24 Recreation and Amenity
24 RECREATION AND AMENITY
24.1 Introduction
24.1.1 This chapter provides an assessment of the potential impacts to the recreation and amenity resource at and around Hinkley Point resulting from the construction and operation of the proposed Hinkley Point C (HPC) Development and, where required, proposes suitable mitigation to manage any potentially adverse impacts that are identified to be of significance. 24.1.2 The study area for this assessment is shown in Figure 24.1 and includes:
the development site; the surrounding Public Rights of Way (PRoW) network (within a 1km radius of the Development Site), including the West Somerset Coast Path, which follows the foreshore on the northern boundary of the Development Site, and the footpaths and bridleways that extend to the east, south and west across the Development Site to the settlements of Stogursey, Burton, Shurton and Stolford; the foreshore of the Bristol Channel immediately north of the Development Site boundary; and a 1km wide corridor on either side of the C182 (Wick Moor Drove) running from Hinkley Point to the A39 at Cannington. A 1km corridor was selected as this would be the maximum extent to which traffic related noise could be perceived. 24.1.3 Key legislation and planning policy relating to the assessment of impacts on recreation and amenity is identified in Section 24.3. The assessment has been undertaken using the methodologies described in Section 24.4. The baseline conditions described in Section 24.5 are based on desk studies using published sources, combined with the results of a Recreational Access Survey carried out in relation to the proposed development. The Recreational Access Survey Report is provided in Appendix 24a. 24.1.4 Impacts on the recreation and amenity resource at Hinkley Point are assessed. This includes consideration of potential impacts on the PRoW network; any existing sports and recreation facilities (both land and water based); and any areas of open access land and public open space. 24.1.5 Section 24.6 provides an assessment of the potential impacts associated with the construction of the proposed HPC power station, whilst Section 24.7 provides an assessment of the potential impacts associated with the operation of the proposed HPC power station. Appropriate mitigation, aimed at avoiding, reducing or offsetting the impact of the proposed development on the recreation and amenity resource is identified, along with any impacts that would remain following the implementation of this mitigation (residual impacts). 24.1.6 Section 24.8 provides a tabulated summary of the assessment, including details of all impacts identified, proposed mitigation, and any potential residual impacts.
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 1 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
24.2 Scope of Assessment
24.2.1 For the purpose of this assessment, the following objectives were developed:
identify the extent and quality of the existing recreation and amenity resource within the study area that may potentially be affected by the development; identify how this resource is used by local residents and visitors to the area, in particular how the existing PRoW network is used; assess the effect of the construction of the HPC Development (obstruction and disturbance from construction activities) on the recreation and amenity resource; assess the effect of operation of the HPC Development on the recreation and amenity resource; and recommend mitigation strategies including enhancements, if determined necessary, to avoid, reduce or offset the impacts of the Development on the recreation and amenity resource. 24.2.2 This assessment has not considered potential impacts relating to the increased demand for recreation and amenity facilities associated with the workforce required to construct and operate the proposed HPC power station. This assessment is included within Volume 2 Chapter 8 on socio-economic effects.
24.3 Legislation
a) Introduction to Planning Context Analysis 24.3.1 The Development Site is located within the District of West Somerset, whilst the wider study area lies within the District of Sedgemoor. Aspects of legislation, planning policy and guidance which are of relevance to this assessment are described below. b) International and European Legislation and Policy 24.3.2 The scope of assessment is not affected by international or European legislation. c) National Legislation, Policy and Guidance i) The Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 24.3.3 The Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 aims to improve public access to, and enjoyment of the English coastline, by creating a coastal margin that is available for access around the coast of England. 24.3.4 The Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 also amends the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 to ensure that a two metre wide strip of land on either side of the new route, all land seaward of the route, and any of the classic coastal land types such as dunes and cliffs to the landward side of the route will normally be accessible to the public. Consequently, identifying the line of the route will have consequences not only for the route itself, but will lead to access being given to land around the route.
2 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity ii) Planning Policy Guidance Note 17: Planning for Open Space, Sport and Recreation (PPG 17) 24.3.5 PPG 17 primarily deals with the effective maintenance and development of open space, sports and recreational facilities, to ensure local communities are well served by these resources. 24.3.6 PPG17 identifies recreational rights of way as an important resource, stating that local authorities should:
seek opportunities to provide better facilities for walkers, cyclists and horse-riders, for example by adding links to existing rights of way networks; and protect and enhance those parts of the rights of way network that might benefit open space.
iii) Planning and Policy Guidance Note 20: Coastal Planning (PPG 20) 24.3.7 PPG20 outlines policies for developments which may specifically require a coastal location, including nuclear energy projects. It provides supplementary advice to that included in PPG17 on planning for recreation within coastal areas. 24.3.8 PPG20 states that public access to the coast should be a basic principle, and that where appropriate, development schemes should seek to include public access as a positive feature. d) Regional Policy and Guidance i) The Draft Regional Spatial Strategy for the South West 2006-2026 (Ref 24.1) 24.3.9 The Draft Regional Spatial Strategy for the South West sets the regional development framework for the South West up to 2026. It aims to guide the planning process at the local level through the District Local Development Frameworks. 24.3.10 Whilst the Draft Regional Spatial Strategy for the South West does not include specific policies relating to recreation and amenity, it does identify the need for an integrated approach to coastal development planning, which includes adequate provision of recreational facilities, amenity space and access to rights of way (paragraph 6.2.18 (Ref 24.1)). ii) Somerset and Exmoor National Park Joint Structure Plan 1991-2011 24.3.11 The Somerset and Exmoor National Park Joint Structure Plan (the Structure Plan) provides the strategic base for all land use planning in the combined area of Somerset and Exmoor National Park for the period up to 2011. The Structure Plan was prepared by Somerset County Council (SCC) and the Exmoor National Park Authority, and has three main functions:
to provide a framework of strategic policies for local planning and development control decisions; to ensure that the provision for development is realistic and consistent with national and regional policy; and to secure consistency between local plans. 24.3.12 The following policies from the Structure Plan are of relevance to the proposed development:
Policy 38: Sport and Recreation in the Countryside – Outside of settlements, provision may be made for sport and recreation facilities, provided that they are compatible with the amenity, landscape and environment of the area. Additionally, protection should be afforded to land accessible to the public and associated public access routes, including bridleways and green lanes. New developments which would generate substantial transport movements should be accessible by public transport.
