Xerox University Microfilms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Xerox University Microfilms INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary/sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 76-3576 THOMPSON, Woodrow Burr, 1946- THE QUATERNARY GEOLOGY OF THE DANBURY-NEW MILFORD AREA, CONNECTICUT. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1975 Geology Xerox University Microfilms , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 THE QUATERNARY GEOLOGY OF THE DANBURY-NEW MILFORD AREA, CONNECTICUT DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Woodrow Burr Thompson, B.A., M.S ****** The Ohio State University 19 75 Reading Committee: Approved By Sidney E. White Richard P. Goldthwait Charles E. Corbato iser Department of Geology and Mineralogy Frontispiece. Southward aerial view of Housatonic Gorge (center) and junction of Still River with Housatonic River. Photo by J. A. Pawloski. PREFACE This report is based on field work done by the author during the summers of 19 70 through 19 74. The work was funded by the United States Geological Survey during the first three summers and by the Connecticut State Geological and Natural History Survey during the final summer. It was part of a co-operative mapping program involving the state and federal geological surveys. The geologic maps and much of the other information in the present study will be published by the U.S.G.S. as part of the Geologic Quadrangle Map series. The author gratefully acknowledges the U.S.G.S. for providing base maps and other essential materials for the preparation of this report. Fred Pessl, Jr. and William Langer of the U.S.G.S. visited the author in the field and expressed helpful opinions concerning mapping problems. Robert Melvin of the Water Resources Division of the U.S.G.S. supplied bedrock contour and subsurface data that were important in interpreting the Quaternary stratigraphy of the study area. The writer is especially indebted to Dr. Sidney E. White for his help as faculty adviser and for reviewing this iii manuscript. Editorial comments were also contributed by Dr. Richard P. Goldthwait and Dr. Charles E. Corbato. Dr. White and Dr. Goldthwait visited the study area and ex­ amined the Quaternary deposits that are discussed here. Where possible, the geographic and geologic features mentioned in this report are located with respect to places that are readily identifiable on Plate I. However, it is occasionally necessary to use a grid system to refer the reader to a certain part of the map. The Danbury and New Milford quadrangles (Plate I) are divided into ninths, each of which covers 2.5 minutes of latitude and longitude. These divisions are indicated on Plate I by printed lines on the map border and by crosses that designate their corner pointsc The author has assigned letter symbols to the divisions in the following manner: Danbury quadrangle New Milford quadrangle NW NC NE NW NC NE WC C EC wc C EC SW SC SE sw SC SE Localities that may be hard to find on Plate I are referred to one of the above divisions. This grid system is also used to help locate the sources of samples that are listed in Appendix B. iv All grain-size measurements in this report are in metric units. Metric equivalents are given in parentheses for most other measurements except topographic map elevations. Preference is commonly given to English measurements because of their usage in previous reports — particularly in pub­ lished well and test hole logs. v VITA December 10, 1946 Born - Plymouth, New Hampshire 1968............. B.A. Geology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampsire 1969-1971....... Teaching Assistant, Department of Geology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 1971-1975....... Teaching Associate, Department of Geology and Mineralogy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio PUBLICATIONS Stone,.B.D., and Thompson, W.B., 19 71, Late Wisconsin . glacial readvance deposits on Isle La Motte, Vermont (abs.): Geol. Soc. America Abstracts with Programs, .v. 3, p. 51. Thompson, W.B., 1971, Rodingite near Thetford Mines, Quebec: Mineralogical Record, v. 2, p. 45-46, 48. Thompson, W.B., 1973, Theories on the origin of pegmatite — a summary: Earth Science, v. 26, p. 77-78. Thompson, W.B., 1974, The Palermo Mine, New Hampshire: Mineralogical Record, v. 5, p. 2 74-279. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Geology Studies in Glacial Geology. Professor Richard P. Goldthwait Studies in Geomorphology. Professor Sidney E, White vi TABLE OP CONTENTS Page PREFACE................................................... iii VITA.................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES......................................... ix LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS............................. x Chapter I. INTRODUCTION................. 1 Purpose and scope.................. 1 Means of investigation................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA .......... 5 Geography.................................. 5 Geomorphology........... 7 Bedrock geology........................... 10 Surficial geology......................... 13 Previous work............................. 16 III. TILL DEPOSITS............................... 19 Introduction.............................. 19 Upper till................................. 19 Lower till.......................... 34 Ages of the upper and lower tills........ 41 IV. GLACIAL-MELTWATER DEPOSITS...........'...... 52 Basis for delineation and correlation of map units............................... 52 Meltwater-stream deposits................ 57 Glacial Lake Danbury deposits............... 6 3 Saugatuck River stage deposits......... 64 Pond Brook stage deposits.............. 68 Pumpkin Hill stage deposits............ 73 Housatonic River stage deposits........ 75 Glacial Lake Kenosia deposits............ 79 Glacial Lake Candlewood deposits......... 80 vii V. LATE-GLACIAL AND POSTGLACIAL DEPOSITS........ 81 Eolian deposits....................... 81 Stream-terrace deposits.................... 84 Flood-plain deposits.................. 85 Swamp deposits............................. 85 Colluvium........................ .......... 87 VI. GLACIAL HISTORY............................... 89 Pre-Wisconsinan events..................... 89 Early Wisconsinan glaciation.............. 91 Late Wisconsinan glaciation............... 92 Recession of the Late Wisconsinan glacier........................ .......... 96 Deposition of stratified drift during deglaciation....... .............. 9 7 VII. LATE-GLACIAL AND POSTGLACIAL HISTORY......... 113 Late-glacial events........................ 113 Postglacial events......................... 118 VIII. SUMMARY........................................ 123 APPENDIX A . LOGS OF WELLS AND TEST HOLES PLOTTED ON PLATE I ....................'................ 127 B. SAMPLE LOCATIONS........... ■.................. 130 C. X-RAY DIFFRACTION DATA FOR CLAY FRACTIONS OF TILL SAMPLES............................ 132 REFERENCES CITED........................................ 135 viii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Grain-Size Analyses of Upper Till Samples....... 25 2 Gasometric Determinations of Calcite and Dolomite Weight Percentages in Till Samples and Till Clasts........... ..................... 33 3 Grain-Size Analyses of Lower Till Samples....... 37 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Frontispiece Page Southward aerial view of Housatonic Gorge and junction of Still River with Housatonic River........................................... i Figure 1 Location of study area........................... 6 2 Outcrop of rottenstone marble between U. S. Route 7 and Grays Bridge Road........... 12 3 Ablation facies of upper till at New Fairfield two-till locality............... 22 4 Grain-size distributions of till samples....... 24 5 X-ray
Recommended publications
  • Update of Hazard Mitigation Plan for the Naugatuck Valley Region
    Update of Hazard Mitigation Plan for the Naugatuck Valley Region Workshop: Victoria Brudz, CFM Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment David Murphy, PE, CFM Noah Slovin, CFM WORKSHOP LOGISTICS • 9:00 – Welcome & Logistics • 9:05 – Main Presentation • 9:50 to 10:05 – Breakout Sessions • Riverine and dam flood risks • Wind, snow, and power outages • Geologic hazards (landslides, earthquakes, Cheshire sinkholes) • Please comment in the chat back box which group you would like to be placed in • 10:05 to 10:15 – Report from Sessions & Wrap Up Agenda • Purpose and Need for Hazard Mitigation Planning • Review of Hazards to be Addressed • Effects of Climate Change • Report