DOCSLIB.ORG

Websphere Application Server Versions: What's Different?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Websphere Application Server Versions: What's Different? WebSphere Application Server Versions: What’s Different? For V9.0 and earlier © 2021 IBM Corporation Revision Date 06/2016 Agenda § v9, v8.5, v8.0 and v7.0 Feature Highlights § High level view of Migration changes § Modernizing to Liberty § Changes per version – Changes in v9.0 – Changes in v8.5 – Changes in v8.0 – Changes in v7.0 – Changes in v6.1 – Changes in v6.0 2 Revision Date 06/2016 New June WAS V9: 2Q16 Key Announcements 2016 Create WAS V9 delivers robust & modern developer environment for speed & new cloud enterprise scalability apps • Cloud-First Java app platform - Speed development with composable runtime and microservices architecture; • Full Java EE7 certification for both WAS Traditional and Liberty Profiles; • Leverage Spring and Spring Boot frameworks within applications; • Quick start cloud native Java apps with Liberty app accelerator and Game-On exemplar – seamless deploy to IBM Bluemix • Leverage end-to-end DevOps Toolchain and Garage Method (best practices) • Portability of apps with Docker support; Deploy to IBM Container Service, Docker Data Center, and other container services • Seamlessly manage Java and Node.js apps and APIs through common management interface 3 Revision Date 06/2016 New June WAS V9: 2Q16 Key Announcements (cont.) 2016 Optimize Move apps anywhere, in any way, to increase speed and optimize costs costs for • Create a borderless environment with easy app portability regardless of architectural app infra environment (Cloud container services, Docker, VMWare) • Exploit WAS ND intelligent management for workload optimization and placement • Move apps to the IBM public cloud with choice of pre-configured environ, flexible PayGo pricing models • WAS Liberty app deployment to OpenShift and Pivotal Cloud Foundry running in IBM SoftLayer, Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, and IBM Bluemix • WAS on Bluemix- Single Tenant : New option to deploy on Cloud • Ease of use enhancements for caching to optimize user experience 4 Revision Date 06/2016 New June WAS V9: 2Q16 Key Announcements (cont.) 2016 Connect Connect to cloud services to integrate new capabilities, improve time to mkt existing & lower costs apps & • Seamlessly connect on-premises apps to cloud services like Watson, Cloudant, dashDB. data API Connect , Log Analytics (beta) - take advantage of latest technologies and extend the value of existing Java apps • Optimize use of APIs for exposing and better monetizing traditional apps • Leverage PayGo models and eliminate risk and complexity of managing these new services • Leverage “API Connect Essentials” now included in WAS editions 5 Revision Date 06/2016 New June WebSphere Application Server 2016 The cornerstone of your cloud strategy $325K annual 30%+ 122% infrastructure Industry Leading 30% Intelligent TCO ROI savings Security better performance Management WAS on Cloud Liberty by year 3 - Open ID Connect with Java 8 45% less hardware 45% less software Bluemix vs On- vs Open Source vs. Open Source - Secure Engineering 60% admin savings 90% fewer outages premises Accreditation O-TTPS CREATE CONNECT OPTIMIZE Developer focused to Easy cloud connections for new & Smart management of speed delivery pipeline existing apps the mission critical • Lightweight composable runtime - • Create, expose and connect APIs • Leading edge cloud & mobile perfect for microservices • Re-use existing apps and connect security • Full integration with any DevOps to “on or off” premises • Enterprise Management of Java & toolchain for continuous delivery • Deploy anywhere - on premises, Node.js • Java EE7 market leadership and in cloud or hybrid • High availability: auto-scaling, support for Open Source dynamic routing, health management, diagnostics 6 Revision Date 06/2016 WAS V8.5 Delivers Unparalleled Application Development and Management Environment, Rich User Experiences…Faster Developer Experience Application Resiliency Operations and Control Fast, flexible, Intelligent Improved and simplified Management Operations, application & Enhanced Security, Control development Resiliency & Integration §Liberty Profile §Application Edition §Selectable JDK Management §Expanded Tooling and WAS §WebSphere Batch Tooling Bundles §Application Server Health enhancements Management §OSGI programming model §Admin Security Audit enhancements §Dynamic Clustering §OSGi Blueprint security §EJB support in OSGi apps §New Intelligent Routing improvements capabilities §JDK7 Support §Cross Component Trace §Messaging infrastructure (XCT) §Migration toolkit resiliency §Enhanced IBM Support §Web 2.0 & Mobile Toolkit; IBM §Memory leak detection & Assistant Worklight Integration protection in WAS §Better log and trace filtering §SCA OASIS programming model 7 Revision Date 06/2016 WAS v8.5.5 Delivers Fit for Purpose Servers enabling unmatched combination of Application Server runtime and development experience, from the highly resilient to the lightweight and nimble Developer Experience Application Resiliency Operational Excellence Fast, flexible, and simplified Intelligent Management and Improved Operations, application development Enhanced Resiliency Security, Control & Integration §New lightweight WebSphere §WAS ND and WAS z/OS full §Liberty profile Application Server Liberty Core profile enhancements in v8.5 ** §Security enhancements edition § App Edition Mgmt §Problem determination §Liberty Profile § App Server Health Mgmt §Monitoring § Dynamic Clustering §Java EE 6 Web Profile § Intelligent Routing §Service Mapping § EJB Lite, CDI, Managed Beans § Messaging resiliency §Web Services § Enterprise Java Batch §SIP improvements §JMS, MDB § Memory leak protection §NoSQL DB (MongoDB Client) §Improved Load Balancer for §Support for WebSphere Web §Liberty Profile collective IPV4 and IPV6 Cache (DynaCache) administration §Add custom and third party §Liberty profile packaging and Liberty features §Liberty Profile clustering install enhancements §Asynchronous work management §Enhanced developer tools §Intelligent management in §WebSphere Extreme Scale integration §Supported WAS and WDT on WebSphere web server developer desktops §Performance enhancements 8 Revision Date 06/2016 **Available since WAS 8.5 WebSphere Application Server v8.0 Speed Delivery of Operational Efficiency Security & Control Applications & Services & Reliability § Open Source to Enterprise § High Performance § Administrative § Free WAS for Developers Productivity § Self Service Development § Transactional Strength Environments § OSGi Application Agility § Scalability & HA § Faster Edit-Compile-Debug § Security § Programming Models § Install & Maintenance – Java EE 6 § Migration – Web 2.0 & Mobile § Problem Determination – OSGi Applications – SCA § Platform & Environment – Java Batch Flexibility – XML – SIP & CEA § Flexible Pricing Models – Dynamic Scripting § Integrated Tooling § Feature Packs § Application Adapters 9 Revision Date 06/2016 IBM WebSphere Application Server Version 7.0 Simplification for Developers Intelligent Management § New and enhanced Standards: § New Flexible Management: JDK 6.0, Java EE 5 certification, Job Manager, Administrative Agent EJB3, Web Services, SIP, Portlet § New WebSphere Business Level § Web 2.0 Feature Pack Applications (BLAs) § New Rational Application Developer Support § New Centralized Installation Manager High Performance Foundation for SOA Innovation that Matters § Multi-Cell Support Feature Pack for Web 2.0 § Application investment protection Feature Pack for SCA Feature Pack for Communications Enabled § Performance leadership Applications § New Runtime Provisioning Feature Pack for XML § New and Enhanced Security Features Feature Pack for OSGI and JPA § New Consolidated WebSphere and Feature Pack for Dynamic Scripting DataPower administration Feature pack for Modern Batch 10 10 Revision Date 06/2016 Agenda § v9, v8.5, v8.0 and v7.0 Feature Highlights § High level view of Migration changes § Modernizing to Liberty § Changes per version – Changes in v9.0 – Changes in v8.5 – Changes in v8.0 – Changes in v7.0 – Changes in v6.1 – Changes in v6.0 Revision Date 06/2016 Updated June Migration impacts (worst case scenario) 2016 Potential Impact areas v6.0 v6.1 v7.0 v8.0 v8.5 V9.0 Java Runtime n/a 6 2 n/a 0/20/19 19 JEE - JSP 8 n/a 1 1 0 0 JEE - Servlet 5 n/a 0 2 0 9 JEE - Other 3 n/a 5 7 1 50 WAS Specific 1 6 0 4 0 3 3rd party packages 2 0 1 0 0 3 Development total 19 12 9 13 0/20/19 64 Administrative script 4 3 2 0 0 1 WAS directory structure 1 1 0 0 0 1 Other administrative 5 2 6 7 0 1 Total administrative 10 6 8 7 0 3 Total potential impact areas 29 18 17 20 0/20/19 67 Note: V8.5 supports Java 6, 7 and 8. Java7 and Java 8 introduces a number of behavior changes. “0” represents Java612 and “20” is for Java7. Not all breaking changes will impact all applications Revision Date 06/2016 JEE specification change analysis (1 of 3) Updated June traditional WebSphere 2016 v6.0 v6.1 v7.0 v8.0 v8.5 V9.0 Java Runtime 1.4.2 