The Implementation of start (d) librarian assistantship to help writers or researchers to create scholarly in Library article that has an impact. as an Alternative From Altmetrics, the scholar can (1) Measurement Method for explore the impact of scholarly article; (2) manage the scholarly reputation. The result Scholarly Article Impact in of this study can be a basic consideration Social Web Ecosystem for the librarians to develop their collection based on the impact of scholarly article and Nuning Kurniasih the requirement of users. Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor-Indonesia [email protected] Key words: Altmetrics, Scholarly Article, Social Web Ecosystem PROCEEDINGS International Conference on Science Mapping and the Development of Science Yogyakarta, 20-21 April 2016 For decades, libraries have been using Publisher: Library and Information Management as a method to measure the Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University of a scholarly journal and h- Page: 63-73 index of personal reputation by counting : the number. Along with the Altmetrics is an alternative method to inception of various media platform of complement the traditional method to information and communication, however, measure impact of scholarly articles in Bibliometrics is considered no longer able social web ecosystem. This paper aims to to meet the requirement of measurement examine how the librarians can implement standard published in new media, especially Altmetrics in their library so it can deliver in social web or social media. However, high impact scholarly article. The method nowadays social web makes scholarly to reach the aim is by evaluation method. communication more open and varied than The study shows that (1) The librarian has before. The use of scholarly articles is not an important role in disseminating, training only marked by a conventional citation, but as well as for administrative assessor of also can share through the links, blog posts, Altmetrics (2) The scholarly trends in tweets, bookmarks, discussions on social articles mostly use digital format forum and others. These are the reasons with interactive dialog. It is marked by the why Bibliometrics cannot represent the increasing presence of the scholar in impact of the scholarly article properly and various social media platform which can need an alternative metrics. build effective communication among Altmetrics comes up as an alternative researchers. (3) that social media have method to complement the traditional brought the activity of sharing and method to measure impact of scholarly collaborating not only among researchers articles in social web ecosystem. By using on the same field but also on the different Altmetrics, scholarly articles impact is not field. (4) The impact of scholarly article on only seen from the number of but the social web can be seen from how many also the number of visitors, readers, links clicks, reads, shares, saves/downloads, shared, mentions, conversation, saves / discussions in a forum, adaptations, downloads, adaptations, reviews, and other reviews of a scholarly article, etc.(5) To social media usage in real time and implement Altmetrics in the Library, the immediately. library will need to prepare (a) Altmetrics knowledge and skills for librarians (b) organization support (c) good willing to Study Purposes search engine evaluation and purely This paper aims to examine how the descriptive studies of the web. librarian can implement Altmetrics in their Since 2004, every 6 months, library so it can deliver high impact articles webometrics.info provides assessment for for the users. From this study, it can be university ranking in the world through the concluded: university's website. According to 1. What are the roles of librarians on webometrics.info, Altmetrics dissemination? “The original aim of the ranking is to 2. How is the tendency of the scholar in promote academic web presence, publishing their article on the ? supporting the 3. How does the scholar share the initiatives for increasing significantly knowledge and collaborate with other the transfer of scientific and cultural scholars? knowledge generated by the 4. How is the impact of scholarly article universities to the whole Society” published in social web? (Aguillo, 2016). 