DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Manchester Student Law Review Is a Student Led Peer-Reviewed Journal Founded at the University of Manchester, School of Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Manchester Student Law Review Is a Student Led Peer-Reviewed Journal Founded at the University of Manchester, School of Law University of Manchester Student Law Review The University of Manchester’s School of Law Student Journal VOL. II The University of Manchester Student Law Review is a student led peer-reviewed journal founded at the University of Manchester, School of Law. The journal exhibits the best academic work in law, criminology and ethics, on both the undergraduate and postgraduate levels, publishing it annually. VOLUME II DECEMBER 2013 University of Manchester Student Law Review ©University of Manchester Student Law Review, 2013 All rights reserved The University of Manchester Student Law Review and its editors are not responsible for the opinions expressed in this journal. No part of this journal may be reproduced in any form without the expressed consent of The University of Manchester Student Law Review or the University of Manchester, School of Law. All enquires should be addressed to: University of Manchester Student Law Review Williamson Building, School of Law University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL [email protected] Typeset in Baskerville Old Face Printed in United Kingdom University of Manchester Student Law Review Editor-in-Chief Ben Adamson Associate Editors Christopher Markou Craig Prescott Jorge Nunez Melissa Bone Michal Kniec Ugochukwu Orazulike Assistant Editors Ammar Lulla Ashley Porter Étienne Farmer Lacombe Iman Nauman Sarah Burke Sonam Cheema Layout and Design Emile Abdul-Wahab Finance Officer Joseph Tomlinson Faculty Advisors Prof Geraint Howells Prof Rodney Brazier Prof Margot Brazier Prof Toby Seddon Dr Jackson Maogoto Dinah Crystal OBE V This year’s edition was generously funded by the University of Manchester, School of Law. The entire editorial team are sincerely grateful for the School of Law’s continuing support. VI VII Preface from the Head of the School of Law On becoming Head of School I was happy to give the go ahead for this Review to be launched. It was an easy decision because of the enthusiasm of the students. It has also been one of the best decisions given the quality of what has been produced. It reflects the academic strength of the Law School and demonstrates that it spans the undergraduate and postgraduate communities and the disciplines of law, criminology and ethics. Particular thanks this year go to Ben Adamson, the editor. It was a daunting task to follow our energetic founding editor, Michal Kniec, but I have had chance to see advanced copy and he has pulled off a tremendous success. Once again the Review has managed to showcase the quality of scholarly work in the School in a format which is appealing and accessible. There is a whole team that has worked with Ben from authors and editors to those involved in the management and production of the Review. The Law School is proud to sponsor the Review and proud of our student community for producing work of such high quality. Geraint Howells Head of Law School VIII IX Preface from the Editor-in-Chief Familiar as I am with the prestige associated with student-led law reviews in the United States and their growing presence in the landscape of English legal education, I was very excited when I joined the University of Manchester Student Law Review in 2011 as an associate editor after its founding by Michal Kniec. Upon assuming the mantle of Editor-in-Chief for the Review’s second volume in 2012, I was eager to extend its already ambitious remit of publishing the finest examples of work from the School of Law’s undergraduate and taught postgraduate students to also include work from postgraduate research students - reflecting the University of Manchester’s membership of the Russell Group, and giving students a much sought after opportunity to publish original work stemming from their doctoral research. In this, our second year, the response rate from students to the call for papers was astonishing and we received more high quality papers than we could possibly publish in two or even three volumes, let alone one. This presented the Editorial Board with a tremendously difficult task, narrowing down the papers to the selection presented in this volume. More importantly, the response represents a source of great pride in the School of Law and its students and one that should be shared by all - that so many students have produced work that is not only of high academic quality but also of high interest value and a genuine pleasure to read. There are many people who deserve praise and thanks for their participation and support in the Review and it is regrettable that to list every one of them by name would be too time consuming an exercise. First and foremost I would like to thank Michal Kniec for all his hard work in founding the Review and for his continuing support throughout the second volume, allowing me to benefit from his considerable experience in student-led journals and from his passion and commitment to this Review. I would also like to thank Prof. Geraint Howells for his ongoing interest, X support and advice, and Dinah Crystal for her hard work in seeking and arranging funding. Without her