Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 CONTENTS

Facts about Orkla Cover Key Figures Cover Message from the CEO: Sustainable development 1 About this report 2 Dialogue with stakeholders 4 Employees 6 Customers and consumers 12 Suppliers 17 Shareholders 22 Orkla and society 26 Environment 32 Financial investments 34 The UN Global Compact 36 GRI index 37 Information about this report 41 Contact information 41

Financial Calendar 2009

23 APR 24 APR 06 MAY 06 MAY 12 AUG 30 OCT ANNUAL SHARES QUOTED FIRST QUARTER DIVIDEND SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER GENERAL MEETING EXCL. DIVIDEND REPORT PUBLISHED PAID OUT REPORT PUBLISHED REPORT PUBLISHED

Orkla wishes to promote the electronic distribution of its Annual Report and notice of the Annual General Meeting rather than paper-based communication. For information on how to receive the Annual Report and notice electronically, see Orkla’s website (www.orkla.com) under «Investor Relations». orkla 2008

EBITA for 2008 was slightly weaker than in 2007. The reasons are largely associated with the financial crisis, which has gradually spread to the real econo- my, leading to a sharp decline in demand in several of the markets which to Orkla Aluminium Solutions and Orkla Materials are particularly exposed. Orkla Brands is relatively less affected by the economic cycle and reported EBITA1 of NOK 2.6 billion, an improvement of 17 %.

Profit before tax for the full year came to NOK -2.0 billion, compared with almost NOK 10 bil- lion in 2007. This can primarily be explained by the significant write-downs taken for accounting Progress purposes on the Share Portfolio in 2008 due to the for Orkla Brands decline on the stock markets, while large gains Sharp price increases for raw materials and other input factors and the weak were realised in 2007. Write-downs of goodwill performance of Bakers and the Eastern European businesses resulted in a decline in profit for Orkla Brands in 2007. Orkla Brands compensated for this in and material assets and restructuring charges were 2008 by means of extensive improvement programmes and price adjustments and, in line with its stated intentions, brought the business back to its normal also higher than in 2007. profit trend. Both profit and margins improved for all segments.

OPERATING REVENUES EBITA1 EARNINGS PER SHARE, DILUTED

80,000 6,000 20

70,000 5,000 5,084 5,112 15 60,000 4,805 15.1

65,579 65,579 4,240 4,000 63,867

50,000 10 10.9

55,304 40,000 52,683 3,000 8.1 2

2,738 6.9 5 30,000 2,000 5.6 1 2.9

32,126 32,126 20,000 0 1,000 10,000 -2.8

NOK NOK NOK 04 05 06 07 08 million 04 05 06 07 08 million 04 05 06 07 08

Historical figures (incl. discontinued operations) Historical figures (incl. discontinued operations) ¹ Earnings per share before gain on sale of Orkla's interest for 2004-2007 for 2004-2007. in Carlsberg Breweries.

² Earnings per share before net profit and gain on sale of Orkla Media.

Net sales by geographical area Capital employed by geographical area employees by geographical area

Rest of the America 6 % America 11 % world 14 % 18 % Asia 3 % Norway 57 % Norway 21 % Other European Asia 7 % Asia 7 % countries 9 % Central and Eastern Other Nordic Europe 5 % Other European countries 21 % countries 18 %

Other European Other Nordic Other 31 % countries 20 % countries 22 % Central and Eastern Eu- Central and Eastern rope 9 % Europe 21 %

Total net sales NOK 63,937 million Total capital employed (capitalised) NOK 66,035 million No. of employees 31,541

1 Operating profit before amortisation, write-down inventory Sapa Profiles, restructuring and significant impairment charges. facts about orkla

orkla

Orkla Brands Orkla Aluminium Orkla Orkla Orkla Financial Solutions materials Associates* Investments Orkla Foods Nordic Orkla Brands Nordic Sapa Profiles Share Portfolio Orkla Brands International Sapa Building System REC ASA Orkla Finans Orkla Food Ingredients Sapa Heat Transfer AS Orkla Eiendom

* Orkla’s ownership interest is approximately 40 % orkla brands share of group key figures

Orkla Brands is a leading supplier of branded consumer goods and concept solutions, primarily to the Nordic grocery and 36 % Operating revenues: catering sectors. The business mainly holds no. 1 and no. 2 Operating revenues NOK 23,398 million positions in its categories, in which most of the branded goods EBITA1: NOK 2,590 million are proprietary and have been on the market for many years. 61 % Number of man-years: 13,349 Orkla Brands also holds strong local positions in Russia and EBITA1 India, in addition to being an important supplier of ingredients to the European bakery market. The business area consists of 43 % four units: Orkla Foods Nordic, Orkla Brands Nordic, Orkla Brands International and Orkla Food Ingredients. Number of man-years orkla aluminium solutions share of group key figures

Sapa develops, manufactures and markets value-added profiles, profile-based building systems and heat-exchanger strip in alu- 42 % Operating revenues: minium. Sapa consists of the three business units Sapa Profiles, Operating revenues NOK 27,809 million Sapa Building System and Sapa Heat Transfer, and is represented EBITA1: NOK 697 million in Europe, North America and Asia. Its business concept is based 16 % Number of man-years: 12,585 on close collaboration with its customers. Sapa is a leader in its EBITA1 field and has customers in the building, transport, engineering and telecommunications industries. 41 % Number of man-years orkla materials share of group key figures

Orkla Materials consists of the companies Elkem and Borregaard. Elkem is a world leader in the environmentally friendly produc- 21 % Operating revenues: tion of metals and materials. Its main products are silicon, high- Operating revenues NOK 13,600 million purity silicon for the solar industry, special ferrosilicon alloys for EBITA1: NOK 1,373 million the foundry industry, carbon, microsilica and energy. Borregaard 32 % Number of man-years: 4,526 has one of the world’s most advanced biorefineries. Using EBITA1 timber as a raw material, it produces a wide variety of advanced biochemicals and biomaterials that are sustainable alternatives 15 % to oil-based products. The company also holds strong positions in additives, fine chemicals and energy. Number of man-years

Orkla associates

Orkla Associates primarily consists of Orkla’s investments in the Renewable Energy Corporation ASA (REC) and Jotun AS. Profit from associates was Orkla owns a 39.73 % stake in REC and a 42.5 % stake in NOK 2,189 million in 2008. Jotun. REC and Jotun are presented in Orkla’s financial statements according to the equity method of accounting and Orkla’s share of profit after tax is presented on the line for profit from associates.

Orkla financial inVestments share of group key figures

Orkla Financial Investments consists of three main busi- nesses: the Share Portfolio, Orkla Finans and Orkla Eiendom. 1 % Operating revenues: The Share Portfolio staff manage one of Norway’s largest Operating revenues NOK 876 million share portfolios which primarily comprises investments in EBITA1: NOK -98 million the Nordic region, Eastern Europe and Asia. Orkla Finans -2 % Number of man-years: 188 offers investment services to institutional and private EBITA1 investors, while Orkla Eiendom invests in and develops real estate properties. This business area also includes Borregaard 1 % Skoger, which develops and manages Orkla’s forests. Number of man-years

1 Operating profit before amortisation, write-down inventory Sapa Profiles, restructuring and significant impairments. Sustainable development

In the shadow of a global financial crisis, people are discuss- ing whether the world can “afford” to pursue its ambition of mitigating climate change and investing in renewable energy. In many contexts, human rights and labour rights are also being pushed into the background. One of the les- sons that can be learned from this is that sustainable devel- opment cannot be achieved unless it is also economically sustainable.

At the beginning of 2009 uncertainty new to Orkla. Our story began in 1654, reigns and it is hard to predict when with at the Løkken Works in we will see the upturn the world is Sør-Trøndelag County, which provided waiting for. Nevertheless, we can main- the basis for the first three hundred tain that the way out of the crisis will years of the company’s history. The be found in interaction between poli- way in which the company managed tics, business and individuals. The mu- to readjust when the mine was no tual interdependence of business and longer viable deserves respect. This is society has been highlighted and pro- a good starting point for reflecting on Dag J. Opedal vides a basis for new thinking and dia- Orkla and the issue of corporate re- President and CEO logue that can lead to progress in a sponsibility. Orkla ASA long-term perspective. In 1987, after 333 years, the mine was The crisis has a great deal to do with closed down. Although the Group had confidence; confidence in banks and fi- acquired more strings to its bow in the nancial institutions, confidence in the meantime, Orkla continued to invest On the basis of Orkla’s Goals and Val- financial resilience of companies, and in the local Løkken community, in the ues, active dialogue with employees confidence in stock exchanges and seed corn business and local business and the community, and the recom- markets. Insight into companies’ gov- development. The company helped to mendations laid down in the UN Glo- erning mechanisms and reliable re- look after the buildings and the inhab- bal Compact, Orkla feels responsible porting are essential to the recovery of itants. Today this has become a highly for managing its development in a way such confidence. viable business that provides both jobs that balances economic, environmen- and profit, to the benefit of the local tal and social considerations as well as Corporate responsibility is about be- community and the Orkla Group. possible. having responsibly in all relationships. In times of crisis, this is more impor- Today, companies are expected to oper- We must ensure this while at the same tant than ever. Corporate responsibili- ate responsibly. Profitable business de- time running a profitable company. ty is most effective when it is integrat- velopment is not sustainable in the Only then will we be able to deliver ed into the way we run our long term without good corporate gov- long-term value creation – in the wid- business – into our monitoring of sup- ernance systems, environmental con- est sense. pliers, our relations with employees, trol, respect for workers’ rights and a our attitudes to environmental issues conscious attitude to corruption. and our corporate governance. We work systematically on improvements I hope this report will provide greater that will generate added value for Ork- insight into our companies and help to la shareholders, our employees and the inspire confidence in Orkla’s business- society of which we are a part. es. Sustainable development means that we must operate in a way that is The crisis has necessitated dramatic re- viable in the long term – in relation to structuring in many places, including the environment, natural resources in our Group. But restructuring is not and, of course, our own employees.

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 1 About this report

This report describes Orkla’s work on corporate responsibility in 2008. The topics covered have been selected on the basis of material criteria – areas where the Group has significant influence and where initiatives and measures can contribute to positive changes and ripple effects, both for Orkla and for the Group’s stakeholders.

The report concerns the 2008 account- ing year. Unless otherwise specified, the key figures are as of 31 December and apply to the entire Orkla Group, including companies in the Group. We have sought to present a cross-section of possibilities and challenges within the Group. The report is supplemented by other information that is provided in Orkla’s Annual Report, EHS Report and websites. Interested parties are re- ferred to the EHS Report, which pro- vides a more comprehensive picture of the Group’s work on environment, Orkla’s Corporate Responsibility Forum, which comprises representatives from the Group Executive Board, various health and safety. specialist functions and all business areas, meets regularly to discuss relevant topics. Photo: Ola Dyrhaug Eggen

Sustainability reports have gradually on this year’s report – see the final The Group’s policy on corporate re- gained a natural place alongside finan- pages for contact details. sponsibility commits us to operating a cial reports, EHS reports and other in- sound, long-term, sustainable business formation that gives shareholders and Orkla and corporate ­responsibility in which responsibility for employees, others valuable insights into the com- Orkla’s work on corporate responsibil- society and the environment plays a pany’s state of health. The way infor- ity must be in accordance with our pivotal role. mation is presented is also gradually business strategy and concerns how being standardised. Orkla welcomes we run our business in relation to our The various business units affect the this trend. We have chosen to report goals and our interfaces with various environment in many ways and the according to the Global Reporting Ini- stakeholders. This is an area where fi- Group aims to minimise its environ- tiative (GRI) (G3 Guidelines), one of nance, environmental considerations mental footprint, among other things the most accepted international stand- and corporate responsibility intersect. by using new technology and working ards in this area. At the back of the re- The precautionary and life-cycle prin- continuously to reduce emissions and port, you will find a list of indicators ciples must permeate both our deci- energy consumption. that shows which GRI parameters Ork- sions and our activities, and informa- la reports on, and where this informa- tion about the results of our efforts Orkla is an important social actor in tion may be found. must be provided in an open, trust- many places. Through its activities, it worthy manner. fills an important role for employees, We welcome questions and comments partners, suppliers and local communi-

