Who produced Fuggle's hops? Kim Cook

In 1875 the new Fuggle's hop, said to aim of this article, therefore, is to discover have been propagated by Richard where original historical documentation Fuggle of Fowle Hall, Brenchley, was agrees with Percival, and where his introduced very successfully to the brew- account is unsubstantiated. ing market. Professor J. Percival, in a 1901 article for the Royal Agricultural Fowl or Fowle Hall probably came into Society1 states that 'the original plant the possession of the Fuggle family fol- was a casual seedling which appeared in lowing the marriage at Brenchley, on 26th the flower garden of Mr George Stace of April 1769, of Thomas Fuggle, born in Horsmonden, Kent', and was first noticed 1743, and Mary Fowle. Thomas died in 1861. He adds that before 1825, but various wills suggest that he was one of a large family of at the seed from which the plant arose was least five sons and one daughter. From shaken out along with crumbs from the hop- the content of these wills, together with picking dinner basket used by Mrs Stace ... parish registers, I have drawn up a pro- the sets ... afterwards introduced to the public visional family tree, together with an by Mr Richard Fuggle of Brenchley, about the outline tree for what appears to be a year 1875. different Fuggle family in which there were two Richards extant at the relevant His information was said to have come time. However, could either of them have from correspondence from Mr John been the propagator of the Fuggles hop? Larkin of Horsmonden and Mr W.J. One would expect that the discoverer of Noakes of Goudhurst. Later reports state the first seedling in 1861 was an adult that Mr Richard Fuggle was of 'Fowle and would still have been around in 1875 Hall, Brenchley'. to see his years of propagation come to fruition and claim the credit. But does this charming story stand up to historical scrutiny? Percival's account to Fowle Hall, its occupants, and other local a prestigious learned organisation has Fuggles are not easy to trace, for the been much quoted, often word for word, property sits on the boundaries of the and is now considered to be the definitive two parishes of Brenchley and Yalding. account of the origin of the variety. The Additionally, nearby land and farms,

Brewery History Number 130 3 Figure 1. Upper Fowle Hall, 2008. (Photo: Kim Cook)

including Old Hay, less than two miles what crops were grown, and what it was away, fall within a detached part of the worth. The tithe system stipulated that a more distant parish of Mereworth! tenth of the produce, or its equivalent in Members of the Fuggle family, when giv- cash, had to be paid to the tithe recipient. ing their parish of birth, took their pick of Great tithes were those which went to the the three parishes, and often this varied rector of a parish, while lesser tithes went from document to document. With many to the vicar of the parish. However, tithe Christian names recurring in the family, entitlements could be bought and sold, baptisms spread between three parishes, and lay (non-ordained) persons who and some not appearing in any, determin- acquired tithe rights were known as ing which child belonged to which set of impropriators. parents is problematical. The tithe apportionment records for the Tithe apportionment records, where they Brenchley area were drawn up in the survive, provide useful information about mid-1840s, probably between 1841 and farm land, who owned it, who rented it, 1843. These show only one Richard

4 Journal of the Brewery History Society Fuggle, who is farming land he owns him- tures totalled about 10¼ acres (internal) self, but not at Fowle Hall. At Longreeds, or just under twelve acres (external), for Old Hay Farm, he has a field with a which he paid 12s.3d. to the vicar and statute measure of 4 acres 2 roods 1 pole £1.19s.0d. to the impropriator. None of in bounds, or 5 acres 8 poles out bounds. his land is shown as growing hops! A rood was a quarter of an acre, and there were 40 square poles to a rood, so The tithe records show two Fuggles the internal measure of the field was a who owned much more land; Ann Fuggle little over 4½ acres. Used for arable and John Fuggle. This John Fuggle is crops, it was not liable for tithes to the probably the one born in 1772 who, in vicar, but was valued at £1.2s.6d. 1826 was the main beneficiary in the will payable to the impropriator. Richard also of his uncle Richard Fuggle. Richard, owned 3 roods 7 poles of woodland at born in 1751, had property at Gatehouse Shawfrith, which was not taxable, and Farm, Mill Farm, Bramble Reed Farm, two parcels of pasture at Frossate Field, White Barn (with approximately 29 acres all within the area of Old Hay. The pas- of land attached), and a 'Messuage or

