Environment Agency Kent Area I Autumn 2000 Floods Review Rea Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environment Agency Kent Area I Autumn 2000 Floods Review Rea Report Environment Agency Kent Area i Autumn 2000 Floods Review rea Report E n v ir o n m e n t Southern Region Ag en c y E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION Guildbourne House. Chatsworth Road, Worthing. West Sussex BN 1 1 1LD Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West Almondsbury Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 www.environment-agency.gov.uk ISBN 1 -85-705668-X © Environment Agency All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior permission of the Environment Agency. Printed on recycled paper Environment Agency Kent Ai XX) Floods Review FOREWORD The dramatic events experienced last winter have deeply affected all those involved. The extent of the flooding and speculation regarding climate change have devastated the confidence of those living in flood risk areas, the effects of which will be felt long after the physical damage has been repaired. We must now work together to face up to the challenge of managing the risk of flooding. To ensure that the Environment Agency delivers the best possible service to our customers, it is essential that we continually review our performance to identify any areas for improvement. This report has been produced to provide an accurate and clear understanding of the events that occurred during the Autumn floods in the Kent Area. Throughout the report issues are raised and recommendations have been made. From the list of recommendations an Action Plan will be produced in order to address the recommendations proposed. The Action Plan will include a detailed programme for introducing the improvements. We expect to produce the Action Plan by August 2001. In the meantime, much is being done to repair the defences damaged over the Autumn and Winter period and to increase the number of people who receive warnings directly from ourselves. Copies of this review are being circulated to interested groups including Local Authorities, Emergency Services, Local MPs and members of the public on request. If you would like further information relating to content of this review, we would welcome your written comments at the address below. Andrew Pearce Kent Area Flood Defence Manager July 2001 Andrew Pearce Kent Area Flood Defence Manager Orchard House Addington Kent ME19 5SH ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 9 0845 933 3111 1 01732 875 057 062142 S [email protected] Version 1.0 Page i 19/08/01 Environment Agency Kent Area Autumn 2000 Floods Review Kent Area J ^ * °NMENT autum n 2000 FLOODS IN SOUTHERN REGION FLOOD EVENTS 15 SEPTEMBER -15 NOVEMBER No Properties Flooded Hampshire and Isle of ■ Up to 20 Wight Area | >20 to <100 100 or greater ^ R e g io n a l WM Boundary w Main River Urban Areas MAP 1.1 R*S»\G«_P«OJECTS\OCT_Fl DJVTCMTT Version 1.0 Page ii 19/08/01 Environment Agency Kent Area Autumn 2000 Floods Review CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary........................................................................................ 1-1 2 Flood Forecasting and Hyrdological Response............................................2-1 2.1 Forecasting............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Rainfall...................................................................................................2-4 2.3 River Flows............................................................................................2-6 2.4 Issues and Recommendations............................................................... 2-16 3 Flood Warning.................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Trigger/Threshold Levels for Warnings................................................. 3-1 3.2 Trigger levels for Specific Sites............................................................. 3-2 3.3 Warnings Issued.....................................................................................3-2 3.4 Automated Voice Messaging (AVM) Use and Effectiveness.................3-3 3.5 AVM Availability and Reliability...................................... .'............ ......3-4 3.6 ‘Floodline’..............................................................................................3-4 3.7 Issues Arising and Recommendations.................................................... 3-6 4 Emergency Response/Standards of Defence................................................ 4-1 4.1 Major Incident Plans Activated.............................................................. 4-1 4.2 Gold and Silver Controls with Agency Attendance............................... 4-1 4.3 Agency (staffing, equipment and plant)..................................................4-2 4.4 Adequacy of Agency Resources............................................................. 4-4 4.5 Numbers of Staff Deployed.................................................................... 4-4 4.6 Range of Functions and inter Regional Co-Operation........................... 