Corral Framework: Trustworthy and Fully Functional Data Intensive Parallel Astronomical Pipelines
J. B. Cabrala,b,∗, B. Sanchez´ a, M. Beroizc,d, M. Dom´ıngueza, M. Laresa, S. Gurovicha, P. Granittoe
a Instituto De Astronom´ıaTe´oricay Experimental - Observatorio Astron´omicoC´ordoba (IATE–OAC–UNC–CONICET), Laprida 854, X5000BGR, C´ordoba, Argentina. b Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Ingenier´ıay Agrimensura, UNR, Pellegrini 250 - S2000BTP, Rosario, Argentina. c University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV), One West University Blvd. Brownsville, Texas 78520, USA. d University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), 1 UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA. e Centro Internacional Franco Argentino de Ciencias de la Informaci´ony de Sistemas (CIFASIS, CONICET–UNR), Ocampo y Esmeralda, S2000EZP, Rosario, Argentina.
Abstract Data processing pipelines represent an important slice of the astronomical software library that include chains of processes that transform raw data into valuable information via data reduction and analysis. In this work we present Corral, a Python framework for astronomical pipeline generation. Corral features a Model-View-Controller design pattern on top of an SQL Relational Database capable of handling: custom data models; processing stages; and communication alerts, and also provides automatic quality and structural metrics based on unit testing. The Model-View-Controller provides concept separation between the user logic and the data models, delivering at the same time multi-processing and distributed computing capabilities. Corral represents an improve- ment over commonly found data processing pipelines in Astronomy since the design pattern eases the programmer from dealing with processing flow and parallelization issues, allowing them to focus on the specific algorithms needed for the successive data transformations and at the same time provides a broad measure of quality over the created pipeline. Corral and working examples of pipelines that use it are available to the community at https://github.com/toros-astro. Keywords: Astroinformatics, Astronomical Pipeline, Software and its engineering: Multiprocessing; Design Patterns
1. Introduction discovery engine for the intermediate Palomar Transient Fac- tory (iPTF Kulkarni, 2013); and the Pan-STARRS PS1 Image The development of modern ground–based and space–born Processing Pipeline (Magnier et al., 2006), performing the im- telescopes, covering all observable windows in the electro- age processing and analysis for the Pan-STARRS PS1 proto- magnetic spectrum, and an ever increasing variability interest type telescope data and making the results available to other via time–domain astronomy have raised the necessity for large systems within Pan-STARRS and Vista survey pipeline that in- databases of astronomical observations. The amount of data cludes VIRCAM, a 16 CCD nearIR camera for the VISTA Data to be processed has been steadily increasing, imposing higher flow system Emerson et al. (2004) . In fact, the implementation demands over: quality; storage needs and analysis tools. This of pipelines in Astronomy is a common task to the construction phenomenon is a manifestation of the deep transformation that of surveys (e.g. Marx and Reyes, 2015; Hughes et al., 2016; Astronomy is going through, along with the development of Hadjiyska et al., 2013), and it is even used to operate telescopes new technologies in the Big Data era. In this context, new au- remotely, as described in Kubanek´ et al. (2010). Standard tools for pipeline generation have already been developed and can tomatic data analysis techniques have emerged as the preferred 1 solution to the so-called “data tsunami” (Cavuoti, 2013). be found in the literature. Some examples are Luigi , which implements a method for the creation of distributive pipelines;
arXiv:1701.05566v2 [astro-ph.IM] 7 Aug 2017 The development of an information processing pipeline is a OPUS (Rose et al., 1995), conceived by the Space Telescope natural consequence of science projects involving the acquisi- Science Institute; and more recently Kira (Zhang et al., 2016), a tion of data and its posterior analysis. Some examples of these distributed tool focused on astronomical image analysis. In the data intensive projects include The Dark Energy Survey Data experimental sciences, collecting, pre-processing and storing Management System (Mohr et al., 2008), designed to exploit a data are common recurring patterns regardless of the science camera with 74 CCDs at the Blanco telescope to study the na- field or the nature of the experiment. This means that pipelines ture of cosmic acceleration; the Infrared Processing and Analy- are in some sense re-written repeatedly. A more efficient ap- sis Center (Masci et al., 2016), a near real-time transient-source proach would exploit existing resources to build new tools and perform new tasks, taking advantage of established procedures ∗Corresponding author Email address: [email protected] (J. B. Cabral) 1Luigi: https://luigi.readthedocs.io/
Preprint submitted to Astronomy and Computing June 24, 2021 that have been widely tested by the community. Some success- 2. Astronomical Pipelines ful examples of this are the BLAS library for Linear Algebra, the package NumPy for Python (Van Der Walt et al., 2011) and Typical pipeline architecture involve chains of processes that the random number generators. Modern Astronomy presents consume a data flow, such that every processing stage is depen- plenty of examples where pipeline development is crucial. In dent output of a previous stage. According to Bowman-Amuah this work, we present a python framework for astronomical (2004), any pipeline formalism must include the following en- pipeline generation developed in the context of the TOROS tities: collaboration (“Transient Optical Robotic Observatory of the Stream: The data stream usually means a continuous flow South”, Diaz et al., 2014). The TOROS project is dedicated of data produced by an experiment that needs to be trans- to the search of electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational formed and stored. wave (GW) events, as a response to the dawn of Gravitational Wave Astronomy. TOROS participated in the first observation Filters: a point where an atomic action is being executed on run O1 of the Advanced LIGO GW interferometer (Abramovici the data and can be summarized as stages of the pipeline et al., 1992; Abbott et al., 2016) from September 2015 through where the data stream undergoes transformations. January 2016 with promising results (Beroiz et al., 2016) and Connectors is currently attempting to deploy a wide-field optical telescope : the bridges between two filters. Several connec- in Cordon´ Macon,´ in the Atacama Plateau, northwestern Ar- tors can converge to a single filter, linking one stage of gentina (Renzi et al., 2009; Tremblin et al., 2012). The collab- processing with one or more previous stages. oration faced the challenge of starting a robotic observatory in Branches: data in the stream may be of a different nature and the extreme environment of the Cordon´ Macon.