GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT and ACTION PLAN Communities

HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

new emission stacks at Webequie in 2011

2011 Greenhouse Gas August 1, 2012 Inventory Report and Action Plan

new fuels tanks at Webequie in 2011

Hydro One Remote Communities Inc, 680 Beaverhall Place, Thunder Bay, ON, P7E 6G9 Page 0 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 5 2 ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE...... 6 3 GHG INVENTORY DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT ...... 8 3.1 Organizational Boundaries ...... 8 3.2 Operational Boundaries ...... 8 3.2.1 Direct GHG emissions for Remotes ...... 8 3.2.2 Energy indirect GHG emissions for Remotes ...... 8 3.2.3 Other indirect GHG emissions for Remotes ...... 9 3.3 Historical Emissions ...... 9 4 QUANTIFICATION ...... 12 4.1 Diesel ...... 12 4.1.1 Activity data for diesel ...... 12 4.1.2 Emission factors for diesel ...... 12 4.2 Electricity ...... 12 4.2.1 Activity data for electricity ...... 12 4.2.2 Emission factors for electricity ...... 12 4.3 Natural Gas ...... 12 4.3.1 Activity data for natural gas ...... 13 4.3.2 Emission factors for natural gas ...... 13 4.4 Fuel Transport ...... 13 4.4.1 Activity data for fuel transport ...... 13 4.4.2 Emission factors for fuel transport ...... 13 4.5 Bio-diesel ...... 13 4.5.1 Estimation of bio-diesel emission impacts ...... 13 5 GHG INVENTORY COMPONENTS ...... 14 5.1 Emissions ...... 14 5.2 Target Setting ...... 16 5.3 Directed Actions to Reduce GHG Emissions ...... 17 5.3.1 Technological upgrades ...... 17 5.3.2 Fuel switching ...... 18 5.3.3 Customer demand management ...... 19 5.3.4 Other actions to reduce GHG emissions - RET ...... 21 5.3.3 Future actions to reduce GHG emissions ...... 21 5.4 Estimation of Uncertainty ...... 22 6 GHG INVENTORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT ...... 23 6.1 GHG Information Management ...... 23 6.2 Document Retention and Record keeping ...... 24 6.3 Organization's Role in Verification Activities ...... 24

Page 1 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

APPENDIX A: GHG INVENTORY ...... 25 APPENDIX B: EMISSION FACTORS & GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIALS ...... 53 Emission Factors ...... 53 Global Warming Potentials ...... 54 APPENDIX C: STANDARD REPORTING DECLARATION ...... 55 APPENDIX D: PAST EMISSION REDUCTION ACTIVITIES ...... 57 APPENDIX E: FUTURE EMISSION REDUCTION ACTIVITIES ...... 61

Page 2 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

List of Tables and Figures Figure 1.1: Hydro One Remote Communities' Service Territory ...... 7 Table 3.1: Comparison of Direct GHG Emissions from Base Year ...... 9 Figure 3.1: Direct GHG Emissions Intensity ...... 10 Table 3.2: Comparison of Direct, Energy Indirect and Other Indirect Emissions Intensity ...... 10 Table 3.3: Quantification of Direct GHG Emissions ...... 10 Table 5.1: Emission Source Summary ...... 14 Figure 5.1: GHG Emissions by Source (tCO2) ...... 14 Table 5.2: Total Direct CO2e Emissions per Remote Community ...... 15 Figure 5.2: Percentage of Total CO2e Emissions from Remote Communities in 2011 ...... 16 Figure 5.3: GHG Emission Intensity Performance...... 17 Table 5.3: Completed Emission Reduction Activities for 2011 ...... 17 Table 5.4: Summary of Bio-diesel Use for 2011 ...... 18 Figure 5.4: Percentage of Total Fuel Consumed in 2011 ...... 18 Figure 5.5: Summary of Fuel Use from 2008-2011 (L) ...... 19 Table 5.5: 2011 Energy Savings Initiatives through Customer Demand Management ...... 20 Table 5.6: Uncertainty Ranking ...... 22 Table 6.1: GHG Report Responsibilities ...... 23 Table A-1: Direct GHG Emission Totals ...... 25 Table A-2: Energy Emissions - Thunder Bay Service Centre ...... 26 Table A-3: Armstrong ...... 27 Table A-4: Attawapiskat ...... 28 Table A-5: Bearskin Lake ...... 29 Table A-6: Big Trout Lake ...... 30 Table A-7: Bisco ...... 31 Table A-8: Cat Lake ...... 32 Table A-9: Deer Lake ...... 33 Table A-10: Fort Albany ...... 34 Table A-11: Fort Severn ...... 35 Table A-12: Gull Bay ...... 36 Table A-13: Hillsport ...... 37

Page 3 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-14: Kasabonika ...... 38 Table A-15: Kingfisher ...... 39 Table A-16: Lansdowne ...... 40 Table A-17: Marten Falls ...... 41 Table A-18: Oba ...... 42 Table A-19: Pikangikum ...... 43 Table A-20: Sachigo ...... 44 Table A-21: Sandy Lake ...... 45 Table A-22: Sultan...... 46 Table A-23: Wapekeka ...... 47 Table A-24: Weagamow ...... 48 Table A-25: Webequie ...... 49 Table A-26: Fuel Transport Emissions - by ROAD ...... 50 Table A-27: Fuel Transport Emissions - by AIR ...... 51 Table A-28: Generation by Renewable Energy Technology (RET) ...... 52 Table B-1: Emission Factors ...... 53 Table B-2: Global Warming Potentials ...... 54 Table C-1: Reporting Information ...... 55 Table D-1: Completed Emission Reduction Activities from 2001 to 2010 ...... 57 Table E-1: Future Emission Reduction Activities from 2012 to 2016 ...... 61

Page 4 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

1 INTRODUCTION

Remotes believes that the CleanStart™ Registry is an important initiative to focus efforts on GHG emission reductions, thus helping Canada meet its GHG reduction goals of reducing the effects of global warming. Remotes has committed to submitting an annual GHG Inventory Report and Action Plan to the CleanStart™ Registry in support of these goals.

The following report details the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory for the operations of Hydro One Remote Communities (Remotes). This inventory lists the sources of GHG emissions and the quantity of emissions released from each source during the reporting period. Remotes will use the data from this report to disclose its emissions to CSA's CleanStart™ Registry.

Integrated Management Solutions Ltd. (IMS) is the agent to Remotes and is responsible for the completion of Remotes' GHG inventory and reporting in accordance with CAN/CSA-ISO Standard 14064-1-06 Greenhouse Gases - Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. In addition, the World Resource Institute (WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Standard: Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standards and CAN/CSA-ISO Standard 14064-3-06 Greenhouse Gases - Part 3: Specification with guidance for the validation of greenhouse gas assertions were used as additional resources. An independent third party will be engaged to provide independent verification of this report.

It is determined that Remotes produced 73,908 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) for the 2011 reporting year. Direct GHG emissions account for 58.82% of reported emissions. Energy indirect account for 0.05% of the reported emissions. Other indirect GHG emissions account for the remaining 41.13% of the reported emissions. Please refer to Section 5 and Appendix A for the detailed GHG inventory.

Page 5 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

2 ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE Remotes is a subsidiary of Hydro One Inc. and is based in Thunder Bay, Ontario. Remotes generates and distributes electrical energy to remote communities in Northern Ontario that are not connected to the province's electricity grid. Remotes currently serves twenty-one (21) remote northern communities with nineteen (19) diesel generating stations.

The electricity that Remotes produces is primarily generated by diesel generators, with some community loads supplemented by mini-hydroelectric plants and/or wind turbines.

Page 6 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Figure 1.1: Hydro One Remote Communities' Service Territory

Page 7 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

3 GHG INVENTORY DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

3.1 Organizational Boundaries Organizational boundaries are used to determine how GHG emissions are accounted for. Organizations can choose to account their GHG emissions based on three different boundary conceptions: equity share, financial control or operational control.

Remotes has consolidated and is reporting its facility-level GHG emissions and offsets over which it has financial and operational control. This includes emissions generated from the production of electricity by fuel-burning generators at each remote community it serves, the offsets produced from hydroelectric generation, transport emissions associated with the fuel deliveries used for production, and imported electricity used at the service centre building.

3.2 Operational Boundaries Operational boundaries are identified to define the GHG emissions and offsets associated with the organization's operations. GHG emissions and offsets are categorized as direct emissions, energy indirect emissions and other indirect emissions, as defined below:

Direct GHG emissions: GHG emissions from GHG sources owned or controlled by the organization.

Energy Indirect GHG emissions: GHG emissions from the generation of imported electricity, heat or steam consumed by the organization.

Other Indirect GHG emissions: GHG emissions, other than energy indirect emissions, which is a consequence of an organization's activities, but arises from greenhouse gas sources that are owned or controlled by other organizations.

3.2.1 Direct GHG emissions for Remotes

Direct GHG emissions released from Remotes' facility-level sources are a result of fuel combustion and natural gas consumption.

Generators within the serviced remote communities burn diesel and bio-diesel fuels for the production of electricity, directly emitting GHGs to the atmosphere. Fuel consumption is determined through purchase receipts. Natural gas, purchased from Union Gas, is used to operate Remotes' head office in Thunder Bay. These emissions are based on purchase receipts.

Direct transportation emissions from property-owned vehicles, employee travel or commuting was not included in this GHG inventory.

3.2.2 Energy indirect GHG emissions for Remotes

Page 8 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Indirect GHG emissions from the operation of Remotes' head office in Thunder Bay result from imported electricity and are included in the GHG inventory. Estimates are based on receipts from the purchase of electrical energy from Thunder Bay Hydro.

3.2.3 Other indirect GHG emissions for Remotes

This report also accounts for other indirect GHG emissions which are based on the transportation of purchased primary material. Remotes relies on purchased fuel to service the generators that produce most of its product. Due to the distributed nature of Remotes' generating capabilities and the amount of travel involved to deliver fuel to the nineteen communities, Remotes included the indirect air and road transport emissions to build a more comprehensive GHG inventory. (Note: Fuel delivery by barge was not included in this report.)

3.3 Historical Emissions The base year quantification of 1990 was chosen to evaluate GHG emissions. Refer to Tables 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3, and Figure 3.1 for summaries and illustrations of GHG emission intensity from the base year to the current reporting period. Since fuel transport emissions were included for the first time in 2011, Tables 3.1 and 3.3 only include the direct emissions to better illustrate the comparison of emissions intensity over the years. Table 3.2 accounts for emissions from all reported sources.

For direct emissions only, Remotes achieved a net emission intensity of 0.000738 CO2e per kWh for 2011. Since the base year, Remotes has increased its direct emissions by 78.1% due to a 131.6% increase in electricity demand within the communities. Through directed emission reduction activities and an increase in renewable energy generation, however, Remotes has lowered its overall emission intensity by 26.0% since the 1990 baseline.

Table 3.1: Comparison of Direct GHG Emissions Intensity from Base Year

Current Reporting Year Base Year (1990) (2011) Absolute Emissions (tonnes CO2e) Direct Emissions 24,410.38 43,473.31 Production (kWh)

Units of Generator Production (kWh) 24,505,364 56,751,074 Renewable Energy Technology Production n/a 2,136,132 (kWh) Emission Intensity (tonnes CO2e/unit production) Gross Emission Intensity 0.000996 0.000766 Net Emission Intensity n/a 0.000738

Page 9 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table 3.2: Comparison of Direct, Energy Indirect and Other Indirect Emissions Intensity

Current Reporting Year Base Year (1990) (2011) Absolute Emissions (tonnes CO2e) Direct Emissions 24,410.38 43,473.31 Energy Indirect 58.00 37.45 Other Indirect Emissions n/a 30,397.00 Production (kWh)

The methodology used to calculate base year quantification has not changed since Remotes’ original submission to CSA's Challenge Registry in 2003.

Emission factors used to calculate emissions are listed by GHG source in sub-sections 4.1 to 4.5 and in Appendix B.

Table 3.3: Quantification of Direct GHG Emissions

CO CH N O Total 2 4 2 C0 e CO e per kWh Year (expressed as (expressed as (expressed as 2 Generation 2 (total tonnes) Generated CO2e) CO2e) CO2e) (kWh) 1990 22,704.88 23.81 1,057.23 24,410.38 24,505,364 0.000996 1991 26,145.99 27.42 1,217.46 28,061.55 28,349,815 0.000990

Page 10 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

CO CH N O Total 2 4 2 C0 e CO e per kWh Year (expressed as (expressed as (expressed as 2 Generation 2 (total tonnes) Generated CO2e) CO2e) CO2e) (kWh) 1992 26,962.43 28.28 1,255.48 29,053.50 31,883,583 0.000911 1993 33,007.36 34.62 1,536.96 35,330.57 37,681,890 0.000938 1994 35,856.14 37.61 1,669.61 38,304.46 41,662,806 0.000919 1995 40,423.68 42.40 1,882.29 43,298.19 46,438,464 0.000932 1996 42,527.41 44.60 1,980.25 45,790.90 51,119,647 0.000896 1997 44,171.49 46.33 2,056.80 47,854.60 51,469,797 0.000930 1998 40,984.34 42.99 1,908.40 44,595.94 49,904,700 0.000894 1999 41,644.46 43.68 1,939.13 45,299.22 52,481,796 0.000863 2000 45,715.73 47.95 2,128.71 49,632.96 60,548,438 0.000820 2001 45,739.67 47.95 2,128.33 47,915.95 58,407,766 0.000820 2002 42,961.87 45.03 1,998.80 45,005.70 57,849,172 0.000778 2003 43,560.93 45.66 2,026.70 45,633.29 58,434,379 0.000781 2004 38,502.62 40.35 1,790.95 40,333.92 52,045,608 0.000775 2005 37,742.15 39.50 1,755.43 39,537.09 52,241,239 0.000757 2006 38,291.58 40.13 1,781.31 40,113.02 51,299,438 0.000782 2007 39,426.52 41.33 1,834.57 41,302.42 53,809,839 0.000768 2008 41,248.08 49.06 1,918.49 43,209.80 54,865,485 0.000788 2009 40,216.76 40.56 1,870.86 42,128.18 55,371,891 0.000761 2010 39,880.89 39.26 1,855.82 41,775.97 54,945,714 0.000760 2011 41,501.74 40.60 1,930.97 43,473.31 58,887,206 0.000738

Page 11 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

4 QUANTIFICATION

Remotes has identified and assessed its GHG sources and estimated its GHG emissions using quantification methodologies that minimize uncertainty and yield accurate, consistent and reproducible results.

