<<

The cores of in the

Rob ert Minchin

April

Contents

Intro duction

Historical Background

This pro ject

Data Reduction

Image pro cessing

The images

ray removal Cosmic

Ellipse tting

Galphot ellipt

IRAF ellipse

Checking the ellipse ts

Dusty galaxies

Data calibration

Other data

Analysis of data

Graphs from the ellipse ts

Isophote shap es

Images

Power laws

Fitting p ower laws

Information from the t

Graphs from the p owerlaw ts

analysis of p owerlaw ts Statistical

Results

The Results

Dierences b etween the two regions

vs M

v

Central region

Halo region

r vs

b

r r vs M

b lim v

Break radius vs Eective radius

Comparison with previous results

M vs

v

r vs

b

Diskiness

Dening a Core

Conclusions

vs M

v

M

v

vs r

b

r r vs M

b lim v

Diskiness

Summary

A Errors in the ellipses

Notes on Galaxies B

C Dieren tials of the Nuker Law

programmes D Computer

Recip es routines D Numerical

D My routines

D Pro jectc

D Funcsc

List of Tables

Semima jor axis ts

Average radius ts

Other data

List of Figures

Fab er et al results for r vs M

b v

Data from ellipsetting to NGC

Nukerlaw t to NGC

Data from the averageradius t

Distribution of

Nukerlaw t to NGC

Plots of against M for the central and halo regions

v

and m r vs r

v b e

comparison to Fab er et als data

cos terms for disky galaxies

Nukerlaw t to NGC

Abstract

I have analyzed HST images of galaxies selected from the central and halo regions of the Coma

cluster A nukerlaw t to the proles has b een found and the relationships b etween the parameters

of the nukerlaw and b etween the total luminosity and isophote shap e has b een investigated

with half of the galaxies in the sample Problems were encountered with dust in the galaxies

suering some degree of dust p ollution Where this was severe enough to aect the prole the

galaxy was excluded from the data set

The dierences b etween the central and halo regions have b een investigated It is predicted

that coretyp e galaxies will form preferrentially in the central region This predicted relationship

is not proven to exist although there is some evidence for it Due to a dierence in magnitudes

b etween the two samples it is necessary for a relationship b etween and luminosity to exist in

order to show preferrential core formation in the central region It is not p ossible to say that this

relationship is denately seen in the data

Comparison of the data with previous results shows that the lack of cores seen in lessluminous

galaxies could b e an eect of resolution This would create an articial trend of with luminosity

and an apparent dichotomy as only the steep outer p owerlaw would b e resolved in galaxies with

smaller cores giving a large value of This trend and the values of higher than could b e a

M galaxy selection eect Disky galaxies are seen to b e able to form cores and a bright

v

is seen with no resolved core

Chapter

Intro duction

Historical Background

Originally cores were dened as the areas of constant surface brightness in the centre of the King

mo del This was shown by King to b e a reasonable t to the central regions of

elliptical galaxies Later CCD imaging showed that the King mo del did not describ e adaquately

the surface brightness proles of elliptical galaxies the central regions were not to the limit of

resolution areas of constant surface brightness The regions now known as cores are regions of low

logarithmic slop e sep erated from the steep er outer logarithmic slop e by a sharp break The inner

logarithmic slop e do es not go to zero as predicted by the King mo del Lauer et al at the

limit of resolution

Imaging of the cores of elliptical galaxies with the Hubble Space Telescop e has allowed them to

b e examined at previously unattainable resolutions The galaxies app ear to divide into two typ es

Jae et al Larger galaxies generally have proles with well dened cores describ ed by a

double p owerlaw whilst smaller galaxies can b e describ ed by a single p owerlaw and have no well

Kormendy et al dened core Bosch et al

It is known that larger galaxies are triaxial systems supp orted by random motions and there

fore having b oxy isophotes while smaller galaxies are rotationally supp orted with disky isophotes

Davies et al This division into two sorts of elliptical galaxies app ears to correlate well

with the division into those with and without unresolved cores Kormendy et al Jae et al

Lauer et al tted a parameter double p owerlaw to the inner proles of galaxies This

er law ts b oth coretyp e and p owerlaw galaxies well law known as the Nuk

r r

b

I r I

b

r r

b

The parameters tted by this law are the inner logarithmic slop e the outer logarithmic

the sharpness of the break b etween the two slop es the radius of the break r and slop e

b

the intensity at the break I In terms of dening a core is the most imp ortant as it shows

b

the slop e of the surfacebrightness prole as it tends towards zero It can b e seen that for r r

b

I r r r I r r and for r

b

The results of tting this law to a numb er of elliptical galaxies and to the bulges of spiral

galaxies are given in Fab er et al This classies galaxies as having cores if and

if the break is wellresolved The claim is also made that there is a divide b etween the coretyp e

galaxies and the p owerlaw galaxies which have The coretyp e galaxies are large triaxial

systems with M and the p owerlaw galaxies are small rotationally supp orted systems

v

with M

v

Fab er et al nd that there is a clear division b etween the core and p owerlaw proles see g

from Fab er et al which can b e seen on the graph of r vs M and also as a gap in the

b v

distribution of b etween and Figure also shows the division found into b oxy and disky

galaxies

Figure Fab er et al results for r vs M

b v

This pro ject

Bender Burstein and Fab er prop osed that the controlling factor in the evolution of a galaxy

is the amount of gas present during formation and mergers If there is a large amount of gas present

then most of the energy is dissipated and the galaxy forms a small rotationally supp orted disky

system Larger galaxies are formed later by mergers of these smaller galaxies when most of the gas

has formed into These stellar mergers do not dissipate energy and so form triaxial systems

continuum GS continuum Fab er et al puts forward This theorem is called the gasstellar

this theorem as explaining why disky galaxies show p owerlaws as the gas in dissipative mergers

is carried towards the centre of the galaxies

The Coma cluster provides a go o d test area for this theory as the central region consists of a

dynamically relaxed system where the galaxies have interacted frequently and have little gas and

the halo region consists of relatively gasrich galaxies which have not yet visited the core and have

had little chance to interact The cluster is rich enough to b e able to form a statistically signicant

cluster has shown that it is sample of b oth regions and pro jection of HST data from the

p ossible to distinguish the two kinds of proles at the distance of the Coma cluster

