DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme (Including Blackpool and Ballyvolane)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme (Including Blackpool and Ballyvolane) LOWER LEE (CORK CITY) FLOOD RELIEF SCHEME (INCLUDING BLACKPOOL AND BALLYVOLANE) CONSTRAINTS STUDY JULY 2014 Report Control Sheet FORM 214 Rev 002 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Client Office of Public Works Project No. 2317 Project Title Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme (Including Blackpool And Ballyvolane)– Environmental Services Report Title Constraints Study Rev. Status Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By Issue Date 0 Draft to Client C Malone B Keville M Joyce 11.09.2013 B Keville T Shryane L Dolan 1 Final B Keville B Keville M Joyce 08.07.2014 J Reid J Reid L Dolan Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme in association with LOWER LEE (CORK CITY) FLOOD RELIEF SCHEME (INCLUDING BLACKPOOL AND BALLYVOLANE) CONSTRAINTS STUDY REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 1 SUMMARY OF KEY CONSTRAINTS ............................................................................................ 2 1..... INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 ..... Overview of Scheme ................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 ..... Study Area ................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 ..... Stage of Process ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 ..... Scope of assessment ................................................................................................................ 10 1.5 ..... Consultation ............................................................................................................................... 10 2..... SCHEME CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND ......................................................................... 11 2.1 ..... History of Flooding ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 ..... Future Changes ......................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 ..... Potential Flood Risk Management Measures ........................................................................... 12 2.4 ..... Topography And Mapping ......................................................................................................... 12 3..... ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ..................................................................................... 14 3.1 ..... Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 14 3.2 ..... Methodology and Guidelines ..................................................................................................... 14 3.3 ..... Human Beings ........................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.1 .... Settlements and Planning Policy ........................................................................................ 15 3.3.2 .... Population and Housing ..................................................................................................... 18 3.3.3 .... Industry and Business ........................................................................................................ 19 3.3.4 .... Tourism .............................................................................................................................. 22 3.3.5 .... Community Facilities .......................................................................................................... 23 3.3.6 .... Key Constraints .................................................................................................................. 24 3.4 ..... Ecology ...................................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.1. ... Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.2. ... Desk study .......................................................................................................................... 26 3.4.3. ... Field Study ......................................................................................................................... 42 3.4.4. ... Summary of Key Constraints and Implication for the Proposed Scheme .......................... 45 3.5 ..... Water ......................................................................................................................................... 49 3.5.1 .... Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 49 3.5.2 .... Receiving Environment ...................................................................................................... 49 3.5.3 .... Summary of Key Constraints and Implication for the Proposed Scheme .......................... 57 3.6 ..... Soils & Geology ......................................................................................................................... 58 3.6.1 .... Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 58 3.6.2 .... Receiving Environment ...................................................................................................... 58 3.6.3 .... Summary of Key Constraints and Implication for the Proposed Scheme .......................... 61 3.7 ..... Archaeology and Cultural Heritage ........................................................................................... 62 3.7.1 .... Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 62 3.7.2 .... Receiving Environment ...................................................................................................... 63 3.7.3 .... Summary of Key Constraints and Implication for the Proposed Scheme .......................... 63 3.8 ..... Landscape ................................................................................................................................. 65 3.8.1 .... Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 65 3.8.2 .... Receiving Environment ...................................................................................................... 65 3.8.3 .... Summary of Key Constraints and Implications for the Proposed Scheme ........................ 