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 3 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
Policy 42: Walking – Facilities for pedestrians should be improved by maintaining and extending the footpath network, particularly between residential areas, shops, community facilities, workplaces and schools and by ensuring that improvements to the highway provide for safe use. e) Local Policy and Guidance i) Somerset Local Transport Plan 2006-2011 24.3.13 The Somerset Local Transport Plan recognises the value of the regions’ PRoW network as a valuable resource in encouraging modal shift from private vehicular use to walking and cycling over short to medium distances, linking local communities. It identifies improved maintenance and signage as a vital tool for increasing usage levels. ii) Somerset County Council Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2006 24.3.14 The SCC Rights of Way Improvement Plan (RoWIP) is contained within SCC’s Local Transport Plan. It describes SCC’s proposals to improve the provision of PRoW in Somerset for walkers, cyclists, equestrians and those with visual or mobility impairments. Its key aims are to:
raise the strategic profile of the PRoW network; improve how the PRoW network is maintained; improve how Definitive Map Modification and Public Path Orders are processed; improve access information provision; and work in partnership with key organisations. 24.3.15 The RoWIP recognises that walking is the most popular reason for the general public to visit the countryside in Somerset, and notes that the existing PRoW network requires improvement. 24.3.16 Appendix F of the RoWIP includes a prioritisation system (a scorecard based approach) which is to be adopted by local authorities when considering applications for the diversion and closure of PRoW. iii) The West Somerset District Local Plan 24.3.17 The introduction of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 has made a number of changes to the planning system at the local level, and as a consequence the West Somerset Local Development Framework (LDF) will replace the West Somerset District Local Plan adopted in 2006. 24.3.18 Policies within the West Somerset District Local Plan relevant to the proposed development include:
Policy R/12: Informal Recreation Facilities – Development proposals which would facilitate and enhance informal recreational activities and access related to the enjoyment and interpretation of the countryside will be permitted where they would: o be integrated with the Public Rights of Way system or public transport network; o not adversely affect the character of the area; and o not be likely to have an adverse affect on other land uses in the vicinity. iv) West Somerset District Local Development Framework 24.3.19 West Somerset District Council is in the early stages of developing the West Somerset LDF. Initial public consultation on the development of the Core Strategy was undertaken between July and September 2009.
4 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity 24.3.20 The Somerset Local Area Agreement themes and outcomes most relevant to the LDF Core Strategy and recreation and amenity can be summarised as:
Healthier communities theme: o an increased proportion of people taking part in physical activity. Children and young people theme: o improved take up of physical activity, sport and cultural opportunities for 0-19 year olds; and Promotion of better play opportunities for all children. v) Sedgemoor District Local Plan 1991-2011 24.3.21 The Sedgemoor District Local Plan was adopted in 2004. Saved policies relevant to this assessment include:
Policy RLT11: The existing public rights of way network will be protected and maintained in order to facilitate public access to the countryside. Additional permissive access routes may also be sought. Development which would adversely affect the recreational or amenity value of a public footpath, bridleway, cycle track or other public right of way will not be permitted unless a suitable alternative route is made available. Policy RLT12: Proposals for development that would prejudice the creation of recreational walking, cycling and/or horse riding routes shown on the Proposals Map will not be permitted. Any major housing, employment or tourism development proposals in the vicinity of these routes should make appropriate connections in order to facilitate local access. vi) Sedgemoor District Local Development Framework 24.3.22 Sedgemoor District Council is currently developing its LDF, which will ultimately replace the adopted Local Plan. Sedgemoor DC has issued its draft Core Strategy Preferred Options Report, for public consultation, which ended in December 2009. The Core Strategy includes a series of Preferred Options, which are not formal policies, but suggest Sedgemoor District Council’s intended approach to the future development of the district. Those relevant to the proposed development and this assessment include:
Preferred Option SU 1: Sustainable Development Principles. The final Core Strategy will include an overarching policy for assessing development proposals and the contribution to key sustainable development principles. The key principles will include: o efficient use of land, including the reuse of previously developed land and buildings; o protecting and enhancing the quality of the natural and built environment; o promoting greater self containment of settlements by contributing to communities that are supported by adequate services, employment opportunities, infrastructure and transport options; o reducing the need to travel, whilst increasing opportunities for walking and cycling; and o promoting design principles that contribute to a healthy, safe, accessible and attractive environment for the local community. Preferred Option DW 12: Protecting and Enhancing the Natural Environment. The final Core Strategy will include a core policy on the natural environment that seeks to protect and enhance wherever possible. Key considerations will include: o improving access to the countryside. Preferred Option DW 13: Green Infrastructure. The Council will promote green infrastructure throughout the district ensuring that developments include new open spaces and that these are linked to existing and enhanced green spaces creating pleasant and sustainable places
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 5 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
to live, work, visit and invest in. The aim will be to provide a network of connected and multi-functional open spaces that improve access, recreation and tourism opportunities. Preferred Option MP 1: Potential Impacts of New Nuclear Build. The Council considers the local issues that need to be adequately addressed in any proposal consist of at least the following: o to ensure that the benefits (including financial contributions) are enjoyed by local communities.
