DOCSLIB.ORG

(Columbus to Cleveland), Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final Report Cleveland Metro Area Strategic Plan for Deployment of Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Interstate 71 Corridor (Columbus to Cleveland) @I D Prepared for Ohio Department of Transportation Prepared by: Columbus Metro Area Barr Engineering, Inc. April 1998 STRATEGIC PLAN FOR DEPLOYMENT OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN THE l-71 CORRIDOR (COLUMBUS TO CLEVELAND) FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Page Foreword i Background vi 1.0 Existing Transportation System, Problems, and Opportunities 1-1 2.0 Institutional Framework 2-l 3.0 ITS User Services 4.0 User Service Objectives and Performance Criteria 5.0 Integrated User Services 5-l 6.0 Functional Requirements 6-l 7.0 System Architecture 7-1 8.0 System Component Options 8-l 9.0 Implementation and Operational Strategies 9-l 10.0 Strategic Deployment Plan 10-l 11.0 Cost-Benefit Analysis 11-l 12.0 I-71 Communications Alternatives 12-1 , _ STRATEGIC PLAN FOR DEPLOYMENT OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN THE l-71 CORRIDOR (COLUMBUS TO CLEVELAND) FINAL REPORT List of Figures Figure 1 Study Area ii Figure 2 National ITS Planning Process vi Figure 1.0-1 Inventory of Existing ITS Elements l-3 Figure 1.0-2 Traveler Facilities and Points of Interest l-5 Figure 1.0-3 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes l-9 Figure 1.0-4 1996 Daily Traffic Variations l-10 Figure 1.0-5 Congestion Areas l-11 Figure 1.0-6 Existing and Projected Traffic Volumes 1-12 Figure 1.0-7 Total Vehicles Involved in Traffic Accidents 1-14 Figure 1.0-8 Summary of Corridor Safety Problems 1-15 Figure 3.0-l Identification of Needs and User Services 3-13 Figure 7.0-1 Broadcast Traveler Information Market Package 7-6 Figure 7.0-2 Long-Term I-71 Architecture Interconnect Diagram 7-10 Figure 10.0-1 Project Deployment by Phase 10-2 . Figure 10.0-2 I-71 High Level ITS Architecture, Columbus to Cleveland 10-4 Figure 10.0-3 Project Deployment by Organization Responsible 10-10 . - STRATEGIC PLAN FOR DEPLOYMENT OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN THE l-71 CORRIDOR (COLUMBUS TO CLEVELAND) FINAL REPORT List of Tables Page Table I-7 1 Strategic Planning Study Tasks V Table .0-2 Summary of I-7 1 Miles 1-8 Table 0-2 Summary of Corridor-Wide Accident Data 1-13 Table 2.0-1 ITS Program Goals 2-4 Table3 .O-11 Problems Identified by Private Vehicle Travelers 3-6 Table3.0-2 Suggested Solutions Identified by Private Vehicle Travelers 3-7 Table3 .O-3 Problems Identified by Truck Travelers 3-8 Table3 .O-4 Suggested Solutions Identified by Truck Travelers 3-8 Table3.0-5 Summary of Corridor Needs and Matched User Services 3-14 Table 4.0-1 Recommended Performance Measures 4-3 Table 4.0-2 Summary of Corridor Needs, Specific Objectives, User Services, Performance Criteria, and System Objectives - Tourism and Travel Information 4-5 Table 4.0-3 Summary of Corridor Needs, Specific Objectives, User Services, Performance Criteria, and System Objectives - Traveler Safety and Security 4-7 Table 4.0-4 Summary of Corridor Needs, Specific Objectives, User Services, Performance Criteria, and System Objectives - Emergency Services 4-8 Table 4.0-5 Summary of Corridor Needs, Specific Objectives, User Services, Performance Criteria, and System Objectives - Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance 4-9 Table 4.0-6 Summary of Corridor Needs, Specific Objectives, User Services, Performance Criteria, and System Objectives - Public Traveler /Mobility Services 4-10 Table 4.0-7 Summary of Corridor Needs, Specific Objectives, User Services, Performance Criteria. and System Objectives -Commercial Vehicle Operations 4-11 Table 5.0-1 Relationship of User Services Categories and Critical Program Areas 5-2 Table 5.0-2 User Services Based on Needs in the Ohio 1-7 1 Corridor 5-3 Table 5.0-3 Compilation of Needs by Critical Program Area 5-4 Table 5.0-4 Summary of Ranked Needs Potential Time Frames. and Constraints on Deployment 5-7 Table 6.01 ITS User Services Mapped to Functional Areas 6-3 Table 7.0- 1 Short-Term User Needs Mapped to Critical Program Areas and Market Packages 7-5 Table 7.0-2 Mid-Term User Needs Mapped to Critical Program Areas and Market Packages 7-7 Table 7.0-3 Long-Term User Needs Mapped to Critical Program Areas and Market Packages 7-8 List of Tables, continued Table8.0- 1 ATIS Technology Summary 8-6 Table 8.0-2 Common Sensors Used for Incident Detection and Environmental Conditions 8-9 Table 9.0-1 Advisory Committee Organizations with Responsibility for ITS Deployment 9-5 Table 9.0-2 Strategic Plan - General Description of Deployment Program Areas by Units Responsible 9-7 Table 9.0-3 Potential Barriers to Successful ITS Deployment 9-8 Table 1 O.O-1 Ohio I-71 Corridor-wide ITS Project Summary 10-5 Table 10.0-2 I-71 Projects Managed by the ODOT Districts 10-8 Table 