Refresher Programme for the Officers of Delhi Higher Judicial Service posted as District Judge (Commercial Courts) (25.07.2020)

Delhi Judicial Academy, Dwarka, Sector - 14, New Delhi - 110078

For Private and Internal Circulation only

INDEX Session I: Force Mazeure in Times of Covid-19: Challenges and the Road Ahead

1. CIRCULARS

S. No. Title 1. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (‘MORTH’) circular dated 18.05.2020 (‘MORTH Circular’) 2. Ministry of Home Affairs circular dated 17.05.2020 3. Ministry of Finance office memorandum with respect to ‘Manual for Procurement of Goods, 2017’ dated February 19, 2020 4. Ministry of Finance office memorandum with respect to ‘Manual for Procurement of Goods, 2017’ clarification dated May 13, 2020 5. Ministry of New & Renewable Energy office memorandum with respect to solar project developers dated March 20, 2020

2. CASE LAWS

S. No. Title Citation A. Force Majeure and Performance of Contracts

Supreme Court 1. South East Asia Marine Engineering and Constructions Ltd. v. Oil Civil Appeal Nos. 673 India Limited (¶¶21-27) and 900 of 2012 Dated: 11.05.2020 2. Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity (¶¶32-42) (2017) 14 SCC 80

3. The Naihati Jute Mills Ltd. vs. Khyaliram Jagannath (¶20) AIR1968SC522 4. Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur and Company and Ors AIR 1954 SC 44 (¶¶10-27)

High Court of Delhi 1. Rashmi Cement Ltd v. World Metals & Alloys (FZC) & Anr(¶¶24- O.M.P.(I)(COMM) 36) 118/2020 Dated: 18.06.2020

2. M/S Polytech Trade Foundation v UOI (¶¶45-51) W.P.(C) 3029/2020 Order Dated: 22.05.2020

1 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

B. Construction Contracts High Court of Delhi 1. MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd. v South Delhi Municipal W.P.(C) 2241/2020 Corporation (¶¶27, 29, 31) Dated: 12.06.2020

C. Invocation of Bank Guarantee High Court of Delhi 1. M/S Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. v. Vedanta Limited & O.M.P (I) (COMM.) Anr(¶¶56-58, 62-63, 69) No. 88/2020 Dated: 29.05.2020 2. Indrajit Power Private Limited vs. Union of India and Ors. (¶¶54- W.P. (C) 2957/2020 55) (URGENT) Dated: 28.04.2020

3. Coastal Andhra Power Limited v. Andhra Pradesh Central Power 256(2019)DLT764 Distribution Co. Ltd. and Ors. (¶29)

4. Global Steel Philippines v. STC of India Ltd. (¶¶12,14,17-18) FAO (OS) No. 186/2009, Dated: 12.05.2009 5. Global Steel Philippines (SPV-AMC) v. STC of India Ltd. and Ors. 2009 (110) DRJ 516 (¶¶59-63)

D. Pledge of Shares Other High Court 1. Rural Fairprice Wholesale Limited and Ors. v. IDBI Trusteeship 2020 SCC OnLine Services Limited and Ors. (¶7) Bom 518

E. Classification of an asset as Non-Performing Asset (NPA) High Court of Delhi 1. Anant Raj Ltd v. Yes Bank (¶¶25-31) 2020 SCC OnLine Del 543 2. Shakuntla Educational & Welfare Society v Punjab & Sind Bank W.P.(C)2959/2020 (¶¶13-14) Order Dated: 13.04.2020 3. India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Securities Exchange Board of W.P.(C) Urgent No. India & Ors. (¶8) 7/2020 order dated 03.04.2020

2 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

Other High Court 1. Transcon Skycity Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. ICICI Bank and Ors. (¶¶38- Writ Petition LD-VC 44) Nos. 28 and 30 of 2020 Dated: 11.04.2020 (BOMHC)

F. Invocation of LC’s (Letter of Credits) Other High Court 1. Standard Retail Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. G.S. Global Corp. and Ors(¶4) Commercial Arbitration Petition Nos. 408 and 407 of 2020 Dated: 08.04.2020 (BOMHC)

G. Defaults in Payment of Reverse Factoring Facility High Court of Delhi 1. Eastman Auto & Power Ltd. v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors. (¶¶15- W.P.(C) 2997/2020 16) Order Dated: 27.04.2020

H. Lease/Rent Agreements Supreme Court 1. Sushila Devi v. Hari Singh (¶8) AIR 1971 SC 1756 2. Dhruv Dev Chand v. Harmohinder Singh and Ors.(¶¶9-11,17) AIR 1968 SC 1024

High Court of Delhi 1. Gaurav Jain v. UOI (¶¶4-6,9-10) WP(C) 3519 of 2020, Dated: 15-06-2020 2. Ramanand and Ors. v. Girish Soni and Ors. (¶¶30-32) R.C. Rev. 447/2017 Dated: 21.05.2020

I. Employment Contracts and Payment of Wages Supreme Court 1. Ficus Pax Private Ltd. and Ors. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. W. P. (C) Diary No. (¶37) 10983 of 2020 Order Dated:12.06.2020

3 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

Other High Court 1. Align Components Pvt Ltd v Union of India (¶¶6,8) W. P. STAMP NO.10569 of 2020 Order Dated: 30.04.2020 (BOM HC)

3. Practice Directions by HMJ Pratibha M. Singh

S.No. Suit Title Suit No. Date of Direction(s) Decision

1. Amrish Agarwal CM (M) 27.08.19 The TC’s order, taking on record the Legal v. Venus Home 1059/18 Proceedings Certificate relating to the trademark, Appliances Pvt. was challenged on the ground that evidence had Ltd. already concluded and the matter was at the stage of final arguments. The Court observed that in a trademark infringement matter, it is imperative for the Court to be able to see that the trademark itself is registered. Directions were therefore passed, specifying the documents, such as the Legal Proceedings Certificate, which ought to be filed along with the plaint in trade mark infringement matters. (Para 7)

2. Lalit Kumar v. CM (M) 29.08.19 The TC’s order, appointing an LC to seize the M/s Samsonite IP 737/19 alleged counterfeit products, was challenged on Holding SARL the ground that the name of Defendant No. 2 was mentioned as ‘Ashok Kumar’. The reason given for not specifying the name of the Defendant was that the Plaintiff was unaware of the name of the Defendant’s proprietor. In order to ensure that such grievances are not raised in the future, a direction was given that if the name of the proprietor of the Defendant or any other entity is not known, the trading name shall appear in the memo of parties as the name of the Defendant. (Para 7)

3. Satender Singh CM (M) 29.08.19 In view of the fact that several adjournments Rana & Ors. v. 1017/19 were taking place due to non-receipt or non- Gaon Sabha supply of copies of complete pleadings and Kadipur& Anr. documents, directions were passed in respect of

4 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

service of copies of documents/pleadings between counsels and court clerks. (Para 3)

4. BVG India Ltd. CM (M) 04.09.19 In this case, a handwritten notation had caused v. Navin Saini 1311/19 confusion as to whether only the dispute in the suit was settled or whether all the disputes arising under the agreements between the parties were settled. It was observed that the court which recorded the settlement ought to have perused the report and clarified the same prior to disposing of the suit. Direction was given to Mediators to not allow any handwritten notations or words, in the Mediation/settlement agreements, especially if the same are not countersigned/initialed by the Mediator himself. (Para’s 6&7)

5. PSA Nitrogen CM (M) 17.09.19 The TC’s order, rejecting the Plaintiff’s Ltd. v. Maeda 4/19 application for condonation of delay in filing the Corporation written statement to the Defendant’s’ counterclaim, was challenged on the ground that the counter-claim had not been registered. The Court clarified that a counter-claim is governed by the same rules as applicable to plaints under the Commercial Courts Act. Hence, it was observed that every counter-claim must be registered before summons can be issued and the time for filing the written statement runs from the date of service of summons. Directions were given prescribing the procedure to be followed for registration of counter-claims to ensure that there is no ambiguity in the timelines for filing of the written statement to the counter-claim. (Para 11)

6. Rajesh Aggarwal CM(M) 17.09.19 The TC’s order, permitting an amendment to the v. Om Prakash & 768/19 plaint, was challenged on the ground that it was Anr. highly belated. The Court observed that at the stage of final arguments the TC ought not to permit amendments in the plaint. (Para’s 4&5)

7. M/s Prakash Oil CM (M) 19.09.19 The question before the Court was whether the Corporation & 1002/18 admissibility and mode of proof of an exhibited Anr. v. document is to be decided at the final stage or BrijKishan during the trial itself - at the time when the exhibit mark is being put on the document. The

5 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

Court observed that the mere marking of a document as an exhibit does not amount to it being proved. Several judgments were relied on to clarify the procedure to be adopted in the case of exhibition of documents. Finally, it was observed that “allowing objections regarding exhibited documents to be captured in the statement of the witness and permitting cross examination to be conducted without prejudice to the objections raised, would strike the right balance between ensuring that the trial is not protracted and that the rights of the party are also not jeopardized”. (Para’s 10-14)

8. Veena Gupta v. CM (M) 30.10.19 The TC’s order, imposing costs on the Plaintiff Bajaj Allianz Life 1555/19 for non-appearance, was challenged on the Insurance Co. ground that the Junior Counsel’s appearance had Ltd. wrongly been recorded as ‘Proxy Counsel’, due to which the Plaintiff was considered as having not appeared. The Court issued directions clarifying when the term “Proxy Counsel” ought to be used.(Para 6)

9. Zile Singh v. CM (M) 06.11.19 This petition challenged an order of the TC by Santosh@Santra 1296/18 which the evidence of a witness was directed to & Ors. not be read, as no affidavit had been filed on their behalf and the evidence of another witness, who was present in Court, was not recorded, on the ground that the list of witnesses was not filed. In so far as the second witness was concerned, the Court held that “once witnesses are summoned and are present before the Court, with notice to the opposite party, the usual procedure ought to be to record their evidence rather than sending them back”. As regards the first witness, it was found that a non-existent affidavit had been exhibited. In view of these discrepancies in the recording of evidence, directions were passed, specifying the manner in which evidence must be recorded. (Para 14)

10. Ganga Ram v. CM (M) 22.11.19 Two grievances were raised in this petition. The Shekhar Kumar 1656/19 first was that the TC had accepted the Plaintiff’s witness’ evidence by way of affidavit without the Plaintiff having filed a list of witnesses. The

6 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

second was in relation to the de-exhibition of exhibited documents. With respect to the first grievance, while an exception was made in this case, it was observed that parties ought not to be permitted to commence evidence without having filed a list of witnesses. As regards the second grievance, it was observed that the mere exhibition of a document does not amount to it being proved. (Para’s 5-8)

11. Harwant Singh v. CM(M) 22.11.19 In this case, the written statement was taken on Govind Singh 1662/19 record, subject to costs. A demand draft was made out in the name of the Plaintiff, however, the same was not accepted on the ground that the costs were to be tendered in the name of the Plaintiff’s counsel. On the Plaintiff’s claim that costs had not been tendered, the written statement was taken off the record and additional costs were imposed on the Plaintiff. Setting aside this order, the Court held that - “Whenever orders are passed imposing costs on parties, unless there is any specific person in whose favour the costs are directed to be paid, it is understood that costs are to be in the name of the party in whose favour the costs are being awarded.”(Para 5)

12. Krishan Kumar CM(M) 29.11.19 The grievance in this petition was that the TC v. Shanti Devi& 1694/19 had settled the issues and also directed affidavits- Anr. in-evidence to be filed, without waiting for the Plaintiff’s to file their replication. After passing certain directions, specific to the case at hand, the Court observed that – “In order to avoid unnecessary delays and complexities, by framing issues prior to filing of replication, it is directed that in future, Trial Courts shall ensure that if permission for replication is being granted, issues shall be framed only after the replication is filed.”(Para 4)