2 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 ties. In accordance with the Group’s and reporting on measures and results basic values, which underline the im- in this report. portance of involvement, we engage in active dialogue with these groups. Special challenges in 2008 and 2009 Transparency in processes and in the Orkla is no more immune to the ef- reporting of results helps to promote fects of the financial crisis than any- the trust on which the Group depends one else. Towards the end of 2008 we for its success. saw a growing number of adjustments and workforce reductions in several This does not mean that Orkla either countries. We know that the Group’s can or will assume responsibility for business areas will face many chal- all the measures suggested by stake- lenges in 2009. We must be capable of holders, partly because various consid- adapting to deal with this situation. In erations will often conflict with each our view, to a great extent, our long- other and partly because expectations term approach helps ensure that even will change in step with general devel- if it may be necessary to introduce opment. Orkla’s task is to work sys- short-term measures that have a rapid tematically on measures that also ac- impact, there is a high level of aware- cord with our business strategy. The ness of the importance of upholding way we work can therefore be as im- our long-term goals and the direction portant as the specific targets we set in which the Group develops. ourselves. Improvement orientation, structural To ensure that Orkla’s business prac- measures and innovation are all com- tices correspond with the Group’s ponents in continuous work on corpo- guidelines, each business area is re- rate responsibility. Some of these is- sponsible for assessing its impact on sues become even more important in society and for allocating sufficient re- the light of the crisis. At the same sources and developing measures to time, the climate challenges have not ensure that these principles are com- diminished, they have just been tem- plied with. porarily pushed into the background in the news media. This report also ex- Orkla’s Board of Directors and Group plains how Orkla is meeting these Executive Board address relevant top- challenges. ics in this area as and when necessary, but they also carry out an annual, over- We hope that this report will help to all review. At Group level, important clarify both our ambitions and the topics are regularly discussed and fol- practical measures that are being im- lowed up in Orkla’s Corporate Respon- plemented in the Group in various are- sibility Forum, which comprises repre- as under the heading of corporate sentatives of the Group Executive ­responsibility. We have seen that re- Board, various specialist functions and porting also helps to clarify the issues all business areas. In addition to im- internally and encourage discussion in proving the flow of information Orkla companies. throughout the Group, the Forum also provides opportunities for discussion We refer to both successes and areas and the exchange of experience be- where we need to work harder to tween business areas. At the same achieve our goals. From this point of time, it simplifies dialogue with impor- view, this report helps us to identify tant stakeholders and enables us to areas of responsibility, establish strate- meet expectations at the right level. gies and analyse areas where we can improve. Orkla’s decentralised governance mod- el, which entails a significant degree of local authority, also sets natural guide- lines for how we structure our work

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 3 Dialogue with stakeholders

Both at Group level and through its various business units, Orkla engages in dialogue with people who are influenced by and influence our activities. Corporate responsibility also entails identifying, understanding and addressing the needs of such stakeholders in their encounters with the Orkla Group. Orkla’s most important stakeholders are our shareholders, employees, customers, consumers, suppliers and the local com- munities in which we operate. Through dialogue, we wish to gain knowledge about expectations and interests that is impor- tant if we are to make good decisions. This also gives us an opportunity to inform people about our plans, thereby generat- ing understanding of measures we may find it necessary to implement. Photo: Guri Dahl Photo: Employees house magazines facilitate the flow of We engage in continuous dialogue up-to-date information. We also have with our employees, on the basis of a good (formal and informal) channels stated desire for broad-based involve- for discussion and information be- ment in all the Group’s processes. This tween employees’ representatives and dialogue takes place through regular management. employee interviews, departmental Comprehensive, structured employee meetings, larger meetings and group- surveys are carried out every second wide surveys. The Intranet and the in- year. Photo: Niklas StoltzPhoto: Customers and consumers their needs and interests are satisfied The Orkla Group encounters its cus- as accurately as possible. Up-to-date in- tomers and consumers in many are- formation about the Group’s products nas. Through consumer and customer is available on the companies’ various satisfaction surveys, the Group re- websites at all times, with contact de- ceives necessary feedback on our abili- tails for anyone who wishes to know ty to meet needs and expectations re- more. Many Orkla companies have ex- garding our products. Customers and tensive contacts with consumers and consumers are also included in certain customers through their consumer development projects to ensure that service departments or customer centres.

Photo: Ole Kristian Photo: Lunde Suppliers Regardless of business area, market or Orkla wishes to engage in constructive product, Orkla companies require their dialogue with its suppliers on important suppliers to comply with strict quality corporate responsibility issues. Among standards. These quality standards are other things, the Group includes require- incorporated into supplier contracts, ments relating to EHS and ethical stand- and compliance is monitored by ards in its contracts, and is currently in- means of delivery inspections, product creasing the number of group-wide certificates, continuous dialogue and, guidelines and systems in this area. As a when necessary, supplier audits. consequence of Orkla’s decentralised Several Orkla companies receive in- structure, responsibility for following up puts for their monitoring of suppliers suppliers rests with individual Orkla and on other matters relating to sus- companies. Nevertheless, in order to tainability as a result of their dialogue strengthen monitoring of product quali- with non-governmental organisations ty and working conditions in the suppli- and their membership of organisations er chain, the Group has found it appro- such as the UK organisation Sedex and priate to further develop common the Ethical Trading Initiative – Norway. systems and working methods.

4 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 Photo: Sara Photo: Johannessen/Scanpix Shareholders mation, reports and documents are As the largest privately owned company also published on Orkla’s website. The in Norway and one of the five largest company always ensures that all share- companies listed on the Stock Ex- holders have the same access to finan- change, Orkla seeks to communicate ac- cial information. All significant events tively and openly with the financial mar- are reported to the market immediate- ket. The company’s annual and interim ly through notices or press releases. reports provide extensive information Around one hundred such notices and about the various aspects of its activities. press releases were issued in 2008. Presentations of quarterly results are we- The Group’s Investor Relations depart- bcast directly on the Internet and are ment is responsible for contacts with available on Orkla’s website, alongside shareholders apart from the General press releases, notices to the Stock Ex- Meeting. The Board of Directors is reg- change, and annual and quarterly reports. ularly informed about the company’s Other comprehensive, detailed infor- investor relations activities.

Photo: Ole Kristian Photo: Lunde Society cal authorities and other actors in their Orkla is an international Group and the local communities. choices we make must take into ac- We collaborate with and are members count our impact on our host commu- of many organisations all over the nities. We identify needs, expectations world that provide valuable informa- and development potential on the basis tion and feedback. Orkla must also be of dialogue with these communities, as prepared to deal with changes in well as risk assessments and conse- framework conditions, and to this end quence analyses. In accordance with we pursue an active dialogue with au- our decentralised approach to corporate thorities, both directly and through rel- responsibility, it is the individual com- evant sector organisations. panies that initiate cooperation with lo-

Employees

• EHS in own businesses • Terms and conditions and employment contracts • Communication and cooperation with employees’ representatives Society • Management and employee development • Environmental impact of Suppliers products throughout the value chain • Environmental impact of own production plants • Business ethics/corruption (waste, energy, noise) • Monitoring suppliers’ EHS performance • Contribution to the development and working conditions of the local community • Natural resource • Contribution to the development management of society at large • Environmental impact of transport Orkla

Shareholders Customers/consumers

• Reporting/insight • Product safety/Food safety • Goals and Values • Product information • Profitability • Consumer health • Internal control • Marketing ethics • Business ethics/corruption • Competition law • Environmental impact of transport

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 5 Employees

Systematic training and the development of safe, secure jobs are essential elements in value creation in the Orkla Group. Photo: Orkla

Orkla’s corporate culture is Restructuring and continuous im- “Developing people – creating value” provement are a necessary element of indicates both that the Group has high intended to promote value Orkla’s business operations. The Group ambitions and that it has taken upon creation and ensure future involves employees in restructuring itself serious commitments. The chal- recruitment. To succeed in processes at as early a stage as possible lenges assume an extra dimension in in order to minimise uncertainty. times of economic decline. Orkla’s this aim, the Group is de- business goal, to grow internationally, pendent on the ability and Orkla’s motto, “Developing people – also makes human resource develop- creating value”, expresses our main ment more challenging. Transferring commitment of each indi- goal and provides guidelines for how norms and social standards makes vidual employee. The de- value creation is to be achieved in new demands on Orkla when the companies in the Orkla Group: Group moves into new countries and velopment of management incorporates different national cultures. and staff therefore has high • Recruit employees whose attitudes are in accordance with the Group’s Goals and Values priority. Orkla makes active value base Orkla’s value statement, Goals and Val- efforts to promote diversity • Further develop employees’ skills and ues, provides the foundation for the attitudes by providing systematic Group’s awareness-raising activities and a working environment training and defines the kind of behaviour the that is characterised by trust, • Develop secure, safe jobs that make it Group expects of its leaders and em- involvement and focus on attractive to work at Orkla ployees. Goals and Values was revised • Manage the workforce responsibly in in 2007 and rolled out throughout improvement. both good times and bad 2008. The goal of the implementation process is to ensure that all employees are aware of the contents of Goals and

6 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 ”Goals and Values” provides the foundation for Orkla’s corporate culture. Workshops and seminars are arranged in many companies. Photo: Betzy A. K. Thangstad

Values. Support for and compliance Health and safety with values such as a long-term ap- Orkla wishes to develop a strong EHS proach, commitment and thorough- culture by promoting correct behav- ness are prerequisites for the realisa- iour and attitudes. Targeted efforts are tion of the Group’s main goals. made to improve the working environ- ment through training, regular emer- The implementation of Goals and Values gency drills, audits and other measures takes place in individual companies. In related to the working environment. the case of companies that have recently The aim is to realise Orkla’s EHS vi- become a part of the Orkla Group, this sion of zero harm to people or the en- has provided a good opportunity to in- vironment. form management and employees about the values and corporate culture the Orkla seeks to provide healthy, safe Group stands for. For example, Goals and and attractive workplaces and to meet Values was a topic at a large meeting of the needs of individual employees by managers from Orkla Foods Fenno-Baltic, giving them developing, challenging attended by around one hundred manag- jobs. A good, safe working environ- ers from the various companies and pro- ment is a fundamental prerequisite for duction plants. In enterprises such as the sustainable value creation. That is why Indian company MTR and the Russian we focus on prevention. companies Sladco and Krupskaya, meet- ings have been arranged where work on Orkla companies must have good pro- Goals and Values has also been used to cedures in place for following up staff address cultural differences. in connection with sickness absence, and reporting and dealing with inju- Several of the established Orkla compa- ries and non-conformances. nies have also carried out management meetings and workshops, as well as pro- Despite the focus on preventing occu- viding information at company meetings pational accidents, there were again and through other channels. The purpose some serious incidents at Orkla in of these discussions has been to create 2008. The most serious of them was more specific understanding of what the death of a female sales representa- Orkla’s values mean in our day-to-day tive in a traffic accident in Latvia. work. This process will continue in 2009.

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 7 Employees

ing the rules that apply to the Group’s activities. Orkla therefore believes it is important to take active steps to dis- seminate knowledge in order to estab- lish a culture which ensures that em- ployees have the necessary competence and respect for compli- ance with the legislation and ethical principles that apply to Orkla compa- nies. In connection with this effort, Orkla’s new manual on compliance with competition law was launched throughout the Group in 2007. The manual has been translated into many different languages and followed up with compulsory reviews and semi- nars in Orkla companies. Ongoing ef- forts to ensure compliance with com- petition law continued in 2008 and will proceed in 2009, with the main fo- Abba Seafood has seen a marked decline in sickness absence. Photo: Abba Seafood cus on specific problems, seminars and training. The Lost Work Day Rate (LWDR*) rate Development of good ethical attitudes in 2008 was 6.2, compared with 7.2 in Orkla’s corporate culture is based on In 2009, Orkla will intensify its efforts 2007. This result is still unsatisfactory, the fundamental values enshrined in to prevent all forms of corruption. In- but it shows that increased focus on Goals and Values: a long-term ap- ternational legislation and the Orkla behaviour is essential if Orkla is to proach, commitment and thorough- Code of Conduct contain strict require- succeed in achieving its vision of zero ness. In Orkla’s Code of Conduct, these ments for the Group’s behaviour in injuries. values are further developed, specified this area too. Orkla has started work and placed in a commercial context to on a new anti-corruption manual for The sickness absence rate in the Orkla promote good business practices, hon- all Orkla companies. This manual is in- Group was 3.4 % in 2008, while the cor- esty and respect for others. In this way, tended to increase awareness and responding figure for 2007 was 4.2 %. the Group can strengthen its competi- knowledge of corruption issues and to The rules for registering sickness ab- tiveness, increase its credibility and clarify the Group’s attitudes and proce- sence and follow-up vary from one enhance its good reputation. dures to ensure compliance with anti- country to another. In Norway, Orkla corruption legislation. In the course of complies with the principles of the in- The process of training staff in ethical 2009, seminars will be arranged and clusive working life policy, which en- reflection is continuing, with seminars other steps will be taken to ensure im- tails active follow-up of absentees and and dilemma training. A special guide plementation of the manual in all busi- cooperation with the company health to this type of training that targets ness areas. service. The requirement for active ef- managers was published in 2008. forts to be made to reduce sickness ab- Orkla is also in the process of collect- sence applies to Orkla companies in all Anti-corruption efforts ing many different instructions con- parts of the world. Sickness absence for In recent years, as part of the Group’s cerning the handling of confidential the Norwegian companies was 5.7 %, general policy of acting in accordance information, including insider infor- down from 6.5 % in 2007. with relevant rules and otherwise be- mation, in a single set of instructions. having in an ethically responsible The purpose is to ensure a uniform ap- Regular employee surveys are carried manner, Orkla has intensified its ongo- proach to information security in the out to identify the potential for ing efforts to ensure compliance with Orkla Group. Seminars on these in- ­improvements in the working the various regulations that apply to structions will be arranged in 2009 in ­environment. the Group’s activities. relevant forums.