4-5 4.7 Emergency Services, Local Authority, Other Response Organisations.. 4-5 4.8 Property evacuated (no. of people) and type.......................................... 4-6 4.9 Issues And Recommendations................................................................ 4-8 5 Event Impact and Data Collection................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Sources of Flooding................................................................................5-1 5.2 Number of Properties not Flooded due to Agency Defences................. 5-7 5.3 Number of Properties not Flooded due to Third Party Defences............5-8 5.4 Number of Properties Flooded due to Failure (not exceedence) of Agency Defences.................................................................................................5-9 5.5 Number of Properties Flooded due to Failure (not exceedence) of Third Party Defences........................................................................................5-9 5.6 Number of Properties Flooded due to Exceedence of Agency Defence Standards................................................................................................5-9 5.7 List of Towns Affected Without Adequate Defences............................5-9 5.8 Major Infrastructure Affected..............................................................5-10 5.9 Incidence of Repeat Flooding...............................................................5-11 5.10 Issues and Recommendations...............................................................5-12 6 Subsequent Events of Importance................................................................. 6-1 6.1 December 2000.......................................................................................6-1 6.2 January 2001...........................................................................................6-1 6.3 February 2001.........................................................................................6-1 6.4 Rivers Affected.......................................................................................6-2 6.5 Operational response..............................................................................6-9 6.6 Issues and Recommendations...............................................................6-11 Version 1.0 Page iii 13/08/01 Environment Agency Kent Area Autumn 2000 Floods Review APENDICES Appendix A : Development in the Floodplain Appendix B : Public Response Appendix C : History of Flooding Appendix D : Views of Professional Partners Appendix E : Telemetry Appendix F : Severe Flood Warnings Issued Appendix G : A VM Statistics Appendix H : Rainfall Isohyets FIGURES Figure 2.1: An Aerial view o f Penshurst on Friday 13th October 2000 at the confluence between the River Eden with the River Medway...................................................................................................................2-6 Figure 2.2: An aerial view of the Leigh Barrier in operation on the afternoon of the 12 th October 2000 ..................................................................................................................................................................................2-7 Figure 2.3: View across the floodplain of the River Medway with the Hop Farm at Stilstead in the distance...................................................................................................................................................................2-7 Figure 5.1: The High Street bridge in Yalding with the River Beult in flood. .........................................5-1 Figure 5.2: One of the culverts taking the River Rother flood flows beneath the A21 bypass embankment downstream of Robertsbridge................................................................................................... 5-2 Figure 5.3: Aerial view of the River Medway floodplain downstream of Tonbridge 13th October......5-4 Figure 5.4: Aerial view o f Colliers Land bridge on the Upper Medway, the gauging station is a key element of the Leigh Barrier operating system..............................................................................................5-5 Figure 5.5: General view of Yalding. The River Beult is in the foreground............................................5-5 Figure 5.6:Aerial view of the River Teise and the Lesser Teise on Friday 13°' October, showing Colliers Street and
Recommended publications
  • All London Green Grid River Cray and Southern Marshes Area Framework
    All River Cray and Southern Marshes London Area Framework Green Grid 5 Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 8 Area Description 9 Strategic Context 10 Vision 12 Objectives 14 Opportunities 16 Project Identification 18 Project Update 20 Clusters 22 Projects Map 24 Rolling Projects List 28 Phase Two Early Delivery 30 Project Details 48 Forward Strategy 50 Gap Analysis 51 Recommendations 53 Appendices 54 Baseline Description 56 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA05 Links 58 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA05 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg .
