DOCSLIB.ORG

Plotinus' Reception of Aristotle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plotinus' Reception of Aristotle CHAPTER 13 Plotinus’ Reception of Aristotle Sara Magrin 1 Introduction So much has been said about Plotinus’ reception of Aristotle, and the nature of this reception has been interpreted in so many ways, that one cannot approach this subject without first providing a brief history of its develop- ment. This procedure, I hope, will allow us to identify the main philosophical domains in which Plotinus engages with Aristotle’s thought, while at the same time enabling us to better interpret that engagement. I will therefore start by sketching the views on Plotinus’ reception of Aristotle that have shaped the recent history of this subject. Then I will introduce the contemporary debate and argue that, despite its specific traits, like previous discussions, it aims at a general assessment of Plotinus’ reception of Aristotle by focusing on the analysis of Aristotle’s philosophical doctrines and Plotinus’ approach to them. I will suggest that, given the variety and complexity of Plotinus’ use of Aristotle’s doctrines, no such assessment can be reached. In contrast to this doctrinal approach, I will argue that the key to arriving at a general assessment of Plotinus’ reception of Aristotle is the analysis of his method of philosophi- cal inquiry. 2 Plotinus’ Reception of Aristotle: A Brief History Plotinus’ interest in Aristotle and the Peripatetic tradition is well documented. In his Life of Plotinus (14.4–7), Porphyry remarks that in Plotinus’ writings Stoic and Peripatetic doctrines (δόγματα) are mingled in (ἐμμέμικται) in a concealed way (λανθάνοντα), and he says that Aristotle’s Metaphysics, in particular, is compressed (καταπεπύκνωται) in them. Porphyry also informs us that, in the meetings of Plotinus’ school, students were asked to read commentaries, some of which were by Peripatetic philosophers (14.10–14). He mentions Aspasius, Alexander, and Adrastus, but says that this list is not exhaustive and that Plotinus had his students read any commentary on Aristotle that was available. Thus not only are we told that Plotinus read and somehow incorporated Aristotle’s works into the Enneads, but we are also informed that he read © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���6 | doi ��.��63/97890043�540�_0�5 Plotinus’ Reception of Aristotle 259 commentaries on those works, and we have the names of at least some of the Peripatetic commentators he was familiar with. This is a wealth of informa- tion, but the interpretation of it raises at least two problems. The first problem is this: the more we learn about Peripatetic philosophy in the early Empire, the more it seems that the interpretation of core Aristotelian doctrines varied significantly among the Peripatetic commentators of that period, to the point that we can speak of many forms of Aristotelianism from at least the time of Boethus of Sidon (first century BC) until that of Alexander of Aphrodisias (late second and early third century AD).1 Thus, while the fact that Plotinus used several commentaries to interpret Aristotle’s works establishes his interest in Aristotle, it raises the question of which Aristotle he was interested in. The second problem has to do with the use Plotinus makes of Peripatetic doctrines. By saying that Peripatetic doctrines are mingled in Plotinus’ writings, Porphyry might mean that Plotinus appropriated some Peripatetic doctrines and some- how fitted them into his own Platonism. But he might also simply mean that Plotinus often mentioned those doctrines, perhaps even to refute them, with- out explicitly reporting his source.2 In the last fifty years, the debate on Plotinus’ reception of Aristotle has been defined by these two problems: that of identifying which Aristotle Plotinus is interested in, and that of understanding how Plotinus uses Peripatetic doctrines. As Porphyry’s remarks in the Life of Plotinus show, the discussion of Plotinus’ reception of Aristotle can be traced back to the first generation of his students. It is only in the 60s, however, that it began to take the shape that characterizes it today, with the publication of Les Sources de Plotin, a volume of ten essays aimed at recovering the sources of Plotinus’ thought.3 Two essays, in particular, became the starting points for any subsequent analysis of the sub- ject. By means of close textual comparison, Paul Henry and A. H. Armstrong independently argued that Plotinus developed some of his best known the- ses in psychology and metaphysics on the grounds of observations made by Alexander in On the Soul and Mantissa.4 Armstrong’s study became especially influential for two main reasons: its analysis of Plotinus’ engagement with Alexander, and the centrality in Plotinus’ thought of the thesis it examined, namely the thesis of the identity of Intellect (Nous) and its thoughts. As is well known, Plotinus posits three first principles (ἀρχαί) of reality: the One, the Intellect, and the Soul. The origin of this triad can be traced back to 1 On this issue, I refer the reader to chapters 5, 6, 7, and 8 of this volume. Cf. Rashed 2007: 1–6. 2 For a review of possible interpretations of Porphyry’s claim, see Kalligas 2014: 57–58. 3 Dodds et al. 1960. 4 Henry 1960; Armstrong 1960..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John S
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU School of Architecture, Art, and Historic School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications Preservation 2015 Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John S. Hendrix Roger Williams University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp Part of the Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Hendrix, John S., "Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination" (2015). School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications. Paper 31. http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp/31 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John Hendrix In the thought of Plotinus, the imagination is responsible for the apprehen- sion of the activity of Intellect. If creativity in the arts involves an exercise of the imagination, the image-making power that links sense perception to noet- ic thought and the nous poietikos , the poetic or creative intellect, then the arts exercise the apprehension of intellectual activity and unconscious thought. According to John Dillon in “Plotinus and the Transcendental Imag- ination,” 1 Plotinus’ conception of the imagination led to the formulation of the imagination as a basis of artistic creativity. In Plotinus, imagination operates on several different levels: it produces images in sense perception, it synthesizes images in dianoetic thought, and it produces images in correspondence with the articulation through logos of noetic thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoic Influences on Plotinus' Theodicy?