Further information about health and In many cases, the different sets of Whistleblowing safety efforts at Orkla may be found in regulations are complicated and it Orkla has formalised a system where- the EHS Report for 2008. might be possible to achieve a short- by employees can raise the alarm term financial advantage by contraven- about inappropriate or illegal conduct

* LWDR=injuries leading to absence per million hours worked. 8 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 Orkla Brands operates on a multi-local model, largely based on local employees and local products for local markets. Here: the Spilva food company in Riga, Latvia. Photo: Ole Kristian Lunde in an organised manner. While an to alert the Group’s governing bodies open corporate culture is an important to possible breaches of Orkla’s Code of prerequisite for constructive dialogue Conduct if it is impossible to resolve on difficult matters, in addition to this the problem locally. Two electronic we have established a “whistleblowing mailboxes have been established, ladder” which shows how to proceed [email protected] (English) with such matters. [email protected] (Norwegian) the contents of which are automatical- An improved whistleblowing service ly directed to the head and deputy was established on Orkla’s website in head of the Internal Audit Depart- 2008. This service is intended to give ment. The Internal Audit Department employees and others the possibility reports on such matters to the Board

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 9 Employees

Increasing internationalisation creates new challenges. One of them is to make diversity a competitive advantage. Photo: Ole Kristian Lunde

of Directors’ Audit Committee and is to improve the balance between wom- Orkla employees in a global therefore formally independent of en and men in leading positions. ­perspective Orkla’s line management. Among other things, there is focus on A globalised economy and growing in- identifying and developing female can- ternationalisation also lead/give rise to Recruitment and diversity didates for management posts. new challenges: Orkla makes active efforts to attract good staff, primarily in each individual Orkla is also continuing to collaborate • Orkla’s original competitive advan- company. Recruitment practices vary with the Alarga Foundation to attract tage in the Nordic region is being according to the business area con- candidates from ethnic minorities. challenged by cheaper manpower cerned. While Orkla Brands operates from other countries on the basis of a multi-local model, with Managing the workforce in good • The establishment of new jobs in emphasis on local management in local times and bad low-cost countries may lead to a loss markets, Sapa and Orkla Materials sup- It is important for Orkla to cooperate of jobs in the Nordic region plement this practice to a certain extent continuously with its employees, both • New divisions and conflicts emerge by posting key personnel on assign- to ensure competitiveness and, to the ment abroad/deploying key personnel greatest possible extent, to be able to Orkla’s aim is to incorporate fundamental to posts abroad. Between 50 and 60 em- carry out workforce reductions with- values, such as those relating to democra- ployees were working on assignment in out firing people. cy, environment, health and safety, equal- 10-15 countries in 2008. ity and justice, into a framework of global At year-end, the Group had 31,633 em- cooperation. Managers and employees The common denominator of all re- ployees (34,680) , 6,604 of whom were must understand differences, so that di- cruitment practice is the desire to en- in Norway (7,393)1, 7,072 in the rest of versity can be a competitive advantage. sure that Orkla companies have the the Nordic region (7,469)1 and 17,956 best employees, regardless of gender, outside the Nordic region (19,818)1. Development and training religion or ethnicity. Orkla emphasises the importance of In 2008, the largest manpower reduction human resource development, both to In the Nordic region, Orkla’s aim is to in the Group was at Sapa, where the enhance skills and to develop good at- achieve more equal gender distribution workforce was reduced by 1,900 man- titudes. The most important human re- than we have today. The proportion of years. At the same time, Sapa recruited source development takes place locally, defined female candidates for the man- new staff equivalent to 300 man-years. in individual companies, primarily in agement team increased from 28 per These are challenging processes and the form of on-the-job training but cent in 2007 to 32 per cent in 2008. The rules have been established in local com- also through regular programmes or- Group’s most important goal in this panies which aim to safeguard the inter- ganised by local companies. area is to build up potential manage- ests of individuals. Whenever possible, ment capacity. Specific measures to in- we seek to offer other job opportunities Some 700-800 employees participate crease management diversity will con- within the Orkla Group or help employ- each year in the Group’s centralised tinue in 2009. In the Nordic businesses, ees to find another job so that unem- human resource development pro- special measures have been introduced ployment can be avoided. grammes at the Orkla Academies. A

10 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 1 Figures for 2007 Orkla has always stressed the importance of involving employees’ representatives in the Group’s decision-making processes. (From left) Chairman of the Board Stein Erik Hagen, Ynge Haagensen, former head of the Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO), Chief trade union representative Aage Andersen, LO head Roar Flåthen and President and CEO Dag J. Opedal. From a meeting between trade union representatives and management at Borregaard Manor in November 2008. Photo: Ole Kristian Lunde growing number of employees from ery and product quality, and on reduc- ership will hopefully also help to strength- abroad take part in these programmes. ing the use of various resources. en and further develop the common val- In 2009, the human resource develop- ue base and common identity on which ment programmes included: Orkla’s restructuring programmes Orkla’s business activities are based. stress the importance of involvement, • The Orkla Brand Academy transparency and close cooperation be- The programme complies with the pro- • The Orkla Sales Academy tween trade union representatives, em- visions of the Norwegian Public Limited • The Orkla Production Academy ployees and management. The Rede- Liability Companies Act and in 2008 • The Orkla Purchasing Academy sign programmes achieve significant shares were offered to around 28,500 • The Orkla B2B (Business to business) improvements in a short space of time employees in 26 countries. Employees ­Academy and pave the way for further work on were offered a 25 per cent discount – up > Customer Value Management continuous improvement processes. from 20 per cent in 2007 – and could > B2B2D buy up to 884 Orkla shares in 2008. > Negotiating techniques The employee share purchase • The Orkla Finance Academy ­programme In 2008, 2,979 employees took part in • Management Training Programmes Orkla har over flere år hatt et program the programme, equivalent to about 10 > SMP for aksjeeierskap. Rabattordningen gir per cent of those who received an of- > OMP de ansatte muligheten til å ta direkte fer. Employees purchased a total of > Mentor programme del i verdiskapningen i konsernet, og 1,991,497 shares at a total value of al- et bredt eierskap vil forhåpentligvis most NOK 63 million. Restructuring to boost competitiveness også være med på å styrke og videreut- Continuous efforts to improve our com- vikle det felles verdigrunnlag og den petitiveness and develop our organisa- felles identitet som ligger til grunn for tions and competence are an important Orklas virksomhetsutøvelse. prerequisite for growth and long-term Shares for Shares for value creation. Improvement pro- Orkla has had an employee share pur- employees employees grammes are implemented in all parts chase programme for several years. This of the Group, with coherent focus on discount scheme gives employees the op- improving environment, health and portunity to participate directly in the safety performance, reliability of deliv- Group’s value creation. Broad-based own-

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 11 Customers and consumers

Orkla’s branded consumer goods busi- ness operates in 18 countries in Eu- rope and Asia, while the aluminium, energy and materials companies oper- ate on a global, industrial market. Re- gardless of sector or geographical mar- ket, Orkla companies base their activities on products and solutions that offer relevant advantages and are safe for health and the environment.

In 2008, Orkla Brands continued to fo- cus on health and nutrition and made further improvements in the field of food and product safety. At the same time, all the business areas continued to concentrate on customer-driven innova- tion and on developing products and so- lutions that improve profitability, both for themselves and for their customers.

Environmentally and energy-friendly solutions from Sapa Sapa’s business is based on aluminium and includes value-added profiles, pro- file-based building systems and heat transfer strip. Sapa has the highest turn- over of all the companies in the Orkla Group and manufactures products that are socially useful, environmentally friendly and easy to recycle. These prod- ucts help to reduce energy consumption in both transport and buildings.

Aluminium has a longer life than alter- native products and is also easy to re- use. It therefore offers significant ad- vantages to both manufacturers and end-users. The special properties of Sapa’s business, which is based on aluminium, supplies products that are socially useful, environmentally-friendly and easy to recycle. They help to reduce energy consumption in both transport and buildings. Photo: Guri Dahl aluminium, such as low weight and good strength, reduce energy con- sumption in the transport sector, while Orkla creates value through its companies’ ability to offer its ability to withstand corrosion in- products that satisfy market demand. A Group that supplies creases the life of products. such diverse products as branded consumer goods, alumini- Aluminium is easily recycled, and both um solutions and materials must necessarily understand the process waste and end products are ex- tensively re-used. When it is resmelted, preferences and needs of all customers, large and small. We all the positive properties of the metal engage in dialogue with our customers through consumer are retained and energy consumption is only five percent of original consump- surveys, market analyses, consumer services and other tion. To take advantage of energy-effi- types of customer contact. This enables us to develop prod- cient recycling, Sapa has resmelting works in ten countries. Approximately ucts that create value for society, are preferred by consum- half of Sapa’s total production is based ers and win market shares. on recycled aluminium.

12 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 At Sapa Profiles, the properties of the metal are further enhanced at the com- pany’s innovation and applications cen- tres, where customers have access to Sapa’s extensive experience and compe- tence in areas such as aluminium and profile know-how, construction and de- sign, calculation, the development of prototypes, processing, logistics, trials and testing. In 2008, five new innova- tion centres were opened, in Sweden, the USA, Spain, Poland and Italy. It has become increasingly important to short- en the period from idea to product launch, and these centres contribute to effective solutions, in full confidentiality, in cooperation with Sapa’s experts.

Heating and ventilation systems in buildings account for more than 40 per cent of global electricity consumption. It The special profile that joins the roof and walls of Kabe camper vans and caravans is the result of a long, complicated process. has become a necessity and a responsi- bility for entrepreneurs to find energy- Case: Kabe camper vans and caravans saving solutions and good alternatives to In cooperation with Kabe, Sapa has developed new profiles for several applications. At first glance, traditional energy sources. The develop- the aluminium profile that joins the roof and walls of Kabe’s camper vans and caravans does not look ment of more economical energy solu- particularly unusual. Nevertheless, its design and function are based on a long, complicated process. tions through environmentally sound The major challenge was to solve the curve of the profile. A classic R&D process ensued, during and energy-efficient building solutions which many curved profiles were scrapped before the final solution was found. The contract with in aluminium was a key element of Kabe has grown in volume, as well as in the number of profile solutions. Plastic materials in caravans Sapa’s technical development activities have partially been replaced by aluminium, and Kabe’s camper vans now contain more aluminium in 2008. Sapa offers complete solar cell fittings. These are durable solutions which are light and thereby save energy. Furthermore, they can solutions for facades and roofs, adapted be recycled at the end of the camper vans’ and caravans’ lifetime. to architectural requirements.

Sapa Heat Transfer, which produces ents are important, and nutrition and parts for radiators and air conditioning health are natural considerations in systems, has continued the trend to- product development and production. wards thinner materials in combination Product developers, chefs, nutrition ex- with greater strength and improved pro- perts and marketing staff work togeth- tection from corrosion. er to develop new products that are adapted to the needs of today’s and to- Sapa often participates in its customers’ morrow’s consumers. product development processes, helping them to find good solutions. Customer Tasty health Value Management has become a key For Orkla Brands, nutrition and health area of Sapa’s business activities. As a re- is not only a question of responsibility sult of this cooperation, customers can but also an area that offers interesting offer more competitive products on their business opportunities. Orkla Brands’ markets. The customer and Sapa share launches of food products with special the value of the total solution, to the ben- nutritional advantages account for an efit of both parties. increasingly large proportion of the 1 Orkla Brands includes the Norwegian companies Stabburet, food companies’ total sales. Bakers, Sætre, Nidar, KiMs, Idun Industri and Axellus, the Swedish companies Procordia Food, Abba Seafood, Göteborg Broad-based focus on health and Kex, OLW and KåKå, the Finnish companies Felix Abba, Chips and Panda, the Danish companies Beauvais, Credin, Credin ­nutrition For the food products that are part of Bageripartner, Dragsbæk and Odense Marcipan, the Latvian For Orkla Brands food companies, an ordinary, basic diet, our ambition is company Spilva, the Estonian company Poltsamaa Felix, the Lithuanian company Suslavicius Felix, the Russian companies good, high quality food and ingredi- to develop tasty, healthy products that Sladco and Krupskaya, and the Indian company MTR Foods.