5. How to implementation of Atmetrics in a Like Bibliometrics, Webometrics has some library? disadvantages, especially when a website is not indexed by Google and no major search The result of this study can be a basic engine allows useful hyperlink searches. consideration for the librarians to develop Another web metrics is Altmetrics. their collection based on the trend or Altmetrics or Alternative Metrics used for popularity and the requirement of users. measuring the impact of online events and interactions (Didegah, Bowman, & Holmberg, 2015). using 1. Bibliometrics vs Web Metrics "doughnut" symbol. This symbol is a way To measure the quality of scholarly works, for visualising the reach and impact of an Bibliometrics used Journal Impact Factor article. The symbol can be seen at Figure 1 (JIF) and counted the citation number. JIF below: created by Institute of Scientific Figure 1 Information (ISI – now Thomson Reuters) Doughnut/Symbol of Altmetrics in 1960. JIF is used to assess the quality and prestige of a journal. A journal and an article are considered to have the prestige and quality when article in the journals cited by many authors. Source : altmerics.com However, Bibliometrics have some From Figure 1, we can see that the symbol disadvantages: of Altmetrics is colorful. It shows the 1. Many papers are not published in various of online sources and it can be journals, while the Bibliometrics focus attached to the online resource. The score in on the journal. the center of the doughnut is based on: (1) 2. Bibliometrics needs much time so it how many people share or mention the delays the calculation of the citations. article (2) where they mention it (3) who is 3. Bibliometrics does not accommodate talking about it (University of Leeds, 2014). information search and dissemination Briefly, area among Bibliometrics, through new media such as social web Webometrics and Altmetrics can be seen at or social media. Figure 2 below: On the other hand, Webometrics / Cybermetrics and Altmetrics come up to Figure 2 cover web metrics. Sources of Webometrics The Relationship between the Different are link analysis, web citation analysis, Metrics based Research Area Blogs, Pinterest, Weibo users, Reddiators, Delicious, GitHub, Reddit, StackExchange, SourceForge, Amazon, Science Seeker, Datasift, etc.

3. How Altmetrics Works (Holmberg, 2016) There are several steps to start working with From Figure 2, we can see that Informatics altmetrics: overshadows all research fields with a. Embed Altmetrics to website, for analyzing quantitative aspects in Library example from altmetric.com : and Information Science, consist 1. Copy and paste the javascript Bibliometrics, , snippet of altmetric.com into the Cybermetrics, Webometrics and website HTML. Altmetrics. Some references reveal that 2. Find the DOI or other persistent Cybermetrics is Webometrics, while some identifier of the item and use it others distinguish both. to build a badge of website. 3. Copy and paste a simple snippet of 2. Tools of Altmetrics HTML into the webpage to display Altmetrics is Article-Level-Metrics the badge. (ALMs). “ALMs are rapidly emerging as b. Use Altmetrics in all your social web. important tools to quantify how individual Source: (University of Leeds, 2014) articles are being discussed, shared, and used” (Tananbaum, 2013). According to Agents of Altmetrics Richard Cave of Public Library of Science According to González-Fernández- (PLOS), the sources of ALM can be broken Villavicencio, et al, there are six agents of down into five categories, there are usages, altmetris, consisting of: “1) Suppliers, 2) captures, mentions, social media and editors, firms and organizations which citations (Tananbaum, 2013). measure the impact of research with Tools of Altmetrics including: alternative metrics; 3) scientific journals; 4) 1. CiteULike repositories; 5) researchers 6. Librarians” 2. F1000 (González-Fernández-Villavicencio, 3. Citations Dominguez-Aroca, Calderón-Rehecho, & 4. Hernández, 20XX) 5. Zotero For supplier the main tool is PLUM 6. Altmetric.com Analytics by EBSCO. PLUM Analytics is a 7. ImpactStory payment service. They have ORCID 8. Plum Analytics Identifiers to connect with researchers’s 9. Figshare profile, Public Library of Science (PLOS) 10. PaperCritic to connect among the editors which supply 11. PLoS (Public Library of Science) altmetrics data. Impact Explorer 12. ResearchGate, Key Performance Indicators of Social 13. Scholarometer Media 14. To maximize Altmetrics, we need to select 15. ScienceCard the appropriate social media. Here is some 16. Academia.edu Key Performance Indicator for social Those tools of Altmetrics are supported by media: social media such as: , , Table 1 Youtube, Wikipedia, Vimeo, Google+, Matrix KPI for Social Media SlideShare, Blogs, Researchblogging.org, Social Key Term Success Media Indicators Twitter 1. Favorite 1. Increase in c. Expose Evaluation program to see the Engagement 2. Retweet overall program impact. Metrics 3. Mention engagement One of evaluation models was developed by 2. Increase in website Stufflebeam, consisting of: visits CONTEXT–INPUT–PROCESS-PRODUCT from (Stufflebeam, 2003) Twitter Twitter 1. Followers 1. Increase in Study Results Followers 2. Following followers Metric 2. Increase in 1. The Roles of Librarians in Altmetrics