from Municipal Meetings- What Did We Hear? • Characterizing Hazard Loss Estimates • FEMA Map Updates (Diane Ifkovic, CT DEEP) • Next Steps PURPOSE AND NEED FOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Authority • Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (amendments to Stafford Act of 1988) Goal of Disaster Mitigation Act • Promote disaster preparedness • Promote hazard mitigation actions to reduce losses Mitigation Grant Programs • Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) • Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) • Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) • Replaces Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) • Shift from pre-disaster spending to research-supported investment Graphic courtesy of FEMA PURPOSE AND NEED FOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN PURPOSE AND NEED FOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Status of Plans in Connecticut • Most initial plans developed 2005-2011 • Local plans updated every five years Status of
    [Show full text]
  • Saugatuck Watershed Partnership
    National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Project Evaluation Form Project Name and Number: Saugatuck Watershed Partnership (CT) #2005-0191-028 Recipient: The Nature Conservancy Project Location: Weston, CT – Saugatuck River Watershed 1) Were the specific objectives as outlined in your application and grant agreement successfully implemented and accomplished? Explain. The objective of this project was to establish a watershed partnership and a watershed action plan for the protection and enhancement of biodiversity within the Saugatuck River Watershed. The Nature Conservancy (TNC) proposed to conduct three workshops using the TNC 5-S planning method to identify Systems, Severity and Scope of Stresses, Strategies and Success. Workshops involving 80 individuals representing over 25 organizations and all eleven towns within the watershed were conducted in February, July and October of 2005. Fifteen additional public meetings, presentations and smaller groups planning sessions were held before the grant‟s phase three ended March 30, 2006. 2) Please assess project accomplishments as quantitatively as possible. For example: a. Number of miles of stream/river corridor benefited. Categorize by type of benefit (e.g., protected, enhanced, restored, made accessible). N/A a. Total acres of land conserved. Categorize by conservation mechanism (e.g., restored, managed, acquired, placed under an easement) and by habitat type (e.g., wetland, deciduous forest, shortgrass prairie). N/A b. Species benefited. If possible, report number of individuals of each species. N/A c. Number of meetings/events held. Three planning workshops involving environmental scientists, members of various stakeholder groups and representatives from the watershed towns were held in 2005. Additionally, we hosted a second annual stream walk training program with NRCS in June, and a macroinvertebrate identification training and sampling in October, with the CT Department of Environmental Protection.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources
    2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources In The Spotlight Updated Launch & Pumpout Directories CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION HTTPS://PORTAL.CT.GOV/DEEP/BOATING/BOATING-AND-PADDLING YOUR FULL SERVICE YACHTING DESTINATION No Bridges, Direct Access New State of the Art Concrete Floating Fuel Dock Offering Diesel/Gas to Long Island Sound Docks for Vessels up to 250’ www.bridgeportharbormarina.com | 203-330-8787 BRIDGEPORT BOATWORKS 200 Ton Full Service Boatyard: Travel Lift Repair, Refit, Refurbish www.bridgeportboatworks.com | 860-536-9651 BOCA OYSTER BAR Stunning Water Views Professional Lunch & New England Fare 2 Courses - $14 www.bocaoysterbar.com | 203-612-4848 NOW OPEN 10 E Main Street - 1st Floor • Bridgeport CT 06608 [email protected] • 203-330-8787 • VHF CH 09 2 2021 Connecticut BOATERS GUIDE We Take Nervous Out of Breakdowns $159* for Unlimited Towing...JOIN TODAY! With an Unlimited Towing Membership, breakdowns, running out GET THE APP IT’S THE of fuel and soft ungroundings don’t have to be so stressful. For a FASTEST WAY TO GET A TOW year of worry-free boating, make TowBoatU.S. your backup plan. BoatUS.com/Towing or800-395-2628 *One year Saltwater Membership pricing. Details of services provided can be found online at BoatUS.com/Agree. TowBoatU.S. is not a rescue service. In an emergency situation, you must contact the Coast Guard or a government agency immediately. 2021 Connecticut BOATER’S GUIDE 2021 Connecticut A digest of boating laws and regulations Boater's Guide Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Rules and Resources State of Connecticut Boating Division Ned Lamont, Governor Peter B.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Watch | 2016