´ Given the iso- serve different purposes, meaning that pipelines can host lation of this geographic location (the site is at 4,600 m AMSL groups of filters on which every kind of data must pass, as and the closest city is 300 km away), human interaction and well as a disjoint set of filters specific to different kinds of that Internet connectivity is not readily available, this imposes data. This concept allows pipelines the ability to process strong demands for in-situ pipeline data processing and storage data in parallel whenever data is independent. requirements along with failure tolerance issues. To assess this, we provide the formalization of a pipeline framework based on This architecture is commonly used on experimental projects the well known design pattern Model–View–Controller (MVC), that need to handle massive amounts of data. We argue that it and an Open Source BSD-3 License2 pure Python package ca- is suitable for managing the data flow from telescopes immedi- pable of creating a high performance abstraction layer over a ately after data ingestion through to the data analysis. data warehouse, with multiprocessing data manipulation and In general, most dedicated telescopes or observatories have quality assurance reporting. This provides simple Object Ori- at least one pipeline in charge of capturing, transforming and ented structures that seizes the power of modern multi-core storing data to be analyzed in the future, manually or automat- computer hardware. On the assurance reporting given the mas- ically (Klaus et al., 2010; Tucker et al., 2006; Emerson et al., sive amount of data expected to be processed, Corral extracts 2004). This is also important because many of the upcoming quality assurance metrics for the pipeline run, useful for error large astronomical surveys (e.g. LSST, Ivezic et al., 2008), debugging. are expected to be in the PetaByte scale in terms of raw data,3, 4, meaning that a faster and more reliable type of pipeline en- This work is organized as follows. In section 2 the pipeline gine is needed. LSST is currently maintaining their own foun- formalism and the relevance of this architecture is discussed, in dation for pipelines and data management software (Axelrod section 3 the framework and the design choices made are ex- et al., 2010). plained. The theoretical ideas are implemented into code as an Open Source Python software tool, as shown in section 4. In section 5 a short introductory code case for Corral is shown, 3. Framework followed by section 6 where a detailed explanation of the inter- Most large projects in the software industry start from a com- nal framework’s mechanisms and their overhead is discussed, mon baseline defined by an already existent framework. and in section 7 a comparison between Corral and other similar The main idea behind a framework is to offer a theoretical projects is shown. Finally in section 8 three production-level methodology that significantly reduces the repetition of code, pipelines, each built on top of Corral are listed. In section 9 allowing the developer to extend an already existent function- conclusions, discussion and future highlights of the project can ality, optimizing time, costs and other resources (Baumer¨ et al., be found. Finally the appendix appendix A presents two brief 1997; Pierro, 2011). A framework also offers its own flow con- examples about experiences of pipeline development with Cor- trol and rules to write extensions in a common way, which also ral, and appendix B where a table that compares Corral with facilitates the maintainability of the code. other pipeline framework alternatives can be found.
3LSST System & Survey Key Numbers: https://www.lsst.org/ scientists/keynumbers 2BSD-3 License: https://opensource.org/licenses/ 4LSST Petascale R&D Challenges: https://www.lsst.org/about/ BSD-3-Clause dm/petascale 2 3.1. The Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern the program is correct (Jazayeri, 2007). Following this, the CC MVC is a formalism originally designed to define software is the percentage of code executed by the unit tests (Miller and with visual interfaces around a data driven (DD) environment Maloney, 1963). (Krasner et al., 1988). The MVC approach was successfully Another interesting metric is related to the maintainability of adopted by most modern full stack web frameworks including the software. Although this may seem a subjective parameter, it Django5, Ruby on Rails6, and others. The main idea behind this can be measured by using a standardization of code style. The pattern is to split the problem into three main parts: number of style deviations as a tracer of code maintainability. It is also interesting to define quality based on hardware–use • the model part, which defines the logical structure of the and its related performance given the software. This is com- data, monly known as profiling A software profile aids in finding bottlenecks in the resource utilization of the computer, such as • the controllers, which define the logic for accessing and processor and memory use, I/O devices, or even energy con- transforming the data for the user, and sumption (Gorelick and Ozsvald, 2014). The broader profile • the view, in charge of presenting to the user the data stored type classification splits into application profiling and system in the model, managed by the controller. profiling. Application profiling is restricted to the currently developed software, while system profiling tests the underly- In general these three parts were initally defined by the Object ing system (databases, operating system and hardware) looking Oriented Paradigm (OOP, Coad, 1992). MVC implementation for configuration errors that may cause inefficiencies or over- provides self contained, well defined, reusable and less redun- consumption (Gregg, 2013). There are different techniques to dant modules, all of these key features are therefore necesarry obtain this information depending on the unit of analysis and for any big collaborative software project such as astronomical the data sampling method. There are profilers that evaluate data pipeline. the application in general (application level profiling), on each function call (function level profiling) or each line of code (line 3.2. Multi-processing and pipeline parallelization profiling) (Gregg, 2013). Another profiler classification further As stated before, pipelines can be branched when the chain divides them into deterministic and statistic (Roskind, 2007) of data processing splits into several independent tasks. This (Schneider). Deterministic profilers