24.4 Methodology
a) Summary of Approach 24.4.1 The assessment has been undertaken in accordance with the relevant EIA Directive, regulations, and various guidance documents as identified in Volume 1 Chapter 5, in particular the Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (Ref 24.2). The methodology and criteria adopted for the assessment is described in detail in Volume 1 Chapter 5. b) Methodology of Recreation and Amenity Baseline Studies i) Introduction 24.4.2 The surveys and studies that have been undertaken to identify the recreation and amenity receptors that could be affected by the construction or operation of the proposed HPC Development are described below. ii) Baseline Data 24.4.3 The existing recreation and amenity resource at Hinkley Point was identified through:
a Recreational Access Survey, carried out in July and August 2009 (see Appendix 24a). The survey entailed counts of users of PRoW, both within and outside of the school holiday period, covering the PRoW linking Shurton, Burton, Wick and the western end of Stolford to the coastline around Hinkley Point. A questionnaire survey was undertaken as part of this exercise to gain an understanding of the patterns of use of the PRoW; a review of existing information, including current Ordnance Survey (OS) maps; a site walkover survey (record sheets for the PRoW covered during this survey are presented within Appendix 24a); and consultation with appropriate Statutory Bodies and other organisations including SCC’s Rights of Way Team, Natural England, the Ramblers Association, users of the local PRoW network, and local sports and recreation clubs that may be affected by, or have an interest in the proposed development. iii) Consultation 24.4.4 Extensive consultation has been undertaken throughout the EIA process in order to identify all potential impacts arising from the proposed development on the recreational and amenity resource at Hinkley Point. 24.4.5 Several meetings have been held with SCC’s Rights of Way Officers and consultation has also been undertaken with:
Natural England; Local equestrians; The Ramblers Association; Local residents; and
6 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
Users of the PRoW network (members of the public), through a Recreational Access Survey carried out in July and August 2009. 24.4.6 Between Stage 2 and the submission of the DCO application, further consultation will be undertaken with relevant parties including Somerset County Council, the Ramblers Association and local residents regarding the final proposed mitigation measures. c) Assessment Methodology and Criteria 24.4.7 The recreation and amenity resource in and around the HPC Development Site has been assigned a level of importance/sensitivity in accordance with the criteria described in Table 24.1. As noted above, the magnitude and significance criteria used for the amenity and recreation assessment are set out in within Volume 1 Chapter 5.
Table 24.1: Criteria Used to Determine Importance of Receptor
Importance/Sensitivity Description
High/National Feature/receptor possesses key characteristics which contribute significantly to the distinctiveness and character of the site, e.g. footpath of national significance, and receptor is identified as having very low capacity to accommodate proposed form of change, i.e. is very highly sensitive. Feature/receptor possess very significant social/community value. Feature/receptor is extremely rare.
Medium/Regional Feature/receptor possesses key characteristics which contribute significantly to the distinctiveness and character of the site, e.g. footpath of regional significance such as the West Somerset Coast Path, and receptor is identified as having low capacity to accommodate proposed form of change, i.e. is highly sensitive. Feature/receptor possesses significant social/community value. Feature/receptor is rare.
Low/Local Feature/receptor only possess characteristics which are locally significant e.g. local PRoW network. Feature/receptor not designated or only designated at a local level. Feature/receptor identified as having some tolerance of the proposed change subject to design and mitigation i.e. is only moderately sensitive. Feature/receptor possess moderate social/community value. Feature/receptor is relatively common.
Very Low/Negligible Feature/receptor characteristics do not make a significant contribution to the character or distinctiveness of the site and surroundings at a local scale. Feature/receptor not designated. Feature/receptor identified as being generally tolerant of the proposed change, i.e. of low sensitivity. Feature/receptor possess low social/community value. Feature/receptor is common.
Unknown The importance and sensitivity of the feature/receptor cannot be identified.