    Harbor Watch | 2016 Fairfield County River Report: 2016 Sarah C. Crosby Nicole L. Cantatore Joshua R. Cooper Peter J. Fraboni Harbor Watch, Earthplace Inc., Westport, CT 06880 This report includes data on: Byram River, Farm Creek, Mianus River, Mill River, Noroton River, Norwalk River, Poplar Plains Brook, Rooster River, Sasco Brook, and Saugatuck River Acknowledgements The authors with to thank Jessica Ganim, Fiona Lunt, Alexandra Morrison, Ken Philipson, Keith Roche, Natalie Smith, and Corrine Vietorisz for their assistance with data collection and laboratory analysis. Funding for this research was generously provided by Jeniam Foundation, Social Venture Partners of Connecticut, Copps Island Oysters, Atlantic Clam Farms, 11th Hour Racing Foundation, City of Norwalk, Coastwise Boatworks, Environmental Professionals’ Organization of Connecticut, Fairfield County’s Community Foundation, General Reinsurance, Hillard Bloom Shellfish, Horizon Foundation, Insight Tutors, King Industries, Long Island Sound Futures Fund, McCance Family Foundation, New Canaan Community Foundation, Newman’s Own Foundation, Norwalk Cove Marina, Norwalk River Watershed Association, NRG – Devon, Palmer’s Market, Pramer Fuel, Resnick Advisors, Rex Marine Center, Soundsurfer Foundation, Town of Fairfield, Town of Ridgefield, Town of Westport, Town of Wilton, Trout Unlimited – Mianus Chapter. Additional support was provided by the generosity of individual donors. This report should be cited as: S.C. Crosby, N.L. Cantatore, J.R. Cooper, and P.J. Fraboni. 2016. Fairfield
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Watersheds
    Percent Impervious Surface Summaries for Watersheds CONNECTICUT WATERSHEDS Name Number Acres 1985 %IS 1990 %IS 1995 %IS 2002 %IS ABBEY BROOK 4204 4,927.62 2.32 2.64 2.76 3.02 ALLYN BROOK 4605 3,506.46 2.99 3.30 3.50 3.96 ANDRUS BROOK 6003 1,373.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.09 ANGUILLA BROOK 2101 7,891.33 3.13 3.50 3.78 4.29 ASH CREEK 7106 9,813.00 34.15 35.49 36.34 37.47 ASHAWAY RIVER 1003 3,283.88 3.89 4.17 4.41 4.96 ASPETUCK RIVER 7202 14,754.18 2.97 3.17 3.31 3.61 BALL POND BROOK 6402 4,850.50 3.98 4.67 4.87 5.10 BANTAM RIVER 6705 25,732.28 2.22 2.40 2.46 2.55 BARTLETT BROOK 3902 5,956.12 1.31 1.41 1.45 1.49 BASS BROOK 4401 6,659.35 19.10 20.97 21.72 22.77 BEACON HILL BROOK 6918 6,537.60 4.24 5.18 5.46 6.14 BEAVER BROOK 3802 5,008.24 1.13 1.22 1.24 1.27 BEAVER BROOK 3804 7,252.67 2.18 2.38 2.52 2.67 BEAVER BROOK 4803 5,343.77 0.88 0.93 0.94 0.95 BEAVER POND BROOK 6913 3,572.59 16.11 19.23 20.76 21.79 BELCHER BROOK 4601 5,305.22 6.74 8.05 8.39 9.36 BIGELOW BROOK 3203 18,734.99 1.40 1.46 1.51 1.54 BILLINGS BROOK 3605 3,790.12 1.33 1.48 1.51 1.56 BLACK HALL RIVER 4021 3,532.28 3.47 3.82 4.04 4.26 BLACKBERRY RIVER 6100 17,341.03 2.51 2.73 2.83 3.00 BLACKLEDGE RIVER 4707 16,680.11 2.82 3.02 3.16 3.34 BLACKWELL BROOK 3711 18,011.26 1.53 1.65 1.70 1.77 BLADENS RIVER 6919 6,874.43 4.70 5.57 5.79 6.32 BOG HOLLOW BROOK 6014 4,189.36 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.51 BOGGS POND BROOK 6602 4,184.91 7.22 7.78 8.41 8.89 BOOTH HILL BROOK 7104 3,257.81 8.54 9.36 10.02 10.55 BRANCH BROOK 6910 14,494.87 2.05 2.34 2.39 2.48 BRANFORD RIVER 5111 15,586.31 8.03 8.94 9.33 9.74
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfield County River Report: 2020