Figure 2. Old Hay’s only remaining oasts. (Photo: Kim Cook)

Brewery History Number 130 5 tenement' with outbuildings, gardens, was. As the family trees show, there are orchard and four parcels of land near a number of Ann Fuggles, any one of Chownings Green in the Parish of whom could have been the one men- Brenchley'.2 As he died in 1826, this tioned in the tithe apportionment records. Richard clearly couldn't have been linked with the Horsmonden seedling. Ann Fuggle (née Diamond) was still alive in 1841, farming at Mare Place, Ann Fuggle owned 49 parcels of land Brenchley, with four daughters. Husband which she managed herself, including Thomas and son, also Thomas, were not arable, woodland, hops and an oast, at home, and it is possible that both had totalling about 88¼ acres (internal) and died. No record of any of the family has almost 119½ acres (external). Of these, been found in 1851, although in 1861 there were hops on about 3½ acres at Toll three of the daughters, Mary, Frances Field, almost 4 roods at Upper Church and Ann, all unmarried teachers, were Field, about 2¼ acres at Hale Mead, with living together in Wadhurst. No death or an oast and yard totalling 24 poles. Her burial record has yet been found for Ann, total tithes on this were £5.17s.0d. to the so it is impossible to be sure whether or vicar and £11.10s.0d. to the impropriator. not she was still alive at the time of the Ann grew more hops on land rented from tithe apportionment. It is unlikely that her John Fuggle, with just under 2 acres unmarried daughter Ann, born in 1820, (internal) at Little Raiments, almost 3½ would have been the hop farmer, for she acres at Great Wood Field, just over 2 trained as a teacher. acres at Little Wood Field with a further 1 acre 11 roods at the Oast Hop Garden Ann Fuggle, born in 1781, would have and 3 acres 12 poles at the Oast Hop been the sister-in-law and aunt respec- Field. tively of the above two Anns, but so far no record has been found of her after her John Fuggle's total holding was about baptism, so there is no certainty that she 250 acres, but he tended less than 20 survived into adulthood. Even had she acres himself, with no hops. Of his many survived and remained single, she would tenants who farmed the remaining land, have been well into her sixties by the time only one, Thomas Mercer, was growing the tithe apportionment was recorded, hops, with a small hop garden of 2 roods and unlikely to have been farming on her 34 poles. Clearly, the main hop grower at own at that age. this time was Ann Fuggle. There is, however, another much more Unfortunately, with no indication of age likely possibility. As the Brenchley family or marital status given in the tithe appor- tree shows, John Fuggle and his wife tionment records, it has been difficult to Hannah Fielder had only one child, determine exactly who this Ann Fuggle Thomas Fielder Fuggle, baptised in

6 Journal of the Brewery History Society Figure 3. Little Fowle Oast. (Photo: Kim Cook)

Brenchley in 1804. It is believed that From this second marriage, John had Hannah died during, or soon after, child- four known children, Elizabeth (1805), birth. John (1808), Mary (1810), and Ann (1814). Elizabeth is known to have mar- In December 1804 in Brenchley, a John ried Henry Barton, and they named their Fuggle married Elizabeth Corke. There first child John Fuggle Barton. were a number of John Fuggles in the area at that time, and initially it was On 20th December 1830 in Brenchley, a unclear which of them had married John Fuggle married an Ann Fuggle. Elizabeth. However, after an extensive Which John and which Ann is a real puz- search to trace their descendants, cen- zle. Were they cousins in some degree? sus entries, naming patterns and other Or was Ann the widow of another evidence combine to give a very strong Fuggle? Clearly, they can't both have indication that this was a second mar- been children of John and Elizabeth, so riage for the John who had first married did their John marry another Ann, or did Hannah Fielder. their Ann marry another John? The

