Of Oxford County, Maine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Of Oxford County, Maine FLOROF OXFORAD CounTY , MAINE Of OxfordChristophe County,r S. Campbel l and Leslie M. Eastman LIFE SCIENCES AND AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF MAINE AT ORONO TECHNICAL BULLETIN 99 JULY 1980 Flora of Oxford County, Maine Christopher S. Campbell and Leslie M. Eastman LIFE SCIENCES AND AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OF MAINE AT ORONO TECHNICAL BULLETIN 99 JULY 1980 DEDICATION This flora is dedicated to the members of the Josselyn Botanical Society of Maine who have collected vascular plants in Oxford County during the club meetings in the county in 1907, 1920, 1926, 1929, 1938, 1955 1964 1972, and 1975. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have contributed to this effort. It is a pleasure to acknowledge their considerable kindnesses. Charles D. Richards has provided much guidance and support in flo- ristic techniques both in the herbarium and in the field in Oxford Coun­ ty. Several people have contributed their expertise in identifying specimens from Oxford County: Norman Famous in the Asteraceae, Peter Gagnon in Potamogeton, Barre Hellquist in aquatics, James Hickey in Lycopodium, Fay Hyland in woody plants, Lawrence Morse in Hudsonia, Henry Svenson in the Cyperaceae, and Rolla Tryon in Dry- opteris. Final responsibility for the identification of all specimens cited in this flora is taken by the authors. The Brown Paper Co. and the International Paper Co. granted us permission to cross their land and to collect specimens. Thanks are also due to the curators of the herbaria at the University of New Hampshire, the New England Botanical Club, the Harvard University Herbaria, and the University of Maine for the use of their collections. We are par­ ticularly indebted to the Department of Botany and Plant Pathology of the University of Maine at Orono for facilities and equipment necessary for work on a flora. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ] Present Botanical Investigations 1 Previous Botanical Investigations 1 Location and Area 2 Culture 2 FACTORS AFFECTING THE FLORA 4 Topography 4 Climate 5 Geology and Soils 8 Drainage 11 Biological Environment 14 PLANT ASSOCIATIONS 15 Aquatic 15 Shores 16 Bogs 16 Swales 18 Bottomland Forest 20 Upland Forest 21 Ledges 24 Montane 25 Sand Barrens 26 Old Fields 26 Roadsides, Waste Places, and Railroad Ballast -28 TYPE LOCALITIES IN OXFORD COUNTY 29 EXCLUDED SPECIES 30 CATALOGUE 30 REFERENCES 217 INDEX 225 INTRODUCTION Present Botanical Investigations This is a study of the vascular plants occurring in Oxford County, Maine. Plants with vascular or conductive tissue (kingdom Plantae, divi­ sion Tracheophyta [102]*) include the ferns and their "allies" (horsetails and lycopods) and the seed-bearing plants. Our work on this flora began in the summer of 1973 when we collected herbarium specimens in an area centered around Evans Notch and including all the towns of Batchelders Grant, Gilead, and Mason and adjoining portions of the towns of Beth­ el, Stoneham, and Stow (see Figure 1). In 1974 we decided to expand our work to include all of Oxford County. We have attempted to survey all the types of habitats throughout the county at all times of the growing season. From a review of the plant material collected in the county and deposited in the herbaria of the University of Maine at Orono and the New Hampshire and the New England Botanical Club, it became clear that certain regions of the county, namely the extreme north and south, had been relatively neglected. Hence these areas were explored more inten­ sively than others in 1974. For the county as a whole, in 1974 and 1975, areas which appeared promising in terms of diversity or rarity of species were surveyed with the intent of finding all the species, varieties, and forms of plants growing without cultivation in the county. Over 3000 voucher specimens accompanied by appropriate field data have been deposited in the herbaria of the University of Maine at Orono and the New England Botanical Club. Our aim has been to determine which plants occur in the county and, based on herbarium collections and observations, their habitat preferences, frequency of occurrence, and geographic distribution. We have also endeavored to explain the nature of the flora first in terms of the various factors which influence its composition and second by group­ ing the plants into the most important natural associations. Previous Botanical Investigations There is no complete botanical survey of Oxford County. Previous work consists of more or less local collecting of herbarium specimens and some generalized collecting throughout the county except in the extreme north. Based on the material in the herbaria of the Universities of Maine at Orono and New Hampshire and the New England Botanical Club, there had been no botanical explorations in Bowmantown, Oxbow, Par- machenee, Parkertown, and Upper Cupsuptic until the present work. •Numbers in [ ] refer to published works listed in literature cited on page 217. Numbers in ( ) usually refer to pressed specimens preserved in various herbaria. 