Lepidoptera, Adelidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lepidoptera, Adelidae) MIKHAIL V. KOZLOV Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Finland THE IDENTITY OF TINEA BASOCHESELLA HÜBNER, [1824] (LEPIDOPTERA, ADELIDAE) Kozlov, M. V. 2004. The identity of Tinea basochesella Hübner, [1824] (Lepidoptera, Adeli- dae). – Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 147: 107-109. [ISSN 0040-7496]. Published 1 June 2004. Examination of the original watercolour painting of Hübner’s [1824] figure (pl. [69], fig. [462]) demonstrated that the name Tinea basochesella Hübner, [1824] is most probably a senior subjective synonym of Adela dumerilella Duponchel, [1839]. This newly discovered senior sub- jective synonym, Nemophora basochesella (Hübner, [1824]), has not been used for a species of Nemophora since 1863, whereas the junior synonym, N. dumerilella, is commonly accepted (at least 34 references, by 28 authors, during the past 50 years), so this discovery has no effect on the nomenclature of fairy moths (Adelidae): the junior synonym is protected by the ICZN (4th edn., article 23.9.1). Hübner’s figure is designated as the lectotype of Tinea basochesella Hübn- er (nomen oblitum); the lectotype and paralectotypes of Adela dumerilella Duponchel (nomen protectum) are deposited in the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris). Correspondence: Mikhail V. Kozlov, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] Key words. – Adelidae; Tinea basochesella; Nemophora dumerilella; nomenclature; nomen pro- tectum; taxonomy; Southern Europe. For almost 20 years I have been intrigued by the consider the species rare or very difficult to obtain, as identity of Tinea basochesella, illustrated by figure indicated by a moderate exchange value (3) ascribed to [462] in the famous work by Jacob Hübner (1796 – the species: the highest value among the Tinea (sensu [1836]). Note that the figure number in this work is lato) included in his list was 6. Further references to erroneously printed as 456, and the plate number 60 N. basochesella as a distinct species were made by instead of [69] (see Hemming 1937: 301 for details). Duponchel ([1839], 1844), who did not possess any While the identity of all other fairy moths depicted in specimen, and Heydenreich (1851a, b). While this work was more or less certain (except for Tinea Duponchel [1839] considered both N. basochesella megerlella: Kozlov & Kaila 2002), the name ‘basoche- and N. dumerilella as belonging to the same section of sella’ had not been confidently associated with any Eu- the genus Adela, Heydenreich (1851a, b) placed the ropean species. Moreover, the last reference to this two in different genera, and listed N. basochesella be- name that I could discover was published 140 years tween N. metallica (Poda) (referred to as N. aerosellus) ago (Herrich-Schäffer [1863]), and the name has been and N. pfeifferella (Hb.). completely forgotten since then. Luckily, the original Zeller (1853) discussed the characters shown on watercolour painting of T. basochesella has survived in Hübner’s plate and found that most of them corre- the library of the Natural History Museum, London sponded to N. dumerilella, although the ochreous basal (Hübner, [1785]), and examination of this figure part of the forewing, dark hindwings and, especially, sheds some light on the identity of this mysterious the antennal base thickened by hairs or scales, did not species. allow him to unequivocally synonymize these two species. Herrich-Schäffer [1855] supported this opin- ion, indicating that he had seen in Hübner’s collection Identity of Nemophora basochesella (Hübner, [1824]) one exceptionally large specimen of N. dumerilella with Hübner had not mentioned the name ‘basochesella’ a missing head, and suggested that the head on Hübn- in any subsequent work, and Herrich-Schäffer (1835) er’s plate was painted arbitrarily. This indeed solves the was probably the first researcher who cited Hübner’s problem with head characters, but discrepancies in name by including Tinea basochesella (as ‘- Basoches wing coloration remain unexplained, and in subse- 462. 3’) in his ‘Nomenclator’ (p. 29). He did not pos- quent publications Herrich-Schäffer (1861, [1863]) sess any specimen of this species, as showed by the mi- listed N. basochesella as separate species, placing it be- nus sign in front of the name. However, he did not tween N. basella (Ev.) and Adela australis (Heyd.). 