1

1 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMONWEALTH OF 2 * * * * 3 House Bill 231 * * * * 4 House Game & Fisheries Committee 5

6 Irvis Office Building Room G-50 7 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

8 Tuesday, May 12, 2015 - 9:00 a.m. 9 --oOo-- 10

11 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:

12 Honorable Keith Gillespie, Majority Chairman Honorable 13 Honorable Hal English Honorable 14 Honorable Matthew Gabler Honorable 15 Honorable Honorable 16 Honorable David Maloney, Sr. Honorable John McGinnis 17 Honorable Brett Miller Honorable 18 Honorable Mike Peifer Honorable 19 Honorable Honorable Ted Harhai, Minority Chairman 20 Honorable Honorable Michael Driscoll 21 Honorable Frank Farina Honorable Marty Flynn 22 Honorable Patrick Harkins Honorable Sid Kavulich 23 Honorable William Kortz Honorable 24 Honorable

25 1300 Garrison Drive, York, PA 17404 717.764.7801 Key Reporters [email protected] 2

1 STAFF PRESENT:

2 Greg Raffensperger 3 Majority Executive Director

4 Cheryl Gruber 5 Majority Administrative Assistant

6 Scott Little 7 Majority Public Relations

8 Steve McMullen 9 Minority Executive Director

10 Johnathan Detrick 11 Minority Executive Director

12 Rogette Harris 13 Minority Research Analyst

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Key Reporters [email protected] 3

1 INDEX OF TESTIFIERS TESTIFIERS PAGE 2 Opening statement of Majority Chairman 3 Gillespie...... 4

4 Opening statement of Minority Chairman Harhai...... 4 5 John Kline, Government Liaison...... 7 6 PA Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs

7 Craig Ebersole, Treasurer...... 19 County of Lancaster & spokesperson for 8 County Treasurer's Association of PA

9 Pennsylvania Game Commission

10 Matthew Hough, Executive Director..... 49 Dorothy Derr, Director...... 56 11 Bureau of Administration Paul Mahon, Director of Automated 12 Technology

13

14 SUBMITTED WRITTEN TESTIMONY 15

16 (See other submitted testimony and handouts online.) 17

18

19

20 REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTATION 21

22 Page Line Page Line

23 56 8-9 -- --

24

25

Key Reporters [email protected] 4

1 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Good

2 morning, everybody. Welcome to the public hearing

3 of the House Game and Fisheries Committee. I'm

4 Keith Gillespie, the Republican Chair.

5 Today we'll be receiving testimony from

6 several organizations regarding House Bill 231

7 sponsored by Representative Mullery, which seeks to

8 place the antlerless deer application and licensing

9 process under the purview of the Game Commission,

10 via the Pennsylvania Automated Licensing System, or

11 PALS as it's better known.

12 I'd like to call the meeting to order

13 and conceive with business. I'd like to have the

14 members introduce themselves, but first recognize

15 my co-chairman, Representative Harhai.

16 MINORITY CHAIRMAN HARHAI: Thank you,

17 Mr. Chairman.

18 It's been a while since I have been in

19 G-50, so it's good to be back. I want to thank

20 everybody for coming and the testimony we're about

21 to receive. I am state Representative Harhai, and

22 I am the co-chair along with Mr. Gillespie.

23 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: We'll

24 proceed to the left there.

25 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Thank you, Mr.

Key Reporters [email protected] 5

1 Chairman. Gerald Mullery, 119th Legislative

2 District in Luzerne County.

3 REPRESENTATIVE FLYNN: Marty Flynn,

4 Lackawanna County; 113th district.

5 REPRESENTATIVE KORTZ: Good morning,

6 everyone. Bill Kortz, Allegheny County; 38th

7 district.

8 REPRESENTATIVE BURNS: Representative

9 Frank Burns, 72nd district.

10 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Good morning. Dan

11 Moul, 91st district; Adams County.

12 REPRESENTATIVE McGINNIS: Representative

13 John McGinnis, 79th district; Blair County.

14 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: Representative

15 David Maloney, Berks County; 130th.

16 REPRESENTATIVE FEE: Mindy Fee, 37th

17 district; Lancaster County. And I'd like to

18 welcome Craig Ebersole from Lancaster County.

19 REPRESENTATIVE KELLER: Good morning.

20 Representative Mark Keller, the 86th district,

21 which is Perry and Cumberland County.

22 REPRESENTATIVE DRISCOLL: Mike Driscoll,

23 Philadelphia County; 173rd.

24 REPRESENTATIVE SIMS: Brian Sims,

25 Philadelphia; 182.

Key Reporters [email protected] 6

1 REPRESENTATIVE WARNER: Good morning.

2 Brian Warner, 52nd district; Fayette and

3 Westmoreland counties.

4 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: Good morning.

5 Hal English, 30th; Allegheny County.

6 REPRESENTATIVE WENTLING: Parke

7 Wentling, 17th district; Lawrence, Mercer, Crawford

8 and Erie County.

9 REPRESENTATIVE JOZWIAK: Barry Jozwiak,

10 105th district, Berks County.

11 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: Good morning.

12 Mike Peifer, 139th district, which includes

13 portions of Pike and Wayne counties.

14 REPRESENTATIVE HARKINS: Good morning.

15 , 1st district; Erie.

16 REPRESENTATIVE MILLER: Brett Miller,

17 41st district; Lancaster County. And welcome,

18 Craig Ebersole.

19 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Excellent.

20 I want to thank the committee members for their

21 turnout. Just reminding everybody, this is a

22 session day, so members will be coming and going

23 throughout the meeting.

24 We're pleased to have three

25 organizations testifying before us today. The

Key Reporters [email protected] 7

1 first is the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen's

2 Clubs. John Kline is here on behalf of the

3 Federation. Welcome, John. You may begin when

4 ready.

5 MR. KLINE: Thank you and good morning.

6 Chairman Gillespie, Chairman Harhai, and members of

7 the House Game and Fisheries Committee:

8 I'm John Kline, Director of Government

9 Affairs for the Pennsylvania Federation of

10 Sportsmen's Clubs. On behalf of the officers,

11 individual members, member clubs and member

12 organizations of the Federation, we want to thank

13 you for the opportunity to provide testimony on

14 House Bill 231 regarding the issuance of antlerless

15 deer licenses.

16 Since its inception in 1932, the

17 Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs'

18 mission has been to provide a statewide, united

19 voice for the concerns of all sportsmen and

20 conservationists, to ensure their rights and

21 interests are protected, and to protect and enhance

22 the environment and our natural resources.

23 The Federation is a true grass roots

24 organization, representing approximately 70,000

25 women and men that come from diverse backgrounds

Key Reporters [email protected] 8

1 and hail from virtually every area in the

2 Commonwealth.

3 In March of this year, the Federation

4 held its annual spring convention in Lewisburg,

5 Pennsylvania. Delegates and officers of the

6 organization gathered to discuss a wide variety of

7 issues concerning hunting, fishing, trapping and

8 other conservation-related topics. Part of the

9 annual convention process is to address and vote on

10 current matters that affect our members and their

11 outdoor interests.

12 The results of these votes become the

13 Federation's formal position or platform on

14 whatever matter is addressed, whether it's

15 legislation, regulation, or any position related to

16 our outdoor pursuits. Voting is carried out by

17 individual delegates representing member clubs,

18 individual members and other member organizations

19 that have a seat at our table.

20 One of the topics discussed and voted on

21 in March of this year was House Bill 231. After a

22 lengthy discussion, a vote to support House Bill

23 231 was adopted. This is not the first time that

24 Federation of Sportsmen's Club has supported

25 removing the county treasurers from the antlerless

Key Reporters [email protected] 9

1 license issuance process. The Federation has been

2 on report in support of moving this process

3 strictly under the Game Commission since the PAL's

4 system and Wildlife Management Units were first

5 implemented.

6 In general, the Federation views the

7 sole responsibility of the licensing process as

8 that of the Game Commission. As most of us who

9 have hunted in Pennsylvania for years recall that

10 the Commonwealth was once, for purposes of hunting,

11 separated into geographic boundaries by county.

12 Allocation of antlerless licenses was the

13 responsibility of the Game Commission, and

14 distribution of these licenses was the

15 responsibility of the county treasurers.

16 This approach had some logic when the

17 issuance of all licenses had to be hand processed,

18 and the antlerless tags were issued on a

19 county-wide basis. Hunters submitted their

20 requests to the county they wanted to hunt in.

21 When the Game Commission introduced and

22 adopted the wildlife management, or WMU system,

23 hunters were now permitted to hunt for antlerless

24 deer in larger areas not bound by county lines.

25 The county treasurers, however, were still involved

Key Reporters [email protected] 10

1 in the licensing process because of this

2 legislative mandate.

3 Upon introduction of Pennsylvania's

4 Automated Licensing System, or PALS system, Game

5 Commission and the Fish and Boat Commission took

6 huge steps toward modernizing the license-issuing

7 process. And for somebody that's worked in the gun

8 shop for a number of years filling out the old

9 carbon paper and cardboard licenses, this was

10 really a great thing.