73 3.9 ..... Air Quality .................................................................................................................................. 75 3.9.1 .... Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 75 Constraints Study Report (i) Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme in association with 3.9.2 .... Receiving Environment ...................................................................................................... 75 3.9.3 .... Summary of Key Constraints and Implication for the Proposed Scheme .......................... 76 3.10 ... Material Assets .......................................................................................................................... 77 3.10.1 .. Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 77 3.10.2 .. Receiving Environment ...................................................................................................... 77 3.10.3 .. Summary of Key Constraints and Implications for the Proposed Scheme ........................ 82 4..... PUBLIC CONSULTATION..................................................................................................... 84 4.1 ..... Public Consultation Arrangements ............................................................................................ 84 4.1.1 .... Public Information Day ....................................................................................................... 84 4.1.2 .... Advertising of Public Information Day ................................................................................ 84 4.1.3 .... Literature Available for the Consultation ............................................................................ 85 4.2 ..... Public Consultation Materials .................................................................................................... 85 4.2.1 .... Public Consultation Brochure ............................................................................................. 85 4.2.2 .... Public Consultation Questionnaire ..................................................................................... 85 4.2.3 .... Public Consultation Exhibition Posters............................................................................... 86 4.2.4 .... Project Website .................................................................................................................. 86 4.3 ..... PID Exhibition ............................................................................................................................ 86 4.3.1 .... Officials
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment B.2 Characteristics and Composition of the Substance Or Material for Disposal
    POC Maintenance Dredging Application | January 2014 Attachment B.2 Characteristics and Composition of the Substance or Material for Disposal Reports included as part of this attachment: • Assessment of Benthic and Fisheries Impacts of Maintenance Dredging in Lough Mahon and the Lower River Lee, Aquatic Services Unit (March 2013) [included separately within Attachment B.2]. Relevant references include: Section 2.2 – Sub-tidal Benthos Survey Section 2.4 – Inter-tidal Survey Results & Overview Section 2.5 – Sub-tidal Surveys • Water Injection Dredging Tracer Study, Van Oord (July 2012) [included as part of Attachment D.3]. Relevant references include: Section 2.2 – Tracer Particle Size Section 3.2 – Sampling Survey Section 4 – Data and Results Castletownbere Feasibility Report | December 2013 • June 2011 Sediment Sampling Results [included separately within Attachment B.2]. In summary, these results describe that the sampled material generally comprises black mud with over 50%-60% fraction size less than 63 microns. • June 2013 Sediment Sampling Results [included as part of Attachment B.1 (i)]. In summary, these results describe that the sampled material generally comprises mud with over 60% fraction size less than 63 microns. Report Reference: IBM0455/R/KG Revision Number: - 2 rpsgroup.com/ireland Assessment of Benthic and Fisheries Impacts of Maintenance Dredging in Lough Mahon and the Lower River Lee (2011-2012) Commissioned by: Port of Cork Undertaken by: Aquatic Services Unit (UCC) (March 2013) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 3 IINTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Cork City Licence Register No
    Annual Environmental Report 2015 Agglomeration Name: Cork City Licence Register No. D0033-01 Table of Contents Section 1. Executive Summary and Introduction to the 2015 AER 1 1.1 Summary report on 2015 1 Section 2. Monitoring Reports Summary 3 2.1 Summary report on monthly influent monitoring 3 2.2 Discharges from the agglomeration 4 2.3 Ambient monitoring summary 5 2.4 Data collection and reporting requirements under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 7 2.5 Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) - report for previous year 7 Section 3 Operational Reports Summary 9 3.1 Treatment Efficiency Report 9 3.2 Treatment Capacity Report 10 3.3 Extent of Agglomeration Summary Report 11 3.4 Complaints Summary 12 3.5 Reported Incidents Summary 13 3.6 Sludge / Other inputs to the WWTP 14 Section 4. Infrastructural Assessments and Programme of Improvements 15 4.1 Storm water overflow identification and inspection report 15 4.2 Report on progress made and proposals being developed to meet the improvement programme requirements. 22 Section 5. Licence Specific Reports 26 5.1 Priority Substances Assessment 27 5.2 Drinking Water Abstraction Point Risk Assessment. 28 5.3 Shellfish Impact Assessment Report. 28 5.4 Toxicity / Leachate Management 28 5.5 Toxicity of the Final Effluent Report 28 5.6 Pearl Mussel Measures Report 28 5.7 Habitats Impact Assessment Report 28 Section 6. Certification and Sign Off 29 Section 7. Appendices 30 Appendix 7.1 - Annual Statement of Measures 31 Appendix 7.1A – Influent & Effluent Monitoring Incl. UWWT Compliances 32 Appendix 7.2 – Ambient River Monitoring Summary 33 Appendix 7.2A – Ambient Transitional & Coastal Monitoring Summary 34 Appendix 7.3 – Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) Summary Sheets 35 Appendix 7.4 – Sewer Integrity Tool Output 36 WasteWater Treatment Plant Upgrade.
