Interpretive Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interpretive Plan Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Interpretive Plan 73 CDNST Interpretive Plan 1 2 CDNST Interpretive Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction 5 3.3a. Three-Panel 7. Funding and Cost Estimates 31 Information/Orientation Kiosk 17 1.1 Planning Assumptions 5 3.3b. Continental Divide Sign 18 7.1 Funding 31 1.2 Legislative History 5 3.3c. Low Profile Interp Exhibits 18 7.2 Cost Estimates 31 1.3 Trail Purpose 6 3.3d. Electronic Media 18 7.3 Annual Operation And 1.4 Parameters For Trailhead 3.3e. Brochures 19 Maintenance 31 Interpretation 7 1.5 Management Policy And 4. Interp Design Guidelines 20 8. Evaluation Strategies and Direction - Goal 9 Techniques 32 1.6 Visitor Use And Analysis 10 5. Personal Services Program 21 8.1 Unobtrusive Methods 32 2. Interpretive Overview 11 5.1 Potential Interpretive 21 8.2 Obtrusive Methods 33 Opportunities 8.3 Recommended Exhibit 2.1 Interpretive Purpose & Goal 11 5.1.a. Informal (Roving) Evaluation Methods 33 2.2 Interpretive Objectives/Expected Interpretation 21 8.4 Summary 34 Outcomes 12 5.1.b. Conducted Interpretive 2.3 Statements Of Significance 13 Programs 21 Additional Resources 35 2.5 Sub–Themes 14 5.2 Program Planning 23 5.3 Suggested Personal Services Acknowledgements 36 3. Recommended Interpretive Interpretation 23 Opportunities 16 5.4 Conducting An Interpretive Program With Limited Staff and 3.1 Existing Conditions 16 Dollars 24 3.2 Proposed Interpretive Sites 16 5.5 Interpretive Resource Manual 26 3.2a. Level I Trailheads 16 5.6 Training 27 3.2b. Level II Trailheads 17 5.7 Summary 28 3.2c. Level III Trailheads 17 3.3 Recommended Actions 17 6. Marketing Recommendations 29 73 CDNST Interpretive Plan 3 APPENDIX A 39 APPENDIX C 55 APPENDIX E 67 Background for Statements of Wayside Exhibit Evaluation 55 Interpretive Program Outline 67 Significance 39 Program Evaluation APPENDIX B 45 APPENDIX D 61 Proposed Interpretation 45 Sample Program Plan 61 4 CDNST Interpretive Plan 1. Introduction The Continental Divide National Comprehensive Plan, 1985, the Forest media developed for the Scenic Trail (CDNST) Interpretive Service National Recreation Strategy, CDNST. Plan guides the development and 2001, and the Forest Service Draft · Interpretation will be a tool to implementation of information, National Interpretive Plan, 2001. (No educate the public about the orientation and interpretation for the USDI planning documents were managing public agencies, CDNST. Specifically, this plan received.) Significant changes in Continental Divide Trail includes interpretive goals, objectives, visitor use, or federal agency policies, Alliance (CDTA), and the themes, exhibit recommendations, and may require modification to this plan. natural and cultural resources design guidelines for interpretive The following assumptions serve as a along the CDNST. efforts associated with the trail. The foundation: · The agencies will evaluate and specific recommendations for monitor interpretive services. Monarch Pass Trailhead is an example · The CDNST Interpretive Plan of the next step of Proposed will provide an outline for all 1.2 Legislative History Interpretation (Appendix B), which information, orientation, and define the type of media, size of interpretive exhibits and The legislative mandate to the exhibits, and recommendations useful priorities, including messages Secretaries and the Federal agencies in developing exhibit plans. Future to be delivered at Level I, II, was originally contained in the 1968 development of interpretive media and III Trailheads as identified National Trails System Act. It will be consistent with this plan and in the Design Guideline. established policies and procedures evaluated against the goals and · The agencies will work for a nationwide system of trails objectives presented in this document. cooperatively with local consisting of National Recreation communities, nonprofit Trails, National Scenic Trails, and 1.1 Planning Assumptions organizations, and other connecting or side trails. The Act partners in developing designated the Appalachian Trail and This plan is based on a number of interpretive opportunities, as the Pacific Crest Trail as the initial assumptions about the current and appropriate. National Scenic Trails, and authorized anticipated future use and projected · The CDNST Interpretive Plan the study of the Continental Divide management of the CDNST. The will help strengthen agency National Scenic Trail. development of this interpretive plan image and professionalism is consistent with the National Trails through greater design System Act (P.L. 90-543), CDNST consistency in the interpretive 73 CDNST Interpretive Plan 5 1. Introduction The legislative mandate and intent of lakes and streams teeming with trout. The Senate describes, in “Establishing Congress: Provide for maximum The high mountains are home to many a Nationwide System of Trails outdoor recreation potential and the species of game, including the bighorn Report” of 1968, the