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 13 Customers and consumers

give a sense of well-being and enjoy- terpretation of the regulations. ment. A healthy diet also has room for snacks and confectionery products in- Guideline Daily Amount (GDA) tended to bring pleasure. In the case of In 2008, the common European Guide- these products, Orkla companies stress line Daily Amount (GDA) labelling sys- the importance of good labelling and tem was implemented in a majority of information about their nutritional Orkla’s food companies that manufac- content. It must be easy for the con- ture products for the grocery market. sumer to plan his or her diet. The com- GDA is a voluntary labelling system panies develop varieties with a more that is supported by most of the major favourable nutritional profile whenev- food companies in Europe and there- er this is natural and possible. fore will ensure uniform presentation of nutritional information to consum- THE NEED FOR GOOD ers. This product labelling system NUTRITIONAL ADVICE presents important nutrition facts in a Guidance on diet and good information standardised way and provides guid- about the nutritional content of the ance regarding recommended portion food we eat are important if consumers sizes. Special websites containing in- are to be able to plan their diet. Orkla’s formation about GDA labelling were WHO and the EU are increasingly interested in the food companies emphasise the impor- established in 2008 in Denmark, Swe- connection between health and nutrition. In 2008 Orkla Brands established its own websites containing diet- tance of good product labelling and use den and Norway under the auspices of related information, and a report on health and well- their websites to provide easily under- the local food organisations: being will be published at the beginning of 2009. standable, fact-based information and advice on their products’ nutritional http://www.gdainfo.dk properties. In 2008 Orkla Brands estab- http://www.gdainfo.se lished special websites with diet-related http://www.gdainfo.no information, and a report on health and well-being will be published at the be- However, the GDA scheme has been ginning of 2009. The report describes received with scepticism in certain or- the principles for Orkla Brands’ work ganisations and has, among other on health and nutrition and provides a things, been criticised for using por- detailed list of food products with fa- tion sizes that are too small. In 2008, vourable nutritional properties and in- the Danish consumer organisation re- formation associated with this topic. ported several Danish food companies for using GDA labelling in a mislead- Marketing healthy food ing manner. For instance, KiMs in The EU Regulation on Nutrition and Denmark received two such com- Health Claims Made on Food, which plaints. However, GDA labelling is entered into force in summer 2007, broadly accepted in the EU and is be- was implemented in the national regu- ing incorporated as general product la- lations of the Nordic countries in 2008. belling for food products in Europe. The new regulation has led to uncer- Orkla Brands’ food companies will tainty about its interpretation among continue to implement GDA labelling both manufacturers and relevant or- on its products in 2009. ganisations. In Norway, Bakers re- ceived a complaint from the Food In- The keyhole label spectorate in 2008 concerning what In 2008 the authorities in Norway, the Inspectorate regarded as mislead- Sweden and Denmark agreed on the ing labelling of bread under the brand criteria for a common Nordic keyhole name Bakers Naturlig Sunt (Bakers label, modelled on the existing Swed- Naturally Healthy). As a result of this ish scheme. Keyhole is a labelling sys- complaint, the company reviewed and tem that shows which varieties in a The common European labelling system, the improved its product labelling. Orkla food category have a favourable nutri- Guideline Daily Amount (GDA), has now been implemented in most of Orkla’s food companies. GDA Brands believes that dialogue between tional profile, on the basis of criteria quantities are given for energy, fat, saturated fat, industry and the authorities is impor- such as salt, sugar or fibre content. sugar and salt/sodium. tant in order to establish an agreed in- This is a simple, clear system which

14 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 shows consumers that products with a FOOD SAFETY AT ORKLA’S keyhole label are a better choice than PRODUCTION PLANTS other products in the same category. To ensure a high, stable level of quality and food safety, Orkla has established The keyhole label has existed in Swe- its own requirements for safe food den since the end of the 1980s. The production in the Orkla Food Safety Orkla Brands company Procordia Standard (OFSS). All companies in the Food has actively marketed keyhole-la- Group that manufacture food and bev- belled products. Since 2004, Orkla erages are required to comply with the Brands has taken part in a revision of Food Safety Standard. the Swedish system. The company has also been involved in the development The OFSS was introduced in 2004. It is of a Nordic keyhole label and supports based on the internationally recog- the scheme. Several Orkla Brands food nised British Retail Consortium Stand- companies will introduce this label- ard for Food Safety (BRC), but it also ling system if the scheme enters into contains additional requirements spe- force. cific to Orkla in several areas.T he OFSS contains detailed requirements Guidelines for marketing to children for the control of raw materials and New guidelines for marketing food and production processes, quality assur- drink to children and young people ance systems, order and tidiness, hy- Orkla has established internal rules for safe food were drawn up in Norway in 2007 in giene, documentation and training. production in the Orkla Food Safety Standard (OFSS). cooperation between the Consumer The requirements are followed up Council, the food industry and Norwe- through regular food safety audits. The gian grocery retailers. Similar guide- system also includes internal routines, Developing healthier food products lines have been introduced in Den- for example for systematic quality as- In 2008, the Swedish company Procordia Food launched BOB Smoothie, a frozen fruit mark. Orkla Brands supports these surance (the HACCP Manual) and con- mix for use in smoothies that meets 25 per national guidelines and, in 2008, ar- tingency planning. cent of the daily fruit and vegetable require- ranged information and training pro- ment. The Norwegian company Stabburet la- grammes to increase awareness of the The OFSS was reinforced in several ar- unched a wholemeal pie under the brand guidelines in its Nordic companies. eas in 2008. Among other things, even name Mia and reduced the sugar content in Measures have also been implemented stricter requirements were introduced several juice and jam varieties under the Nora label. These are good examples of how in Orkla Brands companies to adapt in- for management focus, the handling of Orkla Brands, in different food categories and ternal marketing procedures to the new allergens and raw materials and safety as a result of development work, can make it guidelines. Among other things, stricter controls. Audits were carried out at 47 easier for consumers to achieve a healthier, criteria have been introduced for as- of Orkla Brands’ factories in 2008. This tastier diet. sessing advertising and sponsorship. process will continue in 2009.

In 2009, Orkla Brands will continue to When an accident happens follow up this topic in order to ensure With the help of risk management and good, standardised marketing practic- good quality control systems, Orkla es relating to children in Orkla Brands Brands companies ensure that the companies. products consumers find in the stores are safe and of high quality. The Group Safe food has also established contingency plans Consideration for food safety is a fun- to be able to deal with accidents and damental prerequisite in all food and other undesired events in a way that beverage production. Through com- effectively safeguards consumers’ mon requirements and procedures, fo- health and safety. Common guidelines cus on competence development and have been established for dealing with continuous improvement in compa- emergencies, and Orkla Brands Corpo- nies and the establishment of a food rate Affairs Department provides ad- safety resource centre, good control of vice and guidance for companies when production processes has been estab- they need it. Among other things, the lished in all Orkla companies. Corporate Affairs Department arrang- es regular emergency drills for the

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 15 Customers and consumers

”We follow a standard procedure, but adapt the agenda to special areas of improvement for each factory,” says food safety auditor Sofia Lindgren.Photo: Pål Breivik

On the job with the auditor assurance system and a meeting Sofia Lindgren is one of Orkla’s ten with a representative of the mana- certified food safety auditors. After gement, where the auditors revi- carrying out more than 50 audits, ew management responsibility and she has excellent insights into the previous reports and assess the practical aspects of food safety. improvement measures that have been implemented and planned. “The actual audit usually takes two Then there is an inspection of the Orkla’s team of ten certified food safety auditors carried out audits at 47 of Orkla days, but the visit must naturally be factory to check on important fac- Brands’ factories in 2008. Photo: Kari Westersund well prepared and followed up too,” tors, such as critical control points, says Sofia Lindgren. cleaning, hygiene rules, the danger “We follow a standard procedure, of contamination, and the use of king days after the visit, at the la- tor is also challenging. You have to but we also adapt the agenda to the detectors to seek out foreign bo- test. After that, the factory must support the factories and encourage areas that have been identified in dies and pests. The audit also in- draw up an action plan to remedy improvements, but you also have to previous audits as requiring improve- cludes a review of employee trai- any non-conformances within four put your foot down if necessary. To ment. The purpose of the audit is ning programmes and a check on weeks. This plan must be approved ensure that our assessments are cor- both to measure the factory against procedures at the factory’s labora- by the auditor. rect, we always have two auditors the standard and to provide inputs tory. The audit ends with a me- working together. This is an impor- for the factory’s improvement ef- eting with the management, whe- “Auditing is rewarding work: I find it tant way of exchanging experience forts. We always try to allocate re all non-conformances are very meaningful to be able to contri- and validating our own working me- enough time to discuss the possibili- presented, along with guidance as bute to safe food production, and it’s thods,” concludes Sofia Lindgren. ties for improvement.” to which improvement measures good to know that we have intimate The audit begins with a review of should be carried out. The factory knowledge of all the Orkla Brands the factory’s risk factors and quality receives the audit report ten wor- factories. However, the role of audi-

companies’ management teams. ances. In most cases, the variance was consumer groups Twelve such emergency drills took dealt with without affecting consum- • lead to products with significant advan- place in 2008. Fire and industrial pro- ers. In some cases it was necessary to tages for customers and consumers. tection drills are also carried out at recall products from the market. each factory every year. Orkla’s policy concerning modern GMO POLICY gene technology was adopted by the The regular emergency drills that have Orkla has adopted a wait-and-see poli- Group Executive Board in 2001 and been carried out in recent years have cy regarding the use of modern gene has since been revised annually. improved companies’ ability to deal technology in the manufacture of food with undesired events, and this work products because a clear majority of Read more about Orkla and GMO at will continue unabated in 2009. consumers in its main markets do not www.orkla.com/gmo accept the use of genetically modified Products with quality non-conform- raw materials. ances that may be a danger to consum- er health or safety are rapidly recalled If Orkla is to change its restrictive poli- from the market, in close cooperation cy regarding the use of modern gene with retailers. In such cases, compa- technology, the raw materials and pro- nies provide information about the duction methods based on this tech- event through press releases and other nology must appropriate channels. In 2008, Orkla • have proved to be safe from the point Brands companies experienced a total of view of health and the environment of 21 emergencies due to product vari- • be accepted by large customer and

16 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 Suppliers

The Pierre Robert Group (formerly La Mote) systematically monitors working conditions at supplers’ factories, including those in China. Photo: Pierre Robert Group

Orkla makes active efforts to promote the Group’s values in its supplier chain. This means that it imposes clear requirements regarding human rights, working conditions, environmental impact and corruption. Orkla wishes to pursue a constructive dialogue with its most important suppliers and is currently increasing the number of group-wide guidelines and systems in this area.

As a consequence of Orkla’s decentral- by means of delivery inspections, prod- ised structure, responsibility for follow- uct certificates, continuous dialogue ing up suppliers rests with individual and, when necessary, supplier audits. Orkla companies. Nevertheless, in order As a consequence of Orkla’s interna- to strengthen its monitoring of product tional expansion and the increasing quality and working conditions in the quantities of goods purchased from supplier chain, the Group has found it countries in Asia and Eastern Europe, appropriate to further develop group- several companies have also incorporat- wide systems and working methods. In ed matters relating to environment, 2008 Orkla therefore focused on inter- health and safety (EHS) and labour Orkla is further developing its system for following up nal improvements at Group, business rights into their purchasing procedures suppliers. Pål Eikeland and Per Røhnebæk from Orkla’s area and company levels. more actively than before. In 2008, the central purchasing function. Photo: Tor Aske Børresen various business areas improved their Regardless of business area, market or procedures for monitoring suppliers product, Orkla companies require their and several new improvements were suppliers to comply with strict quality initiated. requirements. These quality require- ments are incorporated into supplier Orkla has had ethical guidelines for contracts and compliance is monitored purchasing for several years, but wishes

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 17 Suppliers

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AT ORKLA BRANDS

Intensified food safety control In 2008 Orkla Brands developed a new system for approving and monitoring suppliers with respect to food safety. This system covers all suppliers of raw materials and packaging to Orkla’s food manufacturing companies and all exter- nal food producers associated with these companies. The new system is a further development of the Orkla Food Safety Standard (OFSS), which is Orkla Brands’ system for ensuring food safety at its own production plants. It consists of common contract specifications, risk assessments and, where appropriate, supplier audits.

Risk assessment of suppliers is based on a self-assessment that has to be car- ried out by all suppliers. A number of other criteria are included in Orkla’s as- sessment, such as previous experience of using the supplier, the supplier’s geo- graphical location and potential food safety risk in the production process. All potential new suppliers must fill in a self-assessment form, while existing suppliers have to fill in a form every second year. Audits are carried out in cases where, on the basis of the risk as- sessment, there is a perceived need for further inspection. Both the audits and the approval processes are carried out for each factory individually by internal auditors who are employed by Orkla Brands’ various food companies. Re- sponsibility for coordination and tech- Orkla’s central purchasing function has started work on to incorporate more detailed require- nical support is based in Orkla Brands’ establishing common procedures for monitoring ments relating to EHS and labour rights Corporate Affairs Department, which is working conditions at suppliers’ factories. a central technical support unit. Photo: Anna Enwall Lundberg into the Group’s standard contracts. This will take place in connection with a major revision of standard contracts In 2008 the focus was on implementing that began in spring 2008 and will be internal training programmes and devel- completed in the first half of 2009.T he oping an IT-based support system. A to- requirements are designed to incorpo- tal of 85 persons from 31 Orkla Brands rate the provisions laid down in the companies attended training courses in core ILO conventions, including prohi- auditing and supplier approval, and ap- bition against child labour, freedom of proximately 130 supplier audits were organisation, and bans on discrimina- carried out. As part of the auditor train- tion and forced labour. ing, at least three audits are carried out with the help of coaches from the Corpo- rate Affairs Department. The goal is to have trained around 100 auditors by the

