Shark Attack: a Program of Data Reduction and Analysis H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shark Attack: a Program of Data Reduction and Analysis H Contributions from the Mote Marine Laboratory Volume 1, Number 2 Shark Attack: A Program of Data Reduction and Analysis H. David Baldridge Sarasota, Florida 1974 ANNOUNCEMENT The Mote Marine Laboratory is an outgrowth of the Cape Haze Marine Laboratory founded in 1955 by William H. and Alfred G. Vanderbilt and ably directed by Dr. Eugenie Clark from 1955 to 1966. In 1961 the Cape Haze Marine Laboratory was moved from its original location in Placida, Florida to Sarasota, Florida and in 1967 its name was changed to honor its President, William R. Mote. The Mote Marine Laboratory is an independent, nonprofit institution, staffed by resident scientists and visiting investigators. Major areas of interest include continuing programs in Neurobiology and Behavior, Biomedical Studies, Estuarine Ecology, Microbiology and Environ­ mental Health, and the Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes. Volume 1, Number 2 of Contributions from the Mote Marine Laboratory represents the second of a series based on work entirely or chiefly undertaken at this laboratory. Number 1 of the series appeared in 1972 and the mono­ graph entitled "On the relationship of teleost scales to pigment patterns" was authored by Dr. C. M. Breder, Jr. It is with pleasure that we continue the high standards of excellence Dr. Breder's monograph set for the series and publish "Shark attack: A program of data reduction and analysis" by Dr. H. David Baldridge, Senior Research Associate at MML. The publication of the second number in this series is made possible by a generous financial contribution from Elizabeth Mote Rose of Tampa, Florida and from funds provided in Contract N00014-73-C-0252 between the Mote Marine Laboratory and the Office of Naval Research, United States Navy. PERRY W. GILBERT, PHD Director Sarasota, Florida January, 1974 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MOTE MARINE LABORATORY Volume 1, Number 2 Shark Attack: A Program of Data Reduction and Analysis H. David Baldridge Sarasota, Florida 1974 Additional copies may be obtained from MOTE MARINE LABORATORY 9501 Blind Pass Road Sarasota, Florida 33581 $4.00 postpaid Publication costs were partially defrayed by the Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy, under Contract NOOOI4-73-C-0252 (NR 104-148). PRINTED IN U .S.A. BY ALLEN PRESS, INC., LAWRENCE, KANSAS 66044 ABSTRACT Data from 1165 case histories of shark attack against man were reduced to a form handleable by automatic data retrieval systems. Numerous probes by computer were made to (a) provide statistical significance to the existence or absence of common factors associated with known instances of predaceous shark behavior, and (b) evaluate the present approach to gathering meaning­ ful data on shark attack and thereby determine requirements for maintaining such an effort in the future. Although information was carefully screened for correlations between occurrence of shark attack and a number of environ­ mental and behavioral parameters, it was considered of greater importance that patterns or relationships be identified that distinguished victims from non-victims among exposed populations. Points of interest were examined in the light of previously accepted correlations and popular beliefs. Wound characteristics and other considerations suggested that perhaps 50-75% of shark attacks on humans have no direct relationship to feeding. A number of popular concepts linking shark attack to environmental parameters, in­ cluding water temperature, appear to be casual relationships having to do more with determining bathing pressure at beaches. Contrary to current ideas, divers appear attack prone, with a strong relationship to spearfishing. Trends indicate that, in the 1970's, attacks upon divers will average at least one-third of all reported cases. Yet, divers show fewer, less damaging injuries than swimmers and enjoy a far lower mortality rate. Effectiveness of a variety of weapons and diversionary actions were examined. Updated advisories were developed for bathers and swimmers, divers, and attack victims. The question of shark motivation in human attack was examined. A case was made strongly favoring continuation and expansion of the Shark Attack File. CONTENTS BACKGROUND 1 DEVELOPMENT OF DATA REDUCTION PROCEDURES 2 DATA ASSIMILATION PROGRAM . 