DOCSLIB.ORG

Fighting Corruption in the Extractive and Natural Resources Sector

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fighting Corruption in the Extractive and Natural Resources Sector INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND WORLD BANK GROUP 2018 ANNUAL MEETINGS CIVIL SOCIETY POLICY FORUM FIGHTING CORRUPTION IN THE EXTRACTIVE AND NATURAL RESOURCES SECTOR Jakarta B, BICC Bali, Indonesia Friday, October 12, 2018 4:00 p.m. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS MARYATI ABDULLAH National Coordinator, Publish What You Pay Indonesia LAODE MUHAMMAD SYARIF Commissioner, Anti-Corruption Commission, Indonesia DADANG TRISASONGKO Secretary General, Transparency International Indonesia EMANUEL BRIA Indonesia Country Manager, Natural Resource Governance Institute SIMON CLYDESDALE Extractive Industries Campaign Leader, Global Witness * * * * * FIGHTING CORRUPTION IN THE EXTRACTIVE AND NATURAL RESOURCES SECTOR (4:00 p.m.) RISKI: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the session of Fighting Corruption in the Extractive and Nature Resources Sector hosted by Publish What You Pay Indonesia along with NRGI, Transparency International-Indonesia, Global Witness. The issue of corruption in the extractive and natural resource sector is really a huge issue. Well, (Inaudible) growth in the sector will enable the countries, including Indonesia to finance meaningful development agenda. Anticorruption movement in the sector has been particularly growing, but the challenge persists. This panel will showcase the existing efforts, along with their impact, furthering a better collaborative strategy. It's also expected to exemplify country's effective practices in tackling corruption and also stimulate debate underneath to scale it up into a systemic policy reform. Without further ado, I'll invite our moderator, Ms. Maryati Abdullah, the National Coordinator for Publish What You Pay Indonesia to lead the session for this afternoon. Ms. Maryati Abdullah, the stage is yours. Thank you. MS. ABDULLAH: Thank You, Riski (phonetic). Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your coming this afternoon. Let me please invite our four speaker in this forum. First, Mr. Laode Muhammad Syarif. Let's give applause. (Applause) MS. ABDULLAH: He's Commissioner of Anti- Corruption Commission. We call it KPK in Indonesia. And he also in-charge in the mostly last five years in terms of the Natural Resource Coordination and Supervision in Indonesia, particularly in the sector of extractive industry and natural resources. Secondly, we have Mr. Dadang Trisasongko. He is Secretary General of Transparency International Indonesia, where Transparency International Indonesia have chosen MACRA to assess the risks of corruption in the licensing of mining sector. Give applause. (Applause) MS. ABDULLAH: The third speaker, we will have Simon. One of the oil and gas campaigner from Global Witness. Maybe all of us know Global Witness has many investigative and also research in terms of the corruption, particularly interjurisdiction country. And last but not least speaker is Mr. Emanuel Bria. Mr. Emmanuel Bria is Country Manager of Natural Resource Governance Institute where NRGI has many expertise and also provide technical assistance to improve transparency and anti-corruption effort in natural resources sector. So we have four speaker now. As I wanted to reemphasize that our forum today we will discuss more on the many angle of the effort to tackling anti-corruption in the mining sector, oil and gas and also other natural resources sector. Even though from the preventive side, from the improving policy side in along the extractive industry failure chains and also from the law enforcement body sides, because we have anti-corruption commissions and we also wanted to emphasize how the important to tackling corruptions in extractive industry, because in many natural resources rich country they are dependence on the natural resource as part of the resource mobilization to finance their development, also to tackling inequality and poverty in many countries, but we see there are many problems in terms of lack of transparency, lack of governance and also anti-corruption and this would be herald (phonetic) as the people like in terms of the natural resources. Secondly, in many country on dependent on oil and gas, mining in natural resources facing a high risk on the dependent their national fiscal in terms on the natural resources, and also to some extent on the fossil fuel sector. So that's why this anti-corruption issue is very important. And I know and we know, IMF and the World Bank put the anti-corruption as the new critical issue. As we know also in the spring meeting this April, IMF launched the report on the anti-corruption, think to improve the governance and also macroeconomic of a fiscal structure. So I didn't want to be taken very long. I want you to give time for Mr. Laode Syarif to highlight some issue and also presentation. Mr. Laode, please. MR. SYARIF: Thank you very much, moderators. And ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. Yes, they asked me actually to talk about addressing corruption on natural resources exploitations in Indonesia and things the KPK actually have some program on how to tackle natural