10.0-3 I-71 Projects Managed by Other Partners 10-9 Table 10.0-4 Summary of Project Capital Cost Estimates 10-11 Table 10.0-5 Summary of Annual Project Operations and Maintenance Cost Estimates 10-13 Table 11 .O-1 Cost-Benefit Analysis, Scenario 1 11-5 Table 11 .O-2 Cost-Benefit Analysis, Scenario 2 1l-6 Table 11.O-3 Cost-Benefit Analysis, Scenario 3 11-7 Table 11.O-4 Sensitivity Analysis, Scenario 3 Interest Rates 11-7 Table 11.0-5 Costs and Benefits by County 11-8 Table 12.0-1 Device Data Requirements 12-3 Table 12.0-2 Aggregate Device Quantities and Data Needs 12-3 Table 12.0-3 Alternative 1 Communication Services 12-4 Table 12.0-4 Alternative 1 Unit Costs 12-5 Table 12.0-5 Alternative 1 Quantities and Total Costs 12-6 Table 12.0-6 Wireless Equipment Frequency Band and Licensing Requirements 12-7 Table 12.0-7 Alternative 2 Unit Costs 12-8 Table 12.0-8 Alternative 2 Quantities and Total Costs 12-9 Table 12.0-9 Quantity of Serial Devices 12-10 Table 12.0-10 Number of Outside Phone Lines at Operations Center 12-10 Table 12.0-11 Number of Leased T-1 Lines 12-11 Table 12.0-12 Alternative 3 Unit Costs 12-12 Table 12.0- 13 Alternative 3 Quantities and Total Costs 12-13 -) FOREWORD The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA} signed by the U.S. Congress in December of 199 1 called for improvements in surface transportation through technological advancements. The U.S. Department of Transportation subsequently launched the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program, involving research. strategic planning, and operational tests of new technologies. These technologies promise to bring much needed operational improvements to the nation’s transportation system, and provide a safer, more convenient, and more efficient trip experience for the traveling public. The I-71 Corridor ITS Strategic Deployment Plan is an effort undertaken by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) to develop a strategic plan for deploying ITS technologies. The vision for this project is to identify, innovative ITS technologies to satisfy the many challenges facing the rural I-71 Corridor between Columbus and Cleveland. The focus is on incident management, traveler information, and improved trucking operations. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has developed a Planning Process to aid local/regional agencies in the development of ITS Strategic Plans. In addition, a National Program Plan for ITS has been prepared to provide a general framework to guide ITS investment decisions and promote ITS goals. The National ITS “Early Deployment” Planning Program provides much needed assistance to state transportation agencies and MPOs for the development of local or corridor-wide long-term strategic deployment plans. This study was launched recognizing that the I-71 Corridor in Ohio is an excellent location for deployment of rural applications of ITS technologies. The I-71 Corridor between Columbus and Cleveland is shown in Figure 1. This Strategic Plan will serve as a roadmap for implementing ITS technologies. It will also be an excellent summary of the overall transportation and travel-related communications needs that exist in the Corridor. To ensure that this Strategic Plan leads to rapid implementation, priority will be given to implementation of the recommendations of this study by ODOT. other state and regional agencies, local governments in the Corridor, and private sector partners. The Strategic Plan identifies short-, medium-, and long-term initiatives. One of the project goals is to carry out the necessary groundwork for launching short-term initiatives in 1998. The National ITS planning process. depicted in Figure 2 is consistent with the methodology used in this study. ~Iq.<.~ .., . ,_. ..,. , ..- ,.. ~~ ., & Develop Institutional Framework and Build Coalition Define Problems and Needs Establish User Service Objectives - Establish Performance Criterian Identify Needed Functional Areas Define Functional Requirements Define System Architecture Identify and Screen Alternative Technologies and Related Issues I Strategic Deployment Plan I Figure 2 National ITS Planning Process The ODOT has outlined a process that closely parallels the National ITS Program Plan and FHWA Planning Process. It has been divided into ten sequential tasks. listed in Table 1. Table 1 I-71 Strategic PIanning Study Tasks NO. Task Task Objective To produce a comprehensive document describing the current A Define Systems and transportation system. along with the needs and problems in the I-71 Problems Corridor that may be alleviated by the application of ITS technologies. To create a database of people and organizations interested in ITS B Establish Institutional solutions for the transportation problems and needs of the l-71 Framework Corridor and form an I-71 Advisory Committee and ITS Coalition.
Recommended publications
  • Directions to Cleveland Operations