107 T E, 147, 2004 The figure of Tinea basochesella published by Hüb- Tinea basochesella Hübner, [1824]: pl. [69] fig. [462], nomen oblitum, syn. n. Lectotype (: Southern Europe; ner [1824] is very bright and seems to provide several the specimen shown on the original figure by Hübner is important diagnostic characters. Therefore the failure here designated as lectotype (depository unknown; the of earlier authors to recognise this species may indicate specimen presumably lost, see Hemming 1937). that either the species does not belong to the European Tinea basoches [sic!]: Herrich-Schäffer 1835: 29. fauna, or the figure contains some errors hampering Adela basochesella: Duponchel [1839]: 29. species identification. Since a detailed survey of the ex- Adela basochesiella: Duponchel 1844: 356 (incorrect subse- quent spelling). otic Adelidae in several major collections, including Nematois [sic!] basochesiellus: Heydenreich 1851a: 81, the Natural History Museum (London), did not re- 1851b: 18 (incorrect subsequent spelling). veal any species even resembling figure [462] by Hüb- Nemotois basochesella: Zeller 1853: 84; Herrich-Schäffer ner [1824], I compared T. basochesella with all Adeli- [1855]: 99 (both as a questionable synonym of N. dumer- dae occurring in Europe. As a result, I accept the ilella Dup.). opinion of Zeller (1853) that N. dumerilella (Dupon- Adela basoches [sic!]: Herrich-Schäffer 1861: 27, [1863]: 19. chel, [1839]) is most similar to T. basochesella. Investigation of the type specimens of N. dumerilel- Investigation of Hübner’s original painting (Hübn- la confirmed that the current use of this name is indeed er [1785]) demonstrated that the printed copy is correct. The designation of the lectotype (which was much brighter than the watercolour original, which labelled as such by E. S. Nielsen in 1981, but never shows an indistinct forewing pattern with suffused made available through publication) and two paralec- th colours resembling N. dumerilella much more than totypes is made in accordance with the ICZN (4 edn., the printed image of T. basochesella. Furthermore, the article 74.7) to assure nomenclatural stability within thickness of the antennal base is most probably unin- the genus Nemophora, and because discrimination of tentional – at least the right antenna was originally N. dumerilella from several other species (some of painted with a thin base, but the line has been acci- which are still to be described) on the basis of the orig- dentally spread, giving a false impression of hairs or inal description by Duponchel [1839] is impossible. scales. However, the eyes of the T. basochesella male To the best of my knowledge, the newly discovered are not enlarged as in males of N. dumerilella, but this senior synonym, Tinea basochesella, has not been used may (as suggested by Herrich-Schäffer [1855]) indi- since 1863. At the same time, a more or less compre- cate that the head was painted from another specimen hensive bibliography (to be published in forthcoming or arbitrarily. Finally, Hübner’s specimen was not revision of the genus Nemophora by the present au- spread (Herrich-Schäffer [1855]), and this might ex- thor) includes about 80 references to N. dumerilella, plain why the hind wings are painted too dark, as their among which 34 sources by 28 authors have been colour could not be properly seen from the specimen. published since 1953. Thus, the conditions of ICZN Keeping in mind that N. dumerilella is the only suit- article 23.9.1.2, which requires that the junior syn- able candidate, and accounting for the fact that this onym has been used as the valid name in at least 25 decision is mostly of historical interest, I synonymize publications during the last 50 years, are met. Fur- N. basochesella (Hübner, [1824]) and N. dumerilella thermore, all major revisions (Razowski 1978, Küp- (Duponchel, [1839]). Since Hübner’s collection is lost pers 1980), keys (Wojtusiak 1972, Zaguljaev 1978) (Hemming 1937), I designate Hübner’s figure as lec- and checklists (Wojtusiak 1996, Leraut 1997) have totype of Tinea basochesella Hübner (nomen oblitum) consistently applied this name, which can be consid- for the proper fixation of this taxonomic decision ered as sufficient proof of its universal usage. There- (ICZN article 74.4). fore, in accordance with the procedure described in ICZN (1999), article 23.9.2, the application of the principle of priority is moderated, and the prevailing Nemophora dumerilella (Duponchel) nomen protectum usage of the junior subjective synonym, Nemophora Adela dumerilella Duponchel, [1839]: 372-373, pl. 300 fig. dumerilella (Duponchel, [1839]), is maintained. 12. Lectotype ( (here designated): France, near Paris; la- belled: 4 x 10 mm, red paper, print ‘TYPE’; 8 mm circle, black ink ‘duponche’; 8 mm circle, black ink ‘1517’; 5 x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 20 mm, black ink ‘Dumerilella, D,’; 13 x 10 mm, print + black ink ‘E. S. Nielsen | Gen. slide no. | 2189 ( | E. S. I am grateful to E. J. van Nieukerken, G. S. Robin- Nielsen’; 9 x 21 mm, red paper, print + black ink ‘LECTO- son, J. van Tol, K. R. Tuck and J. Minet for providing TYPE | Adela | dumerilella Dup. | teste E.S.Niesn [sic!] access to collections, for useful discussions, and for ( 1981’. – Paralectotypes: 2 , labeled: 4 x 7 mm, blue to editing the manuscript, and thank SYS-Resource (EC black frame, black ink ‘17 Juilett | Boulougne’; 8 mm cir- cle, black ink ‘1517’; 12 x 21 mm, pink paper, print + Programme ‘Access to Research Infrastructures’) for black ink ‘Paralectotype ( Adela | dumerilella | financial support of study visits to the Natural Histo- Duponchel [1839] | M. Kozlov design. 1999’ (Museum ry Museum in London. National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris). 108.