Continental conservation and enjoyment of the sheep, mule deer, and bear. Divide Trail as: nationally significant scenic, historic, “Designed to accommodate riders and or cultural qualities of the areas The primary purpose of a Continental hikers, the Continental Divide Trail through which it passes. Divide Trail would be to provide a would pass through some of the most continuous, appealing travel route. scenic areas in the country…The 1.3 Trail Purpose Broad restrictions against any one designation of the Continental Divide type of trail use should be avoided. Trail represents an attempt to make In the “Trails for America” report, the Along each section of the trail, only available by trail a stretch of country CDNST purpose was described in those uses should be permitted that do which has historical interest and 1966 as: not conflict with other uses of the charm, and bisects the Western United same section and with management States. The committee does recognize “A Continental Divide Trail would objectives of adjacent lands. that no such contiguous trail has ever, provide a continuous route along the Incompatible uses have not yet in fact, existed. However, the Continental Divide and Rocky materially affected the esthetic committee believes that the trail Mountains from the Canadian border character of the private lands the trail should be regarded as calling almost to the Mexican border must cross. However, scenic right-of- attention to the grandeur and esthetic …designed to accommodate riders passage easements should be acquired qualities of the Continental Divide, and hikers, a Continental Divide Trail or local zoning regulations enacted to and that it will add significantly to the would pass through some of the most protect the esthetic qualities of the Nation’s appreciation of its priceless scenic areas in the country in its trail and the public investment in the natural heritage…” 3,082-mile route. The 763 miles in trail from incompatible uses in the Montana, 147 miles in Idaho, 506 future.” miles in Wyoming, 614 miles in Colorado, and 1,052 miles in New Mexico span spectacular, wild, mountain country, rich in the early history of the West. The route affords views of perpetual ice fields and of awesome peaks, many over 14,000 feet. It passes hundreds of alpine 6 CDNST Interpretive Plan 1. Introduction The entire concept of the CDNST · Meet accessibility standards Written responses also planning and management is based on · Consider bilingual signage as indicated a feeling of need the project being socially responsive appropriate, particularly in for the agencies to provide to the needs and situations of local Colorado and New Mexico adequate information to let areas. These areas contribute to the · Provide detailed safety the user know what to character of the Great Divide as much information to the trail user expect not only in the way as the more evident physiographic through reliable brochures, of environmental features. The CDNST has been signing and education on conditions, but also about conceived as a “people’s trail.” A trail hazards, water availability, historic and current uses of that would facilitate, but not dictate, avalanche prone areas, etc. the land along the way. the opportunity for the recreation user · Respect adjacent private · Address local concerns to actively (not passively) experience property through information The following concerns were the magnificent variety of landscapes, and signing addressed in the 1985 natural phenomenon, prehistoric and · Expound the “nature and Comprehensive Plan. These historic actions of humans, and purposes” of this National need to be reviewed and current uses of the resource rich Scenic Trail and non- updated or changed as backbone of America. motorized use opportunities necessary (Social Resource · Facilitate user experiences Units identify the section of through trailhead design, trail by State and Segment per 1.4 Parameters for Trailhead construction and the Comprehensive Plan and Interpretation interpretation/information. associated maps.) Potential users of the trail said q Social Resource Unit · Stay within Recreation they would use the experience (SRU) 1B (Segments 1 Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) to: – 29) – Grizzly Bear q classifications, Visual Quality q “get away from the SRU 1A and 4B Objectives (VQO), and the usual demands of life,” (Segments 30-46) – Built Environment Image q “learn about things Facility construction, Guidelines (BEIG) for along the trail,” mostly trailheads trailhead and interpretive q “be with friends,” development and any other q
Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for a Quality Trail Experience