engagements Dissemination Facebook 1. Page Likes 1. Increase in The main purpose of the library service is to Page Like 2. Visits page likes meet the information needs and interests of Metric 2. Increase in users. To provide the information the users visits 3. Increase in needed quickly and appropriately, we engagements require an in-depth analysis of various data. Facebook 1. Likes 1. Increase in The data can be seen from the number of People 2. Comments People access to the level of popularity and impact Talking 3. Shares Talking of information resources, including About This 4. Mention About This scholarly articles. Metric 5. Event 2. Increase in RSVP overall In online environment, level of popularity 6. Review engagement and impact can be seen from how many Facebook 1. Likes 1. Increase in clicks, reads, shares, saves/downloads, Engagement 2. Comments overall discussions in a forum, adaptations, reviews Metrics 3. Shares engagement. of a scholarly article, etc. 4. Clicks 2. Increase in 5. Reach post reach. The librarian has an important role to 3. Increase in accommodate conventional media to new website media characteristics changes. The changes visits from in these characteristics lead to the Facebook. development of a new measurement tool in Key Social Impact of 1. Website assessing a scholarly article impact. For Metrics referrals social media 2. Conversion efforts on other example, when librarians aware of the s, marketing limitations of Bibliometrics and 3. Engagemen channels Webometrics / Cybermetrics in measuring t on social the scholarly articles impact that published sites via the social web, then the librarian could (Klipfolio Inc, 2016) try Alternative Metrics (Altmetrics). Hoffman and Fodor in Holmberg (2016) Librarians have an important role in the explained that KPI for social web includes disseminating of Altmetrics as mention by indicating awareness such as number of González-Fernández-Villavicencio, et al, : members, comments, replies, likes, “Librarians have an important role in the subscribers, active users, etc., and word of disseminating of altmetrics and in the mouth to deliver opinion by number of training of using them in the best interests retweets, inlinks, bookmarks, etc. of their researchers’ scientific (Holmberg, 2016) publications. This role is also important as assessors for the administration in order Study Method to value these metrics in university This study is an evaluation research. The processes, as well as their inclusion in steps of an evaluation research are: catalogs, databases or repositories” a. Pre-Evaluation Program as a (González-Fernández-Villavicencio, preliminary study. b. Ongoing Program to solve the problem. Dominguez-Aroca, Calderón-Rehecho, & a. Social media tools are gaining Hernández, 20XX). acceptance and trust in academic circle. Thus, the librarian has an important role in b. Scholar use social media to keep up date disseminating and training as well as for with development in their area. administrative assessor. c. Many academics like to read or comment The result of Altmetrics can be a basic on blog posts, but fewer are incline to consideration for the librarians to develop maintain their own blog. their collections and repositories based on d. Academics social networking sites are the impact of scholarly article and the becoming more popular. requirement of users. (Gruzd, Goertzen, & Mai, 2012) What about the Altmetrics application in The Social networking which are the most Indonesia? Currently there is no library in popular in Science and Engineering Indonesia implementing Altmetrics to scholarly circles are Google Scholar, measure the impact of a scholarly article. To ResearchGate, Linkedln, Facebook, disseminate Altmetrics can be started by Google+, Twitter, ResearcherID, adding Altmetrics in Subject of Mendeley, ORCID, Academia.edu, Bibliometrics in university curriculum, and BioMedExperts and trainings or workshops organized by the Search. Meanwhile, the social networking association of profession in Librarianship. which are most popular in Social Science, When Altmetrics course can be Art and Humanities are GoogleScholar, disseminated properly to the librarian, the Facebook, Linkedln, ResearchGate, library is expected to be able to implement Academia.edu, Twitter, Google+, of Altmetrics to their library. Mendeley, ResearcherID, ORCID and Microsoft (Noorden, 2. The Tendency of The Scholar in 2014). Publishing their Article From the research results above, it can be A study shows that there is an increased concluded that the scholarly trends in presence of researchers and research groups publishing articles mostly use digital format on social media (González-Fernández- with interactive dialog. It is marked by the Villavicencio, Dominguez-Aroca, increasing presence of the