    [Show full text]
  • A3 Hadlow Hill 10 P1&2 Cover Pmd.Pmd
    HADLOW CONSERVATION AREAS Introduction The objective of the Hadlow Conservation Areas Appraisal is to analyse and record the special character of the Conservation Areas. The Hadlow High Street Conservation Area was originally designated in 1972. Following an assessment of the conservation area boundary, the Borough Council proposes to update it to include new areas and exclude others. Aseparate Conservation Area at The Freehold is also proposed. The appraisal covers the areas within the revised High Street Conservation Area boundary, together with the proposed additional Conservation Area, and provides further details to assist with the interpretation and use of planning policies. It will help guide the Council in making planning decisions on planning applications and to this end will be adopted for development control purposes. It is intended that this appraisal will inform and influence the activities of the Council and other bodies (e.g. Kent County Council and other statutory agencies), where these impact on the Conservation Areas. It will also assist in the identification of any APPRAISAL programmes of action that are considered appropriate by these bodies, subject, of course, to financial limitations and other priorities they may have. Importantly, it is hoped that the appraisal will prove to be of help to residents, businesses and landowners. For anyone proposing new development or changes within the Conservation Areas, the appraisal should be read in conjunction with the Borough Council’s Conservation Area Advice Note. This includes guidance on the broad issues to be considered and the special controls that apply in Conservation Areas. AREAS As the purpose of this appraisal is to describe the character of the area, it does not include a detailed description of every feature or building.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Kilburne, a Topographie Or Survey of The
    Richard Kilburne A topographie or survey of the county of Kent London 1659 <frontispiece> <i> <sig A> A TOPOGRAPHIE, OR SURVEY OF THE COUNTY OF KENT. With some Chronological, Histori= call, and other matters touching the same: And the several Parishes and Places therein. By Richard Kilburne of Hawk= herst, Esquire. Nascimur partim Patriæ. LONDON, Printed by Thomas Mabb for Henry Atkinson, and are to be sold at his Shop at Staple-Inn-gate in Holborne, 1659. <ii> <blank> <iii> TO THE NOBILITY, GEN= TRY and COMMONALTY OF KENT. Right Honourable, &c. You are now presented with my larger Survey of Kent (pro= mised in my Epistle to my late brief Survey of the same) wherein (among severall things) (I hope conducible to the service of that Coun= ty, you will finde mention of some memorable acts done, and offices of emi= <iv> nent trust borne, by severall of your Ancestors, other remarkeable matters touching them, and the Places of Habitation, and Interment of ma= ny of them. For the ready finding whereof, I have added an Alphabeticall Table at the end of this Tract. My Obligation of Gratitude to that County (wherein I have had a comfortable sub= sistence for above Thirty five years last past, and for some of them had the Honour to serve the same) pressed me to this Taske (which be= ing finished) If it (in any sort) prove servicea= ble thereunto, I have what I aimed at; My humble request is; That if herein any thing be found (either by omission or alteration) substantially or otherwise different from my a= foresaid former Survey, you would be pleased to be informed, that the same happened by reason of further or better information (tend= ing to more certaine truths) than formerly I had.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Advisory Visit to the River Darent, Kent, Undertaken on Behalf of Kingfisher Angling and Preservation Society, by Vaughan Lewis, Windrush AEC Ltd March 2005