    23 Viktor Ilievski Stoic Influences on Plotinus’ Theodicy? 1. The aim of this paper, as the interrogative form of its title indicates, is to critically examine the widespread opinion that in constructing his theodicy, Plotinus utilized quite a few building blocks of Stoic origin. Since his philosophical encounters and engagements with the Stoics in the Enneads are both obvious and well-recorded,1 their influence on Plotinus’ theodicy has also been taken as significant and unquestionable.2 It should be noted, however, that I do not harbour the ambition to provide here an exposition and evaluation of either the Stoic or the Plotinian theodicy – such a task is clearly beyond the scope of a single paper. Instead, I shall limit my efforts to an attempt to isolate the Stoic answers to the problem of evil, try to see how they reflect on and to what degree they affect Plotinus’ theodicy, and investigate whether they have a prior source, i.e. whether they can be called Stoic in the full sense of the word. My hope is to demonstrate that their influence on Plotinus’ theodicy is mostly indirect, on account of the fact that the key Stoic theodicean strategies are borrowings or elaborations of the Platonic ones. Unlike Plotinus’, the Stoic attitude towards theodicy must have been ambivalent; on the one hand, it can be taken as almost redundant on account of Stoic determinism, identification of fate and providence, and their theory of indifferents (adiaphora),3 while on the other, the necessity to present a theodicy may seem inherent to the Stoic system
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinus and the Platonic Metaphysical Hierarchy
    PLOTINUS AND THE PLATONIC METAPHYSICAL HIERARCHY G.S. BOWE Global Scholarly Publications New York, New York 2003 Published by Global Scholarly Publications Copyright © 2004 by G5. Bowe All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be dupli­ cated in any way without the expressed written consent of the publisher, except in the form of brief excerpts or quotations for review purposes. Typeface: Garamond. Greek Typeface: Athenian Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data G.S. Bowe, 1969- Plotinus and the Platonic Metaphysical Hierarchy / G.S. Bowe. p.cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-9724918-4-8 1. Plotinus - Metaphysics. 2. Aristotle -- Metaphysics. 3. Plato - Metaphysics. 4. Greek Philosophy. I. Title Distributed by Global Scholarly Publications 220 Madison Avenue, Suite llG New York, New York 10016 www.gsp-online.org [email protected] Phone: (212) 679-6410 Fax: (212) 679-6424 For my buddy jlknur CONTENTS ACKl'lOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION iii CHAPTER I - THE PLATONIC METAPHYSICAL HIERARCHY CHAPTER II - iVIElliEXlS !li'lD THE PRINCIPLES OF EMj\NATION 33 t Positive Production 37 2. Non Convertibility 44 3. Indexed Unity 47 4. The Priority of the Simple 49 CHAPTER HI - PLOTINUS' RESPONSE TO ARISTOTLE'S UNMOVED MOVER 57 1. The Unmoved Mover as Substance 58 2. The Unmoved Mover as NolIS 69 CHAPTER IV - THE DIDASKAlJKOS AND NUMENIUS 87 1. The Didaskalikos 88 2. Numenius of Apamea 96 CHAPTER V - THE ONE OF PLOTINUS 105 CHAPTER VI - ErvlANATION AND THE SOUL 131 BIBLIOGRAPHY 155 INDEX 163 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I should thank a number of people who helped me do this.