11 Even though antlerless deer license

12 allocations had no county boundaries whatsoever,

13 the county treasurers were, and are still,

14 responsible for issuance of these licenses because

15 of the legislative mandate.

16 The current process is antiquated. We

17 believe adoption of House Bill 231 could save the

18 Game Commission time and money. This would relieve

19 the county treasurers of the burden of the

20 antlerless license issuance.

21 We've heard stories of issuing problems

22 with the current process. The Federation, however,

23 believes that housing the entire process under the

24 resource agency using the PAL's system is

25 appropriate and will streamline the process. It

Key Reporters [email protected] 11

1 just makes common sense to us.

2 The Federation views House Bill 231 as a

3 logical and, frankly, past-due change that will

4 improve and fully utilize the capabilities of the

5 computerized point-of-sale licensing system. It's

6 worked well. It's been a useful tool for the

7 agencies, and a convenience for the hunters who

8 should be able to purchase their antlerless license

9 the same way and at the same time they purchase any

10 other license. With today's technology, our

11 question is, what are we waiting for?

12 With the PALS system, county treasurers

13 who still want to issue licenses can continue to do

14 so the same way all authorized license agents

15 operate. This will make the process more efficient

16 and convenient in the long haul.

17 On behalf of the Federation of

18 Sportsmen's Clubs, we hope you will support this

19 legislation and help move it through the

20 legislative process.

21 Thank you for the opportunity to present

22 our views, and I can answer any questions.

23 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: While the

24 members are preparing their questions, we have been

25 joined by Representative Kavulich.

Key Reporters [email protected] 12

1 Any questions? Representative Mullery,

2 prime sponsor of the bill.

3 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Thank you, Mr.

4 Chairman. Thank you, John, for your testimony.

5 I guess my first question is, when you

6 had your annual spring convention, it seems to me,

7 and this is one of the main reasons that I

8 introduced the bill that a logical extension of

9 PALS, and it would a great convenience to hunters.

10 I'm curious as to what, if any, arguments were

11 presented by your members in opposition to

12 supporting my bill?

13 MR. KLINE: I can tell you, right out of

14 the gate, everybody on this committee already knows

15 that Pennsylvania's hunters are a passionate and

16 outspoken bunch. It's rare that the Federation

17 would come before you with a 100 percent vote one

18 way or the other. The vote came out about

19 two-thirds in favor of support of the bill.

20 Opposition was mostly tradition. This

21 is the way it used to be done. We're from

22 Pennsylvania, that sort of thing. But far, the

23 drive to adopt it was convenience. We should only

24 go through buying hunting licenses one time a year.

25 Why do we go through these extra steps? That was

Key Reporters [email protected] 13

1 the predominant feeling.

2 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Did your

3 organization, or did you have any discussions at

4 your annual spring convention as to whether you

5 envision this bill being the issuance of tags as

6 first-come, first-served basis or continuation of

7 the lottery? Was that discussed at all in --

8 MR. KLINE: It was. Our position is to

9 support the bill. The Federation believes it's up

10 to the Game Commission to figure that sort of thing

11 out with the committee's oversight, as always.

12 But, there were two schools of thought.

13 Some folks thought that it should be issued right

14 away. Others believed that it could be -- it could

15 still be an electronic lottery system. For

16 example, the licenses are issued typically in

17 September of a license year. Perhaps, the Game

18 Commission could run an electronic lottery at that

19 time of year and then issue the licenses. Two

20 different ways.

21 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Does the

22 Pennsylvania Federation have any contact,

23 communication, correspondence with other state

24 federations where this type of system has been put

25 into place? Have you received any feedback from

Key Reporters [email protected] 14

1 other states' federations regarding its

2 successfulness?

3 MR. KLINE: We didn't reach out to any

4 specifically for this issue. We have a whole lot

5 of members that hunt in other states. You hear

6 anecdotal stories, they do it this way in this

7 state; they do it this way in that state. But none

8 specific, no.

9 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: I just have one

10 more question about the actual process of voting at

11 your spring convention. Do delegates representing

12 clubs and individuals have their vote count the

13 same? If I show up as a single representative, do

14 I have the same vote as somebody coming as a

15 delegate, let's say on behalf of the Wild Turkey

16 Federation?

17 MR. KLINE: Okay. Individual members

18 are represented at a convention by a member

19 at-large. That's where the -- That person will

20 vote on behalf of individual members. Individual

21 clubs and organizations also have specific votes.

22 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Thank you.

23 I have no further questions, Mr.

24 Chairman.

25 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

Key Reporters [email protected] 15

1 Representative Mullery.

2 Representative Maloney.

3 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: Thank you, Mr.

4 Chairman.

5 Thank you, Mr. Kline, for being here.

6 Just a couple clarifications for me and, really,

7 kind of an overview of some of the statements you

8 made here.

9 I know you mentioned the fact that

10 approximately 70,000 women and men who are members,

11 or at least associated one way or another -- And

12 bringing up the point of the convention, there is a

13 part -- Whether you take a position one way or the

14 other on this bill, there is a part of this that

15 would raise a question to me in previous

16 conversations and things that have come up with

17 respect to the sportsmen of the state.

18 I guess when I see that two-thirds of

19 however many those people were, do you have a

20 number of those amounts of people who you could say

21 were totally and completely represented?

22 MR. KLINE: Specific numbers of members,

23 no, sir. I can tell you that at the 2015 spring

24 convention, there were I think a hundred or 101

25 specific votes, so it was 68-32 and one abstention.

Key Reporters [email protected] 16

1 It was two-thirds, but I can't give you exact

2 number of people, no.

3 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: So comparing it

4 to the deer management issue compared to this type

5 of thing, which basically has mostly -- the

6 controversy has mostly to do with doe allocations,

7 the numbers that you're representing here are

8 nothing compared to the full sportsmen picture with

9 the problem with deer management?

10 MR. KLINE: I'm not sure I understand

11 your question.

12 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: So, in other

13 words, the numbers that you are referring to, the

14 people, who you have more or less lotteried in a

15 question, is very small compared to the overall

16 picture of the sportsmen in the state?

17 MR. KLINE: I can tell you that what I

18 just relayed to you, it was specific to this bill.

19 We didn't talk --

20 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: You brought up

21 all the other different things that you may or may

22 not have brought up in your convention.

23 MR. KLINE: Right.

24 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: You're

25 isolating one issue?

Key Reporters [email protected] 17

1 MR. KLINE: Correct.

2 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: Okay. All

3 right.

4 I would say that there is -- Again,

5 whether you support this bill or not, I'm not

6 taking that position. I'm just trying to give an

7 overall view of the conflict.

8 You know, there are many sportsmen to

9 your argument that would rather go back to the

10 by-county allocation. We continuously see an issue

11 with how those doe allocations take place across

12 the state, and they were better managed by county.

13 And whether or not we hear this later today or not,

14 I will be very blunt and say that the inside

15 politics of this in the beginning was to remove the

16 county commissioners out of this -- out of this

17 equation. So that was the intent from the

18 beginning when you find out the internal politics

19 through the Game Commission and the deer

20 allocation.

21 So I think it's somewhat of a mixed

22 message to say that through the Wildlife Management

23 Units and the fact that we moved away from county

24 that there wouldn't be a reason to do this. So, I

25 just want to make that clear, especially some of

Key Reporters [email protected] 18

1 the members here that may or may not realize that,

2 and many of them asked me to clarify some of those

3 things. So, thanks again.

4 Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

5 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

6 Representative Maloney.

7 Any other members with questions?

8 (No response).

9 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Seeing

10 none, Mr. Kline, thank you so much for your

11 testimony.

12 Okay. With that, we now have Craig

13 Ebersole, Treasure of County of Lancaster and

14 spokesperson for the County Treasurer's Association

15 of Pennsylvania. Mr. Ebersole, whenever you're

16 ready.

17 MR. EBERSOLE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

18 Good morning.

19 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: I'm sorry,

20 Mr. Ebersole. Before you begin, we have been

21 joined by Representative Gabler. I'm sorry, sir.

22 Go ahead.

23 MR. EBERSOLE: No problem.

24 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: And

25 Representative Everett is walking in as we speak.

Key Reporters [email protected] 19

1 Go ahead, Mr. Ebersole.

2 MR. EBERSOLE: Mr. Chairman, and

3 honorable committee members: Thank you for the

4 opportunity to present testimony at today's hearing

5 on House Bill 231.

6 My name is Craig Ebersole. I'm the

7 Treasurer of Lancaster County. I'm a past

8 president of County Treasurer's Association of

9 Pennsylvania, and I currently chair what we call

10 the Antlerless Deer Committee within the state

11 association. My remarks are as the spokesperson

12 for the state association.

13 On most occasions, I favor legislation

14 that is brief--this is a one-page bill--brief as

15 opposed to lengthy or convoluted. But in the case

16 of House Bill 231, its brevity, its lack of

17 implementation methodology, and the carte blanche

18 mentality are the most worrisome components.

19 House Bill 231 specifically mentions

20 using Pennsylvania Automated Licensing System known

21 as PALS. County treasurers across the great

22 Commonwealth have been using the PALS system as

23 mandated by the PGC for many years, and we've

24 watched it crash virtually every year.

