Annette Ess Ukrainian Banking Sector 2021 Outlook: Natalia Yalovskaya

Clean-Up And Renewed Growth March 15, 2021 Key Takeaways

– Ukrainian banks are well equipped to fight the economic shock of 2020-2021 thanks to the National Bank of 's (NBU) system clean-up, increased capital and liquidity cushions, and strengthened banking regulation and supervision. – Main 2021-2022 challenges for four state-owned banks: – Cleaning up nonperforming loans (NPLs) from balance sheets; – Implementing viable new business strategies; and – Strengthening corporate governance to prepare them for partial or full privatization. – Foreign- and privately-owned Ukrainian banks should remain resilient to the pandemic and resume growth in retail and corporate segments. – Bank earnings in 2021 should remain in line with 2020: we expect growth in retail and corporate loans but pressure on net interest margin due to record low interest rates. – Cost of risk will remain elevated at about 2.3% in 2021, compared to about 3.0% in 2020. – Following write-offs, NPLs will reduce to about 30% by end-2021 from 41% at end-2020. Strengthened Regulation Supports Ukrainian Banking Sector Development

– We note material improvements in regulation and supervision in the Ukrainian banking sector over the past six years. – The NBU aims to be independent despite political pressure. – Its regulatory actions are predictable and consistent. – It has provided adequate and timely responses to support the banking system during the COVID-19 crisis. – Upcoming 2021 regulatory intiatives: – Harmonize banking regulation with EU standards; – Increase risk weights for unsecured consumer loans to 125% by mid-2021 and 150% by January 2022 from 100% currently; – Tighten corporate governance requirements and strengthen board responsibility; and – Increase banking system digitalization. More Severe GDP Contraction And More Pronounced Recovery In Ukraine Compared To Peer Average

Real GDP Growth

2021f 2020e – Ukraine's GDP growth and public finances 6 outperformed our expectations in 2020 4 thanks to a strong rebound in domestic demand. 2 – GDP contraction in Ukraine was about 4.2% 0 in 2020, which was less severe than the 9.8%

(2) reported in 2014.

% – Estimated GDP growth of about 4% in 2021 (4) should support the growth and recovery of (6) the banking sector. (8) – However, epidemiological considerations pose an important risk to our growth (10) projections. (12) Egypt Kenya Turkey Greece Nigeria Tunisia Georgia Belarus Ukraine Armenia Azerbaijan Uzbekistan Kazakhstan e--Estimate. f--Forecast. Source: Central Banks, S&P Global Ratings.

4 NPL Write-Offs Will Exceed New Loan Generation In 2021-2022

Loans In Ukrainian Banking System

Net corporate loans Provisions on corporate loans Net retail loans Provisions on retail loans We expect: 1,200 – Net retail loans to increase by 10%-15% per year in 2021-2022, capitalizing on low key 1,000 policy rate of 6.5% currently. – Net corporate loans to increase by 5%-10% 800 per year thanks to economic revival and government stimulus to increase lending. 600 – Gross corporate loans to reduce by about

Bil . UAH 10% annually due to write-offs of legacy 400 NPLs.

200

0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021f 2022f f--Forecast. NPL--Nonperforming loan. UAH--. Source: , S&P Global Ratings.

5 Leverage Reduction Versus Growth

Leverage Reduction: Banks Growth: Foreign-Owned Banks PrivatBank, Oschadbank, Ukreximbank, Ukrgazbank 18 banks excluding two Russian state banks

Performing loans NPLs NPLs (right scale) Performing loans NPLs NPLs (right scale) 600 120 300 15.0 250 12.5 200 10.0 500 100 150 7.5 %

Bil . UAH 100 5.0 50 2.5 400 80 0 0.0 2020 2021f Growth: Private Ukrainian Banks % 300 60 48 banks Bil . UAH

Performing loans NPLs NPLs (right scale) 200 40 250 25 200 20

150 15 % 100 20 100 10 Bil . UAH 50 5 0 0 0 0 2020 2021f 2020 2021f f--Forecast. UAH--Ukrainian hryvnia. Source: National Bank of Ukraine, S&P Global Ratings.

6 Challenge Of Rehabilitation Of State-Owned Banks

State-Owned Banks Account For A Sizable Share Of The System As of end-2020 PrivatBank Oschadbank Ukreximbank Ukrgazbank – We expect the rehabilitation of state-owned banks to continue in order to reduce the NPLs share of government ownership of the Ukrainian banking system to 25%. This will involve the full sale of PrivatBank, and the Retail sale of minority stakes in Oschadbank, deposits Ukreximbank, and Ukrgazbank.

Corporate – In January 2021, International Finance deposits Corporation provided Ukrgazbank with a €30 million loan convertible into a stake in the Net retail bank's capital. loans – The banks have installed independent Net supervisory boards and introduced plans to corporate reduce legacy NPLs. They continue to loans develop their growth strategies. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 %

NPL--Nonperforming loan. Source: National Bank of Ukraine.

7 A Pronounced Reduction Of NPLs Due To Write Offs

NPLs In The Ukrainian Banking System 60 – In summer 2020, the Financial Stability Council approved plans by four state-owned 50 banks to reduce their NPLs by UAH305 billion over 2020-2022.

40 – In 2020, these state-owned banks reduced NPLs by more than UAH110 billion. – The main reduction was at PrivatBank, by

% 30 more than UAH70 billion. – We forecast NPLs in the system to reduce to 20 about 20% by end-2022. We expect writeoffs of legacy fully provisioned NPLs will outweigh

10 asset quality deterioration due to COVID-19 and seasoning of loans.