scholar in Calderón-Rehecho, & Hernández, 20XX). various social media platform which can According to Dunham, there are six trends build effective communication among that have impacted positively on the researchers. dissemination of research, regardless of the That phenomenon is very obvious that we discipline, by making the content to be more need the other measuring tools that accessible, visible, and sustainable: complements Bibliometrics, and Altmetrics a. Digital forms of publishing. can accommodate it. b. Parsing and leveraging content. c. Connecting with associated content 3.The Scholars Share and Collaborate on environments. the Internet d. Increasing receptivity to multimedia A research result shows what the scholars components. do when visiting academics social networks e. Growing interactivity and dialogue using as follows: Web 2.0. 1. Follow discussion f. Moving to mobile. 2. Comment on research (Dunham, 2011) 3. Actively discuss research The trend changes of dissemination of 4. Share links and authored content research influence the change of scholarly 5. Post (work) content landscape. For example, a survey result 6. Contact Peers reveals that: 7. Track Metrics 8. Discover Jobs d. Technical readiness means availability 9. Discover Peers of technology to support collaboration. 10. Discover Recommended Papers (He & Jeng, 2016) 11. Use informally In the Evolution of scholarly access and 12. Browse only: not maintaining profile sharing there is Scholarly Collaboration 13. Incase contacted Networks (SCN) Working Group. SCNs is (Noorden, 2014) a platforms that enable researchers to Sharing and collaborating is important develop and maintain professional activities besides transferring knowledge to relationships, enabling the discussion of each other. research and the sharing of results, articles Talja divides information sharing to four and data (King, 2015) types: Hence, it can be concluded that social media a. Strategic sharing for maximizing have brought the activity of sharing and efficiency in a research group. collaborating not only among researchers b. Paradigmatic sharing within a on the same field but also on the different discipline or across disciplines. field. This advancement is supported by the c. Directive sharing: information sharing platform which enable them to build between teachers and students. effective communication among d. Social sharing as a relationship- and researchers. community-building activity. How many a scholarly article discussed and (Talja, 20xx) shared by the authors who collaborate will Information sharing is the essence to build be collected by Altmetrics. and maintain social relationships (ERDELEZ & RIOUX, 2000, p. 228). 4.The Impact of Scholarly Article Good social relation among individuals Published in Social Web with the organization is the key to be There are types of data in social web: successful in scholar collaboration. Table 2 Scholar collaboration can be arranged in Classes of Platform and Tool that two ways, namely: Provide Data for Altmetrics a. Vertical Research Collaboration (VRC) Applications In VRC, a researcher collaboration with Types of data Examples another researcher from the same field General Mentions, links, Twitter, to complete a very specific research social ‘likes’, Facebook, networking bookmarks to Del.icio.us project and area. application articles b. Horizontal Research Collaboration s (HRC). In HRC a researcher Specialized Links, Zotero.org, collaboration with another researcher research bookmarks, Mendeley.co from interdisciplinary to look for tools recommendation m, s, additions to Citeulike.org diverse avenues for research from reading groups different fields. Publisher Web page views, PLoS, , (Shaikh, 2014) platforms PDF downloads, Pubmed There are four factors that affect the success Abstract views of the scholar collaboration: Research Views, Github.com, a. Common ground, which is character output, recommendation Datadryad.org publishing s, shares , sharing among the members and its component Slideshare.net, cover a range of concept of work. s Figshare.com, b. Coupling work. Source: ImpactStory in (Taylor, 2013) c. Collaborative readiness, which is a According to Hoffmann, CristophLutz, & motivation to collaborate. Meckel, impact matrics are described as multifaced constructs, on four pillars: usage, peer-review, citation and Altmetrics (Hoffmann, CristophLutz, & Meckel, 2014). Altmetrics service ImpactStory, for example, collects data from social media like we can see on the Table 2. Then it creates a statistics to show the article impact. Here is an example how Altmetrics on altmetric.com works. Firstly, we need to (1) install a free browser bookmarklet from Altmetric (2) open the article to see its metrics through PubMed, arXiv or pages containing a DOI. (3) Click “Altmetric It” on Bookmark (4) Altmetrics shows. “Altmetric started supporting a publisher after July 2011 then Twitter mentions are only available from that date onwards“ (Altmetrics.com, n.d.) It is the result of Altmetrics for the article with the tittle: Effect of a Vitamin/Mineral Supplement on Children and Adults with Altmetrics shows that the article with the Autism. title “Effect of a Vitamin/Mineral Figure 3 Supplement on Children and Adults with Summary of Altmetrics Autism” is in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked (5,000,595) (Altmetric.com, 2016). So, the impact of scholarly article on the social web can be seen from how many clicks, reads, shares, saves/downloads, discussion in a forum, adaptations, reviews of a scholarly article, etc. From Altmetrics, the scholar can: a. Explore the impact of scholarly article. b. Manage the scholarly reputation.

5. The Implementation of Atmetrics in Library To implement Altmetrics in the Library, the library will need to prepare the following things: 1. Having an equal perception that one of the tasks of the library is to help institutions and researchers to provide information sources up to date and have the impact. 2. Support from the institution. 3. Training of the librarians with knowledge of Altmetrics. 4. The librarian assistantship, so the 5. The impact of scholarly article on the librarian can help writers or researchers social web can be seen from how many to create scholarly article that has an clicks, reads, shares, saves/downloads, impact. discussions in a forum, adaptations, 5. The identification of trends scholarly reviews of a scholarly article, etc. article by the librarian to develop 6. The librarian has an important role in collections and repositories. disseminating, training as well as for 6. The dissemination of Altmetrics administrative assessor. knowledge to the other librarians or 7. The result of Altmetrics can be a basic writers. consideration for the librarians to develop their collections and Discussion repositories based on the impact of scholarly article and the requirement of Altmetrics is a new measurement tool so it users. is still in the experimental and development stage. There are several advantages in using Bibliography Altmetrics, such as Aguillo, I. F. (2016, January 1). a. The ability to measure the number of Methodology. Retrieved from Ranking citation based on social web quickly; Web of Universities: b. The ability to measure the diverse http://www.webometrics.info/en/Metho impact from a scholarly article quickly; dology c. Improving information sharing and Altmetric.com. (2016, April). Effect of a collaboration among the authors. vitamin/mineral supplement on children On the other hand, Altmetrics has and adults with autism. Retrieved from limitation: Altmetric: a. Social websites tend to have no quality https://www.altmetric.com/details/4895 control so Altmetrics cannot measure 41#score the quality of scholarly article. Altmetrics.com. (2014). Case Study : b. Concerns about data manipulation on University of Cambrige. Retrieved from the metrics. Altmetrics.com: https://www.altmetric.com/case- Conclusion studies/university-of-cambridge-2/ Altmetrics can be implemented in the Altmetrics.com. (n.d.). Bookmarklet for library with some considerations: Researchers. Retrieved from Altmetrics: 1. There is an increased presence of https://www.altmetric.com/products/fre researchers and research groups and e-tools/bookmarklet/ distribute scholarly article on social Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). web. Toward a basic framework for 2. The evolution of scholarly access, webometrics. Journal of the American sharing and collaboration based on Society for Information Science and social web. Technology Vol.55, 1216-1227. 3. Bibliometrics is considered no longer Bonasio, A. (2015, January 12). Newsflo able to meet the requirement of brings new impact metrics to Mendeley. measurement standard published in new Retrieved April 2, 2016, from media, especially in social web or social https://blog.mendeley.com/2015/01/12/ media. newsflo-brings-new-impact-metrics-to- 4. Altmetrics is an alternative method to mendeley/ complement the traditional method to Didegah, F., Bowman, T. D., & Holmberg, measure impact of scholarly articles in K. (2015, October 25). The need for social web ecosystem. more sophisticated altmetric indicators: https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio A proposal for the categorization and n/259702938_Impact_Factor_20_Apply development of aggregate indicators. ing_Social_Network_Analysis_to_Scie Retrieved from The 2015 Altmetrics ntific_Impact_Assessment Workshop: Holmberg, K. (2016). Altmetrics for http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics15/didega Information Professionals : Past, h/ Present and Future. USA: . Duke University Medical Center Library & Howard, J. (2013, Juni 03). Rise of Archives. (2015, December 2015). 