Brewery History Number 130 7 Brenchley family tree provisionally shows Neither John nor Thomas was at home, John as the child of John and Elizabeth, and it seems likely that both had died. because to show both possibilities would Living with Ann and Elizabeth were a be unneccessarily confusing. farm carter, two female servants and Ann Manwaring, aged about 15. Although in Whoever the respective parents of this 1841 adult ages were rounded to the couple were, they had two children, nearest five years, Ann Fuggle's age is Thomas Fuggle (1831) and Elizabeth clearly wrong by some seven years, Jane Fuggle (1833), both baptised in which explains why a search using her Brenchley. At first neither Thomas nor name, together with her age plus or Ann could be found in 1841, and their son minus five years, failed to find her. As it is Thomas wasn't to be found either. I had quite common to find minor age discrep- begun to wonder if either of the children ancies in census returns, a search on had survived. age plus or minus five years usually cap- tures the person being sought. Checking on any other references to an Ann Fuggle who might have been the Gatehouse Farm was formerly the prop- hop farmer, I found that, on 27th January erty of Richard Fuggle (1751-1826), and 1848 in Etchingham, just across the had been willed to his nephew John county border in Sussex, Ann Fuggle, Fuggle (1772-1844), who was either the said to be aged 38, and recorded as father or father-in-law of Ann Fuggle, later the daughter of John Fuggle, married Durrant. Whether Ann Durrant was the William Durrant, aged 41, son of Thomas daughter or daughter-in-law of John Durrant. Searching for these two in Fuggle and Elizabeth Corke, she is the 1851, I found them at Gatehouse Farm, likeliest candidate for the hop-grower Brenchley, along with 17-year-old Elizabeth found in the tithe records. Jane Fuggle, described as William's daughter-in-law what we would now call By 1861, when the Fuggle seedling was step-daughter. Clearly this is Ann, widow discovered, William and Ann Durrant were of John, and their daughter, who had at Key Lands, Beltring Road, Nettlestead, been baptised in Brenchley in 1833. in the new parish of Paddock Wood. This Ann's birthplace is given as Yalding and parish included parts of Brenchley and her age as 42, but which of the many Yalding. Living with them was William's John Fuggles was her father has not yet niece, Ann Woodgate Durrant, born been determined. Horsmonden, said to be 18 years old. Ann, born on 10th June 1841 and baptised on Going back to the census returns for 24th July that year in Horsmonden, was 1841, eventually I found Elizabeth, aged the daughter of Woodgate Durrant and 8, with her mother Ann, said to be a his wife Anna Maria née Tapsell, and farmer aged 25, both at Gatehouse Farm. would in fact have been 19, but as already

8 Journal of the Brewery History Society noted such minor discrepancies are quite Although Richard was back at Fowle common in census returns. Hall by April 1871, within a few months he had married, in Croydon, Jane Lydia The only Fuggles in residence at Fowle Bateman, and they had emigrated to a Hall in 1861, when the seedling was farm in Lambton, Ontario. Between 1872 allegedly found, were Thomas Fielder and 1880 they had four children, all born Fuggle, farming 100 acres at Fowle Hill there. Clearly Richard could not have Farm, his wife with three children.3 been in England propagating his crop, or Thomas, baptised on 2nd April 1804 in conducting an effective marketing cam- Brenchley, but who gave his birthplace as paign, ready for the new variety to be Mereworth, was the son of John, and launched in 1875. grandson of Thomas Fuggle and Mary Fowle. In 1830 in St. Pancras, London, In 1889, shortly before his death, Richard, he married Mary Fuggle, probably one of who had been working as a miller, was in his many cousins. His presence in St. Thomas, British Columbia. His will of London suggests business there, possi- 1890 mentions his father, 'Thomas bly as a factor for their crops. No children Feelder Fuggle of Fowell Hall, Yalding', of this marriage have been found, and it his brothers Thomas, of 117, North is assumed that Mary died within a few Street, Brighton, and John, 'late of Fowell years of the marriage, for in 1838 John Hall, Yalding'. However, he may have married again. been out of touch with his family for some years, for his father had died in 1879 at His second wife was another cousin, the age of 74. Jane Manwaring, grand-daughter of Mary Fuggle and Richard Manwaring. The Richard Fuggle who appears in the Thomas Fielder Fuggle and Jane had 1840s tithe apportionment was still at Old twelve children, only three of whom, Hay in 1861, by which time his holdings John (21), Elizabeth (6) and Alice (2) there had grown to 103 acres. No bap- were at home in 1861. They did have a tism record for Richard, born circa 1806, son Richard, baptised in Brenchley in has yet been found, and the only clue to 1848, who was at Fowle Hall in 1851,4 his parentage is the census of 1841. Old along with his parents and five siblings, Hay was then being farmed by John all born in Yalding, the parish in which Fuggle, possibly a widower, whose age the property was listed. However, was about 65, with Richard, presumably Richard was not there in 1861 and has his son. However, as the 1841 census not been found elsewhere. Had he dis- doesn't show marital status or relation- covered the hop 'sport', he would have ships, this can be only a strong inference. been 13, and it would have been his By 1851 John had died, and a search for father Thomas who propagated it and his burial revealed that two John Fuggles received due credit. had died in Brenchley within 15 months.

