DOCSLIB.ORG

Redalyc.LAW in HABERMAS's THEORY of COMMUNICATIVE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Redalyc.LAW in HABERMAS's THEORY of COMMUNICATIVE Vniversitas ISSN: 0041-9060 [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Colombia Deflem, Mathieu LAW IN HABERMAS'S THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION Vniversitas, núm. 116, julio-diciembre, 2008, pp. 267-285 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=82515355011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LAW IN HABERMAS’S THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION ISSN:0041-9060267 LAW IN HABERMAS’S THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION* Mathieu Deflem** ABSTRACT This paper outlines and reviews the legal theory of JÜRGEN HABERMAS in the context of HABERMASs general social theory, known as the theory of communicative action. First explained are the central concepts of system in lifeworld around which HABERMAS has developed his theory of modern society. Subsequently attention is paid to the dual role of law as an institution and a medium in HABERMASs theory, after which the latest developments of HABERMASs legal theory are reviewed. Finally, the paper discussed the influence and criticisms of HABERMASs perspective on law in the secondary literature. Key words: Law; legal theory; communicative action; JÜRGEN Fecha de recepción: 14 octubre 2008 Fecha de aceptación: 17 noviembre 2008 HABERMAS; discourse theory. *ADAPTEd and modified from: DEFLEM, MATHIEU, Introduction: Law in HABERMASs Theory of Communicative Action. In: Habermas, Modernity and Law, edited by MATHIEU DEFLEM. London: Sage, 1996. * * Associate Professor in the Pp. 1-20 Department of Sociology at the University of South California. Email: [email protected] (www.mathieudeflem.net). Vniversitas. ucls. Bogotá (Colombia) N° 116: 267-285, julio-diciembre de 2008 268 MATHIEU DEFLEM EL DERECHO EN LA TEORÍA DE LA ACCIÓN COMUNICATIVA DE HABERMAS RESUMEN Este artículo perfila y revisa la teoría jurídica de JÜRGEN HABERMAS en el contexto de su teoría social general, conocida como la teoría de la acción comunicativa. En primer lugar, se explicarán los conceptos centrales de sistema en el mundo de la vida alrededor del cual HABERMAS ha desarrollado su teoría de sociedad moderna. Posteriormente, se prestará atención al papel dual de lo jurídico en la teoría de HABERMAS, como una institución y como un medio, después de que se repasen los últimos desarrollos de la teoría del derecho del autor alemán. Finalmente, el artículo discutirá la influencia y las críticas de la perspectiva jurídica de HABERMAS en la literatura secundaria. Palabras clave: Derecho, teoría jurídica, acción comunicativa, JÜRGEN HABERMAS, teoría del discurso. INTRODUCTION The writings of JÜRGEN HABERMAS are widely acclaimed among the major contributions to the theoretical understanding of contemporary society, and specifically his legal theory has since recent years become a topic of growing scholarly attention. However, to date, the debate on HABERMAS and law has largely been confined to a predominantly European audience of specialists in the tradition of Critical Theory, and most discussions have taken place in moral and legal philosophy rather than in empirically oriented studies of law1. Given the growing 1 This is not to suggest that HABERMASs theories have not received attention in the field of legal studies outside Europes borders. For general introductions and critical reviews of HABERMASs approach to law, for instance, see: BRAND (BRAND, ARIE. Ethical Rationalization and Juridification: HABERMAS Critical Legal Theory, Australian Journal of Law and Society 4, 1987, pp. 103-27); EDER (EDER, KLAUS. Critique of HABERMAS Contribution to the Sociology of Law, Law and Society Review 22, 1988; pp. 931-44); HAARSCHER (HAARSCHER, GUY. PERELMAN and HABERMAS, Law and Philosophy 5, 1986; pp. 331- 342); MURPHY (MURPHY, W. T. The HABERMAS Effect: Critical Theory and Academic Law, Current Legal Problems 42, 1989; pp. 135-165); PREUSS (PREUSS, ULRICH K. Rationality Potentials of Law: Allocative, Distributive and Communicative Rationality, In: C. JOERGES and D. M. TRUBEK (eds). Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989); RAES (RAES, KOEN. Legalisation, Communication and Strategy: A Critique of HABERMAS Approach to Law, Journal of Law and Society 13, 1986; pp. 183-206); SCHEUERMAN (SCHEUERMAN, BILL. NEUMANN v. HABERMAS: The Frankfurt School and the Case of the Rule of Law, Praxis International 13, 1993; pp. 50-67); VAN DER Vniversitas. ucls. Bogotá (Colombia) N° 116: 267-285, julio-diciembre de 2008 LAW IN HABERMAS’S THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION 269 concern in the field of legal studies to interconnect broad philosophical and theoretical perspectives with empirically based research on specific social issues an aspiration which is in fact central to HABERMASs work the contributions in this paper hope to fulfill a twofold purpose. I will in this paper briefly outline the main tenets of HABERMASs theory of communicative action. I limit this presentation of HABERMASs approach to law and society to the formulation in The Theory of Communicative Action and its developments