5 PRELIMINARY COMPUTER PROGRAMS 6 RESULTS REFLECTING UPON DATA CREDIBILITY 6 Documentation lag time 7 Primary data source 7 Analytical approach 7 DATE AND TIME . 8 Trends in mortality rates 8 Human population dynamics 10 Day of the week . 10 Time of day. 10 Shark population dynamics 11 Conclusions regarding time factors 11 GEOGRAPHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 11 METEROLOGICAL AND HYDROGRAPHIC FACTORS 13 Sunlight conditions . 13 General weather conditions 13 Underwater visibility 14 Sea conditions 14 TEMPERATURES OF AIR AND WATER 14 Water temperature . 14 Feeding behavior of sharks versus temperature 17 Human physiology temperature considerations 18 Conclusions regarding water temperature. 19 Water temperature affecting species of attackers 20 FEATURES OF THE SITE OF ATTACK 21 Proximity to deep water . 21 Depth of water at attack site 23 Relative water depth . 24 Distance from shore . 26 Depth of victim in water at time of attack 28 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF VICTIMS 29 Race ........ 29 VII CON TEN T S (Continued) Sex of victims 30 Age of victims 31 Physical condition of victims prior to attack 31 Skin pigmentation 32 Degree of clothing . 32 Wetsuits . 33 Colors of clothing and gear 34 Laboratory studies on color effects under attack conditions 35 Strikes directed at colored bathing suits . 37 Conclusions regarding importance of color 37 Sudden presentation of unfamiliar color 37 Patterns and special features of clothing 38 General visual presentation . 38 PRESENCES OF POSSIBLE SIGNIFICANCE AT A ITACK SITE 39 Artificial lighting . 39 Animals. 39 Porpoises (dolphins) 39 Other people . 40 Fish. 41 Large floating objects 41 Blood, human 42 Blood, fish . 42 Human waste 43 Garbage or refuse 43 Other chemical stimuli 44 ACTIVITIES OF VICTIMS AND OTHERS IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO ATTACK 44 Fishing . 44 Provocative acts 46 Specialized gear 46 General activities of others than victims 46 Pre-attack shark behavior . 47 Pre-attack activities of victims . 48 Length of time victim was in water prior to attack 51 Headings of victims in water 51 THEATTACK. 52 Number of sharks directly involved 52 viii CON TEN T S (Continued) Direction of original strike received by victim 53 Nature of initial strike . 53 Aggressive close passes without contact 53 Number of strikes by shark. 53 Number of bites or wound-groups 54 Attacks as single-event encounters 54 Shark behavior during attack . 55 High mortality rate of victims of frenzied sharks 55 Use of weapons against attacking sharks . 55 Chemical and physical anti-shark devices 56 Shark billy . 57 Spears, spearguns, etc. 57 Powerhead or bangstick 57 Diversionary actions by victims and others 57 OUTCOME OF A ITACK 59 Mortality rate . 60 Injury to rescuers 60 Injury to others than primary victims and rescuers 61 Wound characteristics 62 Recovery of tooth fragments from wounds 62 Body parts injured 62 Nature of wounds 64 A ITACKER SHARKS 65 Identity of attackers 65 Basis for identification of attacker sharks 65 Lengths of attacker sharks . 65 Basis for length assignments . 69 Evaluation of abilities to estimate shark length 70 Post-attack shark behavior . 71 Capture of attacker shark . 71 Human remains in sharks' stomachs 71 DIVERS AS VICTIMS OF SHARK A ITACK 72 Trends with time . 72 Distance from shore 73 Depths at which attacks occurred on divers 74 Provocation by divers 74 General activities of divers . 75 ix CON TEN T S (Continued) Direction of initial strike against divers 75 Close passes, strikes, and bites . 75 Body parts injured . 76 Nature of wounds received by divers 77 Mortality rate among diver-victims 78 Lengths of sharks attacking divers 78 Pre-attack shark behavior . 79 Nature of initial strike . 80 Shark behavior during attacks on divers 80 Post-attack shark behavior 81 Identity of sharks . 81 Water temperature . 81 Rescuers of diver-victims 82 Frequent availability of speargun as weapon 82 Summary of observations on attacks involving divers 82 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEND A TIONS 83 Advice to bathers and swimmers 84 Advice to divers . 85 Advice to victims . 86 THE QUESTION OF SHARK MOTIVATION 86 REMARKS CONCERNING STATISTICAL TREATMENTS 90 THE CASE FOR CONTINUING AND EXPANDING THE SAP 91 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 92 LITERATURE CITED . 