18 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 end of 2009. Orkla Brands aims to carry uct categories. In 2009, as part of the pi- out 200 audits and to provide training lot project, the Group will study a selec- Sedex courses on the new IT system for all tion of suppliers and draw up a plan for Supplier Ethical Data companies in the course of 2009. The gradual, broader implementation. Inter- Exchange (Sedex) is an organisation for new system will initially cover Orkla nal procedures and an internal training enterprises commit- Brands companies in the Nordic region, programme will also be developed. ted to continuous the Baltic States, Poland, Austria, the improvement of Czech Republic, Romania and Portugal. Lilleborg, the Pierre Robert Group and their supply chains The companies in Russia and India will Nidar are members of the Ethical Trad- with respect to wor- be included from 2010. ing Initiative – Norway (IEH). As a re- king conditions and business ethics. sult of their membership, these compa- The four main pillars of the organisation’s ac- tivities are labour standards, environment, Although the new system for monitor- nies have received valuable support in health and safety in the workplace, the ex- ing suppliers primarily focuses on food monitoring suppliers, in the form of ternal environment and business ethics. The safety, certain environmental aspects guidance, courses and access to good Sedex Foundation is based in London but is have also been included. The system tools. The experience gained from this open to member enterprises from all over will gradually be further developed in work will be applied in the develop- the world. Manufacturers, suppliers and retai- the next two years and, over time, will ment of new procedures for the entire lers can all join the organisation, which cur- rently has many leading international bran- also incorporate working conditions Orkla Brands organisation. More de- ded goods companies on its membership list. and labour rights. tailed information about the three com- Sedex was established in 2001 by a group of panies’ work in this area may be found English retailers and their suppliers, who rea- New procedures for in their annual reports to the IEH. lised there was a need for collaboration and monitoring working conditions common standards for supplier audits, both At Orkla Brands, the procedures for Ethical textile trading to drive improvement processes and to redu- ce the amount of work for suppliers. Sedex monitoring suppliers’ performance in One of the Orkla companies that works provides opportunities to share audit data relation to EHS and labour rights have most systematically on monitoring with several customers, thus reducing the varied, depending on the activities and working conditions at suppliers’ facto- need for repeated, time-consuming audits. the perceived risk of individual compa- ries is the Pierre Robert Group (former- nies. In 2008, Orkla Brands established ly La Mote), not least because of the a central purchasing unit to assist com- substantial volume of goods the compa- panies in their general purchasing ac- ny purchases from China. Because tivities. The new unit began work by es- working conditions at Chinese factories tablishing common procedures for vary, trading with China requires partic- monitoring working conditions in sup- ular focus on EHS and labour rights. In plier enterprises. As part of this effort, 2008 the Pierre Robert Group revised in autumn 2008, as the first industrial its ethical guidelines for purchasing company in the Nordic region, Orkla and implemented RAID, a system for Brands decided to join the British Se- risk assessment of suppliers developed dex Foundation (see separate box). by the Ethical Trading Initiative. An in- Membership of this organisation gives ternal system manager has been ap- access to tools and systems for identify- pointed and all purchasers have attend- ing risk factors in the supplier chain re- ed courses in the use of the system. lating to EHS, labour rights and the ex- ternal environment, and competence in In the course of the year, the Pierre Rob- this method of following up suppliers. ert Group carried out a risk assessment of all its 25 Chinese manufacturers, A project team has been established, based on a self-evaluation procedure. The comprising representatives from vari- assessment gave a generally satisfactory ous companies, which in 2009 will con- impression, but identified challenges re- sider how this system can best be im- lating to working hours and the lack of plemented at Orkla Brands, and will trade union membership at several sup- organise the implementation process. plier enterprises. The suppliers receive The team will carry out a pilot project written summaries of the assessment in which the new tools will be tested in and are given a time-limit to propose a selection of Orkla companies. Orkla measures to remedy undesirable condi- Membership of Sedex provides a good basis for Brands has more than 40,000 suppliers tions. The assessment will also be fol- dialogue between the various links in the value chain and for efficiency gains. with a large number of different prod- lowed up at supplier meetings in 2009.

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 19 Suppliers

To reduce the need for overtime in sup- achieved extremely good results in this plier enterprises, the Pierre Robert area. From 2000 to 2008 the Long Work Group is considering the possibilities Day Rate (LWDR) (number of injuries for increasing the lead time on orders leading to absence per million hours and engaging in closer dialogue with worked) declined from 5 to 1.4. One of suppliers on production planning on an the really good examples of EHS work annual basis. In autumn 2008, several in Elkem’s international operations is of the company’s suppliers also attend- from Elkem Carboderivados in Brazil. As ed a seminar on EHS in the workplace a result of hard work and dedicated, On 1 October 2008 Elkem Carboderivados in Brazil under the auspices of the Ethical Trad- long-term efforts, this factory can pride celebrated 4000 days without injury leading to ing Initiative. A significantly larger itself on more than 11 years without in- absence. number of the Pierre Robert Group’s jury absence. Another good example is suppliers attended this course in 2008 from the construction of the Elkem fac- than in 2007. The Pierre Robert Group tory in Kristiansand, which will produce believes that its influence on suppliers high-purity silicon for the solar industry. has resulted in their giving higher pri- During the construction period, the com- ority to EHS. pany arranged safety courses for approx- imately 5,500 people from 45 different In future, the Pierre Robert Group will countries. In conjunction with strong fo- identify potential challenges further cus on EHS during the project and thor- back in the value chain and consider ough follow-up, this resulted in 2.6 mil- how the company can influence manu- lion working hours without injury facturers’ sub-suppliers. The company absence. is also in the process of finding a per- manent partner to carry out inspections Elkem also requires its suppliers to pro- of suppliers’ factories. vide good, safe working conditions for their employees, regardless of country or Elkem expanding its supplier audits culture. Although this has long been a Elkem uses its Elkem Business System topic in Elkem’s dialogue with its suppli- (EBS) to carry out systematic improve- ers, in 2008 the company intensified its ments in the fields of EHS, innovation efforts in this area in order to ensure and the use of resources. The company more systematic follow-up. A major ef- is concerned to look after its employees fort is in progress to establish new audit- and expects its own companies to com- ing standards, train the company’s inter- ply with international standards relating nal auditors and implement measures to human rights, labour rights, EHS and and sanction mechanisms that will more ethics. Work on these topics is regarded effectively ensure that suppliers comply as both good business and good fulfil- with Elkem’s requirements. Through ment of the company’s corporate more detailed and systematic follow-up, ­responsibility. the goal is to promote continuous im- provement for the company’s suppliers, As an international company operating including in communities where funda- in many countries all over the world, mental human rights do not necessarily Elkem encounters both linguistic and have high priority today. cultural barriers that pose challenges as regards standardisation and understand- Raw materials from ing of the guidelines for corporate re- sustainable forestry sponsibility. These barriers are not insur- Borregaard has one of the world’s most mountable, but it takes time to introduce advanced biorefineries which, based on trans-national rules and ensure that they a unique concept, utilises the different are complied with. substances found in timber to produce many different products that can re- Elkem’s work on corporate responsibili- place oil-based products. Borregaard ty is based on a simple rule: “EHS is our makes great efforts to ensure that the first priority”.T hanks to continuous, timber it uses comes from forests that long-term focus, the company has are managed according to international-

20 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 Borregaard makes great efforts to ensure that the Borregaard and the sector organisation for the Norwegian pulp and paper industry also took part in the Living timber it uses comes from forests that are managed Forest project, which helped to formulate rules for sustainable forest management in Norway. according to internationally recognised principles for Photo: Jørn Bøhmer Olsen/Odin media sustainable wood production. Photo: Per Andersen

Forest management 2006. The standard also includes third Orkla is one of the largest forest owners party inspection. in Norway and harvests approximately 100,000 solid cubic meters of timber When timber is purchased, similar re- each year from the Borregaard Forests. quirements for responsible forest man- With Statskog (the national forest au- agement and traceability apply. The thority), Borregaard has established the Borregaard factories in , Nor- company SB Skog AS, which is respon- way, purchase approximately one mil- sible for managing forest properties. lion solid cubic metres of timber a year. The Group’s forests are now environ- The timber used in 2008 came from mentally certified, which means that Norwegian and Swedish forests that are Timber from Sweden being unloaded at Borregaard’s Melløs quay. they are managed on the basis of long- largely certified according to theF orest term plans in accordance with recog- Stewardship Council (FSC) and PEFC ly recognised principles for sustainable nised standards that take into account standards. Borregaard wishes all the wood production. As far as is practical- biological diversity and social and eco- timber it uses to come from certified ly possible, Borregaard transports tim- nomic impacts. forests. In Norway, most forest owners ber to its factories by sea or rail. are members of larger business units As one of the first in Norway, the that ensure certification and inspection. Borregaard uses timber as a raw materi- Group’s forestry operations were certi- In practice, this means that all the Nor- al in the production of biomaterials fied according to the ISO 14001 inter- wegian timber purchased by Borre- (speciality cellulose and lignin-based national environmental management gaard is certified. In Sweden, it is the products), biochemicals (vanillin) and standard in 1999. Borregaard and the individual forest owner who is certified, biofuel (bioethanol). The raw material sector organisation for the Norwegian which means that it is currently diffi- that is used mainly comes in the form pulp and paper industry also took part cult to ensure 100 per cent certification, of logs, but Borregaard also uses wood in the Living Forest project, which but the percentage is high. chips from various sawmills. The com- helped to formulate rules for sustaina- pany’s development is dependent on a ble forest management in Norway. The continuous supply of biomass, in the Living Forest standards were approved form of timber of the right quality. by the Pan European Forest Certifica- tion (PEFC) system in 2000 and the standard was further developed in

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 21 Shareholders

Providing correct information at the right time and ensuring transparency about the company’s affairs creates confidence and leads to correct pricing of shares. Here from the company’s Annual General Meeting. Photo: Sara Johannessen/Scanpix Orkla’s goal is to give shareholders a long-term return that is well above the stock market average. To achieve this, the Group focuses on growth and its ability to adapt rapidly in order to take best advantage of the market situation.

Orkla has more than 50,000 sharehold- about the company’s affairs creates veloping constantly and in 2008 the ers, and it is important for the compa- confidence and leads to correct pricing Group Executive Board and the Board ny to ensure effective, transparent of shares. Compliance with the princi- of Directors reviewed the status of Ork- communication with the financial mar- ples for good corporate governance la’s efforts in this area. Orkla’s basic ket. Shareholders, investors and ana- lays the foundations for long-term val- premise is that systematic focus on our lysts must have access to up-to-date in- ue creation, to the benefit of sharehold- corporate responsibility minimises risk, formation on the Group’s situation at ers, employees, other stakeholders and enhances our reputation and offers fi- all times. This is ensured through regu- society at large. nancial possibilities. By integrating en- lar, open dialogue with important vironmental, sustainability and ethical stakeholders. The Board’s and management’s work thinking into its business strategy, Ork- on corporate responsibility la will be able to exploit new commer- Providing correct information at the Orkla’s awareness of and activities relat- cial opportunities, strengthen the organ- right time and ensuring transparency ing to corporate responsibility are de- isation and influence the conditions in which our companies operate. LONG-TERM VALUE CREATION Line managers are responsible for the 25 sustainability of their operations. In order to strengthen the way this area is 23 dealt with, it has however been decid- 20 Avkastning for Orkla- ed that in future Orkla will arrange aksjen for noen presentations and discussions at senior 15 tidsperioder 15 15 management level. sammenlignet med 13 Oslo Børs Benchmark 11 10 Index. The Board of Directors has stated that 9 it wishes the status and progress of

6 5 work on the Group’s corporate respon- 5 The Orkla share sibility to be reviewed on a regular, an- The nual basis. Orkla companies will be re- % 83-08 93-08 99-08 04-08 Benchmark Index quired to provide more details of their * Dividend reinvested on first trading day after Orkla's Annual General Meeting. ambitions for work on corporate re-

22 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 sponsibility in their strategic business with the International Financial Re- plans. porting Standards (IFRS). The Board of Directors’ Audit Committee moni- Orkla’s goal and the long-term return tors work on the company’s reporting Orkla’s goal is to achieve a long-term on behalf of the Board of Directors. return that is higher than the return Orkla makes efforts/strives to commu- from relevant, competing investment nicate actively and openly with the alternatives. market. All shareholders must be treat- ed equally as regards access to finan- Return on the Orkla share in certain cial information. The Board is regular- periods compared with the Oslo Stock ly informed about the company’s Exchange Benchmark Index. investor relations activities.

For shareholders, this is expressed as a The Group has been awarded the Far- combination of the long-term perform- mand Prize several times for its annu- ance of the Orkla share price and the al reports, and regularly achieves a dividend paid out. Orkla makes contin- high score on international website uous efforts to improve its underlying surveys. operations. In conjunction with struc- tural measures, this results in in- Orkla’s mission statement creased cash flow and thereby a long In accordance with its mission state- term increase in value for sharehold- ment, Orkla ASA operates in several ers. For Orkla and investors with a different areas. Orkla is a leading sup- long investment horizon, it will there- plier of branded consumer goods to fore be important to measure value the Nordic grocery market and also creation in terms of the development has strong positions in the fields of of the Group’s underlying operations. aluminium profiles, metals and materi- als, and renewable energy. Its activities Contacts and communication also include financial investments.T he with investors company operates on a long-term basis One of the overarching objectives of in- and has generated substantial excess vestor relations activities at Orkla is to value for shareholders. The goals and create confidence by giving all actors main strategies of the Group and of in- equal access to financial information. dividual business areas are described in Orkla’s Annual Report. Orkla seeks to ensure that its accounts and financial statements are worthy of Orkla’s principles for corporate investor confidence. Orkla’s account- ­governance ing practices are highly transparent Orkla’s principles for corporate gov- and since 2005 Orkla has presented its ernance are intended to lay the foun- financial statements in accordance dation for long-term value creation, to

A systematic, transparent information policy is a fundamental prerequisite for the financial market’s confidence in a company. From the presentation of Orkla’s results for the fourth quarter of 2007. Photo: Terje Bendiksby/Scanpix

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 23 Shareholders

the benefit of shareholders, employees, has been set at one-and-a-half times • Human resource development other stakeholders and society at large. the annual salary for the Group Execu- • Achievement of financial targets tive Board and one time the annual • Improvements in the executive’s These principles cannot replace efforts salary for other participants sphere of responsibility to promote a sound corporate culture • Collaboration in all parts of the Group, but must be At year-end, 8,391,860 options were • Application of Orkla’s basic values in viewed in conjunction with them. outstanding. Orkla’s Board of Directors practice Openness, transparency, accountability will propose to the General Meeting a • Potential for further development and equal treatment underpin confi- total of 3.500,000 options for 2008. • Market considerations – securing key dence in the Orkla Group, both inter- This is equivalent to approximately 0.3 competence nally and externally. per cent of outstanding shares. • Other factors