    Directions to Cleveland Operations

    Directions to Cleveland Works 1600 Harvard Avenue Cleveland, OH 44105 Please note that there are no sleeping areas at this facility. You must stop at a rest area or truck stop. From Interstate 71 th North bound: Take 1-71 North to Exit 247A, W. 14 St. and Clark Ave. Make a right at the end of the exit ramp. nd Then take route 176 south, approx. ¼ mile on your left. Harvard Ave. will be your 2 exit. At the end of the rd ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 209, Lodi From Interstate 77 North bound: Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 111, North Canton From Interstate 80 East East or West bound: Exit 11 / 173 to I-77 North. Take I-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area East Bound between exits 10 / 161 and 11 / 173 West Bound between exits 14 / 209 and 13A / 193 From Interstate 480 East bound: Exit 17 onto Route 176 North. Exit onto Harvard Ave. Take a right onto Harvard Ave. Gate 6 will rd be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area None West bound: Exit 20B onto I-77 North. Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave).
  • City of Brunswick Location in the NOACA Region

    City of Brunswick Location in the NOACA Region

    C I T Y O F B RUNSWICK T HE C ITY OF B RUNSWICK R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Background .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. PART I: 2016 Pavement Condition ................................................................................................................................................ 8 4. PART II: 2018 Current Backlog .................................................................................................................................................... 13 5. PART III: Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Program ........................................................................................................... 14 6. PART IV: Comparative Analysis .................................................................................................................................................. 16 7. Appendix ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 M APS 1: City of Brunswick Location in the NOACA Region ...........................................................................................................................
  • Location/Directions FRIDAY, JANUARY 10, 2020

    Location/Directions FRIDAY, JANUARY 10, 2020

    OHIO DIABETES CONSORTIUM STATEWIDE PLANNING SUMMIT Location/Directions FRIDAY, JANUARY 10, 2020 For additional directions, visit: https://www.quest-centers.com/location/ North Follow Interstate 71 South to Gemini Parkway exit. Turn left onto Gemini Parkway. Turn right onto Orion. Go across Polaris Parkway and turn right after Mr. Tire (about 100 yards). Quest Conference Center is the first building on your left. South Quest Conference Center is located 14 miles from downtown Columbus, Ohio. Follow Interstate 71 North to Exit 121, is Polaris Parkway. Turn right onto Polaris Parkway. On your right hand side you will see a sign that reads, “The Offices at Polaris”. This is Pulsar Place. Turn right onto Pulsar Place. Quest Conference Center 8405 Pulsar Pl, Columbus, OH 43240 East Quest Conference Center is located 12 miles north of downtown Columbus. Follow Interstate 270 North to Hampton Inn & Suites Interstate 71 North. The first exit on I-71 is Exit 121, Polaris 8411 Pulsar Pl, Columbus, OH 43240 Parkway. Turn right onto Polaris Parkway. On your right hand side you will see a sign that reads, “The Offices at Polaris”. This is Pulsar Place. Turn right onto Pulsar Place. West Follow Interstate 70 East to Interstate 270 North/Cleveland (This is a loop around Columbus). Exit onto the 270 loop and follow this to Interstate 71 North. Exit onto I-71 North. The first exit on I-71 is Exit 121, Polaris Parkway. Turn right onto Polaris Parkway. On your right hand side you will see a sign that reads, “The Offices at Polaris”. This is Pulsar Place.
  • Driving Directions to the OSU Specialty Clinic at Central Ohio Primary Care (COPC)