until the publication of Faktizität und Geltung. With his two-volume work The Theory of Communicative Action2, HABERMAS has undoubtedly formulated an innovative and influential theory of society, but the book (as are most of HABERMASs writings) is by all standards not easy to read. In particular, the structure of argumentation, which seeks to develop a social theory on the basis of detailed, meta -theoretical discussions of a wide range of classical and contemporary social theories, may initially discourage potential readers from a thorough investigation of the work3. A brief presentation of HABERMASs general BURG ( VAN DER BURG, WIBREN. Jürgen Habermas on Law and Morality: Some Critical Comments, Theory, Culture and Society 7, 1990; pp. 105-111). HABERMASs theory has meanwhile also found its way into empirical research in the American law and society tradition, dealing with such diverse issues as feminist legal thought (COLE, DAVID. Getting There: Reflections on Trashing from Feminist jurisprudence and Critical Theory, Harvard Womens Law journal 8, 1985; pp. 59-91.), environmental law (NORTHEY, ROD. Conflicting Principles of Canadian Environmental Reform: TRUBEK and HABERMAS v. Law and Economics and the Law Reform Commission, Dalhousie Law Journal 11, 1988; pp. 639- 662), legal interpretation (HOY, DAVID C. Interpreting the Law: Hermeneutical and Poststructuralist Perspectives, Southern California Law Review 58, 1985; pp. 135-176; MOOTZ, FRANCIS J. The Ontological Basis of Legal Hermeneutics: A Proposed Model of Inquiry Based on the Work of GADAMER, HABERMAS, and RICOEUR, Boston University Law Review 68, 1988; pp. 523-617), professional roles in the legal community (DAN -COHEN, MEIR. Law, Community, and Communication, Duke Law journal 6, 1989; pp. 1654-76), and analyses of legislation and constitutional regulations (FELDMAN, STEPHEN M. The Persistence of Power and the Struggle for Dialogic Standards in Postmodern Constitutional jurisprudence: MICHELMAN, HABERMAS, and Civic Republicanism, Georgetown Law journal 81, 1993; pp. 2243-90; FELTS, ARTHUR A. and FILDS, CHARLES B. Technical and Symbolic Reasoning: An Application of HABERMAS Ideological Analysis to the Legal Arena, Quarterly Journal of Ideology 12, 1988; pp. 1-15; LEEDES, GARY C. The Discourse Ethics Alternative to RUST v. SULLIVAN, University of Richmond Law Review 26, 1991; pp. 87-143; SOLUM, LAWRENCE B. Freedom of Communicative Action: A Theory of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech, Northwestern University Law Review 83, 1989; pp. 54-135). On the influence of HABERMASs theory in Latin America, see: BOTERO, ANDRÉS. Aproximación al pensar filosófico de HABERMAS, Revista Holística Jurídica: Facultad de Derecho USB. 2 (2003); pp. 7-36. Botero will soon publish another critical paper about HABERMASs influence in Latin America. 2HABERMAS, JÜRGEN. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1984. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2, System and Lifeworld: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1987. 3 The encyclopedic nature and relative inaccessibility of HABERMASs work, however, have produced an enormous number of introductory essays and books intended to acquaint the readership with the basic elements of his thought. MCCARTHYs critical summary of HABERMASs writings is in this regard still the Vniversitas. ucls. Bogotá (Colombia) N° 116: 267-285, julio-diciembre de 2008 270 MATHIEU DEFLEM theoretical framework, therefore, may help to clarify his approach to law as well as some of the criticisms which have thus far been suggested in the literature. I - THE THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION: CONCEPTS AND THESES HABERMASs theory of communicative action fundamentally rests on a distinction between two concepts of rationality that shape knowledge to guide action4. First, cognitive-instrumental rationality conducts action that alms at the successful realization of privately defined goals. These action types are either instrumental, when they are directed at efficient interventions in a state of affairs in the world (e.g. through labor), or strategic, when they guide attempts to successfully influence the decisions of other actors (e.g. in relations of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Instructional Communication 8 the Emergence of a Field
    Instructional Communication 8 The Emergence of a Field Scott A. Myers ince its inception, the field of instructional communication has Senjoyed a healthy existence. Unlike its related subareas of communi- cation education and developmental communication (Friedrich, 1989), instructional communication is considered to be a unique area of study rooted in the tripartite field of research conducted among educational psychology, pedagogy, and communication studies scholars (Mottet & Beebe, 2006). This tripartite field focuses on the learner (i.e., how students learn affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively), the instructor (i.e., the skills and strategies necessary for effective instruction), and the meaning exchanged in the verbal, nonverbal, and mediated messages between and among instructors and students. As such, the study of instructional com- munication centers