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 7 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
d) Baseline Environmental Characteristics i) Recreation and Amenity Baseline Study Area Description 24.4.8 The study area lies in Stogursey Parish in the District of West Somerset. 24.4.9 As shown in Figure 24.1, the northern boundary of the Development Site is delineated by the southern shore of the Severn Estuary. The site extends southwards for approximately 1.5km, terminating to the north of the village of Shurton. The western boundary runs alongside Benhole Lane, in a northerly direction to the coast, while the eastern boundary is formed by the C182 (Wick Moor Drove), which lies immediately south of the existing Hinkley Point Power Station Complex. 24.4.10 The wider study area includes the foreshore of the Severn Estuary, and the PRoW network that services Hinkley Point and surrounding residential developments. This includes the West Somerset Coast Path, which follows the foreshore on the northern boundary of the Development Site, and the footpaths that extend to the east, south and west across the Development Site to the settlements of Stogursey, Burton, Shurton, and Stolford. 24.4.11 Furthermore, the study area extends to the south, as a 1km corridor along the C182 (Wick Moor Drove), where it joins the A39 at the south-east corner of Cannington. The C182 runs south-east from Hinkley Point, passing to the west of Combwich, before entering the northern end of Cannington and passing through the village in a north-south direction. Public Rights of Way 24.4.12 The Development Site is well served by a network of PRoW, including a portion of the West Somerset Coast Path. A resource of regional importance, the West Somerset Coast Path is a 25km linear walk that links the River Parrett Trail at Steart in Bridgwater Bay with the South West Coast Path National Trail at Minehead. 24.4.13 Within the vicinity of Hinkley Point, the West Somerset Coast Path runs along the coastal frontage of the Development Site (see Plate and Plate 24.2), continuing east along the promenade of the coastal defences that front the existing Hinkley Point Power Station Complex, and onwards to the seafront at Stolford. 24.4.14 Figure 24.2 shows the PRoW network around Hinkley Point, and those within 1km of the proposed site are listed in Table 24.2. Within 3km of the Development Site, there are 50km of PRoW that are connected to the Hinkley Point area by road or other footpaths. To the west of the C182 (Wick Moor Drove), which provides access to Hinkley Point, a network of north-south PRoW link the settlements of Shurton, Burton and Knighton with the West Somerset Coast Path, whilst numerous interconnecting east-west PRoW join these routes together.
8 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
Plate 24.1: View of the Foreshore from the South West Coast Path (looking east towards the existing Hinkley A and B Power Stations)
Plate 24.2: View of the Foreshore from the South West Coast Path (looking west)
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 9 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
Table 24.2: PRoW within 1km of the HPC Development Site
WL 23/16 WL 23/46 WL 23/59
WL 23/20 WL 23/47 WL 23/60
WL 23/21 WL 23/48 WL 23/61
WL 23/22 WL 23/50 WL 23/62
WL 23/24 WL 23/52 WL 23/68
WL 23/25 WL 23/53 WL 23/69
WL 23/28 WL 23/54 WL 23/70
WL 23/29 WL 23/55 WL 23/71
WL 23/43 WL 23/56 WL 23/95
WL 23/44 WL 23/57 WL 23/105
WL 23/45 WL 23/58 WL 23/110
24.4.15 The average length of the PRoW sectors (i.e. between the start and any connecting link with another footpath) is around 390m. A number of the north-south coastal access paths, as well as east-west connecting PRoW fall within the Development Site. 24.4.16 The PRoW network across the study area provides access to a blend of coastal and inland environments, with long distance views to the west and along the West Somerset Coast Path, whereas, to the east, views are enclosed with occasional distant glimpses of Exmoor, the Quantocks, or Brean Down/Bleadon Hills, and Mendips. Particularly fine views are found along the east-west track which runs along the ridge beginning immediately south-west of the entrance to the existing Hinkley Point Power Station Complex. 24.4.17 There are a large number of footpaths that run adjacent to, or connect with the C182 between Hinkley Point and Cannington, and a smaller number that specifically cross the C182 within the study area. PRoW within 1km of the C182 are presented in Table 24.3 and shown in Figure 24.3. 24.4.18 From the survey carried out in 2009 (see Appendix 24a), the majority of users appear to be local residents (70% of those surveyed lived less than 3km from the study area), though on occasion visitors who reside significant distances from the area (e.g. live in excess of 25km from the study area) use the PRoW. 24.4.19 The PRoW network is predominantly favoured for dog walking (85% of users counted), although for some lengths, use is specific to the interest along it (such as fishing along the coastal path). Approximately 65% of users indicated that they intended to follow a circular route whilst the remainder intended to return the way they had come.
10 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
Plate 24.3: North-south footpath WL 23/48 (Benhole Lane) – Viewed from within the Development Site, Looking South
Plate 24.4: View from the East-west Ridge Path Looking East towards Hinkley Point
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 11 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
Table 24.3: PRoW within 1km of the C182 between Hinkley Point and the A39 at Cannington
WL 23/15 WL 23/95 BW 7/8
WL 23/16 WL 23/105 BW 25/1
WL 23/18 WL 23/106 BW 25/2
WL 23/20 WL 23/110 BW 25/11
WL 23/21 BW 5/1 BW 25/12
WL 23/22 BW 5/2 BW 25/14
WL 23/48 BW 5/3 BW 25/16
WL 23/54 BW 5/4 BW 25/17
WL 23/55 BW 5/5 BW 25/18
WL 23/56 BW 5/5A BW 25/19
WL 23/57 BW 5/7 BW 25/20
WL 23/58 BW 5/8 BW 25/21
WL 23/59 BW 5/15 BW 25/22
WL 23/60 BW 5/16 BW 25/23
WL 23/61 BW 5/17 BW 25/25
WL 23/62 BW 5/20 BW 25/30
WL 23/63 BW 5/22 BW 25/31
WL 23/64 BW 5/23 BW 25/32
WL 23/67 BW 5/24 BW 25/33
WL 23/68 BW 5/25 BW 25/34
WL 23/69 BW 5/26 BW 25/35
WL 23/70 BW 5/27 BW 32/2
WL 23/71 BW 5/29 BW 32/3
WL 23/86 BW 5/32 BW 32/4
WL 23/88 BW 5/33 BW 32/5
WL 23/89 BW 5/34 BW 32/6
WL 23/92 BW 5/35 BW 32/7
12 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
24.4.20 The counts presented and reported in Appendix 24a did not reveal significant differences in visitor/user numbers between weekdays and weekends, which reflects the fact that it is mostly local residents using the PRoW network, and mainly for the regular walking of their dogs. Use of the PRoW network is therefore seen to be of low intensity (a low number of users) but frequent (use of the network or footpath once or twice a day by users), and Table 24.4 presents the combined user counts generated from the four day survey for the various PRoW. Annual use figures were generated in Table 6.2 in Appendix 24a, however, these figures are significantly greater than the actual count of users of the Coastal Path, and as such the generated annual use numbers have not been incorporated in this document.