Since direct measurement is not always practical, Remotes has quantified its diesel, electricity, natural gas and fuel transport emissions using a calculation based on GHG activity multiplied by a GHG emission factor, or:

Activity Data x Emission Factor = GHG Emission

Additionally, Remotes quantified its bio-diesel emissions using an estimation of emission impacts.

Please refer to Appendix B for a summary of the emission factors used.

4.1 Diesel

4.1.1 Activity data for diesel

Activity data for diesel fuel accounts for the volume of fuel combusted and is based on fuel purchase invoices from several fuel suppliers, reported in litres (L).

4.1.2 Emission factors for diesel

The emission factors used for the burning of diesel fuel were taken from Environment Canada's National Inventory Report, 1990-2010, Part 2, Annex 8, Table A8-4 Emission Factors for Refined Petroleum Products, and is expressed in grams per litre of fuel (g/L).

4.2 Electricity

4.2.1 Activity data for electricity

Activity data for electricity consumption is based on utility bills from Thunder Bay Hydro and is reported in kilowatt hours (kWh).

4.2.2 Emission factors for electricity

Electricity emission factors were obtained from Environment Canada's National Inventory Report, 1990-2010, Part 3, Annex 13, Table A13-7: Electricity Generation and GHG Emission Details for Ontario. The 2010 value is based on preliminary data and since the report published data up to 2010, the 2010 value was used for 2011. The electricity generation intensity emission factor is measured in grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per

kilowatt hour (g CO2e/kWh).

4.3 Natural Gas

Page 12 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

4.3.1 Activity data for natural gas

Activity data for natural gas usage is based on utility bills from Union Gas and is reported in cubic metres (m3).

4.3.2 Emission factors for natural gas

Emission factors for burning natural gas in a commercial building were obtained from

Environment Canada's National Inventory Report, 1990-2010, Part 2, Table A8-1: CO2

Emission Factors for Natural Gas and Table A8-2: CH4 and N2O Emission Factors for Natural Gas. The emission factors are expressed in grams per cubic metre (g/m3).

4.4 Fuel Transport

4.4.1 Activity data for fuel transport

Activity data for road and air transport emissions was estimated using measured map distances and the total volume of fuel delivered to each community (based on fuel delivery receipts by several suppliers, as reported in litres).

4.4.2 Emission factors for fuel transport

Emission factors for road and air transport emissions were obtained from Environment Canada's National Inventory Report, 1990-2010 Part 2, Table A8-11: Emission Factors for Energy Mobile Sources. Emission factors are expressed in grams per litre (g/L).

For air transport, a Radiative Forcing Index (RFI) value for aircraft of 2.7 was used, as obtained from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Reports: Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, Chapter 6.6.5. Also, an average fuel economy of 6.229 L/km or 2.650 gallons/miles was used, as listed the US EPA Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol Core Module Guidance, Direct Emissions from Mobile Combustion, Table 4: Fuel Economy Values by Vehicle Type.

For road transport, an average fuel economy of 1L/2.13km or 5 miles/gallon is used, and is based on an educated guess.

4.5 Bio-diesel

4.5.1 Estimation of bio-diesel emission impacts

Bio-diesel emissions were calculated based on an estimation of the emission impacts of its use from the volume of fuel combusted. The estimated percent change in emissions per bio-diesel blend was derived from US EPA'S A Comprehensive Analysis of Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions, Draft Technical Report, 2002, Figure ES-A.

Data for bio-diesel consumption is based on purchase invoices from several suppliers and is reported in litres (L).

Page 13 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

5 GHG INVENTORY COMPONENTS

5.1 Emissions The total emissions from direct, energy indirect and other indirect emission sources for the

2011 reporting year are 73,908 tonnes of CO2e. Diesel and bio-diesel fuel combustion, energy use including natural gas consumption and electricity use, and fuel transport via road and air account for Remotes' reported emissions. Table 5.1 and Figure 5.1 summarizes the emissions by their GHG source. (Refer to Appendix A for the complete GHG emissions inventory.)

Table 5.1: Emission Source Summary

Source Emissions (t CO2e) % of Total

DIRECT GHG EMISSIONS Diesel Combustion 43,405 58.73% Bio-diesel Combustion 31 0.04% Natural Gas Consumption 37 0.05% ENERGY INDIRECT EMISSIONS Electricity 37 0.05% OTHER INDIRECT EMISSIONS Fuel Transport via ROAD 112 0.15% Fuel Transport via AIR 30,285 40.98% TOTALS 73,908 100.00%

Figure 5.1 GHG Emissions by Source (t CO2e)

Diesel Combustion (58.73%)

Bio-diesel Combustion (0.04%) 30,285 Natural Gas Consumption 43,405 (0.05%) Electricity (0.05%)

Fuel Transport via ROAD 112 (0.15%) 37 31 Fuel Transport via AIR (40.98%) 37

Page 14 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

The breakdown of CO2 emissions per Remote Community is illustrated in Table 5.2 and Figure 5.2. In most cases, emissions reflect the electricity output or demand in the community, with the largest stations (e.g. Sandy Lake) responsible for the largest share of emissions.

Refer to Section 3.3 of this report for the GHG emission intensity summary.

Table 5.2: Total Direct CO2e Emissions per Remote Community

Remote Community 2011 tCO2e % of Total CO2e Emissions

Thunder Bay 37 0.09% Armstrong 3,062 7.04% Bearskin Lake 2,190 5.04% Big Trout Lake 4,680 10.77% Bisco 451 1.04% Deer Lake 2,696 6.20% Fort Severn 2,074 4.77% Gull Bay 1,086 2.50% Hillsport 289 0.66% Kasabonika 3,172 7.30% Kingfisher 1,830 4.21% Lansdowne 1,552 3.57% Marten Falls 1,505 3.46% Oba 307 0.71% Sachigo 2,198 5.06% Sandy Lake 8,168 18.79% Sultan 229 0.53% Wapekeka 2,136 4.91% Weagamow 3,438 7.91% Webequie 2,371 5.45% TOTAL 43,473 100.00%

Page 15 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Figure 5.2: Percentage of Total CO2e Emissions from Remote Communities in 2011

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%

Oba

Bisco

Sultan

Sachigo

Gull Bay Gull

Hillsport

Deer Lake Deer

Kingfisher

Webequie

Wapekeka

Armstrong

Sandy Lake Sandy

Lansdowne

Kasabonika

Fort Severn Fort

Weagamow

Marten Falls Marten

Thunder Bay Thunder

Bearskin Lake Bearskin Big Trout Trout Lake Big

5.2 Target Setting

Remotes began implementing emission reduction activities in 1997 as part of Ontario Hydro’s (former name of Hydro One) corporate program for renewable energy and have since been using them to set its emission intensity targets. A goal of reaching 0.000731

tonnes CO2e per kWh has been set for the end of 2015. Since 1998, these activities have

reduced CO2e emissions intensity by 26.0%, as shown in Figure 5.3. (Refer to Figure 3.1 for the detailed emission intensity performance to date.)

Remotes is on track to meeting its target. It is important to note that the emissions intensity target was set prior to the inclusion of fuel transport emissions to the GHG inventory. This may therefore challenge target-reaching deadlines.

The emission intensity target is reviewed regularly as part of the management system. Targets will be updated once they are reached.

Page 16 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Figure 5.3: GHG Emission Intensity Performance 0.001200

0.001000 Target CO2e per 0.000800 kWh Generated

0.000600 Actual CO2e per kWh Generated 0.000400

CO2e/kWh Generated CO2e/kWh 0.000200

0.000000

2000 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

5.3 Directed Actions to Reduce GHG Emissions

Remotes has implemented directed actions to reduce GHG emissions. In 2011, these strategies focused on technological upgrades, fuel switching and customer demand

management programs. Remotes estimates that 277 tonnes of CO2e has been prevented from release to the atmosphere, as summarized in Table 5.3. Refer to specific sub-sections for more details. (For a list of past emission reduction actions, see Appendix D.)

Table 5.3: Completed Emission Reduction Activities for 2011

Estimated Emission Emission Reduction CO e Description 2 Reduction Activities Reductions Category (tonnes) Technological Tier 2+ engine replacements at two sites: TBD Upgrades Gull Bay (1) and Oba (3) (working with Direct suppliers to quantify)

Station upgrade at Webequie 95 Direct

Fuel Switching Bio-diesel use in 18 communities 2 Direct

Customer Demand Energy savings initiatives and efficiency and Use upgrades 180 Direct Management

TOTAL: 277 tonnes CO2e

5.3.1 Technological upgrades

Page 17 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Technological upgrades involve the replacement of older engines with Tier 2 or Tier 3 engines. Although the amount of fuel consumed may not be reduced, fuel efficiencies should improve, thereby reducing emissions. Currently, Remotes is working with suppliers to assess the reduction in emissions from these new engines.

In 2011, engine replacements occurred at two Remote communities.

‐ Gull Bay (1) upgrade was placed in service in August. ‐ Oba (3) upgrade was placed in service in November.

Due to technical start-up issues and the limited time with which the engines were in service, generator efficiencies only registered slightly better than the 5-year site average.

Other technological upgrades involve station upgrades with the installation of new, more efficient engines and PLC units. A PLC assesses current load requirements and matches this with the optimum engine to run, ensuring the most efficient use of generators possible.

Typically, a station upgrade will result in approximately a 4% reduction in CO2e per kWh generated (determined from historical information – typical station upgrade at Sachigo

resulted in 4.3% reduction of CO2e per kWh generated).

In July of 2011, Webequie underwent a complete station upgrade. It is estimated that 95

tonnes of CO2e was prevented release to the atmosphere as a result.

5.3.2 Fuel switching

In 2011, Remotes used blended bio-diesel for 77% of their total fuel needs, as outlined in Table 5.4 and Figure 5.4. Combustion data is based on fuel delivery receipts.

Table 5.4: Summary of bio-diesel use for 2011 Figure 5.4: Percentage of Total Fuel Consumed in 2011 Total Amount Percentage of Fuel Type Combusted Total Fuel 14.56 (L) Consumed (%) Diesel (regular) 22.84 Diesel B5 diesel 3,556,088 22.84 (regular) 62.6 B20 diesel B5 diesel 9,746,833 62.60

B20 diesel 2,267,688 14.56

TOTALS 15,570,608 100.00

Remotes began using bio-diesel in 2008 after successful pilot projects in 2004 and 2005, and has considerably increased its bio-fuel consumption over the years. Figure 5.5 illustrates the increased use.

Page 18 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Figure 5.5: Summary of Fuel Use from 2008-2011 (L)

16,000,000

14,000,000 3,556,088 4,055,534 12,000,000 Regular Diesel 9,763,078 Consumption (L) 10,000,000 13,251,798 Bio-diesel 8,000,000 Consumption (L) 12,014,521 6,000,000 10,909,433 4,000,000 5,322,443 2,000,000 2,217,423 0 2008 2009 2010 2011

Due to the consideration of the fuel life cycle perspective, this report only calculates the

direct effects of remotes' fuel switching activities, or bio-diesel use, on CH4 and N20 emissions.

It is understood that biomass-derived fuels reduce net atmospheric carbon by rapidly cycling the carbon to the atmosphere (via Remotes' generators) and from the atmosphere (via photosynthesis). They also reduce atmospheric carbon by displacing fossil fuels, where the combustion releases carbon that took millions of years to be removed from the

atmosphere, rather than the rapid cycling of CO2 through biomass combustion. Although

the net effect of biodiesel use is the reduction of CO2 in the atmosphere, this report does not account for its life cycle emission reductions. More research is needed.

5.3.3 Customer demand management

Customer demand management (CDM) initiatives take place at most Remote communities. The strategy combines efficiency improvements for actual energy savings with an education and training program to increase energy conservation awareness. The overall goal is that energy demand is reduced, thus achieving proportionate declines in diesel fuel needs and GHG emissions.

Table 5.5 lists the completed 2011 energy savings initiatives. Savings result from efficiency improvements through direct customer distribution of energy efficient products.