2 LSA EXPERIMENT STATION TECHNICAL BULLETIN 99 Numerous brief articles concerning locations and range extensions of notable plants may be found in the literature [3], [5], [6], [7], [14], [16], [18], [27], [28], [29], [30], [33], [41], [49], [50], [62], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [82], [83], [84], [85], [87], [92], [99], [100], [101], and [104], More comprehensive works on the state and regional levels have been helpful [8], [34], [40], [61], [80], and [97]. Other local floras from the Northeast have been useful in suggesting methods [60], [72], and [86], Pease's work [86] on Coos County, New Hampshire has provided the basis for the format of our work. Although the two counties share 116 km of boundary, their floras differ in several ways. The biggest dif­ ferences are the alpine zone of the Mt. Washington Range and the many cedar bogs of Coos County and the sand plains and many southern species at the northern limit of their range in Oxford County. Location and Area Oxford County lies in the northwest corner of Maine and is bordered to the north by Frontenac County of the Province of Quebec, Canada, to the east and south by Franklin, Androscoggin, Cumberland, and York Counties of Maine, and to the west by Carroll and Coos Coun­ ties of New Hampshire. The only natural boundaries are the northern which divides the watersheds of the Androscoggin and St. Lawrence Rivers, the southern which is the Ossipee River, and those parts of the eastern boundary with Cumberland County made by the Saco and Crook­ ed Rivers and Elkins Brook. In size and shape the county resembles the state of Delaware. It is long in a north-south direction, about 175 km from its northernmost point on Saddle Hill (45° 20' N. Lat.) to its south­ ernmost point on the Ossipee River (43° 47' N. Lat.) and varies from about 13 km wide at its widest point in the northernmost town (Bowman- town) to its greatest width just below its middle, and back to about 16 km at its southern border. The distance from the westernmost point at Crown Monument (71° 4' W. Long.), the junction of Maine, New Hampshire, and Quebec, to its easternmost point in Canton (70° 15' W. Long.) is about 68 km. The total area of the county is 5550 sq km, of which 225 sq km are open water and 75 sq km are bog or swamp. Culture The county includes 54 towns of which 20 are unorganized. The 44,345 inhabitants of these towns (1975 census) depend upon the pulp and paper and wood products industry as the leading source of employ­ ment. The major companies in the county (Brown Paper Co., Interna­ tional Paper Co., Seven Islands Land Co., and Oxford Paper Co.) hold the northern third of the county as a vast reservoir of timber for their LSA EXPERIMENT STATION TECHNICAL BULLETIN 99 3 Figure 1. Political map of Oxford County. 4 LSA EXPERIMENT STATION TECHNICAL BULLETIN 99 mills. Nearly every inhabited town has a mill for the production of paper or wood products such as dowels or tool handles. Oxford Paper Division of Boise-Cascade Paper Group is the largest employer (4000 employees) in the most concentrated population center, the Rumford-Mexico area. Other large towns are Bethel, Fryeburg, Norway, and Paris, the county seat. Farming has been in a steady decline over the past 95 years. Day [24] notes that early movement away from the farm in the decade following agriculture's zenith in 1880 was concentrated in "rough and hilly areas" such as characterize much of Oxford County. In that decade alone Rum- ford and Norway lost 42 and 50 farms respectively. And now old stone walls that once separated pastures are a common sight in woods that have grown up on abandoned farmland. Nevertheless farming remains a very important aspect of Oxford County's economy. There are about 800 farms of which 200 are dairy (with 52 sq km in pasture), 119 poultry, and the remainder in field crops. Of the 207 sq km of farmland given over to crops, most are in the valleys of the Saco and Androscoggin Rivers. The former, which has the largest farming area of contiguous alluvial soils in Maine [90], produces string, shell, and dry beans, potatoes, squash, cu­ cumbers, lettuce, and broccoli. The latter yields primarily corn and potatoes. In economic importance after the wood industry and farming come tourism, apple orchards, tanning, and canning. FACTORS AFFECTING THE FLORA Growth, reproduction, and dispersal of plants and thus the com­ position of the flora are affected by topography, climate, geology, soils, and the biological environment. It must be understood that these factors are interrelated. The topography of a region reveals variation in its bedrock, particularly its resistance to weathering, and geologic history.