Table 24.4: Combined User Counts From Four Day Survey.
Footpath Combined Survey Count (number of users)
WL23/43 (north of 23/110) 2
WL23/45 (south of 23/110) 7
WL23/46 2
WL23/48 (southern end) 1
WL23/48 (south of 23/110) 2
WL23/56 (north of Shurton Road) 1
WL23/56 (south of 23/110) 4
WL23/56 (north of 23/110) 2
WL23/95 (east of Hinkley Point) 4
WL23/95 (shoreline in front of site) 3
WL23/95 (coast path west of site) 1
WL23/107 3
WL23/110 (east of 23/48) 2
WL23/110 (west of 23/48) 1
WL23/110 (west of 23/46) 5
24.4.21 The users identified the most desirable characteristics of a footpath as good views (80%) and peace and quiet (65%), followed by a mix of countryside and coast (50%), good condition of the footpaths (40%), connections to other footpaths (30%), well marked footpaths (25%), and far from the road (20%). 24.4.22 Data regarding use of the West Somerset Coast Path, which runs along the northern boundary of the Development Site, is presented in Figure 24.4 and Table 24.5, and was obtained through consultation with SCC’s Rights of Way Team. The data provides approximate visitor numbers
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 13 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity each month along the West Somerset Coast Path between 2006 and 2009, with counts taken from the junction of PRoW WL 23/56 and WL 23/95. The data indicates that use of the West Somerset Coast Path generally peaks during summer months, and also during holiday periods, including Easter. Usage of the coastal path is generally lower in the winter months (with spring/summer/autumn between 50% and 200% higher use).
Table 24.5: West Somerset Coast Path – Visitor Count Data 2006 to 2009
Month/Year Number of Visitors (approximate)
April 2006 30
May 2006 125
June 2006 180
July 2006 175
August 2006 190
September 2006 225
October 2006 155
November 2006 70
December 2006 70
January 2007 80
February 2007 90
March 2007 125
April 2007 265
May 2007 155
June 2007 125
July 2007 75
August 2007 150
September 2007 195
October 2007 100
November 2007 95
December 2007 90
January 2008 100
14 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
Month/Year Number of Visitors (approximate)
February 2008 120
March 2008 150
April 2008 170
May 2008 160
June 2008 170
July 2008 200
August 2008 410
September 2008 260
October 2008 180
November 2008 125
December 2008 130
January 2009 140
February 2009 95
March 2009 125
April 2009 200
24.4.23 A rolling 12 month total of users from Table 24.5 shows an increasing number of users from April 2006 to April 2009, up by about 30%, though much of this may have arisen from a depression in the number of users in 2006 and 2007 from the foot and mouth outbreak, with numbers then rebounding. The total yearly users at the counter reach a maximum of around 2,200 for the 12 months between February 2008 and January 2009. Equestrians 24.4.24 Through consultation with local equestrians, it has been established that the footpaths and limited number of bridleways within the Development Site and surrounding area are used for equestrian activities. However, due to the limited availability of public bridleways, the majority of this equestrian activity takes place on private land. Water-based Recreation 24.4.25 Within the Severn Estuary and Bristol Channel, there are a large number of sailing, cruising, boating and yacht clubs that sail or cruise within the Severn. However, no specific or formal boating/sailing activities or events are known to occur off Hinkley Point. 24.4.26 Limited sailing activity in Bridgwater Bay is generated by Burnham Yacht Club, whose facilities are located at the mouth of the River Brue in Highbridge, approximately 9km east of the Development Site.
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 15 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity 24.4.27 Combwich Motorboat and Sailing Club have mooring facilities and slipways at Combwich Wharf, which lies on the River Parrett, approximately 5km south-east of the Development Site, as shown on Figure 24.3. With regard to use of open water, consultation indicates that the majority of members use the River Parrett and Bridgwater Bay for sailing and motor boating, but would not use the foreshore in the vicinity of Hinkley Point due to the insufficient depth of water at this location. Sports and Recreational Facilities, Open Access Land, and Public Open Space 24.4.28 A search of the Sport England Active Places database (Ref 24.3) indicates that there are no existing sports and recreation facilities (including playing fields, sports clubs and stadiums) within a 1km radius of the Development Site at Hinkley Point. As shown on Figures 24.2 and 24.3, the nearest facilities include:
Stogursey and District Victory Hall – local facilities for the residents of Stogursey, including a village hall, playing field and outdoor basketball court, located approximately 1km south of the Development Site, and approximately 1km south-west of the C182 (Wick Moor Drove); Stockland Lovell Manor Equestrian Training and Competition Centre – located at Coultings, approximately 3.5km south-east of the Development Site, and approximately 750m south of the C182; Mill Farm Caravan and Camping Park – located at Fiddington, approximately 4.5km south of the Development Site, and approximately 1500m south of the C182; Combwich Village Green – located approximately 5km south-east of the Development Site, and approximately 200m east of the C182; a sports pitch and clubhouse – located adjacent to the C182, immediately north of Cannington, approximately 7km south-east of the Development Site; sports and recreation facilities operated by Bridgwater College, including sports pitches, a golf course and a horse riding school – located at Cannington, approximately 7km south- east of the Development Site, and adjacent to the C182; sports and recreation facilities owned by Brymore School – located at Cannington, approximately 7km south-east of the Development Site, and approximately 800m from the C182; and sports and recreation facilities owed by Cannington Church of England Primary School – located at Cannington, approximately 7km south-east of the Development Site, and approximately 800m from the C182. 24.4.29 There are no areas of open access land within the Development Site itself. A search of Natural England’s Common Rights of Way (CRoW) database (Ref 24.4) indicates that the nearest areas of open access land include a series of commons which take up land immediately east of the Development Site, to the south of the existing Hinkley Point Power Station Complex, extending east, along the foreshore to the Steart Peninsula. As shown on Figures 24.2 and 24.3, these include:
Wick Moor Common; North Moor Common; Great Hooks and Little Hooks Common; Ham Common; Redham Common; Sharpham Common; and North Ham, Goose Marsh and Catsford Common. 24.4.30 Consultation with Natural England indicates that Catsford Common is extensively used for walkers, both with and without dogs, and for horse riding.