Page 19 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table 5.5: 2011 Energy Savings Initiatives through Customer Demand Management Activity Type1 Community # of Items kW Savings Delivered Lighting (Lamps) F32T8 (25W) Fluorescent Bulbs Kingfisher 206 7,069.92 PHL SLS 24 Marathon Univ (25W) Kingfisher 1 3,942.00 (10W) Crosstour LED Wallpak Kingfisher 5 686.40 13W Fluorescent Bulbs Sachigo 24 613.92 various 6 153.48 LED 35/string Holiday Lighting Sachigo 24 115.92 Holiday Lighting various 298 1,439.34 Equipment Outdoor Motion Sensors Sachigo 64 10,200.32 Fort Severn 5 796.90 Power Cost Monitors Sachigo 24 11,605.20 Fort Severn 87 42,068.85 Cold Water Detergent Sachigo 122 76,006.00 various 8 4,984.00 Energy Star Chest Freezers various 7 320.67 Energy Star Refrigerators various 15 1,692.00 Energy Star Stove c/w Ovens various 11 605.00 Energy Star Washing Machines various 8 1,450.16 Energy Star Dishwashers various 1 7.00 Water Conservation Items Low-flow Shower Heads Sachigo 40 15,080.00 Fort Severn 65 24,505.00

various 6 2,262.00 Kitchen Faucet Aerators Sachigo 133 23,446.57 *(1.5 GPM Max) Fort Severn 87 15,337.23

various 6 1,057.74 Bathroom Faucet Aerators Sachigo 133 no data available *(0.5 GPM Max) Fort Severn 87 no data available

various 6 no data available Toilet Tank Banks Sachigo 94 no data available * saves up to 0.8 US gallons or 3.02 various 6 no data available L per flush 5 Minute Shower Timers Sachigo 50 no data available various 6 no data available General Gadgets Smart Power Bar various 3 160.17 Refrigerator Thermometers Sachigo 50 no data available

Page 20 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Activity Type1 Community # of Items kW Savings Delivered * indicates proper temperatures for various 3006 no data available safe food and energy savings Hot Water Gauge Sachigo 50 no data available * gauges when temperatures are various 6 no data available above or below 120-130 degrees TOTALS 4,744 245,605.79 items delivered kW saved Note 1: The following 2011 building upgrades were not included in Table 5.5 (kW saved is assumed from efficiency improvements): ‐ new lighting systems at Big Trout and at the head office in Thunder Bay; and ‐ new windows with UV coating at the head office in Thunder Bay.

Energy conservation education is also essential to Remotes' CDM strategy. Actions may include circulating quarterly newsletters with billing statements, and communicating Remotes’ environmental and energy efficiency programs with general pricing information and tips regarding energy conservation. The goal is to create an information-sharing network to better educate customers to reduce their energy demand.

Remotes also continues to consult with their Customer Advisory Board. The Board acts as a forum for the discussion of issues with Remotes’ customers and is comprised of Remotes staff and customer representatives. The Board offers an excellent opportunity to share energy conservation strategies that can translate into reduced energy costs and lower atmospheric emissions.

Remotes continues to develop their CDM program by establishing initiatives for 2012 and beyond. (Refer to Appendix E: Future Emission Reduction Actions.)

5.3.4 Other actions to reduce GHG emissions - RET

Remotes operates renewable energy technologies (RET) that impacts GHG fuel-burning emissions by preventing their release to the atmosphere. Hydroelectric units operate at Deer Lake (Shoulderblade Falls) and at, and wind units are working at Big Trout and Kasabonika. Refer to Table A-28 in Appendix A for the 2011 RET generation data.

It is estimated that the 2011 RET operations saved 586,084 L of fuel, preventing 1,561

tonnes of CO2e emissions from entering the atmosphere. (Note: there was no wind generation at Big Trout during 2011.)

5.3.3 Future actions to reduce GHG emissions

Activities and projects that may be implemented in the future are outlined in Appendix E. These applications will focus Remotes on the achievement of their emission intensity target. Their completion is dependent on workforce availability, funding or approval by government agencies, in addition to partnerships with First Nation groups.

Page 21 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

5.4 Estimation of Uncertainty

Remotes has performed a qualitative estimation of the impact of uncertainties on the accuracy of its GHG inventory. Table 5.6 below presents the opinions of the level of uncertainty associated with each measured emission source and their emission factors.

Table 5.6: Uncertainty Ranking Activity data Uncertainty Assessment Diesel Generator Low Uncertainty – Diesel consumption is based on the quantity of fuel Combustion purchased. Minimal loss is expected from storage or generator leakages but the impacts are negligible on fuel combustion data. Diesel emission factors are consistent and quite accurate.

Electricity Consumption Low Uncertainty – Electricity consumption is based on metered data from Thunder Bay Hydro that is calibrated and verified. The emission factor is based on an annual provincial grid average that includes all of the province's controllable fuel sources (such as coal, natural gas, hydro and nuclear). Since the emission factors for 2009-2011 have yet to be published (the reported 2009 value was only an estimate at the time of publication), the 2008 value was used for years 2009 through to 2011.

Natural Gas Consumption Low Uncertainty – Natural gas consumption is based on metered data that is calibrated and verified by Union Gas. Natural gas emission factors are less dependent on location and are almost always standard and accurate, although uncertainty may be derived from fluctuations in measurement equipment.

Fuel Transport High Uncertainty – Transport distances are measured by mapping techniques using scaled maps. Amount of fuel consumed for transport is based on the measured distances and the quantity of fuel delivered to corporate reservoirs. Fuel data excludes fuel delivered by barge due to measurement difficulties. Transport emission factors from mobile combustion sources are consistent and accurate. Remotes uses winter roads for fuel transport instead of air delivery when seasonal conditions permit. This has a significant impact on emissions as fuel trucks have a far greater capacity than air carrier tanks, lowering the number of trips required and thereby reducing the emissions released. Due to the variable conditions upon which winter fuel delivery operates, a high uncertainty is given to fuel transport emissions. Bio-diesel Consumption High Uncertainty - Bio-diesel fuel combustion is based on the quantity of fuel purchased. Minimal loss is expected from storage or generator leakages but the impacts are negligible on fuel combustion data. Bio-diesel emission factors, however, have a high uncertainty due to the limited emission data currently available. Emission factors were extrapolated from estimates in the percent change in emissions per bio-diesel blend, which although fairly consistent with other sources, may not be the most accurate. Extrapolation- based emission factors also have a higher potential for interpretive errors. Refer to sections "4.5.1 Estimation of Bio-diesel Emission Impacts" and "5.3.2 Fuel Switching" in this report for further details.

Page 22 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

6 GHG INVENTORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT

6.1 GHG Information Management Remotes has established roles, responsibilities and authorities for the management of its GHG inventory. This ensures consistency, accuracy, completeness, transparency and conformance with the CAN/CSA-ISO Standard 14064-1-06 Greenhouse Gases - Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. Table 6.1 outlines the core GHG report responsibilities.

Table 6.1: GHG Report Responsibilities

Name Role Company Responsibilities

Kraemer Coulter Project Director Hydro One ‐ To approve and sign the CSA Remote CleanStart™ Registry application form Communities Inc.

Bob Shine Project Manager Hydro One - Overall responsibility of the GHG Remote inventory and GHG information Communities Inc. management

- To plan future emission reduction activities

Dorothy Daneff Project Associate Hydro One ‐ To provide required inventory input Remote data (e.g. energy usage, volume of Communities Inc. fuel delivered , kW generated, etc.) ‐ To provide information regarding customer demand management initiatives

Stephanie Sudac GHG Quantifier Integrated - To request and analyze activity data, Management to collect appropriate emission factors Solutions Ltd. and to perform GHG calculations (IMS Ltd.) - To produce a report consistent with both the CleanStart™ Registry and CAN/CSA-ISO Standard 14064-1-06 requirements

Evan Jones Third Party Verifier Brookfield LePage - To verify that Remotes' GHG Inventory Johnson Controls Report meets both the CleanStart™ (BLJC) Registry and CAN/CSA-ISO Standard 14064-1-06 requirements

- To issue a verification statement

Page 23 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

6.2 Document Retention and Record keeping Remotes keeps copies of all utility bills, fuel receipts, GHG emissions and other important information used to generate the GHG inventory on Remotes' secure server. All fuel data is input to the fuel management database system.

6.3 Organization's Role in Verification Activities

Evan Jones of Brookfield LePage Johnson Controls (BLJC) was contracted to provide independent third party verification as per CAN/CSA-ISO Standard 14064-3-06 requirements. The verification was completed to a reasonable level of assurance. Remotes prepared for the verification by:

‐ Engaging an objective third party verifier to provide a reasonable level of assurance; - Agreeing to verification objectives, scope, materiality and criteria with the verifier; - Reviewing each section using the CSA Registry checklist; and, - Using an internal review process for quality control of the inventory and of the report.

CSA Standard reporting declarations is presented in Appendix C.

Page 24 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

APPENDIX A: GHG INVENTORY

Table A-1: Direct GHG Emission Totals

DIRECT GHG EMISSION TOTALS

Emission Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions Increase Increase in Intensity RET in CO2e electricity Bio- CH4 C02e Reduction Total Fuel Diesel - Bio-diesel Bio-diesel Generation Efficiency C02 N2O CO2e/kWh since output since diesel - Generation (in (total since (L) Regular (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (in C02e) (in Co2e) Generated 1990 1990 Year B40 (L) (kWh) CO2e) tonnes) 1990 1990 8,526,053 8,526,053 24,505,364 2.87 22,704.88 23.81 1,057.23 0.000996 0.00% 0.00% 24,410.38 0.00% 1991 9,818,246 9,818,246 28,349,815 2.89 26,145.99 27.42 1,217.46 0.000990 0.63% 15.69% 28,061.55 14.96% 1992 10,124,834 10,124,834 31,883,583 3.15 26,962.43 28.28 1,255.48 0.000911 8.52% 30.11% 29,053.50 19.02% 1993 12,394,802 12,394,802 37,681,890 3.04 33,007.36 34.62 1,536.96 0.000938 5.88% 53.77% 35,330.57 44.74% 1994 13,464,567 13,464,567 41,662,806 3.09 35,856.14 37.61 1,669.61 0.000919 7.70% 70.02% 38,304.46 56.92% 1995 15,179,754 15,179,754 46,438,464 3.06 40,423.68 42.40 1,882.29 0.000932 6.40% 89.50% 43,298.19 77.38% 1996 15,969,739 15,969,739 51,119,647 3.20 42,527.41 44.60 1,980.25 0.000896 10.08% 108.61% 45,790.90 87.59% 1997 16,587,115 16,587,115 51,469,797 3.10 44,171.49 46.33 2,056.80 0.000930 6.66% 110.03% 47,854.60 96.04% 1998 15,390,288 15,390,288 49,904,700 3.24 40,984.34 42.99 1,908.40 0.000894 10.29% 103.65% 44,595.94 82.69% 1999 15,638,174 15,638,174 52,481,796 3.36 41,644.46 43.68 1,939.13 0.000863 13.35% 114.16% 45,299.22 85.57% 2000 17,167,002 17,167,002 60,548,438 3.53 45,715.73 47.95 2,128.71 0.000820 17.71% 147.08% 49,632.96 103.33% 2001 17,162,271 17,162,271 58,407,766 3.40 45,739.67 47.95 2,128.33 0.000820 17.64% 138.35% 47,915.95 96.29% 2002 16,117,399 16,117,399 57,849,172 3.59 42,961.87 45.03 1,998.80 0.000778 21.90% 136.07% 45,005.70 84.37% 2003 16,342,407 16,342,407 58,434,379 3.58 43,560.93 45.66 2,026.70 0.000781 21.60% 138.46% 45,633.29 86.94% 2004 14,440,948 14,416,403 24,545 0 0 52,045,608 3.60 38,502.62 40.35 1,790.95 0.000775 22.20% 112.38% 40,333.92 65.23% 2005 14,154,441 14,000,941 97,500 56,000 0 52,241,239 3.69 37,742.15 39.50 1,755.43 0.000757 24.02% 113.18% 39,537.09 61.97% 2006 14,363,464 14,363,464 51,299,438 3.57 38,291.58 40.13 1,781.31 0.000782 21.50% 109.34% 40,113.02 64.33% 2007 14,793,411 14,793,411 53,809,839 3.64 39,426.52 41.33 1,834.57 0.000768 22.95% 119.58% 41,302.42 69.20% 2008 15,469,221 13,251,798 2,217,423 0 0 54,865,485 3.55 41,248.08 49.06 1,918.49 0.000788 20.94% 123.89% 43,209.80 77.01% 2009 15,085,521 9,763,078 4,361,915 261,450 699,078 55,371,891 3.67 40,216.76 40.56 1,870.86 0.000761 23.62% 125.96% 42,128.18 72.58% 2010 14,964,966 4,055,534 9,040,430 1,869,003 0 54,945,714 3.67 39,880.89 39.26 1,855.82 0.000760 23.67% 124.22% 41,775.97 71.14% 2011 15,570,609 3,556,088 9,746,833 2,267,688 0 56,751,074 3.64 2,136,132 41,501.74 40.60 1,930.97 43,473.31 0.000738 25.89% 78.09% 131.59%

Page 25 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-2: Energy Emissions - Thunder Bay Service Centre

Thunder Bay Service Centre - Energy Emissions Electricity Emissions Natural Gas Emissions (indirect) (direct)

Year Electricity C02e Natural Gas C02 CH4 N2O C02e Consumed (tonnes) Use (m3) (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (kWh) 1990 290,000 58.00 1991 331,200 66.24 1992 270,720 54.14 1993 276,480 55.30 1994 302,400 60.48 1995 332,640 66.53 1996 349,920 69.98 1997 292,320 58.46 1998 250,560 50.11 1999 302,400 60.48 2000 369,000 107.01 2001 351,720 102.00 19,446.13 36.54 7.20E-04 6.81E-04 36.77 2002 329,040 95.42 21,947.62 41.24 8.12E-04 7.68E-04 41.49 2003 314,510 91.21 21,873.56 41.10 8.09E-04 7.66E-04 41.35 2004 298,440 86.55 24,682.02 46.38 9.13E-04 8.64E-04 46.66 2005 279,720 64.34 26,011.00 48.87 9.62E-04 9.10E-04 49.18 2006 258,840 49.18 22,177.62 41.67 8.21E-04 7.76E-04 41.93 2007 247,680 52.01 16,853.00 31.67 6.24E-04 5.90E-04 31.86 2008 263,880 44.86 28,498.65 53.55 1.05E-03 9.97E-04 53.88 2009 271,080 27.11 23,425.13 44.02 8.67E-04 8.20E-04 44.29 2010 249,120 32.39 15,531.54 29.18 5.75E-04 5.44E-04 29.36 2011 288,090 37.45 19,802.44 37.21 7.33E-04 6.93E-04 37.44

