TNBC: Potential Targeting of Multiple Receptors for a Therapeutic Breakthrough, Nanomedicine, and Immunotherapy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TNBC: Potential Targeting of Multiple Receptors for a Therapeutic Breakthrough, Nanomedicine, and Immunotherapy biomedicines Review TNBC: Potential Targeting of Multiple Receptors for a Therapeutic Breakthrough, Nanomedicine, and Immunotherapy Desh Deepak Singh 1 and Dharmendra Kumar Yadav 2,* 1 Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur 303002, India; [email protected] 2 Department of Pharmacy and Gachon Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, College of Pharmacy, Gachon University, Hambakmoeiro 191, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21924, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-32-820-4948 Abstract: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous, recurring cancer associated with a high rate of metastasis, poor prognosis, and lack of therapeutic targets. Although target-based therapeutic options are approved for other cancers, only limited therapeutic options are available for TNBC. Cell signaling and receptor-specific targets are reportedly effective in patients with TNBC under specific clinical conditions. However, most of these cancers are unresponsive, and there is a requirement for more effective treatment modalities. Further, there is a lack of effective biomarkers that can distinguish TNBC from other BC subtypes. ER, PR, and HER2 help identify TNBC and are widely used to identify patients who are most likely to respond to diverse therapeutic strategies. In this review, we discuss the possible treatment options for TNBC based on its inherent subtype receptors and pathways, such as p53 signaling, AKT signaling, cell cycle regulation, DNA damage, and programmed cell death, which play essential roles at multiple stages of TNBC development. Citation: Singh, D.D.; Yadav, D.K. We focus on poly-ADP ribose polymerase 1, androgen receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor TNBC: Potential Targeting of Multiple receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor as well as the application of nanomedicine and Receptors for a Therapeutic immunotherapy in TNBC and discuss their potential applications in drug development for TNBC. Breakthrough, Nanomedicine, and Immunotherapy. Biomedicines 2021, 9, Keywords: triple-negative breast cancer; therapeutic target; signaling pathway; clinical trial 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ biomedicines9080876 Academic Editors: Agata 1. Introduction Grazia D’Amico, Luca Vanella and Antonella Marino Gammazza Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. The molecular classification of BC is shown in Figure1. The highest mortality rate has been Received: 15 June 2021 observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC is characterized by a high histo- Accepted: 21 July 2021 logical grade and proliferation rate and ductal histology and is associated with a lack of Published: 23 July 2021 estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) expression (making it ER-, PR-, and HER2-negative). The classification Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral of TNBC is shown in Figure2[ 1]. Metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) is associated with a poor with regard to jurisdictional claims in overall survival rate [2]. TNBC has a high recurrence rate, which is the greatest within the published maps and institutional affil- first 3 years. However, a sharp reduction in recurrence is observed after 5 years. Therefore, iations. there is a lack of long post-therapy regimens [2,3]. Ductal pathology and gene expression analyses have led to further classification of BC into HER2-enhanced, luminal A and B, basal-like, and claudin-low subtypes [1,4]. The claudin-low subtype is primarily diagnosed in women under 45 years of age and is identified by a high expression of epithelial-to- Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. mesenchymal transition-associated genes, low expression of hormone receptor (HR), and Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. low expression of tight junction markers [5]. Currently, TNBC diagnosis is based on mam- This article is an open access article mography, immunohistochemistry, and radio-imaging. Confirmatory biopsy of metastatic distributed under the terms and lesions is required, as metastatic lesions possess different phenotypes based on the tumor conditions of the Creative Commons type [6]. Surgery is sometimes recommended to treat TNBC [7]. Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). Biomedicines 2021, 9, 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9080876 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/biomedicines BiomedicinesBiomedicines 2021, 9, 2021x FOR, 9 ,PEER 876 REVIEW 2 of 28 2 of 26 Biomedicines 2021, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 28 Figure 1. FigureMolecular 1. classification of breast cancer. Figure 1.Molecular Molecular classificationclassification of of breast breast cancer. cancer. Figure 2. Classification of triple-negative breast cancer. FigureFigure 2. 2.Classification Classification of triple-negative breast breast cancer. cancer. TNBC hasTNBC TNBCbeen hasthe has beensubject been thethe of subjectsubjectintensive of of researchintensive intensive on research researchnew therapeutic on onnew new therapeutic approaches therapeutic approaches in approaches in in recent years [3]. The development of targeted cancer therapies, often in combination with recentrecent years years [3 [3].]. The The developmentdevelopment of of targeted targeted cancer cancer therapies, therapies, often often in combination in combination with with establishedestablished chemotherapy, chemotherapy, has been applied has been to applied a few new to a clinical few new studies clinical [8,9]. studies Therefore, [8,9]. Therefore, established chemotherapy, has been applied to a few new clinical studies [8,9]. Therefore, there is an thereurgent is needan urgent to develop need to novel develop ther novelapeutic ther options.apeutic Capeci options.tabine Capeci hastabine been hasused been used in combinationtherein iscombination an with urgent docetaxel, needwith to docetaxel, developixabepilone, novel ixabepilone, doxorubicin therapeutic doxorubicin options.cyclophosphamide, Capecitabinecyclophosphamide, and has been and used in paclitaxelcombination inpaclitaxel metastatic in with metastaticTNBC docetaxel, [1–8]. TNBC Many ixabepilone, [1–8]. studies Many doxorubicinhave studies been have performed cyclophosphamide, been performed to determine to anddetermine paclitaxel in whethermetastatic patientswhether with TNBCpatients TNBC [ 1with– 8were]. ManyTNBC more were studies like lymore to have choose like beenly tomastectomy performedchoose mastectomy over to determine lumpectomy over lumpectomy whether patients [7]. Resultswith[7]. revealed TNBC Results were that revealed morethe TN that likely status, the to TN choosewhile status, being mastectomy while associated being over associated with lumpectomy younger with youngerage [7 ].and Results age and revealed that the TN status, while being associated with younger age and higher-grade tumors, did not impact the patients’ choice of surgical treatment [5–7]. Although TNBC tends to be more aggressive, decision-making for surgery likely rests on more traditional clinicopathological variables and patient preferences in disputative TNBC [6]. Traditionally, radiotherapy Biomedicines 2021, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 28 Biomedicines 2021, 9, 876 3 of 26 higher-grade tumors, did not impact the patients’ choice of surgical treatment [5–7]. Alt- hough TNBC tends to be more aggressive, decision-making for surgery likely rests on ismore administered traditional inclinicopathological TNBC, as in other variables breast and cancer patient subtypes, preferences following in disputative mastectomy or conservativeTNBC [6]. Traditionally, breast surgery radiotherapy (CBS); however,is administered this issue in TNBC, remains as in controversialother breast cancer [10]. subtypes,As TNBC following is a mastectomy rapidly growing or conservative and locally breast aggressive surgery (CBS); cancer, however, CBS followed this issue by radia- tionremains therapy controversial in early [10]. stage (T N ) may not be equivalent to mastectomy as in other types As TNBC is a rapidly growing1–2 and0 locally aggressive cancer, CBS followed by radia- of BC [10]. Based on the results of metastatic lesion biopsies, TNBC-associated molecu- tion therapy in early stage (T1-2N0) may not be equivalent to mastectomy as in other types larof BC targets [10]. Based and their on the small results molecule of metastat inhibitorsic lesion biopsies, are shown TNBC-associated in Figure3. In molecular addition to the intrinsictargets and evolutional their small molecule drive in inhibitors TNBC, anticancer are shown treatmentin