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 WebApps Servlet 2.4 2.4 2.5 3.0 3.1 JSF 1.0 1.1 1.2 2.0 2.2 JSP 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 EL 3.0 Portlet 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 SIP 1.1(FeP) 1.1 1.1 1.1 Enterprise Apps Bean validation 1.0 1.1 CDI 1.0 1.2 EJB 2.1 2.1/3.0(FeP) 3.0 3.1 3.2 JDBC 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 JMS 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 2.0 JPA 1.0(FeP) 2.0(FeP) 2.0 2.1 WebSocket 1.1 Java Web Start 1.4.2 1.4.2 1.4.2 1.4.2 1.6 13 Revision Date 06/2016 Red indicates significant, Yellow indicate some breakage, Gray indicates deprecation. JEE specification change analysis (2 of 3) Updated traditional WebSphere June 2016 v6.0 v6.1 v7.0 v8.0/v8.5 V9.0 Web Services JAXB 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 JAXP 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 JAXR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 JAX-RPC 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 JAX-RS 1.1 2.0 JAX-WS 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 RAMP 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 SOAP 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 SAAJ 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 MTOM n/a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 StAX n/a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 UDDI 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 W3C XML 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 WS-Addressing n/a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 WS-AT 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 WS-BA n/a 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 WSDL 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 WS-I Basic Profile 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 2.0 14 Revision Date 06/2016 Red indicates significant, Yellow indicate some breakage, Gray indicates deprecation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • XML Document Parsing: Operational and Performance Characteristics
    COMPUTING PRACTICES XML Document Parsing: Operational and Performance Characteristics Parsing is an expensive operation that can degrade XML processing performance. A survey of four representative XML parsing models—DOM, SAX, StAX, and VTD—reveals their suitability for different types of applications. Tak Cheung Lam roadly used in database and networking applications, the and Jianxun Jason Ding Extensible Markup Language is the de facto standard for the Cisco Systems interoperable document format. As XML becomes widespread, it is critical for application developers to understand the opera- Jyh-Charn Liu tional and performance characteristics of XML processing. Texas A&M University BAs Figure 1 shows, XML processing occurs in four stages: parsing, access, modification, and serialization. Although parsing is the most expensive operation,1 there are no detailed studies that compare • the processing steps and associated overhead costs of different parsing models, • tradeoffs in accessing and modifying parsed data, and • XML-based applications’ access and modification requirements. Figure 1 also illustrates the three-step parsing process. The first two steps, character conversion and lexical analysis, are usually invariant among dif- ferent parsing models, while the third step, syntactic analysis, creates data representations based on the parsing model used. To help developers make sensible choices for their target applications, we compared the data representations of four representative parsing models: document object model (DOM; www.w3.org/DOM), simple API for XML (SAX; www.saxproject.org), streaming API for XML (StAX; http://jcp.org/ en/jsr/detail?id=173), and virtual token descriptor (VTD; http://vtd-xml. sourceforge.net). These data representations result in different operational and performance characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Guide