If the GS continuum theorem is correct it should b e p ossible to see preferential formation

of p owerlaw galaxies in the halo region and preferential formation of coretyp e galaxies in the

central region This should result in there b eing a signicant dierence b etween the distributions

of for the two samples I will also examine the relationships seen by Fab er et al in their survey

to determine if these are seen in the Coma cluster

There are galaxies in the sample from the central region of Coma and from the halo

In chapters and I explain how the images were reduced and the data analysed In chapter

I present my results and in chapter I give my conclusions The derivation of the error in the

surfactbrightness prole and notes on the galaxies are given in an app endix

Chapter

Data Reduction

Image pro cessing

The images

The Hubble Space Telescop e was used to obtain WFPC images of each of the galaxies

to in the sample The Planetary Camera images were extracted and trimmed from

in order to remove noise around the b ottom and left edges of the plates The images

were examined and those with susp ected dust noted

Cosmic ray removal

Cosmic ray interference was reduced by combining the two images of each galaxy using the IRAF

routine imcombine with the parameters rejectcrre ject hsig gain These parameters tell

the routine to lo ok for ob jects that resemble cosmic rays sharply dened bright p ositive p oints

and remove them if they are more than times the exp ected variation from the value on the

the other image The gain value of was obtained from the image headers and denes how many

photon counts there are for each ADU

In order to ensure the alignment of the two images prior to combining them the IRAF routine

center was used to nd the centre of each image From this the oset b etween the centres in the

pair was found and those galaxies with an oset of less that pixels were combined those with

an oset of greater than pixels b eing noted see App endix B

Four galaxies had osets outside of this range these were examined using the IRAF routine X

register This routine p erforms a crosscorrelation over a wide area rather than nding the centre

This routine gave two of the galaxies as having shifts less than pixels these were combined

The remaining two galaxies were shifted using Xshift prior to b eing combined see App endix B

Ellipse tting

A working notation of naming the galaxies c to c was intro duced with c to c b eing in

o

the core angular distance from the cluster centre less than Mp c as dened in Lucey et

al and c to c b eing in the halo This notation allowed automated routines to b e run

easily and the core and halo galaxies to b e easily distinguished Header les were constructed for

each galaxy containing the prop er names exp osure times and other data from literature

ellipt Galphot

The Galphot routines by R Peletier were used to t ellipses to the galaxies The routines identied

stars and remaining cosmic rays and masked them out Problems with this masking such as

unmasked diraction spikes were corrected manually and a manual masking routine was also used

to remove dust lanes A map of bad pixels was also constructed and added to the mask

An initial t was made using the harmt routine This ts circular isophotes with harmonics

This pro duced a residual image which could b e used to check the mask

The nal t was made using the ellipt routine This ts elliptical isophotes for a numb er of

iterations then ts harmonic terms to these isophotes The routine creates a residual image after

each iteration and uses this to correct itself thus giving it go o d accuracy The t is done using

annuli of of the radius at intervals Outside pixel radius the t is done to all the pixels

that are inside the annulus within this radius the width of the annulus is less than pixel so

interp olation is used to calculate the values

ellipse IRAF

The IRAF routine ellipse was used as a check to the Galphot ts This routine ts by sampling

a numb er of sectors around annuli and using these to construct ellipses The routine app ears less

reliable than the Galphot routines as it uses a cruder tting metho d but pro duced comparable

output

In order to run this routine two IRAF scripts were used The rst ran an initial t over to

pixels radius and was seeded using p oints the ends of the ma jor an minor axes found from

an isophote contour map of the galaxy The second script used the largest reliable t indicated by

the programme returning a stopvalue of meaning that the t had b een trouble free from the

rst t and ran over the range to pixels radius For this second t a minimum value for the

intensity slop e was sp ecied in order to stop the ellipses overlapping at low intensities At these

low intensities high radii tting was done concentrically with the ellipticity and centrep osition

held constant

Checking the ellipse ts

The ellipses used were those pro duced by the Galphot routines The ts prduced were consistent

with those from the IRAF routine The residuals pro duced by Galphot were also checked this

often showed dust that had b een missed on a prior insp ection of the image as the dust led to large

residuals b eing formed

Dusty galaxies

A numb er of galaxies are badly aected by dust If there were serious features caused by dust after

masking of visible dustlanes an entry was made into the header les of these galaxies and they

were not included in the sample This excluded galaxies from the central region and from the

halo region

Ab out half of the sample were aected by dust but half of these were not seriously aected

the dust lanes were thin enough to b e masked out without any ma jor loss of information

Data calibration

The data tables were read into Sup er Mongo The data was calibrated from ADU to magnitudes

using the equation

P H O T F LAM D N

PT m log PHOTZ

E X PTIME

from the WFPC instrument handb o ok where DN is the numb er of counts PHOTFLAM and

