The River Ingol a Water Framework Directive Local Catchment Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The River Ingol a Water Framework Directive Local Catchment Plan THE NORFOLK RIVERS TRUST RESTORING NORFOLK’S RIVERS THE RIVER INGOL A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN DEVELOPED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE RIVER STIFFKEY A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN | PAGE A THE NORFOLK RIVERS TRUST RESTORING NORFOLK’S RIVERS THE RIVER INGOL A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN WITH SUPPORT FROM THE RIVER STIFFKEY A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN | PAGE A CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction 1 The Water Framework Directive 1 This plan has been produced by Norfolk Rivers Trust in participate in setting objectives for an environmentally A choice of rivers for our future 2 consultation with relevant agencies, landowners, farmers sustainable solution for their area. Delivery of the actions and residents in the Ingol Catchment. The catchment is outlined in the plan will lead to improved water quality, River Ingol statistics 4 thought to be an appropriate scale to consider because ecosystem health, and should encourage economically Why restore rivers? 4 it encompasses the entire area which drains towards valuable fish species. the river so can involve even distant sources of pollution which could affect the river. The aim of the plan is to The plan begins by providing an audit of the current THE CATCHMENT provide an outline for improvement of the ecological state of the catchment. This information is then used to status of the Ingol, guided by the Water Framework identify ecological pressures. In the final stages of the The community 5 Directive (WFD). Setting ecological restoration objectives plan, solutions to these pressures are identified, costed Overview of restorations options 6 should be undertaken with community consultation, and prioritised. and Norfolk Rivers Trust is very keen for local people to Geodiversity of the river Ingol 7 Geodiversity of the Ingol valley 7 Wildlife surrounding the Ingol 9 A history of human management 11 The Ingol from source to mouth 11 THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE Section 1 – Source at Shernborne to Ingoldisthorpe (St Thomas’ Lane) 12 The Water Framework Directive (WFD) was introduced status must be achieved by 2021 or 2027, depending on Section 2 – Ingoldisthorpe (St Thomas’ Lane) to A149 14 in 2000 and commits European Union member states the severity of the barrier to good status. The majority Section 3 – A149 to Source to tidal sluice 16 to improving the physical and ecological quality of their of Britain’s rivers fail to attain good status due to a wide streams, rivers and lakes. The quality of these waters variety of pressures. In England, the Environment Agency is measured using a range of indicators outlined below are responsible for WFD delivery. THE PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS which combine to give a picture of a river’s health. Using this combination of indicators a river (or lake) is then The current report is informed by an existing technical How connected is the river along its course and to its floodplain? 18 graded on its overall “ecological status”, and designated Waterbody Report undertaken by the Environment Water quality 19 as either bad, poor, moderate, good or high. Each Agency, but also draws together information from other member state is required to bring its water bodies to sources, and is written with stakeholders as the intended Diffuse pollution 19 good status by 2015. Where this is not possible, good audience. Environmental flows and abstraction 19 River structure 19 Water Framework Current river Predicted by 2015 Invasive species 20 Directive Status Status (2009) Ecosystem 20 Bad Trees and woody debris 21 Poor Invertebrates Invertebrates Fish Fish AN ACTION PLAN Phosphate Phosphate Moderate Overall status Overall status Section 1 – Source at Shernborne to Ingoldisthorpe (St Thomas’ Lane) 22 Section 2 – Ingoldisthorpe (St Thomas’ Lane) to A149 22 Good Section 3 – A149 to Source to tidal sluice 23 High Dissolved Oxygen Dissolved Oxygen Ammonia Ammonia Costs and timeline 25 pH pH Further information 25 Heavily Modified Water Body for Heavily Modified Water Body for wider environment wider environment Author: Olly van Biervliet of Norfolk Rivers Trust Design: Ark Creative (UK) Ltd Hydrology supports good status Hydrology supports good status Table 1. Results of detailed water body investigations undertaken by the Environment Agency to determine This plan has been enriched by James Wilson Sarah Keane Ellis Selway the status of the River Ingol. A prediction about the status at the next “waypoint” in the WFD schedule (2015) THANKS cooperation and contributions Clive Fleming Valerie and Lorne Green Helen Blower also shown. from many different people Tim Makin Tim Holt-Wilson Richard Bowen and organisations. Norfolk Rivers Trust are grateful to the Mark Robinson Andrina Walmsley Kelly Powell help from these individuals, Claire Singh Emily Nobbs Jonah Tosney and do not seek to imply that Avril Wright Helen