13. SarveshBisaria v. CM (M) 17.12.19 In this case, though the suit had been filed under Anand 1787/19 Order XXXVII CPC, summons were not issued NirogDham under the said order. Instead, a template order Hospital Pvt. had been passed which simply set out various Ltd. portions of the CPC, did not record any satisfaction under Order XXXVII CPC and

7 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

required the Defendant to file his written statement within 30 days of the receipt of summons. It was held that – “Whenever summons are issued, the Court has to be conscious of the provision under which the summons is to be issued. The summons in a summary suit is completely different from the summons in Form No.2, for settlement of issues in an ordinary suit. Clearly, the Court has not taken into consideration that the suit was filed under Order XXXVII CPC and the Plaintiff’s grievance is thus completely justified.”(Para 10)

14. ICICI v. Naveen CM (M) 23.12.19 These petitions concerned applications seeking Kalkal;ICICI v. 1821/201 ; permission to sell hypothecated vehicles. In all Priya Baveja; 9; CM 13.01.20 these cases, though possession of the vehicle had ICICI v. (M) 20; been taken by the Receiver, inordinate delay was Deepanshu 16/2020; 13.01.20 being caused in the grant of permission for sale Bansal & Anr. CM (M) 20 of the vehicle, leading to additional expenditure & 18/2020 for maintenance etc. In view of this, as well as Connected the fact that the value of the vehicle deteriorates Matters as time passes by, the Court directed the TC to expeditiously consider such applications. The directions, as to the manner in which cases of vehicle loans are to be dealt with, as passed by a ld. Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Kamal Kumar Garewal, [FAO 49/2015, decided on 29th May, 2015], were reiterated and public auction was permitted in all the cases. (Naveen Kalkal: Para’s 6-9; Priya Baveja: Para’s 9-12; Deepanshu Bansal: Para’s 5-8)

15. YN Gupta CM (M) 24.12.19 In this case, the matter had been heard and (Deceased thr. 1827/19 adjourned on more than 10 hearings, with the LRs) v. MA order-sheet showing the matter as being either Ramzana ‘part-heard’ or listed ‘for orders’. The Court held that it was impermissible to repeatedly adjourn cases for orders and observed that the same “reflects extremely poorly on the Court system” and that “Repeated hearing of arguments also increases the litigation costs for litigants, as they have to incur expenses for legal representation, etc., Such a practice would also make access to justice unaffordable.”(Para’s 18-20)

8 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

Session II: Commercial Courts Act, 2015

A. STATUTES REFERRED

S. No. Title 1. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (as amended by The Arbitration and Conciliation Act (Amendment) Act, 2015) 2. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 3. Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of the High Courts Act, 2015 (as amended by the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts (Amendment) Act, 2018) 4. Court Fees Act, 1870 5. Indian Evidence Act, 1872 6. Specific Relief Act, 1963

B. BILLS & RULES

S. No. Title 1. Commercial Courts (Pre-Institution, Mediation and Settlement) Rules, 2018 2. Commercial Courts (Statistical Data) Amendment Rules, 2020 3. Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016 4. Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 5. Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 as amended by notification dated 16.10.2018 6. High Court Commercial Division Procedure Rules, 2012

C. CIRCULAR & NOTICE

S. No. Title 1. Circular on “Case Management Hearing” for commercial cases by the office of District & Sessions Judge, South District, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi, dated: 05.12.2018 2. Guidance note for conducting arbitration proceedings by video conference

D. INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS

S.No. Title Source 1. Convention on the Recognition and http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitrat Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, ion/NY-conv/New-York-Convention-E.pdf 1958 9 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

2. Hague Convention on Choice of Court https://assets.hcch.net/docs/510bc238-7318- Agreements, 2005 47ed-9ed5-e0972510d98b.pdf

E. LAW COMMISSION REPORTS

S. Title Source No. 1. 253rd Law Commission Report, Commercial Division and http://lawcommissionofindia.nic. Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts and in/reports/Report_No.253_Com Commercial Courts Bill, 2015 mercial_Division_and_Commerc ial_Appellate_Division_of_High _Courts_and__Commercial_Cou rts_Bill._2015.pdf 2. 245th Law Commission Report, http://lawcommissionofindia. Arrears and Backlog: Creating Additional Judicial nic.in/reports/Report_No.245. (wo)manpower pdf

3. 240th Law Commission Report on Costs in Civil http://lawcommissionofindia. Litigation(May, 2012) nic.in/reports/report240.pdf 4. 222nd Law Commission Report, Need for Justice-dispensation http://lawcommissionofindia. through ADR, 2009 nic.in/reports/report222.pdf 5. 188th Law Commission Report, Proposals for Constitution of http://lawcommissionofindia. High-Tech Fast-Track Commercial Divisions in High Courts, nic.in/reports/188th%20report 2003 .pdf

F. OTHER REPORTS

S. No. Title Source 1. Doing Business 2020 Comparing Business Regulation in 190 World Bank Group Economies http://documents.worldbank.o rg/curated/en/6887615719349 46384/pdf/Doing-Business- 2020-Comparing-Business- Regulation-in-190- Economies.pdf 2. Doing Business 2019 Training for Reform World Bank Group http://www.worldbank.org/co ntent/dam/doingBusiness/me dia/Annual- Reports/English/DB2019- report_web-version.pdf

10 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

3. Doing Business 2018 Reforming to Create Jobs World Bank Group http://www.doingbusiness.org /content/dam/doingBusiness/ media/Annual- Reports/English/DB2018- Full-Report.pdf

4. Doing Business 2016 Measuring Regulatory Quality and World Bank Group Efficiency http://www.doingbusiness.org /content/dam/doingBusiness/ media/Annual- Reports/English/DB16-Full- Report.pdf

5. The influence of international commercial and investment law Governance and Social and procedure on foreign investment and economic Development Resource development/ growth (2013) Centre http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/op en/hdq881.pdf 6. Case Management through CIS 3.0 eCommittee Supreme Court of India http://doj.gov.in/sites/default/ files/CIS%203.0%20final_0.p df

7. National Service and Tracking of Electronic Process User eCommittee Supreme Court Manual of India http://doj.gov.in/sites/default/ files/NSTEP- User%20manual_0.pdf

8. e-Court Digital Payment User Manual eCommittee Supreme Court of India http://ecourts.gov.in/ecourts_ home/static/manuals/ePay- Final-USer-manual.pdf 9. E-Filing Procedure User Manual eCommittee Supreme Court of India http://ecourts.gov.in/ecourts_ home/static/manuals/efiling- User-manual.pdf 10. What makes civil justice effective? https://www.oecd.org/eco/gro Economics Policy Department Policy Note No. 18 wth/Civil%20Justice%20Poli cy%20Note.pdf

11 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

G. PARLIAMENTARY DEBATEREPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE COMMERCIAL DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS BILL, 2009

S. No. Title 1. Commercial Division of High Courts, 2009

1. CASE LAWS

1. COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS ACT, 2015

S. No. Title Citation A. Objective High Court of Delhi 1. Union of India vs. Associated Construction Co. (¶25) 264 (2019) DLT 523

B. Jurisdiction of Commercial Courts High Court of Delhi 1. Dolby International AB and Ors v. Das Telecom Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶ 7- MIPR 2018(2) 56 10) 2. VeenaBahl. v.ManmohanBahl and Ors. (¶¶ 18, 19, 22) 238 (2017) DLT 281 3. Soni Dave and Ors. v. Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd. AIR 2016 Delhi 186 (¶¶ 8, 11, 25) 4. Kamal Sharma and Ors. v Blue Coast Infrastructure Development 229(2016) DLT438 Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. (¶¶ 8, 9, 12, 13, 15)

Other High Courts 1. OCI Corporation v.Kandla Export Corporation and Ors. (¶¶ 7.1, 2017GLH (1)383 GUJ 7.2, 12) HC 2. GhanshyambhaiIndravadanbhai Pandyav. Maharaja Sayajirao (2017) 58 (4) GLR University (¶ 19) 2705 GUJ HC

C. Jurisdiction of Commercial Division High Court of Delhi 1. Guiness World Records Ltd. v. Sababbi Mangal (¶¶ 3, 7, 8, 13) (2016) 230 DLT 377

Other High Court 1. Gautam Hari Singhania v. Hari Shankar Singhania and Ors. (¶ Commercial App. 22)BOM HC No.4/2016 Dated: 29.03.2017 12 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

D. Bar of Jurisdiction of Commercial Courts and Commercial Division Other High Courts 1. Khandwala Securities Limited v. Nirma Limited (¶¶ 5.2, 5.3, 6) Special Civil Application No. 22291/2017 Dated: 12/12/2017 GUJ HC 2. Active Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. Assotech Realty Private Limited and AIR 2017 P&H 41 Ors. (¶¶ 9, 10) 3. Sushila Singhania and Ors. v. Bharat Hari Singhania and Ors. (¶¶ 2017 (4) BomCR 348 25, 28, 30) 4. GhanshyambhaiIndravadanbhai Pandya v. Maharaja Sayajirao 2017(4) GLR 2705 University (¶¶5-6) (Gujarat)(DB)

E. Jurisdiction is not according to Plaintiff’s Choice Other High Court 1. Dashrath B Rathod v. Fox Star Studios India Pvt Ltd (¶¶28,30- 2018 (1) Mh.LJ 474 31,33-34) (Bombay)

F. Definition of Commercial Dispute Supreme Court 1. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd v. K.S. Infraspace LLP(¶¶14- 2019 SCC OnLine SC 16,46) 1311

High Court of Delhi 1. Sumer Singh and Ors.v. Om Prakash Gupta and Ors. (¶ 3) (2017) 186 PLR 35 2. Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C. v. Airports Authority of India (¶¶ 12, 13, 240(2017) DLT731 14) 3. Sanofi Winthrop Industries v. Kirti B Maheshwari(¶¶ 2-10, 14-18) CS(OS) 2265/2014 4. Havells India Limited v. Advertising Standards Council of India 2016(227) DLT 719 (¶¶ 15, 22) 5. Soni Dave v. Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd AIR (2016) Delhi 186 (¶¶14,18,31,36-37)

Other High Courts 1. Madhuram Properties v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (¶¶ 4.3, (2017) 4 GLR 3327 5) GUJ HC 2. Vasu Healthcare Private Limited v. Gujarat Akruti TCG Biotech AIR 2017 Guj 153 Limited and Ors. (¶¶ 7.2, 7.3, 7.5, 7.6) a) Commercial Disputes arising out of transactions of bankers/merchants Supreme Court 1. Videocon International Ltd.v. SEBI (¶¶ 17-20, 22) AIR 2015 SC 1042

13 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

High Court of Delhi 1. Kailash Devi Khanna v. DD Global Capital Ltd. (¶¶29-30) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9954 2. Punj Lloyd v. Hadia Abdul Jamil Lateef Co. Ltd. (¶¶ 3-10) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12455 3. Eros Resorts & Hotels v. Explorer Associates Pvt. Ltd.(¶¶ 12, 13, 2018(170)DRJ366 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 29) 4. Rita Agarwal v. Uday Medicare (¶¶ 10-15) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 8595 5. FRHI Hotels and Resorts S. A. R. L. v. Dr.Mukram Ulla Khan (¶¶ 2018 Indlaw DEL 1921 10-15) 6. Federal Express Court v. Fedex Securities (¶¶ 7-18) (2017)240 DLT 378 7. Ardee Infrastructure v. Anuradha Bhatia &Ors. (¶¶ 9, 10, 11, 15, 2017(162) DRJ201 16, 17) b) Commercial Disputes arising out of Construction and Infrastructure Contracts High Court of Delhi 1. North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Vikram Bhagat (¶¶ 47-58) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 8055 2. East Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Pawan Kumar Suri (¶¶ 32- 2018 SCC OnLine Del 46, 52-70) 8061 3. Bhayana Builders Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Oriental Structural (2018)249DLT619 Engineers (¶¶ 16-34) 4. Parsoli Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. BMW India Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶ 36-47, 49-63) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 6556 c) Commercial Disputes arising out of Immovable property involved in trade High Court of Delhi 1. Greater Noida Development Authority v. Union of India (¶¶ 4-23) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 7536 2. Sanjeev Kumar Arora v. Satish Mohan Aggarwal (¶¶ 4,6, 7, 9, 16, 2017(163) DRJ 541 17, 24, 25, 26, 28) 3. Jagmohan Behl v. State Bank of Indore (¶¶ 9-17) 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10706 4. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Delhi Auto General Finance Pvt Ltd. 2017 SCC OnLine Del (¶¶ 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) 12521 d) Commercial Disputes arising out of Joint Venture Agreements High Court of Delhi 1. Focus Energy Ltd. v. Reebok International Ltd. (¶¶ 10-18, 31-33) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12231