    [Show full text]
  • Cork Harbour Special Protection Area
    Cork Harbour Special Protection Area (Site Code 4030) ≡ Conservation Objectives Supporting Document VERSION 1 National Parks & Wildlife Service November 2014 T AB L E O F C O N T E N T S SUMMARY PART ONE - INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 1 1.1 Introductiion to the desiignatiion of Speciiall Protectiion Areas ........................................... 1 1.2 Introductiion to Cork Harbour Speciiall Protectiion Area ................................................... 2 1.3 Introductiion to Conservatiion Objjectiives........................................................................ 2 PART TWO – SITE DESIGNATION INFORMATION .................................................................... 4 2.1 Speciiall Conservatiion Interests of Cork Harbour Speciiall Protectiion Area ...................... 4 PART THREE – CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES FOR CORK HARBOUR SPA ........................... 9 3.1 Conservatiion Objjectiives for the non-breediing Speciiall Conservatiion Interests of Cork Harbour SPA ............................................................................................................. 9 PART FOUR – REVIEW OF THE CONSERVATION CONDITION OF WATERBIRD SPECIAL CONSERVATION INTERESTS ................................................................... 13 4.1 Popullatiion data for waterbiird SCI speciies of Cork Harbour SPA ................................. 13 4.2 Waterbiird popullatiion trends for Cork Harbour SPA ..................................................... 14 4.3 Cork
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Our Catchment
    streamscapes Lee source to sea An Introduction to our Catchment Where the Lee is young...the rich & complex ecology of the Gearagh www.streamscapes.ie “To protect your rivers, protect your mountains.” - Emperor Yu (1600BC) Foreword: What is a Catchment? When you think of it, we all live in valleys, no matter how steep or broad, SAFETY FIRST!!! The ‘StreamScapes’ programme involves a hands-on survey of your local landscape and and all of our valleys have streams and rivers. From the hills above us to waterways...safety must always be the underlying concern. If you are undertaking aquatic survey, remember that all bodies of water are potentially dangerous places. the sea below, these watercourses make their way across our landscape and Slippery stones and banks, broken glass and other rubbish, polluted water courses which define the Catchment in which we live. Here a mountain stream runs may host disease, poisonous plants, barbed wire in riparian zones, fast moving currents, misjudging the depth of water, cold temperatures...all of these are hazards to be minded! swiftly and tumbles over waterfalls, there a wide river flows easily past If you and your group are planning a visit to a stream, river, canal, or lake for purposes of assessment, ensure that you have a good ratio of experienced and water-friendly adults green fields, through our communities and down to the sea. to students, keep clear of danger, and insist on discipline and caution! In that river, along its banks and into the surrounding landscapes, may be found a wealth of biodiversity; fish, birds, insects, animals, trees, wild Welcome to StreamScapes, a dynamic environmental education programme for schools, flowers, and people, but only if our waters run pure and clean.