    Apache Syncope - Reference Guide Version 2.1.9 Table of Contents 1. Introduction. 2 1.1. Identity Technologies. 2 1.1.1. Identity Stores . 2 1.1.2. Provisioning Engines . 4 1.1.3. Access Managers . 5 1.1.4. The Complete Picture . 5 2. Architecture. 7 2.1. Core . 7 2.1.1. REST . 7 2.1.2. Logic . 8 2.1.3. Provisioning . 8 2.1.4. Workflow. 9 2.1.5. Persistence . 9 2.1.6. Security . 9 2.2. Admin UI. 10 2.2.1. Accessibility . 10 2.3. End-user UI. 12 2.3.1. Password Reset . 12 2.3.2. Accessibility . 13 2.4. CLI . 15 2.5. Third Party Applications. 15 2.5.1. Eclipse IDE Plugin . 15 2.5.2. Netbeans IDE Plugin. 15 3. Concepts . 16 3.1. Users, Groups and Any Objects . 16 3.2. Type Management . 17 3.2.1. Schema . 17 Plain . 17 Derived . 18 Virtual . 18 3.2.2. AnyTypeClass . 19 3.2.3. AnyType . 19 3.2.4. RelationshipType . 21 3.2.5. Type Extensions . 22 3.3. External Resources. 23 3.3.1. Connector Bundles . 24 3.3.2. Connector Instance details . 24 3.3.3. External Resource details . 25 3.3.4. Mapping . 26 3.3.5. Linked Accounts . 29 3.4. Realms . 29 3.4.1. Realm Provisioning . 30 3.4.2. LogicActions . 31 3.5. Entitlements. 31 3.6. Privileges . 31 3.7. Roles. 31 3.7.1. Delegated Administration . 32 3.8. Provisioning. 33 3.8.1. Overview. 33 3.8.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Licensing Information User Manual Release 21C (21.1) F37966-01 March 2021
    Oracle® Zero Downtime Migration Licensing Information User Manual Release 21c (21.1) F37966-01 March 2021 Introduction This Licensing Information document is a part of the product or program documentation under the terms of your Oracle license agreement and is intended to help you understand the program editions, entitlements, restrictions, prerequisites, special license rights, and/or separately licensed third party technology terms associated with the Oracle software program(s) covered by this document (the "Program(s)"). Entitled or restricted use products or components identified in this document that are not provided with the particular Program may be obtained from the Oracle Software Delivery Cloud website (https://edelivery.oracle.com) or from media Oracle may provide. If you have a question about your license rights and obligations, please contact your Oracle sales representative, review the information provided in Oracle’s Software Investment Guide (http://www.oracle.com/us/ corporate/pricing/software-investment-guide/index.html), and/or contact the applicable Oracle License Management Services representative listed on http:// www.oracle.com/us/corporate/license-management-services/index.html. Licensing Information Third-Party Notices and/or Licenses About the Third-Party Licenses The third party licensing information in Oracle Database Licensing Information User Manual, Third-Party Notices and/or Licenses and Open Source Software License Text, applies to Oracle Zero Downtime Migration. The third party licensing information included in the license notices provided with Oracle Linux applies to Oracle Zero Downtime Migration. Open Source or Other Separately Licensed Software Required notices for open source or other separately licensed software products or components distributed in Oracle Zero Downtime Migration are identified in the following table along with the applicable licensing information.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Memory
    Topic 18: Virtual Memory COS / ELE 375 Computer Architecture and Organization Princeton University Fall 2015 Prof. David August 1 Virtual Memory Any time you see virtual, think “using a level of indirection” Virtual memory: level of indirection to physical memory • Program uses virtual memory addresses • Virtual address is converted to a physical address • Physical address indicates physical location of data • Physical location can be memory or disk! 0x800 Disk:Mem: 0x803C4 0x3C00 Virtual address Physical address 2 Virtual Memory 3 Virtual Memory 1 4 Virtual Memory: Take 1 Main memory may not be large enough for a task • Programmers turn to overlays and disk • Many programs would have to do this • Programmers should have to worry about main memory size across machines Use virtual memory to make memory look bigger for all programs 5 A System with Only Physical Memory Examples: Most Cray machines, early PCs, nearly all current embedded systems, etc. Memory 0: 1: Store 0x10 CPU Load 0xf0 N-1: CPU’s load or store addresses used directly to access memory. 6 A System with Virtual Memory Examples: modern workstations, servers, PCs, etc. Memory 0: Page Table 1: Virtual Physical Addresses 0: Addresses 1: Store 0x10 CPU Load 0xf0 P-1: N-1: Disk Address Translation: the hardware converts virtual addresses into physical addresses via an OS-managed lookup table (page table) 7 Page Faults (Similar to “Cache Misses”) What if an object is on disk rather than in memory? 1. Page table indicates that the virtual address is not in memory 2. OS trap handler is invoked, moving data from disk into memory • Current process suspends, others can resume • OS has full control over placement, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Known Security Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components