14 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

2. Nuziveedu Seeds Limited Monsanto Technology v. Monsanto 2018(74)PTC 12(Del) Technology LLC and Ors. (¶¶ 21) 3. Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v. Unitech Limited (¶¶ 41-65, 84- (2017) 239 DLT 649 107)

G. Suit for Specific Performance for the Property to be Purchased High Court of Delhi 1. Monika Arora v. Neeraj Kohli &Anr(¶¶4-16) 2016 SCC OnLine Del 5259

Other High Court 1. Kanchanganga Realtors Pvt. Ltd v. M/s Monarch Infrastructure AIR 2019 Bom 102 Developers Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶10-16)

H. Interpretation of Commercial Contract Supreme Court 1. Nabha Power Limited (NPL) v. Punjab State Power Corporation (2018) 11 SCC 508 Limited (PSPCL) (¶¶34-49,72)

I. Determination of Specified Value High Court of Delhi 1. Deputy Secretary v. Bhayana Builders (¶¶ 11-16) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 11406 2. Focus Energy Ltd. v. Reebok International Ltd. (¶¶ 10-18, 31-33) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12231 3. Jagmohan Behl v. State Bank of Indore (¶¶ 9-17) 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10706 4. Laxmi Narayanv. Navneet and Ors. (¶¶ 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12) 240 (2017) DLT 247 5. Hindpal Singh Jabbal and Ors. v. Jasbir Singh and Ors. (¶¶ 5, 6, FAO(OS) 50/2016 10, 11,13) Dated: 22.08.2016 6. HPL India Ltd. v. QRG Enterprises and Anr. (¶¶ 6, 7, 10, 14, 15, (2017)238DLT123 16, 26, 27, 28, 30, 42, 43, 47, 49-53) 7. Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd. . Goldy Dish Antenna and CS (Comm.) 775/2016 Ors. Dated: 17.08.2016 (¶¶ 4, 12, 13, 20, 24) 8. Soni Dave v. Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶ 6- AIR 2016 Del 186 21)

Other High Court 1. Neelkanth Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Neelkanth Minechem, 2018 (2) WLN 3 (Raj.) Partnership Firm (¶¶7-8)

J. Amendments Introduced to CPC by the Commercial Courts Act are Only Applicable to Commercial Disputes of a Specified Value 15 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

Other High Court 1. Axis Bank Ltd. v. Mira Gehani(¶¶20,29) 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 358 K. Impact of Amendments in CPC on Case for Recovery under Order 37 Other High Court 1. Ajay G Goenka v. Alfred MichealArambhan(¶13) II (2019) BC 21(Bom.)

L. Imposition of Costs under Section 35 CPC (as amended with respect to commercial suits) High Court of Delhi 1. Country Inn Private Limited v. Country Inns and Suites (¶¶10,12) (2018) 74 PTC 548 (Del)

2. COMMERCIAL DISPUTES AND ARBITRATION

A. Commercial Disputes and Arbitration Supreme Court 1. Emaar MGF Land Limited v. Aftab Singh (¶¶26,33) 2019 (133) ALR 228 2. The State of Bihar v. Bihar Rajya Bhumi Vikas Bank Samiti(¶¶ AIR 2018 SC 3862 27-28) 3. Emkay Financial Services Ltd. v. GirdharSondhi (¶¶ 20, 21, 22) AIR 2018 SC 3894

High Court of Delhi 1. Gammon India Ltd. & Ors. v National Highways Authority of O.M.P. (COMM)- India(¶ 44) 392/2020 Dated: 23-06-2020

2. SSIPL Lifestyle Private Limited and Ors. v. Vama Apparels CS (COMM) 735/2018 (India) Private Limited and Ors. (¶¶29-31) Decided on: 19.02.2020 3. Astonfiled Renewables Pvt. Ltd. v. Ravinder Raina (¶¶ 27-40) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 6665 4. Krishan Radhu v. Emmar Mgf Construction Pvt. Ltd, (Delhi) (¶¶ 2017(1) AD(Delhi) 19-29) 5. Antrix Corporation v. Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶ 12-18, 23- 2018(4) ARBLR 30) 66(Delhi) 6. Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Ltd. v. RVR Projects Pvt. 2018 SCC OnLine Del Ltd. (¶¶ 2, 3, 6-10) 9003 7. Spicejet Siesta Ltd. v. Siesta Hospitality Services (¶¶ 10-15) 2018VIIIAD(Delhi)109 8. GMR Energy Ltd. v. Doosan Power Systems Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶ 10- 2017 SCC OnLine Del 21,30-39)) 11625 9. Benara Bearings & Pistons Ltd. v. Mahle Engine Components 2017 (162) DRJ 431 India Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶ 2-8, 24)

16 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

10. Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. OMP (I) (Comm.) and Ors. (¶¶ 2-8, 10, 11) 55/2015 Dated:14.07.2017 11. Vedanta Ltd. v. Shenzhen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction 2018 SCC OnLine Del Company Ltd. (¶¶ 29-31) 10916

Other High Court 1. NHPC Ltd. v. Jaiparkash Associates Ltd. (¶¶39-40) 2019(2)RCR(Civil)119

3. TIMELINES AND PROCEDURE

A. Framing of Issues High Court of Delhi 1. Tullio Giusi Spa v. House of Trims Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶3,18) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9656

B. Issuance/Service of Summons High Court of Delhi 1. Sudhakar Singh & Anr v. M/S Webkul Software Pvt Ltd(¶¶4-6) CM(M)-50/2020 Decided on:28.01.2020 2. North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. M/S Dhingra Construction CM (M) 136/2020 Company (¶9) Dated: 05.01.2020 3. Red Bull AG v. Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd (¶25) 2019 (176) DRJ 642

C. Time to file Written Statement Supreme Court 1. SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure 2019 SCC OnLine SC Pvt. Ltd (¶¶8,17-18) 226

High Court of Delhi 1. Seema Rani v. Sunil Garg (¶¶3-4) CM(M) 329/2020 Dated: 13.03.2020 2. Friends Motel Private Limited Through Its Director Mr. Arun CS (COMM.) Dwivedi v. Ved Consultancy LLP(¶¶4-5) 140/2019 Dated: 15.01.2020 3. Kailash Devi Khanna v. DD Global Capital Ltd. 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9954 4. Indian Style Wrestling Association of India v Wresting Federation CS(COMM) of India (¶¶14-19) 1303/2018 Decided on: 20.08.2019 5. Ravinder v. Subhash Gupta (¶¶2-4) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9834 6. Atlanta Limited v. National Highways & Infrastructure 2019 (176) DRJ 642 Development Corporation Limited and Ors. (¶9)

17 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

7. Gulf DthFzLlc v. Dishtv India Limited (¶¶ 5-18) 2016 (8) AD (Delhi) 266 8. Oku Tech Pvt. Ltd. v. Sangeet Agarwal (¶¶ 2-5, 8-12) 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6601

Other High Courts 1. Bharat Bhogilal Patel v. Leitz Tooling Systems India Private Notice of Motion (¶¶28-30) Commercial Division (L) No. 2118 of 2018 Dated: 01.06.2019 2. Axis Bank Limited v. Mira Gehani & Ors (¶¶96-103) 2019 SCC OnLine Bom. 358 3. Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Colonial Life Notice of Motion Insurance Company (Trinidad) Limited (¶¶10,12,20) Commercial Division No. 561 of 2018 Dated: 24.05.2019 4. Indian Overseas Bank v. Jason Deckor P. Ltd. (¶¶13,17,30) 2018 SCC OnLineGuj 4551

D. Late Filing of Written Statement With(out) Imposition of Costs High Court of Delhi 1. Sinopharm Weiqida Pharmaceutical Co (WQD) v. Dsm Sinochem 2018 (246) DLT 443 Pharmaceuticals India Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶21-24,27) 2. Sunil Alagh v. Shivraj Puri(¶4) 2017 SCC OnLine Del 12368

Other High Court 1. Ltd. v. Sony Music Entertainment India AIR 2018 Madras 232 Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶4-9, 11)

E. Maintainability of Appeal Against the Order Allowing Taking Written Statement on Record After 120 Days High Court of Delhi 1. Varun Fashion v. Income Tax Commissioner Ltd (¶¶1,7) (Not 2017 SCC OnLine Del maintainable) 11972 F. Decree Can Be Passed if the Defendant Fails to File Written Statement High Court of Delhi

1. Comite Interprofessionnel Du Vin De Champagne v. M/s. Chinar 2017 SCC OnLine Del Agro Fruit Products (¶¶4-7) 10704 2. Nirog Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. Umesh Gupta (¶¶11,28) 2016 SCC OnLine Del 5961

18 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

3. Singer Company Limited S.A.R.L. v. Ms. Anshu Singh (¶7) 2017 SCC OnLine Del 11034

G. Ex-parte Decree without Evidence High Court of Delhi 1. Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. v. Mr. Munish Thakur (¶¶9-13) 2017 SCC OnLine Del 11226

H. Belated Filing of Documents High Court of Delhi 1. Nitin Gupta v. Texmaco infrastructure & Holding Ltd. (¶¶25- 2019 SCC OnLine Del 26,32,37-38) 8367

I. Time to Conclude Oral Arguments High Court of Delhi 1. Roland Corporation v. Sandeep Jain (¶¶4,6-7,11-13) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6557 J. Admission of Documents High Court of Delhi 1. Unilin Beheer B.V. v. Balaji Action Buildwell (¶¶30-32) (Effect of 260(2019) DLT478 failure of defendant to file an affidavit of admission and denial of documents filed by plaintiff)

Other High Court 1. State of Gujarat v. Union of India (¶¶14-15) R/Special Civil Application No. 737 of 2018 Dated:07.05.2018 K. Revision Barred Against Interlocutory order Other High Courts 4. M/s Active Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. Assotech Realty Private Limited AIR 2017 P&H 41 (¶¶ 9-12) L. Appeal and Revision Against the Order on Application under Order VII Rule 11 is not Maintainable Other High Courts 1. Shri Balaji Industrial Products Limited v. AIA Engineering 2018 SCC OnLine Raj 2. M/s.Limited Supreme (¶¶25 -Tex26) Mart Limited v. Stoll Financial Services (¶¶3-7) 20172315 SCC OnLine P&H 386

M. Appeal against the judgment or order of a Commercial Division of a High Court High Court of Delhi

19 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

1. D&H India Ltd. v Superon Schweisstechnik India Ltd. FAO (OS) (COMM) Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act (under Chapter IV, 237/2019, decided on Appeals) entitles any person aggrieved by the judgment or order of 16.03.2020 a Commercial Division of a High Court to prefer an appeal to the Commercial Appellate Division of that High Court (within a period of 60 days from the date of the judgment or order)

N. Condonation of delay in Appeal High Court of Delhi 1. Union of India vs. Associated Construction Co.(¶¶8, 24, 28) 264 (2019) DLT 523