16 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity 24.4.31 There are no areas of public open space, such as formal parks and gardens within the Development Site. The nearest formal areas of public open space include:
Combwich Village Green and Combwich Common – located approximately 5km south-east of the Development Site; Cannington Park in Cannington – located approximately 7km south-east of the Development Site; and Cranleigh Gardens and Eastover Park – located at Bridgwater, approximately 10km to the south-east of the Development Site. 24.4.32 Walking, wildfowling, fishing, bird watching and horse riding are the predominant sporting and recreational activities undertaken in close proximity to the Development Site, generally in relatively restricted areas, as well as in low numbers. Conversely Fenning Island, at the mouth of the Parrett River, some 6km east of the Development Site, is heavily used for bird watching. Consultation with Natural England suggests visitor numbers exceed 5,000 people per year. 24.4.33 Two wildfowling clubs, the Highbridge and Huntspill Wildfowlers Association and the Bridgwater Bay Wildfowlers Club operate within the Bridgwater Bay National Nature Reserve (NNR), which extends along the foreshore from Lilstock in the west, to the Steart Peninsula and beyond, and includes the foreshore in the immediate vicinity of Hinkley Point. Consultation with Natural England indicates that there are approximately 100 members of the two wildfowling clubs, but only 20-30 shoot on the reserve, and then sporadically. As shown in Figures 24.2 and 24.3, the clubs have rights to shoot in the Parrett Estuary and the Huntspill Foreshore, some 6km east of the Development Site. 24.4.34 In addition, as shown in Figures 24.2 and 24.3, an Excepted Area is located on the foreshore at Hinkley Point, stretching from Stolford in the east, past Hinkley Point, to the boundary of the Bridgwater Bay NNR in the west. The Excepted Area can be used for shooting by any member of the British Society for Shooting and Conservation (BASC). Consultation with Natural England indicates that the Excepted Area is used by approximately 5-10 people a year. 24.4.35 Fishing is considered to be one of the most popular activities at Hinkley Point, with the rock shoals proving popular during winter months with sea anglers fishing for cod. Statutory Constraints 24.4.36 Part VIII of the Highways Act 1980, and Part X and Schedule 14 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 set down measures that must be adopted by local authorities when stopping up or diverting public footpaths or bridleways. However, approval for stopping up or diversion of PRoW falls within the scope of the IPC.
24.5 Assessment of Potential Impacts during Construction
a) Potential Construction Phase Impacts 24.5.1 This section identifies and assesses the potential impacts associated with the construction of the proposed development, without taking into account any proposed mitigation measures. A description of the construction site, including phasing of activities, is presented within Volume 2, Chapters 2 and 3. i) Obstruction to Public Rights of Way 24.5.2 During construction of the proposed development, a security barrier will be established around the perimeter of the site, which will cut across, and result in the obstruction of a number of PRoW.
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 17 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity 24.5.3 Table 24.6 provides a summary of the PRoW that may be affected by the construction works area.