93 APPENDIX. Summary listing of localities of 1165 shark attacks for which data were coded and analyzed . 96 x Shark Attack: A Program of Data Reduction and Analysis H. DAVID BALDRIDGE Mote Marine Laboratory BACKGROUND This program had its beginnings along with that of the Shark Research Panel of the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), which was established on 25 June 1958 by the Office of Naval Research (Gilbert, 1963a). Dr. Sydney Galler, who then headed the Biology Branch of ONR, assembled in April of that year in New Orleans, Louisiana a group of 34 scientists internationally recognized for their knowledge of sharks. The pur­ pose of the conference, which was jointly supported by ONR and the Navy's Bureau of Aeronautics, was to consider basic research approaches to the development of better means for protecting naval personnel from predaceous shark activity. It was generally agreed that to accomplish this goal a much better understanding of the shark attack problem would have to be gained through intensified basic research in such areas as shark behavior, taxonomy, and functional anatomy. The Shark Research Panel was then charged with responsibility to the Navy for serving as a clearing house for information related to elasmobranch biology in general and the shark hazard problem in particular. It would also coordinate Navy-supported research in these and related areas, acting through the Hydrobiology Committee of the AIBS. Dr. Perry Gilbert, present Director of the Mote Marine Laboratory, was chairman of the Panel during its almost 12 years of existence. Other members were Dr. Sydney Galler (ONR), Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Dentist Helps 'Soul Surfer' Regain Her Smile
    September 19, 2011 Dentist helps ‘Soul Surfer’ regain her smile By Stacie Crozier, ADA News staff Manhattan Beach, Calif.—When 13-year-old surfer Bethany Hamilton lost her left arm in a shark attack off the North Shore of the Hawaiian island of Kauai on Halloween day 2003, a dentist some 2,600 miles away felt a calling to reach out to the girl—surfer to surfer. Dentist and surfer: Dr. Patrick Turley rides a wave. “It struck me when I saw her on a talk show that she was a 13-year-old girl and I was just blown away by what a strong young woman she was,” said Dr. Patrick Turley, a Manhattan Beach, Calif., orthodontist. “I’ve been a surfer all my life. When you’re out there there’s a little part of you that wonders what’s under the water. It strikes a special chord. Every surfer thinks about the possibility of a shark attack, but also that it’s only a one in a million chance.” Bethany’s story of survival and return to professional surfing has captured the attention and hearts of people around the world. Her story was featured in the 2011 film, “Soul Surfer.” The now 21-year-old surfer, public speaker, author and philanthropist chronicles her life, her faith in God and her busy schedule via her website, www.bethanyhamilton.com. She is the inspiration for the Friends of Bethany Hamilton (www.friendsofbethany.com), a nonprofit charitable organization with a mission to “support shark attack survivors and amputees worldwide and to present inspiring life stories through movies, projects and activities.” A few months after the attack, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Shark Attack Hotspots: Identifying Underlying Factors Behind Increased Unprovoked Shark Bite Incidence
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308601225 Global shark attack hotspots: Identifying underlying factors behind increased unprovoked shark bite incidence Article in Ocean & Coastal Management · December 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.010 CITATIONS READS 0 347 2 authors: Blake Kristin Harahush Daryl Mcphee Blake Chapman Communication Bond University 8 PUBLICATIONS 89 CITATIONS 32 PUBLICATIONS 392 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Daryl Mcphee on 26 September 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Ocean & Coastal Management 133 (2016) 72e84 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean & Coastal Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ocecoaman Global shark attack hotspots: Identifying underlying factors behind increased unprovoked shark