PHOTZPT are photometric calibration constants the sensitivity and zero p oint of the CCDs

which have the values and resp ectively for this data and EXPTIME is the exp osure

time The values for these were obtained from the image header les EXPTIME was not constant

over the set of readings b eing seconds for the fainter galaxies seconds for the ma jority

of galaxies in the sample and seconds for the dominant galaxy NGC The distance scale

was calibrated using pixel arcseconds This allowed the surface brightness to b e found

2

in terms of magnitude arcsec

Other data

b carried The magnitude of the galaxies in the vband was found from measurements of A and S

e e

1

by Lucey et al The distance to Coma was taken from Fab er et al as km s

1

A value of H km s Mp c was used to calculate the absolute magnitudes and the angular

0

scale as this was the value adopted by Fab er et al

The header les eventually contained the prop er names exp osure times distances from the

centre of the Coma cluster in degrees eective diameter and average surface brightness within

this diameter and whether the galaxy was seriously aected by dust The data on the distances

from the centre of Coma the eective diameter and the eective surface brightness were those from

Lucey et al mentioned ab ove I made the judgement on whether the galaxies were badly aected

by dust if there were problems due to dust which prevented ellipses b eing tted over an extended

region or if the prole was distorted by dust so it could not b e well tted by a p owerlaw then the

galaxy was dened as b eing badly aected by dust

Chapter

Analysis of data

from the ellipse ts Graphs

Graphs were made using Sup er Mongo by reading in the data les pro duced by the ellipt routine

in galphot The data were calibrated so that ADU were converted to magnitudes and distances

were in arcseconds Data from the IRAF ellipse routine were also read in and graphed This

provided a check on the galphot data

The surface brightness p er arcsecond squared p osition angle ellipticity deviation of the centre

in x and y and the harmonics for and were plotted against the log of a the semima jor axis

r

p

For data from galphot a was calculated using a where is the ellipticity This conversion

1

was unnecessary for ellipse data as it used a rather than r for its scaling

The ellipse data matched well with the galphot data in most of the graphs The galphot data

alone was used for analysis

An example of the graphs obtained is given in gure this is of the Dtyp e galaxy NGC

c in my numb ering scheme The results from Galphot are shown by crosses and the results

from IRAF are shown by b oxes

Figure Data from ellipsetting to NGC

Isophote shap es

The range over which the prole app eared reliable was from a radius of pixels to a surface

2

brightness of mag arcsec The highest absolute value reached by the cos term in this

region was used to determine whether the galaxy app eared to b e b oxy or disky

A Sup er Mongo routine was written to return the highest absolute value This value was then

converted to aa by dividing by conversion factor from Pelatier This gure shows the

distortion of the ellipse into a b oxy or disky shap e disky shap es having p ositive values For the

purp oses of denition galaxies with aa were said to b e disky if this value was not b eing

returned due to distortions due to dust

Images

Black and white greyscale images were obtained using the print function within SAOimage They

showed the outer part of the galaxies scaled logarithmically from to of the luminosity the

core of the galaxies scaled logarithmically from to of the luminosity and the residuals

left by galphot The outer parts and the residuals were at magnication and the cores were

at magnication with the exception of NGC the cD galaxy which was shown at

magnication

The greyscales were examined for signs of visible dust and galaxies thus identied were added

to the list of galaxies already noted as containing dust The residuals were also examined and those

with large residuals in the centre were retted Most of the large residuals were due to severe dust

contamination and only small improvements in the t were p ossible

Power laws

er laws Fitting p ow

A computer programme was written to t the nuker law to the surface brightness prole using a

simulated annealing Levenb ergMarquadt routine from Numerical Recip es Press et al to

nd the ve parameters The t was made to b oth semima jor axis and averageradius proles

1

b etween pixels and mag arcsec the limits that app ear to b e the limit of resolution and

the p oint where sky eects b ecome imp ortant

p

2

g D N +

r n

p

was used in A prop ortional error in the numb er of counts DN of P

N D

g D N 2 r r

the input data see App endix where D N is the average numb er of counts in ADU in an

r is the width of the annulus g is the gain and annulus r is the inner radius of the annulus

r n

is the read noise

5

p

The read noise is taken to b e as each image has a read noise of and two images were

2

averaged The gain is taken to b e as each image has a gain of so photons are needed for

each ADU

from the t Information

The t returned values and errors for the parameters needed for the nuker law r

b

I These were used to construct a mo del prole which was compared with the original to check

r

whether the t was satisfactory If the errors asso ciated with the constants of the t were to o large

or the t did not match the original date the t was rejected as unsatisfactory

An example graph is given in g of NGC showing the datap oints with the t through

them in the top half and the dierence b etween the t and the datap oints with the line of error

around the datap oints in the b ottom half

The t was unable to t satisfactorily to some of the proles these were removed from the

Figure Nukerlaw t to NGC

sample This removed galaxies all of them from the central region on the semima jor axis ts

and galaxies all but one from the central region on the averageradius ts Another galaxy was

removed from the central region in the averageradius ts as it had an inner logarithmic slop e

that indicated a core but its break radius was to o close to the limit of resolution to b e considered

reliable as was one from the outer regions on the semima jor axis t

For the averageradius t this left galaxies in the central region and in the halo For the

semima jor axis ts this left galaxies in the central region and in the halo

The parameters returned for each galaxy are given in tables C semima jor axis ts and C

averageradius ts and the graphs obtained from these are also given

Graphs from the p owerlaw ts

The values of and r from the nukerlaw ts and the values of m and distance from the centre

b v

of Coma were plotted against each other in graphs of apparent values and graphs of absolute

values Only those galaxies left in the sample as detailed ab ove were graphed These graphs were

examined for trends and for dierences b etween the samples from the inner and outer regions of