4. PRE-INSTITUTION MEDIATION, CASE MANAGEMENT HEARING AND JUDGMENT

A. Pre-Institution Mediation Other High Courts 1. GSD Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Balaji Febtech Engineering Pvt. MA No. 4081/2019 Ltd. (¶¶8-9) Dated: 07.08.2019 (MPHC) 2. Sathyam Wood Industries v. Adoniss (P) Ltd. and Ors. (¶¶3-7) C.R.P. (MD) No. 804 of 2019 Dated:10.06.2019 (MADHC) 3. M/SM K Food Products v. M/SS H Food Product(¶¶7-12) CRP No.3690 of 2018 Dated: 21.02.2019 (TEL HC)

B. Extension of time for Completing theProcess of Compulsory Pre-Litigation, Mediation and Settlement Supreme Court 1. In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 3/2020 Order Dated: 10.07.2020

C. Case Management in a Commercial Suit High Court of Delhi 1. Roland Corporation v. Sandeep Jain (¶¶ 6-10) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6557

D. Summary Judgment under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 High Court of Delhi 20 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

1. K.R. Impex v. Punj Lloyd Ltd. (¶¶28-30,34-36) CS (COMM) 646/2016 Dated: 08.01.2019 2. Mallcom (India) Limited and Ors. v. Rakesh Kumar and Ors. 259( 2019) DLT1 (¶¶16,19,21) 3. Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd. v. Kunwer Sachdev (¶¶90-91) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10764 4. Universal Contractors & Engineers (P) Ltd. v. National Projects 2019 SCC OnLine Del Constructions Corporation Ltd (¶¶19, 24) 11436 5. Sandisk LLC v. Memory World (¶¶12-15) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 11243 6. Skechers USA INC and Ors. v. Pure Play Sports (¶¶ 12-16) 2016(67 vPTC 324(Del) 7. Rockwood International A/S and Ors. V. Thermocare Rockwood CS (COMM) 884/2017 India Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶ 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15) Dated:16.10.2018 8. NSK India Sales Co. Pvt. Ltd. V. Proactive Universal Trading CS (Comm) 33/2016 Corporation Private Ltd. Order dated 9th February 2017 9. Tata Sons Limited v. Mr. Rajbir Jindal (¶¶ 7-19) 2017(8) AD(Delhi) 223

10. Satya Infrastructure Ltd. V. Satya Infra & Estates Pvt. Ltd. 2013 III AD (Delhi) (¶¶4,15) 176

E. Application of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 in IPR Matters High Court of Delhi 1. Christian Louboutin SAS v. Abubaker and Ors. (¶¶ 5) 2018(74)PTC 301(Del) 2. Inter Ikea Systems B.V. and Ors. V. Sham Murari and Ors. (¶¶ 24) 2018(76)PTC 121(Del) 3. Burger King Corporation v. Ranjan Gupta &Ors. (¶¶ 21-24) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 11484 4. VINI Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. V. Abhay Enterprises and Ors. (¶¶ 14- 2018 SCC OnLine Del 17) 11708

F. Maintainability of Appeals u/s 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Supreme Court 1. Kandla Export Corporation and Ors. V. OCI Corporation and 2018 (2) SCALE 368 Ors. ( ¶¶ 11-17, 21, 23-26, 28) 2. Arun Dev Upadhyaya v. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. And Ors. AIR 2016 SC 4899 (¶¶ 11-14, 16, 21) 3. Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. And Ors. V. Jindal Exports Ltd. (¶¶72- AIR 2011 SC 2649 74)

High Court of Delhi

21 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

1. South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Tech Mahindra (¶¶9-11) EFA (OS) (COMM) 3/2019 DOD:12.02.2019 2. HPL (India) Limited and Ors. V. QRG Enterprises and Ors. (¶¶ 5, 238 (2017) DLT 123 8, 24, 26-28, 30, 32-35, 40, 43, 48, 50) 3. Samsung Leasing Ltd. V. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (¶¶ 8-18) 2017(9) AD(Delhi) 657

Other High Courts 1. Base Industries Group v. Mahesh P. Raheja (¶¶21-23) (2019) 1 Bom CR 636 2. Shailendra Bhadauria v. Matrix Partners India Investment 2018 SCC OnLine Bom Holdings LLC (¶¶44-45) 13804 3. Sushila Singhania and Ors. v. Bharat Hari Singhania and Ors. 2017 (4) Bom CR 348 (¶¶ 22, 24, 25, 29, 30, 33, 34, 42, 43, 46, 51, 54, 58, 60)

G. Transfer of Appeal Other High Courts 1. Executive Director v. M/s. Y.R. Reddy Engineers, (Bombay) 2017(5) Mh.LJ 660 (Aurangabad Bench) (¶¶ 16-21)

H. Transfer of Pending Cases High Court of Delhi 1. OKU Tech Private Limited v. Sangeet Agarwal and Ors. (¶ 11) 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6601 2. Soni Dave and Ors v. Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd. AIR 2016 Delhi 186 (¶¶ 36, 37) 3. Guiness World Records Ltd. v. Sababbi Mangal (¶¶ 5, 6, 17) (2016) 230 DLT 377 4. Vifor (International) Limited v. High Court of Delhi (¶4) 2016 (154) DRJ 67

Other High Courts 1. Dr. Dilip Choudhury v. Pratishruti Projects Limited & Ors. Old G.A. No. 1369 of (¶¶21-30) 2019 Dated: 09.01.2020 (Calcutta HC) 2. UjwalaRaje Gaekwar v. Hemaben Achyut Shah and Ors. (¶¶ 5.4, (2017) 1 GLR 360(Guj) 5.8) 3. Hubtown Limited v. IDBI Trusteeship Service Limited (¶¶ 19, 22- 2017 (4) Bom CR 310 24, 29, 30)

I. Period of Limitation High Court of Delhi 1. NBCC (India) Ltd. v. Aircon Engineering Services (¶¶7-9) (The C.S. (COMM) period of limitation for filing written statement in a commercial 232/2017 Order Dated: suit starts from the first service and not subsequent service dates if 03.09.2019 the bailiff’s report indicates successful service on the first occasion itself.)

22 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

2. Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. Ericsson v. Lava International Limited 226 (2016) DLT 342 (¶¶ 20, 21, 22)

J. Power to condone delay in filing written statements beyond the prescribed period of 90 days qua non-commercial suits Supreme Court 1. Desh Raj v. Balkishan (2020) 2 SCC 708

K. Expeditious Disposal of Cases High Court of Delhi 1. Vifor (International) Ltd. v. Suven Life Sciences Ltd. (¶¶1-2) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 7514

5. EXECUTION

A. Execution of Foreign Court Decree (Section 44A, Sections 13 &14) Supreme Court 1. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Celem S.A. of FOS 34320 Roujan, AIR 2017 SC 1 France and Ors. (¶¶13-15, 21)

2. M/s. International Woolen Mills v. M/s. Standard Wool (U.K.) AIR 2001 SC 2134 Ltd. (¶30)

B. Limitation For Execution Of Foreign Decree Supreme Court 1. Bank of Baroda v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.(¶¶ 19,35,39,43) Civil Appeal No. 2175 of 2020 Dated: 17.03.2020 C. Guidelines for Executing Courts High Court of Delhi 1. M/s Bhandari Engineers & Builders v. M/s You One Maharia EX.P. 275/2012 Dated: (Jv) Delhi &Ors (¶¶57-66) 05.12.2019 2. Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharia Raj Joint (2016) 227 DLT 302 Venture

23 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

2. GENERAL READINGS

S. No. Title Author Source A. Commercial Matters a) General Readings 1. Dispute Resolution in India An Nishith Desai Associates http://www.nishithdes Introduction ai.com/fileadmin/user _upload/pdfs/Researc h%20Papers/Dispute _Resolution_in_India .pdf 2. Commercial Courts Act, 2015: An Ameen Jauhar and Vidhi Centre for Empirical Impact Evaluation VaidehiMisra Legal Policy 3. Resolving Commercial Disputes in Vijay Kumar Singh, 5 RFMLR (2018) 1 India: Focus on 'Mediation' As an Professor, UPES, R Effective Alternative 'Towards Ease of Dehradun Doing Business 4. Transnational Commercial Law Klaus Peter Berger http://cisgw3.law.pac in the Age of Globalization e.edu/cisg/biblio/berg er1.html 5. An Analysis of the Commercial Debashree Datta, Legal 3(3) Indian Law Division of High Courts Bill Manager, ICICI Bank, Journal Mumbai 6. Commercial Litigation or Justice V. 2015 NLS Bus L Rev Litigation Commercial: Ramasubramanian, 79 Specialised Commercial Courts in India 7. Fair, Timely, Economical Justice: National Judicial College, https://www.judges.o Achieving Justice through Effective Reno, Nevada rg/wp- Case flow Management content/uploads/Effec tive-Caseflow- Management.pdf 8. ICT in Indian Court: Challenges & Rishi Prakash, T. 1(2)International Solution Mohanty, Ramji Gupta Journal of Internet &Vinay Jain Computing (IJIC), 2011 9. Information Technology and its Impact Sri A.C.Upadhyay, http://nagaonjudiciary on Judiciary Registrar General(ex), .gov.in/articleacu.htm Gauhati High Court 10. National Policy and Action Plan for E-Commerce, http://hcraj.nic.in/acti Implementation of Information and Supreme Court of India, on-plan-ecourt.pdf Communication Technology in the New Delhi Indian Judiciary

24 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

11. Status of Information Technology in Courts Informatics http://indiancourts.nic Indian Courts Division, National .in/courts/itinjud.html Informatics Centre, Ministry of Information Technology b) Case Management: Enhancing Judicial Efficiency 1. Case Management and its Advantages Justice M. Jagannadha Law Commission of Rao India (Article) http://lawcommission ofindia.nic.in/adr_con f/mayo%20rao%20ca se%20mngt%203.pdf

2. Case Management and Court Justice Madan B. Lokur Law Commission of Administration India (Article) http://lawcommission ofindia.nic.in/adr_con f/Justice_Lokur.pdf

3. Delay defeats Justice: Issue of large Justice Pranav Tripathi 2016 (2) 1 pendency of cases in Indian Courts International Journal of Legal Developments and Allied Issues 4. The Business of Court Management Justice Roshan Dalvi 2007 7 Law Rev. GLC 25 5. Judicial Impact Assessment Justice M. Jagannadha http://doj.gov.in/sites/ Rao default/files/judiciali mpactassessmentrepo rtvol2_0.pdf

c) Mediation 1. Resolving Commercial Disputes in Vijay Kumar Singh, 5 RFMLR (2018) 1 India: Focus on 'Mediation' As an Professor, UPES, R Effective Alternative 'Towards Ease of Dehradun Doing Business

2. Formulating a Model Legislative RashikaNarain (2018)11NUJS LRev Framework for Mediation in India

3. The Mediation Gap: Where India Stands Tara Olapally 2017 SCJ 321 and How Far It Must Go 4. Mediation its Importance and Relevance Justice RV Raveendran 2010 PL October 10

25 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

d) E-Commerce 1. Law Relating to E-Commerce: Dr. Jyoti Rattan 1(2) International International and National Scenario Journal of Social with Special Reference to India Science and Economics Invention (IJSSEI) 2015 2. An Introduction to Electronic YaserAhangariNanehkara 2(4) International Commerce n Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 2013 3. Topical Issues in the Regulation of E- Rohitashwa Prasad, US Indian Business Commerce in India Gerald Manoharan Council, Legal (Partners), and Nidhi Service Newsletter, Sahay (Senior Advocate), 2016 J. Sagar Associates, Advocates and Solicitors e) International Commercial Arbitration 1. The Finality and the Fairness in Prasenjit Kundu, 8 RMLNLUJ (2016) International Commercial Arbitration: A Assistant Professor, Dr. 233 Paradox in International Arbitral Awards Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University 2. The Role of Arbitral Institutions in the P. K. Ravindranatha (2004) Sep PL (Jour) Modern World Menon 13

Session-III Intellectual Property and Injunctions

A. STATUTES REFERRED

S. No. Title 1. Biological Diversity Act, 2002 2. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 3. Constitution of India, 1950 4. Copyright Act, 1957 5. Designs Act, 2000 6. Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration & Protection) Act, 1999 7. Indian Contract Act, 1872 8. Indian Evidence Act, 1872 9. Information Technology Act, 2000 10. Patents Act, 1970 11. Plant Variety Protection and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001 12. Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 26 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

