Copyright Ó 2006 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.051011

Deleterious Epistatic Interactions Between Electron Transport System Protein-Coding Loci in the californicus

Christopher S. Willett1 Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280 Manuscript received September 12, 2005 Accepted for publication April 12, 2006

ABSTRACT The nature of epistatic interactions between genes encoding interacting proteins in organisms can have important implications for the of postzygotic and speciation. At this point very little is known about the fitness differences caused by specific closely interacting but evolutionarily divergent proteins in hybrids between populations or species. The intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus provides an excellent model in which to study such interactions because the species range includes numerous genetically divergent populations that are still capable of being crossed in the laboratory. Here, the effect on fitness due to the interactions of three complex III proteins of the electron transport system in F2 hybrid resulting from crosses of a pair of divergent populations is examined. Significant deviations from Mendelian inheritance are observed for each of the three genes in F2 hybrid adults but not in nauplii (larvae). The two-way interactions between these genes also have a significant impact upon the viability of these hybrid copepods. Dominance appears to play an impor- tant role in mediating the interactions between these loci as deviations are caused by heterozy- gote/homozygote deleterious interactions. These results suggest that the fitness consequences of the interactions of these three complex III-associated genes could influence reproductive isolation in this system.

PISTASIS contributes to a wide range of evolution- specific molecular interactions that are involved. Sev- E ary phenomena such as reproductive isolation, the eral cases are known from Drosophila, where one gene potential for the evolution of sex, and the nature of involved in an interaction has been identified but the adaptation (Whitlock and Phillips 1995). However, interacting partner(s) and the physiological process specific interactions between individual loci and the that are disrupted remain to be elucidated (Ting et al. impact of these interactions on fitness are largely un- 1998; Barbash et al. 2003, 2004; Presgraves et al. known for naturally occurring variation in most 2003). Here I look for evidence that nuclear and species. In the context of speciation, epistasis plays mitochondrial-encoded proteins in the electron trans- a primary role in postzygotic reproductive isolation, port system (ETS) in Tigriopus californicus could be which is thought to be caused primarily by negative involved in deleterious interactions and contribute fitness interactions between loci. These deleterious in- to reproductive isolation in hybrids from population teractions are known as Dobzhansky–Muller (D–M) crosses of this species. incompatibilities (the model was originally proposed by In taxa with partial reproductive isolation that can be Dobzhansky 1936 and Muller 1942). D–M incom- crossed, patterns of segregation of molecular markers patibilities are hypothesized to result from the breakup or chromosomal regions can be examined in hybrid of positive epistasis that develops between interacting offspring to determine candidate regions for D–M in- genes within distinct evolutionary lineages (coadapted compatibilities. Studies of crosses between species often gene complexes). These interactions are generally reveal widespread detrimental interactions (where non- thought to be between two or more nuclear-encoded parental genotype combinations have a negative effect genes; however, rapidly evolving mitochondrial-encoded on fitness) and occasional positive interactions (con- genes in many taxa provide another potential partner versely, when nonparental genotype combinations have in deleterious interactions. Despite the crucial role of increased fitness) (Palopoli and Wu 1994; Rieseberg D–M incompatibilities in postzygotic reproductive iso- et al. 1996; Burke et al. 1998; Coyne et al. 1998; Fishman lation, there are very few examples of the types of et al. 2001; Presgraves 2003). Other studies have shown evidence for deleterious epistatic interactions in crosses between divergent populations of the same species 1Address for correspondence: Department of Biology, University of North obzhansky rmbruster i Carolina, CB 3280 Coker Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280. (D 1950; A et al. 1997; L et al. E-mail: [email protected] 1997; Galloway and Fenster 1999; Fenster and

Genetics 173: 1465–1477 ( July 2006) 1466 C. S. Willett

Galloway 2000a,b; Hall and Willis 2005). One caveat for many of these segregation studies is that the ob- served patterns of non-Mendelian inheritance could result from meiotic drive rather than from the break- down of coadapted gene complexes; this has been shown to play a role for at least one well-characterized locus in an interspecific plant cross (Fishman and Willis 2005). Studies of segregation of genotypes in hybrids will sometimes allow the proportion of hetero- zygous/homozygous (where one locus is homozygous for the same allele and the second locus is heterozygous for two alleles) to homozygous/homozygous (both loci are homozygous in a two-locus comparison) incompat- ibilities to be estimated. The ratio of these types of Figure 1.—Schematic of complex III and its position in the incompatibilities can have significant effects on the electron transport system. Complex III is known to function as a dimer in the inner membrane of the mitochondrion as results obtained from models of postzygotic isolation depicted in the diagram. Within each half, the cytochrome (Turelli and Orr 2000). b protein (CYTB) is mtDNA encoded, while the rieske The intertidal copepod T. californicus has proven to be iron–sulfur protein (RISP), cytochrome c1 (CYC1) proteins, a useful system in which to examine the initial stages of and the soluble protein cytochrome c (CYC) are all encoded allopatric speciation. Geographically distinct popula- in the nucleus. Ubiquinol (QH2) is a lipid soluble compound that moves within the membrane and is oxidized by complex tions of this copepod from the Pacific coast of North III. The diagram is derived from information in Saraste America are dramatically divergent in mitochondrial (1999) and Lange and Hunte (2002). DNA (mtDNA) even over relatively short distances (Burton and Lee 1994; Burton 1998; Burton et al. 1999; Edmands 2001; Willett and Burton 2004). The specific cross yielded results consistent with coadapta- changes in mtDNA include a large number of replace- tion between CYC and mtDNA-encoded proteins in ment differences leading to substantial divergence in both F2 and advanced generation hybrids. In this cross these mtDNA-encoded proteins. Crosses between these [between populations from Santa Cruz (SC) and Aba- copepod populations typically show that F2 hybrids (but lone Cove (AB)] the selection against non-mtDNA type not F1 hybrids) have lower fitness by a variety of mea- CYC genotypes occurred during the juvenile life stages sures when each class is compared to the parental pop- (postzygote), thereby ruling out meiotic drive as an ulations, suggesting that coadapted gene complexes explanation for skewed ratios. Results obtained in the are disrupted in these hybrids (Burton 1986, 1987, prior studies of coadaptation between mtDNA-encoded 1990; Edmands 1999; Edmands and Deimler 2004). and nuclear-encoded proteins appear to be highly in- Some genetic regions that contribute to this reduction fluenced by the particular pair of populations crossed in F2 hybrid fitness have been identified by segregation (and the direction of the cross), suggesting that in- studies of molecular markers in crosses of divergent dependent evolution has occurred in these coadapta- copepod populations (Burton 1987; Harrison and tion systems in each lineage. Edmands 2006). Complex III of the ETS (also known as ubiqui- The intimate interactions between mtDNA-encoded nol/cytochrome c oxioreductase) includes both the proteins and nuclear-encoded proteins in the physio- mtDNA-encoded cytochrome b (CYTB) and a set of logically indispensable ETS, coupled with the high rate nuclear-encoded subunits (10 in mammals), 2 of which, of divergence in mtDNA in T. californicus, suggested this cytochrome c1 (CYC1) and the rieske iron–sulfur pro- system as a candidate system in which to examine the tein (RISP), contain redox centers (Figure 1) and are wata evolution of epistasis and its potential role in F2 hybrid found in the bacterial complex III homolog (I et al. breakdown. Several studies have suggested that mito- 1998). These three functionally important components chondrial/nuclear coadaptation has diverged in these of complex III have been characterized from several genetically isolated copepod populations: Edmands and T. californicus populations and have been shown to have Burton (1999) found evidence for mitochondrial/ differences in amino acid sequence in comparisons nuclear coadaptation in backcross hybrids between across populations (Willett and Burton 2004). Much populations. Rawson and Burton (2002) uncovered like the pattern seen for other mtDNA genes (Burton functional coadaptation between nuclear-encoded cy- and Lee 1994; Burton 1998; Burton et al. 1999; tochrome c (CYC) and complex IV (which contains Edmands 2001), CYTB was remarkably divergent be- three mtDNA-encoded proteins) in studies of enzymatic tween T. californicus populations with synonymous rates. Willett and Burton (2001, 2003) demonstrated pairwise divergence exceeding 65% for comparisons that the fitness of CYC genotypes in hybrids is influ- between SC, AB, and San Diego (SD) copepod popula- enced by the cytoplasmic type of the cross and one tions. In contrast, synonymous divergences for the Epistatic Interactions of ETS Proteins 1467