Coma

analysis of p owerlaw ts Statistical

The KolomogrovSmirnov twosample test was used to examine dierences b etween the samples

This test gives the condence that two samples are from the same parent p opulation Details of

the test were found in Wall This test was used to lo ok for dierences in magnitude and

Chapter

Results

The Results

The results are given of ts to b oth the semima jor axis and the averageradius in tables and

Additional information is given in table Data from the averageradius t is shown graphically

in gure with crosses representing galaxies from the central region and b oxes representing

galaxies from the halo region

b etween the two regions Dierences

The KolomogrovSmirnov test showed that the distributions of in the two regions were likely to

b e from the same parent distribution eg there was no signicant dierence b etween them Using

the same test the probability that the magnitudes were from the same parent distribution was

tested and was found to b e in the tail of the normal distribution eg the distributions of the

magnitudes were fairly signicantly dierent

Figure Data from the averageradius t crosses central b oxes halo except for m vs R

v

crosses op en b oxes b oxed cross

c d a b

name r Status

b b b

NGC

IC

NGC

RB

IC

IC

RB

RB

NGC

RB

RB

RB

NGC

IC

RB

IC

IC

RB

IC

NGC

RB

NGC

NGC

NGC

Zw

IC

Zw

IC

NGC

NGC

Zw

Zw

IC

NGC

NGC

IC

NGC

NGC

NGC

NM

IC

NGC

NGC

NGC

Zw

a

Break radius in parsec

b

Break radius in arcsec

c 2

surface brightness in mag arcsec at the break radius

d

Okay Dusty Unsatisfactory t Break radius less than limit of resolution arcsec

Table Semima jor axis ts

a b c d

name r Status

b b b

NGC

IC

NGC

RB

IC

IC

RB

RB

NGC

RB

RB

RB

NGC

IC

RB

IC

IC

RB

IC

NGC

RB

NGC

NGC

NGC

Zw

IC

Zw

IC

NGC

NGC

Zw

Zw

IC

NGC

NGC

IC

NGC

NGC

NGC

NM

IC

NGC

NGC

NGC

Zw

a

Break radius in parsec

b

Break radius in arcsec

c 2

surface brightness in mag arcsec at the break radius

d

Okay Dusty Unsatisfactory t Break radius less than limit of resolution arcsec

Table Average radius ts

a b c d d

name mag radius abs mag c a

NGC

IC

NGC

RB

IC

IC

RB

RB

NGC

RB

RB

RB

NGC

IC

RB

IC

IC

RB

IC

NGC

RB

NGC

NGC

NGC

Zw

IC

Zw

IC

NGC

NGC

Zw

Zw

IC

NGC

NGC

IC

NGC

NGC

NGC

NM

IC

NGC

NGC

NGC

Zw

a

from Vband measurements of A and SB Calculted

e e

b

Distance from centre of Coma cluster in degrees

c 1

Calcultated from taking H Mp c km s

0

d

deviations from ellipse and aa deviation from ellipse calculated from c by dividing by cos

Table Other galaxy data

The galaxies in the halo region were on the whole a magnitude brighter than the galaxies in

the central region b oth regions had the same distribution of in their samples If there is a trend

of with M this would show that there was a dierence in the formation of coretyp e galaxies

v

b etween the halo and central regions

vs M

v

Examination of the graph of M against do es not show any denite trend out of galaxies

v

brighter than magnitudes show cores indicating that larger galaxies generally contain cores

There do not app ear to b e many smaller galaxies with cores but it is imp ossible to say whether

a physical eect or whether this is an artefact of resolution this reects

There are p oints in the region For a uniform distribution b etween and

which encompasses all the values in the data set p oints would b e exp ected in this region The

p

exp ected counting error on this is therefore this means that the numb er of p oints

found in this region is barely signicantly less than would b e exp ected from a uniform distribution

It is still the case that this region has a lower numb er density than the core or p owerlaw regions

either side of

The frequency distribution of the s of galaxies from the averageradius t is shown in g

The shaded area represents galaxies in the halo region the clear area represents galaxies in

the central region

Central region

There is only one bright galaxy in the sample NGC This is one of two Dgalaxies in the

central region of Coma and shows a denite core Due to cannibalisation by the two Dgalaxies

there are no other bright galaxies in this region this is a contributing factor to the dierence in

magnitudes b etween the two regions

Figure Binned distribution of for the central region upp er graph and the halo region lower

graph

The evidence for a trend in with M is fairly go o d in this region see g although this

v

could b e a selection eect due to the smaller lowluminosity galaxies two of the galaxies in the

intermediate zone are in the central region exactly the numb er that would b e

exp ected for a uniform distribution b etween and and the same numb er density as is seen in all

bins when is binned in tenths see t

region Halo

There are bright galaxies in the sample dened as b eing in the M region where Fab er et

v

al nd no cores two of them show denite cores but the third NGC has a single p owerlaw

through to the limit of resolution see g There are few faint galaxies in the sample due to

the lack of comprehensive surveying in the halo region of Coma

There is only galaxy in the intermediate zone in the halo region even if this region is extended

to cover There do es app ear to b e a welldened gap see g This region shows

virtually no correlation of with M see g

v

r vs

b

Taking the values returned by the t there is a fairly even distribution of break radii see g

