Cyclommatus, and List of the Described Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cyclommatus, and List of the Described Species CYCLOMMATUS FREY-GESSNERI. 1 NOTE I. Description of a new species of the Lucanoid genus Cyclommatus, and list of the described species BY C. Ritsema+Cz. Cycl ommatus - Frey Gessneri, n. sp. ¹). This species is allied to Cyclommatus canaliculatus Rits. from Nias Mus. (Notes Leyd. XIII, p. 235) on account of the of the notch the presence on outer upper margin of the mandibles at some distance from the tip. It differs from canaliculatus by the want of the distinct groove along the middle of the pronotum. of the forma Length major 40 mm., breadth at the 3 shoulders 8 mm. — Rather head and /4 pale castaneous, thorax with slightly darker than the elytra, aeneous tints; the margins of the mandibles, of the thorax and of the elytra (the basal margin excepted) bronze black; the tarsi, the teeth of the mandibles and the of apical scape the antennae glossy black, the flagellum (with the exception of the three apical joints of the club) glossy brownish red; the upper side of the femora pale yellowish brown. The insect is rather densely covered with whitish scales; 1) Ihis species will be the Dehaani of Bur- perhaps prove to Cyclommatus meister which is perfectly distinct from Westwood's Dehaani of which I have examined the type-specimen preserved in the late Melly's collection in the Natural History Museum at Geneva. The latter species is not notched on the outer of upper margin the mandibles at some distance from the tip. •Notes from the Leyden Museum, Vol. XIV. I 2 CYCLOMMATUS FREY-GESSNERI. these scales are roundish on the head and pronotum, narrow on the elytra. The mandibles are as long as the distance between the of the head in front of the front-margin eyes and the base of the abdomen; their outer is margin regularly convex from the base the to apex, their inner margin armed at one of their with length a strong tooth; the ante-apical tooth is not truncated, and between it and the tip of the mandible three teeth are present. On the apical third of the mandibles the outer upper margin rises slowly, but opposite the front- of the margin ante-apical tooth this raised margin ends to suddenly so as form here a small tooth-like projection. The mandibles and are opaque covered with scale-bearing punctures which disappear, however, towards the end where the mandibles are glossy. The side of the head shows upper a large flattened depres- sion, the margins of which are only raised in front of the the the cheeks eyes; sculpture on is slightly coarser than that on the disk. The front-margin of the head between the of outer margin the mandibles is broadly emargiuate, the middle of the portion emargination nearly straight; at this margin the head sinks perpendicularly down towards is the clypeus which declivous and broadly truncate and has its front-margin faintly or more distinctly ') bisinuate. The sides of the prothorax are angular about the middle; the is front-margin accompanied laterally by an indistinct and the surface is impression, densely covered with a scale- bearing punctuation; a faintly impressed line runs along the middle of the pronotum. r lhe are covered elytra with a fine but verv distinct scale-bearing punctuation, and each of them shows two indistinct costae. The intercoxal part of the is presternum couically por- The fore-tibiae rected. are unarmed and nearly straight. Two male specimens of equal development and both from This latter is the in the 1) case male specimen of the Museum at Geneva. Motes from tlie Leyden Museum, Vol. XIV. CYCLOMMATUS FREY-GESSNERI. 3 Java. One of them belongs to the Leyden- the other to the Geneva The latter Museum. specimen has been com- municated with to me, together the type of Cyclommatus Dehaani Westw., by the able Conservator of the named Museum, Mr. E. Frey-Gessner, and I have much pleasure in naming this new species after that gentleman. LIST OP SPECIES ¹). afllnis Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1864, — id. 40; — p. 1870, p. 109; id. 1875, p. 12. Borneo, [Philippi- (This is in my opinion a mere syno- nes *)]. of nyra Dehaani Westw.). canaliculars Rits. Notes Leyd. Mus. XIII, 235. Nias. 1891, p. Deliaani Westw. Ann. a. Mag. Nat. Hist. 124 3 Borneo. VIII, 1842, p. ). Westw. Cab. Orient. Entom. 2 1848, p. 21; pi. 10, f. (sub rangifer Schonh.). „ Thorns. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 397. 1862, p. [Java]. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1864, — id. p. 84; 1870, p. 109; — id. 12. 