CYC1 and RISP genes were 5% for comparisons of Crosses were done in petri dishes with 15 males and 15 these same sets of populations (Willett and Burton females, and two plates were set up for each of the reciprocal 3 3 2004). Complex III interacts closely with CYC (a soluble crosses (ABf SDm and ABm SDf). Female copepods were moved to new dishes when copepodids of the next generation protein that transfers electrons from complex III to were observed (if copepodids molt to the final adult stage, complex IV; Saraste 1999); CYC has also diverged then generations will be indistinguishable). Males were re- between copepod populations, divergence that has moved and discarded because females mate only once in potentially been driven by positive selection (Rawson their lifetime and store sufficient sperm to produce multiple et al. 2000; Willett and Burton 2004). clutches. F2 progeny were obtained by allowing F1 male and female copepods to mate after replicate crosses were mixed (to Given the importance of these ETS proteins for minimize the chance of inbreeding). Nucleotide variability energy generation and the presence of changes in the (which should be a proxy for functionally important genetic amino acid sequences between copepod populations, variation) is much lower within these populations than be- an unanswered question is whether these differences in tween them, reflecting the apparent long-term restrictions on proteins will lead to detrimental interactions within the gene flow between these populations. F1 females were then transferred to new petri dishes when F2 copepodids were ETS that will negatively influence fitness in hybrids from observed. This crossing design has the potential disadvantage genetically divergent populations. An examination of of not allowing cross-to-cross variability to be uncovered but it genotypic viabilities in F2 hybrids from T. californicus does permit a large number of F2 progeny to be collected, populations for these three interacting proteins (CYC, thereby increasing power to detect epistatic interactions. CYC1, and RISP) and their combined impact on viabil- F2 copepods were collected as both nauplii and adults: First- stage nauplii were obtained by incubating mature egg sacs ity affords the opportunity to uncover the nature of (red in color) from F1 females in seawater at which point nuclear/nuclear interactions as well as nuclear/mtDNA nauplii would hatch out and were immobilized on filter paper interactions for this system. The degree to which het- and then collected into 10 ml of proteinase-K cell-lysis buffer erozygote/homozygote vs. homozygote/homozygote types (Hoelzel and Green 1992). Adults were separated according m of interactions are occurring is also examined. Addi- to sex and then collected and placed into 20 l of proteinase-K cell-lysis buffer. Both adults and nauplii were placed in 96-well tional comparisons of levels of epistasis between these polymerase chain reaction (PCR) plates and incubated at 65° three proteins with two non-ETS proteins (malic en- for 1 hr and 95° for 15 min to prepare DNA for subsequent zyme homologs, ME1 and ME2) will help to illuminate PCR reactions. Two 96-well plates each of nauplii, adult males, the level of background interactions expected for and adult females were collected and stored at 20°. arbitrarily chosen proteins. The results presented in ETS gene marker scoring and data analysis: PCR-based markers were developed for each of the three ETS proteins this article suggest that for a cross between two South- to allow the scoring of the genotypes of hybrids by length ern California copepod populations, Abalone Cove differences, i.e., allele-specific PCR products of different and San Diego, interactions between these three com- sizes. Genotyping assays for the gene CYC were described in Willett and Burton (2001). Primers for RISP and CYC1 took plex III nuclear proteins are having an impact upon F2 hybrid fitness. These interactions appear to be nuclear/ advantage of length differences in introns between AB and SD populations uncovered in these sequences in Willett and nuclear and primarily heterozygote/homozygote in type Burton (2004). The primers for RISP had the following and could be responsible for deleterious interactions sequences: RISPcon.f 59-TGGCAGATCCAAGGCAAATACTAA that act as D–M incompatibilities in these hybrid CAAT-39 and RISPcon.r 59-TGGTTAGATTTGAATACGGAACC copepods. TTCA-39. The CYC1 primers were CYC1ex3con.f 59-GACTCGT TTGACCATGCTTCCATTCG-39 and CYC1ex4con.r 59-CGGC ATGGGTAGATAGTCGGTCAAT-39. PCR reactions were run under standard conditions (with 55° annealing temperatures for both sets of reactions) and genotypes were determined by MATERIALS AND METHODS visualizing differences in the size of PCR products on 1.5% Crosses and culturing conditions: T. californicus were agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. collected from intertidal rock pools at two sites in southern Each of the complex III markers was tested for departures California, SD (32°44.749 N, 117°15.309 W, San Diego County) from homogeneity between sexes, using contingency tests. and AB (33°44.269 N, 118°22.529 W, Los Angeles County). The Deviations from Mendelian 1:2:1 ratios were then examined copepods were maintained in mass culture in artificial sea- for the sexes separately or combined. This test can be used to water (Instant Ocean, Aquarium Systems) in 400-ml beakers at test the significance of differences in genotypic viability that 20° with a 12:12 L:D photoperiod. Cultures were maintained at can then be compared across reciprocal crosses (with different a concentration of 35 parts per thousand seawater and fed with mtDNA backgrounds) to determine whether mitochondrial/ commercial flake fish food (O.S.I. Spirulina, Ocean Science nuclear interactions are influencing F2 hybrid fitness. Relative International), but copepods were also allowed to consume viabilities of homozygous genotypes and their standard devia- aldane natural algal growth. tions were calculated according to H ’s (1956) formu- To test for the existence of epistatic interactions between las. For the estimated viability value this is simply wAA ¼ 2NAA/ ETS proteins, crosses were set up using copepods from the (NAa 1 1), where NAA is the number of one homozygous class AB and SD populations that had been maintained under and NAa is the number of heterozygotes. The standard de- the culturing conditions described above for at least 1 year viation of this value is (multiple generations are likely to have occurred under these sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi laboratory conditions). Virgin females were obtained by 2 wAAð1 1 wAAÞ separating clasped pairs (Burton 1985) and placing these SD w ¼ : AA 1 females in dishes with males from the other population. NAA NAa 1468 C. S. Willett