Recommended publications
  • The Newfoundland Rare Plant Project Including an Update to the Rare Vascular Plants of the Island of Newfoundland
    The Newfoundland Rare Plant Project Including an Update to the Rare Vascular Plants of the Island of Newfoundland April 2004 prepared by: Nathalie Djan-Chékar, Project Manager Newfoundland and Labrador Inland Fish and Wildlife Division and Claudia Hanel, Assistant Botanist Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre ii Table of Contents Table of Contents..........................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................iii Participants....................................................................................................................................4 Background...................................................................................................................................1 Project description ........................................................................................................................1 Methodology.................................................................................................................................2 Results...........................................................................................................................................3 Revised list of rare vascular plants of the Island of Newfoundland .............................................4 Additions to the list of rare vascular plants of the Island of Newfoundland ............................4 Deletions
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Document Comes to You From
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) ACTS AND RESOLVES AS PASSED BY THE Ninetieth and Ninety-first Legislatures OF THE STATE OF MAINE From April 26, 1941 to April 9, 1943 AND MISCELLANEOUS STATE PAPERS Published by the Revisor of Statutes in accordance with the Resolves of the Legislature approved June 28, 1820, March 18, 1840, March 16, 1842, and Acts approved August 6, 1930 and April 2, 193I. KENNEBEC JOURNAL AUGUSTA, MAINE 1943 PUBLIC LAWS OF THE STATE OF MAINE As Passed by the Ninety-first Legislature 1943 290 TO SIMPLIFY THE INLAND FISHING LAWS CHAP. 256 -Hte ~ ~ -Hte eOt:l:llty ffi' ft*; 4tet s.e]3t:l:ty tfl.a.t mry' ~ !;;llOWR ~ ~ ~ ~ "" hunting: ffi' ftshiRg: Hit;, ffi' "" Hit; ~ mry' ~ ~ ~, ~ ft*; eounty ~ ft8.t rett:l:rRes. ~ "" rC8:S0R8:B~e tffi:re ~ ft*; s.e]38:FtaFe, ~ ~ ffi" 5i:i'ffi 4tet s.e]3uty, ~ 5i:i'ffi ~ a-5 ~ 4eeme ReCCSS8:F)-, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi'i'El, 4aH ~ eRtitles. 4E; Fe8:50nable fee5 ffi'i'El, C!E]3C::lSCS ~ ft*; sen-ices ffi'i'El, ~ ft*; ffi4s, ~ ~ ~ ~ -Hte tFeasurcr ~ ~ eouRty. BefoFc tfte sffi4 ~ €of' ~ ~ 4ep­ i:tt;- ~ ffle.t:J:.p 8:s.aitional e1E]3cfisc itt -Hte eM, ~ -Hte ~ ~~' ~, ftc ~ ~ -Hte conseRt ~"" lIiajority ~ -Hte COt:l:fity COfi111'lissioReFs ~ -Hte 5a+4 coufity. Whenever it shall come to the attention of the commis­ sioner
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Interim Summary Report Series No. 06-06: C
    Fishery Interim Process Report Series No. 06-06 C Pond Smallmouth Bass Investigations By David P. Boucher Caring for Maine's Outdoor Future December, 2006 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Division of Fisheries & Wildlife FISHERY INTERIM PROGRESS REPORT SERIES NO. 06-6 C POND SMALLMOUTH BASS INVESTIGATIONS BY DAVID P. BOUCHER MAINE DEPARTMENT OF INLAND FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND HATCHERIES AUGUSTA, MAINE DECEMBER 2006 JOB F-201 INTERIM PROGRESS REPORT No. 1 (2006) C POND SMALLMOUTH BASS INVESTIGATIONS SUMMARY C Pond has a surface area of 173 acres and is located in C Surplus Township in north central Oxford County, Maine. C Pond's outlet fonns the Dead Cambridge River, which flows 7.8 miles