Recommended publications
  • Spanish Pyrenees 12 – 19 May 2018
    Spanish Pyrenees 12 – 19 May 2018 Participants Sue and Peter Burge Diana and David Melzack Helen and Malcolm Crowder Colin Taylor Kate Dalziel Pauline and Keith Vaughton Leaders Chris Gibson, who also wrote this report, and Peter Rich. Our hosts: Melanie and Peter Rich at Casa Sarasa www.casasarasa.com Photos by Chris Gibson (CG), Kate Dalziel (KD) and Helen Crowder (HC) were all taken during this holiday. Front cover: female Spanish moon moth (CG). Above: the group at Casa Sarasa, with Berdún in the background. Below: a street in Berdún (KD); giant peacock moth at Casa Sarasa (CG). This holiday, as for every Honeyguide holiday, also puts something into conservation in our host country by way of a contribution to the wildlife that we enjoyed, in this case for La Sociedad Española de Ornitología (SEO), the Spanish Ornithological Society, and its work in Aragón. The conservation contribution this year of £40 per person was supplemented by gift aid through the Honeyguide Wildlife Charitable Trust, leading to a total of £500. This donation brings the total given to SEO since the first Honeyguide holiday in Spain in 1991 to £18,785 (through all Honeyguide holidays, mostly the Spanish Pyrenees and Extremadura). As at May 2018, the total for all conservation contributions through Honeyguide since 1991 was £124,020. 2 DAILY DIARY Saturday 12 May: the way there… Departing from a rainy Stansted after lunch, a rather bumpy flight took us to Biarritz, and more rain and strong winds. After meeting Peter, and picking up the second van, we headed into the low cloud of the Pyrenees; occasional showers interspersed with shafts of sunlight spearing through the cloud made the Motorway of the Mountains suitably dramatic, with a few griffon vultures and red and black kites for accompaniment.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist
    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Incurvariidae) with Two New Species from China and Japan
    Zootaxa 4927 (2): 209–233 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4927.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:96B9981B-01B5-4828-A4C6-E2E4A08DB8F2 Review of the genus Vespina (Lepidoptera, Incurvariidae) with two new species from China and Japan TOSHIYA HIROWATARI1*, SADAHISA YAGI1, ISSEI OHSHIMA2, GUO-HUA HUANG3 & MIN WANG4 1Entomological laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 819-0395 Japan. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-1219 2Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto, 606-8522 Japan. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-9749 3Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology and Control of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6841-0095 4Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-4058 *Corresponding author. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-2229 Abstract Asian species of the genus Vespina Davis, 1972 (Lepidoptera, Incurvariidae) are mainly reviewed. Vespina meridiana Hirowatari & Yagi sp. nov. from the Ryukyu Islands, Japan, and Vespina sichuana Hirowatari, Huang & Wang sp. nov. from Sichuan, China, are described. The previously known Vespina species are associated with plants from the Fagaceae family on the western coast of the USA and East Asia and with Sapindaceae (Aceraceae) in eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Cave Use by Butterflies and Moths
    International Journal of Speleology 50 (1) 15-24 Tampa, FL (USA) January 2021 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Increased cave use by butterflies and moths: a response to climate warming? Otto Moog 1, Erhard Christian 2*, and Rudolf Eis3 1Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel 33 Str., 1180 Vienna, Austria 2 Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel 33 Str., 1180 Vienna, Austria 3Waldegg 9a, 2754 Waldegg, Austria Abstract: Between 2015 and 2019, the list of Lepidoptera from “cave” habitats (i.e., proper caves, rock shelters and artificial subterranean structures) in Austria grew from 17 to 62 species, although the effort of data collection remained nearly constant from the late 1970s onwards. The newly recorded moths and butterflies were resting in caves during daytime in the the warm season, three species were also overwintering there. We observed Catocala elocata at 28 cave inspections, followed by Mormo maura (18), Catocala nupta (7), Peribatodes rhomboidaria, and Euplagia quadripunctaria (6). More than half of the species have been repeatedly observed in caves in Austria or abroad, so their relationship with such sites is apparently not completely random. Since the increase of records in Austria coincided with a considerable rise in the annual number of hot days (maximum temperatures ≥30°C) from 2015 onwards, we interpret the growing inclination of certain Lepidoptera towards daytime sheltering in caves as a behavioral reaction to climate warming. Keywords: Lepidoptera, cave use, diurnal retreat, refuge-site preference, climate change Received 22 October 2020; Revised 26 December 2020; Accepted 29 December 2020 Citation: Moog O., Christian E.