Page 26 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-3: Armstrong

ARMSTRONG

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Fuel Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 908,586 908,586 2,229,656 2.45 2419.565 0.121 0.363 2535 0.00% 0.00114 1991 1,169,779 1,169,779 2,751,814 2.35 3115.121 0.156 0.468 3263 28.75% 0.00119 1992 906,078 906,078 3,026,163 3.34 2412.886 0.121 0.362 2528 -0.28% 0.00084 1993 1,028,712 1,028,712 3,140,258 3.05 2739.460 0.137 0.411 2870 13.22% 0.00091 1994 1,158,111 1,158,111 3,621,219 3.13 3084.050 0.154 0.463 3231 27.46% 0.00089 1995 1,232,613 1,232,613 3,692,237 3.00 3282.448 0.164 0.493 3439 35.66% 0.00093 1996 1,253,103 1,253,103 4,029,600 3.22 3337.013 0.167 0.501 3496 37.92% 0.00087 1997 1,266,885 1,266,885 3,686,169 2.91 3373.715 0.168 0.507 3534 39.43% 0.00096 1998 1,118,458 1,118,458 3,778,800 3.38 2978.454 0.149 0.447 3120 23.10% 0.00083 1999 1,030,978 1,030,978 3,880,405 3.76 2745.494 0.137 0.412 2876 13.47% 0.00074 2000 1,185,746 1,185,746 4,350,982 3.67 3157.642 0.158 0.474 3308 30.50% 0.00076 2001 1,166,721 1,166,721 4,490,026 3.85 3106.978 0.155 0.467 3255 28.41% 0.00072 2002 1,204,308 1,204,308 4,484,140 3.72 3207.072 0.160 0.482 3360 32.55% 0.00075 2003 1,203,851 1,203,851 4,479,740 3.72 3205.855 0.160 0.482 3358 32.50% 0.00075 2004 1,152,496 1,152,496 4,328,490 3.76 3069.097 0.153 0.461 3215 26.85% 0.00074 2005 1,152,739 1,152,739 4,234,130 3.67 3069.744 0.153 0.461 3216 26.87% 0.00076 2006 1,069,953 1,069,953 3,980,440 3.72 2849.285 0.142 0.428 2985 17.76% 0.00075 2007 1,103,626 1,103,626 4,076,810 3.69 2938.956 0.147 0.441 3079 21.47% 0.00076 2008 1,139,293 1,139,293 4,186,110 3.67 3033.937 0.152 0.456 3178 25.39% 0.00076 2009 1,083,142 1,196 802,117 148,798 131,031 4,041,600 3.73 2884.407 0.000 0.101 0.016 0.011 0.433 3021 19.20% 0.00075 2010 1,043,151 0 790,462 252,689 0 3,905,490 3.74 2777.911 0.000 0.099 0.027 0.000 0.417 2910 14.80% 0.00075 2011 1,097,787 0 844,394 253,393 0 4,104,510 3.74 2923.407 0.000 0.106 0.027 0.000 0.439 3062 20.81% 0.00075

Page 27 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-4: Attawapiskat

ATTAWAPISKAT

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

Page 28 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-5: Bearskin Lake

BEARSKIN LAKE

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 273,587 273,587 741,313 2.71 728.562 0.036 0.109 763 0.00% 0.00103 1991 319,191 319,191 830,174 2.60 850.006 0.042 0.128 890 16.67% 0.00107 1992 364,149 364,149 1,089,969 2.99 969.729 0.048 0.146 1016 33.10% 0.00093 1993 557,090 557,090 1,593,305 2.86 1483.531 0.074 0.223 1554 103.62% 0.00098 1994 555,071 555,071 1,870,931 3.37 1478.154 0.074 0.222 1549 102.89% 0.00083 1995 614,157 614,157 2,135,196 3.48 1635.500 0.082 0.246 1713 124.48% 0.00080 1996 595,220 595,220 1,874,400 3.15 1585.071 0.079 0.238 1661 117.56% 0.00089 1997 633,080 633,080 2,067,214 3.27 1685.892 0.084 0.253 1766 131.40% 0.00085 1998 679,735 679,735 1,826,400 2.69 1810.134 0.090 0.272 1896 148.45% 0.00104 1999 629,166 629,166 2,290,875 3.64 1675.469 0.084 0.252 1755 129.97% 0.00077 2000 719,276 719,276 2,400,300 3.34 1915.432 0.096 0.288 2007 162.91% 0.00084 2001 704,230 704,230 2,460,000 3.49 1875.364 0.094 0.282 1965 157.41% 0.00080 2002 704,612 704,612 2,535,000 3.60 1876.382 0.094 0.282 1966 157.55% 0.00078 2003 726,000 726,000 2,548,500 3.51 1933.337 0.097 0.290 2025 165.36% 0.00079 2004 758,802 758,802 2,734,500 3.60 2020.690 0.101 0.304 2117 177.35% 0.00077 2005 735,531 735,531 2,628,000 3.57 1958.719 0.098 0.294 2052 168.85% 0.00078 2006 740,113 740,113 2,610,000 3.53 1970.921 0.098 0.296 2065 170.52% 0.00079 2007 791,805 791,805 2,893,500 3.65 2108.577 0.105 0.317 2209 189.42% 0.00076 2008 834,416 834,416 2,917,500 3.50 2222.050 0.111 0.334 2328 204.99% 0.00080 2009 802,337 477,660 324,677 0 0 2,794,500 3.48 2136.623 0.064 0.041 0.000 0.000 0.321 2238 193.26% 0.00080 2010 734,336 46,000 528,118 160,218 0 2,643,000 3.60 1955.537 0.006 0.066 0.017 0.000 0.294 2048 168.39% 0.00078 2011 785,091 262,195 508,579 14,317 0 2,826,000 3.60 2090.697 0.035 0.064 0.002 0.000 0.314 2190 186.95% 0.00078

Page 29 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-6: Big Trout Lake

BIG TROUT LAKE

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Fuel Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 658,710 658,710 1,989,883 3.02 1754.145 0.088 0.263 1838 0.00% 0.00092 1991 722,491 722,491 2,533,474 3.51 1923.994 0.096 0.289 2016 9.68% 0.00080 1992 775,333 775,333 2,429,984 3.13 2064.712 0.103 0.310 2163 17.70% 0.00089 1993 860,795 860,795 3,056,078 3.55 2292.297 0.114 0.344 2401 30.68% 0.00079 1994 1,140,629 1,140,629 3,789,262 3.32 3037.495 0.152 0.456 3182 73.16% 0.00084 1995 1,235,802 1,235,802 3,926,502 3.18 3290.941 0.164 0.494 3448 87.61% 0.00088 1996 1,089,309 1,089,309 3,572,800 3.28 2900.830 0.145 0.436 3039 65.37% 0.00085 1997 1,135,700 1,135,700 3,828,721 3.37 3024.369 0.151 0.454 3168 72.41% 0.00083 1998 1,101,579 1,101,579 3,908,800 3.55 2933.505 0.147 0.441 3073 67.23% 0.00079 1999 1,131,808 1,131,808 3,964,800 3.50 3014.005 0.151 0.453 3158 71.82% 0.00080 2000 1,234,683 1,234,683 4,515,200 3.66 3287.961 0.164 0.494 3445 87.44% 0.00076 2001 1,304,148 1,304,148 4,443,600 3.41 3472.946 0.173 0.522 3638 97.99% 0.00082 2002 1,405,403 1,405,403 5,009,600 3.56 3742.588 0.187 0.562 3921 113.36% 0.00078 2003 1,445,964 1,445,964 5,270,400 3.64 3850.601 0.192 0.578 4034 119.51% 0.00077 2004 1,512,992 1,512,992 5,553,600 3.67 4029.098 0.201 0.605 4221 129.69% 0.00076 2005 1,528,135 1,528,135 5,372,800 3.52 4069.424 0.203 0.611 4263 131.99% 0.00079 2006 1,530,136 1,530,136 5,545,600 3.62 4074.752 0.204 0.612 4269 132.29% 0.00077 2007 1,556,208 1,556,208 5,755,700 3.70 4144.182 0.207 0.622 4341 136.25% 0.00075 2008 1,640,071 1,640,071 5,899,804 3.60 4367.509 0.218 0.656 4575 148.98% 0.00078 2009 1,645,049 888,150 668,155 0 88,744 6,137,600 3.73 4380.765 0.118 0.084 0.000 0.007 0.658 4589 149.73% 0.00075 2010 1,613,492 0 1,357,588 255,904 0 5,843,200 3.62 4296.729 0.000 0.170 0.027 0.000 0.645 4501 144.93% 0.00077 2011 1,677,785 0 1,310,830 366,955 0 6,059,200 3.61 4467.941 0.000 0.164 0.039 0.000 0.671 4680 154.68% 0.00077

Page 30 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-7: Bisco

BISCO

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 139,656 139,656 376,349 2.69 371.904 0.019 0.056 390 0.00% 0.00104 1991 158,662 158,662 408,747 2.58 422.517 0.021 0.063 443 13.61% 0.00108 1992 145,609 145,609 477,875 3.28 387.757 0.019 0.058 406 4.26% 0.00085 1993 153,843 153,843 547,139 3.56 409.684 0.020 0.062 429 10.16% 0.00078 1994 173,563 173,563 442,672 2.55 462.198 0.023 0.069 484 24.28% 0.00109 1995 181,266 181,266 458,474 2.53 482.711 0.024 0.073 506 29.79% 0.00110 1996 182,406 182,406 482,100 2.64 485.747 0.024 0.073 509 30.61% 0.00106 1997 171,184 171,184 442,247 2.58 455.863 0.023 0.068 478 22.58% 0.00108 1998 187,538 187,538 477,600 2.55 499.414 0.025 0.075 523 34.29% 0.00110 1999 188,365 188,365 486,900 2.58 501.616 0.025 0.075 525 34.88% 0.00108 2000 194,674 194,674 549,000 2.82 518.417 0.026 0.078 543 39.40% 0.00099 2001 189,868 189,868 477,300 2.51 505.618 0.025 0.076 530 35.95% 0.00111 2002 162,329 162,329 435,300 2.68 432.282 0.022 0.065 453 16.23% 0.00104 2003 168,206 168,206 445,500 2.65 447.934 0.022 0.067 469 20.44% 0.00105 2004 158,301 140,316 17,985 0 0 416,400 2.63 421.556 0.019 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.063 442 13.35% 0.00106 2005 150,439 34,939 78,000 37,500 0 410,700 2.73 400.619 0.005 0.010 0.004 0.000 0.060 420 7.71% 0.00102 2006 156,892 156,892 387,000 2.47 417.803 0.021 0.063 438 12.34% 0.00113 2007 150,962 150,962 408,000 2.70 402.012 0.020 0.060 421 8.10% 0.00103 2008 162,683 162,683 421,200 2.59 433.225 0.022 0.065 454 16.49% 0.00108 2009 162,680 0 125,355 37,325 0 426,900 2.62 433.217 0.000 0.016 0.004 0.000 0.065 454 16.48% 0.00106 2010 156,160 0 91,871 64,289 0 443,700 2.84 415.854 0.000 0.012 0.007 0.000 0.062 436 11.80% 0.00098 2011 161,841 0 143,930 17,911 0 467,100 2.89 430.983 0.000 0.018 0.002 0.000 0.065 451 15.88% 0.00097

Page 31 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-8: Cat Lake

CAT LAKE

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

Page 32 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-9: Deer Lake

DEER LAKE

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 268,687 268,687 902,346 3.36 715.513 0.036 0.107 750 0.00% 0.00083 1991 281,631 281,631 954,103 3.39 749.983 0.037 0.113 786 4.82% 0.00082 1992 313,532 313,532 1,117,830 3.57 834.936 0.042 0.125 875 16.69% 0.00078 1993 341,839 341,839 1,411,672 4.13 910.317 0.045 0.137 954 27.23% 0.00068 1994 440,246 440,246 1,630,869 3.70 1172.375 0.059 0.176 1228 63.85% 0.00075 1995 519,207 519,207 1,921,120 3.70 1382.648 0.069 0.208 1448 93.24% 0.00075 1996 539,898 539,898 1,768,400 3.28 1437.748 0.072 0.216 1506 100.94% 0.00085 1997 577,218 577,218 1,977,191 3.43 1537.132 0.077 0.231 1610 114.83% 0.00081 1998 611,469 611,469 1,969,200 3.22 1628.342 0.081 0.245 1706 127.58% 0.00087 1999 560,245 560,245 2,645,035 4.72 1491.932 0.075 0.224 1563 108.51% 0.00059 2000 527,153 527,153 2,919,676 5.54 1403.808 0.070 0.211 1471 96.20% 0.00050 2001 549,372 549,372 2,788,174 5.08 1462.978 0.073 0.220 1533 104.47% 0.00055 2002 625,252 625,252 3,250,544 5.20 1665.046 0.083 0.250 1744 132.71% 0.00054 2003 791,655 791,655 3,779,725 4.77 2108.177 0.105 0.317 2209 194.64% 0.00058 2004 803,443 803,443 3,798,468 4.73 2139.569 0.107 0.321 2241 199.03% 0.00059 2005 684,361 684,361 4,766,509 6.96 1822.453 0.091 0.274 1909 154.71% 0.00040 2006 847,089 847,089 3,969,498 4.69 2255.798 0.113 0.339 2363 215.27% 0.00060 2007 869,216 869,216 4,391,229 5.05 2314.722 0.116 0.348 2425 223.51% 0.00055 2008 913,088 913,088 4,565,771 5.00 2431.553 0.121 0.365 2547 239.83% 0.00056 2009 907,769 229,996 621,454 0 56,319 4,781,339 5.27 2417.389 0.031 0.078 0.000 0.005 0.363 2532 237.83% 0.00053 2010 902,126 0 698,555 203,571 0 4,700,727 5.21 2402.362 0.000 0.088 0.021 0.000 0.361 2517 235.72% 0.00054 2011 966,636 0 729,681 236,955 0 5,018,002 5.19 2574.152 0.000 0.091 0.025 0.000 0.387 2696 259.73% 0.00054