on the study of the communicative factors in the teaching-learning process that occur across grade levels (e.g., K–12, post- secondary), instructional settings (e.g., the classroom, the organization), and subject matter (Friedrich, 1989; Staton, 1989). Although some debate exists as to the events that precipitated the emer- gence of instructional communication as a field of study (Rubin & Feezel, 1986; Sprague, 1992), McCroskey and McCroskey (2006) posited that the establishment of instructional communication as a legitimate area of scholarship originated in 1972, when the governing board of the Inter- national Communication Association created the Instructional Communi- cation Division. The purpose of the Division was to “focus attention on the role of communication in all teaching and training contexts, not just the teaching of communication” (p. 35), and provided instructional communication researchers with the opportunity to showcase their scholarship at the Association’s annual convention and to publish their research in Communication Yearbook, a yearly periodical sponsored by the Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Academical Accomplishments 1. Christoph-Eric
    Summary of academical accomplishments 1. Christoph-Eric Mecke 2. Diploma of general studies of French law (“Diplôme d'Études Juridiques Générales Françaises”) at the Faculty of Law and Economics of the University of Tours (France) obtained in 1986 after completing studies in France during one year. Diploma after legal studies at the Faculty of Law at the Georg August University in Göttingen obtained in 1991 (first state law examination). Diploma after a two-year law application in courts, public administration, public prosecutor's office and private law offices, conferral of the title of an assessor of law (entitles in Germany to practice as judge, prosecutor and attorney) granted by the High Court of Lower Saxony in Celle in 2007 (second state law examination). Degree of a Doctor of Legal Science awarded by the Council of the Faculty of Law at the Georg August University in Göttingen on July 17, 2007 on the basis of a comprehensive law examination (“Rigorosum”) and the presented monographic dissertation entitled Begriff und System des Rechts bei Georg Friedrich Puchta [= Concept and legal system in the legal thought of Georg Friedrich Puchta] marked with the highest possible final grade “summa cum laude”. 3. Information on employment in academic positions: 1991-1993 - junior researcher at the Department of Legal Theory at the Faculty of Law at the Georg August University in Göttingen; from February 1, 2008 to March 31, 2016 – researcher at the Department of Civil Law and History of Law and lecturer at the Faculty of Law at the Leibniz University in Hanover, there I’m still an academic teacher in the field of legal history from April 15, 2016 to December 31, 2017 – researcher at the Department of Roman Law and Pandetics at the Faculty of Law of the Georg August University in Göttingen; from January 1, 2018 until today – researcher and lecturer at the Brunswick European Law School at the Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences in Brunswick (Braunschweig).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Scientific Theories for Media and Communication JMC:6210:0001/ 019:231:001 Spring 2014
    Social Scientific Theories for Media and Communication JMC:6210:0001/ 019:231:001 Spring 2014 Professor: Sujatha Sosale Room: E254 AJB Office: W331 AJB Time: M 11:30-2:15 Phone: 319-335-0663 Office hours: Wed. 11:30 – 2:30 E-mail: [email protected] and by appointment Course description and objectives This course explores the ways in which media impact society and how individuals relate to the media by examining social scientific-based theories that relate to media effects, learning, and public opinion. Discussion includes the elements necessary for theory development from a social science perspective, plus historical and current contexts for understanding the major theories of the field. The objectives of this course are: • To learn and critique a variety of social science-based theories • To review mass communication literature in terms of its theoretical relevance • To study the process of theory building Textbook: Bryant, J. & Oliver M.B. (2009). Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. 3rd Ed. New York: Routledge. [Available at the University Bookstore] Additional readings will be posted on the course ICON. Teaching Policies & Resources — CLAS Syllabus Insert (instructor additions in this font) Administrative Home The College of Liberal Arts and Sciences is the administrative home of this course and governs matters such as the add/drop deadlines, the second-grade-only option, and other related issues. Different colleges may have different policies. Questions may be addressed to 120 Schaeffer Hall, or see the CLAS Academic Policies Handbook at http://clas.uiowa.edu/students/handbook. Electronic Communication University policy specifies that students are responsible for all official correspondences sent to their University of Iowa e-mail address (@uiowa.edu).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 the Theory of Communicative Action