    [Show full text]
  • Cauchas Terskella - a New Species of Adelidae S
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 1994 Band/Volume: 25 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuprijanov Alexey V. Artikel/Article: Cauchas terskella - a new species of Adelidae s. str. from Middle Asia (Lepidoptera, Incurvarioidea) 399-403 ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (May 1994) 25(1/2):399-403, Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 Cauchas terskella - a new species of Adelidae s. str. from Middle Asia (Lepidoptera, Incurvarioidea) by ALEXEY V. KUPRIJANOV received 4.XI.1993 Abstract: A new species Cauchas terskella is described from south-eastern Kasakhstan. The male and female genitalia are pictured. The new species differs from all the other unpatterned small-eyed Adelidae only in the structure of the genitalia. Zusammenfassung: Eine neue Art Cauchas terskella - wird aus dem süd-östlichen Kasachstan beschrieben. Die männlichen und weiblichen Kopulationsorgane werden dar­ gestellt. Der neue Art unterscheidet sich von den anderen einfarbigen kleinäugigen Adeliden nur durch den Bau der Kopulationsorgane. Pe3K)Me: HoBbiii bma C a u c h a s t e r s k e l l a oriMcaH ms KDro-BocTOHHoro Ka3axcTaHa. ripMBefleHbl pMCyHKM TepMMHa/IMM CaMUOB M CaMOK. HOBbIM BMA Hafle>KHO OT/lMHaeTCfl OT npOHMX OflHOUBeTHblX A d e lid a e C Ma/ieHbKMMM Ma3aMM /lMWb no CTpoeHMIO TepMM­ Ha/IMM. Introduction A new species of Adelidae was discovered among the Lepidoptera collected by Dr. V. V. Zolotuhin in south-eastern Kazakhstan. Its description is given below. The types are deposited in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (St.-Petersburg).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Texas Lepidoptera Knudson & Bordelon, Jan 2018 Texas Lepidoptera Survey
    1 Checklist of Texas Lepidoptera Knudson & Bordelon, Jan 2018 Texas Lepidoptera Survey ERIOCRANIOIDEA TISCHERIOIDEA ERIOCRANIIDAE TISCHERIIDAE Dyseriocrania griseocapitella (Wlsm.) Eriocraniella mediabulla Davis Coptotriche citripennella (Clem.) Eriocraniella platyptera Davis Coptotriche concolor (Zell.) Coptotriche purinosella (Cham.) Coptotriche clemensella (Cham). Coptotriche sulphurea (F&B) NEPTICULOIDEA Coptotriche zelleriella (Clem.) Tischeria quercitella Clem. NEPTICULIDAE Coptotriche malifoliella (Clem.) Coptotriche crataegifoliae (Braun) Ectoedemia platanella (Clem.) Coptotriche roseticola (F&B) Ectoedemia rubifoliella (Clem.) Coptotriche aenea (F&B) Ectoedemia ulmella (Braun) Asterotriche solidaginifoliella (Clem.) Ectoedemia obrutella (Zell.) Asterotriche heliopsisella (Cham.) Ectoedemia grandisella (Cham.) Asterotriche ambrosiaeella (Cham.) Nepticula macrocarpae Free. Asterotriche helianthi (F&B) Stigmella scintillans (Braun) Asterotriche heteroterae (F&B) Stigmella rhoifoliella (Braun) Asterotriche longeciliata (F&B) Stigmella rhamnicola (Braun) Asterotriche omissa (Braun) Stigmella villosella (Clem.) Asterotriche pulvella (Cham.) Stigmella apicialbella (Cham.) Stigmella populetorum (F&B) Stigmella saginella (Clem.) INCURVARIOIDEA Stigmella nigriverticella (Cham.) Stigmella flavipedella (Braun) PRODOXIDAE Stigmella ostryaefoliella (Clem.) Stigmella myricafoliella (Busck) Tegeticula yuccasella (Riley) Stigmella juglandifoliella (Clem.) Tegeticula baccatella Pellmyr Stigmella unifasciella (Cham.) Tegeticula carnerosanella Pellmyr
    [Show full text]
  • The Pollinators