Page 33 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-10: Fort Albany

FORT ALBANY

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

Page 34 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-11: Fort Severn

FORT SEVERN

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 257,534 257,534 894,347 3.47 685.813 0.034 0.103 718 0.00% 0.00080 1991 255,261 255,261 831,693 3.26 679.760 0.034 0.102 712 -0.88% 0.00086 1992 455,762 455,762 1,020,593 2.24 1213.694 0.061 0.182 1271 76.97% 0.00125 1993 283,425 283,425 1,191,359 4.20 754.761 0.038 0.113 791 10.05% 0.00066 1994 340,691 340,691 1,137,002 3.34 907.260 0.045 0.136 950 32.29% 0.00084 1995 411,905 411,905 1,284,908 3.12 1096.903 0.055 0.165 1149 59.94% 0.00089 1996 510,079 510,079 1,682,800 3.30 1358.340 0.068 0.204 1423 98.06% 0.00085 1997 573,800 573,800 1,751,307 3.05 1528.029 0.076 0.230 1601 122.81% 0.00091 1998 618,972 618,972 1,872,000 3.02 1648.322 0.082 0.248 1727 140.35% 0.00092 1999 550,705 550,705 1,902,400 3.45 1466.527 0.073 0.220 1536 113.84% 0.00081 2000 676,719 676,719 2,304,800 3.41 1802.103 0.090 0.271 1888 162.77% 0.00082 2001 700,932 700,932 2,331,200 3.33 1866.582 0.093 0.280 1955 172.17% 0.00084 2002 763,932 763,932 2,474,400 3.24 2034.351 0.102 0.306 2131 196.63% 0.00086 2003 778,269 778,269 2,674,400 3.44 2072.529 0.104 0.311 2171 202.20% 0.00081 2004 787,745 787,745 2,652,800 3.37 2097.765 0.105 0.315 2198 205.88% 0.00083 2005 751,944 751,944 2,540,800 3.38 2002.427 0.100 0.301 2098 191.98% 0.00083 2006 766,655 766,655 2,542,400 3.32 2041.602 0.102 0.307 2139 197.69% 0.00084 2007 784,406 784,406 2,625,600 3.35 2088.873 0.104 0.314 2188 204.58% 0.00083 2008 797,397 797,397 2,698,400 3.38 2123.468 0.106 0.319 2225 209.63% 0.00082 2009 745,462 466,147 279,315 0 0 2,625,600 3.52 1985.165 0.062 0.035 0.000 0.000 0.298 2080 189.46% 0.00079 2010 671,859 0 507,339 164,520 0 2,287,200 3.40 1789.161 0.000 0.064 0.017 0.000 0.269 1874 160.86% 0.00082 2011 743,573 378,310 365,263 0 0 2,420,800 3.26 1980.135 0.050 0.046 0.000 0.000 0.297 2074 188.72% 0.00086

Page 35 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-12: Gull Bay

GULL BAY

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 237,717 237,717 655,555 2.76 633.040 0.032 0.095 663 0.00% 0.00101 1991 217,952 217,952 770,691 3.54 580.406 0.029 0.087 608 -8.31% 0.00079 1992 193,851 193,851 689,178 3.56 516.225 0.026 0.078 541 -18.45% 0.00078 1993 575,563 575,563 805,244 1.40 1532.724 0.077 0.230 1606 142.12% 0.00199 1994 251,275 251,275 724,928 2.88 669.145 0.033 0.101 701 5.70% 0.00097 1995 271,460 271,460 803,435 2.96 722.898 0.036 0.109 757 14.19% 0.00094 1996 276,448 276,448 825,100 2.98 736.181 0.037 0.111 771 16.29% 0.00093 1997 246,995 246,995 681,748 2.76 657.748 0.033 0.099 689 3.90% 0.00101 1998 229,685 229,685 654,900 2.85 611.651 0.031 0.092 641 -3.38% 0.00098 1999 244,800 244,800 684,000 2.79 651.902 0.033 0.098 683 2.98% 0.00100 2000 251,639 251,639 745,800 2.96 670.115 0.033 0.101 702 5.86% 0.00094 2001 236,830 236,830 754,500 3.19 630.678 0.031 0.095 661 -0.37% 0.00088 2002 276,649 276,649 922,200 3.33 736.716 0.037 0.111 772 16.38% 0.00084 2003 323,033 323,033 1,087,800 3.37 860.238 0.043 0.129 901 35.89% 0.00083 2004 289,431 289,431 969,000 3.35 770.755 0.038 0.116 807 21.75% 0.00083 2005 247,587 247,587 804,000 3.25 659.324 0.033 0.099 691 4.15% 0.00086 2006 252,689 252,689 801,900 3.17 672.911 0.034 0.101 705 6.30% 0.00088 2007 317,333 317,333 980,700 3.09 845.058 0.042 0.127 885 33.49% 0.00090 2008 328,670 328,670 1,056,900 3.22 875.248 0.044 0.131 917 38.26% 0.00087 2009 363,021 1,159 269,310 15,988 76,564 1,147,690 3.16 966.725 0.000 0.034 0.002 0.006 0.145 1013 52.69% 0.00088 2010 364,996 0 324,582 40,414 0 1,231,600 3.37 971.984 0.000 0.041 0.004 0.000 0.146 1018 53.53% 0.00083 2011 389,224 0 289,597 99,627 0 1,282,500 3.30 1036.504 0.000 0.036 0.010 0.000 0.156 1086 63.72% 0.00085

Page 36 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-13: Hillsport

HILLSPORT

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 119,844 119,844 220,665 1.84 319.145 0.016 0.048 334 0.00% 0.00152 1991 115,955 115,955 249,055 2.15 308.788 0.015 0.046 323 -3.25% 0.00130 1992 88,237 88,237 248,799 2.82 234.975 0.012 0.035 246 -26.37% 0.00099 1993 105,876 105,876 261,776 2.47 281.948 0.014 0.042 295 -11.66% 0.00113 1994 121,370 121,370 304,121 2.51 323.208 0.016 0.049 339 1.27% 0.00111 1995 126,584 126,584 374,126 2.96 337.093 0.017 0.051 353 5.62% 0.00094 1996 118,701 118,701 406,400 3.42 316.101 0.016 0.047 331 -0.95% 0.00081 1997 119,453 119,453 261,085 2.19 318.103 0.016 0.048 333 -0.33% 0.00128 1998 127,811 127,811 467,400 3.66 340.361 0.017 0.051 357 6.65% 0.00076 1999 122,803 122,803 308,004 2.51 327.024 0.016 0.049 343 2.47% 0.00111 2000 111,554 111,554 279,300 2.50 297.068 0.015 0.045 311 -6.92% 0.00111 2001 129,572 129,572 296,550 2.29 345.050 0.017 0.052 361 8.12% 0.00122 2002 120,884 120,884 357,450 2.96 321.914 0.016 0.048 337 0.87% 0.00094 2003 129,559 129,559 334,350 2.58 345.015 0.017 0.052 361 8.11% 0.00108 2004 135,305 135,305 372,750 2.75 360.317 0.018 0.054 377 12.90% 0.00101 2005 131,922 131,922 364,200 2.76 351.308 0.018 0.053 368 10.08% 0.00101 2006 126,358 126,358 338,700 2.68 336.491 0.017 0.051 353 5.44% 0.00104 2007 125,317 125,317 304,500 2.43 333.719 0.017 0.050 350 4.57% 0.00115 2008 123,977 123,977 328,800 2.65 330.151 0.016 0.050 346 3.45% 0.00105 2009 110,924 0 80,130 30,794 0 280,800 2.53 295.391 0.000 0.010 0.003 0.000 0.044 309 -7.45% 0.00110 2010 107,572 0 77,320 30,252 0 268,050 2.49 286.464 0.000 0.010 0.003 0.000 0.043 300 -10.25% 0.00112 2011 103,463 0 87,970 15,493 0 249,000 2.41 275.522 0.000 0.011 0.002 0.000 0.041 289 -13.68% 0.00116

Page 37 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-14: Kasabonika

KASABONIKA

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Fuel Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 344,699 344,699 826,734 2.40 917.933 0.046 0.138 962 0.00% 0.00116 1991 338,709 338,709 907,159 2.68 901.982 0.045 0.135 945 -1.74% 0.00104 1992 356,150 356,150 1,167,657 3.28 948.427 0.047 0.142 994 3.32% 0.00085 1993 411,146 411,146 1,556,691 3.79 1094.882 0.055 0.164 1147 19.28% 0.00074 1994 553,972 553,972 1,629,028 2.94 1475.227 0.074 0.222 1545 60.71% 0.00095 1995 600,197 600,197 1,810,852 3.02 1598.325 0.080 0.240 1674 74.12% 0.00092 1996 615,297 615,297 2,138,000 3.47 1638.536 0.082 0.246 1717 78.50% 0.00080 1997 685,184 685,184 2,028,859 2.96 1824.645 0.091 0.274 1912 98.78% 0.00094 1998 744,321 744,321 2,545,500 3.42 1982.127 0.099 0.298 2077 115.93% 0.00082 1999 732,558 732,558 2,443,850 3.34 1950.802 0.097 0.293 2044 112.52% 0.00084 2000 827,656 827,656 2,893,500 3.50 2204.048 0.110 0.331 2309 140.11% 0.00080 2001 911,627 911,627 2,969,844 3.26 2427.663 0.121 0.365 2543 164.47% 0.00086 2002 895,977 895,977 3,208,500 3.58 2385.987 0.119 0.358 2500 159.93% 0.00078 2003 951,463 951,463 3,433,500 3.61 2533.747 0.127 0.381 2654 176.03% 0.00077 2004 1,010,838 1,010,838 3,627,000 3.59 2691.862 0.134 0.404 2820 193.25% 0.00078 2005 964,111 964,111 3,643,500 3.78 2567.428 0.128 0.386 2690 179.70% 0.00074 2006 1,073,429 1,073,429 3,819,000 3.56 2858.541 0.143 0.429 2995 211.41% 0.00078 2007 1,105,610 1,105,610 4,036,500 3.65 2944.239 0.147 0.442 3084 220.75% 0.00076 2008 1,206,582 1,206,582 4,240,500 3.51 3213.128 0.160 0.483 3366 250.04% 0.00079 2009 1,204,169 1,204,169 0 0 0 4,210,500 3.50 3206.702 0.160 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.482 3359 249.34% 0.00080 2010 1,147,437 911,326 116,622 119,489 0 4,192,500 3.65 3055.625 0.121 0.015 0.013 0.000 0.459 3201 232.87% 0.00076 2011 1,136,943 554,112 566,762 16,069 0 4,114,500 3.62 3027.679 0.074 0.071 0.002 0.000 0.455 3172 229.83% 0.00077

Page 38 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-15: Kingfisher

KINGFISHER

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 0 0 0 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.00% 0.00000 1991 133,668 133,668 325,241 2.43 355.958 0.018 0.053 373 0.00% 0.00115 1992 229,994 229,994 615,132 2.67 612.474 0.031 0.092 642 72.06% 0.00104 1993 178,910 178,910 675,042 3.77 476.437 0.024 0.072 499 33.85% 0.00074 1994 263,364 263,364 805,157 3.06 701.338 0.035 0.105 735 97.03% 0.00091 1995 377,008 377,008 1,083,397 2.87 1003.972 0.050 0.151 1052 182.05% 0.00097 1996 440,064 440,064 1,548,800 3.52 1171.890 0.059 0.176 1228 229.22% 0.00079 1997 488,172 488,172 1,296,380 2.66 1300.002 0.065 0.195 1362 265.21% 0.00105 1998 492,689 492,689 1,394,400 2.83 1312.031 0.066 0.197 1375 268.59% 0.00099 1999 519,218 519,218 1,434,000 2.76 1382.678 0.069 0.208 1449 288.44% 0.00101 2000 535,005 535,005 1,738,400 3.25 1424.718 0.071 0.214 1493 300.25% 0.00086 2001 517,591 517,591 1,699,200 3.28 1378.345 0.069 0.207 1444 287.22% 0.00085 2002 539,247 539,247 1,854,400 3.44 1436.015 0.072 0.216 1504 303.42% 0.00081 2003 554,405 554,405 1,792,000 3.23 1476.381 0.074 0.222 1547 314.76% 0.00086 2004 585,469 585,469 1,900,000 3.25 1559.104 0.078 0.234 1633 338.00% 0.00086 2005 573,465 573,465 1,902,400 3.32 1527.137 0.076 0.229 1600 329.02% 0.00084 2006 624,570 624,570 1,917,600 3.07 1663.230 0.083 0.250 1742 367.25% 0.00091 2007 649,374 649,374 2,052,800 3.16 1729.283 0.086 0.260 1812 385.81% 0.00088 2008 710,801 710,801 2,166,400 3.05 1892.863 0.095 0.284 1983 431.77% 0.00092 2009 730,882 554,231 176,651 0 0 2,348,800 3.21 1946.339 0.074 0.022 0.000 0.000 0.292 2039 446.78% 0.00087 2010 593,560 0 436,689 156,871 0 2,192,000 3.69 1580.650 0.000 0.055 0.016 0.000 0.237 1656 344.01% 0.00076 2011 655,985 0 515,622 140,363 0 2,370,400 3.61 1746.888 0.000 0.065 0.015 0.000 0.262 1830 390.71% 0.00077