    Habitat Advisory visit to the River Darent, Kent, undertaken on behalf of Kingfisher Angling and Preservation Society, by Vaughan Lewis, Windrush AEC Ltd March 2005 Sponsored by: 1.0 Introduction This report forms the output of a site visit to the River Darent, near Eynsford, Kent on 31 March 2005 on behalf of Kingfisher Angling and Preservation Society (KAPS). Information in the report is based on observations on the day of the visit and additional comments provided by members of the club. This is the third advisory visit undertaken by the Wild Trout Trust (WTT) to the River Darent in this area, with visits previously made to the Park Farm Fishery and Darent Valley Trout Fishers water. Located between these fisheries, this visit to the KAPS fishery compliments management advice given in previous visits to these fisheries. Habitat in the River Darent has been severely compromised in the past by long periods of low flow, due in part to borehole abstraction for potable supply. However, negotiations with water undertakers in the Darent valley have secured a significant reduction in the volume of water abstracted, with an associated partial restoration of flows in the river. KAPS has a membership of approximately 110 members, with a mix of stillwater and river fisheries in Kent. Throughout the report, normal convention is followed, with right bank (RB) and left bank (LB) of the river identified when looking downstream. 2.0 Fishery Description The KAPS fishery on the River Darent effectively begins at the outlet from their ex. gravel pit fishery at Lullingstone Castle. This is a now a lake of some 15-20ha, stocked with Rainbow trout Onchorhynchus mykiss.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentish Weald
    LITTLE CHART PLUCKLEY BRENCHLEY 1639 1626 240 ACRES (ADDITIONS OF /763,1767 680 ACRES 8 /798 OMITTED) APPLEDORE 1628 556 ACRES FIELD PATTERNS IN THE KENTISH WEALD UI LC u nmappad HORSMONDEN. NORTH LAMBERHURST AND WEST GOUDHURST 1675 1175 ACRES SUTTON VALENCE 119 ACRES c1650 WEST PECKHAM &HADLOW 1621 c400 ACRES • F. II. 'educed from orivinals on va-i us scalP5( 7 k0. U 1I IP 3;17 1('r 2; U I2r/P 42*U T 1C/P I;U 27VP 1; 1 /7p T ) . mhe form-1 re re cc&— t'on of woodl and blockc ha c been sta dardised;the trees alotw the field marr'ns hie been exactly conieda-3 on the 7o-cc..onen mar ar mar1n'ts;(1) on Vh c. c'utton vPlence map is a divided fi cld cP11 (-1 in thP ace unt 'five pieces of 1Pnii. THE WALDEN LANDSCAPE IN THE EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTERS AND ITS ANTECELENTS Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London by John Louis Mnkk Gulley 1960 ABSTRACT This study attempts to describe the historical geography of a confined region, the Weald, before 1650 on the basis of factual research; it is also a methodological experiment, since the results are organised in a consistently retrospective sequence. After defining the region and surveying its regional geography at the beginning of the seventeenth century, the antecedents and origins of various elements in the landscape-woodlands, parks, settlement and field patterns, industry and towns - are sought by retrospective enquiry. At two stages in this sequence the regional geography at a particular period (the early fourteenth century, 1086) is , outlined, so that the interconnections between the different elements in the region should not be forgotten.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome Pack’ from the Parish Council Useful
    EAST PECKHAM WELCOME HANDBOOK First produced by East Peckham Parish Council in November 2014 Updated September 2016 Updated June 2017 WELCOME TO EAST PECKHAM Whether you have just come to live in the village, or you have lived here most of your life, we hope that you will find this “welcome pack’ from the Parish Council useful. Some information will change, so we’ll try to keep the important items up-to-date via our monthly newsletter and our website www.eastpeckham-pc.gov.uk. We have produced this pack to assist anyone moving into the village to settle down quickly and to be aware of the facilities and services that are available in the area. Because it has been written by the Parish Council we are starting with Parish and village information and then other useful bits and bobs about the area. Please note that the inclusion of businesses and organisations in this document does not constitute endorsement. We hope that the information given in this Welcome Pack will help you to settle more comfortably into your new home and the village. Neighbours usually become your first contacts and advisors, but please feel free to contact any of the Councillors or Clerk for information and help. We hope that you will quickly become and feel part of this community. We have tried to gather as much useful local information as possible, but would be pleased to hear any suggestions or improvements you might have about this pack. More local information is available via our website and through its links to other local websites.