sample data at all times, can be easily exploited so that the pipeline takes full advantage while statistic profilers records data at regular intervals, taking of the available resources that a multi-core machine provides. note of the current function and line of execution. Unlike the Furthermore with this approach, the distribution of tasks inside analysis unit, which is decided in advance and is usually mod- a network environment, such as in a modern cluster is simple ified during the analysis, the choice for a deterministic profile and straightforward. is based on the need to retrieve precise measurements, at the cost of speed, since deterministic profiles can slow down the 3.3. Code Quality Assurance application execution time by up to a factor of ten. On the other Software quality has become a key component to software hand, the statistic profiler method executes the application at development. According to Feigenbaum (1983), almost true speed. ”Quality is a customer determination, not an engineer’s determination, not a marketing determination, nor a general 4. Results: A Python Framework to Implement repro- management determination. It is based on the customer’s ducible Pipelines Based on Models, Steps and Alerts actual experience with the product or service, measured against his or her requirements – stated or unstated, conscious We designed a Data Driven process based on MVC to gener- or merely sensed, technically operational or entirely subjective ate pipelines for applications in Astronomy that support quality – and always representing a moving target in a competitive metrics by means of unit-testing and code coverage. It is com- market”. posed of several pieces, each one consistent with the function- ality set by traditional Astronomical pipelines and also features In our context, a customer is not a single person but a role branching option for parallel processing naturally. This design that our scientific requirements define, and the engineers are was implemented on top of the OO Python Language and Re- responsible for the design and development of a pipeline able lational Databases in a Open Source BSD-3 licensed software 7 to satisfy the functionality defined by those requirements. Mea- project named Corral suring the quality of software is a task that involves the extrac- tion of qualitative and quantitative metrics. 4.1. The Underlying Tools: Python and Relational Databases One of the most common ways to measure software quality is As previously mentioned, Corral is implemented on the Code Coverage (CC). CC relies on the idea of unit-testing. The Python programming language 8; which has a vast ecosystem objective of unit-testing is to isolate and show that each part of of scientific libraries such as NumPy, SciPy Van Der Walt et al.
5Django: https://www.djangoproject.com/ 7 Corral Homepage: https://gitub.com/toros-astro/corral 6Ruby on Rails: https://rubyonrails.org 8Python Programming Language: http://python.org 3 (2011), Scikit-Learn Pedregosa et al. (2011), and a powerful Loader and simple syntax. Most astronomers are choosing Python as Traditional Pipelines their main tool for data processing, favoring the existence of li- braries such as AstroPy Robitaille et al. (2013), CCDProc9, or PhotUtils10Tollerud (2016), e.t.c., It is also worth mentioning that Python hosts a series of libraries for parallelism, command Step Step Step line interaction tools, and test case design, that are all useful for a smooth translation from ideas into real working software. Another key requirement is the storage and retrieval of data Alert Relational Databases in multiple processes, which led us to use Loader Management Systems (RDBMS). Relational Databases are a proven standard for data management and have been around Corral Pipelines for more than thirty years. They support an important number of implementations and it is worth mentioning that amongst the most widely used are Open Source, e.g., PostgreSQL. SQL is a powerful programming language for RDBMS and Data offers advantages in data consistency, and for search queries. SQL has a broad spectrum of implementations: from smaller, local applications, accessible from a single process, like SQLite (Owens and Allen, 2010), to distributed solutions on computer Step Step clusters, capable of serving billions of requests, like Hive (Thu- soo et al., 2009). This plethora of options allows flexibility in the creation of pipelines, from personal ones, to pipelines Alert deployed across computing clusters hosting huge volumes of data and multiple users. Inside the Python ecosystem, the SQLAlchemy11 library offers the possibility of designing model Schema in a rather simple way while at the same time offering enough flexibility so as to not cause dependence issues related Figure 1: Data road-map in traditional pipeline architecture (upper panel) and to specific SQL dialects. Thus offering a good compromise to Corral’s pipeline model (lower panel). In previous pipeline models data is be- satisfy different needs of the developer. ing processed sequentially from one Step to the next one, with the possible scenario of parallel branching; while in the model proposed in this work Steps 4.2. From Model-View-Controller to Model-Step-Alert are independent entities that interact with a shared central data container. In both architectures data can be extracted when desired conditions are met, and To bridge the gap between traditional MVC terminology and shared at any time to users. that used to describe pipeline architecture, some terms (e.g. Views and Controllers) have been redefined in this work, to make the code more descriptive for both programmers and sci- Steps select data from the stream by imposing con- entists. straints, and load the data again after some transfor- mation. It follows from this that steps are both filters Models define protocols for the stream of our pipeline. They and connectors, that implicitly include branching. define data structures for the initial information ingest, in- termediate products and final knowledge of the processing Alerts To define views we take that concepts of Alerts as uti- pipeline. Since the framework is Data Driven, every stage lized in some astronomical applications used for follow-up of the process consumes and loads data trough the mod- experiments, as inspiration to design the views. In Corral els that act as the channels of communication amongst the views are called Alerts and are special events triggered by different pipeline components. The models can store data a particular state of the data stream. or metadata. Some Python code examples regarding each of these ”pipeline Steps Just like the Models, Steps are defined by classes, and processors” can be found in section 5 and appendix A A com- in this case they act like filters and connectors. We know plete picture of the framework and the user defined elements of mention two different types of steps used by Corral: load- the pipeline along with their interactions, is displayed in figure ers, and steps. 