resources related corruptions. But I think we are still in the beginning. We need to scale it up. But before that I'll try for the audience that not familiar with the KPK, I'd like to explain a little bit of KPK, what we are doing and also I always love this. This is actually about 350 years before Christ and this is impossible for one dealing with the government funds not to taste at least a little bit of the king world. So -- but in the case of Indonesia or in many countries they do not only taste a little bit but I think big chunk of it. So this is not the case in Indonesia, so that's why I always said as the opening of mine. So basically we never change since Kautilya time. And even actually Bu Hatta, the Indonesians -- the first Indonesian Vice President said do not let corruption become part of Indonesia culture. He said it in '61. But I think now it has become -- I will not admit it that corruption has become a part of Indonesian culture, but I think if you check it correctly maybe yes, unfortunately. Yes, so this is the KPK. KPK is independent from the judiciary and the legislatures. We are responsible only to the public, financially audited by the Indonesian Supreme Audit Board. It is established in 2003 and it is actually led by five commissioners, collective collegial and I am one of them. But in the prosecution side we only have -- I have to change it about 300 now, it is not 250 but about 300 investigators and prosecutors. And what is actually KPK duties and functions. Based on the KPK law, we do coordination with government agencies, including with civil society. We supervise other law enforcement agency that look after corruption like, Attorney General Office and the police. Also we are monitoring government's policies and we do preventions of corruptions, and last one, this make us a little bit famous little bit because we do pre-investigation, investigation and prosecution in one roof, which is actually bit different from like ICAC in Hong Kong or CPIB in Singapore or Malaysian Anti-corruption Commission in Malaysia. We are similar with, say, SFO, Serious Fraud Office in UK, because we investigate and prosecute in one roof. Natural resources corruption is one of the main focus of the KPK, why, simply because there are a lot of money in it, and to be honest one of the worst governance this natural resources, compared to some other industry. And I give you an example. But then if you look at the map of Indonesian, we are quite rich actually, if you look at its natural resources. You name it, we have it. Gold, yeah, one of the biggest. Coal, we're quite rich and also the coal resources, but basically they are become actually -- if you look at oil and gas, we used to be an exporter, but now we are importers. So this is also a good sign that actually oil and natural resources, it is not unlimited. It is very, very limited, yeah, because Indonesia used to be part of OPEC and now we are importers, net importers and actually killing our economy. I think this is to not today importance, but what is actually corruption in natural resources. There are many. For example, preventing state losses in Indonesian forestry sectors. I work on this report before I join the KPK actually. I used to assist the KPK in the past, but it is quite interesting to see. If you look at the estimated actual timber production from natural forest 2003-2014, you can actually see it. The reported production it is actually on red. We actually the estimation one, it's mentioned, we saw commercial value and reported timber production is much, much better -- much bigger, but it is unreported, mostly illegal, some of them half illegal. Why I said they half illegal, they have a license but actually they cut more than they supposed to cut. They actually cut inside natural forests for examples. So that's why we are actually -- the KPK actually launched Gerakan Nasional Penyelelamatan Sumber Daya Alam, a national movement to save Indonesian natural resources and one of them actually on mining. This is the set reality of our finding. 90% of licenses holder do not report their mining activities. This is a real finding. That's why I'm saying, it's one of the worst. 90% licensing holder do not pay the obligatory reclamation and post-mining rehabilitation fund. About 2,000 license holder do not have a tax file number. I mean, how can you operate it within a country. Some of these licensing holder are operating within more than 6 million hectares of conservation and protected areas. So they're overlapping 6 million hectares.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Governance and Corruption in Public Health Care Systems by Maureen Lewis