    Tracking known security vulnerabilities in third-party components Master’s Thesis Mircea Cadariu Tracking known security vulnerabilities in third-party components THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in COMPUTER SCIENCE by Mircea Cadariu born in Brasov, Romania Software Engineering Research Group Software Improvement Group Department of Software Technology Rembrandt Tower, 15th floor Faculty EEMCS, Delft University of Technology Amstelplein 1 - 1096HA Delft, the Netherlands Amsterdam, the Netherlands www.ewi.tudelft.nl www.sig.eu c 2014 Mircea Cadariu. All rights reserved. Tracking known security vulnerabilities in third-party components Author: Mircea Cadariu Student id: 4252373 Email: [email protected] Abstract Known security vulnerabilities are introduced in software systems as a result of de- pending on third-party components. These documented software weaknesses are hiding in plain sight and represent the lowest hanging fruit for attackers. Despite the risk they introduce for software systems, it has been shown that developers consistently download vulnerable components from public repositories. We show that these downloads indeed find their way in many industrial and open-source software systems. In order to improve the status quo, we introduce the Vulnerability Alert Service, a tool-based process to track known vulnerabilities in software projects throughout the development process. Its usefulness has been empirically validated in the context of the external software product quality monitoring service offered by the Software Improvement Group, a software consultancy company based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Thesis Committee: Chair: Prof. Dr. A. van Deursen, Faculty EEMCS, TU Delft University supervisor: Prof. Dr. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Management Server Virtual V10.2.11 Adminhelp
    Security Management Server Virtual v10.2.11 AdminHelp Table of Contents Welcome ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 About Online Help ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Attributions & Copyrights .................................................................................................................................. 1 Get Started.......................................................................................................................................................... 23 Get Started with Dell Data Security ................................................................................................................ 23 Log In ............................................................................................................................................................... 23 Log Out ............................................................................................................................................................ 23 Dashboard ........................................................................................................................................................ 24 Change Superadmin Password ......................................................................................................................... 26 Components .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Concept-Oriented Programming: References, Classes and Inheritance Revisited
    Concept-Oriented Programming: References, Classes and Inheritance Revisited Alexandr Savinov Database Technology Group, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany http://conceptoriented.org Abstract representation and access is supposed to be provided by the translator. Any object is guaranteed to get some kind The main goal of concept-oriented programming (COP) is of primitive reference and a built-in access procedure describing how objects are represented and accessed. It without a possibility to change them. Thus there is a makes references (object locations) first-class elements of strong asymmetry between the role of objects and refer- the program responsible for many important functions ences in OOP: objects are intended to implement domain- which are difficult to model via objects. COP rethinks and specific structure and behavior while references have a generalizes such primary notions of object-orientation as primitive form and are not modeled by the programmer. class and inheritance by introducing a novel construct, Programming means describing objects but not refer- concept, and a new relation, inclusion. An advantage is ences. that using only a few basic notions