    [Show full text]
  • Mahon Local Area Plan 2014
    MAHON LOCAL AREA PLAN 2014 Cork City Council City Hall, Cork Comhairle Cathrach Chorchai Halla na Cathrach, Corcaígh MAHON LOCAL AREA PLAN 2014 Adopted 24 March 2014 Strategic Planning and Economic Development Directorate Cork City Council City Hall, Cork Stiúrthóireacht Pleanála Stratéiseach agus Forbairt Eacnamíochta Comhairle Cathrach Chorchai Halla na Cathrach, Corcaígh Contributors to the Local Area Plan and process This Local Area Plan was prepared by the Planning Policy Section of the Strategic Planning and Economic Development Directorate. Primary authors Other key contributions Jeremy Ward, Senior Executive Planner Geraldine Harris, Assistant Staff Officer Ann Bogan, Senior Planner Helen Sheehan, Clerical Officer Maire Harrington, Senior Executive Technician The plan benefitted from support and contributions from Senior Management, including both Tim Lucey, the (former) City Manager and Patrick Ledwidge, Director of Services (Strategic Planning and Economic Development). Additional contributions to the Local Area Plan content and plan process were made by a wide range of people from across Cork City Council, including: Architects Stephen Sullivan, EA Law Deborah Hegarty, Law Agent Tony Duggan, City Architect Corporate Edith Roberts, SEEO (Property) Roads and Edith Roberts, SEE Affairs Niall O’Donnabhain, SEEO Transportation (Transport) (Property) Elizabeth Kidney, SEO Nicky Carroll, SO (CS) (Transport) Tadgh Keating, SEO (CS) Gerry O’Beirne, DOS John Gibson, EE (Roads Design) John Stapleton, SEE (Roads Design) Noel
    [Show full text]
  • LLFRS Supplementary Report on Option of Raising
    Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme (Drainage Scheme) Supplementary Report on Option of Raising Existing Dams 230436-00 December 2017 Office of Public Works Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme Supplementary Report – Option of Raising Existing Dams Issue to website | 5 December 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 230436-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ireland Ltd Arup One Albert Quay Cork T12 X8N6 Ireland www.arup.com Office of Public Works Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme Supplementary Report – Option of Raising Existing Dams Contents Page Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Background and Context 3 1.2 Scope of the Study 4 1.3 Datums 4 1.4 Consultation with ESB 5 2 Hydrology 6 2.1 Catchment Characteristics 6 2.2 Calculation of Design Flows for Cork 6 2.3 Estimation of additional storage volume required to avoid direct defences 8 3 Description of Existing Dams and Reservoirs 11 3.1 Introduction 11 3.2 Carrigadrohid Dam and Reservoir 11 3.3 Inniscarra Dam and Reservoir 14 4 Overview of Objective and Possible Options 17 4.1 General Objective 17 4.2 Overview of Constraints/Assumptions 17 4.3 Identification of Potentially Feasible Options 21 5 Development of Dam-Raising Options 24 5.1 Introduction 24 5.2 Design/Construction Issues 24 5.3 Preliminary Stability Analysis 26 5.4 Description of Dam Raising Works 28 5.5 Residual Fluvial Defences 40 5.6 Residual Tidal Defences 41 6 Identification of Reservoir Impacts 42 6.1 Introduction 42 6.2 Carragadrohid Reservoir 42 6.3 Inniscarra Reservoir 51 7 Preliminary Cost Estimate 57 7.1 Cost Estimation Methodology 57 7.2 Initial Top-Down Capital Cost Estimate 57 | Issue to website | 5 December 2017 | Arup \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\CORK\JOBS\230000\230436-00\4.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening Assessment for a Proposed Residential Development at Ardarostig, Bishopstown, Cork
    SCREENING ASSESSMENT FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT ARDAROSTIG, BISHOPSTOWN, CORK. In support of the Appropriate Assessment Process Prepared for: HW Planning On behalf of Ardstone Homes Ltd. Prepared by: Kelleher Ecology Services Ltd. November 2018 SCREENING ASSESSMENT FOR A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT ARDAROSTIG, BISHOPSTOWN, CORK. Our Project Reference: 028-01-2018 Document Rev. No. Details Contributors Date A Draft Katherine M. Kelleher 05.07.18 0 Final Katherine M. Kelleher 12.07.18 1 Updates Katherine M. Kelleher 19.10.18 2 Updates Katherine M. Kelleher 28.11.18 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background: Appropriate Assessment .................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 2 2 Brief Description of the Site, Project & Natura 2000 Sites ....................................................... 4 2.1 Site: Location ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Site: Walkover.......................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Project Details.......................................................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY SECURITY in IRELAND 2020 Report ENERGY SECURITY in IRELAND 2020 Report