'Altmetrics' Revives Questions About Altmetrics for Researchers. Retrieved How to Measure Impact of Research. April 1, 2016, from Retrieved April 01, 2016, from http://guides.mclibrary.duke.edu/altmetr http://chronicle.com/article/Rise-of- ics Altmetrics-Revives/139557/ Dunham, G. (2011, February). What are Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Trends in Scholarly Publishing? Discourse Analysis as Theory and Retrieved from asha.org: Method. London • Thousand Oaks • New http://www.asha.org/Academic/question Delhi: SAGE Publications. s/Trends-Scholarly-Publishing/ King, G. (2015, October 5). The Evolution ERDELEZ, S., & RIOUX, K. (2000). of Scholarly Access and Sharing: A Sharing information encountered for Summary. Retrieved from Digital others on the Web. New Review of Science: https://www.digital- Information Behaviour Research 1(1), science.com/blog/events/the-evolution- 2000, 219-233, 219-233. of-scholarly-access-and-sharing-a- Galloway, L. M., & Pease, J. L. (2013). summary/ Altmetrics for the Information Klipfolio Inc. (2016). Social Media Metrics Professional: A Primer. Libraries' and and KPI Examples : Interact, measure, Librarians'Publications, : analyze, profit. Retrieved from Klipfolio http://surface.syr.edu/sul/105. Inc: González-Fernández-Villavicencio, N., https://www.klipfolio.com/resources/kpi Dominguez-Aroca, M.-I., Calderón- -examples/social-media Rehecho, A., & Hernández, P. G. Kock, N. (2009). E-Collaboration: (20XX). What role do librarians play in Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and altmetrics? Retrieved from Applications. Hershey - New York: http://eprints.rclis.org/25481/1/Altmetri Information Science Reference. cs.pdf Liu, J., & Adie, E. (2014, March 26). Gruzd, A., Goertzen, M., & Mai, a. P. Realising the Potential of Altmetrics (2012). Survey Results Highlights: within Institutions Trends in Scholarly Communication and http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue72/liu- Knowledge Dissemination in the Age of adie#sthash.M5HVe4iv.dpuf. Retrieved Social Media. Social Media . Canada: April 1, 2016, from Lab , Dalhousie University. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue72/liu- He, D., & Jeng, W. (2016). Scholarly adie#sthash.M5HVe4iv.dpuf Communication on the Academic Social López-Cózar, E. D., Robinson-García, N., Web. Chapel Hill: Morgan & Claypool & Torres-Salinas, D. (2012). Publishers. Manipulating Google Scholar Citations Hoffmann, C. P., CristophLutz, & Meckel, and Google Scholar Metrics:simple, M. (2014, January). Impact Factor 2.0 : easy and tempting. Granada: Appliying Social Networks Alalysis to Universidad de Granada. Scientific Impact Assesment. Retrieved Melero, R. (2015). Altmetrics – a from ResearchGate: complement to conventional metrics. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun; 25(2), Trends Issue 33: 152-160. http://www.researchtrends.com/issue- Noorden, R. V. (2014, August 15). Online 33-june-2013/the-challenges-of- collaboration: Scientists and the social measuring-social-impact-using- network. Retrieved from Nature altmetrics/ International Weekly Journal of Science University of Leeds. (2014, August xx). Vol. 512 Issue 7513: Bibliometrics : an Overview. Retrieved http://www.nature.com/news/online- from Researcher at Library, The collaboration-scientists-and-the-social- University Library: network-1.15711 https://library.leeds.ac.uk/downloads/fil Scott, N. (2012, December 17). Altmetrics e/265/bibliometrics_an_overview. are the central way of measuring communication in the digital age but what do they miss? Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialscie nces/2012/12/17/scott-altmetrics- central-digital-whats-missing/ Shaikh, A. A. (2014, November 24). A brief guide to research collaboration for the young scholar. Retrieved from Elsevier: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/a- brief-guide-to-research-collaboration- for-the-young-scholar Slater, R. (2014, June 24). Altmetrics. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://www.library.illinois.edu/learn/res earch/altmetrics.html Stufflebeam, D. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, & T. Kellaghan, The international handbook of educational evaluation (p. 2). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Talja, S. (20xx). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/dow nload?doi=10.1.1.96.163&rep=rep1&ty pe=pdf Tananbaum, G. (2013, April). Article- Level-Metrics : A SPARC Primer. Retrieved from SPARC ALM Primer: http://www.sparc.arl.org/sites/default/fil es/sparc-alm-primer.pdf Taylor, M. (2013, June). The Challenges of Measuring Social Impact Using Altmetrics. Retrieved from Research