    Working Paper Number 78 January 2006 Governance and Corruption in Public Health Care Systems By Maureen Lewis Abstract What factors affect health care delivery in the developing world? Anecdotal evidence of lives cut tragically short and the loss of productivity due to avoidable diseases is an area of salient concern in global health and international development. This working paper looks at factual evidence to describe the main challenges facing health care delivery in developing countries, including absenteeism, corruption, informal payments, and mismanagement. The author concludes that good governance is important in ensuring effective health care delivery, and that returns to investments in health are low where governance issues are not addressed. The Center for Global Development is an independent think tank that works to reduce global poverty and inequality through rigorous research and active engagement with the policy community. This Working Paper was made possible in part by funding from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Use and dissemination of this Working Paper is encouraged, however reproduced copies may not be used for commercial purposes. Further usage is permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons License. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and should not be attributed to the directors or funders of the Center for Global Development. www.cgdev.org 1 Governance and Corruption in Public Health Care Systems Maureen Lewis* Senior Fellow Center for Global Development January 2006 * I am grateful to William Savedoff for extensive peer review comments and suggestions, and to James Habyarimana, John Hicklin, Randi Ryterman, Julian Schweitzer, Peter Heller and Adam Wagstaff for helpful comments on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in Indonesian Local Government: Study on Triangle Fraud Theory
    International Journal of Business and Society, Vol. 19 No. 2, 2018, 536-552 CORRUPTION IN INDONESIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT: STUDY ON TRIANGLE FRAUD THEORY Muhtar Universitas Sebelas Maret Sutaryo. Universitas Sebelas Maret Sriyanto Universitas Sebelas Maret dan Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) ABSTRACT The paper examines the effect of performance accountability, regional income, e-government, internal audit capabilities, audit responses, and public officials wage on corruption in local government using fraud triangle theory framework. The increasingly widespread corruption cases even though abundance of government’s programs have been done to overcome them, let this research seeks to answer whether government’s priority programs are aligned with corruption eradication strategy. This paper uses local government panel data in Indonesia from 2010 to 2013 analyzed using multiple linear regression method. The result shows that performance accountability and public official wage have negative effect on corruption, while audit responses have positive effect on corruption. On the other hand, regional income, e-government, and internal audit capabilities show no evidence on effect on corruption. This finding is fairly robust in separate analysis on municipalities and local government outside Sumatra and Java. This paper provides empirical evidence that audit responses can detect corruption whereas performance accountability and the increase in regional income increases can contribute to curbing corruption. Keywords: Audit response; Corruption; E-government, Fraud triangle, Local government; Performance accountability. 1. INTRODUCTION Corruption is one of big problems in world economy in 2016. This case covers 35% of all frauds on job and inflict economic loss of Rp 2.7 billion in average (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners/ACFE, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • The Practice of Corruption in Indonesian Politics in Historical Comparative Perspective
    NEW STATE, OLD SOCIETY: The Practice of Corruption in Indonesian Politics In Historical Comparative Perspective Wijayanto Abstrak Dengan menggunakan perspektiv perbandingan sejarah, dan mendasarkan pada kasus korupsi di sektor perhutanan, artikel ini berargumen bahwa meskipun Indonesia telah berubah dari negara berstruktur otoriter menjadi negara yang berstruktur demokratis namun sikap (attitude) para pelaku (actors) dalam negara masih belum berubah. Mereka masih berlaku feodal sebagaimana halnya pada saat negara ini masih berbentuk kerajaan ribuan tahun silam. Karakter feodal inilah yang kemudian memberi justifikasi bagi tetap langgengnya tradisi korupsi pada sepanjang sejarah bangsa. Lebih jauh, watak feodal dan korup ini sesungguhnya bisa dilacak akarnya pada nilai-nilai yang terdapat dalam budaya Jawa sebagaimana diuraikan oleh Bennedict Anderson. Kata kunci: sikap, pelaku, budaya jawa, korup A. PENDAHULUAN Indonesia has been one of the most corrupt countries in the world. According to the report from Transparency International, Indonesian score of Corruption Perception Index is still very low as clearly described in the bellow: Table 1 Indonesia Corruption’s Perception Index (CPI) Years 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 CPI 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.3 2,6 2,8 2,8 3,0 Source: Transperancy International Indonesia Those bad score are very surprising since nowadays Indonesia has entered more than a decade reformation era marked by the fall of the authoritarian centralistic regime under the New Order. This fact has made the arguments that based on the structural variables as a basic explanation of corruption no longer acceptable. While these arguments said that corruption was caused by a highly centralized -governmental structure (Smith, 1971), the data shows us that corruption was still happening during the first decade of decentralization era.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation and Corruption: Claims, Evidence and Explanations*