Orkla aims at all times to organise its Options are awarded according to the activities and otherwise conduct its af- following criteria: fairs in accordance with the Norwe- gian Code of Practice for Corporate The 20 largest shareholders as of 31.12.2008 Governance. The Annual Report for Shareholder No. of shares % of capital 2008 reports on Orkla’s principles in 1 Canica AS1 139,542,000 13.6 % relation to the recommendation of 4 2 Folketrygdfondet 121,313,110 11.8 % December 2007 (www.nues.no), which 3 Tvist 5 AS1 77,000,000 7.5 % provides information on principles 4 JP Morgan Chase Bank Nominee 31,283,900 3.0 % laid down on matters such as: 5 State Street Bank and Trust Nominee 27,551,252 2.7 % 6 BNY s/a F. Templeton-Mutual Shares2 24,350,543 2.4 % • Equal treatment of shareholders 7 BNY s/a F. Templeton-Mutual Discovery 20,568,718 2.0 % • Transactions with close associates 8 JP Morgan Chase Bank Nominee 19,650,000 1.9 % • Freely negotiable shares • Governing bodies; composition, 9 Clearstream Banking Nominee 17,525,161 1.7 % 1 ­independence and activities 10 Canica Investor AS 16,000,000 1.6 % 3 • Information and communication 11 Orkla ASA 11,917,888 1.2 % • Risk management and internal control 12 rasmussengruppen AS 9,804,000 1.0 % • External auditor 13 BNY s/a F. Templeton-Mutual Qualified Fund 9,599,083 0.9 % 14 JP Morgan, Franklin Templeton Lending Nominee 8,966,651 0.9 % Orkla has also drawn up its own guide- 15 Oslo Pensjonsforsikring 8,500,000 0.8 % lines for corporate, ethical and social 16 JP Morgan Chase Bank Nominee 8,409,511 0.8 % responsibility and behaviour, which 17 BNY s/a F. Templeton-Mutual Beacon Fund 8,348,283 0.8 % may be found on Orkla’s website un- 18 investors Bank & Trust Company Nominee 8,252,748 0.8 % der “Corporate Responsibility” 19 dNB Nor Bank ASA 8,066,014 0.8 % 20 Vital Forsikring ASA 7,899,246 0.8 % Option programme Total shares 584,548,108 56.8 % The Orkla Group has an option pro- Total all Orkla shares 1,028,930,970 100.0 % gramme for approximately 150 senior Number of outstanding shares 1,017,013,082 98.8 % managers under which each manager ¹ On 10 December 2008 Stein Erik Hagen and related parties disclosed their ownership of 239,942,000 Orkla shares, equivalent to is entitled in future to buy a number 23.3 % of the total number of shares in Orkla. Canica AS, Tvist 5 AS and Canica Investor AS are parties related to Stein Erik Hagen. of Orkla shares at a specified exercise 2 On 13 July 2007 Franklin Templeton Group disclosed its ownership of 8.14 % of the shares in Orkla. Shareholders no. 6, 7, 13 and 17 are part of the Franklin Templeton Group. price. At year-end, approximately 10.3 ³ Shares owned by Orkla carry no voting rights. million options had been issued. The option programme is moderate in scope, since it represents less than one per cent of outstanding shares. Further Shares by size of shareholding as of 31.12.2008 information on the option programme No. of shares No. of shareholders % of capital may be found in the Annual Report, in 1-500 21,302 0.45 % Note 5 to the financial statements for 501-5,000 23,827 3.92 % Orkla ASA regarding “Remuneration 5,001-50,000 4.675 6.18 % and contractual arrangements”. 50,001-500,000 642 8.85 % 500,001-2,500,000 119 12.68 % A ceiling for the potential annual gain over 2,500,000 48 67.92 %

24 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 Orkla shareholders matters. Shareholders and other stake- were evaluated cover matters such as As of 31 December 2008 Orkla had holders also have access to live quar- labour standards, product safety, envi- 50,613 shareholders, compared with terly presentations through web- ronmental issues and human rights. 40,933 the previous year. At year-end, streaming on Orkla’s websites, where The Group will continue its dialogue 35.9 per cent of shares were owned by it is also possible to submit questions with this type of rating agency and foreign investors, compared with 42.8 to Orkla’s management. seeks to be among the best in its class per cent at the beginning of the year. on the basis of financial, social and en- Many Nordic and certain international See also the chapter on “Corporate vironmental criteria. brokerage houses follow the perform- Governance” in Orkla’s Annual Report. ance of the Orkla share. A list of bro- Employee representation in kerage houses and analysts that regu- Ethical ranking ­governing bodies larly follow Orkla may be found in the Orkla’s work on corporate responsibil- Under Norwegian law, employees final pages of theA nnual Report. This ity and the results that are achieved must be represented in the company’s list is updated on www.orkla.com/ir. are evaluated regularly. For the Group, governing bodies. On this basis, and in this confirms the extent to which our accordance with the current system of Presentations, interim reports, annual efforts achieve the desired results and corporate democracy, Orkla employees reports, financial statements, notices to provides valuable feedback from exter- have the right to elect seven out of a the stock exchange and press releases nal experts. Orkla therefore uses this total of 21 members to the Corporate are published on Orkla’s website on an information actively to identify the po- Assembly of Orkla ASA. Similarly, ongoing basis. tential for improvement in Orkla com- Orkla employees have the right to elect panies. In January 2009 Orkla was three members and two observers to The website also contains general in- ranked 17th in its sector in the Cova- the Board of Directors of Orkla ASA. formation about the Orkla share, share lence Ethical Ranking survey. The scor- price performance and shareholder ing criteria for the 541 companies that

HOW ORKLA’S GOVERNING BODIES ARE ELECTED

Employees of Orkla companies The General Meeting

Elect in accordance with the Orkla Group’s Elects on the basis of a recommendation system of corporate democracy by the Nomination Committee

The Corporate Assembly 7 employee-elected members The entire Corporate Assembly elects its own Chairman 14 shareholder-elected members

A are elected on the basis of a recommendation by the Nomination Committee

3 employee-elected members The Board of Directors 7 shareholder-elected 2 employee-elected observers The entire Corporate Assembly elects the Chairman of the Board members

1 The list is updated regularly on Orkla’s website.

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 25 Orkla and society

Orkla’s most important contri- butions to society are jobs, tax revenues, value creation and innovation. They can only be safeguarded by maintaining efficient, profitable and com- petitive companies.

By running profitable companies, we also generate positive ripple effects from our core businesses that support development in the local communities in which Orkla companies operate.

Tax revenues and products that society needs, which are direct consequences of Orkla’s operations, benefit society as a whole.

Orkla mainly uses local suppliers. As well as creating jobs in the countries and local communities concerned, this promotes human resource develop- ment and the transfer of expertise. The Group also seeks to recruit local staff.

Through dialogue and cooperation with authorities, sector organisations and non-governmental organisations, Orkla helps to establish good stand- ards and approaches in areas that are relevant for the Group’s activities, in- cluding from the perspective of sus- tainability.

At Group level, Orkla also emphasises the importance of sponsoring cultural In addition to providing good local jobs, Orkla companies contribute to human resource development and the and social activities that are not direct- transfer of expertise to other countries, as Nidar is doing for West African farmers. Photo: Winrock International ly connected to its subsidiaries’ social relationships with their own custom- and for society, in accordance with its as of human rights, working condi- ers, employees and local communities. business principles and its value state- tions, environmental impacts and Orkla ASA has entered into a few ma- ment, “Goals and Values”. In this con- anti-corruption activities (Communica- jor sponsorship agreements whose text, one important individual contri- tion on Progress). purpose harmonises with the Group’s bution is to ensure transparency with activities in various ways. respect to the operations of its busi- Research and development (R&D) ness units. and innovation Orkla has a funda- Research and development has high mental responsibility Orkla has formalised these obligations, priority at Orkla and the R&D function for running its busi- among other things by joining the UN plays a pivotal role in the development nesses in a way that Global Compact. Member companies of individual businesses. reduces risk and max- are required to report to and update imises value creation, interested parties on challenges, meas- At Elkem, development work takes both for the Group ures and developments in the key are- place in collaboration between the fac-

26 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 Elkem Solar’s new factory in Kristiansand is the result of long-term focus on research and expertise. Energy consumption in this production process is radically lower than for traditional solutions. Photo: Nicolas Tourrenc tories, the divisions’ R&D departments lished its own Center of Excellence and Elkem’s research centre in Kris- and, with a new, larger organisation, tiansand. In addition to the Sapa busi- increased its investment in research ness units’ own research departments, and development in 2008. Sapa has a central R&D unit at Fin- spång, Sweden, which serves the en- • Elkem aims to lead the way in the de- tire company. Borregaard has a joint velopment of new environmentally research centre for all its business and energy-friendly technologies. The units and also works closely on a development and construction of a broad front with institutions and uni- new factory for Elkem Solar is a good versities in several countries. At Orkla example of the commercialisation of Brands, consumer and market insights technology developed by Elkem. In are combined with technological ex- all, around 250 people work on re- pertise to develop innovative products search and development at Elkem. that are preferred by consumers. The business areas’ R&D departments also • Borregaard has approximately 60 em- seek to produce results that benefit the ployees working on R&D and almost entire organisation whenever this is one fourth of its industrial sales come natural and possible. from products launched in the past five years. Borregaard has a special R&D is essential for the further devel- unit working on business and tech- opment of companies’ market posi- nology development in connection tions. Innovation also creates solutions with a biorefinery concept. and products that are valuable to socie- ty because they promote sustainable, • At Orkla Brands, work is done on positive development in areas such as R&D and product development health and nutrition, energy and the throughout the value chain. Norma- environment, safety and efficiency: tive tools are used purposefully and systematically, while in-depth con- • Sapa is responsible for much of the sumer and customer insights en- R&D work on practical targets, such hance the quality of the innovation as productivity and costs. It also does process. long-term work on solutions that will create added value for customers. In order to achieve this, Sapa has estab-

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 27 Orkla and society

VALUE CREATION AT ORKLA R&D – developingHusk punktum i of this decade and many laboratory- environmentaly-akse! technology scale tests have been carried out. So 15,000 Orkla’s contributions to R&D are far the project has cost several hun- linked to the competitiveness of its dred million NOK.

12,000 business operations, but it is impor- tant to emphasise thatGul, such Brands invest- • Today, cathode blocks from the alu- ments often help to promote the in- minium industry are often deposited 9,000 terests of society in a broader sense. on landfill sites. This practice has Orange, finans invest been prohibited in the EU since the 6,000 One example is our development of beginning of 2008. On the basis of environmentally friendly technology Elkem’s research into slag processes,

3,000 and alternative energyRød, sources. Jotun SignifREC - the company has built a demonstra- icant energy and environmental gains tion plant for recycling cathode blocks from the aluminium industry Mill. have been made in thisMørkrød, area in Alumin.solu recent NOK years. The investments in solar ener- at Elkem Bjølvefossen. When a suc- To employees as wages (11,622) gy through Elkem Solar and REC are cessful demonstration plant is in Annual result after minorities/reinvested important contributions to the effort place and other conditions have (2,828) Lysgrønn, Materials, To society through taxes (895) to reduce greenhouse Borregaard,gases. Elkem been met, NOK 100 million will be To shareholders as dividends and buy back invested in a plant that will solve an (2,909) • The start-up phase at the Elkem So- environmental problem. An environ- 80 % sort lar factory, which will produce solar- mental plant at Bjølvefossen will grade silicon and was built in Kris- also be able to recycle other types of tiansand at a cost of NOK 4 billion, waste. 30 % sort, stroke began at the end of 2008. Production of Elkem Solar Silicon® will gradu- Research-based innovation ally be stepped up throughout 2009. Orkla is involved in several research 20 % sort, fill This investment is the result of a projects relating to health and nutri- long research process and the appli- tion. In 2008 the Group donated NOK cation of process know-how and ex- 16 million to several different research pertise from Elkem’s smelting projects at the University of Oslo, in- plants. The energy consumed in the cluding research into the possible ef- production processElektrisk has energibeen re- fects of Omega-3 on child diabetes, Varmeenergi duced by 75 per cent, which means probiotic bacteria and anti-oxidants. both lower costs and lower emis- These funds are part of a donation sions. It also reduces the time from from Orkla and Elkem totalling NOK the solar cell begins producing ener- 45 million, which is administered by gy until it has produced more ener- the Research Council of Norway and gy than was consumed in the pro- must be used to finance socially useful duction process from 1.6 to 1.1 research in the fields of environment, years. resource management, nutrition, obes- ity and materials science. • The next pioneering industrial inno- vation for Elkem may be a new pro- In 2008 a number of Orkla Brands duction process that is being devel- companies began to cooperate on re- oped with Alcoa, which has the search with the Antidiabetic Food Cen- potential to revolutionise the alu- tre (AFC) at Lund University, Sweden. minium industry. Carbothermic alu- The AFC’s role is to promote knowl- minium production is a new way of edge and expertise relating to the de- manufacturing aluminium that may velopment of food products that can reduce energy consumption by 30 help to reduce the risk of obesity, type per cent. Furthermore, CO gas from 2 diabetes and cardio-vascular disease. the process can be used in other in- Axellus is the Orkla company that will dustrial and energy production and cooperate most closely with the AFC, help to reduce CO2 emissions. Re- but Procordia Food, Credin, Stabburet, search and development work has Göteborgs Kex and Bakers are also par- been in progress since the beginning ties to the two-year cooperation agree-

28 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 ment, under which these companies Both Elkem Ferroveld and LignoTech South Africa have policies and measures to deal with and limit will provide financial support for the the spread and effects of HIV infection. research centre.