Page 39 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-16: Lansdowne

LANSDOWNE

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 213,142 213,142 518,142 2.43 567.597 0.028 0.085 595 0.00% 0.00115 1991 202,624 202,624 516,567 2.55 539.588 0.027 0.081 565 -4.93% 0.00109 1992 229,211 229,211 615,837 2.69 610.389 0.030 0.092 639 7.54% 0.00104 1993 236,421 236,421 856,023 3.62 629.589 0.031 0.095 660 10.92% 0.00077 1994 302,670 302,670 769,613 2.54 806.010 0.040 0.121 844 42.00% 0.00110 1995 400,886 400,886 1,014,802 2.53 1067.559 0.053 0.160 1118 88.08% 0.00110 1996 385,640 385,640 1,056,880 2.74 1026.959 0.051 0.154 1076 80.93% 0.00102 1997 454,780 454,780 1,113,823 2.45 1211.079 0.060 0.182 1269 113.37% 0.00114 1998 439,555 439,555 1,349,700 3.07 1170.535 0.058 0.176 1226 106.23% 0.00091 1999 566,796 566,796 1,624,121 2.87 1509.378 0.075 0.227 1581 165.92% 0.00097 2000 515,700 515,700 1,693,000 3.28 1373.309 0.069 0.206 1439 141.95% 0.00085 2001 509,913 509,913 1,677,000 3.29 1357.898 0.068 0.204 1423 139.24% 0.00085 2002 566,953 566,953 1,870,000 3.30 1509.796 0.075 0.227 1582 166.00% 0.00085 2003 549,759 549,759 1,839,000 3.35 1464.009 0.073 0.220 1534 157.93% 0.00083 2004 617,944 617,944 2,055,000 3.33 1645.585 0.082 0.247 1724 189.92% 0.00084 2005 605,615 605,615 2,032,000 3.36 1612.753 0.081 0.242 1690 184.14% 0.00083 2006 551,891 551,891 1,837,000 3.33 1469.686 0.073 0.221 1540 158.93% 0.00084 2007 570,509 570,509 1,878,000 3.29 1519.265 0.076 0.228 1592 167.67% 0.00085 2008 602,047 602,047 1,840,000 3.06 1603.251 0.080 0.241 1680 182.46% 0.00091 2009 543,727 478,839 0 0 64,888 1,702,000 3.13 1447.945 0.064 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.217 1517 155.09% 0.00089 2010 539,108 63,276 362,636 113,196 0 1,750,000 3.25 1435.645 0.008 0.045 0.012 0.000 0.216 1504 152.91% 0.00086 2011 556,202 0 401,792 154,410 0 1,795,000 3.23 1481.166 0.000 0.050 0.016 0.000 0.222 1552 160.93% 0.00086

Page 40 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-17: Marten Falls

MARTEN FALLS

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

Page 41 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-18: Oba

OBA

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 135,449 135,449 403,877 2.98 360.701 0.018 0.054 378 0.00% 0.00094 1991 138,724 138,724 442,527 3.19 369.422 0.018 0.055 387 2.42% 0.00087 1992 177,807 177,807 409,202 2.30 473.500 0.024 0.071 496 31.27% 0.00121 1993 123,818 123,818 472,877 3.82 329.727 0.016 0.050 345 -8.59% 0.00073 1994 145,309 145,309 412,902 2.84 386.958 0.019 0.058 405 7.28% 0.00098 1995 155,337 155,337 410,289 2.64 413.662 0.021 0.062 433 14.68% 0.00106 1996 161,496 161,496 450,600 2.79 430.064 0.021 0.065 451 19.23% 0.00100 1997 164,006 164,006 425,493 2.59 436.748 0.022 0.066 458 21.08% 0.00108 1998 164,641 164,641 473,700 2.88 438.439 0.022 0.066 459 21.55% 0.00097 1999 143,912 143,912 419,100 2.91 383.238 0.019 0.058 401 6.25% 0.00096 2000 136,883 136,883 356,970 2.61 364.519 0.018 0.055 382 1.06% 0.00107 2001 149,689 149,689 324,000 2.16 398.622 0.020 0.060 418 10.51% 0.00129 2002 130,271 130,271 344,100 2.64 346.912 0.017 0.052 363 -3.82% 0.00106 2003 118,192 118,192 298,800 2.53 314.745 0.016 0.047 330 -12.74% 0.00110 2004 111,426 111,426 287,100 2.58 296.727 0.015 0.045 311 -17.74% 0.00108 2005 121,364 121,364 321,300 2.65 323.192 0.016 0.049 339 -10.40% 0.00105 2006 117,925 117,925 287,100 2.43 314.034 0.016 0.047 329 -12.94% 0.00115 2007 112,808 112,808 259,800 2.30 300.408 0.015 0.045 315 -16.72% 0.00121 2008 123,856 123,856 264,300 2.13 329.829 0.016 0.050 346 -8.56% 0.00131 2009 122,581 0 94,036 28,545 0 271,500 2.21 326.433 0.000 0.012 0.003 0.000 0.049 342 -9.51% 0.00126 2010 104,184 0 62,769 41,415 0 227,700 2.19 277.442 0.000 0.008 0.004 0.000 0.042 291 -23.09% 0.00128 2011 110,054 0 74,281 35,773 0 264,900 2.41 293.074 0.000 0.009 0.004 0.000 0.044 307 -18.76% 0.00116

Page 42 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-19: Pikangikum

PIKANGIKUM

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

Page 43 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-20: Sachigo

SACHIGO

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 256,472 256,472 733,082 2.86 682.985 0.034 0.103 716 0.00% 0.00098 1991 299,640 299,640 986,724 3.29 797.941 0.040 0.120 836 16.83% 0.00085 1992 241,489 241,489 871,130 3.61 643.085 0.032 0.097 674 -5.84% 0.00077 1993 258,567 258,567 1,007,544 3.90 688.564 0.034 0.103 721 0.82% 0.00072 1994 308,048 308,048 945,311 3.07 820.332 0.041 0.123 859 20.11% 0.00091 1995 381,741 381,741 1,079,492 2.83 1016.576 0.051 0.153 1065 48.84% 0.00099 1996 482,660 482,660 1,577,400 3.27 1285.324 0.064 0.193 1347 88.19% 0.00085 1997 620,533 620,533 1,737,210 2.80 1652.479 0.083 0.248 1731 141.95% 0.00100 1998 647,477 647,477 1,686,000 2.60 1724.231 0.086 0.259 1806 152.46% 0.00107 1999 654,152 654,152 2,103,300 3.22 1742.007 0.087 0.262 1825 155.06% 0.00087 2000 718,571 718,571 2,458,500 3.42 1913.555 0.096 0.287 2005 180.18% 0.00082 2001 760,941 760,941 2,562,000 3.37 2026.386 0.101 0.304 2123 196.70% 0.00083 2002 831,540 831,540 2,907,000 3.50 2214.391 0.111 0.333 2320 224.22% 0.00080 2003 803,011 803,011 2,778,000 3.46 2138.418 0.107 0.321 2240 213.10% 0.00081 2004 819,845 819,845 2,862,000 3.49 2183.247 0.109 0.328 2287 219.66% 0.00080 2005 824,784 824,784 2,928,000 3.55 2196.400 0.110 0.330 2301 221.59% 0.00079 2006 832,741 832,741 2,860,500 3.44 2217.589 0.111 0.333 2323 224.69% 0.00081 2007 848,612 848,612 2,874,000 3.39 2259.854 0.113 0.339 2367 230.88% 0.00082 2008 868,704 868,704 3,034,500 3.49 2313.359 0.116 0.347 2424 238.71% 0.00080 2009 867,679 506,688 360,991 0 0 2,992,500 3.45 2310.629 0.067 0.045 0.000 0.000 0.347 2421 238.31% 0.00081 2010 795,251 0 701,189 94,062 0 2,838,000 3.57 2117.753 0.000 0.088 0.010 0.000 0.318 2218 210.05% 0.00078 2011 788,068 0 553,666 234,402 0 2,847,000 3.61 2098.625 0.000 0.069 0.025 0.000 0.315 2198 207.24% 0.00077

Page 44 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-21: Sandy Lake

SANDY LAKE

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Fuel Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 821,496 821,496 2,444,479 2.98 2187.644 0.109 0.329 2292 0.00% 0.00094 1991 1,023,130 1,023,130 2,655,792 2.60 2724.595 0.136 0.409 2854 24.54% 0.00107 1992 933,805 933,805 3,024,617 3.24 2486.723 0.124 0.374 2605 13.67% 0.00086 1993 1,312,833 1,312,833 3,508,788 2.67 3496.074 0.175 0.525 3663 59.81% 0.00104 1994 1,575,065 1,575,065 5,052,161 3.21 4194.398 0.209 0.630 4394 91.73% 0.00087 1995 1,779,811 1,779,811 5,381,963 3.02 4739.637 0.237 0.712 4965 116.65% 0.00092 1996 1,904,994 1,904,994 6,707,000 3.52 5072.999 0.253 0.762 5315 131.89% 0.00079 1997 2,016,301 2,016,301 6,623,048 3.28 5369.410 0.268 0.807 5625 145.44% 0.00085 1998 2,271,550 2,271,550 7,962,500 3.51 6049.138 0.302 0.909 6337 176.51% 0.00080 1999 2,561,092 2,561,092 8,234,500 3.22 6820.188 0.341 1.024 7145 211.76% 0.00087 2000 2,667,201 2,667,201 9,572,500 3.59 7102.756 0.355 1.067 7441 224.68% 0.00078 2001 2,984,916 2,984,916 9,745,000 3.26 7948.831 0.397 1.194 8327 263.35% 0.00085 2002 3,066,124 3,066,124 10,877,501 3.55 8165.088 0.408 1.226 8554 273.24% 0.00079 2003 2,972,644 2,972,644 10,487,500 3.53 7916.152 0.395 1.189 8293 261.86% 0.00079 2004 2,951,531 2,951,531 10,772,500 3.65 7859.927 0.393 1.181 8234 259.29% 0.00076 2005 2,961,984 2,961,984 10,697,500 3.61 7887.763 0.394 1.185 8263 260.56% 0.00077 2006 2,943,110 2,943,110 10,745,000 3.65 7837.502 0.391 1.177 8211 258.26% 0.00076 2007 2,951,470 2,951,470 11,025,000 3.74 7859.765 0.393 1.181 8234 259.28% 0.00075 2008 3,076,090 3,076,090 10,772,500 3.50 8191.628 0.409 1.230 8582 274.45% 0.00080 2009 2,917,836 2,388,999 247,305 0 281,532 11,140,962 3.82 7770.197 0.318 0.031 0.000 0.023 1.167 8140 255.17% 0.00073 2010 2,916,491 1,242,657 1,673,835 0 0 10,930,120 3.75 7766.617 0.165 0.210 0.000 0.000 1.167 8136 255.01% 0.00074 2011 2,928,069 1,129,018 1,554,803 244,248 0 11,290,000 3.86 7797.448 0.150 0.195 0.026 0.000 1.171 8168 256.41% 0.00072

Page 45 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-22: Sultan

SULTAN

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 163,240 163,240 463,250 2.84 434.708 0.022 0.065 455 0.00% 0.00098 1991 230,157 230,157 541,625 2.35 612.908 0.031 0.092 642 40.99% 0.00119 1992 168,890 168,890 571,375 3.38 449.754 0.022 0.068 471 3.46% 0.00082 1993 212,201 212,201 638,611 3.01 565.091 0.028 0.085 592 29.99% 0.00093 1994 244,427 244,427 639,601 2.62 650.909 0.033 0.098 682 49.73% 0.00107 1995 206,556 206,556 649,040 3.14 550.059 0.027 0.083 576 26.54% 0.00089 1996 210,475 210,475 670,800 3.19 560.495 0.028 0.084 587 28.94% 0.00088 1997 109,459 109,459 587,186 5.36 291.489 0.015 0.044 305 -32.95% 0.00052 1998 150,275 150,275 729,000 4.85 400.182 0.020 0.060 419 -7.94% 0.00058 1999 154,035 154,035 763,500 4.96 410.195 0.020 0.062 430 -5.64% 0.00056 2000 191,957 191,957 824,400 4.29 511.181 0.026 0.077 536 17.59% 0.00065 2001 277,343 277,343 726,600 2.62 738.564 0.037 0.111 774 69.90% 0.00106 2002 157,430 157,430 730,500 4.64 419.236 0.021 0.063 439 -3.56% 0.00060 2003 92,156 92,156 684,900 7.43 245.411 0.012 0.037 257 -43.55% 0.00038 2004 126,004 119,444 6,560 0 0 625,800 4.97 335.549 0.016 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.050 352 -22.81% 0.00056 2005 102,830 64,830 19,500 18,500 0 541,500 5.27 273.836 0.009 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.041 287 -37.01% 0.00053 2006 38,932 38,932 523,900 13.46 103.676 0.005 0.016 109 -76.15% 0.00021 2007 43,038 43,038 529,500 12.30 114.610 0.006 0.017 120 -73.64% 0.00023 2008 63,864 63,864 543,000 8.50 170.070 0.008 0.026 178 -60.88% 0.00033 2009 22,412 116 22,296 0 0 509,700 22.74 59.683 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.009 63 -86.27% 0.00012 2010 50,462 0 24,218 26,244 0 459,600 9.11 134.380 0.000 0.003 0.003 0.000 0.020 141 -69.09% 0.00031 2011 82,175 0 82,175 0 0 450,900 5.49 218.832 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.033 229 -49.66% 0.00051