priceless contribution, this book would not be in your hands today. Of course without the editors, we would have no articles ready for publication and mere words cannot express my gratitude for the work of the Editorial Board – all of whom were hand picked from a high number of excellent applications. Offering up constructive critique on work that is already of a very high standard is no easy task and I am confident that every one of the editors this year has truly done justice to their respective authors and I hope that everyone involved is as proud of this Review as I am. Volume two of the University of Manchester Student Law Review represents the culmination of a long and, at times, arduous journey for everyone involved from advisors to authors to editors and not least for myself but it also represents what has been a tremendously rewarding and enjoyable experience. The work published in this book truly sets the gold standard to which all University of Manchester law students should aspire and I hope that you derive as much inspiration and as much pleasure from reading it as we did from putting it together. Ben Adamson Editor-in-Chief XI Contents PREFACE FROM THE HEAD OF THE SCHOOL OF LAW ....... V PREFACE FROM THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF ............................... IX STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ENGLISH AND FRENCH APPROACHES TO FAULT IN ESTABLISHING TORTIOUS LIABILITY ............................................ 1 Danny Watson SHAM SELF-EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS: TAKING A LIBERTY? .... 15 Fabian McNeilly THE BLOODY CODE .................................................................... 28 Harriet Evans PROPORTIONALITY - AN UNATTAINABLE IDEAL IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ........................................................... 41 Joel Goh MARPOL 73/78: THE CHALLENGES OF REGULATING VESSEL-SOURCE OIL POLLUTION ................................................ 73 Mark Szepes CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM AND THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY.................................................................................... 110 Richard Jones A RADICAL INTERPRETATION OF INDIVIDUAL SELF-DEFENCE IN WAR....................................................................................... 148 Tanzil Chowdhury MERCHANDISING AND BRAND EXTENSION IN THE MUSIC INDUSTRY ................................................................................... 190 Magdalena Borucka DO NO HARM: ‘BEST INTERESTS’, PATIENTS’ WISHES AND THE MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 ............................................ 224 Sarah L Morgan XII HARD CASES .............................................................................. 240 Dorota Galeza CORPORATE TAKEOVERS AND SHAREHOLDER PROTECTION: UK TAKEOVER REGULATION IN PERSPECTIVE ......................... 267 Francis Okanigbuan WHAT HAS THE STATE GOT TO DO WITH HEALTHCARE? ......... 298 Malcolm Oswald Style over Substance? A Comparative Analysis of the English and French Approaches to Fault in Establishing Tortious Liability Danny Watson Abstract The English law and French law methods for establishing tortious liability are stylistically divergent. Casuistry prevails in English tort law, whereas the French law of delict (equivalent to English tort law) proceeds rigidly from a general principle of liability in three spartan articles of the Code Civil. The purpose of this article is to examine, with regard to the role of fault in tortious liability for harm caused by things under one’s control, whether these different methods produce substantively different results. The English and French approaches to fault-based liability have evolved near- concurrently. Through examining these policy-based evolutions, it will be shown that both systems have sought to attenuate fault-based liability for harm caused by things under one’s control, in favour of a stricter liability regime. This implies that the inflexible theoretical basis of liability in French law has not prevented the French system from incorporating policy just as fluidly as the English system. An exposition of the diminution of fault-based liability thus provides a salient example of how two legal systems with differing methodologies may coalesce in attaining practical solutions. I. Introduction The French law of liability for harm caused by things under one’s control is founded on a single article1 of the Code Civil. English law relies on the tort of negligence espoused in Donoghue v Stevenson 2 , as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recognising Customary Law in Vietnam: Legal Pluralism and Human Rights Nhat Thanh Phan University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2011 Recognising customary law in Vietnam: legal pluralism and human rights Nhat Thanh Phan University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Phan, Nhat Thanh, Recognising customary law in Vietnam: legal pluralism and human rights, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Wollongong, 2011. