Education and Training Committee
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R
Author Exchange Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R. Venema A Reply to Meyer Dennis R. Venema Weizsäcker’s book The World View of Physics is still keeping me very busy. It has again brought home to me quite clearly how wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know; God wants us to realize his presence, not in unsolved problems but in those that are solved. Dietrich Bonhoeffer1 am thankful for this opportunity to nature, is the result of intelligence. More- reply to Stephen Meyer’s criticisms over, this assertion is proffered as the I 2 of my review of his book Signature logical basis for inferring design for the in the Cell (hereafter Signature). Meyer’s origin of biological information: if infor- critiques of my review fall into two gen- mation only ever arises from intelli- eral categories. First, he claims I mistook gence, then the mere presence of Signature for an argument against bio- information demonstrates design. A few logical evolution, rendering several of examples from Signature make the point my arguments superfluous. Secondly, easily: Meyer asserts that I have failed to refute … historical scientists can show that his thesis by not providing a “causally a presently acting cause must have adequate alternative explanation” for the been present in the past because the origin of life in that the few relevant cri- proposed candidate is the only known tiques I do provide are “deeply flawed.” cause of the effect in question. -
Download This Article in PDF Format
E3S Web of Conferences 258, 07027 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125807027 UESF-2021 Family institute and environmental responsibility in the view of Russian youth Marina Rosenova1,*, Irina Sokolovskaya2, and Elena Tkach3 1Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 127051, 29 Sretenka Str., Moscow, Russia 2State University of Management, 109542, 99 Ryazan Ave., Moscow, Russia 3Pacific National University, 68000, 68 Karl Marx srt., Khabarovsk, Russia Abstract. Modern studies of ideas about the family reflect a contradiction: on the one hand, young people are guided by the values of individualism, freedom, and self-development, and on the other, they maintain the high value and desirability of the family. The use of methods of psychosemantics and metaphorical images in the study revealed the peculiarities of young people's ideas about the family and revealed the "zones of psychological tension" in the sphere of family and family relations. In the semantics of ideas about the family, schoolchildren and students alike identified the priorities of boundaries and the understanding of the family as a closed location. In the minds of students, the cognitive and emotional aspects of ideas are more clearly differentiated, and the willingness to actively create their own family is reflected. Among young people with higher education and experience of marriage or cohabitation, negative connotations of family assessment prevail. The area of psychological stress in the family sphere: schoolchildren have a weak orientation in family relations, students have idealistic expectations, and older youth have numerous problems related to personality characteristics. 1 Introduction Since the second half of the 20th century, in science and social practice, active discussions and debates have been conducted about role and value of family in the life of a modern person, liberated in his individuality. -
Assembly Parlynet Extract 13 June 2001 from Book 8
PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-FOURTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION 13 June 2001 (extract from Book 8) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor JOHN LANDY, AC, MBE The Lieutenant-Governor Lady SOUTHEY, AM The Ministry Premier and Minister for Multicultural Affairs ....................... The Hon. S. P. Bracks, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Planning......... The Hon. J. W. Thwaites, MP Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister assisting the Minister for Workcover..................... The Hon. M. M. Gould, MLC Minister for Transport............................................ The Hon. P. Batchelor, MP Minister for Energy and Resources, Minister for Ports and Minister assisting the Minister for State and Regional Development. The Hon. C. C. Broad, MLC Minister for State and Regional Development and Treasurer............ The Hon. J. M. Brumby, MP Minister for Local Government, Minister for Workcover and Minister assisting the Minister for Transport regarding Roads........ The Hon. R. G. Cameron, MP Minister for Community Services.................................. The Hon. C. M. Campbell, MP Minister for Education and Minister for the Arts...................... The Hon. M. E. Delahunty, MP Minister for Environment and Conservation and Minister for Women’s Affairs................................... The Hon. S. M. Garbutt, MP Minister for Police and Emergency Services and Minister for Corrections........................................ The Hon. A. Haermeyer, MP Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs............ The Hon. K. G. Hamilton, MP Attorney-General, Minister for Manufacturing Industry and Minister for Racing............................................ The Hon. R. J. Hulls, MP Minister for Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment and Minister for Finance........................................... The Hon. -