1875, p. (I believe affinis Parry to belong to this species), elaphus Gestro. Ann. Mus. Genova, XVI, 1881, p. 309, Jig. Sumatra. 1) I have it thought of interest to indicate in this list the localities of the species like they are recorded by the various authors, much confusion existing in this regard. The incorrect localities are in brackets. 2 The ) specimen from the Philippines in the British Museum, alluded to "y Major no doubt will to Parry, prove belong to Cyclommatus Zuberi Waterh. Published 3) in October 184.1. Notes from the Leyden Museum, "Vol XIV. 4 LIST OF THE CYCLOMMATUS-SPECIES. faunicolor Hope. Proc. Ent. Soc. 1844, 1 106. I p. ) Westw. Trans. Ent. Soc. Lon- don, IV, 1847, p. 273; pi. 20, /. 1. Java? Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1864, 84. p. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1870, — id. 1875, 12. Java, p. 109; p. [Nias]. Rit anted 1. Java. Frey-Gfßssneri s. p. ? Dehaani Burm. [nee Westwood), Handb. d. Ent. 375. Borneo, V, 1847, p. Soc. insignis Parry. Proc. Ent. 1862, — id. Cat. Col. Lucan. p. Ill; 41. Oriente. 1864, p. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1864, 84. or.? p. Archipel Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1870, and 12. Borneo. p. 109, 1875, p. Kaupi H. Deyr. Ann. Soc. Ent. Beige, 2. 2 IX, 1865, p. 30; pi. 2, /. [Celebes )]. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1870, 59 and and pp. 109, 1875, 12. Batchian]. p. [Celebes, Gestro. Ann. Mus. Genova XYI, , 1881, p. 310, fig. (without synonym). Nov. Guinea. Maitlandi Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 4. Nias. 1864, p. 40; pi. 12, /. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1870, 86 and 109. Nias, pp. [Java]. (I believe Maitlandi Parry to be specifically distinct fromfaunicolor Hope). I have been able the of the 1814. 1) not to compare Proceedings year in 2) This locality is given by mistake in stead of New Guinea (see: Gestro Ann. Mus. Genova, XVI, 1881, p. 311). Notes from the Leyden Museum, "Vol. XIV. LIST OF THE CYCLOMMATUS-SPECIES. 5 Margaritae Gestro. Ann. Mus. Genova, IX, 1877, p. 324, fig. ; — id. 1881, XVI, p. 310, fig. Fly river. (Margaritae Gestro and Kaupi Deyr. are said to be distinct species), inetallifor Boisd. Voy. Astrolabe. Fn. Ent. 1835, p. 236; pi 6, /. 20. Menado. H. Ann. Deyr. Soc. Ent. Beige, IX, 1865, p. 30; pi. 2, f, 1. Celebes. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1864, pp. 39 84 a. ( (aeneomicans Parry). Batchian. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1870, 109, and 12. p. 1875, p. Batchian, Celebes. Oestro, Ann. Mus. Genova , XYI, 310. 1881, p. Menado. Mniszcchi Thorns. Rev. Zool. (2) VIII, 1856, 526. p. [Borneo]. Thorns. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 397. 1862, p. Shanghai. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1864, — id. p. 84; 1870, p. 109; - id. 12. 1875, p. China. Pastenri R i t s. Notes Leyd. Mus. XIII, 1891, p. 233; pi. 10, f. 1. Sumatra, strigiceps W e s t w. Cab. Orient. Entom. 1848, p. 18; pi. 8, /. 5. Himalaya, var. multidentatus Westw. I.e.p. 17; pl. 8, f. 3. India or. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1864, — id. p. 84; 1870, p. 109; -id. 12. 1875, p. „ „ arandns T h u n b. Mém. Moscou. I , 190 1. 1806, p. j pi, 12, f. India or. Burm. Handb. d. Entom. V, 374. 1847, p. India, rhoms. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 397 and 1862, pp. 421. Borneo. Notes from the Leyden Museum, "Vol. XXV. 6 LIST OF THE CYCLOMMATUS-SPECIES. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1864, — id. 1870, p. 84; p. 109; — id. 12. Borneo. 1875, p. H. Deyr. Pet. Nouv. Entom. 1870, 87. II, p. Oestro. Ann. Mus. Genova XYI, , 309. 1881, p. x Schönh. Ins. 1 3 rangifer ) Syn. , , 322. India or. 1817, p. Zuberi Waterh. Ent. Mo. Mag. XII, 173. Mindoro. 1876, p. Parry. Cat. Col. Lucan. 1875, 12. p. recorded 0 b s. The specimens from Palembang and Deli, in List of Sumatran Lucanidae Mus. my (Notes Leyd. XI, under the of p. 233) name Cyclommatus faunicolor (Hope) Westw., do not belong to that species but to Cyclommatus Dehaani Westw. to As the Lucanoid fauna of Nias, a recent consignment of Nias-beetles received from Mr. Pasteur, contained three species which were not yet recorded from that island, viz. Metopodontus occipitalis Hope, Eurytrachelus purpurascens Voll. and Gnaphaloryx taurus Fabr. (see also Notes Leyd. Mus. XIII, p. 238). Leyden Museum, October 1891. 1) This name was proposed by Schonherr to substitute tarandus Thtinb., the Latter name having already been used by Swederus fora Lucanus. Both species, to distinct viz. and however, belong genera, Mesotopus Cyclommatus. Notes from the Leyden Museum, Vol. XIV..