    ENERGY SECURITY IN IRELAND 2020 Report ENERGY SECURITY IN IRELAND 2020 Report ENERGY SECURITY IN IRELAND 2020 Report September 2020 Report prepared for SEAI by Byrne Ó Cléirigh. Disclaimer While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents of this report, SEAI accepts no liability whatsoever to any third party for any loss or damage arising from any interpretation or use of the information contained in this report, or reliance on any views expressed therein. Public disclosure is authorised. This guide may be reproduced in full or, if content is extracted, then it should be fully credited to SEAI. 1 ENERGY SECURITY IN IRELAND 2020 Report The Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland The Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI) is Ireland’s national energy authority investing in, and delivering, appropriate, effective and sustainable solutions to help Ireland’s transition to a clean energy future. We work with Government, homeowners, businesses and communities to achieve this, through expertise, funding, educational programmes, policy advice, research and the development of new technologies. SEAI is funded by the Government of Ireland through the Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment. SEAI is the official source of energy data for Ireland. We develop and maintain comprehensive national and sectoral statistics for energy production, transformation and end-use. These data are a vital input in meeting international reporting obligations, for advising policymakers and informing investment decisions. SEAI’s core statistics functions are to: • Collect, process and publish energy statistics to support policy analysis and development in line with national needs and international obligations; • Conduct statistical and economic analyses of energy services sectors and sustainable energy options; • Contribute to the development and promulgation of appropriate sustainability indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • Cables and Cable Termination
    Trade of Electrician Standards Based Apprenticeship Cables and Cable Termination Phase 2 Module No. 2.2 Unit No. 2.2.1 COURSE NOTES Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 3 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 4 COMMON ELECTRICAL CONDUCTING MATERIALS ..................................................................... 5 COMMON ELECTRICAL INSULATING MATERIALS ....................................................................... 6 CABLES AND FLEXIBLE CORDS ............................................................................................................ 7 TERMINALS, CLAMPS AND LUGS ....................................................................................................... 12 USE OF HAND TOOLS ............................................................................................................................. 13 MARKING OUT ......................................................................................................................................... 22 FIXING DEVICES ...................................................................................................................................... 26 SURFACE INSTALLATION OF PVC / PVC CABLES ......................................................................... 39 TERMINATING TECHNIQUES .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Lee FRS – Exhibition Report
    Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme Protecting Cork from future flooding Exhibition Report In association with Non-Technical Summary Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme LowerLower LeeLee (Cork(Cork City)City) FloodFlood ReliefRelief SchemeScheme Contents 1. Introduction 2. Project Objectives and Delivery 3. Alternative Solutions Considered 4. Technical Concerns about the Exhibited Scheme 5. Potential Impacts of the Exhibited Scheme 6. Proposed Changes to the Scheme arising from Exhibition Stage 7. Next Steps 8. Conclusion Proposed View Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme 1. Introduction This report outlines the statutory public In its consultation on the Scheme, the OPW consultation process on the proposed Lower was anxious to hear the comments and Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme (“The concerns