    Driving Directions to the OSU Specialty Clinic at Central Ohio Primary Care (COPC)

    Driving Directions to the OSU Specialty Clinic at Central Ohio Primary Care (COPC) From the North (Sandusky, Delaware and Cleveland) 33 Take any major highway to Interstate 270 west 270 Take Interstate 270 west to State Route 315 south Take State Route 315 south to the Bethel Road Exit 62 Turn right onto Bethel Road 315 71 Turn left onto Olentangy River Road OSU Specialty Clinic at Central Ohio Primary Care will be on the right 70 670 From the South (Circleville, Chillicothe and Cincinnati) Take any major highway to Interstate 71 north 71 70 Take Interstate 71 north to State Route 315 north Take State Route 315 north to the Henderson Exit 270 33 Turn left onto West Henderson Road Take the first right onto Olentangy River Road 23 OSU Specialty Clinic at Central Ohio Primary Care will be on the left From the East (Newark, Zanesville and Pittsburgh) North Not to scale LINW Take any major highway to Interstate 70 west ORTH R Take Interstate 70 west to Exit 99C toward Rich Street /Town Street Merge onto State Route 315 north D Take State Route 315 north to the Henderson Road Exit Turn left onto West Henderson Road BETHEL RD Take the first right onto Olentangy River Road O 23 L E OSU Specialty Clinic at Central Ohio Primary Care will be on the left N P T H A I N 315 G G H Y D (Springfield, Dayton and Indianapolis) From the West KNIGHTSBRIDGE BLV S R T I V E R Take any major highway to Interstate 70 east R D Take Interstate 70 east to State Route 315 north W HENDERSON RD Take State Route 315 north to the Henderson Road Exit COOKE RD Turn left onto West Henderson Road Take the first right onto Olentangy River Road OSU Specialty Clinic at Central Ohio Primary Care will be on the left OSU Specialty Clinic at Central Ohio Primary Care (COPC) 4895 Olentangy River Rd Suite 150, Columbus, OH 43214 For directions assistance call 614-293-8000 i wexnermedical.osu.edu The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center is committed to improving people’s lives.
  • Ohio Ranks Among Worst States for Aging Interstate Bridges, Bottlenecks

    Ohio Ranks Among Worst States for Aging Interstate Bridges, Bottlenecks

    Transportation Ohio ranks among worst states for aging interstate bridges, bottlenecks TRIP’s report, “America’s Interstate Highway System at 65: Meeting America’s Transportation Needs with a Reliable, Safe & Well-Maintained National Highway Network,” comes as the U.S. Interstate Highway System turns 65 years old this week. “As the U.S. Interstate Highway System turns 65, it is congested, carries significant levels of travel – particularly by large trucks – and lacks adequate funding to make needed repairs and improvements,” TRIP noted in its report. “America’s most critical transportation link will need to be rebuilt and expanded to meet the nation’s growing transportation Since funding was approved for the U.S. Interstate Highway System in needs.” 1956, annual vehicle miles of travel increased by 427% in 2019. CORRIE SCHAFFELD | CBC The nonprofit’s study looks at the Interstate Highway System’s use, condition and benefits. The report also shines some light on the findings of another report By Bill Cieslewicz released by the Transportation Research Board in 2019 on Managing editor, Cincinnati Business Courier actions required to restore and upgrade the system. Thursday, June 24, 2021 The organization ranked states hose highway systems are Ohio received poor marks for bottlenecks and the age of the most congested, have experienced the greatest its bridges but scored a high rating for lives saved due to increase in miles traveled by vehicles since 2000, are the safety precautions in a new report on the nation’s busiest based on daily travel per lane, have the largest interstate highways. share of pavement in poor condition and have the greatest share of bridges in poor or structurally deficient The study, released by transportation research nonprofit condition.
  • Columbus Rail Today