    Guidelines for a Quality Trail Experience mountain bike trail guidelines January 2017 About BLM The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) may best be described as a small agency with a big mission: to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of America’s public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. It administers more public land – over 245 million surface acres – than any other federal agency in the United States. Most of this land is located in the 12 Western states, including Alaska. The BLM also manages 700 million acres of subsurface mineral estate throughout the nation. The BLM’s multiple-use mission, set forth in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, mandates that we manage public land resources for a variety of uses, such as energy development, livestock grazing, recreation, and timber harvesting, while protecting a wide array of natural, cultural, and historical resources, many of which are found in the BLM’s 27 million-acre National Landscape Conservation System. The conservation system includes 221 wilderness areas totaling 8.7 million acres, as well as 16 national monuments comprising 4.8 million acres. IMBA IMBA was founded in 1988 by a group of California mountain bike clubs concerned about the closure of trails to cyclists. These clubs believed that mountain biker education programs and innovative trail management solutions UJQWNF DG FGXGNQRGF CPF RTQOQVGF 9JKNG VJKU ƒTUV YCXG QH VJTGCVGPGF VTCKN access was concentrated in California, IMBA’s pioneers saw that crowded trails and trail user conflict were fast becoming worldwide recreation issues. This is why they chose “International Mountain Bicycling Association” as the organization’s name.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Trail Assessment
    SUMMER TRAIL ASSESSMENT A Guide to Management of Non-motorized Trails on the Jackson Ranger District, BTNF ʹͲʹͲ Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND NEED FOR CHANGE… …………………………………………………………. 2 HOW DOCUMENT WILL BE USED……………………………………………………………….. 4 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT………….……………………………………… 5 POLICY FRAMEWORK …………….. ………………………………………………………….. 6 DEFINITIONS…………………………………………………………………………………… 6 II. TRAIL SYSTEM MANAGEMENT TRAIL SYSTEM GOALS ……………………………………………………………………….. 8 TRAIL SYSTEM TASKS ………………………………………………………………………... 9 TRAIL CARE ON THE GROUND ……………………………………………………. ………… 13 THE NATURE OF TRAIL IMPACT…………………………… ………………………………… 15 TRAIL RECREATION DESIRES……………………….………………………………….. ……. 19 WILDLIFE HABITAT INFORMATION…………………………………………………………….21 III. OVERVIEW OF THE TRAIL SYSTEM SYSTEM STATUS ………………………………………………………………………………23 MAP ..…………………………………… …………………………………………………… 26 FUNDING AND BACKLOG ………………………………………………………………………27 IV. GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND TRAIL SYSTEM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW OF KEY TRAIL SYSTEM NEEDS …………………………………………………… 27 GROS VENTRE WILDERNESS ………… ………………………………………………………. 29 MOUNT LEIDY HIGHLANDS ………………………………. …………………………………32 WYOMING RANGE / WILLOW CREEK ………..……………… ………………………………...35 PALISADES WSA / SNAKE RIVER RANGE. ……………………………………………………..38 SHADOW MOUNTAIN / DITCH CREEK……...…………………. ………………………………..41 MUNGER MOUNTAIN …………………… …………………………………………………… 43 CACHE-GAME (GREATER SNOW KING) … ………………...…………………………………...47 TETON PASS …………………….............…………………. …………………………………52 JACKSON HOLE MOUNTAIN RESORT ………
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Youth with the Outdoors
    OnOn thethe trail—trail— connectingconnecting youthyouth withwith thethe outdoorsoutdoors American Trails SPRING 2008 On the Cover: Summer Youth Work Program trail crew in Jefferson County, Colorado; photo by Kim Frederick, Jefferson County Open Space Trails Supervisor Features Support Funding for Trails and Recreation 5 Administration’s proposed budget would cut federal land and funding programs Training Calendar: Opportunities for Trail Skills 6 Ten top reasons for getting trail-related training in 2008 Trails and Wildlife Habitat 8 Design for trail system provides wildlife viewing and teaches about playa resources By Roy B. Mann, MLA, The Rivers Studio, LLC National Trails System Turns 40 in 2008 12 The National Trails System Act opened the door to federal involvement in trails By Pam Gluck, Executive Director, American Trails News from National Recreation Trails 16 Trail database updated, NRT Photo Contest results, and a featured trail in Alaska The American Trails National Trails Symposium 22 Join us November 15-18 in Little Rock for a great conference and learning opportunity Transitions 26 People who have helped shape our ideas and create trails and greenways Trails lead to a fit community 30 A homebuilder talks about why trails and pathways are essential to new developments By Randy Martin,Trailscape.net Trail Tracks Editorial: Trails, Rivers, and Global Warming 38 By Roger Bell, Vice-Chair, American Trails News • AwARDs • RESOuRces • eveNTs • peOple • plAces • pROjecTs www.AmericanTrails.org 3 American Trails eeditorialditorial
    [Show full text]
  • The Jagged End of Mosley Ridge the Mosley Ridge Trail #851 Is A