of members of the public and to Scheme”). This formal public consultation, address genuine issues in a constructive way. known as “Public Exhibition”, followed on In this report, the main issues that arose from a number of informal consultations during the Public Exhibition are highlighted with the public during 2013 and 2014 and is and addressed. These can be grouped into provided for under the Arterial Drainage Acts, a number of main topic areas as outlined in 1945 and 1995, under which the Scheme is the sections following and in the body of the being advanced. report. The report explains the essential facts about the project and answers some of the The Scheme was commissioned by the Office main questions raised in relation to suggested of Public Works (OPW) with the objective alternative solutions to address flooding of providing protection for Cork City and in Cork city.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayfield Matters Joins in Celebrating the 50Th Anniversary of Our Lady Crowned Church
    25 Years Serving the Local Community Mayfield Matter s Mayfield Community Training Centre FREE COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER, HIGHLIGHTING LOCAL NEWS St. Joseph’s Community Association On 6th November, Mayfield Community Training Centre had an open day to celebrate ISSUE 2562: years Jun/Jul of 2012serv- Our Lady Crowned Parish Celebrates its Jubilee. The Bishop of Cork and Ross, the Very Rev. Dr. John Buckley is joined by the Lord Mayor of Cork, Cllr. Terry Shannon, priests and altar servers at the 50th Anniversary Mass at Our Lady Crowned Church, Mayfield on Sunday 27th May 2012. Picture: Andy Gibson This issue of Mayfield Matters joins in celebrating the 50th anniversary of Our Lady Crowned Church. The church is closely connected to the spiritual, educational and social life of our community. Many of the social services in our area were initiated at parish level. The parish can take justifiable pride in the contribution of the many priests, sisters and lay Catholics who have served the common good. Our Lady Crowned Parish has reflected the changing profile of the area, welcoming newcomers and bringing all together in a community of faith. Mayfield Matters is staffed by a dedicated team of volunteers who contribute to the Newsletter in all the various stages of production. All contributors who write for the Mayfield Matters is staffed by a dedicated team of volunteers who contribute to the Newsletter do so on a voluntary basis. Mayfield Matters operates independently and is Newsletter in all the various stages of production. All contributors who write for the entirely Matters is staffed by a dedicated team of volunteers who contribute to the Newsletter do so on a voluntary basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme (Drainage Scheme)
    Lower Lee (Cork City) Flood Relief Scheme (Drainage Scheme) Supplementary Report on Option of River Diversions 230436-00 December 2017 Office of Public Works Lower Lee Flood Relief Scheme Supplementary Report on Option of River Diversions 230436-00 Issue to website | 5 December 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 230436-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ireland Ltd Arup One Albert Quay Cork T12 X8N6 Ireland www.arup.com Office of Public Works Lower Lee Flood Relief Scheme Supplementary Report on Option of River Diversions Contents Page Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 4 2 Potential for Partial Diversion of the River Lee at Cork 6 2.1 Suggested River Lee Bypass Route 6 2.2 Estimation of Required Conveyance Capacity of Diversion. 8 2.3 Potential for Gravity or Pumped Diversion with 200m3/s Capacity 8 3 Option of Isolating South Channel by Substantially Diverting Curaheen and Glasheen 10 3.1 Introduction and Background 10 3.2 Storage Capacity of South Channel 10 3.3 Estimation of Peak Tributary Flows and Volumes 11 3.4 Isolation of South Channel – Required Reduction in Tributary Inflows 12 4 Options for Diversion of Glasheen 14 5 Options for Diversion of Curraheen 16 5.1 Option for Diversion of Curraheen into Tramore River 16 5.2 Potential for Diversion of Curraheen to River Lee at Inchigaggin 17 5.3 Curraheen Storage Option 19 5.4 Curraheen - Combination of Options 20 6 Summary of Alternative Solution Incorporating Optimum Curraheen/Glasheen Solution 21 7 Preliminary Cost Estimate 23 8 Conclusion 24 Appendices Appendix A Flood Risk Mapping Appendix B Preliminary Cost Estimate 230436-00 | Issue to website | 5 December 2017 | Arup \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\CORK\JOBS\230000\230436-00\4.
    [Show full text]