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3455 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact Manager Repository Services: [email protected]. RECOGNISING CUSTOMARY LAW IN VIETNAM: LEGAL PLURALISM AND HUMAN RIGHTS The thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY from UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG By PHAN, NHAT THANH LLB, Hochiminh City University of Law (Vietnam) LLM, Transnational Law and Business University (South Korea) FACULTY OF LAW 2011 CERTIFICATION I, Phan Nhat Thanh, declare that this thesis, submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Faculty of Law, University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Phan Nhat Thanh 19 July 2011 ABSTRACT This thesis examines whether customary law should be more effectively recognised in Vietnam. By exploring how customary law is treated in different parts in the world, the thesis provides a survey overview of the position of customary law in a number of legal systems. Customary law is regarded as law, infra state law, or non- law depending on social circumstances and the attitude of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Sports Law Journal 2003, No. 2
    ISLJ 2003/2 Def 01-07-2004 10:13 Pagina A 2003/2 World Anti-Doping Code Kolpak Case Terror and Politics in Sport Sports Torts and Negligence Powers of USOC Dual Nature of Football Clubs Social Dialogue in European Football ISLJ 2003/2 Def 01-07-2004 10:13 Pagina B K LUWER C ONGRES *** Congres Sport & Recht Juridische actualiteiten en knelpunten op sportgebied Dinsdag 16 december 2003 • Meeting Plaza Olympisch Stadion, Amsterdam ■ Mondiale doping regelgeving: achtergrond, inhoud en praktische consequenties van de World Anti Doping Code ■ Recente uitspraken schadeaansprakelijkheid Spel en Sport (HR); deelnemers Sprekers onderling; aansprakelijkheid trainers / coaches; letselschade door paarden Mr. Fred Kollen Mr. Steven Teitler ■ Overheidssteun aan betaald voetbal; Nationale en Europese invalshoek Mr. Cor Hellingman Mr. Mark J.M. Boetekees Prof. mr. Heiko T. van Staveren ■ Verenigingsrechtelijke ontwikkelingen in de sport; bestuurlijk invulling van Mr. Hessel Schepen de tuchtrechtspraak; de positie van afdelingsverenigingen bij sportbonden en het duaal stelsel; mediation bij verenigingsrechtelijke conflicten Kosten € 575,- p.p. (excl. BTW) ■ Sportrecht bezien vanuit de rechterlijke macht Kluwer bundel 5 Sport & Recht 2003 Deze nieuwe uitgave ontvangt u bij deelname en is bij de prijs inbegrepen. ❑ Ja, ik ontvang graag meer informatie over het congres ‘Sport & Recht’ Antwoordkaart verzenden per fax of in ❑ Ja, ik wil deelnemen aan het congres ‘Sport & Recht’ open envelop zonder postzegel aan: Kluwer Opleidingen, Dhr./Mevr.: Antwoordnummer 424, 7400 VB Deventer Functie: T 0570 - 64 71 90 F 0570 - 63 69 41 Bedrijf: E [email protected] Aard van het bedrijf: W www.kluweropleidingen.nl Postbus/Straat: Kluwer legt uw gegevens vast voor de uitvoering van de overeenkomst.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty: a Critical Inquiry, 26 La
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 26 | Number 4 June 1966 The rB itish Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Critical Inquiry Roy Stone de Montpensier Repository Citation Roy Stone de Montpensier, The British Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Critical Inquiry, 26 La. L. Rev. (1966) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol26/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BRITISH DOCTRINE OF PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY: A CRITICAL INQUIRY Roy Stone de Montpensier The purport of this argument is that Dicey and other legal positivists, Austin and Bentham among them, have propounded a spurious doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty because they have uncritically accepted a mistake of Blackstone, who in turn has mistakenly construed Coke's remarks on the nature and analysis of sovereignty, or better, the supremacy, of the High Court of Parliament. The law as a whole is a calculus,' self-contained and self- explanatory, like a circle within which in geometry it is possible to trace the delineaments of the two-dimensional plane con- tained within the circle, as Waissman explains in his Essay on Language Strata; or like language which is also like a circle - that is, as Dr. Johnson explains, a lexicographer sees language by giving definitions of words by reference to other words, and those words by other words, so that in the end words like buck and doe, female and male, he and she, are tautologous in the sense that the one has to refer to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • William Blackstone) Published on Natural Law, Natural Rights, and American Constitutionalism ( Primarysourcedocument
    Of the Laws of England (William Blackstone) Published on Natural Law, Natural Rights, and American Constitutionalism (http://www.nlnrac.org) primarysourcedocument Of the Laws of England (William Blackstone) Of the Laws of England (William Blackstone) “Of the Laws of England,” Excerpt 1753 By William Blackstone [Blackstone, William. “Of the Laws of England.” Commentaries on the Laws of England. Volume 1. 