    MAY/JUNE 2019 • VOLUME 70 • NUMBER 5 The Pollinators They form irreplaceable strands in the intricate web of biodiversity and are critical indicators of the health – or decline – of our native habitats. They need our help. • The Audubon Club at San Diego City College Steps Up Big for Pollinators • Silverwood and Anstine-Audubon Are Remarkable Preserves for Pollinators • Three Common Pollinators and the Threats to Their Future San Diego Audubon Puts Down Roots at City College The Audubon Club has transformed thirsty, unfriendly grass and roses into thriving pollinator-friendly native plant gardens by Shari Hatch About three years ago, Professor As a tenured professor, Chaddock teaches several geography classes. Lisa Chaddock viewed the “grass She requires each student to engage in a community service project, and a few trees and roses” behind documented with a poster (including a map), an abstract her classroom at San Diego describing the project, a bibliography, and photos showing their City College and dreamed of volunteer work. Almost 200 volunteers are spread across San Diego transforming it into a paradise for serving our communities. pollinators, primarily butterflies and Chaddock is also the Vice President of San Diego Audubon and hummingbirds. She went to work recruiting enthusiastic students energetically promotes chapter involvement among her college to plant and tend budding native plant gardens in that same plaza students. The City College Audubon Club now boasts 72 student area behind her classroom. She also received a modest grant from members (and counting), with new chapters emerging at San Diego the California Audubon Society, which she used for rewarding two Mesa College and Grossmont College, with hopes of expanding to dedicated interns, who were assisted by students in the fledgling City Southwestern and other community colleges.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Nemophora Acaciae Sp. Nov. (Lepidoptera: Adelidae) from Kenya
    Zootaxa 4058 (2): 287–292 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4058.2.10 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:862B3040-489D-4E4D-87A5-A0B3551A55C5 Description of Nemophora acaciae sp. nov. (Lepidoptera: Adelidae) from Kenya DAVID J. L. AGASSIZ1 & MIKHAIL V. KOZLOV2,3 1Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] 2Section of Ecology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] 3Corresponding author Abstract Nemophora acaciae sp. nov. is described from Kenya on the basis of a large series bred from flowers of Acacia seyal and A. lahai. The new species differs from all Afrotropical Nemophora species by its dark brown forewing fascia with white medial stripe near the costal margin of forewing. The key to the Afrotropical Nemophora species is provided. Key words: Acacia lahai, Acacia seyal, Afrotropical region, biology, flowers, new species Introduction Adelidae are small archaic (monotrysian) moths, whose males, with the exception of the genus Cauchas Zeller, 1839 have conspicuous long antennae. The family includes nearly 300 species worldwide (van Nieukerken et al. 2011), about 90 of which were described from the Afrotropical region (De Prins & De Prins 2015). The majority of Afrotropical species of Adelidae belongs to the genus Ceromitia Zeller, 1852 (subfamily Nematopogoninae), while metallic-coloured day-flying adelids (subfamily Adelinae) include 2−4 species of the genus Adela Latreille, 1796 (taxonomic positions of two species remain uncertain) and 7 species of the genus Nemophora Hoffmannsegg, 1798.