To test for epistatic interactions between nuclear-encoded nauplii to adult for each of these three markers in these gene products (nuclear/nuclear interactions), a multiplica- hybrids. The ABf 3 SDm cross shows significant differ- tive model was used in which the null hypothesis was that ences between the sexes for RISP and CYC1 genotypic single-locus effects are mutually independent to generate expected numbers without epistasis. The expected number ratios (only for CYC1 when significance values are cor- of each two-locus genotype class was calculated by using rected for multiple comparisons). For all three ETS observed single-locus genotype frequencies to correct for markers there is a marked reduction in viability for both deviations associated with each of the two single loci. This homozygote classes in adults when compared to the het- was done for each genotypic combination (nine total) by erozygous class (Table 2).Willett and Burton (2001) multiplying the two observed genotypic frequencies of the two loci and then multiplying these by the total number of performed an analogous cross under similar conditions copepods scored for both markers. This simplifies to and scored AB 3 SD F2 adults for CYC; these results are summarized in Table 2 for comparison. NAA 3 NBB The potential for CYC coadaptation with mtDNA- Exp NAABB ¼ ; NTotal encoded proteins has been suggested by a number of studies (Edmands and Burton 1999; Willett and where Exp N is the expected number of a two-locus ge- AABB Burton 2001, 2003); however, these studies have fo- notypic class with corresponding numbers of NAA and NBB observed for each locus individually and Ntotal equal to the cused largely on a different population cross (Abalone total number of copepods scored for both loci. Three-way Cove and Santa Cruz in central California). Both RISP epistatic interactions between RISP, CYC1, and CYC were and CYC1 are found in the same protein complex as detected using a procedure analogous to that described above CYTB, which sets up the potential for the coadaptation for two-way interactions. The expected number for each of the 27 three-locus classes was derived from the average of each of of these nucDNA-encoded proteins with the mtDNA- the three two-locus classes multiplied by the excluded locus encoded CYTB. To test for nuclear/mitochondrial co- class. This simplifies to the formula adaptation it is instructive to look at the representation of the alternate homozygous genotypic classes with the ðN 3 N Þ 1 ðN 3 N Þ 1 ðN 3 N Þ Exp N ¼ AABB CC AACC BB BBCC AA ; expectation that there will be a 1:1 ratio between them AABBCC 3ðN Þ2 Total (or equivalent viabilities when compared to the hetero- where Exp NAABBCC is the expected number of a three-locus zygous genotypic class). An examination of the viabil- genotypic class; the observed number in each two-locus class is ities in Table 2 does not lend support to a large role of NAABB, NAACC,orNBBCC; the observed number of each single- mitochondrial/nuclear coadaptation in determining locus class is NAA, NBB,orNCC; and NTotal is the total sample size F hybrid fitness in the AB 3 SD crosses for these three for which all three genotypes were obtained. The significance 2 of deviations from independence in single-, two-, and three- markers. There is not widespread agreement with a locus comparisons was tested with a x2-test. A sequential simple model of ETS gene/mtDNA coadaptation when Bonferroni correction was used to determine a critical P-value comparing bias in alternate homozygous classes with the for each table that adjusted for multiple tests. The significance maternal parent in each cross for each of the three of interactions with the functionally distantly related malic genes. With maternal inheritance of mtDNA, nuclear/ enzyme homologs (ME1 and ME2) was calculated using mtDNA coadaptation would predict that the viability of genotypes collected from the same F2 individuals scored herein (genotypes from J. Berkowitz and C. S. Willett, the homozygous class not matching the female parent unpublished data). These markers (in addition to two-way should be reduced. For the current results, only three of interaction results for histone H1 from Willett and Burton nine possible comparisons between homozygous classes 2001) will provide some insight into the background level of in Table 2 (underlined) show biases matching this pre- epistatic interactions in these crosses. diction for the current results. Epistatic interactions between ETS genes: Given the close interactions of CYC, CYC1, and RISP proteins in RESULTS complex III of the ETS, hybridization could result in the Deviations from Mendelian inheritance for ETS breakdown of coadaptation between these proteins in markers: To test the potential contribution of nuclear- this complex. These nuclear/nuclear gene interactions encoded ETS genes to hybrid breakdown in population within complex III could then be a potential source of crosses in T. californicus the genotypic-specific viabilities hybrid inviability. To test for the presence of this co- of the three ETS loci were examined individually. The adaptation, I have examined the patterns of epistasis genotypes for CYC, CYC1, and RISP were determined observed between the markers in the three complex III- both from hybrid F2 adults and from first-stage nauplii associated genes in the F2 hybrid populations examined from two reciprocal crosses between AB and SD pop- above. There are substantial deviations from indepen- ulations (Table 1). There are significant deviations from dence for two-way comparisons of these three markers Mendelian inheritance for each of these markers in in adult F2 hybrids but no evidence of departures in F2 both of the reciprocal crosses for F2 adults but no sig- nauplii (Table 3). The departures from multiplicative nificant deviations are observed for F2 nauplii, suggest- independence were calculated by using expected values ing that fitness differences between genotypic classes that correct for the fitness effects of each of the sin- are leading to selection during development from gle loci. The two comparisons involving CYC1 display Epistatic Interactions of ETS Proteins 1469

TABLE 1

Observed genotypic numbers for three ETS genes in F2 progeny from interpopulation crosses of Tigriopus californicus between Abalone Cove (AB) and San Diego (SD)

No. of genotypic class Male vs. ETS gene and reciprocal cross Sex/stagea SD/SD AB/SD AB/AB female x2 P b,c 1:2:1 x2 P CYC-ABm 3 SDf Female 35 121 32 4.29 0.11 Male 46 121 20 M 1 F 81 242 52 36.2 ,0.0001* Nauplii 50 79 48 2.08 0.35 CYC-ABf 3 SDm Female 32 123 29 1.27 .0.5 Male 33 132 22 M 1 F 65 255 51 53.1 ,0.0001* Nauplii 50 87 48 0.70 .0.5

CYC1-ABm 3 SDf Female 25 125 38 0.67 .0.5 Male 31 120 36 M 1 F 56 245 74 37.0 ,0.0001* Nauplii 38 104 36 5.1 0.078 CYC1-ABf 3 SDm Female 13 124 49 17.6 0.0001* 34.6 ,0.0001* Male 40 115 35 8.7 0.013 M 1 F 53 239 84 32.8 ,0.0001* Nauplii 50 100 33 4.7 0.094

