CHARTERS in New York City the Conversation Around Charters Is A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
From: Wolfe, Emma To: Wolfe, Emma Bcc: Josh Gold; Steph Yazgi; Natalia Salgado; Alison Hirsh; Santucci, Laura Greenberg Anna; Jonathan Rosen; Amy Rutkin; Robert Gottheim; Kevin Finnegan; Dell Smitherman; Debra Pucci; [email protected]; Randi Weingarten; Jonathan Westin; [email protected]; Bill Lipton; Ibrahim Khan; Khan Shoieb; Joe Dinkin; Karen Scharff; Jef Pollock; Michael Gianaris; Shelley Mayer; Robert Master; Suri Kasirer; Julie Greenberg; Neal Kwatra; Jesse Campoamor Smith; Jesse Strauss; Sid Davidoff; Norman Steisel; Stephen Aiello; Letitia James; Melissa Mark Viverito Personal email; [email protected]; Jimmy Oddo; Amelia Adams; ; Eric Schneiderman; Eric Schneiderman; Micah Lasher; Kirsten John Foy; Reshma Saujani; Gale Brewer; [email protected]; Marvin Holland; Hatch, Peter; Pete Sikora; Barbara Bowen Subject: Re: An Update from City Hall – What You’re Hearing in the News on Colocations… Date: Sunday, March 09, 2014 5:38:33 PM CHARTERS in New York City The conversation around charters is a good one to have. While the vast majority of New York’s students are served by traditional public schools, we are committed making sure EVERY child in New York City can secure a quality education that prepares students for career and college. If we’re going to educate our children for the 21st century, we must not divide parents and children in this discussion. It’s time for all leaders and stakeholders to unite around common goals and a strong public policy that lifts up every student. Latest on Charters & Co-Location: · New York City made decisions based on sound public policy and what’s best for our schools and students. · The mayor and his team inherited 45 colocations proposals for this coming September that were rushed through in the final days of the past administration. Because of the hasty manner of these original approvals, the mayor and his team needed to act quickly to determine if these were all good ideas. · The mayor and his team were determined to do right by all students, and we set up objective criteria to make sure children weren’t harmed because of these decisions. · The objective criteria were simple. o No elementary schools opening on high school campuses o No colocations that create very small schools (under 250) that cannot provide range of support needed to serve our students effectively o No colocations that require heavy construction o We will not reduce District 75 seats – special education. Will not disadvantage those kids in need. · In all, the mayor’s team approved 36 of the 45 total colocation proposals because working with school communities, those plans could be implemented responsibly. · Nine proposals were declined because they did not meet these smart, common sense standards. · Contrary to some of the news reports, 14 of 17 charter proposals were approved, and 5 out of 8 proposals were approved from the Success Academy network. · Two colocations were declined because they would have put an elementary school into a high school campus. This is a bad education policy that doesn’t work for either population of kids because it doesn’t enable shared resources such as AP classes or a library. No students were impacted by these two decisions because these schools have not had their lotteries yet. · A third colocation that was declined at PS149 would have reduced enrollment for special education students already going to school at there — kids with serious disabilities that our system has too often let down. · We are here to serve ALL of our kids. · And just like we won’t approve a colocation that will hurt special needs students at a traditional public school, we won’t turn our backs on the children who were planning to attend this charter school prior to this decision. We are working to find space for the kids at Success Academy 4 because we know that every child, every student is our charge. · And we are working cooperatively with a number of charters right now on a range of shared priorities. · This administration is committed to working with all parents, educators and stakeholders to ensure that every single one of New York’s 1.1 million students receives a great education. From: B To: Patrick Gaspard Subject: Fw: VANITY FAIR: The de Blasio Diaries, Chapter 55: Cropped Out Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 5:52:28 PM Enjoy!! From: Clips <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:56:37 +0000 To: Clips<[email protected]> Subject: VANITY FAIR: The de Blasio