Earth Asteroids By
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Observational Constraints on the Number, Albedos, Sizes, and Impact Hazards of the Near- Earth Asteroids by Joseph Scott Stuart BSE Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Pennsylvania, 1993 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EARTH, ATMOSPHERIC AND PLANETARY SCIENCES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN EARTH, ATMOSPHERIC AND PLANETARY SCIENCES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2003 © 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author:_______________________________________________________ Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences 21 March 2003 Certified by:_____________________________________________________________ Richard P. Binzel Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Thesis Supervisor Accepted by:_____________________________________________________________ Ronald G. Prinn Head Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Observational Constraints on the Number, Albedos, Sizes, and Impact Hazards of the Near- Earth Asteroids by Joseph Scott Stuart Submitted to the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences on March 21, 2003 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Field of Planetary Science Abstract This work provides a statistical description of the near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) in terms of number, orbital parameters, reflectance spectra, albedos, diameters, and terrestrial and lunar collision rates. I estimate the size and shape of the NEA population using survey data from the Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research project including more than 1300 NEA detections. The NEA population is more highly inclined than previously estimated and the total number of NEAs with absolute magnitudes (H) brighter than 18 is +170 1227−90 . The absolute magnitude and orbital parameter distributions for the NEAs are combined with reflectance spectra and albedo measurements. I obtain a debiased estimate of the fraction of NEAs in each of 10 taxonomic complexes, and a debiased average albedo for each. The number of NEAs larger than 1 km is 1090±180. Next, I determine the impact frequency, collision velocity distribution and collision energy distribution for impacts of NEAs into the Earth and Moon. Globally destructive collisions (~1021 J) of asteroids 1 km or larger strike the Earth once every 0.60±0.1 Myr on average. Regionally destructive collisions with impact energy greater than 4x1018 J (~200 m diameter) strike the Earth every 47,000±6,000 years. The rate of formation of craters expected from the NEAs is found to be in close agreement with the observed number of craters on the Earth and Moon. These results combine the largest set of NEA discovery statistics from a single survey, the largest set of physical data on NEAs, and corrections for observational bias. The result is a comprehensive estimate of the total NEA population in terms of orbital parameters, absolute magnitudes, albedos, and sizes. This improved description of the NEAs will help us to plan surveys to find and study the remaining undiscovered NEAs, to connect the NEAs to their origins in the main-belt, to connect the NEAs to meteorite samples, to compare the lunar and terrestrial cratering record to the current population of potential impactors, and to understand the magnitude of the NEA impact hazard to the Earth’s biosphere. Thesis Supervisor: Richard P. Binzel Title: Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences 3 4 Acknowledgements Je voudrais d'abord remercier Rick Binzel qui a uniformément fait tout son possible afin de m'aider à accomplir mes buts principaux: approfondir mes connaissances, publier mes recherches, et finir mes études doctorales. Il a gracieusement guidé l'orientation de mes recherches dans un domaine fructueux et il a également fourni mon projet avec un bon nombre de données de haute qualité. De plus, il a lu toutes mes ébauches de thèse avec une rapidité étonnante, et cela en dépit d'un programme très chargé. Pour ces raisons ainsi que d'autres, je lui suis très reconnaissant. I am deeply indebted to the entire team that makes the Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR) Project a success. Frank Shelly and the other engineers at the telescope site have done a superb job of designing the system and keeping it running. Of course, special thanks go to the observers who stay up all night to collect the photons. All of those asteroid detections would go to waste if it weren’t for the busy folks at the Minor Planet Center to keep track of all the orbits. I would also like to thank three of Rick’s former students and a postdoc: Bobby Bus, Tom Burbine, Steve Slivan, and Andy Rivkin. They have enlightened me on many aspects of asteroid research and academic procedure. My work was greatly enhanced by scientific discussions with Bill Bottke and Al Harris, both of whom also offered suggestions for improving early drafts of chapters of this thesis. The members of my thesis examination committee, Rick Binzel, Jim Elliot, Jack Wisdom, and Al Harris provided many useful suggestions for improving the final draft of my thesis. The management of MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Gerry Banner, Grant Stokes, Hsiao- Hua Burke, and the Lincoln Scholar’s Committee not only provided the financial resources for me to attend graduate school, but also gave me the latitude to pursue an academic goal. Many of my coworkers at Lincoln Laboratory have helped me along the way, including Ron Sayer, Pablo Hopman, Herb Viggh, and Jenifer Evans. Successful academic pursuits require a great deal of support and encouragement from outside academe, as well. In that regard I have been quite blessed. My Mother has always been there for me, and instilled in me early in life a respect for education. My many friends at Thursday Night Dinner have helped keep me entertained and fed through 5 the years of toil. And I am most indebted to and thankful for my family. My dear wife Meg, has helped and supported me in more ways than I could possibly list. My son Benji, came into my life midway through this PhD process and changed everything. Without a word, he has taught me volumes about curiosity, determination, and joyfulness. 6 Table of Contents Abstract............................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. 5 Table of Contents................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 9 1.1 History of Impact Threat................................................................................... 10 1.2 History of NEA Discovery................................................................................ 12 1.3 History of Population Estimates ....................................................................... 13 1.4 Origin of the NEAs ........................................................................................... 14 1.5 Meteorites and Resources ................................................................................. 17 1.6 Some Definitions .............................................................................................. 17 1.7 Scope of this Work............................................................................................ 19 Chapter 2 An NEA Population Estimate from the LINEAR Survey ............................ 21 2.1 Abstract............................................................................................................. 21 2.2 Introduction....................................................................................................... 21 2.3 LINEAR Survey Data....................................................................................... 22 2.4 Debiasing Technique ........................................................................................ 29 2.5 Detection Probability Analysis ......................................................................... 30 2.6 Debiasing .......................................................................................................... 33 2.7 Absolute Magnitude and Orbital Element Distributions .................................. 35 2.8 Comparisons to Other NEA Population Estimates ........................................... 40 2.9 Conclusions....................................................................................................... 44 Chapter 3 Albedo Bias in NEA Discovery.................................................................... 47 3.1 Abstract............................................................................................................. 47 3.2 Introduction....................................................................................................... 47 3.3 Description of Luu and Jewitt Model ............................................................... 48 3.4 Further Experiments with the LJ Model ........................................................... 50 3.4.1 Differential Phase Darkening versus Albedo............................................ 51 3.4.2 Changing the Albedos............................................................................... 52 3.4.3 Limiting Magnitude of Survey.................................................................