25 The co-sponsorship memorandum that

Key Reporters [email protected] 20

1 circulated prior to the introduction of House Bill

2 231 said in part, quote, in light of the recent

3 updates to the Pennsylvania Automated Licensing

4 System, close quote. Well, I hope there have been

5 updates, and I hope the updates are better than the

6 updates to the PALS system that we've been promised

7 over the last five years.

8 Last October the 23rd, the County

9 Treasurer's Association held a annual one-day -- or

10 semi-annual, rather, one-day workshop in State

11 College where we heard from the Fish and Boat

12 Commission, the Bureau of Dog Law, the Department

13 of Revenue, as it applies to small games of chance,

14 and the Pennsylvania Game Commission.

15 Speaking on behalf of the PGC was Mr.

16 Anthony Frascella, chief from the Hunting License

17 Division. As part of his presentation, he was

18 candid and he did mention that House Bill 2493,

19 which was last session's version of this bill, and

20 he mentioned that the PGC supported the bill.

21 We inquired of him as to the

22 distribution methodology of antlerless deer permits

23 if the legislation were to be adopted, and county

24 treasurers cut out of the process. Mr. Frascella's

25 answer was that nothing was in concrete and that

Key Reporters [email protected] 21

1 they, the PGC, were, quote, bouncing several ideas

2 around, close quote.

3 After the meeting I contacted the PGC

4 and offered to meet with them and work on a

5 solution. Rather than a continuation of them

6 supporting a bill that throws us under the bus and

7 we opposing, becoming part of the road surface, no

8 one returned my call.

9 Only a few weeks ago, April 9th to be

10 specific, Mr. Frascella again attended our

11 springtime one-day workshop in State College. This

12 time he told us about House Bill 231 and that the

13 PGC supported the bill. When asked once again

14 about the distribution methodology and how it would

15 benefit the hunter, the answer was, quote, we're

16 bouncing a few ideas around, close quote. Nothing

17 was certain because they would not know exactly

18 what they would need to do until the bill was

19 passed and they had a chance to read it. Where we

20 heard this before may be in a different capital.

21 I hope that they have a plan. I hope

22 that what he told us was that they were only

23 bouncing ideas around was not an accurate

24 statement. I hope that they simply have a plan

25 that they did not wish to share their plan with us

Key Reporters [email protected] 22

1 at that time. I sincerely hope that the plan will

2 benefit the hunters of the Commonwealth and not

3 penalize our counties of $750,000 in annual revenue

4 to the benefit of a large company in Arkansas.

5 If the plan is for on-line sales, I

6 guess the question would be, could that possibly

7 discriminate against the elderly, the poor and the

8 Plain communities in Lancaster county and the many

9 of the other agricultural areas of the

10 Commonwealth.

11 So, what is the future? Well, the

12 future, is it always going to include 750,000 pink

13 envelopes? Probably not. Should the future

14 represent what is best for the hunter? Absolutely

15 yes. Have there been some snafus? Yes. Mostly in

16 home rule counties who have a system that fails to

17 recognize hunters as constituents.

18 Let me ask you this. Do your field

19 offices get letters and phone calls every single

20 week on some sort of issue between a constituent

21 and PennDOT? Probably. Do you put bills in the

22 hopper to take PennDOT out of the equation?

23 Probably not.

24 In House Bill 231, the Pennsylvania Game

25 Commission says PALS will handle the sales. PALS

Key Reporters [email protected] 23

1 is the solution. Their hope is that you will give

2 them a pass on the details, but the devil will be

3 in those details. Right now it just feels like

4 with this one-page bill they want to wrestle

5 antlerless deer permits away from the county and

6 then develop a plan for step number 2. We have

7 seen this play before.

8 When the Pennsylvania Game Commission

9 changed their in-house regulations a number of

10 years ago and had applicants at that time send all

11 the pink envelopes to the PGC in Harrisburg, who

12 then sorted them by WMU and then mailed them in

13 bundles of a hundred back to county treasurers.

14 That was actually a game plan they used for a

15 period of time, until they realized that the temps

16 they hired could not count to a hundred.

17 We're concerned about the hunter. We're

18 concerned about the details of the distribution

19 methods, and we will once again extend our hand to

20 go the second mile with the PGC; send a small

21 committee to meet with the PGC; share our knowledge

22 and thoughts from decades of selling antlerless

23 deer permits, and seek an efficient, economical

24 solution that works for all parties; but most

25 importantly, our shared constituent, the hunters of

Key Reporters [email protected] 24

1 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

2 Thank you. And I'll gladly take

3 questions.

4 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

5 Mr. Ebersole.

6 Questions from the members?

7 Representative Mullery.

8 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Thank you, Mr.

9 Chairman.

10 Thank you, Mr. Ebersole, for being here

11 today and providing your testimony.

12 Since Pennsylvania is the only state in

13 the nation that uses the distribution system we now

14 have in place, do you think we're the only state

15 that's doing it right, and everyone else is doing

16 it wrong? Or is there something we can learn from

17 every other state that's using a computerized

18 system right now?

19 MR. EBERSOLE: As I said in my remarks,

20 I do not believe the 750,000 pink envelopes is the

21 answer going forward. Do I think this is the

22 answer? No.

23 Do I believe that between the knowledge

24 of the sportsmen who are here, hunter groups, the

25 PGC and the county treasurers who have done this

Key Reporters [email protected] 25

1 for decades and decades that a better solution can

2 be found? Yes.

3 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: I listened

4 intently when you talked about big box stores, and

5 from your testimony I can only conclude that you're

6 talking about one, and that's Walmart in an effort

7 to scare people away from the bill.

8 You do understand that there are 750

9 licensing agencies in the Commonwealth, correct,

10 and they are not all big box stores? A lot of them

11 are small mom-and-pop family-owned businesses that

12 sell ammunition, rifles, hunting supplies and

13 things of that nature?

14 MR. EBERSOLE: I don't believe there's

15 anyone else in the Commonwealth that comes close to

16 selling the number of hunting licenses that Walmart

17 sells.

18 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: But you do

19 understand that there are 750 license-issuing

20 agencies in the Commonwealth, correct?

21 MR. EBERSOLE: I understand there are

22 many. Again, I'll -- I'll defer to the executive

23 director, but I will wager that hundreds and

24 hundreds of those moms and pops can go together

25 before you come close to Walmart.

Key Reporters [email protected] 26

1 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: And you also

2 understand that those 750 licensing agents are the

3 same stores that sell hunting equipment are tied

4 directly to the sport of hunting and to hunters?

5 You understand that, correct?

6 MR. EBERSOLE: No.

7 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: So you don't

8 believe that the licensing agents that sell hunting

9 licenses right now through the PALS system to every

10 hunter in Pennsylvania, including those that come

11 to Pennsylvania from out of state, also sell them

12 hunting supplies? You don't believe that?

13 MR. EBERSOLE: Currently, all the county

14 treasurers in the Commonwealth sell hunting

15 licenses; regular season hunting licenses. I have

16 yet to sell an orange vest.

17 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: I'm talking

18 about the stores you referenced in your testimony.

19 MR. EBERSOLE: We're one of the -- We're

20 67 of the 750. We're like 8 percent.

21 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: The remaining

22 693, would you agree that those are dedicated

23 outlets to serve hunters in a full-service

24 capacity?

25 MR. EBERSOLE: I don't know, but I'll

Key Reporters [email protected] 27

1 accept that as fact.

2 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Can you see,

3 then, why that connection and the fact that these

4 stores already sell other available hunting

5 licenses, that common sense points them being the

6 logical source for antlerless deer tags?

7 MR. EBERSOLE: If there were regulations

8 promulgated within this bill or even spoke to

9 regulations being promulgated, I would be more

10 comfortable that that's what would happen.

11 Looking at this one-page bill, I have no

12 idea what will happen other than PALS. PALS is the

13 answer. We have PALS software, let us go.

14 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: When you

15 referenced the, what you describe as a penalty of

16 losing $750,000 to county budgets, do you believe

17 it's the hunter's job to, at least in part, support

18 our county treasurers?

19 MR. EBERSOLE: No. But I was curious as

20 to why a bill of this nature wouldn't be referred

21 to some sort of a fiscal impact committee.

22 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: When you had

23 your meeting on October 23rd, was there any

24 discussion with your fellow treasurers as to how

25 many of their offices view the sale and issuance of

Key Reporters [email protected] 28

1 antlerless tags as a positive revenue generator and

2 how many of them view it as revenue neutral?

3 Because I know, at least in northeastern

4 Pennsylvania, there are several county treasurers'

5 offices who use that fee to simply bring in a

6 political appointee to handle the sales while

7 they're going on, so there's absolutely no revenue

8 generated from the process.

9 Was there any discussion of that at your

10 October 23rd meeting?

11 MR. EBERSOLE: I'll assure you there was

12 no discussion about bringing in political whatevers

13 to utilize the fees or process them for them. We

14 had a frank and open discussion on what we see

15 going forward and what we believe this should be.

16 The revenue part, there were a number of

17 county treasurers who told me to -- and I'll share

18 with you now, that if -- if this component is taken

19 from them, they won't be selling regular hunting

20 licenses simply because -- Well, the Centre County

21 Treasurer, $11,000 from this from regular licenses,

22 600 bucks, is he going to maintain a PALS system

23 terminal, et cetera, et cetera, for $600 a year?