Diaries, Chapter 55: Cropped Out The de Blasio Diaries, Chapter 55: Cropped Out VANITY FAIR - Staff http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/02/bill-de-blasio-diaries-chirlane-new-york-times-magazine Our mayor dad explains why he had to make a last-minute change to his Valentine’s Day plans. Dear Diary, Valentine’s Day was not, to say the least, always a favorite holiday of mine. There were some years when I would call in sick to school on it. “Mom, I’ve got . I’ve got that tall-guy nauseous thing . Kyle was telling me about it—you, uh, get it after you get a growth spurt,” I told her one year, and then I hid under the covers reading my Batman comics the whole day. I just wasn’t the romantic sort of guy at that age. I was a foot taller than all the other dudes, and my jump shot was garbage. If you’re gangly and tall in your teens and not a basketball star, you’re basically hopeless. Everything changed when I got to college, though. I was dating a girl whom I really liked and I took her to this Italian place my mom had recommended (What? This is my diary—if I can’t be honest here, then where?) and then we saw a movie (I don’t even remember which one, which tells you how well the date was going :D). That was the confidence boost I needed. My Valentine’s Day celebrations with Chirlane have been pretty low-key. We’re not really your seven-course-dinner and horse-and- carriage-ride kind of couple, which shouldn’t come as much of a surprise (hmmm, maybe should have used imagery other than horse- and-carriage there!). We went bowling a few years ago. One time, Chirlane went to some poetry retreat and straight up didn’t even realize she wouldn’t be home for Valentine’s Day. It was fine! I made cannolis with Dante and Chiara instead. We’ve never put much stock in the Hallmark brand of gooeyness; we’d rather eat out of a clay pot our daughter made in art class than on some fancy china, ya catch my drift? This year, though, I decided to really try and be a romantic, for once, to channel my inner Mario Lopez. (I met that guy once, and was very impressed; his skin really glistens.) I arranged for a helicopter ride over the city, and I rented out our favorite local spot for the night, for dinner, with the chef on retainer to make whatever Chirlane wished. And then I had a book made of all of her sketches from the past decade. (She’s always sketching . she’s just overteeming with creative spirit, that woman). It’s been an intense two years. I felt like she deserved to be really pampered for a night. I wanted to do something special. On Valentine’s Day, though, I got an e-mail from my press team. “You know that feature Chirlane’s doing for The New York Times Magazine?” it started. (My first thought was that somehow Chirlane was breaking up with me via magazine profile—the late hours of this job will make a man insane, and ever since getting back from Iowa, I haven’t been able to sleep.) “Well, it’s out, and the photos are . interesting. You might want to take a look.” I clicked immediately on the attachment: the first photo I saw looked fine, it was the two of us gazing into each other’s eyes. In the second, though, my head was, well, cropped off at the middle. I wrote back to my aide, “Hey, I think this is funny! It’s fine! It’s just a joke about how I’m tall, right?” But then I started to think about it some more. Was it a joke about me being tall? Or was there more to it? Was the photo editor trying to make some kind of point about our relative merits? Was there a joke at my expense embedded in here? I started having tremors remembering the New York Magazine cover, in which I was miniaturized to about a twentieth of the page. What was it with these magazine people and manipulating my image? No one ever messed with Bloomberg like this! Do I really give people the idea that they can do whatever they like to my face and I’ll just laugh it off?!?!? And, if so, that’s maybe not a bad trait for a person to have, but for a mayor!??! I went into Chirlane’s office, where she was grinning broadly in a way I had frankly never seen before. She said, “Did you see these photos of us?!? I love them. I just had my person tweet them!” I just nodded, solemnly. “Yeah,” I said. “I saw them.” “I think I want to blow them up, like poster-sized, and hang them in the house.” “Oh, uh, maybe . sure, sure.” She looked up. “So, what do you want to do tonight, for Valentine’s Day?” There was a part of me, a part I didn’t particularly like but had to acknowledge nevertheless, that, despite what my head was saying, despite my better instincts, hesitated.