    Columbus Rail Today

    ColumbusA Timeline to Multi-Modal TransportationRail Today DRAFT ColumbusA Timeline to Multi-Modal TransportationRail Today CHAD D. GIBSON, PROFESSOR KNOWLTON SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY DESIGN BY WILL HUGHEN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Columbus, Ohio is the largest city in the United States without passenger rail service. Recognizing this as a key factor to Columbus’ ability to compete with other cities for business and residents, Mayor Michael Coleman challenged the city to connect downtown to Port Columbus by passenger rail in his 2014 State of the City address. Following this charge, the Jobs, Expansion and Transportation Task Force was assembled to find ways to maximize Columbus’ assets and turn it into a world-class city. It quickly became apparent that Columbus cannot become a world-class city without a world-class transportation system. Cities across the country have been increasingly turning to fixed-guideway transit systems such as light rail to serve their citizens’ mobility needs and attract business and development to their urban cores. This has been happening in the context of a wider trend of reurbanization, which Columbus has also undergone. The experience of cities throughout the nation has shown that successful light rail transit is best utilized in dense corridors, which Columbus has been cultivating for over a decade. Port Columbus is a tremendous asset to the city’s transportation infrastructure, but it lacks connectivity with the rest of the city. While the Broad Street corridor could provide service to the airport via Seltzer Road, the existing development patterns are less attractive for light rail projects than is the High Street corridor, where a relatively short line could serve a dense collection of neighborhoods with strong connectivity within the fabric of the city.
  • Washington CH Outlot Sale/Lease Brochure

    Washington CH Outlot Sale/Lease Brochure

    LAND FOR GROUND LEASE OR SALE FAYETTE SQUARE OUTPARCEL 1391 Leesburg Avenue, Washington Court House, OH 43160 OFFERING SUMMARY PROPERTY OVERVIEW SALE PRICE/LEASE RATE: Call for Details Available for Ground Lease or Sale. Call for details. LEASE TERM: Negotiable LOCATION OVERVIEW The City of Washington Court House, Ohio is located approximately forty miles LOT SIZE: 1.98 Acres south of Columbus, Ohio and seventy-two miles north of Cincinnati, Ohio. The county seat of Fayette County, the city lies at the heart of an extensive roadway connector system, which includes Interstate 71, U.S. Routes 22, 35 and 62, and State Routes 41 and 753. These through-ways facilitate a smooth flow of traffic to, from and through the Washington Court House region. PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS • Outlot to High Volume Walmart Supercenter • 1.98 AC Lot Can Be Subdivided • 17 Minutes from Tanger Outlet Mall in Jeffersonville • Opposite Southern State Community College; 2,800 Students Enrolled • Great Visibility from the Road and Easy Access • Pylon Sign Available Vikaas Patni [email protected] D 513.588.1122 All information furnished regarding property for sale, rental or financing is from sources deemed reliable, but no warranty or representation is made to the accuracy thereof and same is submitted to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions prior to sale, lease or financing or withdrawal without notice. No liability of any kind is to be imposed on the broker herein. 10123 Alliance Road, Suite 300 Cincinnati, OH 45242 513.272.6800 lee-cincinnati.com LAND FOR GROUND LEASE OR SALE FAYETTE SQUARE OUTPARCEL 1391 Leesburg Avenue, Washington Court House, OH 43160 Vikaas Patni [email protected] D 513.588.1122 All information furnished regarding property for sale, rental or financing is from sources deemed reliable, but no warranty or representation is made to the accuracy thereof and same is submitted to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions prior to sale, lease or financing or withdrawal without notice.
  • DNA KY 338 from US-42 to I-75