Baczkowska Jonathan Lewis the document is necessarily Robin Balaam Reed Kye Jerrom Chris Roberts endorsed by those listed here. NRT would like to thank all Steve and Sue Booth James Dyke Emmie van Biervliet those involved for their help: Alexander George Nina Birkby Sam Brown THE RIVER INGOL A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN (DRAFT) | PAGE 1 A CHOICE FOR THE FUT URE OF OUR RIVERS… PAGE 2 | THE RIVER INGOL A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN (Draft) THE RIVER INGOL A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN (Draft) | PAGE 3 RIVER INGOL STATISTICS SECTION 1 THE CATCHMENT Approximate river length: 10.3 km The Ingol is a chalk stream in North Norfolk which runs from the stream. A section of the river passes through Catchment area: 35.3 km2 from its source in Shernborne through a predominantly Ingoldisthorpe and Snettisham providing scenic nature Protected areas: Snettisham RSPB Nature Reserve and the coastline – SSSI, SAC, Ramsar site, SPA. rural catchment until its mouth close to Snettisham RSPB walks for the community. Below Snettisham, intensive Nature Reserve. Towards the headwaters of the stream, arable agriculture borders the stream and the Ingol has Legal designations: Natura 2000 (Habitats and/or Birds Directive), Nitrates Directive, Shellfish agriculture is represented by low intensity grazing by been modified to such an extent that it has almost no Water Directive cattle and captive red deer, with arable fields at a distance ecological value. THE COMMUNITY WHY RESTORE RIVERS? It is part of the Norfolk Rivers Trust’s mission to gain the active participation of the community. Stakeholders help Britain’s rivers generally fail to reach “good” ecological absorb and process pollutants. This enhances water us to set objectives, keep us informed about issues on the quality. This is both a problem in itself and a sentinel quality within limits. However, very polluted rivers have less ground such as pollution and actively volunteer to make of trouble. wildlife and in turn a reduced capacity to provide such many more worthwhile projects possible. benefits. This leads to a downward spiral. Wildlife itself A well-functioning river system is an inseparable has an intrinsic value and is enjoyed by groups such as Norfolk Rivers Trust have recently started to work in the combination of good water quality, distinctive physical fishermen, ramblers and bird watchers. Ingol catchment, and we were very pleased to receive processes and diverse wildlife. These factors interact over 70 people at our latest event. The River Ingol is a to provide benefits. A naturally functioning river has a If any of the three pillars of the river system are damaged rural catchment, containing the towns and villages of floodplain with sufficient capacity to absorb inundation (water quality, physical processes, ecosystem), then the Shernborne, Dersingham, Ingoldisthorpe and Snettisham. and to act as a store for silt carried by high flows. The river value of the entire interconnected system is reduced. channel is also self-scouring. This reduces flood risk and Arguably, we also have a responsibility to repair our An opportunity to restore a section of the River Ingol by the need for expensive management. Headwater forests damaged natural heritage for future generations. Thus, improving habitat has already been identified, and this reduce surges of water into the system by increasing ecological restoration aims to enhance the functioning, project will be greatly aided by the help of volunteers. drainage and removal of water. Moreover, the vegetation, as well as the intrinsic value of our beautiful rivers. Norfolk Rivers Trust are grateful for the help which microbes and invertebrates in the river corridor also landowners have given to make this project happen, and hope that more projects will be initiated in the near future. A Norfolk Rivers Trust event in Snettisham in March 2014 which was attended around 100 people. PAGE 4 | THE RIVER INGOL A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN (DRAFT) THE RIVER INGOL A WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE LOCAL CATCHMENT PLAN (DRAFT) | PAGE 5 Dorset. There are 12 such rivers in Norfolk. They are fed OVERVIEW OF RESTORATIONS OPTIONS GEODIVERSITY OF THE principally from groundwater rather than surface water, and flow is gradually released through springs or directly RIVER INGOL up through the river bed. Chalk rivers have a distinctive Summary of possible restoration options on the river Ingol. flow regime: their springheads tend to have steady flow, These proposals will greatly enhance the water quality although some headwater valleys may be dry in summer and wildlife value of the river. It is stressed that these are Introducing Chalk Rivers when groundwater levels fall. They tend to have more subject to landowner consent and are only outline ideas at stable temperature regimes than other rivers due to a this stage. Chalk rivers are a distinctive and valuable part of constant baseflow component. Their waters are highly England’s landscape. There are more to be found here alkaline, which gives rise to a distinctive ecology and than anywhere else in the world.