1. Loaders are responsible for feeding the pipeline at its 4.3. Some Words About Multiprocessing and Distributed Com- earliest stage. By design choice, a pipeline over Cor- puting ral can only have one loader. As previously mentioned our project is built on top of a 9CCDProc: http://ccdproc.readthedocs.io RDBMS, which by design can be accessed concurrently from a 10PhotUtils: http://photutils.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ local or network computer. Every step accesses only the filtered 11SQLAlchemy: http://www.sqlalchemy.org/ part of the stream, so with minimum effort one can deploy the 4 pipeline in one or more computers and run the steps in paral- own tests fail then no result is guaranteed to be reproducible. lel. All the dangers of data corruption are avoided by the ACID The RPT factor is a measure of how many of the different pro- (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation and Durability) properties of cessing stages critical to the pipeline are being tested (a low the database transactions. This approach works well in most value of this parameter should be interpreted as a need to write scenarios, but there are some unavoidable drawbacks, that arise new tests for each pipeline stage). The ΛCov factor shows the for example in real-time processing, where consistency is less percentage of code that is being executed in the sum of every important than availability.Corral takes advantage of this tech- unit test; this displays the ”quality of the testing” (a low value nology to start a process for each Loader, Step or Alert within should be interpreted as a need to write more extensive tests, the pipeline, and allows interaction with the data stored in the and it may correlate with a low number of processors being database. If needed, groups of processes can be manually dis- tested, that is a low RPT ). NNS err/(τ × N f ) is the scaling fac- tributed on nodes of a cluster where the nodes will interact with tor for the exponential. It comprises the information regarding the database remotely. style errors, attenuated by a default or a user-defined tolerance It is worth noting that any inter-processes direct communica- τ times the number of files in the project N f . The exponential tion is forbidden by design, and the only way to exchange mes- function expresses the fact that a certain number of style errors sages is through the database.On this last particular point, the isn’t critical, but after some point this seriously compromises absolute isolation of the processes, is guaranteed by the MVC the maintainability of the software project, and in this situation pattern. γ strongly penalizes the quality index.The factor 1/2 is a nor- malization constant, so that QAI ∈ [0, 1]. This index aims to 4.4. Quality – Trustworthy Pipelines encode in a single figure of merit how well the pipeline meets One important requirement for a pipeline is the reliability of the requirements specified by the user. We note that this index its results. A manual check of the data is virtually impossible represents a confidence metric. Thus a pipeline could be com- when its volume scales to the TeraByte range. In our approach pletely functional even if every test fails, or if no tests are yet we suggest a simple unit testing approach to check the status of written for it. And in the opposite direction, the case where the stream before and after every Step, Loader or Alert. every test passes and the pipeline is delivering wrong or bogus QAI Because tests are unitary, Corral guarantees the isolation of results is possible.The index attempts to answer the ques- each test by creating and destroying the stream database before tion of pipeline reliability and whether a particular pipeline can and after execution of the test. If you feed the stream with a be trustworthy. It should not be confused with the pipeline’s sufficient amount of heterogeneous data you can check most of speed, capability, or any other performance metric. the pipeline’s functionality before the production stage. Finally 4.4.2. Determining the default error tolerance in a python we provide capabilities to create reports with all the structural project and quality assurance information about the pipeline in conve- Corral, as earlier mentioned is written in Python, which nient way, and a small tool to profile the CPU performance of offers a number of third party libraries for style validation. the project. Code style in Python is standardized by the PEP 8 document12. Flake813 is a style tool that allows the user to measure the 4.4.1. Quality Assurance Index (QAI) number of style errors, that reflects the maintainability of the We recognize the need of a value to quantify the pipeline project. software quality. For example, using different estimators for For the QAI measurement of Corral a key detail was in the the stability and maintainability of the code, we arrived at the determination of the amount of style errors developers tollerate following Quality Index: as normal. For this we collected data from nearly 4000 public Θ × Λ × R Python source code files. The number of style errors was deter- QAI = Cov PT γ mined using Flake8 and the inter-quartile mean was determined as a measurement for τ.A τ of ∼ 13 was found. It is important and γ is a penalty factor defined as: to note that this value can be overridden by the user if a stronger !! QAI is required (Fig. 2). 1 NS Error γ = × 1 + exp 2 τ × N f 4.4.3. Quality and Structural reporting Corral includes the ability to automatically generate doc- Θ is 1 if every test passes or 0 if any one fails, RPT is the ra- tio of tested processors (Loader, Steps and Alerts) to the total umentation, creating a manual and quality reports in Mark- down14 syntax that can be easily converted to a preferred format number of processors, ΛCov the code coverage (between 0 and such as PDF (ISO., 2005), LaTeX (Lamport, 1994) or HTML 1), NS Error is the number of style errors, τ is the style tolerance, (Price, 2000). A Class-Diagram (Booch et al., 2006) generation and N f is the number of files in the project. The number of 15 test passes and failures are the unit-testing results, that provide tool for the Models defined using Graphviz are also available a reproducible and updatable manner to decide whether your 12 Θ PEP8: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008 code is working as expected or not. The factor is a critical 13Flake8: http://flake8.pycqa.org/ parameter of the index, since it is discrete, and if a single unit 14Markdown: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/ test fails it will set the QAI to zero, in the spirit that if your 15Graphviz: http://www.graphviz.org/ 5 bugs can decrease substantially, up to 80% (Jeffries and Melnik, 2007).