1753. Reprint, Philadelphia: J. Lippincott Co. 1893. Introduction, Section III. The Online Library of Liberty. Used with permission of the Online Library of Liberty.] Several footnotes have been omitted. The municipal law of England, or the rule of civil conduct prescribed to the inhabitants of this kingdom, may with sufficient propriety be divided into two kinds: the lex non scripta, the unwritten, or common law; and the lex scripta, the written, or statute law. The lex non scripta, or unwritten law, includes not only general customs, or the common law properly so called; but also the particular customs of certain parts of the kingdom; and likewise those particular laws, that are by custom observed only in certain courts and jurisdictions. When I call these parts of our law leges non scriptæ [“unwritten laws”], I would not be understood as if all those laws were at present merely oral, or communicated from the former ages to the present solely by word of mouth. It is true indeed that, in the profound ignorance of letters, which formerly overspread the whole western world, all laws were entirely traditional, for this plain reason, because the nations among which they prevailed had but little idea of writing.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 Nettleship V Weston
    Law’s Fictions Reading Law as Literature Alexandra Reichelt A Thesis Presented to the Department of Literature, Area Studies, and European Languages University of Oslo In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the MA Degree Spring 2016 I II III Law’s Fictions Reading Law as Literature Alexandra Reichelt IV © Alexandra Reichelt 2016 Law’s Fictions: Reading Law as Literature Alexandra Reichelt http://www.duo.uio.no Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo V VI Abstract This thesis seeks to explore how narrative functions in law, and how case law can be read as literature. The analysis is based on the close-reading of three central judgements in the field of negligence, a kind of tort law, in British common law. Applying narratology to law demands certain adaptations, such as the inclusion of the narrator into the implied author. There are also narratives structures that are particular to case law. The analysis focuses on three main aspects of case law as literature, in three judgements. The analysis of Donoghue v Stevenson concerns the frame narrative and the implied authors specially. The second judgement, Smith v Leech Brain, is centred around fact narratives, or statements of fact. Finally, the analysis of Nettleship v Weston focuses on competing narratives. Throughout this thesis is focused on the ethics of literature, as seen in the implied authors’ ethical standards. This thesis seeks to prove that literary analysis can be applied to case law, and that there are aspects of judgements that can only be unearthed through literary analysis. VII VIII Acknowledgements First, thank you to my supervisors, Tore Rem and Rebecca Scherr, for allowing me to explore my mad ideas and helping me do it.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Injustice in Compensating Injury to Autonomy in English and Singaporean Negligence Law
    This is a repository copy of Gender injustice in compensating injury to autonomy in English and Singaporean negligence law. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/135195/ Version: Published Version Article: Keren-Paz, T. (2018) Gender injustice in compensating injury to autonomy in English and Singaporean negligence law. Feminist Legal Studies. ISSN 0966-3622 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-018-9390-3 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Feminist Legal Studies https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-018-9390-3 Gender Injustice in Compensating Injury to Autonomy in English and Singaporean Negligence Law Tsachi Keren‑Paz1 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract The extent to which English law remedies injury to autonomy (ITA) as a stand-alone actionable damage in negligence is disputed. In this article I argue that the remedy available is not only partial and inconsistent (Keren-Paz in Med Law Rev, 2018) but also gendered and discriminatory against women. I irst situate the argument within the broader feminist critique of tort law as failing to appropriately remedy gendered harms, and of law more broadly as undervaluing women’s interest in reproductive autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Law: Continued
    Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 10-1-1987 The Evolution of Law: Continued Alan Watson University of Georgia School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation Alan Watson, The Evolution of Law: Continued (1987), Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/494 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Evolution of Law: Continued Alan Watson In my book The Evolution of Law' I sought to give a general theory of legal evolution based on detailed legal examples from which generalizations could be drawn, offering as few examples as were consistent with my case in order to present as clear a picture as possible. I was well aware as I was writing that some critics would regard the examples as mere isolated aberrationsand for them and for other readerswho, whether convinced of the thesis or not, would like furtherevidence, I want here to bring forward a few extra significant examples. I In the first chapterI wantedto show that it is, above all, lawyers thinking aboutlaw, not societal conditions, that determinesthe shape of legal change in developed legal systems. I chose to show as the main example that it was the thoughtpattern of the Romanjurists, ratherthan conditions in the society at large, that determinedthe origins and nature of the individual Roman contracts, and that the jurists were largely unaffectedby society's realities.