24 No.

25 So there was discussion on the revenue,

Key Reporters [email protected] 29

1 yes, sir.

2 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: I understand

3 why it wouldn't be openly discussed about political

4 favored, jobs and things of that nature. But in

5 your position as past president of the association

6 and current chair of the Antlerless Deer Committee,

7 is this something you know that happens across the

8 Commonwealth?

9 MR. EBERSOLE: Is -- Is what something?

10 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Where county

11 treasurers take the income generated from -- the

12 revenue generated from the process of issuing

13 antlerless deer tags and simply redirect that

14 revenue into a political appointee for a period of

15 time?

16 MR. EBERSOLE: Not at all.

17 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: You're totally

18 unfamiliar with that?

19 MR. EBERSOLE: I will tell you that I've

20 been treasurer for 12 years. I've been in the

21 County Treasurer's Association every one of those

22 years. The treasurer of Indiana County, Sandy --

23 Sandy Kirkland, has been there for many, many, more

24 years than I have, I knew her for 10 years before I

25 knew she was a Democrat.

Key Reporters [email protected] 30

1 We have no caucuses at the County

2 Treasurer's Association; no Republican caucus, no

3 Democratic caucus. Money is green. Money knows no

4 party.

5 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: I respect your

6 opinion that you believe this will result in a

7 potential loss of revenue to some counties. I

8 don't necessarily agree with your figure. Is that

9 750,000 a gross figure?

10 MR. EBERSOLE: It's approximately

11 750,000 antlerless permits issued a year.

12 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Okay.

13 MR. EBERSOLE: And (inaudible word) we

14 get a buck a doe.

15 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: But in addition

16 to what they cost and how many are issued, isn't it

17 true that many county treasurers have to spend

18 money to sell those licenses, whether it's on

19 additional staff, overtime, et cetera? So there

20 are costs associated with the county, so it's not a

21 gross loss of $750,000, correct?

22 MR. EBERSOLE: No. Again, I know county

23 treasurers who go to the Office of Aging, and there

24 are senior citizens, particularly senior hunters,

25 who can't wait to raise their hand and come in and

Key Reporters [email protected] 31

1 volunteer just to open envelopes or what have you.

2 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: So it's your

3 opinion that the counties realize every single

4 dollar that is generated from the antlerless tags,

5 and there's absolutely no costs associated with

6 running the program through each of the 67

7 counties?

8 MR. EBERSOLE: First I would tell you I

9 do not know how Philadelphia County handles it or

10 doesn't handle it. I don't know anything about

11 Philadelphia County.

12 The other counties handle it however the

13 elected officials sees fit that that is the most

14 economical and efficient for the constituents.

15 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: So the answer

16 to my question is, you have no idea what the number

17 -- what the potential revenue impact is for the 67

18 counties?

19 MR. EBERSOLE: Can I quantify it sitting

20 here? No.

21 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: I have no

22 further questions, Mr. Chairman.

23 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

24 Representative Mullery.

25 We have been joined by Reverend Farina,

Key Reporters [email protected] 32

1 Emrick and Heffley. Next up is Vice Chairman Moul.

2 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Thank you, Mr.

3 Chairman.

4 If I wanted -- If I lived in the

5 northwest or northeast and I wanted to get a doe

6 license in your county, how would I go about doing

7 that without traveling to your county?

8 MR. EBERSOLE: Through the mail.

9 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Where would I get

10 the application for your county? From a vendor out

11 in my neck of the woods?

12 MR. EBERSOLE: The application comes

13 with your hunting license.

14 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Okay.

15 MR. EBERSOLE: And it is not county

16 specific.

17 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: And when would I

18 know that I actually received a doe permit from

19 your county? Would that be down the road

20 somewhere? Is there a specific date that you open

21 up the envelopes? Is it luck of the draw? How do

22 you determine who gets those licenses and when?

23 MR. EBERSOLE: There is an absolute

24 specific date before we'll even accept them. If

25 you send it in early, it will be returned because

Key Reporters [email protected] 33

1 that's the regulations and we will follow them.

2 It's a Monday and -- I'm lucky the post

3 office is next door. We go over to the post office

4 and come back with, admittedly, a couple of trays

5 and we start processing.

6 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: And how do you --

7 If you receive more applications than you have

8 permits allocated, how do you determine who gets

9 the doe license?

10 MR. EBERSOLE: The WMU allocations are

11 set by the Game Commission.

12 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Correct.

13 MR. EBERSOLE: And as we're entering, we

14 can see on-line how many allocations are left for a

15 given WMU, and it was -- It was a number of days

16 this year, and I don't remember the exact number.

17 There was a number of days before the first WMU

18 sold out.

19 Our WMU in Lancaster County is 5B.

20 There's a very large allocation for 5B. It didn't

21 sell out for a month, month and a half.

22 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Okay. Let's just

23 play devil's advocate for a moment. Let's say in

24 those trays of a few thousand envelopes that you

25 receive, you find out that you only have a thousand

Key Reporters [email protected] 34

1 that you can -- that you're allocated to give out.

2 You're going to run out because you've got 2,000

3 applications. How do you determine which thousand

4 gets the license and which thousand does not?

5 MR. EBERSOLE: We don't sort them by

6 WMU. You can live anywhere --

7 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Correct.

8 MR. EBERSOLE: -- send your application

9 anywhere to hunt anywhere.

10 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Correct.

11 MR. EBERSOLE: So you can live in Adams

12 County, send it to Perry County to hunt in

13 Lancaster County. That's up to you; wherever you

14 think you want to send it.

15 But the number of allocations left are

16 by WMU. I don't know what the WMUs, the thousand

17 stack is asking for. I don't know that it's going

18 to run out because -- Just because they send it to

19 me doesn't mean they want 5B.

20 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: But you issue the

21 license, correct?

22 MR. EBERSOLE: For anywhere in the

23 Commonwealth.

24 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: For anywhere in

25 the Commonwealth?

Key Reporters [email protected] 35

1 MR. EBERSOLE: Anywhere.

2 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Well, if one is

3 sold out, how do you know you can issue that

4 license?

5 MR. EBERSOLE: When it is sold out?

6 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: The WMU is sold

7 out. Let's say 5-O is sold out.

8 MR. EBERSOLE: The WMU that you, the

9 hunter, is seeking?

10 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Yes. How do you

11 know -- If I'm seeking that and you've got it in

12 your hand, how do you know whether to give me that

13 license or not? You can see that on-line?

14 MR. EBERSOLE: Yes, sir.

15 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Well, wouldn't it

16 make sense, if you could see that instantaneously

17 as to hunter which WMU user is sold out so you know

18 whether to apply for that one or not to apply for

19 that one?

20 MR. EBERSOLE: If you're waiting the

21 first month, yes. If you're -- I believe that the

22 hunter -- If this goes live at 12:01 in the

23 morning, I believe hunters will set their alarm

24 clock.

25 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: They might. But

Key Reporters [email protected] 36

1 my concern is, they send you an envelope to hunt in

2 5A, and they're sitting there waiting and find out

3 later on, oops, 5A's sold out. They really should

4 have applied for Garth's District 4. Darn. Wish I

5 would have applied for that.

6 Had they gone to a PALS system, they

7 would have known instantaneously, correct?

8 MR. EBERSOLE: I don't know.

9 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Am I correct about

10 that?

11 MR. EBERSOLE: I haven't seen how this

12 is gonna be handled.

13 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: So, I would

14 certainly --

15 MR. EBERSOLE: But you went, darn, I

16 should have applied for 4A. On that envelope you

17 put your first, second and third choices.

18 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Okay. I just see

19 it as a more modern up-to-date. I can know right

20 now what's available wherever.

21 I don't want to take too much time here,

22 but the other question is, if they wrote -- if

23 Representative Mullery wrote into his bill that the

24 county would get a dollar for every person that

25 applied for a doe permit from that county so that

Key Reporters [email protected] 37

1 counties wouldn't lose a dollar, would you still be

2 opposed to the bill?

3 MR. EBERSOLE: I would be opposed to not

4 knowing how we've improved -- I mean, I don't want

5 to be bought off and the hunter suffers. The

6 hunter is our shared constituent. We believe that

7 we have ideas to share with the PGC. We've reached

8 out to them.

9 A few years ago, you will recall that

10 the Bureau of Dog Law was in disarray. I was

11 selling 36,000 dog licenses a year in Lancaster

12 County. This year I'll sell a thousand a week.

13 I'll sell 52,000, because we met with the Bureau of

14 Dog Law. We had a real give-and-take, a sit-down,

15 and we came up with solutions that didn't involve

16 legislation.

17 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Okay. So it's

18 just not about money. It's you want to be involved

19 in the process. Okay. Fair enough.

20 MR. EBERSOLE: I want to be involved in

21 improved process.

22 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Thank you. Fair

23 enough.

24 Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

25 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

Key Reporters [email protected] 38

1 Vice Chairman.

2 Representative Peifer.

3 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: Thank you, Mr.