RISP-ABm 3 SDf Female 34 122 27 0.71 .0.5 Male 29 112 41 M 1 F 63 234 68 29.2 ,0.0001* Nauplii 45 88 44 0.014 .0.5 RISP-ABf 3 SDm Female 33 130 18 8.21 0.016 37.0 ,0.0001* Male 29 122 39 16.4 0.0003* M 1 F 62 252 57 47.8 ,0.0001* Nauplii 43 97 41 0.98 .0.5 M, male; F, female. a Female and male are F2 adults, while nauplii are first-stage nauplii. b The significance of deviations from expected Mendelian 1:2:1 ratio and equal genotypic ratios between sexes was tested with contingency x2-tests and P-values were computed with 2 d.f. P-values ,0.05 are indicated in italics. c Application of the sequential Bonferroni method to the data yields a critical P-value of 0.004 (a ¼ 0.05); an * denotes values exceeding this significance threshold. significant deviations for the adults summed across the vs. underrepresented for these two genes in these hy- reciprocal crosses and large deviations (approaching brid copepods. For the CYC and CYC1 genotypic combi- significance only when correcting for multiple tests) for nations, the homozygote/heterozygote classes are all at least one of each of the reciprocal crosses. For the underrepresented, suggesting their potential involve- RISP/CYC comparison, only the total female sample ment in deleterious interactions. Doubly parental SD has a marginally significant deviation from indepen- homozygotes (e.g., CYCSD/SD/CYC1SD/SD) show large pos- dence (approaching the critical sequential Bonferroni- itive deviations (as does the nonparental type, CYCSD/SD/ corrected P-value). CYC1AB/AB). The nature of deviations from independence could A similar pattern is found in the RISP/CYC1 compar- yield insights into the types of epistasis occurring be- ison for deviations from multiplicative independence tween these genes. The simplest pattern that could be (Figure 3). Once again the heterozygous/homozygous generated by D–M incompatibilities would be an excess classes are underrepresented. The large positive effect of parental-type double homozygotes and a deficit of of the RISPSD/SD/CYC1AB/AB class and the similar result non-parental-type double homozygotes. However, more seen for a nonparental genotype with CYC and CYC1 are complex patterns of homozygote/heterozygote incom- not consistent with completely negative interactions patibilities are also possible (modeled by Turelli and between genes from different populations. The devia- Orr 2000). Figure 2 separates the components of the x2- tions for RISP/CYC (for which the overall x2-values deviations into the nine different two-locus genotypic were largely marginally significant or insignificant) are classes for CYC and CYC1. This provides a qualitative shown in Figure 4. For these two genes the largest assessment of which interactions are overrepresented contribution to the overall x2-deviation comes from 1470 C. S. Willett

TABLE 2

Relative viabilities of ETS markers for F2 hybrids in AB 3 SD population crosses

RV, current resultsa RV, 2001 resultsb Locus Cross Sex SD/SD AB/AB SD/SD AB/AB CYC ABm 3 SDf Combinedc 0.67 (0.08)d 0.43 (0.05) 1.03 (0.14) 0.87 (0.12) ABf 3 SDm Female 0.52 (0.09) 0.47 (0.08) 0.77 (0.15) 1.86 (0.33) Male 0.50 (0.08) 0.33 (0.06) 1.31 (0.26) 0.34 (0.09)

CYC1 ABm 3 SDf Combined 0.46 (0.06) 0.60 (0.07) ABf 3 SDm Female 0.21 (0.05) 0.78 (0.12) Male 0.69 (0.11) 0.60 (0.10)

RISP ABm 3 SDf Combined 0.54 (0.07) 0.58 (0.07) ABf 3 SDm Female 0.50 (0.08) 0.27 (0.05) Male 0.47 (0.08) 0.63 (0.10) RV, relative viabilities. a Underlined viabilities are cases when the higher viability of the homozygote classes matches the mtDNA background of the cross. b Previous results for CYC are from Willett and Burton (2001). c Combined sexes for the ABm 3 SDf cross for each marker because there was no significant difference between the sexes (either in Table 1 or in Willett and Burton 2001). d Relative viability is calculated assigning a heterozygote a fitness of 1. Standard deviations of relative viabilities are in parentheses. positive deviations for both parental-type double homo- Bonferroni correction. The total adult genotypic class zygous classes. The heterozygous/homozygous geno- deviates from independence by having an observed typic combinations are once again all underrepresented excess of triple heterozygotes, and, in addition, several from RISP/CYC. double-heterozygote/single-homozygote classes are un- There is limited evidence for significant three-way derrepresented (results not shown). For the three-way interactions between RISP, CYC, and CYC1 when the ef- interactions as well as the two-way interactions previ- fects of the two-way interactions are factored out (Table ously, the female classes show greater deviations from 4). When all adults in both reciprocal crosses are summed independence than do the male classes. Although the (total adults in Table 4), they deviate substantially from interactions between these three ETS genes appear to be independence between the three ETS genes but do complex, it appears that their interactions have signif- not reach the significance threshold with a sequential icant effects upon hybrid fitness in this population cross.

TABLE 3

Two-way epistatic interactions between ETS loci in F2 hybrids

Nauplii Females Males Adultsa Cross Genes x2 b P x2 P c x2 P x2 P ABf 3 SDm CYC1/CYC 1.82 .0.95 14.7 0.066 12.54 0.13 24.08 0.0022 ABm 3 SDf 2.30 .0.95 20.94 0.0073 7.61 0.47 24.87 0.0016 Total 0.41 .0.95 26.3 0.0009* 16.0 0.04 39.21 0.00006*

ABf 3 SDm RISP/CYC 5.03 0.75 19.8 0.011 3.01 0.93 11.83 0.16 ABm 3 SDf 2.81 0.95 6.69 0.57 2.25 .0.95 4.96 0.76 Total 2.64 .0.95 20.8 0.0077 4.16 0.84 13.78 0.08

ABf 3 SDm CYC1/RISP 3.27 0.92 6.79 0.56 14.7 0.065 11.98 0.15 ABm 3 SDf 3.91 0.87 13.1 0.11 14.2 0.077 23.02 0.0033 Total 4.98 0.75 14.6 0.67 22.6 0.0039 28.56 0.0004*

a Adults are the total of male and female F2 hybrids for indicated cross(es). b x2-value is measure of deviation from a model of independent gene action for an indicated pair of genes (discussed in materials and methods); P-values are calculated with 8 d.f. P-values ,0.05 are indicated in italics. c Application of the sequential Bonferroni method to the data yields a critical P-value of 0.0015 (a ¼ 0.05); an * denotes values exceeding this significance threshold. Epistatic Interactions of ETS Proteins 1471

Figure 2.—Relative contributions to x2-devia- tions for genotype-by-genotype classes in F2 hy- brids of a cross between SD and AB for T. californicus for CYC and CYC1. The magnitude of the deviation in x2 is shown by the length of the bars on the y-axis while the direction indicates more (positive) or less (negative) in each cate- gory than expected. The genotypic combinations are indicated at the top while the reciprocal cross or combined result is indicated by shading as shown in the inset. Boxed classes are heterozy- gous/homozygous comparisons while the two un- derlined classes are nonparental homozygous/ homozygous comparisons. The x2-value for each cross and associated P-value are given below each cross name in the inset.