The centre has 38 senior researchers, including research teams from the Lund and Malmö university clinics in Sweden. The AFC will receive funding from the Swedish Vinnova Foundation for a period of 10 years and has a total budget of SEK 200 million. Lund Uni- versity and the Swedish food industry are also important financial contribu- tors to the research centre.

For further information, please contact Anders Högberg: anders.hogberg@ procordiafood.com or Anita Helland: [email protected]

In 2008 the Orkla Brands company Credin also provided financial support comprises representatives of Orkla’s for the Grainity Project, a research Group Executive Board, Elkem, Borre- project on wholemeal under the aus- gaard and Orkla Brands. pices of the Nordic innovation centre Norden. The aim of the project is to Orkla bases its contacts with authori- compare and analyse existing research ties on fundamental principles such as into the favourable effects on health of transparency, honesty, accessibility, oats and rye, and to disseminate infor- consistency and a long-term approach. mation on this subject. While these re- Adherence to these principles is essen- search projects are of general benefit tial if we are to establish the necessary to society as a whole, Orkla Brands trust on the part of the authorities and also incorporates the knowledge thereby create a platform for achieving gained from the projects into its com- the Group’s goals. Orkla was the first panies’ own development work. Norwegian company to register in the EU Lobby Register in Brussels when it In 2009 Orkla Brands will follow up was established in 2008. the ongoing research projects and rein- force its cooperation with relevant ex- Policy and measures to meet the ternal resource centres. HIV/AIDS challenge in South Africa Like many other African countries, Contacts with authorities South Africa faces a serious challenge Myndighetskontakt er et systematisk in its efforts to manage and limit the Orkla works systematically and pur- spread and effects of the HIV epidemic. posefully to cultivate contacts with au- By establishing guidelines and imple- thorities. We do this to ensure that the menting systematic measures, LignoTe- relevant authorities understand the ch in South Africa has achieved good kind of operating parameters that are results by dealing with this challenge in necessary to run an efficient, competi- a way that benefits employees, the busi- tive industrial enterprise, and facilitate ness itself and the local community. the establishment of such operating parameters. LignoTech South Africa is a joint ven- ture between Borregaard and the South Work on contacts with authorities is African company Sappi. coordinated by and based in the Fo- rum for Government of Affairs, which A basic precondition for this work is

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 29 Orkla and society

Orkla is working on plans to finance a new Children’s Village in Asia, probably in Vietnam. Here: two happy children from another SOS Children’s Village in Vietnam. Photo: Katja Snozzzi

that no employee who is or becomes in- the threshold for accepting advice and Major sponsorship agreements fected with HIV is discriminated assistance. Orkla seeks to establish long-term rela- against. A group of voluntary employ- tionships and is continuing certain ees have been specially trained to in- Due to the anonymity requirement, it is major sponsorship agreements whose form their colleagues about issues and difficult to measure the results of these purpose harmonises with the Group’s measures that are important and rele- efforts directly, but available surveys activities in various ways. vant in efforts to meet the HIV/AIDS show that the number of people with challenge. HIV in the company is far lower (ap- The purposes of sponsorship: proximately one third) than in the rest The programme, which has been in of the population in the area. • To create positive associations with progress for several years, includes of- Orkla as a responsible actor in society fers of regular tests, advisory and fol- Borregaard and the company’s employ- • To promote commitment, pride and low-up services, and free medical treat- ees in South Africa have also provided motivation among our employees ment and medicines for those who are financial support and assistance for lo- • To draw attention to Orkla values infected with HIV. It is stressed that cal children who have lost both parents that cannot easily be highlighted these measures safeguard anonymity due to AIDS. through traditional advertising or and employees are followed up by an other measures independent third party, which lowers

30 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 small, to be able to continue to oper- ate throughout the year.

Pledge of support for the Østfold ­ScienceCenter In 2008 Orkla pledged to provide NOK 5 million over three years for the Øst- fold County ScienceCenter, which is currently being planned in Sarpsborg, not far from Orkla’s own resource cen- tre at Borregaard Manor.

The centre will focus particularly on children and young people and aims to arouse interest in topics that are also relevant for the Orkla Group, such as environment and energy, health and nutrition. Through educational play- and-learn activities, the centre will also provide an important service for schools in the region. Science centres of this type have been successful in several countries, not least because they arouse curiosity and promote in- terest in science subjects, invention Jan Ove Rivenes marked Lilleborg’s 125th anniversary by handing over a check for NOK 1 million to SOS Children’s and innovation. Villages, represented by General Secretary Svein Grønnem (left). Photo: SOS Children’s Villages Norway

• The Norwegian State Opera & Ballet Orkla is a partner of this magnificent new opera house in Oslo, which was inaugurated in 2008. Orkla’s custom- er box is frequently used for small group meetings, customer visits and courses, and as a meeting place be- fore and during performances. The Before Christmas, Orkla donated NOK 2 million to the Salvation Army, represented by Commander Carl Lydholm. building has been awarded the covet- The gift was presented by Ellen Ronæss, sponsorship ed architectural prize World Cultural manager, and Ole Kristian Lunde, SVP Corporate Building of the Year. Communications. Photo: Frelsesarmeen/Carina Eide Øyan. • The Oslo Center for Peace and ­Human Rights Orkla is one of ten companies that On this basis, the following agree- are helping to finance the centre’s op- ments were continued or initiated in erating costs in the period 2006-2010. 2008: The centre works at government level and through contacts and dialogue. • SOS Children’s Villages • Donation to the Salvation Army In addition to regular support, Orkla In autumn 2008 Orkla decided to do- is working on the details of plans to nate NOK 2 million to the Salvation finance the construction of a new Army. Several voluntary organisa- SOS Children’s Village in Asia. tions are expecting the financial crisis • The Nobel Peace Center to have a negative impact, especially As one of the main sponsors, Orkla on contributions from business and contributes to attractive events at this industry. The Salvation Army is one exciting peace centre. of many organisations that are totally dependent on donations, large and

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 31 Environment

Changes in the structure of the Orkla Group in recent years have resulted in significant changes in Orkla’s total consumption of raw materials and energy, and in emissions. It is important to have ambitious, realistic environmental targets that are adapted to the various businesses. Here: the Borregaard factories in Sarpsborg. Photo: Jarl Morten Andersen

Orkla has been working Orkla operates in many different areas ­expectations of employees, customers, and its businesses impact on the envi- consumers and society at large. systematically on environ- ronment to differing degrees. Changes mental issues for many in the structure of the Orkla Group and In several cities and urban areas, Ork- in the size, composition and factory la’s factories are major employers gen- years, among other things by structure of its business areas in recent erating a high level of activity, which developing energy-efficient years have resulted in major changes in poses many challenges for the local production processes and Orkla’s total consumption of raw materi- community. The consequences of Ork- als and energy, and its emissions. It is la’s industrial activities include substan- reducing emissions. There important to have ambitious, realistic tial energy consumption and emissions has also been strong empha- environmental targets that are adapted and discharges to the environment, as to the various businesses. In the same well as transport activities both inside sis on economising on the way as for work on corporate responsi- and outside the factory site. Orkla’s fo- consumption of raw materi- bility in general, responsibility for the cus on continuous improvement entails environment is decentralised and rests control and reduced emissions, and im- als, water and energy and with the individual companies. provement activities are based on “the preventing environmental best available technology” and achieva- Environmental activities are largely ble emission and discharge levels. damage. based on the guidelines in the ISO 14000 international environmental Emissions to air from Orkla factories management standard, and several Ork- are mainly caused by the use of fossil la companies are certified according to materials for energy production and as this standard. National legislation and raw materials in the electro-chemical local requirements shall be complied production of metals, i.e. emissions of with, and Orkla companies work hard the greenhouse gases SO2 and NOx. to meet the growing environmental Orkla’s focus on process improvements

32 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 Husk punktum i y-akse!

TOTAL CO2 EMISSIONS FOR ORKLA ASA 2004-08 Gul, Brands

5,000,000 Orange, finans invest 4,000,000

3,000,000 Rød, Jotun REC

2,000,000 Mørkrød, Alumin.solu

1,000,000 Lysgrønn, Materials, Borregaard, Elkem Tonne CO2 04 05 06 07 08 Emissions from process 80 % sort District heating Electricity Natural Gas Propane Heavy oil 30 % sort, stroke Oil

20 % sort, fill

Mørk grønn ALLOCATION OF CO2 EMISSIONS FOR ORKLA ASA 2008 Orkla companies are making active efforts to reduce and control discharges to water or sewage systems and surveillance programmes have been established to monitor and control pollution.

Electricity 29.2 % Coke 1.2 % Grønn and the right choice of raw materials resources and environmental impact. Natural Gas 52.0 % District heating 0.9 % has resulted in a significant reduction However, reducing the amount of pack- Husk punktum i in emissions over time. There is also fo- aging per product is a challenge be- Propane 0.9 % y-aksen! cus on noise and odours from produc- cause, for marketing reasons, it has be- Heavy oil 10.4 % tion and transport activities. come more common to have smaller Emissions from Oil 1.8 % process 40.5 % quantities of product in each package. Active efforts are also being made to re- Gul, Brands duce and control discharges to water It is important for Orkla to take respon- and sewage systems, and surveillance sibility for limiting environmental im- Further information about Orkla’s environmental efforts and activities, and results for 2008 may programmes have been established to pacts throughout the value chain. We be found in the EHS report for 2008: Orange, finans invest monitor and control pollution. therefore carry out life cycle analyses to www.orkla.com/EHS/2008 show the impact of various products Efforts to reduce and sort waste have and production methods on the envi- Rød, Jotun REC had priority for several years, and most ronment and the climate. factories have invested in waste man- Mørkrød, Alumin.solu agement centres or sorting systems Orkla analyses its impact on the cli- (containers) to rationalise these efforts. mate and has plans to introduce fur- ther climate measures. The measures Lysgrønn, Materials, Orkla Brands companies aim to find that have been implemented so far Borregaard, Elkem the best possible packaging solutions have resulted in a reduction in total and therefore use a variety of materials greenhouse gas emissions from Orkla’s 80 % sort to package their products. Work on de- production plants over time. The cli- veloping optimum packaging solutions mate accounts are based on the inter- is being intensified.T he goal is for national Greenhouse Gas Protocol Ini- 30 % sort, stroke packaging to adequately protect the tiative (GHG Protocol). product with the lowest possible use of 20 % sort, fill Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 33

Mørk grønn

Grønn Financial investments

Every securities business is dependent on the trust of its customers and investors for its success. Orkla Finans operates on the basis of internal procedures and rules that aim to promote confidence in the company as a supplier of financial products and services.Photo: Jan Lillehamre/Cox

Orkla has been actively engaged in profitable investment management for more than half a century, investing prima- rily in Nordic shares and real estate. In recent years, Orkla Financial Investments has, on average, managed shares and securities worth in the order of NOK 15-20 billion. In 2008 the turbulence on the financial markets led to a significant decline in the value of assets under management, although this decline was less than for comparable indices.

34 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 Orkla Financial Investments is man- Orkla has therefore chosen to apply business is dependent on the trust of dated to identify and invest in value- the same rules. This means that if a its customers and investors for its suc- creating assets, mainly in the form of company is excluded from the Pension cess. Orkla Finans operates on the ba- shares and real estate. This business Fund, it will also be an inappropriate sis of internal procedures and rules area also helps to identify industrial investment for Orkla. that aim to promote confidence in the options for the Group. company as a supplier of financial In addition to the share portfolio, Ork- products and services at all times. Orkla’s Share Portfolio reflects the la Financial Investments consists of Group’s consistently responsible ap- the companies Orkla Eiendom and Competence is one of Orkla Finans’ proach to its investment activities. Orkla Finans. Orkla Eiendom is en- fundamental values. The Orkla Fi- Over time, Orkla has chosen to pursue gaged in real estate development, nance Academy, which offers a com- an investment practice similar to that while Orkla Finans offers investment prehensive two-year human resource of the Norwegian Government Pension services to institutional and private in- development programme, has been es- Fund – Global. The Government Pen- vestors. tablished to ensure that employees are sion Fund – Global devotes substantial suitably qualified. resources to further developing its eth- The financial sector has faced extreme- ical investment guidelines and assess- ly difficult challenges in the past year. es relevant companies from an ethical One of the effects of the crisis is gener- point of view on an ongoing basis. The ally weaker confidence in some parts fund has thereby developed a great of the financial sector. deal of expertise in this area, while its practice relating to socially responsible Confidence is a prerequisite for the investment (SRI) is public knowledge achievement of Orkla’s goal of long- and publicly available. term value creation. Every securities

Main shareholdings 31.12.2008 Share of Equity Fair value Security portfolio interest (NOK million) Systems 5 % 15.5 % 557 Hennes & Mauritz B 4 % 0.2 % 483 Rieber & Søn 4 % 15.6 % 435 Nokia A 3 % 0.1 % 337 Network Norway 2 % 26.2 % 282 Industri Kapital 2000 2 % 3.6 % 279 Industri Kapital 2004 2 % 5.0 % 273 Elekta B 2 % 4.2 % 268 AstraZeneca 2 % 0.1 % 257 Amer Sports 2 % 6.6 % 252 Total 30 % 3,423

Structure of Share Portfolio as of 31.12. Largest transactions 2008 NOK million 2008 2007 Net sales Net purchases Norwegian listed shares 32 % 40 % Fast Search & Transfer Nokia Foreign listed shares 45 % 45 % StatoilHydro Network Norway Norwegian unlisted shares 10 % 5 % Ericsson B Enter Select Foreign unlisted shares 13 % 10 % Awilco Offshore Enter Sverige Pride International Total market value NOK 11,426 million Aker Yards Tandberg

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 35 The UN Global Compact

Orkla has been supporting the Global Compact and the guidelines enshrined in this UN initiative since 2005. Almost 5,000 companies all over the world have joined the Global Compact since it was launched in 2000.