    Fairfield County River Report Harbor Watch | 2020 Fairfield County River Report: 2020 Sarah C. Crosby Mary K. Donato Peter J. Fraboni Devan S. Healy Nicole C. Spiller Kasey E. Tietz Harbor Watch, Earthplace Inc., Westport, CT 06880 This report includes data on: Ash Creek Watershed, Aspetuck River, Byram River, Comstock Brook, Deadman’s Brook, Little River, Noroton River, Norwalk River, Rippowam River, Saugatuck River, Silvermine River, and Stony Brook. This report should be cited as: S.C. Crosby, M.K. Donato, P.J. Fraboni, D.S. Healy, N.C. Spiller, and K.E. Tietz. 2020. Fairfield County River Report 2020. Harbor Watch, Earthplace, Inc. 1-52 p. Fairfield County River Report 2020, Harbor Watch | 1 About Harbor Watch The mission of Harbor Watch is to improve water quality and ecosystem health in Connecticut. Each day we strive to reach this goal through research in the lab and field, collaboration with our partners, and education of students and the public. Harbor Watch addresses pollution threats to Long Island Sound and educates the next generation of scientists through hands-on research and experiential learning. As part of the larger organization of Earthplace, the work performed by Harbor Watch also supports the mission of Earthplace to build a passion in our community for nature and the environment through education, experience, and action. Since its inception, Harbor Watch has trained over 1,000 high school students, college interns, and adult volunteers in the work of protecting and improving the biological integrity of Long Island Sound and has monitored hundreds of sites for a variety of physical and biological parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Saugatuck River Watershed and the the Saugatuck River Watershed Partnership
    An Introduction to the Saugatuck River Watershed and the The Saugatuck River Watershed Partnership Bethel, Danbury, Easton, Fairfield, Newtown, Norwalk, Redding, Ridgefield, Weston, Westport and Wilton March 2006 Project Coordinator: Sally Harold, Conservation Manager The Nature Conservancy’s Saugatuck Forest Lands Project (203) 226-4991 x207 [email protected] Project Summary: Through a series of planning workshops and public meetings, and with the cooperation of municipal representatives, stakeholder groups, environmental experts and interested individuals, a conservation action plan has been drafted that presents strategies to mitigate threats to the health of the Saugatuck River system. “When we save a river, we save a major part of an ecosystem, and we save ourselves as well because of our dependence - physical, economic, spiritual - on the water and its community of life.” Tim Palmer, The Wild and Scenic Rivers of America 2 Special thanks to all who have helped to develop the Partnership. Thanks for your input, ideas, critiques, time, enthusiasm and encouragement. We’ve just begun this partnership and I look forward to continued collaboration and hard work in our pursuit to keep this watershed healthy. To the attendees of the planning workshops, to those who came to public meetings, to members of local stakeholder groups, volunteers, citizens and my colleagues at The Nature Conservancy who have helped with this effort, I thank you. Participants in the Saugatuck River Watershed Planning Workshops – 2005 Andrew Morosky Town Engineer Bethel Beth Cavagna Inland Wetlands Bethel Jack Kozuchowski Coordinator of Environmental and Occupational Health Services Danbury Scott LeRoy, MPH, MS Sr. Inspector, Health Department Danbury Philip Doremus Zoning Enforcement Officer Easton Tom Steinke Conservation Director Fairfield Alexis Cherichetti Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Westport Shellfish Regulations
    Westport Shellfish Regulations I. Purpose These Regulations are hereby adopted by the Shellfish Commission of the Town of Westport for the purpose of protecting and propagating shellfish as defined in Section III (A) herein within the Town of Westport in order to restore and prevent the serious depletion of this natural resource. II. Shellfish Commission Authority and Duties A. Pursuant to CGS Section 26-257a, a Westport Shellfish Commission was established by the Board of Selectmen on October 3, 1983. Said Shellfish Commission shall have charge of all the shellfish grounds lying within the established jurisdictional boundaries of the Town of Westport including all rivers, inland waters and flats adjacent to all beaches and water within the limits and tidal demarcations of the Town of Westport, which are not under the jurisdiction of the State of Connecticut. B. In accordance with CGS Section 26-257a, the Shellfish Commission and/or its designee may issue permits for the taking of shellfish from the town’s jurisdictional boundaries and fix the fees