bite incidence * Blake K. Chapman , Daryl McPhee Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia article info abstract Article history: Unprovoked shark bite remains a rare, unlikely occurrence; however, shark bite incidence is increasing Received 22 October 2015 world-wide. In an effort to understand why shark bite incidence is increasing, we examine recent trends Received in revised form in unprovoked shark bite statistics and other media from the six global shark bite “hotspots”, the United 31 August 2016 States, South Africa, Australia, Brazil, Reunion Island and the Bahamas, and review recent literature that Accepted 15 September 2016 identifies potential causative factors that may contribute to rising shark bite incidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2 Main Text Part 3 of 3
    Kinsale Area Decommissioning Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report Volume 2 Main Text Part 3 of 3 253993-00-REP-08 | 30 May 2018 PSE Kinsale Energy Limited Kinsale Area Decommissioning Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report Table of Contents Page Glossary of Terms 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Project Background 1 1.3 EIAR 3 1.4 Consent Application Process 3 1.5 Environmental Assessment Process 4 1.6 Overall Project Schedule 4 1.7 Structure of the EIAR 6 1.8 Consultation 7 1.9 List of Contributors 8 2 Legal and Policy Framework 11 2.1 Legislative Framework 11 2.1.1 Introduction 11 2.1.2 Relevant National Legislation 11 2.1.3 Relevant European Legislation 13 2.1.4 Relevant International Conventions 14 2.1.5 Summary of key relevant National and European legislation 15 2.2 Legislative basis for EIA and EIAR 15 2.3 EIAR Guidance and Methodology 16 2.4 Kinsale Energy Environmental Management System Overview 16 3 Project Description 18 3.1 Introduction 18 3.1.1 History of Kinsale Area 18 3.1.2 Rationale for Decommisstioning 19 3.2 Kinsale Area Facilites 21 3.2.1 Kinsale Head Development 22 3.2.2 Ballycotton Subsea Development 24 3.2.3 Southwest Kinsale and Greensand Subsea Developments 25 3.2.4 Seven Heads Subsea Development 26 3.2.5 Wells 27 3.2.6 Onshore Pipeline and Terminal 28 3.2.7 Summary of Kinsale Area Facilities 31 3.3 Consideration of Potential Re-Uses 41 3.4 Decommissioning Alternatives Considered 42 3.4.1 Do Nothing Alternative 42 3.4.2 Other Decommissioning Alternatives Considered 42 3.4.3 Platform Topsides
    [Show full text]
  • Mcphee Head – Higher Degree Research Today…
    What Causes Clusters of Unprovoked Shark Bites? Associate Professor Daryl McPhee Head – Higher Degree Research Today….. • A brief introduction to trends in unprovoked shark bite. • Discussion of a number of factors which may influence the location and timing of bite clusters. • What can be done? Global Trends in Unprovoked Shark Bites (1982-2012) 90 y = 2.0494x - 4043.7 80 R² = 0.90093 70 60 50 40 30 20 No. of Unprovoked Shark Bites 10 0 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 Year Source: McPhee (2014) Unprovoked Shark Bites: Are They Becoming More Prevalent? Coastal Management 42(5): 478-492. We fear what our ancestral history has prepared us to fear. Four We fear influences on We fear what what’s our we cannot immediate. intuitions control about fear. We fear what’s most readily available in memory. Source: Dr Alison Kock, Cape Town Shark Spotters Program Why the Clusters? • Compare the cognitive need for a single reason with reality. – There is no single factor that explains the occurrence of a cluster of shark bites. – There is no effective predictive tool. – There are a range of factors operating at a several different scales that are inter-related. Why the Clusters? Human population increase? Per Capita Trends in Unprovoked Shark Bite in Australia 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Shark attack per 100,000 people 0.1 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Chapman, B.K and McPhee, D.P. (2016) Global shark attack hotspots: Identifying underlying factors behind increased unprovoked shark bite incidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerhead™ 12