Figure 3. servesIn addition as a to source the intrin- of selection pressuresic evolutional [10,11 drive]. To in this TNBC, date, anticancer it remains trea controversialtment serves as whether a source chemotherapy of selection pres- resistance emergessure [10,11]. from To the this selection date, it andremains expansion controversial of rare whether pre-existing chemotherapy subclones resistance (adaptive resis- tance)emerges or from from the the selection induction and of expansion new mutations of rare pre-existing (acquired resistance)subclones (adaptive [11]. Currently, re- the treatmentsistance) or options from the for induction TNBC are of new limited, mutations because (acquired TNBC resistance) tumors are [11]. not Currently, sensitive tothe hormone therapytreatment and options TNBC-specific for TNBC are drug limited, targets because are TNBC lacking. tumors Some are common not sensitive chemotherapeutic to hor- agentsmone therapy show limited and TNBC-specific efficacy [2,6 drug,10,11 targ]. Therefore,ets
Recommended publications
  • COVID-19 Publications - Week 05 2021 1328 Publications
    Update February 1 - February 7, 2021, Dr. Peter J. Lansberg MD, PhD Weekly COVID-19 Literature Update will keep you up-to-date with all recent PubMed publications categorized by relevant topics COVID-19 publications - Week 05 2021 1328 Publications PubMed based Covid-19 weekly literature update For those interested in receiving weekly updates click here For questions and requests for topics to add send an e-mail [email protected] Reliable on-line resources for Covid 19 WHO Cochrane Daily dashbord BMJ Country Guidance The Lancet Travel restriction New England Journal of Medicine Covid Counter JAMA Covid forcasts Cell CDC Science AHA Oxford Universtiy Press ESC Cambridge Univeristy Press EMEA Springer Nature Evidence EPPI Elsevier Wikipedia Wiley Cardionerds - COVID-19 PLOS Genomic epidemiology LitCovid NIH-NLM Oxygenation Ventilation toolkit SSRN (Pre-prints) German (ICU) bed capacity COVID reference (Steinhauser Verlag) COVID-19 Projections tracker Retracted papers AAN - Neurology resources COVID-19 risk tools - Apps COVID-19 resources (Harvard) Web app for SARS-CoV2 mutations COVID-19 resources (McMasters) COVID-19 resources (NHLBI) COVID-19 resources (MEDSCAPE) COVID-19 Diabetes (JDRF) COVID-19 TELEMEDICINE (BMJ) Global Causes of death (Johns Hopkins) COVID-19 calculators (Medscap) Guidelines NICE Guidelines Covid-19 Korean CDC Covid-19 guidelines Flattening the curve - Korea IDSA COVID-19 Guidelines Airway Management Clinical Practice Guidelines (SIAARTI/EAMS, 2020) ESICM Ventilation Guidelines Performing Procedures on Patients With
    [Show full text]
  • FAQ505 -- BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations
    AQ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FAQ505 fWOMEN’S HEALTH BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations • What is cancer? • What causes cancer? • What is hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome? • What are BRCA1 and BRCA2? • How much do BRCA mutations increase the risk of breast cancer? • How much do BRCA mutations increase the risk of ovarian cancer? • Do BRCA mutations increase the risk of other types of cancer? • How common are BRCA mutations? • Should I be tested for BRCA mutations? • What is genetic counseling? • Why don’t doctors test everyone for BRCA mutations? • How is testing for BRCA mutations done? • What does a negative test result mean? • What does an unclear test result mean? • What does a positive test result mean? • How can you prevent cancer if you test positive for a BRCA mutation? • What breast cancer screening tests are available? • What ovarian screening tests are available? • What medication can help prevent breast cancer? • What medications can help prevent ovarian cancer? • Can surgery help prevent breast cancer? • What are the side effects of a mastectomy? • Can surgery help prevent ovarian cancer? • What are the side effects of removing the ovaries? • What else should I think about before choosing risk-reducing surgery? • I am concerned about discrimination based on genetic testing results. What should I know? • What should I know about direct-to-consumer genetic tests? • Glossary What is cancer? Normal cells in the body grow, divide, and are replaced on a routine basis. Sometimes, cells divide abnormally and begin to grow out of control. These cells may form growths or tumors.Tumors can be benign (not cancer) or malignant (cancer).