Interactions of ETS proteins with ME homologs: that led to a significant deviation for the F2 adult Markers have been developed for two different malic females; F2 males of the reciprocal cross had a non- enzyme homologs from T. californicus, and these have significant trend for a deviation in the same genotypic been used to genotype the same F2 hybrids genotyped class. In comparison with the results involving the three for the three nuclear-encoded ETS genes in this study ETS proteins, these data suggest fewer fitness interac- (J.Berkowitz and C. S. Willett, unpublished results). tions in hybrids between these two ME homologs with There were significant departures from 1:2:1 Mendelian the ETS proteins (and linked genes). expectations for these two loci when examined singly that involved greatly reduced numbers of both homo- DISCUSSION zygous classes (results not shown). We can gain some insight into the levels of background epistasis by looking Significant epistatic interactions between ETS pro- at two-way interactions between the ME proteins and teins: The three genes, CYC, CYC1, and RISP, encode the three ETS proteins in the F2 hybrids. The same proteins crucial for the function of complex III and are multiplicative model of independent gene action was involved in epistatic interactions that have deleterious tested for the comparisons of each of these two ME impacts upon hybrid fitness in crosses between AB markers with the three ETS genes (Table 5). None of the and SD populations of T. californicus. The deleterious deviations were significant when corrected for multiple interactions for these crosses appear to be largely tests using the sequential Bonferroni procedure. The nuclear/nuclear in nature despite the extensive inter- ABf 3 SDm cross for ME/CYC had a large departure actions of these proteins with mtDNA-encoded proteins from independence that approached the sequential (the limited evidence for mitochondrial/nuclear co- Bonferroni-adjusted P-value. This departure was driven adaptation for these markers in this cross is discussed by an excess of individuals in the CYCSD/SD/MEAB/AB class later). For each of these markers the heterozygote/

Figure 3.—Relative contributions to x2-devia- tions for genotype-by-genotype classes in F2 hybrids of a cross between SD and AB for T. cali- fornicus for CYC1 and RISP. The magnitude, direction, and cross type are all as indicated in Figure 1. Boxed classes are heterozygous/homo- zygous comparisons while the two underlined classes are nonparental homozygous/homozy- gous comparisons. The x2-value for each cross and associated P-value are given below each cross name in the inset. Note the difference in scale of the y-axis from Figure 2. 1472 C. S. Willett

Figure 4.—Relative contributions to x2-devia- tions for genotype-by-genotype classes in F2 hy- brids of a cross between SD and AB for T. californicus for CYC and RISP. The magnitude, direction, and cross type are all as indicated in Figure 1. Boxed classes are heterozygous/homo- zygous comparisons while the two underlined classes are nonparental homozygous/homozy- gous comparisons. The x2-value for each cross and associated P-value are given below each cross name in the inset. Note the difference in scale of the y-axis from Figures 2 and 3.

homozygote genotypic classes are underrepresented markers are involved in the interactions rather than the in comparison to numbers expected with no epistasis three ETS genes. Given the close nature of interactions (Figures 2–4). This congruence in deviations from in- between each of these proteins in complex III they are dependence across reciprocal crosses is a strong argu- clearly strong candidates for causing the observed epi- ment for the pattern’s significance despite the lack static interactions. of replication of each reciprocal cross individually in An examination of background levels of epistasis the experimental design (all F2 adults were pooled to between genes that are not functionally interacting maximize sample size). These interactions between the would provide a measure of the uniqueness of the genes encoding CYC, CYC1, and RISP could then be observed interactions. Epistatic interactions approach- an example of both partners of a D–M incompatibility ing significance were much less common for other two- leading to lowered hybrid fitness. Below, I explore way comparisons using these markers and the two ME other potential explanations for this pattern and argue homologs or histone H1 (Willett and Burton 2001) that they are unlikely to be leading to the observed or for the ME homologs to each other ( J. Berkowitz pattern. and C. S. Willett, unpublished results). Although If any of these three genes are linked to another, this malic enzyme is not directly in the ETS, most could generate a significant pattern of nonindepen- have an isoform of this protein that functions in the dence; however, other work examining patterns of mitochondrion (Kochan et al. 1995; Dolezal et al. segregation in backcrosses with these markers has dem- 2004) and could lead to functional interactions with onstrated that they are on three separate chromosomes complex III. Harrison and Edmands (2006) have (H. B. Leisy and C. S. Willett, unpublished results). shown that a combination of microsatellite and RAPD The lack of significant deviations from independence in markers on different chromosomes only rarely shows two-way comparisons for first-stage nauplii also demon- significant pairwise epistatic interactions in F2 back- strates that these genes are not linked to one another. crosses between SD and a population closely related to Another possibility is that genes linked to these three AB (Royal Palms). Only 6 of 132 possible pairwise

TABLE 4

Three-way interactions between RISP, CYC1, and CYC genes in F2 hybrids

Nauplii Females Males Adultsa Cross x2 b P x2 P c x2 P x2 P ABf 3 SDm 14.0 .0.9 38.2 0.058 21.7 0.71 34.9 0.11 ABm 3 SDf 9.4 .0.9 24.2 0.56 15.1 .0.9 27.2 0.40 Total 6.9 .0.9 38.2 0.058 28.3 0.34 46.8 0.007

a Adults are the total of male and female F2 hybrids for indicated cross(es). b x2 value is measure of deviation from a model of independent gene action for the three genes, RISP, CYC1, and CYC (discussed in methods); P-values are calculated with 26 d.f. P-values ,0.05 are indicated in italics. c Application of the sequential Bonferroni method to the data in this table yields a critical P-value of 0.0042 (a¼0.05); none of the values exceed this threshold. Epistatic Interactions of ETS Proteins 1473

TABLE 5

Two-way epistatic interactions between ETS loci and malic enzyme homologs in F2 hybrids

Nauplii: Males: Females: Adults:a Cross Genes x2 b x2 x2 c,d x2 ABf 3 SDm ME/CYC 6.99 2.96 21.7** 20.4** ABm 3 SDf 2.32 10.4 1.68 6.69 Total 1.50 19.2* ABf 3 SDm ME2/CYC 3.27 3.30 1.57 0.59 ABm 3 SDf 5.07 2.20 5.03 2.78 Total 7.33 3.74 ABf 3 SDm ME/CYC1 0.07 10.0 4.13 9.67 ABm 3 SDf 4.09 1.15 4.08 4.61 Total 1.80 11.49 ABf 3 SDm ME2/CYC1 2.14 5.96 6.79 5.94 ABm 3 SDf 6.01 3.60 1.21 1.66 Total 2.37 4.35 ABf 3 SDm ME/RISP 2.12 7.02 5.65 9.82 ABm 3 SDf 3.15 3.38 12.3 3.14 Total 0.63 10.4 ABf 3 SDm ME2/RISP 3.00 6.80 0.49 1.80 ABm 3 SDf 0.78 3.72 5.90 4.84 Total 2.80 3.26