Recommended publications
  • Pre Submission Document
    Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Pre-Submission Document 311 Rural West Norfolk G G.80 Shernborne (SVAH) Smaller Village and Hamlet G.80.1 Shernborne is designated a ‘Smaller Village and Hamlet’ by the 2011 Core Strategy. As such it does not have any specific site allocations or a development boundary. G.80.2 Only very limited development would be expected here, and this would be judged against the range of policies in the Core Strategy and the Development Management Policies in this Plan (including, in particular, DM3: Infill Development in the Smaller Villages and Hamlets). G.81 Shouldham (RV) Rural Village Description G.81.1 Shouldham is situated approximately ten miles south east of King’s Lynn and approximately six miles north east of Downham Market. The village is based on a circuit form and the high quality character has been recognised through designation as a Conservation Area towards the south east of the settlement. Buildings are generally two-storey with the materials of the older buildings consisting of carstone, and red and yellow brick. Roofs are mainly pitched and of red clay pantiles and slates. The village has an adequate range of services including a school, a bus route, shop, Post Office and there are some employment opportunities. The Parish of Shouldham has a population of 605(61). G.81.2 In considering landscape character the village is situated within “Settled Farmland with Plantations” character type(62). This is defined as having intact mature landscape structure including mature parkland trees, intact hedgerows and woodland plantations. Also a patchwork of grazed parkland and a moderate to strong sense of tranquillity throughout the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of England's Chalk Streams
    FUNDED WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM REPORT UK 2014 The State of England’s Chalk Streams This report has been written by Rose O’Neill and Kathy Hughes on behalf of WWF-UK with CONTENTS help and assistance from many of the people and organisations hard at work championing England’s chalk streams. In particular the authors would EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 like to thank Charles Rangeley-Wilson, Lawrence Talks, Sarah Smith, Mike Dobson, Colin Fenn, 8 Chris Mainstone, Chris Catling, Mike Acreman, FOREWORD Paul Quinn, David Bradley, Dave Tickner, Belinda by Charles Rangeley-Wilson Fletcher, Dominic Gogol, Conor Linsted, Caroline Juby, Allen Beechey, Haydon Bailey, Liz Lowe, INTRODUCTION 13 Bella Davies, David Cheek, Charlie Bell, Dave Stimpson, Ellie Powers, Mark Gallant, Meyrick THE STATE OF ENGLAND’S CHALK STREAMS 2014 19 Gough, Janina Gray, Ali Morse, Paul Jennings, Ken Caustin, David Le Neve Foster, Shaun Leonard, Ecological health of chalk streams 20 Alex Inman and Fran Southgate. This is a WWF- Protected chalk streams 25 UK report, however, and does not necessarily Aquifer health 26 reflect the views of each of the contributors. Chalk stream species 26 Since 2012, WWF-UK, Coca-Cola Great Britain and Pressures on chalk streams 31 Coca-Cola Enterprises have been working together Conclusions 42 to secure a thriving future for English rivers. The partnership has focused on improving the health A MANIFESTO FOR CHALK STREAMS 45 of two chalk streams directly linked to Coca-Cola operations: the Nar catchment in Norfolk (where AN INDEX OF ENGLISH CHALK STREAMS 55 some of the sugar beet used in Coca-Cola’s drinks is grown) and the Cray in South London, near 60 to Coca-Cola Enterprises’ Sidcup manufacturing GLOSSARY site.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn 2018 Newsletter
    Newsletter Autumn 2018 bove is a copy taken from a section duce a long term management plan for few pails a day. Using a lot of water brings of Bryant’s 1826 Map of Norfolk and the additional water resource required to with it how is it used and what is in the Ayou might want to ponder what you meet forecast demand. The plan runs for waste water, apart from the obvious. It take from this before reading further. The 25 years with a rolling five year review by has to be treated at a sewage treatment flow through the articles in this Newslet- OFWAT. Anglian Water is working on their works and the effluent discharged into a ter is ‘water’, how we sourced and used it plan running from 2020-2045. There are river. The ‘raw’ water abstracted by a wa- in the past, and how we source, use and several factors involved and a significant ter company from aquifers and rivers has dispose of it now. The article content is all degree of uncertainty. The forecast is that long been recognised as containing nitrate, ‘local’ but reflects the wider situation in to avoid a water deficit at 2045 there is phosphate, and pesticides. Anglian Water East Anglia, and much nationally. A very an additional need for water resource of describes this as ‘an ongoing challenge’. wet spring followed by a very hot and dry between 307 and 472 million litres per A recent spillage from the water sew- summer raised media and public inter- DAY. The two largest factors are house- age network in the centre of Blakeney il- est.