Brewery History Number 130 9 Figure 4. Fuggle’s hops. (Photo: Charles Faram and Co. Ltd.)

John Fuggle of Mereworth, was buried sequence of children, and the lack of a on 30th March 1843, aged 66, indicating baptism record may simply have been a that he was born circa 1776-7, and was clerical error in the parish registers. from Old Hay, then an outpost of However, there were clearly two separate Mereworth. Mr John Fuggle of Brenchley Johns, and unless one was a childless (note the deferential entry, usually man who doesn't fit into the family tree, reserved only for people of high local the John at Old Hay must have been a status) was buried on 28th June 1844, different person from a separate, but aged 71, entirely consistent with the probably related, family. If the John who baptism of John Fuggle, son of Thomas fathered Richard was indeed from a and Mary, on 27th December 1772. separate branch of the family, he might also have been the father of other children It is tempting to think that the John including Ann Fuggle or her husband Fuggle at Old Hay was the father, not John Fuggle who married in 1830. only of Richard, but also of Thomas, John and all the other children shown on In 1851 Old Hay's 134 acres were the Brenchley tree. The ages of these being farmed by Richard, a widower, children allow for Richard to fit into the who consistently gave his place of birth

10 Journal of the Brewery History Society as Mereworth.5 Also in the household Farm, Wittersham, a holding of some were Richard's three sons, Richard (9), 117 acres, where their two youngest John (5) and Henry (2), all born in children, John Henry (1878) and Ann Mereworth, and housekeeper Ann Florence (1880), were born. Richard's Dodswell, a 36-year-old single woman brother Henry may have moved with born in Horsmonden. them, for he died in that area in 1878, aged 29. Ann Woodgate Fuggle died in In the 1861 census Old Hay is recorded 1887, aged 45, and by 1891 Richard had twice, once as a detached part of given up Owley Farm and was living at 4, Mereworth.6 By this time Richard's for- High Street Wittersham, with three chil- mer housekeeper Ann was listed as his dren, and was working as an overseer for wife, although no record of their marriage someone else. Richard lived on until has yet been found. Living with them 1913, when he died at the age of 72. were his sons, listed this time as Richard (20), Jack (16) and Harry (13). However, This is the only Richard Fuggle found in Richard senior died in 1864, when he the Brenchley area both in 1861, when would have been about 58, and therefore the first seedling was found, and in 1875, could not have been propagating the when the Fuggle's hop was finally mar- Fuggles hop through until the marketing keted. So was he the propagator of the launch 1875. Fuggles hop? If so, why did he suddenly leave Old Hay once the carefully nurtured By 1871 the three brothers were running product was on the market? Presumably the 130-acre farm in partnership. In 1868 he had a good crop growing there, and the eldest, Richard, now about 27, had plenty of customers, so why give it all up? married Ann Woodgate Durrant who, like Or was the propagator of the Fuggles Richard's step-mother, was also from hop not a Richard after all, Richard being Horsmonden. Ann was the niece of a hop factor rather than a grower? William Durrant, who had married, in 1848, Ann Fuggle, the probable hop farmer! And what of George Stace, in whose Horsmonden garden the Fuggle's hop A year after the marriage of Richard and was apparently found in 1861? A search Ann, their daughter, Annie Louisa Fuggle, of the 1861 census for Horsmonden was born at Old Hay, followed by Richard (RG9/496, districts 9 and 10), revealed Woodgate Fuggle (1871), and daughters, no George Stace indeed nobody with Ada Jane (1872), Alice Margaret (1873) the surname Stace at all. Nor was there and Agnes Gertrude, baptised in Yalding any George whose surname bore any on 14th September 1874. resemblance to Stace.