a Adults are the total of male and female F2 hybrids for indicated cross(es). b x2-value is measure of deviation from a model of independent gene action for an indicated pair of genes (discussed in materials and methods). c x2-values exceeding P ¼ 0.05 with 8 d.f. are indicated in italics, with the magnitude indicated by *P , 0.05 and **P , 0.01. d Application of the sequential Bonferroni method to the data yields a critical P-value of 0.0008 (a ¼ 0.05); none of the P-values in this table exceeded this significance threshold (for comparison, for the highest value, a x2 of 21.7, P ¼ 0.0055). comparisons were significant in their data set (only 2 near the interacting regions, none of them are the after Bonferroni correction); however, measures across interacting residues themselves (Willett and Burton all chromosomes for this cross in their study do suggest 2004). If, as this study suggests, these changes have the presence of more complex interactions. Combined, important fitness consequences, this would imply that these results suggest that the three nuclear-encoded the basic interactions such as the residues responsible ETS proteins show many more significant pairwise epi- for binding have remained unchanged while the resi- static interactions than other non-ETS genes and that dues that have changed will cause smaller modifications high numbers of significant epistatic interactions are to the complex III enzyme. The RISP protein interacts not ubiquitous across markers in crosses of these cope- both in structure and in function with the CYC1 and pod populations. CYTB proteins but has no direct interactions with CYC Another argument for the epistatic interactions be- (Iwata et al. 1998). For two-way comparisons between ing caused by the deleterious interaction of the protein these three genes, the comparisons between RISP and products of the CYC, CYC1, and RISP genes is that the CYC had smaller deviations from independence as magnitude of interactions is related to the degree of would be predicted by the more limited structural/ structural and functional interactions within complex functional interactions. If we use yeast or mammal com- III (and to CYC). The soluble CYC protein is bound to plex III as a model there are either six or seven (respec- complex III at the CYC1 protein during the electron- tively) other nuclear-encoded subunits in complex III. transfer phase from complex III to CYC (Lange and Of these subunits, QCR6p (corresponding to subunit Hunte 2002). In comparison with the 26-amino-acid 8 in mammals) and QCR9p (corresponding to subunit differences between the AB and SD CYTB proteins, 10) are close in the structure to the active sites of CYC1 there is only a single (CYC1) or two (RISP, CYC) amino and RISP (Iwata et al. 1998; Zhang et al. 1998; Lange acid differences between these three nuclear-encoded and Hunte 2002). Although complex III can function proteins. Although some of the amino acid changes without these two subunits, it appears that they are between T. californicus populations in these proteins fall important for complex assembly and may modify 1474 C. S. Willett functional interactions as well (Kim et al. 1987; Schmitt The homozygous–homozygous classes do not always and Trumpower 1991; Zara et al. 2004). To gain a deviate in a manner predicted by the D–M incompati- complete understanding of the evolution of interac- bility model; in several cases the nonparental-type double- tions in this complex for these hybrid copepods, these homozygote class (e.g., RISPSD/SD/CYC1AB/AB in Figure additional subunits should be characterized as well. 3) is overrepresented. Clearly the nuclear/nuclear in- For the F2 adult hybrids of the AB and SD populations, teractions between the three ETS proteins (or linked dominance appears to play a large role in structuring genes) have a complex relationship to fitness in the the interactions between these genes. The two-way ge- hybrid copepods of this population cross. If the ob- notypes with homozygous/heterozygous combinations served epistasis is caused solely by the interactions of the are all underrepresented for comparisons between the ETS proteins, these results would suggest that both three ETS gene markers (Figures 2–4). This pattern positive and negative fitness interactions can result even suggests that deleterious interactions involving compo- from single pairs of genes. Whether these loci with both nents of complex III may involve one heterozygous negative and positive epistatic interactions will function locus and one homozygous locus. In models of post- as D–M incompatibilities overall will depend upon the zygotic isolation the ratio of heterozygous/homozygous relative strength of the effects and whether the negative to homozygous/homozygous incompatibilities influ- outweighs the positive. The results of the epistatic in- ences the ability of reproductive isolation to evolve and teractions observed in this study suggest that D–M can help explain the phenomenon known as the large X incompatibilities are very complex even when broken effect (Turelli and Orr 2000). They conclude that a down to the level of individual loci. small ratio of heterozygote/homozygote incompatibili- Mitochondrial/nuclear coadaptation: For the crosses ties (h1 in their terminology) to homozygote/homozy- between copepods from the AB and SD populations, gote incompatibilities (h2) would make dominance a coadaptation between the nuclear-encoded CYC1 and good explanation for the observation of a large X effect RISP genes and the mtDNA-encoded proteins does not for differences between species. T. californicus does not appear to play a significant role in determining the have differentiated sex chromosomes so this large X fitness of F2 hybrids. RISP and CYC1 are part of the effect is not applicable to this species, but the results for same complex with CYTB (Figure 1). CYTB is evolving epistasis at complex III could indicate that heterozy- more rapidly than the nuclear-encoded RISP and CYC1 gous/homozygous deleterious incompatibilities can be proteins with 26-amino-acid differences between the AB uncoupled from homozygous/homozygous interaction and SD proteins (Willett and Burton 2004). For effects. In results seen to date from Drosophila and wasp complex III the expectation from structural and func- studies h1 is generally much lower than h2 (Breeuwer tional considerations would be that RISP would have and Werren 1995; Hollocher and Wu 1996; Trueet al. the closest interactions with CYTB (Iwata et al. 1998); 1996; Turelli and Orr 2000) although the results of however, the deviations seen in the F2 hybrids are not Taoet al. (2003), which looked at hybrid male sterility in generally consistent with the deviations expected from Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana using introgres- mtDNA/nuclear coadaptation for this cross (Table 2). sions, suggest that dominance/epistatic relationships It is possible that such coadaptation could be obscured are very complex for loci influencing this trait. if the neighboring regions of the genome contain op- It is not clear what the proximate cause of high fre- posing interactions that are stronger in effect. These quency of heterozygote/homozygote deleterious inter- interactions may be detectable in advanced generation actions would be for the genes in this study. Complex III hybrids if they exist. Functional studies on complex is a stable dimer with each monomer containing one III such as those performed by Rawson and Burton each of the CYC1, RISP, and CYTB proteins (Saraste (2002) for CYC and complex IV could also help illu- 1999) (see Figure 1). There is the potential for both minate any potential coadaptation. parental alleles to be present in the same complex III For the