Orkla uses the Global Compact actively Principle 5: in its efforts to promote the right atti- We work to eliminate all forms of child tudes, in its internal and external com- labour. munications, and in contacts with its Page 2-3, 17-21, 26, 35* business partners. Principle 6: Participation in the Global Compact is a We will not discriminate in respect of commitment, and regular reporting is employment and recruitment. an important way of showing the re- Page 8, 12-13 sults of Orkla’s efforts over time. The summary below shows where more in- formation may be found on our efforts Environment to comply with the ten principles for sustainable development in recent Principle 7: years. See also the information on We will apply the “precautionary” ­Orkla’s corporate responsibility on our principle in all issues related to the ­website at www.orkla.com/cr. ­environment. Page 2-3, 32-33 and page 2-4 of the EHS Report Human rights Principle 8: Principle 1: We will promote initiatives to assume We will support and respect interna- greater environmental responsibility. tionally proclaimed human rights. Page 2-3, 32-33 and our EHS Report Page 1-3, 17-21, 26, 35 Principle 9: Principle 2: We will encourage the development We will ensure that the company is not and diffusion of environmentally complicit in human rights abuses. friendly technologies. Page 1-3, 17-21, 26, 35 Page 32-33 and our EHS Report

Labour standards Anti-corruption

Principle 3: Principle 10: We uphold the freedom of association We will work against corruption in all its and the right to collective bargaining. forms, including extortion and bribery. Page 2-3, 17-21, 26, 35 Page 1-3, 8-9, 17-21, 35*

Principle 4: We work to eliminate all forms of forced and compulsory labour. Page 2-3, 17-21, 26, 35*

* Orkla’s support for the Global Compact is reflected in many of our governing principles. More information can be found in the Annual report and under the theme Corporate Responsibility (CR) on our website. 36 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 GRI index

Orkla reports its results in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) guidelines. GRI provides a framework for reporting our economic, envi- ronmental and social impact according­ to a tripple bottom line approach, and gives an internationally accepted framework for sustainability reporting. We wish, however, to emphasise that the initiative’s reach is quite extensive in some areas and designed for companies with a less complicated structure than Orkla’s. In accordance with GRI’s own recommendations we have therefore chosen to focus on the most important themes in this report. Further information can however be found on our website.

Indicator Summary WHERE

Strategy and analysis: 1.1 Statement from the CEO 1 1.2* Impacts, risks and opportunities Several/several/several

Organisational profile: 2.1 Name of reporting organisation Cover 2.2 Primary brands, products and/or services Cover, Cover 2.3 Operational structure Cover, 124-127 2.4 Location of headquarters 124 2.5 Countries located Cover, Cover 2.6 Nature of ownership 22-25, 84-85 2.7 Nature of markets served Cover, 38-39,44 2.8 Scale of the reporting organisation Cover, 2 2.9 Significant organisational changes during the reporting period 8-10 2.10 Awards received 25

Report scope: 3.1 Reporting period 2 3.2 Previous report Cover 3.3 Reporting cycle 41 3.4 Contact information regarding the report 41 3.5 Process for defining report content 41 3.6 Boundary of the report 2 3.7 Limitations of scope 2, 41 3.8 Basis for reporting on joint ventures and subsidiaries Several, several 3.9 Data measurement techniques 2-5, 41 3.10 Re-statements of information (from previous reporting) N/A 3.11 Changes from previous reporting periods in scope, boundary or measurement methods N/A 3.12 GRI indeks 37-40 3.13 Independent assurance report 41

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 37 GRI index

Indicator Summary WHERE

Structure and governance: 4.1 Governance structure 22-25, 89-93 4.2 Role of the Chairman of the Board 22-23, 128 4.3 Number of independent board members 22-23, 128 4.4 Shareholders’ and employees’ communication with the highest governance body 8-11, 22-25, 89-93 4.5 Linkage between compensation for managers and the organisation’s performance 22-23, 44-45, 69-70 4.6 Processes regarding conflicts of interest (1), Codes of Conduct 4.7 Board members’ involvement on economic, social and environmental topics 3,22 4.8 Code of ethics and other CSR-related policies and guidelines Several, 94 4.9 Procedures for the Board’s assessment of management of economic, environmental and social performance (1) 4.10 Evaluation of the Board’s performance regarding economic, environmental and social performance (1) 4.11 Approach to the precautionary principle 2, 32-33, 78-81, 4-5 4.12 Commitments to externally developed economic, environmental and social charters, principles or initiatives Several, Cover 4.13 Main memberships 12-21 4.14 List of stakeholders 2-5 4.15 Selection of stakeholders to engage with 4-5 4.16 Approach to stakeholder consultation 4-5, several 4.17 Information generated from stakeholder consultation 4-5, several

Economic performance indicators: EC1 Economic value generated and distributed 27, 28 EC2 Financial implications due to climate change Several, several EC3 Coverage of the organisation’s defined benefit plan obligations 13, 45-46 EC4 Significant financial assistance received from government - EC6 Spending on locally-based suppliers 17-21 EC7 Procedures for local hiring and proportion of senior management hired from the local community 120-121 EC8 Infrastructure investments and services provided primarily for public benefit 26-31

Environmental performance indicators: EN1 Materials used Several (2) EN2 Percentage of materials used that are recycled input materials Several (2) EN3 Energy use 11 EN4-6 Energy use (2) EN8 Total water withdrawal Several (2) EN11-15 Biodiversity: habitats and impacts EN16 Greenhouse gas emissions, reduction measures 12-13 EN17 Greenhouse gas emissions, others 12-13 EN19 Ozone-depleting substances emissions (2) EN20 NOx, SOx, and other significant air emissions Several (2) EN21 Total water discharge Several (2) EN22 Total weight of waste by type and disposal method Several (2) EN23 Significant spills (2) EN26 Initiatives to mitigate environmental impacts of products and services Several EN27 Percentage of products sold that are reclaimed EN28 Fines and non-monetary sanctions

38 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 Indicator Summary WHERE

Social performance indicators: Labour practices and decent work: LA1 Total workforce by employment type, employment contract, and region/country Cover LA2 Employee turnover 9-10, 44 LA4 Employees covered by collective bargaining agreements - LA5 Minimum notice period(s) regarding significant operational changes (1) LA7 Rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days and absenteeism 6-8, 14-15 LA8 Serious diseases: education and prevention - LA10 Training 10-11 LA13 Governance bodies and employees; indicators of diversity 9-10, 18 LA14 Ratio of basic salary of men to women -

Human rights: HR1 Human rights screening; investments 17-21, 35 HR2 Human rights screening; suppliers and contractors 17-21 HR4 Discrimination; incidents and actions taken - HR5 Freedom of association and collective bargaining - HR6 Child labour; risks and environmental measures - HR7 Forced or compulsory labour; risks and environmental measures -

Society: SO1 Impacts of operations on communities 26-31 SO2 Corruption; analysis of risk 8-9, 17-20, 35 SO3 Corruption; training in organisation’s anti-corruption policies and procedures 8-9 SO4 Corruption; incidents and actions taken - SO5 Public policy positions and lobbying 29 SO8 Fines and non-monetary sanctions -

Product responsibility: PR1 Health and safety impacts of products and services 12-16, several PR3 Information requirements 12-16 PR6 Programs for adherence to laws, standards, and voluntary codes related to marketing communications 12-16, 30 PR9 Fines -

Orkla Sustainability Report 2008 39 GRI index

Indicator Summary WHERE

Management Approach (3): Economical See Orkla’s Mission Statement and Goals and Values on our website. Additional information in the description of corporate governance in the Annual and sustainability report, and pg. 78-93 in the Annual Report. Environment See Orkla’s Environmental Policy on the web, as well as in the EHS Report, pg. 2-4, 11 og 14. Labour Practices See Letter from the CEO, Codes of Conduct and pg. 2-4 in the EHS Report. Human Rights See Letter from the CEO, communication on progress to the Global Compact and pg. 17-21 in the Sustainability Report. Society See Letter from the CEO, Shareholder and Orkla and Society in the Sustainability report, Global Compact references and Codes of Conduct. Product Responsibility See Letter from the CEO, the Suppliers chapter, pg. 2-4 in the EHS Report and our Codes of Conduct.

*Green indicates the Sustainability Report, Blue the Annual Report and Red the EHS Report. Page numbers refer to rele- vant information irrespective as to whether this information is partially or completely covered in accordance with GRI’s criteria. ’-’ indicates that the subject either is not covered in the report or that it is not relevant for Orkla

(1) - Complete information on these subjects is to be found under Investor Relations and Corporate Governance on Orkla’s website. (2) - Orkla’s EHS Report is composed such that the business areas and environmental impact are presented separately. This gives the reader a good overview, but it becomes confusing to provide page references to the GRI indicators for each of Orkla’s business areas. Relevant indicators are described for Orkla Brands on pages 16 to 31, for Orkla Materials on pages 32 and 39, and for Orkla Aluminum Solutions on pages 40 to 43. (3) - Further information about Orklas Management Principles is available in our Codes of Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Policy, on www.orkla.com

40 Orkla Sustainability Report 2008

Information about this report

Orkla reports on the Group’s ac- The information contained in Orkla’s Sustainability Editors: tivities with respect to corpo- Report is based on inputs from many different Ole Kristian Lunde (SVP Corporate Communica- units and sources of data. There has been strong tions and CR, Orkla ASA) and Jørgen Hanson rate social responsibility on an emphasis on ensuring that this information is cor- ­(Consultant, Vipe AS) annual basis and the publica- rect. However, the report does not aim to cover all the detailed matters that may be important for in- Contributors (text): tion date is the same as for dividual local businesses, activities or products. To Ellen Behrens, Håkon Mageli, Kari Westersund, Orkla’s other reports. In 2009, be able to further develop and improve our work Terje Solbakken (Orkla Brands), Gabriella Ekelund the Annual Report, the EHS Re- on sustainability and corporate responsibility and and Eva Ekselius (Sapa), Johan Hovland and Betzy our reporting routines, we welcome comments and Thangstad (Elkem), Dag Arthur Aasbø and Tone port and the Sustainability Re- inputs from you. Horvei Bredal (Borregaard), Roar Engeland, Bjørn port were published on 2 April. Slåtto and Mette Lindbæk (Orkla Financial Invest- The next report will be pub- The thematic approach and the treatment and se- ments), Hilde Myrberg, Geir Aarseth, Natalia Ma- lection of information are based on the GRI princi- thisen, Pål Eikeland, Per Røhnebæk, Ellen W. lished at the same time in ples. The content of the report has not been evalu- Ronæss and Anja Y. Sulen (Orkla ASA). 2010. ated by a third party. Design: Comments may be sent to [email protected] Cox Oslo

The contact person for this report is: Web-production: Ellen Behrens (Vice President, Corporate Odin media as ­Responsibility, Orkla ASA). Technical web solution: Ergogroup ASA

Contact details

Orkla ASA Orkla Brands Orkla Aluminium Solutions Orkla Materials Borregaard Ole Kristian Lunde Kari Westersund Sapa Elkem AS Dag Arthur Aasbø Gabriella Ekelund Inger Johanne Eikeland P. O. Box 423 Skøyen P. O. Box 711 P. O. Box 162 NO-0213 Oslo NO-1411 Kolbotn Humlegårdsgatan 17 P. O. Box 5211 Majorstuen NO-1701 Sarpsborg Tel: + 47 22 54 40 00 Tel: + 47 66 81 61 00 Box 5505 NO- 0303 Oslo Tel: + 47 69 11 80 00 Fax: + 47 22 54 45 90 Fax: + 47 66 80 63 78 SE -114 85 Stockholm Tel: + 47 22 45 01 00 Fax: + 47 69 11 88 01 E-mail: kari.westersund@­ SWEDEN Fax: + 47 22 45 04 95 E-mail: dag.arthur.aasbo@ orklabrands.no Tel: +46 84 59 59 00 E-mail: inger-johanne.eike- borregaard.com Fax: +46 84 59 59 50 [email protected] Mob: +46-70-9530853 E-mail: gabriella.ekelund@ sapagroup.com

Main sponsor of: Sponsor of: Copyright notice The content of this annual report is copyright protected material. The content may be freely distributed, reproduced and electronically stored. This consent is given on the condition that the source of the material is correctly cited. © 2009 Orkla ASA Orkla ASA D esign and production: Cox D esign, Oslo.R K Grafisk A Print: P.O. Box 423 Skøyen NO-0213 Oslo, Norway Tel: +47 22 54 40 00 Fax: +47 22 54 44 90 Enterprise number: NO 910 747 711

Office address: Karenslyst allé 6 NO-0278 Oslo, Norway www.orkla.no S [email protected]

In addition to the Annual Report Orkla also publishes an EHS Report and a Sustainability Report. These are available at www.orkla.com/cr