    PowerHead™ 12 Instructions for use and parts list Nilfisk-Advance MODELS 56648042, 56250185 English 7/00 revised 3/04 Form Number 56041495(083483C-1) IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS This machine is only suitable for commercial use, for example in hotels, schools, hospitals, factories, shops and offices other than normal residential housekeeping purposes. When using an electrical appliance, basic precautions should always be followed, including the following: READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE USING THIS APPLIANCE. WARNING! To reduce the risk of fire, electric shock, or injury: • Do not leave the appliance when it is plugged in. Unplug the unit from the outlet when not in use and before servicing. • To avoid electric shock, do not expose to rain. Store indoors. • Do not allow to be used as a toy. Close attention is necessary when used near children. • Use only as described in this manual. Use only the manufacturer’s recommended attachments. • Do not use with damaged cord or plug. If the appliance is not working as it should be, has been dropped, damaged, left outdoors or dropped into water, return it to a service center. • Do not pull or carry by the cord, use the cord as a handle, close a door on the cord, or pull the cord around sharp edges or corners. Do not run the appliance over the cord. Keep the cord away from heated surfaces. • Do not unplug by pulling on the cord. To unplug, grasp the plug, not the cord. • Do not handle the plug, cord or appliance with wet hands. • Do not put any object into openings.
    [Show full text]
  • Excel 1 Owners Manual
    Version 2.3 January 2012 BWC EXCEL 1 24 VDC Battery Charging System Owner’s Manual EXCEL 1 Wind Turbine PowerCenter Controller Bergey Windpower Co. 2200 Industrial Blvd. Norman, OK 73069 USA Telephone: (405) 364-4212 Fax: (405) 364-2078 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.bergey.com BWC EXCEL 1 Wind Turbine 24V Battery Charging System OWNER’S MANUAL Table of Contents 1. Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Cautions and Warnings ............................................................................................................................ 3 3. Identification ............................................................................................................................................. 4 4. System Description .................................................................................................................................. 5 5. SYSTEM OPERATION ............................................................................................................................ 7 6. Turbine Installation ................................................................................................................................. 15 7. PowerCenter Installation ........................................................................................................................ 22 8. Inspections and Maintenance ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acclaim Electric Powerhead Manual
    ACCLAIM 12 AND ACCLAIM 15 by SEBO POWERHEADS OWNER’S MANUAL For Household Use Only TABLE OF CONTENTS Technical Details 2 Identification of Parts 2 Important Safety Instructions 3 Acclaim Powerhead Product Features 4 Operating Instructions 5 Operating the Powerhead 5 The Brush Height Adjustment Feature 5 Indicator Lights 5 Maintenance 6 Changing the Brush Rollers 6 Cleaning the Brush Rollers 6 Clog Removal 6 Clogs in the Airflow Pathway 6 Clogs in the Swivel Neck 6 Trouble-Shooting Guide 7 Acclaim 12 Powerhead Schematic and Part Numbers 8 Acclaim 15 Powerhead Schematic and Part Numbers 9 Warranty Information 10 TECHNICAL DETAILS Acclaim 12 Acclaim 15 Brush motor 175 Watts, 1.6 Amps 200 Watts, 1.8 Amps Width 12 in. 15 in. Weight 5.4 lbs. 5.7 lbs. Brush roller Replaceable Replaceable Brush drive Toothed belt with electronic Toothed belt with electronic overload protection overload protection IDENTIFICATION OF PARTS 1. Powerhead 1 4 2. Brush height adjustment 3. Swivel neck 2 3 4. Connection plug 8 5. Brush indicator light 9 6. Brush on/off switch and power light (not available on all models) 8 10 7. Brush roller end cap 7 2 8. Foot Pedal 1 9. Telescopic Tube release button 5 6 10. Brush roller release button 2 IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE USING THIS MACHINE ! SAVE THESE INSTRUCTIONS. WARNING: To reduce the risk of fire, electric shock, or injury: 1. Do not leave Powerhead while plugged in. Unplug when 15. Maintenance and repairs must be done by qualified not in use and before servicing.