we are able to describe One reason for this asymmetry is that there is a very many general patterns of thoughts currently belonging to old and very strong belief that it is entity that should be in different programming paradigms: modeling object hier- the focus of modeling (including programming) while archies (prototype-based programming), precedence of identities simply serve entities. And even though object parent methods over child methods (inner methods in identity has been considered “a pillar of object orienta- Beta), modularizing cross-cutting concerns (aspect- tion” [Ken91] their support has always been much weaker oriented programming), value-orientation (functional pro- in comparison to that of entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of Organization Exempt from Income
    OMB No. 1545-0047 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Form 990 Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except black lung benefit trust or private foundation) Open to Public Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service The organization may have to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements. Inspection A For the 2011 calendar year, or tax year beginning 5/1/2011 , and ending 4/30/2012 B Check if applicable: C Name of organization The Apache Software Foundation D Employer identification number Address change Doing Business As 47-0825376 Name change Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number Initial return 1901 Munsey Drive (909) 374-9776 Terminated City or town, state or country, and ZIP + 4 Amended return Forest Hill MD 21050-2747 G Gross receipts $ 554,439 Application pending F Name and address of principal officer: H(a) Is this a group return for affiliates? Yes X No Jim Jagielski 1901 Munsey Drive, Forest Hill, MD 21050-2747 H(b) Are all affiliates included? Yes No I Tax-exempt status: X 501(c)(3) 501(c) ( ) (insert no.) 4947(a)(1) or 527 If "No," attach a list. (see instructions) J Website: http://www.apache.org/ H(c) Group exemption number K Form of organization: X Corporation Trust Association Other L Year of formation: 1999 M State of legal domicile: MD Part I Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities: to provide open source software to the public that we sponsor free of charge 2 Check this box if the organization discontinued its operations or disposed of more than 25% of its net assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Technologies in Java EE
    Web Technologies in Java EE JAX-RS 2.0, JSON-P, WebSocket, JSF 2.2 $ whoami • Lukáš Fryč – Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat • AeroGear, (Arquillian, RichFaces) – Interests • HTML5, Web Components, AngularJS • Living and advocating Java EE (6 yrs) • Running, Hiking • Enjoying time with my family Agenda • Client-Side vs Server-Side Web • JAX-RS 2.0 RESTful Services – Origins + News in 2.0 • JSON-P Java API for JSON Processing • Java API for WebSocket • JSF 2.2 JavaServer Faces – Origins + News in 2.2 Client-Side vs Server-Side Web Architecture Client- vs. Server-Side Web • Server-Side Web (Thin Client) – Well-established approach – 90's, 00's • Client-Side Web (Thick Client) – Moden approach – SPA (Single Page Applications) – Fully leverages enhancements in web standards and protocols – 10's Server-Side Client-Side Client-Side Web Approach • Off-loading server – Stateless, Scalable • Client-Side Frameworks – AngularJS, Ember, Backbone, .......... • Standards improvements – HTML5 + Protocols • REST interfaces – Data-oriented, presentation independent Java API for RESTful Services JAX-RS 2.0 JAX-RS Origins • RESTful Principles – Assign everything an ID – Link things together – Use common methods (GET, POST, ...) – Stateless communication – OData, HATEOAS JAX-RS 1.0 Goals • POJO-Based API • HTTP Centric • Format Independence – plain/text – XML – HTML – JSON JAX-RS API • Resources – @Path • HTTP methods – @GET / @POST / @PUT / @DELETE / ... • Parameters – @PathParam / @QueryParam / ... • Media-Type – @Consumes / @Produces Demo JAX-RS Endpoint http://javaee-samples.github.io/ HTTP Method Purpose Method Meaning @GET Read, possibly cached @POST Modify or create without a known ID (modify/update) @PUT Modify or create with a known ID (create/modify) @DELETE Remove @HEAD GET with no response @OPTIONS Supported methods http://stackoverflow.com/questions/630453/put-vs-post-in-rest Parameter Injection Annotation Example @PathParam(“id”) @Path(“/consumer/{id}”) @QueryParam(“query”) GET /consumer/search? query=??? @CookieParam(“userna Cookie: ..