    1 Regulation and corruption: claims, evidence and explanations* Claire A. Dunlop and Claudio M. Radaelli In A Massey (Ed.) A Research Agenda for Public Administration, E. Elgar March 2019. Research funded by ERC Project PROTEGO Introduction and aims Definitions of public sector corruption abound but, at its most general, corruption is considered to be the abuse of government resource or power for private gain, an illegal exchange (Varese, 2018). Critical to this definition is the view that corruption is itself a by- product of high levels of government activity and regulations (Holcombe and Boudreaux, 2015). At the most abstract level, any form of government intervention creates opportunities for corruption, even if we assume that the government intervenes to correct market failures (Acemoglu and Verdier, 2000) and not to further the career of bureaucrats and politicians (Shleifer and Vishny, 1994). This is because, in order to correct market failures, the government needs bureaucracies to make decisions. This generates opportunities for public managers to demand bribes or be corrupted (Acemoglu and Verdier, 2000). In economic models with some heterogeneity among bureaucrats, this principal–agent problem originates a misallocation of resources and increases the size of the bureaucracy. Yet, this does not mean that the larger the size of the state, the higher corruption levels are – although some econometric estimates suggest greater government intervention implies higher levels of corruption (Goel and Nelson 2010). For example, in Acemoglu and Verdier’s model the causal force behind corruption is not the government. Markets do not perform efficiently all the time, and governments rightly intervene. But, corruption ‘emerges as an unpleasant side effect of necessary intervention’ (Acemoglu and Verdier, 2000: 196).
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Challenges at Sub-National Level in Indonesia
    www.transparency.org www.cmi.no Corruption Challenges at Sub-National Level in Indonesia Query: Please provide an overview of anti-corruption challenges at the sub-national and local levels in Indonesia, with a particular emphasis on challenges within basic service delivery. Purpose: Summary: Donors are increasingly working in complex Since the fall of General Suharto’s regime, Indonesia operating environments where decentralisation has embarked on a comprehensive and unprecedented brings many new challenges. One of those process of decentralisation, devolving almost overnight challenges includes ensuring the effectiveness of enormous responsibilities to regional, provincial and service delivery at the sub-national and local level. local governments. In spite of considerable achievements, the Indonesian decentralisation process continues to face major challenges of state capture by the local elites, a deeply entrenched patronage system Content: and widespread petty and bureaucratic corruption. The emergence of stronger civil society and a free media Part 1: The Context of constitute promising trends that, combined with further Decentralisation in reforms aimed at promoting transparency, community Indonesia participation as well as reinforcing upwards and Part 2: Overview of Corruption downward accountability mechanisms, could ensure Challenges at the Local that decentralisation fully yields the intended benefits. Level Part 3: Further Reading Part 1: The Context of Decentralisation in Indonesia To fully understand the nature of corruption
    [Show full text]
  • 93 a New Approach to Preventing Corruption in Indonesia
    Journal of Social Studies Education Research Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi 2019:10 (1), 93-115 www.jsser.org A New Approach to Preventing Corruption in Indonesia: A Study of the TP4 in Central Java, Indonesia Pujiyono,1 Fajar A. Setiawan,2, David M. T. Hutabarat3 Abstract This article scrutinises the Escorting and Safeguarding Team to Governance and Development (TP4), a newly established prosecutor task force in Indonesia appointed to supervise government projects. Its effects in curbing the corruption that has plagued said projects and boosting the budget absorption of the Indonesian government are also explored. The research is conducted as a quantitative case study to the works of the regional TP4 of Central Java during the period of January 2016 until July 2018. The TP4 was established by the High Prosecutor Office of Central Java in 2016. The findings of this study show that the establishment of the TP4 in Central Java has contributed to the exponential increase in budget absorption rates and has drastically reduced the level of corruption crimes. The research also shows that such achievements are due to the 2 roles played by the TP4: As a legal advisor, it extends exhaustive support mechanisms; as a legal inspectorate, it has exhaustive alternative legal settlement mechanisms. Hence, we contend that the TP4 has proven its efficiency in achieving 2 seemingly contradictory goals (i.e., curbing and preventing corruption while enabling bureaucrats to progress with their projects without fearing corruption indictment). However, we also acknowledge the limitations of this study, as only statistical data have measured the progress of the TP4.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Exercise of Corruption and Governance Measurement Tools in Asia and Caucasus Countries