Available for Download As a Pdf File 883.95 Kb
PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA LAW REFORM COMMITTEE 7(&+12/2*< 7+( /$: REPORT Ordered to be Printed Melbourne Government Printer May 1999 No 52 Session 1998–99 Parliament of Victoria, Australia Law Reform Committee Melbourne Bibliography ISBN 0-7311-5272-7 Also available on CD-Rom ISBN 0-7311-5273-5 Cover Design & Graphics: Paul Angus C OMMITTEE M EMBERSHIP CHAIRMAN *Mr Victor Perton, MP DEPUTY CHAIR *Mr Neil Cole, MP MEMBERS *Mr Florian Andrighetto, MP *Ms Mary Delahunty, MP *Hon Carlo Furletti, MLC *Hon Monica Gould, MLC *Mr Noel Maughan, MP Mr Alister Paterson, MP Mr Tony Robinson, MP * denotes membership of Technology and the Law Inquiry Subcommittee The Committee’s address is — Level 8, 35 Spring Street MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3000 Telephone inquiries — (03) 9651 3644 Facsimile — (03) 9651 3674 Email — [email protected] Internet— http://www.lawreform.org.au iii iv C OMMITTEE S TAFF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH Mr Douglas Trapnell RESEARCH OFFICER Ms Padma Raman OFFICE MANAGER Ms Angelica Vergara v vi C ONTENTS Committee Membership........................... ............................................................................................... iii Committee Staff ........................................................................................................................................v Chairman’s Foreword .............................................................................................................................xiii Functions of the Committee...................................................................................................................xvii -
'His Excellency'
AROUND TOWN No.151 Autumn 2012 ISSN 0159 3285 ISSN ’His Excellency’ The Hon Alex Chernov AC QC Governor of the State of Victoria 1 VICTORIAN BAR NEWS No. 151 Autumn 2012 Editorial 2 The Editors - Victorian Bar News Continues 3 Chairman’s Cupboard - At the Coalface: A Busy and Productive 2012 News and Views 4 From Vilnius to Melbourne: The Extraordinary Journey of The Hon Alex Chernov AC QC 8 How We Lead 11 Clerking System Review 12 Bendigo Law Association Address 4 8 16 Opening of the 2012 Legal Year 19 The New Bar Readers’ Course - One Year On 20 The Bar Exam 20 Globe Trotters 21 The Courtroom Dog 22 An Uncomfortable Discovery: Legal Process Outsourcing 25 Supreme Court Library 26 Ethics Committee Bulletins Around Town 28 The 2011 Bar Dinner 35 The Lineage and Strength of Our Traditions 38 Doyle SC Finally Has Her Say! 42 Farewell to Malkanthi Bowatta (DeSilva) 12 43 The Honourable Justice David Byrne Farewell Dinner 47 A Philanthropic Bar 48 AALS-ABCC Lord Judge Breakfast Editors 49 Vicbar Defeats the Solicitors! Paul Hayes, Richard Attiwill and Sharon Moore 51 Bar Hockey VBN Editorial Committee 52 Real Tennis and the Victorian Bar Paul Hayes, Richard Attiwill and Sharon Moore (Editors), Georgina Costello, Anthony 53 Wigs and Gowns Regatta 2011 Strahan (Deputy Editors), Ben Ihle, Justin Tomlinson, Louise Martin, Maree Norton and Benjamin Jellis Back of the Lift 55 Quarterly Counsel Contributors The Hon Chief Justice Warren AC, The Hon Justice David Ashley, The Hon Justice Geoffrey 56 Silence All Stand Nettle, Federal Magistrate Phillip Burchardt, The Hon John Coldrey QC, The Hon Peter 61 Her Honour Judge Barbara Cotterell Heerey QC, The Hon Neil Brown QC, Jack Fajgenbaum QC, John Digby QC, Julian Burnside 63 Going Up QC, Melanie Sloss SC, Fiona McLeod SC, James Mighell SC, Rachel Doyle SC, Paul Hayes, 63 Gonged! Richard Attiwill, Sharon Moore, Georgia King-Siem, Matt Fisher, Lindy Barrett, Georgina 64 Adjourned Sine Die Costello, Maree Norton, Louise Martin and James Butler. -
States of Origin: Influences on Research Into the Origins of Life
COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright Influences on Research into the Origins of Life. Idan Ben-Barak Unit for the History and Philosophy of Science Faculty of Science The University of Sydney A thesis submitted to the University of Sydney as fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 Declaration I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person, nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a University or other institute of higher learning. -
Regulatory Review