    Chapter 11 The Theory of Communicative Action 11 The Theory of Communicative Action and Theory of System and Lifeworld in Relational Practice In this chapter I would like to inform our understanding of relational practice and sustainability by taking another set of ideas about communication and behaviour, which is slightly different to the Batesonian pragmatics of human communication used in the last chapter. Here I focus upon the critique of modern welfare-state capitalism to be found in the social theory of Jurgen Habermas and his associated working of behavioural communication. I first describe some key aspects Habermas’ social theory (located within a line of critical theorists from the Frankfurt school following Marx) by introducing two main elements of his theory of communicative action - the theory of system and lifeworld and the theory of knowledge constitutive interests. Having introduced these ideas - in what is again quite a theoretically dense section - I then work with Habermas’ theoretical constructs to engage in further reflection upon business- NGO relations and my own research/practice in the context of the modern welfare-state. More specifically, looking through the conceptual lenses of system and lifeworld, I suggest that perceptions of NGOs as being separate from the steering media of money and power have allowed the sector to engage in change efforts with powerful actors such as business. However, this distance is more perceived than real. As a result private sector engagement, whilst affording solutions to pressing problems, may seriously affect NGO legitimacy. I frame my own research/practice in terms of the system and lifeworld theory.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNICATION STUDIES 20223: Communication Theory TR 11:00-12:20 AM, Moudy South 320, Class #70959
    This copy of Andrew Ledbetter’s syllabus for Communication Theory is posted on www.afirstlook.com, the resource website for A First Look at Communication Theory, for which he is one of the co-authors. COMMUNICATION STUDIES 20223: Communication Theory TR 11:00-12:20 AM, Moudy South 320, Class #70959 Syllabus Addendum, Fall Semester 2014 Instructor: Dr. Andrew Ledbetter Office: Moudy South 355 Office Phone: 817-257-4524 (terrible way to reach me) E-mail: [email protected] (best way to reach me) Twitter: @dr_ledbetter (also a good way to reach me more publicly) IM screen name (GoogleTalk): DrAndrewLedbetter (this works too) Office Hours: TR 10:00-10:50 AM & 12:30 PM-2:00 PM; W 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (but check with me first); other times by appointment. When possible, please e-mail me in advance of your desired meeting time. Course Text: Em Griffin, Andrew Ledbetter, & Glenn Sparks (2015), A First Look at Communication Theory (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Course Description From TCU’s course catalog: Applies communication theory and practice to a broad range of communication phenomena in intrapersonal, interpersonal and public communication settings. You are about to embark on an exciting adventure through the world of communication theory. In some sense, you already inhabit this “world”—you communicate every day, and you may even be very good at it. But, if you’re like me, sometimes you might find yourself wondering: Why did she say that? Why did I say that in response? What there something that I could have said that would have been better? How could I communicate better with my friends? My parents? At school? At work? If you’ve ever asked any of these questions—and it would be hard for me to believe that there is anyone who hasn’t!—then this course is for you! By the end of our time together, I hope you will come to a deeper, fuller understanding of the power and mystery of human communication.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Philosophy
    An Introduction to Philosophy W. Russ Payne Bellevue College Copyright (cc by nc 4.0) 2015 W. Russ Payne Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document with attribution under the terms of Creative Commons: Attribution Noncommercial 4.0 International or any later version of this license. A copy of the license is found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 1 Contents Introduction ………………………………………………. 3 Chapter 1: What Philosophy Is ………………………….. 5 Chapter 2: How to do Philosophy ………………….……. 11 Chapter 3: Ancient Philosophy ………………….………. 23 Chapter 4: Rationalism ………….………………….……. 38 Chapter 5: Empiricism …………………………………… 50 Chapter 6: Philosophy of Science ………………….…..… 58 Chapter 7: Philosophy of Mind …………………….……. 72 Chapter 8: Love and Happiness …………………….……. 79 Chapter 9: Meta Ethics …………………………………… 94 Chapter 10: Right Action ……………………...…………. 108 Chapter 11: Social Justice …………………………...…… 120 2 Introduction The goal of this text is to present philosophy to newcomers as a living discipline with historical roots. While a few early chapters are historically organized, my goal in the historical chapters is to trace a developmental progression of thought that introduces basic philosophical methods and frames issues that remain relevant today. Later chapters are topically organized. These include philosophy of science and philosophy of mind, areas where philosophy has shown dramatic recent progress. This text concludes with four chapters on ethics, broadly construed. I cover traditional theories of right action in the third of these. Students are first invited first to think about what is good for themselves and their relationships in a chapter of love and happiness. Next a few meta-ethical issues are considered; namely, whether they are moral truths and if so what makes them so.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Communication Theory ❖ ❖ ❖