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinus' Use of Early Greek Philosophers: the Case of Ethics
    Centre for Neoplatonic Virtue Ethics University of Copenhagen Plotinus’ use of early Greek philosophers: the case of Ethics Centre for Neoplatonic Virtue Ethics University of Copenhagen Plotinus’ use of early Greek philosophers: the case of ethics Giannis Stamatellos, Post Doc Department of Media, Cognition and Communication Giannis Stamatellos (Post Doc) – May 2010 1 Centre for Neoplatonic Virtue Ethics University of Copenhagen Plotinus’ use of early Greek philosophers: the case of Ethics Plotinus and the Presocratics [Table 1] Key areas of reference Presocratics Plotinus Heraclitus The flux of becoming The flux of the heavenly bodies Unity of the opposites Soul’s ascent and descent Unity and plurality Unity of cosmos Alterations of Soul Soul’s ascent and descent Logos The universality of logos Self-knowledge Self-knowledge: soul’s ascent Empedocles Love and Strife The unity of cosmos The cycles of Soul The descent of soul The Four Roots Theory of Matter Parmenides The ‘signs’ of being The properties of intelligible Being Thinking and Being Self-thinking Intellect Timelessness of Being Timelessness of Eternity Anaxagoras Nous Purity of Intellect The original mixture Theory of matter Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans The unity of the One The Monad Plotinus’ Virtue Ethics [Table 2] Level State Virtues Wisdom Justice Self-Control Courage Practical Civic Reason Minding its Harmony Emotions own business between where ruling passion- and being reason ruled are concerned Purification Body- Soul acts Ruled by Not being Not afraid Soul alone reason
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinian Henadology
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by PhilPapers Edward P. Butler PLOTINIAN HENADOLOGY In his Life of Plotinus, Plotinus’ student Porphyry states that there were, in Plotinus’ time, “many Christians and others, and sectarians [αἱρετικοι] who had abandoned the old philosophy,” from whom came a profusion of “treatises” as well as “revelations” (ἀποκαλύψεις), that Porphyry says “deceived themselves and many others, alleging that Plato had not penetrated to the depths of intelligible substance,” and that Plotinus “often attacked their position in his lectures,” as well as in the entire treatise that Porphyry says “we have given the title ‘Against the Gnostics’” (Vita Plotini 16.1‑11). The project of refuting these sectarians was so important to Plotinus that not only was it a recurring focus of his own work, but Porphyry speaks of his fellow student Amelius and himself pursuing it in multiple works of theirs as well. In Plotinus’ day, so ‑called Gnostics and Christians were scarcely distinguishable, and it was surely difficult to imagine any one of this profusion of emerging sects achieving hegemonic status, much less that one of them, through seizing for itself the power of the imperial state, would be able to sweep away before it cults that had existed for thousands of years. Hence Plotinus writes against the new sectarians, not as a threat against the Pagan world, but as a threat to the correct interpretation of Platonism, because some of these sects had adopted elements of it and might, if not critiqued, succeed in positioning themselves as Plato’s legitimate interpreters.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoplatonism
    Book Notes Neoplatonism ANNE SHEPPARD More books are published on Plotinus than on any other Neoplatonist. It is a sign of his acceptance as a major philosopher that he now has a Cambridge Companion 1 devoted to him. This is a volume for those who may be new to Plotinus but are not new to philosophy. It o ffers a series of discrete essays of high quality, most of them by well-known scholars. The essays range over metaphysics, philosophical psychology and ethics and PlotinusÕ relation to his predecessors is covered both in Maria Luisa GattiÕs rst chapter entitled ÔPlotinus: The Platonic tradition and the foun- dation of NeoplatonismÕ and from time to time in discussions in other essays. PlotinusÕ in uence on his successors is tackled to a limited extent in the last two chapters where Cristina DÕAncona Costa in ÔPlotinus and later Platonic philosophers on the causality of the rst principleÕ discusses some speci c metaphysical topics and John Rist in ÔPlotinus and Chris- tian philosophyÕ argues that Augustine was the only Christian thinker of late antiquity to be in uenced by Plotinus in particular rather than by Platonism in general. It is impossible to cover all aspects of a philoso- pherÕs thought in a volume of this kind and the selection made is rea- sonable enough. Nevertheless, I am probably not the only reader to regret that neither aesthetics nor mysticism receives much coverage. Some of the essays offer fresh surveys of familiar topics by experts who are well- known for their publications in that area (so, for example, John Bussanich on ÔPlotinusÕ metaphysics of the OneÕ, Dominic OÕMeara on ÔThe hierar- chical ordering of reality in PlotinusÕ or Henry Blumenthal ÔOn soul and intellectÕ); others tackle particular problems or discuss more unusual issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinus on the Objects of Thought