therefore, may designate the quantities to be taken, the sizes of such shellfish, and the methods of taking of such shellfish. C. In accordance with CGS Section 26-257a, the Shellfish Commission may prohibit the taking of such shellfish from certain designated areas for periods not in excess of one (1) year. D. At least once each calendar year, the Shellfish Commission shall publish, in a newspaper having general circulation in the Town of Westport, a notice describing the boundaries of the shellfisheries and shellfish grounds regulated by these regulations; and shall post notices upon the shore describing the boundaries of such grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Schenob Brook
    Sages Ravine Brook Schenob BrookSchenob Brook Housatonic River Valley Brook Moore Brook Connecticut River North Canaan Watchaug Brook Scantic RiverScantic River Whiting River Doolittle Lake Brook Muddy Brook Quinebaug River Blackberry River Hartland East Branch Salmon Brook Somers Union Colebrook East Branch Salmon Brook Lebanon Brook Fivemile RiverRocky Brook Blackberry RiverBlackberry River English Neighborhood Brook Sandy BrookSandy Brook Muddy Brook Freshwater Brook Ellis Brook Spruce Swamp Creek Connecticut River Furnace Brook Freshwater Brook Furnace Brook Suffield Scantic RiverScantic River Roaring Brook Bigelow Brook Salisbury Housatonic River Scantic River Gulf Stream Bigelow Brook Norfolk East Branch Farmington RiverWest Branch Salmon Brook Enfield Stafford Muddy BrookMuddy Brook Factory Brook Hollenbeck River Abbey Brook Roaring Brook Woodstock Wangum Lake Brook Still River Granby Edson BrookEdson Brook Thompson Factory Brook Still River Stony Brook Stony Brook Stony Brook Crystal Lake Brook Wangum Lake Brook Middle RiverMiddle River Sucker BrookSalmon Creek Abbey Brook Salmon Creek Mad RiverMad River East Granby French RiverFrench River Hall Meadow Brook Willimantic River Barkhamsted Connecticut River Fenton River Mill Brook Salmon Creek West Branch Salmon Brook Connecticut River Still River Salmon BrookSalmon Brook Thompson Brook Still River Canaan Brown Brook Winchester Broad BrookBroad Brook Bigelow Brook Bungee Brook Little RiverLittle River Fivemile River West Branch Farmington River Windsor Locks Willimantic River First
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Sea Grant Project Report
    1 CONNECTICUT SEA GRANT PROJECT REPORT Please complete this progress or final report form and return by the date indicated in the emailed progress report request from the Connecticut Sea Grant College Program. Fill in the requested information using your word processor (i.e., Microsoft Word), and e-mail the completed form to Dr. Syma Ebbin [email protected], Research Coordinator, Connecticut Sea Grant College Program. Do NOT mail or fax hard copies. Please try to address the specific sections below. If applicable, you can attach files of electronic publications when you return the form. If you have questions, please call Syma Ebbin at (860) 405-9278. Please fill out all of the following that apply to your specific research or development project. Pay particular attention to goals, accomplishments, benefits, impacts and publications, where applicable. Project #: __R/CE-34-CTNY__ Check one: [ ] Progress Report [ x ] Final report Duration (dates) of entire project, including extensions: From [March 1, 2013] to [August 28, 2015 ]. Project Title or Topic: Comparative analysis and model development for determining the susceptibility to eutrophication of Long Island Sound embayment. Principal Investigator(s) and Affiliation(s): 1. Jamie Vaudrey, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut 2. Charles Yarish, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut 3. Jang Kyun Kim, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut 4. Christopher Pickerell, Marine Program, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County 5. Lorne Brousseau, Marine Program, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County A. COLLABORATORS AND PARTNERS: (List any additional organizations or partners involved in the project.) Justin Eddings, Marine Program, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County Michael Sautkulis, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County Veronica Ortiz, University of Connecticut Jeniam Foundation (Tripp Killin, Exec.