5. Study case: A Simple Pipeline to Transform (x, y) Image Coordinates to world coordinates (RA, Dec)
A few examples are given below to illustrate each part of a toy model pipeline built over Corral. A more extended example can be found in appendix A and in the TOROS GitHub repos- itory page https://github.com/toros-astro/toritos, where a fully functional astronomical image preprocessing pipeline is available. We encourage the interested users to read the full Corral tu- torial located at: http://corral.readthedocs.io Figure 2: Ideal test pass, and coverage QAI curves, with NS Err ∈ [0, 40] for four values of τ, for only one file. A damp in the error slope decay can be observed when τ is higher. 5.1. A Model example In the following example a Model for an astronomical source is shown. It uses both (x, y) and (RA, Dec) coordinates and a for the pipelines created with Corral. We provide in Appendix field given for apparent magnitude. The identification field is A.4 an example of a pipeline (EXO) with an implementation of automatically settled. tests and the corresponding results of the QA report. # this code is inside mypipeline/models.py 4.4.4. Profiling from corral import db Corral offers a deterministic tool for the performance analy- sis of CPU usage at a function level16 during the execution of class PointSources(db.Model): unit tests. It is worth noting that in case a pipeline shows signs "Model for star sources" of lagging or slowing down, running a profiler over a unit test __tablename__ = "PointSources" session can help locate bottlenecks. However for rigurous pro- filing, real data on real application runs should be used, instead id = db.Column( of unit testing. db.Integer, primary_key=True) Another kind of profiling at the application level could be x = db.Column(db.Float, nullable=False) carried out manually using existing Python ecosystem tools y = db.Column(db.Float, nullable=False) such as memory profiler17 18 (memory line level determinis- ra = db.Column(db.Float, nullable=True) tic profiling), statsprof.py19 (statistic function level profiling), dec = db.Column(db.Float, nullable=True) o line profiler20 (line level deterministic) amongst other tools. We note that although some application level profiling tools are app_mag = db.Column(db.Float, nullable=False) included or suggested, Corral was never intended to offer a sys- tem profiling tool. Nor does it claim to offer data base profiling, 5.2. A Loader example or I/O, energy profiling, network profiling, etc. In the following example a Loader is shown, where the PointSource Model from above example is filled with new data. 4.4.5. Final words about Corral quality We note that the (RA, Dec) fields in PointSource Model are al- The framework does not contain any error backtrace concept, lowed to be null, and therefore there is no need to set them a or retry attempts in processing. Each processor should be able priori. to handle correctly the required information on its conditions. # this code is inside mypipeline/load.py ff It is implicitly expected that the quality tools o ered serve to from astropy.io import ascii unveil code errors as well. from corral import run If the pipeline’s developer achieves a high code coverage and is able to test enough data diversification, the possible software from mypipeline import models
class Load(run.Loader): 16Function Level CPU Profiling: shows function call times and frequency, as well as the chain of calls they were part of based on the receiver of the call. "Pipeline Loader" 17memory profiler:https://pypi.python.org/pypi/memory_ def setup(self): profiler self.cat = ascii.read( 18 memory profiler:https://pypi.python.org/pypi/memory_ ’point_sources_cat.dat’) profiler 19statsprof.py:https://github.com/smarkets/statprof 20line profiler: https://github.com/rkern/line_profiler def generate(self): 6 for source in self.cat: 5.5. Running your Pipeline src = models.PointSource() As seen in the previous sections we define our protocol for src.x = source[’x’] the stream and the actions to be performed in order to covert the src.y = source[’y’] coordinates; but code is never defined to schedule the execu- src.app_mag = source[’app_mag’]) tion. Nevertheless applying the Corral MVC equivalent pattern yield src guarantees that every loader and step is to be executed indepen- dently which means that both tasks run as long as there is data 5.3. A Step example to work with. In every Step/Loader/Alert there is a guarantee An example Step is displayed below, where a simple data of data consistency since each is attached to an SQLAlchemy transformation is conducted. Where the step takes a set of session, and every task is linked to a database transaction. sources and transforms their (x, y) coordinates to (RA, Dec): Since every SQL transaction is atomic, so the process is exe- lines 10-12 show definitions for Class-level attributes, which cuted or fails, thus lowering the risk of data corruption in the are responsible for this query. The framework retrieves the data stream. and serves it to the process method (line 14), which executes the relevant transformation and loads the data for each source. # this code is inside mypipeline/step.py from corral import run from mypipeline import models import convert_coord class StepTransform(run.Step): "Step to transform from x,y to ra,dec"
model = models.PointSource conditions = [model.ra == None, model.dec == None]
def process(self, source): x = source.x y = source.y
source.ra, source.dec = convert_coord(x, y)
5.4. Alert Example In the example below an Alert is triggered when a state sat- isfies a particular condition of data in the stream. A group of communication channels are activated. In this particular case an email and an Astronomical Telegram (Rutledge, 1998) are posted whenever a point source is detected in the vicinity of Sgr A∗, near the center of the galaxy. # this code is inside mypipeline/alert.py from corral import run from corral.run import endpoints as ep from mypipeline import models class AlertNearSgrA(run.Alert):
model = models.PointSource conditions = [ model.ra.between(266.4, 266.41), model.dec.between(-29.007, -29.008)] alert_to = [ep.Email(["[email protected]", "[email protected]"]), ep.ATel()] 7 Typically for a given pipeline with defined: Loader; Alert models.PointSource.ra==self.ra, and Steps, the following output is produced: models.PointSource.dec==self.dec) self.assertStreamCount( $ python in_corral.py run-all 1, models.PointSource) [mypipeline-INFO@2017-01-12 18:32:54,850] Executing Loader As shown in lines 12-16 the setup() method is in charge of ’
Appendix A.1. Installation • Define the models for the data base. In this case, tell what The recommended installation method for getting Corral run- kind of data will be stored in the database, set names, etc. ning is using pip: • Create the database for the data. This is accomplished ac- $ pip install -U corral-pipeline cording to the settings and the models.