    Binghamton University The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 3-1991 Plotinus on the Objects of Thought Eyolfur Emilsson University of Oslo, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, and the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Emilsson, Eyolfur, "Plotinus on the Objects of Thought" (1991). The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter. 182. https://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/182 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter by an authorized administrator of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. ··*■ - ' » i L,íaas\ is$oí ^ STFSl Plotinus on the Objects of Thought One of the features by which Neoplatonism diverges from the doctrines of Plato as they are generally understood nowadays is in the Neoplatonic account of intellect and its relation to the ideas. The received view is that according to Plato the ideas, even if knowable by the intellect and in fact the proper objects of thought, exist independently of any mind, whether human or divine, that may contemplate them. The Neoplatonists, on the other hand, all believed that the realm of ideas is to be identified with a realm of a divine intellect, which hence not merely thinks about the ideas, but in some sense is the ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Background: Plato, Aristotle & Plotinus
    Philosophical Background: Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus James Broucek American University of Beirut CVSP202 I. Socrates (469-399 BCE) • Socrates saw himself as a midwife to the ideas of others. My art of midwifery is in most respects like theirs [midwives’]; but differs, in that I attend men and not women; and look after their souls when they are in labour, and not after their bodies. The triumph of my art is in thoroughly examining whether the thought which the mind of the young man brings forth is a false idol or a noble and true birth. And like the mid-wives, I am barren, and the reproach which is often made against me, that I ask questions of others and have not the wit to answer them myself, is very just—the reason is, that the god compels me to be a midwife, but does not allow me to bring forth. And therefore I am not myself at all wise, nor have I anything to show which is the invention or birth of my own soul. But those who converse with me profit. [Theaetetus 149a-151d] • In 399 BCE, Socrates was convicted and executed for corrupting Athens’ youth— specifically, for teaching them to believe in new spirits rather than the classical Greek gods recognized by the polis. • In Socrates’ work and his death sentence we see that from the beginning philosophy was used to aid—or others might say, confuse—religious knowledge. II. Plato (427-347 BCE) • Like Socrates, Plato believed that if he could discover a definition of a property that explained all instances of that property, then he would know what that property is.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmological Theories of the Pre-Socratic Greek Philosophers and Their Philosophical Views for the Environment Udc 1(38)
    FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History Vol. 10, No1, 2011, pp. 89 - 99 THE COSMOLOGICAL THEORIES OF THE PRE-SOCRATIC GREEK PHILOSOPHERS AND THEIR PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWS * FOR THE ENVIRONMENT UDC 1(38) Efstratios Theodossiou1, Vassilios N. Manimanis1, Milan S. Dimitrijević2 1Department of Astrophysics-Astronomy and Mechanics, School of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece E-mail: [email protected] 2Astronomical Observatory of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In this paper the views related to nature, Mother-Earth and the natural environment in the ancient Greek world are discussed, from the Оrphic Hymns and the Homeric world, through the works of Hesiod and Sophocles, and the theories and works of the pre-Socratic philosophers, the Ionian School, Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes, Heraclitus, Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans, Empedocles, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics and Neo-Platonists, with a particular emphasis on Plotinus. The common elements in the teaching of the pre-Socratic Ionian philosophers and of the latter ancient Greek natural philosophers were the observation of living environment and nature, the corresponding relations, changes and cyclic periodic variations. We note the attempts of Anaximander to formulate the need for the conservation of a dynamical equilibrium in nature and in ecosystems; also, his views on evolution of the leaving creatures and the humans. Key words: history of science, natural philosophy, pre-Socratic philosophers, environment. 1. INTRODUCTION The views of the ancient Greek pre-Socratic philosophers from Ionia opened new paths for the study of nature using human logic. Starting from the worship of the Earth as a goddess, they proceeded to examine its position in the Cosmos, proposing a spherical Received March 02, 2011 * Acknowledgements.