Page 46 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-23: Wapekeka

WAPEKEKA

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 0 0 0 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.00% 0.00000 1991 67,966 67,966 43,937 0.65 180.993 0.009 0.027 190 0.00% 0.00432 1992 200,902 200,902 704,398 3.51 535.002 0.027 0.080 560 195.59% 0.00080 1993 264,681 264,681 592,109 2.24 704.846 0.035 0.106 738 289.43% 0.00125 1994 239,244 239,244 690,663 2.89 637.107 0.032 0.096 667 252.01% 0.00097 1995 289,182 289,182 946,706 3.27 770.092 0.038 0.116 807 325.48% 0.00085 1996 316,969 316,969 857,000 2.70 844.088 0.042 0.127 884 366.36% 0.00103 1997 316,989 316,989 909,439 2.87 844.142 0.042 0.127 884 366.39% 0.00097 1998 304,100 304,100 913,000 3.00 809.818 0.040 0.122 848 347.43% 0.00093 1999 343,354 343,354 1,021,000 2.97 914.352 0.046 0.137 958 405.18% 0.00094 2000 538,305 538,305 1,600,000 2.97 1433.506 0.072 0.215 1502 692.02% 0.00094 2001 572,730 572,730 1,686,800 2.95 1525.180 0.076 0.229 1598 742.67% 0.00095 2002 577,479 577,479 1,868,000 3.23 1537.827 0.077 0.231 1611 749.66% 0.00086 2003 645,610 645,610 2,114,000 3.27 1719.260 0.086 0.258 1801 849.90% 0.00085 2004 679,849 679,849 2,127,000 3.13 1810.438 0.090 0.272 1897 900.28% 0.00089 2005 661,013 661,013 2,109,000 3.19 1760.278 0.088 0.264 1844 872.56% 0.00087 2006 699,489 699,489 2,205,000 3.15 1862.739 0.093 0.280 1951 929.17% 0.00089 2007 738,399 738,399 2,346,000 3.18 1966.357 0.098 0.295 2060 986.42% 0.00088 2008 734,631 734,631 2,297,000 3.13 1956.322 0.098 0.294 2049 980.88% 0.00089 2009 739,977 449,854 290,123 0 0 2,424,000 3.28 1970.559 0.060 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.296 2064 988.72% 0.00085 2010 745,268 0 624,810 120,458 0 2,384,000 3.20 1984.649 0.000 0.078 0.013 0.000 0.298 2079 996.44% 0.00087 2011 765,876 0 621,351 144,525 0 2,535,000 3.31 2039.528 0.000 0.078 0.015 0.000 0.306 2136 1026.75% 0.00084

Page 47 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-24: Weagamow

WEAGAMOW

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Fuel Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 422,506 422,506 967,520 2.29 1125.133 0.056 0.169 1179 0.00% 0.00122 1991 351,748 351,748 1,068,413 3.04 936.705 0.047 0.141 981 -16.75% 0.00092 1992 340,083 340,083 1,098,724 3.23 905.641 0.045 0.136 949 -19.51% 0.00086 1993 373,853 373,853 1,262,248 3.38 995.571 0.050 0.150 1043 -11.52% 0.00083 1994 494,822 494,822 1,459,854 2.95 1317.711 0.066 0.198 1380 17.12% 0.00095 1995 581,586 581,586 1,637,477 2.82 1548.764 0.077 0.233 1623 37.65% 0.00099 1996 587,657 587,657 1,820,000 3.10 1564.931 0.078 0.235 1639 39.09% 0.00090 1997 632,439 632,439 1,855,566 2.93 1684.185 0.084 0.253 1764 49.69% 0.00095 1998 693,435 693,435 2,416,000 3.48 1846.617 0.092 0.277 1935 64.12% 0.00080 1999 762,616 762,616 2,620,000 3.44 2030.846 0.101 0.305 2128 80.50% 0.00081 2000 901,867 901,867 3,259,200 3.61 2401.672 0.120 0.361 2516 113.46% 0.00077 2001 1,003,625 1,003,625 3,637,600 3.62 2672.653 0.133 0.401 2800 137.54% 0.00077 2002 1,119,784 1,119,784 3,849,600 3.44 2981.985 0.149 0.448 3124 165.03% 0.00081 2003 1,115,477 1,115,477 3,918,000 3.51 2970.516 0.148 0.446 3112 164.01% 0.00079 2004 1,165,609 1,165,609 4,224,000 3.62 3104.017 0.155 0.466 3252 175.88% 0.00077 2005 1,142,540 1,142,540 4,126,500 3.61 3042.584 0.152 0.457 3187 170.42% 0.00077 2006 1,140,094 1,140,094 4,068,000 3.57 3036.070 0.152 0.456 3181 169.84% 0.00078 2007 1,207,567 1,207,567 4,305,000 3.57 3215.751 0.161 0.483 3369 185.81% 0.00078 2008 1,261,692 1,261,692 4,560,000 3.61 3359.886 0.168 0.505 3520 198.62% 0.00077 2009 1,236,085 1,236,085 0 0 0 4,549,500 3.68 3291.694 0.164 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.494 3448 192.56% 0.00076 2010 1,155,499 1,122,982 32,517 0 0 4,273,500 3.70 3077.094 0.149 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.462 3224 173.49% 0.00075 2011 1,232,453 1,232,453 0 0 0 4,480,500 3.64 3282.022 0.164 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.493 3438 191.70% 0.00077

Page 48 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-25: Webequie

WEBEQUIE

Fuel Consumption Generation GHG Emissions

CH (tonnes) Diesel - 4 Total Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel Generation Efficiency C02 Diesel - N2O C02e CO2e/kWh Regular Biodiesel Biodiesel Biodiesel % Change Year Fuel (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (kWh) (kWh/L) (tonnes) Regular (tonnes) (tonnes) Generated (L) - B5 (L) - B20 (L) - B40 (L) (L) 1990 253,449 253,449 831,452 3.28 674.935 0.034 0.101 707 0.00% 0.00085 1991 268,781 268,781 893,253 3.32 715.764 0.036 0.108 750 6.05% 0.00084 1992 297,088 297,088 1,087,651 3.66 791.145 0.040 0.119 829 17.22% 0.00076 1993 569,713 569,713 1,679,048 2.95 1517.146 0.076 0.228 1589 124.78% 0.00095 1994 454,889 454,889 1,742,224 3.83 1211.369 0.061 0.182 1269 79.48% 0.00073 1995 542,644 542,644 1,856,731 3.42 1445.061 0.072 0.217 1514 114.10% 0.00082 1996 560,406 560,406 1,635,900 2.92 1492.361 0.075 0.224 1563 121.11% 0.00096 1997 592,187 592,187 1,907,273 3.22 1576.994 0.079 0.237 1652 133.65% 0.00087 1998 624,073 624,073 1,981,600 3.18 1661.906 0.083 0.250 1741 146.23% 0.00088 1999 630,087 630,087 2,052,000 3.26 1677.922 0.084 0.252 1758 148.61% 0.00086 2000 697,322 697,322 2,360,000 3.38 1856.968 0.093 0.279 1945 175.13% 0.00082 2001 703,116 703,116 2,284,800 3.25 1872.398 0.094 0.281 1962 177.42% 0.00086 2002 718,989 718,989 2,425,600 3.37 1914.668 0.096 0.288 2006 183.68% 0.00083 2003 756,493 756,493 2,636,800 3.49 2014.540 0.101 0.303 2110 198.48% 0.00080 2004 773,918 773,918 2,739,200 3.54 2060.944 0.103 0.310 2159 205.35% 0.00079 2005 814,077 814,077 2,818,400 3.46 2167.887 0.108 0.326 2271 221.20% 0.00081 2006 851,398 851,398 2,860,800 3.36 2267.273 0.113 0.341 2375 235.92% 0.00083 2007 867,151 867,151 3,067,200 3.54 2309.223 0.115 0.347 2419 242.14% 0.00079 2008 881,359 881,359 3,072,800 3.49 2347.059 0.117 0.353 2459 247.75% 0.00080 2009 855,163 855,163 0 0 0 2,906,400 3.40 2277.299 0.114 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.342 2386 237.41% 0.00082 2010 827,942 615,575 212,367 0 0 2,860,800 3.46 2204.810 0.082 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.331 2310 226.67% 0.00081 2011 850,043 0 652,269 197,774 0 2,737,762 3.22 2263.665 0.000 0.082 0.021 0.000 0.340 2371 235.36% 0.00087

Page 49 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-26: Fuel Transport Emissions - by ROAD

Total Estimated # of Total Fuel Delivered Roundtrip Volume of Fuel C0 CH N O CO e Community Distance (km) delivery trips 2 4 2 2 by Winter Roads (L) Distance Combusted (L) (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (rounded up) Traveled (km) from Pickle Lake Bearskin 433 708,023 15 12,990 6,099 16.242 9.15E-04 4.57E-04 17 Big Trout 324 240,003 5 3,240 1,522 4.053 2.28E-04 1.14E-04 5 Deer Lake 540 114,131 3 3,240 1,522 4.053 2.28E-04 1.14E-04 5 Fort Severn 275 607,117 13 7,150 3,357 8.940 5.04E-04 2.52E-04 10 Kasabonika 364 707,847 15 10,920 5,127 13.653 7.69E-04 3.85E-04 14 Kingfisher 243 69,000 2 972 457 1.217 6.86E-05 3.43E-05 2 Lansdowne 209 94,415 2 836 393 1.047 5.90E-05 2.95E-05 2 Sachigo 429 184,914 4 3,432 1,612 4.293 2.42E-04 1.21E-04 5 Sandy Lake 430 962,201 20 17,200 8,076 21.506 1.21E-03 6.06E-04 22 Wapekeka 356 55,000 2 1,424 669 1.782 1.00E-04 5.02E-05 2 Weagamow 286 175,000 4 2,288 1,075 2.863 1.61E-04 8.06E-05 3 Webequie 329 81,000 2 1,316 618 1.646 9.27E-05 4.64E-05 2

from Red Lake Deer Lake 310 114,131 3 1,860 874 2.327 1.31E-04 6.56E-05 3 Sandy Lake 380 962,201 20 15,200 7,137 19.006 1.07E-03 5.35E-04 20 TOTALS* 4,908 5,074,983 110** 82,068 38,538 102.627 5.78E-03 2.89E-03 112

* Total winter road fuel quantities include fuel delivered by Hydro One and purchased from First Nations. ** Number of trips is an estimate as tanks are not always full. The quantity discrepancies, however, is immaterial.

Page 50 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-27: Fuel Transport Emissions - by AIR

Estimated # of Total Roundtrip Distance from Total Fuel Delivered Volume of Fuel C0 CH N O CO e Community delivery trips Distance Traveled 2 4 2 2 Pickle Lake (km) by Air Transport (L) Combusted (L) (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (tonnes) (rounded up) (km)

Bearskin 286 77,068 10 5,720 35,630 243.773 2.69E-03 6.83E-03 246 Big Trout 267 1,437,782 180 96,120 598,732 4096.405 4.53E-02 1.15E-01 4,133 Deer Lake 296 738,374 114 67,488 420,383 2876.176 3.18E-02 8.06E-02 2,902 Fort Severn 536 136,456 21 22,512 140,228 959.412 1.06E-02 2.69E-02 968 Kasabonika 242 429,096 54 26,136 162,802 1113.859 1.23E-02 3.12E-02 1,124 Kingfisher 177 586,985 74 26,196 163,175 1116.411 1.23E-02 3.13E-02 1,127 Lansdowne 179 461,787 58 20,764 129,339 884.912 9.78E-03 2.48E-02 893 Marten Falls 299 539,341 135 80,730 502,868 3440.522 3.80E-02 9.64E-02 3,472 Sachigo 188 603,154 76 28,576 178,000 1217.840 1.35E-02 3.41E-02 1,229 Sandy Lake 280 2,337,303 360 201,600 1,255,767 8591.707 9.49E-02 2.41E-01 8,669 Wapekeka 270 89,525 14 7,560 47,092 322.194 3.56E-03 9.03E-03 326 Weagamow 183 1,057,453 163 59,658 371,610 2542.481 2.81E-02 7.12E-02 2,566 Webequie 257 769,043 119 61,166 381,004 2606.753 2.88E-02 7.30E-02 2,630 TOTALS 3,460 9,263,367 1,378 704,226 4,386,630 30,012 3.32E-01 8.41E-01 30,285

Page 51 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Table A-28: Generation by Renewable Energy Technology (RET)

Generation by Renewable Energy Technology (RET)

Shoulderblade Sultan Hydel Big Trout Wind Kasabonika Total RET Falls (at Deer Generated kWhs Generated kWhs Wind Generated Generated kWhs Lake) Hydel kWhs in 2011 Generated kWhs

JANUARY 189,091 41,000 0 260 230,351 FEBRUARY 138,313 31,400 0 690 170,403 MARCH 137,764 34,400 0 710 172,874 APRIL 111,786 35,800 0 460 148,046 MAY 196,422 36,800 0 390 233,612 JUNE 140,578 41,200 0 780 182,558 JULY 103,784 41,200 0 730 145,714 AUGUST 145,420 32,800 0 1,470 179,690 SEPTEMBER 94,062 2,200 0 1,390 97,652 OCTOBER 167,426 8,400 0 2,170 177,996 NOVEMBER 169,390 36,000 0 780 206,170 DECEMBER 137,966 51,200 0 1,900 191,066

YTD Total 1,732,002 392,400 0 11,730 2,136,132

Fuel Savings (L) 586,084

Estimated tCO2e Prevented from Entering Atmosphere 1,561

Refer to Tables 3.1-3.3 in section "3.3 Historical Emissions" and to section "5.3.4 Other Actions to Reduce GHG Emissions - RET" for further details on the effect of these renewable energies on overall emissions intensity.

Page 52 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

APPENDIX B: EMISSION FACTORS & GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIALS

Emission Factors Table B-1 summarizes the emission factors used for calculating Remotes' GHG emissions.