to Umbagog Lake, the lowennost water body of the Rangeley Chain of Lakes. C Pond remains homothennous during the summer months, but brook trout nonetheless thrive and provide an excellent early-season sport fishery. Local anglers first reported the presence of smallmouth bass in C Pond in 2001 . That same year, Department biologists conducted fish surveys but did not confirm the presence of bass. Additional reports of bass were received in 2002 and 2005. Trapnet and scuba surveys conducted in 2005 confirmed the presence of small numbers of adult and juvenile bass. Bass most likely migrated upstream from Umbagog Lake where they were illegally introduced during the mid-1980s. The presence of smallmouth bass in C Pond could severely impact the pond's wild brook trout population. · The 2005 surveys suggested that smallmouth bass had not yet become well established in C Pond, probably because numbers of adult spawners remained very low, juvenile habitat was limiting, and large populations of bullheads and cyprinids suppressed the recruitment of young bass.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin / New York State Museum
    Juncaceae (Rush Family) of New York State Steven E. Clemants New York Natural Heritage Program LIBRARY JUL 2 3 1990 NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN Contributions to a Flora of New York State VII Richard S. Mitchell, Editor Bulletin No. 475 New York State Museum The University of the State of New York THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Albany, New York 12230 NEW YORK THE STATE OF LEARNING Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from IMLS LG-70-15-0138-15 https://archive.org/details/bulletinnewyorks4751 newy Juncaceae (Rush Family) of New York State Steven E. Clemants New York Natural Heritage Program Contributions to a Flora of New York State VII Richard S. Mitchell, Editor 1990 Bulletin No. 475 New York State Museum The University of the State of New York THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Albany, New York 12230 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University Martin C. Barell, Chancellor, B.A., I. A., LL.B Muttontown R. Carlos Carballada, Vice Chancellor , B.S Rochester Willard A. Genrich, LL.B Buffalo Emlyn 1. Griffith, A. B., J.D Rome Jorge L. Batista, B. A., J.D Bronx Laura Bradley Chodos, B.A., M.A Vischer Ferry Louise P. Matteoni, B.A., M.A., Ph.D Bayside J. Edward Meyer, B.A., LL.B Chappaqua Floyd S. Linton, A.B., M.A., M.P.A Miller Place Mimi Levin Lieber, B.A., M.A Manhattan Shirley C. Brown, B.A., M.A., Ph.D Albany Norma Gluck, B.A., M.S.W Manhattan James W.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypericaceae Key, Charts & Traits
    Hypericaceae (St. Johnswort Family) Traits, Keys, & Comparison Charts © Susan J. Meades, Flora of Newfoundland and Labrador (Aug. 8, 2020) Hypericaceae Traits ........................................................................................................................ 1 Hypericaceae Key ........................................................................................................................... 2 Comparison Charts (3) ................................................................................................................... 4 References ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Hypericaceae Traits • Perennial herbs (in our area). • Stems are erect (lax in plants growing in flooded habitats) and glabrous; terete (round), or square in cross-section; internodes of terete stems with or without 2 low, vertical ridges along their length. • Leaves are cauline, opposite, and usually sessile; blades are simple, linear to ovate, with mostly entire margins; apices are obtuse to rounded; stipules are absent. • Pellucid glands with essential oils appear as translucent dots on the leaves (visible when leaves are held up to the light). • Dark red to blackish glands (with essential oils like hypericin) appear as slender streaks or tiny dots along the leaf, sepal, or petal margins of some species. • Flowers are solitary or 2–40 in terminal and often axillary simple to compound cymes, rarely in panicles. • Flowers are bisexual