    01-Dainton.qxd 9/16/2004 12:26 PM Page 1 1 Introduction to Communication Theory ❖ ❖ ❖ recent advertisement for the AT&T cellular service has a bold A headline that asserts, “If only communication plans were as simple as communicating.” We respectfully disagree with their assess- ment. Cellular communication plans may indeed be intricate, but the process of communicating is infinitely more so. Unfortunately, much of popular culture tends to minimize the challenges associated with the communication process. We all do it, all of the time. Yet one need only peruse the content of talk shows, classified ads, advice columns, and organizational performance reviews to recognize that communication skill can make or break an individual’s personal and professional lives. Companies want to hire and promote people with excellent communi- cation skills. Divorces occur because spouses believe that they “no longer communicate.” Communication is perceived as a magical elixir, one that can ensure a happy long-term relationship and can guarantee organizational success. Clearly, popular culture holds paradoxical views about communication: It is easy to do yet powerful in its effects, simultaneously simple and magical. 1 01-Dainton.qxd 9/16/2004 12:26 PM Page 2 2 APPLYING COMMUNICATION THEORY FOR PROFESSIONAL LIFE The reality is even more complex. “Good” communication means different things to different people in different situations. Accordingly, simply adopting a set of particular skills is not going to guarantee success. Those who are genuinely good communicators are those who under- stand the underlying principles behind communication and are able to enact, appropriately and effectively, particular communication skills as the situation warrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Overturning the Paradigm of Identity with Gilles Deleuze's Differential
    A Thesis entitled Difference Over Identity: Overturning the Paradigm of Identity With Gilles Deleuze’s Differential Ontology by Matthew G. Eckel Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy Dr. Ammon Allred, Committee Chair Dr. Benjamin Grazzini, Committee Member Dr. Benjamin Pryor, Committee Member Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2014 An Abstract of Difference Over Identity: Overturning the Paradigm of Identity With Gilles Deleuze’s Differential Ontology by Matthew G. Eckel Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy The University of Toledo May 2014 Taking Gilles Deleuze to be a philosopher who is most concerned with articulating a ‘philosophy of difference’, Deleuze’s thought represents a fundamental shift in the history of philosophy, a shift which asserts ontological difference as independent of any prior ontological identity, even going as far as suggesting that identity is only possible when grounded by difference. Deleuze reconstructs a ‘minor’ history of philosophy, mobilizing thinkers from Spinoza and Nietzsche to Duns Scotus and Bergson, in his attempt to assert that philosophy has always been, underneath its canonical manifestations, a project concerned with ontology, and that ontological difference deserves the kind of philosophical attention, and privilege, which ontological identity has been given since Aristotle.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexy's Theory Of
    Over the years Robert Alexy has devel- the other dimensions of his system are pre- oped a systemic approach to legal theory, sented here, along with a contribution on Alexy’s Theory of Law an approach whose dimensions include human rights, one of Alexy’s more recent discourse theory, principles theory, and a foci. Alexy’s work is receiving ever greater Proceedings of the Special Workshop “Alexy’s Theory of Law” non-positivist conception of law. Principles attention, both at home, in Germany, and th theoryisfoundattheverycoreofAlexy’s abroad, with translations of his treatises held at the 26 World Congress of the International Association for system. Constitutional rights, he argues, and papers into many languages. The au- Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Belo Horizonte, 2013 are best understood as principles, and thors of the contributions aim to promote collisions between constitutional rights enquiry into Alexy’s project. While their – understood now as competing princi- general approach is that of analytical ju- ples – are resolved by balancing their re- risprudence, the individual contributions Edited by Júlio Aguiar de Oliveira / Stanley L. Paulson / spective weights. Critical examinations of reflect great variety in their respective as- Alexandre Travessoni Gomes Trivisonno Alexy’s work on principles theory and on sessments of Alexy’s seminal work. s Theory ofLaw ’ Alexy www.steiner-verlag.de ARSP ARSP Beiheft 144 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Franz Steiner Verlag Franz Steiner Verlag ISBN 978-3-515-11043-3 de Oliveira / Paulson / Trivisonno 9 7 8 3 5 1 5 1 1 0 4 3 3 Alexy’s Theory of Law Edited by Júlio Aguiar de Oliveira / Stanley L.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Influence: Communication Theories