Other methods are also possible, and are detailed in the on- • Load the data: read the CSV table and save it in the line documentation27. database. python in_corral.py load Appendix A.2. Simple pipeline examples • Define the steps: write the code to be applied to the data. Here we present a quick start guide to use Corral to set up a pipeline, with two simple examples. • Run the pipeline: this will read the data from the database The workflow for creating a simple pipeline can be summa- and perform all the steps defined before. rized as follows (see also Fig. A.3): python in_corral.py run
• Create the pipeline • Output data can be obtained through Alerts. python in_corral.py check-alerts • Define the models In what follows we present a step–by–step guide to carry out • Create the database for the data this tasks. After installation, a pipeline can be created by running the 27http://corral.readthedocs.io/en/latest/install.html command: 11 and also stores information about the locations of data files. For example, we can create the variable IRIS PATH in the IRIS pipeline that stores the location of the data file containing the IRIS data, iris.csv 28 IRIS_PATH = os.path.join(PATH, "iris.csv") This file contains 5 columns, listing the sepal length, sepal width, petal length, petal width and name of 150 samples if the IRIS flower from the original dataset (Fisher 1936). For the exoplanets pipeline, we store the data in the file ex- oplanets.csv29, which contains the following columns: name, period and mass of the planet; star–planet separation; distance to the host star; and mass, radius, effective temperature and metallicity of the star. This is a subset of data obtained from exoplanets.org. For this pipeline, the only modification in Figure A.3: Basic scheme of the workflow to build a pipeline using Corral the settings.py file, with respect to the other example, is: EXO_PATH = os.path.join(PATH, "exoplanets.csv") $ corral create my_pipeline Besides this basic configuration, the names of classes con- which creates a file in corral.py and a new directory taining loaders, steps and alerts must be listed in the LOADER, ’my pipeline’. The file in corral.py is the access point to the STEPS and ALERTS variables, respectively. For example, for pipeline, and allows commands to be executed inside the envi- the IRIS pipeline we create 4 steps: ronment of the pipeline. The directory my pipeline is the root directory for the pipeline, and the actual Python package for the STEPS = [ project. Its name is the Python package name that can be used "pipeline.steps.StatisticsCreator", to import anything inside it (e.g. my pipeline.models). The "pipeline.steps.SetosaStatistics", name my pipeline can be replaced by IRIS or EXO, for our ex- "pipeline.steps.VirginicaStatistics", amples on IRIS data or exoplanet data, respectively. There are "pipeline.steps.VersicolorStatistics"] some files that are created within the project directory, each of them with a specific purpose within the Corral framework: Appendix A.3. Processing of the IRIS data As an essential part of the MVC pattern, the next step in my pipeline/ init .py An empty file that tells Python that preparing the pipeline is to define the models. The Model deter- this directory should be considered a Python package. mines the structure of the data, and is defined in the models.py my pipeline/pipeline.py The suggested file to globally config- file. ure the pipeline on execution time. We can create a model as a database which consists on two tables. The Flower table has 4 columns that store the sepal my pipeline/models.py Contains the entities (or tables) that length and width, and the petal length and width, in the vari- are stored in the pipelines database. ables sepal l, sepal w, petal l, and petal w, respectively. The my pipeline/load.py Contains the Loader class. This would other table stores the name of the flower (Name). Each model be the entry point for raw data to the pipeline stream, be- is a class that inherits from db.model, so that Corral take these fore going through any defined Steps. as tables in the database. Both tables are linked through their primary keys, which are added automatically when the database my pipeline/steps.py Contains all pipeline steps. is created. my pipeline/alerts.py Contains the definitions of the Alerts, from corral import db that offer custom communication channels to report ex- pected results (a email for instance). class Name(db.Model): my pipeline/commands.py Used to add custom console com- __tablename__ = ’Name’ mands, specific for the pipeline.