13. Specific Relief Act, 1963 14. Trademarks Act, 1999

B. RULES

S. No. Title 1. Biological Diversity Rules, 2004 2. Copyright Rules, 2013 3. Designs (Amendment) Rules, 2014 4. Designs Rules, 2001 5. Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration & Protection) Rules, 2002 6. Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011 7. Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 8. Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2014 9. Patents Rules, 2003 10. Trade Marks Rules, 2017

C. INTERNATIONAL TREATIES/ CONVENTION

S. No. Title 1. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, 1883 2. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1886 3. Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), 1967 4. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), 1970 5. Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms against Unauthorized Duplication of their Phonograms, 1971 6. Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Micro-organisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure, 1977 7. Nairobi Treaty on the Protection of the Olympic Symbol, 1981 8. Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, 1989 9. Washington Treaty on Intellectual Property in respect of Integrated Circuits, 1989 10. Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), 1994 11. World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement, 1994 12. Doha Declaration on the TRIPS agreement and Public Health, 2001 13. Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who are Blind, Visually Impaired, or Otherwise Print Disabled, 2013 (Adopted)

D. REPORTS & MANUALS

S. No. Title Author Source 1. National Intellectual Ministry of Commerce and Industry http://dipp.gov.in/English Property Rights Policy, Department of Industrial Policy & /Schemes/Intellectual_Pr 2016 Promotion, Government of India operty_Rights/National_I

27 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

PR_Policy_12.05.2016.p df

2. Discussion paper on Government of India Department of http://www.ipindia.nic.in/ Standard Essential Patents Industrial Policy and Promotion writereaddata/Portal/New and their availability on Ministry of Commerce & Industry s/196_1_standardEssentia FRAND terms lPaper_01March2016_1_. pdf 3. National IPR Policy (First Prabha Sridevan, Former Judge, http://dipp.nic.in/English/ Draft), 2014 Madras High Court Schemes/Intellectual_Pro perty_Rights/IPR_Policy _24December2014.pdf 4. 188th Law Commission Law Commission of India, http://lawcommissionofin Report on Proposals for Government of India dia.nic.in/ Constitution of Hi-Tech Fast–Track Commercial divisions in High Courts 5. Manual Of Office Of The Controller General Version 01.11 As Geographical Of Patents, Designs And modified on July 26, Indications Practice Trademarks & Registrar Of 2011 And Procedure Geographical Indications

E. CASE LAWS

a) IPR and E-commerce

S. No. Title Citation a) E-commerce & Liability of Intermediary

High Court of Delhi 1. Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Amway India Enterprises Pvt. 2020(81)PTC399(Del) Ltd. (¶¶117-129) 2. Amway India Enterprises Pvt.Ltd. v.1MG Technologies Pvt.Ltd. 260 (2019) DLT690

3. Skullcandy Inc. vs. Shri Shyam Telecom and Ors. (¶19) 2019 (77) PTC 155 (Del)

4. L'oreal v. Brandworld & ANR. (¶¶64,66) 254 (2018) DLT 433

5. Christian Louboutin Sas v.Nakul Bajaj & Ors(¶¶27-28) 253 (2018) DLT 728

6. Luxottica Group S.P.A. v. Mify Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (¶17) 254 (2018) DLT 472

7. Kent RO Systems Ltd. and Ors. v. Amit Kotak and Ors. (¶34) 2017 (69) PTC 551 (Del)

28 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

8. My Space Inc. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. (¶¶77-78) 236 (2017) DLT 478

9. Swami Ramdev and Ors. vs. Facebook, Inc. and Ors. (¶¶76- 263 (2019) DLT 689 81,84)

b) Injunction Orders

S. No Title Citation a) John Doe/ Ashok Kumar Orders & Anton Piller Orders High Court of Delhi 1. ESPN Software India Private Ltd. v. Tudu Enterprise and Ors. (¶¶28-30) MANU/DE/1061/2011 2. Taj Television Ltd. & Anr. v. Rajan Mandal & Ashok Kumar (¶¶17,18) 2003 FSR 22

Other High Courts 1. Balaji Motion Pictures Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam MANU/MH/3469/201 Ltd (¶9) 6 (Bom) 2. Bucyrus Europe Limited and Ors. v. Vulcan Industries 2005 (30) PTC 279 Engineering Company Private Limited (Calcutta) (¶27) (Cal)

Foreign Judgments 1. Yousuf v Salama(United Kingdom) (1980) 3 All ER 405 2. Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Process (United Kingdom) (1976) 1 All ER 779 3. EMI v Pandit(United Kingdom) (1975) 1 All ER 418 4. BMG Canada Inc. v. John Doe. (Canada) [2004] F.C.J. No. 525 (QL)

b) Dynamic Injunction High Court of Delhi

1. UTV Software Communication Ltd. and Ors. v. 1337X to and 2019(78)PTC375(Del) Ors.(¶¶99-101) 2. Limited v. National Internet Exchange of India (Nixi) 259(2019)DLT468 And Ors (¶¶18-21)

Foreign Judgments 1. Disney Enterprise v. Ml Ltd.(Singapore High Court) (2018) SGHC 206

c) Anti-Suit Injunction Supreme Court 1. Modi Entertainment Network and Ors. v. W.S.G. Cricket PTE. AIR2003SC1177 Ltd. (¶¶33-34) 29 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

High Court of Delhi 1. HT Media Limited v. Brainlink International Inc.(¶¶29-32, 44- CS (COMM) 119/2020 45) Dated: 28.04.2020

2. M/S Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd. v M/S Veritas Investment 2019 SCC OnLine Del Research Corporation & Ors. 8294 (¶¶33-34)

Foreign Judgments 1. John Reginald Stott Kirkham and others v Trane US Inc and [2009] 4 SLR(R) 428 at others (Singapore Supreme Court) [44]

d) Interlocutory Injunction

Supreme Court 1. Wander Ltd. and Ors. v. Antox India P. Ltd (¶9) 1990 (2) ARBLR 399 (SC) e) Mareva / Freezing Injunction High Court of Delhi 1. Rite Approach Group Ltd. v. Rosoboronexport (¶6) AIR 2007 Delhi 145

Other High Court 1. Iridium India Telecom Limited v. Motorola Inc. a Corporation 2003(6)BomCR511 and Ors (¶¶46-49)

Foreign Court 1. Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA [1980] 1 All ER 213 The Mareva

c) Jurisdiction S. No. Title Citation Supreme Court 1. Dhodha House and Ors. vs. S.K. Maingi and Ors. (¶¶18-20) AIR 2006 SC 730 2. Exphar SA and Ors. vs. Eupharma Laboratories Ltd. and Ors. AIR 2004 SC 1682

High Court of Delhi 1. Juggernaut Books Pvt. Ltd. v. Inkmango inc. and ors(¶20) CS (COMM) 421/2019 DOD: 09.08.2019 30 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

2. Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Exoncorp Private Limited(¶¶23,27) 2019 (79) PTC 335 (Del) 3. Burger King Corporation v. Techchand Shewakramani and Ors. 2019 II AD (Delhi)106 (¶¶18,21,23,25) 4. Millennium and Copthorne International Limited v. Aryans Plaza MANU/DE/1854/2018 Services Private Limited and Ors.(¶26) 5. Banyan Tree Holding (P) Limited v. A. Murali Krishna Reddy and 2010 (42) PTC 361 (Del) Anr. (¶¶42,45) 6. The Jay Engineering Works Ltd. vs. Ramesh Aggarwal 2006 (33) PTC 561 (Del)

d) Copyright Act, 1957

S. No. Title Citation a. Objectives of Copyright Law Supreme Court 1. Eastern Book Company v. DB Modak(¶¶ 56, 57) (2008) 1 SCC 1

High Court of Delhi 1. Time Warner Entertainment Company v. RPG Netcom(¶¶ 9, 18) 2007 (34) PTC 668

Other High Courts 1. Amir Raza Husain v. Cinevistaas Limited(¶31) 2003 (27) PTC 425 (Bom) 2. Sulamangalam R. Jayalakshmi v. Meta Musicals (¶¶ 69, 70) 2000 PTC 681 3. N.T. Raghunathan v. All India Reporter Ltd. Bombay(¶¶ 17, 18) AIR 1971 Bom 48

b. Original Literary Works/ Test of Originality Supreme Court Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. v. Super Cassette Industries Ltd. 1. (¶¶ 44-46) 2008 (37) PTC 353 2. Eastern Book Company v. DB Modak(¶¶ 8-11) (2008) 1 SCC 1

High Court of Delhi 1. Time Warner Entertainment Company v. RPG Netcom(¶¶ 17, 18) 2007 (34) PTC 668 2. Camlin Private Ltd. v. National Pencil Industries(¶ 2) 1987 (7) PTC 1 (Del)

Other High Courts Periyar Self Respect Propaganda v. Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam 1. (¶¶ 21, 22) 2010 (44) PTC 422 (Mad) 2. Shyam Lal v.Gaya Pasad(¶¶ 14, 15) AIR 1971 All 192 3. Macmillan v. Cooper(¶¶ 17, 36) AIR 1924 PC 75 (Bom)

31 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

English case University of London Press Ltd. v. University Tutorial Press Ltd. (¶¶ 1. 13,14) (1916) 2 Ch 601 c. Ownership of Copyright Supreme Court 1. Vicco Laboratories v. Art Commercial Advertising(¶¶ 9, 10) AIR 2001 SC 2753 2. RG Anand v. Delux Films(¶¶ 20, 57, 58) AIR 1978 SC 1613 High Court of Delhi 1. Diljeet Titus Advocate v. Alfd A Adebare(¶¶ 34, 35) 2006 (32) PTC 609 2. Najma Heptulla v. Orient Longman(¶¶ 16, 17, 37, 38) AIR 1989 Delhi 63

Other High Courts Gee Pee Films Private Ltd. v. Pratik Chowdhury(¶¶ 22, 23) 1. (Calcutta) 2002 (24) PTC 392

English case University of London Press Ltd. v. University Tutorial Press Ltd. 1. (¶¶ 31, 32) (1916) 2 Ch 601

d. Author’s Moral Rights Supreme Court 1. Amarnath Sehgal v. Union of India(¶¶ 27, 28, 62) 2005 (30) PTC 25

High Court of Delhi 1. Arun Chadha v. OCA Productions Private Ltd.(¶¶ 12, 13, 14) 2013 (53) PTC 401 PEE PEE Publishers and Distributors v. Neena Khanna 2. (¶¶ 25,26, 49) 2010 (44) PTC 45 3. Manu Bhandari v. Kala Vikas Pictures Ltd.(¶¶ 25, 27) AIR 1987 Del 13 4. Wiley Eastern Limited v. Indian Institute of Management(¶¶ 25, 26) (1995) 58 DLT 449

Other High Courts Sajeev Pillai vs Venu Kunnapalli (¶¶8,10) MANU/KE/5406/2019

e. Assignment of Copyright Supreme Court Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Eastern India Motion Pictures 1. Association(¶¶ 23-25) (1977) 2 SCC 820

High Court of Delhi 1. The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford v. 2003 (26) PTC 186 32 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

Orient Longman Private Ltd. (¶¶ 11-14) 2. Rishi Raj v. International Films Distributors(¶¶ 3, 4) 2002 (24) PTC 541 3. KPM Sundaram v. Rattan Prakashan Mandir(¶¶ 12, 13) AIR 1983 Del 461