4 Chairman.

5 I just want to make a comment. The

6 maker of the bill--And I don't know where he was

7 going with this--but he mentioned the northeast.

8 You know, I've tried to sit here and listen to

9 this, and I'm trying to work together with the Game

10 Commission, obviously, with the maker of the bill.

11 But when he says the people in the northeast hire

12 political appointees and have political favors to

13 hire people, I personally have no idea what he's

14 talking about.

15 Now, if he has an issue within his own

16 county where there is an issue and a problem and

17 there are political appointees and political favors

18 being done, I wish he would just address that

19 county specifically and keep Pike and Wayne out of

20 it, because we have nothing to do with what he's

21 talking about.

22 Everyone's here looking at me like we're

23 doing something wrong. I know nothing being -- as

24 far as -- As far as the organizational structure,

25 as far as the way cash flow occurs, I know nothing

Key Reporters [email protected] 39

1 that is being done wrong in my two counties.

2 And my second point is, as far as costs,

3 a treasurer does not make overtime. So a treasurer

4 is not sitting there late at night doing -- They're

5 not getting paid for overtime. Deputy treasurers

6 are considered management. They do not collect

7 overtime.

8 So, I'm sure there's some additional

9 costs maybe for additional staff somewhere along

10 the line. But, I can tell you that most of the

11 revenue that was generated from these doe licenses

12 stayed in the county where -- where they were

13 issued.

14 So, if the gentleman wants to make

15 comment specifically about arranging, I'd just like

16 him to make that a tighter area so my constituents

17 who are working very hard and they're very proud of

18 the jobs that they perform aren't being painted by

19 that brush, Mr. Chairman. Thank you.

20 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

21 Representative Peifer.

22 Representative Maloney.

23 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: Thank you, Mr.

24 Chairman.

25 Sir, I appreciate your testimony being

Key Reporters [email protected] 40

1 here today. Couple things I think is pretty

2 interesting about the questioning and the process.

3 Would you say that this all changed and

4 we are here having this discussion because Wildlife

5 Management Units were changed from county to a

6 different geographic area?

7 MR. EBERSOLE: It was impactful.

8 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: It was

9 impactful. So it had something to do with it. I

10 know that somewhat of a -- allude to my next

11 question.

12 I think -- I think when we see

13 efficiency and convenience -- Again, I'm not

14 hopefully just speaking for my geographical area,

15 but for the sportsmen across Pennsylvania. It

16 would seem to me the convenience and efficiency is

17 something that we should strive for.

18 So, would you see any problem with using

19 the PALS system if you were in a county doe

20 allocation process; for instance, going back to the

21 county-by-county doe allocation, but use the PALS

22 system to initiate it? Would that be a possibility

23 to you?

24 MR. EBERSOLE: It would be a

25 possibility.

Key Reporters [email protected] 41

1 REPRESENTATIVE MALONEY: Okay.

2 Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

3 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

4 Representative Maloney.

5 Any other members? Representative

6 English.

7 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: Thank you, Mr.

8 Chair.

9 I know the system's outdated, but let me

10 just understand. On that special magic Monday

11 morning, I need to get it in the mail, and then I

12 get it to whatever county, and I can pick and

13 choose, and I put my first, second and third

14 preference. And I hope if it goes to your county,

15 you're going to entering it into --

16 How are you entering it? Is it like the

17 PALS system that you're entering it from your

18 county? That's the part I don't know what you do.

19 MR. EBERSOLE: Yes.

20 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: You get the

21 tray from the post office. Okay. So you're

22 entering it and your staff, right?

23 MR. EBERSOLE: Yes.

24 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: So it's a

25 little bit of roll the dice, which stack you get

Key Reporters [email protected] 42

1 and how you process them. What I understand is

2 you're seeing --

3 MR. EBERSOLE: Yes.

4 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: There's an

5 allotment and you're seeing commuter-wise it's

6 going down and --

7 MR. EBERSOLE: Everyone -- Last year

8 everyone who sent to my county the first week got

9 their first choice.

10 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: That's fine. I

11 mail mine to Cambria County. That was my Marine

12 Corps Reserve Unit. I put my little Marine Corps

13 sticker on there because I hope there's some Marine

14 in the post office that's going to pull mine when

15 it gets real narrow, they're going to pull mine

16 ahead of someone else's. That's where I keep my

17 fingers crossed and it's worked. I think only one

18 year I've missed out and got my second choice. So

19 thanks everybody in Cambria County that does that.

20 I guess I'm just looking for how -- And

21 it will be for the executive director coming up.

22 What's going to happen with the proposed bill? Are

23 we going to have the 750 point of sales? Now I

24 have to go and get in line and wait to get -- to

25 see if it can be computer generated so that I know

Key Reporters [email protected] 43

1 instantly that I got my particular area? I'm

2 trying to see -- I'm just trying to understand the

3 mechanics and where the difference is if all the

4 county treasurers are processing them versus the

5 point of sales. That's more of a statement, I

6 guess, than a question.

7 I'm conflicted here. How is it going to

8 improve with this bill? I'm looking for

9 improvement because, you do worry when you have to

10 get the right color and the stamp and the return

11 stamp and, yes, there's 98 cents. It just seems

12 like a pain to do, but it is kind of a system.

13 I really don't -- I'm not sure I want to

14 get in line and have to run up to my store and

15 stand in line behind, you know, a hundred other

16 people, because that's what happens on the Sunday

17 before you have to mail them in when I go, oh,

18 yikes, I've got to get my booklet to be able to get

19 in the mail for Monday morning. That's exactly

20 what happens.

21 How is this going to be any different?

22 MR. EBERSOLE: And that's one of our

23 questions. And again, we've -- We'd like to have

24 dialogue with PGC. But, will it be all on-line;

25 you can do it from your home at oh dot 30. I don't

Key Reporters [email protected] 44

1 know. Or will you have to physically go somewhere?

2 You're talking about the 98 cents in stamps. You

3 can't start your car and leave the driveway for 98

4 cents, so, you know, put it in mail.

5 But we're -- We've been down the road;

6 not with this executive director, and so part of me

7 doesn't -- I take no joy in accusing them of things

8 that didn't occur under his watch. But, I just --

9 April the 9th, or whatever it was, when I asked how

10 will this work, the answer was, we'll have to wait

11 until it's passed to see what it looks like. We're

12 bouncing ideas around. I'm like, no, you can't

13 support a bill that you don't know how it's going

14 to work. You can't do that.

15 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: Well, thank

16 you. I appreciate your information today.

17 MR. EBERSOLE: Thank you.

18 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE:

19 Representative Mullery, you have a follow-up

20 question?

21 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Thank you, Mr.

22 Chairman. Just two comments.

23 First in response to Representative

24 Peifer, I don't think I referenced the northeast

25 when I made those comments. I simply asked Mr.

Key Reporters [email protected] 45

1 Ebersole if he had heard in his past lives as

2 either the past president or the County Treasurer's

3 Association or the current chair of the Antlerless

4 Deer Committee whether or not that was an issue

5 across the state.

6 The reason I brought it up at this

7 hearing is because I was approached by three

8 members of the State House who came to me and told

9 me why they couldn't support the bill is because

10 they were contacted by their state treasurers and

11 told that this is the reason why they didn't want

12 them to support the bill. That's number 1.

13 Number 2, in response to what -- the

14 line of question that Rep. Moul was laying down.

15 He had it exactly right. What this bill seeks to

16 do is eliminate the middle man.

17 So when you go to, whether it's the big

18 box store or your mom-and-pop gun shop, and you buy

19 your buck tag and you say, listen, I'm here at the

20 point of purchase. I want to do one-stop shopping.

21 I want to hunt in 3E. He pulls it up right there.

22 You're not waiting a month for the county treasurer

23 to get the envelope, go into same system and see if

24 it's there. If it's sold out, I want this WMU. If

25 that's sold out, I want this one. But you're

Key Reporters [email protected] 46

1 leaving that store with all your tags.

2 That's why I think the time has come

3 that we need to move this forward; get it to the

4 point where we're in the 21st Century, and start

5 treating our hunters appropriately.

6 Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

7 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Questions

8 from any of the members?

9 (No response).

10 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Just one

11 follow-up, if I may, Treasurer Ebersole. If you

12 can maybe give some likeness on how the current

13 system with the pink envelopes and the bins and the

14 process going on for a very long time is better or

15 more convenient for the sportsmen as opposed to a

16 system in which hunters could get their antlerless

17 tags at the same time as they're getting their

18 general license and other tags.

19 MR. EBERSOLE: The last part of your

20 question is yet to be seen. You're assuming a

21 certain methodology there that would occur at the

22 same time. The bill doesn't say that. The bill

23 simply says, here's a software package that we got

24 from a company in Tennessee or Kentucky--I forget

25 where Palace is headquartered--and this is the

Key Reporters [email protected] 47

1 answer. There are no details as to how it will be

2 more convenient.

3 If it weren't for some past history of,

4 you know, the PALS system this year it's going to

5 be sliced bread and it crashes. It crashes the

6 first or the second or third day. The Fish and

7 Boat Commission as of a month ago had not renewed

8 their contract with PALS. They're still looking at

9 it. They still have some questions. Why? And all

10 -- always fixer (phonetic).