    Trail Ethics: The Mosley Ridge Trail is maintained for foot and horse travel. Please don’t cut across switchbacks or create new trails. Motors & Machines: Motorized vehicles and bicycles are not allowed on the Mosley Ridge Trail or in Length 1.8 Miles Wilderness areas. A Pack String on the Mosley Ridge Trail Drinking Water: DO NOT drink water directly from a river or stream. Photo by Anne Williams Paonia R.D. Water needs to be treated first by either filtering, boil- ing for at least 10 minutes or treating with iodine The Mosley Ridge Trail #851 tablets. is a shortcut from the Little Multiple use: Robinson Trail #850 to the As you use this area you may notice that the For- Cliff Creek Trail #840. The est is managed for a broad range of uses. Rec- trail starts at Little Robinson reation use alone includes hiking, horseback Creek and switchbacks up the riding, hunting, and sightseeing. In addition, the vegetation in the Forest requires some form side of Mosley Ridge through of management. Livestock grazing is a form of aspen forests. Upon reaching land management you may encounter while us- The Jagged End of Mosley Ridge the ridge top the trail turns to ing this area. The livestock grazing on this area Photo by Anne Williams Paonia R.D. the east traveling through as- is managed in a very progressive and specific pen and open parks and around manner. The fences and gates that you may see are critical to managing the livestock and meet- old beaver ponds. From the ing the resource objectives that are planned for ridge top there are spectacular this area.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the Take a Hike!
    NATURE’sCALLING! Environmental Education Hike! A Familytake Activity Guide fora Nature Trails and Paddling Routes in the Long Point Watershed WE LIVE IN A Very Special Place he Long Point Watershed, which includes Norfolk County, as well as sections of Elgin, Oxford, TBrant and Haldimand Counties, is located in the very heart of the Carolinian Life Zone. The many creeks and streams that make up our watershed flow into Big Creek Marsh, the Inner Bay of Long Point and Lake Erie. The wetlands here are rich in plant life, insects, crustaceans, molluscs, amphibians and reptiles, fish, birds and mammals. Our forests are home to more than 70 native species of trees and more than half of all species of birds that breed in Canada. Here you can observe wild and wonderful species like Tuliptree, Flowering Dogwood, Giant Swallowtail Butterfly, Blanding’s Turtle, Carolina Wren, Louisianna Waterthrush, Wood Duck, and Red-bellied Woodpecker. With 4 provincial parks, a National Wildlife Area, a UNESCO biosphere reserve, numerous conservation areas and land trust reserves, the Long Point Watershed is a dream come true for naturalists, birders, hikers, canoeists, kayakers and cross-country skiers. It’s the perfect place for families to enjoy getting outdoors and enjoying nature. Whether taking the kids for an invigorating hike in the woods, enjoying a quiet paddle on one of our creeks, or cross country skiing on a crisp winter day, the Long Point Watershed has it all! 2 NATURE IS CALLING! TAkE A hikE oR pAddle! Numerous studies have shown the health benefits to children (and adults) This Family Activity Guide provides you with a map and descriptions of who are exposed to nature and the outdoors: 12 of our favourite nature trails and 4 of the best paddling routes in our • being outdoors encourages physical activity, healthy development and watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Flagstaff Regional Trail Strategy
    Flagstaff Regional Trail Strategy Final - April 2020 Especially in times of crisis, trails are part of what make Flagstaff what it is. Trail providers, users, conservation advocates and other stakeholders have come together to prepare the Flagstaff Regional Trail Strategy, a plan for the region’s recreational trail system and a set of actions to get there. The Flagstaff Trails Initiative (FTI) represents the most sustained, broad-based attempt to bring together everyone who cares about trails to answer the question: how can we elevate our trails from good to extraordinary? The completion of this phase of FTI comes during a time of significant crisis. This will mean substantial changes ahead that cannot be predicted. One thing we can predict is that people will seek out places to peddle, ride, run and walk for their physical and mental health. Our hope is that through collaboration, good faith and a vision for the future, trails and open space can be part of what gets people through a difficult time. - the Flagstaff Trails Initiative Team Letters of support from all FTI core team organizations can be found at the end of the document. Front Page Photo Courtesy of WH Waters TABLE OF CONTENTS NAVIGATING THE TRAIL STRATEGY 4 FLAGSTAFF REGIONAL TRAIL PLAN 25 Updates from the November 2019 Draft 4 Trail Planning Goals and Strategies 27 What’s in the Works Right Now (as of Spring WHAT IS THE FLAGSTAFF TRAILS INITIATIVE? 2020) 29 5 Trailheads and Trail Access 36 Our Purpose 5 Signs and Wayfinding 38 Scope 6 Future Planning Needs 38 Partners 7
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna River Water Trail-West Branch Stewardship and Conservation Plan August 2009