REGULATORY REVIEW - THE NEXT WAVE? Victor Perton MP Parliament of Victoria Chairman, Law Reform Committee Commonwealth Conference on Delegated Legislation Wellington, New Zealand - 10-13 February 1997 Foreword Mr Speaker, New Zealand friends, Commonwealth colleagues, thank you for this opportunity to participate in this conference. I was a brand new MP when the last commonwealth delegated legislation conference was held. Yesterday, Senator Bill O'Chee described me as a 'hardy veteran' in this field. As a result of my eight years experience in this field, I feel passionate about the need to provide good scrutiny regimes to protect the human and civil rights of the community. I have travelled widely and proselytised about the benefits of and best mechanisms for parliamentary scrutiny.1 The paper I offer touches upon new challenges in the field. Introduction As the 21st century looms, those in government charged with the responsibility of making regulation are under increasing pressure. This is reflected in the observation that "[t]o some business spokespeople, government interference in the marketplace is regarded as the embodiment of evil. Others adopt a more flexible approach, objecting strenuously to some forms of regulation, but tolerating, indeed, embracing, those forms of government involvement which happen to foster their own business interests."2 There is increasing pressure to improve the business environment by reducing costs and other impediments. There are increasing demands that regulations be "efficient and effective". In response, governments (or, at least, those that wish to be elected and re-elected) increasingly pledge that they will "cut red tape". However, there is a general business ignorance of what those in government are doing enough to make the regulatory process more efficient. -
Creation, Evolution, and the Human Genome
Curriculum Units by Fellows of the Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute 1990 Volume VI: Genetics Creation, Evolution, and the Human Genome Curriculum Unit 90.06.09 by Anthony B. Wight Students are generally introduced to topics of diversity and heredity in 7th and 8th grade science classes. These topics are explored further in a variety of Biology courses during the first or second year of high school. This unit is aimed primarily at students in the upper grades of high school for whom an interdisciplinary setting might provide rich interplay between scientific evidence and broad reaching ideas and questions about evolution. In my school, a magnet public high school of about 240 students, I have undertaken the development of just such an interdisciplinary science and humanities course with one of my colleagues from our English Department. During one quarter of the year (nine weeks) students can enroll in an intensive seminar of this nature which meets for three hours daily. Although this may seem to most teachers to be an enormous amount of time to prepare for, it offers exceptional opportunities for extended study, research, writing, and discussion. In this unit I present an overview of the science curriculum for this seminar; my colleague has prepared separately a plan for the humanities curriculum. Since we teach together for the entire three hours daily we blend ideas and draw upon each other as resources throughout the course. For the purposes of organization, I have divided the unit into three themes: I. The Origins of Life: Creation vs. Science? This first theme sets the stage for inquiry and seeks to engage students at a variety of levels, providing “hooks and handles” for the humanities component of the interdisciplinary seminar through readings from several creation myths and posing some “unanswered questions in science.” II. -
Speaking the Body of Christ at St. Bede Parish
W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 12-2009 Religious Mouths and Religious Bodies: Speaking the Body of Christ at St. Bede Parish Jonna Knappenberger College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Knappenberger, Jonna, "Religious Mouths and Religious Bodies: Speaking the Body of Christ at St. Bede Parish" (2009). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 457. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/457 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 Acknowledgements First, much thanks to Brad Weiss for his time, encouragement, and expertise throughout this project. I am also thankful to Kathleen Jenkins and Jonathan Glasser. I am very thankful to the Catholics who let me enter their lives – Sue and Charlie Huber, Barbara and Gary Curtin, and others at St. Bede and the CCM. Thank you, Deacon Dominic Cerrato and Father John Abe. I am grateful to the Nathan Altshuler Award committee for their financial support and to Tom Trovato and Kerry Murphy for encouragement. At this last juncture of my undergraduate career, I am acutely aware of the excellent professors who have molded me. James Harris opened my mind in many ways. Richard and Sally Price embody my highest ideals of scholarship. Christina Berndt, Sharla Blank, Michael Cole, Kevin Honeycutt, and others all helped me find my way. -
Gap Congress on Regulatory Affairs