    [Show full text]
  • By Email : Network Rail Freedom of Information the Quadrant Elder
    Network Rail By Email : Freedom of Information The Quadrant Elder Gate Milton Keynes MK9 1EN T 01908 782405 E [email protected] 8th June 2018 Dear Information request Reference number: FOI2018/0602 & FOI2018/00603 Thank you for your emails of 16th May 2018, in which you requested the following information: FOI201800602 Please may I request the following Level Crossing Narrative Risk Assessment’s 1. Yapton Automatic Half Barrier (AHB) Level Crossing 2. Woodgate MCB-CCTV Level Crossing 3. Woodhorn AHB Level Crossing 4. Park Lane Occupational Crossing 5. Decoy Farm Occupational Crossing 6. Lake Lane Occupational Crossing And FOI201800603 Please may I request the following Level Crossing Narrative Risk Assessment: Network Rail Infrastructure Limited Registered Office: Network Rail, 2nd Floor, One Eversholt Street, London, NW1 2DN Registered in England and Wales No. 2904587 www.networkrail.co uk 7. Kemps Farm Crossing 8. Southerham User Worked Crossing (UWC) 9. Asheham No.1 UWC 10. Itford UWC 11. Stoor UWC 12. Durham Farm UWC 13. Tarring Neville No.1 UWC 14. Tarring Neville No. 2 UWC 15. Parsons UWC 16. Tide Mills UWC 17. Courthouse Farm UWC I have processed your requests under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). I confirm we hold the information you have requested. I have combined the requests into one response for your convenience. Please see attached the latest risk assessments as requested labelled “FOI201800602.zip” and “FOI201800603.zip”. I have withheld the names, phone numbers and email addresses of members of staff from each of these documents under section 40(2) of the FOIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre
    GB 1204 Ch 46 Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 22324 ! National Arc F Kent Archives Offic Ch 46 Watts Charity MSS., 1579-1972 Deposited by Mr. Chinnery, Clerk to the Charity, Rochester, 1st May 1974, and 5th February, 1976 Catalogued by Alison Revell, June 1978 INTRODUCTION For information concerning the establishment of Watts's Charity, under Richard Watts of Rochester's will, in 1579 and its subsequent history, The Report of Commissioners for Inquiring Concerning Charities - Kent, 1815-39 Pp. 504-9, provides most of the basic facts. Other Rochester Charities are dealt with in the same Report (see pages 55-57, and 500-513). The Report also deals with various early legal cases concerning the Charity, and the uses to which its funds should be put, most notably the cases of the parishes of St. Margaret 's Rochester, and Strood, against the parishioners of St. Nicholas in 1680, and of the parishioners of Chatham against the Trustees of the Charity in 1808 (see L1-4B in this catalogue). The original will of Richard Watts, drawn up in 1579 and proved in the following year in the Consistory Court of Rochester, is kept in this Office under the catalogue mark, DRb PW12 (1579), with a registered copy in the volume of registered wills, DRb PWr 16 (ffl05-107). A copy is also catalogued in this collection as Ch46 L1A. Further Watts Charity material is found in the Dean and Chapter of Rochester MSS, under the KAO catalogue number, DRc Cl/1-65, and consists mainly of accounts of the Providers of the Poor of Rochester, between the years 1699 and 1819.
    [Show full text]
  • Maidstone's Biodiversity Strategy
    Maidstone’s Biodiversity Strategy: A Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2009-2014 Rivers Action Plan Maidstone’s Biodiversity Strategy A Local Biodiversity Action Plan Phase 1: 2009 – 2014 HAP 11: Rivers 1 | P a g e Maidstone’s Biodiversity Strategy: A Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2009-2014 Rivers Action Plan Table of Contents Description ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 National status ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Local status ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Factors causing decline in biodiversity ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Current national action .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • River Darent Action Plan