    [Show full text]
  • From Plotinus to S. Thomas Aquinas
    FROM PLOTINUS TO S. THOMAS AQUINAS BEING STUDIES IN THE LATER PHASES OF THE TRADITION . OF GREEK PHILOSOPHY . 15Y W. R. V. BRADE, M.A. PUBLISHED IN LONDON BY THE FAITH PRESS, LTD., AT THE FAITH HOUSE, 22, BUCKINGHAM STREET, • • · · CHARING CROSS, W.C. 2. · · · · TO THE DEAR MEMORY OF MY FRIEND ARTHUR BOUTWOOD (" HAXLUYT EGERTON"), WITHOUT WHOSE HELP THESE CHAPTERS COULD NOT HA VE BEEN WRITTEN. Mede and l'"ri11I.J in Gr..rl Brlleln. CONTENTS Chap, Paae. Pru!FACE vii. I. SOME LATER PHASES OF GREEK PHILOSOPHY Change of atmosphere in passing from classical thought to that of the first few centuries A.D. (1). Growth of Ethical Interest (3). Concurrent de­ velopment of Grreco-Roman religious ideas (4). Some representative thinkers, Philo (5). Neo­ Pythagoreans, N umenius (8). N eo-Platonism, Am­ monius Saccas (11). Plotinus (11). Porphyry (18). Iamblichus (18). Proclus (20). S. Augustine's criticism (21). II. SOME LOGICAL CONTROVERSIES OF THE EARLIER MIDDLE AGES 23 The ninth to the thirteenth century, topics of discussion, "Subject and Predicate," "The One and the Many," (23). " Categories" of Aristotle (25). John the Scot (26). Rhaban Maurus and others (28). Berengar (29). Roscellinus (30). William of Champeaux (33). Walter of Mor­ tagne (35). "De Ge_neribus et Speciebus" (36). Peter Abelard (39). III. THE ARISTO'l'ELIAN TRADITION IN ISLAM. AVERROES 45 Syriac and Arabic translations of Aristotle (45). Moslem sects, Motakallimin and Ashari (46). Arab logicians and metaphysicians, AlKindi, AlFarabi (48). Avicenna (49). Averroes (51). "The Com­ mentator," (52). •• Matter and Form" (53). "Generation and Corruption," the "Creation of the World" (54).
    [Show full text]
  • Plotinus, Aristotle and the Origin of the Free Will
    PLOTINUS, ARISTOTLE AND THE ORIGIN OF THE FREE WILL* PLOTINO, ARISTÓTELES Y EL ORIGEN DEL LIBRE ALBEDRÍO JULIANA ACOSTA LÓPEZ DE MESA† Southern Illinois University – USA Φ Abstract This article has as its main purpose to criticize the mainstream scholar tradition on the free will, according to which, there is no notion of free will in ancient Greek Philosophy. With this aim, I will make a direct critique to Michael Frede’s interpretation on the matter, who claims that this concept originates from the Stoic tradition, in some measure, because they are the first to develop an intellectual concept of the free will that, in his point of view, provides the best account on this issue. Moreover, I will show that Aristotle does have a notion of free will, in my 32 opinion, even much more broad and effective than the merely intellectual one, for it explains, among other things, the possibility of choosing evil. Finally, in order to evaluate the limitations of the intellectualist free will, I shall use the analysis of the problem provided by Plotinus. Keywords: Free will, Frede, Aristotle, Plotinus, Stoicism. Resumen El presente artículo tiene como propósito hacer una crítica a una de las vertientes interpretativas más influyentes en la tradición filosófica, la cual sostiene que no existe una noción de libre arbitrio en los filósofos griegos clásicos. Con tal fin, haré una crítica directa a los planteamientos de Michael Frede quien sostiene que tal concepto nace en la tradición Estoica, en parte, debido a que son los primeros en desarrollar un concepto intelectualista del libre arbitro el cual, en su opinión, promete la mejor perspectiva del problema.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Disembodiment: an Approach
    THE PROBLEM OF DISEMBODIMENT: AN APPROACH FROM CONTINENTAL FEMINIST-REALIST PHILOSOPHY By Stanimir Panayotov Submitted to Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Gender Studies Principal supervisor: Eszter Timár Associate Supervisor: István Perczel CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2019 CEU eTD Collection i For my mother, the container of the uncontainable, who gave me birth twice. CEU eTD Collection ii CEU eTD Collection iii Copyright Statement I hereby declare that the dissertation contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions, nor does it contain any materials previously written and/or published by another person, except where appropriate acknowledgment is made in the form of bibliographical reference. Stanimir Panayotov, July 16, 2019 CEU eTD Collection iv CEU eTD Collection v Acknowledgements To acknowledge is to cut. That is, to isolate and credit, to the best of your capabilities, those persons who have attended the articulation of one’s thoughts which would otherwise have some sense, but no real meaning. In the case of this dissertation, the individuals I am thankful to and who I list below have all contributed in multifarious ways to bound my often boundless and formless thinking around the problems of boundlessness and disembodiment. I am grateful to my principal supervisor Eszter Timár for the lasting stubbornness and critical stability with which she upended my thought notwithstanding the evolutionary digressions this project underwent. These qualities of hers helped me transform my writing from, at times, a turgid moral opera into a critical opus whose judgements and risks are now less of an intuitive pronouncement than a factual diagnosis.
    [Show full text]