Recommended publications
  • The Early Evolution of Biting–Chewing Performance in Hexapoda
    Chapter 6 The Early Evolution of Biting–Chewing Performance in Hexapoda Alexander Blanke Abstract Insects show a plethora of different mandible shapes. It was advocated that these mandible shapes are mainly a function of different feeding habits. This hypothesis was tested on a larger sampling of non-holometabolan biting–chewing insects with additional tests to understand the interplay of mandible function, feeding guild, and phylogeny. The results show that at the studied systematic level, variation in mandible biting–chewing effectivity is regulated to a large extent by phylogenetic history and the configuration of the mandible joints rather than the food preference of a given taxon. Additionally, lineages with multiple mandibular joints such as primary wingless hexapods show a wider functional space occupation of mandibular effectivity than dicondylic insects (¼ silverfish + winged insects) at significantly different evolutionary rates. The evolution and occupation of a compa- rably narrow functional performance space of dicondylic insects is surprising given the low effectivity values of this food uptake solution. Possible reasons for this relative evolutionary “stasis” are discussed. 6.1 Introduction Insecta sensu lato (¼ Hexapoda) display a high diversity of mouthpart shapes within the early evolved lineages which started to radiate approximately 479 million years ago (Misof et al. 2014). These shape changes were described qualitatively and were often stated to relate mainly to the type of food consumed (Yuasa 1920; Isely 1944; Evans and Forsythe 1985; Chapman and de Boer 1995). To the knowledge of the author, this and related statements regarding mouthpart mechanics being shaped by functional demands have never been tested in a quantitative framework.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Animal Weapons
    The Evolution of Animal Weapons Douglas J. Emlen Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008. 39:387-413 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on animal diversity, sexual selection, male competition, horns, antlers, tusks September 2, 2008 The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Abstract Systematics is online at ecolsys.annualreviews.org Males in many species invest substantially in structures that are used in com- This article's doi: bat with rivals over access to females. These weapons can attain extreme 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173 502 proportions and have diversified in form repeatedly. I review empirical lit- Copyright © 2008 by Annual Reviews. erature on the function and evolution of sexually selected weapons to clarify All rights reserved important unanswered questions for future research. Despite their many 1543-592X/08/1201-0387$20.00 shapes and sizes, and the multitude of habitats within which they function, animal weapons share many properties: They evolve when males are able to defend spatially restricted critical resources, they are typically the most variable morphological structures of these species, and this variation hon- estly reflects among-individual differences in body size or quality. What is not clear is how, or why, these weapons diverge in form. The potential for male competition to drive rapid divergence in weapon morphology remains one of the most exciting and understudied topics in sexual selection research today. 3*7 INTRODUCTION Sexual selection is credited with the evolution of nature's most extravagant structures, and these include showy male adornments that are attractive to females (ornaments) and an arsenal of outgrowths that function in male-male combat (weapons) (Darwin 1871).