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry River Wilderness
    «¬110 SOUTH White Mountain National Forest - Forest Protection Areas POND !5 !B Forest Protection Areas (FPAs) are geographic South !9 Designated Sites !9 The Alpine Zone Wilderness Pond areas where certain activities are restricted to A Rarity in the Northeast Rocky prevent overuse or damage to National Forest Designated sites are campsites or Wilderness Areas are primitive areas Pond resources. Restrictions may include limits on picnic areas within a Forest The alpine zone is a high elevation area in with few signs or other developments. !B camping, use of wood or charcoal fires and Protection area where otherwise which trees are naturally absent or stunted Trails may be rough and difficult to maximum group size. FPAs surround certain features prohibited activities (camping at less that eight feet tall. About 8 square follow. Camping and fires are gererally miles of this habitat exists in the prohibited within 200 feet of any trail W (trails, ponds, parking areas, etc) with either a 200-foot and/or fires) may occur. These e s or ¼ mile buffer. They are marked with signs sites are identified by an official Northeast with most of it over 4000 feet unless at a designated site. No more t M as you enter and exit so keep your eyes peeled. sign, symbol or map. in elevation. Camping is prohibited in the than ten people may occupy a single i la TYPE Name GRID n alpine zone unless there is two or more campsite or hike in the same party. Campgrounds Basin H5 feet of snow. Fires are prohibited at all Big Rock E7 !B Blackberry Crossing G8 ROGERS times.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Survey of Plant Distribution in Ohio.* John H
    A PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF PLANT DISTRIBUTION IN OHIO.* JOHN H. SCHAFFNER. The following data are presented as a preliminary basis for field work in determining the natural plant areas of Ohio. It is hoped that the botanists of the State will begin active study of local conditions with a view to determine natural or transition boundaries as well as cataloging local associations. The distri- bution lists are based on herbarium material and more than 15 years of sporadic botanizing in the state. Of course, distribution at present indicates to a considerable extent merely the distri- bution of enthusiastic botanists and their favorite collecting grounds. Nevertheless, enough has been done to indicate in a rough way the general character of our plant geography. The kind of data most important in indicating characteristic areas are as follows:— 1. Meteorological data. 2. Geology, including the nature of the surface rock and soil. 3. Physiography and topography. 4. The actual distribution of characteristic species of plants and to some extent of animals. In Ohio, the following important maps may be studied in this connection:— Meteorology. By Otto E. Jennings in Ohio Naturalist 3: 339-345, 403-409, 1903. Maps I-XII. By J. Warren Smith in Bull. Ohio Agr. Exp. Station No. 235, 1912. Figs. 3-14. Geology. By J. A. Bownocker, A Geological Map of Ohio. 1909. Topography. The maps of the topographic survey, not yet completed. Various geological reports. The eastern half of Ohio is a part of the Alleghany Plateau. The western half belongs to the great interior plain. In Ohio, the Alleghany Plateau consists of a northern glaciated region and a southern non-glaciated region.