11 And I don't know that what you all think

12 will happen will happen because it doesn't say

13 that. All this bill does is wrestle control

14 completely away from the counties, and now the PGC

15 can move forward and -- and do as they see fit

16 under regulations as opposed to coming back to this

17 committee.

18 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: You were

19 here when Mr. Kline testified about the carbon

20 copies and the stuff that we used to do years and

21 years ago filling out a hunting application. Do

22 you agree that that was a rather antiquated system

23 and needed to be updated as a lot of states have

24 done?

25 MR. EBERSOLE: That was a -- Excuse me.

Key Reporters [email protected] 48

1 That was a system where there were lines out the

2 door on the courthouses on the first day, yes, sir.

3 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Well,

4 regardless of the lines, just the fact of a hand

5 application versus -- I realize technology is

6 wonderful when it works, and it certainly does have

7 its nuisances. But for the majority, I mean, we're

8 sending rockets into outer space and a lot of great

9 advances in science and technology as a result of

10 the work that we've done.

11 The question is, do you believe that was

12 an antiquated system and needed to be updated?

13 MR. EBERSOLE: Yes, sir.

14 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Mr.

15 Ebersole, thank you so much for your testimony and

16 traveling up here from Lancaster County.

17 With that, we're going to go with Matt

18 Hough, the Executive Director of the Pennsylvania

19 Game Commission, for the final testimony.

20 MR. EBERSOLE: Thank you to the

21 committee.

22 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Mr. Hough,

23 whenever you're ready. And I think you have a

24 couple of guests with you.

25 MR. HOUGH: I do.

Key Reporters [email protected] 49

1 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: I'm going

2 to be stepping out for just a couple minutes to go

3 to a voting meeting. Vice Chairman Moul will be

4 conducting the meeting until I get back. So,

5 whenever you're ready, Mr. Hough.

6 Vice Chairman, it's all yours.

7 ACTING CHAIRMAN MOUL: Thank you.

8 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: I'll be

9 back.

10 MR. HOUGH: Good morning. Thank you,

11 Chairman Gillespie, and members of the House Game

12 and Fisheries Committee. I appreciate the

13 invitation to testify before you today with regards

14 to House Bill 231, which was introduced by

15 Representative Mullery.

16 With me today are Dorothy Derr and Paul

17 Mahon. Dot is the director of the agency's Bureau

18 of Administration, and Paul is the agency's

19 director of automated technology, and are the

20 agency's experts in automated license sales.

21 I would like to state upfront and for

22 the record that the Pennsylvania Game Commission is

23 in full support of this much anticipated and long

24 overdue legislation.

25 Nearly six years ago, in conjunction

Key Reporters [email protected] 50

1 with the Fish and Boat Commission and an outside

2 vendor, the Pennsylvania Automated License System,

3 or PALS, was launched. This system finally allowed

4 the hunters of Pennsylvania the opportunity to

5 purchase their hunting and furtaking licenses and

6 add-on privileges or permits faster, easier and

7 more convenient than in the past. That is, almost

8 all of their add-on permits. As you're well aware

9 and the reason for us being here today,

10 applications for antlerless licenses must be

11 submitted through the county treasurers.

12 With all of today's technological

13 advantages at our fingertips, to say that the

14 process hunters have to go through to purchase

15 their doe license is antiquated would be an

16 understatement. This process remains a point of

17 contention that we hear about every year, as I'm

18 sure you do as well.

19 Have you ever sealed the outer part of

20 you're pink antlerless application envelope and

21 forgotten whether or not you put the postage stamp

22 on the inside? How many times do you check,

23 recheck, and then check again to make sure

24 everything is filled out exactly the way it needs

25 to be? And if you make a mistake like forgetting

Key Reporters [email protected] 51

1 to circle the number of applications contained in

2 the envelope, you find out several weeks later that

3 your application was rejected and returned to you

4 through the postal system.

5 The fact of the matter is, that after

6 all of these years, the current antlerless license

7 system is still confusing to many hunters, with no

8 reason other than, that that is the way it's always

9 been, and hunters are growing tired of this

10 cumbersome process.

11 Make no mistake about it, Pennsylvania

12 hunters want this process to change. They want to

13 be able to purchase their doe tags on-line or over

14 the counter when they visit one of our issuing

15 agents and purchase every other tag and permit. By

16 moving the sale of antlerless licenses to the

17 automated system used by 750 issuing agents, you'll

18 be creating that one-stop shopping experience that

19 hunters have been asking for.

20 This also eliminates the extended

21 waiting game; waiting to find out if you are

22 awarded a doe tag or not; waiting for your check to

23 be processed; and waiting for that doe tag to

24 arrive in the mail. By moving to PALS, you will

25 know if there are antlerless tags available for

Key Reporters [email protected] 52

1 purchase in the Wildlife Management Unit that you

2 are interested in hunting. And if that WMU is sold

3 out, you will know it immediately and receive an

4 antlerless license for your second choice.

5 The idea of having a first-come, first-

6 served system is of great importance to our

7 hunters. Some may argue that the current system

8 with the county treasurers is first come, first

9 served. In actuality, that is simply not the case.

10 And I would agree -- And I would argue that the

11 proposed automated system would, in fact, be much

12 closer to a true first-come, first-served system.

13 Unfortunately, for a number of our

14 hunters over the past few years of sending their

15 antlerless app -- allocations to a county

16 treasurer, only to find out later that that

17 particular treasurer's office decided that they

18 would not process any applications, and without

19 giving any kind of notice beforehand. This left

20 many hunters without the opportunity to apply for

21 the WMU they wanted to hunt, because by the time

22 they realized what had happened, that WMU was

23 already sold out.

24 There have been some that have

25 questioned whether or not the automated license

Key Reporters [email protected] 53

1 system can handle the volume of sales that will

2 probably occur on the first day antlerless licenses

3 go on sale. With today's technology, we have no

4 reason to believe it couldn't. Software will be

5 activated that will essentially throttle the

6 transactions, much like the system used today for

7 the sale of concert tickets. This software will

8 put the applicant into a queue that will process

9 their applications in the order in which they are

10 received. This system is currently being used for

11 hunting license sales in Colorado, and it is our

12 understanding that it is working very well.

13 Not all antlerless licenses will be sold

14 on-line. The 750 issuing agents located across the

15 Commonwealth will continue to operate as they

16 currently do, with one exception; they will now be

17 able to issue antlerless licenses over the counter.

18 Keep in mind, this also includes our 65 county

19 treasurers who are also issuing agents.

20 With any new idea or proposal, the

21 question of costs always comes up. What will the

22 impact of this change be to the agency; and even

23 more importantly, what will the impact be to the

24 consumer, the Pennsylvania hunter? In this

25 particular case, there's actually going to be a

Key Reporters [email protected] 54

1 savings for both.

2 We have done the research into this, and

3 for the Game Commission we would see significant

4 savings. On just the printing and shipping of the

5 antlerless license application envelopes alone, we

6 would save approximately $109,000.

7 Additionally, hunters who purchase their

8 antlerless licenses over the counter at an issuing

9 agent will save on postage. This may sound

10 trivial, but the proposed change to utilize over-

11 the-counter sales will currently save hunters 98

12 cents per application envelope that they now are

13 required to mail in. However, hunters utilizing

14 the on-line sales process would still be required

15 to pay a postage fee.

16 Today's hunters want this change to take

17 place and have been asking for it for years. We

18 believe the Pennsylvania Automated License System

19 is currently capable of handling it, and it is time

20 to bring the antlerless license process into the

21 21st Century.

22 I would like to thank Representative

23 Mullery for introducing this important piece of

24 legislation, and thank this committee for the

25 opportunity to come in to testify today.

Key Reporters [email protected] 55

1 I will be happy to answer any questions

2 you may have.

3 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

4 Executive Director Hough.

5 Questions? Representative Mullery.

6 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Thank you,

7 Executive Director.

8 First question is simply this: How long

9 will it take to switch over to the new system? Is

10 this something that if this bill were to proceed

11 through to pass, we can have it in place for next

12 hunting season?

13 MR. HOUGH: We would like this to take

14 place for the 2016 hunting license season.

15 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: With regard to

16 the dollar agent fee, if we were to go to this

17 system and this bill were adopted, who would get

18 that fee?

19 MR. HOUGH: The sporting goods stores

20 that are issuing agents or the county treasurer, if

21 they were an issuing agent, would still collect

22 that dollar fee.

23 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Obviously, you

24 were present for Mr. Ebersole's testimony. How

25 many traditional deer licenses are sold, if you

Key Reporters [email protected] 56

1 know, through the 65 county treasurers' offices?

2 MR. HOUGH: I don't know. Dot?

3 MS. DERR: General licenses?

4 MR. HOUGH: General licenses. Do you

5 know, Dot?

6 MS. DERR: From the county treasurers,

7 no, I do not.

8 MR. HOUGH: Don't have that information.

9 We can get that for you.

10 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: I would

11 appreciate that.

12 Do you know which WMUs sell out of tags

13 in the first round? Do you have that data

14 available?

15 MR. HOUGH: Yes. It's usually 2G and

16 2H.

17 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Two WMUs?