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD LIST of EDIBLE INSECTS 2015 (Yde Jongema) WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY PAGE 1
    WORLD LIST OF EDIBLE INSECTS 2015 (Yde Jongema) WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY PAGE 1 Genus Species Family Order Common names Faunar Distribution & References Remarks life Epeira syn nigra Vinson Nephilidae Araneae Afregion Madagascar (Decary, 1937) Nephilia inaurata stages (Walck.) Nephila inaurata (Walckenaer) Nephilidae Araneae Afr Madagascar (Decary, 1937) Epeira nigra Vinson syn Nephila madagscariensis Vinson Nephilidae Araneae Afr Madagascar (Decary, 1937) Araneae gen. Araneae Afr South Africa Gambia (Bodenheimer 1951) Bostrichidae gen. Bostrichidae Col Afr Congo (DeFoliart 2002) larva Chrysobothris fatalis Harold Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) larva Lampetis wellmani (Kerremans) Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) syn Psiloptera larva wellmani Lampetis sp. Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Togo (Tchibozo 2015) as Psiloptera in Tchibozo but this is Neotropical Psiloptera syn wellmani Kerremans Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) Psiloptera is larva Neotropicalsee Lampetis wellmani (Kerremans) Steraspis amplipennis (Fahr.) Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) larva Sternocera castanea (Olivier) Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Benin (Riggi et al 2013) Burkina Faso (Tchinbozo 2015) Sternocera feldspathica White Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) adult Sternocera funebris Boheman syn Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Zimbabwe (Chavanduka, 1976; Gelfand, 1971) see S. orissa adult Sternocera interrupta (Olivier) Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Benin (Riggi et al 2013) Cameroun (Seignobos et al., 1996) Burkina Faso (Tchimbozo 2015) Sternocera orissa Buquet Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Botswana (Nonaka, 1996), South Africa (Bodenheimer, 1951; syn S. funebris adult Quin, 1959), Zimbabwe (Chavanduka, 1976; Gelfand, 1971; Dube et al 2013) Scarites sp. Carabidae Col ground beetle Afr Angola (Bergier, 1941), Madagascar (Decary, 1937) larva Acanthophorus confinis Laporte de Cast.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Kumbang Dewasa
    Keanekaragaman KUMBANG STAG (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) di Pulau Jawa Woro Anggraitoningsih Noerdjito i Dilarang mereproduksi atau memperbanyak seluruh atau sebagian dari buku ini dalam bentuk atau cara apa pun tanpa izin tertulis dari penerbit. © Hak cipta dilindungi oleh Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 All Rights Reserved ii Keanekaragaman KUMBANG STAG (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) di Pulau Jawa Woro Anggraitoningsih Noerdjito LIPI Press iii © 2016 Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia Pusat Penelitian Biologi Katalog dalam terbitan Keanekaragaman Kumbang Stag (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) di Pulau Jawa/Woro Anggraitoningsih Noerdjito – Jakarta: LIPI Press, 2016. xxiv+148; 14,8 x 21 cm. ISBN 978-979-799-856-1 1. Keanekaragaman 2. Kumbang stag 595.764 9 Copy editor : M. Sidik Nugraha dan Sonny Heru Kusuma Proofreader : Sarwendah Puspita Dewi dan Fadly Suhendra Penata Isi : Erna Rumbiati, Prapti Sasiwi, dan Rahma Hilma Taslima Desainer sampul : Rusli Fazi Cetakan pertama : November 2016 Diterbitkan oleh: LIPI Press, anggota Ikapi Jln. Gondangdia Lama 39, Menteng, Jakarta 10350 Telp.: (021) 314 0228, 314 6942. Faks.: (021) 314 4591 E-mail: [email protected] Website: lipipress.lipi.go.id LIPI Press @lipi_press iv DAFTAR ISI DAFTAR GAMBAR .................................................................................vii DAFTAR TABEL ......................................................................................xv PENGANTAR PENERBIT.....................................................................xvii KATA PENGANTAR ...............................................................................xix
    [Show full text]
  • A Multilocus Assessment Reveals Two New Synonymies for East Asian
    ZooKeys 1021: 65–79 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1021.58832 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A multilocus assessment reveals two new synonymies for East Asian Cyclommatus stag beetles (Coleoptera, Lucanidae) Jiao Jiao Yuan1,2, Dan Chen1,2, Xia Wan1,2 1 Department of Ecology, School of Resources and Engineering, Anhui University, 111 Jiulong Rd., Hefei 230601, China 2 Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, Hefei 230601, China Corresponding author: Xia Wan ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Frolov | Received 26 September 2020 | Accepted 31 January 2021 | Published 2 March 2021 http://zoobank.org/23EF341F-3DAF-4D3C-8292-4AE87334E1B9 Citation: Yuan JJ, Chen D, Wan X (2021) A multilocus assessment reveals two new synonymies for East Asian Cyclommatus stag beetles (Coleoptera, Lucanidae). ZooKeys 1021: 65–79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1021.58832 Abstract Cyclommatus scutellaris Möllenkamp, 1912, Cyclommatus elsae Kriesche, 1921 and Cyclommatus tam- daoensis Fujita, 2010 are East Asian stag beetle species with long-debated taxonomic relationships due to high intraspecific morphological variability. In this study, we applied multilocus phylogenetic analyses to reassess their relationships. Two mitochondrial genes (16S rDNA, COI) and two nuclear genes (28S rDNA, Wingless) were used to reconstruct the phylogeny through the Bayesian inference (BI) and Maxi- mum Likelihood (ML) methods. Both topologies supported two clades: the clade C. scutellaris was sister to the clade (C. elsae + C. tamdaoensis) with the subclade C. tamdaoensis embedded in the subclade C. elsae. The Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) genetic distance analysis yielded a low mean value (≤0.035) among the three taxa, which was well below the minimum mean value between other Cyclommatus species (≥0.122).