If it is assumed that the cores are unresolved for then all these galaxies have break radii

smaller than the limit of resolution r p c limit of resolution given by log r arcsec

lim b

as used in Fab er et al

r r vs M

b l v im

Fab er et al claim values for r much smaller than their value used for the limit of resolution

lim

for the cores by examining deconvolved proles within arcsec and comparing these with a

Figure Nukerlaw t to NGC

Figure Plots of against M for the central and halo regions

v

convolved and deconvolved mo dels with break radii of and arcsec By saying

that the deconvolved proles give a lower limit to the surface brightness they have said that where

the mo dels fall b elow the deconvolved prole the break radius for that mo del gives an upp er limit

for the break radius of that galaxy This has allowed them to set upp er limits of and

rounded from on the break radii of some galaxies

On other galaxies no upp er limit has b een found from the mo dels so the upp er limit has b een

set at arcsec which was the upp er limit of the region of the prole they were examining As

the limit of resolution for cores has b een set at arcsec this has led to an apparent gap b etween

the break radii of the observed cores and the maximum p ossible break radii of the galaxies without

resolved cores

I have used r p c at Coma distance arcsec If this is used instead of the

lim

arcsec range used by Fab er et al then no gap is seen b etween the break radii of resolved

cores and the maximum break radii of unresolved cores as is seen in the lower graph of gure

crosses central b oxes halo

Break radius vs Eective radius

Fab er et al found a linear relationship b etween eective radius and core radius r r in

b e

those galaxies with resolved cores This relationship has b een plotted with my data p oints in

the upp er graph of gure I do not nd this relation in the galaxies with resolved cores in our

sample as cam b e seen from this graph Addition of more large galaxies would probably lead to a

relationship b eing found as it is in Fab er et al but this relationship do es not app ear to hold when

only the smaller galaxies are considered eg r p c

e

Figure Upp er plot of r vs r for those galaxies with with the t found by Fab er et

b e

al shown by the dotted line

Lower Plot of r vs m with r substituted for galaxies with

b v lim

Comparison with previous results

Plots of my data and Fab er et als data are in gure My data is shown by crosses and Fab er

et als by b oxes

M vs

v

The results are similar to those obtained by Fab er et al b elow magnitudes the cut o

p oint for our observations see g I have found signicantly more p oints with

than Fab er et al and my results do not show the clear trend given by the lowluminosity tail in

Fab er et als results see g

vs r

b

Once again our results are very similar to Fab er et al in the larger galaxies ab ove our limit of

resolution log r r p c see g Below this all of Fab er et als results have

b b

and have either b een classied as cores or as having to small a break radius to classify as

resolved The galaxies in this section that were classied as having cores would not have had

these cores resolved in our sample

In the Fab er et al sample M has a resolved core at its true distance but this core is unresolved

when it is translated to Virgo This would app ear to supp ort the hyp othesis that the coretyp e

p owerlaw distinction is an eect of resolution

Diskiness

Diskiness is dened as describ ed in section as having a maximum value of a greater than

Out of the dustfree galaxies meet this criterion These are RB RB IC IC

and NGC from the central region and IC Zw NGC and NGC from the

Figure Comparison of Fab er et als data b oxes and my data crosses

halo region NGC is a Dtyp e galaxy with dust in the central region that while it hasnt

aected the t has led to distortion of the aa term and so can b e removed from this list The

cos deviation proles of the galaxies which app ear to b e disky are given in g Galphot

results are shown by crosses and IRAF results are shown by b oxes

The other galaxies app ear to have disks on insp ection of the graphs This includes galaxies

in the central region in the halo which have resolved cores All of these galaxies are

fairly bright b etween and This app ears to contradict Fab er et als

assertion that galaxies with cores are b oxy and galaxies with p owerlaws are disky

Dening a Core

Throughout this rep ort I have used Fab er et als denition of a core as having There are

galaxies such as NGC see g with a very well dened break but with a steep inner section

Galaxies with welldened breaks are found over a range of values of these would app ear to b e

more than random ukes and it is p ossible that the low cores are a subset of whatever physical

pro cess causes these breaks to lower slop es there is not particular reason for cho osing as

the cuto rather than a higher value except for the apparent dichotomy seen at this p oint see

g It is also p ossible that there are a numb er of these steps in some galaxies leading to an

almost at central core This would require a multiple p owerlaw t to b e accurately describ ed

Figure cos terms for the galaxies identied as disky Crosses are Galphot data b oxes are

IRAF data

Figure Nukerlaw t to NGC

Chapter

Conclusions

M vs

v

There is no denite trend in the the data set as a whole or in the halo region sample but there is

an apparent trend in the central region sample

It is shown statistically that the values of in b oth regions are probably from the same parent

p opulation The distribution diers b etween the regions with there b eing two distinct p eaks in the

distribution of gamma as seen by Fab er et al in the halo region while there is a at distribution

in the central region

M

v

The p opulations of M seen in the two regions are shown to b e probably from dierent parent

v

p opulations the halo p opulation b eing on average a magnitude brighter than the core p opulation

vs r

b

There do es not app ear to b e a link b etween the value for the breakradius returned by the tting

routine and the value for

r r vs M

b l im v

There is no clear evidence seen for a trend in r with M nor is the break seen by Fab er et al seen