    River Darent Action Plan Phase 2 – River Restoration Strategy Nigel Holmes with Eddie Bradbrook, Richard Andrews, Chris Conroy, Ian Humpheryes, Dave Best, Bridget Thorn Where is the Darent? Problems: Historical Groundwater Abstraction Problems: 1976; 1984; 1989-91 Darent Daily Flow at Otford 15 10 Chalk Stream with a difference 5 Flow (cumecs) 0 Jan-87Jan-88Jan-89Jan-90Jan-91Jan-92Jan-93Jan-94Jan-95Jan-96Jan-97Jan-98Jan-99Jan-00Jan-01Jan-02 Date Daily Mean Flow on the River Itchen at Allbrook and Highbridge 25 20 Hydrograph of a Real Chalk stream 15 10 Flow (cumecs) Flow 5 0 01.10.198715.03.198828.08.198810.02.198926.07.198908.01.199023.06.199006.12.199021.05.199103.11.199117.04.199230.09.199215.03.199328.08.199310.02.199426.07.199408.01.199523.06.199506.12.199520.05.199602.11.199617.04.199730.09.199715.03.199828.08.199810.02.199926.07.199908.01.200022.06.200005.12.200020.05.200102.11.2001 - Itchen Abstraction: effects on flow Naturalised flow Actual Flow Abstraction: effects on flow Naturalised Flow Actual Flow Distance down the Darent Historical Channel Degradation Water Quality • Phosphates low – below EN’s SSSI Target • Nitrates OK – within WHO Drinking Water limits • Occasionally high BOD due to ‘weed growth’ in hot summers • Minor point-source small incidents • Silt is a problem • Around 1900 catastrophic pollution ‘killed every living thing in the river’ - previously considered one of finest trout rivers in the country The Darent Action Plan – Water Resources • Two Phases • Phase I (1996) – Reduction of 20 Ml/d from upper catchment & augmentation in low-flow periods in vulnerable lower reaches • Phase II (2005) – Further reductions of 23.5 Ml/d from lower catchment sources • Modelling and other studies to determine an ‘Environmentally Acceptable Flow Regime’ (EAFR) The Darent Action Plan – Reduced Licences Daily licensed abstraction accretion profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Area Guide
    An insider’sguide to the local area Eating out A fantastic choice of places to eat and drink. p. 8 – 13 Great shopping Everyday essentials, designer fashion, to statement pieces for your new home. p. 14 – 17 Picturesque open spaces Amazingly beautiful Kent countryside, picturesque parks and historic gardens – yours to explore. p. 18 - 23 2 – 3 An insider’s guide From the delights of the English countryside right on your doorstep to connecting with friends over a coffee, Paddock Wood is well placed to A place to cater for all your needs. EX Foal Hurst Green is located in Paddock Wood, set in the heart of the Kent countryside, along a hedge-lined country road that winds through farmland, meadows and hop fields. Traditional oast houses dot the landscape and mature woodland that has stood for centuries provide shelter for wildlife. The far-reaching countryside views are simply stunning. For shopping, transport and entertainment, Paddock Wood and historic Royal Tunbridge Wells town centres are both close by. This guide gives an overview of the many advantages of living in Paddock Wood, and we hope you will find it useful. 4 – 5 Post Office Groceries Dentist PADDOCK WOOD POST OFFICE WAITROSE AYCLIFFE DENTISTRY 19-23 Commercial Road, Church Road, 49 Maidstone Road, Paddock Wood, TN12 6EN Paddock Wood, TN12 6EX Paddock Wood, TN12 6DG T 0345 611 2970 T 01892 836647 T 01892 833926 0.8 mile away 1.1 miles away 1.1 miles away Everyday Butchers Pharmacy Library POMFRET BROS PADDOCK WOOD PHARMACY PADDOCK WOOD LIBRARY 45 Commercial Road, 12 Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Maidstone Area Archaeological Group, Should Be Sent to Jess Obee (Address at End) Or Payments Made at One of the Meetings
    Maidstone Area Archaeological Group Newsletter, March 2000 Dear Fellow Members As there is a host of announcements, I will hold over the Editorial until the next Newsletter, due in May (sighs of relief all round). David Carder Subscriptions and Membership Cards Subscriptions for the year beginning 1st April 2000 are now due. Please use the renewal form enclosed with this Newsletter, and complete as much as of it as possible - that way we can establish what members' interests really are. Return the form with your cheque by post to Jess Obee (address at end), or hand it with cheque or cash to any Committee Member who will give you a receipt. Renewing members will receive a handy Membership Card with the May Newsletter, giving details of indoor meetings, subscription rates, and contacts. In order to comply with the data protection legislation, we have included on the form a consent that your details may be held on a computer database. This data is held purely for membership administration (e.g. printing of address labels and registration of subscription payments). It will not be used for other purposes, or released to outside parties without your express consent. If you have any queries or concerns over this, please write to the Chairman. Notice of Annual General Meeting - Friday 28th April 2000 This year's AGM will be held at 7.30 pm on Friday 28th April 2000 (not 21st as previously published) at the School Hall, The Street, Detling. The Agenda is as follows : 1. Chairman's welcome 2. Apologies for absence 3.
    [Show full text]