Table 24.6: Significance of Impacts for Each PRoW Affected during Construction
Footpath ID Length Description of Importance Impact Significance Impact Magnitude
WL 23/48 782m Footpath Local/Low Medium Minor Adverse Obstruction
WL 23/50 300m Footpath Local/Low Medium Minor Adverse Obstruction
WL 23/56 1692m Footpath Local/Low Medium Minor Adverse Obstruction
WL 23/68 627m Footpath Local/Low Medium Minor Adverse Obstruction
WL 23/69 694m Footpath Local/Low Medium Minor Adverse Obstruction
WL 23/70 1168m Footpath Local/Low Medium Minor Adverse Obstruction
WL 23/95 1280m Footpath Regional/Medi Medium Moderate Obstruction um Adverse (Part of the West Somerset Coast Path)
WL 23/105 557m Footpath Local/Low Medium Minor Adverse Obstruction
WL 23/110 1028m Footpath Local/Low Medium Minor Adverse Obstruction
24.5.4 The obstruction of the affected PRoW (excluding WL 23/95) is considered to represent a medium magnitude disturbance, due to the presence and retention of PRoW to the east, south and west. The affected PRoW network is considered to represent a resource of low (local) importance, and consequently an impact of minor adverse significance is expected. 24.5.5 During the construction of the temporary jetty and coastal defences, it will be necessary to close the section of the West Somerset Coast Path (WL 23/95) within the site for between 18 months and 3 years, dependant on if preliminary works are granted consent in advance of the DCO. The closure of the West Somerset Coast Path is considered to represent a medium magnitude effect as access along the coast would require a significant diversion, albeit for a reasonably short period of time. Given the regional importance of this asset, a short- to medium-term impact of moderate adverse significance is expected. ii) Disturbance to Users of Public Rights of Way 24.5.6 Activities associated with the construction of the proposed development would potentially result in a range of disturbance impacts on users of nearby PRoW including increased traffic
18 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity along the road network, construction noise, dust and other emissions to air and visual disturbance. iii) Loss of Water-based Recreational Resource 24.5.7 Construction of the proposed development, and the installation of infrastructure along the foreshore and open water to the north of the Development Site (including outfall and intake structures in the Bristol Channel, the new sea wall and the temporary jetty) will result in restricted access to the foreshore and open water immediately surrounding the Development Site, for water-based recreation activities such as boating, sailing and fishing. 24.5.8 The foreshore and open water in the vicinity of the site is considered to be a resource of low (local) importance, because it is used relatively infrequently for water-based recreation, and because it represents a very small area of the overall resource available for these activities. Given that any impacts on this resource would be short-term, temporary and reversible, representing an impact of low magnitude, it is considered that the significance of any impact would be negligible. iv) Disturbance to Sports and Recreation Facilities, Open Access Land, Public Open Space 24.5.9 Activities associated with the construction of the proposed development would potentially result in a range of disturbance impacts on users of nearby common land near to the Development Site including construction noise, associated traffic noise, dust and other emissions to air, and visual disturbance to recreational assets. b) Mitigation Measures during Construction i) Obstruction to Public Rights of Way 24.5.10 Several lengths of temporary footpath would be provided around the boundary of the construction works area, providing around 2,000m of PRoW to partially offset the 8,200m affected and creating a linked circular PRoW around the entire construction site. This circular diversion would be used by those following the West Somerset Coast Path for the duration of the coastal works (anticipated to be between 18 months to 3 years), after which the coastal path would be reopened along the top of the new seawall. The final route for the temporary footpath will be provided in the ES to accompany the DCO application and will be the subject of further consultation following Stage 2. ii) Disturbance to Users of Public Rights of Way 24.5.11 In order to mitigate for general disturbance impacts such as noise and dust generation and adverse visual impacts, standard mitigation measures will be adopted on site. These will be outlined in the Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (EMMP), and are described further in Chapters 9, 10, 11 and 21 regarding transportation, noise and vibration, air quality, and landscape and visual impacts. c) Residual Impacts during Construction Phase i) Obstruction to Public Rights of Way 24.5.12 Following the establishment of any required footpath diversions, along with the installation of notices to inform PRoW users of the alternative routes available, it is considered that impacts associated with the temporary obstruction of footpaths (aside from the West Somerset Coast Path) during construction would remain of minor adverse significance. This is because although the magnitude of impact would be reduced from medium to low by the mitigation measures outline above, a great length of PRoW would remain inaccessible during construction. 24.5.13 With regard to the West Somerset Coast Path, it is considered that impacts associated with its temporary obstruction during construction would be reduced from being of moderate adverse
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 19 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity significance to minor adverse significance. This is because the magnitude of impact would be reduced from medium to low on a resource of medium (regional) importance. This is due to temporary footpath diversions and the fact that the path will be reopened within three years.
Table 24.7: Significance of Residual Construction Impacts for each PRoW following Implementation of Mitigation Measures
Footpath ID Length Measure Importance Impact Significance Magnitude
WL 23/48 782m Diversion Local/Low Low Minor Adverse
WL 23/50 300m Diversion Local/Low Low Minor Adverse
WL 23/56 1692m Diversion Local/Low Low Minor Adverse
WL 23/68 627m Diversion Local/Low Low Minor Adverse
WL 23/69 694m Diversion Local/Low Low Minor Adverse
WL 23/70 1168m Diversion Local/Low Low Minor Adverse
WL 23/95 1280m Diversion Regional/Medi Low Minor Adverse um (Part of the West Somerset Coast Path)
WL 23/105 557m Diversion Local/Low Low Minor Adverse
WL 23/110 1028m Diversion Local/Low Low Minor Adverse
24.6 Assessment of Potential Impacts during Operation
a) Potential Operational Phase Impacts 24.6.1 This section identifies and assesses the potential impacts associated with the operation of the proposed development. A detailed description of the operational site area, along with the expected operating methods and activities is presented in Volume 2, Chapters 2 and 4. i) Obstruction to Public Rights of Way 24.6.2 Following construction, PRoW located within the footprint of the Development Site will not be re- opened, and therefore the proposed development will result in the permanent obstruction of a number of existing PRoW, as listed in Table 24.8. 24.6.3 The combined closure of these PRoW is considered to represent a permanent, direct, high magnitude effect on a resource that is considered to be of low (local) importance. Consequently a permanent moderate adverse impact is expected. 24.6.4 The West Somerset Coast Path would remain open running along the top of the sea wall in front of the development. As this PRoW would not be obstructed, no impact is expected.