18 MR. HOUGH: Correct.

19 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Okay. So would

20 those few areas, am I right in my thought, that

21 standing in line to get an antlerless tag for the

22 vast majority of WMUs will not be needed?

23 MR. HOUGH: We anticipate there will be

24 some standing in line. And if I was a sporting

25 goods store, I would take advantage of that. I

Key Reporters [email protected] 57

1 think that would add to the overall experience, you

2 know, of coming in there and hunters purchasing the

3 other items that are available in a sporting goods

4 store.

5 REPRESENTATIVE MULLERY: Thank you, Mr.

6 Chairman. I have no additional questions.

7 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

8 Representative Mullery.

9 Representative Moul.

10 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Thank you, Mr.

11 Chairman.

12 Matt. Thank you, guys. Appreciate you

13 being here. Good to see a fellow Adams countian

14 here today.

15 MR. HOUGH: Thank you.

16 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Have you ever done

17 a survey among the hunters to see if this system is

18 what they want as opposed to mailing in? I mean,

19 just so I can put that thought to bed that, for

20 sure, this is what the hunters want?

21 MR. HOUGH: I don't believe we've ever

22 done a survey on antlerless licenses. We have done

23 surveys on the overall license process, which you

24 can purchase on-line at an issuing agent, and they

25 have -- they have preferred that system compared to

Key Reporters [email protected] 58

1 the old system.

2 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: If this bill were

3 to be voted into law, assigned into law, how long

4 would it take to actually make the transformation

5 from county treasurers to the PALS system?

6 MR. HOUGH: Well, first thing we would

7 have to do is change the regulations, because in

8 Title 58, which is regulations, as Chairman

9 Ebersole pointed to, those regulations were put in

10 place for the county treasurer system, so we'd have

11 to go back in and change the regulations, which

12 would take two commission meetings to have that,

13 because they have to go through two voting cycles.

14 The actual Game Commission would have to vote twice

15 on that to make sure that those regulations pass.

16 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: You're talking

17 probably the best part of the year out until you

18 get through everything that you need to do and set

19 it up.

20 MR. HOUGH: Which is why we're looking

21 at the 2016 license year. We would be ready to go

22 by then.

23 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: All right. As far

24 as -- Boy, this is probably going to be a touchy

25 area to tiptoe through, so I'll just come right out

Key Reporters [email protected] 59

1 and say it.

2 Obviously, as Mr. Ebersole's testimony,

3 the county treasurer is going to lose $750,000

4 because 750,000 doe licenses--I assume that's a

5 good number--were issued. I find it hard to

6 believe that they have no costs in it.

7 So, if they're taking in 750,000, and

8 this question I probably should have asked this

9 gentleman, what's the actual cost when the dust all

10 settles of the labor it takes to produce and mail

11 out? So, what is their net?

12 And out of that, in order to keep the

13 counties whole, because I know we're going to get

14 push-back from all our local commissioners, hey,

15 you're taking money away from us that we need to

16 run our county and we don't want to raise taxes,

17 so -- Is there some medium ground that the Game

18 Commission, at least for a while, could work with

19 the counties to make sure we don't just snap the

20 plug completely?

21 MR. HOUGH: Well, keep in mind that

22 county treasurers can still be an issuing agent.

23 They can still sell antlerless licenses over the

24 counter, so -- they can still --

25 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: They can. But you

Key Reporters [email protected] 60

1 know as well as I do --

2 MR. HOUGH: Right.

3 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: -- when I'm in a

4 sporting goods store -- Like he said, he never sold

5 one orange vest in his life. When I'm in the

6 sporting goods store, why would I not buy it right

7 there.

8 MR. HOUGH: The other thing I think you

9 have to realize is, the average amount that a

10 county treasurer takes in is $11,500. It ranges

11 from $1,419 in Cameron County to $30,499 in Berks,

12 I believe?

13 MS. DERR: In Bucks.

14 MR. HOUGH: Bucks, excuse me. So the

15 average is $11,000.

16 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Okay. So we're

17 not talking about a large amount of money.

18 MR. HOUGH: Not when it's spread out

19 over 65 counties.

20 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Yeah. I just know

21 the questions and the comments that are going to be

22 coming at us from the County Commissioners

23 Association. You're take money from us. Now how

24 are we going to get it back? Just kind of

25 tiptoeing through those tulips a little bit.

Key Reporters [email protected] 61

1 MR. HOUGH: I know Dot can tell you

2 actually how much it cost to lease another

3 terminal, which many county treasurers have to do.

4 Dot, you have that information?

5 MS. DERR: Yes. Many county treasurers

6 have the opportunity to lease additional equipment

7 to get ready for the antlerless process. We had

8 approximately 13 county treasurers that leased

9 additional equipment last year directly from our

10 vendor. The cost of that is approximately $3,600

11 total. It turns out to be about $260 per county

12 treasurer to lease it three months minimum a new

13 station.

14 In addition to that, we have many county

15 treasurers that go out and hire temporary help just

16 for that first or second week. So, of course,

17 that's a savings that they will recognize as well.

18 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: So the average

19 actually comes down a little bit. The counties

20 that don't lease the equipment, do they own their

21 equipment?

22 MS. DERR: No. The equipment is owned

23 and provided free of charge by the vendor. That's

24 all part of our negotiations with our contractor.

25 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Now wait a minute.

Key Reporters [email protected] 62

1 You just said some counties lease equipment.

2 MS. DERR: Yes, unless -- The county

3 treasurers -- The 65 county treasurers currently

4 are issued three stations, and they're the only

5 issuing agent that has three stations. All other

6 issuing agents are provided one station. The

7 county treasurers were given that primarily because

8 of the issuing agent -- excuse me, the antlerless

9 process.

10 In addition to that, if they choose to

11 bring on additional help, they have the opportunity

12 to lease an additional station for a cost of $260

13 for a three-month period.

14 REPRESENTATIVE MOUL: Okay. Thank you.

15 Thanks.

16 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

17 Vice Chairman Moul.

18 Representative English.

19 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: Thank you, Mr.

20 Chair.

21 So, can you just again help me

22 understand, where's the -- Is there still not going

23 to be a bottleneck or a rush for that first day for

24 the WMUs that traditionally sell out? Is there not

25 going to be a rush for everyone standing in line

Key Reporters [email protected] 63

1 trying to get those?

2 I think the system will be great, I

3 fully agree with it, for once the immediate rush is

4 over where the WMUs that don't sell out that really

5 seems like a no-brainer, and that would be great.

6 But we just have this challenge of trying to get

7 the areas of your first choice. I don't see it

8 going away. I still see us 25 deep waiting in line

9 at the sportsmen club, or do we go through the luck

10 of the draw at the county treasurer?

11 MR. HOUGH: Actually -- No, I anticipate

12 there will be some waiting in line. But you have

13 to realize, there's two ways that you can purchase

14 your antlerless license through the PALS system.

15 You can go over the counter or you can go on-line.

16 So basically, from your Smartphone, once licenses

17 go on sale, you can go into the website through the

18 outdoor shop and order your hunting license right

19 from your phone. Now, you would have to pay

20 postage in that case, but you could still get your

21 antlerless license.

22 We would hope that people realize they

23 don't have to wait in line and do purchase their

24 license on-line as opposed to going to the counter.

25 But, we know there are some that are definitely

Key Reporters [email protected] 64

1 going to go to the counter, and some for religious

2 beliefs are not going to have any other choice but

3 to go to the counter to purchase that.

4 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: So I can do it

5 from my home computer?

6 MR. HOUGH: Correct.

7 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: I was not aware

8 of that, so thank you.

9 MR. HOUGH: You can do that from your

10 home computer right through the PALS system.

11 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: Then we're back

12 to like the concert ticket analogy.

13 MR. HOUGH: Correct.

14 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: I'm trying to

15 get Neil Diamond or the Rolling Stones.

16 MR. HOUGH: And they're sold out in 20

17 minutes.

18 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: I saw Neil

19 Diamond. It was good. I liked it.

20 MR. HOUGH: I just want to clarify that

21 the county treasurers currently use the PALS system

22 to issue antlerless licenses. So this isn't

23 something that's brand-new. The system can handle

24 the issuance of antlerless licenses. We're going

25 from 65 agents that do that now, the county

Key Reporters [email protected] 65

1 treasurers, to 756. So, I mean, that's the

2 difference, basically.

3 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: Can people --

4 Can I sit at home and try to get my 30 friends from

5 my hunting camp, and I sit there and I enter them

6 all at one time?

7 MR. HOUGH: No. You can only order

8 three as a group.

9 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: Okay.

10 MR. HOUGH: Yes, that's the maximum.

11 That's the way the system currently is.

12 REPRESENTATIVE ENGLISH: Okay. All

13 right. Thank you.

14 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

15 Representative English.

16 Representative Peifer.

17 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: Thank you, Mr.

18 Chairman.

19 Thank you for being here today.

20 Has the Game Commission looked at the

21 cash flow of this situation? I mean, the licenses

22 go on sale in July. Everyone runs out in the

23 middle of July and buys a license so they can apply

24 for a doe license, because you need to buy your

25 hunting license first. Is that a concern?

