The "Doctor of " and the Prince

o f Humanists: 's Contact with

by Darren Williamson

Erasmus influence Anabaptism? This question is not new; it has Didelicited a variety of responses ever since the sixteenth century when some of Erasmus' own contemporaries linked him with Anabaptism. Protestant opponents such as Luther could describe Erasmus as-among other things- an Anabaptist, and opponents like Noel B6da claimed that elements of his writings encouraged Anabaptism.' Modem scholars renewed the ques- tion in the early twentieth century when some prominent historians strongly hinted that a spiritual kinship existed between Erasmus and the Anabaptists. One, Johan Huizinga, even went so far as to say, "There was a group among the reformed to whom Erasmus in his heart of hearts was more nearly akin than to the Lutherans or Zwinglians with their rigid dogmatism: the Anabap- tists."' The renewal of the question of Erasmus and Anabaptism coincided with the flourishing of North American research in Anabaptist history, espe- cially among Mennonite scholars. Most of the early studies on the topic de- rived from historians of Anabaptism in search of keys to understanding the origins of that movement. Harold Bender considered the question of Eras- mus' influence in his seminal study of and ultimately arrived at a negative conclusion,' but the trend in subsequent Anabaptist scholarship pointed away from his assessment and increasingly granted at least some small place for Erasmus in the intellectual origins of Anabaptism.4

'For Luther'sassociation of Erasmuswith Anabaptism,see Ep. 2936, line 388 Allen. For Beda'scritique of the prefaceto the Paraphraseon Matthew,see LB 9:445B-F,459A-F, 483D- 484C, 557D-560C. 2JohanHuizinga, Erasmus of Rotterdam(New York,1924: reprint New York:Phaidon Pub- lishing,Inc., 1952),177. 'Harold Bender,Conrad Grebel, c. 1498-1526,the Founderof the SwissBrethren Sometimes CalledAnabaptists (Goshen, IN: MennoniteHistorical Society, 1950), 65, Z00. 4 Forexample, see Robert Kreider,"Anabaptism and Humanism:An Inquiryinto the Rela- tionshipof Humanismto the EvangelicalAnabaptists," Mennonite Quarterly Review 26 (1952): 140; Heinhold Fast, "The Dependenceof the First Anabaptists on Luther, Erasmus,and Zwingli,"Mennonite Quarterly Review 30 (1956): 104-119,esp. 109-111,who came to similar conclusions.See alsoThor Hall, "Possibilitiesof ErasmianInfluence on Denckand Hubmaierin

[37] 38

Two studies are worthy of particular note in that development. Hans Hillerbrand's seminal work on Anabaptist origins identified Erasmus as a sig- nificant contributor, alongside Luther and Zwingli, to the early development of the movement. He argued that "the parallels between Erasmus and An- abaptism are striking and cannot be overlooked" and that "evidence concern- ing the connection between Erasmus and the Anabaptists can be marshalled without difficulty." Owing to perceived parallels between Erasmus and An- abaptists on , ethics, the , , commu- nion, and freedom of the will, Hillerbrand proceeded to rank Erasmus as one of the influences on early Anabaptism. His study, which focused on theologi- cal similarities as evidence of Anabaptist dependence upon Erasmus, became the point of departure for most subsequent research into the question. It also highlighted the importance of the Paraphrase on Matthew, (1522) as a poten- tial source of Erasmian influence upon Anabaptism.5 Kenneth R. Davis' research on Anabaptist also allotted Eras- mus an important place in early Anabaptist . Davis elaborated on Hillerbrand's claims by providing an "organized assessment of the nature, ex- tent and significance of Erasmus' theological contribution to Anabaptism" and arguing that "the basic seeds for most of the distinctive Anabaptist positions-even the pattern of ideas-are contained in pre-1525 Erasmian thought and through him were available to the Anabaptists." Following an extensive examination of over fifteen parallels, including lay asceticism, pro- gressive revelation, ethical dualism, and the doctrine of the believers' , Davis concluded that, "the probability is heightened that the Anabaptists are best understood, apart from their own creativity, as a radicalization and Protestantization not of the Magisterial but of an earlier lay- oriented, ascetic vision of reformation-and that Erasmus is the principal mediator of these views to Anabaptism." Davis' research constitutes the most comprehensive attempt at addressing the question of Erasmus' influence upon Anabaptism.'

Their Views on the Freedomof the Will," MennoniteQuarterly Review 35 (1961): 149-70; Irvin B. Horst, Erasmus,the Anabaptistsand the Prnblemof ReligiousUnity (Haarlem:H. D. TjeenkWillink en Zoon,1967), 1-32. 'Hans Hillerbrand,"The Origin of Sixteenth-CenturyAnabaptism: Another Look,"Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte53 ( 1962): 152-80 at 157-58. 'Kenneth R. Davis, "Erasmusas Progenitorof AnabaptistTheology and Piety,"Mennonite QuarterlyReview 47 (1973): 163-78,quotes from 163and 178;also Davis, Anabaptism and Asceti- cism:A Studyin IntellectualOrigins (Scottdale, PA: Herald Press,1974), 266-348,where Davis