    [Show full text]
  • BRCA1 and BRCA2 Play an Activities Have No Relevant Financial Relationships to Important Role in the Repair of Damaged DNA and the Disclose
    Alaska Pharmacists Association Continuing Education Home Study Series Program 0139-0000-19-201-H04-P/T Genetic Mutations in Quarterly AKPhA Newsletter Cancer: BRCA1 and Release Date 10/07/2019 Expiration Date 10/07/2022 BRCA2 CPE Hours: 2.0 (0.2 CEU) Authors: This lesson is a knowledge-based CPE activity Danielle Hess, PharmD Candidate 2020 and is targeted to pharmacists and technicians Anne Marie Bott, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS, in all practice settings. NCPS, Alaska Native Medical Center Learning Objectives Cancer is a genetic disease that results from an At the completion of this activity, the participant accumulation of mutations in genes that normally will be able to: control cellular growth. This accumulation of mutations 1. State two positive changes you can make to can arise from either somatic or germinal tissue. While your practice following participation in this the majority of mutations are somatic and result from series. environmental exposures, lifestyle, the aging process, or simply chance, germline mutations are inherited. These 2. Summarize three practice updates or changes inherited mutations in specific tumor suppressor genes you acquired while participating in this series. and DNA mismatch genes predispose individuals to 1 Disclosure various hereditary cancer syndromes. The author(s) and other individuals responsible for Of the tumor suppressor genes associated with inherited planning AKPhA continuing pharmacy education cancer syndromes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 play an activities have no relevant financial relationships to important role in the repair of damaged DNA and the disclose. stability of genetic material within cells. However, when these genes are mutated or altered, the DNA repair Fees process may not function properly, which causes cells to CE processing is free for AKPhA members.
    [Show full text]
  • BRCA1 and BRCA2 Full Gene Sequence Analysis and Common Deletion/Duplication Variants
    BRCA1 and BRCA2 Full Gene Sequence Analysis and Common Deletion/Duplication Variants Testing includes full gene sequencing of exons and 25 base pairs of introns of BRCA 1 and 2 and the common deletions of BRCA1 (exon 13 del 3.835kb, exon 13 dup 6kb, exon 14-20 del 26kb, exon 22 del 510bp, exon 8-9 del 7.1kb). Sequencing does not include the promoter, enhancers or splicing modulators in intronic regions. Deletion duplication analysis is limited to the commonly reported variants; refer to full deletion/duplication testing. Indication: This testing is indicated for individuals that meet the criteria for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. For assistance with interpreting guidelines, please contact Henry Ford Precision Genomic Diagnostics, or refer to genetic counseling for evaluation. Testing on minors is not indicated. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are genes that code for proteins that help repair DNA damage. Inherited mutations in BRCA 1 or 2, in combination with additional acquired mutations, can result in increased risk for developing cancer. Specific mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers, and have been associated with increased risk of several additional types of cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for about 20 to 25 percent of hereditary breast cancers and about 5 to 10 percent of all breast cancers. In addition, BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for about 15 percent of ovarian cancers overall. Breast and ovarian cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations tend to develop at younger ages than their nonhereditary counterparts.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Characterization of Inulin Conjugate for Improved Intracellular and Targeted Delivery of Pyrazinoic Acid to Monocytes