Some time between this baptism and There were a few Stace families in Kent 1878 the family moved south to Owley in 1861, but none likely to have been liv-

Brewery History Number 130 11 ing in Horsmonden and working at either of Willesborough, George, son of John Fowle Farm or Old Hay. One George and Martha, was almost certainly the Stace was a 64-year-old farmer living at George Stace who, in 1852 in East Standen House, Sandhurst, Kent, where Ashford, married Sarah (née either he farmed 15 acres, and would not have Bartholomew or Hart), and was clearly not been labouring for someone else so far living in Horsmonden when the Fuggles away. Living with him were four nieces seedling was found. and three nephews, including George, a 12-year-old scholar, who was unlikely to In 1871 a George W. Stace, said to have have been labouring in Brenchley. been born circa 1842 in Sevington, near Ashford, was lodging in North Street, Three young Stace brothers were, in some Ashford. In later years he lived with his documents, said to have been born in wife Sarah F., born circa 1855, and their Horsmonden. In 1861 William, Henry, and family in Boughton under Blean, near John Stace, sons of William Stace and his Faversham and gave his place of birth as widow Harriet, were farming their own Mersham. This George has not been iden- land at Upper Green, Sandhurst.7 But tified prior to 1871, and his birth and mar- there was no George in this family and, riage records have not been found, again, men farming their own land were although a George Wallace Stace, son of unlikely to have been labourers at another Thomas and Millicent Stace, was baptised farm many miles away. in Ewhurst, Sussex on 10th July 1845, but no corresponding civil registration has In 1861 George Stace, a 40-year-old agri- been found. cultural labourer born in Smeeth, and his wife Sarah, were living at Willesborough Interestingly, an Amos William Durrant Lees, just outside Ashford. However, Stace (no parents named) was baptised, Willesborough Lees is well over 20 miles also in Ewhurst, on 25th January 1857, from Horsmonden and Brenchley as the although his birth registration in the first crow flies, so his employer would not have quarter of 1857 (Battle registration dis- been one of the Fuggles in that area. By trict) omits his two middle names. The 1871 this George was farming a small- death of Amos William Stace was regis- holding of 19 acres at Stelling Minnis. In tered in the same quarter. These events 1851 a George Stace, said to have been would seem to tie in with the marriage, born in 1842 in Hinxhill, was living with his also in the first quarter of 1857, of Amos parents John, an agricultural labourer Durrant and Caroline Stace. A Caroline born circa 1817 in Wye, and wife Martha, Stace, daughter of Thomas and in Kennington, near Ashford. However, by Philadelphia Stace, had been baptised in 1861, when the family had moved to near- Ewhurst in 1832. An Amos Durrant, son of by Willesborough, George was not at Moses and Mary, was reportedly born home. As Hinxhill is only about a mile east circa 1836 in Waldron, Sussex. In 1861

12 Journal of the Brewery History Society Amos (25), an agricultural labourer, and However, in 1880 the younger John suf- Caroline (28) were at Warren Corner, fered a double blow when both his father Waldron, with daughter Mary Jane. In and his wife died within a few weeks of 1871 they were at Copwoods, Uckfield, each other. John remained a widower with three daughters and two sons, all for some years, but later married born in Waldron. Caroline Seggie, widow of Scotsman David Seggie, and presumably in some Although there was clearly a well- way related to his first wife. They had a established Stace family in Ewhurst and further four children, all born in there was a co-incidence of the names Horsmonden, and were still farming at Fuggle, Durrant and Stace, I have so far Ashdown in 1901. found no close connection between Caroline Stace and George Stace, the William John Noakes was 14 years alleged discoverer of the Fuggles younger than John Larkin, having been seedling. Nor have I yet found any close born in Brenchley in 1857. In 1861 he link between Amos Durrant and William was at Burr's Hill, Brenchley, where his Durrant, second husband of Ann Fuggle. father, also William, farmed 120 acres with four labourers and two boys. His So where did those letter-writers, Mr mother was Silvia Sophia, née Waghorn, John Larkin of Horsmonden and Mr and both parents had been born in W.J. Noakes of Goudhurst, obtain such Sussex. By 1871 the family farm had precise, and yet apparently incorrect, grown to 190 acres employing nine information? I haven't been able to trace labourers and a boy, and by 1881 to 269 these letters, but I have located those I acres employing twelve labourers and believe where the two correspondents. six boys.