    DNA KY 338 from US-42 to I-75

    Data Needs Analysis Scoping Study Boone County KY-338 From MP 0.756 to 4.611 Prepared by KYTC District 6 April 2020 06-113.00 (Recommended Plan) Data Needs Analysis KY-338 Boone Scoping Study RECONSTRUCTION I. PRELIMINARY PROJECT INFORMATION From Triple Crown Blvd/Grand National Blvd to KY-2951 (Chambers Road) County: Boone Item No.: 06-113.00 (Recommended Plan) Route Number(s):* KY-338 Road Name: Richwood Road Program No.: UPN: FD52 08 338 000-005 Federal Project No.: Type of Work: RECONSTRUCTION 2020 Highway Plan Project Description: CONDUCT PLANNING STUDY TO EVALUATE OPTIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTING KY 338 (RICHWOOD ROAD) FROM TRIPLE CROWN BOULEVARD TO US 42. Beginning MP: 0.756 Ending MP: 2.09 Project Length: 1.334 In TIP: Yes No Reconcile Project Information in Clearview State Class.: Primary Secondary Route is on: NHS NN Ext Wt Functional Class.: Urban Rural Truck Class.: % Trucks: 11.737 MPO Area: Terrain: ADT (current): 3,221 2019 Access Control: None Permit Fully Controlled Partial Spacing: Median Type: Undivided Divided (Type): Existing Bike Accommodations: Ped: Sidewalk Posted Speed: 35 mph 45 mph 55 mph Other (Specify): KYTC Guidelines Preliminarily Based on : 45 MPH Proposed Design Speed COMMON GEOMETRIC Roadway Data: EXISTING PRACTICES** No. of Lanes 2 3 to 5 Existing Rdwy. Plans available? Lane Width 9 ft 11 ft Yes No Shoulder Width 4 ft 8 ft Year of Plans: Max. Superelevation*** Unknown 6% Traffic Forecast Requested Minimum Radius*** Unknown 587 ft Date Requested: Maximum Grade Unknown 7% Mapping/Survey Requested Minimum Sight
  • 3C+D Corridor

    3C+D Corridor

    3C+D Corridor Amtrak’s vision to connect communities across Ohio Amtrak's Vision Frequency Initial Trip Time Host Railroads Annual Economic Impact 3 daily round trips 5:30 CSX, NS $129.6 million AmtrakConnectsUS.com 1 3C+D Corridor Corridor Growth Despite being less than 250 miles apart, the last time Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinnati were connected directly by rail was in 1967. The three cities, commonly referred to as the “Three C’s," are the largest in the state of Ohio. Columbus’ metropolitan area is home to over two million residents, making it the second-largest metropolitan area in the country without Amtrak service. According to the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 2000, Columbus has added over 200,000 jobs to its economy, and Cincinnati has added over 100,000 jobs in the same time period. Amtrak’s vision would turn both Cincinnati and Cleveland into new hubs for Amtrak service. In addition to the existing Long Distance trains that operate through Ohio – the Capitol Limited, Cardinal, and Lake Shore Limited – the following improved services are included in Amtrak’s vision: • Cincinnati - Chicago: +4 daily roundtrips • Cleveland - Detroit: +3 daily roundtrips • Cleveland - New York City: +2 daily roundtrips These new rail connections would improve mobility for underserved communities and provide reliable and efficient transportation to education and employment opportunities along the route. Connections would be available to Cleveland’s RTA Light Rail System, Columbus’ COTA system, and Cincinnati’s Metro system. The proposed route would serve dozens of colleges and universities and connect 18 Fortune 500 companies.
  • ODOT District 12 2021 Construction Program

    ODOT District 12 2021 Construction Program

    ODOT District 12 2021 Construction Program Lake Geauga Cu GARFIELD HTS. yahoga 12 SERVING CUYAHOGA, GEAUGA AND LAKE COUNTIES Mike DeWine, Ohio Governor | Jack Marchbanks, Ph. D., ODOT Director | John Picuri P.E., District Deputy Director ODOT DISTRICTODOT District12 | 2018 12 CONSTRUCTION 2021 Construction GUIDE Program Table of Contents Overview..................................................................... Page 2 Cuyahoga County....................................................... Pages 3-26 Geauga County........................................................... Pages 27-32 Lake County................................................................ Pages 33-38 Regional Projects....................................................... Pages 39-40 Local-Let Projects........................................................ Page 41-42 LOCAL LET PROJECTS 1 ODOT DISTRICTODOT District12 | 2018 12 CONSTRUCTION 2021 Construction GUIDE Program The Ohio Department of Transportation District 12 is responsible for the maintenance and construction on all Interstates, U.S. Routes, and State Routes in unincorporated municipalities in Cuyahoga, Geauga, and Lake counties. Each spring, we shift our focus from snow and ice removal to the construction and maintenance of our roadways. The 2021 Construction Program includes information about major construction projects in the District 12 tri-county area. For up to date project information and to sign up to receive project-related emails, please visit www.transportation.ohio.gov. To find additional project
  • Download Authenticated