    pharmaceutics Article Design and Characterization of Inulin Conjugate for Improved Intracellular and Targeted Delivery of Pyrazinoic Acid to Monocytes Franklin Afinjuomo 1, Thomas G. Barclay 1, Ankit Parikh 1, Yunmei Song 1, Rosa Chung 1, Lixin Wang 1, Liang Liu 1, John D. Hayball 1, Nikolai Petrovsky 2,3 and Sanjay Garg 1,* 1 School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; olumide.afi[email protected] (F.A.); [email protected] (T.G.B.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (Y.S.); [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (L.W.); [email protected] (L.L.); [email protected] (J.D.H.) 2 Vaxine Pty. Ltd., Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia; nikolai.petrovsky@flinders.edu.au 3 Department of Endocrinology, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-8302-1567 Received: 26 April 2019; Accepted: 16 May 2019; Published: 22 May 2019 Abstract: The propensity of monocytes to migrate into sites of mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) infection and then become infected themselves makes them potential targets for delivery of drugs intracellularly to the tubercle bacilli reservoir. Conventional TB drugs are less effective because of poor intracellular delivery to this bacterial sanctuary. This study highlights the potential of using semicrystalline delta inulin particles that are readily internalised by monocytes for a monocyte-based drug delivery system. Pyrazinoic acid was successfully attached covalently to the delta inulin particles via a labile linker.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethical Implications of Emerging Genetic Predictors of Poor Organ Transplant Outcomes
    THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF EMERGING GENETIC PREDICTORS OF POOR ORGAN TRANSPLANT OUTCOMES by Michael Aloysius Freeman Bachelor of Arts, Siena College, 2004 Doctor of Medicine, Albany Medical College, 2008 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Pittsburgh 2016 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Michael A Freeman It was defended on July 20th, 2016 and approved by Lisa S. Parker, Professor, Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh Mark R. Wicclair, Professor, Department of Philosophy, West Virginia University Benjamin E. Hippen, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Thesis Director: Lisa S. Parker, Professor, Department of Human Genetics ii Copyright © by Michael A Freeman 2016 iii THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF EMERGING GENETIC PREDICTORS OF POOR ORGAN TRANSPLANT OUTCOMES Michael A Freeman, MA, MD University of Pittsburgh, 2016 Abstract: Emerging research is beginning to identify genetic risk factors which may predict an increased likelihood of rejection following transplantation. The identification of these predictors prompt us to consider how we should incorporate this information into the process of transplant candidate evaluation and organ allocation, as well as the ethical implications of such incorporation. In order to ground this analysis, this thesis begins with an examination of how we consider other predictors of poor transplant outcomes currently, as interpreted in concordance with the US transplant system’s dual goals of efficacious and just organ allocation. It then proceeds with a brief summary of the current research on genetic predictors of poor transplant outcome, followed by a specific examination of the mechanisms by which these genes are investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Nanomaterials in Biomedicine
    nanomaterials Editorial Advances in Nanomaterials in Biomedicine Elena Ryabchikova Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science, 8 Lavrentiev Ave., 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; [email protected] Keywords: nanotechnology; nanomedicine; biocompatible nanomaterials; diagnostics; nanocarriers; targeted drug delivery; tissue engineering Biomedicine is actively developing a methodological network that brings together biological research and its medical applications. Biomedicine, in fact, is at the front flank of the creation of the latest technologies for various fields in medicine, and, obviously, nanotechnologies occupy an important place at this flank. Based on the well-known breadth of the concept of “Biomedicine”, the boundaries of the Special Issue “Advances in Nanomaterials in Biomedicine” were not limited, and authors could present their work from various fields of nanotechnology, as well as new methods and nanomaterials intended for medical applications. This approach made it possible to make public not only specific developments, but also served as a kind of mirror reflecting the most active interest of researchers in a particular field of application of nanotechnology in biomedicine. The Special Issue brought together more than 110 authors from different countries, who submitted 11 original research articles and 7 reviews, and conveyed their vision of the problems of nanomaterials in biomedicine to the readers. A detailed and well-illustrated review on the main problems of nanomedicine in onco-immunotherapy was presented by Acebes-Fernández and co-authors [1]. It should be noted that the review is not limited to onco-immunotherapy, and gives a complete understanding of nanomedicine in general, which is useful for those new to this field.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from BRCA1 and BRCA2