    [Show full text]
  • North West Norfolk Abstraction Licensing Strategy
    North West Norfolk abstraction licensing strategy A strategy to manage water resources sustainably 227_10_SD01 version 7 8 May 2017 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment. Acting to reduce the impacts of a changing climate on people and wildlife is at the heart of everything we do. We reduce the risks to people, properties and businesses from flooding and coastal erosion. We protect and improve the quality of water, making sure there is enough for people, businesses, agriculture and the environment. Our work helps to ensure people can enjoy the water environment through angling and navigation. We look after land quality, promote sustainable land management and help protect and enhance wildlife habitats. And we work closely with businesses to help them comply with environmental regulations. We can’t do this alone. We work with government, local councils, businesses, civil society groups and communities to make our environment a better place for people and wildlife. Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon House, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2017 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 22 Contents Contents .....................................................................................................................................3 1. About the licensing strategy ..................................................................................................4 2. Water resource availability of the North West Norfolk abstraction licensing strategy ........4 2.1. Resource availability ..........................................................................................................4 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council (Anmer
    THE SANDRINGHAM ROYAL ESTATE It will be noticed that no public rights of way have been claimed across land comprising the Sandringham Royal Estate. As this is a private estate of Her Majesty the Queen it was mistakenly omitted from inclusion in the original survey of the definitive map and statement due to the belief that the estate was exempt from the provisions of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 as Crown Land. The Sandringham Royal Estate does not in fact qualify as Crown Land as a private estate of Her Majesty the Queen. All public rights of way within the Estate have, therefore, been mistakenly excluded from this survey. DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY KING'S LYNN AND WEST NORFOLK DISTRICT PARISH OF ANMER This parish lies wholly within the Sandringham Royal Estate which is exempt from the provisions of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act, 1949. PARISH OF BAGTHORPE-WITH-BARMER Restricted Byway No. 1 (Barmer-South Creake Road to Parish Boundary). Starts from the Barmer to South Creake Road, opposite Restricted Byway No. 2, and runs north north-westwards to the parish boundary. Restricted Byway No. 2 (Barmer-South Creake Road to Parish Boundary). Starts from the Barmer-South Creake Road and runs south eastwards for approximately 330 yards, then bears more easterly running through Manor Ling Wood to the parish boundary where it joins Syderstone Restricted Byway No. 4. Restricted Byway No. 3 (Barmer-South Creake Road to Parish Boundary). Starts from the Barmer-South Creake Road at Barmer Farm and runs in a south easterly direction to the parish boundary at the north east corner of Twenty Acre Plantation where it joins Syderstone Restricted Byway No.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Lynn IDB: Inspection Report 2011
    KING’S LYNN INTERNAL DRAINAGE BOARD SUMMER INSPECTION WEDNESDAY 20 JULY 2011 Page 1 of 17 ITINERARY 09:45 – 10:00 Board Room, Kettlewell House – Coffee 10:00 Depart Kettlewell House Note: via Tennyson Avenue, The Walks flood plain on right; via Nar-Ouse Way, Pierrepointe Pumping Station on left; via Eau Brink Road, Straight Mile Outfall into River Great Ouse 10:25 20 minute stop at Islington Pumping Station and Straight Mile 10:45 Depart Islington PS following the route of the main Smeeth Lode Note: replaced Black Ditch outfall on right; Greenbank Pumping Station and Museum on left 15 minute stop at Smeeth Road, Emneth Hungate to view completed flood storage 11:10 pond. Short explanation of purpose – off-line storage during event - and incidental benefits – biodiversity habitat. Lady’s Drove, Emneth Hungate – short pause to view larger flood storage pond across 11:35 approx intervening field (not possible to take coach closer to site) A47 Wisbech Bypass (pause in abandoned petrol station entrance) – View potential 11:55 approx development land and discuss Developer Contributions 12:10 Arrive lunch venue (Elme Hall Hotel, Wisbech) 14:00 Depart lunch venue On route along A47 and A149, the Engineer will highlight points of interest including: • Possible need for pond in future to protect north-east Wisbech to east of bypass on DRN145P1001 • Protection options for Hardwick Ind. Est. (pause in layby if possible) • King’s Reach Attenuation Pond and Pumping Station • Gaywood Flood Plain and River valley • Babingley River 15:00 20 minute stop