    Susquehanna River Water Trail-West Branch Stewardship and Conservation Plan August 2009 This project was financed by the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network and a grant from the Community Conservation Partnerships Program, Environmental Stewardship Fund under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Stewardship and Conservation Plan August 10, 2009 Susquehanna River Water Trail-West Branch Table of Contents Steering Committee Members and Contributors………………..……………… 3 1.0 Project Overview……………………………………..…………………………….. 4 a Project Purpose……………………………………….……………………………. 4 b Background……………………………………………..………………………….. 4 c Goals and Objectives………………………………………………………………. 5 d Project Approach…………………………………………………………………… 5 e Public Participation…………………………………………………………………. 5 2.0 Current Status of the Water Trail…………………………………………………. 7 a General Description of the Corridor………………………………………………. 7 b Public Interests and Concerns……………………………………………………. 8 c Access Site Owners and Managers……………………………………………… 12 d River Access Site Inventory and Analysis of Existing Conditions…….………. 13 e Trail Gap Analysis………………………………………………………………….. 17 3.0 Issues for Sustainability of the Water Trail……………………………….……… 20 a Securing Public Access…………………………………………………….……… 20 b Conservation…………………………………………..…………………………… 22 c Stewardship………………………………………………………………………. 25 4.0 Taking the West Branch Water Trail to the Next Level………………………… 26 a Additional Public Access and Camping………………………………………….. 26
    [Show full text]
  • Leave No Trace Outdoor Ethics
    Trail Ethics: Trails are signed for the type of use allowed. Please Please don’t litter! Please don’t litter! don’t cut across switchbacks or create new trails. LEAVE NO TRACE Motors & Machines: OUTDOOR ETHICS Motorized vehicles and bicycles are not allowed on Set a positive example for future generations some Trails and are never allowed in the Wilderness areas . by practicing the following “Leave No Trace” principles: * Plan Ahead and Prepare * Travel and Camp on Durable Stream Safety: Surfaces DO NOT drink water directly from a river or stream. * Dispose of Waste Properly Water needs to be treated first by either filtering, boil- ing for at least 10 minutes or treating with iodine * Leave What You Find tablets. Some campgrounds do have drinking * Minimize Campfire Impacts water available. * Respect Wildlife All visitors are welcome to the National For- * Be Considerate of Other Visitors Multiple use: est. We want you to have an enjoyable stay. Leave no Trace ethics that are most com- As you use this area you may notice that the We ask for your cooperation in protecting monly defied are: Forest is managed for a broad range of uses. the environment by keeping a clean campsite * Camping too close to water Recreation use alone includes hiking, horse- back riding, hunting, and sightseeing. In ad- and by not misusing or damaging tables, * Poor horse management with exces dition, the vegetation in the Forest requires signs, and other structures. Dollars saved by sive damage to vegetation and pollu some form of management. Livestock graz- lower maintenance costs can be used to im- ing is a form of land management you may tion of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotts Bluff National Monument Trail Development Plan and Environmental Assessment
    Scotts Bluff National Monument Trail Development Plan and Environmental Assessment Photo courtesy of Bret Betnar, Professor of Landscape Architecture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln July 2013 1 Scotts Bluff Trail Development Plan and Environmental Assessment Summary The National Park Service (NPS) at Scotts Bluff National Monument is proposing a trails development plan for the entire park. The proposed project is intended to address issues such as offering community members and visitors a more cohesive way of interacting with geologic, cultural, and natural resources through the development of recreational trails. The proposed trails development plan is needed to enhance educational, interpretive and recreation opportunities about the geological, natural, and cultural resources to trail users, to protect and preserve historic properties and ensure Scotts Bluff’s significance as a National Monument. In addition, the plan seeks to manage visitor use so that impacts on natural resources are minimized, to create established travel routes to minimize impacts to park resources and to enhance public safety for park trail users. This environmental assessment evaluates three alternatives: a No-Action alternative and two action alternatives. The No-Action alternative describes the current condition with no construction of pedestrian or bicycling trails. Both action alternatives address the construction of the trails. This Environmental Assessment has been prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act to provide the decision-making framework that: 1) analyzes a reasonable range of alternatives to meet the project’s purpose and needs, 2) evaluates potential impacts to cultural, natural, visitors and park management resources, and 3) identifies mitigation measures to lessen the degree or extent of these impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Compatibility Determination Use: Non-Motorized Recreational Trail Use by Walking, Hiking, Jogging, Walking a Leashed Animal