    [Show full text]
  • This Represents the Title
    PRIVACY, CONSTITUTIONS AND THE LAW OF TORTS: A COMPARATIVE AND THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF PROTECTING PERSONAL INFORMATION AGAINST DISSEMINATION IN NEW ZEALAND, THE UK AND THE USA A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law in the University of Canterbury by Martin Heite University of Canterbury 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................IV ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................V CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION .................................................................. 1 CHAPTER TWO - THE LAW OF THE USA .................................................... 11 1 Constitutional background of the speech-privacy conflict..............................................................13 1.1 Foundations of a constitutional ‘right to privacy’............................................................................13 1.2 First Amendment viability of the public disclosure of private facts ................................................17 1.2.1 Function and doctrinal framework of the First Amendment.....................................................18 1.2.2 Early implications for New Zealand and the UK......................................................................22 1.2.3 Constitutionalisation of private law ..........................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • The Textualization of Precedent, 82 Notre Dame L
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 82 | Issue 3 Article 6 12-1-2006 The exT tualization of Precedent Peter M. Tiersma Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Recommended Citation Peter M. Tiersma, The Textualization of Precedent, 82 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1187 (2013). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol82/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TEXTUALIZATION OF PRECEDENT Peter M. Tiersma* The municipal law of England... may with sufficient propriety be divided into two kinds; the lex non scripta, the unwritten or common law; and the lex scripta, the written, or statute law. -Sir William Blackstone1 INTRODUCTION In the English-speaking world, there are traditionally two major sources of law: statutes and judicial opinions. The former consist of written texts that have been carefully drafted in advance and which have been scrutinized and formally enacted by a legislature. Deter- mining the meaning of statutes generally involves close textual analy- sis. Legislation thus came to be called lex scripta ("written law"). In contrast, judicial opinions were traditionally pronounced orally from the bench, and were thus known as lex non scripta ("unwritten law"). Figuring out what an opinion meant-determining the ratio decidendi or holding of a case-required engaging in the process of legal reasoning. This unwritten law made by judges has long been touted by the legal profession, especially in England, as being in many ways superior to the written enactments of the legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • Lex Scripta Et Lex Non Scripta: Tensions Between Law and Language in Late Fourteenth-Century England and Its Literature
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1997 Lex Scripta Et Lex Non Scripta: Tensions Between Law and Language in Late Fourteenth-Century England and Its Literature. Susanne Sara Thomas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Thomas, Susanne Sara, "Lex Scripta Et Lex Non Scripta: Tensions Between Law and Language in Late Fourteenth-Century England and Its Literature." (1997). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6461. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6461 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Fictions in Private Law
    Deus ex Machina: Legal Fictions in Private Law Liron Shmilovits Downing College Faculty of Law University of Cambridge May 2018 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Liron Shmilovits 2018 Printed by Cambridge Print Solutions 1 Ronald Rolph Court Wadloes Road, Cambridge CB5 8PX United Kingdom Bound by J S Wilson & Son (Bookbinders) Ltd Unit 17 Ronald Rolph Court Wadloes Road, Cambridge CB5 8PX United Kingdom ii ABSTRACT of the PhD dissertation entitled Deux ex Machina: Legal Fictions in Private Law by Liron Shmilovits of Downing College, University of Cambridge This PhD dissertation is about legal fictions in private law. A legal fiction, broadly, is a false assumption knowingly relied upon by the courts. The main aim of the dissertation is to formulate a test for which fictions should be accepted and which rejected. Subsidiary aims include a better understanding of the fiction as a device and of certain individual fictions, past and present. This research is undertaken, primarily, to establish a rigorous system for the treatment of fictions in English law – which is lacking. Secondarily, it is intended to settle some intractable disputes, which have plagued the scholarship. These theoretical debates have hindered progress on the practical matters which affect litigants in the real world. The dissertation is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is a historical study of common-law fictions. The conclusions drawn thereform are the foundation of the acceptance test for fictions. The second chapter deals with the theoretical problems surrounding the fiction. Chiefly, it seeks precisely to define ‘legal fiction’, a recurrent problem in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • English Law Studies Programme Level 1
    ENGLISH LAW STUDIES (ELS) PROGRAMME (2016-2017) Appendix 1 LEVEL 1 October-June: 250 hrs.: 100 hrs. compulsory class attendance; 150 hrs. independent study time: = 10 ECTS/20 UK credits 1. INTRODUCTORY TOPICS [items listed below can be introduced at different points in Levels 1-4] 1.1 Welcome to the course: map, a training to provide advice on English law and related legal services, a fresh chip, ‘odious comparisons’ and ‘lost translations’, dual traininG for a global world 1.2 Course method explained: exploring the ‘pond’, black-letter law, practice competencies and transferable skills, continuinG assessment, the evaluations, the ‘cut’, pass marks 1.3 ‘Skyscrapers’, ‘hole in the ground’, ‘scales’ ‘pendulum’ (the Overton Window), ‘spider’s web’ 1.4 What makes us tick? 1.5 “Islands” 1.6 What need for law (social harmony or anarchy) 1.7 Around the camp fire: deciding the substantive rules, ensurinG procedures to ensure the fair application of substantive rules (procedure) 1.8 “Lady Justice”; scales, sword, blindfold; balancing social priorities and individual freedoms, balancing the conflictinG interests of individuals 1.9 The social contract: three playing fields for everyone: ‘must do or must not do (criminal Law), ‘should do or should not do’ (tort), ‘better do or not do’ (social codes), and a fourth playing field for some: ‘to agree to do or not to do’(contract) 1.10 Why courts and judGes, how to judGe: codified principles and their application (ascertaininG the facts, applying the principle); having special regard for previous stories
    [Show full text]