When John Larkin was born in In 1889 William John married Matilda Horsmonden in 1843, his father John Jane Beeching, born circa 1860 was inn-keeper at the Kings Arms there. Goudhurst. In 1891 they were at Both parents had been born in Trottenden Farm, Goudhurst, with one Horsmonden. By 1851 John senior was servant. Matilda died in 1891, and they farming about 50 acres at Ashdown had no surviving children. William con- Farm, but his wife, Ann, née Longley, tinued to farm at Trottenden, and in 1901 died between 1851 and 1861, possibly in was living there with his married sister-in- 1853. John senior, who is believed to law Melissa Hobbs (née Beeching), his have married, in 1863, Eliza Drury, born 4-year-old niece Cathleen Maude Hobbs, c. 1823, Horsmonden, continued to farm and two servants. A few months later at Ashdown, with the help of his son William John Noakes married again, his John. John junior married, in 1872, Annie bride being either Beatrice Dungey or Seggie, and they had four sons. Nellie Jenner.

Brewery History Number 130 13 Random searches for any links between of the Fuggle family for many years, the the names of these two correspondents historical records for specific dates and and any of the Fuggles, Durrants, names do not match the account given Dodwells, Staces or any other families by Percival. The only Richard Fuggle who who feature in this maze, produced a fits the dates and records was from Old few results. In 1862 a Mary Ann Stace Hay, not Fowle Hall, and even he didn't married in St. Pancras, with one of the remain at Old Hay to see the fruits of his possible grooms being a John Noakes; supposed labours. Ann Fuggle of in 1873 in Lewes, Sussex, a William Brenchley similarly fits with the dates, Henry Stace married Ann Elizabeth and the tithe records suggest she could Noakes; in 1853 in Rye a Louisa Larkin have been the main hop grower in the married Edward Noakes; and in 1893 in Fuggle family at the appropriate time. the Tonbridge area, an Agnes Larkin Was she denied the credit because she married, with one of the possible grooms was a woman? being an Albert Noakes. But so far I have found nothing to link any of these with If old invoices for Fuggle's hops bought the people who feature in the events by brewers or factors still exist, the connected with Fuggles hops or with the answer may lie there. If you have access two correspondents who provided the to such archive material, perhaps you information in 1901. Were Larkin and can solve the mystery. Noakes close friends of one of the Fuggle-related families? How did they really know the circumstances in which References the Fuggles seedling was found and propagated? 1. Percival, J. (1901) ‘The hop and its English varieties,’ Journal of the Royal So we are left puzzling over who really Agricultural Society of England, Vol. LXII, did find the seedling, whether it was pp.67-95. found in Horsmonden, and who propagat- 2. Will of Richard Fuggle, National Archives ed it. Although the two correspondents Prob 11/1717 who gave the information to Percival 3. PRO census RG9/497.2.18.7 have been located, the supposed finder 4. PRO census HO107/1610.1e.9 George Stace and his wife cannot be 5. PRO census HO107/1612.5b substantiated. Although Fowle Hall was, 6. PRO census RG9/485.10.162.24 indeed, in the possession of one branch 7. PRO census RG9/508.11.115.9

14 Journal of the Brewery History Society John Fuggle = unknown wife B = baptised bc 1775 bc1776 b = born mc1805 d before 1841 m = married d1843 d = died Br = Brenchley H = Horsmonden Hs = Hastings unknown wife 1) = Richard Fuggle = 2) Ann Dodswell M = Mereworth bc1806M bc1805H Mx = Middlesex m1) c1840 W = Wittersham m2) ? Y = Yalding d1864Br Brewery History Number 130

Richard Fuggle = Ann John Henry b1841M Woodgate Fuggle Fuggle m1868 Durrant b1846M b1848M d1913 b1842H d1878W d1887