b v

when the limit of resolution is used as r

lim

Diskiness

Disky galaxies are seen to b e able to form cores as well as p owerlaw proles this app ears to indicate

that it is not true that rotationally supp orted galaxies have p owerlaws and triaxial galaxies have

cores

Summary

There is a spread of break radii from the limit of resolution outwards The gap seen by Fab er et

al is not apparent when the maximum p ossible core radius for galaxies without resolved cores is

set to b e the limit of resolution

The drop in the numb er of galaxies with is seen only in the halo region not in

the central region

It is seen that bright galaxies can form apparent p owerlaws and that disky galaxies can form

cores

No denite trend can b e seen in the graphs of vs M It is therefore not p ossible to use the

v

dierence in magnitudes to say that there would b e a dierence in the distributions of if the two

samples were over the same magnitude range Therefore the dierence b etween the two regions

predicted by the gasstellar continuum has not b een proven

knowledgements Ac

I would like to thank Professor Davies Dr de Jong and Dr Lucey for their advice and help in doing

this pro ject

App endix A

in the ellipses Errors

Average numb er of counts in an annulus D N

Gain g Average numb er of photons in annulus numb er of electrons g D N

Numb er of pixels in an annulus area of annulus r r

Read noise p er pixel in electrons

r n

p

2

r r Total read noise in annulus

r n

p

2

2 r r

r n

r n

p

Average read noise in annulus

2 r r

2 r r

Total numb er of counts in annulus D N r r

Total numb er of photons in annulus g D N r r

p

Counting error in total photons g D N r r

p

q

g D N 2 r r

g D N

Counting error in average photons

2 r r 2 r r

Total error in ellipse

r

2

2

p

r n

p

2 r r

r

2 2

g D N

r n

p

sq r t

2 r r

2 r r

q

2

g D N +

r n

2 r r

Prop ortional error in average numb er of counts in annulus

p

2

g D N +

r n

p

P DN

g D N 2 r r

App endix B

Notes on Galaxies

Those galaxies which had an oset b etween the centres of the galaxy in the two images of b etween

and pixels are noted as such b elow No note is made if the oset was less than pixels

For the four galaxies with an oset greater than pixels it is noted whether they had a shift

less than pixels when examined using a crosscorrelation routine or whether one of the images

had to b e shifted in order to align it It is also noted what evidence of dust there is in each of the

galaxies and if there are any other features on the image

NGC had a separation b etween the two images of b etween and pixels when they

were combined There is no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

IC shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms There is a small companion

galaxy or a in the b ottomright of the frame

NGC had a separation b etween the two images of b etween and pixels when they

were combined There is visible dust in the core this also shows up in the terms

RB had a separation b etween the two images of b etween and pixels when they were

combined There is no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

IC has visible dust in the core this also shows in the terms

IC shows p ossible visible evidence for a ring of dust around the core This do es not

show up in the terms but there do es app ear to b e a disruption in the terms There is

a companion galaxy in the b ottom left of the frame

RB shows p ossible visible evidence for dust This do es not show up in the terms but

there is a discrepancy b etween the terms measured by ellipfit and ellipse inside of

arcsec pixels There are a couple of stars in the b ottom left of the frame This galaxy

is classied as a p ossible lenticular

RB shows no visible evidence of dust but there is some evidence of an asymmetry in the

terms

NGC had a separation b etween the two images of b etween and pixels when they

were combined There is visible dust in the core this also shows up in the terms There

is a large star in the b ottom left of the frame there is another ob ject to the top left and two

ob jects to the top right

RB shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms There is a star to the top

right of the frame

RB shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms There are o dd stretch

marks on the ellipt residual lines pro jecting radially from the centre and symmetric through

the centre

RB shows no visible evidence of dust but there is evidence of an asymmetry in the

terms The galaxy undergo es a visible rotation b etween radii of and arcseconds The

terms are also confused The core app ears disky and this is supp orted by the cos terms

this do es not extend outwards

NGC had the two images shifted to match them b efore they were combined This is the

cD galaxy and is very attopp ed There is little visible evidence of dust but the and

terms are very confused within arcsecond This is within the core radius so do es not aect

the conclusion that this galaxy has a soft core

IC has visible dust in the core this do es not show particularly in the terms but there

is a discrepancy b etween the ellipse and ellipfit terms

RB has visible dust in the core this also shows up in the terms The core is visibly

disky There is a star at the top of the frame There are o dd stretch marks on the ellipt

residual lines pro jecting radially from the centre and symmetric through the centre

IC has visible dust in the core this also shows in the terms

IC shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms There are a numb er of

small ob jects on the frame

RB shows no visible evidence of dust although the terms app ear confused

IC has faintly visible dust in the core this also shows up in the terms There are a

large numb er of small ob jects on the frame

but cross NGC app eared to have a separation of greater than pixels using center

correlation using Xregister gave a smaller shift There is no visible evidence of dust but

there is evidence of an asymmetry in the terms

RB shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

NGC shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

NGC had a separation b etween the two images of b etween and pixels when they

were combined There is no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

NGC shows no visible evidence of dust but there is some evidence of an asymmetry in

the terms The ellipfit routine has not tted b etween and pixel radius

Zw shows p ossible visible evidence of dust and there is evidence of an asymmetry in

the terms There is an hump in the brightness prole at the p oint where the asymmetry

o ccurs

IC had a separation b etween the two images of b etween and pixels when they

were combined There is no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

Zw shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms There is a discrepancy

b etween the ellipse and ellipfit terms near the core There is a star in the top right

of the frame

IC shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

NGC shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms There is a discrepancy

b etween the ellipse and ellipfit terms within arcsecond

NGC shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

Zw shows visible evidence of a dust lane From the terms this lane extends from

arcseconds to arcseconds The t continues inside arcseconds The residual is very

confused at the radii of the dust lane

Zw shows no evidence of dust The cos terms show a denite disky comp onent

extending to arcseconds radius

IC shows visible evidence for a dust ring around the core this also shows faintly in the

and terms and in a hump on the brightness prole

NGC shows a strong dust lane through the core this also shows in the and terms

and in a turndown of the brightness prole near the centre The ellipfit t stops at ab out

arcseconds radius

NGC shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

IC shows visible evidence for a dust lane around the core this also shows in the terms