Each time a new pipeline is created, the first step is to per- id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True) form the configuration by editing the file settings.py This name = db.Column(db.String(50), unique=True) file contains the variables that should be set in order to put the pipeline into work. In particular, it stores the location of the 28https://github.com/toros-astro/corral/raw/master/ settings.py file: datasets/iris.csv 29https://github.com/toros-astro/corral/raw/master/ PATH = os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(__file__)) datasets/exoplanets.csv 12 class Flower(db.Model): At this point the database does not contain any data, so the loaders must be used for that purpose. This is accomplished __tablename__ = ’Flower’ with the sentence $ python in_corral.py load id = db.Column( db.Integer, primary_key=True) that uses the information set in the load.py file. This file con- tains the Loader class, which reads the data and save it to the name_id = db.Column( database according to the model. The loader for this pipeline db.Integer, db.ForeignKey(’Name.id’), would be: nullable=False) class Loader(run.Loader): name = db.relationship( "Name", backref=db.backref("flowers")) def setup(self): sepal_l = db.Column( self.fp = open(settings.IRIS_PATH) db.Float, nullable=False) sepal_w = db.Column( def get_name_instance(self, row): db.Float, nullable=False) name = self.session.query( petal_l = db.Column( models.Name db.Float, nullable=False) ).filter( petal_w = db.Column( models.Name.name == row["Name"] db.Float, nullable=False) ).first()
In the IRIS example, in order to compute a basic statistic (the if name is None: mean) for each data column, an additional table must be created name = models.Name(name=row["Name"]) to store the results (and any other value that could be required). This table in the database is linked to the ”flowers” table by # we need to add the new its primary key, which is generated automatically. It must be # instance and save it declared into the models.py file: self.save(name) self.session.commit() class Statistics(db.Model): return name __tablename__ = ’Statistics’ def store_observation(self, row, name): id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True) return models.Flower( name_id = db.Column( name=name, db.Integer, db.ForeignKey(’Name.id’), sepal_l=row["SepalLength"], nullable=False, unique=True) sepal_w=row["SepalWidth"], name = db.relationship( petal_l=row["PetalLength"], "flowers", uselist=False, petal_w=row["PetalWidth"]) backref=db.backref("statistics")) def generate(self): mean_sepal_l = db.Column( for row in csv.DictReader(self.fp): db.Float, nullable=False) name = self.get_name_instance(row) mean_sepal_w = db.Column( obs = self.store_observation( db.Float, nullable=False) row, name) mean_petal_l = db.Column( yield obs db.Float, nullable=False) mean_petal_w = db.Column( def teardown(self, *args): db.Float, nullable=False) if self.fp and not self.fp.closed: self.fp.close() def __repr__(self): In this example, setup is executed just before generate, return "
def setup(self): class HabitableZone(run.Step): # we open the file and assign it to __tablename__ = "HabitableZoneStats" # an instance variable self.fp = open(settings.EXO_PATH) id = db.Column( db.Integer, primary_key=True) def float_or_none(self, value): try: planet_id = db.Column( return float(value) db.Integer, db.ForeignKey(’Planet.id’), except (TypeError, ValueError): nullable=False) return None planet = db.relationship("Planet", backref=db.backref("hzones")) def generate(self): # now we make use of "self.fp" luminosity = db.Column(db.Float) # for the reader radio_inner = db.Column(db.Float) for row in csv.DictReader(self.fp): radio_outer = db.Column(db.Float) di = { ’name’: row[’NAME’], in_habitable_zone = db.Column(db.Boolean) ’per’: self.float_or_none( row[’PER’]), Then, the step performs the search of planets that fulfill the ’mass’: self.float_or_none( requirement of being in the habitable zone. To that end, we row[’MASS’]), compute the boundaries of the habitable zone as rin = L/(1.1 ∗ ’sep’: self.float_or_none( Lsun) and rout = L/(0.53 ∗ Lsun), and the luminosity as row[’SEP’]), L = 4πR2 ∗ σT 4 (A.1) ’dist’: self.float_or_none( ∗ e f f row[’DIST’]), This is performed on the models.Planet model for the plan- ’mstar’: self.float_or_none( ets that have both the period and the mass measured in the row[’MSTAR’]), dataset. All these planets that satisfy the condition of being ’rstar’: self.float_or_none( in the habitable zone are then ingested to the data base on the row[’RSTAR’]), HabitableZoneStats table. ’teff’: self.float_or_none( row[’TEFF’]), from corral import run ’fe’: self.float_or_none( import numpy as np row[’FE’])} from astropy import units as u, constants as c yield models.Planet(**di) from . import models
def teardown(self, *args): STEFAN_BOLTZMANN = c.sigma_sb # checking that the SUN_LUMINOSITY = c.L_sun # file is really open if self.fp and not self.fp.closed: class HabitableZone(run.Step): self.fp.close() """Compute some statistics of the star of a given planet and then determines if is in where the function Empty2None allows to deal with missing their habitable zone. values, which is common in exoplanet data. This pipeline can """ also be extended by adding steps and alerts. For instance, a step can be configured to filter the dataset, compute correlation model = models.Planet parameters, or apply machine learning techniques to discover conditions = [model.rstar != None, clustering or perform classifications. If new planets are added model.teff != None] to the data file, running the pipeline updates all the results previ- ously computed. Also, the python environment allows to write def process(self, planet): alerts, which can be configured to produce plots, send the re- # habitable zone of the host star sults by email or replace older versions in a webpage. Here we Rstar = (planet.rstar * u.solRad).to(’m’) show an example of a step, which determines the list of planets Teff = planet.teff * u.K in the habitable zone, and of an alert, which performs a scatter luminosity = ( 15 STEFAN_BOLTZMANN * 4 * np.pi * ep.File("in_habzone.log"), (Rstar ** 2) * (Teff ** 4)) LogScatter( lratio = luminosity / SUN_LUMINOSITY "in_habzone.png", rin = np.sqrt(lratio / 1.1) xfield="per", yfield="mass", rout = np.sqrt(lratio / 0.53) title="Period Vs Mass", marker="*")] in_hz = ( planet.sep >= rin and def render_alert(self, now, ep, hz): planet.sep <= rout) planet = hz.planet return models.HabitableZoneStats( data = [] planet=planet, for fn in planet.