Other High Courts 1. Saregama India Ltd. v. Suresh Jindal(¶¶ 40, 65) 2007 (34) PTC 522 (Cal) Deshmukh and Co. Private Ltd. v. Avinash Vishnu Khandekar 2. (¶¶ 40, 41) 2006 (32) PTC 358 3. Sulamangalam R Jayalakshmi v. Meta Musicals Chennai(¶¶ 70, 71) 2000 PTC 681 4. Video Master v. Nishi Productions(¶¶ 7-9 ) 1998 (18) PTC 117 (Bom) Gramophone Company of India Ltd. v. Shanti Film Corporation 5. (¶¶ 22, 26) AIR 1997 Cal 63

f. Compulsory Licenses Supreme Court Entertainment Network (India) v. Super Cassette Industries 1. (¶¶ 68, 69, 72, 74, 75) (2008) 13 SCC 30 Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. vs. Music Broadcast Pvt. Ltd. (¶¶56- 2. 58) AIR2012SC2144 Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. and Ors. v. Super Cassette 3. Industries Ltd. and Ors. (¶¶63,64,68-71,74,80,102) (2008)13SCC30

High Court of Delhi Super Cassette Industries Ltd. v. Bathla Cassette Industries Private 4. Ltd.(¶¶ 35, 36) 2003 (27) PTC 280 Gramophone Company of India v. Super Cassette Industries 5. (¶¶ 24-26) 1996 (16) PTC 252

Other High Courts 6. Tips Industries Ltd. v. Wynk Music Ltd. and Ors. (¶72) (Bombay High Court) MANU/MH/0862/2019

g. Infringement of Copyright Supreme Court Krishika Lulla and Ors. v. Shyam Vithalrao Devkatta &Ors. 1. (¶¶ 8, 11,13,20) (2016) 2 SCC 521 2. RG Anand v. Delux Films(¶¶ 20, 57, 58) AIR 1978 SC 1613

High Court of Delhi 1. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v.M/s Shreya Bhattacharya Pvt. Ltd 258(2019)DLT116 2. IGNOU vs. Dominant Publishers and Distributors (¶16) MANU/DE/1739/2019

33 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

3. Adidas AG and Ors. v. Praveen Kumar and Ors. (¶¶18-20) 2019(78)PTC468(Del) Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. v. Rangar Breweries Ltd. 2019(78)PTC653(Del) 4. (¶10) 5. Rasmala Trade Finance Fund v. Raman Gupta MANU/DE/2344/2019 6. Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Exoncorp Private Limited (¶26) MANU/DE/2262/2019 7. Arun Chopra v. Kaka-Ka Dhaba Pvt Ltd & Ors (¶10) 2019(77)PTC268(Del) Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s I- Vision Digital LLP MANU/DE/4205/2018 8. (¶¶6-8) The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford v. 233(2016)DLT279 (SJ) 9. Rameshwari Photocopy Services (¶¶ 96, 97, 99) The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford 10. v.Rameshwari Photocopy Services (¶¶ 27, 28, 30, 79, 80) 235 (2016) DLT 409 (DB) 11. Super Cassette Industries v. Hamar Television Network(¶¶ 8-11 ) 2011(45)PTC70 12. Super Cassette Industries v. Myspace Inc. (¶¶ 96-98 ) 2011 (48) PTC 49 13. John Wiley v. Prabhat Chander Kumar Jain(¶¶ 88, 109, 91, 92, 93 ) 2010 (44) PTC 675 (Del.) 2009 SCC Online Del. 14. Warner Bros. Entertainment v. Santosh VG (¶¶ 67, 85, 86 ) 835 15. Anil Gupta v. Kunal Dasgupta(¶¶ 29, 30, 51 ) AIR 2002 Delhi 379

Other High Courts 1. Fermat Education v. M/s Sorting Hat Technologies Ltd(¶36) C.S. No.330/2018 (Mad) DoD: 13.08.2018 2. Ramesh Sippy v. Shaan Ranjeet Uttamsingh(¶¶ 20, 43, 53, 54) 2013 (55) PTC 95 (Bom) 3. Urmi Juvekar Chiang v. Global Broadcast News(¶¶ 18, 29, 26 ) 2008 (36) PTC 377 (Bom) 4. Euro Kids International v. India Book Distributors(¶¶ 23, 26 ) 2005 (6) BomCR 198 Barbara Taylor Bradford v. Sahara Media Entertainment 5. (¶¶ 142, 143 ) 2004 (28) PTC 474 (Cal) 6. Shyam Lal v. Gaya Prasad (¶¶ 14-15 ) AIR 1971 All 192 6. V Govindan v. Gopalakrishna (¶¶ 12-13 ) AIR 1955 Mad 391

h. Passing Off High Court of Delhi 1. Super Cassette Industries v. Hamar Television Network(¶¶ 8-11 ) 2011(45)PTC70 2. Time Warner Entertainment Company v. RPG Netcom(¶¶ 17, 18 ) 2007 (34) PTC 668

Other High Courts 1. Bharati Cellular v. Jai Distillers(¶¶ 18, 19) 2006 (33) PTC 220

i. Preventive Civil Remedies/ Damages for Infringement Supreme Court 1. Gujarat Bottling Company Ltd. v. Coca Cola Company(¶¶ 46, 47) AIR 1995 SC 2372 2. Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh(¶¶ 13, 14) (1992) 1 SCC 719 34 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

3. Wander Ltd. v. Antox India Private Ltd.(¶¶10, 11) 1990 (Supp) SCC 727

High Court of Delhi 1. Super Cassette Industries v. Nirulas Corner House Private Ltd. (¶¶ 20-22) 2008 (37) PTC 237 2. Microsoft Corporation v. K Mayuri(¶¶ 21-24) 2007 (35) PTC 415 3. Mirabai Films Private Ltd. v. Hathway Cable and Datacom Private Ltd.(¶¶ 15-16) 2002 (25) PTC 148

Other High Courts 1. RM Subbiah v. N Sankaran Nair(¶¶13-14) AIR 1979 Mad 56 j. Preventive Civil Remedies for Passing off Supreme Court 1. Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhat Shah & Ors. (¶¶13,16) AIR 2002 SC 275

High Court of Delhi 1. Burger King Corporation vs. Techchand Shewakramani and Ors. 2019 II AD (Delhi)106 (¶¶25,26)

k. Fair Dealing Supreme Court Academy of General Edu., Manipal and Ors. vs. B. Malini Mallya 1. (¶20) AIR2009SC1982 2. Eastern Book Company v. DB Modak(¶38) (2008) 1 SCC 1

High Court of Delhi 1. Raj Rewal vs. Union of India and Ors. (¶30) 260(2019)DLT190 The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of University of Oxford and 2. Ors. vs. Rameshwari Photocopy Services and Ors. (¶¶34,39,47) 235(2016)DLT409 Syndicate of The Press of The Universtiy of Cambridge on Behalf of The Chancellor, Masters and School and Ors. vs. B.D. Bhandari and 3. Ors.(¶¶34-37) 185 ( 2011 ) DLT 346

Foreign Judgment CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada(¶53) (Supreme 1. Court of Canada) 2004 SCC 13

l. Designs and Copyright High Court of Delhi 1. Microfibres Inc v. Girdhar and Co. and Ors. 2006(2)RCR(Civil)40

35 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

Kiran Shoes Manufacturers vs. Registrar of Copyrights & Anr. 2013 (54) PTC 386 2. (Del)

e) Trademark Act, 1999

S. No. Title Citation a. Objectives of Trademark Law Supreme Court 1. Laxmikant Patel v. Chetanbhat Shah(¶¶ 16, 17) AIR 2002 SC 275

High Court of Delhi 1. Cadbury India Ltd. v. Neeraj Food Products (¶¶ 80-82) 2007 (35) PTC 95 2. Kanungo Media Private Ltd. v. RGV Film Factory(¶¶ 36, 37) 2007 (34) PTC 591 3. Biswaroop Roy Chourdhary v. Karan Johar(¶¶ 11, 12) 2006 (33) PTC 381 4. Corning Inc.v Raj Kumar Garg(¶¶ 16-18) 2004 (28) PTC 527

Other High Courts 1. Carrefour v. V Subramanium(¶¶ 43, 44) 2007 (35) PTC 225 (Mad)

b. Domain Name Supreme Court Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Private Ltd. 1. (¶¶12, 32, 34) (2004) 6 SCC 145

High Court of Delhi 1. Arun Jaitley v. Network Solutions Private Ltd.(¶¶ 21, 22) 2011 (47) PTC 1 2. Celador Productions Ltd. v. Gaurav Mehrotra(¶¶ 8-9) 2003 (26) PTC 140 3. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories v. Manu Kosuri(¶¶ 6, 7) 2001 (58) DRJ 241 4. Tata Sons v. Manu Kosuri(¶¶ 42, 43) 2001 PTC 432 5. Yahoo Inc. V. Akash Arora(¶¶ 13-16) 1999 (19) PTC 201

Other High Courts 1. Rediff Communications Ltd. v. Cyberbooth(¶¶ 20-21) AIR 2000 Bom 27 2. I Plus Inc. V. Consim Info Private Ltd.(¶¶11, 23-26) 2010 (42) PTC 50 (Bom)

c. Descriptive Trademark Supreme Court Godfrey Philips India Ltd v. Girnar Food and Beverages Co. 1. (¶¶ 3, 4) (2004) 5 SCC 257 36 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

2. NR Dongre v. Whirlpool Corporation(¶¶ 21-23) 1996 PTC (16) 583 3. JR Kapoor v. Micromix India(¶¶ 4-6) 1994 Supp (3) SCC 215

High Court of Delhi Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing 1. Foundation Ltd.(¶¶ 11-14) 2008 (36) PTC 168 2. Evergreen Sweet House v. Evergreen and Others(¶¶ 23, 24) 2008 (38) PTC 325 3. NR Dongre v. Whirlpool Corporation(¶¶ 21, 22) AIR 1995 Delhi 300

Other High Courts Hindustan Development Corporation Ltd. v. The Deputy Registrar of 1. Trademarks(¶¶10, 14, 15) AIR 1955 Cal 519 d. Infringement of Trademark Supreme Court 1. Parle Products Private Ltd. v. JP and Co. (¶¶ 7-9) (1972) I SCC 618 2. KR Chinna Krishna Chettiar v. Sri Ambal and Co.(¶¶ 9-11) AIR 1970 SC 146 Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma vs. Navaratna Pharmaceutical 3. Laboratories(¶29) AIR 1965 SC 980

High Court of Delhi 1. Bigtree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. vs. D. Sharma and Ors. (¶19) 2019(77)PTC411(Del) 2. Crocs Inc. USA vs. Bata India Ltd. and Ors. (¶31) 2019 (78 )PTC 1 (Del) 3. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB and Ors.v. HM Megabrands Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. (¶24) 2018(74)PTC229(Del) 4. Arun Chopra vs. Kaka-Ka Dhaba Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.(¶11) 2019(77)PTC268(Del) 5. Cargill India Pvt Ltd v. Gati Ltd(¶9) 2019(80)PTC92(Del) Mankind Pharma Limited versus Lee Pharmaceuticals Of Lee 6. House(¶4) MANU/DE/2223/2019 7. Parveen Kumar Jain vs. Rajan Seth and Ors. (¶9) 2019(78)PTC649(Del) 8. Paridhi Udyog vs. Jagdev Raj Sarwan Ram Dhiman (¶¶29-31) MANU/DE/1479/2019 9. XEROX Corporation and Ors. vs. P.K. Khansaheb and Ors. (¶9) MANU/DE/2217/2019 Elder Projects Ltd. and Ors. vs. Elder Pharmacia LLP and Ors. 10. (¶¶18-22) MANU/DE/1163/2019 11. Tata Sons Ltd. vs. Prakash Yadav and Ors. (¶15) MANU/DE/2376/2019 Patanjali Ayurved Limited vs. Masala King Exports Trading Pvt. Ltd. 12. and Ors. (¶¶16-18) MANU/DE/1391/2019 13. Horlicks Ltd. and Ors. vs. Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. MANU/DE/0944/2019 14. Mallcom (India) Limited and Ors. vs. Rakesh Kumar and Ors. (¶25) 259(2019)DLT1 15. Dabur India Ltd. vs. Emami Limited (¶28) MANU/DE/2112/2019 16. Burger King Corporation vs Techchand Shewakramani & Ors 253(2018)DLT93 17. Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. vs. HT Media Limited (¶¶29-33) 251(2018)DLT370 37 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