NGC app eared to have a separation of greater than pixels using center but cross

correlation using Xregister gave a smaller shift There is no evidence of dust either visibly

or in the terms

NGC shows visible evidence for a faint dust lane in the core this also shows in the

terms

NGC had a separation of b etween and pixels b etween the two images when they

were combined There is no visible evidence for dust but the and terms are very

confused It has a very at prole similar to that of NGC

NM shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms There is a discrepancy

b etween the ellipse and ellipfit terms near the core

IC shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

NGC shows visible evidence for a dust lane in the core this also shows in the terms

NGC had the two images shifted to match them b efore they were combined There is

no visible evidence for dust but there is evidence for an asymmetry in the terms

NGC had a separation of b etween and pixels b etween the two images when they

were combined There is no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

Zw shows no evidence of dust either visibly or in the terms

App endix C

tials of the Nuker Law Dieren

These were calculated using the Maple symb olic pro cessor programme They are necessary in order

to t the nuker law to the surfacrbrightness proles

c

r r

b

I r I

b

r r

b

r r r dI r

b

I ln ln

r

d r r r

b b

a

r r r r r

2

ln ln ln

r r r r r

b b b b b

r

r

b

a

r r r

b

I ln ln

b

dI r

r r r

b b

d

r r r r dI r

b b

I ln ln ln

b

d r r r r

b b

r r r

b

I

b

dI r

r r r

b b

dr

r

b

r

b

r

b

a

dI r r r

b

dI r r

b b

App endix D

Computer programmes

Recip es routines D Numerical

The following Numerical Recip es routines were used in the pro ject covsrtc gaussjc mrqminc

and nrutilc

D My routines

Pro jectc reads the data in from le and calls the tting programme mrqminc It supplies initial