    [Show full text]
  • Tick Humoral Responses: Marching to the Beat of a Different Drummer
    fmicb-08-00223 February 11, 2017 Time: 18:53 # 1 MINI REVIEW published: 14 February 2017 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00223 Tick Humoral Responses: Marching to the Beat of a Different Drummer Adela S. Oliva Chávez1*, Dana K. Shaw1, Ulrike G. Munderloh2 and Joao H. F. Pedra1 1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2 Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA Ticks transmit a variety of human pathogens, including Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiological agent of Lyme disease. Multiple pathogens that are transmitted simultaneously, termed “coinfections,” are of increasing importance and can affect disease outcome in a host. Arthropod immunity is central to pathogen acquisition and transmission by the tick. Pattern recognition receptors recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns and induce humoral responses through the Toll and Immune Deficiency (IMD) pathways. Comparative analyses between insects and ticks reveal that while the Toll pathway is conserved, the IMD network exhibits a high degree of variability. This indicates that major differences in humoral immunity exist between insects and ticks. While many variables can affect immunity, one of the major forces that shape Edited by: immune outcomes is the microbiota. In light of this, we discuss how the presence Melissa Jo Caimano, of commensal bacteria, symbionts and/or coinfections can lead to altered immune University of Connecticut Health Center, USA responses in the tick that impact pathogen persistence and subsequent transmission. Reviewed by: By investigating non-insect arthropod immunity, we will not only better comprehend tick Juan Anguita, biology, but also unravel the intricate effects that pathogen coinfections have on vector CIC bioGUNE, Spain Job E.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Nemophora in Vietnam, with Description of a New Species (Lepidoptera: Adelidae)
    Vol. 16 No. 1-2 2005 (2007) HIROWATARI: Notes on Vietnam Nemophora 27 TROPICAL LEPIDOPTERA, 16(1-2): 27-34 (2007) NOTES ON NEMOPHORA IN VIETNAM, WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES (LEPIDOPTERA: ADELIDAE) TOSHIYA HIROWATARI Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka, 599-8531 Japan ABSTRACT.- Nemophora tanakai n. sp., which is a close relative of N. fluorites (Meyrick, 1907), is described from Tarn Dao, Vietnam. N. fluorites is also recorded from Vietnam and Myanmar for the first time and given descriptive notes. Nemotois takamukuella Matsumura, 1932, which was described based on a single male from "Japan," is synonymized with N. fluorites (Meyrick). The former was considered to be erroneously recorded from Japan. KEY WORDS: Asia, India, Japan, Myanmar, nectaring, Nemophora, Nemophora tanakai n. sp., Oriental, Southeast Asia, Taiwan, Tarn Dao, taxonomy. The adelid fauna of Vietnam has been poorly investigated. In whitish yellow hairs, sparsely mixed with black. Eyes large, very close to May 1998, the author participated in a field survey project in each other dorsally; horizontal eye diameter (hd)/ minimum distance northern Vietnam conducted by Yutaka Arita of Meijo University, between eyes (md): 4.28 ±0.47 (mean ±SD, n = 30). Labial palpus long, Japan. During the survey, at one of the peaks (1230m) of Tam Dao, beyond vertex; 2nd longest, densely covered with raised golden brown hairs; 3rd shortest with dark brown scales. Antenna moderate in length, 27.02 the author and Ban Tanaka (Toyota, Japan) collected two Nemopho- ±1.67mm (mean ±SD, n = 30), al/fl 2.70 ±0.10 (mean ±SD, n = 30); basal ra species.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MICROLEPIDOPTERA Section 2 COSMOPTERIGIDAE THROUGH HEPIALIDAE
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 8-1-1984 TB114: A List of the Lepidoptera of Maine--Part 2: The icrM olepidoptera Section 2 Cosmopterigidae through Hepialidae Auburn E. Brower Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Brower, A.E. 1984. A list of the Lepidoptera of Maine--Part 2: The icrM olepidoptera section 2 Cosmopterigidae through Hepialidae. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 114. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 0734-9556 A LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF MAINE Part 2 THE MICROLEPIDOPTERA Section 2 COSMOPTERIGIDAE THROUGH HEPIALIDAE Auburn E. Brower A GHOST MOTH — Sthenopis argenteomaculatus Harris A JOINT PUBLICATION OF THE (MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Maine Forest Service Division of Entomology, Augusta, Maine and the DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY, ORONO August 1984 Inquiries concerning this bulletin may be sent to: Dr. Auburn E. Brower 8 Hospital Street Augusta, ME A LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF MAINE Part 2 THE MICROLEPIDOPTERA Section 2 COSMOPTERIGIDAE THROUGH HEPIALIDAE Auburn E. Brower A JOINT PUBLICATION OF THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Maine Forest Service Division of Entomology,
    [Show full text]