    Corruption and Governance Measurement Tools in Asia and Caucasus countries – February, 2005 Mapping exercise of Corruption and Governance Measurement Tools In Asia and Caucasus countries Policy and Research Department1 Transparency International Secretariat Table of contents: Part I: Background and methodology p.1 Part II: Mapping the tools (listed by type) p.2 A. Single Country Tools A.1 Opinion Surveys on Perceptions and Experiences of Corruption p.2 A.2 Public Sector Diagnostics p.19 A.3 Sectoral Surveys p.23 A.4 Press Monitoring p.26 B. Multi Country Tools p.28 B.1 Opinion Surveys p.28 B.2 Public Sector Diagnostic p.31 B.3 Private Sector Environment Surveys p.32 B.4 Democracy and Governance Cross Country Indicators p.36 Summary p.40 Appendix (attached): Matrix of the tools (listed per country) Part I: Background and methodology The purpose of the study Following on from the report on Local Corruption Diagnostics and Measurement Tools in Africa, carried out by Transparency International for the U4 in February 2004, DFID has requested that TI identify and present the international, national and local tools that measure corruption and related phenomenon in Asia and the Caucasus. DFID has expressed interest in the following key focus countries for this exercise: Armenia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Moldova, Nepal, China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Thailand and Vietnam. For Pakistan and India, special attention will be given to the tools assessing the provinces of Punjab, Orissa and West Bengal. Methodology of the study (including coverage and contents)2 The mapping covers a range of tools in 16 countries from the Asia and Caucasus region.
    [Show full text]
  • The State and Illegality in Indonesia in Illegality and State the the STATE and ILLEGALITY in INDONESIA
    Edited by Edward Aspinall and Gerry van Klinken The state and illegality in Indonesia THE STATE AND ILLEGALITY IN INDONESIA The popular 1998 reformasi movement that brought down President Suharto’s regime demanded an end to illegal practices by state offi cials, from human rights abuse to nepotistic investments. Yet today, such practices have proven more resistant to reform than people had hoped. Many have said corruption in Indonesia is “entrenched”. We argue it is precisely this entrenched character that requires attention. What is state illegality entrenched in and how does it become entrenched? This involves studying actual cases. Our observations led us to rethink fundamental ideas about the nature of the state in Indonesia, especially regarding its socially embedded character. We conclude that illegal practices by state offi cials are not just aberrations to the state, they are the state. Almost invariably, illegality occurs as part of collective, patterned, organized and collaborative acts, linked to the competition for political power and access to state resources. While obviously excluding many without connections, corrupt behaviour also plays integrative and stabilizing functions. Especially at the lower end of the social ladder, it gets a lot of things done and is often considered legitimate. This book may be read as a defence of area studies approaches. Without the insights that grew from applying our area studies skills, we would still be constrained by highly stylized notions of the state, which bear little resemblance to the state’s actual workings. The struggle against corruption is a long-term political process. Instead of trying to depoliticize it, we believe the key to progress is greater popular participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    The 2nd Proceeding a “Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020” TABLE OF CONTENTS Front Page ....................................................................................................................................... i FrontInformation Page .............................................................................................................. of the International Seminar ....................................................................................... i ii Committee Composition.................................................................................................................. iii InformationPreface .............................................................................................................................................. of the International Seminar ................................................................. iiiv CommitteeGreeting FromComposition The Dean ..........................................................................................Faculty of Law .......................................................................................... iivii PrefaceINDONES ...................................................................................................................IA’S KPK AND NSW’S ICAC: COMPARISONS AND CONTRASTS iv Prof. Simon Butt .............................................................................................................................. 1 Greeting From The Dean Faculty of Law ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bribery & Corruption