0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021f 2022f f--Forecast. NPL--Nonperforming loan. UAH--Ukrainian hryvnia. Source: National Bank of Ukraine, S&P Global Ratings.

8 Dollarization of Loans And Deposits In Ukraine To Remain At Elevated Levels

Dollarization Of Loans And Deposits For Ukrainian Banks And Peers – Dollarization of loans and deposits in Ukraine is high in a At end-2020 global context but is in the middle of the range of CIS FX loans FX deposits depreciation in 2020 members. 70 – We expect the Ukrainian hryvnia to depreciate moderately in 2021 on top of 16% depreciation in 2020 – 60 one of the highest depreciation rates in the region. 50 – We do not expect currency depreciation to materially harm Ukrainian banking system stability because: 40 – Regulation does not allow retail loans in FX in Ukraine. 30 Net retail loans in FX were 3% at end-2020 and are progressively reducing through repayments.

% 20 – The majority of corporate loans in FX are to exporters. 10 We expect dollarization of net corporate loans to slightly reduce to about 46% in 2021 from 48% at 0 end-2020, reflecting reduced rates on UAH loans (10) following the reduction of a key policy rate. – De-dollarization of deposits is likely to slowly (20) continue, largely depending on currency stability. (30) – FX mismatches at the majority of Ukrainian banks are Kazakhstan Russia Azerbaijan Ukraine Belarus Uzbekistan Armenia Georgia moderate.

CIS--Commonwealth of Independent States. FX--Foreign exchange. Source: Central Banks, S&P Global Ratings.

9 Cost Of Risk To Remain Elevated But Lower Than Peer Average

– We expect Ukrainian banks' cost of risk (COR) to be about 2.3% in 2021, one of the lowest among international peers, reflecting very high COR in 2016-2018 and limited growth hereafter. – At about 3% in 2020, COR in Ukraine was in line with the peer average.

COR For Ukrainian Banks And Peers

8 2021f

7 2020e 6

5

% 4

3

2

1

0 Egypt Kenya Turkey Russia Greece Nigeria Tunisia Georgia Belarus Ukraine Armenia Azerbaijan Uzbekistan Kazakhstan

COR--Cost of risk. Source: Central Banks, S&P Global Ratings.

10 We Expect The Pandemic To Moderately Harm 2021 Profitability

Revenue And Expenses For Ukrainian Banks

Net interest income Fees Other income Loan loss provisions Administrative expenses Taxes Expectations for 2021: – Stable net interest margin. This will reflect an increasing share of retail and SME lending, 2021f and increasing share of performing versus nonperforming loans, but low key policy rate. – Volume growth to spur an approximate 10% increase in fees. 2020e – Investment in digitalization and IT to spur an approximate 10% increase in expenses. – Provisions will remain above 2019 levels. – ROA of about 2% in 2021, in line with 2.3% in 2019 2020.

(125) (100) (75) (50) (25) 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 Bil. UAH e--Estimate. f--Forecast. ROA--Return on assets. SME--Small and midsize enterprise. UAH--Ukrainian hryvnia. Source: National Bank of Ukraine, S&P Global Ratings.

11 PrivatBank And Foreign Banks Will Remain Main Profit Generators

ROA In 2020 Breakdown Of Net Income In 2020

7 70 6.5 61 6 60

50 5 40 4 31

% 30 % 3 2.3 2.3 20 14 2 1.8 10 0.9 1 0

(5) 0 (10) PrivatBank Foreign-owned Private Oschadbank and All banks PrivatBank Oschadbank, Foreign-owned Private Ukrainian banks* Ukrainian banks Urkgazbank Ukrgazbank, Ukreximbank

*Except Russian-owned. Source: National Bank of Ukraine. Source: National Bank of Ukraine.

12 Deposits Remain Main Funding Source And Liquidity Is Ample

Deposits Significantly Exceed Net Loans

Net loans Deposits – We expect deposits to remain the main 1,800 funding source for Ukrainian banks, 1,600 accounting for 80%-90% of total liabilities in 2021-2022. 1,400 – We do not expect any material local or 1,200 foreign debt issuance by Ukrainian banks in 2021-2022 due to ample liquidity. 1,000 Outstanding gross external debt was about 800 $4 billion at end-2020. Bil . UAH

600 – Banks remain very liquid with cash equivalents and securities accounting for 400 about 45% of total assets.

200 – We expect deposit growth to somewhat slowdown in 2021 to about 15% from 27% in 0 2020. 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021f 2022f

Source: S&P Global Ratings, National Bank of Ukraine

13 Ukrainian Banks' Funding And Liquidity Are Stronger Than Peers'

Funding Metrics For Ukrainian Banks And Peers At end-2020e

180 Egypt 160

140

120 Azerbaijan Ukraine Kazakhstan 100 Kenya Greece Russia Nigeria 80 Turkey Armenia Belarus Georgia 60 Tunisia

40 Uzbekistan Core customer deposits as loans% of a 20

0 (30) (20) (10) 0 10 20 30 Net banking sector external debt as a % of loans

We define core deposits as 100% of retail and 50% of corporate deposits. e--Estimate. Source: S&P Global Ratings, Central Banks.

14 Analytical Contacts

Annette Ess Natalia Yalovskaya Associate Director Director [email protected] [email protected] +49 69 33 999 157 +44 20 7176 3470

15 Copyright © 2021 by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.

No content (including ratings, -related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Australia: S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Ltd holds Australian financial services license number 337565 under the Corporations Act 2001. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings and related research are not intended for and must not be distributed to any person in Australia other than a wholesale client (as defined in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act).

STANDARD & POOR'S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. spglobal.com/ratings

16