    [Show full text]
  • Original Research Articlethe Function of Appendage Patterning Genes In
    Developmental Biology 422 (2017) 24–32 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Developmental Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/developmentalbiology Original research article The function of appendage patterning genes in mandible development of MARK the sexually dimorphic stag beetle ⁎ Hiroki Gotoha,b,c, , Robert A. Zinnab, Yuki Ishikawaa,d, Hitoshi Miyakawaa,e, Asano Ishikawaa,f, Yasuhiro Sugimea, Douglas J. Emleng, Laura C. Lavineb, Toru Miuraa a Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan b Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA c Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan d Graduate School of Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan e Faculty of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 321-8505, Japan f Division of Ecological Genetics, Department of Population Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan g Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana-Missoula, MT 59812, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: One of the defining features of the evolutionary success of insects is the morphological diversification of their Appendage patterning appendages, especially mouthparts. Although most insects share a common mouthpart ground plan, there is Exaggerated trait remarkable diversity in the relative size and shapes of these appendages among different insect lineages. One of Stag beetle the most prominent examples of mouthpart modification can be found in the enlargement of mandibles in stag Sexual dimorphism beetles (Coleoptera, Insecta). In order to understand the proximate mechanisms of mouthpart modification, we RNAi investigated the function of appendage-patterning genes in mandibular enlargement during extreme growth of the sexually dimorphic mandibles of the stag beetle Cyclommatus metallifer.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritability of Male Mandible Length in the Stag Beetle Cyclommatus Metallifer
    Title Heritability of male mandible length in the stag beetle Cyclommatus metallifer Author(s) Gotoh, Hiroki; Fukaya, Keiichi; Miura, Toru Entomological Science, 15(4), 430-433 Citation https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8298.2012.00527.x Issue Date 2012-10 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/53417 Rights The definitive version is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com Type article (author version) File Information ES15-4_430-433.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Heritability of male mandible length in the stag beetle, Cyclommatus metallifer Hiroki GOTOH1 , Keiichi FUKAYA2 and Toru MIURA1 1 Laboratory of Ecological Genetics and 2 Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan Correspondence: Toru Miura, Laboratory of Ecological Genetics, Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan. Email: [email protected] 1 Abstract Numerous coleopteran species express male-specific “weapon traits” that often show size variations among males, even within a single population. Many empirical studies have demonstrated that environmental conditions during development affect absolute weapon size. However, relatively few studies in horned beetles support the hypothesis that the relationship between weapon size and body size, also referred to as a “scaling relationship” or “static allometry”, is largely determined by genetic factors. In this study, the heritability of absolute mandible length and static allometry between mandible length and body size were estimated in the stag beetle Cyclommatus metallifer. While no significant heritable variation was observed in absolute mandible length, high heritability (h2 = 0.57 ± 0.25) was detected in the static allometry between mandible length and body size.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaw Morphology and Fighting Forces in Stag Beetles Jana Goyens1,2,*, Joris Dirckx2 and Peter Aerts1,3
    © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2016) 219, 2955-2961 doi:10.1242/jeb.141614 RESEARCH ARTICLE Jaw morphology and fighting forces in stag beetles Jana Goyens1,2,*, Joris Dirckx2 and Peter Aerts1,3 ABSTRACT large and heavy musculature to bite their rivals forcefully. The jaws of different species of stag beetles show a large variety of Concomitantly, species with high bite forces probably needed to shapes and sizes. The male jaws are used as weapons in fights, and evolve a more robust jaw morphology to enable them to take a firm they may exert a very forceful bite in some species. We investigated in grip on rivals and to avoid mechanical failure (Goyens et al., 2015a). 16 species whether and how the forcefulness of their bite is reflected In sexually dimorphic stag beetle species, males with larger jaws in their jaw morphology. We found a large range of maximal muscle have higher mating rates than males with smaller jaws (Harvey and forces (1.8–33 N; factor of 18). Species investing in large bite muscles Gange, 2006; Lagarde et al., 2005; Okada and Hasegawa, 2005; also have disproportionately large jaw volumes. They use this Okada and Miyatake, 2006; Shiokawa and Iwahashi, 2000). Owing additional jaw volume to elongate their jaws, increasing their to their longer jaws, they can reach further forward in aggressive chances of winning in battles. The fact that this also decreases the battles to grab their opponent and to detach him from the substrate mechanical advantage is largely compensated for by elongated in- (Goyens et al., 2015b).