CYC gene, only the ABm 3 SDf cross for CYC dimer, perhaps contributing to the observed interac- has a lowered viability of the non-mtDNA type homozy- tions. It is also possible that the observed patterns of gous class for adults (SD mtDNA-type in this cross) and a genotypic deviations derive from the influence of genes nonsignificant difference between the sexes (Tables 1 linked to the ETS markers combined with the inter- and 2). The reciprocal cross does not lend additional actions of the ETS proteins themselves. For this study support to the suggestion that CYC is involved in mito- F2 hybrids were examined, which allows for only one chondrial/nuclear coadaptation in hybrids of these generation of recombination; therefore, there will be two populations, however, as the same direction of bias fairly large numbers of linked genes with the potential toward SD homozygotes is observed in the two recip- to influence the viability of the ETS markers scored in rocal crosses. The CYC protein interacts with complex this study. Future studies are planned to isolate these IV (cytochrome c reductase), a complex primarily com- three ETS markers from linked genes, which may help posed of three mtDNA-encoded proteins (Saraste to clear up the nature of the interactions between these 1999), in addition to the close interaction of CYC with genes from the effects of background loci. complex III. In a cross between AB and a copepod Epistatic Interactions of ETS Proteins 1475 population from SC, CYC did show fitness deviations each population is much lower than the divergence seen consistent with mitochondrial/nuclear coadaptation in between each of these three populations (typically previous studies (Willett and Burton 2001, 2003). A around an order of magnitude lower for nuclear genes physiological study has also suggested the possibility of if variation at silent sites is compared within and coadaptation for CYC and complex IV enzymatic rates between these two populations; Willett and Burton for the AB and SC populations (Edmands and Burton 2004). In addition, 30 females and 30 males were used 1999). Combined, these studies suggest that if mito- to set up each cross, which should have the effect of chondrial/nuclear coadaptation is contributing to hy- averaging over any genetic variation present within each brid breakdown in survival in these copepod hybrids it of the populations. Clearly, repeatability is an issue for may involve interactions between CYC and complex IV. interpreting the single-locus effects but could poten- In other systems, few studies to date have looked at the tially reflect an underlying biological reality that many contribution of individual ETS proteins to organismal factors can influence the relative fitness of copepods, fitness due to genomic coadaptation. A number of stud- and at these relatively low levels of reproductive iso- ies have used crosses between populations or species to lation, specific deleterious interactions might be some- examine the magnitude of mitochondrial/nuclear co- what transient in nature. adaptation on fitness (Clark and Lyckegaard 1988; In support of the changeable nature of genetic inter- Hutter and Rand 1995; Rand et al. 2001, 2006; James actions, the environment appeared to play a significant and Ballard 2003; Perrot-Minnot et al. 2004). Signifi- role in the expression of potential incompatibilities in a cant impacts of mitochondrial/nuclear coadaptation previous study of interpopulation hybrids of T. californi- upon fitness have been found in these studies, demon- cus. Willett and Burton (2003) found that tempera- strating that such interactions might not be uncommon ture environment affected whether there was selection in diverging populations or species (along with signifi- at CYC in a cross between AB and Santa Cruz. Temper- cant effects of nuclear/nuclear interactions in some ature interactions would not be surprising given that studies as well). The specific genetic interactions leading these copepods are ectotherms and the ETS should to these mitochondrial/nuclear interactions remain have evolved to function best under the range of con- largely unknown at this point. ditions that particular populations of copepods have The results obtained in this study can be compared to experienced in their past. The stability of protein– results for CYC obtained from a previous study using the protein interactions is often highly dependent upon AB and SD populations (Willett and Burton 2001), temperature and may then lead to the widespread in- and this comparison shows similar overall trends but a volvement of temperature in the expression of D–M few larger differences as well (Table 2). The direction of incompatibilities. Replication of the current study un- bias between the AB/AB and SD/SD alternate homozy- der a different temperature environment could help gote classes in this 2001 experiment is qualitatively sim- reveal if nuclear/nuclear interactions detected in this ilar to the results obtained in the present study; the study for ETS genes are influenced as dramatically by largest discrepancy for CYC is for adults in the ABf 3 the environmental conditions. SDm cross that show little difference between the I thank E. Hoddeson, Q. Qin, and J. Berkowitz for their help with the viabilities of the alternate homozygotes in the current copepod crosses and sample preparation. Helpful suggestions on the results but large differences in opposite directions be- manuscript were provided by R. Burton, M. Servedio, T. Vision, A. tween males and females in the 2001 results. This varia- Bouck, and S. Hartman; by the University of North Carolina (UNC) tion in results suggests that there can be differences evolgen reading group; and by two anonymous reviewers. I thank M. Servedio for help with analyses. C.W. was supported by money from from cross to cross in the magnitude and expression of UNC and National Science Foundation grant DEB-0516139. hybrid incompatibilities even when conducted under similar conditions (the largest controlled difference was the use of artificial seawater for the current experiment LITERATURE CITED vs. natural seawater for the previous experiment). It is conceivable that other experimental factors could in- Armbruster, P., W. E. Bradshaw and C. M. Holzappel, 1997 Evo- lution of the genetic architecture underlying fitness in the fluence the repeatability of these fitness effects; in par- pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Evolution 51: 451– ticular, relative levels of competition (different numbers 458. Barbash, D. A., D. F. Siino,A.M.Tarone and J. Roote, 2003 A rap- of nauplii will be in each of the F2 petri dishes) and algal idly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolation in Dro- growth in the cultures are factors that vary to some sophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 5302–5307. extent but not in a systematic way between experiments. Barbash, D. A., P. Awadalla and A. M. Tarone, 2004 Functional It is also possible that the differences between studies divergence caused by ancient positive selection of a Drosophila hy- brid incompatibility locus. PloS Biol. 2: 839–848. result from genetic variation segregating within each of Breeuwer, J. A., and J. H. Werren, 1995 Hybrid breakdown be- the populations. The copepods used in these two sets tween two haplodiploid species: the role of nuclear and cytoplas- of crosses were from outbred lab populations sampled mic genes. Evolution 49: 705–717. Burke, J. M., T. J. Voss and M. L. Arnold, 1998 Genetic interactions at different times from the field. It should be noted, and natural selection in Louisiana iris hybrids. Evolution 52: however, that the magnitude of genetic variation within 1304–1310. 1476 C. S. Willett