    Download Authenticated

    Ohio Administrative Code Rule 4901:2-8-04 Prohibitions. Effective: July 18, 2013 (A) As used in this rule, "northeast Ohio" means the following counties in the state of Ohio: Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina. (B) As used in this rule, "through transportation" means the transportation of hazardous materials which has neither a place of origin nor a destination in northeast Ohio. (C) The following routes shall be designated routes for the through transportation of hazardous materials in northeast Ohio: (1) Interstate 90 from the Lake/Ashtabula county line to interstate 271 in Lake county. (2) Interstate 80 and interstate 80/90 (Ohio Turnpike) from gate 13 in Portage county to the Lorain/Erie county line. (3) Interstate 271 from interstate 90 in Lake county to interstate 71 in Medina county. (4) Interstate 77 from interstate 80 in Cuyahoga county to interstate 271 in Summit county. (5) Interstate 71 from interstate 80 in Cuyahoga county to Medina/Wayne county line. (6) Interstate 480 from interstate 80, gate 13 in Portage county to interstate 271 in Summit county. (7) Interstate 480 from interstate 480N in Cuyahoga county to interstate 80 in Lorain county. (8) Interstate 480N from interstate 271 to interstate 480 in Cuyahoga county. (D) The following routes shall be restricted routes for the through transportation of hazardous materials in northeast Ohio: Page 1 (1) Interstate 90 from interstate 271 in Lake county to interstate 80/90 in Lorain county. (2) Interstate 71 from interstate 80 to interstate 90 in Cuyahoga county. (3) Interstate 77 from interstate 80 to interstate 90 in Cuyahoga county.
  • Annual Report for the Town of Duxbury for the Year Ending

    Annual Report for the Town of Duxbury for the Year Ending

    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Town Officers and Committees OF THE TOWN OF DUXBURY MASSACHUSETTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 1956 Ouxbury Free Library 352.0744 D987 3n ii^monam Member Board of Selectmen 1955 - 1956 3n iiemDmm EUGENE F. COVELL BOARD OF HEALTH 1917-1929 Born: July 27, 1863 Died: December 31, 195 :iiC3:i'i:Cili(Ei)lli:::3^^^^^ EDWARD S. O'NEIL HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT 1919-1945 Born: October 18, 1872 Died: July 20, 19 3n fMcmnnam JOSEPH T. C. JONES Town Clerk and Treasurer 1935-1956 November 24, 1878 Died: May 21, 1956 3 TOWN OFFICERS FOR 1956 SELECTMEN Philip W. Delano 1957 James H. W. Jenner . 1958 Francis W. Perry 1959 ASSESSORS Philip W. Delano 1957 James H. W. Jenner 1958 Francis W. Perry 1959 BOARD OF HEALTH The Selectmen MODERATOR Bartlett B. Bradley 1957 CEMETERY TRUSTEES Harry A. Tammett . 1957 H. Russell Chandler 1958 J. Newton Shirley 1959 Edward P. Hobart 1960 Carl E. Johnson 1961 4 WATER COMMISSIONERS John A. Borgeson 1957 Lloyd B. Salt . 1958 Leonard B. Gallagher 1959 TOWN CLERK AND TREASURER Maurice H. Shirley 1959 TOWN COLLECTOR Edwin M. Noyes 1959 SCHOOL COMMITTEE Dominic LaGreca . 1957 Albert P. Richards 1957 Earl C. Grenquist 1958 Elizabeth U. Nickerson 1959 Edward L. Butler 1959 PLANNING BOARD Atherton Loring, Jr 1957 Carl F. Danner 1958 Oliver L. Barker 1959 David Marshall 1960 Lucius A. Howard . 1961 WELFARE BOARD Adrian H. Cordeau 1957 Paul N. Swanson . 1958 Howard M. Clark 1958 Alice H. Garside 1959 Paul Barber 1959 .^5 TREE WARDEN Roy E. Parks . 1958 CONSTABLES Earl W.