Annie Richard = Ada Alice Agnes John Anna Louisa Woodgate Jane Margaret Gertrude Henry Florence Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle B1872Y B1871Y B1872Y B1873Y B1874Y b1878W b1880W d1912Mx mAustralia d1912Bn d1891Hs d1962 NSW

issue in Aus & NZ

Provisional family tree for the Fuggle family of Old Hay, Kent. 15 John Fuggle = Elizabeth Knight

John = Elizabeth William = Ann Thomas = Mary Fuggle Corke Fuggle White Fuggle Fowle b1737Br b1741Br b1743Br m1772Br d1820 m1769 d1804G

Blackman = dau Richard = Mary Elizabeth Hannah = John = 2) Elizabeth Fuggle Manwaring Fuggle Fuggle Fielder Fuggle Corke bc1775 B1771Br B1771Br B1770Br B1772Br B1770Br m1803 m2)1804Br d1844Br

6 children Elizabeth = Thomas Mary 1) = Thomas = 2) Jane Elizabeth = Henry Barton Manwaring Fuggle Fielder Manwaring Fuggle Barton B1798Br Fuggle B1821Br B1805Br m1818Br B1804Br m1830Br m1830P m2)1838 d1879

Jane Sarah = Thomas = 2) Margaret John = Ellen Mary Hannah = Robert Thomas Manwaring Awberry Fuggle Boorman Fuggle Hammond Fuggle Fielder Ridge Fielder B1821Br b1842 b1838 bc1840EP b1840Br b1850 b1841Br Fuggle Ellis Fuggle m Thos F d1865 m1864R d1917Bt m1870Ti b1843Br b1845Br Fuggle 2)1867C d1910Bt

William Sarah Julia Thomas Florence Eva Richard Hannah Caroline Percival Charles Frank Fuggle Fuggle Margaret Fielder Emily Fuggle Fuggle Fielder Augusta John Pomfret Ernest b1865Bt b1868Bt Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle b1876Bt b1878Bt Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle d1865Bt b1869Bt b1871Bt 1874Bt d1878Bt b1879Bt b1871H b1874H b1875H b1877H d1871Bt d1910 m1912 m1897

B = baptised b = born m = married d = died A = Ashford Br = Brenchley Bt = Brighton C = Camberwell Cr = Croydon CS = Chart Sutton EP = East Peckham G = Goudhurst H = St. George, Hanover Square H = Horsmonden Hc = Headcorn M = Marden O = Ontario, Canada P = St. Pancras, London R = Reading S = Smarden T = Tenterden Ti = Ticehurst

Provisional family tree for the Fuggle family of Brenchley, Kent.

16 Journal of the Brewery History Society Richard = Elizabeth Elizabeth James = ?Jane Fuggle Boorman Fuggle Fuggle b1751Br bc1755 b1740Br m1777Br d1826

Thomas = Ann Ann James William Fuggle Diamond Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle B1775Br bc1785 B1781Br m1814Br

John = Ann = 2) William Mary Ann Thomas Mary Frances Ann Elizabeth Fuggle Fuggle Durrant Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Gibbons Fuggle Fuggle B1808Br bc1806 B1810Br B1814Br B1815Br B1816Br Fuggle B1820Br B1822Br m1830Br m2)1848Ti B1818Br d1877Ti

Jane Richard = Jane William Emily Elizabeth John Thomas Thomas = Elizabeth = 2) Robert Fuggle Fuggle Lydia Fuggle Fuggle Fielder Fuggle Fuggle John Jane Elliot b1847Br b1848Br Bateman b1852Br b1853Br Fuggle Barton B1831Br Startup Fuggle bc1817A m1871Cr d1867 b1855Br B1831Br bc1812A B1833Br d1890O d1878A m1858A m2)1879A

Ellen Thomas Richard Elizabeth Hannah Madeline George Emily Lydia Fredrick Hannah Mary Thomas Mary Fielder Fuggle Fielder Fielder Tomkin William Jane Alice Charles Fielder Jane Robert Fuggle Fuggle b1885S Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Fuggle Startup Startup Startup b1879M b1882CS b1888T b1888T b1892Hc b1872O b1874O b1876O b1878O b1859A b1860A b1862A d1889 m1886A m1890A

Brewery History Number 130 17