    [Show full text]
  • BS Powerhead En Manual 20171213
    Operator’s Manual Model: P0820B Reproduction for Not Important! It is essential that you read the instructions in this manual before operating this machine. Reproduction for Not 1 3 2 4 ReproductionFig. 1 for 5 Not 6 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 English (original instructions) SAFETY INFORMATION Indicates a potentially READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY hazardous situation, WARNING WARNING which, if not To avoid serious personal injury, do not avoided, could attempt to use this product until you have result in death read this Owner’s Manual thoroughly and or serious understand it completely. If you do not injury. understand the warnings and instructions Indicates a in this Owner’s Manual, do not use this potentially product. Contact an authorized service hazardous center for assistance. situation, CAUTION which, if not WARNING avoided, may For use only with Briggs & Stratton result in minor batteries BSB2AH82 (2 amp-hour) or or moderate BSB4AH82 (4 amp-hour) or BSB5AH82 (5 injury. amp-hour) and Briggs & Stratton charger Indicates a BSRC82 or BSSC82. situation that may result in Battery-operated products do not have NOTICE damage to the to be plugged into an electrical outlet; product. therefore, they are always in operating condition. Be aware of possible hazards Some of the following symbols may be used when not using the powerhead. FollowingReproduction on this product. Please study them and this rule will reduce the risk of electric learn their meaning. Proper interpretation shock, fire, or serious personal injury. of these symbols will allow you to operate The following signal words and meanings the product better and safer.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Safe Storage Prohibited Firearms Levels 1, 2 & 3
    Vers 2.2 July 2021 OFFICIAL SCHEDULE 1 PROHIBITED FIREARMS Safe Storage Levels 1, 2 & 3 All persons possessing firearms in NSW must comply with the safe keeping and storage requirements as prescribed by the Firearms Act 1996, associated Regulation and as recommended by the Commissioner. This fact sheet provides information on the safe keeping and storage requirements for prohibited firearms. What are the general requirements in relation to the safe keeping of firearms? All licence holders in NSW are subject to the general requirement for safe storage of firearms under section 39 of the Firearms Act 1996 (Act). Any person in possession of a firearm must take all reasonable precautions to ensure the firearm is kept safely, is not lost or stolen and does not come into the possession of an unauthorised person. A licence or permit holder may only store a firearm in an inhabited dwelling or in a dwelling where the licence or permit holder, or someone on their behalf, can easily observe the premises where the firearm is stored. An inhabited dwelling is a person’s principal place of residence, where the licence or permit holder may or may not also live, or where a person lives while the firearm is stored there. If a person stores their firearms in a place other than an inhabited dwelling, they can do so provided the following safe storage requirements are met or exceeded: All firearms must be - • stored in a safe of an approved type, and • fitted with a trigger or barrel lock that prevents the firearm from being discharged, and • secured individually on, or in, a locked device within the safe.