values and stopping conditions for the tting

Funcsc is called by mrqminc and returns the nukerlaw and the dierentials

D Pro jectc

1 include stdioh

include mathh

include nrutil h

struct profile

5

float a

float i

float di

char datatype

10 struct profile nextadd r

main

15 struct profile list temp

displays tr uc t profile int char

void fitint struct profile float float float float

int populates tr uc t profile char

float nalamda nchisq

20 float alamda covar alpha chisq

char galname

int ndata i

ri x covarmat

25 alphamat ri x

al amd a alamdan

chisqnc hi sq

alamda 30

chisq

Set up the list and then populate it

of st ru ct profile list struct profile malloc si ze

35 ndata populate list galname

dump the first blank entry

temp list

ta dd r list listnex

40 freetemp

ndata ndata

the contents of the list Display

displayl is t ndatagal na me

45

n ts n galname printf

fitndata l ist a la md ac ov ar al ph a ch isq

50 void fitint ndata struct profile list float alamda float covar float

alpha float chisq

float xndata yndata signdat a a

int ia

55 int iter zcnt

void funcsflo at f lo at float float int

void mrqminfl oa t float float intflo at int intf lo at

float float void funcs f lo at fl oa t float float int fl oa t

int n m

60 struct profile current

float ochi

outfile covfile FILE

char oname cname temp

int df ndata

65

output data file Open

printf nE nte r output filename cfit g or cfite n

scanfc te mp

getsona me

printf nE nte r covarianc e matrix filename ccov g or ccove n 70

getscna me

outfile fo pen o n am e w

covfile fo pen c n am e w

fprintfo ut fi le al pha t be ta tg am ma tb re ak ra d tb re ak in t tch is q n

75

current list

Setup an array with the values in

80 for n n ndata n

printf d n

xn current a

yn current i

85 current current ne xt add r

sign current d i yn

printf n

90

a

a

a

a

95 a

for n n n

printfa d f Enter new value nan

100 scanff a n

set which values to vary

printfv ar y ad no yes n

fprintfo ut f il e f t a n

scanfd i a n

105 if ian

ian

fprintfo ut fi le n

110 Note a is times true value

un nin g Iterative Fitting Function n printfR

printfI te r Chisq A A A A An

mrqminx y sig n da ta a ia co va r al pha c hi sq fu nc s ala md a

115 printf d ftf f f f fnite r chisq a a a

a a

do

ochi chisq

120 mrqminx y s ig nd at aa i a cov ar a lph a ch is qf un cs al am da

iter

ifochi chisq

zcnt

else

125 zcnt

for n n n

if an

ana n

printf d ftf f f f fnit er chisq a a

130 a a a

zcnt chisq ochi while ochi chisq

alamda

mrqminx y sig n da ta a ia co va r al pha c hi sq fu nc s ala md a

135

for n n n

df df ian

Print out values for the constants

140 printf nc his q t f c hi sq

printf nd f t i df

printf nr edu ce d chi squared t f chi sq d f

printf ni ter t d ite r

for n n n

145 printf n a d t f tC ov ar t f tS E t f n an co var n n

powcova r n n

printf n

for n n n

150 fprintf ou t fil e ft a n

fprintfo ut fi le f n ch isq

for n n n

fprintf ou t fil e ft po w cov ar n n

155 for m m m

fprintfc ov fi le f t c ov ar n m

fprintf co v fil e n

160 fprintfo ut fi le f n ch isq d f

fcloseou t fil e

return

165 int populate st ru ct profile current char galname int ndata

Subroutin e to read the data and put it into the list

FILE infile

170 int n num

float exptime photzpt photflam err pi

tmp char galnum fname hname

float ardri s x y ep s po ss s s s c c c c f f f f

float meanint rm s te ta x y s lo pe m ag A B A B b igA

175 char choice

a file to work upon Gets

printf n En ter galaxy number

getsgal nu m

180

header file name and data file name from galaxy number Make

printf n Enter data file name

getsfna me

185 printf n Enter header file name

getshna me

printf n Enter e to fit to ellipse data g to fit to galphot data

scanfc choice

190 Open header file

infilef op en h na me r

fgetstmp in f il e

Set photomet ric constant s and read exptime

195 photflam

photzpt

pi

fscanf infile f s exptime galname

printfe xp tim e fnexp tim e

200

Close header file

fclosein f ile

Check choice

205

Set num number of data to zero

num

switchch oi ce

210

case g

Open galphot datafile

infilefo pe n f nam e r

215 Dump the first two lines

for nn n

fgetstm p i n fi le

Runs through the galphot file reading the data

220 while fscanf infile f f f f f f f f f f f f f f

f f f f f frd r i s x y e ps pos s s s s c c c

EOF cf f f f

225 if r i exptime

Set nextaddr ess

current n ex tad dr struct profile malloc si ze of st ru ct profile

current cu rr ent ne xta dd r

230

Finds error in i

if a

err pow i pi r d r r i

else

235 err pow i pi r i

Finds a

a r sqrt ep s

240 Calibrat e data

a a

i pow ph otz pt photflam i exptime

pow

245 Add data to list and add one to num

num

current a a

current i i

current d i err

250 current d at aty pe g

printf d num

currentn ex ta dd r NULL

255 fclosein fi le

break

case e

Open ellipse file

260 infilefo pe n f nam e r

Dump the first two lines

for nn n

fgetstm p i n fi le

265 Runs through the ellipse file reading the data

while fscanf infile f f f f f f f f f f f f f f

amea ni nt r ms eps te ta x y sl op e ma g A B A B b igA EOF

if i exptim e

270

Set nextaddr ess

current n ex tad dr struct profile malloc si ze of st ru ct profile

current cu rr ent ne xta dd r

Find the error

275 r a pow eps

err pow me ani nt pi r m ea nin t

Calibrat e data

a a

280 i pow ph otz pt photflam meanint

exptime pow

Add data to list and add one to num

285 num

current a a

current i i

current d i err

current d at aty pe e

290 printf d num

currentn ex ta dd r NULL

fclosein fi le

295 break

default

printfNo data read

returnnu m

300

void display struct profile contents int ndata char galname

305 Subroutin e to display the a and i values from the list

int n

printf n ts ga ln ame

for n n ndata n

310

printf n a f c on ten ts a

printf t d n

printf t i f c on ten ts i

printf t di f co nte nt s d i

315 contents contents n ex ta dd r

return

D Funcsc

1 include mathh

void funcsf loa t x float a float y float dyda int na

5 float rad k inner outer

rad x a

k pow a a a

inner powrad a

10 outer pow powrad a a a a

y a k inner outer

dyda y a a log log powrad a

15 log powrad a log powrad a pow rad a a

pow rad a log rad powa powrad a

dyda y log log powrad a a

dyda y logr ad a log log powrad a a

dyda y a powrad a a a powrad a

20 dyda y a

return

References

Bender R Burstein D Fab er S M Ap J

van den Bosch F C Ferrarese L Jae W Ford H C OConnell R W AJ

I Grillmair C J Fab er S M Ajhar E A Dressler A Kormendy J Lauer T Byun Y

R Richstone D Tremaine S AJ

Davies R L Efstathiou G Fall S M Illingworth G Schechter P L Ap J

Fab er S M Tremaine Ajhar E A Byun I A Dressler A Gebhardt K Grillmair C

Kormendy J Preprint

Ferrarese L van den Bosch F C Ford H C Jae W OConnell R W AJ

Gebhardt K Richstone D Ajhar A E Lauer T R Byun Y I Kormendy J Dressler A

Fab er S M Grillmair C Tremaine S Preprint

Jae W Ford H C OConnell R W van den Bosch F C Ferrarese L AJ

King I R AJ

King I R ApJ

Kormendy J Dressler A Byun Y I Fab er S M Grillmair C Lauer T R Richstone D

Tremaine S ESOOHP Workshop on Dwarf Galaxies ed Meylan G

Lauer T R Ajhar E A Byun Y I Dressler A Fab er S M Grillmair C Kormendy J

Richstone D Tremaine S AJ

Lucey J R Guzman R Carter D Terlevich R J M N R A S

Peletier R Elliptical Galaxies Structure and Stellar Content PhD Thesis

Press W H Teukolsky S A Vetterling W T Flannery B P Numerical Recip es in

C Second Edition

Wall J V Practical Statistics for Astronomers