18. Christian Louboutin Sas v.Ashish Bansal & Anr (¶7) 2018SCCOnLineDel10205 19. Times Internet v. Jonathan S.(¶¶ 21-23) 2012 (51) PTC 195 2012 SCC OnLine Del 20. Kapil Wadhwa & Ors. vs Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.(¶¶ 51, 75, 82,84) 5172 United Biotech Private Ltd. v. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals 21. Ltd. (¶¶13, 14) 2012 (50) PTC 433 (DB) 22. Consitex SA v. Kamini Jain(¶¶ 21, 22) 2011 (47) PTC 337 23. Tata Sons v. Manoj Dodia(¶¶ 27, 28) 2011 (46) PTC 244 24. ITC Ltd. v. Philip Morris Products SA(¶¶ 31, 32) 2010 (42) PTC 572 25. Horlicks v. Kartick Sadhukan(¶¶ 10, 11) 2002 (25) PTC 126 26. M/s Biofarma v. Sanjay Medical Stores(¶¶ 11, 12) 1997 (17) PTC 355

Other High Courts 1. Avighna Coffee v. Cothas Coffee(¶¶ 31, 32) 2016(4) AKR 646 (Kar) 2. B Kishore Jain v. Navratana Khazana Jewellers(¶¶ 20-22) 2008 (37) PTC 536 (Mad) 3. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd v. Universal Twin Labs(¶¶ 26, 27) 2008 (36) PTC 675 (Bom) Health & Glow Retailing Private Ltd. v. Dhiren Krishna Paul 4. (¶¶ 31, 33) 2007 (35) PTC 474 (Mad) James Chadwick & Bros. Ltd. v. National Sewing Thread Company 5. Ltd. AIR 1951 Bom 147 e. Defences against Infringement Supreme Court 1. Midas Hygiene Industries Private Ltd. v. Sudhir Bhatia(¶¶ 10, 11) (2004) 3 SCC 90 2. Uniply Industries v. Unicorn Plywood(¶¶ 3, 5, 6) (2001) 5 SCC 95

High Court of Delhi 1. Exide Industries Ltd. v. Exide Corporation, USA(¶¶ 33, 34) 2013 (53) PTC 137 2. Kapil Wadhwa v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.(¶¶ 31, 32, 68) 2013 (53) PTC 112 3. Rolex SA v. Alex Jewellery Private Ltd.(¶¶ 24, 25) 2009 (41) PTC 284

Other High Courts 1. Amaravathi Enterprises v. Karaikudi Chettinadu(¶¶ 8-10) 2008 (36) PTC 688 (Mad) 2. B Kishore Jain v. Navratana Khazana Jewellers(¶¶ 31-33) 2008 (37) PTC 536 (Mad) 3. Kores (India) Ltd. v. Whale Stationary Products Ltd.(¶¶ 16, 17) 2008 (36) PTC 463 (Bom) New Hope Food Industries Private Ltd. v. Pioneer Bakeries Private Ltd. 4. (¶¶11-13) 2008 (36) PTC 400 (Mad) 5. Khoday Distilleries v. Scotch Whisky Association(¶¶105-107) AIR 1992 Bom 294 f. Passing Off Supreme Court 1. S Syed Mohideen v. P Sulochana Bai(¶¶ 22, 24) 2015 (7) SCALE 136 38 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

2. Khoday Distilleries v. Scotch Whisky Association(¶¶106-107) AIR 2008 SC 2737 3. Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Private Ltd.(¶¶ 32, 34) (2004) 6 SCC 145 4. Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (¶¶42) (2001) 5 SCC 73 5. NR Dongre v. Whirlpool Corporation(¶¶ 18-20) (1996) 5 SCC 714 6. Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satyadeo Gupta(¶¶ 13-16) AIR 1963 SC 449

High Court of Delhi 2019 SCC OnLine Del 1. Sun Pharma Laboraties Ltd v. Ajanta Pharma Ltd. (¶¶18,25,26) 8443 2. Louis Vuitton Malletier vs. Iqbal Singh and Ors.(¶22) 258(2019)DLT760 Vardhman Buildtech Pvt. Ltd & Ors v. Vardhman Properties Ltd. 3. (¶¶11-12) 233 (2016) DLT 25 4. Delhi Public School Society v. DPS World Foundation(¶¶ 43-44) 230 (2016) DLT 5 5. TV Today Network v. Kesari Singh Gujjar(¶¶ 28, 29) 2013 (56) PTC 359 6. Reckitt Benkiser v. Hindustan Unilever(¶¶ 20, 21) 2013 (55) PTC 156 7. Glaxo Group v. Rajesh Bansal(¶¶13-14) 2013 (53) PTC 441 8. Delhi Public School Society v. DPS Trust(¶¶ 7-9) 2013 (53) PTC 449 9. Cadila Healthcare Ltd. v. Dabur India Ltd.(¶¶ 11, 13) 2008 (38) PTC 130 10. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories v. Manu Kosuri (¶¶ 7-11) 2001 (58) DRJ 241 11. Tata Sons v. Manu Kosuri(¶¶ 42, 43) 2001 PTC 432 12. Yahoo Inc. v. Akash Arora (¶¶ 12, 16) 1999 (19) PTC 201 Flamagas, SA vs. Irfan Ahmed and Ors. and Baker Hughes Limited 74 (1998) DLT 715 13. and Ors. vs. Hiroo Khushalani (¶66)

Other High Courts 1. Gorbatschow Wodka KG v. John Distilleries Ltd.(¶¶ 21-24) 2011 (47) PTC 100 (Bom) g. Civil Remedies/ Damages for Infringement Supreme Court Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel 1. (¶¶ 30, 50, 72) AIR 2006 SC 3304 2. Dhodha House v. S. K. Maingi(¶¶ 37, 40, 47, 48) (2006) 9 SCC 41 3. Colgate Palmolive Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever Ltd. (¶¶ 41, 42) AIR 1999 SC 3105 4. NR Dongre v. Whirlpool Corporation(¶¶ 20, 21) (1996) 5 SCC 714 Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. v. United Industrial Bank Ltd. 5. (¶¶ 31, 32) (1983) 4 SCC 625

High Court of Delhi Three-N-Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Kairali Exports and Ors. (AYUR 246 (2018) DLT 691 1. CASE)(¶¶ 15-17) 2. Yahoo Inc v. Rinshad Rinu & Ors.(¶¶ 7, 8) 2017 (71) PTC 608 3. Icon Health and Fitness v. Sheriff Usman(¶¶ 17, 18) CS (Comm.) 216/2016

39 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

DOD: 12.09.2017 Shell Brands International AG v. Pradeep Jain Proprietor Shell 4. Exports(¶¶ 15-17) 2011 (47) PTC 175 5. Intel Corporation v. Nair(¶¶ 13-14) 2006 (33) PTC 345 6. Mars Incorporated v. Kumar Krishna Mukherjee(¶¶ 29, 30) 2003 (26) PTC 60

Other High Courts 1. Avighna Coffee v. Cothas Coffee(¶¶ 19, 31, 32) 2016 (4) AKR 646 (Kar) 2. Lupin v. Johnson & Johnson(¶¶ 59, 60) 2015 (61) PTC 1 (Bom) 3. Som Distilleries v. Sabmiller India(¶¶ 13, 14) 2013 (56) PTC 237 (Bom) 4. Arviva Industries (India) v. Vikas M. Tulsian(¶¶ 13-15) 2013 (54) PTC 199 (Bom) 5. Consim Info v. Google India(¶¶ 214, 215) 2011 (45) PTC 575 (Mad)

h. Design and Trademark Other High Court 1. Super Smelters Limited v. SRMB Srijan Private Limited 2020(81)PTC101(Cal)

i. E-commerce & Liability of Intermediary High Court of Delhi 1. Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Amway India Enterprises Pvt. 2020(81)PTC399(Del) Ltd. (¶¶117-129) 2. Amway India Enterprises Pvt.Ltd. v.1MG Technologies Pvt.Ltd. 260(2019)DLT690 3. Skullcandy Inc. vs. Shri Shyam Telecom and Ors. (¶19) 2019(77)PTC155(Del) 4. L'oreal v. Brandworld & ANR. (¶¶64,66) 254(2018)DLT433 5. Christian Louboutin Sas v.Nakul Bajaj & Ors(¶¶27-28) 253 ( 2018 ) DLT 728 6. Luxottica Group S.P.A. v. Mify Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (¶17) 254(2018)DLT472 7. Kent RO Systems Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Amit Kotak and Ors. (¶34) 2017(69)PTC551(Del) 8. My Space Inc. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. (¶¶77-78) 236(2017)DLT478 9. Swami Ramdev and Ors. vs. Facebook, Inc. and Ors. (¶¶76- 263 (2019) DLT 689 81,84)

f) Patent Act, 1970

S. No. Title Citation a. Objectives of Patent Law Supreme Court 2014 SCC OnLine 1. Monsanto Technology & ORS v. Nuziveedu Seeds & ORS (¶¶23-24) BAEPO 418 Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metal Industries 2. (¶¶ 17-19) (1979) 2 SCC 511 40 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

High Court of Delhi Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Rajesh Bansal, Sole 2018 SCC OnLine Del 1. Proprietor, Manglam Technology (¶¶10,12) 9793 2. F Hoffman-la Roche v. Cipla Ltd(¶¶14, 15, 67, 68) 2008 (37) PTC 71 Telemecanique & Controls (I) Ltd. v. Schneider Electric 3. Industries SA(¶¶ 21, 22) 2002 (24) PTC 632

Other High Courts 1. Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motor Company Ltd.(¶¶ 8, 9) 2008 (36) PTC 417 (Mad) 2. Shinning Industries v. Shri Krishna Industries(¶¶ 7, 32, 33) AIR 1975 All 231

b. Invention/ Inventive Step Supreme Court 1. Novartis AG v. Union of India(¶¶ 44-46) 2013 (4) PTC 1 Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metal Industries 2. (¶¶ 16, 17) (1979) 2 SCC 511

High Court of Delhi 1. F Hoffman-la Roche v. Cipla Ltd(¶¶ 40, 41, 43) 2008 (37) PTC 71 2. Ram Narain Kher v. Ambassador Industries, New Delhi(¶¶ 23, 24) AIR 1976 Delhi 87

Other High Courts 1. Mariappan v. AR Safiullah (¶¶ 18-20) 2008 (38) PTC 341 (Mad) 2. Dhanpat Seth v. Nil Kamal Plastic Crates Ltd.(¶¶ 21, 27, 28) 2008 (36) PTC 123 (HP) Press Metal Corporation Ltd. v. Noshir Sorabji Pochkhanwalla 3. (¶¶ 16, 18) AIR 1983 Bom 144 Lallubhai Chakubhai Jariwala v. Samaldas Sankal Chand Shah 4. (¶¶ 29, 30, 31) AIR 1934 Bom 407 c. Non-Obviousness Supreme Court 1. Novartis AG v. Union of India(¶¶ 183-184) 2013 (4) PTC 1 Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metal Industries 2. (¶¶ 19, 22) (1979) 2 SCC 511

High Court of Delhi 1. Asian Electronics Ltd. v. Havells India Ltd. (¶¶ 13-15) 2010 (44) PTC 66 2. F Hoffman-la Roche v. Cipla Ltd(¶¶130-132) 2008 (37) PTC 71 3. Bilcare Ltd. v. Amartara Private Ltd.(¶¶ 19, 20) 2007 (34) PTC 419 4. M/s Stanipack Private Ltd. v. M/s Oswal Trading Company AIR 2000 Delhi 23 41 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

Ltd.(¶¶19-21) Ram Narain Kher v. Ambassador Industries, New Delhi 5. (¶¶17, 23, 24) AIR 1976 Delhi 87