20 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
Table 24.8: Significance of Impacts for PRoW affected during Operation
Footpath ID Length Description of Importance Impact Significance Impact Magnitude
WL 23/48 254m Permanent Local High Moderate Obstruction Adverse
WL 23/56 840m Permanent Local High Moderate Obstruction Adverse
WL 23/68 627m Permanent Local High Moderate Obstruction Adverse
WL 23/70 1168m Permanent Local High Moderate Obstruction Adverse
WL 23/105 557m Permanent Local High Moderate Obstruction Adverse
WL 23/110 482m Permanent Local High Moderate Obstruction Adverse
ii) Disturbance to Users of Public Rights of Way 24.6.5 It is possible that enjoyment of the PRoW network in the vicinity of the Development Site may be affected by noise emissions from the operation of the site, or visual disturbance due to the presence of the Development. iii) Disturbance to Sports and Recreation Facilities, Open Access Land, Public Open Space 24.6.6 Operation of the proposed development will not directly impact upon any existing sports and recreation facilities, or areas of open access land or public open space. It is therefore considered that there will be no impact on this resource during operation of the proposed development. b) Mitigation Measures during Operation i) Public Rights of Way 24.6.7 In order to mitigate for the closure of PRoW located within the footprint of the proposed HPC Development, a number of measures have been identified in discussion with SCC and third parties. Consultation with the SCC’s Rights of Way Team identified the rationalisation and enhancement of the existing PRoW to be a key mitigation measure. This has been incorporated into the scheme design, where EDF have the relevant ownership rights. 24.6.8 Figure 21.50 shows the indicative landscape restoration plan including reinstated PRoW. These largely follow the routes of the current PRoW (following rationalisation) but with some minor changes to take account of the new proposed landscape design. The additional proposals that would be implemented as part of the proposed development include:
provision of interpretation boards at a number of locations; the use of kissing gates on boundaries and access, and replacing any stiles on existing access with kissing gates; improved access (through clearance and signposting) along PRoW reference WL 23/71 and WL 23/61 (which runs from the south of Pixies Mound north east along the eastern
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 21 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
boundary of Hinkley Point B station to the coastal path), which would be upgraded to a permissive bridleway; improving access along Benhole Lane (WL 23/48) or providing an alternative; upgrading of PRoW reference WL 23/110, which is the east-west lane that runs near to the southern boundary of the proposed development, to a bridleway and cycle path; reinstatement of PRoW reference WL 23/56 which runs from the west of Lower House (Shurton) northward to the east-west lane; reinstatement of PRoW reference WL 23/69 which starts at the midway point of WL 23/56 above and runs west to connect with Benhole Lane; reinstatement of PRoW reference WL 23/48 which runs from the northern end of Benhole Lane north to the coast via a dogleg); and the provision of a number of permissive paths north of Doggetts to the site boundary.
ii) Disturbance to Users of Public Rights of Way 24.6.9 No specific mitigation measures are proposed to address impacts on users of PRoW during operation. However, the facility would be operated in accordance with planning conditions imposed to minimise disturbance to surrounding receptors. c) Residual Impacts during Operational Phase i) Obstruction to Public Rights of Way 24.6.10 Following the implementation of the mitigation measures identified above, it is considered that the moderate adverse impact to PRoW would be changed to a minor beneficial residual impact. This is because many of the PRoW would be re-opened and the proposals described in 24.6.8 would be implemented. These improvements are expected to result in a medium magnitude effect in relation to the improvements to the PRoW network in the Hinkley Point area.
Table 24.9: Significance of Residual Impacts for PRoW affected during Operational Phase after Implementation of Mitigation Measures
Footpath ID Length Description of Importance Impact Significance Mitigation Magnitude Measures
WL 23/48 254m Diversion. Local Medium Minor beneficial
Improved WL 23/56 840m Local Medium Minor beneficial passage along PRoWs. WL 23/68 627m Local Medium Minor beneficial Increased WL 23/70 1168m accessibility Local Medium Minor beneficial (equestrians and WL 23/105 557m cyclists). Local Medium Minor beneficial
WL 23/110 482m Increased Local Medium Minor beneficial accessibility (installation of kissing gates). Signposting and notice boards.
22 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
Footpath ID Length Description of Importance Impact Significance Mitigation Magnitude Measures Provision of additional permissive paths.
24.7 Summary of Potential Impacts
24.7.1 Table 24.10 presents a summary of the perceived impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed development, identifying impacts prior to mitigation, the mitigation measures proposed, and the residual impacts.
Table 24.10: Summary of Construction and Operational Phase Impacts on Recreation and Amenity
Description of impact Impact Mitigation Residual Measure impact
Construction Phase
Obstruction to public rights of way Minor to Footpath diversions Minor Adverse moderate Adverse
Disturbance to users of public rights of way To be detailed Implementation of To be detailed in DCO EMMP in DCO application application
Loss of water-based recreational resource Negligible None Negligible
Disturbance to sports and recreation To be detailed Implementation of To be detailed facilities, open access land, and public in DCO EMMP in DCO open space application application
Operational Phase
Obstruction to public rights of way Moderate Reinstatement of Minor Adverse PRoW, and access Beneficial and PRoW improvements
Disturbance to users of public rights of way To be detailed Implementation of To be detailed in DCO EMMP in DCO application application
Disturbance to sports and recreation No Impact Planning conditions No impact facilities, open access land, public open to manage operating space procedures
HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2 | 23 ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2 24 Recreation and Amenity
References
24.1 South West Regional Assembly (2006). The Draft Regional Spatial Strategy for the South West 2006-2026. 24.2 Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment, 2004. Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment. IEMA, Lincoln. 24.3 www.activeplaces.com Sport England, 2010. 24.4 www.openaccess.naturalengland.org.uk. Natural England, 2010.
24 | HINKLEY POINT C PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION – STAGE 2
ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL – VOLUME 2