    MEDIA INFLUENCE: COMMUNICATION THEORIES Hypodermic Needle Agenda Setting Reinforcement Theory Uses & Gratification Encoding/Decoding Theory Function Theory Theory YEAR 1920 - 1940 1972 1960 1974 1980 THEORIST Various Maxwell McCombs Joseph Klapper Jay Blumler Stuart Hall Donald Shaw Elihu Katz OVERVIEW A linear communication theory This theory suggests that the Klapper argued that the The Uses and Gratification Stuart Hall’s which suggests that the media media can’t tell you what to media has little power to Theory looks at how people Encoding/Decoding Theory has a direct and powerful think but it can tell you what influence people and it just use the media to gratify a suggests that audience influence on audiences, like being to think about. Through a reinforces our pre-existing range of needs – including derive their own meaning injected with a hypodermic process of selection, omission attitudes and beliefs, which the need for information, from media texts. These needle. and framing, the media have been developed by personal identity, meanings can be focuses public discussion on more powerful social integration, social dominant, negotiated or particular issues. institutions like families, interaction and oppositional. schools and religion entertainment. organisations. AUDIENCE Audiences are passive and Audiences are active but, Audiences are active and Audiences are active and Audiences are active in homogenous, this theory does not when it comes to making exist in a society where they can have power over the decoding media account for individual differences. important decisions like who are influenced by important media. If people don’t messages. They can to vote for, they draw on social institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action Udc: 316.286:316.257
    UNIVERSITY OF NIŠ The scientific journal FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Philosophy and Sociology Vol.2, No 6/2, 1999 pp. 217 - 223 Editor of Special issue: Dragoljub B. Đorđević Address: Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, YU Tel: +381 18 547-095, Fax: +381 18-547-950 NEW SOCIAL PARADIGM: HABERMAS'S THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION UDC: 316.286:316.257 Ljubiša Mitrović Faculty of Philosophy, Niš Abstract. The paper discusses the contribution of J. Habermas to the foundation of a new social paradigm in the form of the communicative action theory. The author first gives a global survey of Habermas's intellectual development, starting from Marx through the critical theory to post-Marxism that Habermas finally left behind since oriented towards convergence and integration of the social action theory, the system theory and the symbolic interactionism theory. Unlike Marx's paradigm of production and social labor as the basic category Marxist theory is built upon, Habermas has built a new paradigm of the communicative action focused upon the communicative mind, communication and rationality as well as the communicative community. The author critically points to the values as well as inner limits of Habermas's theory that reduced a complex and controversial class nature of the society to the "communicative community" thus promoting idealistic worship of the role of the rational discourse. Key words: Communicative Action, Rational Discourse, Communicative Mind, Communicative Community, Post-Marxism The theory of communicative action belongs to the set of modern post-Marxist theories. Its author is Jurgen Habermas (1929-), the German philosopher and sociologist who pertains to the second generation of the Frankfurt philosophical circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Habermas's Politics of Rational Freedom: Navigating the History Of
    This is a repository copy of Habermas’s politics of rational freedom: Navigating the history of philosophy between faith and knowledge. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/162100/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Verovšek, P.J. (2020) Habermas’s politics of rational freedom: Navigating the history of philosophy between faith and knowledge. Analyse & Kritik, 42 (1). pp. 191-218. ISSN 0171-5860 https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2020-0008 © 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in Analyse and Kritik. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Habermas’s Politics of Rational Freedom: Navigating the History of Philosophy between Faith and Knowledge* Peter J. Verovšek† Department of Politics & International Relations University of Sheffield Elmfield, Northumberland Road Sheffield, S10 2TU United Kingdom [email protected] ABSTRACT Despite his hostility to religion in his early career, since the turn of the century Habermas has devoted his research to the relationship between faith and knowledge.
    [Show full text]