Other High Courts 1. Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motor Company Ltd.(¶¶ 13-15) 2008 (36) PTC 417 (Mad) Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Instacare Laboratories Private 2. Ltd.(¶¶10, 11) 2001 (21) PTC 472 (Guj) d. Rights of Patentee High Court of Delhi Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson v. Intex Technologies (India) 1. (¶¶ 43-47) 2015 (62) PTC 90 2. F Hoffman-la Roche v. Cipla Ltd(¶¶ 110, 111) 2008 (37) PTC 71

Other High Courts Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. AI Chopra, Engineers & 1. Contractors(¶¶17, 18) 2010 (42) PTC 731 (Bom) 2. FDC Ltd. v. Sanjeev Khandelwal(¶¶ 28, 29) 2007 (35) PTC 436 (Mad) 3. Dimminaco A.G. v. Controller of Patent and Designs(¶¶10, 11) 2002 IPLR 255 (Cal) e. Filing & Surrender/ Revocation of Patent Supreme Court Monsanto Company v. Coramandal Indag Products Private Ltd. 1. (¶¶ 11, 12) (1986) 1 SCC 642 Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metal 2. Industries(¶¶19, 20) (1979) 2 SCC 511

High Court of Delhi Communication Components Antenna Inc. vs. Ace Technologies 1. Corp. and Ors. (¶¶36-39,77-78) MANU/DE/2202/2019 F Hoffman-la Roche v. Cipla Ltd., Mumbai Central, Mumbai 2. (¶¶ 115, 116) 2012 (52) PTC 1 3. Chemtura Corporationv. Union of India(¶¶ 13, 14) 2009 (41) PTC 260 4. Bilcare Ltd. v. Amartara Private Ltd.(¶¶ 46, 48, 81, 84) 2007 (34) PTC 419 M/s Stanipack Private Ltd. v. M/s Oswal Trading Company Ltd. 5. (¶¶ 14, 15) AIR 2000 Delhi 23

Other High Courts Farbewerke Hoechst Aktiengessellschaft Vornals Meister Lucius & 1. Bruning Corporation v. Unichem Laboratories (¶¶16-18) AIR 1969 Bom 255

42 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

Lallubhai Chakubhai Jariwala v. Samaldas Sankal Chand Shah 2. (¶¶ 34, 35) AIR 1934 Bom 407 f. Compulsory Licenses High Court of Delhi 1. Bayer Corporation and Ors.Vs.Union of India and Ors(¶¶ 117-119) 2019(78)PTC521(Del) 2. Bayer Corporation and Ors.Vs.Union of India and Ors.( ¶¶44-45) 238(2017)DLT701 3. Bayer Corporation and Anr.VsUnion of India) and Ors.( ¶¶33-34) 2010(43)PTC12(Del) 4. Bristol Myers Squibb Company v. J.D Joshi & Ors(¶¶ 16, 17) 2015 (64) PTC 135

Other Authorities Intellectual Property Appellate Board Bayer Corporation v. Union of India, The Controller of Patents and MIPR 2013 (2) 97 1. Natco Pharma Ltd. (¶¶16, 18) (IPAB, Chennai)

Controller of Patents CLA No. 01 of 2015 DoD: January 19, 2016 ( Controller of Patents, 1. Lee Pharma v. Astrazeneca(¶¶ 17, 18) Mumbai) g. Infringement of Patent/ Remedies Supreme Court 1. Novartis AG v. Union of India(¶¶ 192, 193) 2013 (4) PTC 1 2. Anand Prasad Agarwalla v. Tarkeshwar Prasad(¶¶ 4-6) (2001) 5 SCC 568 3. Wander Ltd v. Antox India Private Ltd.(¶¶ 10, 11) 1991 PTC 1

High Court of Delhi 1. Pradeep Sharma and Ors. vs. UPL Ltd. . (¶8) 2019(77)PTC229(Del) 2. UPL Ltd. v. Pradeep Sharma and Ors. (¶¶ 20-22) MANU/DE/0772/2018 LG Electronics India Private Ltd. v. Bharat Bhogilal Patel 3. (¶¶ 88, 89) 2012 (51) PTC 513 4. Microsoft Corporation v. K. Mayuri(¶¶ 14-16) 2007 (35) PTC 415 5. Bilcare Ltd. v. Amartara Private Ltd.(¶¶ 19, 21, 89, 90) 2007 (34) PTC 419 National Research and Development Corporation of India v. Delhi 6. Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd.(¶¶ 7-9) AIR 1980 Del 132

Other High Courts Hind Mosaic and Cement Works v. Shree Sahajanand Trading 1. Corporation(¶¶18, 25) 2008 (37) PTC 128 (Guj) 2. Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. TVS Motor Company Ltd.(¶¶ 13-15) 2008 (36) PTC 417 (Mad) 43 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

3. FDC Ltd. v. Sanjeev Khandelwal(¶¶ 6, 15, 22, 24, 26) 2007 (35) PTC 436 (Mad) 4. Wockhardt LTD. v. Hetero Drugs(¶¶ 15-17) 2006 (32) PTC 65 (Mad) Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Instacare Laboratories Private 5. Ltd.(¶10) 2001 (21) PTC 472 (Guj) 6. Fabcon v. Industrial Engineering Corporation(¶¶ 36, 37) AIR 1987 All 338 7. Laxmi Dutt Roop Chand v. Nankau(¶¶ 26, 28, 29) AIR 1964 All 27

h. Standard Essential Patent Foreign court Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc and Gen. Instrument corp. 1. (¶A2) (Washington District Court) 104 U.S.P.Q.2D 2000

i. Bolar Exemption High Court of Delhi 1. Bayer Corporation and Ors.v.Union of India and Ors(¶¶ 117-119) 2019(78)PTC521(Del) 2. Bayer Corporation and Ors.v.Union of India and Ors.(¶¶44-45) 238(2017)DLT701

k. Hot-tubbing Micromax Informatics Limitedv.Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. 1. Ericsson(¶¶13-14) MANU/DE/1477/2019

g) Design Act, 2000

S. No. Title Citation Supreme Court 1. Bharat Glass Tube v. Gopal Glass Works(¶¶ 5, 6, 14 ) 2008 (37) PTC 1 (SC)

High Court of Delhi 1. Crocs Inc. USA vs. Bata India Ltd. and Ors. (¶28) 2019(78)PTC1(Del) 2. Pentel Kabushiki Kaisha and Ors. vs. Arora Stationers and Ors.(¶25) 2019(79)PTC42(Del) 3. Greenlight Planet India Pvt. Ltd. vs Gee Lighting Technology(¶¶7-8) MANU/DE/4203/2018 4. M/s Crocs Inc.USA v. M/s Liberty Shoes Ltd (¶¶ 22, 24 ) 2018(73)PTC425(Del) 5. Kent RO Systems v. Amit Kotak(¶¶ 28, 42, 44 ) 240 (2017) DLT 3 Carlsberg Breweries v. Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd. 6. (¶¶ 177, 178) 2017 PTC 413 7. Reckitt Benkiser v. Wyeth Ltd. (¶¶ 3, 7, 22) 2013 PTC 90 8. Dabur India Ltd. v. Amit Jain(¶¶ 17, 18) 155 (2008) DLT 407 Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare GmbH v. Anchor Health 9. (¶¶ 15, 17) 2004 PTC 72

44 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

10. Smithkline Beechem v. Hindustan Liver(¶¶ 13, 16) 2000 (28) PTC 83

Other High Courts 1. Cello Household Products v. Modware India(¶¶ 12, 37, 38) AIR 2017 Bom 162 2. Whirlpool of India v. Videocon Industries(¶¶ 14, 17) 2014 (60) PTC 155 (Bom) 3. Marico v. Raj Oil Mills(¶¶ 17, 28, 29) 2008 (37) PTC 109 (Bom) 4. Castrol India Ltd. v. Tide Water Oil Co. (I) Ltd.(¶¶ 21, 22) 1996 (16) PTC 202 (Cal)

h) Trade Secrets

S. No. Title Citation High Court of Delhi 1. American Express Bank Ltd. v. Ms. Priya Puri(¶¶ 6, 20, 46, 47) (2006) III LLJ 540 Michael Heath Nathan Johnson v. Subhash Chandra 60 (1995) DLT 757 2. (¶¶ 34, 44, 47) 3. Mr. Anil Gupta v. Mr. Kunal Dasgupta(¶¶ 104, 105) (2002) ILR 1Delhi 250 John Richard Brady v. Chemical Process Equipments Private Ltd. AIR 1987 Delhi 372 4. (¶¶ 38, 39)

Other High Courts 1. Homag India Private Ltd. v. Ulfath Ali Khan(¶¶ 6, 40, 51) MANU/KA/1569/2012 2. Jet Airways v. Mr. Jan Peter(¶¶ 15, 19, 21) 2000(4)ALLMR437 3. Tractors and Farm Equipment Ltd. v. Green Field Farm Equipments 2006 (32) PTC Pvt. Ltd. and Ors(¶¶ 24, 25, 28) 343(Mad)

i) Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration & Protection) Act, 1999

S. No. Title Citation High Court of Delhi State Government Of Madhya Pradeshv.Union Of Iindia & Ors(¶¶39- 1. 44) MANU/DE/1444/2019 2. Scotch Whisky Association v. Golden Bottling Limited(¶¶ 16-18) 2006 (32) PTC 656 3. Dyer Meakin Breweries v. Scotch Whisky Association(¶¶ 16, 17) AIR 1980 Del 125 4. Mohan Meakin v. Scotch Whisky(¶¶ 15, 17) 17 (1980) DLT 466

Other High Courts 45 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

1. Tea Board of India v. ITC Ltd(¶¶ 6, 19, 20) 2019(79)PTC 1(C al) 2. Scotch Whiskey Association v. Pravara Shakar Karkhana(¶¶ 30, 31) AIR 1992 Bom. 294 3. Imperial Tobacco v. Registrar of Trademarks(¶¶ 8, 25, 39) AIR 1977 Cal 413

j) Biological Diversity Act, 2002

S. No. Title Citation Supreme Court 1. Aruna Rodrigues and Ors v. Union of India(¶¶ 5, 6) (2012) 5 SCC 331

Other High Courts 1. Central India AYUSH Drug Manufacturers’ Association v. State of AIR2016Bom261 Maharashtra(¶¶ 27, 28) R. Muralidharan v. The Secretary Ministry of Law & Justice 2015-2-LW481 (Mad) 2. (¶¶ 1, 17, 18) 3. Environment Support Group v. National Biodiversity Authority(¶ 3) AIR2014Kant20

National Green Tribunal Bio Diversity Management Committee v. Western Coalfields Ltd. OA Nos. 28/2013; 17/2014 (¶¶ 29, 30, 31, 33) (CZ) 1. DoD: October 06, 2015

k) Plant Variety Protection and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001

S. No Title Citation Supreme Court 1. Monsanto Technology LLC and Ors. vs. Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. and AIR2019SC559 Ors.(¶23)

High Court of Delhi 1. Pioneer Overseas Corporation vs. Chairperson, Protection of Plant MANU/DE/2102/2019 Varieties and Farmers Rights and Ors. (¶72) 2. Prabhat Agri Biotech Ltd. and Ors. Vs Registrar of Plant Varieties MIPR2017(1)349 and Ors. .(¶40)

F. General Readings

46 For Private and Internal Circulation Only

John Doe/ Ashok Kumar & Anton Piller Orders 1. CopyrightEnforcement: Evaluating The Nitish R Daniel Journal OF Legal Hardships Caused By 'ANTON PILLER' & Studies and Research 'JOHN DOE’ orders in India Volume 4 Issue 3 June 2018 2. Anton Piller Order in UK and its Possible Souvik Bhadra Journal of Intellectual Implications in India andArka Property Rights Vol Majumdar 12, September 2007, pp 488-496

DISCLAIMER: All Articles suggested hereinabove contain/reflect the views of the concerned author(s) only.

47 For Private and Internal Circulation Only