    Compatibility Determination Use: Non-motorized recreational trail use by walking, hiking, jogging, walking a leashed animal, bicycling, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, and horseback riding. Refuge Name: Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Establishing and Acquisition Authorities: Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) was established by Public Law No. 94- 466, 94th Congress on October 8, 1976. The Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Act authorized acquisition of lands for Refuge purposes. Waterfowl Production Areas - Migratory Bird Hunting Stamp Act of March 16, 1934 as amended by section 3 of the Act of August 1, 1958 (72 Stat. 486, 16 U.S.C. sec. 716 d(c), authorized the Secretary of Interior to acquire small wetland or pothole areas suitable as Waterfowl Production Areas. Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. § 742(a)(4)) and (16 U.S.C. § 742(b)(1)) Emergency Wetlands Resources Act of 1986 (16 U.S.C. § 3901(b), 100 Stat. 3583). National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, 16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee (Refuge Administration Act). Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, 16 U.S.C. 460k-460k-4 (Refuge Recreation Act). Refuge Purposes: The Secretary shall develop and administer ... the Refuge, in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System Act ... The Secretary may also exercise any other authority available to him for the conservation and management of wildlife and natural resources, the development of wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities, wildlife interpretation, and environmental education, to the extent deemed by him to be appropriate ..
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicts on Multiple-Use Trails: Synthesis of the Literature and State
    CONFLICTS ON MULTIPLE-USE TRAILS: Synthesis of the Literature and State of the Practice Sponsored by The Federal Highway Administration and The National Recreational Trails Advisory Committee Notice: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers' names may appear herein only because they are considered essential to the object of this document. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Acknowledgments The large number of people and organizations involved in the research for and writing of this report is an indication of how strongly trail managers and users feel about improving cooperation and sharing on multiple-use trails. Their concern and commitment have earned them the thanks of the trails community. Several contributors deserve special recognition, however. The members of the National Recreational Trails Advisory Committee recognized the need for this baseline information and made this project a high priority. They shared their vast trail contacts and advice and reviewed drafts. Advisory Committee Chair Stuart Macdonald, in particular, provided invaluable guidance and contacts and got the effort off to a solid start. Several individuals deserve special thanks for their efforts in actually gathering the information and producing the report you are holding.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Hardwoods Trail
    Central Hardwoods Scenic Trail Land Between The Lakes National Recreation Area January 2015 The Central Hardwoods Scenic Trail spans the entire width of Land Between The Lakes (LBL) connecting Lake Barkley and Kentucky Lake. We designed this multiple-use trail with smooth surfaces, gentle grades, and trailside rest areas. The paved eastern portion of the trail offers shoreline views of Lake Barkley as well as wildlife viewing opportunities in adjacent open areas. The central and western portions are made of compacted stone surface. Here visitors will explore rolling hills and ridge tops of a central hardwood forest ecosystem. Visitors will enjoy a variety of seasonal and scenic diversity. Spring and summer showcase vibrant wildflowers and a canopy provided by the hardwood trees. Fall and winter give way to an array of colors as well as deep woodland views from ridges and narrow valleys. Great viewing is available during any season. Outdoor enthusiasts will likely see wildlife that call the Central Hardwoods Eco-Region home, especially early and late in the day. Seven access points give visitors multiple opportunities to bike and hike sections of the Central Hardwoods Scenic Trail. The Central Hardwoods Scenic Trail is a multiple-use trail. Bikers and hikers share the entire length of the trail. Length: 11 miles (2.5 miles paved on the east side beginning at Lake Barkley, and the remaining 8.5 miles compacted stone west to Kentucky Lake) Trailheads: Fenton, English Hill, Golden Pond, Meredith, Sunset, Devil’s Elbow, Cumberland and parking lots Fenton - (located at Fenton Campground) Begin your hike at one of the first recreation areas established in LBL.
    [Show full text]