    [Show full text]
  • Tallgrass Prairie Center's Native Seed Production Manual
    Bluejoint reedgrass Establishment for Seed Production (Appendix A) Direct seeding: Calamagrostis canadensis, (Michx.) NOT RECOMMENDED FOR THIS SPECIES Beauv. Greenhouse: Seed pre-treatment: No stratification necessary. Genus Calamagrostis, Greek Kalomos meaning ‘reed’ and Germination of grass seed usually improves with agrostis meaning ‘grass’; species canadensis Latin ‘of proper storage (cool, dry conditions) throughout Canada’. the first year after harvest. Sow seed in greenhouse two months before last frost free date at ¼” depth. Family: Grass (Poaceae) Transplant after all danger of frost. Greenhouse grown plugs can be transplanted into wide row Other Common Name(s): Bluejoint, Canada bluejoint, spacing, 6-8 feet between rows, and plants should be Canada reedgrass, marsh reedgrass, meadow pinegrass 1-2 feet apart within the rows. This gives the newly established plants adequate root-space for rhizome spread, and promotes more flowering and seed set Description: Native perennial cool-season grass, highly after establishment. Irrigate during establishment and rhizomatous. Flowering culms 3-5 feet tall, smooth stem. Leaf as needed for flowering and seed production. sheaths smooth with prominent veins. Leaf blades 3-8 mm (3/16-3/8 inch) wide, up to 30 cm (12 inches) long. Ligule is a membrane, about 3mm (1/8 inch) tall. Seedhead consists of 12 a loosely branched spikelike panicle, 10-20 cm (4-8 inches) 10 long. Flag leaf just below panicle is short and tends to stick out at a 90 degree angle from the stem. 8 Adaptation/Habitat: 6 Wet to wet-mesic soil conditions, bogs, marshes, 4 wet swales, along rivers Acre Pounds/ Yield 2 and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Present-Day Genetic Structure of the Holoparasite Conopholis Americana
    Int. J. Plant Sci. 177(2):132–144. 2016. q 2015 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2016/17702-0003$15.00 DOI: 10.1086/684180 PRESENT-DAY GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE HOLOPARASITE CONOPHOLIS AMERICANA (OROBANCHACEAE) IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA AND THE LOCATION OF ITS REFUGIA DURING THE LAST GLACIAL CYCLE Anuar Rodrigues1,* and Saša Stefanović* *Department of Biology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada Editor: Félix Forest Premise of research. Understanding how various organisms respond to previous changes in climate could provide insight into how they may respond or adapt to the current changes. Conopholis americana has a broad distribution across eastern North America, covering both previously glaciated and unglaciated regions. In this study, we investigated the postglacial history and phylogeographic structure of this parasitic plant spe- cies to characterize its genetic variation and structure and to identify the number and locations of refugia. Methodology. Molecular data from 10 microsatellite markers and DNA sequences from the plastid gene/ introns (clpP) were obtained for 281 individuals sampled from 75 populations spanning the current range of the species in eastern North America and analyzed using a variety of phylogeographic methods. Distribution modeling was carried out to determine regions with relatively suitable climate niches for populations at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and present. Pivotal results. We inferred the persistence of a minimum of two glacial refugia for C. americana at the LGM, one in north-central Florida and southern Alabama and another in the Appalachian Mountains near the southern tip of the Blue Ridge Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangeley Lake Fish Management
    RANGELEY LAKE FISH MANAGEMENT Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Fisheries Research Bulletin No. 10 Rangeley Village with City Cove shown to the left. RANGELEY LAKE FISHERY MANAGEMENT By Raymond A. Dt'Sandre Regional Fishery Biologist, Region D Charles F. Ritzi Environmental Coordinator and William L. Woodward Assistant Regional Fishery Biologist, Region D Maynard F. Marsh, Commissioner 1977 Published Under Appropriation 4550 TABLE OF CONTENTS RANGELEY LAKE FISHERY MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF RANGELEY LAKE ................................................ 3 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SALMON POPULATION Introduction........................................................................................ 6 Growth and Longevity..................................................................... 6 Natural Reproduction....................................................................... 7 Dodge Pond Stream ................................................................ 7 Long Pond Stream (Greenvale Stream ).............................. 8 Rangeley Lake O u tle t............................................................ 11 Evaluation of Salmon Stocking ..................................................... 12 Stocking history and study methods......................................12 Representation of hatchery salmon in the lake population . 14 Stocking assessment and conclusions ................................ 14 a) Effects of
    [Show full text]