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanics and Bite Forces of the Mandibles in the American Cockroach Periplaneta Americana
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Fast and Powerful: Biomechanics and Bite Forces of the Mandibles in the American Cockroach Periplaneta americana Tom Weihmann1*, Lars Reinhardt2, Kevin Weißing3, Tobias Siebert4, Benjamin Wipfler3* 1 Dept. of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2 Science of Motion, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany, 3 Entomology Group, Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie mit Phyletischem Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany, 4 Institute of Sport and Motion Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany a11111 * [email protected] (TW); [email protected] (BW) Abstract Knowing the functionality and capabilities of masticatory apparatuses is essential for the OPEN ACCESS ecological classification of jawed organisms. Nevertheless insects, especially with their out- Citation: Weihmann T, Reinhardt L, Weißing K, standing high species number providing an overwhelming morphological diversity, are noto- Siebert T, Wipfler B (2015) Fast and Powerful: riously underexplored with respect to maximum bite forces and their dependency on the Biomechanics and Bite Forces of the Mandibles in mandible opening angles. Aiming for a general understanding of insect biting, we examined the American Cockroach Periplaneta americana. the generalist feeding cockroach Periplaneta americana, characterized by its primitive PLoS ONE 10(11): e0141226. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0141226 chewing mouth parts. We measured active isometric bite forces and passive forces caused by joint resistance over the entire mandibular range with a custom-built 2D force transducer. Editor: Wulfila Gronenberg, University of Arizona, UNITED STATES The opening angle of the mandibles was quantified by using a video system. With respect to the effective mechanical advantage of the mandibles and the cross-section areas, we cal- Received: July 18, 2015 culated the forces exerted by the mandible closer muscles and the corresponding muscle Accepted: October 6, 2015 stress values.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost of Flight and the Evolution of Stag Beetle Weaponry Rsif.Royalsocietypublishing.Org Jana Goyens1,2, Sam Van Wassenbergh1,3, Joris Dirckx2 and Peter Aerts1,4
    Cost of flight and the evolution of stag beetle weaponry rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org Jana Goyens1,2, Sam Van Wassenbergh1,3, Joris Dirckx2 and Peter Aerts1,4 1Laboratory of Functional Morphology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium 2Laboratory of Biophysics and BioMedical Physics, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, Research 2020 Antwerp, Belgium 3Department of Biology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Cite this article: Goyens J, Van Wassenbergh 4Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium S, Dirckx J, Aerts P. 2015 Cost of flight and the evolution of stag beetle weaponry. J. R. Soc. Male stag beetles have evolved extremely large mandibles in a wide range of extraordinary shapes. These mandibles function as weaponry in pugnacious Interface 12: 20150222. fights for females. The robust mandibles of Cyclommatus metallifer are as long http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0222 as their own body and their enlarged head houses massive, hypertrophied musculature. Owing to this disproportional weaponry, trade-offs exist with terrestrial locomotion: running is unstable and approximately 40% more costly. Therefore, flying is most probably essential to cover larger dis- Received: 12 March 2015 tances towards females and nesting sites. We hypothesized that weight, size Accepted: 26 March 2015 and shape of the weaponry will affect flight performance. Our compu- tational fluid dynamics simulations of steady-state models (without membrane wings) reveal that male stag beetles must deliver 26% more mechanical work to fly with their heavy weaponry. This extra work is almost entirely required to carry the additional weight of the massive arma- Subject Areas: ture.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Functional Analyses of Sex Determination Genes in the Sexually Dimorphic Stag Beetle Cyclommatus Metallifer
