. 3. On verifying the Form-I, Precise atea communication letter and Mining Plan approval letter, it was noticed that the extent of sand quarry is 4.90 Ha whereas in the SEAC minute, the extent of sand quarry is typed inadvertently as 4.94 Ha

In view of the above, the Authority unanimously accepts the recommendation of SEAC and decided to grant Environmental Clearance for the proposed Sand quarry over an extent of 4.90Ha in Palar river bed in S.F.No. 242(P) in

MEMBER MEMBER CHAIffi\,YI SEIAA-TN Page 33 of37 Arumparuthi Village, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore

District subject to the conditions as recommended by SEAC & normal condition in addition to the following condition.

1. As per the recommendation of SEAC, the Permitted ultimate depth of mining is restricted to theoretical bed level. Hence the quantity that shall be mined up to theoretical bed level as per the approved mining plan is 51297m3.

2. As per the recommendation of SEAC, Manual Mining shall be carried out using Bullock carts only restricting up to 198 Nos. ol'bullock carts per day.

As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum

F.No.22-65 12017-IA.Iil dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detailed EMP to TNPCB, mentioning all the CER activities as committed with action plan while applying for CTE from TNPCB. The CER activity shall be carried out before obtaining CTO from TNPCB.

20. To consider the proposal for the grant 4396 After detailed discussion, the Authority of Environmental Clearance for the unanimously accepts the recommendation of Existing Multi Colour Granite SEAC and decided to request the Member Quany over an extent of 16.12.0 Ha Secretary, SEIAA to obtain the following details at S.F. No.516/l , 51814 & 534, from the proponent as recommended by SEAC Arasiramani Village, Sankari Taluk, and place the proposal in the ensuing Authority Salem District by M/s. Tamil Nadu meeting for further course of Action. Minerals Limited 1. The SEAC has prescribed the amounts for Ecological remediation (Rs. 6.448 lakhs), VtF MEMBER snckrnv MEI\,IBE-R-_ CH^Ml'4\' SEIAA-TN Page 34 of37 natural resource augmentation (Rs. '8.06 | lakhs) & community resource augmentation I (Rs. I 1.284lakhs), totaling Rs. 25J921

Lakhs. Hence the project proponent has to I

I remit the amount of Rs. 25.792 Lakhs in the

I form of bank guarantee to Tamil Nadu I and submit the Pollution Control Board I

acknowledgement of the same to SEIAA- |

I TN. The funds shall be utilized for the

I remediation plan, Natural resource I ..rou... augmentation plan & Commurity I I augmentation plan as indicated in tf,e I EIA/EMP report. I

2. The amount committed by the Project proponent for CER (Rs.6.448 Lakhs) shall be remitted in the form of DD to the beneficiary for the activities committed by the proponent. A copy of receipt from the beneficiary shall be submitted to SEIAA-TN

J. The project proponent shall submit the proof for the action taken bY the state Government/TNPcB against project proponent under the provisions ofSection 19 of the Environment (Protection) Ac, 1986 as per the EIA Notification dated: 14.03.2017

and amended 08.03.201 8.

4. The project shall fumish the revised letter obtained from Assistant Director, Deparment of Geology & Mining.

2t. To consider the proposal for the grant 8303 After detailed discussions, the Authority noted of Terms of Reference with Public as follows. \ %.r/ ryA.N MEMBER SBCKaNV MEMBER CHAIRIIAN SEIAA-TN Page 35 of37 Hearing Proposed Red Gravel & l. The Project Proponent, Thiru.M.Karthik Ordinary Stone quarry lease over an has applied for Terms of Reference for the

extent of 4.55.0 Ha at S.F.Nos. proposed Red Gravel & Ordinary Stone 295/2A, 2g5l2B, 2g5l2D, 23glt, quarry lease over an extent of of 4.55.0 Ha 295 I 4C, 23813 A, 23812 and 238138 at at S.F.Nos. 29512A, 295128, 29512D, Keelaramanadhi Village, Kamuthi 23811, 29514C, 23813A, 23812 and 238/38 Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, at Keelaramanadhi Village, Kamuthi Taluk, Tamil Nadu by Thiru.M.Karthik Ramanathapuram District.

2. In the 208th meeting of SEAC held on 24.03.2021, the SEAC has recommend the proposal for the issue of the following Terms of Reference along with public hearing among others:

a. Restricting the maximum depth of mining up to l4m (12 m of Ordinay strrne & 2 m of Gravel) considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety

of the working personnel and following the principle of the ]

I sustainable and mining I consequently the maximum minable quantities of 3, 19,531 cu.m of Orldinary stone & 68,840cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years.

3. On verifying the Form-l & approved mining plan the maximum minable quantities for the restricted ultimate depth of 14m is 349421 cu.m of ordinary stone & 68840 cu.m of Gravel whereas in the SEAC minutes

MEMBER srcffiv "roiM\rVrSEIAA.TN Page 36 of37 quantity the Ordinary stone is ty --\ inadvertently as 3119,531 cu.m.

1. As per the recommendation of SEAC and as accepted by the proponent, the ultimate depth of mining is restricted to l4m (12 m of

Ordinaly strrne & 2 m of GmvO considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequently the maximum minable quantities of 349421 cu.m of Ordinary stone & 68,840cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years.

2. As per the MoEF& CC office memorandum

F.No.22-65 12017 -IA.lIl dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall fumish the detailed EMP, mentioning all the CER activities as committed and the concerns raised during public hearing meeting & the action plan to mitigate the concerns.

ry- H MEMBER S MEMBER a"or SEIAA-TN

Page 37 of37