Table B-1: Emission Factors

Emission Source Emission Factor Reference

Diesel Carbon dioxide (CO2) 2.663 kg CO2/L Environment Canada's National Inventory Combustion Report, 1990-2010, Part 2, Annex 8, Table Methane (CH4) 0.000133 kg CH4 /L A8-4 Emission Factors for Refined

Nitrous oxide (N2O) 0.0004 kg N2O /L Petroleum Products

Electricity Carbon dioxide 170 g CO2e/kWh Environment Canada's National Inventory Use equivalent (CO2e) Report, 1990-2010, Part 3, Annex 13, Table A13-7: Electricity Generation and GHG Emission Details for Ontario

3 Natural Gas Carbon dioxide (CO2) 1879 g CO2/m Environment Canada's National Inventory Consumption 3 Report, 1990-2010, Part 2, Table A8-1: CO2 Methane (CH4) 0.037 g CH4/m Emission Factors for Natural Gas and Table 3 A8-2: CH and N O Emission Factors for Nitrous oxide (N2O) 0.035 g N2O/m 4 2 Natural Gas

Fuel Carbon Road: 2663 g CO2/L Environment Canada's National Inventory Transport dioxide Report, 1990-2010 Part 2, Table A8-11: Air: 2534 g CO2/L (CO2) Emission Factors for Energy Mobile Sources.

Methane Road: 0.15 g CH4/L Additional Relevant Factors Used: (CH4) Air: 0.028 g CH4/L Road transport fuel economy value (for a Road: Nitrous 0.075 g N2O/L heavy-duty truck) of 1L/2.13km or 5 oxide Air: miles/gallon was used, and was based on (N O) 0.071 g N2O/L 2 an educated guess. Air transport fuel economy value (for aircraft) of 6.229 L/km or 2.650 gallons/miles was used, as listed the US EPA Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol Core Module Guidance, Direct Emissions from Mobile Combustion, Table 4: Fuel Economy Values by Vehicle Type.

Radiative Forcing Index (RFI) value for aircraft of 2.7 was used, as obtained from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Reports: Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, Chapter 6.6.5

Emission Source Estimated % Reference Reduction

Bio-diesel Methane (CH4) 5.75 % US EPA's A Comprehensive Analysis of Combustion Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions, Nitrous oxide (N2O) 21.09 % Draft Technical Report, 2002, Figure ES-A

Emission Source Emission Factor Source of Emissions Factor

Page 53 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Global Warming Potentials Table B-2 summarizes the global warming potential values used for calculating Remotes' carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions.

Table B-2: Emission Factors

Greenhouse Gas Global Warming Potential Reference (GWP)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) GWP 1 Environment Canada's National (100-yr) Inventory Report, 1990-2008, Part 2, Annex 8, Table A8-4 Emission Factors

Methane (CH4) GWP (100-yr) 21 for Refined Petroleum Products

Nitrous Oxide (N2O) GWP 310 (100-yr)

Page 54 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

APPENDIX C: STANDARD REPORTING DECLARATION

Table C-1 provides a summary of the reporting information required by CAN/CSA-ISO Standard 14064-1-06.

Table C-1: Reporting Information

No. CSA Reporting Requirement Declaration

A Description of the reporting organization See section "2 Organizational Profile"

B Person responsible Bob Shine, EHS Coordinator, Hydro One Remote Communities Inc. Tel: 807-474-2823 Email: [email protected]

C Reporting period covered January 1st, 2011 to December 31st, 2011

D Documentation of organizational Financial and operational control approaches boundary.

E Direct GHG emissions, quantified See "Appendix A: GHG Inventory" separately for each GHG, in tonnes of

CO2e.

F A description of how CO2 emissions from See section "5.3.2 Fuel Switching" the combustion of biomass are treated in the GHG inventory.

G If quantified, GHG removals, quantified in Not applicable to this inventory

tonnes of CO2e.

H Explanation for the exclusion of any GHG Due to measurement difficulties, this inventory excludes sources or sinks from quantifications. fuel transport emissions for fuel delivered by barge and the leakage of refrigerant from air conditioners and other equipment. GHG sinks are not applicable to this inventory.

I Energy indirect GHG emissions associated See "Appendix A: GHG Inventory" with the generation of imported electricity, heat or steam, quantified

separately in tonnes of CO2e.

J The historical base year selected and the See section "3.3 Historical Emissions" base-year GHG inventory.

K Explanation of any change to the base Not applicable to this inventory year or other historical GHG data, and any recalculation of the base year or other historical GHG inventory.

Page 55 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

No. CSA Reporting Requirement Declaration

L Reference to, or description of, See section "4 Quantification" quantification methodologies including reasons for their selection.

M Explanation of any change to Not applicable to this inventory quantification methodologies previously used.

N Reference to, or documentation of, GHG See "Appendix B: Emission Factors and Global Warming emission or removal factors used. Potentials"

O Description of the impact of uncertainties Uncertainties in calculations include error margins in on the accuracy of the GHG emissions and emissions factors and measured activity data. Refer to removals data. Section "5.4 Estimation of Uncertainty".

P A statement that the GHG report has been This report has been prepared in accordance with the prepared in accordance with ISO Standard following standard: CAN/CSA-ISO Standard 14064-1-06 - 14064-1. Part 1: Specification with Guidance at the Organization Level for Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals.

Q A statement describing whether the GHG Evan Jones of BLJC will provide third party verification for inventory, report or assertion has been this GHG inventory report and will provide a reasonable verified, including the type of verification level of assurance. See Table 6.1 in Section "6.1 GHG and level of assurance achieved Information Management" for more details.

Page 56 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

APPENDIX D: PAST EMISSION REDUCTION ACTIVITIES

The results from completed emission reduction activities from the time Remotes began participation in CSA's GHG Challenge Registry are summarized in Table D-1.

Table D-1: Completed Emission Reduction Activities from 2002 to 2010 Predicted Actual CO e Emission CO e 2 Year Completed Emission Reduction Activities 2 Reductions Reduction Reductions (tonnes) Category (tonnes) 2002 Generator upgrade at Sachigo n/a 91 Direct

Hydel refurbishment & installation of PLC at n/a 347 Direct Sultan

TOTAL: n/a 438 tonnes CO2e

2003 Attawapiskat connected to provincial 6,428 6,428 Offset electricity grid

Secondary heat recovery at Fort Severn 46 135 Direct

TOTAL: 6,474 6,563 tonnes CO2e

2004 Bio-diesel use at Sultan & Bisco (began Nov 23 1 Direct 1 at 5%)2

Station upgrades at Deer Lake (installation of two new high efficiency generators) 138 340 Direct

TOTAL: 161 341 tonnes CO2e

2005 Carbon Sequestration project (6,476 trees 45 n/a Offset planted)

Bio-diesel use at Sultan2 24 1 Direct

Bio-diesel use at Bisco2 47 1 Direct

Customer Demand and Use Management n/a 13 Direct program pilot project

TOTAL: 116 15 tonnes CO2e

2006 Customer Demand and Use Management 389 33 Direct program rollout at four sites

TOTAL: 389 33 tonnes CO2e

Page 57 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Customer Demand and Use Management 404 301 Direct program rollout at three sites

Carbon Sequestration project (1150 trees 8 n/a Offset planted)

Improved Maintenance on Deer Lake Hydel n/a n/a Direct to improve efficiencies

New VFD drives installed at Weagamow (2), Kingfisher (1), Fort Severn (1) reducing n/a n/a Direct Station service load

TOTAL: 875 301 tonnes CO2e

2008 Station upgrades 1 site: Sandy Lake n/a 322 Direct

Refurbish 3 wind turbines (Kasbonika (3 – 220 68 Offset starting in Feb. for 11 months))

Customer Demand and Use Management initiatives at three additional sites (no new 313 301 Direct sites in 2008)

Bio-diesel use at 7 sites2 695 n/a Direct

TOTAL: 1228 691 tonnes CO2e

2009 Bio-diesel use at sixteen sites (B5, B20, 660 1 Direct B40) 2

Customer Demand and Use Management 313 264 Direct initiatives

Station upgrades: 38 766 Direct

- generator upgrades at Gull Bay and

Sandy Lake (not in service until Dec’09) - Tier 2 engine replacement at 4 sites:

Bearskin, Kasabonika, Kingfisher, Sachigo

TOTAL: 1011 1030 tonnes CO2e

Page 58 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Bio-diesel use at 17 sites 2 2,234 3 Direct

Customer Demand and Use Management initiatives – continue existing programs + 300 0 Direct one new site (Fort Severn) 3

Tier 2+ engine replacements: Big Trout4 Working with suppliers to 0 Direct quantify

Shoulderblade Falls Optimization5 n/a 217 Offset

Catalytic Reactor Project – Armstrong6 n/a 0 Offset

TOTAL: 2739 220 tonnes CO2e

Notes:

1. E-torus at Sandy Lake was installed and then removed and abandoned because it was not working as expected.

2. CO2e savings calculated by determining CO2e emissions from all regular diesel compared to actual 2010 values. Biodiesel emissions calculated at 5.75, 21.09 and

37.74 percent CH4 reductions for concentrations of B5, B20 and B40, respectively. Refer to sections "4.5.1 Estimation of Bio-diesel Emission Impacts" for further details on the estimation of its impacts. Also refer to "5.3.2 Fuel Switching" regarding the exclusion of CO2 emissions.

3. In 2010, all Customer Demand Management initiatives were education-based only, therefore emission reductions cannot be assessed.

4. Tier 2+ Engine upgrades were completed for Big Trout only. This was due to unsafe winter roads and the heavy engines were not able to get to sites. Older engines are replaced with Tier 2 or Tier 3 engines. These may not reduce the amount of fuel consumed, however the engines have reduced emissions. Currently, Remotes is working with suppliers to assess the reduction in emissions from these new engines.

5. Shoulderblade Falls HGS generated an additional 404,642 kWh from August 1 to December 31, 2010, over and above the estimated normal 590,000 kWh assumed without the optimization project improvement. That is a five month calculation only, not an annual figure. The improvement was 68%, well above the estimate at about

Page 59 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

40%. Hydroelectric energy generated at Shoulderblade Falls diverts diesel energy from being generated at Deer Lake.

6. A study into the project was completed with the recommendation that Remotes not proceed with the project, therefore it was not completed.

Page 60 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

APPENDIX E: FUTURE EMISSION REDUCTION ACTIVITIES

Activities and projects that are planned for future implementation are outlined in Table E-1.

Table E-1: Future Emission Reduction Activities from 2012 to 2016

Predicted CO2e Emission Year Future Emission Reduction Activities Reductions Reduction (tonnes) Category 2012 Tier 2+ engine replacements1: Biscotasing and Fort Severn n/a Direct

Wind project 30 kW (Kasabonika Lake)2 30 Offset

Conservation Demand Management Initiatives5: energy 108.5 Direct saving lighting, energy saving equipment, water conservation items – at 2 sites (Bearskin and Kingfisher) for their first year

TOTAL: 138.5 tonnes CO2e

2013 Tier 2+ engine replacements1: Sandy Lake, Sachigo, n/a Direct Lansdowne (2), Wapekeka

Wind turbines: 61 Offset

1. Refurbish Big Trout (1)3a

2. finish refurbishment at Kasabonika (3)3b

Conservation Demand Management Initiatives6: continue 108.5 Direct existing programs at Bearskin and Kingfisher for the second year plus invite two more new sites.

TOTAL: 169.5 tonnes CO2e

2014 Tier 2+ engine replacements1: Wapekeka (2), Deer Lake n/a Direct and Marten Falls

Conservation Demand Management Initiatives6: two new n/a Direct sites from 2013 begin first year with energy saving lighting, energy saving equipment, water conservation items.

TOTAL: n/a tonnes CO2e

2015 Tier 2+ engine replacements1: 4 engines, sites to be n/a Direct determined based on need

Conservation Demand Management Initiatives6: continue n/a Direct with existing programs at the two new sites from 2014 plus invite two more new sites

Page 61 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

Predicted CO2e Emission Year Future Emission Reduction Activities Reductions Reduction (tonnes) Category TOTAL: n/a tonnes CO2e

2016 Tier 2+ engine replacements1: 4 engines, sites to be n/a Direct determined based on need

Station upgrade at 1 site4: Kasabonika 127 Direct

Conservation Demand Management Initiatives6: two new n/a Direct sites from 2015 begin first year with energy saving lighting, energy saving equipment, water conservation items

TOTAL: 127 tonnes CO2e

Notes:

1. Older engines are replaced with Tier 2 or Tier 3 engines. Although the amount of fuel consumed may not be reduced, fuel efficiencies should improve, thereby reducing emissions. Currently, Remotes is working with suppliers to assess the reduction in emissions from these new engines.

2. Wind Calculation: 30 kW unit x 8760 hrs x 15% available wind = 39,420 kWh/year x

CO2e/kWh at Kasabonika.

3. a) Big Trout 50 kW wind power installation: 50kW x 8760 hrs x 15% available wind power

= 65,700 kWh/yr x CO2e/kW at Big Trout.

b) Kasabonika 3 of 10 kW refurbishments: 30kW x 8760 hrs x 5% = 13,140 kWh / year x

CO2e/kW at Kasabonika.

4. Station upgrades include the installation of new, more efficient engines and PLC units. A PLC assesses current load requirements and matches this with the optimum engine to run, ensuring the most efficient use of generators possible. Typically, a station upgrade will result in approx. a 4% reduction in CO2e per kWh generated (determined from historical information – typical station upgrade at Sachigo resulted in 4.3% reduction of CO2e per kWh generated).

5. As of 2012, all planned Conservation Demand Management Initiatives are implemented over two years at two communities that have signed up (i.e. 2012 first year at Kingfisher &

Bearskin). The predicted CO2e savings are spread out over the two-year period (108.5

CO2e in 2012 and 2013).

Lighting = 78,144 kW/h savings over 2 years (2012, 2013) Equipment = 156,015 kW/h savings over 2 years (2012, 2013) Water conservation items = 61,205 kW/h savings over 2 years (2012, 2013)

Page 62 HYDRO ONE REMOTE COMMUNITIES: August 1, 2012 Remote GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN Communities

6. CDM emission reduction prediction cannot be assessed until a First Nation has agreed to sign up and participate in CDM initiatives (size of First Nation being contributing factor).

Page 63