    [Show full text]
  • A Post-Apocalyptic Sun.Misc.Unsafe World
    A Post-Apocalyptic sun.misc.Unsafe World http://www.superbwallpapers.com/fantasy/post-apocalyptic-tower-bridge-london-26546/ Chris Engelbert Twitter: @noctarius2k Jatumba! 2014, 2015, 2016, … Disclaimer This talk is not going to be negative! Disclaimer But certain things are highly speculative and APIs or ideas might change by tomorrow! sun.misc.Scissors http://www.underwhelmedcomic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/runningdude.jpg sun.misc.Unsafe - What you (don’t) know sun.misc.Unsafe - What you (don’t) know • Internal class (sun.misc Package) sun.misc.Unsafe - What you (don’t) know • Internal class (sun.misc Package) sun.misc.Unsafe - What you (don’t) know • Internal class (sun.misc Package) • Used inside the JVM / JRE sun.misc.Unsafe - What you (don’t) know • Internal class (sun.misc Package) • Used inside the JVM / JRE // Unsafe mechanics private static final sun.misc.Unsafe U; private static final long QBASE; private static final long QLOCK; private static final int ABASE; private static final int ASHIFT; static { try { U = sun.misc.Unsafe.getUnsafe(); Class<?> k = WorkQueue.class; Class<?> ak = ForkJoinTask[].class; example: QBASE = U.objectFieldOffset (k.getDeclaredField("base")); java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool QLOCK = U.objectFieldOffset (k.getDeclaredField("qlock")); ABASE = U.arrayBaseOffset(ak); int scale = U.arrayIndexScale(ak); if ((scale & (scale - 1)) != 0) throw new Error("data type scale not a power of two"); ASHIFT = 31 - Integer.numberOfLeadingZeros(scale); } catch (Exception e) { throw new Error(e); } } } sun.misc.Unsafe
    [Show full text]
  • JAVA XML Mock Test
    JJAAVVAA XXMMLL MMOOCCKK TTEESSTT http://www.tutorialspoint.com Copyright © tutorialspoint.com This section presents you various set of Mock Tests related to JAVA XML Framework. You can download these sample mock tests at your local machine and solve offline at your convenience. Every mock test is supplied with a mock test key to let you verify the final score and grade yourself. JJAAVVAA XXMMLL MMOOCCKK TTEESSTT IIII Q 1 - Which of the following method is used to read contents in SAX parsing? A - startDocument B - characters C - startElement D - endElement Q 2 - Which of the following is true about JDOM Parser? A - It is java optimized, it uses java collection like List and Arrays. B - It works with DOM and SAX APIs and combines the best of the two. C - Both of the above. D - None of the above. Q 3 - Which of the following is true about JDOM Parser? A - It is of low memory footprint. B - It is nearly as fast as SAX based parser. C - Both of the above. D - None of the above. Q 4 - Which component of JDOM Parser represents DOM tree? A - Document B - Element C - Attribute D - Text Q 5 - Which component of JDOM Parser represents XML Element? A - Document B - Element C - Attribute D - Text Q 6 - Which component of JDOM Parser represents XML attribute? A - Document B - Element C - Attribute D - Text Q 7 - Which component of JDOM Parser represents text of XML tag? A - Document B - Element C - Attribute D - Text Q 8 - Which component of JDOM Parser represents comments in a XML document? A - Comment B - Element C - Attribute D - Text Q 9 - Which
    [Show full text]
  • Metro User Guide Metro User Guide Table of Contents
    Metro User Guide Metro User Guide Table of Contents Preface .............................................................................................................................. x 1. Introduction to Metro ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Required Software ................................................................................................ 1 1.2. What is WSIT? .................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1. Bootstrapping and Configuration ................................................................... 2 1.2.2. Message Optimization Technology ................................................................ 3 1.2.3. Reliable Messaging Technology .................................................................... 4 1.2.4. Security Technology ................................................................................... 4 1.3. How Metro Relates to .NET Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) ...................... 5 1.4. Metro Specifications ............................................................................................. 5 1.4.1. Bootstrapping and Configuration Specifications ............................................... 7 1.4.2. Message Optimization Specifications ............................................................. 8 1.4.3. Reliable Messaging Specifications ............................................................... 10 1.4.4. Security Specifications
    [Show full text]