__table__.c: in_habitable_zone=in_hz, data.append([fn.name, luminosity=lratio.value, getattr(planet, fn.name)]) radio_inner=rin.value, fields = ", ".join( radio_outer=rout.value) "{}={}".format(k, v) for k, v in data) return "[{}] {}\n".format( Finally, we show an alert that produces a scatter plot of planet now.isoformat(), fields) mass vs. period: In order to generate a report on the quality of this pipeline, class LogScatter(ep.EndPoint): we must perform some tests. In what follows, we show two tests that check for consistency in the data. The test def __init__(self, path, xfield, yfield, in HabitableZoneTest creates an instance of a planet with title, **kwargs): R∗ = 1 and Te f f = 1. This should produce a luminosity of self.path = path 4 ∗ π ∗ σ/L , and should not be into the habitable zone. The self.xfield = xfield test also accounts for the consistency of the boundary values, self.yfield = yfield checking that the inner boundary is lesser than the outer bound- self.title = title ary. Finally, it verifies that as a result of the step, just one entry self.kwargs = kwargs on the HabitableZoneStats is produced. self._x, self._y = [], [] class HabitableZoneTest(qa.TestCase): def process(self, hz): subject = steps.HabitableZone planet = hz.planet x = getattr(planet, self.xfield) def setup(self): y = getattr(planet, self.yfield) planet = models.Planet( if x and y: name="foo", rstar=1, teff=1) self._x.append(x) self.save(planet) self._y.append(y) def validate(self): def teardown(self, *args): planet = self.session.query( plt.scatter( models.Planet).first() p.log(self._x), hzone = planet.hzones[0] np.log(self._y), **self.kwargs) self.assertAlmostEquals( plt.title(self.title) hzone.luminosity, 8.96223797571e-10) plt.legend(loc="best") self.assertLess( plt.savefig(self.path) hzone.radio_inner, hzone.radio_outer) super(LogScatter, self).teardown(*args) self.assertFalse(hzone.in_habitable_zone) self.assertStreamCount( class PlotAlert(run.Alert): 1, models.HabitableZoneStats) """Store a list of planets in habitable zone in a log file and also generate a The other test checks that in the case a planet does not have period vs mass plot of this planets the two values that are required for the plot in the alert, no entry """ is generated on the HabitableZoneStats table.
model = models.HabitableZoneStats class HabitableZoneNoRstarNoTeffTest(qa.TestCase): conditions = [ model.in_habitable_zone == True] subject = steps.HabitableZone alert_to = [ 16 def setup(self): planet = models.Planet(name="foo") self.save(planet)
def validate(self): self.assertStreamCount(0, models.HabitableZoneStats)
These tests produce a QA index of 27.31 per cent, and a qual- ification F with a 81.94 per cent coverage. It must be noticed that in order to improve the quality of this pipeline, more tests should be prepared. This example can be downloaded from the project repository. All the structural and quality documents can be found in GitHub pipeline repository in the following direc- tions:
• Pipeline repository, https://github.com/ toros-astro/corral_exoplanets
• QA report, https://github.com/toros-astro/ corral_exoplanets/blob/master/exo/qareport. md
• Model class diagram, https://github.com/ toros-astro/corral_exoplanets/blob/master/ exo/models.png
• Pipeline documentation, https://github.com/ toros-astro/corral_exoplanets/blob/master/ exo/doc.md
17 Appendix B. Comparative Table Between Several Pipeline Frameworks
In the following table we condense a collection of some of the most prominent pipeline implementations. Given a particular problem situation and resource constrain, it can be difficult to decide on a particular implementation of a pipeline and it would be even harder to test every pipeline framework available. See section 7 for a discussion. No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Tutorial No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Docs No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes GUI (Desktop) MVC ETL ETL ETL ETL Collection Of Scripts ETL ETL anyported sup- by Hadoop ETL Architecture QA Yes No No No No No No No No Yes Process Python Multiprocess- ing Custom Scheduler (can be used manually, with Mortar or Hadoop) Custom Scheduler Custom Scheduler Java ProcessAnd Hadoop Builder Manual Run Custom Scheduler over Hadoop System Process Spark Single-process management Main Storage - - Arvados-Keep RDBMS FITS Files AnyStorage Hadoop - HDFS - RDBMS (including Hive) Language Python Python Python Python Java C ++ Java / R Java Scala C ++ Suported By Independent. Spotify Inc. Apache Foundation Curoverse Inc Linkedin SpaceScience Institute Telescope Apache Foundation UC Davis,Santa Barbara, UC San UC Diego Berkeley Institute For Data Science Oxford e-Research Centre Primary Focus General Purpose General Propouse General Purpose Bio-Informatics General Purpose Astronomy General Propose General Science Astronomy (Images) Radio Astronomy License BSD-3 Apache-2 Apache-2 AGPL-3 Apache-2 Apache-2 CMU MIT Mit Not-Specif ed Not-Specified [5] [9] [6] [4] [7] [8] [10] [3] [2] [1] Luigi Airf ow Arvados Azkaban OPUS Oozie Kira Alternative Corral Kepler Pelican
18 Links
[1] Corral: http://corral.readthedocs.io [2] Luigi: https://luigi.readthedocs.io [3] Airflow: http://airflow.apache.org/ [4] Arvados: https://arvados.org [5] Azkaban: http://azkaban.github.io/azkaban [6] OPUS: http://www.stsci.edu/institute/software_hardware/opus/ [7] Oozie: http://oozie.apache.org/ [8] Kepler: https://kepler-project.org [9] Kira: https://github.com/BIDS/Kira/ [10] Pelican: http://www.oerc.ox.ac.uk/~ska/pelican/
19