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Trends Report
    Coastal Trends Report The Wash (Gibraltar Point to Old Hunstanton) RP002/W/2007 March 2007 i We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Shoreline Management Group Environment Agency Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way Orton goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency 2007 Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: All rights reserved. This document may be http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk reproduced with prior permission of or our National Customer Contact Centre: T: the Environment Agency. 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. ii The Wash from the mouth of the River Witham (Photo: Environment Agency) Contents 1.0 THE ANGLIAN COASTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society
    Norfolk Bird & Mammal Report 2.“1 S . <P THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY (Reg Charity No 291604) www.nnns.org.uk The county’s senior natural history society. It has for its principal objectives the practical study of natural science, the conservation of wildlife, the publication of papers on natural history, especially those relating to the county of Norfolk, arranging lectures and meetings and the promotion of active field work. Specialist groups cover most aspects of the county's flora and fauna. Annual Subscription Rate: Publications: Individual/Family £12 Transactions Affiliated Groups £15 Bird & Mammal Report Overseas Members £18.50 Quarterly newsletter “Natterjack' Secretary: Membership Secretary: Dr R Carpenter D L Pauli 33 Low Street 8 Lindford Drive Wicklewood Eaton Wymondham NR18 9QG Norwich NR4 6LT © Norfolk & Norwich Naturalists’ Society. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner, except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Application for permission should be addressed to the publisher, the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists’ Society, Castle Museum, Norwich NRl 3JU. Front cover photognipir. Little Egrets (Julian Blnilerao) Back cover photograph-. Harvest Mice (Mike Toms) NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 2004 Editor: Giles Dunmore Editorial Review of the Year Wetland
    [Show full text]
  • SANITARY SURVEY REPORT the Wash October 2013
    www.cefas.defra.gov.uk EC Regulation 854/2004 CLASSIFICATION OF BIVALVE MOLLUSC PRODUCTION AREAS IN ENGLAND AND WALES SANITARY SURVEY REPORT The Wash October 2013 Cover photo: Shellfish boats on the Wash. © Crown copyright 2014 This document/publication is also available on our website at: http://www.cefas.defra.gov.uk/our-science/animal-health-and-food-safety/food-safety/sanitary- surveys/england-and-wales.aspx Contacts For enquires relating to this report or For enquires relating to policy matters on further information on the implementation the implementation of sanitary surveys in of sanitary surveys in England and England: Wales: Simon Kershaw Karen Pratt Food Safety Group Hygiene Delivery Branch Cefas Weymouth Laboratory Local Delivery Division Barrack Road Food Standards Agency The Nothe Aviation House Weymouth 125 Kingsway Dorset London DT4 8UB WC2B 6NH +44 (0) 1305206600 +44 (0) 207 276 8970 [email protected] [email protected] Statement of use This report provides a sanitary survey relevant to bivalve mollusc beds within The Wash, as required under EC Regulation 854/2004 which lays down specific rules for official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption. It provides an appropriate hygiene classification zoning and monitoring plan based on the best available information with detailed supporting evidence. The Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas) undertook this work on behalf of the Food Standards Agency (FSA). Report prepared by Alastair Cook,
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Rivers Trust David Diggens CEO European Status 2018 Any RED= NOT GOOD Integrated Constructed Wetlands Applications