    Gotoh et al. BMC Genomics (2016) 17:250 DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2522-8 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Identification and functional analyses of sex determination genes in the sexually dimorphic stag beetle Cyclommatus metallifer Hiroki Gotoh1,2,4, Robert A. Zinna1, Ian Warren1, Michael DeNieu3, Teruyuki Niimi4,5, Ian Dworkin3,6, Douglas J. Emlen7, Toru Miura2 and Laura C. Lavine1* Abstract Background: Genes in the sex determination pathway are important regulators of sexually dimorphic animal traits, including the elaborate and exaggerated male ornaments and weapons of sexual selection. In this study, we identified and functionally analyzed members of the sex determination gene family in the golden metallic stag beetle Cyclommatus metallifer, which exhibits extreme differences in mandible size between males and females. Results: We constructed a C. metallifer transcriptomic database from larval and prepupal developmental stages and tissues of both males and females. Using Roche 454 pyrosequencing, we generated a de novo assembled database from a total of 1,223,516 raw reads, which resulted in 14,565 isotigs (putative transcript isoforms) contained in 10,794 isogroups (putative identified genes). We queried this database for C. metallifer conserved sex determination genes and identified 14 candidate sex determination pathway genes. We then characterized the roles of several of these genes in development of extreme sexual dimorphic traits in this species. We performed molecular expression analyses with RT-PCR and functional analyses using RNAi on three C. metallifer candidate genes – Sex-lethal (CmSxl), transformer-2 (Cmtra2), and intersex (Cmix). No differences in expression pattern were found between the sexes for any of these three genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles World No. 16, September 2017 Imprint
    Beetles World Journal of biodiversity in Coleoptera No. 16 September 30, 2017 Beetles World No. 16, September 2017 Imprint Beetles World ISSN 1867 - 2892 Covered by Zoological Record Beetles World Is an occasional published journal devoted to taxonomy and to biodiversity of Coleoptera. We offer cooperation on the new description for every taxonomist from all parts of the world. Descriptions and any taxonomical act should be in accordance with the criteria defined by ICZN. Articles must be in English or in another mainly spoken language in science with English abstract. All rights, including reprinting of extracts, electronic or optical reproduction and translation are belonging to the publisher. Editor & Publisher Editorial Board Dr. K.-Dirk Schenk Andreas Kirchner, Neuburg / Donau – Germany Hermann-Löns-Str. 10, Karl Martini, Ingolstadt – Germany D-37287 Wehretal – Germany Frank Fiedler, Grossbreitenbach – Germany e-Mail: [email protected] Pictures & Layout Frank Fiedler, Grossbreitenbach – Germany e-Mail: [email protected] web: http://www.frankfiedler.com Contents K.-D. Schenk Cyclommatus subtilis De Lisle, 1967; a rare taxon from Sumatra (Coleoptera, Lucanidae) K.-D. Schenk Description of the female of Lucanus jibii (Coleoptera Lucanidae) K.-D. Schenk Revision of the Genus Epidorcus Séguy, 1954 (Coleoptera, Lucanidae) K.-D. Schenk Revision of the Genus Kirchnerius Schenk, 2009 (Coleoptera, Lucanidae) L. C. Pardo-Locarno Additions to the distribution of Cantharolethrus luxerii inflexus Boileau and Cantharolethrus steinheili Parry (Coleoptera-Lucanidae) in Colombia Adiciones a la distribución de Cantharolethrus luxerii inflexus Boileau y de Cantharolethrus steinheili Parry (Coleoptera-Lucanidae) en Colombia Cover Cyclommatus subtilis De Lisle, 1967 Beetles World No. 16, September 2017 Cyclommatus subtilis De Lisle, 1967 - A rare taxon from Sumatra (Coleoptera, Lucanidae) Klaus-Dirk Schenk Abstract A big male of Cyclommatus subtilis De Lisle, 1967 from Sumatra Island is figured and compared for the first time to the holotype.
    [Show full text]