    [Show full text]
  • How Sharks and Shark–Human Interactions Are Reported in Major Australian Newspapers
    sustainability Article How Sharks and Shark–Human Interactions are Reported in Major Australian Newspapers Nigel Hardiman 1, Shelley Burgin 2,* and Jia Shao 3 1 School of Strategy and Leadership, Faculty of Business and Law, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK; [email protected] 2 School of Science, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith 2751, Australia 3 SIGMA and Centre for Financial and Corporate Integrity, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 3 March 2020; Accepted: 26 March 2020; Published: 29 March 2020 Abstract: Few phrases evoke more negative emotion, or generate more media coverage, than ‘shark attack’ despite the few deaths that have been attributed to shark bite. Typically, tabloids are considered to provide more sensational coverage than broadsheets. We investigated how sharks and shark–human interactions were portrayed in four major Australian newspapers during a period of a record number of shark attacks in Australian waters. There was strong focus on human risk from sharks, and over-reportage of negative aspects. Thirty incidents were recorded: two fatal, 20 injury, and eight ‘near-miss’. Of 309 ‘shark’ articles surveyed, 24% mentioned fatalities (65% occurred prior to the study, some decades earlier). Injury was reported in 40% of articles, and ‘near-miss’ in 33% (89% related to an incident in South Africa involving an Australian surfing celebrity). The tabloid, Telegraph, published substantially more shark-related articles and photographs than other newspapers. There was otherwise no consistent pattern of difference between genre or newspapers. Keywords: biased reporting; anthropogenic focus; shark incidents; shark attacks; news media bias; genre bias reporting; shark conservation; marine ecosystems; ‘fake news’ We are not afraid of predators, we’re transfixed by them, prone to weave stories and fables and chatter endlessly about them ::: (E.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilco Prins Rip Curl Ceo Skateboarding's Lost
    ISSUE #078. AUGUST/ SEPTEMBER 2015. €5 WILCO PRINS RIP CURL CEO SKATEBOARDING’S LOST GENERATION SUP FOCUS & RED PADDLE’S JOHN HIBBARD BRAND PROFILES, BUYER SCIENCE & MUCH MORE. TREND REPORTS: ACTION CAMS & ACCESSORIES, ACTIVEWEAR, LONGBOARDS, LUGGAGE & RUCKSACKS, SUNGLASSES, SUP, SURF APPAREL, WATCHES, WETSUITS. US HELLO #78 The boardsports industry has been through searching for huge volumes, but are instead Editor Harry Mitchell Thompson a time of change and upheaval since the looking for quality and repeat custom. And if a [email protected] global financial crisis coincided with brands customer buys a good technical product from a realizing the volume of product they had been brand, this creates loyalty. Surf & French Editor Iker Aguirre manufacturing was far too large. [email protected] Customer loyalty also extends to retail, where Since then it has been sink or swim, and one retailer’s satisfaction with a wetsuit, a Snowboard Editor Rémi Forsans Rip Curl are a brand who has come out with sunglass, SUP or longboard can equate to [email protected] their head well above water. For this issue large orders and given the right sales support of SOURCE, Rip Curl’s European CEO Wilco and payment terms will be the beginning (or Skate Editor Dirk Vogel Prins tells us how the company has thinned continuation) of a fruitful relationship. [email protected] its product lines by 50% and has executed a strategy, segmenting their lines to fit their SOURCE #78’s trend reports break down the German Editor Anna Langer consumer with a high amount of technical ever increasing amount of product information [email protected] innovation, guaranteed quality and with the available, as our experts review what’s worth stories being told by some of the finest athletes a punt for SS16 in everything from wetsuits SUP Editor Robert Etienne in their field.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shark's Electric Sense
    BIOLOGY CREDIT © 2007 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. LEMON SHARK chomps down on an unlucky fish. THE SHARK’S SENSE An astonishingly sensitive detector of electric fields helps sharks zero in on prey By R. Douglas Fields menacing fin pierced the surface such as those animal cells produce when in KEY CONCEPTS and sliced toward us. A great blue contact with seawater. But how they use ■ Sharks and related fish can shark—three meters in length— that unique sense had yet to be proved. We sense the extremely weak homed in on the scent of blood like a torpe- were on that boat to find out. electric fields emitted by animals in the surrounding do. As my wife, Melanie, and I watched sev- Until the 1970s, scientists did not even water, an ability few other eral large sharks circle our seven-meter Bos- suspect that sharks could perceive weak organisms possess. ton Whaler, a silver-blue snout suddenly electric fields. Today we know that such elec- ■ This ability is made possible thrust through a square cutout in the boat troreception helps the fish find food and can by unique electrosensory deck. “Look out!” Melanie shouted. We operate even when environmental condi- structures called ampullae both recoiled instinctively, but we were in tions render the five common senses—sight, of Lorenzini, after the 17th- no real danger. The shark flashed a jagged smell, taste, touch, hearing—all but useless. century anatomist who first smile of ivory saw teeth and then slipped It works in turbid water, total darkness and described them. back into the sea.
    [Show full text]