    [Show full text]
  • Deglaciation of the Upper Androscoggin River Valley and Northeastern White Mountains, Maine and New Hampshire
    Maine Geological Survey Studies in Maine Geology: Volume 6 1989 Deglaciation of the Upper Androscoggin River Valley and Northeastern White Mountains, Maine and New Hampshire Woodrow B. Thompson Maine Geological Survey State House Station 22 Augusta, Maine 04333 Brian K. Fowler Dunn Geoscience Corporation P.O. Box 7078, Village West Laconia, New Hampshire 03246 ABSTRACT The mode of deglaciation of the White Mountains of northern New Hampshire and adjacent Maine has been a controversial topic since the late 1800's. Recent workers have generally favored regional stagnation and down wastage as the principal means by which the late Wisconsinan ice sheet disappeared from this area. However, the results of the present investigation show that active ice persisted in the upper Androscoggin River valley during late-glacial time. An ice stream flowed eastward along the narrow part of the Androscoggin Valley between the Carter and Mahoosuc Ranges, and deposited a cluster of end-moraine ridges in the vicinity of the Maine-New Hampshire border. We have named these deposits the" Androscoggin Moraine." This moraine system includes several ridges originally described by G. H. Stone in 1880, as well as other moraine segments discovered during our field work. The ridges are bouldery, sharp-crested, and up to 30 m high. They are composed of glacial diamictons, including flowtills, with interbedded silt, sand, and gravel. Stone counts show that most of the rock debris comprising the Androscoggin Moraine was derived locally, although differences in provenance may exist between moraine segments on opposite sides of the valley. Meltwater channels and deposits of ice-contact stratified drift indicate that the margin of the last ice sheet receded northwestward.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Explanation-Surficial Geology Map, Maine Geological Survey
    Maine Geological Survey Address: 22 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333 Telephone: 207-287-2801 E-mail: [email protected] MAINE Home page: http://www.maine.gov/doc/nrimc/nrimc.htm Sample explanation of information shown on the Detailed Surficial Geology Map of the Gray 7.5' quadrangle: Artificial fill - Includes landfills, highway and railroad Marine ice-contact delta - Glacial-marine delta composed Contact - Indicates boundary between adjacent map units, dashed USES OF SURFICIAL GEOLOGY MAPS af embankments, and dredge spoil areas. These units are mapped Pmd primarily of sorted and stratified sand and gravel. Deposit was where approximate. only where they are resolvable using the contour lines on the map, graded to surface of late-glacial sea and is distinguished by flat top A surficial geology map shows all the loose materials such as till Glacial striation or groove - Arrow shows direction of former ice (commonly called hardpan), sand and gravel, or clay, which overlie solid ledge or where they define the limits of wetland units. Minor artificial fill and foreset and topset beds. Deltas have been assigned a unique (bedrock). Bedrock outcrops and areas of abundant bedrock outcrops are movement. Dot marks point of observation. is present in virtually all developed areas of the quadrangle. geographic name listed below: shown on the map, but varieties of the bedrock are not distinguished (refer to bedrock geology map). Most of the surficial materials are deposits formed by Pmdng - New Gloucester delta Streamlined hill - Hill shaped by glacial processes and reflecting glacial and deglacial processes during the last stage of continental glaciation, Pmdsp - Sabbathday Pond delta regional ice flow.
    [Show full text]