    Bribery & Corruption 2019 Sixth Edition Contributing Editors: Jonathan Pickworth & Jo Dimmock CONTENTS Preface Jonathan Pickworth & Jo Dimmock, White & Case LLP Australia Tobin Meagher & Richard Abraham, Clayton Utz 1 Austria Holger Bielesz, Angelika Hellweger & Paul Krepil, Wolf Theiss 18 Brazil Rogério Fernando Taffarello, Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. e Quiroga Advogados 29 Cayman Islands Martin Livingston, Adam Huckle & Adrian Davey, Maples and Calder 40 China Hui Xu, Sean Wu & Catherine E. Palmer, Latham & Watkins 50 France Stéphane Bonifassi, Bonifassi Avocats 68 Germany Christian Pelz, Lars Kutzner & Martin Schorn, Noerr LLP 79 Greece Ovvadias S. Namias & Vasileios K. Petropoulos, Ovvadias S. Namias Law Firm 85 India Aditya Vikram Bhat & Shantanu Singh, AZB & Partners 92 Indonesia Denny Rahmansyah & Nico Angelo Putra Mooduto, SSEK Indonesian Legal Consultants 102 Ireland Megan Hooper, Imelda Higgins & Heather Mahon, McCann FitzGerald 112 Italy Roberto Pisano, Studio Legale Pisano 120 Japan Daiske Yoshida & Junyeon Park, Latham & Watkins 131 Mexico Leonel Pereznieto, Santiago Acosta Álvarez & Andrés Sánchez Ríos y Valles, Creel, García-Cuéllar, Aiza y Enríquez, S.C. 141 Netherlands Jurjan Geertsma & Madelon Stevens, JahaeRaymakers 156 New Zealand Ben Upton, Simpson Grierson 167 Nigeria Dayo Adu, Ridwan Oloyede & Akinbobola Adeniyi, Famsville Solicitors 177 Romania Mihai Mareș, Mareș / Danilescu / Mareș 188 Russia Hannes Lubitzsch, Noerr OOO 202 Serbia Vladimir Hrle, Hrle Attorneys 214 Singapore Chia Boon Teck & Jonathan Chan, Chia Wong LLP 220 Slovenia Uroš Čop, Katarina Mervič & Eva Rop, Law fi rm Miro Senica and attorneys, Ltd. 240 Spain Mar de Pedraza Fernández & Paula Martínez-Barros Rodríguez, De Pedraza Abogados, S.L.P. 252 Switzerland Marcel Meinhardt & Fadri Lenggenhager, Lenz & Staehelin 266 Taiwan Grace Wang, Wen-Ping Lai & Bessie Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Programme Action Against Corruption
    THEMATIC PROGRAMME ACTION AGAINST CORRUPTION & ECONOMIC CRIME (2010 – 2011) April 2011 I. MANDATES, ORGANISATIONAL CONTEXT, GUIDING PRINCIPLES, SERVICES AND PRODUCTS .................................................................................................................................. 3 (A) INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK and MANDATES ............................................ 3 International legal framework ........................................................................................... 3 The Conference of the States Parties to UNCAC and its working groups .......................... 4 Specific UNODC mandates against corruption .................................................................. 5 The Thematic Programme on Corruption and UNODC medium-term Strategy ................ 6 (B) ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT ...................................................................................... 7 (C) GUIDING PRINCIPLES .................................................................................................. 8 (D) UNODC SERVICES AND PRODUCTS .......................................................................... 10 UNODC Services – focusing on technical assistance needs ............................................. 10 Tools, manuals and publications ...................................................................................... 12 II. OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR 2010-2011 .................................................................. 13 (A) Outcomes, outputs and indicators ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TACKLING CORRUPTION, TRANSFORMING LIVES Accelerating Human Development in Asia and the Pacific
    TACKLING CORRUPTION, TRANSFORMING LIVES Accelerating Human Development in Asia and the Pacific Published for the United Nations Development Programme Copyright ©2008 by the United Nations Development Programme Regional Centre in Colombo, Human Development Report Unit 23 Independence Avenue, Colombo 7, Sri Lanka All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. First published, 2008 Published for UNDP by Macmillan India Ltd. MACMILLAN INDIA LTD. Delhi Bangalore Chennai Kolkata Mumbai Ahmedabad Bhopal Chandigarh Coimbatore Cuttack Guwahati Hubli Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Madurai Nagpur Patna Pune Thiruvananthapuram Visakhapatnam MACMILLAN WORLDWIDE Australia Brazil Cambodia China Egypt France Germany India Japan Korea Malaysia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Philippines Russia Singapore South Africa Switzerland Thailand Turkey United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States of America Vietnam and others ISBN CORP-000130 Assigned UN sales number: E.08.III.B.2 Published by Rajiv Beri for Macmillan India Ltd. 2/10 Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110 002 Printed at Sanat Printers 312 EPIP, Kundli 131 028 TEAM FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE Asia-Pacific Human Development Report TACKLING CORRUPTION, TRANSFORMING LIVES Team Leader Anuradha Rajivan Core Team: Gry Ballestad, Elena Borsatti, The Asia-Pacific Human Development
    [Show full text]