    Oncogene (2000) 19, 6159 ± 6175 ã 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0950 ± 9232/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/onc Lessons learned from BRCA1 and BRCA2 Lei Zheng1, Shang Li1, Thomas G Boyer1 and Wen-Hwa Lee*,1 1Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 15355 Lambda Drive, San Antonio, Texas, TX 78245, USA BRCA1 and BRCA2 are breast cancer susceptibility susceptibility genes has provided two human genetic genes. Mutations within BRCA1 and BRCA1 are models for studies of breast cancer. responsible for most familial breast cancer cases. To understand how the loss of BRCA1 or BRCA2 Targeted deletion of Brca1 or Brca2 in mice has function leads to breast cancer formation, mouse revealed an essential function for their encoded products, genetic models for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have BRCA1 and BRCA2, in cell proliferation during been established. This work has revealed that Brca1 embryogenesis. Mouse models established from condi- homozygous deletions are lethal at early embryonic tional expression of mutant Brca1 alleles develop days (E)5.5 ± 13.5 (Gowen et al., 1996; Hakem et al., mammary gland tumors, providing compelling evidence 1996; Liu et al., 1996; Ludwig et al., 1997). Three that BRCA1 functions as a breast cancer suppressor. independent groups generated distinct mutations within Human cancer cells and mouse cells de®cient in BRCA1 Brca1, yet nonetheless observed similar embryonic or BRCA2 exhibit radiation hypersensitivity and phenotypes, including defects in both gastrulation and chromosomal abnormalities, thus revealing a potential cellular proliferation, and death at E6.5 (Hakem et al., role for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the maintenance of 1996; Liu et al., 1996; Ludwig et al., 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Profiles of BRCA1-Mutated and Matched Sporadic Breast Tumours: Relation with Clinico-Pathological Features
    British Journal of Cancer (2001) 85(4), 538–545 © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign doi: 10.1054/ bjoc.2001.1937, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IIH ii http://www.bjcancer.com Molecular profiles of BRCA1-mutated and matched sporadic breast tumours: relation with clinico-pathological features EMJJ Berns1, IL van Staveren1, L Verhoog1,2, AMW van de Ouweland3, M Meijer-van Gelder1, H Meijers-Heijboer3, H Portengen1, JA Foekens1, LCJ Dorssers2 and JGM Klijn1 1Division of Endocrine Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Center (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and University Hospital Rotterdam; 2Department of Pathology and 3Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands Summary About 5–10% of breast cancers are hereditary; a genetically and clinically heterogeneous disease in which several susceptibility genes, including BRCA1, have been identified. While distinct tumour features can be used to estimate the likelihood that a breast tumour is caused by a BRCA1 germline mutation it is not yet possible to categorize a BRCA1 mutated tumour. The aim of the present study is to molecularly classify BRCA1 mutated breast cancers by resolving gene expression patterns of BRCA1 and matched sporadic surgical breast tumour specimens. The expression profiles of 6 frozen breast tumour tissues with a proven BRCA1 gene mutation were weighed against those from 12 patients without a known family history but who had similar clinico-pathological characteristics. In addition two fibroblast cultures, the breast cancer cell-line HCC1937 and its corresponding B-lymphoblastoid cell line (heterozygous for mutation BRCA1 5382insC) and an epithelial ovarian cancer cell line (A2780) were studied.