GAP CONGRESS ON REGULATORY AFFAIRS “OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESS” 25 ‐ 26 September 2008 Melbourne, Victoria GAP CONGRESS ON REGULATORY AFFAIRS “OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESS” Melbourne, Australia 25 & 26 September 2008 For further information contact: Global Access Partners Pty Ltd 53 Balfour St, Chippendale, Sydney NSW Australia 2008 Phone +61 2 8383 2416 Fax +61 2 9319 5754 Website www.globalaccesspartners.org 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 Partners & Sponsors 5 Keynote Speakers 6 Report of the Congress Proceedings 7 The Steering Committee 27 Participating Organisations 28 Appendices: Appendix 1 – Programme 29 Appendix 2 – Speakers’ Profiles 31 Appendix 3 – Sponsors’ Profiles 37 Appendix 4 – List of Delegates 45 DISCLAIMER: This Report represents a wide range of views and interests of the participating individuals and organisations. Statements made during discussions are the personal opinions of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect those of the organisers and sponsors of the Congress. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The GAP Congress on Regulatory Affairs, held Key points arising from the Congress included: at Parliament House of Victoria on 26 September Technological innovation and the dissolving of 2008, brought government, business and industry national boundaries in cyberspace render traditional experts together to discuss how companies can approaches to its regulation irrelevant. Despite the best adapt and respond to new regulation by problems this raises, technology offers great benefits embracing the commercial opportunities it in citizen‐centric service delivery which should not be provides. stymied by the hyping of privacy concerns not shared by the majority of citizens. The Congress, organised by Sydney‐based policy network Global Access Partners (GAP), ‘Cloud computing’ has the ability to revolutionise championed a forward thinking approach to how business computing, but requires safeguards and Australian businesses can use regulation to their incentives to promote its adoption. -
5568 Law Matters
LAW Matters NEWS FROM THE MONASH LAW SCHOOL COMMUNITY ISSUE 2/08 FEATURE: INSIDE: Tax and Society Virtual Worlds – At the cutting edge of law Where are they now? Monash Law School alumni share their career stories with us www.law.monash.edu Features: Dean’s message 1 Queens Birthday Honours Queens Birthday Honour for Emeritus Professor Richard Fox Alumni magazines like Law Matters are Janus-like publications, simultaneously looking backwards and forwards. 2 The next generations For the ten thousand or so graduates of the law The alumni of the future are with us now studying a school who receive this publication and probably scan wide variety of undergraduate and graduate programs. challenge it briefly, it provides an opportunity to keep abreast of The rich diversity of courses, our clinical programs at 3rd Year Law/Arts student developments in the faculty: incoming and outgoing Clayton and Springvale, our international programs, Nick Bearlin-Allardice was staff, new programs, events and courses. It also local and overseas internships, mooting and advocacy recently selected for ‘Our provides an opportunity to partly answer the eternal programs, learning, counseling and student support Generations Challenge’, questions of “whatever happened to?” and “where services, as well as our mentoring, peer support and are they now?” high achievers programs all require more resources than are provided by governments. For this edition we decided to take a closer look at the Honours Board which hangs in the basement and On page 10, Springvale Director -
Rethinking Abiogenesis: Part 1, Continuity of Life Through Time Emily Boring Emily Boring, J
Article Rethinking Abiogenesis: Part 1, Continuity of Life through Time Emily Boring Emily Boring, J. B. Stump, and Stephen Freeland Evolution teaches that any particular organism, population, or species is a point on a continuous lineage that extends back to life’s origins. Apparent discontinuities (for example, species) often reflect subjective, human decisions as much or more than objective measurements. In the same way, no intrinsic, objective reason identifies any particular moment in the development of biochemical complexity as the origin of life J. B. Stump other than the origin of the universe itself. There is no natural breakpoint presented by the physical universe. Focusing excessively on any other points robs science of impor- tant context and is detrimental to future progress—for example, by failing to extend our view one notch further back in order to understand how and why this particular point emerged. We advocate, instead, a view of abiogenesis that stresses continuity over particular “starting points.” This way invites rich resonances with strands of historical and contemporary theology. Stephen Freeland ne of the standard objections to encompasses the one continuous (and as- biological evolution is that there yet-incomplete) transition from the origin O is no scientific explanation for of time.4 A different way to express this how life could emerge from nonlife. A idea is that this perspective of continuity standard response to this objection is that in abiogenesis opens up interesting ques- the theory of evolution deals with only tions on a number of different practical the diversification of life, not the origin fronts for interdisciplinary research, both of life.1 Indeed, one form of this argu- within science and beyond, including ment is that the emergence of “life” and rich new pairings of theology with evolu- “evolution” can usefully be distinguished tionary science.