Key Reporters [email protected] 66

1 Because in my mind, similar to

2 Representative English, I see a lot of people

3 November 19th going out there in line to go hunting

4 tomorrow trying to get their doe license then. And

5 that's five months after your cash flow -- or three

6 or four months after your cash flow normally comes

7 in.

8 MR. HOUGH: We do have a -- I mean,

9 license usually go on sale about June 8th is when

10 the regular hunting license begins; you know, when

11 the new cycle starts for hunting license sales.

12 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: So you have a

13 large group of people buying their hunting

14 licenses, their 50, $60 of hunting license then --

15 MR. HOUGH: Correct.

16 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: -- upfront --

17 MR. HOUGH: Correct.

18 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: -- because they

19 need the pink envelopes to be able to apply for

20 their doe licenses in August.

21 MR. HOUGH: July, yes.

22 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: Okay, July.

23 MR. HOUGH: Yes.

24 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: So, now that's

25 all going to happen in November. It's going to

Key Reporters [email protected] 67

1 happen the day before hunting season.

2 MR. HOUGH: Antlerless license in most

3 Wildlife Management Units will be gone by then.

4 People are going to have to purchase -- If they

5 want to get an antlerless license, just as they do

6 now, they're going to have to purchase their

7 regular hunting because --

8 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: Okay. So the

9 timing -- The timing -- So the timing of the doe

10 licenses would continue to be the same, so you'd

11 still have to just go on-line or buy them on-line?

12 MR. HOUGH: Correct. It will either be

13 the same or very similar. We could tweak that one

14 way or the other. They go on sale the first Monday

15 in --

16 MS. DERR: Second Monday.

17 MR. HOUGH: Second Monday.

18 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: But then there

19 would also be a second -- If there are eligible

20 licenses left, there would be like a second round.

21 You'd have a regular -- that date structure be the

22 same?

23 MR. HOUGH: Correct.

24 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: How about the

25 cost? Would there be an additional 70 cents

Key Reporters [email protected] 68

1 attached to the license for the actual doe license,

2 like we pay for the bear and every --

3 MR. HOUGH: Yes.

4 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: -- license I

5 buy?

6 MR. HOUGH: Yes. I can do that now,

7 though.

8 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: I know. It kind

9 of irks me that I buy a license, and then I buy a

10 bear license for additional 70 cents, an archery

11 license for additional 70 cents, a flintlock

12 license for another 70 cents. I mean, I -- That

13 would now be a tacked-on cost, too; an additional

14 70 cents for the vendor?

15 MR. HOUGH: Yes, which would go to

16 Active, who is our vendor that manages the PALS

17 system.

18 REPRESENTATIVE PEIFER: Thank you.

19 As far as Representative Mullery, he

20 talked a little bit about -- I mean, he phrased his

21 question wrong. I thought he was simply going to

22 apologize. He did say the northeast and he did say

23 political appointees and favors. He rephrased it

24 and said that we do listen to our elected

25 officials. I listen to my elected officials every

Key Reporters [email protected] 69

1 day. I listen to my constituents every day, and I

2 try to make educated decisions that are best for my

3 area, Mr. Chairman.

4 So I just wanted to point that out.

5 Thank you.

6 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

7 Representative Peifer.

8 Representative Heffley.

9 REPRESENTATIVE HEFFLEY: Thank you, Mr.

10 Chairman. Just a couple questions.

11 In Carbon County, I haven't heard any

12 complaints about the system, and I think our county

13 treasure is doing a fine job. It doesn't mean that

14 we can't look at different things moving forward.

15 What is the average age of hunters that

16 are applying for doe tags? Do you -- I mean, do

17 you have all those figures?

18 MR. HOUGH: I can tell you that the

19 average deer hunter in Pennsylvania is now 50 plus

20 years of age.

21 REPRESENTATIVE HEFFLEY: Looking at

22 folks that are 50 plus years of age or folks that

23 are maybe in their 60's or 70's, is there a concern

24 that -- I mean, every year people get their license

25 and they put it in the envelope, and they do fill

Key Reporters [email protected] 70

1 out the paperwork correctly and they send it to the

2 county treasurer and they get their doe tags back.

3 People that may not want to go on the

4 computer or may not want to use a different system

5 to get their license, is there a concern that there

6 could be a dropoff in those older hunters, or is

7 this looking at a gain maybe in younger hunters?

8 MR. HOUGH: I think the younger hunters

9 will definitely go on-line and purchase their

10 hunting licenses. But the old hunters can still go

11 and purchase it at the sporting goods store over

12 the count just like they have to purchase their

13 hunting license.

14 So, if they don't -- They can go in when

15 antlerless licenses are on sale, buy their general

16 hunting license, buy their bear license, buy their

17 archery license, and also get their antlerless

18 license at the same time.

19 REPRESENTATIVE HEFFLEY: And that would

20 be on a first-come, first-served basis?

21 MR. HOUGH: Correct.

22 REPRESENTATIVE HEFFLEY: I still -- My

23 only concern with that, I think you're going to

24 have lines of people waiting that don't have

25 computers, and I don't see too many 70 years old

Key Reporters [email protected] 71

1 waiting in line for an hour or two. I do have some

2 concerns about how that system would work. I guess

3 that's been the sticking point every time this

4 topic has come up, because I know we've looked at

5 it four years ago and sit down and make it fair and

6 equitable, the distribution.

7 My other concern is, if you take the

8 county treasurers out of it, they are the voice of

9 the people that elect them and how that system

10 works. And if there's changes to it, they're going

11 to be responsive to their constituents.

12 The Game Commission is an independent

13 agency who really isn't responsive to anybody. I

14 have people in my district that despise what you've

15 done to the deer herd. I'm not saying it's right

16 or wrong, but they're very distrusting of the Game

17 Commission.

18 We have the county treasurers that are

19 kind of overlooking this process right now to make

20 sure it is fair and equitable. I haven't in my

21 district heard of any complaints of anything that

22 was done incorrectly in the county treasurer's

23 office.

24 So I have great concerns in giving you

25 even more authority. We have very little

Key Reporters [email protected] 72

1 accountability as a legislative body over some of

2 the things that you do when they come into

3 classifications for endangered species, which we

4 had many discussions on. We have very little

5 oversight.

6 I do think the county treasurers can

7 apply and be the voice in some regard of the people

8 that they represent because they are accountable,

9 in that, they have to go out and get reelected.

10 So, those are my concerns, but I'd still

11 keep an open mind. But right I'd probably be

12 leaning towards keeping the system the way it is.

13 Thank you.

14 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

15 Representative Heffley.

16 Representative Harkins.

17 REPRESENTATIVE HARKINS: Thank you.

18 Thank you for your testimony this

19 morning. Up in my area, I really don't have any

20 complaints from anyone that voices any strong

21 opinions.

22 However, I would like to say, as the

23 system as a whole, let's make sure that we don't

24 forget the new person coming into the system.

25 Automation is great; but at the same time, let's

Key Reporters [email protected] 73

1 not lose the -- lose sight of the person who's just

2 coming into it. Maybe those with younger family

3 members who may have questions with the automation

4 part. Somebody can do it on-line, but they don't

5 have those questions answered in a reasonable time

6 or in a thorough manner for them.

7 With that, that's something I'd like

8 everybody to keep on the -- on the forefront.

9 MR. HOUGH: I would agree. The

10 education process of changing from the decades old

11 system to the new system will be a challenge. We

12 will have to really make an educational effort to

13 get that out to all of our constituents, the

14 hunters.

15 REPRESENTATIVE HARKINS: I think it's

16 often a miscommunication or a breakdown of

17 communication sometimes with fish and game in our

18 area; boating, those are the concerns that come up.

19 MR. HOUGH: Thank you.

20 REPRESENTATIVE HARKINS: It's one thing

21 it's interpreted in a different way. It's not

22 uncommon to be out on a Saturday afternoon and you

23 get pulled over in a boat. The way one person

24 interprets something is different from the way it

25 actually is.

Key Reporters [email protected] 74

1 MR. HOUGH: Correct.

2 REPRESENTATIVE HARKINS: It's just those

3 thoughts. Thank you.

4 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: Thank you,

5 Representative Harkins.

6 Any other questions from any of the

7 members.

8 (No response).

9 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: With that,

10 Executive Director Hough, thank you for coming and

11 bringing your colleagues with you and your

12 testimony.

13 MR. HOUGH: Thank you very much.

14 MAJORITY CHAIRMAN GILLESPIE: With that,

15 I'm going to go ahead and adjourn this meeting of

16 the House Game and Fisheries Committee.

17 (At 10:21 a.m., the hearing concluded).

18 * * * *

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Key Reporters [email protected] 75

1 C E R T I F I C A T E

2

3 I, Karen J. Meister, Reporter, Notary

4 Public, duly commissioned and qualified in and for

5 the County of York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,

6 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and

7 accurate transcript, to the best of my ability, of

8 a public hearing taken from a videotape recording

9 and reduced to computer printout under my

10 supervision.

11 This certification does not apply to any

12 reproduction of the same by any means unless under

13 my direct control and/or supervision.

14

15

16

17 Karen J. Meister Reporter, Notary Public 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Key Reporters [email protected]