    Norfolk Rivers Trust David Diggens CEO European Status 2018 Any RED= NOT GOOD Integrated Constructed Wetlands Applications Forest and Industrial (food ponds processing) intercepting Flood attenuation wastewater land drainage and treatment treatment Water management through the coherent reanimation of ‘integrated’ constructed wetland types In situ Recreational treatment of Municipal wastewater self cleansing landfill leachate treatment swimming pond Two Wetlands: One Outcome Water Quality in Norfolk’s Chalk Rivers Improved 1) River Mun, Northrepps Wetland (Pilot Scheme) • Established winter 2014 • Private agreement with landowner • Catering for 800 inhabitants • Proved the science which led to Anglian Water Ingol project • Phosphate focus 2) River Ingol AWG Sponsored May 2018 • Larger ambitions - 6000 inhabitants • Ammonia focus • Great opportunity to compare and contrast • Research – micro plastics and other water-vectored substances • SIP 3 Special Investigations • Potential for NATIONAL IMPACT The eutrophication of this lake highlighted a Northrepps Wetland phosphate problem in the River Mun 2014 River Mun Catchment First steps – the Northrepps wetland • Constructed in October 2014 • 0.4 hectare site • Site size dictated by population size. • Targeting phosphate in particular Treatment Plant Northrepps Wetland • Fantastic community buy in – 60+ local volunteers involved in creation • Team of Riverfly volunteers monitoring invertebrate changes downstream • Wildlife watching hide set up for locals on site: kingfishers, barn owl, otters,
    [Show full text]
  • 12 June 2018
    Broadland Catchment Partnership - Steering Group SITE VISIT NOTES and PARTNER UPDATES Tuesday 12th June 2017 (10.30am – 12.30pm) Ingol Wetland, Ingoldisthorpe Attendees: Andrea Kelly (chair), Donna Dean, Rob Holland, Simon Hooton, Emily Long, Neil Punchard, Rory Sanderson, Ian Skinner, Jamie Smith, Sarah Taigel, Jonah Tosney, Rob Wise, Lottie Carlton (minutes). Apologies: Katy Anderson, Robert Camps, Richard Cooper, Richard Mason, Matt Philpot, Will Robinson 1. Site Visit to Ingol Wetland Jonah Tosney welcomed everyone to the Ingol Wetland and took the group on a site visit to learn about the project. Apologies as above. Huge thanks to Jonah from the Norfolk Rivers trust for showing members of the Broadland Catchment Steering Group around the new Ingol Wetlands project between Ingoldisthorpe and Shernbourne. This £500,000 project has created one hectare of new wetland, made up of four shallow interconnected ponds planted with native chalk wetland species such as iris, sedges, rush, marsh marigold and watercress. Thanks also to all those who were able to make it, we hope that the following gives an overview to those not able to make the site visit. Ingoldisthorpe Water Recycling Centre is sited on the banks of the River Ingol, a rare chalk stream. The outfall from the WRC met the standards set by the Environment Agency quality procedures however EA monitoring of the River Ingol identified that the WRC was still the largest source of phosphates entering the river. High levels of phosphates cause rapid algae growth which can damage the natural river environment, particularly serious for chalk stream habitats. With chemicals like phosphates and ammonia coming from urban areas (due to domestic products like detergents and waste) the plants in the wetland filter the treated water further removing the need for expensive carbon treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Babingley Catchment 8 Key Successes 2.1 Babingley Catchment – the Place 8 • 730 Followers on Twitter @9Chalkrivers
    9 Chalk River Project Community Engagement Report Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens “can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has. Margaret Mead ” Contents Summary of key engagement successes for the 9 Chalk Summary of key engagement successes for the 9 Chalk Rivers Project 1 Summary of river enhancements and community work 2 Rivers Project 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE 9 CHALK RIVERS PROJECT 4 Key issues 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Why the project was undertaken and the role of local communities 4 Lack of access to rivers, increased development, loss of green 1.3 Overall management of the project 5 space, pollution in the river, loss of habitat and a need for people to 1.4 The project team 5 get out into the wider countryside to learn about the local environ- 1.5 Location of rivers 6 ment, health of the rivers and their wildlife and how these could be 1.6 How community engagement has been measured through the project 6 improved, water quality, continued support for farming to maintain 1.7 Structure of this report 6 profitable production, silt, localised flooding and better understand- ing of the rivers and their catchments. 2. THE RIVERS 7 2. Babingley catchment 8 Key successes 2.1 Babingley catchment – The place 8 • 730 followers on Twitter @9ChalkRivers. 2.2 The community 9 2.3 Practical work to the river 9 • Over 500 people subscribed to the 9 Chalk 2.4 Events in the Babingley catchment 9 Rivers Project newsletter. 2.5 Results of engagement and future for the river 10 • Over 70 public events held covering all 9 river 3.
    [Show full text]