    [Show full text]
  • BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Men
    BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Men Everyone has BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. These genes help repair damage to the DNA within cells. However, some individuals inherit a mutation in one of their BRCA genes, which increases their risk for certain cancers, including breast (female and male), ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancers, as well as melanoma. Those who test positive for a gene mutation have options available to lower and manage their cancer risks. Man can carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations and can be at increased risk for certain cancers. While cancer risks in male BRCA mutation carriers are not as dramatically elevated as those of female BRCA mutation carriers, cancer risk management and early detection are crucial. It is important for both men and women to remember that a family history of breast, ovarian, prostate or pancreatic cancers on their father’s side of the family may indicate a hereditary gene mutation. Many people mistakenly believe a family history of breast or ovarian cancer only matters on their mother’s side of the family. Men can inherit a BRCA gene mutation from their mother or father and can pass on their BRCA gene mutation to their male and female children. Medical management for men with BRCA1/2 mutations changes at age 35–40. Starting at age 35, male BRCA mutation carriers should begin yearly clinical breast exams with a physician. At age 40, prostate cancer screenings are recommended for BRCA2 carriers and considered for BRCA1 carriers. Men with a BRCA mutation and a family history of pancreatic cancer or melanoma should speak to a physician to develop a personalized screening plan for those cancers.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Bionanotechnology Into Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering
    AC 2009-504: INTRODUCING BIONANOTECHNOLOGY INTO UNDERGRADUATE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING Aura Gimm, Duke University J. Aura Gimm is Assistant Professor of the Practice and Associated Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Duke University. She teaches courses in biomaterials, thermodynamics/kinetics, engineering design, and a new course in bionanotechnology. Dr. Gimm received her S.B. in Chemical Engineering and Biology from MIT, and her Ph.D. in Bioengineering from UC-Berkeley. Page 14.802.1 Page © American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Introducing Bionanotechnology in Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Abstract As a part of the NSF-funded Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education Program, we have developed and implemented a new upper division elective course in Biomedical Engineering titled “Introduction to Bionanotechnology Engineering”. The pilot course included five hands- on “Nanolab” modules that guided students through specific aspects of nanomaterials and engineering design in addition to lecture topics such as scaling effects, quantum effects, electrical/optical properties at nanoscale, self-assembly, nanostructures, nanofabrication, biomotors, biological designing, biosensors, etc. Students also interacted with researchers currently working in the areas of nanomedicine, self-assembly, tribiology, and nanobiomaterials to learn first-hand the engineering and design challenges. The course culminated with research or design proposals and oral presentations that addressed specific engineering/design issues facing nanobiotechnology and/or nanomedicine. The assessment also included an exam (only first offering), laboratory write-ups, reading of research journal articles and analysis, and an essay on ethical/societal implications of nanotechnology, and summative questionnaire. The course exposed students to cross-disciplinary intersections that occur between biomedical engineering, materials science, chemistry, physics, and biology when working at the nanoscale.
    [Show full text]
  • BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes and Their Relationship to Breast And
    BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO BREAST AND OVARIAN CANCER THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION - NONCOMMERCIAL - SHAREALIKE 4 . 0 INTERNATIONAL LICENSE . BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes In humans, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes code for proteins that work to suppress tumors. The gene names come from BReast CAncer genes 1 & 2. The official names of these genes is breast cancer1, early onset and breast cancer2, early onset. Everyone, male and female, has these genes which normally work to repair DNA and are involved in cell growth and cell division. BRCA1 Gene Location at 17q21 www.ghr.nlm.nih.gov BRCA2 Gene Location at 13q12.3 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/understandingcancer/cancergenomics/AllPages BRCA1 Protein Domain Map http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BRCA1 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en No changes were made. BRCA1-BARD1 Heterodimeric RING-RING Complex http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=1JM7 BRCA2 and RAD51 Protein Complex http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=1N0W BRCA1 and BRCA2 Work Together to Repair DNA http://www.dandrealab.org/research.html http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/understandingcancer/cancergenomics/AllPages Results of BRCA1 Mutations http://openi.nlm.nih.gov/detailedresult.php?img=1390683_gkl010f4&query=null&req=4&npos=-1 http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/understandingcancer/cancergenomics/AllPages http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/understandingcancer/cancergenomics/AllPages http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/understandingcancer/cancergenomics/AllPages
    [Show full text]