Burton, R. S., 1985 Mating system of the intertidal copepod Tigrio- Hollocher, H., and C.-I. Wu, 1996 The genetics of reproductive pus californicus. Mar. Biol. 86: 247–252. isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: X vs. autosomal effects Burton, R. S., 1986 Evolutionary consequences of restricted gene and male vs. female effects. Genetics 143: 1243–1255. flow in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Bull. Mar. Hutter, C. M., and D. M. Rand, 1995 Competition between mito- Sci. 39: 526–535. chondrial haplotypes in distinct nuclear genetic environments: Burton, R. S., 1987 Differentiation and integration of the genome Drosophila pseudoobscura vs. D. persimilis. Genetics 140: 537–548. in populations of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 41: 504–513. Iwata, S., J. L. Lee,K.Okada,J.K.Lee,M.Iwata et al., Burton, R. S., 1990 Hybrid breakdown in developmental time in 1998 Complete structure of the 11-subunit bovine mitochon- the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 44: 1814–1822. drial cytochrome bc1 complex. Science 281: 64–71. Burton, R. S., 1998 Intraspecific phylogeography across the Point James, A. C., and J. W. O. Ballard, 2003 Mitochondrial genotype Conception biogeographic boundary. Evolution 52: 734–745. affects fitness in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 164: 187–194. Burton, R. S., and B.-N. Lee, 1994 Nuclear and mitochondrial gene Kim, C. H., C. Balny and T. E. King, 1987 Role of the hinge protein genealogies and allozyme polymorphism across a major phylo- in the electron transfer between cardiac cytochrome c1 and c. geographic break in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Proc. J. Biol. Chem. 262: 8103–8108. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 5197–5201. Kochan,Z.,J.Karbowska,F.Bukato and J. Swierczynski, 1995 Com- Burton, R. S., P. D. Rawson and S. Edmands, 1999 Genetic archi- parative studies on NADP1-linked malic enzyme in the central tecture of physiological phenotypes: empirical evidence for co- nervous system of ectothermic and endothermic animals. Comp. adapted gene complexes. Am. Zool. 39: 451–462. Biochem. Physiol. 110B: 309–314. Clark, A. G., and E. M. S. Lyckegaard, 1988 Natural selection with Lange, C., and C. Hunte, 2002 Crystal structure of the yeast cyto- nuclear and cytoplasmic transmission. III. Joint analysis of seg- chrome bc1 complex with its bound substrate cytochrome c. regation and mtDNA in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 118: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 2800–2805. 471–481. Li, Z., S. R. M. Pinson,A.H.Paterson,W.D.Park and J. W. Stansel, Coyne, J. A., S. Simeonidis and P. Rooney, 1998 Relative paucity of 1997 Genetics of hybrid sterility and hybrid breakdown in an genes causing inviability in hybrids between Drosophila melanogas- intrasubspecific rice (Oryza sativa L.) population. Genetics 145: ter and D. simulans. Genetics 150: 1091–1103. 1139–1148. Dobzhansky, T., 1936 Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of Muller, H. J., 1942 Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and tempera- sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21: ture. Biol. Symp. 6: 71–125. 113–135. Palopoli, M. F., and C.-I Wu, 1994 Genetics of hybrid male sterility Dobzhansky,Th., 1950 Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Ori- between Drosophila sibling species: a complex web of epistasis is gin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of revealed in interspecific studies. Genetics 138: 329–341. Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 35: 288–302. Perrot-Minnot, M.-J., A. Migeon and M. Navajas, 2004 Inter- Dolezal, P., S. Vanacova,J.Tachezy and I. Hrdy, 2004 Malic en- genomic interactions affect female reproduction: evidence from zymes of Trichomonas vaginalis: two enzyme families, two distinct introgression and inbreeding depression in a haplodiploid mite. origins. Gene 329: 81–92. Heredity 93: 551–558. Edmands, S., 1999 Heterosis and outbreeding depression in inter- Presgraves, D. C., 2003 A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid in- population crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution compatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163: 955–972. 53: 1757–1768. Presgraves, D. C., L. Balagopalan,S.M.Abmayr and H. A. Orr, Edmands, S., 2001 Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigrio- 2003 Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviabil- pus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differen- ity gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423: 715–719. tiation at northern latitudes. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1743–1750. Rand, D. M., A. G. Clark and L. M. Kann, 2001 Sexually antagonis- Edmands, S., and R. S. Burton, 1999 Cytochrome c oxidase activity tic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. in interpopulation hybrids of a marine copepod: a test for Genetics 159: 173–187. nuclear-nuclear or nuclear-cytoplasmic coadaptation. Evolution Rand, D. M., A. Fry and L. Sheldahl, 2006 Nuclear-mitochondrial 53: 1972–1978. epistasis and Drosophila aging: introgression of Drosophila simu- Edmands, S., and J. K. Deimler, 2004 Local adaptation, intrinsic co- lans mtDNA modifies longevity in D. melanogaster nuclear back- adaptation and the effects of environmental stress on interpop- grounds. Genetics 172: 329–341. ulation hybrids in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. J. Exp. Mar. Rawson, P. D., and R. S. Burton, 2002 Functional coadaptation be- Biol. Ecol. 303: 183–196. tween cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric Fenster, C. B., and L. F. Galloway, 2000a Inbreeding and out- populations of a marine copepod. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: breeding depression in natural populations of Chamaecrista fasci- 12955–12958. culata (Fabaceae). Conserv. Biol. 14: 1406–1412. Rawson, P. D., D. A. Brazeau and R. S. Burton, 2000 Isolation and Fenster, C. B., and L. F. Galloway, 2000b Population differentia- characterization of cytochrome c from the marine copepod tion in an annual legume: genetic architecture. Evolution 54: Tigriopus californicus. Gene 248: 15–22. 1157–1172. Rieseberg, L. H., B. Sinervo,C.R.Linder,M.C.Ungerer and D. M. Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis, 2005 A novel meiotic drive locus com- Arias, 1996 Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: evi- pletely distorts segregation in Mimulus (monkeyflower) hybrids. dence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272: 741–745. Genetics 169: 347–353. Saraste, M., 1999 Oxidative phosphorylation at the fin de siecle. Fishman, L., A. Kelly,E.Morgan and J. H. Willis, 2001 A genetic Science 283: 1488–1493. map in the Mimulus guttatus species complex reveals transmission Schmitt, M. E., and B. L. Trumpower, 1991 The petite phenotype ratio distortion due to heterospecific interactions. Genetics 159: resulting from a truncated copy of subunit 6 results from loss of 1701–1716. assembly of the cytochrome bc1 complex and can be suppressed Galloway, L. F., and C. B. Fenster, 1999 The role of nuclear and by overexpression of subunit 9. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 14958–14963. cytoplasmic factors in the adaptive evolution of populations of Tao, Y., Z-B. Zeng,J.Li,D.L.Hartl and C. C. Laurie, 2003 Ge- Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Evolution 53: 1734–1743. netic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila Haldane, J. B. S., 1956 The estimation of viabilities. J. Genet. 59: 29–36. simulans and D. mauritiana. II. Mapping hybrid male sterility loci Hall, M. C., and J. H. Willis, 2005 Transmission ratio distortion in on the third chromosome. Genetics 164: 1399–1418. intraspecific hybrids of Mimulus guttatus: implications for geno- Ting, C.-T., S.-C. Tsaur, M.-L. Wu and C.-I Wu, 1998 A rapidly evolv- mic divergence. Genetics 170: 375–386. ing homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282: Harrison, J. S., and S. Edmands, 2006 Chromosomal basis of viabil- 1501–1504. ity differences in Tigriopus californicus interpopulation hybrids. J. True, J. R., B. S. Weir and C. C. Laurie, 1996 A genome-wide survey Evol. Biol. (in press). of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked Hoelzel, A. R., and A. Green, 1992 Analysis of population-level var- segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into D. simulans. iation by sequencing PCR-amplified DNA, pp. 159–187 in Practi- Genetics 142: 819–837. cal Approach Series: Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations, edited Turelli, M., and H. A. Orr, 2000 Dominance, epistasis, and the ge- by A. R. Hoelzel. Oxford University Press, New York. netics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154: 1663–1679. Epistatic Interactions of ETS Proteins 1477

Whitlock, M. C., and P. C. Phillips, 1995 Multiple fitness peaks Zara, V., I. Palmisano,L.Conte and B. L. Trumpower, 2004 Fur- and epistasis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 601–629. ther insights into the assembly of the yeast cytochrome bc1 com- Willett, C. S., and R. S. Burton, 2001 Viability of cytochrome c plex based on analysis of single and double mutants lacking depends on cytoplasmic background in Tigriopus californicus. supernumerary subunits and cytochrome b. Eur. J. Biochem. Evolution 55: 1592–1599. 271: 1209–1218. Willett, C. S., and R. S. Burton, 2003 Environmental influences Zhang, Z., J. Huang,V.M.Sculmeister, Y.-I. Chi,K.K.Kim et al., on epistatic interactions: viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes 1998 Electron transfer by domain movement in cytochrome in interpopulation crosses. Evolution 57: 2286–2292. bc1. Nature 392: 677–684. Willett, C. S., and R. S. Burton, 2004 Evolution of interacting pro- teins in the mitochondrial electron transport system in a marine copepod. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 443–453. Communicating editor: D. M. Rand